The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2012-00241 - retaining wall � � CITY OF ORONO * Z 0 1 2 - 0 0 Z 4 1 * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 04/03/2012 ORONO, MN 55356- 952 249-4600 FAX: 952 249-4616 ADDRESS : 2320 GLENDALE COVE LA PIN : 34-118-23-33-0064 LEGAL DESC : GLENDALE COVE : LOT 005 BLOCK 001 PERMIT TYPE : ZONING PERMIT PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : RETAINING WALL<4 FEET ACTIVITY : O/S GENERAL NOTE: RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION&CHANGG IN SIDEWALK LOCATION NO rSCROW REQU[RED PER CM APPLICANT RETA[NING WALL<4' S0.00 B BUTTERFIELD LANDSCAPE ENG[NEERING REVIEW COSTS 3925 WATERTOWN RD TOTAL 50.00 ORONO, MN 55359 (952)473-3712 OWNER NOZNESKY,JUSTIN& SARA 2320 GLENDALE COVE LA LONG LAKE, MN 55356- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be perfonned according to the approved plans and specitications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. "rhis permit is for only the work described and does not grant pennission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions ot�laws and ordinances governing[his type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not � commenced within l80 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of]80 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspec[ions are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. / / / / Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issued By gnature ate SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED AB E. � City of Orono . �, ` ,~- Zoning Permit Applica#ion Mailing Address: Permit number: O � —�� a � .Q,Q JI� PO Box 66 Date received: � " O'� —�� Y �`V Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Q _ Q Escrow#and �" ..m Street Address: amount: '� ' �" 2750 Kelley Parkway Permit Fee: �t�t " '3 �p�� Orono, MN 55356 A roved b : 9kE3H�4' PP Y - Fax: 952-249-4616 Notes: Main: 952-249-4600 �ci orono.mn.us This application form must be cgmpl�et-e`d�in�fu�l�l and al1 required information must be submitted. (Please pnnt.) Job Site Address: ��.�Q n �,,pvE,. l�N� LONC._-� (;,�� (�N . CONTRACTOR I A ICANT INFORMATION: Name: �.. Phone: Fax: Address: Cit : hst� ZIP: 53 Contact Person: ContacYs phone number �'��-?3^`3�..�.a-- � Email Applicant is: Contractor Homeowner (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: `�t,�S'C''l�J �1oZt�t'cS�T Phone (day): (�� J�,�'�''�' Mailing Address: ��5 G�tiS�R-u�'1 o N ,4�(.')CJ . Z�P: Email and/or Fax Overall Project Description: ��,ar� �� t.�,J f�iv��-�n� CBoxk TYPE OF PERMIT COST* Dock, Residential— Permanent dock on any lake or initial seasonal dock not on $50 + engineering review costs Lake Minnetonka ermane t dock re uires CUP Dock, Commercial $50+ engineering review costs Escrow for erosion c rol and en ineerin review costs $2,000 Driveway Permit(Mew or Replacement) No charge Also re uired is a Minor or Ma�or Land Alteration Permit Land Alteration, Major(grading, filling, or excavating) more 500 cubic yards or $50 more than 10 cubic yards in lakeshore setback (also requires CUP) Escrow for erosion control and en ineerin review costs As determined b CUP Land Alteration, Minor(grading, filling or excavating)—500 or�ess cubic yards $50+ engineering review costs outside of lakeshore setback or less than 10 yards in lakeshore setback Escrow for erosion control and en ineerin review costs $2,000 Retaining Wall measuring under four feet require a zoning permit. $50+.�ee� , Retaining walls measuring more than four feet(from bottom of footings to top of ��,� wall) require a building permit. (Tiered retaining walls are considered one wall unless the walls are separated by twice the height of the lower wall.) Escrow for erosion control and en ineerin review costs � Stairway to Lake (New or Replacement) $50+ engineering review costs Escrow for erosion control and engineering review costs $2,000 Structure Permit for other structures not requiring a building permit but $50+ engineering review costs regulated by the zoning code (including, but not limited to accessory building of less than 120 square feet, detached deck or platform and sport court) Escrow for erosion control and en ineerin review costs $2,500 Tree Removal or other ve etation removal in 0 to 75 foot zone No char e. (over) *Permit fee will be collected at the time the permit is issued. Updated: December 30, 2011 APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Applicant agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department; � _ • "� , • Owner agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs where applicable; • Applicant certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Applicant acknowledges the attached Escrow Agreement is completed and signed by Owner; • Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information, the application may not be issued. The undersigned certify that the information su plied is rue and correct to the best of their knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: o �}-^Q�C�'� Property Owner's Signature: Date: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Except far tree removal permits, all permits TYPE OF PERMIT: require a completed application form, escrow agreement (signed by the property owner) and escrow check from owner, two copies of all plans, and three copies of all grading plans or surveys/site plans Dock, Residential Seasonal Dock-survey showing proposed dock Permanent Dock- plans as approved by CUP and copy of LMCD permit Dock, Commercial 1. Structural plans for the dock 2. Survey showing the proposed location of the dock 3. Copy of LMCD permit Driveway Permit 1. All Minor or Major Land Alteration Permit requirements 2. Hardcover calculations, existing and proposed 3. Driveway plans Land Alteration, Major 1. Plans as approved by Conditional Use Permit 2. Erosion control plan or copy of MCWD Erosion Control Permit Land Alteration, Minor 1. Grading plan including existing and proposed contours (Less than 10 cu.yds. within 75' of 2. Amount of fill to be imported and/or exported and haul route lake or less than 501 cu.yds 3. Amount of earth to be moved around on site elsewhere.) 4. Erosion control plan or copy of MCWD Erosion Control Permit Retaining Wall 1. Plans for wall(s) 2. Unless repair or exact replacement of existing wall, submit an updated survey with grading plan including existing and proposed contours 3. Hardcover calculation worksheets if in shoreland district 4. Erosion control lan or co of MCWD Erosion Control Permit Stairway to Lake 1. Construction plans for stairway, including footings 2. Topographical survey of property with proposed stairs shown 3. Erosion control plan or copy of MCWD Erosion Control Permit Structure Permit 1. Plans for structure. 2. Survey of property with proposed structure shown and with setbacks to property lines, other structures on property and the septic system indicated. The general location of any sewer and water services should be shown if applicable. 3. Grading plan if grading is required 4. Hardcover calculation worksheets if in shoreland district 5. Erosion control lan or co of MCWD Erosion Control Permit Tree Removal Call: 952-249-4600 to schedule a single tree removal inspection. A re-planting plan/ mana ement lan required for clear cuttin , buckthorn or other intensive ve etation removal. Updated: December 30,2011 � Christirre Mattson From: Jesse Struve Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:55 PM To: Jesse Struve; Christine Mattson Subject: RE: 20120403 2320 Glendale Cove Lane I have review the retaining wall and change of sidewalk application with plans dated 9/26/11. The application is complete from an engineering standpoint, but if the retaining walls end up being over 4' in height, the applicant will need to submit engineering design drawings for it. Jesse Struve, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Orono (952) 249-4661 - Direct (952) 249-4616- Fax www.ci.orono.mn.us 1 .. � Plan Review Checklist for Zoning Permit Applications Address: ��JG—�J �\�,�V�1J��v �.S�f v� V�� Description of work: �� I �i��1"' Type of permit: �;� � Zoning review by: � Date Approved: Grading review by: � Date Approved: /.� Other Review, Reviewed by: Date Approved: Zonin : Zoning File#: Resolution#: Resolution Date: Lot Area: , G � �, C Width: Depth: 0 Survey Submitted? es 0 No Date of S rve : � � - � Existin Setbacks: Front(Lake) Rear(Street) ( N S E W ) ( N S E W ) Other Buildings Wetland Side Side Proposed Setbacks: Front e) Rear(S et) ( N S �E� W ) ( N S E W� Other Buildings Wetland � Side Side �- � �p� ��I C C C 53� Shoreland District MCWD Permit Received Average Lakeshore Setback Met? Bluff ❑ Yes � No �/A � Yes o � Yes �0 0 Yes No 0 N/A Permit Number: Setback: Hardcover Zones Existin Proposed Variance Re uir CUP Require 0-75' 0 Yes No � Yes No 75-250' Type(s): Type(s): 250-500' Zoning File#: Zoning File#: 500-1000' t Resolution #: Resolution #: Created: March 29,2011 z:\forms\plan review checklist for zoning permit applications.docx Planning Review Checklist for Zoning Permit Applications ,• ' Page 2 of2 Cubic Yards �n Out Total Haul Route? ? 0 Yes � No Explain haul route in detail: Fees to be Charged Amount Orono Inspections Required Permit Amount � Site Escrow Amount � `�,�' ^ 0 Hardcover Removal �Jl��t��!/' �% � �� '� Z�� 1 ❑ Footing Signed escrow received? 0 Poured Wall As-Built Survey 0 Yes � No 0 Planting Plan � Wetland Escrow amount received? p�f 0 Final �� 0 Other(specify) 0 Yes � No Engineering review needed? '�Yes 0 No REMARKS (in-house): Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: REMARKS (TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED BY PERSON PULLING PERMIT) , ' �, �� 'l t �1 �� F ,�� (,1,� ' 1 �� , 1` �� .5 } � �— Created: March 29,2011 z:\forms\plan review checklist for zoning permit applications.docx DATE TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED -��- PERMIT NO. COMPLETED ��'� ADDRESS Z�� C c�/v(�A(k-r C�v�-Q OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR �: DESCRIPTION � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING �OURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS O � FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC F�NAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � W a � � O � � O � W � Q � 2 W � W � � d W K SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE W CORRECT WORK&PROCEED G ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑CARRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALLTO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the nex ' pection 24 hours in advance. �95Z� 249-46�0 OwnerlContrac r it Inspect . Whiie Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice , �` LEGEND REVISIONS MISC.REVISIONS 10-17-11 JML �� . � MISC.REVISIONS �o DENOTES RETAINING WALL $ DENOTES SANITARY MA ,o-ze-„aM� CITY COMMENTS 30 15 0 15 30 60 � � DENOTES ITYDRANT REVISIONS 10-31-11 JML TW DENOTE. TOP OF RETAINING WALL FouNoaTiotinse�i�r 11-21-11 DBP c DENOTES CATCH BASIN REVISEOPERCITY SCALE IN FEET BW DENOTE. BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL � COMMENTS 12-20-11 DBP � 1 aE��Eo sEoewA K o�ze-�z.nu� �A` �� I OO DENOTES STORM MANHOLE �V / CjO� � City of Orono I � DENOTES STORM APRON � �Np p,L Planning&Zoning Plan �ev�,��W p DENOTES IRON MONUMENT U o G� 004.4 �� . O 1 SitE Pian Review Date: I -3 �� { , DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION NORTH z � `� � 6'�� I �. PRROVEn I (000.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION � � 1 � �G`_�Dc� �Q 1004.5� 1006.4 ` ❑qF�ROVED WITH F.E ISILNS (see notes) -�-- DENOTES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE � � \ G G�1�p�0 Fp 4.6 p DENI�ED Y � Z \ �� G J 1 4.8 /��8 � pOp.O DENOTES SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ELEVATION � � i 1nn �y J�1004.4 �0 7' �� h B 4 9 9 `� y,�;,�� Staff: __��V V 4�� I � � / � 1 0 0 4.9 � P I D EN OTES PINE TREE A SH D E N O T E S A S H T R E E � '� 5.0 1005•� '� �`� / a � \ 1008.0 � S -��5'Z� �\ � I T V B D E N O T E S C A B L E T V B O X T B D E N O T E S T E L E PH ONE BOX W 3 BENCHMARKA T N 1 0 0 5.7 1 0 0 �s k � � 3 �%1000.1 m Q � 7NHELEV.=fAGiB.QS "' . 1 .57 W 3 1006.1 0 1005.2 ,� 5'1 �'� ��p s '``•�`9� �6I'3 � 999�1 I -- - - - DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR � o t 0 5.0 L S ' 1 .8 n� 10 0�4 � 8 ��., • 9 9 8.1 •1 9 9 9.1 = m � • 005.0"� \ `�pa,9 1006 38 �oos� � Q` � NOTES: a' � i � � � u, 5 TB � 3�• a� j i • �� I� � I 1.)EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. Q � � � �61� N � �49 pG� w / � � 999�4 � 8 4�` THE CONTRACTOR SHAL�DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND (n � alSA�2 �� 8 40 �P o6y� 1�UO2.6 � �9g � - I ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE 1004,g . 6 �g 0 l�0 �'J•� � 8� / ; I FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS ,�oRs Sb� 1004.82 OS#4 �x � • . FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING �`` �i6 1004.6 Z • ,��i' S� � �pV'� ��,�j OO�k.�` /��.C`„999.06 � ' 9 7.9 UTILITIES. N «- b � ,p � �6 p,L r10 ,�' , i � j a, � . 998.9 . Q$� � 1004.6�N �,E� � '�� 0 � ; � I X ��\; � 2�`L O�L qF� G,�� y � � 2.)MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 2%SI.OPE GRADIENT TO ACCOMMODATE d"'�1, �v`t" 1004.2,�' � � � �+ G/ �g�,1 97•6� �/ POSITIVE DRAINAGE. �v3 oEs 251004.j i�9 98.9 BW j 9�8.1 9�/16 / /: t� '� �1 � 'c�- g98 q�y y 99 •9 / � % �P �16� 3.)ALL OFFSET IRONS ARE MEASURED TO HUNDREDTHS OF A F00T AND 1002.6� � � �0 2 �d�,,� \ / �,� CAN BE USED AS BENCHMARKS. � , 1002-- _„ �0� ,�`','.':''`y / � PI 16 �� Z I .f��.�• �J � � -�p�� -iJ-_t5� gV1// � ��'J� j �8•2 + ��997•3 \ O 4.)THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND DOES / Q'�pp� / l9� � P� �Z � NOT PURPORT TO SHOW EXACTLY HOW THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE BUILT. � r 99B � ��,�7� ' 998.4 ' �. � � 99Q.4�.F,� 993. = W �7•8 � g 4 � __ .._ __+r � ' ~ / J �p.�' 996�9 SH 5.)A TITLE OPINION WAS NOT FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR. F- � � w Q � � � 9 7.8 � � • 997.8 996,� - - y J � W Z � 0 � • 996.2 g o� � /� J�� 99� � 6.)PROPOSED GRADES SHOWN ADJACENT TO BUILDING FOUNDATION � � � ¢ W � -�g96 _ .I 997.0 r. � 995.A" PI 12 997. m � � w z `_"" �I 70 �� 6'0 .��Y � � REFERS TO TOP OF BLACK DIRT. � � � Q O Z / - - -- �T9�" �P ,c Q o = U � �� 9s �p,� 6' 996.9 7.)BENCHMARK: Z � W w p . 994� 994'B - �99J4S� � � c � �F� 12 MNDOT GEODETIC STATION#81489-MONUMENT IN BRIDGE SIDEWALK IN � W ¢ � ¢ O i � /� 994.7 J � SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WILLOW DRIVE. Q Q � Q Z � w � _ __ __ __ __ __ __ • 995.0 ELEVATION=1012.81 (NAVD88) Z � a = � � ' • 994.5 � • 994.5 N89�2� ��W � �J4.�� • 994.8 � � � N v DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATA - WO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION w m OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: () GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION =1005.5 OFFSET IRONS BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =997.0 ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF PIPE LOT 5,BLOCK 1,GLENDALE COVE,ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT PROPOSED ELEVATIONS os#,=,00,.s6 OS#3=1003.57 HARDCi�VER THEREOF,HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA os#2=1ooa.82 OS#4=999.06 LOT AREA= 18,278.3 S.F. AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND OTHER PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION = 1006.50 PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION=1006.83 HOUSE AREA= 1,854 S.F. IMPROVEMENTS AS PROVIDED TO ME THIS 29 DAY OF SEPTEMBER,2011. DRAW/CHECK PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =998.16 DRIVEWAY AREA=926 S.F. JML/DBP SIDEWALK AREA=80 S.F. DATE SETBACKS STOOP ARE6�=148 S.F. 09-26-11 ASBUILT ELEVATIONS MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK=30' ` � ^_ BOO N/�PAGE ASBUILT GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION = 1006.05+0.33= 1006.38 NOT POURED MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK=10', 10' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA=3,008 S.F. rN.+� ASBUILT TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION=1006.73 � � MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK=30' JOB NO. ASBUILT BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =998.07 COVERAGE= 16.5% David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor 3568-018 Minnesota License No. 40344 DWG. NAME Floor Area Rat:o:0.248 CERT 3568-018