The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMN Wetland Conservation Act Notice of application,delineation/decision Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Governinent Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application Number Herman Renovation Company 1135 Heritage Lane 7/5/2016 W16-36 (Mike Herman) Type of Applicarion (check all that apply): � Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Summary and description of proposed project(attach additional sheets as necessary): Herman Renovation Company (Mike Herman) has applied for a wetland boundary & type confinnation for the wetlands located at 1135 Heritage Lane in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal description: Section 10, Township 117N, Range 23 W. The boundary & type approval was requested July St�', 2016. A wetland delineation was conducted by Kjolhuag Environmental Services on April 6`�', 2016. A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD on July St�', 2016. One wetland was delineated alon�the property. Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 2/3, Wet meadow/Shallow Marsh wetland. Wetland 1 is located along the fringe of PWI Basin 27- 865W. The boundaries will be reviewed in the field by MCWD staff. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this coinpleted fonn to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Comments must be received by (minimum I 5 Rachel Workin business-day comment period): Permitting Technician 7/28/2016 (4:30PM) Address (if different than LGU) Date,time, and location of decision: 15320 Minnetonka Blvd A decision will be made following the review Minnetonka, MN 55345 of the application and completion of the comment eriod. Phone Nuinber and E-mail Address Decision-maker for this application: (952)641-4518 � Staff rworkin a,minnehahacreek.or ❑ Governin Board or Council BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 2 /� " 1�1 .� /� 1 1 � � . � l� �� i Signature: Date: 7/7/2016 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES � SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@hennepin.us � BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer—ben.me,yer@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): � DNR TEP Becky Horton-becky.horton@state.mn.us � DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): Leslie Parris - leslie.parris@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO (if applicable): � Applicant(notice only) and Landowner(if different): allisondoris@live.com � Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): ben@kjolhaugenv.com Christine Mattson- cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us � Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Melissa Jenny— melissa.m.jenny@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: ��.b��sr.state.mn.us,�contact�'WCA_areas.pdi� ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state,mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP_contacts.pdf ➢De artment of Natural Resources Re ional Offices: NW Reeion: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div.EcoL Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd.NE 1201 E.Hwy.2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemid'i,MN 56601 Grand Ra ids,MN 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 New Ulm,MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: l�ttp: �liles.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr re��ions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: ��.mvp.usace.arn��.milire<�ulatorv/default.asp'?pa<�eid=687 or send to: ➢ US Anny Corps of Engineers St.Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coardinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 5. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application, list any other attachinents: � Com lete delineation re ort BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 2 1135 Heritage Lane Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Mike Hennan by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2016-007) June 21, 2016 WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 1.1-acre 1135 Heritage Lane Parcel was inspected on April 6, 2016 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI-map showed a PEM1C wetland within the property. • The soi] survey showed Muskego/Blue Earth/Houghton as the hydric soil types present within the review area. • The DNR Public Waters map showed DNR Public Waters 27-865W within the property. • The National Hydrography Dataset Map showed a lake/pond within the property. Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the 1135 Heritage Lane Parcel Wetland Wetland T e ID Circular 39 Cowardin E ers and Reed Dominant Vegetation 1 Type 2/3 PEM 1 B/PEM 1 C wet ineadow/Shallow Poa spp., reed canary grass, Marsh Tv ha s . 1 1135 Heritage Lane Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report I. INTRODUCTION The 1.1-acre 1135 Heritage Lane Parcel was inspected on April 6, 2016 far the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section l 0, Township 117N, Range 23W, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Generally, the site location was north of North Shore Drive and west of Heritage Lane (Figure 1). The site liinits corresponded to Hennepin County PID 1011723130021. A sin�le-family home occupied the eastern half of the site; the western half of the site was do�ninated by inanicured lawn and emergent wetland. Adjacent land use was primarily single- family homes, hardwood forest, and emergent wetland. Tl�e topography sloped from east to west with an elevation of 958 feet msl in the southeastern portion of the site to a low of 932 feet msl within Wetland l. One depressional wetland was identified and delineated on the site (Figure 2). II. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Detennination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Glean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that were located by Willis Gilliard & Associates. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species doininance was estiinated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Co�nmittee for Hydric Soils, Version 7, 2010). 2 Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2015 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2014. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.2, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). III. RESULTS Review of NWI, Soils, DNR, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatia] Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed a PEM1C wetland within the property (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed Muske�o/Blue Earth/Houghton as the hydric soil types present within the review area. Soil types inapped on the property are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 2. Soil types mapped on the 1135 Heritage Lane Parcel Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating L2E Malardi-Hawick complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes Non-Hydric L16A Muskego, Blue Earth, and Houghton soils, ponded, 0 to 1 H dric percent slopes v L22C2 Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded Predominantly Non- Hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed DNR Public Waters 27-865W within the property boundaries (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one lake/pond on the property (Figure 6). Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on April 6, 2016. One (1) wetland was identified and delineated within the subject parcel (Figure 2). Corresponding data for-ins are included in Appendix A. The following description of the wetlands and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that tiine precipitation totals were below normal based on available 30-day rolling precipitation data and nonnal based on the three-month antecedent conditions (January, February, March) (Appendix B). Vegetation was actively growing at the time of our site visit. � Wetland 1 was a Type 2/3 (PEM1B/PEM1C) wet meadow/shallow marsh dominated by Kentucky bluegrass, fowl bluegrass, reed canary grass and cattail that transitioned to open water. 3 Saturation was observed at the surface with water at 12" below the soil surface at the wetland boundary. Additional secondary hydrology indicators observed include Geoinorphic Position and FAC-Neutral Test. This wetland covered 0.25 acres within the property boundary. Adjacent upland at the sa�nple location was dominated by manicured Kentucky blue grass. The delineated boundary followed a gradual change in topography and was placed along the transition zone from wetland to upland plant coininunities, where hydrology indicators were no longer present, and the transition from hydric to non-hydric soils. Wetland 1 was indicated on the NW I map as a PEM 1 C wetland and was located in an area of mapped Muskego/Blue Earth/Houghton (hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 1 is located along the fringe of PWI Basin 27-865W. Other Areas No other areas with wetland vegetation or hydrology were observed on the site. 4 IV. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as reguired by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation Coinpleted by: Ben Carlson, Wetland Specialist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1125 Report Completed by: Ben Carlson, Wetland Specialist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1125 � Report reviewed by: Date: June 21, 2016 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 5 1135 Heritage Lane Wetland Delineation Report Figures: • Figure l — Site Location Map • Figure 2 —Existing Conditions Map • Figure 3 —NW I Map • Figure 4— Soil Survey Map • Fi�ure 5 —DNR Protected Waters Map • Figure 6—National Hydrography Dataset Map p `,_, �aPA Oaw a c f F Y � # ``^ Q`t Q�: ,`? �, T� I.TC�L � 'Q < �� Project Location �A'� � �� e �' ��oy�� (�'Y ,0 ':��,.4 �i � , P 9�� 0 .�0 �� Nerit�� .- � - - - � �l-- .. - - . . ', _ -. ,/�/ �� Mlnwtpr�ka Ave�ve � �� /� � ' � � 4 /�� _c ^ C CR I S ��9 �� , �x�q``"�r C �'� , m� .� k�l a ' G( � OO OpenStreetMap(and)contributors,CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Map N 1135 Heritage Ln. (KES 2016-007) � 0 0.1 0.2 Orono, Minnesota MI�@S Note: Boundaries indicated s ` � � �(' � u� on this iigure are approximate l��OL1111UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �'�-^'� official survey product. +�.�� , ,� , .�' ` �� # � ' �. � . �i F ,��- � ��,� ��'� �� N � � s�, 'f j,� �� . � �� . � �� ` � �.� � f" � Wetland 1 �� o� "�"� '�� " �� ,,��` 0.25 Acres � :� ��,`� .� 1 � �� , .� � - � � � .....�,�. �� , � ,,k;:� � � � �` , _a , � � ,.� �``�: �„ . .� '" �� . ; . . �t � � ;� � � �a �,�,. '_ ;,, � rn k � �,� � ; �' � <''I�,G,;' r :� �, ';��> ,� �r � �-'�� . � �,��. ,� �� ,. ,�, � � e, �.� :.�, t- � ,�..�^'"' � "� _ �� N.�� '�� u�. � � ,�r ,, � � " � ':''' s . ,�+ �^k • {� �t� �� ...�� .. � .: � :.,... � �� 1L.u� ..�5 �� " ,}�F�`�... � qJt .... �. � .. 'S - R � �`� �F�' �� ,�':, ^' :� '� � +�S ,'.�" d '�< � �i�:�� '"�`. _ :;, � � i ,x � �,� �`� �'� c� � ��•��'��"��4 .��`��' ,� r � ` �� 7 f (� =�� "�+ � � it � ,,�% �' M1'`� �� 1, g�t ��/: ,n� � '✓ � �... ��4,. � � ��. ; F � ''� � S� ,' � � ��oa ��; �:, 'A R u• � •� `, . .,. � �k�k�"'.� . , , ��.. � a y � � ` � ',` `. .e . � . . � � '�f �4�',Y'� .. � k k'� � - -• �".r�°`g,�-" _ _ �� '� �f , � °' � � � ��., � � .� 2 � 1,. y � / �� ., . �-�� :��" � �` • ,. � �� . ,� "• ` �M e y � I� � s g� ��,� �, �. t �� ,� N kn� ;,F , = x:�-�. � F, ` E � �' � ,yy ,y� ` . i � �� I �/,:�.,.',t"' k,�. �. .. � � .� ' p�� ' ` A ��I .�� . .E.. y_ .,,. "��. ' . �� a sj �"��, � h� � � P . . �� 6�� k � M . r€ 'v: �... . -� ��,� � 6�� .a�� '�� . r , . , ; 6, . 7 �e � :. ., ';. ��'t � �... '� �n a ' �' " � � '- .. �>� t§�'� � � , i` �9 . r 'va.. ... . - Y �. .�� s� ,�. ��'� '� '. � �. , .. � �' �' .yg,. - �'��- �:� �.�,� .. f } s�4$ � hy� �,. 'K, � � ��. . �" ..� dr , a, 1 ��4 a� �r � /� �E, �e�'4 f>� �� ' h _,. � � y. . : , . � � , .�, . . .. �, ,- , +'� � yhy e � � !� 5 ; � _ �u� • `� ' �: � ; ..,, r � ��; �. .. Y ' � " � � ,a�� ,�. �� ,�. .�.. �; :;; ., � � r , T. . p�, � �� w _ � � � ,r o ,� � : ;, ., , � . :��- � . . ,� � , _ � � :,�� , � . �w , ; �h�"� a+ � . , ...k, .a :� �_ _ �rr .,` r �.. � ;�� , � a�,� � ..�, � ., . _ ¢ `�' ,.� . . � ,. [� � . �� Sample Point �'d`�,�.� �.• � �` �� ,� �_- � �9 �� `� * � �. F �� . ;�". �, � Transect ,�� ` � r�' � - ! �� s i. � k� � �,.�� . g�p � Approximate Parcel Boundary � �� a '�'�' � ` ,' �` GPS Wetland Boundary Yy �, "� `� �� .960� "�� ` �. �-. �. Figure 2 - Existing Conditions Map - World lmagery N 1135 Heritage Ln. (KES 2016-007) .� � Feet Orono,Minnesota � ..- � � 50 �� Note: Boundaries indicated � Tu�rT on this i'igure are approximate KJ�L11L1VG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �"'�"'� official survey product. ^r�/ Sourcr.N1nCeo,ESRI Imagen Basemap — -�.�� -1 � µ � � P F01 A ,�,,. ''�, �,: � �. � �,� ;� . ; �' . , � s�, �� - � ,, k r i, �' � a 4 . �� „ .;k' . a� 5 � �,3. -..� ^ �� , , . � , ,�� ,� � ri * � ' � ' '��'',Fl� �. ':� ��#�w .� � +.,.. . . ��.Y . 1, < . •�' � �� ` �3 � .., � � � �� 1t � � , v�,, � � . 81 �.*4 �_��r�� y. *�� rk'. . �� ' ��'�'�� . �� PABG � �e „ . �, � ,., . � �.� �� *��. L '�b ' �� '� � � � " ';��` r��;�. �� y� ,� , �. � �� .M� � � �� '�+► a ��,µ , �� ' � � . �� , •� ",�� y �� ,� ,��> w�'� " �, �� , . - ' �'�' �yf�i �� .a_� •� ;aA?, ° : .,�.. .._ . . ► � � � u x � � � `� r � � �. , PEM 1 C , � �� ,.��-, �� ''�' '�'�� , � €^�� ,.� , � ,: �� r �.. !�'� , ,. �� - . . , s r , e � '�" � � � �� ,-�: ,��`•,� , '� . _ _ ' �' K � � . �� , `�"' � „! "`* � `� �. � � . � i ah�� i:. � .,. .. . �, . ,,, � , ,. . , ,�. .i ,,. ..�. n .4y� 1 . . � � � � � _ �. t �a � r v 4 f � .E� �� ry��+tr� .e� a,K��. . v � ` ' r w. ��+�,/ � ' �t� :�.. . L' ;.. - ` T�� S.j� �3r'. .., ... � ,d � '§:; � �t �i ,-. �a + .. ', • '�.iY w � * �,ffi:�..� >y� .�� r . .+Nu �'�`�' �. , , � <`�� ,v ,�,„a'�., .� S: ' � 4� . ,� ° � �'�' °��1R 4h . . . , ��,�,,;: 'h� �e� .�£ � E p� �' � �'��' �� . ��+'�.�`� � ,�,��,' • # "'r t� '� y � �� , z . .�, � �. _i� . a..e �.]� ,�' :rr.T. .- ,A` �` �. � ��':� �, . � , �a. ,Y, i � �.� � 4 r�� ' l� /�-n. � � ' � � u . . � � �. T � .: 3 �. .�� V .�i..# �� '�*��:.. .� ' �y. YI` ` '�..y A Y = � � p/�, F � � ,�� a � ;r� � . , a. �� 'R�' �„.+�� . � . ' , � '��+ .t . �,. a�� #$ y,�.: .;� . �,,._. . � � ��`'.•w w,, +i4'� . �,.. �s Npproximate rarcei tsounaary ' �� ' � r ��`� .,r..,M,. 'r�,;; �� T � l��Er�US;GS AEX Go;n, � ��t iGfJ �l�P �, ":and S User Comrmunity' , � �, Figure 3 - National Wetland lnventory Map (2013 MN DNR) N 1135 Heritage Ln. (KES 2016-007) ' � 0 75 T50 Orono, Minnesota � Feet Note:Boundaries indicated � s �jOT u�T TG on this figure are approaimate � L11111J ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �'�'� official survey product. �1v R* "4'�r t.) � e�'. '�a� #�C.. Y ��` _��_, .�,i:£ ' �i "�v. .��'��_""'"�n, . , � � � "��';,p�� .�� - +* . Y� �;. f� �� ..+E..,�� L16A�: � ��,`� r i , � ' 'f � - Hs I!'n,.�y � �, � ` ' �. � �� "� " �.� � �� ,t �� ., N � ..��-�� r r� �" � S � g , ��'; / , . .'.._ 8 � � �. . �., V � ��» . � " ` � ' . �`f�� .�� ",� . .* ,.�.bc : . . � �� .. ��'�' , � - §w;�,." +� �� '.� '� =y��`'�,�a��. ��, '�`' �`.;P , . . y ,g r , f �,�?.W�" . �4K . . �^iG „ � `�, «;� �,��` VV "�� .��~��' �� ` ,'� � : .� . i' a� .. ' ..��,�"' �.� � �"` -� �- , �� 4 -� r'��. .R I, y•:�', y�. � . . . . ��'. � T. �� " ♦^�Ib^,m �t ,g;� ._ . �p.K {. '� .�.'�*4d4E �t4�..�I ��'!, a"'� . llI o �- :: �, L16A��`��K� li � � fi � " � ��L�2 E �� 4 �, � � � fi . , < , - '� .W,��1�. . , �.. . i "� ".� �` '' , . � i � � �� r �.� � �� .. � ^�.F`.tC'.ye� . ..�5 �„�� d ,. �" gk� � � r * � � r t ��'+ �. � '��... h, . . � �4'.,.. `' p � .',�# } ,.. � ':,� �:.... � � . ' L22C2 �`�. �';+' � � ` �� .� ��v. �1: /' � . .. �*�"= Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating , p ,. g..w. �Q�..: _..__'.�a—_—._'__�:rr._s:�.r ..._—_—._—__ ____.._.... _.. . .._. ._ Malardi-Hawickcomplex, 18to �� Approximate Parcel Boundary �2E rvon-Hydric 35 percent slopes Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Muskego, Blue Earth,and L16A Houghton soils, ponded,Oto 1 Hydric Partially Hydric percent slopes Non-Hydric/Predominantly Non-Hydric L22C2 Lester loam,6to 10 percent predominantly Non-Hydric slopes,moderately eroded Figure 4 - Soil Survey Map N 1135 Heritage Ln. (KES 2016-007) .� � 0 100 200 Orono, Minnesota � . - � Feet Note:Boundaries indicated � �TOT u�T TG on this figure are approximate ,� L1111V ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an '�'�'" official survey product. ��v � - ��. :, ; °. , ,m . R. �G,� tr' . r' qt , � : �;i��M' ##� �� iir',. �" � �; 1" * Unnamed (27-865;W) �'�` w , .�` �' : § �t. ��.�:< � � : t . � .�""�� , . �ar' . �. '�l � , '° � y ♦' S � � �.�� M f k ryi /#� ��! F �� ` �� I `� a � ��. l � 'e � ,�`�wa"' ,: . , , . *�� '��'�� „�,�� a.�� i.� �� "'�,' ��. , � ;::�. �`ry �^� , a� . �� K �• y+'� . �� .�� ,s`8��"fi* _� .�d,� . .��". � � .�' t¢' �a � y�¢.'� I �, �`�^ •f �j� .j , � � �� ".� �'. :.��s �"`�� ;,.A '' �� ;,�' ,�„ L<. .."�', � � t' ��A�Y -�� '��w.a �{ �$LY..' Y� ��.1 ��''..y . } eA, , ';�%�'� �"� � , � � .�q t * ��%:..� �'�. .� �.:.,s y y � • .. -�..q �� '�fi�� s.� �} � , . {' r.. ��* � § ��' . 4.. p�•�Y� Unnamed (27-865 W) . =�` �.�:�s �� .� ; `� ,;: � ":?�, �€'r �^�;.�� y,�+i �. � � ° .~• � . � `�?�^ ' A,r�''., �� w « �v�+ ��w' s � a �w �+� �'u� �,.�" a ,�e.��w�Alr" �'. 1� .� � �" .. .r' �� `�. ,�� ' w � �, � i � �ti �. ,�: �� y�M1�. �h p'; ,.;. �, �A.�y.� i ��,,,,y i� � � ��e�. 'f�.' '� r-� _� � ��: �9 j : 4 n� i � i � — .. � Y•�a -• . . , , 'T ,,,�,qra�„ . � `�,�: . , k ' W�'tA a+�e ,i'dbM' "x. r � � , _, � .� � ti .,� ai�-.� , � �� . � z , ot .. 1! `�r ,,��"'"°�,��,7*► �,�;�r�' ��F� ^� "'v . j�. . s. :1.� � , � , �.: , : R� � : ' �r �h � �,.. . ��. � ,'k�, .»�� ,„ �"' �f°, _► A y"r ��, �%9'��. '. � 4 y �> }f' � �£�A:. • �. � }r �`. x �, t 'i: �s �t � .t� " � .�y� M y � ,1��r ��a t'' . � .r s ,�N. �'� �.� 'F y q � 1 �:�,, � �!� :�� 1�i' 'r''��. � t i � �. «� ♦ �tP. � • n� ' �,* �►' ~�A� * _ � . �� •� � ,,� ' ..��, �,, v, "�. � , "« , , , � �� .�µ� ;, � �,; � .. • .., . �„ .� � • ; � �. *��c, �,� . . , , > t �y. t f{ F z . �,r A�. �" ` � . A�� .._.__.x . .. .. , .�, � . � .. � 'i S~ �- � . � . .iM ��' '*�� Approximate Parcel Boundary -��<��y"� < ,,, ; ;� �.I �. Ya7pr�'y k.� ;il iy ' � .. .: � �: l .: x '. $ ��y, Y �IQIl ."�E9' . PWI Basin ` -w�s� r.,:� ��+��• �• �` JS�DDP JSGS N`EX Getniappi� � � �ia i�� _.. ��. s� ,�«�;I�`vIS�Use�..i�Cr�''�n�rn�ity •P�� _ Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Map N 1135 Heritage Ln. (KES 2016-007) � � 0 125 250 Orono, Minnesota Feet � _ � Note: [3oundaries indicated � �� u�� on this figurc are approximate L17.t1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �'�-�� official survey product. ^�� ! "4 /.,. A �'•"M'4a,�.#� ....._.�_. �� . _ 94 ...._ .,_.�rt.y k�-s ; � � � ` . a ��' ` '�� ,.. �.y r .'. , � �. � •. '� �� 1, f IIr � �, ��,.� • a`r� *, �.�",. ,� " .t._,� ,� �_� -�r r Y � y s' l t t � _+� � � •1��, �s �a r�° t,� �„,"r'`. ' } , .'' . ` - ,. M��* �9 .;��p # �� e- I p f 4 � f � �. �.t .$.� S ' �,q�€ �� /�+ � 41 .. � �'�� ^+_...� /�` " .c�q �� .�' y� d •!(�,• � � ,.� !. �' �� 4 •.� .:r�� . � �*�., � . /�', ! �p�, �, �`;.y� �' , �� `•V;'° ' � K "+P ' � � ! �s�.��g. •�,�." . f . ,� ♦ r � � D �I-s� . � � �S�n . ��, 'a t . i y �.� 'M;°� ""MMG . ( ,� �� ' � �� • N �# � I , fi� �s � '� -* n`� ..� �"r ., �� Y F yy � ' � � r . 'A �� m. �� . � � � t . y" , s�Q� ��ei � �t� � �•�f a� s.. � � I �. � y�� . � ��i+,��( �{�� .�. ��w"' �� a I. �'�"�� L� r��.: k�� ',i"� k, �•�� r 3� �� i �� s ,»� �°` �_ ,� t�''.�'' � < /�`' . ,,.� �... �' « '� � �,s+°;�� . , fi �q �; 1 '/�z�r"�� "�� '�� ..,+4�r��J E+°" "�� 4��"�� •" � ; *�'�'" . � a '�� •'�� -� ~3�� * �'.f"`� .�'*(' ��. ' �� A � h�� l'/r� . � 'j ��,Y ��'. � a *� a , � y,`� � +�« 1�' �� ./ r o� '� +� �. . ,� � S � � `fl^ ` , r � • „ ; , ; , , , ` �' .s •�:�.. - . .r. , �;'�� "� ��. � , ' . � '�� s,.: �. 4,. Po � ' ��rf 1✓ ,. � �� ., e- s �, � ��,... �� ,�x � � � - �,,�, � ' � �' � % ��b��• � � � �' " �a�` f, � s, '��f a �� J� � � � � � � j* � ,.'f � �f',S � 1 �q' �n 4 � �^ ';+>� l �,�_�� , .'�`"f . � ' ,5�� • ' �to I� f Y� «�� "�.r! a} "� � � � �� .�' �`..�^+ .y►�� n . w� #�{ !� '� � � '+� +r�. ` *��s/ . � � . 'p tl, � M�� . �,. ` a ai� ,'. �: � � �, l.,� F- 4' � M � ��,� r• "` �� ri « a� s, ..� . R M�w. Q � r .,.T��' ,� ¥ .� $.. 1�' ,�`,J ��t * a� t ^,�,n3,a, «f � ,��,� '��°�� ' '� + '�` �� i �,'� ; �`� e a r�-� i. ..: /� ; /� _�� ,,� �p�&:�'. ! � � �� i � r �' �. :�' µ 'k *, �� ,� � � � �'.�. ��i�,. e • � " 'e � ' � � j ` � � ; � ,.� .� # I /�N ' � � A �: 4( � �� . ,, , /,y�p, 4 � y� iy � �i� � .n-. "� w M � �, � #� � y,m *# ''�� ll �rk � a��,`� ._ '.. �.+ a .� . , � � *�� „ , �� , ' -Y . , � ." Y- � .'b ��x � ' ,3 _ . ,� y i - ` .. � �A,F�Y ..A �,� � .. .#. �,�, �.�. . ..4 �� "�,M 1 4�� _ �, • �� '� ,�^r �akerona ' �` � .�' � t � ��`�n ice��Esri. DigitalGlobe C� �`�� ,�is A roximate Parcel Boundar ' . Lra' � ,. , , p(� y �" a � �. r i I��DA�USGS AEsX. �etm�,F,�i y ii`�e'��i"� ��, .. �nei . �-. t. a� �. k ��" _� � '�. ��I�S Jser Gomrnunity 'X� Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset Map (US(�S) N 1135 Heritage Ln. (KES 2016-007) � , � Orono,Minnesota 0 75 1 rJ� Note:Boundaries indicated -�- ` � Tu� Feet on this figure are approximate �JOL17L1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �"�-�� official survey product. �1� 1135 Heritage Lane Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A: Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite 1135 Heritage Lane City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/6/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Mike Herman State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) 3ection,Township, Range: Sec. 10,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slope Local relief(concave,convex, none): Linear slope Slope(%): 4-6 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Malardi-Hawick(Non-Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation X , soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation below normal based on 30-day rolling average and normal for 3-month antecedent. Manicured lawn VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 100 x 3= 300 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 100 (A) 300 (B) 1 Poa p�alensis 100 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0" 7 Morphogical adaptations`(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a g separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation� 100 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 y rop ytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampting Point: 1-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirtn the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc"' Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 Sandy loam 8-36 10YR 4/3 100 Sand with gravel 36-48 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 4/2 10 D M Clay loam *Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region ProjecUSite 1135 Heritage Lane City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/6/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Mike Herman State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) 5ection,Township, Range: Sec. 10,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief(concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0-1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameMuskego, Blue Earth, Houghton(Hydric) �WI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation below normal based on 30-day rolling average and normal for 3-month antecedent. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) °/o Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saplinq/Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15 ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 85 x 2= 170 4 FAC species 15 x 3= 45 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Column totals 100 (A) 215 (B) 1 Pha/aris arundinacea 85 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.15 2 Poa prafensis 15 N FAC 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0' � Morphogical adaptations'(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 100 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 � *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 y rop ytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc"' Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 12-28 10YR 2/1 100 Organic Peat(Oa) '`Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ""'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: X Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present7 Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 12 Indicators of weUand Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology presentT Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1135 Heritage Lane Wetland Delineation Report Appe�dix B: Precipitation Data Minnesota Climatology Working Group � _ State Climatology Office - UNR Divisicm of L,colo�ical and Water Resources Univcrsitv of Minnesota home � currcnt c�mcliti�ms � �oil irnal � past data � stm�maries � a�riculture � other sites � contact us � search � � Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23 W nearest community: Crystal Bay section number: 10 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches first prior second prior third prior month: A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar- month: month: January based cstimatcs. March 2016 February 2016 2016 estimated precipitation total for this location: 1.09 0.9 0.33 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 1.18 0.41 0.48 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 2.00 0.87 1.13 type of month: drv normal ��et Dry Wet drv monthly score 1 � 3 = 3 2 * 3 =6 1 � 1 = 1 multi-month score: 10 (Normal) G t�� 9 (dty) 10 to 14 (norn�al) 15 to 1�? (wct) 3 --__ __ ___ _-- _ _ _..-- - _.� 3rd Prior 30 Days 2nd Prior 30 Days 1st Prior 30 Days � ! m � 1135 Heritage Ln, C Orono MN Site Visit 4/6/2016 � . G O f+ � 2 a � .� a� L a � i 0 � � t • � � c . . . : 0 � 1 c ca � - ca � G � ! I p - - '- 1/6/16 1/14/16 1/22/16 1/30/16 2/7/16 2/15/16 2/23/16 3/2/16 3/10/16 3/18/16 3/26/16 4/3/16 o monthly precip - daily precip 30d rolling total Project Name and/or Number: 1135 Heritage Lane PART ONE: Applicant Information I If applicant is an entity(company,government entity, partnership,etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant, lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. � Applicant/Landowner Name: Herman Renovation Company—Mike Herman Mailing Address: 5645 Eureka Road, Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone: 952.474.1757 E-mail Address: allisondoris@live.com Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above�: �' � Mailing Address: I� � Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Ben Carlson Mailing Address: 26105 Wild Rose Lane Shorewood, MN 55331 �, Phone: (952)-401-8757 �' E-mail Address: ben@kjolhaugenv.com '� PART TWO: Site Location Information ' County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono ', , Parcel ID and/or Address: 1135 Heritage Lane, PID 1011723130021 I Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): 510 T117N R23W i Lat/Long(decimal degrees): , , Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways. ' II Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project,length(feet): 1.1 Ac j � If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: ht�_j/www mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals 57 docs/re�ul_ato�JRe�ulatoo�Docs_engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information , If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination,jurisdictional determination, or other ' correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. , Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The ' project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements i i that effect aquatic resources(wetland, lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings 'i I showing the location,character,and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. ', 'i Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11 I� � � � Project Name and/or Number: 1135 Heritage Lane PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource impactl Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below.Include all anticipated impacts,including those expected to be temporary.Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo,and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s)of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Type of Impact Duration of County,Major ; Aquatic Existing Plant Aquatic Resource (fill,excavate, Impact Overall Size of Watershed#, i Resource Type Community ;� ID(as noted on drain,or Permanent(P) Size of ImpactZ Aquatic and Bank (wetland, lake, Type(s)in ; overhead view) remove or Temporary Resource 3 Service Area# tributary etc.) Impact Area° � vegetation) (T)1 of Impact AreaS i i i � � ii llf impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the"T". for example,a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered"T(220)". �, Zlmpacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the ' nearest 0.01 acre. 7ributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the Iinear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 square feet). i 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A". 4 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3'�Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. SRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. � If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated i with each: i I . . �; PART FIVE: Applicant Signature II ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have ', provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. i ' By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the ' authority to undertake the work described herein. � ,� � '�/ 6 I Signature:: ate: 6/21/2016 I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish,upon request, suppfemental information in support of this application. I � � ' 1 The term"impacY'as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of il I� __ __ _ _ _ _- _ _ — - __ _ _ - —�� IProject Name and/or Number: 1135 Heritage Lane I �� Attachment A � , Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or I � �urisdictional Determination I IBy submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District II (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU) provide me with the following(check all that apply): I �Wetland Type Confirmation I � Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU � � concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation � ; concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address � I the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). � Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminaryjurisdictional determination (PJD)is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements,a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all I ' waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be � I appealed. � i � ❑Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that I � jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the i affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. IIn order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.arm�.mil/Missions/Re�ulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx i Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 I --- � Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka, MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Naine Project Na�ne Date of Application Herman Renovation Company 1135 Heritage Lane Application Number (Mike Herman) 7/5/2016 W16-36 � Attach site locator map Type of Decision: � Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation(if any): ❑ Approve ❑ Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary(ar attach): 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 8/1/2016 � Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): Herman Renovation Company(Mike Herman) applied for a wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 1135 Heritage Lane in the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Legal description: Section 10, Township 117N, Range 23W. The boundary & type approval was requested July 5`h, 2016. A wetland delineation was conducted by Kjolhuag Environmental Services on April 6t", 2016. A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD on July Sth, 2016. One wetland was delineated along the property. Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 2/3, Wet meadow/Shallow Marsh wetland. Wetland 1 is located along the fringe of PWI Basin 27- 865W. Boundaries and types were reviewed in the field on July 27`h, 2016. Flags had been removed and were to be replaced. MCWD was in agreeinent with the boundary as originally flagged and type. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as originally delineated in the field and documented in the delineation report submitted on July St�', 2016. This decision is valid for five years. A future project located on this ro ert may require a BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 permit from the MCWD. For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal(sq. ft. or nearest .O1 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑ Financial Assurance:For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance,a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement,evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed wit11 the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal:For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits,confirmation that BW SR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Si nature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU u on re uest. Name Title Rachel Workin Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail ,� � � 8/1/2016 (952) 641-4518 rworkin@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT Additional approvals or pennits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started befare the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible far restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: � Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and $0 fee(if applicable)to: Send petition and$500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Director 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka,MN 55345 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES � SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@hennepin.us � BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer—ben.mever@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): � DNR TEP Becky Horton- becky.horton@state.mn.us � DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): Leslie Parris - leslie.parris@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO (if applicable): � Applicant (notice only) and Landowner(if different): allisondoris@live.com � Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): ben@kjolhaugenv.com Christine Mattson- cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us � Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Melissa Jenny— melissa.m.jenn,y@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: ��ww.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsri'workareas/WCA_areas.�df ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: ��.b��sr.state.nln.us/��etlands/wca/DNR_TEP�contacts.pdf� ➢De artment of Natural Resources Re ional Offices: NW Region: NE Re�ion: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol.Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E.Hwy. 2 Div. Ecol.Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm,MN 56073 Bemid'i,MN 56601 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.Tnn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_re�ions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: ��.mvp.usace.armv.mil/re�ulatorv/default.asp?pa�reid=657 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: � Approved wetland boundaries ❑ ❑ BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 4 of 3 � . �•. �� , ,�' k �� ` �,`� "� ,� ,�``� �� j�� :s L� , } �i� �. �� c � ,�"�� '� � " ' ' �N �� '� e �. �, y ,. �� 1'�"F'�'..; ,�; Y,r:., . ��'��" ` ' i� .,�• ,�: � � �:� r Wetland 1 �� n; M �,� � � � � � `� x� , �, � , � . � 0.25 Acres � '� �� '" � � �o`r, � . : . �. ,� ,, ,, �� . � r ,. � �� ' � ' .s .� ' � �.:��' �,. . �, r Ir�� , � � co �:,� . � �°�`� � '� �� ` �� . W� - �+ N� ''~^� . ;`, �`�d ` �. �`�� ,� �,��r� � ,�• '��, � f�� r ��` � ,.��` � s� �N � `}��"...m, l,�, , � , - � . .r...' �„�r°,x ,„�,�; � � .�� : , .. ! f�e � � /,Ftb,. a `� ';� �A '�"� 4 ` :�.� �� t��` ��4 A �a.�r ;�� .�, f� ��,. . � � � /,�� / i .v�.� M ^ •� �� Pr*y•�. � � ' ..4 � �� W pe. �o_ �G rii., �,�„ .c"' �� , . ,x o �-� ~ : �'.�,�'.,.��° f� � M f � � f � �:� ,�� ,r, �. � '� e,i ��. �'��! y,< 1 � ��1 � �' 1� '�4 � �k '�'� � L�!'� % � �, � �,l " � � i '�,�� " x � � �� '�`t tJl � ,_ � y '' . �� , p� � ■ � ,p r � i�- � ��'� �� ..c� * �". �O, �� .:� y! ° . ., . ' ' �� ,��,�� Mj : �_ �,.� --� �M . �+�� k 'Y=' `� �. � '� � � �S �'� ",� �rrs., . s fe ' _ �t �' ,. � "� _ �� ., �, � 4� '�`" �� . !� � c+� ' s G.�r•�. �,;� � � �� N �� f i � � � d�'� u`�^ ` i, t . i, �° �r � _ , �f,h � �"f � �`�' � � f :. '��` �`� g �S 'w � � `�. � ;��`� �: . ,, , � i,� s;`� � � ,�� r �- , � ., s _ � � �t. ,�,. _ '�, .� a�:� n�g, ,.._ � � �"f �e" . ,+� 'f % �•• . ,.+€" � r. pl� .'�" ... , � . � , . �ti: +� — - "�!'4� . ' � + '^ s,�y � �F � '�' ¢ � � r'� . c�',fF �� * �'� � . � �'� � .� ..u�� p /�w,Y�" ,..- . . + '�� n ,-�.� ,j �3' � ` � � .{� � . . , ;_ � S� �6 '� �, . � h .�� 'PIn� "�t � �� F' ., ' '�° ¢ !�w k� µr�1 `T 4` 4; '� � ?l � �-� �,� ` � � �,� -�-- �, _ , ,� n � : , �. �. ��: , � �,. � ��r � ,�� - � � �''�� ,� .,� ,� o- '�� r , �_ � . � �. �� -��:: � _� r . .h �.� � - � � �� _�� °�� ,� M�` � � �„ . . � � �� . �; Sample Point O�� `�� x� �< �`�� ` �"�,,.. � � a�+ � �° ' � . 'r �� Transect • �`'F � � �` �, � � _� p x� . � �.. �r �, �.w,� � Approximate Parcel Boundary �f � �� . - _'`Y� I� .. ,� . GPS Wetland Boundary � �� `� :��. � �'�� 960� ,}�� .�.` Figure 2 - Existing (:onciitions Map - World lmagery '� 1135 Heritage Ln. (KES 2016-007) �' Feet Orono,Minnesota ¢ s- � � 50 �00 Note:Boundaries indicated KTOT u�T TG on this figure are approximate ,� L11riV ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �''�'�'� ofscial survey product. �1/ Source:MnGeo,ESRI Imager� Basemap