HomeMy WebLinkAboutEngineers Report,
Melanie Curtis
From: donelle feldmann <dfelds@me.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 10:13 AM
To: Melanie Curtis
Subject: Engineer Report 805 Forest Arms Lane
Attachments: Feldmann Engineer report.pdf
Good morning Melanie!
We have slowly been working on getting all of our open permits closed out for the pool project we completed in 2014.
Attached I have included the final necessary report to have them closed out!! I dropped a copy off for Roger at the city,also whom I
have been working with,and was told he will be on vacation for the week. I don't have an E-mail address for him, but felt it would
also be best if the city had an electronic copy of this for your records.
We would like to get these tied up as soon as we can if possible. I'm not sure if this is something you are able to finalize or
not?! He told me he had been out here enough recently to know the project was completed properly. We are required to have this
report being one of the walls is over 4 feet,and our landscaper failed to mention this. We were finally able to get the last piece of
the puzzle!! Could you please let me know if this is something you could do,or if I have to wait for his return please. It will be a
huge weight off my shoulders when this finally over!!
Thanks So Much your helpl!
Donelle Feldmann
1
�
C � N N fRS
CRITERIUM-SCHIMNOWSKI ENGINEERS
161 DUNBAR WAY
MAHTOMEDI,MN 55115
TEL 651779-7700
FAX 651779-7114
www.criterium-schimnowski.com
August 17, 2016
Asher Judd
Outdoor Innovations Landscaping
5885 165�'Street
Hugo, MN 55038
RE: Boulder Retaining Wall Evaluation
805 Forest Arms Lane
Orono, Minnesota
Project#16-2367
Dear Mr. Judd:
This letter is being sent per your request regarding the recently constructed boulder retaining walls at the
above address. This evaluation is based on my observations during a site visit on August 4, 2016, and
information you provided in an email on August 3, 2016, including as-built survey information and a
sketch of a swimming pool post footing detail indicating that the pool footing loads are being supported
below the influence of the retaining walls.
The construction of the retaining walls is structurally stable and in general conformance with boulder
retaining wall and construction industry standards.The walls were constructed with stone of sufficient size
and setback. Other typical construction details such as use of drainage elements also appeared to be
followed correctly.As is normal for boulder retaining walls of this type, some wall movement and soil
settlement should be expected. I recommend that concentrated areas of surface water should be directed
away from the walls. Several photos were taken for documentation, some of which have been provided
as part of this report.
This evaluation was performed using the design guidelines presented in the third edition of the"Design
Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls"(DMSRVI� published by NCMA in 2009. Direct all surface
drainage away from the retaining walls. If soil conditions, proposed layouts, or other design parameters
vary from that assumed, a revised analysis might be needed. Please call me rf you have any questions or
need more information. Thank you.
Sincerely,
r
1`�L����p�iSCl�1�f��t
�,�a, � s ,
�;
,. �� • !s
I _ ` , ..
„ SE , '. ::
,,,.�....�
Paul Schimnowski, PE ' � ���E€��- ; *,=
; �• 40120 *�*`
. �
�oa,�`•��. �,:��.,�e
�i � •�-��••�•�,4 �e
LICENSED J''����a!!N!�11��4�r`a
PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERS
HOME 8 BUILDING INSPECTIONS
STRUCTURAL EVALUATIONS
ASSOCIATION RESERVFJTRANSITION STUDIES
RES I DENTIAUCOM MERCIAL
RETAINING WALL DESIGN 8�EVALUATIONS
805 Forest Arms Lane, Orono, Minnesota
August 17, 2016
Page 2 of 2
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
This WALL EVALUATION and ensuing recommendations is expressly made subject to the following terms and
conditions to which all persons that receive and rely thereon agree:
1.Standard of Service—Services performed by ENGINEER under this agreement shall be performed in a manner
consistent with the skill and care ordinarily used by members of the engineering profession practicing under similar
conditions at the time and in the locality the services are performed.
• Client recognizes that interpretations and recommendations of ENGINEER are based solely on the
information available to the company.
• ENGINEER will be responsible for those interpretations and recommendations,but shall not be responsible
for the interpretation by others of the information developed
• Services provided reflect the professional judgment of ENGINEER,to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge,
information, and belief as of the date hereof.
• No other warranty or guarantee,express or implied, is made.
2. Said design is based entirely on and expressly limited by the scope of services ENGINEER has been employed by
Client to perform and as described in WALL PROVISIONS and LIMITATIONS.
3. If the ENGINEER is hired for any construction phase services or site visits, it is understood that the Contractor, not
the ENGINEER, is responsible for the construction of the project, and that ENGINEER is not responsible for the acts
or omissions of any contractor,subcontractor or material supplier;for safety precautions, programs or enforcement;
or for construction means, methods,techniques,sequences and procedures employed by the Contractor.
4.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS:All reports,field data,field notes,calculations,estimates and other documents
('reports')prepared by Engineer, as instruments of service,shall remain the property of Engineer. Client agrees that
all reports furnished to Client or his agents,which are not paid for,will be returned upon demand and will not be used
by Client for any purpose whatever. Engineer will retain all pertinent records relating to the services pertormed for a
period of five years following submission of the report,during which period the records will be made available to
Client at all reasonable times.
5.TERMINATION:This agreement may be terminated by either party by written notice. In the event of termination,
ENGINEER shall be paid for services performed and expenses incuned up to the termination notice date. Neither
Client not ENGINEER may delegate,assign,sublet or transfer his/her duties or interest in this Agreement without the
written consent of the other party.
6. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Client and ENGINEER(1)waive against each other,and the other's
employees,officers,directors,agents, insurers, partners, and consultants,any and all claims for or entitlement to
special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages arising out of, resulting from,or in any way related to this wall
design and written report, (2)agree that ENGINEER's total liability to Client shall be limited to the total amount of
compensation received by ENGINEER and(3)if an action is brought against the ENGINEER and the ENGINEER
prevails, ENGINEER shall be entitled to recover costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys'fees and costs.
CRITERIUM-SCHIMNOWSKI ENGINEERS
TEL 651 779-7700
��i�rE���r���
Location Photos Taken by: Inspection Date:
805 Forest Arms Lane, Paul D Schimnowski, August 4,2016
Orono,MN ���������
�
�
1 Front view of house. 2 Rear view of house with boulder retaining
wa11s.
x
.�:
3 Upper wall is structurally adequate. 4 Upper wall is structurally stable.
5 Direct surface water and runoff away from 6 Direct surface water and runoff away from wall
wall. to revent backf'ill movement.
, ,
��������� �
Location Photos Taken by: Inspection Date:
805 Forest Arms Lane, Paul D Schimnowski, August 4,2016
Orono,MN ���'������
s�� ��� �����i����,
��:�.
w�,_
7 Measurement photo of upper wall. 8 Direct surface water and runoff away from wall
to revent backfill movement.
9 View of tiered wall area. 10 Direct surface water and runoff away from wall
to revent backf'�ll movement.
,,.
11 Expect some patio paver displacement due to 12 Expect some patio paver displacement due to
seasonal movement of boulder wall. normal settlement of boulder wall.