HomeMy WebLinkAbout#4671-denying variances-2001 � �
%///'�_\�\
� � � \
O 0��,.
�s. - , � I j C ITY of ORONO
� � ;,
��t G'�'ii� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
�\kESHOj/ NO. '� S � .�
_
A RESOLUTIO� DEIV'YING
VARIA\CES PER
NIUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 AND
SECTION 10.56, SL'BDIVISION 16 (L) (2)
FILE #2636
`VHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
`VHEREAS,pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq.and 46?et. seq.,the City Council
of the City of Orono has adopted zoning re�ulations for the protection of the public health, safety
and general ���elfare; and
WHEREAS,Gary Cable and.Susan Cable(hereinafter "the applicants") are owners
of the property located at 3�32 Ivy Place within the City of Orono(hereinafter"the City")and legally
described as follo�vs:
Lots 179 and 180, Ta}�lor's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, Hennepin County,
Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
`VHEREAS, the applicants ha��e applied to the City of Orono for a ��ariance to
Municipal Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56, Subdi�-ision 16 (L) (2) to permit
3,3�6 s.f. (2�.4%)hardcover on the property��-here the land area within the 75-2�0' setback allows
3,250 s.£ (2�%) hardcover to permit an ice house within 7S of the lal:eshore to remain on the
property; and
�VHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendations
of the City staff and the Planning Commission; and the comments and��ritten statements submitted
by the applicant.
NO`V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota hereby denies the requested after-the-fact variances as described above based on one or
more of the fullowing findin�s of fact concerninQ this property:
PaQe 1 of 4
, � �
� ��
� O�
O O
��, CITY of ORONO
� �
�� G'�' � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
���SK j ruo. 4 f `� �
1. The property is located in the LR-1C zoning district, a single family lakeshore
residential district.
� 2. Properties in the lakeshore residential district and in the Shoreland Overlay District
are subject to hardcover regulations. The subject property is allowed to use 25% of
the land area beyond the 75' lakeshore setback for hardcover.
3. The total land area in the 75-2�0' lakeshore setback is 13,182.8 s.£ Allowed
hardcover allowed on the property is 25% of the area within the 75-250' lakeshore
setback. The total allowed hardcover on the property is 3,296 s.f.
4. Hardcover regulations do not permit any hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore.
5. The City of Orono's hardcover policy requires that properties that are redeveloping
not exceed allowed hardcover. That includes any eYisting or proposed hardcover
within 75'of the lakeshore be reduced from the amount of hazdcover that is allowed
on the property under the requirements of the hardcover ordinance. The ice house
is located within 75'of the lakeshore and does constitute hardcover on the property.
6. A building permit for a new house�vas issued on November 13,2000 based on a site
plan that met all requirements of the Zoning ordinances and Building Code.
Applicants were approved with the understanding that the future of the ice house
�vould be determined by the City though the variance application process. The
applicants submitted a written statement stating they �vould abide by the final
decision of the City regarding the future of the ice house building.
7. The City of Orono issued a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy on April 19,2001.
A condition of approval was the shed"ice house"be removed or get approval from
the City within 90 days.
8. The Planning Commission revie��-ed this application on November 20, 2000 and
tabled the item to allow the applicants an opportunity to revise the plan that would
at a minimum reduce the total hardcover on the property to not exceed the 25%limit
in the 75-250' setback.
Page 2 of 4 �
, ►,; �
���
�� �� �
0 0
��, CITY of ORONO
� �
��� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
�.kESK� rvo. 4 6 ?' 1
9. The Planrung Commission again reviewed the request on May 21, 2001 and
recommended denial by a vote of 4 to 0 based on the following findings:
A. New construction proj ects that demonstrate a suitable building area have been
held to the 25%hardcover limitation and the Planning Commission has not
looked favorably on applications the exceed allowed limits.
B. The Planning Commission agreed to table the application on November 20,
2000 to allow the applicants an opportunity to reduce hardcover. The plan
reviewed on May 21,2001 did not reduce hardcover from the plan reviewed
on November 20, 2000.
C. The approved site plan does not allow any hardcover for a sidewalk to the
front entrance or indicate hardcover that could be used for access to the third
stall of the gazage. �.
D. The Planning Commission did not make findings that could have supported
a hardship that would have required variances to allow hardcover in excess
of what is permitted on the property.
10. The granting of the requested variances would be contrary to the provisions of
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22,Subdivision 1 and Section 10.56,Subdivision
16(L)with which the applicants must first comply in order that variances be granted.
The Council finds that:
A. The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under the
conditions allowed by the official controls if the proposed variances are noi
granted.
B. Granting of the proposed variances would appear to serve as a convenience
to the applicants and the applicants have not demonstrated a reasonable
hardship or practical difficulty acceptable to the City Council to permit an ice
house to remain on the property eYceeding allowed standards.
Page 3 of 4
� � �.,. , .
���
�� 0�
O O
, C ITY of ORONO
� �
�� �,'�' ' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
���`�k'F1SKQ� NO. � � �a' `�
\` C. The conditions and Zoning Code limits imposed and eYisting on this property
generally apply to all other land and structures in the zoning district in which
this property is located as well as in adjacent residential zoning districts.
11. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City staff, comments by
the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health,safety and welfaze
of the community.
12. Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy approval the ice house building shall be removed
from the property. Removal of the ice house is required to be complete by August
17, 2001.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 23rd day of July, 2001.
ATTEST:
yi;� �.
�<{l � ��2t�� � /',�'�('�
Lincla S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of July,2001
by Barbara A. Peterson & Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
. -:�_� RACHEL DODCE L.���� ���
: , -�.
, . �`_"�, NCTARY PU6lIC-M�NNE�OTA
.( �•�>>;.�'
�� +.,.,a::��- i,fi,�,�„�,�,s,ian.s�,zoos Notary Public
>4 ti'y
`�c,'rr✓J,�a'...'.G
Page 4 of 4