The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2009-00270 - septic mound system - CITY OF ORONO PERMIT NO.: 2009-00270 � � 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356- DATE IssUED: 06/OU2009 (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 REPRINTED ON 7/14/2009 ADDRESS : 3285 GRAHAM HILL RD PIN : OS-117-23-11-0006 LEGAL D�ESC : GRAHAM HILL PRESERVE : LOT 000 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE : SEPTIC PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : NEW A.CTNITY : MOUND SYSTEM-SEPTIC . APPLICANT SEPTIC NEW 200.00 DASEN CO. STATE SURCHARGE SEPTIC 0.50 24245 NATCHEZ TOTAL 200.50 LAKEV[LLE, MN 55044- (952)461-2100 Minnesota State License#: 1612 OWNER BPS Properties, LLC LLC, BPS PROPERTIES, 201 LAKE ST E WAYZATA, MN 55391 AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT I�he work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. "I'his permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for addi[ional or related work which requires separate permits. nll provisions of laws and ordinances goveming this type of work shall be compied wi[h whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not �(,�� commenccd within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is � suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced � �J �� The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are � ,��' requested in conformance wi[h the State Building Code.This permit may be J'� revoked at any time for due cause. / / �'/ � Applicant Permitee Signature Date � � � Issued By Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. , .1 CITY OF ORONO PERMIT NO.: 2009-00270 � ' 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356- DATE IssuEn: 06/OU2009 (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 3285 GRAHAM HILL RD PIN : OS-117-23-11-0006 LEGAL DESC : GRAHAM HILL PRESERVE : LOT 000 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE : SEPTIC PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : NEW APPLICANT SEPTIC NEW 200.00 DASEN CO. STATE SURCHARGE SEPT[C 0.50 24245 NATCHEZ TOTAL 200.50 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044- (952)461-2100 Minnesota State License#: 1612 OWNER BPS Properties, LLC LLC, BPS PROPERTIES, 201 LAKE ST E WAYZATA, MN 55391 AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 0 da s at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is r o i e � assuri II required inspections are requested in co o a a Building Code.This permit may be revoked at a e �i�J Z � ��j' / / Applic Permitee Signature Date Issued By S' � ature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED OVE. . �. �� City of Orono FOR CITY USE ONLY � P.O. Box 66 �' — ', 2750 Kelle Parkwa Date Received: � Permit#�� 7� �t.,�e Y Y a �t�?=,';. +. � Crystal Bay, MN 55323 �-r� W �Yi i> ¢ a��!�.��F�;�yo (952)249-4600 Amount: $ .J" ��oe CITY OF ORONO - SEPTIC SYSTEM PERMIT APPLIC�k�'�ON (All permits must be approved by the On-Site Septic Manager and/or Building Official) 3 ZS�' (�r�,l.�.r�. �.( � Job Site l Owner information: � ^ t:� ��/ �-''�c�i "'r: Site Address: `>� S � .=- �� .� --y '��` � - c- ��'� i J Owner: � `�' � '� `� Mailing Address: City: Zip: Home Phone: Alternate Phone: Contractor/Applicant Inforrnation: i`�' � Contractor/App.: ,�� ,,.-� � =�- Contact Person: � > ',✓'��=z `� ;ys-� / � Address �� 5 /�'��t f��'z State License #: '� /I� � � � ..- City: �''��`�'�� Zip: -> S��' `� Expiration Date: �j'�`''� 2� �='�� Phone: � �7 �� C� �� Alternate Phone: ��- �'�� - cU�� TYPES OF CICCU`PANCY � Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Other PERMIT TYPE AND FEES —� New or Replacement System � �200.00 ,,�f��C.�' Repair Existing System 100.00 (Tanks or Drainfield) State Surcharge .50 .50 Total $ ��i �� V:\(Permits)\Septic Permit Application-New Permit Fees 2009.doc 1 / 2 i�. � ** ATTENTION APPLICANT ** � ' I ; Fill in all appropriate blanks and check all appropriate boxes. � I will be installing the following: Tanks ❑ Precast Concrete ❑ Fiberglass ❑ Plastic ❑ Other � (list manufacturer) % Number of Tanks: I � , �- , Size of Tanks: ? �i � f� j li�� v % � J Treatment System Trenches s.f. � ��'�- / o�.� t3P� �% ��3 0 � Mound !� s.f. Gravel less s.f. Chamber s.f. Final Cover/ Top Soil �� to be borrowed from site (show location on site plan) trucked in The undersigned hereby applies to the City of Orono for issuance of a septic system installation permit, agrees to do all the work in strict accordance with ordinances of the City and regulations of the State of Minnesofa'and certifies that all statements made on this application are complete, true and correct. ' , � __... f SignatureofApplicant ;,�� ' �% ��-� Date: -< �� --� �: �r �" _- , c>� MPCA License No.: � Staff Review: Accept ❑ Denied Reviewer: �',, ��,� �'� Date: �v�� ( -O � - - - r Reason for Denial: Comments (to be printed on inspection card): V:\(Permits)\Septic Permit Application-New Permit Fees 2009.doc 2 � 2 � 3��s5 �r��.vn I-�l 11�, Rusty Olson's--Soil and Percolation Testing G:�O:�i: i;G��Y Joseph J. Olson--MPCA License#810 11481 Riverview Rd.NE, Hanover,MN 55341 (763)498-8779 Fax(763)498-8290 ORONO COPY Revised February 08,2009 Chazles Cudd Co. Lot 5,Block 1 Graham Hill Preserve Orono, Hennepin County T'his on-site Sewage Treatment System is designed for a Type 1,five-bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. The seasonally saturated soils were located at 16"-22"(mottled soil). Due to seasonally saturated soils,a pressurized Mound System will need to be installed to treat septic ef�luent. The bottom of the treatrnent area must be located at least 3'above the saturated soils. Tfie soils at a depth of 12"have a percolarion rate averaging 9 NIPI. All neighboring wells aze located greater than 100'away from proposed treatment area. OF�QNO COPy A tank filter and lateral clean outs need to be installed. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area. The power supply and Switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weatherproof enciosure. A warning device must be installed with light and sound devices;this is in case of a pump failure. The manifold and supply line must have back drainage to the pumping chamber. The distribution pipes shall have a clean out device connected to there end for maintenance. Keep all heavtr equiament off of the uroaosed treatment areas before,durine�nd after construction The area around both sites must be fenced off bv the contractor before anv construction be¢ins This Design is not valid and the Svstem will need to be retocated if failure to arotect the areas proaosed for On-Site Sewage Treatment occurs. Nothing other than gray water,(laundry,showers,etc.) Human water and toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks. Gazbage disposals are not recommended. Addirives must not be used;they may cause harmful damage to your sepric system. It is recommended that you pump the tanks every two years. Sincerely, CiTY 4F ORONQ SEPTIC P��,�4N R V " / �~��---� INSPECTOR � / ``� �y - . . . . ' � 1 I iY� � �7 � Tr� '�3'09.-PERMIT NO.�„�� 1o5eph 1.OlsOn � 1 T2 0 " �^�.PPROVF.b AS SUBM[TTED C w �/� �PPROVEp WITH CORREC'CEONS Af NOTEp 5 tiOT Ai'PROVED•CORRECT A,BESUBMII' _i��cummcots see tor yout infbrmiuloq, Aii wotk shsii be daN � ��,��}�'QR in ipli eompliancp with dl appflcebli�eptic pW soping c.�►de. ��R�� Requiremen�s iacludia�i�emi�rot specificaltr aoteJ ia t6ts ceri�, ��R�Ot��i1f�I.lOAt�j�IS� x�r�w.,u��ro�s��rz�u.ru+�� j �'i�v��SCa C��1f'T SrRTro�.+ .�-' °s .r ��P�sEp G' r ,-v�H��r.� ��v'�r!`�1' ��aM 95y.� ____z�l ys q � � T„ y 'Re9 � �9 3 gy. �� ' f / �86.� '"� 1�2o�'oSEI� / % � ` 1 4Ce�� .. +� �� `�- '`� .�StS `*a�, � SQrL ,' �i / �' � � �SC�nS � 1 / 99v,L �. ' I�'rW{�s `T � ! Tp�� ;'99c�,%� �'� � �, �°,.6 � ;: I ObL � �� \ � _ T�3�(L�(=16�T 1 C)�L� �J F +'�. ?�� \ SFl� � � `(Hl-: H�L(yS �dJ{�:'�� { Sa�:� i ,1 iS' I7(�DN��'��l> AND A��I i1r�S sn6 3 �r',Nos�� . wE�� ' 5--� $t3JC:�_ f s�� Perooletion Test _.�____--------._..______ i 0 �il8oring � 8cncb Maric C:hcck a11 underground uW�Ucs f�roperiy of'CNaRt�'��? ��. Lo7S 1,,r/�c �,6�R�1-1� ilL - ."S�� ' • (��2 IJO f)�:=NN�- 1'�;;' �';�'I.'^-'' `� �,Ev,��, I>aic a l �S I_v� f If�16;1�47R-R77� ' Ru�iy OIsor�'s u�il nrul�x'r�l�on.►cs�in�: - C��tii�;n��c11+1•��.�_/� ---- l ��_ �$ �� O � F � � • � � �� ' �.. �� $� � " � � � � �. ��a � — �;o.$i3 � �.g � � � � �� ,�� s� � � �� g �� $ � �N � �.� _�� -�r� � �� . � x �� r� � �a �� T . * � ��•�i� � r J � ��r,i�r�� v C� �P��. ��. !�� - � � �pl{ � 3 a � � A r _ .� = r� �'�� _ � � � r�. :� +� . . �!� �� ` C +$.� O� ,_ - .,n � � � � a � � � � „� C O �� v � M �� b�a k �� . � � W �3 � � � �= w Q � �� o � o �^ �� a h � � a• o m �� 5 . � � � � " � �� ` o �_; � �, �� - �; � C z � �� h ' . �,,�r' �� z �"' Z � � r * �. ♦ '� � �+� ., �� a=i � -�� . - � � �'� �� v r � A�p�A � ` � . Qd �e� � M .n ' o N� �� J � � .n _ > � l,, q ~ � �� . � �: ��= ..,� � . �QC � r � 3i g ��'� c 3v � �.� • � � � a O�'�q o °� . . • � ; �� ' � �� . �Q � I�� i `, _ �. � � � o dw , � r — �.. � °` � h�b�N � � � � . o • • Q �� . �� Z �d Q �a��N � � �; �� P �� "' _,� ' . +A . . � .� frti °9 � M �1=�i�"I f ` Q � 1 � o�+..�'p � �C � � �C M � � �� }-� � ,' � O � � ' ' s w a� Site A bt 5 block 1 Job#� TR�ATMENT PROGRAM � � Universi of Minnesota Mound Design Worksheet Greater than 1%Slopes� A FLOW Estimated 750 gpd(see figure A-1) or measured x 1.5(safety factor)= 0 gpd B. SEPTIC TANK LIQUID VOLUMES Septic tank capaaty 3000 gallons(see figure G1 J Number of tanks/compartments 0 Effluent Filter (yeslno) yes C-1 Septic Tank Capacity in Gallons Number of Minimum Capacity with Capacity with Bedrooms Capacity Garb.Disp. Disp.and Lift 2 or less 750 1125 1500 3 or 4 1000 1500 2000 5 or 6 1500 7150 3000 7,8 or 9 2000 3000 4000 C. SOILS(Site evaluation data) 1. Depth to restricting layer- 1.6 feet 2. Depth of percolation tests= 12 inches 3. Texture loam 4. Soil loading rate(see Figure D-33) 0.60 gpd/ft2 Percolation rate 9 MPI 5. %Land Sbpe 8.0 °k D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS 1. Multiply average design flow(A)by 0.83 to obtain required area of rock layer:Item A x 0.83= 750 gpd x 0.83 ft2/gpd= 630 ft 2. Determine rodc layer width =0.83 ft`/gpd x Linear Loading Rate(LLR)(see LLR chart 0.83 ftlgpd x 12.00 = 10.0 ft LlR Chart Perk Rate LLR <120 MPI <=12 >=120 MPI <=6 3. Length of rocic layer=area divided by width= 630.0 ft� I 10.0 feet= 63.0 ft E. ROCK VOLUME 1. Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock 630.0 X 1.0 ft= 630.0 ft3 2. Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3 to get cubic yards 630.0 ft3 / 27 = 23.3 yd3 3. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons; 23.3 yd3 X 1.4 ton/yd3 = 32.7 tons Page 1 of 5 F. ABSORPTION WIDTH Absorption ratio: 2 1. Absorption width equals absorption ratio times rock layer width Ske A 2.00 x 10.0 ft = 20.0 ft G. MOUND SLOPE WIDTH 8 LENGTH(Greater than 1%) 1. Downslope absorption width=absorption width minus rock layer width 20.0 feet - 10.0 feet= 10.0 ft 2. Ca�ulate mound size UPSLOPE a.Depth of clean sand at upslope edge of rodc layer=3 feet minus distance to restricting layer(C1) 3.0 ft - 1.6 ft= 1.4 ft b.Mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer=depth of clean sand for separation(G2a) at upslope edge plus depth of rock layer(1 foot)to depth of cover(1 foot) 1.4 ft+1ft+1 ft= 3.4 ft c.Upslope berm multipiier based on land slope(see figure D-34) Selected berm multiplier: 3.03 d.Upslope width=berm mulGplier(G2c)6mes upslope ma�nd height(G2b): 3.03 x 3.4 ft = 10.4 ft DOWNSLOPE e.Drop in elevation=rock layer width(D2)times percent landslope(C5)/100 10.0 ft x 8.0 % /1�= 0.8 ft f.Downslope mound height=depth of dean sand for slope difference(G2e) at downslope rock edge plus the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer(2b) 0.8 ft + 3.4 ft= 4.2 ft g.Downslope benn muitiplier based on percent land siope(see Figure D-34 Selected berm mulGplier. 5.88 h.Downslope width=downslope mui6plier(G2g)times downslope mound height(G2� 5.88 x 4.2 = 24.7 ft i.Select greater of G1 and G2h as the downslope width 24.7 ft j.Total mound width is the sum of upslope(G2d)width plus rock layer width(D2)plus downslope width(G2i) 10.4 ft+ 10.0 ft+ 24.7 ft= 45.1 ft k.Totat mound length is the sum of upslope width(G2d)plus rodc layer length(D3)plus upslope width(G2d) 10.4 ft + 63.0 ft+ 10.4 ft= 83.8 ft Final Dimensions (slope>1%) 45.1 ft x 83,8 ft I hereb certify that al►work has been completed in accordance with all applicable ordinances,rules&laws. (signature) 810(license#) 12I19/2006(date) Page 2 of 5 4"inspection pipe Site A 0 0 0 12"topsoil 1.4 riginal grade Restrictive layer 1.6 10.4 10.0 24.7 : .: .`. �-► 34.7 °. - -. absorption width Mound Detail: Land slope> 1% 10.4 Upslope berm: Rockbed 10.4 Width: 10.0 10.4 Total Length: 63.0 �dth: 45.1 Downslope berm: Downslope absorption width: 24.7 10.0 Total length: 83.8 Notes: Divert surface water away from mound. Page 5 of 5 - s�:.�� Site B bt 5 biock 1 Job#C� TREATMEIVT P�aoo�c�aus � ��^' University of Minnesota Mound Design Worksheet Greater than 1°/a Slopes A. FLOW Estimated 750 gpd(see figure A-1) or measured x 1.5(safety factor)= 0 gpd B. SEPTIC TANK LIQUID VOLUMES Septic tank capacity 3p00 gallons(see figure G1) Number of tanks/compartments 0 Effluent Filter (yeslno) yes C-1 Septic Tank Capacity in Gallons Number of Minimum Capacity with Capacity with Bedrooms Capacity Garb.Disp. Disp.and Lift 2 or less 750 1125 1500 3 or 4 1000 1500 2000 5 or 6 1500 2250 3000 7,8 or 9 2000 3000 4000 C. SOILS(Site evaluation data} 1. Depth to restricting layer- 1.3 feet 2. Depth of percolation tests= 12 inches 3. Te�ure loam 4. Soil loading rate(see Figure D-33) 0.60 gpd�ft Percolation rate 9 MPI 5. °10 Land Slope 9.0 % D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS 1. Multiply average design flow(A)by 0.83 to obtain required area of rock layer.Item A x 0.83= 750 gpd x 0.83 ft/gpd= 630 ft 2. Determine rock layer width =0.83 ft`/gpd x Linear Loading Rate(LLR)(see lLR chart 0.83 ft/gpd x 12.00 = 10.0 ft LLR Chart _ Perk Rate _ LLR <120 MPI <=12 >=120 MPI <=6 3. Length of rock layer=area divided by width= 630.0 ft! 10.0 feet= 63.0 ft E. ROCK VOLUME 1. Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock 630.0 X 1.0 ft= 630.0 ft3 2. Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3to get cubic yards 630.0 ft3 ! 27 = 23.3 yd3 3. Multiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons; 23.3 yd3 X 1.4 ton/yd3 = 32.7 tons Page 1 of 5 F. ABSORPTION WIDTH Absorption ratio: 2 ' 1. Absorption width equals absorption ratio times rock layer width Site B 2.00 x 10.0 ft = 20.0 ft G. MOUND SLOPE WIDTH 8�LENGTH(Greater than 1°k) 1. Downslope absorption width=absorption width minus rock layer width 20.0 feet - 10.0 feet= 10.0 ft 2. Caiculate mound size UPSLOPE a.Depth of clean sand at upslope edge of rock layer=3 feet minus distance to restricting layer(C1} 3.0 ft - 1.3 ft= 1.7 ft b.Mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer=depth of clean sand for separation(G2a) at upslope edge plus depth of rock layer(1 foot)to depth of cover(1 foot) 1.7 ft+1ft+1 ft= 3.7 ft c.Upslope berm multipiier based on land slope(see figure D-34) Selected berm multiplier. 2.94 I d.Upslope width=berm multiplier(G2c)times upslope mound height(G2b): 2.94 x 3.7 ft = 10.9 ft DOWNSLOPE e.Drop in elevafion=rock layer width(D2)times percent landslope(C5)!100 10.0 ft x 9.0 96 /100= 0.9 ft f.Downslope mound height=depth of clean sand for slope difference(G2e) at downslope rock edge plus the mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer(2b) 0.9 ft + 3.7 ft= 4.6 ft g.Downslope bertn multiplier based on percent land slope(see Figure D-34 Selected berm multiplier: 5.18 h.Downslope width=downslope multiplier(G2g)times downslope mound height(G2� 5.18 x 4.6 = 23.9 ft i.Select greater of G1 and G2h as the dawnsbpe width 23.9 ft j.Total mound width is the sum of upslope(G2d)width plus rock layer width(D2)plus downslope width(G2i) 10.9 ft+ 10.0 ft+ 23.9 ft= 4d.8 ft k.Total mound length is the sum of upslope width(G2d)plus rodc layer length(D3)plus upslope width(G2d) 10.9 ft + 63.0 ft+ 10.9 ft= 84.8 ft Final Dime�sions (slope>1%) 44.8 ft x 84.8 ft I hereby certify that alt work has been completed in accordance with all applicable ordinances,rules&laws. (signature) 810(�icense#) 12/19/'ZW6 (date) Page 2 of 5 • , , 4"inspection pipe - � Site B o � � 12"topsoil 1.7 riginal grade Restrictive layer 1.3 10.9 10.0 23.9 33.9 �• --•: absorption width Mound Detaii: Land slope> 1% 10.9 Upslope berm: Rockbed 10.9 Width: 10.0 10.9 Total Length: 63.0 Width: 44.8 Downslope berm: Downslope absorption width: 23.9 10.0 Total length: 84.8 Notes: Divert surface water away from mound. Page 5 of 5 University of Minnesota Pressure Distribution System Design -10/25/04 AN boxed 2ctengfes mast be entered,(fie iest will be cakwfated. ONSIR .SlWA6! �� -- 1. Setect number of perforated taterals: 03 T��•T""�"'T - PROORAM G'�„�~`" 2. Select perforation spacing= 03 ft .-a.t«xtih.f+hrr.- ��.�. 3. Since perforations should not be placed closer that 1 foot to �� ,n�q t the edge of the rock layer(see diagram),subtract 2 feet from ,.��,�x.k the rock layer len th 63 -2ft= 61 ft ��.....�;..,,.,.��,-_��a- r...r�r.;,,.,.,K i.s-s 4. Detertnine the number of spaces between perforations. Divide the length(3)by perforation spacing(2)and round down to nearest whole number. Perforation spacing= 61 ft! 3 ft= 20 5. Select perforation size 1/4 inch 6. Number of perforations is equaf to one plus the number of perforation spaces(4). 'Check frgure E-4 to assure the number of pe►fnrations per latera/guaranfees <?0%discharge varia6on. 20 spaces+1= 21 perforations/lateral E-4 Maximum Number of 1/4 inch perforations E-5 Maximum Number of 3116 inch pertorations r lateral to uarantee<10%dischar e variation r lateral to uarantee<10%dischar e variation Perforation Perforation Spacing Pipe Diameter Spacing Pipe Diameter ft 1 inch 1.25 inch 1.5 inch 2.0 inch feet 1 inch 1.25 inch 1.5 inch 2.0 inch 2.5 8 14 18 28 2.5 12 19 25 39 3.0 8 13 17 26 3 11 18 24 37 3.3 7 12 16 25 3.3 10 17 23 36 4.0 7 11 15 23 4 10 16 21 33 5.0 6 10 14 22 5 9 15 20 31 7. A.Total number of perforations=perforations per lateral(5)times number of laterats(1). 21 perfs/lat x 3 laterals= 63 perforations B.Calculate the square footage per pertoration. Recommended value is&10 sqft/perf.Does not apply to at-grades. 1. Rock bed area=rock width(ft)x rock length(ft) 10 ft x 63 ft= 630 ft 2. Square foot per perforation=Rock Bed Area/number of perfs(6) 630.0 ft� / 63 perfs = 10.0 ft�/perf 8. Determine required flow rate by muftiplying the total number of perforations{6A)by flow per perForations see figure E-6) 63 perfs x 0.74 gpm/perts= 46.6 gpm E�?erforation Dischar e in GPM Head Pertorations diameter feet inches 3116 7/32 1!4 1 0.42 0.56 0.74 2° 0.59 0.80 1.04 5 0.94 1.26 1.65 a. Use 1 A foot fw single-famiy homes. --- - -. __. _ b.Use 2.0 feet for anythi e�se , __ - , '"„` _"_- r.��• 9. Determine Minimum Pipe Size �" - A. Manifold on End. If laterals are connected to header pipe ,, as shown in Figure E-1,to select minimum required lateral Fwu.E-,:M��a��e�d«s,..� diameter;enter figure E-4 or E-5 with perForation spacing and ___ __ __- - _- - -- -' number of perforations per lateral.Select minimum diameter for perforated laterals= 2.0 inches B. Center Manifold. If perforated lateral system is attached to ��»�� ;_-= �� manifold pipe near the center,like Figure E-2,perforated lateral length(3) - ;; _--_ `� and number of perforations per lateral(5)will be approximately F', � = - one half of that in step A. Using these values,select � " � minimum diameter for perforated lateral= 1.5 inches • `�_ r`� I hereby cert� t I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances,rules and laws. (signature) 810 (license#) 02/08l09 (date) University of Minnesota Pump Selection Procedure - 10125104 All boxed rectangles must be entered,the rest will be calculated. ONSIT! � 1. Determine um ca ac s`"""iGe p P p �h►• TREATMENT -�- C, A. Gravity Distribution P"oa""'"' -� 1.Minimum required discharge is 10 gpm 2.Maximum suggested discharge is 45 gpm For other establishments at least 10%greater than the water supply rate,but no faster than the rate at which effluent will flow out of the distribution device. B. Pressure Distribution-see pressure design worksheet soll ireatment system &point of discharge ..IF....;E.. Selected Pump Capacity: 47 gpm totoi p;pe length In(et •°.�..•,.•.�•:..•",.•: 2A.etevation 2. Determine Total namic Head DH �}'" dsfference �Y �T ) a'Pe ;�� i A. Elevation difference between pump and point of discharge. ' ;;�- - - � ;; _ __ 15 feet �:� ; ;i�.. .,......,:�:�:---------------------------- ------ B. Special head requirement?(See Figure-Special Head Requirements) �feet Special Head Requirements Gravity Distribution Oft C. Fricfion loss in supply pipe Pressure Distribution 5ft 1. Select pipe diameter �in 2. Enter Figure E-9 with gpm(1A or B)and pipe diameter(C1) Read fiction loss in feet r 100 feet from Figure E-9 E-9 Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe Friction loss= 3.99 ft/100 ft of pipe er 100 ft nominal 3.Determine total pipe length from pump discharge to soil system discharge point Flow Rate i diameter Estimate by adding 25 percent to pipe length for friction loss in fittings. m 1.5" 2.0" 3" Pi e len th times 1.25=equivalent pipe length 20 2.47 0.73 0.11 65 ft x 1.25= 81.25 feet 25 3.73 1.11 0.16 30 5.23 1.55 0.23 4.Calculate total fiction loss by mul6plying fiction loss(C2) 35 6.9fi 2.06 0.3 by the equivalent pipe length(C3)and divide by 100. 40 8.91 2.64 0.39 Friction Loss= 3.99 ff/100ft X 81.25 ft / 100= 3.2 feet 45 11,07 3.28 0.48 50 13.46 3.99 0.58 D. Total head requirement is the sum of elevation difference(A),special 55 4.76 0.7 head requirements(B),and total friction loss(C4). 60 5.6 0.82 15 ft + 5 ft + 3.2 ft 65 6.48 0.95 70 7.44 1.09 Total Head: 24.0 feet 3. Pump Selection 1.A pump must be selected to deliver at least 47 gpm(1A or B) with at least 24.0 feet of total head(2D). I hereby cer'�iat I have completed this wo�k in acxordance with afl applicable ordinances,rules and laws. , -e / (signature) 810 (license#j 2/08/09 (Date� Page 1 of 1 Losts of Soii Borins�s License#810 Location or Project: Proposed Lot 5, Block 1 Borings made by: Rusty Olson's Soil and Perc testing 12/1/2006 Classfication System: AASHO ; USDS-USDS-SCS X ; Unified ; Other Auger used (check two): Hand X ,or Power .Flight, Bucket or Probe_X Boring Number_1_Surface elevation_993.8^ Mottied Soil at 1.6_feet 0"-16" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at X_ 16"-20" Brown loam 10yr4/4 20"-30" Rusty brown loam 10yr5/4 Boring Number_2_SurFace elevation_993.7_ Mottled Soil at 1.8_feet 0"-18" Dark brown loam 10yr3l2 H20 present at_X_ . 18"-22" Brown loam 10yr4/4 � 22"-30" Rusty brown loam 10yr5/4 Boring Number_3_Surface Elevation_988.8 Mottled Soil at_1.3_ feet 0"-10" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at X_. 10"-16" Brown loam 10yr4/4 16"-24"Rusty brown loam to clay loam 10yr5/4 24"-30" Rusty brown loam 10yr5/3 Boring Number 4_ SurFace elevation_988.8_ Mottled Soii at_1.3_ feet 0-10" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at_X_ 10"-16" Brown loam 10yr4/4 16"-24"Rusty brown loam to clay loam 10yr5/4 24"-30" Rusty brown loam 10yr5/3 Boring Number 5_Surface elevation_987.3_ Mottled Soii at_1.3_feet 0-10" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at_X_ 10"-16" Brown loam 10yr4/4 16"-30" Rusty brown loam 10yr5/4 Boring Number_6_Surface elevation_991.7_ Mottled Soil at_1_3_feet 0-16" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at X_ 16"-20" Brown loam 10yr4/4 20"-30" Rusty brown foam 10yr5/4 Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 9:50 A.M. On12/10/06 Location: Proposed Lot 5, Block 1 Hole number: 1 Date hole was prepared:12/09//06 Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches, Diameter of hole_6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-12" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 12/9/2006 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H20 Perc Rate 11:59 12:29 6" 4.5 6.6 12:56 126 6" 4.2 7.1 1:27 1:57 6" 4.0 7.5 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 7.0 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 9:50 A.M. On12/10/06 Location: Proposed Lot 5, Block 1 Hole number: 2 Date hole was prepared:12/09//06 Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches, Diameter of hole_6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-12" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 12/9/2006 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H20 Perc Rate 12:00 12:30 6" 3.7 8.1 12:55 1:25 6" 3.5 8.5 1:28 1:58 6" 3.3 9.1 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 8.5 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 9:50 A.M. On12/10/06 Location: Proposed Lot 5, Biock 1 Hole number: 3 Date hote was prepared:12/09//06 Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches, Diameter of hole_6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-10" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 10"-12" Brown loam 10yr414 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 12/9/2006 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H20 Perc Rate 12:01 12:31 6" 2.7 11.1 12:54 1:24 6" 2.7 11.1 129 1:59 6" 2.7 11.1 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 11.1 MPI ' 1 Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 9:50 A.M. On12/10/06 Location: Proposed Lot 5, Block 1 Hole number: 4 Date hole was prepared:12/09//06 Depth of hole bottom T12"_inches, Diameter of hole_6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-10" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 10"-12" Brown loam 10yr4/4 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 12/9/2006 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at teast 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H20 Perc Rate 12:02 12:32 6" 3.2 9.4 12:53 1:23 6" 3.1 9.7 1:30 2:00 6" 3.1 9.7 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 9.6 MPI �� D E TIME V CITY OF OFSUIVC7 CALLED IN ��I INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED .��L7U PERMIT NO.aoDg-dOa 7o PLETED ADDRESS � � � . OWNER CONTR. �s�'�� TELEPHONE NO. U//� - �� G� - D�� DESCRIPTION C- � ❑ FOOTING ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANOS y ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE Q ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ WA�L BD. ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ DEMO-SITE � SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � W a O � '_/i�-� C� (f/ �. �Q�7 � C' ��'"/� (�S ( � � , 1 So � �r l S. L-, �T 7"i�it�' � ��0��,7�t� � Q � �'�� (c�'2�t� �/-�Cl't �C) �t C�� ns s� � c�N� �i�ou��v �,v � � e � � d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE � O CORRECT WORK&PROCEED C ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WlLL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR '�CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Ca11 for the next inspection 2a hours in advance. (952� 249-4600 OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. r0 White Copylinspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice �/� /� DAT TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN 5� D� INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED �..3� PERMIT NO. ' ��a'7vconnP�ErEo ADDRESS US �L� �- OWNER CONTR. Q Z/l TELEPHONE NO. �� a� �r(�!. 7� C� � DESCRIPTION C� � ❑ FOOTING � M HANICAL RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q � FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE Q ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ WALL BD. ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ DEMO-FINAL ��.SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOH TO MEET YOU:�YE _NO _ , � COMMENTS: � GL( a �,� �, G�i�`�� O a � � _�i� '� �(�oUC t�C7� � Q � z W � W � � d W� �\WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE W�❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED - ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑ CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. O PHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call forthe next inspection 24 hours in advance. �95Z� Z49-46�� OwnedContractor on site: Inspector. l��T/._� White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice Minnesota Pollution Compliance Inspection Form Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems St.Paul,MN 55155-4194 (SSTS) Doc Type:Compliance and Enforcement Instructions: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA) For local tracking purposes: requirements and attached forms—additional local requirements may also apply. Submit completed form to Local Unit of Government(LUG)and system owner within 15 days System Status System status on date(mm/dd/yyyy): 11/29/2017 ® Compliant—Certificate of Compliance ❑ Noncompliant— Notice of Noncompliance (Valid for 3 years from report date, unless shorter time (See Upgrade Requirements on page 3) frame outlined in Local Ordinance.) Reason(s)for noncompliance (check all applicable) ❑ Impact on Public Health(Compliance Component #1)—Imminent threat to public health and safety ❑ Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component#3)—Imminent threat to public health and safety 0 Tank Integrity(Compliance Component #2)—Failing to protect groundwater ❑Other Compliance Conditions(Compliance Component#3)—Failing to protect groundwater ❑ Soil Separation (Compliance Component #4)—Failing to protect groundwater 0 Operating permit/monitoring plan requirements(Compliance Component #5)—Noncompliant Property Information Parcel ID#or Sec/Twp/Range: 0511723110006 Property address: 3285 Graham Hill Road,Orono, MN Reason for inspection: Property Transfer Property owner: Lori Herkert Owner's phone: 305-878-1733 or Owner's representative: Representative phone: Local regulatory authority: City of Orono Regulatory authority phone: 952-249-4600 Approximately 2-1250 gallon septic tanks,1-1500 gallon lift station and 630 square feet of mound Brief system description: rockbed. Comments or recommendations: TBM:Top of lift station manhole cover Certification I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of future system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate maintenance, or future water usage. Inspector name: Joseph J Olson Certification number: 1255 Business name: Rusty n's Soil&Perc.Testing License number: 810 Inspector signatur Phone number: 763-498-8779 Necessary or Locally Required Attachments ® Soil boring logs ® System/As-built drawing ❑ Forms per local ordinance ❑Other information(list): www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Page 1 of 3 Property address: 3285 Graham Hill Road,Orono, MN Inspector initials/Date: J. O. 11/29/17 1. Impact on Public Health -Compliance component#1 of 5 Compliance criteria: Verification method(s): System discharge sewage to the 0 Yes ® No ® Searched for surface outlet ground surface. ® Searched for seeping in yard/backup in home ❑ Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes System discharge sewage to drain tile ❑Yes ® No ❑ Homeowner testimony(See Comments/Explanation)surface waters. 0 System cause sewage backupinto "Black soil"above soil dispersal system y g 0 Yes ® No dwelling or establishment. ❑ System requires"emergency'pumping 0 Performed dye test Any"yes"answer above indicates the system is ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) an Imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety. ❑ Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) Comments/Explanation: 2. Tank Integrity-Compliance component#2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Verification method(s): System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes ® No 0 Probed tank(s)bottom cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit. 0 Examined construction records Seepage pits meeting 7080.2550 may be ❑ Examined Tank Integrity Form(Attach) compliant if allowed in local ordinance. 0 Observed liquid level below operating depth Sewage tank(s) leak below their 0 Yes ®No designed operating depth. ❑ Examined empty(pumped)tanks(s) If yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks: 0 Probed outside tank(s)for"black soil" Any "yes"answer above indicates the ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) system is Failing to Protect Groundwater. ®Other methods not listed (See Comments/Explanation) Comments/Explanation: Elmer J. Peterson Company pumped the tanks. 3. Other Compliance Conditions-Compliance component#3 of 5 a. Maintenance hole covers are damaged,cracked,unsecured,or appear to structurally unsound. ❑Yes* ®No ❑Unknown b. Other issues(electrical hazards,etc.)to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety. ❑Yes* ®No ❑Unknown *System is an imminent threat to public health and safety Explain: c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector ❑Yes' ®No *System is failing to protect groundwater Explain: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Page 2 of 3 Property address: 3285 Graham Hill Road, Orono, MN Inspector initials/Date: J. 0. 11/29/17 4. Soil Separation—Compliance component#4 of 5 Date of installation: 6/01/2009 ❑ Unknown Verification method(s): ShorelandlWellhead protection/Food Beverage ❑Yes ® No Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil Lodging? observations by two independent parties are sufficient, Compliance criteria: unless site conditions have been altered or local requirements differ. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and 0 Yes 0 No not located in Shoreland or Wellhead ® Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) Protection Area or not serving a food, 0 Two previous verifications(Attach boring logs) beverage or lodging establishment: 0 Not applicable(Holding tank(s), no drainfield) Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. 0 Other(See Comments/Explanation) Non-performance systems built April 1, ®Yes El No Comments/Explanation: 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.* "Experimental" "Other', or `Performance" 0 Yes 0 No Indicate depths of elevations systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type IV or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. A. Bottom of distribution media 104.9 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) B Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 101.9 Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. System separation 3.0 separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. D. Required compliance separation* 2.6 Any "no"answer above indicates the system is *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Failing to Protect Groundwater. Ordinance. 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*-Compliance component#5 of 5 ® Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes 0 No If"yes",A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes 0 No If"yes", B below is required BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed. Compliance criteria a. Operating Permit number: ❑Yes ❑ No Have the Operating Permit requirements been met? b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? 0 Yes 0 No Any "no"answer indicates Noncompliance. Upgrade Requirements(Minn. Stat.§ 115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be upgraded. replaced,or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced.or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.If an existing system is not failing as defined in law.and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded. repaired,replaced,or its use discontinued. notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas.or those used in connection with food,beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657.3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Page 3 of 3 Tank Report Date: November 29,2017 Elmer J.Peterson Co. 5921 Dague Ave. Delano,MN 55328 Phone 763-972-2420 Fax 763-972-7217 MPCA License#219 Lori Herkert 3285 Graham Hill Road Orono,MN 55356 305-878-1733 Baffles: ON OFF Tank Capacity: 2-1250 Gallon Tanks,1-1500 Gallon Tank Per City Records #of Tanks: 3 Type of Tanks: Concrete Gallons Pumped: 3500 Manholes to Grade:411) NO Comments: On November 29,2017,Elmer J.Peterson Co.pumped septic tanks. No cracks or water leaking in tank at that time. NOTE:This is only a tank report. This is not a compliance inspection for point of sale nor does h replace a compliance inspection. Property address: 3285 Graham Hill Road Inspector initials/Date. 11/29/17 1. Impact on Public Health-Compliance component#1 of 5 Compliance criteria: Verification method(s): System discharge sewage to the ; 0 Yes 0 No 0 Searched for surface outlet ground surface. _ 0 Searched for seeping in yard/backup in home System discharge sewage to drain tile ❑Yes 0 No 0 Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes or surface waters. 1 0 Homeowner testimony(See Comments/Explanation) t 0 'Black soil"above soil dispersal system System cause sewage backup into ( 0 Yes 0 No dwelling or establishment. 0 System requires"emergency pumping --- 1 0 Performed dye test Any"yes"answer above indicates the system is 0 Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) an Imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety. ❑ Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) Comments/Explanation: 2. Tank integrity-Compliance component#2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Verification method(s): System consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes ®No 0 Probed tank(s)bottom cesspool,drywell.or leaching pit. 0 Examined construction records Seepage pits meeting 7080.2550 may be 0 Examined Tank Integrity Form(Attach) compliant N allowed in local ordinance 0 Observed liquid level below operating depth Sewage tank(s)leak below their 0 Yes ®No designed operating depth. ® Examined empty(pumped)tanks(s) If yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks: 0 Probed outside tank(s)for"black soil" ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) Any"yes"answer above indicates the ❑Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) system is Failing to Protect Groundwater. Comments/Explanation: On 11/29/17,Elmer J.Peterson Co.pumped tanks. 3. Other Compliance Conditions-Compliance component#3 of 5 a. Maintenance hole covers are damaged,cracked,unsecured,or appear to structurally unsound. 0 Yes' 0 No ❑unknown b. Other issues(electrical hazards,etc.)to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety. ❑Yes' D No ❑Unknown 'System is an imminent threat to public health and safety Explain: c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as determined by inspector ❑Yes' ❑No 'System is failing to protect groundwater Explain: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651.296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800.657.3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Page 1 of 3 Soil Observation Log V.,,+vv.SepticResotn•cc.com vers 12.4 Owner Information Property Owner/project: Lori Herkert Date 11/29/2017 Property Address!PID: 3285 Graham Hill Road Soil Survey Information ❑refer to attached soil survey Parent matl's: ❑Till ❑Outwash ❑ Lacustrine ❑Alluvium ❑Organic ❑ Bedrock landscape position: El Summit ❑ Shoulder El Side slope ❑Toe slope soil survey map units: L41C2 slope °a direction- Lineal Soil Log#1 El Boring ❑ Pit Elevation 107.4 Depth to SHWT 68 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment°/o matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-46 Fill <35 46-58 Topsoil <35 I0yr312 Loose Moderate tslock) 58-64 Clay Loam <35 I0yr4/3 Friable Strong Blocky 64-68 Clay Loam <35 10yr5/4 Friable Strong Block 35 loose loose single gain friable weak uranular blocky 35-50 %50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong. ntassi%c Comments: 3285 Graham Hill Road Soil Log#2 E Boring ❑ Pit Elevation 107.0 Depth to SHWT 66 Inches Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-46 Fill 35 46-56 Topsoil . 35 I Ovr l 2 Loose Moderate Blocky 56-60 Clay Loam -35 10v1.54 Friable Strong Blocky 60-66 Clay Loam - 35 1 U\r5 4 Friable Strong Blocky <35 loose loose single grain friable weak granular blocky 35-50 fine moderate prismatic platy >50 rigid strong massive 3285 Graham Hill Road Soil Log #3 ❑., Boring E Pit Elevation Depth to SHWT Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape loose loose <35 single grain friable weak granular blocky 35-50 firm moderate prismatic platy >50 rigid strong massive loose loose single grain <35 friable weak granular blocky 35-50 firm moderate prismatic platy >50 rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain friable weak granular blocky 35-50 >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive loose loose single grain 'S friable weak granular blocky 35-50 >50 firm moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain friable weak granular blocky 35-50 fire moderate prismatic platy >50 rigid strong massive I hereby cer,;,•this work was completed in accordance with MN 7080 and any local rec/'s. / Rusty Olson's Soil & Pere 810 11-signer Signature Company License I • 81'11A1111/11 A11104.: d ,&�'i su ,„ moi' m • 4 W e t i .41 A ,. 1, � 1_ w --0 T S r- 41 Z) r r n %I.\ �/� c 1 1.., 0 n; ti \P (-.) rJX- v,?,LES Ry 4iiii /0 r D i a (4� 0 \ N ==t),,,, R L(3434S '� J C is l� a �,