The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutA non-structural steel special inspection final report-2015 A Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Orono Police Department Expansion 2730 Kelly Parkway Orono, Minnesota Prepared for Kraus-Anderson Construction Com any Project 614-05902 March 18,2015 Braun Intertec Corporation B R A 1�1 N Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:9 2.995.2000 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Fax: 95�2.995.2020 I NTE RTEC Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com The Science You Build On. March 18, 2015 Project B14-05902 Mr. Mark Kotten Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 8625 Rendova Street NE Circle Pines, MN 55014 Re: Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Procedural and Final Report Submittal Orono Police Department Expansion 2730 Kelly Parkway Orono, Minnesota Dear Mr. Kotten: Please find attached to this procedural report the Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report for the Orono Police Department Expansion located in Orono, Minnesota, and the supporting Special Inspection Daily Reports for your review and records. Special Inspection and Testing Procedures The special inspection services were provided by International Code Council (ICC) certified special inspectors in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17 of the International Building Code (IBC), the Special Inspection and Testing Schedule and/or the project plans and specifications. The purpose of special inspections is to provide a review of the contractor's work designated by the project structural engineer as needing special inspection under the guidelines of the IBC to determine compliance with the approved construction documents.The special inspector doesn't have the responsibility or authority to, nor is it the intent of special inspections to have them,judge, or modify the construction documents. Only the structural engineer of record can do this. As the special inspections were completed, a Special Inspection Daily Report was prepared to summarize the results of our inspections and testing. A copy of this report was provided to the contractor's site representative for their review and records.As part of this report, items needing correction or discrepancies observed from the approved construction documents were noted. Plans and Specifications The provided plans and specifications or the plans available at the site were used for our inspections. AA/EOE Kraus-Anderson Constructionl Company Project B14-05902 March 18, 2015 Page 2 I Summary of Special Inspections and Material Observations and Tests Soil Evaluation and Testing A Geotechnical Evaluation was not performed for the project. Braun Intertec technicians performed shallow hand augers borings that upon review indicate the soils were capable of supporting the presumptive bearing pressures that the structural engineer used for project design.The evaluation we perFormed does not constitute a Geotechnical Evaluation,and because of the limited extents of our evaluation,greater risks remain,which are assumed by the owner. Soils exposed at structure subgrade elevations and in excavations were visually evaluated,while those below subgrade elevations and excavation bottoms were evaluated using hand auger borings.This task was perFormed to determine if the observed and tested soils were would be able to support the structural design loads structural engineer used in their calculations. Hand auger probes were conducted over the course of multiple days to confirm the consistency of soils for the building pad.Soils at the bottom of all excavations were visually evaluated and determined consist of gray sandy lean clay. The hand auger borings were drilled with a 1 1/2-inch-diameter hand auger.The borings were advanced in 2-to 4-inch increments to depths of 2 to 4 feet below subgrade elevations or excavation bottoms.The auger was then withdrawn from the borehole to obtain cuttings.The soils encountered in the borings were classified in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual/Manual Procedures)." Preliminary estimates of soil consistency and density were also evaluated based on resistance to penetration of the hand auger,and the turning resistance. Soils at the bottom of the excavations appeared to be suitable for the bearing capacity of 2000 pounds per square foot, used by the structural engineer. Fill was placed above the bottom of the excavations to bring the bearing elevation back to footing grade. From time to time,compaction tests failed. Failed tests were retested for compaction after the contractor compacted the soils again.All fill placed was compacted to project specifications. Concrete Reinforcement We initially reviewed the reinforcement and dowel requirements on the project structural drawings and shop drawings, if available. Information reviewed included bar size, bar length, bar spacing, bar location, splice lengths and dowel placement.This information was then used to determine if the inplace reinforcement was placed in accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. We also noted if the inplace reinforcement was free of rust, scale and soil. Concrete Ptacement Observations Concrete placement observations were performed to monitor the procedures being used by the contractor and to determine if they were consistent with typical industry standards and the pnoject specifications. e�au� INT,ERTEC Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Project B14-05902 March 18, 2015 Page 3 Fresh Concrete Testing Routine tests to determine the plastic concrete's slump,temperature and air content were done during each pour. In addition, concrete cylinders were cast at rates specified in the project specifications to evaluate the concrete's compressive strength. Concrete Compressive Strength Testing The cast concrete cylinders were temporarily stored at the site and then returned to our laboratory for moist curing and testing.The results of the concrete compressive strength testing were forwarded to the interested parties under a separate cover as they became available. Masonry Construction Observations Prior to conducting the observations,the special inspector reviewed the construction documents and any associated approved submittals.As construction began,the proportions ofthe mortar, construction of mortarjoints and the location of reinforcement and connectors was observed for compliance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. The inspection program included determining the size and location of structural elements in addition to the type, size, and location of anchors, including other details of anchorage of masonry to structural members,frames or other construction for compliance. We also determined if the specified size,grade and type of reinforcement was used and if the protection of masonry was in compliance with the guidelines of the IBC. Prior to grouting,the cleanliness of the grout space, placement of reinforcement and connectors, proportions of grout and construction of mortarjoints were observed. Concrete Masonry Grout Testing The grout prisms cast were tested in general accordance with ASTM C1019:Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Grout.The samples were temporarily stored at the site and returned to our laboratory for compressive strength testing.The results for the compressive strengths of the grout prisms were forwarded to the interested parties under separate cover as they became available. Drilled Epoxy Anchor Observations Observations were preformed during the installation of the drilled in epoxy anchors and to determine if they were installed according to the requirements of the manufacturer and the project documents. Items observed included the placement,depth of embedment, cleanliness of the drilled hole and application of the epoxy adhesive. The type of epoxy used was also documented for compliance with the requirements of the specifications. eRauN INT RTEC Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Project B14-05902 March 18,2015 Page 4 General In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same Iocality. No warranty,express or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to provide the special inspection and testing services for thls project.After review of the attached Special Inspection Final Report,if you have any questions or require additional information, piease call Evan Zik at 952.995.2233,or Chris Kehl at 952.995.2386. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION , � � �--r_ ,..--- ,�.--" � � r Evan A.Zik, EIT I Engin r-In-Training /�� I ��ZE�1/ Christopher R.Kehl, PE Principai—Senior Engineer Attachment: Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report c: Mr. Douglas Hughes, Larsen Engineering Mr. Lyle Oman, City of Orono Mr.Jack Bronczyk, Kraus-Anderson Construction Mr. Mark Kotten, Kraus-Anderson Construction Mr.Steve Kleinman,SKD Architects, Inc. s Ra�u N INTERTEC B R A IJ N Braun Intertec Corporation Phone:952.995.2000 11001 Hampshire Avenue 5 Fax: 952.995.2020 INTE RTEC Minneapolis,MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com The Science You Huild On. Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Final Report Page 1 of 2 City of: Orono Date: March 18, 2015 Attention: Mr. Mark Kotten Project: Orono Police Department Expansion 2730 Kelly Parkway Orono, Minnesota Braun Intertec Project: B14-05902 In accordance with Section 1704 of the International Building Code and the agreed upon scope of services,the required special inspections and testing has been provided for the following items: Soils A Geotechnical Evaluation was not performed for this project. Based on the observations and testing we performed; it appears that the soils are capable of the net allowable bearing pressure of up to 2000 pounds per square foot.The testing and observations we performed, does not constitute a Geotechnical Evaluation. Soils were cut below bearing elevation and raised back up to grade using a standard cut/fill approach. Fill was used to raise the bearing elevation back to grade and compacted to appropriate densities based on the project plans and specifications.There are no outstanding or unresolved soil- related issues. Concrete � The required testing in the field and in the laboratory has been completed.The results have been forwarded under separate cover.The compressive strength testing indicates the concrete placed has met the project requirements.The placement procedures used were judged to have met the project requirements. There are no outstanding or unresolved concrete-related issues. Reinforcing Steel The reinforcement placement detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports was observed according to the requirements of the project plans and specifications.There are no outstanding or unresolved reinforcing steel-related issues. Structural Masonry Construction The required structural masonry observations and testing detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports have been completed in general accordance with the requirements of the project plans and specifications. Following the required corrections,the structural masonry construction was found acceptable.There are no outstanding or unresolved structural masonry-related issues. Drilled in Epoxy Anchor Bolts The drilled in epoxy anchor connections detailed in the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports were observed in general accordance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. The placement was done in accordance with the drawings,the nuts were fully engaged,the adjoining plies were in contact with one another and the nuts were snug tight.There are currently no outstanding or unresolved drilled in epoxy anchor-related issues. �/EOE BR�auN T I M1IT�RTEC Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Project B14-05902 March 18,2015 Page 2 Conclusion Based upon the inspections performed, the testing completed and the attached Special Inspection Daily Reports, it is our professional judgment that,to the best of our knowledge,the inspected work was performed and completed in accordance with the approved plans,specifications,and applicable workmanship provisions of the International Building Code. Inspecting Firm: Braun Intertec Corporation I hereby certify that this plan, specification or repo�t was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. �� /' � f'^"� '�� (y, f G �- „a a��,,, ., / � G ,o'� •��y`P � �--- o � Christopher R. Kehl ° a� . � t ICEF'�. PE . Principal—Senior Engineer a�� .o�� License Number: 43459 �, '� March 18, 2015 °+•.r....•�y��" ni� Attachments: Non-Structural Steel Special Inspection Daily Reports 1 through 34 s R�►u N INTERTEC Page 1 of 1 eRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 ot t Report No.: #1 Dafe: August 1 S,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Expansion ProJecf No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Broun Infertec PM: MARK FLYNN CIIeM: City of Orono Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy Temperafure: 55°F Type of Inspection: Inspedion Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑5pecial Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � DescripHo�and IocaHon of work completed: -Observed the soils in the bottom of test pits excavated in the area of the new addition. List tests perfortned: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed to: Jack To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. / ,-�%��,�% Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 _.____.__ i I -Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solurions since i957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Speciat Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #2 Date: September 2,2014 Projecf Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: B14-05902 Projecf Addreu: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clienf: City of Orono Clie�Project No.: Weather. Partly Cloudy Temperafure: 65°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑ Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descripfion and locaflon of wo�lc completed: -Observed the soils in the bottom excavation on the east end of the addition. Performed hand auger probes in the bottom of the excavation. The soiis consisted of gray sandy lean ciay.The soils appeared to be suitable for the designed footing beqring pressure of 2000 psf. -The elevation at the bottom of the excavation ranged from 1014'to 1016 1/2'. -Performed 3 compaction tests on fill placed in the building pad. One of the three compaction tests failed to meet project specifications of 989b compaction. Nofrfied the contractor of the failing test. List tesis performed: I . Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations� Yes ❑ No � . Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report EmaAed to: Ja�k To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ��:��,�-�= Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prrouiding engineering and environmental solutions since i957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #3 Date: September 3,2014 ProJect Name: Orono Police Dept. Expansion Project No: 814-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Client: City of Orono CIIeM Project No.: WeafhQr. Parfly Cloudy Temperature: 65°F i Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage; ❑ Continuous ❑Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descripfion and localion of work comple+ed: -Observed the soils in the bottom excavation on the east end of the addition. Performed hand auger probes in the bottom of the excavation. The soils consisted of gray sandy lean cloy.The soils appeared to be suitable for the designed footing bearing pressure of 2000 psf. -The elevation at the bottom of the excavation ranged from 1014'to 1016 1/2'. -Performed 2 compaction tests and 1 retest on fill placed in the building pad. The tests met project specifications of 98�0 compaction. list tests perfortned: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached 5ummary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes ❑ No � Report Emailed to: To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. l :��=� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering attd enuironmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau w I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 oF � Report No.: #4 Date: September 4,2014 ProJect Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: B14-05902 Projecf Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Infertec PM: MARK FLYNN CIIeM: City of Orono Clie�Project No.: Weath�r. Partly Cloudy Temperafura: 65°f Type of Inspedion: lnspedion Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding 8�Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorrze changes to approved plans8 Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Description and IocaHon of wo�lc complsted: -Observed the soils in the bottom excavation on the east end of the addition. Performed hand auger probes in the bottom of the excavation. The soils consisted of gray sandy lean clay.The soils appeared to be suitable for the designed footing bearing pressure of 2000 psf. -The elevation at the bottom of the excavation ranged from 1014'to 1016 1/2'. -Performed 4 compaction tests on fill placed in the building pad. The tests met project specifications of 98% compaction. List tests performed: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see atiached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes ❑ No ❑ Report Emalled to: To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. I r.��,�.-= Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I Providing engineering and environmental solutions since i957 Page 1 of 1 sRauw I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #5 Date: September 5,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Projecf No.: B14-05902 i Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clisr�t: City of Orono Client Project No.: Woafher: Parfiy Cloudy Temperature: 65°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Wel�ng&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans? Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � DescripHon and localion of work compleled: -Observed the soils in the bottom excavation for new addition. Performed hand auger probes in the bottom of the excavation. The soils consisted of gray sandy lean clay.The soils appeared to be suitable for the designed footing bearing pressure of 2000 psf. -The elevation at the bottom of the excavation ranged from 1014'to 1016'. -Performed 14 compaction tests on fill placed in the building pad. The tests met project specifications of 989 compaction. List tQsts performed: I . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observationsZ Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this projectZ Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached 5ummary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes ❑ No ❑ Report Emalled to: To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ��% .�,,_-- Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 -Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions since 19� Page 1 of 1 sRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #6 Date: September 8,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJect No.: B14-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Broun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN I Clienf: City of Orono Clie�Project No.: Weaifier. ParflyCloudy Temperafure: 65°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descripfion and location of work completed: -Observed the soils in the bottom excavation for new addition. Performed hand auger probes in the bottom of the excavation. The soils consisted of gray sandy lean clay.The soils appeared to be suitable for the designed footing bearing pressure of 2000 psf. -Performed 5 compaction tests on fill placed in the building pad. The tests met project specifications of 98� compaction. Ust tesh perfo�rned: li I • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observationsZ Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes ❑ No ❑ Report Emailed to: To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ��f ,i,,,.--- Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Providing engineering and enuironmeiital solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of � Reporf No.: #7 Date: September 9,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: 814-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Interfec PM: MARK FLYNN Cllent City of Orono Clie�Project No.: Weather: Parfly Cloudy Tetnperafure: 65°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coveraye: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding 8 Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer author�ze changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Desc�ipiion and locafion of work compl�led: -Observed the soils in the bottom of the footing excavation for new addition at Grid A-2 to D-2 to D-6. Performed hand auger probes in the boltom of the excavation. The soils consisted of gray sandy lean clay.The soils appeared to be suitable for the designed footing bearing pressure of 2000 psf. I List tasts parfortnad: I • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations2 Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes ❑ No ❑ Report Emailed to: To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. / � �i Loosbrock, Tom �D.No.: 1136593 -ProUiding ettgineering and environmenta(solutions since igy� Pag e 1 of 1 s Rau N I NTE RTEC � Special Inspection Daily Report I� CII�/ Of OTol10 Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #8 Date: September 1 l,2014 ProJect Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: B14-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Interfec PM: MARK FLYNN Clier�t: City of Orono Client ProJect No.: Weafher. Partly Cloudy Temperature: 55°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans? Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � DescdpHon and loeallon of work complefed: -Observed the placment of rebar for Footings&Cofumn Pads C�?Grid C-1 to C-2 to D-2 to D-5. -Observed the placement of concrete for footings and column pads at the grids listed above. Sampled and teste the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 1 set of 5-4x6 cylinders(Set#1). list tests parfoRned: Set#1 =Slump-4 1/4",Air Content-3.296,Concrete Temperature-68F,Workorder#45402 . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No I81 • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor. Yes ❑ No ❑ Report Emailed to: To the best of our knowlecige,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,spec�cations and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions since i957 Page 1 of 1 srtauN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #9 Dale: September 12,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJecf No: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun IntQrtec PM: MARK fLYNN Client City of Orono Client P�oject No.: Woathar. Partly Cloudy TemperaturQ: 58°F Type of Inspection: Inspectlon Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑Masonry �Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Doscriptlon and locafiion of work compl�fed: -Observed the placment of rebar for footings Q Grid D to D.2 from 5 to 6. -Observed the placement of concrete for footings and column pads at the grids listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 1 set of 5-4x8 cylinders(Set#2j. List tests perfortnad: Set#2=Slump:4.75",Air Content:3.496,Concrete Temperature:66F,Sample#45609 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project8 Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor. Yes ❑ No ❑ Report Emailed to: To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ,-�� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I'roufdin,q engineering and enuironmentalsolutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #10 Date: September 15,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Expansion Project No.: 614-05902 ProjectAddress: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Infertec PM: MARK FLYNN Cliet�t: City of Orono Clienf Project No.: Weafher: Partly Cloudy Temperature: 57°F Type of Inspection: lnspeciion Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Speclal Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer author¢e changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descriptlon and IocaHon of work completed: -Observed the placement of rebar for Foundation Walls @ Grid D-2.1 to D-5.1 and Footings @ Grid A-2 to A-4 Observed the placement of concrete for footings,foundation walls,and column pads at the grfds listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 2 sets of 5-4x8 cylinders �Set#3&3et#4). lisl tesh perfoRnad: Set#3-Slump:5",Air Content:6.8%,Concrete Temperature:70F,Sample#45839 Set#4-Slump:4",Air Content:3.4�,Concrete Temperature;67F,Sample#45871 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations? Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Broncryk-jack.bronczykCa�krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,speclfications pnd applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. / � f��.--- Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 I Page 1 of 1 eRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #11 Date: September 16,2014 Projecf Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJect No.: 614-05902 ProJecf Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Broun Infertec PM: MARK FLYNN Cllenl: City of Orono Client Project No.: Wecrther. Partly Cbudy Temperat�re: 65°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � DascripHon and locaflon of work completed: -Observed the placement of rebar for Foundation Walls C�?Grid D.l to D.3 from 4.2 to 6. -Observed the placement of concrete for foundation walls at the grids listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 1 set of 5-4x8 cylinder(Set#5�. -Observed the soils in the bottom of the footing excavation Q Grid A-4 to A-6 to 6.2-6 to C.2-6.9. Performed hand auger probes in the bottom of the excavation and the soils appear to be suitable for the designed footing bearing pressure of 2000 psf. Llat tests perfortned: Set#5-Slump:5 1/4",Air Content:5.9�0,Concrete Temperature: 72F,Sample#46045 . Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project8 Yes ❑ No � � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Broncryk jackbrnncryk�akrausandflrson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications pnd applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ,�%.�,z,,f--� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering and enuironmenta!solutions since 195'/ Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of � Report No.: #12 Date: September 17,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJact No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Interfec PM: MARK FLYNN Clier�t City of Orono Clie�ProJect No.: Weuther. Partly Cloudy Temperature: 70°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descdpfion and locafion of work completed: -Observed the placement of rebar for Footings @ Grid A-3.5 to A-6 to B.2-6 to 6.2-6.2 to 6.9-6.2. -Observed the placement of concrete for footings at the grids listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump, air content and temperature. Cast 2 sets of 5-4x8 cylinder(Set#6 8�#7). -Cast 2 sets of cylinders yesterday because the contractor ordered concrete for the foundation walls but decided not to pour the walls and use the concrete in the footings. lisf tests pertormed: 5at�6=Slurnp:4",Air Content:3.5%,Concrete Temperature:70F,Sample#46254 Set#7=Slump:5",Air Content:6.896,Concrete Temperature:70F,Sample#46256 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see atlached Summary Sheet. . Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor. Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Broncryk-jack.bronczyk@k►ausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specificatfons and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. 9 � ��`�..= Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding ettgineering and environmenta(solurions since i957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #13 Date: September 18,2014 Projecf Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun IMertec PM: MARK fLYNN CUenh City of Orono Client Project No.: Weathmr: Par11y Cloudy T�mperalure: 70°F Type of Inspection; Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles�Piers ❑Tendon Plqcement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plansZ Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Doscriptlon and loccrtion of work complefod: -Observed the placement of rebar for Footings @ Grid 8.2-6.2 to 6.9-6.2 to 8.9-6.9 to C.2-6.9 and Wall C�Grid D-2.2 to D-2 to C-2 to C-1 to&1 to B-2 to A-2 to A-4. List tasts periortned: I • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed fo: Jack Broncryk jack.broncryk�skrausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ,-�.��/,�z�_--� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 -Providing engineering and enuironmentalsolutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau w INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Oroflo Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #14 Dofe: September 19,2014 ProJect Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJecf No.: 614-05902 Ptoject Addresx 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Client City of Orono Client Project No.: Weather. Partly Cloudy Temperalure: 70°f Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles& Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer author¢e changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Description and IocaHon of work compl�fod: -Observed the placement of rebar for Footings @ Grid 6.2-6.2 to 6.9-6.2 to 8.9-6.9 to C.2-6.9;Wall @ Grid C-1.3 to C-2 to D-2;Wall C�?Grid A-2 to A-4.5 and Wall Q Grid A.6-6 to C.2-6. -Observed the placement of concrete for footings and wall at the grids listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 2 sets of 5-4x8 cylinder (Set#8&�,. �9 Lisf tasts perfortned: Footing-Set#8=Slump:2",Air Content:2.4�,Concrete Temperature:70F,Sample#46632 Wall-Set#9=Slump:8",Air Content:SA�o,Concrete Temperature:72F,Sample#46654 � • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observationsZ Yes ❑ No � • Are there qny outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed to: Jack Broncryk-jack.bronczyk�krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspecied was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ? ��,,;-- Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1 i 36593 _ � Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions since i957 Page t of 1 BRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Clty Of OP0110 Page: 1 of 1 Repafi No.: #15 Date: September 22,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJect No.: 814-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Interfec PM: MARK FLYNN Cflent City of Orono CUeM Project No.: Weath�r. Partly Cloudy T�mporaturo: 70°F Type of Inspection: Inspedion Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting � Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer author'¢e changes to approved plans8 Yes❑ �listed Below) No � Dos�rlpNon and location of work compl�fod: -Observed the placement of rebar for Wall C�Grid 6.2-6.2 to 8.2-6.3 to B.9-6.3 to 6.9-6.4. -Observed the placement of concrete forwall at the grids listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 1 set of 5-4x8 cylinder(Set#10). List tasts performad: Set#10=Slump:3",Air Content:5.19'0,Concrete Temperature:78F,Sample#46955 • Are there any discrepancies noted from ihis day's observations? Yes ❑ No � . Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes � No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Repo�t Emailed to: Jack Bronczyk-jack.broncryk@krausqnderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �%��'�-� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions since 19� Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report CItY Of OI'On0 Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #16 Date: September 23,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: B14-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Infertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clier�t: City of Orono Client ProJact No.: Weafher. Partly Cloudy Temperature: 70°F Type of Inspection: Inspectfon Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑ Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect ot engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Dascription and location of work completed: -Observed the placement of rebar for Wall�Grid A-2 to D-2 to D-2.2 and Footings Q Grid C to D from 1 to 2. -Observed the placement of concrete for the footings and wall at the grids listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast i set of S-4x8 cylinder(Set#i 1). List tests arformed: P Set#11 =Slump:4",Air Content:5.3�0,Concrete Temperature:73F,Sample#47135 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discreppncies on this project2 Yes � No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Bronczyk jack.broncryk�krnusanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the app�oved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �.�� ,z,��--r� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I Prouiding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report CI['�/ Of OfOnO Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #17 Date: September 24,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Expansion ProJect No.: 814-05902 Projecf Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun I�tertec PM: MARK FLYNN Client City of Orono Cllent Project No.: Weather. Partly Cloudy Temperaturo: 70°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundptions ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Dsscription and IocaFion of work complefed: -Observed tfie placement of rebar for foundation wall @ Grid 8.9-6.2 to B.9-6.9 to C.2-6.9 and piers�Grid C to D from 1 to 1.9. -Observed the placement of concrete for foundation wall and piers at the grids listed above. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 1 set of 5-4x8 cylinder (Set#12). -Performed 3 compaction tests and 1 retest on interior wall backfill. The tests met project specifications of 95� compaction. List tests p�rfortned Set#12=Slump:4 1/2",Air Content:5.096,Concrete Temperature: 70F,Sample#47349 . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � ' . Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � . if yes,see attached Summary Sheet. , • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor. Yes � No ❑ � Report Emalled fo: ' Jack Broncryk-jack.broncryk@krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,spec'rfications pnd applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �%�= Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 -Providi�ig engineering and environmental solutions since 19� Page 1 of 1 s Rau N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 oF � Report No.: #18 Date: September 25,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: 814-05902 Proj�ct Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Client: City of Orono Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy Temperature: 70°F Type of Inspection: Inspedion Coverage: ❑Corrtinuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑ Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans? Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Description and Ixation of work completed: -Observed the placement of rebar for foundation wall cLD Grid A�.S to A�to B-6. List tests pertormed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No � • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed to: Jack Bronczyk-jack.bronczyk@krausanderso�com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above ,�i��,,,,�� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I Proriding engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Raport No.: #19 Date: September 26,2014 ProJecf Name: Orono Police Dept.fxpcxnsion Project No.: B14-05902 ProJect Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clienf: City of Orono CNeM ProJect No.: Weaiher: Partly Cloudy Temperature: 70°F Type of Inspedion: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � DescripHon and location of work compl�fed: -Observed the placement of rebar for foundation wall Ca�Grid A-4.5 to A-6 to B-6. -Observed the placement of concrete for foundation wall C�?Grid A-4.5 to A-6 to B-6.Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature.Cast 1 set of 5-4x8 cylinders (Set#13). -Notified the contractor and Cemstone of the low air content(3.49a). Sampled and tested the next load of concrete and the air content was 5.4�. -Performed 3 compaction tests on interior wall bac�ll.The tests met project specifications of 95�compaction. Lis1 tests pertormed: Set#13=Slump-5",Air Content-3.4�,Temperature-76,Sample#47737 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outsianding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Hronr.ryk-jnck.broncryk@krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable wakmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page_ 1 oF t Report No.: #20 Dafe: September 27,2014 ProJect Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJect No.: B14-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clie�: City of Orono CUent Project No.: Weath�r. Partly Cloudy Temperature: 70°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Mpsonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Description and locaflon of worlc compiefed: -Picked up 1 set of 5-4�cylinders cast on 9-26-14. Usi tasts performod: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project6 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Reporf Emailed to: Jack Bronczyk-jack.broncryk@krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications pnd applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �l�% Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 -Prouiding engineering and enuironmentaf solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of t Report No.: #21 Dafe: October l,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: B14-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN CIIeM: City of Orono Clier�t Project No.: Weafh�r. Partly Cloudy Temperature: 50°F Type of Inspectlon: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous �Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles�Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved ptans? Yes❑ �Listed Below) No � DoscrlpNon and location of work compl�f�d: -Observed the contractor grouting the existing foundation wall down to the e�usfing footing at each location of the new columns on the south side of the existing building. -Performed 4 compaction tests on interior wall backfill. The tests met project specifications of 95�o compaction. I llst tests perfoRned: I . Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observationsZ Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jcac:k Rroncryk jack.broncryk@krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �`r� �f Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I Prouiding engineering and enuironmenta(soluiions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #22 Date: October 2,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Expansion ProJect No: 614-05902 ProJect Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK fLYNN Clier�t: City of Orono CII�M ProJ�ct No.: Weather. Cloudy Temperature: 50°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations �Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing Anchor Bolts ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans8 Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Description and locafion of work complot�d: -Observed the contractor drill&epoxy anchor bolts into the top of the foundation wall�Grid B.l-6 to B.1-6.3 to B.9-6.9 to C.1-6.9. I List tests porfotmed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations2 Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Reporf Emailed to: Jac:k Rron�:ryk-jack.broncryk�krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specificat(ons and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �-%�� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I Prouiding engineer�ttg and enuironrnental solunons stnce 19� Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Speciat Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #23 Date: October 8,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Expansion ProJect No.: B14-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clier�t: City of Orono Client P�ojecf No.: Weath�r: Partly Cloudy T�mperafure: 50°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑Foundations ❑ Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Plpcement �Soils Did the architect or engineer author'¢e changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descripfion and location of work completed: -Performed 2 compaction tests on plumbing trench backfill and 2 compaction tests on fill placed below the exterior slab on grade for the Nash enclosure. The tests met project speci�cations of 9596 compaction. I Llsf t•sts porformod: � • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � . Are there any ouhtanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Broncryk-jac:k.Uionczykiakrausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. � ��-'� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 I Prouiding ettgineering and environrnental solutions since 1957 Page t of 1 s Rau N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #24 Date: October 9,2014 Project Namo: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: B14-05902 ProJed Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Inter#ec PM: MARK FLYNN Clienf: City of Orono Client Project No.: Weathsr: Partly Cioudy Temperature: 50�F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous �Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases ❑ Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plansZ Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Doscrfptlon and IocaFbn of work complefed: -Observed the placement of rebar and gro�t for a masonry wall�Grid B.2-6 to C.2-6 at elevation 109'. -Sampled and tested the grout for slump and cast 1 set of 3 grout prisms(Set#1). j list fests pe�formed: Grout Set#1 =8 3/4" . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observationsZ Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this projectZ Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Report Discussed with and Given to Coniractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jaek Rronc,ryk jack.broncrykC`krousanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provis'rons of the current IBC,except as noted above. ��I �-= Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering and environmental solutions since 19� I Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #25 Date: October 10,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No: 614-05902 Projecf Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. 8raun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clie►�t: Ci1y of Orono Cllent ProJect No.: Weather. Partly Cloudy Temperafure: 50°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans2 Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descripfion and location of work complet�d: -Observed the plqcement of rebar for interior slab on grade @ Grid A to E from 1 to 6. -Picked up grout samples cast on 10-9-14. I Llst tests performad: I • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancfes on this project� Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed to: Jack Bronc.ryk jar:k.broncrykCg-krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,speclfications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. -�;%� Loosbrock, Tom L?h /�/,/� I.D.No.: 1 136593 Prouiding engineering and ettuironmental solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #26 Date: October 11,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Expansion P�oject No.: 814-05902 ProJect Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Client City of Orono Client Project No.: Weafher: Partly Cloudy Temperafure: 50°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑ Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descriptlon and bcaFion of work comp{eted: -Observed the placement of rebar for interior slab on grade @ Grid A to f from 1 to 6. list tests perfortned: . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observationsZ Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emafled to: Jack Bron�;ryk jack.bronczykc"s7krausarxiers��n.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ;��p-� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1 136593 Prouiding engineering and enuironmentai solutions since i957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #27 Date: October 13,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJect No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun In4erFec PM: MARK fLYNN Clienf: City of Orono Client Project No.: Weather: Partly Cloudy Temperature: 50°F Type of Inspedion: Inspedion Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Weldng&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans? Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descripfion and location of work compl�fed: -Observed the placement of rebar for interior slab on grade @ Grid A to E from 1 to 6. -Observed the placement of concrete for interior slab on g�ade @ Grid A to E from 1 to 6.Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air conient and temperature.Cast 1 set of 5-4x8 cylinders(Set#18&#19). list tests performed: Set#1 B=Siump-5 1/2",Air Content-2.44b,Temperature-67,Sample#50205 Set#19=Slump-6 1/4",Air Content-3.3�0,Temperature-64,Sample#50228 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there pny outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emafled to: Jack Bronczyk -jar_k.broncrykf�krauzarxierson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �� Loosbrock, Tom , 3659 ', I.D.No.: 1 3 Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 Pag e 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #28 Date: October 14,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Expqnsion Projecf No.: B14-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN CNer�t: City of Orono Client Project No.: W�afh�r. Parf1y Cloudy Temperature: 50°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting �Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Dosc�iption and IocaHon of work complated: -Picked up 2 sets of 5-4x8 cylinders cast on 1 a13-14. List tests perfoRned: I . Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations� Yes ❑ No � . Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed to: Jack t�ronc�yk jc�ck.broncryk@krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ��;�� x,t,- Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering and enuironmental solutions siitce 19� Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Reporf No.: #29 Dafe: October 15,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion ProJect No: Bl 4-05902 ProJect Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Interfec PM: MARK FLYNN Clienl: City of Orono CIIeM ProJect No.: Weafher: Partly Cloudy TemperaFure: 50°f Type of Inspedion: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement �Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans2 Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descripfio�and IoccFfon of work completed: -Observed the soils in the bottom of the excavation for footings for new sign base located at the norfh and south entrances into the west parking lot. Performed random hand auger probes in the bottom of the footing excavation and the soils appear to be suitable for the designed footing bearing pressure. -Recommended the contractor place cleor crushed rock in the bottom of the excavation for the new sign bases because of water in the bottom of the excavation. List tests pertortned: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are ihere any outstanding discrepancies on this project� Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed to: , Jack Broncryk-jack.broncrykQkrausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the cuRent IBC,except ps noted above. ,�� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering and environmental so(utions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City Of OfOt10 Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #30 Date: October 16,2014 Project Name: Orono Police Dept. Fxpansion Project No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Cilenh City of Orono Client ProJect No.: Woa4he�: PartlyCloudy Temparafur•: 50°F � Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑Continuous �Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑ Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting � Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plansB Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Deser�pMon and location of work eompleted: -Observed the placement of rebar and grout for masonry wall�Grid D-5.2 to D-6 at elevation 104'. -Observed the placement of concrete for interior slab on grade�Grid B.2 to C.l from 6 to 6.9. Sampled and tested the concrete for slump,air content and temperature. Cast 1 set of 5-4x8 cylinders (Set#20). List tests perfortned: Sei #20=Slump-4 1/4",Air Content-3.3�0,Temperature-64F,Sample#50839 . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � • If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. . Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Broncryk jar_k.bronc:ryk:��krc�usanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ��-� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouidiieg engineerittg and enuironmentaI solutions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 sRauN I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Rsporf No.: #31 Date: October 17,2014 ProJect Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Client City of Orono CIIsM Project No.: Waath�r: Partly Cloudy Temperature: 50°F Type of Inspection: Inspedion Coverage: ❑Continuous �Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Speciai Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8,Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plansZ Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � DescripHon and Iocallon of work compleled: -Observed the placement of rebar and grout for masonry wall @ Grid D-5.2 to D-6 at elevation 108'. -Picked up 1 set of 5 cylfnders cast on 10-16-14. ,I list tasts porformed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this days observations� Yes ❑ No ($! • Are there any outstanding discrepqncies on this project� Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emailed to: Jnr.k Rronczyk jack.bronczyk�krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with ihe approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ��,�.,,�/� Loosbrock, Tom 1136593 ,.��v"' I.D.No.: I Prouiding engineering and environmental solutions since 195'7 Page 1 of 1 sRauN INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Clty Of OfOno Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #32 Dafe: December 4,2014 Projed Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Pro)ect No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Keliy Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Client City of Orono Client Project No.: Weather: Parfly Cloudy Temperature: 20°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous �Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Descdption and locafion of work compiefed: -Observed the placement of rebar and grout for masonry wall @ Grid C.6 to D from 5.4 to 6 at elevation 104'and masonry wall�Grid A-5.7 to 8-5.7 at elevation 104'. lisf tests perfortned: I • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes ❑ No � . Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project8 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Broncryk-jqck.brnnczyk@krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,spec'rfications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. a� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 -Prouiding engineering and enuironmenta(solu�ions since 1957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N INTERTEC Special Inspection Daily Report Ciiy of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #33 Date: December 5,2014 Projecf Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No: 614-05902 P�ojecf Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. Braun Intertec PM: MARK FLYNN Clieni: City of Orono Client ProJect No.: Weather. Partly Cloudy Temperature: 20°F Type of Inspection: Inspedion Coverage: ❑ Continuous � Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑ Welding&Bolting ❑Concrete ❑ Freproofing ❑ Piles 8�Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans8 Yes❑ (Listed Below) No � Description and location of work complefed -Observed the placement of rebar and grout for masonry wall Q Grid C.6-5.8 to D-5.8 at elevation 108'. -Observed the masonry contractor drill and epoxy#5 dowels every 48"on center intor the slab on grade for a masonry wall @ Grid 6.9-5.2 to B.9-b. List t�sts performad: I • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations� Yes 0 No � • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached 3ummary Sheet. . Reporf Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack lirc:,nc_ryk-jack.bronc. .ryk�krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. ,-'%��,�.----� Loosbrock, Tom I.D.No.: 1136593 -Providing engineering and enuironmental solutions siiice i957 Page 1 of 1 s Rau N I NTE RTEC Special Inspection Daily Report City of Orono Page: 1 of 1 Report No.: #34 Dafe: December 10,2014 ProJect Name: Orono Police Dept.Expansion Project No.: 614-05902 Project Address: 2730 Kelly Pkwy. eraun IMerfec PM: MARK FLYNN Clier�t: City of Orono Cliant Project No.: W�athar: Cloudy Temperafurr. 20°F Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous �Masonry � Rebar Placement ❑ Foundations ❑Special Cases � Periodic ❑Welding&Bolting ❑ Concrete ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Piles&Piers ❑Tendon Placement ❑Soils Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to approved plans� Yes❑ (Listed Below� No � DesctipHon and location of work complet�d: -Observed the placement of rebar and grout for masonry wall @ Grid A-5.2 to B-5.2 at elevation 110'. List tasts performed: I . Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observationsZ Yes ❑ No � . Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project2 Yes ❑ No � . If yes,see attached Summary Sheet. • Report Discussed with and Given to Contractor: Yes � No ❑ Report Emalled to: Jack Broncryk ja�;k.bronczyk�e�krausanderson.com To the best of our knowledge,work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans,specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the current IBC,except as noted above. �' Loosbrock, Tom ;- ,�.�_ . ,�,�,,_- I.D.No.: 1136593 Prouiding engineering and environmentaf solutions since 1957