HomeMy WebLinkAbout#5420-gen. concept approval/prelim. plat approval-2006 232fl C�I�I:�G�e�
.� O,�.
O �, 4
�.. CITY of ORONO
� _ �
�.�, '��/` ! �,'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L
��kESH04� NO. J� � � �a
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN
AND GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
190 WILLOW DRIVE NORTH AND 177 GLENDALE DRIVE
FILE NO. OS-3131
WHEREAS, Bohland Development, Inc. (hereinafter the "applicant") has an
interest in property located at 190 Willow Drive North and 177 Glendale Drive within the City of
Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
EXHIBIT A (Attached)
(hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested General Concept Plan Approval for
Planned linit Development of this approximately 10.3-acre property. Proposed is a rezonin�
from RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential District to RPUD Residential Planned Unit
Development District far creation of 9 single family residential lots, in addition to creation of a
lot for an existing church on the property to remained zoned RR-1B; and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 200� the Developer filed a subdivision application with
the City for preliminary approval of a 10-lot residential plat of the Property; and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zonin� and Subdivision Codes, the Orono
Plannin` Commission held a public hearing for the application and reviewed it on July 18, 200�,
at which time all persons desirina to be heard concerning this application were given the
opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further reviewed the application at
continued hearinas held on July 18, 2005; September 19, 200�; October 17, 2005; and November
21. 200�; and �
Page 1 of 14
� o�
0 0
' � � CITY of ORONO
� :r� �
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��`9kESI3�4�G NO. 5 � � t)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on November 21, 2005 recommended on
a vote of 6-0 that the Council grant rezoning to RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development
District and brant general concept plan and preliminary plat approval subject to:
1) Defer to Park Commission and/or Council for recommendation on whether trails should
be installed by applicant and who should pay for the installation.
2) Applicant shall agree to and incorporate into plans all of the recommendations of Applied
Ecological Services (AES) regarding conservation design, etc.
3) Applicant shall provide a landscape plan per AES recommendations and per prior
Pla.nning Commission discussions.
4) Applicant to provide evidence of MCWD approval for filling wetland in Lot 8; and
WHEREAS, the Orono City Council makes the following findings in regard to
this application for rezoning and RPUD General Concept Plan approval:
FINDINGS
A. Communitv ManaQement Plan Conformitv; Rezoning
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File#OS-3131.
2. The entire property is currently zoned RR-1B One Family Rural Residential
Zoning District, requiring a minimum residential lot size of 2.0 acres. The
property consists of approximately 10.3 acres in total, comprised of three separate
tax parcels, containing an existing single family residence, a church, and church
related outbuildings.
3. The property is �uided in the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan
(CMP) for single family residential use at a density of up to 3 units per acre. The
proposed layout contains 9 single-family lots (1 existing home and 8 new vacant
building lots) on �.03 acres for a density of 1.79 units per dry-buildable acre (2.12
units per dry acre if private road is excluded). The proposed use of the property is
consistent with the Orono 2000-2020 Community Management Plan (CMP)
guiding of the property
Page 2 of 14
� o�
0 0
' � - CITY of ORONO
�-.
� �
�� '��/' p'�' RESOLUTtON OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��kES�-I�4� N0. 5 � �. �i
4. The Property is located within the MUSA and is intended to be developed using
municipal sewer. Municipal sewer is available from the City of Orono, and
municipal water is available from the adjacent City of Long Lake.
5. Because the property is guided in the CMP for single family residential use at a
density of up to 3 units per acre, use, the portions of the property intended for
such use should be rezoned consistent with the intended and guided use. The most
appropriate zoning for the intended use is RPUD, Residential Planned Unit
Development District. However, the church use on the site is intended to
continue under the existing conditional use permits for said use, and church use is
not a permitted or conditional use in the RPUD District. Therefore, it would be
most appropriate that the church parcel remain zoned RR-1B to allow continued
use under the current CUPs.
6. This proposed SFR development for 8 new homes has an average dry buildable
lot area of slightly under 16,000 s.f., with no new building lots less than 14,000
s.f. as recommended by the Planning Commission. This is consistent with the
general range of lot sizes in the surrounding neighborhood.
7. The property is within "Parcel Group 3" as identified in the CMP and is guided
for residential density �reater than 1 unit per 2 acres. The property is one of the
areas reviewed as part of Orono's Rural Oasis visioning study. Although City
Ordinances do not yet require that applicant address elements of Conservation
Design, because this is a RPUD planned development the applicant has been
required to address the visual impacts and the elements of Conservation Design.
A key element in this development proposal is the retention and enhancement of
natural views looking northeastward towards the site from Willow Drive.
8. Rezoning the portion of the property planned for single family residential use to
RPUD Residential Planned Unit Development is appropriate based on the
proposed density and nature of the proposal, which meets the followin� general
purposes of the RPUD District:
- -incorporates fle�ibility in land development and redevelopment in order to
utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land
development;
- incorporates energv conservation through the use of clusterinQ of
buildings and land; �
Pa�e 3 of 14
� o�
o , o
- ��a:,- CITY of ORON�
,� � :� �.,
�� � ! p'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
L9kESI10g'� NO. � �� � i.l
- preserves desirable site characteristics and open space and protects
sensitive environmental features, including sensitive wetland areas;
- provides design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both
existing and planned;
- results in development compatible with the densities of residential housing
located in the immediate area, including the Hackberry neighborhood of
Orono and the Glendale Drive area in Long Lake;
- yields development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
B. Site Planning & Amenities
9. The southwesterly portion of the property contains wetlands which will be
protected by a Conservation and Flowage Easement, save for a portion of a small
wetland finger extending into Lot 8. A 1700 s.f. portion of this wetland will be
filled, as part of the deminimus amount of fill allowed by WCA regulations
without requiring mitigation. Because of this filling, Lots 7 and 8 will not require
variances for the wetland buffer setback established in the City's new wetland
ordinance.
10. Lot 10 and the proposed public road entrance to Willow Drive include an area of
ditch wetland along Willow Drive. The MCWD has classified this ditch wetland
as "incidental"; however, 300 s.f. wetland fill will be required for roadway
construction, using up the remainder of the 2000 sf deminimus fill allowed by
WCA re�ulations. The required 25' buffer and 20' required setback from the
buffer for structures on Lot 10 would require a structure setback approximately
80' from the west line of Lot 10, leaving a buildable envelope of approximately
60' in width. Applicant has requested that the 20' buffer setback be reduced to 10'
for this lot. Potential alternatives to relaxation of the setback would include
reduction of the buffer width (requires MCWD acceptance); fill wetland and
mitigate elsewhere on site; re-apportionment of Lot 8 deminimus filling to Lot 10;
or shiftin� of lot lines eastward for Lots 8-9-10. Based on the recommendation of
the City's wetland consultant, it would not be inappropriate for the City to allow a
reduction of the�wetland buffer setback to 10' along the west side of Lot 10. The
deminimus fill and buffer setback relaxation are allowed under Zonin� Code
Section 78-1608 in conjunction with an approved buffer management plan.
Page 4 of 14
� o�
0 0
' �� CITY of ORONO
a � �
r� ` _;r'.
.h �
ti
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
�L`9kESH04�� NO. �j c1 � �.J
11. The proposed development meets the RPUD standards for SFR development
[Section 78-626(8)], with the followina exceptions recommended as appropriate
bv the Plannin� Commission:
RPUD Standard Pro osed Standard
Min. dry buildable lot area 15,000 sf 14,000 sf
Min. lot width at front setback line 90' 90'
Front setback: internal street 25' 30'
Setback to Willow Drive �0' S0'*
Minimum lot de th 125' 110'-125'**
Minimum rear yard Lesser of 40' or 20% of Lesser of 40' or 20%
lot de th of lot de th
Min. side yard, lot line interior to RPUD 10' 10'
Min. side yard, lot line exterior to RPUD 1�' 15'
Maximum buildina height 30' & 2-1/2 stories ! 30' &2-1/2 stories
Floor Area Ratio*** 0.5 0.4
Lot coverage b structure*** NA NA
* Existing house on Lot 1 at 40' setback from Willow will remain nonconforming
** Lots 4, 5,6, 7 and 10 are just short of the 12�' standard,but each contains a usable buildin�site with
acceptable rear yard
*** Structural coverage for this development will be governed by Floor Area Ratio and the standard
15%lot covera�e limit will not apply. Floor Area for FAR purposes will include 3-season and 4-
season porches,but not screen porches that are smaller than 12' x l4'.
12. Lots 3-10 will be served by a new public road to be constructed by the developer
to City standards for this 8-lot plat. All 8 new lots will have driveways accessing
the new road, and none shall have direct driveway access to Willow Drive. Lot
1's existing driveway access to Willow Drive will be allowed to remain. Because
this is considered an urban development, the City will ultimately own and
maintain the sanitary sewer lines and water mains.
13. The private recreation area of `10% of the platted property' required under the
RPUD standards will be sufficiently met by the creation of Outlot B as a private
open space area for use of the homeowners just within the development, in
addition to the trail connection between the new road and Glendale Drive through
the church property (Lot 2), such trail connection to be public and to be
constructed by the applicant. The Council has determined that the trail and Outlot
B, while comprising less than 10% of the area of new residential Lots 3-10, are
adequate to provide for the recreational needs of this development, given that it is
directly across Willow Drive from Hackberry Park.
Page 5 of 14
� o�
0 0
' �� CITY of ORONO
�a..,
,� - �
�,� � �.:����: G�
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
l � � �7 � i.J
�kEsi3�4 NO.
14. The Park Commission has recommended that a 10' easement be dedicated to
allow for future extension of the City's public trail system along Willow Drive.
The developer will not be required to construct this trail extension. The City
Council finds that the park dedication for this development should be in the form
of a Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands as allowed by the Municipal Code. No
reduction or reimbursement of park fees will be allowed for construction of the
trail connection to Glendale Drive, as that is considered as an element of the 10%
private recreation area requirement. A Willow Drive trail crossing from the new
road to Elm Lane should be provided (stripin�, signaae), to be paid for by the
Citv.
15. Stormwater management will be provided by stormwater catch basins and storm
sewer lines as well as open swales which will discharge to a NURP stormwater
pond to be located in Outlot A. In addition to the City of Orono, the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District has approval authority over the applicants' stormwater
mana�ement plan.
16. The applicant has provided the following Plans attached to this Resolution as
Exhibits B-1 through B-3 including:
B-l: Preliminary Plat dated 2-7-06.
B-2: Preliminary Gradina, DrainaQe and Utility Plan dated 2-7-06.
B-3: Preliminary Landscape Plan dated 11-14-OS
and Supplement dated 1-23-06.
Applicant has also provided additional preliminary plans not attached hereto.
Council finds that the plans subinitted are generally sufficient to indicate the
intent of the developer and the potential impacts of the project.
17. The City Council finds that the proposed rezoning and proposed development of
the property for sin�le-family uses is appropriate for the property�, w-ill not have
negative impacts on the surrounding properties when all Concept Plan Approval
conditions are met, and is in keeping with the goals, policies and philosophies of
the Citv.
Page 6 of 14
� o�
o , o
� ����:- C ITY of ORONO
,� -: ;.. �
�� � G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
L�kEsI304� NO. �j �i L L?
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Orono hereby approves the General Concept Plan for development of the property at 190 Willow
Drive North and 177 Glendale Drive by Bohland Development, Inc. subject to the following
declarations and conditions:
l. The City of Orono will approve rezoning of Lots 1 and 3-10 to RPUD as described herein
upon City Council finding of satisfactory completion of the Conditions for Development
Plan approval. Lot 2 shall remain zoned RR-1B.
2. Conditions for Development Plan Approval are as follows:
A. RPUD Development Standards and General Conditions.
1) Developer shall provide a final Development Plan for the development
that conforms to all standards of the RPUD District except as modified
herein, and shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Citv Council that all
RPUD standards have been met and shall demonstrate where such
standards have not been met, and shall satisfy the City Council that non-
compliance with said standards is remedied in a manner acceptable to the
Council.
2) Developer shall provide a landscaping plan meeting all of the
requirements of the RPUD District, and addressing the elements of
Conservation Design to the satisfaction of the City Council. Final
landscapin� plans will be reviewed by the City's consulting landscape
planner for conformity with the RPUD standards.
�) The new road servinQ the development shall be platted as a public
roadway as shown on the Conceptual Plat. The road shall have an urban
design, and shall have a corridor width of 50' and a paved width (face of
curb to face of curb) of 28'.
Pa�e 7 of 14
� o�
0 0
����aa=:- CITY of ORON�
� �
�� �'�/` G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��kESH�4� NO. J� � [ �;;
4) An 8' wide bituminous surfaced public pedestrian/bicycle trail shall be
provided by the Developer within Lot 2 connecting from the public road to
Glendale Drive (a portion of which will be in the City of Long Lake and
will require Long Lake's approval). The City of Orono shall be
responsible for maintenance of this public trail upon its completion and
acceptance. Public easements including a suitable shoulder width shall be
granted over said trail. Additionally, Developer shall grant a 10' trail
easement along Willow Drive within Lots and 10 and within Outlots A
and B, for future public trail construction by the City.
C. Utilities; Stormwater Management
5) 5anitary sewer and municipal water mains shall be installed by the
Developer per plans subject to approval by the City Engineer.
6) The City will own and maintain the sanitary sewer and water mains within
the development. The City will inspect these systems during their
construction to ensure proper installation. Drainage and Utility Easements
shall be granted to the City of Orono over all sewer and water utility lines
and facilities, including the riahts of way necessary to maintain same.
7) Developer shall provide suitable evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District (MCWD) approval of the stormwater management plan before
Development Plan Approval will be granted. The stotmwater drainage
system will be oumed and maintained by a Homeowners Association to be
established by the Developer.
D. Wetland Impacts
8) Applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Council that all
� requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as administrator
of the WCA regulations on Orono's behalf, are complied with.
Pa`e 8 of 14
� o�
0 0
' � - CITY of OR4N0
�.n
� �
�� ��', �'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
�`q 4�' NO. �j �� � i,�
kESYiO
9) Orono's wetland buffer and buffer setback requirements (Zoning Code
Section 78-1608) shall be met, except as follows:
a) Deminimus fill of 1700 s.f. of wetland in Lot 8 and 300 s.f. of
wetland to accommodate the new road shall be allowed.
b) The 20' wetland buffer setback shall be reduced to 10' for the
ditched wetland along the westerly portion of Lot 10.
E. Grading, Erosion Control
10) Erosion control shall adhere to "Best Management Practices for Protecting
Water Quality in Urban Areas". All erosion controls as required by the
City and the MCWD shall be in place prior to commencing excavation on
the site. All such erosion control measures shall be maintained in working
order until the site is revegetated.
11) The construction limits shall be clearly marked with adequate fencing to
prevent any construction damage or disturbance of any trees and
vegetation outside of the construction limits area. Developer shall identify
trees to be preserved on site, shall mark them on a site plan, and shall take
extraordinary measures such as fencing, signage, etc. to ensure they are
not disturbed.
F. Other General Conditions.
12) A monument sign may be provided by the developer at the entrance to the
RPUD development site within Outlot B. The signage shall be limited to a
development name and/or logo and on the monument sign. Final
design/materials of monument signa�e shall be provided as part of the
final development plan submittals and shall be subject to approval by the
City Council.
Pa�e 9 of 14
� o� .
0 0
' � - CITY of ORONO
�, :��: _ �ti
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L
�L`9kESH04�� NO. �j �� � i.,;
13) The applicable general engineering comments and or conditions provided
by the City Engineer durin� the review process shall be suitably addressed
by the Developer in the development plan submittals.
14) Developer shall provide copies of proposed covenants and documents
describing the structure, rights and responsibilities of the homeowners
association to be reviewed by the City Attorney.
G. Plans and Speci�cations. The following plans and specifications shall be
submitted for review and approval by the City and other appropriate jurisdictions:
i) Final plans and specifications for all proposed utility lines and services,
including any proposed revisions to existing service facilities. Proposed
plans shall be provided to the City for final review and approval with the
Preliminary Plan set. The Public Works Department and any other
pertinent reviewing agencies shall review and approve all utility
improvements. Final sanitary sewer and watermain plans shall be provided
and are subject to approval by the Public Works Department and City
En�ineer, as well as the City of Long La1:e.
ii) Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan showing existing and
proposed contours, building locations, elevations, stormwater facilities and
calculations, utilities and erosion control measures to be used during
construction. Development Plan Approval and final plat approval will not
be granted until the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and has
approved the stormwater plans.
iii) Final landscaping desi�n plan with planting schedules including numbers
and species, in accordance with the landscapin� requirements of the
RPUD zoning district, and the recommendations of Applied Ecological
Services.
iv) Final building construction plans, including
Final Grading & Drainage Plan and SWPP
Final Landscape Plan.
Road and Utilitv Plan
Any additional plans deemed necessary by the City En�ineer.
Page 10 of 14
� o�
0 0
� ���.- CITY of ORONO
,� ; �
,b � �
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��� ��ti ` �J
�kES�I�4 NO. � � �. -
H. Platting Process. Applicant shall complete all requirements for Final Plat
Approval as follows. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to
the Zoning Administrator 2 weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council
meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month. These submittals are as
follows:
1. Record plat drawings in the form of two (3) mylar copies (one copy for the
City's records, one for filing with Hennepin County, and one copy for
approval by the city of Long Lake) and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'.
Drawing to include:
A. Lot lines platted per preliminary plat survey/drawing by Mark S.
Gronberg, latest revision dated February 7, 2006 attached hereto as
Exhibit B-1, except as modified herein.
B. Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' alon� exterior
property lines and 5' along the interior property lines.
C. Dedication of areas shown as wetlands.
D. Dedication of"Draina�e Easements" over all drainageways
E. Naming of plat.
2. Le�al documents required:
A. Title opinion addressed to the City or a title insurance policy in
favor of the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with
property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other
documents affected by such interest.
B. The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded
easements currently affecting the property.
C. Signed Conservati�n and Flowage Easement to be �ranted over a11
delineated wetlands on the plat that will not be subject to approved
deminimus filling.
Page 11 of 14
� O�
O 4
' ���.:-� � CITY of ORONO
,� �,�.. �
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��l �G~ �l i.i
�kEsi3�4' NO. 5 . �.
D. Signed Buffer Maintenance Agreement.
E. Signed Developers Agreement and Letter of Credit for
construction of improvements, The City Engineer shall establish
the amount to be provided in the Letter of Credit.
3. Plat approval fees to be paid: Total due: � 530.00
A. Final plat fee = $280.00
B. Legal review & filing fees for subdivision and associated
documents= $250.00
I. Development Agreement. Development Approval is contingent upon the
successful execution of a Development Agreement between the applicant and the
City. Such Agreement shall address all specific City requirements for the
development.
J. Financial Guarantee. The Development Ab eement shall include a financial
guarantee by the applicant to ensure the completion of site improvements. The
City Engineer shall complete an estimate of improvement costs, including but not
limited to public and private streets, curb & gutter, stormsewer, landscaping,
grading, erosion control, utilities, trails, and stormwater management facility
construction, and the applicant shall provide to the City a financial guarantee of
150% of the improvement costs.
K. Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fee. The standard Storm Water and
Drainage Trunk Fee for residential development shall be paid by the developer
per the 2006 City Fee Schedule. The area of proposed Lot 2, the church parcel,
shall not be included in the calculation of area for this fee.
�.6 acres x $4,275 per acre = $23,940.00
L. Park Dedication. The Dev�loper shall pay the standard Park Dedication Fee for 8
new lots per the 2006 City fee Schedule. Assuming each lot has a value in excess
of $69,735 the lots are subject to the maximum park fee of $5,5�0 per dwelling
unit.
8 new dwelling units x $�,550 per d.u. _ �44,400.00
Paae 1? of 14
� O�
O ,� O
�a. , ,:� � CITY of ORONO
�� �� � G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
u � i?
`gkESl=i�� N0. � �
M. Sewer and Water Connection Charges. There are no City of Orono sewer and
water connection charges due because the Developer will be installing a complete
lateral system connecting to existing systems. The Developer shall be responsible
for any connection charges imposed on the City of Orono or on the Developer by
the City of Long Lake for connection to Lon� Lake systems. MCES Sewer
Availability Charges will be collected for each Lot at the time building permits
are issued for each Lot.
3. This concept plan approval is based upon the known issues that may affect this project,
but this approval does not limit the City from revising or amending these conditions as
the review process continues.
4. This General Concept Plan Approval resolution approves the development concept
subject to the applicant meeting the requirements of this resolution and all other
requirements of the City. This resolution does not constitute approval of the rezoning.
Such approval shall only be considered when the City Council finds that all "Conditions
for Development Plan Approval" as identified herein have been met.
5. This General Concept Plan Approval shall be effective until December 31, 2007. If
complete application for Development Plan Approval has not been made by that date, the
terms and conditions of this resolution shall be null and void. The City Council at its sole
discretion may extend this effective period.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of February, 2006.
ATTEST:
:,,.�.---,
�--� - �/ / ��� " �
'F i � ��'�;.(�
��Z%�'1/li-t^✓ ��. (/,�Jr�c.��' �� - ��i'7.y
��Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
�� �
Applicant
(for Bohland Development, Inc.)
Page 13 of 14
� O�
Q O
'��� C ITY of ORONO
� �:-
� .{, �
�;� . ti
�� � `� G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
L`�kEsKog'� rvo. 5 a � �;
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this� day of Cc �n,�, ,
2006 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation
and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
-�-e,.�.��:�=''-�'"-� _ �/1.�,�t�- �� C��C�.s,.P-.
�`, ��,n;� Krc15Ti�.�tND�RSOf� Notary Public
u wL�°'-�`�"� NOTARYPUBLiC-MINNESOTA
����k�� My Commission Expires Jan 31,2007
�; �;.,�'
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this �`�?day of r',�%'�-- �= ,
2006 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and
said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
-�_' RACHEL DODGE `�
� " ` NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA ;� ��` � =`" � �� ( �"�('C "\���-
�w��` Notary Public
;;,,.,,� My Commission Expires Jan.31,2010 (�i
.,�?� _ ^�2c�2��
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
On this >�'> day of :L (�=-� 2006 Steven Bohl, �1��
, ''rE�,.x; - of Bohland
Development, Inc. personally appeai•ed before me on behalf of Bohland Development, Inc.
� � dENISE M. LESKINEN ' r`%� ` - ,
� NOTARYPUBLIC-MINNESOTA '—�-'����'G��- � ���--4������—"`�
"� My Commission Expires Jan.31,2010 Notarv Public
� Page 14 of 14
�
�
EXHIBIT A � �� � �;�
` RESOLUTION NO.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREA�15E5 :
All thot po�t of ihe 5oulhwest Ovorler of Section 34, Tovmship 116 North, Ronge 23 West of the 5lh Principal A�eridian, described os follows:
Commencing al o Dainl on lhe West line of aforesoid 5outhwesl Ouorter o dislance of 1018.875 feel (61.75 rods) 5oulh of the Northwest
comer thereo(; lhence Eost ond parollel lo the Norlh line of soid Southwest Ouarler, 214.00 Feet (12 rods 16 feet) lo a point, soid poini being
the lrue point of begin�ing of the property being descrihed; ihence continuinq Eost on the lasl described line 321.255 feet (19.47 rods) ;
thence South ond porollei lo the West line of soid Southwest Ouarter, 810.97 (eet, more or less, io o point which is 813.55 feet Norih of the
South line of soid Southwest Ouorter, meosured porallel to the West line of soid Southwesl Ouarter; thence West and porotle� to the aforesaid
5oulh line 321.255 feet, more or less, to o point, soid point being 214.00 feet Easl of the West line oi soid 5outhwest Ouorter; lhence North,
ond parollel 10 the Wesl line o( soid Soulhwest Ouorter, 810.97 (eet, more or less, lo ihe lrue point of beginning, according lo the l+niled Stales
Government survey thereo(, on file or of record in the offic- of the Regisler of Deeds, in and for Hennepin County, �iinnesoto. •
AL50 ; Lol t, Blo�k 1, BEILE AIRE ESTATES REARRANGEMEN7, ond Lot 14, Block 1, BELLE AIRE ESTATES
AL50, Lot t, Block i, ULMER ESTATES
s
J
j
i!
..__,..
�
GLEN �ALE COVE � ' � n� �
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EXHIBIT B-1 � �s L :.; �� �
BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT/HICKO�Y F(NE HOMES AND KE1TH WILLIANIS RESOLUTIOl� NO. N �
'1 LLj�' �i
OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 , BELLE AIRE ESTATES REARRANGEMENT, AND _ g °' �
LOT 14, BLOCK 1 , BELLE AIRE ESTATES, AND LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ULMER ESTATES, AND V � c,� �
� IN THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 34-118-23 O > o y'
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I Wg� cn o �,� ;'
aga �
r------- ---------- -------------------- - \ �
� WILLO / h °� � � �
I _�'T�'_�.__�_'_'__� ' _'_—__'___'______ '____'____PROPOSED WEiLAND FLLNG__'___'_____'_�'_' _—_ _J _ � �
I � �30D+-SF. �c SSE.".M1<�1 8W23� -r- 1r�� � W �
I1 ` =�- - - - - - - - - 7vm_ �saa.— — � -_' --- -_-� - - - - - J 101&975 ar �c.��� I W ZJ � -
I � ��` _ � _ -112 '_'r` 13}- � -"_ — Q0+• _ � 34-11B-7J I M Z > W
� } / � � LLI > Z
I � - -�'�wiw..xe,e / /� .( ! /o� ^ \ I Z W Z
1 J
� �3 // / ��, �`�----� `�-��1 � � / I � C�7 � i� � �, � I � � 0/�/ > va
wEST UNE O�Sw I/l / - ti \ \ / � �I I LL U '�'
� 0� SEC 34-I iB-23 �� / / , ��� 1 i �iT � � ✓ " � i4 �_ '___—_ '_ '_ � � I .
I < �/ �, � � ,C' � NUR�P PON0. � H' � /�r� W C�
E7CISTING HOUSE ;I
/ � � : � \ Nw�.s9�.s � e�o�s-F.1 � �,� r � i � � �
� � S.F.D�r I / ��" I_ � 'I ��
� '� �ni � $ T� W�-9B3.6 Of�*- r � _ � N �
� i i i l� � i'�/ Y� ��� S /-'�j 1 r '� � o r'•.
I `-� !- ;v�! L-.+ �/ � � � ' - ``� � ' �yp�� ��\\ / l.i� / '�✓3;� i — =.! 9600D+-S.F. � ��1 � i� .
� i aJ "�i' I''"/ � / / / � �
, i �1 S�'% o � `, � �� �� � � .� — � ' u �,
� !� � , r � ��, � so � � � i �
I _ �,. , _,� ,� �.�.. ,�J / 1 � �, � Q�N� �
� a 1 �_ 4 , ���- �'�� ' %',�, � , ; '- - -- - �-—� ��, I -:� o
� � -�� � ' , �
� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — l�i'1�i'= — — — — — — — — — — — — �'� �'OCL�• 737A6 !� � �� — �—�J�' / / 198+. \ 6�E I ..
� � � 813.55 / n« i �roo u. __ _ ` _rc.. � � _ .i 287+- z/.n I
� /v� or»tiu«os R / � � (�/. i/ / / I
� � / �x�u:n- V� 1 i li / �
� � � �/s � 1409tl�y5 F. / /I / � I
'� I \ � —� "9 �27920f.�$�f � \�� / / i � �-7-— - - — - - -- — --—- —-� I
I / I �� �� � � \\ 1B180f-SF."DRY �' / �� � � � � � � I
I I ' i �,y 1 . �.F. _ ' , � /� . \ % % ,� ' / � / + �i / ;
� �`;' ' �� �� _- _ �T �- �% � � � �,' � 2 � �� ;
, _ -� , -� , � ,-
� ) _ y i � 205240+-S.F. 1
( / � �_: �0 I � // \ \� L= �'�� � / ' �� / . ` �1 -
� �� i i / � 17370+. , � �' � ' v
i '" ;�_, � ;, .� � ,eoso.!s.F.oR� /J ,o�� �� r �'� �, I 1 / � � \ I
'� ' � �' i af � .� F" ,� '� / � \ � � � ;
I �� � i . � � / / .9' / ��� � \ v/ i \ � a / I/ � � \ � "s:
I ' �'^ �, ' /�— --�+ �/� - �/' ``��C� � ` .a� � \ \I \ �
� '/^ ' ��`: v -'wo- /' � � � ' � ioxtn ttao+ir�n \
( ." ; � ? � "= - � � � /� � — —' EXISTING BUILDING = I � �
� v , � --�- -_----- � -'°°.— — \ �
i , ---- -- -
, nn-- -� .�
- r= Y---�. ,z.. 7 - -��— � c��Rcro . � I � I� OWNERS
I SOUTN LN�E OF SW 1/a �_i 3 � I �\ S / I (�I"_ ��,� / / � � � I
DF SEC. 3y_118-23 � 1 I I �� ��� / � C%1R�CE � � �
' �,,,c- � I I � CAWINPRESBYTERIANCHURCH y,� �
I. . . � \ \ R 5�jD7 I�,�1�`I � I _ � �� �" ""'.— / I I � LONG LA EAMINNESOTA 55356 �o�� e.. 3�
� ...
„ _ �
� � � . .
1 1 i 5 � I `, � �� � � � �\=�i � I i `_ �_ I I � KEITHA.WILLIAMSON $����'' ''
� � � I . � -r'� t�/ \� � � '� I 14156tiS.F. �� �/ i I I---"-----ASa---'�--"I -I" LONGLAICE,MINNESOTA55356 ¢���F�.,4^ i r
te2�o+_s.F. � � BLACKTOP 1 s� �r
� � � � �' �� �ao�o.. F. �� ��ps' � �� � � I / / �� � i � �eve�oaeR ���� ' � �
J !� I � �i--.e'° I BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT � y�
I � � L-- —y-— - n- --�/- I I� � � ' I � 1 STEVE BOHL '{g 8�-�..,, , �,
I � / � � � \ ' 1844 W,WAYZATA BOULEVARD 6,�_ � �r:
L _ 1 813.55 � �T / � / � PARKING i � I \ I L LONG LAKE,MINNESOTA 44356 �g u� ��� F;
_ _ _ _ � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �;�'+^ _ � — _ � — _ _ _ _ — 1�6«. / 7N- +' — _ � _ —�_ � � —{ _ _ — ' C=J¢ -
—/ �- 500'O�O�E 3� // / �— � \ I --I� ; ! LI— � �- \— � —I µ� . �4 0�� . -
/
� I i \., IU 5 ~ ��q
I // �/ '�~� / I I I � / � I / B `� U g i�.
'�� �' � - � / � � / � �a�3� I :
_,,� • -
� ^ � � i � I � \ / I TOTAL AREA=10.28+-ACRES �;��i � �
.�y� 1. I 1 tI
R�i�'� ! v �� '�'/�i��� I ` I I I !ri .�_r�� �p/ /i'�1 (rl r,�'"� J ��• �i-�i i ���` W � W =
J �
: , , �;,, , _ I _ • , ,r-,� ,�'�%�ii�i�'.r"�iJ�"��i i� � � a �
� � �', i�C - i i?�_r�/�i �.�� ri_ir_n�ir� Y i `i•i�. u� 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTiDN OF PREM(SES : ; " ' �
R � _ ' \�- 1 -- -�1- -\� - //
All thol porl o( the Soulhwesl Ouarler of Section 34, Tovmship 118 Norlh, Ronge 23 West ot lhe Sth Principal Meridion, described as fotlows: o � � � � � _ � / �ac�' — / I � �p�i'��
� Commencfng �l o point on the West line ot oleresaid Southwesl Ouorler o distance o( 7018.875 (eet (61.75 rods) South of lhe IJo�thwest � � � _ _ ,�y i � � �� ��b�
corner �hereol; lhence Eost ond porollel lo the North line of soid Saulhwest Owrler. 214.00 feet 12 rods 16 feet lo o � �'0°`�91006''� � `
( ) voinl. said Point being _/ � / 900'SH30'W 3BJ.lE I
tne lrue poinl o� beoinn�ng ef the properly beine deseribed; lhence con(inuing Eost on the losl described line 3?1.255 Feet (19.47 rods) ; ^o-�F � �
N
�h.�« Sa��h a�� po.a���� �o ,h� w�s� line of 5a,d so�,hw�5, Ouorter, 810.97 feel, more o� ��55, �a o Po;�� wh��h �5 813.55 feet North o< <„� GLENDALE DRIVE ` z Q -
Soulh line of soid Soulhwest Ouarter, meosured parollel to tne West line of said Southwesl Ouorler; Ihence West and porotlel to the aforesoid � r�� :
Soulh line 321.255 feel, mo�e or less, lo o poinl, said poinl being 214,00 feel Easl o! the West line of soid Soutnwest Ouorler, thence North, �,� -
ond parolld ta lhe Wesl line ot said Soulhwest Ouarler, 8t0.97 feel, more or less, fo ihe lrue poinl of beginning, acrording lo the UniLed States I � -
� � J w i
Government survey thereof, on file or of record in the office of the Reqisler of Deeds, in ond for Hennepin Counly, Minnesoto. � o : denoles iron morker L � I -
A1.50 : Lot 1, Blotk 1, BELLE AiRE ESTATES REARRAI�GEM'eNT, ond Lol 14. &otk t, 9ELLE AIRE ESTATES (�io5.3): tlenoles ealsling spol Nevotion. meon seo levd dolum z Z
ALSO. Lo1 1. Block 1, UL�iER ESTATES si� : tlenotes eeisling contour line, meon sea level dolum w Q 5Q �OQ 2��
Beorinqs shown pre ba,eC upon an ossume0 d�tum. � � , ��--�����1 Im i ;
p��
This survey intentls to show lhe houndories of the abave Oescribed properly, fn � � � �
lhe locclion of oll exisling Doildings, visible improvements, lopography, ond lrees �� � � � � ' �;i� I I
thereor.. Il does no; purporl Lo shov� o�y oLher impro���nents or encroocnments. i �
'° SCALE IN FEET � !
oll5ore_lim Q i
05-059 �� ,�
_.___ _ ,
�
. d � � �° �� _.
GLENDALE COVE
PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN FOR EXHIBIT B-2 N ��
BOHLAND DEVEL4PMENT/HICKORY FINE HOMES, AND KEITH WILLIAMS �SOLUTIONNO. � �j L. ���
OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BELLE AIRE ESTATES REARRANGEMENT, AND Q �g�
LOT 14, BLOCK 1, BELLE AIRE ESTATES, AND LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ULMER ESTATES, AND c,� W Z"
IN THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 34-118-23 O ? o
HENNEPfN COUNTY, MfNNESOTA ( WZSo � Qo ;r
Z
. � RIN�9963 Q ��
r---- --------------------- ------ --------- � ------------------- ----�- -------- ------- �oC6N�RUCf��NEATRANCE ------w—�------- - - ---- --- � W ��
NJ�9
� WILLO J\ �,
_ � �ly— �
� � O FS S E C.�3��1 8-2 3 � Nw LOR � Li. W J �
... . . . _ . -� � _ � - - �� �_� - - - - - - 1018.875 orswve W 2 �1� I
; �� � '—, or scc. i � �
3�-i�e-z3 m lj,j �
j ��' �_ �J 11]w - N. 73+, .�' QD"" � � � �
i fg — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � — � �` /N'_ — — , i � \ i zJ �= 'I
� n / // Q --� I � � �/ - -- - - - - - I/ �� � I � � �n'
I i 3 I �o�/'� ` VJL=991.5 \\ � 1� �-- ` I /n '.
WE57 LR.'E OF Sw tit , i . � � � ..
1 0�SEC.3a-t i6-:3 �g / . i.i i i �.1�� � � / I ;I W V
� �� i o � � I ` y� a/ r EXISTING HOUSE � � I �
i ;_ / � � : S �N o� ,\ � So _ , _ ��� , _ 1 � ;i i�
1� r � 30� o i N
� i i i fi •r �-'/ r( ; i � t-- 1 i � , y � , ` ` � W i �o
� i i i ��i�r �"i �� w i �l �I �� O � N � ��� ��` I� ��
I ._� +_ � v� L-.+ i' � '-' i � + /I $ i � `.^�, � _=36000+-S.F. � m
I I � � � / ' \1 � �/ I �^ \\ � g �' IN {�m
1 I � I r
7 �� ' \ Ii �`�� � ;�y� h
� // �'� / ' ' ` i 9 � L-- - - °'�—= --' � I �I,�^6� �
y i Fi
1 R I y�, � -� I
' r l� � � \` �� �\ .. ^ -I' �, , � s oroq�E i
I � �
4� — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — _ _ �i1�� — — _ _ _ _ _ __ _ — �'.�.TLO'W'Lb' �7ZOc �— .�. \ 1qQ8Q+�.$.F / - 198� .�t I
i — v�`y- - 813.55 r - o a�`c�iui¢ �\ / �O' � J � � _ .i 267+- l '� �
I / I � � �
I � f zo.-s.F. j.' 6� � / ,3 '/� ,—%- �--- - - --- - -- � --y� i
i �
„•. .5 .2i 92 /
I � / / i� I I �� �
I / � � / / �
I ' , ' �� � _ — � / / ` 2 1� /
,�_�� � o � ,�w•� /, / �
�
I • , \,)„A � � / / / � 20524D+-S.F. , 1
I � � / t � "� .. . " �
+'� ,
� i • �-�/ � � 73 � � o. � J, � 6 .� // �i ' � � � � \ I I
� _� i��i ����� � I 76 •� R� / �ey ��o�+�./ / � '� ' � ^ \ I � I
� , ''- ' � , w / ,( \\ � I � �
� / ., / '� MH 4 � � � \ �/ \ 'M �
i _ _ /`` ' ` . � 1 1 INV=89 . � MHa / �=�c�3� � '� � � .no• � \! \� � .
�� i � �
I 'I� � r�i f � 1�f' ' V� �� 7 "� � � � LOMP tIOMIUKI \ �\ � �
I '� n , , � I +e �1/ I� �'� / � �.,._ — EXISTING BUIL�NG � ( I \ 1
i�/� ' � � i Y 1 � -�'� � (CH CH) � n I I ` OWNERS
� I � � ��� .� � r�'' � / � I ' �I I � � I CALVINPRESBYTERIANCHURCH � ��
I SouiM ir�E or sw v+ ' � ! � ��{-� ^ EX�n� ��ae�' �' ' - � � 177GLANDALEDRNE �
GAR�GE
I OF SEC.3<-t 78-23 ' � � R= jB� �_ L �I � � ( � 1 I �- �e.v� / / I I LONG LAKE,MINNESOTA 55358 ��w�. � -
H � �
�i
I o � � I � � _�`_ � \ KEITH A.WILLIAMSON ���< �
\ �� ��1 � �- L �'--"---'Mi-'-- �-- 190N.WILLOWDRIVE - 4��•-
I ' 1827 -� \ / �� � . I �BLACKTOP � � r---') �-- LONG LAKE,MINNE507A 55356 �F 4�I � .
� I d. / � l � I W�o � �
I R �� '� ^ ,,, I I� I C i � � / � ' DEVELOPER �o ; �
� � \ f � � ' �F I� ��� � � \�/ I ' I � ST�EVE BODEVEIOPMENT �g 8� �
� � I L- - -� w�.a �--,�-- fG! / i � I 1844 W.WAYZATA BOULEVARD
L — — — — — /L�- - / '� I ��� PARKING � — — ( — — —— � \ � ` LONG LAKE,MINNESOTA 44356 i'�o
\ ��'� �`
' � \ \ I � 'SO�j SV
- - - - - - - - - - �',, � _ _ e,3ss- - - - - - - ' - -�' -� —r7'' — ~_ — 7�I�"
4'�' —/ i- sar��i�.77/ / � � \ i \ 5 H �W�� �
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL // � � � � � � I � / B��V � �'�N
1. Insidl perimeler contro� fencing per Ihe stan�ard detoil lotes. � � � � n / � I "� N1�
W��Sw�� :
2. Instoll o rock tonstruction entronce per the sirndord de�oil OIoLe. ���•� � PpoPoSEDr � ` �� �� q1 0
3. Use horizontol siope groding. � � i i w drtw.uNouSTFW� � � I � ' \ / TOTALAREA=102B+-ACRES =3�Z3
4. Instdl erosion control oround ony lemporcry dirt slockpile oreas. '�-: � � � i I � -
5. Inslall riprop energy dissipolion mmediolely ofler installotion of slorm sewrr. ,�� �� I I I I r, � t�• / � 1,' ��y.� � �'�' 7'�1 i'�J a}' � z
6. Instdl inlet protection oround calch basins. r`� I r�' �_�_ � �/ �� � �?�_ � �_i ' � i� � ,r� � a s
7. The controclor for 6ohlond Develo menl shoil 'ns ect all erosion control B�IPs ' `
ofter eath roinfoll and rePoir os neressary ond emave sediment Irom ;ilt fence; �m. I I .`� �^.�; _` I ' i iT�r�i7���,I�li�i�-�_� n�/� nr �� / l W -
i( it reaches t/3 ca0ocity. . � .�_ '�, r �i __� v i ��` c
8. 7he conlrodor sholl schedule his oDerallans lo minimize the omounl ol dislurbed i� �I �-.� ' ` I
oreo at ony given lime. The conlroctor shall limit hls aclivities to the gr�ding � � i / � � /,
q -I-- i _ ��__ __� '(�
Gmits as shown. � �•f / �; _ / I \ p`�,�
PEP.MANENT EP.OSION CONTROL � � � � �
1. Wilhin 24 hours of completion of lhe N�JRP pond grodinq, inslaA erosion conlrul Z �' _I_ _ ''f,u;-�";�;� � �_f, —
blonket on the side slopes ol tne Da^ds. 6lonkets should be AN•IDOT coleaory } w;�h � soo•savo•wsviea I
2. All thG slopes that ore 3:1 pr sleeper shall be slabilized v�ilh eros�on cunlrol 'a� � � (Jj�n
0 minimum S�aple pallern ol 1.5 per SqUOfe y0rtl. GONNECTTDE%ISTWG Y
blonkel Wllhin 7 do s o( �inol ror]G. CITYOFLONGLAKEWATERAVIN 1
z. o�h« exposed o.�5 5ho��d «9�,�� mulch and secd w��h,� ,4_2, ��YS a�,e< <�„a� GLENDALE DRIVE o�
w
gradng. ��
4. Seeding of dislurbed areas should 'ndude 4-6 inches o( loDsoil. mixlure 190 unill � �
Otl. 20 or dormant se!ding from Oct. 20 M1lov. 15, al 60 Ibs/acre wilh a morimum �
soil lemperoture of 35, with type 1 muicn (2 lons/acre) disc oncnared. For work � Q W � W
next spring lhe seed mizltue shall be 270 ot 12D Pos/ocre. For deLofls refer la o : denoles �ron marker �-- � �
MNDOT Office of Environmenlol Servlces Erosion Conlrol Uni( 2003 seeding manual. (9o83j: tleno�es existinp spol elevotion, mean 5=a levd dolum Z �7
5. Upon estabiishment of lurf, !he sill fence sholl be removed ond dis0osed orr5��e. 0 p P L Q 50 .�oo .LOO
908.3 : denotes r000sed s ot elevotion, mtan seo level dalum
LAND PEATURE CHANGES li�--: Oenotes exi5ling Conlavr line, meon seo level daWm � � m j
A. Talal projec; o�eo = 10.28 +- Ac (J.5 +- A�, Dislurbed) -�: denoles proposed conlour fne. mean see level daWm � �� � �
9. Tofol impervious surfoce aroc of projecl = 1.4 +- Ac. /n �
C. iotal ervious areo of j � �—. denot=s proposeC sill fence
P O�o ett = 8.88 +- Ac. ' v � ��� w
D. 7otol eslimoted Impervious orea of ultimote aevelopment = 2.2 +- Ac. Beorings shown ore Cosed upon an assumed datum. I w I SCALE �N rEET ¢ n
E. Tolal estimoted pervious area o! ultimote development = B.Od +- Ac. o '
�It7�rodinn I
EXHIBIT B-3
���� ���� C OV� RESOLUTION NO. � `� � {�'
F�r:��.INIINAF: r U�;,��t3�;�U, �f�;\i�d:�GE & UTILITY �'LAN ��� � Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets
���L,AP�D DE\/E�.�PIV�E�IT/HICK�RY FI�IE �IOIVIES, A�1D KEITH VV'1111LLIAI�IiSON
OF LOT 1, �3�LOCK 1, BELL� AIRE ESTATES R'�ARRAN�El�/IENT, AND
Lt�T 14, BLOCK �I, BELLE AIRE E� l'ATES, AiVD LOT 1, BLOCK 1, UL1;1ER ESTATES, A�ID v ° ��
IN THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 34-118-23 y; ° �
t���INEPIt*a COU'�aTY, M1�1�IE�OTA �W � " '�`" '
I W � i � = ,T
� �
.., ga� i
� � A^ I
� WILLO —-— � v; i
r- ��\'`�- _I � � ON i
__�_�����e�__���.�������__����_���__�.��������—�������.�����..����.�� ������������ WEST LfiE OF SYf t/4 ������ 1
1(�
�-________ � �— � _ oF sce sti-��s-21 _ i �s�ir��/� = J O► I
i _ �
� i — — �• --� �, > i 101Bf76 a4-tts-u � m = �,
OF gC. S^'W
� �� „° �-� �_�},�y,6'�v��.'� � � ::��:?"�y t:5^�Q.1171�� �`' � +� �• � — — \ i ^-� I L W =�
� �x � _ '�, � -} �.�� _ �V� `iµ � � �/� �) � � 1 � � � �xa �i
�
' �3 � �. �X � "��`4 — -- � k"` �-- ----- ;� � f ��
�F t9
� o"�se��,�e"-u 4 �� ?f,� :�� : µ r_ :�' �, '� I oasntro�ouse �� 4�
� ;� ;/ ..� r�-' � ;�_. � � �I � �
� � '
� ; j � �S ,� �,,�; f"' �. F+�. � � ,"� o �\ � :, � � \ �I �
��� G.. i r: L � `�� . fi � �j _ � .., s. � �I j �r�3EOOQa 3.f. I ` J .
' a-�'�,'� �. :.a r �=sr ;i .. l ' � — t w - ,
� :,,, ��.t� s � .;,� .t r+.-��� /� ,� \\ I V �_' �.
� e" �' yar � �ei � '� � Yr�;. � I � �� � � � N ',
u _s
� �� _� � J � ��
� � � � , t --- u'r=_�- � � • � � � o
� _ `"� �J/ �' �� ' �
� _ ,.,;��'� f E �.
�_ ___ _ _________y��4,�.__ �1J.d6 ____— / �—,� %� j
o � / / , ----- �
' �oW � . � �. i ��
F � w.o. � a . / � (i �
�. _ --� c 2 � `�
� ,f=�i / � �\ �� � sos24w-aF. � �
( i, � /�� i- � — � � \ �1
I �_� �'f � r 7 / / s � /� \ � � � �
i v �1 �,� I � �� � \ � � ' �
1 's � 1 � I/ � � � \
,�- : � MH 4 � \) � \ (
I � . . � . . i ;�� � INV�9D ;�,� � � �— —� \ . .I � .
1 .� � 'L� t �.� � — — iww rwa�tna � � P '
G. � �-% � � -,«.— — EXlSTING ILDING � f I.� ��s
� i . � �` ' -1/ _ � (cHuacH) � I 1 \
�1�
� ' !' ,-; / i� ` ' � J I��� �sT►�o ,„.- � # � � � I / � � I CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ^
' souit�tra a sw t�4 I �+ \ � ( / cMuo¢ � � � _ ' 177�tAND,�.tE DKIVE
av s[c,K-t�e-13 � ,-I � I �- �1� � � ' LONc UKE.MINNE80TA l336e ��
� � �� �J,� �\� I I '1_�_"'_'__'�Y"'l"��., t- KEITHAw1LLUMeON �� �
� - t eo ra.�+i.�ow owve `
� , � �E27 - ��� . I � �j4�};;TOP � � � r LOId�'��'.F,S;E,AAlNNE50TA55356 4 �Q�
I Y� \ 141 . � � i / I I � 6�A'�
� � I % I I I C i / II DEVELOPER ��
I � ', � 10YI�•QF. !� '� ' I .� \�/ � \ I � DOHL4N0 DEVELOPMEM �� W
� � ,
' �, .L__ J /�_��_J sreve F��� N e c
,'+,rt.a,..,A.. � I \ I t0A4`7�'V1e��.>o:ff,DOVLF/.4RD �a
` ,,:� �+,�.�. � ' L LINqr_.Lr,".f. P�iINNESOTA44356 r�u.� ' h .
1--- -- - --- - --- -- - -,'� ti �_ .,a,as- - - - - -- o.... _ �,-,:..a — / PA��',� _ _-�__�T '�-------'� I f �z�g� J��.
1 I
�i� / J ; I /� \` B\�iU 5 W?��� �
, � I � // I I� & T,\ �
C+'p'`„ PAUpOlE�C � �~q�g� �
Cc1 / . I �!TUM11i�(/JbTRAN. 1
���� � � � � / ` / I TOTAL A�:��102�+�-ACRE3 �3 Z z�
.;�,., { r, •, t / S (,� ,,7�.,;�-� T',•LP}• -
��� I I �� .:_���,i /'1 �.i�:. � � rJ.i �i�i i.L..
� ^ _ • � •
� �.�r�i c-. I ��`a.:�P;c�'q'?`;\�vi ny��s i;j����.
, ' �
. _ ._-' . ... __ _._. _ _ ; I 4..♦ . . _ _..._. 1 / -..- - -'. _ _._ - ----_ .
- - � � ' ` i
_ �
t�--�--------� �.��---�' �----'�� d� .
� � °°',� _ � T-— � t �,�t
" — — -'F'�tF"m"�' f � �--l. _ `r
-- _.._.._-- --_--�=�Troa . �'-ri.i�,- � , �
- _ vae ,�
coNne� vicn��c �
�°���"��"E"�' C�LEfVDALE Cr�[°�J� ` � -�� —�
w
�
o : denatea Iron morkx L- 0 � J
(uCe.31: denotav ezisFin9 spot devation, mean saa lavel datum � Z �
a�7 : denotne exi�ting eorttour line, mem aea IevN datum � W O 50 .�o0 200
Beorings uhown ore baead �pon an caeuned datum `,,,,,,,,,' �,.
rn ,P'�r'##rl*�oP m
V Q I , � W
" SCP�LE W FEET io
�,�n�����m __ _ _— ....
_ _ , ,..��
_,�.��
, ;
" EXHIBIT B-3 � u � R;� I
RESOLUTION NO.
, Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets i
Gotv e..��a�R-�--
�������� • On 2-story homes with rear yards facing south, no more than 60% of the lower '
January 23, 2006 �������` , level may be walk out level.
Dear Future Glendale Cove ResidentlHome Owner: Landscaping
• All landscaping plans must be approved.
We are excited that you have chosen Glendale Cove to build your new home! • Landscaping must be completed within one growing season
• Landscape plans must include 2 trees per city requirement.
Architecture and design guidelines play an important role in the protection of your • If homeowner has a sprinkler system rain sensors are required
investment in the Glendale Cave Neighborhood. We seek to distinguish the . Fencing must be behind home only and style approved.
neighborhood from others through careful architectural design and review. . All landscaping installed by Developer must remain. Any conditions of the Final
The list of"Covenants"below are required in your home design. The "Guidelines" below Plat Resolution by the City of Orono, and the Developers Agxeement between the
are encouraged in your home design. This level of detail wi11 ensure that this Developer and the City of Orono must be complied with. Please refer to these
neighborhood is created and maintained throughout the building process and for years to documents and the Glendale Cove—Covenants and Restrictions for additional
come. Additional information is available in the Glenda.le Cove - Covenants and information.
Restrictions. Please use this as your guide as you are considering ideas for designing your Guidelines - Glendale Cove Design and lLandscaping:
new home.
Covenants - Glendale Cove Design and Landscaping: � Architectural Design
• The architectural design team promot�s and encourages:
' o Color clad windows
Architectural Design �
o Flower boxes
• Porches (or permanent courtyard). Full depth sitting porches to create a � o Shutters.
welcoming orientation toward the neighborhood. i o Brackets
• No street exposed or rear exterior railings are to be constructed with dimensional � o Accent lights
lumber. (2X4's etc. detailed railings are preferred) �, o Variation of wall and roof materials
m Home address plates are to be customized for each home. � o Window grids
• Mailboxes will be matching throughout development, copper mailbox with i o Porch railings
matching posts. ; o "Vintage color"palette for exterior
• Exterior home colors will be of such that no two homes in a row may be with � o Decorative vents
similar matching colors. i o Dormers
• Uniform average setback to adjoining homes. o V�%indow trim detail
o Exposed streetscape elevation on all homes will be that of natural materials except �
for cement composite type materials. No vinyl or aluxninum so�ts anywhere on j Landscaping
the home. � • Landscape installed lighting is allowed in front yards only.
• Minunum 12" overhangs and 12" end rakes. (unless demonstrated to be i • If you have pets to contain please consider the use of invisible fencing.
. architecturally appropriate) ,
• Roofing. If shingles are asphalt, they must be dimensional.
• Driveway curb cut width at curb to front yard setback maximum width 14'. 2' Please note that all final plans must be reviewed before approval will be granted.
flairs on either side of the driveway at curb is allowed, however, it must be 12' '
maximum to the front yaxd setback. All driveways must be that of solid paved Thank you for taking the extra effort as you go through the design process to ensure that
surface. Glendale Cove maintains a unique character, making it a truly special place to call home.
s The side and back elevations of the home shall include a similar level of detail as
the front of the home. This shall include; trim detail around windows, stone Sincerely,
accents, shed, gable, window grids and gable treatments and overhangs. ,
� Maximum 25' horizontal wall expanse. For example: there must be a break in
material, depth, or other accent on any wall with 25' length or greater. Steve Bohl