Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-28-1989 Council Minutes1k • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 28, 1989 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers Nettles and Goetten. Councilmembers Callahan and Peterson were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Public Works Director Gerhardson, City Attorney Representative Whitney and City Recorder Scheff ler. WOODHILL AVENUE RESOLUTION #2682 PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. TO 7:05 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. City Administrator Bernhardson provided a brief explanation of the purpose of the $1660.47 assessment for the 3 abutting property owners. Bernhardson clarified that prepayment of all of the assessment could be made, equal installment payments could be made, or, after several payments, the remaining balance could S be entirely paid. It would not be acceptable for random payments to be paid. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cou�ngilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2682. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. COUNTY ROAD 15 LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT RESOLUTION #2683 PUBLIC HEARING 7:05 P.M. TO 7:10 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this assessment was for the street lighting installed as part of the upgrade of County Road 15. The estimated cost of the entire project -'is $535,000. How.o�ver, the City is assessing only the cost of street lighting, $118,P40.94. The assessment will be approximately $400.00/100' resi ential section and $1200.00/100' for the commercial section. Mayor Grabek referenced, for the record, a letter he received from Mr. Ward E. Edwards expressing his opposition to • the proposed assessment. Ms. Sandy Rauschendorfer, 3895 Shoreline Drive, said that she had her property appraised a month ago and their appraised value was $4,000 lower than it had been prior to the County Road 1 • MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 COUNTY ROAD 15 LIGHTING CONTINUED 15 project. She said that it was unfair that the property owners were paying for even part of the assessment when it is not benefiting them. Ms. Liza Crear, owner of property at 3701 Shoreline Drive, said that she did not understand why commercial properties were paying for the street lighting. Mayor Grabek responded by saying that the City viewed this upgrade as an improvement that would benefit both the residential and commercial properties along County Road 15. There were no further comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2683 as the assessment for the County Road 15 Lighting project. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. CONSENT AGENDA* Councilmember Nettles requested the removal of item #4 from the Consent Agenda; Councilmember Goetten requested that item #31 be removed for discussion. • It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the consent agenda, with the exception of items #4 and #31, which were removed and discussed in the numerical sequence in which they appear on the agenda. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* Councilmember Nettles noted that the Minutes of the August 14, 1989 Council Meeting did not reflect that he was absent from the August 14, 1989 Council Meeting. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to approve the Minutes of the August 14, 1989 Regular Council Meeting, as amended. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative, Edward Brown, was not present at this time, but did arrive later. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the Public. 2 A MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: • #1405 THOMAS COLWELL 2640 NORTH SHORE DRIVE FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2684* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2684, approving the final plat for the Colwell Addition. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1326 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB /RON LAUER NORTH FERNDALE ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2685* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2685, approving the plat of Hauser Lauer WCC Addition for Leopold Hauser, Ronald Lauer and Wayzata Country Club, on North Ferndale Road. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1407 LEOPOLD HAUSER 475 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2685* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2685, approving the plat of Hauser • Lauer WCC Addition for Leopold Hauser, Ronald Lauer and Wayzata Country Club, on North Ferndale Road. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1417 NSP SUBSTATION 3960 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2686 City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this was a request for a conditional use permit for construction of an electric substation near Highway 12 and County Road 6. Representatives from NSP met with the neighboring property owners and the satisfactory solution to their concerns is now being proposed. Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that none of the neighbors who had expressed concern about this project were present for this meeting. Mr. David Fisher confirmed that the neighbors totally accepted NSP's proposal. He added that the plans had changed quite a bit as a result of the neighbors' input. He said that the location of the substation had been revised so that there would be no tree removal; NSP intended to plant approximately 80 trees. • Mabusth said that NSP's proposal would not require the erection of any additional electric poles, but additional lines would be added to existing poles. 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 • ZONING FILE #1417 NSP SUBSTATION CONTINUED Councilmember Goetten questioned whether Hennepin County would need to approve the revised access? Mabusth replied that County approval was a condition of the resolution. Goetten also asked for clarification as to whether or not a front /rear setback variance would be necessary? Mr. Fisher said that the fencing was being located so that a variance would not be necessary. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2686, approving the Conditional Use Permit for Northern States Power Company. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1425 WARD FERRELL 3405 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCE /SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2687* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2687, granting a lot area variance to Ward and Mary Ferrell at 3405 Watertown Road, to create one new building site. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1429 RALPH BURGESS 2610 WEST LAFAYETTE ROAD VARIANCE /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • Mr. and Mrs. Burgess were present for this matter, as was Mr. Larry Berg, their Attorney. City Administrator Bernhardson briefly explained that the Burgess's were proposing to replace their existing home with a "walk -out" style home. In order to create the walk -out, substantial removal of the soils in the 0-751 zone will be required. Bernhardson questioned whether the concrete pavers proposed were included in the hardcover calculations? Mr. Burgess replied that the pavers are not included in the hardcover calculations. Mr. Burgess noted that hardcover is being reduced by approximately 1500 s.f. and that inclusion of the pavers would leave the hardcover at the present percentage. Mr. Burgess said that rebuilding the house as he is proposing would reduce the amount of runoff directly into Lake Minnetonka. Mr. Burgess said there is an existing garage on the property which would be rebuilt. Mayor Grabek asked Mr. Burgess if his architecht was aware of the City's policy regarding excavation within 75' of the Lake? Mr. Burgess said that he was familiar with the City's policies. He said that he was dissatisfied with the Planning Commission's explanation of the reasons why the City's policy disallowed any alteration of the shoreline. Mr. Burgess said that in his •opinion his property rights were being denied. He said that he and Mr. Berg had researched the development of the present wording of the City's ordinances pertaining to the maintenance of the shoreline. Mr. Burgess said that he determined that there were two reasons that prompted the current ordinance, one being 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 ZONING FILE #1429- BURGESS CONTINUED • aesthetics, the other was environmental impact. Mr. Burgess showed the Council and Mayor Grabek a model of the proposed home. He said that the house was designed and would be located in such a way that runoff would be directed toward a settling pond. He also showed that by moving the house back, it would no longer encroach into the average lakeshore setback. Mr. Burgess explained that he had a great interest in the preservation of Lake Minnetonka and had formed and been involved in the Lake Minnetonka Association. He hoped that this information would give him credibility regarding his intent to build his home without negatively impacting the Lake. Mr. Burgess said that, in his opinion, his proposal would improve the Lake. He said that he was amazed that lakeshore residents did not do more retention ponding to allow sediments to settle before runoff enters the lake. Mr. Burgess said that his proposal would be an environmental improvement because it would increase the distance runoff would travel before entering the Lake. He also said that he was replacing the hardcover within 0 -75' of the Lake with sod. He said that he did not understand why he was being denied when in fact he was improving the environment. Mayor Grabek explained to Mr. Burgess that the assumptions he made regarding the intent of the City's Code may or may not be • accurate. Mayor Grabek said that in his opinion the City cannot allow excavating along the shoreline, because even though Mr. Burgess's proposal may be aesthetically pleasing, another applicant's proposal to do the same excavation may not have the same results. Mr. Burgess questioned why the City could not hire consultants to review each application on a case by case basis, or why the Planning Commission could not be better informed of the City's Codes. Mayor Grabek responded that the City Council treated the citizens equally and that it would be difficult to allow one application for a walk -out and deny another. He said that the City's Codes and guidelines were very evident in that they disallow any excavation of the shoreline. Mr. Burgess referred to the issue of aesthetics and said that the existing house was a two -story home located on the highest elevation of his property. If given a choice, he believed that the Council and Mayor Grabek would choose the house he was proposing because it was more in conformity with the neighboring properties and aesthetically pleasing. Mayor Grabek reiterated that it was the City's intent to protect the shoreline by disallowing any excavation within 0 -75' of the lake. Councilmember Goetten reminded Mr. Burgess that he was is before the Council because he required a variance. She asked Mr. Burgess what hardship he had for a walk -out? Mr. Burgess said 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 • ZONING FILE #1429- BURGESS CONTINUED that he had submitted a letter spelling out his hardships. City Administrator Bernhardson said that the people responsible for drafting the ordinances in 1960/1970 chose not to have these matters addressed on a case -by -case basis. They chose to state that no excavation could occur within 0 -75' of Lake Minnetonka unless a hardship is demonstrated. Councilmember Goetten interjected that Mr. Brad VanNest was one of the persons responsible for the development of the City Ordinances pertaining to the lakeshore. Mr. Burgess said that significant portions of the bank had fallen into the Lake and unless something was done, more bank would be washed away. Councilmember Goetten said that the City staff would be willing to work with Mr. Burgess in that regard, but that the erosion and walk -out were two separate issues. Mayor Grabek stated that erosion of the bank was not a hardship to warrant a walk -out. Councilmember Goetten asked Mr. Burgess if he had met with the City staff to discuss restoration of his bank? Mr. Burgess stated that he had met with Mr. Gaf f ron and Mr. Cook. He said that Mr. Cook had recommended that fabric be installed and a beneficial amount of sloping be done. Mr. Burgess said that Mr. • Cook indicated that the City preferred to have vegetation rather than retaining wall. Mr. Burgess said that he would have no problem implementing those recommendations. Mr. Berg said that he had taken the time to go back and track Orono's ordinances as they changed. He said the prohibitions about disturbing the Lake had always existed. The difference came when Orono required a permit to disturb the lakeshore and proof that such disturbance would meet the goals of the Community for preserving the lakeshore. Mr. Berg said that in 1975, Orono decided to stop reviewing the aspects of the permits, but rather chose to deny them as a whole. Mr. Berg said that in examining the precedent aspect of denying this type of an application, that he could distinguish Mr. Burgess's proposal from others. He said that Mr. Burgess's proposal also addresses all of the engineering concerns. Mr. Berg noted that the existing house encroaches 35' into the 0 -75' setback zone. The proposed residence would allow hardcover to be totally eliminated in that area and remain the same in the 75 -250' zone. He said that the walk -out was an additional benefit. Mr. Berg asked to have the 6 reasons supporting denial of this application included in the record (see MPG memo 7/13/89). It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to deny application #1429. Councilmember Goetten said • that she would like to give Mr. Burgess the opportunity to revise his proposal and go back before the Planning Commission. Councilmember Nettles reiterated Councilmember Goetten's comments regardin4 the City's consistency in denying applications A MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 ZONING FILE #1429 - BURGESS CONTINUED • involving any excavation of the lakeshore with the policy being that the natural terrain was best. Nettles said that he interpreted the City's ordinances to say just that. Nettles said that Mr. Burgess's proposal went far beyond what was required to restore the lakeshore. City Administrator Bernhardson suggested that conceptual denial be given so that a resolution could be drafted and brought forth at the September 11, 1989 Meeting. Goetten assured Mr. Burgess that the Council does look upon each application individually. Mayor Grabek amended his motion to indicate that conceptual denial be given and that a resolution of denial be brought back to the September 11, 1989 Council Meeting, Councilmember Goetten seconded. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1433 LOREN BUTTERFIELD 3925 WATERTOWN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2688 Mr. Loren Butterfield was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson briefly explained that Mr. Butterfield was applying for a conditional use permit for the removal of peat. The Planning Commission had recommended approval of this application subject to removal not exceeding 300 cubic yards per year. • It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2688, approving the Conditional Use Permit for peat removal for Mr. Loren Butterfield. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1435 JOHN NAFUS 2580 DUNWOODY AVENUE VARIANCE RESOLUTION 2689 Mr. and Mrs. Nafus were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council and Mayor Grabek that the applicants wished to construct a 341x 24' storage addition. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to adopt Resolution #2689, approving a 1' sideyard setback variance for the construction of a storage addition for John and Gail Nafus. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. 1438 MRS. PHILIP PILLSBURY 1200 BRACRETTS POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2690 Mr. Al Paulson, Mrs. Pillsbury's architect, and Mr. Stephen • Pflaum, her attorney were present on her behalf. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that previously, 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 • ZONING FILE #1438 - PILLSBURY CONTINUED Mrs. Pillsbury had applied to the City for approval to construct a 6' serpentine wall surrounding limited areas of the property. The Council at that time had indicated they would only approve a 6' wall on that portion of the property bordering on County Road 15 to the driveway. The applicant chose not to proceed with that plan and is now requesting approval to construct a 4' wall. Councilmember Goetten stated that in her opinion, the wall was most needed. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2690, approving construction of 4' sepentine wall for Mrs. Philip Pillsbury, per staff recommendations. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. ROAD NAME REQUEST DENNIS KUMLIN* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to accept "Gander Road" as the street name for Dennis F. Kumlin's subdivision. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. MAYOR'S REPORT: ORONO CENTENNIAL • Mayor Grabek said that the Centennial fund needed an additional $8,000.00. Mayor Grabek showed the design that will be used for the medallion and will be given as a token of appreciation for contributions. Mr. Roehl's book has been submitted to the printer and is expected to be approximately 80 pages with 100 photographs. The book will be leather -bound and will sell for $14.95. The Centennial Ball will take place on October 13, 1989, with the "Golden Strings" providing entertainment. Mayor Grabek said that contributions thus far total approximately,$9,000.00. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: DEBORAH DRIVE City Administrator Bernhardson said that the residents of Deborah Drive, a private road, were requsting the installation of speed bumps to assist with the maintenance of the speed limit. The residents had submitted a plan to pave Deborah Drive and the plan included the speed bumps. However, the City Engineer did not review or approve the speed bumps. Mr. Thomas Betz, President of the Home Owners' Association, explained that the homeowners agreed to do the paving with the understanding that there would be speed bumps. Mr. Betz said that there were many children in the neighborhood and there has been several accidents. He said that the homeowners voted 7 to 2 • to approve the blacktop with speed bumps. Mr. Greg Carlin echoed Mr. Betz's comments that the paving was conditioned upon the installation of the speed bumps. He MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL FETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 DEBORAH DRIVE CONTINUED • said that the homeowners paid $34,000.00 to have the road paved. Mr. Carlin said that the blacktop surface has encouraged motorists to speed. Mrs. Carlin asked why the City was recommending denial of the speed bumps? Public Works Director Gerhardson replied that the City regulates public and private roads. He said that the problems the residents are experiencing can be addressed in another manner. Gerhardson suggested that the City could pass an ordinance prohibiting heavy trucks from using Deborah Drive. Mrs. Carlin said that large trucks did not pose as much of a problem as did speeding vehicles in general. Gerhardson said that the City has the jurisdiction to enforce traffic regulations on private roads and would so in this case. Bernhardson stated that he had talked with the Police Department regarding an increase of enforcement for Deborah Drive. Bernhardson said that the City would prefer to try other options prior to installing speed bumps. Bernhardson also noted that speed bumps are not as effective as they are thought to be. Gerhardson added that drivers eventually figure out that the speed bumps wi 11 not be f It as much if crossed at higher speeds. Gerhardson also said that drivers have a tendency to drive around • them, which creates other hazards. Mayor Grabek questioned whether the City could provide other alternatives to minimize speeding on Deborah Drive? Councilmember Goetten asked what the posted speed limit was for Deborah Drive. Public Works Director Gerhardson said that the residents had decided to post the speed limit at 25 m.p.h. and that the City may have difficulty enforcing that speed, but it could enforce others. Councilmember Goetten agreed that there was a need to do something to curtail speeds, but felt that it may be best to explore other options prior to installing speed bumps. Another resident indicated that school was starting soon and that there was a need to reach a solution quickly. He added that there would be a large number of children waiting for busses in the morning when speeding traffic was the greatest. He said that the residents of Deborah Drive were responsible for maintaining and plowing the road. Councilmember Nettles questioned whether the City could post a "Local Traffic Only" sign for Deborah Drive and temporarily • locate police at the ends of the street to keep drivers away? Public Works Director Gerhardson replied that it would be 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 is DEBORAH DRIVE CONTINUED difficult to enforce. Councilmember Nettles commented that he was familiar with an area where many speed bumps were placed close together. He said that it was impossible to attain enough speed to "fly" over them. Mr. Betz suggested that the speed bumps be installed for a one or two year trial period. City Administrator Bernhardson said that the City Engineer was unable to be present this evening, but it would be helpful to have his comments about the speed bumps. Mr. Betz said that he had talked with appropriate persons regarding emergency vehicles accessing the street with the speed bumps. He was told that as long as the bumps were not excessive enough to cause a vehicle to break a spring, they would not cause any problems. Mr. Betz said that they were proposing to install 4 speed bumps and each would be marked with a sign. The residents would also post signs at each end of the street indicating that speed bumps were present. City Administrator Bernhardson indicated that the City would prefer to use another alternative. He suggested that should the •Council approve the speed bumps, that the residents be asked to sign an agreement holding the City harmless from any liability. Councilmember Goetten said that initially she was prepared to vote against the speed bumps, but that she now had concerns about the safety of the children. Goetten said that since Deborah Drive was a private road and would be maintained by the residents, it would be difficult to disallow their request. Councilmember Nettles concurred with Goetten. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to allow for the installation of speed bumps for Deborah Drive, subject to the residents executing a Hold Harmless Agreement with the City and that appropriate signage be posted. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. 1990 STRATEGIC PLANNING This was an informational item. L.M.C.D. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS This was an informational item. NAVARRE RE- DEVELOPMENT MEETING City Administrator Bernhardson suggested various meeting • dates. Mayor Grabek indicated that he could not attend a meeting on November 18. Councilmember Goetten said that she would not be available for a November 4 meeting and would inform Bernhardson as soon as possible regarding her availability to attend a meeting on October 7th. 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 1990 BUDGET MEETING - SET 1990 BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING so City Administrator Bernhardson informed the Council and Mayor Grabek that it would be necessary to hold a public hearing in October. The Council and Mayor Grabek agreed to tentatively set October 3, 1989 as a date to meet to discuss the budget. FEE SCHEDULE - DOUBLE FEE POLICY ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 73, 2ND SERIES City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the City's policy regarding double fees for persons working without a permit. Prior to the change, the City staff could use their discretion as to whether or not to require a double fee from contractor or homeowner. Bernhardson said that subsequent to the City Council reviewing this matter, it was agreed that there would no longer be any flexibility and that all offenders would be required to pay a double fee. The policy change has created ill feelings by residents who have been charged a double fee for doing work that they were not aware required a permit. Bernhardson said that City staff was recommending that the policy be amended to allow for one violation for building construction where zoning was not an issue. If a violation occurs involving residential zoning, a double fee would be charged. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember • Nettles, to adopt Ordinance #73, 2nd Series, as an amendment to the Fee Ordinance related to double feeing in selected cases. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. BOND SALE* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to accept the information as presented. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. FEE SCHEDULE - PRD /CUP ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 74, 2ND SERIES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve Ordinance #74, 2nd series. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. PUBLIC /PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to accept the information on the public /private roads. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. STUBBS BAY SEWER* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table further discussion of this item until its September 25, 1989 meeting. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. • FIREWORKS ORDINANCE* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council accept the information from staff on 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 FIREWORKS ORDINANCE CONTINUED this issue. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. CDBG - SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Sub - recipient Agreement between Hennepin County and the City of Orono. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. COUNTY ROAD 116 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING DATE CHANGE SEPTEMBER 28, 1989* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to designate September 25, 1989, 7:00 p.m. to conduct a Public Hearing regarding County Road 116. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. PUBLIC WORKS PROMOTION* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to authorize the alteration of the position as far as Public Works Supervisor and that Mr. James Gregory be appointed to that position. This appointment will become effective as of August 29, 1989 at $14.174 per hour which is Step 3 of Level 8 with eligibility for a compensation review as of 1 March 1990. Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. • RESIGNATION - BUILDING INSPECTOR* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to accept the resignation of Thomas Jacobs, Building Inspector, effective September 8, 1989. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - MEL KILBO Councilmember Goetten said that she had expressed her concerns regarding the Police Department back in April. She said that she had made some recommendations and asked for some changes to be implemented by October. She did not feel that this was an appropriate time for a compensation adjustment, but preferred to review this when she had the information in October. City Administrator Bernhardson said that in his opinion Chief Kilbo continued to perform his job at the acceptable level established for his position. He said that the concerns expressed by Councilmember Goetten would be brought forth in October and would be reflected in the Chief's next review. Mayor Grabek stated that he did not see any reason to deny this. Grabek said denial would indicate that the Chief was not adequately performing his duties and he had no such indication at this time. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adjust Chief Kilbo's compensation to Step 3 of Level 12 plus 5% in accordance with the pay plan effective July 1, 1989. Councilmember Nettles said that his approval of this adjustment was not meant to preclude further resolution of the 12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 28, 1989 ADJUSTMENT -RILBO CONTINUED issues that have been brought to the attention of the Council. Motion, Ayes =2, Goetten, Nay, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding: 530 Stubbs Bay Road; Accident Highway 12 and Willow Drive; Lift Stations 10 & 43 Construction; Site C Discussion; Administrator's Vacation. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Representative Whitney indicated that he had nothing to report. LICENSES* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the following licenses: Home Occupation: Richard Anderson 3980 North Shore Drive Cecilia Smoot 2665 Maple Ridge Lane Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. BILLS* It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 9:00 p.m. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. AT ST: Do othy n- Hall in, City Clerg- Jam Is R. Grabek -Mayor a 13 • r: n LJ