HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-01336 - addn/remodel/repair ' � � CITY OF ORONO PERMIT NO.: 2011-01336
, � 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY
ORONO, MN 55356- DATE tssUED: 1U04/2011
952 249-4600 FAX: 952 249-4616
ADDRESS : 4099 HIGHWOOD RD
PIN : 07-117-23-44-0012
LEGAL DESC : HIGHWOOD LAKE MTKA
: LOT 014 BLOCK 000
PERMIT TYPE : ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR
PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL
CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPAIR
VALUATION : $ 10,000.00
NOTE: I2E'I'AINING WALL AND STAIRS
APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 191.75
SERAN III,ALONZO STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 5.00
4099 HIGHWOOD RD TOTAL 196.75
MOUND, MN 55364-
OWNER
SERAN III, ALONZO
4099 HIGHWOOD RD
MOUND, MN 55364-
AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT
The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to
the approved plans and specitications,applicable City approvals,and the
State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does
not grant pennission for additional or related work which requires separate
permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work
shall be compied with whether or not specitied herein.'1'his permit will
expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not
commenced within l80 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is
suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced.
"rhe applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are
requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be
revoke � ti� for d ause.
/
/ / / / G�
Applicant Per ' e ignature Date Iss e By Signature Date
SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE.
. !� g�
�� i
City of Orono _ , � � �
� � �
Building Permit Application
for New Structures or Additions
Mailing Address: Permit number: D/�—D�,
��„�0,�.\. PO Box 66
�O :_: O� Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: �(�� ��
r �sti
�I '`��' � Received by:
a ' �t ,,�, Street Address'
��'�C, ' ,�z� �ti/ 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: �`�.
L
l ��� Orono, MN 55356
�q��s�o�''� �i D ll� D/3�5
�=_—= Total Fee:
Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us
This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted.
Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print)
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Job Site Address: ''�oqq /-f����.,�o�,d !L/�
Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes No
If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be
required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed.
CONTRACTOR/APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: l�vo/L� i�fU(�C� �ttn/�.SC�v`��
State License# Expiration Date:
Phone: G!SZ �- 5�(�- �Co S� (office) (cell)
Mailing Address: ��7 (�_� ly-�h��,�� f.-��� City����/�`� ZIP: �����
Contact Person: �,g�/� �/t,�� Applicant is: Contractor / Homeowner (Circle One)
Email and/or Fax: `lie�.iyl�Il�4E i,e4�pS��.�@ �c-��✓�Z�/L B✓G^T- . �1/��'-
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: �}� � j� 'j=/t,q-/U
Phone (day): �' _ (o p7����k Cv/2 ,(r 3— � 0 2 �/
Address: ���j�����p� jZQ City: QQpr✓p ZIP: 5����
Email and/or Fax czs2rQ,� �(` _ «�„
ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORMATION:
Name: �f.s� �'�c�t-o/� f�B�d�LT�B�
Phone (day): p���S^ ��
Address: 'Z'L'7 �i/� -rjva� ity: ps�'� ZIP: ���
Email and/or Fax: � ��TS��v�+j i2,��--�����7 ���
PROJECT INFORMATION:
1.Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3. Structure Type 4. Sewage Disposal &
Water Supply
�New Construction [�Single Family with �Residence
Addition attached garage Garage/Accessory Bldg. �Public Sewer
❑Accessory Building ❑ Single Family with ❑ Deck
❑ Relocation detached garage ❑ Office/Commercial ❑ Private Sewer
[�bther. (specify) �`�" !`�c�✓�t- w ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse
❑ Public ❑ Stora e ❑ Public Water
l�n �7'�l N 9
"`Any earth movement may require ❑ Commercial ❑ Other(specify)
MCWD review& permits. ❑ Industrial �Private Well
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑ Other: (speCify)
18202 Minnetonka Blvd
Deephaven,MN 55391
Phone: 952-471-0590
Fax: 952-471-0682
www.minnehahacreek.or
Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ � � Q
STRUCTURE INFORMATION:
1. Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) 2. Type of Construction
a. Length (ft.)= �0 Number of bedrooms=� �-�lVood/Frame
❑ Masonry
b.Width(ft.)= ��� Number of garage stalls: ❑ Metal
Attached= 1�' ❑ Pole Bldg.
Areas in square feet Detached = ❑ ICF
❑ On-site Prefab
c. Basement= �`'l�O ❑ Off-site Prefab
d. 1 S�Story = 'O G ❑ Other(please specify):
e. 2"d Story= ! ���
f. 'h Story = �
g.Total Area= 3 q 3�
� �p� 5���
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed:
N ot
Enclos�sd A licable
[� ❑ Permit A lication
❑ , Pro osed Buildin Plans
❑ MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form
❑ Surve meetin all re uirements
❑ ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
❑ Hardcover Calculation s
❑ Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort
❑ ❑ Access Permit
❑ l4'` Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan
❑ En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above
❑ ❑ Plan Review Fee
❑ ❑ Other
APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
. Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department;
• Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500;
• Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they
are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative
but to reject it until it is complete;
• Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed;
• Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either
private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject
of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our
purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies
required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued.
• Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the
Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000
escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements.
� �
ApplicanYs Signature: � Date: �O���ZO/� __
� Pfan Review Checkiist for New Structures / Additions
Address/PID/Legal: "7�O 99 fI tbH Cvoo�O /�0,9�0
Description of work: IC C'��11I1/� �/l�/�LL fi s''T�i�2 S
Sepfic review by: Date Approved:
�oning review by: ' Date APprovecf: �� '�'��� �
Builciing review by: Date Approved:___f/ - �/—ZO Y�
Grading review by: Date Approved:
Zoning File#: Og,�J7�'f�342�� Resolution#: ��IIJ Z Resolution Date: a-l� -Z.O�
Zoning District Fire Department ' Post'Office
� School District
�� � �
f
Zoning: Lot Area:_ � �� SF; A 1Nidth: � Depth:
Survey Submitted: �es ❑ No Bate of Survey: � " 1 ��.��
Proposed Setbacks:
Front(Lake) Rear S�t-rE`�� (� S E W ) ( 'N / E W ) Other Builclings Wet{and
� Side `�de
►�� � �` ' '
, �
Building Defined Height: �� Building Peak Height: #of Stories�k?: ❑ YES
F�R A BUILDING WITH-A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: FOR A$UILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION:
START WITH the distance between the basement'floor/crawl START the distance between the sfab and the highest
space floor and the highest roof pea�top of WITH roofpeak,the top of the cornice of a flat roof,
the cornice of a flat roof,the d�¢1c'fine of a the deck line of a mansard roof, or the
mansard roof, or the upg�rnio5t point on a round vppermost point or a round or other arch-type
� or other arch-t e roof -
SUBTRACT half the dist� between the highest window and SUBTRACT half the distance,b�tw�en the highest window
hi hest eak of a itched roof and hi hes#-roof eak�f a pitched roDf
SUBTRACT th stance betweenthe basement ffoor/crawl ADD thef.di�fance between the slab andthe highest
space floor and the highest existing grade within � exisfing grade within`the foundafion
1 the foundation or 10 feet.whichever is less. _EQUAL � Defined buildin hei ht I
EQUALS I Defined buildin hei ht
Lot Coverage: SF %
Shorefand District MCWD Permit Received Averege Lakeshore Setback I Bfuff I
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A � ❑ Yes �No �
�s ❑ No
Permit Number: � Yes No ❑ N/A ' Setbaek:
Iiardcover Zones Existin. Pro osed � Variance Re uired CUP Required �
�-75' (7°lb � �°IO I ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes No
� 7�-250' �'Q'.��0 , �'(p,J�'�a TYP��s)� �TYPe(S)� �
I 250-500' � I �
� 500-1000' 'i
�
REMARKS (in-house):
Updated: 09/11/20Q9
z:\formslplan review checkiist.docx
Fees to be Charged YES NO � .
�B'IiIa11G�.x s, �5".�������i��� �k. �e,T �. � �k���c: t � �'r, e '�� +
����." �� _` �t �,,' :"�T�������
Plan Review
_ „�, a .
State;�S�urc�att��c E������� ��" :y
, �. ,
_. , , ., _ .
. , , �
..: .w . :.� ,.�,� -� , �
� :
...,�k _:.. . ., a .�. 4 _ ��.�.,r ,; , .' ..�
� = ...�
tnvestigation Fee
�`¢S�AC=`='Numbe.r of:`SAC�U:nats' '�'��� �;�� ,,��,'� � - ,�,:, . ��
. , _,,,.H . . : .. ,..�.
Sewer Connection I
�f�_'�E,'�,�C�D',��p,P�IO�A .,.����+`- :?.'� �"'"vl'-��"s �_-�.+��:..:
LI�
P.ark Fee
, , -��� ,�,�,��-.����.� ,�,y�
� -���i,�"'�xa�r,,�.�as6�#'�i.'tl1�JII -1�+�ns�aL��n'�'6,.'+�H�,as,�.��W}i�� ..�n� .
�the � 9A�'�Ri lEVr43 �� K�r �i
r(specify)
, .. .�..,r ,.,�.�,.�p�„
_. . .
us�s"�aex�s�s .: . �.,:.. ,.;..-; _�,n
�� :� .
, . . , _ , . -
.
Calculatetl By: -
S uare Foota e :$ per Square`Foota e (
Basement X = �
1 St Floor X _ �
2na Floo� )( I = �
Garage X = �
Estimated Construction Value: � L U�pC9C� �=
Orono.Inspections Requirec! Work Requiring Separate Permits Required'State Permits
❑ Site ❑ Plumbing ❑ Grading/Filling ❑ Well
❑ Hardcover Removal 0 Mechanical ❑ Fire � Efe�trical
fl Footing ❑ Septic D V1/ater Connection
❑ Poured Vllall ❑ �ireplace � Sewer-Connection
❑ Foundation Survey ❑ Masonry ❑"Lawn frrigation
❑ Radon Rock Bed ❑ Mfg.
fl framing ❑ Other(specify)
0 Insulation
-Built Survey
Final - -
❑ Other(specify)
REMARKS (in-house):
O.ther Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved:
A�cess:Existing: 0 YES 0 NO New: ❑ YES ❑ NO
REMARKS (TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED BY PERSON PULLING PERM(T)
Updated: D9/11/2009
z:lfortnslplan review checklist.docx
. . �
' Christine Mattson
From: Darren Amundsen [Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 9:57 AM
To: Lyle Oman
Cc: Christine Mattson; Melanie Curtis; Phil Caswell
Subject: 4099 Highwood wall backfill testing
The below is a partial copy of the wall plan from the engineer for the 4099 Retaining wall. These are the tests required
by the design engineer (not Phil). Test results verifying the backfill meets the requirements of A-C below is what we are
requesting be on file with the city. In a perfect world, these would be done ahead of time and the property owner
would also want these done before the backfill is placed. The wall design relies on the backfill soil properties below.
.,,,. <,,., � _
Bc�Ckfi
A. Bo�Ctfll shON COnSist OI so�thot K kee OI d�tXh Orx1 deie►er+0�us mOlC+�id.
BOCkfifl ShO�mRAt tt1�tOM�Dwirrg gOtklliOn in OCCOrclOnCe wEth ASTM D-i22:
��e�e:,�m r'er�a�t PaksinQ
3/4 inCh 75-140
np.! 20�l OD
no,•10 t3 bQ
no.20b 0�30
Fi. MOCKtM SAO�f1dYA O N1�StiCA'y R1�l�Px�YI� c 15 CF1p tiqulU l�tit (LL)a rYCy�
�STM�43t8.
C bockl�stx��t+cYve a pet�k efifeclive Inction o�le of 3�`.as d�texrrarrod by
� diett st�eclr testi�q.
a. me controcta sd�!oa�a�ir►csap4nd4n�aa resr rc:v'fs ro•�e�rfv+r►�+n+�
�kfi�rrtie�ets Ihe�quien�nh of A Ihrc)ugh C.
Darren Amundsen, PE
Associate
Bonestroo, now Stantec
Tel 651-604-4894
Cell 651-775-5623
darren.amundsenC�stantec.com
stantec.com
Bonestroo has joined Stantec, a professional services consulting firm recognized for its leadership in
sustainability, depth and diversity of talent, and technical expertise.
The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified,
retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately.
� Please consider the environment before printing this email.
1
� ORON� CQPY �Bonestroo
Memorandum �� �n�
2335 Highway 36 W
ro: Darren Amundsen Project: 4099 Highwood Road Date: 11-3-11 St.Paul,MN 55113
Tel 651-636-4600
From: Phil Cdswell Client: City Of Orono Fax 651-636-1311
Re: 2011-01336 File No: 000139-11000-1 WWW stantec.com
Project Review Information Summary:
Project Name/Location: 4099 Highwood Road
Developer/Property Owner: Seran
Design Engineer/Firm: Cameron Roberson —Sole Proprietor (MN#43483)
Documents Reviewed: Site Plan (2008) with Proposed Wall Layout (2011)
Design Wall Cross Section
Segmental Retaining Wall Design Calculations (7' Ht.)
Segmental Retaining Wall Design Calculations (2-Tier)
Date Received: At City of Orono, 10-28-11
Project Review Comments:
1. Project includes privately-owned modular block/segmental landscape retaining
walls that will be installed at 4099 Highwood Road.
2. Site drawing submitted shows the wall layout relative to boundaries, buildings and
other site features. Deviation from this layout is not approved.
3. A geotechnical report and recommendations were not provided. Soil properties
for the retaining wall were assumed in the calculations submitted.
4. Plans were prepared by a professional engineer, licensed in Minnesota, and plan
content appears appropriate to direct retaining wall construction.
5. Calculations for global/slope stability were not submitted. Applicant shall have
actual site conditions evaluated by a qualified design professional to determine
whether or not global stability analysis is required. Submit determination in
writing.
6. Applicant shall ensure that backfiil design properties indicated on the plans are
verified by an independent testing lab, including:
a. Soil gradation meets specifications.
b. Soil plasticity meets specifications.
c. Backfill soils have a peak effective friction angle > 34 degrees, as
determined by direct shear testing.
d. Wall elevations, grades and back slope are verified to conform to design
Submit documentation verifying conformance with backfill soil specifications to
City.
END OF COMMENTS
Actual hardcover 2006 Proposed hardcover 2007 -
len tfi X width S.F. len th X width S.F.
A. House 32.00 X 26.00 832.00 32.00 X 26.00 832.00
8.00 14.00 112.00 8.00 14.00 112.00 -
Fireplace 1.80 X 4.00 7.20 1.80 X 4.00 7.20
Entry 4.00 X 7.70 30.80 6.00 X 7.70 46.20
New addition 8.50 X 14.00 119.00
B. Garage 22.00 X 22.00 484.00 22.00 X 22.00 484.00
shed 8.50 X 14.00 119.00
structual hardcover 1585.00 1600.40 structual hardcover
C. Driveway see attached (#1929) X 922.90 18.00 X 47.00 846.00 planning commission recommendation
D. Sidewalk sidewalk to garage 3.50 X 35.50 124.25 3.00 X 10.40 3120
Stairs garage stairs to garage 4.50 12.00 54.00 3.00 1620 48.60
Sidewalk west sidewalk 3.50 X 26.75 93.63 3.00 X 26.75 80.25
west sidewalk 5.25 X 425 22.31 5.25 X 4.25 22.31
E. Patio/Deck deck 10.75 X 30.75 330.56 10.75 X 30.75 330.56
Stairs deck stairs to deck 3.50 X 8.75 30.63 3.50 X 8.75 30.63
F. Landscape
G. Retaining Walis lakeside wall 19.60 X 1.00 19.60 19.60 X 1.00 19.60
e.wall 11.00 X 0.58 6.38 43.60 X 1.00 43.60
H. Other w.wall 9.00 X 0.58 5.22 42.80 X 1.00 42.80
driveway wail west 66.30 X 1.00 66.30 X 0.00
driveway wall east X 0.00
shed wall 29.00 X 0.58 16.82 X 0.00
nonstructual hardcover 1692.60 1495.55 nonstructual hardcover �
total hardcover in zone 3Z77.60 3095.95 �
zone area 6654.6 SF �
% of hardcover ' 49.3 46.5 '_
Q
�
�
n'C
�' � : �. �,
November 1 l,2011
MSE Project No.: 11-0195
File No.: OOOl39-11000-1 �
City of Orono Permit No.: 2011-01336 MSE
Mortariess Systems Eogineering
To: Mr. AI Seran AnSRWDesignFiim
Subject: Response to Memorandum (Project Review Comments) by Stantec dated 1 1-3-
11, Proposed Segmental Retaining Wall (SRW), Seran Residence, 4099
Highwood Road, Orono, MN
Reference: Design Cross Section, Seran Residence, 4099 Highwood Road, Orono, MN, by
MSE, dated October 24, 2011
, Menzorandum(Project Review Comments)by Stantec, dated 11-3-11
' Mortarless Systems Engineering, Inc. (MSE) has prepared this letter responding to the subject
project review comments of the reference Menaoranduna. Specifically, MSE is responding to
comment items 3, 5 and 6.
With regard to comment item 3.,the proposed SRW has a design bearing pressure of<1300 psf. It
is MSE's understanding that many governing codes, including the 2007 IBC, do not require soil
investigations when loads are less than 1500 psf, and allow for a presumptive allowable bearing
capacity of 1500 ps£ As such,MSE believes a geotechnical report is not required.
With regard to comment item 5., global stability, the overall stability of the soils surrounding(but
not including)the reinforced soil mass of an SRW, is typically a concern when the proposed design
of an SRW includes large loads(> 1500 ps fl and/or surcharges imposed on relatively steep sloping
conditions. The proposed subject SRW geometries include flat grades on top of the walls, with no
surcharging, and predominantly flat grades in front of the walls, with some 3:1 (H:V)grades in the
short bend areas. [ It should be noted that grades are determined perpendicular to the wall face.] As
such, with consideration of the proposed loading (<1500 psf bearing pressure), and relatively flat
geometries,MSE believes a global stability analysis is not required.
With regard to comment items 6. a. thru c., MSE has obtained and visually observed a sample of
the proposed backfill material. Per ASTM D2488, Standard Practice for Description and
Identification ofSoils(Visual-Manual Procedure),the proposed backfill soil can be classified as a
brown silty fine to coarse sand with trace clay and fine gravel. Additionally, it may be assumed
based on this classification, and design reference charts (see Soil Mechanics, NAVFAC Design
Manaral 7.1, 1982), that the proposed backfill soil has a peak effective friction angle of at least 34
degrees. As such, MSE believes the proposed backtill meets or exceeds design specifications
for gradation,plast'c-� -and�<strength.
���ESS�O� �
Res� tfully, ������N ��BF\�ti�
� �� �� � ��;v�� f
� /, ,;��f�� r �� - cis �,�' ��°��
,� -�, .. �. ii ` f�lq�q3A83 � Z' rn'��
Cameron Rob�rsdn,I$�fi•Ob/3D/12 � ��i
President �*\ �I*�'
sT CIV11 �P
�lF�f MINN�SO
\—
325 Alliance Place NE,Rochester,MN 55906-3975� phone 507.535.3526 fax 507.529.2879 e-mail info@mortarless.net
.
National Concrete Masonary Association Page 1 of 10
SRWaII (Version 4) Report
Project Identification
Project ID : 11-0195
Project Name : Seran Residence
Owner .
Client :Seran
Prepared By :J. Schulz
Company : Mortarless Systems Engineering, Inc.
Address : 325 Alliance Place NE Rochester, MN 55906
Telephone : 507-254-6110
Section : 2-tier section
Project File : 2-tier section.prj
Vendor Data File .
Date and Time : 10/24/2011 10:44:58
Type of Structure : Reinforced Wall
Wall Geometrv
Design Wall Height(ft) : 5.00
Embedment Wall Height(ft) : 1.75
Exposed Wall Design Height(ft) : 3.25
Number of Segmental Wall Units : 10
Walllnclination(degrees) : 10.57
G rades
Top Slope(degrees) : 0.00
Uniform Distributed Surcharpe
Live Load Surcharge(Psfl : 75.00
Dead Load Surcharge(Psfl :450.00
Dead Load Surcharge Setback(ft) :4.00
file://C:AProaram Files\NCMA\SRW'all 4.0\Report.html 10/24/201 1
' Natioral Concrete Masonarv Association Paae 2 of 10
Soil Data
Cohesion(c) Friction Unit Weight
Soil Zone Description �P � Angle(ci�) �Y��p �
S (degrees) �
Reinforced Soil Select Backfill(SW-SM) N/A 34.00 125.00
Retained Soil Select Backfill(SW-SM) N/A 34.00 125.00
Leveling Pad Soil Base Aggregate(GP-GM) N/A 45.00 135.00
Foundation Soil Silty Clay(CH) 100.00 24.00 125.00
Segmental Unit Data
Segmental Unit Name : Diamond
Cap Height(Inches) : 3.00
Unit Height(Hu)(Inches) : 6.00
Unit Width (Wu)(Inches) : 12.00
Unit Length (Inches) : 16.00
Setback(Inches) : 1.12
Weight(Infilled)(Ib) : 80.00
Unit Weight(Infilled)(pcfl : 120.00
Center of Gravity(Inches) : 6.00
Geosynthetic Reinforcement Type and Number
Supplier Product Name Number
Mirafi Miragrid 3XT 2
Geosvnthetic Properties
Geosynthetic Product ��b�ft� RFcr RFd RFid (Ib ft) Ci Cds
Miragrid 3XT 3500.00 1.60 1.15 1.15 1654.06 0.90 0.90
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
file://C:AProaram Files\NCYIA`,SRVv all �.0\Report.html l0i?�i�011
' National Con;;rete Masonary Association Page 3 of 10
Unit-Unit Interface Properties
Minimum Shear Shear Friction Maximum Shear
Capacity(Ib/ft) Angle Capacity(Ib/ft)
1076.00 26.00 2150.00
Geosynthetic-SRW Unit Connection Strength properties
Minimum 1st Inflection Point(Ib/ft) 2nd Inflection Point(Iblft)
Geosynthetic Product Conn. Connection Max
Capacity Normal Load Normat Load
(Ib/ft) (Ib/ft) Capacity (Ib/ft) Connection
(Ib/ft) Capacity(Ib/ft)
Miragrid 3XT 355.00 925.00 633.00 2032.00 695.00
Geosynthetic-SRW Unit Shear Strength proqerties
Geosynthetic Minimum Shear Friction Maximum
Product Capac ty(Ib/ft) Angle Cap chty Qb/ft)
Miragrid 3XT 1076.00 26.00 2150.00
Design Criteria For External Stability Analysis
� FOS Sliding : 1.50
FOS Overturning : 2.00
FOS Bearing Capacity :3.00
Base Geosynthetic ratio(L/H) :0.60
Reinforced Soil-Retained Soil Interface Friction Factor : 1.00
Reinforced Soil-Retained Soil Interface Friction Angle : 34.00
(degrees)
file://C:�Program FilesWCMA\SRW�aII 4.0\Report.html 10/24/2011
Natior�al Concrete Masonary Association PaQe 4 of 10
Design Criteria For Internal Stability Analysis
FOS Tensile Overstress : 1.50
FOS Pullout : 1.50
Anchorage Length (ft) : : 1.00
Wall-Retained Soil Interface Friction Factor : 0.67
Wall-Retained Soil Interface Friction Angle(degrees) : 22.78
Design Criteria For Facing Stability Analysis
FOS Geosynthetic-WaIlConnection : 1.50
FOS Crest Toppling : 1.50
Max. Reinforcement Spacing : 2.00
Vertical Components
Vertical Components of Earth Pressures Used :Yes
Cofficients of Earth Pressure and Failure Plane Orientation
Reinforcement Soil(Static)(Ka) : 0.186
Reinforcement Soil(Static)(Kah Horizontal Component) : 0.182
Internal Modified Back Slope(Bint) : 0.000
Orientation of failure plane from horizontal(degrees)for ; 54.275
Internal Stability
Retained Soil(Static)(Ka) : 0.185
Retained Soil(Static)(Kah Horizontal Component) : 0.170
External Modified Back Stope(Bext) : 0.000
Orientation of failure plane from horizontal(degrees)for ; 53.297
External Stability
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
file://C:�Proaram Files\NCMA\SRWaII 4.0\Report.html 10/24/2011
, National Concrete Masonary Association Pa�e � of 10
Resuit of External Stability Static Analysis
Calculated Design Criteria
FOS Sliding 2.73 >1.50
FOS Overturning 6.25 >2.00
FOS Bearing Capacity 6.31 >3.00
Base Reinforcement Length(L)(ft) 5.00
Base Reinforcement Ratio(UH) 1.00 >0.60
Detailed Result of External Stability Analysis
Calculated
Total Horizontal Force(Ib/ft) 711.38
Total Vertical Force(Ib/ft) 3240.01
Sliding Resistance(Ib/ft) 1942.55
Driving Moment(Ib-ft/ft) 1557.24
Resisting Moment(Ib-ft/ft) 9735.84
Bearing Capacity (psf) 6983.68
Base Eccentricity(e)(ft.) -0.02
Eccentricity Ratio(e/L-2e) 0.00
Maximum Bearing Pressure(psf) 1106.65
Results of Internal Stability Static Analysis
SRW Anchor FOS FOS FOS Layer
Geosynthetic Elevation Length Spacing
Unit product ft ft Length Overstress Pullout Slide
# ( � ( � (ft) >=1.50 >=1.50 >=1.50 ��2 00
7 Miragrid 3XT 3.00 5.00 2.40 4.25 1.87 8.20 OK
3 Miragrid 3XT 1.00 5.00 3.47 4.43 5.64 4.88 OK
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
file://C:AProaram Files\NCMA\SRWa11 4.0\Report.html 10/24/2011
' National Concrete Masonary Association Page 6 of 10
Detailed Results of Internal Stability Analysis
SRW Anchor Tensile Pullout Sliding Siiding
Geosynthetic Elevation Length LTDS
Unit product (ft) �ft� Length ��b�ft� Load capacity Force Capacity
# (ft) (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft)
� Miragrid 3XT 3.00 5.00 2.40 1654.06 389.41 729,13 220.84 1811.28
3 Miregrid 3XT 1.00 5.00 3.47 1654.06 373.47 2104.91 526.63 2568.91
Results of Facing Stability Static Analysis
FOS
' Un`it Elev Geosynthetic Crest Co nection
# (ft) Product Toppling �=1.50
>=1.50
7 3.00 Miragrid 3XT 2.85 2.98
3 1.00 Miragrid 3XT 2.38
Results of Facing Stability Analysis(Moment 8�Connectionl
SRW Heel Resist Connection
Unit Elev Geosynthetic Product Drive Moment Moment(Ib- Connection Capacity
# (ft) (Ib-ft/ft) �ft� Load(Ib/ft) (Ib/ft)
7 3.00 Miragrid 3XT 57.69 164.68 143.47 427.13
3 1.00 Miragrid 3XT 209.51 499.26
file://C:AProQram Files\NCMA\SRWaII 4.0\Report.html 10/24/20ll
' Nation�l Conc•rete Masonary Association Paae 7 of 10
Internal Compound Stability Result
SRW Factor �F� EVu Or �,Fs EFgrid EDynF EWt EQI EQd
Units S�ety (Ib/ft) �Ib°ft� (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft) (Ib/ft)
1 1.692 3846 912 2819 11 0 5819 541 1983
2 1.803 2726 920 2216 350 0 4222 501 1670
3 1.771 2163 981 1786 17 0 3309 427 1140
4 1.858 2166 855 1641 29 0 3294 421 1263
5 1.906 2108 579 1429 37 0 3183 438 1244
6 2.367 2178 565 1256 229 0 3270 467 1474
7 2.314 1303 552 802 0 0 1942 354 782
8 2.563 1136 378 591 0 0 1708 347 767
9 3.321 1000 267 381 0 0 1500 358 752
10 5.795 862 187 181 0 0 1285 351 738
Basic Internal Compound Stability Static Result
Lowest FOS : 1.692
Critical Failure Plane Location -
Height of Exit at Wall Face
SRW Unit :# 1
Elevation : 0.00 ft
Distance to Entrance at Top Grade : 8.01 ft
Internal Compound Stability Geometry
SRW Factor Arc Arc Arc Arc Exit Arc Exit Arc Arc
Of Center Center Radius Enter Enter
Units Safety (Xc) (Yc) (R) �X2) �Y2� (X1) (Y1)
1 1.692 0.000 8.917 8.917 0.000 0.000 8.011 5.000
2 1.803 -13.907 31.952 34.427 0.093 0.500 7.513 5.000
3 1.771 -3.369 13.640 13.131 0.187 1.000 6.519 5.000
4 1.858 -1.276 11.583 10.202 0.280 1.500 6.519 5.000
5 1.906 0.373 9.794 7.794 0.373 2.000 6.519 5.000
6 2.367 0.467 12.329 9.829 0.467 2.500 7.016 5.000
7 2.314 0.560 10.160 7.160 0.560 3.000 5.524 5.000
8 2.563 0.653 12.158 8.658 0.653 3.500 5.524 5.000
9 3.321 0.747 15.911 11.911 0.747 4.000 5.524 5.000
10 5.795 0.840 26.690 22.190 0.840 4.500 5.524 5.000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
file://C:AProgram FilesWCMA\SRWaII 4.0\Report.html 10/24/2011
' National Concrete Masonary Association Page 8 of 10
Wall Reinforcement Layout
Q.S�ft
� �
I ' I ' ! i
� � a � �
1 D_�-deg �.Iira�id 3=*;T
� .,
=.C���ft 1.-� ft
�
liira�i���:T
� �.Gr,� r�
C�.`C� ft
Project Identification
Project ID : 11-0195
Project Name : Seran Residence
Owner .
Client : Seran
Prepared By : J. Schulz
Company : Mortarless Systems Engineering, Inc.
Address : 325 Alliance Place NE Rochester, MN 55906
Telephone : 507-254-6110
Section : 2-tier section
Vendor Data File .
Project File : 2-tier section.prj
Date and Time : 10/24l2011 10:44:58
file://C:AProaram FilesWCMA\SRWaII 4.0\Report.html 10/24;2011
National Con�rete Masonary Association Page 9 of 10
Internal Compound Stability Graphics
Lo�;est FC�S: 1:44'
� * i * #� � �
��:�
�.._ m_._� ._� _ _` �`
.»......�.. .�'--- _ � _ p p'p+ }i
y��+.
_ - '�� �:
�
K-= 1 L - .�.. �-' _,�.r".� ." " '�. . . .
� -
� ��� � _ -- H�-1.=11.at� fC �
1. � ft
Global Stability has not been addressed
Project Identification
Project ID : 11-0195
Project Name : Seran Residence
Owner .
Client : Seran
Prepared By : J. Schulz
Company : Mortarless Systems Engineering, Inc.
Address : 325 Alliance Place NE Rochester, MN 55906
Telephone : 507-254-6110
Section : 2-tier section
Vendor Data File .
Project File : 2-tier section.prj
Date and Time : 10/24/2011 10:44:58
file:UC:�Prooram Files\NCMA\SRWaII 4.0\Report.html 10/24/2011
' Natiotlal Cor�crete Masonary Association Pa�e 10 of 10
Project Notes :
See design cross section by MSE, dated 10-24-11.
Soil Notes :
Contractor shall verify soil parameters prior to and during construction. See design
cross section by MSE, dated 10-24-11.
Unit Notes :
Contractor shall place drainage fill material in cores of block and to a minimum
distance of 12"behind the block. Place a 4'strip of filter fabric at top of drainage
zone. See design cross section by MSE, dated 10-24-11.
file://C:AProgram Files\NCMA\SRWall 4.0\Report.html 10/24/20l 1
,.� ��: --- __ . - -- - �
'� _ - � � �
• i
� S/T,�' � �1.lR1J°�� �0�: ,�/� �'��r�� ��err,� - '
, ,,�� j7 �Q 9�' �y��od o� �
� .�� ,,� ,'�, � �� �o� 1�, �r'yI�r.�oa� L�►,�� �yr"�,�e
Q s" � � � �� f�n kQ, f�e/t�c��� Co, �tif/y . ` �
� 4` k °� � �° I Z � - � �
� � {1: � � ,�st. �,
,� � � �-� / t�
�' � /`� r � ��/ �vc! � q,
���
�,,�' ,� ��`�G� ���4^. /q Proposed Wall ��'�, �I
� %�" � '� °� � + � \r`� - '
��� ! O -� c, ! I I ✓ �
� � � \ jL�.;�t�~ '��5q�'' L� � � ��\ : � i ��.,, n
`(� `�. � � � �. �q,�a? �g .��� n�r
U, �. • ,. � q 9 , � s'�'� / �� �C. , / ', N
.�
� / P����s�°� � � '� ` 11.ar ��. ?'��d"SL� �` I� q� o�l��� 1
� . : �
Q,
1 ' '� q�� / ` � �°� �
�r i 1�C� / /
q ri
�� t;� � , �'. �� a19 ` ` � r � q•il� r.. � q'r1�
/ , c� o
- � ' •� � �,���E� / �l �.a��tiry' .s�/�/ '� o `'� °� ,��r � � �. �, q�,� �
lq~ .� y �, ��'xTs�� 0 4i,{�df" �� � ' / �� v. , � �ijt�1 t b�
` / �. �sjj� �56.�' ' . � ,�•�` �;,$ � y _-�
1 ` � "�! 1� � ,� � �'�� 4 ;'' . .:�
� \`� � � J � _ 5'�or� '. ,U �do��9'{� / q� S ��� 93 � �-.�
� ' �' �' a�nL. : ���,z� � 35� � z' _ `�
9�, J'� ey r 1nq . 9 : 3 �.
0 � �� ✓r'^� r � y�lL.��. �i� � T� �� .�' � �
�� '� � � � 4°`�9 f `''�`� q���� � �/ �� �
Q A
. � EiR`/Sf . � ��l' �y , ��� � � ����/ _I� ��:r � .
3 o p�,... � ;��� � , i� �lv t� '3-�: /� ,� ��.1
� � � � �`�. � s.. �.,� �y ���' ,
�,. �� ��.r,�� � � e'!b• � '
_ \ � Gp,, -"� ��}:.' /� �,5 . � � ;� �,/ � �d��
. � '� � � � �,�
LEGEND / Proposed Wall �. � 4 �� �Q
` c,� � � � v . i�,.
� � ��. . g ` .��
�` t�:�t�..�L
{� Denotes Sat Rebar R:LS. No. 14i6? �� b�`�� � � . ��'' � �� �
f,,., / �
� De+SoMs Found I�un Pipe ~� �,�,!`�, eJ'/•;,�,— �(I�, a /� �✓ / �'L \� �1�`+ �
t� D t tto�; Pk' NQrI ir� Blfarrr�lh eus � ��'�''�k7� �� � / � q ,/ ���
DESCRIPTfON `�� � q�'� f�� � i�ti�� ���
�. �� . r� 9s ./ � � �
. a � •� .--- =.Ex%st%' �irivl�r-
�4�.r��, �%y�tr�000�iL�r�G � �../ �^' � ,..' � ' , ,��° � � — � "�
/�f � �/ � � � p�'°�-'�
�tt/'re fan:�''q�,���rfc�v,�n Co.� °� / r��ir��a�''
- /�✓l7�TC.f'e fa� ���� ' .f � .
C��FfC, Q ' / /_ � �'� �z--1�it��s ...F�r%s�S'.
� � / � a . �.
_ � �� , 1� �-t���f��,
, har� � / �� -� , r
� � �, � 9�s PoPos�� E�e��a�ic>ts �xxx� �ttfo�s- �'.-a�osra�
Y ��fy thct thl� aurv+ey, pian oi' E�CVQ fp'Of'l
raPert wna prepar�d by res� or��der.my o, � �
�tract au�,eMsion.end that t om. c duiy � �gr,�3.D �- 1D e�laT`�S IDirix7%�f(
RDgtatered.1.�d.Surveyor under the Ja� � ,� �D.WC.SIf f�tldr' = pf'1L'�qt+1 af„S
of tha Stote o(.i�(tnnesotn. �
� � �� . �'rat-i��� F�onr = �3,9.S l�ri�Ac�
_ ae�� .s= S��zoo� iP��. �=31-�oo8d�� . � T"p or��'��nda�`:o�= dra'�a�z.
_ � � ,'
00 9 B/�. ~ � l
Barton G..u,�„s Re,�. 9-/(�'Z i;
IdN Raq- Nc: 79t62 � / �( ;,
st�.S'rrrvP� 3-J2 -�DO,+�� ! S�if:1 m�/ ��
_ _ �.
°�'� G / l����GZ�G��
� � �o�
� C ITY OF ORONO
y � Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249-4600
c�' G� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616
�qkFSH��� Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 I www.ci.orono.mn.us
�3•Zr0 •15
March 17, 2014 �`"�`�- �"` �- � �� �Q/�
AI Seran l�l1lJ�C (�[T y� �m� �
4099 Highwood Road
Mound, MN 55364 —��—
RE: Building Permit Numbers: ��
2009-00491 (garage) 8� 2011-01336 (retaining walis and stairs)
In the process of closing out building permit project files, I noticed that final inspections have not
been completed on the above two permits on your property. Additionally we have not received
an as-built survey showing the as-constructed additions. Please call Building O�cial,
Lyle Oman at 952-249-4625 to schedule a final inspection for the garage.
We continue to hold an escrow of $2,500 pertaining to the project. Once the weather permits,
please have an as-built survey and hardcover calculations prepared by a surveyor and
submitted to us. Your escrow will be refunded once our engineer determines the property
conforms to the approved building permit plans and approved grading plan. Please see the
attached City code section regarding survey requirements.
Please contact me at 952-249-4620 or at cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ORNO
YV�►� �O���o'►"�
Christine Mattson
Planning Assistant
Attachment
� �
March 17, 2014
4099 Highwood Road
Page 2 of 2
Sec. 86-68. Permit application; information required.
(a) The application for a construction permit shall include such information as may be required by the
city, which may vary between types of construction projects.
(b) Surveys required:
(1) Initial survey. Any building or general permit application for construction of a new structure or
expansion of an existing structure shall be accompanied by a certificate of survey prepared
by a Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor unless the building official determines the
construction project is exempt from this section. The certificate of survey shall conform to the
standards on file in the office of the building official.
(2) Foundation suivey. A foundation survey shall be submitted to the city for review and
approval, unless exempted by the building official, upon completion of the foundation work for
all buildings and all additions to buildings. The foundation survey, prepared by a Minnesota
Registered Land Surveyor, shalf certify the lot dimensions; front, side, rear, lakeshore, and
wetland setbacks; and foundation elevation. A foundation survey must be submitted before
proceeding with framing or further construction. In lieu of a survey a letter prepared by a
Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor containing the same information as a foundation survey
may be submitted.
(3) As-built survey. An as-built survey, prepared by a Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor, shall
be submitted to the city for review and approval upon the completion of all buildings and all
additions to buildings, unless exempted by the building official. The as-built survey shall
certify the final topography of the site; verify drainage patterns; and provide hardcover
calculations for lots in the Shoreland Overlay District. An as-built survey must be approved
before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. In the event that weather or other
conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of
Occupancy is requested, applicant shall provide a sufficient financial guarantee and establish
an escrow agreement to ensure completion of the as-built survey.
(Code 1984, § 12.02; Ord. No. 49 3rd series, § 1, 9-8-2008)
� A ,
�Ol VO
C ITY OF ORONO
� � Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249-4600
y�, ` 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616
l,9KESH���,G Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us
March 17, 2014
AI Seran
4099 Highwood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RE: Building Permit Numbers:
2009-00491 (garage) & 2011-01336 (retaining walls and stairs)
In the process of closing out building permit project files, I noticed that final inspections have not
been completed on the above two permits on your property. Additionally we have not received
an as-built survey showing the as-constructed additions. Please call Building Official,
Lyle Oman at 952-249-4625 to schedule a final inspection for the garage.
We continue to hold an escrow of $2,500 pertaining to the project. Once the weather permits,
please have an as-built survey and hardcover calculations prepared by a surveyor and
submitted to us. Your escrow will be refunded once our engineer determines the property
conforms to the approved building permit plans and approved grading plan. Please see the
attached City code section regarding survey requirements.
Please contact me at 952-249-4620 or at cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ORNO
��
Christine Mattson
Planning Assistant
Attachment
� � March 17, 2014
4099 Highwood Road
Page 2 of 2
Sec. 86-68. Permit application; information required.
(a) The application for a construction permit shall include such information as may be required by the
city, which may vary between types of construction projects.
(b) Surveys required:
(1) Initial survey. Any building or general permit application for construction of a new structure or
expansion of an existing structure shall be accompanied by a certificate of survey prepared
by a Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor unless the building official determines the
construction project is exempt from this section. The certificate of survey shall conform to the
standards on file in the office of the building official.
(2) Foundation survey. A foundation survey shall be submitted to the city for review and
approval, unless exempted by the building official, upon completion of the foundation work for
all buildings and all additions to buildings. The foundation survey, prepared by a Minnesota
Registered Land Surveyor, shall ce�tify the lot dimensions; front, side, rear, lakeshore, and
wetland setbacks; and foundation elevation. A foundation survey must be submitted before
proceeding with framing or further construction. In lieu of a survey a letter prepared by a
Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor containing the same information as a foundation survey
may be submitted.
(3) As-built survey. An as-built survey, prepared by a Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor, shall
be submitted to the city for review and approval upon the completion of all buildings and all
additions to buildings, unless exempted by the building official. The as-built survey shall
certify the final topography of the site; verify drainage patterns; and provide hardcover
calculations for lots in the Shoreland Overlay District. An as-built survey must be approved
before the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. In the event that weather or other
conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of
Occupancy is requested, applicant shall provide a sufficient financial guarantee and establish
an escrow agreement to ensure completion of the as-built survey.
(Code 1984, § 12.02; Ord. No. 49 3rd series, § 1, 9-8-2008)
2011-01336 4099 Highwood Rd aa�ance
4099 Highwood Rd $o.00
Summary All Variances-Permits get a$500 Engineering credit and a$67.50
Legal $0.00 Legal credit(2008 and later)
AI Seran Engineering $1,145.00
4099 Highwood Rd Subtotal $1,145.00 Preliminary Plat Application Fees Paid
Mound,MN 55364 Credits -$500.00
Payments ($645.00)
Balance $0.00
Total Application Fees $0.00
Legal
Invoice Date Activity Invoice# Amount Prelim Plat Improvement Fees
Total $0.00
Fees Paid Applicable to Engineering Prelim Plat $0.00
Engineering
Invoice Date Activity Invoice# Amount
02/15/12 Nov 2011 engineering 20120033 $ 1,145.00
actual invoice 645.due to credit Final Plat Application Fees Paid
Total Final Plat App Fees $0.00
Total $1,145.00
Final Engineering Fees Paid
Fees Paid Applicable to Engineering Final Plat $0.00
Credits
Date Payment Type Check# Amount
eng ($500.00)
Total Fees Paid $0.00
Total ($500.00)
Payments
Date Payment Type Check# Amount
write off ($322.50)
O6/19/12 ($322.50)
Total ($645.00)
1/24/2014
t�i V�W� �
�`Permit � � �
�J " . ► ►' �.I —' I �1 P� � �J �J �' � _a.
P�rtnit#: ::�:datF aci
2009-00491
f' < ,. , , ����ttE�_
Pertnit Address: 4U99 Hfghwood Rd r �. - >,
,-� . t-.
` Parcellssue
� Pertnit Issue
General� Faes ��sP�o►�(��Notes�Applkant Detail�CO Detail�
Seq Inspedion Type Inspector Date Status H Fee Rec
► � � t ��• - �
� 2 Foundation Survey B/4 Framfng
� 3 Framfna WGIB 8/12l2010 P 0
� 4 Insulation WGIB 9/7/2010 P Y 0
� 5 Wallboard
� 6 Final
. 7 As-BUitt SUrvey
►* X
Add New Delete
� � -
---- ______.
�- Permit �� o i O i �3 ��
_� i��� ► ►� � __J � ��-A � � ��� � Qi
Pemtit i�: 2011�01336 .J,- Y
�' ��es=
P�rtnit Addr�ss: 4099 Hlghwood Rd � ;; - � ,;.,
r Pertnit Issue J � Paroel Issue
I
General� Fees ��P�a�(z)�Notes�Aaplisant Detail�CO Detail�
Seq inspedion Type mspedor Date status H Fee Rec
► �� �,�.� � ��
�2 As-Built Survey
►• � X
Add N!w DN�t!
�Permit ��� p �'�,
� I� � ► ►I ��i _� � � PIN� � � ��� � 4i
Pemtlt#: 2011-01299 � ,.u"___
PeRnit Addrlss: 4099 HlghwOod Rd c' . _ -
"" Parcellssue
I- Permit Issue
Generol� Fees Inspectfons(1) �Notes�Aaolicant Detail�CO Detail j
Seq Inspedion Type Inspedor Date Status H Fee Rec
► �
►+ X I
Add New Delete