Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#4458-after the fact CUP/variances-2000• Y /�� /� �� . O O � �4s. - CITY of ORONO a � I �',� 4 �'�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL l9 �. �� � � �SH� NO. � A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AFTER-THE-FACT COivDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 21 AND APPROVING AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES TO . vILTNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2, SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2523 KELLY AVENUE FILE #2540 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and `VHEREAS, DRK Family Associates L.L.C. is the owner of the property located at 2523 Kelly Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follo�vs: Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 1428, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and `VHEREAS, a previous property owners had applied to the City of Orono for an after-the-fact conditional use permit and variances to permit work within the 75' lakeshore setback area including the construction of a retaining wall and land alteration, requiring the followin� approvals: 1. Conditional use permit for land alteration and construction of a retaining wall per Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (5). 2. Variances for land alterations within 75' of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka per Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivision 16(J). 3. Variance for hardcover within 75' of the shoreline where no hardcover is normally allowed per Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivision 16(L); and Page 1 of 7 , � O �� � O O �, CITY of ORONO � � . . _�, ti RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ���9kESII�g'�G NO. � � � � REAS,the property has been sold into new ownership on Apri124, 2000 and the existing property owner has requested to record the approval for the property of an after the fact conditional use permit and after the fact variances; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota . Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on November 15, 1999 and January 19, 2000 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WfIEREAS, an amended application was received on March 24, 2000 including previous properry owner's hardship statement and supporting documents; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendations of the City staff and the Planning Commission;and the comments and written statements submitted by the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested after-the-fact conditional use pernut and variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: FINDINGS 1. The property is located in the LR-1B, One Family Lakeshore Residential District. 2. The property contains 21,700 s.f. of land area within 75' of the shoreline where hardcover, structures, intensive vegetation clearing, and land alteration are prohibited by the Orono zoning code. 3. Without obtaining pernuts the applicant constructed a retaining wall within 75' of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. After-the-fact variances and an after-the-fact conditional use permit must be approved before the City can issue permits for the retaining wall. 4. The boulder wall constructed on the lakeside of the property is hardcover. Section 10.02, Definition 29 defines Hardcover as "Any structure, blacktop or other material which interferes to any degree with the direct absorption of rainfall into the ground." Page 2 of 7 , , � �� 0� O O ��, . CITY of ORONO ,� � � _ . -ti �.� G'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � �`�k'ESf1�4�' NO. 4 � o� � 5. Section 10.02,Defuution 69 defines Structure as "Anything, or part thereof, which is built, constructed or erected, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite • manner, which requires a location on, below, or above the ground, land, or water, or attached to something having a location on the ground, land, or water." 6. The 1980 City of Orono Community Management Plan ("Comprehensive Plan") contains a number of general land use and environmental protection goals and policies with which the applicant's proposal must be consistent, including the following: A. Environmental Protection Plan, Urban Area Policy 2: "Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake...Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation." B. Environmental Protection Plan, General Policy 9: "Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action, natural stone rip-rap shoreline protection will be encouraged." 7. The previous property owner's submittal included an engineers report stating the existing topography requires a retaining wall to avoid increased erosion of the hillside which would result in sediment entering the lake. The boulder retaining wall is necessary to avoid additional erosion concerns caused by a storm which damaged or destroyed a number of trees on the hillside, which trees had provided stabilization of the slope. Page 3 of 7 / Q 'Q� 'j�' � � ��, CITY of ORONO � � _�, �,� G'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL � �9kESII�4�' N0. � � � � . The City Engineer reported that in his opinion the wall is necessary to stabilize the slope. Removing the wall and regrading to the natural elevation may not prevent erosion. A wall is necessary to minimi�e the risk of further erosion, and replacement of the boulder wall with some other type of retaining wall requiring additional excavation of the lakeshore bank likely would result in further loss of • vegetation on the slope. 9. In order to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan requirement for screening as noted above, new plantings would be appropriate between the wall and the shoreline. The relatively low (3'-4') heiQht of the wall in relation to the wooded lakeshore bank behind and above it, coupled with the 8' wide terrace between the wall and the rip-rapped shoreline, will allow for the establishment of vegetation to � adequately screen the wall in a manner that will make it significantly less visible as viewed from the lake. 10. The City Council fmds that the condition� existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other proFerty in this zoning district; that granting of the after-the-fact variances to permit a retaining wall within 75 feet of the lakeshore and the grading work associated with it is necessary to prevent further erosion along the lakeshore, and is justified because there are no other reasonable altemative erosion control methoc�s; that granting of the variances would not adversely affect tra�c conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property, and would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a�emonstrable hardship or difficulty; that granting of the variances is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 11. The City Council has considered this application including the fmdings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safery and welfare of the communiry. Page 4 of i i�'� /� �11�' O O �, CITY of ORONO a � . . �� �,� G'� RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . ��ES�Ip44' NO. � � � c� CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above fmdings, the Orono Ciry Council hereby grants an after-the-fact conditional use permit for a boulder retaining wall and associated grading of the property within 75 feet of the lakeshore, and after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivision 16(n to pemut structure and grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore, and Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2; 10.55, Subdivision 8; and 10.56, Subdivision 16(L) to permit hardcover within 75 feet of the lakeshore where no hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. The only retaining walls and hardcover approved by this resolution are those shown on the Certificate of Survey attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. Shrubs or some other form of natural vegetation, not less than two feet in height, are required to be planted and maintained permanently between the retaining wall and the shoreline. Such shrubs shall be spaced six feet apart along the portion of the retaining wall located northwesterly from the access path(see EYhibit A). The property owner is permitted to trim shrubs to a height matching the height of the retaining wall. A landscaping plan shall be submitted by the property owner and approved by City Staff prior to such plantings. 3. The property owner shall obtain the appropriate building and land alteration permits for the boulder wall. 4. It is the position of the City Council that the boulder retaining wall and the old foundation walls, as shown on Exhibit A,totaling 433 square feet of hardcover, are the only hardcover that shall be permitted within the 75 foot lakeshore setback. Any future requests for additional hardcover will not be looked upon favorably. 5. Authorities granted by this variance and conditional use permit run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for the appropriate after-the-fact permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 10, 2001). Page 5 of 7 i O.�l /� I O O ��, CITY of ORONO ,� � . _ti �� G'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � t`�kESII�4�' NO. � � �, � � iolation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance and conditional use permit shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. � • 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assi�ns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 24th day of April, 2000. ATTEST: n�� � �� Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabri Jabbour, Mayor ��K �1t�( l.� F��i��� Property owner(s)�� � � i STAT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of April, 2000,by Gabriel Jabbour&Linda S. Vee, Mayor&City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. ,�_..� �' MARY AP�N JOHNSON G2 ��.�.i � �c-. ,. NOTARY PUBLIC•MlNNESOTA - '�:�= My Cortm�ssion Expires Jan.31,2005 NOt�I'y 11C �/` Page 6 of 7 i /� O� O O , C ITY of ORONO � � . . ti �',� G'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � �9kES804�' NO. 4 � � � STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this Z b f h day of�,�;/ , 20 co before me a Notary Public within and for said counry,personally appeared - , _ � -�, /7 ,•� �as�<i 4t�s, known to me to be the person described '� and who executed the foregoing instrument, and �-.�-C. acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. �� MARY ANN JOHNSON �h,,v� ��-�yy� �,�,• • NOTARY PUBUC-MINNESOTA � AAr CanrNssion Expir�s Jan.31,�os Notary Publ �._ .. _.� c.r... .. Page 7 of 7 �rA� ': . �.. 1 �cR�iF:CATE OF SURVEY �04 E%HIBIT A � � �� �� BRAD HOYT xEsor.�rzox xo. p= --��T �, R�GI�7=RED LAND SUR'd�Y f�l0. ���8 page 1 of 2 ;-���1NEP'i� �OUIVTY, MiNNESO t/a �. w:...:�>: � _ s -rL \ �', ��C ��/Ci,[� \�f6,� � f-��, C- -_ ` - � �� , _. o' � '� 1 /`�F Q \ .. . 5 n % ''• . . . � "�"i�. ,f`�J`a ` �x _ •�; � \^�cr%�. .... z a �� +se — ry � ;R..y9., a ? - ;xez � t�.� -•- �: •. o t:e.•,.... • '' h.1�i., .y :S < �e�.a:•t < + rn 'F� a°�'(9eG_7'r i� 4 '. aPs_• F� v.:.:. � . � � � 9pQ, 5__.• � •-(9lS.3) < �392)� �: ���Y � . '. � .....�959•. � �j � �3�SS�r:: • �ya,' ,/sr�/�i +~ 0�1��=�.y�� \ .., ,"'.�M a�:•a�: r-. y • �-:�--'"`-� ,' '{ . � 4. ;, �no- T;isc� � �. ., J� _:: fi1�•� � � ✓ A/ `. �b• • 7,7� •.�.i��S \ `` 1 %� � , T 4c\ I• \ �� _ .. . . .,�, ., � .��-. • . . :''' � '� .� � '�� :�� '� \h . � .��, � ' - ` - _ � `\ ;.,' . .. ��•. \s� : , ,; ,,:,\.;,\� ,,, , „ • ,, , .,, , , ,.,, . �� , � ��.. . � �r / �� �.�.: _ _�. ` \..,\• - �- - \ . �T` �\� .D� \�%'y_ I D tts\ " \ � ````�o\�-• ,�� \ . ,�`` ,�\ •``� . �• � •�p� � •1��\\\` � . . . � : ',:�. �` . . , ` � � �, 3�.\'.� • � �,� y � �J '� �� �, �. , �. � � , ; , ,. e�a �:5^Q�='.�: C" =4_N'S=5 : ` � � < ,�� ���/i '��� � . 'r_c: :. �egEt:e•ea :anc S.a.e'l �a. t:i9. �j 'ri, ��;,, ' . a�S���•: ef '�:es. �e�ne^.* Coonty. M:^�+escte. .% ��� a._ � ���y}o1}}�� , i �' �`� C � �( �• o . Gra:es '•r -a,�e. �. , � , �9Dl.:): ea'+e:es e:�s::�y eeoc Ne.etlor:. rr.een eec :e.e r`.r `Y; `� r �`� \� 1� � l "-•9s:----' =e'e'es e.=e:'ny crto�• 6ne. ^'ecn sea :e.e _�.. ��• \ 3ex'r-,s s'e.^ c*e oesec �eon an casw*+ee cac.✓r . ^ \� �,. �;\ ���` �� � a \'•,: -,Fs w:ey 1-.:res :o s^o. :'+e oawar�es o' :re c:o.e ces:✓;eec a•oau'�. � \` �`` . � • !re YccSen e• r e.:�tinS no�se. ent t'e �oeo•b� o' c:t .-s[..e • vew.e•' ��� �\���' t�e•eon. :, cosa 'et ;:7o•t :o aho. e^� eteer :r..•o.e^e�:s a• e^c•eoc^�^rs. �/� �• �� > • • . . • �` ���\�..`�\\ .•.Ale�cu�L..io.�.�R v�Tc '�'e •e s-o+ :.�'e tce eove•, •xe::o• o• e+ �rcec.er �� s�\```\� �. ,a,r. ..r Ia ri..... - . ♦� O `` ` ♦ � • . A \\� �\ tD . `' ♦�\� 7 T� \\` ., ...� 06C�mn sEaw�� »fi OE•e�Rirtxn � IM�erhmnhtluttAw.urve�r�.�ie�:hmraurolermrd�'..-•�i•+. �'' ^ , � , � � mx.n.+nd:lu�1 am a duh�e�pVeeel Grd Enpneer and I�nJ�un.��.++n.'.ar ,��3 /3� �•�Y�' I iN� l�� , (�1!�iwl t�Ne Slil!Of\Q11fW4J �y. z-r m ry+ �.►�a�+�n'�rvia Jr wE "i ��/�/i '-i�-:- pur+�n �J R�v �tar►S.GnmMrc\lu+nr.xa Lrenx\umM I:i3i p�' O � `''�c'y YC �'' � .., '�� a'.f i`�� _ _..�._ \ �` ,�• Q ffiIBIT A `> �.: - � i.:L � � c,f `1 y �� � RESOLIITION N0. - - � . ' . ,� *�� �Oo � Page 2 of 2 � • :\� � � '� ' = �� * ���6 48� � , �+,;�� �� ., �= s'� ',�� '� .5�,�.CIS;. / . � _ ` -_ . : � � ,�'•� � ` � . ' � ••-- . \ . � � y . `�`;ti;� ` ` �\ • . ' �� � • � ��� . �`.� � � ' � � ���\ \ �♦ '\\ �. . \ �. \ . \ ♦ \ �f� •� � � • \ �� \ •� � . \ � �� ,� �� � \ �' \ . � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦� � . � s, �� � � � � � •� co � � � � � � � \ �. � ���•� . � � � \ ��. � ^ • � �\� � � \ � � �� � � � \ � �` � � � � � \� � \ � , � \ � \ \ � � � �� `\ `� \\ \ � — �' � � r C� _ � � ��� \ � �. � �\ \\ \\�a9S \ v / �� ��9�'�L�'C � � ' T `` ��s' `�� �� �° � ` � � ��, � ',�.� � ��, ., ,� . , , � �� , ,, � , � ,. , � ��, � •� ,\ .� �;` � � .� \ . �, �'\ i \\�� � �, \ /� � '�� \\�\\ \ \\ \ \ /// . � \ � \ \ \ \ / 1 \ �/ •� �r\ \\, � \ \ � \ � . �� �\\\ � � � \ �^ 1 � \ \ \ •� Y �Q �\�� '\\ � � \ ' �f J � � � `� / .� ��, � � i '� ��_ � � " � � <2�• `\ � �' ` ! � I �/ �;� �.,,� ,� ' t � ' i � �,r, \ � I . �� ��� � � � 6�• � :''� `, �, �\ � � \ �\ � .` 1 �ei dat�m y� �`� �`�� \ � �� \ l� \ \ oatum � \•. �`� •. \ C � � � ` �. ��`� � � � � \ \. . � �\ `. � � / � °'� � � '� e above aesc�ibed proper'.y. •: � � � � � \. , � of cll visib1e "ha�dco�e�„ �/ � �� • �nprovemen;s o' encroachments. � \\ �U\� \ _�t� \ � � \ ' . \ ��`�`''�i� \ • ''Juo�c� t..n�tor►+�►rtx �it hcrdccver � 9�0;� �� � � � �� � �� ���\� � \ ` � � \ �� � \ . +� ♦ � \\ c� � � � � � • \ \` ` \ � �