Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutseptic info SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTOR Y : � - Address: 1000 Heritage Ln. PID: 10-117-23 14 0005 Building Type: residence BRs Install'd for: 4 In Musa: Yes Permit#: 3890 Date of Permit: 4/9/74 Installer: Widmer Bros. System 1�ype: standard trench Experimental: no Appliances: lndry,dshw, SYSTEM CONDITION Conformity: 3 Tank Condition: 5 DF condition: 11 Failure Pot: high SEPTIC TANKS Material: concrete block Capacity: 1000, 500 Setback to Bldg: 11 Cesspool: no DRAINFIELD Length of Lines: 400 # Lines: 5 Trench Width: 2 Treatment Area: 800 Type of Filter: rock Soil Boring: yes Tile Size: 4 Under Tile: Perc Rate: Setback DF-Bldg: 10 DF Ht above Wt: 0.5 Soil Type: clay loam, gravel Limitations: water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks: 50 Well-DF: 75 Report in File yes Pump Type: subm. Depth: 172 Diameter: 4 Method: drilled INSPECTION RECORD PUMPO UT RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS 10/3/78 compliance s 10/1/87 2000 �/9/83 house vacant-noted location of rock/tile 2 10/24/97 2000 6/18/84 no surfacing 2 9/24/87 some wet areas,not critical 2 7/10/90 DF moist,not seriou(drainage) 2 10/1/92 no surfacing-pump tanks 2 7/14/93 non-conforming-separation 6"-repair by 1 3 6/9/94 non-conforming-no surfacing 3 4/13/98 non-compliant-repair by 12/31/2001 3 7/26/00 connect to sewer by 12/31/2007 (./ 3 (Cr..t�CL�CU �'fC SCwc' 1�.—IS _ c'�1 O 1��� i���i/-� P� . � � N - � � � ��� � � � , : ; - ,q , . ��� i o � i ;o' / � � /� ` _. '/ �� , ` � � 9 0 , � , i �, � ;� � / � , ; , o, , �Ln 13� � 6 D , ,, ,, ;� , , ��. z�, � a g'� �� � � � �� '% � � �� C� � �� ��'� �7'� _� �re, ��-� � �� f Cnv � � � �`�� l �� � o� , o o - �; ��p��l� ;,.� ,� CITY of ORONO ���,, I"����,y'��`� "�� �ti Municipal Offices f���� ��..�� �� �,� ������;=����1".�G Street Address: Mailing Address: �9 ''`r�'' 4ti �f�gg0 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 owner: George Risko Address: 1000 Heritaga Ln. Permit #'s: 3B90 Dates: 4/9/74 Contractors: Widmar Bros. (This is [ ] an existing system [ ] new construction) . SYSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 3 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or locatior., but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level is ( ] or is not [ ] identifiad undar this septic system. If the saturated soil level is not identified, this classification is subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (S-9) : 5 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 The tank or tanks meet the definition of a cesspool and must be replaced within 10 months. (Tha tanks are [ ] or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [ ] unknown. If the tanks are not confirmed to be watartight, this classification is subject to revision.) DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc. ) : high COMMENTS: In order to confirm that your septic system meets Minnesota standards, soil borings were performed to verify a 3 foot separation between the drainfield and the seasonal water table. The separation is .5 feet and the system is non-compliant. Repair or replacement of the septic system is required by 12/31/2001. 4/13/98 L�� - Date of Inspection Septic System Inspecto Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O � O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT r�',, �C�, INSPECTION REPORT �' G~ ��kESH�4'� ' L-n Owner• Address• �E • Permit �'s: 0 Dates: `�7'�/—�/"T" Contractors: � . City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site seWage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (7his is �n existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): � 1 "CODE SYS7EM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input uithout discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but uas installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less t an 3 feet g� unsat ted soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.����rY„_.�/�� �a 3r.-C�� ia� (7he limiting soil characteristic�-has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If e limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): Tank inspection indicates: Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. 7anks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe> must be installed in each tank at next punpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle <does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Dr�e�n field inspection indicates: (7,Y Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City [nspector immediately. Repairs must be completed uithin 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): �� COMMENTS: Date o Inspection e ic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available informatton. This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system loc�tien and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O � O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON–SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT r�,. � INSPECTION REPORT ti ���kESH�4'�G Owner• � J�� �//�1"�,l�/ �l,�f�,ddress• � 7' -� Permit #'s: Q Dates: `��—"r���Contractors: i' f�l� C City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is �an existing system [ ] neu construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and uhich is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. , 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM'�-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet alt the location, design, and construction standards of the curren City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and anv sy�,xem with l _,�oil o� sar�l yibetueen the distribution devi 'm+tina soil charac eristtcs. 5���,; ys��l��/n �/+`<{�'� ''%\ :� y r�r�, (The limiting soil characteristic�has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identifie , this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): / L- Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. b Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped /� out now. 41l/ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulati n). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. ��� �,�� / – , 4 � ►'►�N�, DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Dr field inspection indicates: �Drainfie[d is dry, no surfacing evident. i2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS Cslope,setbacks,etc.): �, � POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): �'� COMMENT : � � ,� � /� , � I �� � _ l . � L' C� ' r � l� � % � � � ��.�� �lT�� Is ` � �f � `� `G"—� P � ��''— Date of Inspection ep c System Inspector ��,�mf���, Note: Yn the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system loc�tion and pumping records. WHITE COPY Inspectors File YELLOW COPY'Homeowner CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O � O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT r�`,� � INSPECTION REPORT ti ��9kESH04'�G owner:���/� !`Yi��4+Q3(`� Address: /� 1�"j°',ii T�p. �p• Permit #'s: .��(� Dates:�—� Contractors: /n�"L.�ri�P+� �rDS. City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is �], an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): � 1 "CODE SYSTEM'�-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system uhich does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but uas installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYS7EM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic [ ] has or� has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): Tank inspection indicates: Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. �olids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be insPected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. ]f tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Dr field inspection indicates: Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated efftuent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed uithin 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS Cslope,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table etc.): ����^ COMMENTS: D te of Inspection ptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the prE�nises with the system locati�n and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner . � S�� T,�STING, INC. Steven B. Schirmers — MPCA Cert. No. 627 951 Katydid Lane NE • St. Michaei, MN 55376 • (612) 497-3566 b September 24 , 1993 �.�A,�� , Garth Johnson 1000 Heritage Lane Orono, Henn. Co. , MN This On-Site Sewage Treatment System is Designed for a Type l, four bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances . The soils on this site are SCS soils mapped - HeB - Heyder sandy loam & LrB - Lester loam. A seasonally high water table was not present in the area of the proposed system. This site has an existing non-conforming system due to a seasonally high water table less than 36" below the bottom of the treatment area, fill soils & in a drainage pattern. The existi�g tanks are recorderd at the city as block type and will need to be abandoned, pumped & filled with soil . The soils at a depth of 30" have a percolation rate averaging 11. 5 min/inch. A Standard Trench System may be installed. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weather proof enclosure. A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device, this is in case of a pump failure. Mercury floats are a good method. The supply line pipe must have back drainage to the pumping chamber. All neighboring wells are located greater than 75 ' away from the proposed treatment area. CONT ' D . � , __ , Gartz Johnson 1000 Heritage Lane Orono, Henn. Co. , MN � 2) Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment area before and after construction. The treatment area should be marked off before construction. This Design is not valid & the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for On-Site Sewage Treatment occurs . With proper installation and maintenance , this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent effectively. Nothing other than gray water, (laundry, showers , etc. ) human waste & toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks . Garbage disposals are not recommended. Smaller amounts of laundry soaps , dish soaps , cleaning agents , etc . are better for the system. Antibacterial soaps & chlorine agents may kill the bacteria needed to treat septic effluent properly. Additives are not recommended, they may cause harmful damage to your system. Recommend to pump & clean your tanks by a certified pumper every year if you have 1 tank & every 2 years if you have 2 tanks to insure proper maintenance. Cr�- , <a✓`---'—O'' Steven . Schirmers SBS/ds �� �` ��re aL.� N�Av�( '�Q�-��P�--l�ra� o�� o� �Cl-�� �oeos� -�'�z�►�-fr-��rA-r �e�o, t��oF� �8 ��� �c�-�s-t�-ac,�C�W-� '��9. ��� _- � �y, . �/ � ! 3s_', � ecs t9� T�.�M: TnP oF So�t'N Cv,s-f' PR�?ERT`t � �1 3`� � X � - rnfirt)r-R Ti�nr.i FLvs H w��s\i � . � � M :. ,� q3. � '`Zi r+� l t�in U N D `� � t>- � - � __�o'C'cx�E'� SD•� `_t` _ ��� LN+�'6'�� �� ''i� ' y �Y/. L- lnO.Ub \ � \��� —aq.a• su �-`z •..�r► _ 7 �3 j \44 t �'� t`'iPerco!o!ion Tests Scote: 1.,'s3�� �x�'T�' . �-� ' X$oil8orings � �� HousE "' � 1�.S — �'• � �s,Z o6 ',. , z.l � \ 3 3 ` ��' ^" �'c�,' '�` ��,t, `� �Benct: Mork \ � W 9'' ��Q` '" \�a �^�� . - �:, � ;' Q' ' � � 433 No1e= This systern ;5 to be construcfed to meet �� �` � S�� �y t:�, `s �" � the Mir,nesolo pollu«ion Con'rot A.;ency -�g s / ���S� � .����o_ �� � � Chapter 7080 & .Local Ordinanc , )99 � �zg ;,� S � _ \`��;�" �� . 7. i � � �TAIti1K5u� �� es� � , Check all underground LZtilitie; I � `� N��txva�. �s� , �a,a PftCPERTY OF: U��� �0�1�50�, ► ; ExislNU �'�� Y�4os+� -fi-��r-t��-� A�4 � w�� .� ��si �.r-� �� 3� �.�� -t��,-���s �DO �_���1'�A1�� L� ._ a��-! �iil.FT. � ' ` ��� 1`�� . 1-1�N�. C O, " z 1 . _ `' S-P TEST/NG/NC �o��. - Oesigned By�,2l�- �. �� .;rY— Ca'e�3/�,:u�� PN.6t2 -497-3566 . - -�i- - ---- --� --- Cx.'.5'��� C'CCC j ; back till 6 �m�n. l 3�to4�� loyer of uncompocted j � , hay or stravr covered with = ; O I 4 pipe dia. _ red rosin paper �� � �'�' . _ i ; � � ^� '� I��rock filter materiol � „ rake sidewalls � bottom to ; ; . I remwe smearing � -� � SET- BACKS ' 'g=36� � ;+—, ---•�; HOUSE System must be� Tank 1SZ� from property lines TR�NCH X- SECTION . �s' `,rom wells ' (rnin, of iwo trenches� �Q from bldgs. 5��� oN ��o� Treatment orea =�fran lakes , _� streams (mmc, length 100�) � Treatment area 3� from property lines t-�i��-���o�.ES �����'" 2�.�from wells RA«`'`'�� �.�from bldgs. �- -- 1Q from trees ote�Power supply and switches must be in a wea?her SOIL BORING ELEVATIONS � � � �i proof endosure outside pumping chamber ;� �min. � � . �i.pJr, � � i � �-� � - „ , ; THAI EL.-� .L� . a piPe___=,;_ � a �-- ' -- ' TH. 2 EL. -q�, I -=--=-17,5' i'��-��--� ;-� .. Tonk " � TH. 3 EL.-� �.4 Tank ; ��w ���,� ,��_� ;__., �__' �_� Grode�%siope Drop to Tank ' S,� - � - - 5 " �!S � '«���' �� �At least 41/2�of undisturbed �• 4 EL_� Min. I to 8 '�.�'�. �q' S 30 o�c�T earth between trenches TH"5 EL. ump!ng Max.l��to4� � ELEVATION at PROPOSED PUMPING , ,� xLs-t»v -fik�`�s �� ���`� Chamber DROP BOXES 4 to 6 dia. pipe �-p�- A�a���o�-► ��w�P �8 ��LL- CHAti'�6ER-5��..� (ground elev.) S O W So�L 1 U'gou r�� A�C �e�C'�f�Y��G--`�,l. �) �� ,Zr-�C n _(u�.(. SYSTEM DESlGN �oY � �5�.-�,a}�� - r, i . o TYPE S,y BE�ROOM - Perco!atien rate� min.�nch (design/L�-3o min./inch) �� �� 1`^9 " t�o.�6 Treatment area required w/��� of rock filter moterial�+10% _��Isq.ft. of trer,ch bottom area needed =_�� trench width = lin.ft.of trench reeded , number of drop boxes (to be determined by the ir,s?a�!er) ' Number of tor�ks required a , Ist iank/Uo�gal_ , 2nd tan4��Jgol. minimums i Cleon rock� cu.yds. ( 3/4�� to 2 !/2��dia.,includes 2��above pipe ) ' PROPERTY OF� L���1� �O�-1�Sv�. •• Pumping chomber copacity= 25% o' doily sewage flow of(c;0 ga�.=1S�9o'.+Reserve.s?oragelc�gol.+ P�pe back drainage a3 go(_= oo'_ cop, /UUO 1-�'G�\''CI�1,� 1.,A . � ' • IS� P�as A�ef���R�r-ts'_ vs�__r.-,.n i000�l c�,�• C7rD1-�p l�'1�1 . \� '�?a1� , Q 0, • � ( Reserve storage = 35ga1./ bedreom =(�?�yal. + pipe back droinaae- �� gal./IOCiin.ft.3, pipe- �eng+h of pipe needed opr�aS ft. �,go!.) Pump size�•�hp w/mercury !ioat pump controls us��`-� I � �-1�0 ��5s, �15�.►aA��� `1 5 �,o,l) „�„n - Ml��l. , S—P/ TEST/NG /N- I Note � When corstruc+,ing be d - , this area s hou b be s hape d h'o te= Dis tance from lrea t men t oreo io neig h b o ring v.e!Is— Designed By�Z�^1-- � - ����'n�---- � to divert run-off from en'ering treo!ment area. �g'�'�� "�� ��a � - pare :g/�/g� � PH. 612-497-3566 I�1DIL'IDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM ZNORKSHEET . .. . ,, , FLOW Estimated Scwage Flows in Gallons per day A. Estirnated C C� O gpd (g�) measured --- x 1.5= — gpd um r SEPTIC TANK VOLUME of Typc I Typc II Typc III TyUc Bedrooms 1V B. J —/0 0 C� gallons 2 300 225 180 SOILS(Site evaluation data) 3 450 300 218 � ,, � 4 6�0 375 256 °t`�` C. Depth to restricting layer= 5(� -ro 7 `� feet "''°`� 5 750 4S0 294 ;,, D. Maximum de th of s stem C-3 ft= � • s � feet 6 900 525 332 �Yr��. p Y 7 1050 600 370 I�°f E. Percolation rate I I. S MPI g 1200 675 a08 �oi�� F. Soil Sizing Factor .l �� sq ft/gpd (See table 3) TIZENCH BOTTOM AREA Scptic Tank Capacitics,in gallons H. For trenches with 6 inches of rock below the pipe: A x F= x = ft of bottom area Number of Minimum Liquid I-�9arba ePd s'�osal� SQ Bedrooms Capaciry g g p I. For trenches with 12 inches of rock bclow the pipe: � AxFx0.8=/�Qx�'Zx0.8=5�lsqftofbottomareahlo�o=��1 23oras ioso�o isouo J. For trenches with 18 inches of rock below the pipe: a o�6 tsoo 2zso A x F x 0.66= x x 0.66= sq ft of bottom area �.8 0`9 2°°° 3°W o��9 K. For trenches with 24 inches of rock below the pipe: AxFx0.6= x x0.6= sqftofbottomarea BED BOTTOM AREA L. For seepage beds with 6 or 12 inches of rock below the pipe; 1.5 x A x F= 1.5 x x = sq ft of bottom area Soil Charactcristics xnd Requircd Arcas foc Sewagc 1'rcatmcnt ROCK VOLUME IN CU FT !'ezcolation Rate in Squate Gallons M. Rock depth below distribution pipe plus 0.5 foot times bottom area: �,������,�n soar�x��� r�� �r a�y�r M=Rock depth(ft)+6 inches x Area (H,I,J,L,or K) �Mf'�> g+ll�On per ���R r«x (� ft+0.5 ft)x�=��a i cu ft Fasur than 0.] • Coarsc Sand ---- ----- ROCK VOL-UME IN CU YDS 0.1 w5 Sand o.s3 �.20 0.1 to 5 1-ine sand•' 1.67 0.60 N. Volume in cu ft divided by 27 6�o�s Sandy L.oam �.z� 0.�9 M+27=cu ds +27= cu ds i 6`°3°__--_ L°'"' - �`6� o.�'° y L3a] �`� y `���o4s ssi�t�m 2.00 oso ROCK WEIGHT a6�6o Ci,y tA�m 2.zo o.a5 Slower th�n 60 a•• GaY ---- ---•- O. Cubic yards times 1.4 = tons Nx1.4= tons�xl.4 =�tons � DISTRIBUTION (Check one based on slope) � t•t�f•f�}•f�f�f•fr;r};fr} T- Bed (]ess than 6%slope) ���������������t��� ���� �� r•r•r•r•r•r•r•r•r•r•:�f�r•r 2 inch Covcr r;i�••••�'�•�••••�••'•'••'••• I •r•r•r•r•:•r•f•:;r•:���i Trenches ' �'�''�''�''� . f.;,f,;. ::f:;:f.; .ti..,..,.ti. • �Drop boxes(any slope) tilti:ti:�• ':::f:' r•r r•f: 'r•r;:•r 4 inch Pipc ti•ti•ti••. Distribution box(level to slightly slopir�g) }•r•f•f• :;f�%:: ti.�..ti.ti. TRENCH LENGTH r�rti'•�r�r' •'�f�''r�f• r•f•r•r•r�'r•r•:•r�r�f•:�'r•: ti,ti,ti,ti,.,,.,,ti,ti,.,,.,.. . . . i/ P. Select trench width= 3 ft r'''f'r'f'r'f'f'f'r'f'f'r'' �a ti••.•ti•ti•ti••.••.•ti••.••.•• Q. Divide bottom area by trench width: (H, I,J,or K)+P= rtif�'•ti;tif�'•�f�f�•'���f�'�f�f� :•f•r• •f•r�r•r�r�::'r:r:r:f: ••. ti••.••.•ti••.•ti••.••.••.••.••.••.•• 6-24 inch . f.f.;.f.f.r.r.:.:.;.f.;. lineal feet �ti'ti•ti•ti•'••ti•'••ti•ti•'••ti•'••'••' Kock I3elow the Yi f.r.;.f.;.:.r•:•:•:•:•:•:•r; P �+�_�lineal fcet '�:�f�'�''•'~''•'�''•'�''•''•'' Y : f;;;f•:.:.:.::::.::::: ti..,,.,, ti..,,.,.. f•:•r•f�r�f•f•r•r�f�:�f�:�:• LAWNAREA ti•ti.ti•.,.ti,ti,ti.ti................. f�f;r•f•r;r;f;f•f;r;r;f•r•r R. Select trench spacing,center to center=�fcet S. Multiply trench spacing by;ineal feet R x Q= sq ft of lawn area ��_x�=��sqft LAYOUT(Use other side) 1.Select an appropriate scale;one square= feet. 2.Sho�v pertinent property boundarics,right-of-way,easements. 3.Show location of house,garage,drive�vay,and all other improvements, existing or proposed 4.Show locaHon and layout of sewage treat►nent system. 5.Show location of water supply wcll. 6. Dimension all set backs and separation distances. . .. . �JI�iP SELECTION PROCEDURE A. Determine pump capadty: Gravity Distribution END PERFORATION OF A PERFORA7ED LATERAL 1. Minimum suggested is 600 gallons per hour(10 gpm)to stay ahead of �--c,,..c,�., water use rate. Topwll -� 2. Maximu��n�s�ugges livery to a drop box of a home system is 2,7(?0 , �.,loyer of Geoiutil� FaDrlc(u tar- gallons r hour(4�gpm) prevent build-up of pressure in drop box. ��mY so� �Y.. -��„��,a,.�.o,�,y,..,.,,<<a�,, >,.,,�«a .o.����� ,, er or I o e a Perlo�otion Orilled Horitonlolly Pressure Distribution • • ���o p �ar Top �/�Fut A1 Leasl 12�lo Edqt 3. a. Select number of perforated ]aterals ` ; F��e q«k� .,:••' o� r�k �r�, b. Select perforation spacing= ft. � ' ` P.;raa,io��'���.a o� c. Subtract 2 ft.from the rock layer length. _ � Cl�an Sond l.oytr Boi�om ol Lateral Y�-�-z Ir _ --ft. . , . ._ , Oripinol Soll Properly Scarilitd � &(ore Plocl�p Sard Loyer d. Determine the number of spaces between perforations. Length perf.spacing=- ft.d Et.- s�aces TABLE OF PERFORATION DISCHARGFS IN CPM e. �-spa�-1 - --- perforations/lateral ' f. Mulriply perforaHons per lateral by number of laterals to Head Perforation diameter(inches) get total number of perforations. ��`�"x ---�-��- --perforations. ��" ��' 1.0a OS6 0.74 7 S 0.69 0.90 g' �gP,,,-r-►�r=�--gPn'' 2.ob a.so �.oa 2S 0.89 1.77 3.0 0.98 1.28 SELECTED PUMP CAPACITY gpm Y�d}JZ. 4.0 1.13 t.a� 5.0 1.26 1.65 B.Determine head requirements: aUse 1.0 foot of head for residential systems. 1. Elevadon difference between pump and point of discharge. bUse 2.o E�c ot head for oct,er estabtuhn,encs ��feet 2. If pumping to a pressure distribution system,add five feet for pressure required at manifold - feet 3. FriCtion loss Pipe Length a. Enter friction loss table with gpm and pipe diameter. � Poin�of D;scharge Read friction loss in feet per 100 feet fro�n table. � `�I.p F.L._ ,�� ft./100 ft of pipe Elevation Difference b. Determine total pipe]ength from pump to discharge Pump SS,� point. Add 25 percent to pipe length for fitting 3 � � loss,or use a fitting loss chart. Equivalent pipe F-18b length-125 rimes pipe lcn�th = 1.5 inch 2.0 inch 3.0 inch ��x 1?5 =��(�feet gpm Friaion lou per 100 ft of pi�e c. Calculate total friction loss by multiplying 10 0.69 0.20 friction loss in ft/100 ft by equi��alent pipe length. 12 0.96 0.28 Total friction loss= ? .� f- x /S� �100=_�feet 14 1.28 038 •S. Total head required is the sum of elc�•ation difference, 16 1.63 0.48 18 2.03 0.60 special head requirements,and total friction loss. 20 2.47 0.73 0.11 25 3.73 1.11 0.16 :C. + - +�_ 30 5.23 1.55 0.23 (1) (2) (3c) 35 7.90 2.06 0.30 40 11.07 2.64 0.39 _4�.____14.73_ 28_- 0.48 TOTAL HEAD � �. feet 50 3.99 0.58 55 4.76 0.70 60 5.60 0.82 C. Pump selection .�.,,1�X 1. A pump must be selected to deliver at least 4� gpm (Step A) with at least � I feet of total head (Step B). ..--1.S ".., :'I1� " ..-: : � u., ,i , ',�,��:, c�f S�i ] 13<>> i r��a:, Location c= Project_��rth ,7ohnson, 1000 Heritacte Lane , Orono .. . Bt�Yings ma�e by �-P '�'estinq, Inc . Steve Schirmers Date 9-21-93 Classi�ict�on Sya�em: AASHc� ; USDA-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Aucer usec (check two) : Iland X , or Power , Flight , or Bucket X Depth, E�ring n�mber 1 Depth , Boring number 2 in in Teet S�rface elevation 91 . 2 feet Surface elevation 91 . 1 J - ---- ---- - ------- 0 - --- - - - Topsoil dark brown 1 _ Topsoil dark brown 1 _ loam sandy loam 0 - 1 ' 4" Brown clay loam 2 - 0 - 2 ' 2" 2 - Dark 2 � 2�� _ 2-1/2 'me�iumlOsa � 1 , 4„ _ 2 , 8„ 3 _ Brown loamy medium sand 3 _ 2-1/2 ' - 3 ' 4" 4 - 4 - Brown loam S - 5 - Brown medium sand� 6 - � 6 - 2 � 8�� _ 6 � 8�� � � Brown coarse sand 3 � 4�� _ g � 6 � 8�� _ 8 , 1 8 - 8 - � � ?�nd of i�oring at g � feet . End of boring at 8 � feet . Standing water table: Standing water table : present at feet of depth , present at feet of depth, hours after boring . hours after boring . Not present in hole X Not present in hole X Mottled soil : Mottled soil : Observed at feet of depth. Observed at feet of depth. Not present in hole Y Not present in hole � Comments : Comments : 1�--1 J � f �O1 � 13c�1 1 Ilc�:; ���'`'�� " � orono --�, .: �, .•-,2/ - Heritage Lane , -= Cr`-.TI;� : ":. ; . 1000 or ProJz`�t Garth Johnson, Date 9-21-93 Location Inc . Steve Schirmers � . Other =-p 'i_estin X _� Unif ied___� � made bY=.-- Boiin� - AASHU • USDA-SCS X � F 1 i g h t , o r B u c k e t_______— Classi=iction Sy��em: . `I�n� or power__� 4 Auger used (�h��'` `WO� � Boring number Depth , number 3 in 85 .3 Depth, IIoring Surface elevation 84 . 4 feet i n —, - ._ feet Surface elevation ---- � - dark brown -- _---- Topso lo�� � _ --- � loam Topsoil dark brown sandy loam 1 - Brown loam 1 - � _ 1-1/2 � lp�� - 1' 10" I'' 10" �andy Brown 1-1/ 2 ' - 1' oam 2 _ 2 - loam Brown sandy 3 - 3 _ BroWn loamy medium sand 4 - 4 - 1' 10" - 4 � g�� , 5 _ groWn loamy medium 1 ' 10" - 5 _ 5 � 4„ loa�oam San y sand 5 - Brown 5' Brown loamy sand 6 - 4 � g�� - 6-1/ 2� 6 - 5 � 4�� - 6 ' 10"-MOTTLED ' ��7 _ Brown me�dium san loam I Brown 6 � 10�� _ 7 ' 2�� 7 _ g ' I ' Rusty olive brown loam 6-1/2� � � 2„ 81 8 I 8 ' End of borinq at 8 ' fe�t . g ' feet . End of borinq at Standing water table : water table : feet of depth , Standing present at�— feet of depth , present at__ hours after boring • X hours after boring • resent in hole X Not � Not present in hole Mottled soil : Mottled soil : Observed at __— feet of depth. Observed at_____ feet of depth• t�ot present in hole X Not present in hole X Comments : �-�mments : I _� _._ y:-�UUL / � PERCOL�TION TEST DATA SHEET S-P Testing, Inc . 9-22-93 8 : 33 � "'. Perc��;::tiun test readings made b�� on �tartin`�at p.m. �.,,., Te>t h��le loeation 1000 Heritage Lane . Hole r,ur,�ber 3 . Date hole�vas prepcired 9'21-93 J,rt�.�f hule bottom 30 inches, Diameter of hole 6 inches Soil data trom test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0 - 18" Topsoil dark brown sandy loam 18" - 22" Brown sandy loam 22" - 30" Brown loamy medium sand �lethod of scratchinE side���all Knif e Depch of�ra�•el in bottom of hole 2 inches Date and hourof initial water filling 9-21-93 , UC�I���initial ��ater fillin� 12 inches above hole bottom �tethod used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours AutomatlC Slphon , Ataximum�t ater depth above hole bottom during tes� 6 inches Time Percolation :ime inrerval. Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks minutes inches lzvel, inches minutes per � � inch • 8 : 20 prefill 6 ; � 8 : 33 9 : 03 " j 3-3/4 8. 0 30 min 9 : 04 9 : 34 � ° 3-11/16 —�-8 . 1 � " " 9 : 39 1 10 : 09 1 " 3-5/8 I 8. 3 � _" " -- i , i - - — ; � � Percolation rate = 8 ' 1 minutes per inch.