The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWetland delineation report-2013 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Kurt Schmid by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2012-016) May 24, 2013 WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 3625 Jacobs Mill Road site was inspected on April 12, 2012 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI-map showed one PEMF/PEMC wetland complex within site boundaries. � The soil survey showed Glencoe and Klossner as the hydric soils present within site boundaries. • The DNR Protected Waters Map showed DNR Protected Wetland 842W within site boundaries. • Three wetlands were delineated within site boundaries as described below. Wetland Plant Wetland Management Circular 404 Jurisdictional ID Category 39 Community Type Observations E ers and Reed Deep marsh, shallow It is possible that this 1 Manage 1 4 marsh, and fresh meadow wetland has an outlet along wetland complex its south/southeast border. Partially drained, fresh wetland 2 drains off site to 2 Manage 2 1 meadow the west via a ditch and culvert. Wetland 3 is a very 3 Manage 2 1 Fresh meadow wetland shallow isolated depression. 1 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report I. INTRODUCTION The 3625 Jacobs Mill Road site was examined on April 12, 2012 for the presence and extent of wetland. The 7.32-acre site was located in Section 32, Township 118N, Range 23W, City of Orono,Hennepin County,Minnesota. Generally the site was located southwest of the intersection of Jacobs Mill Road and Stubbs Bay Road(Figure 1). The site was comprised of all of Hennepin County PID 32-118-23-24-0013. The site was comprised of moderately undulating Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome dominated meadow and was vacant of buildings or other structures (Figure 2). Adjacent land use was large-lot single family homes. II. METHODS Wetlands were identified using Routine Determination methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual(Waterways Experiment Station, 1987)and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region(Version 2.0)as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetlands,which met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pink pin flags and located by Demars-Gabriel surveyors. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at representative locations along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type being sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 18-20 inches(unless otherwise noted)utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used in reporting are from the NTCHS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Version 7,2010)which are commonly found in the Midwest. 2 Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2012 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar, R.W. and Kartesz, J.T. 2009.North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List,version 2.4.0 (https://wetland�lants.usace.army.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover,NH, and BONAP, Chapel Hill,NC.) III. RESULTS Review of Soils,NWI,and DNR Information The National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) (Excelsior Quadrangle, U.S. Fish& Wildlife Service 1999)showed PEMF/PEMC wetland complex within site boundaries(Figure 3). The Soil Survey of Hennepin County,Minnesota (http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo� showed the following soil types within or near site boundaries (Figure 4). Partially hydric means that at least one component of the map unit is rated as hydric and at least one component is rated as not hydric. SMU Ma Unit Name H dric? L24A Glencoe loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes All Hydric L35A Lerdal loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Partially Hydric L37B Angus loam,morainic, 2 to 5 percent slopes Partially Hydric L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes,eroded Partially Hydric L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes All Hydric L 132A Hamel-Glencoe,depressional,complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes Partially Hydric The DNR Protected Waters Map,Hennepin County(http://deli.dnr.state.mn.usn showed DNR Protected Wetland 842W in the southwest corner of the site (Figure 5). Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on April 12,2012. Three wetlands were identified and delineated on the subject site(Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix A. The following description of the wetlands and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time new-growth herbaceous vegetation and tree and shrub leaves were present. Wetland hydrology was assumed to be normal for that date based normal precipitation amounts for March and April (Appendix B). The survey of the wetland boundaries is presented in Appendix C. MNRAM analysis results are included in Appendix D. Wetland 1 was a Type 4 (PEMF/PEMC/PEMB)deep marsh, shallow marsh, and fresh meadow wetland complex dominated by cattail reed canary grass,and lake sedge with lesser amounts of jewelweed, stinging nettle, and giant goldenrod. Soils observed below the wetland boundary 3 were black mucky loam to 16 inches meeting the F1 indicator for hydric soil (loamy mucky mineral). Free water was observed at 10 inches below the soil surface in the sample borehole. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology included geomorphic position and the FAC-Neutral Test. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by Kentucky bluegrass with lesser amounts of smooth brome and Canada goldenrod. Soils at the upland transect location were black silty clay loam to 14 inches, underlain by black clay loam to 46 meeting the Al2 indicator for hydric soil (thick dark surface) (professional experience). No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed. The delineated boundary followed an abrupt change in vegetation composition and a slight change in topography. Wetland 1 corresponded to an NWI mapped PEMF/PEMC wetland and DNR Protected Wetland 842W,and an area mapped with hydric soils(Glencoe and Klossner)on the soil survey. Wetland 1 rated as a Mange 1 wetland based on on-site observations and our MnRAM analysis. Wetland 2 was a Type 1 (PEMAd)partially drained, fresh meadow wetland swale dominated by reed canary grass. Soils observed below the wetland boundary were black clay loam to 46 inches meeting the Al2 indicator for hydric soil (thick dark surface) (professional experience). No free water or saturated soils were observed in the sample borehole. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology included geomorphic position and the FAC-Neutral Test. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by Kentucky bluegrass with lesser amounts of Canada goldenrod and reed canary grass. Upland soils were black clay loam to 46 inches meeting the Al2 indicator for hydric soil(thick dark surface) (professional experience). No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed. The delineated boundary followed an abrupt change in vegetation composition and a slight change in topography. Wetland 2 did not correspond to any NWI mapped wetlands, but was located within an area mapped with very poorly drained,poorly drained, and somewhat poorly drained soils (Hamel-Glencoe)on the soil survey. Wetland 2 rated as a Mange 2 wetland based on on-site observations and our MnRAM analysis. Wetland 3 was a Type 1 (PEMA)fresh meadow wetland dominated by reed canary grass. Soils observed below the wetland boundary were black clay loam to 46 inches meeting the Al2 indicator for hydric soil(thick dark surface)(professional experience). No free water or saturated soils were observed in the sample borehole. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology included geomorphic position and the FAC-Neutral Test. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by Kentucky bluegrass with lesser amounts of Canada goldenrod and reed canary grass. Upland soils were black clay loam to 46 inches meeting the Al2 indicator for hydric soil(thick dark surface) (professional experience). No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology were observed. 4 The delineated boundary followed an abrupt change in vegetation composition and a very slight change in topography. Wetland 3 did not correspond to any NWI mapped wetlands, but was located within an area mapped with very poorly drained,poorly drained, and somewhat poorly drained soils (Hamel-Glencoe)on the soil survey. Wetland 3 rated as a Mange 2 wetland based on on-site observations and our MnRAM analysis. Other Areas No other areas with wetland vegetation or hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown as wetland on the NWI map. 5 V. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation Completed by: Melissa Lauterbach-Barrett, Soil Scientist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1085 Professional Soil Scientist No. 45067 � Report reviewed by: Date: Mav 24, 2013 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 6 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Wetland Delineation Report Figures: Figure 1 —Site Location Map Figure 2—Aerial Photograph Figure 3—NWI Map Figure 4—Soil Survey Map Figure 5 —DNR Protected Waters Map Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. zo� � � 6 ('i� � 6[S{A'vP N � Z h'�LP l � � � :C7R£ � o � j .� r � C�U5��1: Z' .—�y '` � '�� .3,n�J ;��', J tf2 Z Wayr.ata 81vd W Wayzata Btvd W — 1t2 Dani�ls St . : 12 : _ _ rc �� 81 � �t`� Wt c Site Location �:, 4 „ m w�+�,� � t..,K �r+ a :� tab G � b:'atertown�d us A �9 m 5.., JeVaf�L:1 � '^ � m yy- LO? J ^� �a .� � � � y : � T � y � } J �} Bays:de R� -u � �u�s�, �, o- r Sti o} Fox Si 4, l_71(1C�' �' �Pb��r y�,� _ - '��.�-..'C•'a:fi.._!4?'3i._� o._�3�C•Y.:3 �.. ,.�.. Figure 1 — Site Location Map 3625 Jacobs Mill Road (KES No. 2oi2-o16) �, . Orono,Minnesota - `-' � TN No Scale KJOL11t1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �w titi Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. 'M �� , �; , , " � .. �� ,� r ,�^�� _ , - ' '��' � , ,�.,. '� . �s., � " , �� y� � � �� w��E, � � ,� � � � *,�F , �z � ��"' ,° _ � p '�� +� . " � �"`� �. °`'� �` , �. k��,�� q � p�nf : �'� � ,,y ,�• y p dd� s' •'?�. . � A i�v,`e'l•' r . . ,„ + r . ,.. � � < � n e , � a� � � �� .. �� • •.}� • �. �'j-�?.��i � `� � � p."� t"� +ly,� �r � � "'-m�^ t: �M a; � „. � F ♦ -�� a _ � \�� . -, eyF ., .` bww, 1� . �'.rc *y! �,.n ' �' ' � 4 � s . � �, � �� w� s - �.. � e '., r : . .. !. . . 11 " � " . . ,a. ? '� �' , �y� �� , _ .� . '�.., M�" + _ . . � � �� Site Location � �2;,.�� -� ��` , .� : . ,.„ � .� � .. � a . � � � ..,,. ;�- � � ��. �� , � #: , �� ° � , � �. . _ . . . � . � _ � _ _� � . � _ ��' ,j. �;., � � �� ; �• ` r �.y�• .g ��' . � ` . g '� . � ��' �' �� .IP3-UPL` ��::. � '"t � m, . _ .� P3-WE" ,�� '� ` � �,. . ' ° .� , r� �.. . t ��"�� x�, � SP1-UPL .:�� -� �� - �" �� ,,� �'`�:.��` � ,��'S -WET SPZ- '�E-� •'��' fi t#' " � y�-. : � � it'�,� z . .�` 9�=�"'1��, °a' , .'"�` . � �" � . ...� �� ,� r � . ,� ,� .� , �� . , ....�� '.+�;: '�' . . � � , „ _ _ ,� . .� - - - t �. � ' � ' " ` � � -� �,�� . . >, � � � ^ � , 4 �a < ,,;' .. ,� � e��....�,�*� - . s.,�" ��. r'^h., ,�i- �R � ��g}a��, . . ''��r/iti�i. ' � t � � �� . r r-' �.r f � `' ��, � , , � <�- , . , , . . �.' s* �`f � ,: r � � ,,, � . '� F '+t. , ,:, ��. � � ' ' � . � a f ^ Y ♦ ` V t . r; v„V fi . s r. .h:d . ... _..' R4 ... � .p. ,.. w <. .. . x g " "` °� �, + ��` ,r�:, � h � "` rv��., � � �� °� , r . .,, , < ,�, � � , ,� . Y . � _ '`M �� . �,< .�� ,. �, � ,�,. ,� � . � �r, � � ��` � - ,,�� , —� � � . ri ,, � � � �.� .. ., L f�; » �e' . ` !� ,�` `'• , � �,. - s�� - � � ^� .,; . *i �. '' � �` �S �'{ . � " r +d�.. . - . . y ,� r - , .� r x ��r �' �`� � �� i r�i� .,�J}S mM. .x q i'4`w �f 5 , . ` •�'� �.'�W� M M , ,.,"� aTr r� - �'"� K '. � � r � y .,. , .. . � . d�. "a" ` ,��. ,+ +`�r} ,+,,°� . � �.. ^. !r�. . °° " ,," � " .. r{ .nr�„� �,�, ��y � . � - r_ '' a Mr x �� .�i� � *' � �•1,�' .,w a �- � , i a,r'` '�� i . . •,,- °�. .� ^� . . � . , . . .. , . �}� �. �'c�,�w,� _ �:.� �f�;; . .+C^ �,�. '� _ -� �. . r � i . '�_ _. Figure 2 - 2012 Aerial Photograph 3625 Jacobs Mill Road (KES No. 2012-016) � � �, Orono,Minnesota - `� � TN 1 inch � 154 feet '�— KJOL11t1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY ��1i Note: Site boundaries on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. - � �* �,.f � .- �-.. .,, ._�� ,� � f .d►L._ PE PE � �ti �� y �P�MC 'z'`—" � � ` ��.�- 3 �� ' � � � $�-� B M . -.� ' -- .�, �- � _ _ ; � .�..�.... P rnrss�cd �k � EA�C d ,,,,,� ,. �� "�`� � ,�,,., ' _ ��,�� y,, j' ``,,,�/--•� �� --�- �� M d � � `� + � EP - ` � r„�""� � i ��..� . ``,?. �� Site Location � � ��l �� r,� _ -� -- � �, � . � , .�- ,. ,�� " ' .�, ../ . ,v� RF�ldEh � �� C � � � - '�' _ � • � • ��Q/�, - .�. IJ . . �„_ . . �� :� V� • � t _ l \ � _ �� _ `� �. Figure 3 — NWI Map (USGS Excelsior Quadrangle) 3625 Jacobs Mill Road (KES No. 2012-016) �, . Orono, Minnesota � `` � TN 1 inch �628 feet KJOL11C1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �w ^�v Note: Site boundaries on this �gure are approximate and do not constitute an of�cial survey product. �'�"• ' � �..'�: �. �. � � ,� . _ r .� y � � s� � � � � � �� z . ... . � 4 $� . � � �. _ — �� ; . . . +�.�1�� q A , � . ,.. ,, .'. , � � 's.,, . , , ... . �l' r�, � � ' � '1 :^, -. # � 4 � ��` . ..- �;�N . . �� 3�� +�. � � �� ..:� < .:. .� . . .} d ......-� ,�s. � ��..:: � �. � � `�'}� � .. �� .� ,� ;�;2 � . �,� �« �'�' M1 �y. � '"§ ?�„� .. . �+!,��9C �„�� G ' >. ' � . � a � ,. �� . � K y � � ,� , , t� _ N ��< � � � � � � �� .��' � � �.� „ � � „�� 3�� " �' � � �„�v� , i � �. n � . � , �:� ' °� �� Site Location � � , � V� �� ri �� n�� < „ , � � . � � � � � . � � � ; � � �.��: � „ � v� , � � � , � ,, ,� � a ,� �, _� � � � .� , .. „ n : � . � � ' `' ° ��w � ,, n � � �� _, � �� ..� . Soil Legend � �� .� � ...� �. = � L24A-Glencoe loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes(hydric) �°��° �'°� _ � '� L35A-Lerdal loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes �.� � - L37B -Angus loam, morainic,2 to 5 percent slopes � ��. ' � ' L41C2—Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded ��.� �' " L49A -Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes(hydric) "�� L132A-Hamel-Glencoe, depressional, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes '' `� � � �� ..' ..��... i �.� �� Figure 4 — Soil Survey Map 3625 Jacobs Mill Road (KES No. 2012-016) � Orono, Minnesota � r , _, `' � TN 1 inch � 157 feet _-..,-�_ KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �..��., Note: Site boundaries on this figure are ��r �� approximate and do not constitute an � � �� t�:'.�, � �.x ,� � . _ official survey product. ,��, * �. � ,'�� .��" � �µ .,. ;� . ,�.��. ,,.,� ,„�� ''� -.'�}��,s�(� �� .�a �� „ � , _ � � � �� .� '�- �^-� � ,�r. , � . dR ; � �,,� ��, ,�;�., _ ,. DNR �., d . e "&-.� ,� �� .,. ,,� ° "� �, `PNr t ected t• � , w .� ' '� ' � . �3 � ;tl .�. '�,��^� �, a er 162P �� , ., . y ��s;,��+ � . ,��, '�.,, `, � � �;:,� . s*��"�� '�. � ° ;��" k �. , .... .� ,>...�b i" '�► �� _ � .��.. • � � x, 4 "�k *a s° .,�, .:..,, ,a► . �. �- � ;1 �ew. .. , � _� ��_nrw+� ,a,� .. � m.�_ �s . "� � ' ` „ , _'.. x� �. r �M4> „ � ,.m .a.�......0 v«...,�.r ,M' s.w �, .� �� .. _ � � ��... %�'�f �� .�t .. �.► �,.,.-�s � �� '.�, t `_'�'� � ��'.�1,± � ". .�y� �+�+P. � � � ;a. . ,ar �Ite j,OCatlOil ��, k � �!�- f�� , , , ,�' '�� "� "r,�*� • . ,� e .� � + �, ` � �. �,, �. � � , ,� `�''� � ; � � , � � r � �� ' � �t:�� "� �� , '�"�� ,�: � � _ � , a. . , . � � < ., ,t'�r- . �� ,�. � � � , �. � �, , �"' � , .�.r . � � ' . . , �� . � �, !��, ��,>, , �r � �* � �� "+ v � a- �,�` ,�+ �..=k� �.�„'�.,��+ ,�'a ,�, '�y �: �� ' � + a ��tc�a"�.w��aaa� z S�'"��, ` r ��w� ,.a ay � qqq�� . a i +�q4;v. 6 M� � � � '� � �� 's � �� " a" tK,� ''�` .h" ��1g=6 '° �� d ..._ ,.� � ��., �/ y. � �,. �� ., rt a-�1 �! "� 1'� ` �� . y�- � � ^ - a ,� ♦ ,.,.. , . ... � "' " , e st -. . .. � �� _ . . .,,�,� . 'c� �'�� .: +� � .+, �rr��. � ;.�1�� r �f„.' ^�.�` b Y��•"x„a, �� M � DNR __�i ." "��r�' �� '�a.�� `�.. �� Rt„ �j� �A��t�a� ��4at,s � 'ir e �.;9k�-� •.� ,,� ��'� < *�� . ,,�y d � �.w �` � , �"� '�'� ° , ,�< _ ��,��:w�.r�g•��.,�. Wetland �� , . � � � r ��{p,�� . "'•�.,�'�r�.�p.�w`"`"� I.��'!�'f�l`f'1�.� '�r`�,• � .. � ,..«: :,� '�„'. .�"�p^��"�L .+... �� ""° r.�: 'A " �'9'"� Y ��.��`�+� . �w'�" ,w��,.�„ "�wY: } � �'� 'a`�,,..�i . ""�"�d�4 {�'�� '�t�T". .�, ��: � �*�,�a� ,��'. N � � '�� ""�'�k�°{e,,".�� +�� ' � �' �r ,� � m�;"�` m.Y � � > -v +e �� , �p,+�e4,sy �`�'� » 9#�r � � �r � � q t�� _�i�"� ir: r • a`-. � � '�'�w"4',` �.. 1"'!1 �.`. ..'`, �. .'«w��"� �� w�^a��4.,"�"�$ �� 1� � �� , � x ��.� �� R �� a� � } � � i � � � 'S � "- � � r� X.'�a��:k�'+► , # . L "o, ♦ , a . � . „y 11 r. A �» �r �a t_ �,/'t " '.'� � � �� ' . °rt:.t"'�;.�'��,#�'v��e.� w ':�. 9A ;�s " r r � �� y / „o �.._ - w�pr �., _ . , <. _ . ..1 ° ,t�w- "„ ^` �,' r a, ,�. ,n `� �.: � i�.�`"d�.y;v"�a±�`y�" �A,+,�' `��, �`�k �� r. � � w �� y . ,��" �; � � � � - .. �&� *tvt "* . . _ a,.� 1�. "�'4� � �+�,'' '�*�� ,, �--r x � '� � Y" '� �#l"' � � �,�, �..�w. � �.�" • ` �� '.� �� .` ,�M ,�� " � . �" ` '�a`, ��- y ` ��+ � a, r� . .a., 4. wti ',�* "'„.. �,:, ��A� � '�� Nk_ 3�+� �� a. ��9� ��i � Figure 5 — DNR Protected Waters Map 3625 Jacobs Mill Road (KES No. 2012-016) �, . Orono, Minnesota ` �- TN 1 inch�510 feet +-yti,� KJOL11t1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �jv 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A: Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite 3625 Jacons Mill Road City/County: Orono/Henn Sampling Date: 4/12/12 ApplicanUOwner: Schmid State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-UPL Investigator(s): M.Barrett 3ection,Township,Range: 32, 118,23 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): slight convex Slope(%): 1-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameGlenoce VWI Classification: none Are climatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions normal based on precip amounts for preceding 30 days. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00°k (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sa�lin4/Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total°k Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 80 x 3= 240 5 FACU species 30 x 4= 120 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 110 (A) 360 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.27 2 bromus inermis 15 N FACU 3 Solidago canadensis 15 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 53.0* � Morphological adaptations*(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation" 110 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) •Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 y rop ytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) °/a Type" Loc"" Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 2/1 100 SiCL 14-46 10YR 2/1 100 clay loam 46+ 10YR 5/1 100 clay loam assumed-see below *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ""Location:PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surtace(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) •Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): ema s: Soil profile matches mapped soil type. Soil is likely depleted at some depth that is deeper than the 46-inch auger handle. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aqalv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two repuired) Surtace Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation�sible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace(BS) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Fie d Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: emar s: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite 3625 Jacobs Mill Road City/County: Orono/Henn Sampling Date: 4/12/12 ApplicanUOwner: Schmid State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-WET Investigator(s): M.Barrett 3ection,Township,Range: 32, 118,23 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Depression Local retief(concave,convex,none): flat Slope(%): 0-1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameKlossner VWI Classification: PEMF/PEMC Are climatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Wetland 1 Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions normal based on precip amounts for preceding 30 days. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sanlina/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total°�Cover of: 2 OBL species 75 x 1 = 75 3 FACW species 40 x 2= 80 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 115 (A) 155 (B) 1 Typha latifolia 50 Y OBL Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.35 2 Carex lacustris 25 Y OBL 3 Phalaris arundinacea 25 Y FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Impatiens capensis 15 N FACW Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0' � Morphological adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 115 =Tota1 Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (PIOt SIZ@: 30 ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetla�d hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 y rop y ic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confrm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) °/a Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-12 N 2.5/ 100 mucky loam 'Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surtace(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weUand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): emarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aaolvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils �Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(89) Other(Explain in Remarks) Fie d bservations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes � No Depth(inches): 10 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: emarks: Ponded water within interior of wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite 3625 Jacons Mill Road City/County: Orono/Henn Sampling Date: 4/12/12 ApplicanUOwner: Schmid State: MN Sampling Point: SP2/3-UPL Investigator(s): M.Barrett 3ection,Township,Range: 32, 118,23 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): slight hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat slope Slope(%): 1-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel-Glencoe VWI Classification: none Are climatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N` Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarics:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions normal based on precip amounts for preceding 30 days. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover SaplinalShrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 5 x 2= 10 4 FAC species 90 x 3= 270 5 FACU species 15 x 4= 60 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 110 (A) 340 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 90 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.09 2 Solidago canadensis 15 N FACU 3 Phalaris arundinacea 5 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is<_3.0* � Morphological adaptations"(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation" 110 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic p y rop y ic 0 =Total Cover �egetation present? N* Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) " Prevalence Index> 3. Only dominant species is FAC status. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2/3-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type• Loc** Texture Remarks 0-46 10YR 2/1 100 clay loam 46+ 10YR 5/1 100 clay loam assumed-see below "Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) His6c Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surtace(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): ema s: Soil profile matches mapped soil type. Soil is likely depleted at some depth that is deeper than the 46-inch auger handle. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is repuired:check all that aoolv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(814) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surtace(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace(B8) Gauge or Well Data(09) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Fie d bservations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No �Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: emarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite 3625 Jacons Mill Road City/County: OronolHenn Sampling Date: 4/12/12 ApplicanUOwner: Schmid State: MN Sampling Point: SP2/3-WET Investigator(s): M.Barrett 3ection,Township,Range: 32, 118,23 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): sllight depression/swale Local relief(concave,convex,none): slight concave Slope(%): 0-1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameHamel-Glencoe VWI Classification: none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the yea�'? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soi�present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y F yes,optional wetland site ID: Wetland 2&3 Remarks:(Explain atternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Climatic conditions normal based on precip amounts for preceding 30 days. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover t Species Status Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saolina/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total°k Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 100 x 2= 200 4 � FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 100 (A) 200 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0* � Morphological adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 100 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless distufied or problematic 2 y rop y ic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Rema�lcs:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2/3-WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type` Loc"' Texture Remarks 0-46 10YR 2/1 100 clay loam 46+ 10YR 5/1 100 clay loam assumed-see below *Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. "*Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Strat�ed Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark SurFace(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): ema s: Soil profile matches mapped soil type. Soil is likely depleted at some depth that is deeper than the 46-inch auger handle. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is reauired;check all that aoolv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two repuiredl Surtace Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surtace Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(814) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) , Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-NeuVal Test(D5) Inundation�sible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surtace(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(89) Other(Explain in Remarks) Fie d bservations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No �Depth(inches): hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: emarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B: Precipitation Data 3625 Jacobs Mill Road, Orono: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals : 2012 Target: T118 rt22 S1, �at: 44.98598 �on: 93.61474 mon year cc tttN rrw ss nnnn o000000o pre 7an 2012 217935 .49 Feb 2012 217935 1.73 Mar 2012 217935 1.70 Apr 2012 27 118N 23W 22 SWCD 2.08 March/April �aily Records Date Precip. Date Precip. Mar 1, 2012 .10 Apr 1, 2012 - Mar 2, 2012 0 Apr 2, 2012 .O1 Mar 3, 2012 0 apr 3, 2012 .14 Mar 4, 2012 0 Apr 4, 2012 - Mar 5, 2012 0 Apr 5, 2012 - Mar 6, 2012 0 Apr 6, 2012 - Mar 7, 2012 .05 Apr 7, 2012 - Mar 8, 2012 0 apr 8, 2012 - Mar 9, 2012 0 ,4pr 9, 2012 .11 Mar 10, 2012 0 Apr 10, 2012 - Mar 11, 2012 .25 Apr 11, 2012 - Mar 12, 2012 .10 Apr 12, 2012 - Mar 13, 2012 0 Apr 13, 2012 - Mar 14, 2012 0 Apr 14, 2012 - Mar 15, 2012 0 Apr 15, 2012 - Mar 16, 2012 0 Apr 16, 2012 1.02 Mar 17, 2012 0 Apr 17, 2012 .23 Mar 18, 2012 0 Apr 18, 2012 0 Mar 19, 2012 .60 Apr 19, 2012 0 Mar 20, 2012 0 Apr 20, 2012 0 Mar 21, 2012 .10 Apr 21, 2012 - Mar 22, 2012 .20 Apr 22, 2012 - Mar 23, 2012 0 Apr 23, 2012 .Z8 Mar 24, Z012 0 Apr 24, 2012 .O1 Mar 25, 2012 .05 Apr 25, 2012 .05 Mar 26, 2012 0 Apr 26, 2012 - Mar 27, 2012 0 Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 28, 2012 0 apr 28, 2012 - Mar 29, 2012 .25 Apr 29, 2012 - Mar 30, 2012 0 apr 30, 2012 .23 Mar 31, 2012 0 � 1981-2010 Summary Statistics nJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec W,4RM ANN WAT , 30% I 0.46 0.41 1.08 1.91 i 2.39 3.19 �� 2.69 2.91 2.26 1.25 1.07 0.59 16.43 26.35 �il 26.03 70% 1.14 0.85 1.95 2.76 I� 4.00 5.34 I 4.13 4.83 4.14 3.24 � 1.99 1.39 � 21.61 33.44 32.85 mean ' 0.80 i 0.75 1.69 2.56 3.41 4.41 3.88 4.06 3.40 2.39 I 1.65 1.13 � 19.15 30.12 29.96 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C: Wetland Boundary Survey � 77/M SB0.7M 2.V,707B Y 107 �-•� �� --[ f- �.'1 3 PMW GYIO-U[CL56)��W £ .��n�� .�� ^ lC15SWY�!V3 l/ � �A M P wl�a��wi6 'S�°'�uol�!MWI f[N �aad wwins «11w°�`�+e.'w.•':��aM.""".„'�.�,,:s.w� �maerr�-m�va� $ � _ .. �,_ - ,. . ._., _ �. �� —�--------- --- ( o 0 � � J� _ . ._ / ._-.. ..-- --- -.—. �� 1\�0 i � �� S 3��^ �� OS � �, i. - �� . .. �.� , � , .. . .. ��` r-�� '��r-nr � ��a-.,. .-ul � �,�. ' . � �, �q`� y � � \ � . `� m..+.,r, .. ._ . _. �_� ` , �` �� , -- �-y�,.l�� - - �,�� , '-$ S � I � $ \ s-�,." �y� oLn M� .,y ..., �-.r / CA• •,�l?p�S N\i-� �R :,. i-]z ". __ .�-�r - __--� �' I � \ -- _ -�bq . -�,�I I \y- `� � 6S'6L!M..00,OO.SB 5 / i I n�� / � �-� �,� - _ � I � nr� ��N�J-1'J . � . OS / �'� �� `�N'b7ry� � - I ��,�_� \ g � � � _ - - � I � ,,� � _ — — � � � �; ��y= � � � � � � - � �'�� '�z�._ � � � J � � -�-�� ; � - - - - - =.:� � .. — ,,�� ., . , _,� � __ � � 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix D: MNRAM Analysis Results i Management Classification Report for lacobs Mill Rd Orono WL1 Jacobs Mill Rd ID: 9 HENNEPIN County Watershed,# Corps Bank Service Area Based on the MnRAM data input from field and office review and using the classification settings as shown below, this wet�and is classified as Manage 1 Functional rank of this wetland Self-defined classification value based on MnRAM data Functional Category settings for this management level Moderate Vegetative Diversity/Integrity High -- -- -- ---- - ---- - --- High Habitat Structure (wildlife) High � Moderate Amphibian Habitat Moderate Not Applicable Fish Habitat High Not Applicable Shoreline Protection Moderate Low Aesthetic/Cultural/Rec/Ed and Habitat High/ Moderate Moderate Stormwater/Urban Sensitivity and Vegetative Diversity High/ Moderate High Wetland Water Quality and Vegetative Diversity High/ Moderate High Characteristic Hydrology and Vegetative Diversity High/ Moderate Moderate Flood/Stormwater Attenuation* - Not Applicable Commericial use* High Moderate Downstream Water Quality* - The critical function that caused this wetland to rank as Manage 1 was Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure Details of the formula for this action are shown below: Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Str (Q3e*2+Q37+Q38+Q40+Q41+(Q23+Q24+Q25)/3+ Q13+Q20)/9 Question Value Description 13 1 Outlet: hydrologic regime 20 0.1 Stormwater runoff 23 1 Buffer width 24 1 Adjacent area Management 25 0.5 Adjacent area diversity 37 0.5 Vegetation cover interspersion 38 0.5 Community interspersion 3e 0.4 <No Description Found> *The classification value settings for these functions are not adjustable Management Classification Report for Jacobs Mill Rd Orono WLi Jacobs Mill Rd ID: 9 HENNEPIN County Watershed,# Corps Bank Service Area 40 0.5 Wetland interspersion/landscape 41 1 Wildlife barriers This report was printed on: Thursday, May 23, 2013 *The classification value settings for these functions are not adjustable Management Classification Report for Jacobs Mill Rd Orono WL2 Jacobs Mill Rd ID: 10 HENNEPIN County Watershed,# Corps Bank Service Area Based on the MnRAM data input from field and office review and using the classification settings as shown below, this wetland is classified as Manage 2 Functional rank of this wetland Self-de�ned classification value based on MnRAM data Functional Category settings for this management level Low Vegetative Diversity/Integrity Moderate ------ —— — - _—_ . _—_--------- - �Moderate Habitat Structure (wildlife) Moderate 1 Not Applicable Amphibian Habitat Low Not Applicable Fish Habitat Moderate Not Applicable Shoreline Protection Low Low Aesthetic/Cultural/Rec/Ed and Habitat Moderate/ Low Moderate Stormwater/Urban Sensitivity and Vegetative Diversity -/ - Moderate Wetland Water Quality and Vegetative Diversity -/ - Moderate Characteristic Hydrology and Vegetative Diversity -/ - Moderate Flood/Stormwater Attenuation* - Not Applicable Commericial use* - Moderate Downstream Water Quality* - The critical function that caused this wetland to rank as Manage 2 was Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure Details of the formula for this action are shown below: Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Str (Q3e*2+Q39+Q40+Q41+(Q23+Q24+Q25)/3+Q13+ Q20)/8 Question Value Description 13 0.1 Outlet: hydrologic regime � 20 0.1 Stormwater runoff 23 1 Buffer width 24 1 Adjacent area Management � 25 0.5 Adjacent area diversity 39 0.5 Detritus 3e 0.1 <No Description Found> 40 0.5 Wetland interspersion/landscape 'The classification value settings for these functions are not adjustable Management Classification Report for Jacobs Mill Rd Orono WL2 lacobs Mill Rd ID: 10 HENNEPIN County Watershed,# Corps Bank Service Area 41 1 Wildlife barriers This report was printed on: Thursday, May 23, 2013 *The classification value settings for these functions are not adjustable Management Classification Report for Jacobs Mill Rd Orono WL3 Jacobs Mill Rd ID: 11 HENNEPIN County Watershed,# Corps Bank Service Area Based on the MnRAM data input from field and office review and using the classification settings as shown below, this wetland is classified as Manage 2 Functional rank of this wetland Self-defined classiflcation value based on MnRAM data Functional Category settings for this management level Low Vegetative Diversity/Integrity Moderate (Moderate Habitat Structure (wildlife) Moderate � Not Applicable Amphibian Habitat Low Not Applicable Fish Habitat Moderate Not Applicable Shoreline Protection Low Low Aesthetic/Cultural/Rec/Ed and Habitat Moderate/ Low Moderate Stormwater/Urban Sensitivity and Vegetative Diversity -/ - Moderate Wetland Water Quality and Vegetative Diversity -/ - Moderate Characteristic Hydrology and Vegetative Diversity -/ - Moderate Flood/Stormwater Attenuation* - Not Applicable Commericial use* - Moderate Downstream Water Quality* - The critical function that caused this wetland to rank as Manage 2 was Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure Details of the formula for this action are shown below: Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Str (Q3e*2+Q39+Q40+Q41+(Q23+Q24+Q25)/3+Q13+ Q20)/8 Quesfion Value Description 13 0.1 Outlet: hydrologic regime 20 0.1 Stormwater runoff 23 1 Buffer width 24 1 Adjacent area Management 25 0.5 Adjacent area diversity 39 0.1 Detritus 3e 0.1 <No Description Found> 40 0.5 Wetland interspersion/landscape •The classification value settings for these functions are not adjustable Management Classification Report for Jacobs Mill Rd Orono WL3 lacobs Mill Rd ID: 11 HENNEPIN County Watershed,# Corps Bank Service Area 41 0.5 Wildlife barriers This report was printed on: Thursday, May 23, 2013 *The classification value settings for these functions are not adjustable Print Form L'S_lrmc Corps uC Eusiurri's St.Paul Districr Request for Corps of Engineers «'etl�nd Deline�tion Review Please eiiter tlie follo�ving ;eueral infoni��tion abotit the property iinder revie�v: Name of propertS�o��-ner Kurt Schmid Propert,y Address(\o. & Street,City, State, Zip Code) 3625 Jacobs Mill Road, Orono, MN 55356 Lat. - Lon . � decimal de rees Counh�Hennepin Location: 1/-� Section 32 To«�nship 118 Range23 Size of re�-ie��area-10 acre(s) By submis�ion of this�vetland deliiieatiuu repurt I am reqiiestin�that the U.S. �7n�•C'oips of Eusiueer�. St. Palil Dish�ict provide iiie�vith tlie followiiig(check only oue bo�): ❑✓ �Vetland Deluieation Coiicun�euce. Coiicturence witli a�vetl�uid delineatioii is a�vritteii iiotiticati�n ti�om the Coips concuirina. not coucturin�. OT C011llllelltlll$011 tlll'�vetlaud boundaries deliueated on a property. L7nder This request, tl�e Coips �vill tiot address the jtu�isdicrioii�l stan�s of tlie wetlands ori tlie property�, onl�-the bounci��ries of the re5ources withui the revie�v area. ❑ Preliuiuiaiti•Tiuisdictioiial Deteiziiitiatiou. :�preliiiunary jtu�i�dictio�ial deteiYiuiiation is a noti- bindiu��vritten iudicatiou that there ivay be�vaters of the LTuited States, includiu,wetlauds, on a parcel or indicatious of the approYiinate loc�tion(s) of lvaters of the Uuited States or�veHands on a parcel. Preliuunary juri5dictional deteiuunations are aci�-isory in nattue��ncl may not be appealed. ❑�ppro�-ed Turisdictional DeteLYiun�tion. �u approved jtn�i5dictional detennuiation is au ofticial Coips cleteniuuation that juri�dictioual waters �f tl�e United States or na�•iaable �vaters of the[,Tuited 5tates. or both. are eidier present or absent ou the propern'. :�i approE-ed jurisdictional cleteunuiatiou precisel5� identities the liuuts of those tvater� on the project site deteinuned to be jiu�isdictioual under the Cleau«%ater�ct or Rivers .�nd Harbors�ct. :�ppro�-ed jurisclictional detenivuations�au be relied upou bv the affected parn� for a period of ti��e S�ears. .-�u appro��ed jurisdictioual deteimuiatiou may be appealed tlu�oti�h tlie Coips' adiiuiiistrati�•e appeal process. I�i orcier for the Coip� to process yotu�request. the�vetlaud ilelineation inu�t be prepared in accordance �vith the 1987 Coips of En�ineers ��'etland Delineation�Sanual, any appro�-ed Regional Supplements to tlie 1987 �Ianual. and tlie Ciuideluies f�r Submittintr��etland Deliueatioiis.in:�Iiiuies�ta anci�Vi�cousin (littp:%��v�tilv.in�l�.u5ace.aiYu`�.mil/reaulatoiti'-). � / Reqtiestor � D�te 5/24/2013 :�iaulz(n,pzd) Melissa Barrett - • . - • • � ' ' � � • • ` • • � � - • � - • : • • . 1. Project/Site Information ProjecUSite Name: 3625 Jacobs Mill Road Local Government Unit: MCWD Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): T118N, R23W, Sec 32 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: Kurt Schmid or Steve Sexton Address: 3625 Jacobs Mill Road City, State, Zip: Orono, MN 55356 E-mail: steve@minnetonkacustomhomes.com Phone: 612- 386- 4494 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name (if applicable): Kjolhaug Environmental Contact Person: Melissa Barrett Address: 26105 Wild Rose Lane City, State, Zip: Shorewood, MN 55331 E-mail:melissa@kjolhaugenv.com Phone: 952-401-8757 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: X Wetland Boundary(must attach wetland delineation report) X Wettand Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the landow r to pur�ue this de� rmination. ��-- S z� 13 Applicant or Authorized Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check wifh your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only � Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08