HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-25-1976 Council Minutes r .
�
� CITY OF ORONO
Regular t�leeting of the Orono Council, 7:00 P.M.
, October 25, 1976
The Orono Council met on the above date with
� the following members present: tdayor Searles,
Councilmembers Butler, Paurus, and Welsh.
� Councilmember PTassengale absent. Also present:
City Administrator Benson, Building & Zoning
Administrator P�tuhich, City Attorney Malkerson,
• and City Engineer Frank.
� Butler moved, Searles seconded, that the MINUTES
Minutes of the Regular P�teeting of 5eptember 27,
1976, be approved. AZotion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
•
� No Park Commission comments. PARK CONINIISSION
No Human Rights Commission comments. HUMAN RIGHTS COPIMISSION
Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator,
� stated that the original proposal for Gerald
` Parten, 985 Tonkawa Road, was to subdivide the
5 plus acres into three lots and that the Partens
had changed this request to two lots, both
�xceeding two acres. Carl Parten, brother to
the petitioner and neighbor to the south, was
concerned about the swamp area on the rear lot.
• He felt that this wild area should not be
destroyed if a new road were built. Mrs. Gerald
� Parten explained ta the Planning Commission and
� Carl Parten that the road to their property is
already there. Therefore, no new road is
� required on the south lot. Member ricDonald
expressed her concern about drainage at the
� existing road. The Partens explained that there
is now a culvert urider the gravel road.
•
Council meeting - August 23, 1976
� Approved per Planning Commission recommendation.
Park dedication fee - 2�$ X $55,596 = $1,390.00.
•
Planning Commission P4eeting - October I8, 1976
�
Recommended approval of the final plat for two
� lots subject to payment of the park dedication
fee and to County approval of any new access
� to the north parcel.
�� _lsh moved, Butler seconded, to adopt Reso].ution RESOLUTION �'720
.. 720, A Resolution Approving The Parwood Sub- Parwo
da.vision, as per the Planning Commission Minutes #142 od Subdivision
• of October 18, 1976, and also noting that public Gerald Parten
sewers made the subdivision possible in reducing
� lot sizes. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
� ,
ORONO COUNCIL A'lEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 2
� Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
stated that the Council was informed of the 3660 Sixth Avenue North
Planning Commission's request for more detailed #154
information for the Park Gun Club, 3660 Sixth Park Gun Club
Avenue North, regarding schedule and survey
with proposed improvements. The Council also
+ approved extending temporary permit to continue
operation through October to give applicant time
� for submitting necessary data requested.
Planning Commission Meeting - October 18, 1976
• The Park Gun Club presented a marked calendar
showing the proposed hours of operation, a
colored plat map showing adjacent owners, and
a large aerial photo of the entire property.
The Club proposed planting a sound barrier of
� trees along Starkey Road between the existing
trees at Sixth Avenue North and the wooded
area in the center of the property. The pro-
posed lighting and night hours will be handled
when a separate formal proposal is made.
� The Planning Commission recommended approval
� of the conditional use permit for the existing
operation and approval of the operating license
for next year, subject to the hours shown on
the proposed calendar and subject to installation
of the sound barrier trees by next June.
Paurus moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the
� conditional use permit for the Park Gun Club,
3660 Sixth Avenue North, as per the P3anning
� Corunission Minutes of October 18, 1976. Motion,
Ayes (4) - iVays (0) .
•
Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION
� stated that the Planning Commisaion expressed 511 North Ferndale Road
their surprise and concern regarding the #156
� revezsal of their recommendation on the Klaus Klaus Becker
Becker subdivision at 5�.1 North Ferndale. The
� reason for their concern was that this item was
listed as a progress report on the agenda for
• the Council meeting of September 13, 1976. The
• Planning Commission recommended denial of the
proposed subdivision of 5 lots. They offered
T�1r. Becker the opporturiity to submit a revised
proposal of only 4 lats, or the possibility of
acquiring enough additional land for the 5 lots
to meet minimum area �equirements. The Plann�ng
Commission requested that the Council reconsider
�heir decision (Sectio� 39.200) .
� (Continued)
•
� •OROIJO COUNCIL NTEETING HELII� OCTOBER" 25, 1.976 Page 3
Council Meeting - September 27, 1976 SUBDIVISION
� 511 North Ferndale Road
Reconsidered previous action and instructed (Continued)
�applicant to submit revised preliminary plat
for Planning Commission recommendation.
Planning Commission rleeting - October 4, 1976
� Recommended denial of revised preliminary
plat due to non-compliance of the zoning
ordinance (lot area substandard) .
Further action gave applicant opportunity to
a submit another set of revised plans consisting
of lots meeting zoning code requirements either
through purchase of additional land or reducing
the number of building sites.
Planning Commission DZeeting - October 18, 1976
•
F�. Be�ker presented a revised plat showinc�
that each of the five lots contains at least
87,120 sq, ft. of dry buildable �rea� The
road easement is� noted as 50 ' w�.de with a 94'
radius cul de sac, but the easeitt�rit narrows
to 30' along the north s�.de of Lot 5 (matching
� the existing wiclth di the long access through
other property) . Planning Commission recommended
approval sub�ect to the payment of a park
iedication fee and to approval of the final plat.
Paurus moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the
subdivision request for Klaus Becker, 511 North
� F'erndale Road, as per the Planning Commission
�Zinutes of October 18, 1976, noting the 50 ' to
30 ' easement and favoralbe title opinion.
cTotion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
•
Henry P�Zuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, CONDITIONAL USE PERNlIT
stated that after reviewing the Zoning Adminis- 3340 Shoreline Drive
� trator's report, the Planning Commission recom- #162
mended denial based on potential negative result Holiday Station Stores
from projected increase in traffic hazards from
proposed'land use. Requested Council review
S re�ort and instruct legal staff draft resolution
� of denial based on data noted in report.
� Council Meeting - October 12, 1976
Tabled per request of applicant. Will be on
�genda for October 25, 1976 Council meeting.
�
M.r, Jerry Jenson representing Holiday Station
��"tores, stated that all sites that have been
nsidered by Holiday Stores have been either
�ld or the options have run out. Mr. Jenson
�equested Holiday's request to be tabled until
ilovember 8, 1976, when Holiday will be prepared
-co determine if, in fact, property is available
-�o them for a Holiday Station.
• �ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 4
I�-Zr, Douglas Carney, representing Mr. Tom Ryan, SUBDIVISION
1060 Tonkawa Road, presented a survey of the 1060 Tonkawa Road
yproposed subdivision stating that this proposal #170
meets Orono's setback requirements. Mr. George Tom Ryan
Johnson on behalf of Mr. Ryan stated that this
is the last of the original Partenwood Estates
and �his proposal is consistent with the balance
of the area. TZr. Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning
Administrator, reviewed the previous Planning
Comnlission P4inutes, which state that I�Ir. Ryan
resubMitted the original subdivision proposal
after having the Commission members visit the
site again. Some members felt that the lot
lines could be arranged to r.ieet the lot caidth
requirement at the building line, while others
felt that this would amount to gerrymandering
without affecting the actual buildability or
density of the site. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of the preliminary plat
with a lot width variance subject to payment of
a park dedication fee, to County approval of
any new access road to the south parcel, and
to retention of the ponding area on the south
lot. i�Totion approved - 4 Ayes, 2 Nays, and
1 abstention. PZinority reported their concern
was the approval of any subdivision containing
any variance.
"�iro I��iuhich also stated that this preliminary
plat will meet all setback requirements.
Butler moved, Paurus seconded, that the
subdivision request for Tom Ryan, 1060 Tonkawa
Road, be approved per the Planning Commission
r-linutes of October 18, 1976. Motion, Ayes (3) -
Nays (1) . Councilmember We].sh Nay.
•
Henry t�iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISTON
Gtated that I�ir. Van Eeckhout is requesting 400 Old Crystal Bay Ro� 3
approval of a subdivision of approximately 18 �17G
acres into 8 parcels exceeding the minimum lot Van Eeckhout
size of 2 acres located at 400 Uld Crystal Bay
S Road,
The proposal includes a private road which would
exceed 600' in length. Easements of 60' across
the right of way and 100 ' at the cul de sac would
he required, None of the property is designated
as wetlands on the Hennepin County Conservation
wetlands map in our office. A public hearing
should be scheduled.
Planning Commission Meeting - September 7, 1976
�cheduled public hearing for October 4, 197G at
8° 00 P,M. Suggested developer eonsider some
changes in access road to properties. Possible
�-hrough street extending to Fox Street. (Continued)
�
�
ORONO COUNCIL P4EETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 5
Planning Commission T�eeting - October 4, 1976 SUBDIVISION
400 Old Crystal Bay Roa�:
�Several concerned neighbors voiced their concern (Continued)
over drainage. Con�inued public hearing until
next meeting of the Planning Comrnission for
drainage plan so as not to affect neighboring
�roperties (representative informed) .
Staff - October 5, 1976
Also called Van �eckhout office and left
message with secretary to inf_orm Mr. Van
Eeckhout of Planning Commission action,
Planning Commission I�Reeting - October 18, 1976
I�Tr. Van Eeckhout presented the original
proposal with notations showing no change in
the existing drainage patterns across the
property. Communication from the City
S Engineer indicated that he had no objections
to the drainage pro�osals. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the nreliminary
subdivision subject to showing any drainage
easements as may be required by the City
Engineer, subject to payment of a park dedication
fee and subject to approval of the final piat.
elsh moved, Butler seconded, that the subdivision
request for r�ir. Van Eeckhout, 400 Old Crystal
Bay Road, be approved per the Planning Commission
Tlinutes of October 18, 1976 and favorable
t title opinion. i-Zotion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
s
IIenry I�Iuhich, Buiiding & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCES - CONDITIOr1A�
: stated that Dick Conry is requesting the following USE PERZ�iIT
variances and conditional use permit to construct 2425 Scotch Pine Lane
a home on the one remainin�, undeveloped lot #184
at 2425 Scotch Pine Lanea Lake P•Zinnetonka Hor�es
A, Variances
1. Lot area -- approximately 67,000 sq. fte -
from 87,120 sq. ft, required to existing
21,000 sq. ft. (approxe )
2. Lot width - 100 ' - from 200 ' required to
existing 100 ' (approx, )
3. Side yard setback - 2 ' - from 30 °
required to 28' proposed
4, Street side yard setback - 22 ' - f_rom
50 ' required to 28' proposed
B, Conditional Use Permit
� 1> Dock - Accessory use of auxiliar� lake
access lot F�ithout main structure. (Continued)
ORONO COUNCIL NlEETII3� HELD t)CZ'� 2�, a,9T6 Page 6
This subdivision was approved in 19?4. L�Ie have VARIANCES & CONDITIOIIAI,
had some problems in the area previously so USE PERP�IIT
� the applicant should be made aware of the 2425 Scotch Pine Lane
approval necessary before filling or grading (Continued)
Lot 2 for lake access.
P�anning Commission I�leeting - October 4, 1976
�Ir. & I�Irs. Conry presented proposal. A lengthy
discussion followed. Planning Commission was
very concerned about extent of non-conf�rmity
and l�otential effect on health standards from
inadequate onsite sewac�e systems especially
after determining two acre sites as minimum
lot area for sustaining an adequate onsite
sewage disposal system. Planning Comnission
requested applicant consider replatting entire
plat and submit revised plans for Planning
Commission and Council consideration. Applicant
, �aas somewhat doubtful of obtaining approval of
replat from the two other adjoining property
, owners. The Planning Commission then requested
statement irom neighbors along with revised
plat. Applicant aqreed to comply with request
and also include a perc test for the subject
� lot to eliminate the possible danger of pollution
from inadequate septic system.
Staff - October 7, 1976
Applicant in office to discuss information
concerning possible replatting. No written
statement from neighbors has been supplied.
S a soil report and perc test data have been
submitted and approved by the engineer ner his
� letter of October 8, 1976.
Planning Commission ttleeting - October 18, Z976
Applicant returned with original proposal.
Stated that neighbors would not agree to street
f vacation or replatting. Soils testing was done
and ap�roved by City �ngineer as }aeinc� acceptable
for onsite septic system construction. The
Planning Commission recommended approval for
variances as requested due to unavailability
of additional land, and approval of conditional
use permit for dock subject to no other accessory
building on Lot 4 and that Lot 4 always be in
same ownership as Lot 2e
Butler moved, �delsh seconded, that the variances
� and conditional use Permit for Lake P�innetonka
Homes, 2425 Scotch Pine Lane, be approved per
the Planning Commission �linutes of October 18,
19 7 6. T•?otian, Aye�s (�.1 - Nay S (0) .
� ORONO COUNC IL P•7EETING I3ELD OCTOBER 2 5, 19 7 6 Page 7
•
I3enry P�uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
tated that �Ire James Rivers, 1442 Shoreline 1442 Shoreline Drive
• rive, (iaindward rZarine) is considering reaching #�I85
an agreement with Mr. rdcP�iahan whereby he would James RiveLs
� lease or purchase I�1r. P�IcMahan's property to the
north of the L�indward I�Iarine, This would
� include the �esiderice behind I�1aC�s pizza �uildingo
' '_.'Tle existent residence 3s noW ori�y �8 ° �rotn the
shoreline (Mr, River' s measuremettt) e Hawever,
! the water level is extremely low �h�s year, i�r.
• Rivers is requesting approval for an adc�it3.on
to the house (non-conforming residence in B-2
e, zone) . The proposed addition would be 414 sq,
fto in area and extend 9 ' closer to the shoreline.
� This would result in a 29 ' lakeshore setback
from the p•resent shoreline. I do not have the
• data as to where the shoreline would be if
. the water level were at a 929. � elevation,
In order to cornpensate for this additional
� hardcover, I,'tro Rivers has agreed to remove the
� existing hardcover surface extending to the
shoreline between the Windward PTarine building
� and r�tac's Pizza building. This concrete
asphalt slal� is approximately 2 ,000 sqo fte in
• �rea. Approximately 1,200 sq. ft. of this slab
s located within the 75 ° shoreline setback
� line> If approved, he would also remove the
S building that previously was used as T1ac's Pizza
and raore recently as a bait shop.
•
In review of this proposal, we might consider
� several conditions, boat display along the
County road and the pres�nt secaage disposal
• system for all buildings.
S 110 �art of this building lies within the 75 '
� lakeshore setback but if this slab is also
removed, seepage and filtration would be
� improvedo
+ Planning Commission Meeting - October 18, 1976
• The Planning Commission recommended approval
of lot area/width/side setback and lakeshore
�' setback variances for an addition to the existing
+ non-conforming dwelling subject to the followingo
� 10 Removal of the TZac's Pizza building prior
to construction of the addition.
� 2e Removal of the building slab and the concrete
� slabs between the house and the marina
building prior to June 1, 1977,
3e No commercial use of the subject lot or lots
� betc�een County Road �`15 and Tanager Lal:e. (Continued)
•
•
�
� URONO COUNCIL TIEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 8
• 4. No commercial use of the subject lot or VARIANCE
lots between County Road �15 and Brown's 1442 Shoreline Drive
� IIay except for the existing buoy service (Continued)
� dock,
5, Review of the existing septic system for
� conformance to Village Code.
6e Posting a $2,000 �erformance bond for
•� removal of the hardcover mentioned in
. Item #2.
� Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to approve the
variance request for James Rivers, 1442 Shoreline
� Drive, subject too
� 1, Removal of the I-zac's Pizza building prior
to construction of the addition.
� 2e Removal of the building slab and the concrete
� slabs between the house and the marina
building prior to June 1, 1977.
� 3, No commercial use of the subject lot or lots
between County Road #15 and Tanager Take.
� 4e TJo commercial use of the subject lot or lots
between County Road ��15 and I3rown's IIay
• except for the existing buoy service dock,
5e Review of the existing septic system for
� conformance to Village code.
� 6. Posting a $2,000 performance bond for renoval
of the hardcover mentioned in Item #k2.
� 7o No commercial parking.
3, No additional commercial dockage,
� 90 Agreement signed by underlying fee owner
agreeing to all conditions.
• l0e All conditions and variances will become
• part of future licenses.
� liotion, Ayes {4) - Nays (0) ,
•
rlenry Iluhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE
� stated that I�1r. Paul Christensen, 1304 Elmwood 1304 �lmwood Avenue
Avenue, is requesting a variance for an addition #188
to a non-conforming residence, Paul Christensen
` iir. Christensen is requesting approval of two
� variances from existing conditions so he can
add approx.imately 600 sq. ft. of living space
r to his houseo The present lot is approximately
30,000 sqo ft. in area in a 43,560 sq, ft. zone,
� so a variance of about 13,500 sq. fte in area
• is required,
� The lacation of the existing house is 7. � ' from
�Ile side lot line adjacent to a platted street
�nd a 35' setback is required so a variance of
27, 6 ' is requiredo Although Summit Street is
� �latted alongside his property, there appears to
be very little likelihood that it would be (Continued)
•
�
�
� OROT10 COUNCIL AZEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 9
�
improved to any extent (possibly fire lane or VARIANCE
�alce access only) . The proposed addition would 1304 Elmwood Avenue
lave no bearinc{ on the existing conditions as lContinued)
� it c•�oulc� be acldec� to the opposite side. The
� a«c.lition woulci be an improvement to the nroperty.
� Plan:�ing Cor�i:�ission Tleeting - October 18, 1976
� The Planning Co�ulission recommended approvale
i Butler rioved, Searles seconded, that the
• variance request for Paul Christensen, 1304
�lmwood Avenue, be approved, I3otion, Ayes (4) -
� Nay s (0) ,
S
rtenry r�iuhich, Building & Zoning Admir�istrator, VARIANCES
• stated that TIr. Don Roderick and Robert Steel, 2285 Webber Fiills Roacl
2285 L^�ebber :iills Road, are requesting a lot �191
� area, ��idth, and front setback variances, Roderick/Steel
! This area is now zoned RR-1B, minimum 2 acre lots.
� �i'his subject property is a corner lot iaith dwellings
already occupying both adjacent parcels> Tlie
� lot area is approximately 65,000 sq. ft. of which
approximately 15,000 sq. ft. are designated
• -��tlands, It is, therefore, only 570 of the
� equired 87,120 sq. fte of dry buildable lancl,
The lot width is approximately 110 fto at the
� froni, 140 ft. at tlie building line (200 ft.
required) and 273 ft, at the reara The proposed
� front setback is 35 fto due to a very steep
hillside dropping toward the wetlands, Tne
� 35 fto setback is sirailar to that existing on
the adjacent lotso A septic system design for
� this lot was approved by the engineer on
� i�loveml�er 19, 1974.
� Variances requiredo
Lot area 37,000 sqefto , 43�
� Lot width 60 �te , 30%
� Front Setback 15 fto , 300
� Planning Commission T�Ieeting - October 18, 1976
• P.ecommended approval for Zot area and width
� vari.ances due to unavailability of additional
land subject to City Engineer's re-review of
� se�tic system design, and suh�ect to any drive-
�aay curb cut being on T�7ebber Hills Road and
� not on Fox Street. Recomr,iended front setback
�ariance due to slope of lot and compatibility
� :ith adjoining homes. Also ap�roved subject to
}�ayrnent of any park dedication fee due, (Continued)
•
s
•
�
� OROTdO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 10
f' 6�elsh moved, T3utler seconded, that the VARIAr7CES
�variance request for pon Roderick ancl Robert 2285 T�Jebber Hills Roa3
teelo 2285 T�Tehber Hills Road, be anproved (Continued)
� per the Planning Commission Tlinutes of
�)ctober 18, 1976. Motion, A.yes (4) - Nays (0) .
�s
a Searles moved, Butler seconded, to reguest the PUBLyC H�ARING DATE
� Planning Commission to hold a public hearing Navarre Rezoni�g
�Jovember 150 1976 at 7e30 P,PZ. to consider
� the Navarre ar_ea rezoning, Motion, Ayes (4) -
Nays (0) ,
�
� Henry _?uhich, Building & 2�oning Administrator, STATUS REPORTS
informed the City Council that the following
� items were being revie�aed by the Planning
. Corimission for Council action at a later dates
Ro�ert Johnson, 1121 Elmwood Avenue for a lot
, area and width variance; Go Raymond & Ruth
[-Volfe, 2925 Casco I?oin� Road for a side yard
� variance; Ed Lehman, 3527 Shoreline Drive, for
a prelirninary subdivision; Harvey Larson, 1342
• R�st Point Circle for a garage side yard and
street setback variances; Steve ��Iallack (T.r4.G. ) ,
� 4100 Sixth Avenue rlorth for a l�reliminary sub-
` divisiona Bruce Peterson, 2447 Carman Street,
-or a lot area, width setback variance; Robert
� �olie, 1085 North Arm Drive, conditional use
perrait; and Hennepin County Park Reserve
» i�istrict Development Plans.
•
� Dick Benson, eity t'�dministrator, informed the NOIS� CONTROL
Ci�1� Council that on October 6, 1976 ,he had two
` staff rnembers attend a workshop sponsored by the
Pollution Control Agency Noise Control Section
� far the purpose to familiarize us with different
rec�ulations and devices concerning noise control.
� An interesting fact is that through P,CeA, research,
tires are the biggest no�se violator to date.
r �Z'he initiai investment to purchase monitoring
• equi�ment is $10000-$1,500, plus qualified
personnel to staff the operationo It is obvious
� that current minimal staff cannot take on a
complete noise monitoring at this time.
�
�rhe P<C,A, did stat� that they might assist us
• in a certain problem area. Mro Ed I�onteleone,
Iiennepin County Environmentalist,� has been
� requested to find out i� this service is available
� at tYieir level of government, I have not received
reply as yeto (Continued)
s
•
�
•
'� .
+ � ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 25 , 1976 Page 11
• P4r. Robert Birkeland, ilildhurst Trail, has NOISE .CONTgOL
expressed his concerns with extra-ordinary (Continued)
�noise and other disturbing annoyances and caould
.ike to discuss the possibility of initiating
� an ordinance to control such disturhances.
• i-1re Robert Birkeland addressed the City Council
� and reviewed the letter he received from the
I;nvironmental Protection Agency which stated that
� the �nviror�inental Protection Agency (EPA) shares
your concern over the annoyance, disruption of
� concentration and sleep, interference �aith
conuaunication and other irritations that noise
! can cause individualse The Congress of the
United States ex�ressed its concern with the
, exposure of individuals to noise by enacting on
� October 27, 1972, a Noise Control Act "to promote
an environment for all Americans free from noise
` triat jeopardizes their health or welfare. "
� The Noise Control Act of 1972 states that Federal
action is essential to deal with major noise
• sources in commerce, control of which require
� national uniformity of treatmento To that end, it
i� the purpose of the Act to estal�lish a Means
� for effective coordination of Federal research
and activities in noise control, to authorize
� the establishment of Federal noise emission
tandards for products distributed in commerce,
� and to provide information to the nublic respecting
the noise emission and noise reduction characteristics
� of such products. The Noise Control Act, hoc�ever,
� nlaces the primary resnonsibility for the control
of noise i�ith State and local governmentse
�� One responsibility of the Federal Government is
� to assist State and local governments ��ith
technical inforMation on noise and its effect
� on the health and welfare of the nublic. Should
your corimunity at this time be without a local
S noise ordinance, I would urge you to contact
� your local government and express your interest
in noise control. Pde are presently working with
� municipalities interested in establishing a noise
control ordinance. Region V also has available
� sound level meters for loan to communities
interested in surveying their noise environment
� �rior to proposing a noise control ordinance.
The'.r ineters can be loaned for a short period
� of time at no cost to the communitye If your
� community does not have noise control regulations
at present, we will be glad to review a draf_t of
� any regulations which they might propose. Should
�ur community indicate a need for assistance,
• ..e �rould be pleased to respond, In oraer f_or us to
loan equipment to your community, we need a request
� froin an elected official from your community,
• preferably the mayor or the City Tlanager.
"T�rst tJitschonke, Noise Control Specialist
• (Continued)
�
� vRONO COUrdCIL T•�ETING HELD OCTOBER 25 , 1976 Page 12
� i�ayor Searles requested staff to request model NOIS� CO�ITROL
ordinances from other cities for Council review (Continued)
�t a later date.
�
` iia_y,or S�arles renorted to the City Council that LAZCD - SAF�TY & ITdSPECTION
the Lake liSinnetonlca Conservation District Lake SERVICE
� Use Cornraittee held a meeting October 21, 1976,
to discuss the proposed Safety � Inspection
• Service on Lake T•Iinneton}:a o A representative
from tlie Department of Natural Resources stated
� that tlie DN� does not su}�port further control
a o� I�alce i�innetonka o T�layor Searles stated that
t'zere will be future meetings held with other
� agencies for further input to the LTTCn proposal.
•
�utler moved, Paurus seconded, that Resolution RFSOLUTION �;721
� ri721, A Resolution Providing For A Park P7emorial �Zeriorial Func7 Transfer
� Fund Transfer, be ac�onted. rYotion, Ayes (4) -
rlays (0) o
�
` Butler moved, t�leish seconded, that Resolution RESOLUTIOr1 #�7?2
#�7?.2, A Resolution Providinc� For A Change Fund, Change Fund
� �e adopted. rlotion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) .
•
• ick Benson, City AdMinistrator, stated that SAI,ARY INCREASE
�Zro Tom Pletcher, age 19 years, Long Lake, Tom Pletcher
� :nas been employed by the City o� Orono in the
Yublic l�orks Departr:nent during tiie summer months
� as a part-time employeeo Tom has shown c,rreat
interest in his work and has performed well.
•
I recommend that his hourly salary be increased
� tror:2 $2 0 3Q to 53.J0 per houro inle will use him
� on a call-out status for snowplo�aing and other
extra ordinary functionse
•
�_>utler moved, Searles seconded, tha� Tom
� �letcher ° s hourly salary be increasec� from
$2, 30 to $3,00 per hour, effective October 25,
� 197&. T�lotion, Ayes (4; - Nays (�) .
r
Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the LUCE LINE TRAIL
� City Council that at the request of Renresentative
� �alisbury Adams, we will he meeting with T�1r. Blumen-
dahl, D1VR representative, Long Lake, [rJayzata, and
� Qrono to discuss the new propased trail regulations
concerning the Luce Line mul_ti-use trail.
•
ie meeting scheduled for 4030 P,tI. , October 28,
i 1�7G will be initially held at the trail crossing
� on the Old Long Lake Road and froi�l there to Orono's
Council chambers f_or f_urther cor.�ments on t1�is �atter.
�
�
!
� URUNO COUTJCIL I�IEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 13
� Dick nensono City Administrator ,informed the VO-TECH SCHOOL
�Ci�ty Council that the T�Zedina Council and
lanning Cor,►mission have scheduled a meeting
� at their Council Chambers for 8 0 00 F.t�1. , '.^uesday,
October 2G, 1976, to discuss the propose�l Hennepin
� County Vo-Tech School. ,�
� `i'i�e �rono Council and Planning Commissioii are
� invited to attend that evening for their c�mm�ntso
� i�icY Benson, City Adr.linistrator,informed the
PUBI,IC L40RKS RELOCATION
� Cit�� Council that he has again rec�uested response Robb Property
frorniirso Robb's representative concernina the
• purchase of ixso Robb' s nroperty for a Public
Tlorks functiono I?e expects to hear froM i�srse Rohb
� through her daughter and legal representative
� ��itliin the next two weeks. ti9e �>>i11 then reviei•�
the entire matter at that time.
�
� Dick Benson, City Administrator, informed the PIJBLIC N�ARIs?G DA^E
City Council that notice is herehy given that Orono-Long Lake
� the i7etropolitan i•Jaste Control Commission �aill Interceptor
, holci a public hearing to discuss sewer in nrono,
Long Lake, anc:i 6�7ayzata, at the Freshwater
' Bioloyical Institute, 2500 Shady�•�ood Road, Orono,
innesotaa The nearinc� is schec�uled for ��ednesciay,
� _�ovember 10, 1976, at 2 0 00 P.Ti.
� 'i'1ie hearing is for the discussion of the proposed
construction anc� social, economic and environr:�ental
� e�fects of the proposed project. The proposed
• praject consists of constructing an intercepting
sewer, forcernain and pumping stations to phase out
� the Orono and Long Lake t�lastewater Treatment
facilitieso �
•
Cosi:s and financing information, preliminary
� engineering and environmental effects will be
. explained and discussed at the hearing.
t•aritten statenents in place of or in addition to
� oral statements will be accepted at the rleeting
� anc� during a 10-day �eriod following the meetingo
f
Dick: Benson, City Administrator, stated that A�•?CC - TELEMET�R
'� the iletropolitan t•�aste Control Commission intends
to complete negotiations witn th� City of Orono
� to acquire ownershi� of the Ororio-.��innetonka
+ Beacn interceptor which includes gravity sewer
;nes, lift stations, and forcemain�. Acc�uisition
` _ easements appears to be nearing completion and
other �;.PeA, concerns are being clari£ied, (Continued)
•
i
• �
� . , .
� URONO COUNCIL P�IEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 14
� The iietropolitan �Jaste Control Commission requests Tit^�CC - TELFP•ZETER
�permission to install a telemetering system to (Continued)
signal raalfunctions to tlieir maintenance personnelo
� This will have to be acconplishec: before freeze u�
and the Commission is requesting our approval to
r proceed at once.
* Searles moved, 23utler seconded, to a prove the
� request of the i4etropolitan ti•daste Co�trol Commission
to install telemetering equipm�nt in the six lift
+ stations to be acquired by the PZetropolitan ��laste
Control Commission this year. Total cost to be
� borne by the P�letropolitan tVaste Control Corunissi�n.
i
• i�Ire Bruce TTalkerson, City Attorney, distrihuted PROPOSED DOG ORDIi�IANCr
a nroposed revised draft to amend the existing
, dog ordinanceo This will be entered on the
November 8, 1976 Council meeting for final actiono
�
� i•tr_ , Greg Franko City Engineer, briefly revieU�ed COTIPR�HETISIVE SE6�ER rLA�I
Orono° s Comprehensive Sewer P].an noting that his
� �taff are revising in part statistical information
+ and the ��lan will be completed by the November 8,
1y7G Council meeting. It was noted that the
� Planning Commission has revie�ved the proposed plan
�nc� have conceptually aPproved its policies.
�
� �earlea moved, Butler seconded, that the Al1 Funds BILLS
�yccounts 3982 through 4033, 19415 through 19420, and
� Liquor Store Accounts 11563 through 11603, be paido
� �<iotion, Ayes (4) - Idays (0) .
� Searles moved, 3utler seconded, that the meeting ADJOURT1r�IENm
r be adjourned at 9040 PoP�I, P�Iotio�i, Ayes (4) -
Navs (0) .
�
1
� � . _ --• ;.
• �4���-�`� � ���-�-z-���
Robert L. Searles, Niayor
�
� � i
� Attesto ,�
� r Ja ter nson, Clerk-A ministrator
�
�
�
�