HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-01116 - retaining wall , CITY OF ORONO * z 0 1 4 - 0 1 1 1 6 *
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY nATE �ssu�n: t2/08/2014
� ORONO, MN 553_56-
(952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616
ADDRI:SS : 805 FOREST ARMS LA
PIN : 07-117-23-12-0009
LEGAL DESC : FOREST ARMS
: LOT 001 BLOCK 002
PERMIT TYPE : ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL
CO�YSTRUCTION TYPE . RETAINING WALL>4 FEET
< <- +�v,+�.� <�`' ��l�-►{)
VALUATION : $ 7,500.00
NOTE: BOUI,DLR RETAINING WALL
NOTE: PRIQR TO RELEASG OF ESGROW MONI�Y AN AS-BUIL"C SURVEY MUST BE SUI3MITTED AND APPROVED.
INI"CIAL: 1 ,��
+ , ---�
1 �---.
APPLICANT PERMIT FF.E SCHEDULE 162.25
STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 3.75
BUTTERFIELD LANDSCAPE COMPANY TOTAL 166.00
3925 WATERTOWN ROAD
MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359- Payment(s)
CHECK 13977 166.00
OWNER
FELDMANN,JOSEPH & DONELLE
805 FORLST ARMS LA
MOUND, MN 5�364-
AGREEMEIYT AND SWORN STATEMENT
The work for which this permit is issued shall be periormed according to
the approvcd plans and spccitications,�pplicablc Cit��approvals,and thc
State Buildine Code. "�his permit is fbr only the wurk dcscribed and does
not grant permission tur additional or related work which requires separate
permits. All provisions of la�cs and ordinances governing this type of work
shall be compied with�vhether or not specified herein.'fhis permit will
expirc and become null and void if construction aiithorized is not
commenced within 180 days of dic date of issuance,or ifconstruction is
suspended f'or a period oY'1�0 days at any time aCter work has commenced.
The applicant is responsiblelfor assuring all required inspections arc
req��ested in conformance w�[h the State Building Code.This permit may be
revoked at any�ti�ic for due��ause.
I�� `�� a � � .
� � ,��,� � __ , d�. � /,z, �' ,/
A p icant Permi e Signatu e Date � Issue By Signature Date
--------
i— ---
CITY OF ORONO �
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATXAN l��•�
� -
FOR NEW STRUCTURES OR ADDITIONS -
�O . `O Mailing Address: � Permit number: �Q - / �
1V PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: �'�d-/
Street Address:' I�� Received by:
y� � 2750 Keltey Parkway � I��� Plan review fee: /�Jr .
L Orono, MN 55356 �
`�'�ESH��� Total Fee: °2D�y-Ol//S
Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us
This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted.
Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print)
GENERAL INFORMATION: �� � f�� S �
Job Site Address: G
Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers howcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes .� No
!f yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be
rer,urred unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed.
► CONTRACTOR/APP CANT INFORMATION:
Name: �p
State License# Expiration Date:
Phone: cell 1 office
Mailing Address: ti.J ;�
Contact Person: Applicar
Email and/or Fax: ' a ' /
�� ��� �'� � I� ��
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: ���
Name: i
��� -�.lil7r✓t d7.J �' —
Phone (day): �� �
Address: �G�,� �D ���C'1'� �� � ��7�'� l����� � �. - �_-��<��`1 _
Email and/or Fax
ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORMATION:
Name:
Phone (day): Z�3�-`� e,��,"� �"Q�
Address:
Email and/or Fax: wQ,�� � �j �j(��J�_
�
PROJECT INFORMATION: Description of project:
1. Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3. Structure Type 4. Sewage Disposal &
Water Supply
❑ New Construction ❑ Single Family with ❑ Residence
❑Addition attached garage ❑ Garage/Accessory Bldg. ❑ Public Sewer
❑ Accessory Building ❑ Single Family with ❑ Deck
❑ Relocation detached garage ❑ Office/Commercial ❑ Private Sewer
�,Other: (specify) ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse
❑ Public ❑ Storage ❑ Public Water
**Any earth movement may also require ❑ Commercial ❑ Other(specify)
MCWD review&permits. ❑ Industrial� ❑ Private Well
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑ Other: (Specify)
18202 Minnetonka Blvd
Deephaven,MN 55391
Phone: 952-471-0590
Fax: 952-471-0682
www.minnehahacreek.or
$ �,
Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) 1��jQ(�
�•
STRUCTURE INFORMATION:
1.Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions (continued) 2.Type of Construction
a. Length (ft.)= Number of bedrooms= �yyood/Frame
b.Width (ft.)= Number of garage stalls: ❑ Masonry
Areas in spuare feet Attached = ❑ Metal
❑ Pole Bldg.
c. Basement= Detached= ❑ ICF
d. 15f Story = ❑ On-site Prefab
e.2"d Story= ❑ Off-site Prefab
f. 'h Story = ❑ Other(please specify):
g.Total Area=
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: �
All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed:
N ot
Enclosed Ap licable .
❑ ❑ Permit A lication
❑ ❑ Pro osed Buildin Plans
❑ ❑ MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form
❑ , ❑ Surve meetin all re uirements
❑ ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
❑ ❑ Hardcover Calculation s "
❑ ❑ Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort
❑ ❑ Access Permit
❑ ❑ Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan
� ❑ En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above
❑ Q Plan Review Fee
❑ ❑ Application Escrow&Agreement
❑ ❑ Other:
APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
• Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department;
. Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500;
• Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they
are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware ihat upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative
but to reject it until it is complete;
• Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed;
• Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is clas,sified by State law as either
private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject
of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our
purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies
required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued.
. Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the
Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000
escrow to ensure comptetion of the as-built survey and all site improvements.
Applicant's Signature: Date: ����. ��
Owner's Signature: Date:
� , PLA[V REVlEW CHECF(LIST FOR {`lEW STRUCTURES / A�DITIOI�S
Address/Permit Number: �o� �`���� l'�F � E�„�
Qescription of r�rork: �� `
� Se tic revieHr b Qate A ��
�, p Y� pprQved:
Zoning review by: ""� Date Approved: ��'�' �
Building review by: Date Approved: l�` � ° d�
Grading review by: Date Appravecl: �°�' ��
Zaning District: Zoning File#: Reso#: I�eso Qate:
Zoning: Lot Area: SF/AC 1!1lidth: Lot Coverage: SF _%
Survey Submitted: � Yes - No Date of Survey: Revised date(?):
Rro osed Setbacks:
Front(Lake) Rear(�treet) ( N S E W ) ( N S E 1�11 ) Qther�u6lding,s �1►�tland
Side Sicie
Definec6 F�eight: Peak Height: FFE: FFE minus 6 fe�t= (Existing Contour)
Perimeter(linear feet) = 50%_ #of Stories Ok? � YES
�_
FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASENiENT OR CRAWL SPACE:
The distance between the lowest FOR A BUILDIPEG ON A SLAB FOUNDATION:
START WITH proposed floor(of the basement or crawl
space)and the highest point of the roof. START WITH The distance between the top of slab and
the highest point of the roof.
If you have a... If you have a...
• GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no
windows): Subtract half the windows): Subtract half the distance
` distance between the highest point between the highest point of the roof
of the roof to the low point of the
SUBTRACTION corresponding gable or hipped roof to the low point of the corresponding
SUBTRACTION gable or hipped roof
` (BASED ON ROOF . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with (BASED ON . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with
°" TYPE) windows): Subtract half the ROOF TYPE) windows): Subtract half the distance
distance between the top of the between the top of the highest
highest window and the highest window and the highest point of the
point of the roof roof
ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat,
� mansard,etc:No subtraction.
mansard,etc):No subtraction. ADDITION Add the distance between the top of slab
SUBTRACTION Subtract the distance between the (BASED ON and the highest existing grade adjacent to
(BASED ON EXISTING basemenVcrawl space floor and the EXISTING the foundation.
GRADES) highest existing grade adjacent to the GRADES
foundation OR 10 feet(whichever is less). EQUALS Defined building height
EQUALS Defined building height
f'-
!
,r
' . Shoreland �istrict MGWD Permit Receivec9 Avera e Lakeshore �etb�ck IVlet? Bluff
'° � Yes � No 0 N/A � Yes No
�Yes � No �es � No 0 N/A
Permit Number. E�^� �� Setback:
- Stormwater Quality Existinc� Proposed Variance Required CElP RequirecE
Overla �istrict Tier Hardcaver Hardcover
Yes � No a Yes No
TYpe(S)��`�.3 TYPe(S)�
Updated: January 2013
v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx
'���,�",��� ' � w �'�� t _����-�3�""`,�X�-x��g ��+� � �», '�" ''�'��'�`�'k,�+'�,'ti ' �` .e
�i ��;�
"``�x���h. �r»•,, �`t�''ay � > d i«?x *:3,�, � • +4 . .tk� .. ��.a ., ff'n9 „C^a:�:. '�' ' t .�. :s,
.��!..m.*�,."� ��'.. �"' '��. . „ _ �,�'����� . . . . �� � . .. .� . -_. y �
REMARKS (in-house):
Fees to be Char ed YES NO
Permit
Plart 12eview
State Surcharge
Investigation Fee
SAC—Number of SAC Units
�'; Other(specify)
S uare Foota e $ er S uare Foota e
Basement X - $
15'Floor X = $
� 2nd Floo� X - �
� Garage X - �
� �
Estimated Construction Value:
Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits
� Site 0 Plumbing 0 Grading/ Filling 0 Well
` � Hardcover Removal 0 Mechanical � Fire � Electrical
�Footing 0 Septic � Water Connection
� Poured Wall � Fireplace � Sewer Connection
�: � Foundatior� S�ervey Q Masonry � Lawn Irrigation
k' Q Radon Rock Bed 0 Mfg.
0 Framing � Other(specify)
�:, Insulation
� °�.As-Built Survey
� �inal
� � Wetland Buffer
� �Other(specify) ���� . �
�
�
� REMARKS (in-house):
6'
�
r
�
� Other Revievu: Reviewed by: Date Approved:
�
k
�ccess: Existing: 0 YES 0 NO New: � YES � NO
P-
OFFiCIAL FtEN1ARKS -TO BE NOT ON PEf�NlIT AND INITIALLED
���Ql� � � ' �,�-���� �S.�
� � i ��
*
;
�
,
� Updated: January 2013
� v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx
(
�
!
Christine Mattson
From: Robert Bean [bobbe@bolton-menk.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 1:54 PM
To: Christine Mattson
Cc: Andrew Mack; Melanie Curtis; David P. Martini; Brian Simmons
Subject: 2014-01116 -805 Forest Arms Lane
Christine,
I have completed review of the permit application package for a retaining wall over 4' in height at 805 Forest Arms
Lane. The design adequately meets requirements. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to
discuss.
Thanks,
Robert E. Bean,Jr, P.E.
LEED Green Assoc.
Water Resources Engineer
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Consulting Engineers&Surveyors
2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318
P:(952)448-8838, ext 2892
F:(952)448-8805
email: bobbe@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
Far more information please visit http://www.s,ymanteccloud.com
i
�`ickcry�n�in��nn�ty�nnsultino�.I LL THIS DRAWING IS FURNISHED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN PURPOSES
�<-����/illagcWood�j�ri�o,Fdc�Fra�ric,MN5534i ONLY, AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR FINAL DESIGN DRAWINGS OR
p�o�,=: 95z-qG5-az?z CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE CERTIFICATION OF A
www.vic<cryci;v.com PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE IN WHICH THE
WALL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, AND WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN
'szo�4�/ickcry�nginccring�Coi�suldng,LL� PERMISSION OF VICKERY EN6INEERING Sc CONSULTING� LLC.
PROPOSED BOULDER WALLS DESCRIPTION: 6-FOOT EXPOSED CROSS-SECTION
JOSEPH FELDMANN PROJECT VEC PROJECT: VEC 14-069
LOT I, BLOCK 2, FOREST ARMS CLIENT: B BUTTERFIELD LANDSCAPE
ORONO, MINNESOTA DATE: 4/2/14 SHEET: WI OF: I
NOTE: ALL BOULDER SHAPES SHOWN ARE FOR DETAILING PURPOSES ONLY.
ACTUAL BOULDER SHAPES MAY VARY GREATLY IN THE FIELD. BOULDER SIZES
SHOWN ARE MINIMUM DEPTH OF THE BOULDER, AND THE DEPTHS SHOWN IN THE
CROSS-SECTIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED MINIMUM DEPTHS INTO THE SLOPE
(PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL FACE). BOULDER HEIGHTS MAY VARY.
24-INCH 30-INCH 36-INCH 42-INCH
BOULDER BOULDER BOULDER BOULDER
PROPOSED BOULDER WALL
eBOULDER DESIGNATIONS
W� (NOT TO SCALE)
�!��`y����%TO�������������� ������:
���i���`'J�`�i�������5-i���� `��"
24-INCH �` N�,T, ,`� � �`
BOULDER =1 I I-__I I 1==i I
ILTER fGBR'.0 —��
(ILON OR ECIIGL)-I I I–
��� ���=1
30-INCH III-III-III-
6, BOULDER II I II I II I I I I II�II I II
MAX I I=I I I=I I I-I I I-
DRAiNAGE oF—I I i—I I I
I I–PGGREGCTE I I—I I I–
-I I I-I
36-INCH =I I I=I I I=I I�_
BOULDER II'=III=III=1'
-1 I I-1 I I-1 I 1-
I I i-1 I i-1 I I-
42-I NCH I=I I I=I I I=I I I
,� BOULDER 1= -I I I-I I I=I I I=I�
,,,_,I I' I I!=1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I�-1!'-
i-1 I I- �-'_ ,__, ,_ I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I�-
-I I 1=1 I I I I!-1 I 1=�I 1=1 I I-I I 1=1 I I-I I I-I I I-I I i=1�i-i I 1=
=I I 1= I I-1�i=�Tl-1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I 1=1 I 1='"-��I_I I I-1�!_
-"' "-'i I-1T-�"- ��� RECEI�'ED
PROPOSED BOULDER WALL �NR - 3 2014
�b-FOOT EXPOSED CROSS-SECTION
Wi (NOT TO SCALE) C�N OF ORONO
.
�/ick�ry �ngineerin� � �onsultin��., LLC
i��-:h� �rl.�,���Voo�,';[� n.:.;_ -i;('�:,�ii�•.fti1ti >..,,,�_;�a.,
���onC: .� .=i_o5..�;»� �-�:ax: ,�4.1}nc_;t?�
�vi l:c'i t{ii:�vi:�,;erijer.o_coni
Boulder Wall Calculations - 6-foot Exposed Wal� Height
Project VEC 14-069 - April 2, 2013
Joseph Feldman Project, Orono, MN
Desiqn Parameters: Page 1 Of 2
Retained Soil Friction Angle, �sr:= 28deg Soil Unit Weight, �ys:= 125pcf Crest Slope, (�:- Odeg
Foundation Soil Friction Angle, �sf:= 28deg
8] := 3•�sr bl = 18.667•deb Rock Unit Weight, -yr:= 135pcf Surcharge Load, qs := Opsf
Exposed Height, He := 6ft Wall Embedm ent, Hb := lft Total HeigM, Hr:= He + Hb
Hr = 7ft
Top of Wall Width, Wt := 2ft Base of Wall Width, Wba := 3.Sft
a:= 83deg � := 90deg - a � = 7•deg v := tan(�sf) v = 0.532
Calculate Wall Weiqht:
W1 :_ .5•(Wba - Wt)•He•�yr•lft W1 = 607.S1bf W2 := Wt•He•�yr•lft W2 = 1.62x 1031bf
W3 := Hb•Wba•-ys-lft W3 = 437.5 lbf Ww= Wl + W2 +W3 Ww= 26651bf
Active Earth Pressue Coefficient (Ka):
2
Ka = (cos(�sr +1�))
2 Ka = 0.274
(cos(�))��(cos(bl — �))��1 + «sin(�sr+ S1))�(sin(�sr — (�))]
[(cos(bl - �))�(cos(-� - �i))]
Total Horizontal Force: Wt
Horizontal Force From Soil, Fah:_ .5•7s•Ka•Hr•Hr•cos(SI -�)•lft Fah= 822.31bf
Horizontal Force From Surcharge, Fs:= qs�Ka�Hr�lft Fs= 0
Total Horizontal Force, Fh:= Fah+ Fs Fh= 8223 lbf
2 H.
Frictional Resistance:
Vertical Force From Soil, Fav:= .5•�ys•Ka•Hr•Hr•sin(bl - �)�lft Fav= 169.81bf 1
Fu:= v•(Ww+ Fav) Fu= 1507.31bf
Factor of SafetV, Base Slidinq:
3 Hb
FOS Sliding, FOSs := Fu FOSs= 1.833
� Wb
�RjlRCCr/l7f�,�C7�1f/'i(�r7s��7r 7R`,�f151�"�b�C w0�[7"-�
Vic�Cery �ngineerin� � �onsu�ting, LLC
1-4..i..}.f �,�iii::��,r�,'oc+c�.a f�nve;�o�en�'r;7inc.�.��� `��'�-�.-,..,�po
T'hone�. �'SL4r`,�-8�;'_ j-ex: n5>_4.��r_}a;-1
rv�c��:e�ryf�vi,hr.ryerna•.eum
Boulder Wall Caiculations - 6-foot Exposed Wall Height
Project VEC 14-069 - Aprii 2, 2013
Joseph Feldman Project, Orono, MN
Page 2 of 2
Calculate Overturninq Moment:
Driving Moment, Mo := L0.5•Ka•-ys•Hr•Hr•cos(S1 — �)•�HrJJ +�qs•Ka•H��H I� Mo= 1918.71bf
� 3 �2J
Calculate Resistinq Moment:
Resisting Moment is calculated by taking the sum of the weights times the moment arms for each section of wall above
W1•(Wba — Wt)•��J
M1 := M1 = 607.5 lbf
lft
W2L(Wba — Wt) + Wt�
M2:= M2 = 40501bf
(lft)
W2•��a�
M3 := 2 M3 = 28351bf
lft
Resisting Mom ent, Mr := M] + M2 + M3 Mr = 7492.5 lbf
Factor of Safetv, Overturninq:
FOS Overturning, FOSot :_ ��r FOSot= 3.905
Mo
�n�rneerin�>,So�i�tio�'rs!or�:jr7 C�nst��h�r �'(�or�ccl
DATE TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN
INSPECTION NOTI,C�E/.\ SCHEDULED
PERMIT NO. �`-%����v I I I�% COMPLEfED ul � I�
ADDRESS �Jr ��''�s� �'E'r»tj �i v�G
OWNER TELEPHONE NO.
CONTRACTOR
� DESCRIPTION �S�Uf�7� ,�Urv�c� .�i9tpLG��my
4� ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL
Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
Q ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL
Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI �SITE INSPECTION
Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL � ❑RATED WALLS
� ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT
Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP
W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
_
J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL
2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
v�, COMMENTS: S !/% c/Nv' y`� �f�"�"P�'t�7'
� .
a raa�n i .m c� Lr c- ���
o �!�f � � D ll� K� ? �� , a
'' �t� e � �' i� i , �m��
�
� l �( �2G7�/dr�r !l��` � G!� r .yt � i'I?./"
� c� x�c� rne s r r'� �r ��n
z �� �mwc u.�•� �t �,v�'�� ' e
� �,�r � �r�. d �v� yc �rteer,
� z � � � �� �'
a
W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE
� ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
W
O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
V BEFORECWERING PERMANENT
❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL REfURN
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED
❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call forthe next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-4600
OwnerfCon r on site:
Inspecto
White Copyflnspector's Ffle Canary CopylSite Notice
.SIT'� I CRADII�iC ',�
.
FOR -
..dOSEPH F'ELDM�
�
�
�
S I-I��'T' 2 C�F' 2, S�
1 I �p
_ � \ o }
.9 `fliS °
� � � 8" OAK `s� 6' 10" OAK ��
� � �
-� � ;3
�
_
_ � � � � �
\ ' I � \ !
I ' � �
s �
` o
\t o � --� � ° 1
� � � 10" OAK
I ' � \ '
� o I
� , I � � 16" OAI
I� ,, � � - __ TW B W 952.0
� ;,
�OQ��� � , TW B W 945.0 /�,,
� F���J� � ' �`ry I �� �' _�
!`�:;
� ��� i I PROPOSED--�------ TW 952.0 I
�� \ �.'�/ ,o � i RET�N NG \�� 948. BW 948.8
� � � ,.�C7, WALLS �+� 952.0 �
\ 12" < �'� S TEPS .,952 9 �
V ' a 1'�' � ,
� ' ° ` �L 952. 24.9
� � /0 48.8 ';.,���� 948.4 `.,
� � ` ; � ,';'J � TW 952.0
� � ��.�: I , BW 948.8 �, 8.0
\� m IJ�'_:.� �
94�8.8 20.0 ,ExISTING
i A � ��,,'�' - -10.0-- 2.0 ,-'� FLOOR
r'
' I �\ � � �:� � j j;'i� TW 952.8 W � 953.4
` :; � BW948.8 � � `�'
� \� I I ��l�� \ �, � � � N
V � �,�''! `��.,� �� � O
� ` ,� t� o Q `n �
i \ � � ' �•fl� �a �^ �
� � � ��...�--, � � � w
� � � N C�;�y o� ��\{`�o TW 952.8 0
� � d- �� � �Q ��;o BW 948.8 6.0 4.0
� \ a, �,:, o� , a o �
� � � X
\� + 3 � , o z
\ � m �4' � �`` o v� ^ c~n
� � --�6.0- �� _'a, � `v ��' � X
i � i --5.0 ��' ' ���� � � � o PROPOSED �
� TW 937.0 � � \i� �:�\ , `� cv 3-SEASON
8W 936.5 r � �--6.01� ,_RE INI `� � PORCH o �_EXISTING
� � � �` �` � i� WALLS � � � � FLOOR
� `�� 1 i \i ,�/�� BE REMOVED �-yy 952.8 1 9S¢,5 _-' 954.7
� ,,-'�� � ����� � �� � �, �(�
� i �,� ,_ 1� `��� � ��� BW 948.8 4j�� PROPOSED
� �" � � � �� PAT10
_- ,- � i � /
� PROPOSED- �-'` :��, � `���.� �����.. TW 954.5
STONE ` ` � I
'RETAlNING \� _ � J, 948.$ \"�� 9� 8 STEPS gW 952.3
WALLS � '�� � � . � �� ' 21.6
I �� .p, � R. � o � �� 'TW 954.2
�° � r� �
� i �'� �` � � � ca � �v �_
� �<y ���� '0 9�8.8 948.4 .� ,� ,� � ��' �i��,�
� � ���� � ,:_,' i � �C�� TW 954.1 � _
_ � m t�`� .� �, � � i m � , L.�_
� � �
,� ����2 � ,�;� TW 946.2 � �
`� �o o�'� � ` -� BW 942.5 0 'PROPOSED `S?S
� �� �` �`�-'�� �� , g 16" MAPLE STONE
i a �'���� RETAiNING
� ___ � j 1,, `�� 94?O WALL
� -, --20----- � �_ �` ,_.9395 � TW�BW 945.8 �
� t� �
� �~ � N
Z I \
Iw � ; TW 942. �
f< � � Q / I ' B W 941.5 � ��
i W l i `
� � � ' � � �
� � � � ►
� i � , o � i �
� � 18" MAPLE N �
I �-' / I , ,--PROPERTY LINE dl
� � � � �"'� oi
I I � � � a / i _ Di
� I � �
� � � � � ��
II � . . ,._....._ .r.,.� 3
� � illl�;' .
i1i �1r��F':'.
'.��.1�.'_, �y.
�
'� �Z,-n,�7 r,��;,��,
,,.�,// �c.r.a��.� _. �_
�� � � �...� �1.�..�:�-`�[i�]�► ;,.,������
�•� D � � � �708 i sT AvENUE NE;
f roperty lines and existing features are SIlOW11 � BUFFALO, MN 553i
(�y according to As-Built Site Plan by Meyer-Rohlin Pr�. 763.682.i�8 i vwvw.M�
� Land Services. File No. 11212-B, dated 10/26/12 p�wN BY Bootc '`�
�N PAGE
� _ _
,/
DATE TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN �/ $'l
INSPECTION I SCHEDULED 7� . ��
PERMIT NO.�< < �� COMPLETED
ADDRESS
OWNER E EPHONE NO.
CONTRACTOR r
� DESCRIPTION
ly ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL
Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
y ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL
Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION
Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS
� ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT
Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP
W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
_
J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL
2 OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
y COMMENTS:
o�
� ��bv/��G eKGsi�lcii� ,���� �r
� ` ` � t ` '
J � /�'GtG•�'�S l�J•e//�j vvs✓ � /�+ Acs��'
O �
� �- r�-viev � c�� e.� ����,•_
� �� ` 7.�Y r � ¢� �Q r'
W
Q j��l'r '� �1 �t 5,D2��ra.e� �'b�KOI�
�' '
2
� Co�r��� .� ��L� ,a� r���-s���`,�,�.
W
�
�
0
W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPIEfE
� ❑CORRECT VYORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
W
0 �CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REtNSPECTION TEMPORARY
V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT
❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTO TAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL REfURN
❑ TOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED
�PECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-460�
OwnerfContractor on site: �d/I e�C
c
Inspector. �� �
White Copyflnspector's Ffle Canary CopylSite Notice
� � ��� �
�� . �� �
DATE TIME
CI'1!'Y OF C �NO CALLED IN
(NSPLCT� NOTICE SCHEDULED '-� � ! � l� �,
PERMR NG �r�1`�"� ���� COMPLETED
ADDRE�S �% .��� �C�V�'S �- ��I�YI� L f�
OWNER �/� - �����TELEPH NE NO.
CONTR CTOR -� ' �`� �� �.
� r j � �
�� �
� DESCRIPTION�����l l � ���� ���r
ty ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL
� ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
Q ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL
Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION
Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS
� ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT
� ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP
W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
_
J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL
2 01MNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YiOU:_YES_NO
r—;, �
y COMMENTS:"- �< <�
W _. ;: n � , � ,
4
� /�arnGOt�✓��/� ,��'R�-��/� �i�� ri��i�+GP�,�
0
,��
� �'_p�,�� �„�a.� e.��no/����� a h o` 1,,.,; // , �� �._,,' �
0 � wYV�� -��
� �,�.�h�7� �,.� �'��.. �/ � G�` � ��/l .��. �:v
W
�
Q /
�' ���i�� I Dbnv/J/���P�/� Qwo� /1T6K•J' �?n-o0�
W
W
�
�
J
W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED �PROJECT COMPLEfE °)j1C� '�-'".�R
W ❑CORRECT WORK 3 PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY �'C
O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY Y''
V BEFORECONERING PERMANENT 4v"
❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑pHOTOTAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL RETURN
❑CITATION ISSUED
O STOP OHDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR
❑INSPECTION REWIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call br the next inspection 2a hours in advance. (g52) 249-4600
OwnerlContractor on site:
Inspector. ��r� �
Whits Copyllnapector's Ffle Canary CopylSite Notfee
0
• SCHI M NO W SKI ENGI NEERS
CRITERIUM-SCHIMNOWSKI ENGINEERS
761 DUNBAR WAY
MAHTOMEDI,MN 55115
TEL 651779-7700
FAX 651779-7114
www.criterium-schimnowski.com
August 17, 2016
Asher Judd �
Outdoor Innovations Landscaping F�+
5885 165'�'Street F��/
Hugo, MN 55038 qp� ;o F�
C�T}, ` '�O�j
RE: Boulder Retaining Wall Evaluation �F�
805 Forest Arms Lane RONO
Orono, Minnesota
Project#16-2367
Dear Mr. Judd:
This letter is being sent per your request regarding the recently constructed boulder retaining walls at the
above address. This evaluation is based on my observafions during a site visit on August 4, 2016, and
information you provided in an email on August 3, 2016, including as-built survey information and a
sketch of a swimming pool post footing detail indicating that the pool footing loads are being supported
below the influence of the retaining walls.
The construction of the retaining walls is structurally stable and in general conformance with boulder
retaining wall and construction industry standa�ds. The walls were constructed with stone of sufficient size
and setback. Other typical construction details such as use of drainage elements also appeared to be
followed conectly. As is normal for boulder retaining walls of this type, some wall movement and soil
settlement should be expected. I recommend that concentrated areas of surface water shoutd be directed
away from the walls. Several photos were taken for documentation, some of which have been provided
as part of this report.
This evaluation was pertormed using the design guidelines presented in the third edition of the"Design
Manual for Segmental Retaining WaNs" (DMSRVI� published by NCMA in 2009. Direct ail surface
drainage away from the retaining walls. If soil conditions, proposed layouts, or other design parameters
vary from that assumed, a revised analysis might be needed. Please call me if you have any questions or
need more information. Thank you.
Sincerely,
,�,�;tlilrf;r� `
--�; - .!"� •:�'`�,'� ���`�`/ 'Gj¢/,
�--1 ,.� � - �_ ,��` �,,�,'`" . : _ .:,;
�,
I r r-�'''_ �.,.�'_ �' � ,, �,
� �
, �+� ^ o.g�
Paul Schimnowski PE - � ¢
, , '1�i : �,.:^
� �,�l48►ti4��� :,r: .�
� � � �i�'f1 n ',
�'� G Q� M�
a �.
a t�3y` �Ae � t
��� �/y77ss� �
f r/�+ 'na��'p��T' .
LICENSED �i.�,a,`�iRk�i t�`�xQ,'�'l�
PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERS
HOME 8 BUILDING INSPECTIONS
STRUCTURAL EVALUATIONS
4SSOCIATION RESERVE/TRANSITION STUDIES
RESIDENTtAIlCOMMERCIAL '
RETAINING WALL DESIGN 8 EVALUATIONS
' 805 Forest Arms Lane, Orono, Minnesota
� August 17, 2016
Page 2 of 2
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
This WALL EVALUATION and ensuing recommendations is expressly made subjed to the following terms and
conditions to which all persons that receive and rely thereon agree:
1.Standard of Service—Services performed by ENGINEER under this agreement shall be performed in a manner
consistent with the skill and care ordinarily used by members of the engineering profession pradiang under similar
conditions at the time and in the locality the services are performed.
• Client recognizes that irrterpretations and recommendations of ENGINEER are based solely on the
information available to the oompany.
• ENGINEER will be responsible for those interpretations and recommendations,but shall not be responsible
for the interpretation by others of the ir�formation developed
• Services provided reflect the professional judgment of ENGINEER,to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge,
informa6on,and belief as of the date hereof.
• No other wamanty or guarantee,express or implied,is made.
2.Said design is based errtirely on and expressly limited by the scope of serv'ices ENGINEER has been employed by
Client to perForm and as described in WALL PROVISIONS and LIMITATIONS.
3. If the ENGINEER is hired for any construdion phase services or site visits,ft is understood that the Contrador,not
the ENGINEER,is responsible for the constn�ction of the project,and that ENGINEER is not responsible for the ads
or omissions of any corrtrador,subcoMractor or material supplier,for safety precautions, programs or enforcement;
or for construdion means,methods,techniques,sequences and procedures employed by the Contrador.
4.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS:All reports,field data,field notes,calculations,estimates and other documeMs
('reports')prepared by Engineer,as instruments of service,shall remain the property of Engineer. Client agrees that
all reports fumished to Client or his agerrts,which are not paid for,will be retumed upon demand and wili not be used
by Client for any purpose whatever. Engineer will retain all perdnent records relating to the services performed for a
period of five years following submission of the report,during which period the reo�rds will be made available to
Client at all reasonable times.
5.TERMINATION:This agreement may be terminated by either party by written notice. In the event of termination,
ENGINEER shall be paid for services performed and expenses incurred up to the termination notice date. Neither
Clierrt not ENGINEER may delegate,assign,sublet or transfer his/her duties or interest in this Agreement without the
written consent of the other party.
6. To the fullest extent permitted by law,Client and ENGINEER(1)waive against each other,and the other's
employees,oificers,directors,agents,insurers,partners,and cqnsulhants,any and all claims for or entitlement to
special,incidental,indirect,or consequen6al damages arising out of,resulting from,or in any way related to this wall
design and written report,(2)agree that ENGINEER's total liability to Client shalt be limited to the total amount of
compensation received by ENGINEER and(3)if an adion is brought against the ENGINEER and the ENGINEER
prevails, ENGINEER shall be entiUed to recover c�sts and expenses,inGuding reasonable attomeys'fees and costs.
� s
a
;
CRITERIUM-SCHIMNOWSKI ENGINEERS
TEL 651 779-7700 �
�
� Location Photos Taken by: Inspecdam Date: ��� j _� ���� ��. f' `' R i�•,/`
SOS Forest A»ns Zane, Paul D Schimnowski, August 4,2016 `�..--y �� � t._.E '\� �,,...� + � �
o'°"°,'�rN ElYGlNEE�S
�:.:
5
,:� . ,y.:,,�� ' �„ ,,
�: � '�'.. - -,:
t�
;.,. ` .s:-
'.�,-
�-;'�E��r&.��
— ��.
'+�7�r
r
_ �, � ' ���fi '`�
k�w. +� �' �:
� t ws
1 Front view of house. 2 Rear view of house with boulder retaining
walls.
�,� I(�� ,,..
4 � y_ � '��+�I aFt _
�� ,{ ' � �' �r t�I�
�rw�� � � ',�,. �r
�, ._. ... ,p: n�,.il`�y I�li -
7 �e
� s
, . ._ ..a : ��.
.
_ �...... , ,,..�j�. , : ' . _y:. �� ' . ,.. ,
� r
,.. �' '+...,.
�
, i ~
t�m �
� �. �� .:+�"�^�''f°
y E
x'� h�� {E�3 I{ al. ,✓�i•�'�'_
I �i� ��_ £ � �f'
.„x
3 Upper wall is structurally adequate. 4 Upper wall is structurally stable.
�:�" Y��$ � .� �� u�� Y
_ }w� .�
5 >
.,:�-
���` , � - �..
'- ,� ;�$. ;� Y�
;,_>:,
,�� .;,..
1:. �,
�' �:, ;'����� +� 'V �� � . .
- �,��,.� �� _
,. .
��;.�
5 Direct surface water and runoff away from 6 Direct surface water and runoff away from wall
wall. to revent bacl�ill movement.
. � , •
Location PhMus Taken by: Iffipection Date: ���������
805 Forest Arnu Lane, Pau1 D Schimnowski> August 4,2016
oT°n°,"rN FIMGtHEERS
.�
��� � OSr.Y.
�
..y'7n'�'e':
��..
• �
' $�wI' +t,.
�
� •�� t .. . , .�
:�" .a '�"�' �:
�,..� >::..�.�-'
7 Measurement photo of upper wall. 8 Direct surface water and runoff away from wall
to revent bacl�ill movement.
,�,,.�. _ _
ti;
.�:
� ��
;�° � �. �,
s �� :.;�
�.,,,
�F.
9 View of tiered wall area. 10 Direct surface water and runoff away from wall
to revent baci�ill movement.
��':
� ��.
.a� �°
�; �'� '� ��� � " �1
�
� ' ;� wf� � - ,
' � ��. � � _� � ...�b . �*�S
' �` _�— ��
� �� �� � � -
� ��. �.i ,� `+r': ,.,�,
� � ' `'�' �r
..,��
� �r �r;e¢�� , ., .. .�"s a
���k:' � �`r
�;';.,�._ ��es $' _ „<
� ,,,,, = �,�-: �;*�
+> s.
11 Expect some patio paver displacement due to 12 Expect some patio paver displacement due to
seasonal movement of boulder wall. normal settlement of boulder wall.