Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Classification, Identiication & Delineation-2014 t � � � , • ' � , � �` • � � i. � � 1� ,�,� ;t, ;; ,�; `�'� ' - � . - � � • � � � . • � • . .�; � �; - .`�� � � ' � ' � �� �� 4 %�i� ' ���♦ � 1 1 ' i 1 1 1 � ��j �,�- � �'�`�,. ,... �, ; . ,,..�� :, �, .�}�. ' �,1 , -�. �. ��� - :��� . �l-������l �i• `;:=';� ����I��.i„ •,�e y � ,, ''�� . 'i�+f�:►,• ; �" �� i .:/.!.'� �i:''a" :�: , �'/'�- , .:y�fl tr*r;;L: ' �� �+� ' �l'1�\1�w . -.��: ..�� � � w�,. ' / '� �r i�.1� � ; ..'�.,��F'i.}'�i>r:�►i t�/ +� .����i�• 'tix��Y��L� �. `�1 � � r • •r. ,t�. .y,4�F• ��� �.; i 1•�:LjI��.��-''.:���I`� / �I.►'�,� ' i � �2'a� H' �� �11�w��► . w�'. F�j�i,��I �' `�� / �R+� � � � i•i�„�1�jIiI \'.1; 1�� / I ��� � ���� �.�` .�� �; � re y �� � �w I �, � \���1�� �' ' ,� � � � '`� . 1 . . � r �\\1' I f .�rl♦f .i� '. 1 ' . � � � / ' ' . • �� I / i �,. ' � � :` � ` � ` I►��, :.. I " ` ;,,: : � �- ;,,`- --. � � . � I ' I � I ',n��/�ji ��r ;� --- , • � � - � � � � ��'�� ' �"� ! �,��, � � , . � Providing the Sharper Edge in Natural Resources &Environmental Consulting ECOLOGICAL RES�URCES , •�.� , � . , � •. . � � 1165 Ferndale Road Orono, MN Wetland Classification, Identification, and Delineation Report Prepared for: Robert Brook By: Svoboda Ecological Resources Project Number 2014-026 October l, 2014 The contents and format of this report are considered intellectual property and are subject to copyright restrictions and may not be reproduced without the express permission of Svoboda Ecological Resources. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1 METHODS...........................................................................................................................1 RESULTS.............................................................................................................................2 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................5 CERTIFICATION................................................................................................................6 DATASOURCES................................................................................................................7 LITERATURECITED.........................................................................................................8 FIGURE SET: Figure 1: Location of Site Overlaid on USGS Topographic Map Figure 2a: National Wetland Inventory Figure 2b: Hennepin County Wetland Inventory Figure 2c: 2014 DNR NWI Update Figure 3: Web Soil Survey-Hennepin County Figure 4: DNR- Protected Waters Map Figure 5: Approximate Wetland Boundaries and Sample Transect Locations Figure 6: Approximate Wetland Boundary and Soils THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION: Field Data Sheets Plant Indicator Status Soil Series Data Wetland Definition PHOTO LOG ABSTRACT Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) visited the above referenced property on November 1, 2011 to examine the site for the presence of areas meeting wetland criteria. The study parcel is located within the City of Orono, Hennepin Counry Minnesota, (Figure 1). Two wetlands were delineated at this site. One sample transect was established along each of the two wetland boundaries in order to characterize the soil, vegetation, and existing hydrology within the wetland-to-upland transition zones. INTRODUCTION The subject parcel is approximately 0.8 acres in size with a single family home located in the central portion of the property. The site is dominated by manicured lawn, wild grasses, hardwood trees and some scrub-shrub vegetation throughout. The topography of the site is mostly flat within the upland areas and has a slight decline in to the wetland area. The surrounding land use consists mostly of single-family homes. The identified wetlands were classified according to the Cowardin et al., the Circular 39 and the Eggers and Reed classification systems and marked with pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. Please find within the Technical Documentation Section; field data sheets, plant indicator status information, soil survey information, and wetland definition information. METHODS The methods used to delineate the subject parcel are as described in the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Regional Supplement Manual. In the 1987 Manual, the methods used were described under the "routine" methods for wetland sites less than 5 acres. This methodology is followed in order to assess whether the three parameters of a wetland are met for areas on the subject parcel. The three parameters required under normal circumstances in order to delineate a wetland are described in the Technical Documentation Section. The Midwest Regional Supplement Wetland Delineation Manual is also being utilized to increase the accuracy of our wetland boundaries. This addendum to the original 87 Manual was created to address the many regional differences that affect wetlands and the delineation methods used throughout the country. The following explanations are passages from that document. "This Regional Supplement is part of a nationwide effort to address regional wetland characteristics and improve the accuracy and efficiency of wetland- delineation procedures. Regional differences in climate, geology, soils, hydrology plant and animal communities, and other factors are important to the identification and functioning of wetlands. These differences cannot be considered adequately in a single national manual. The development of this supplement follows National Academy of Sciences recommendations to increase the regional sensitivity of wetland-delineation methods (National Research Svoboda F.cological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road Project No.:2014-026 1 Robert Brook Council 1995). The intent of this supplement is to bring the Corps Manual up to date with current knowledge and practice in the region and not to change wetland boundaries." "...This Regional Supplement is designed for use with the current version of the Corps Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and all subsequent versions. Where differences in the two documents occur, this Regional Supplement takes precedence over the Corps Manual for applications in the Midwest Region." National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (Figure 2a), Hennepin County Wetland Inventory (HCWI) maps (Figure 2b), 2014 DNR NWI Update maps (Figure 2c), Web Soil Survey of Orono and Hennepin County maps (Figure 3), Minnesota Protected Waters maps (Figure 4), and 2010 aerial photographs were reviewed prior to the site visit to identify areas that may be wetlands. Areas illustrating evidence of wetland conditions were examined in greater detail during the field survey. Vegetation, soils and hydrology were examined (as outlined in the 1987 Manual) and used to characterize wetland types and determine wetland boundaries. Sample transects were established in representative wetland-to-upland transition zones in order to characterize the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the site. Transects consisted of a representative upland sample point and a representative wetland sample point. Information obtained from the sample points can be found on the field data sheets located in the Technical Documentation Section. Wetland boundaries were marked at the site by pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. The wetland boundary is considered to be the topographically highest extent of the wetland basin; areas below the staked boundary met the three required wetland criteria while areas above were lacking in one or more of these criteria. Wetland classification followed methods described by Cowardin et aL (1979) and used in the NWI (e.g. PEMB, PSS1C, etc.), completed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed classification systems are also given. The indicator status of plants, as described in The Technical Documentation Section, was determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands — Region 3 (Sabine 1999). RESULTS Background Information- (Office-Based Investigation) The NWI map (Excelsior Quadrangle) illustrates no National Wetland Inventory wetlands present within the property boundary (Figure 2a). However, it is evident by aerial photography that portions of the mapped PUBF and L 1 UBH wetlands do encroach within the boundaries of the subject parcel. The NWI appears inaccurate within the subject area. The 2014 DNR NWI Update does show wetlands in those areas on the parcel, PEM1C to the northwest and L2UBH to eh south. The HCWI indicates no other potential wetlands in the area(Wetland 2c). The Web Soil Survey of Orono and Hennepin County classifies two soil complexes on the subject property (Figure 3). Both soil complexes are considered hydric soils. The soil series descriptions are given in the Technical Documentation Section. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, State Protected Waters Map (Public Water Inventory), indicates one Public Water wetland present within the property boundary (Figure 4). Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road Project No.:2014-026 2 Robert Brook The public water is identifies as Minnetonka (27-133P). Site Visit SER ecologists examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria during the site visit. Two wetlands met the jurisdictional criteria of a wetland therefore two wetland boundaries were determined and delineated. The approximate wetland boundaries are outlined in yellow in Figure 5. Accumulated precipitation since 4/O1/2011, as recorded at MSP and reported by the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture reports that for the week ended November 6, 2011, was 1.76" below normal. Precipitation for the period 10/31/2011 to 11/06/2011 was reported to be 0.49" below normal and for the preceding 4 weeks was 1.20" below normal. The Minnesota Climatology Warking Group Gridded Database for the August 1 through October 31, 2011 period WETS Score for the 1971-2000 normal period was Dry (6). The Score was the same using the 1981-2010 normal period. Wetland 1 Wetland 1 is located at the north end of the property and continues off of the subject parcel and out of the evaluated area to the west. Dominant vegetation within Wetland 1 was narrow-leaf cattail (Typha angustifolia, OBL), lake sedge (Carex lacustr�is, OBL), lesser duckweed (Lemna minor, OBL) and hummock sedge (Carex stricta, OBL). Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW) was also dominant within Wetland 1 along portions of the fringe area. Standing water would likely be present during most of the growing season within Wetland 1 but given that this area was delineated in November, standing water was not present. Sample Transect 1-1 The vegetation transition zone along Sample Transect 1-1 started with a dominance of blue-flag iris (Iris versicolor, OBL) at Sample Point (SP) 1-1 WET in the herbaceous stratum. Common bucktharn (Rhamnus cathartica, FAC) and glossy buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula, FAC) were dominant within the shrub layer. Cottonwood (Populus deltoides, FAC) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica, FACW) were dominant within the tree layer. The vegetation transition to upland also yielded a dominance of cottonwood and green ash in the tree layer and common buckthorn in the shrub layer but the herbaceous layer yielded a dominance of only common buckthorn. The dominance test and the prevalence index were not met for the upland point. Soils at SP 1-1 WET were black and hemic down to 4 inches followed by a dark gray sand with 20 percent brown redox concentrations down to 10 inches. From 10 to 18 inches the soils become a sandy clay loam with a black matrix and 10 percent course greenish gray gleyed mottles. Soils at SP 1-1 UP were very dark grayish brown loamy sands down to 9 inches. Soils Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road Project No.: 2014-026 3 Robert Brook became black with sandy loam textures down to 16 inches with 1 percent fine dark brown redox concentrations starting at 13 inches. From 16 to 21 inches soils were sandy with 20 percent dark yellowish brown redox concentrations within a brown matrix. Saturation was observed at the surface of the wetland point along with two secondary hydrology indicators. Only one secondary hydrology indicator was noted at the upland sample point. SER delineated Wetland 1 as a Type 3, PEMF, Shallow Marsh. Wetland 2 Wetland 2 is located at the southern end of the parcel and is fringe wetland of Lake Minnetonka (L 1 UBH). Dominant vegetation within Wetland 2 was narrow-leaf cattail, lake sedge and reed canary grass. Sample Transect 2-1 The vegetation transition zone along Sample Transect 2-1 at the wetland point started with a dominance of reed canary grass, bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara, FAC), and narrow-leaf cattail within the herb layer and elderberry (Sambucus canadensis, FACV� within the shrub layer. The vegetation transition to upland yielded a dominance of reed canary grass, and Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis, FACU) in the herb layer and elderberry in the shrub layer. The dominance test was met for the upland sample point. Soils at SP 2-1 WET were black down to 15 inches and transitioned to a gleyed matrix down to 20 inches. There were 10 percent dark yellowish brown redox concentrations from 10 to 15 inches within the profile. Textures were silt loams that transitioned to more sandy and clayey textures starting at 15 inches. Soils at SP 2-1 UP were very dark grayish brown with a sandy loam texture down to 14 inches. Soils became black and yellower in hue with 1 percent gleyed mottles and 5 percent brown redox concentrations from 14 to 17 inches. From 17 to 20 inches soils had a gleyed matrix with no mottles or redox. Textures from 14 inches to 20 inches were sandy clay loams. Saturation was present at 10 inches below the surface at the wetland point and 15 inches at the upland point. Two secondary indicators of hydrology were also noted at the wetland point. Only one secondary hydrology indicator was noted at the upland sample point. SER delineated Wetland 2 as a Type 3, PEMC, Shallow Mars6 wetland that is fringe to a lacustrine system to the south and west. DISCUSSION Svoboda Ecological Resources 1165 Fendale Road Projcct No.:2014-026 4 Robert Brook SER completed all on-site delineations based on the three required technical criteria as outlined by the 1987 Manual: the presence of hydric soils, a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and indicators of wetland hydrology in each basin. The site visit portion of the wetland delineation was completed on November 1, 2011. SER personnel examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria during the site visit and delineated the edges of two wetland basins within the property boundary as being jurisdictional wetland (Figure 5). Detailed soils, vegetation and hydrology data for Wetlands 1 and 2 is provided in the data sheets of The Technical Documentation Section. RECOMMENDATIONS Activities which impact or potentially impact wetlands are currently regulated at several levels of government. In Minnesota, the two primary jurisdictions are covered at the state and federal levels by the provisions of the following legislative actions. r State jurisdiction by the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) administered by the WCA Local Governmental Unit (LGU). ➢ Federal jurisdiction by the Clean Water Act of 1972 and subsequent amendments. Wetland protection is implemented by the Corps of Engineers (Corps) with permit certification issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. While the wetland boundaries that SER has delineated are not official until approved by a WCA approved local government unit (LGU), SER advises the property owner/developer to refrain from any filling, draining, or excavating, or any impact to the area SER has delineated as wetland. No grading or filling in wetland basins should commence until all necessary permits have been obtained. Violation of wetland regulations has resulted in substantial civil and criminal penalties. Local ordinances may regulate wetland modifications such as brush and tree removal and burning in addition to grading and filling. Depending on the location of the property, buffers around the wetland may also be protected. Any activities in the proximity of the wetland should be cleared with appropriate WCA regulatory agencies. It is also advisable to have the wetland boundary surveyed by a licensed land surveyor. Since the pin flags used along the boundary can be vandalized or inadvertently knocked over, a GPS survey of the flags will assure the permanence of the boundary. The client should also be aware that approved wetland boundaries are typically valid for only three years from the date of approval. To avoid project delays associated with wetland regulations, it is essential that you acquire necessary permits from all jurisdictional agencies before continuing activities. A WCA Sequencing form, a WCA and Army Corps of Engineers Replacement Plan Application form, and a DNR permit application are among the materials that you may be required to submit if impacts are proposed for the delineated wetlands. By initiating the permit process as soon as possible, potential costly delays to the project may be avoided. Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road Project No.:2014-026 5 Robert Brook CERTIFICATION Brian Burgner completed the above-described delineation on November 1, 2011. This delineation was performed according to the procedures described by the US Army Corps of Engineers in the 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Region Supplement Wetland Delineation ManuaL The delineation meets the standards and a criterion described in these manuals and conforms to the applicable standards and regulations in force at the time the delineation was completed. The revised report was prepared by David Remucal and Frank Svoboda on October 1, 2014. Client: Robert Brook Project Name: 1165 Ferndale Road Project No.: 2014-026 Location: Orono, Minnesota Ecologist II Wetland Delineator-Certified # 1124 �-a��--- d' President, Svoboda Ecological Resources October 1, 2014 Date Svoboda F,cological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road Project No.:2014-026 ( Robert Brook DATA SOURCES Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Public Waters Inventory Basin Delineations, Published 7/31/2008 and retrieved from http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html on 5/28/12. 2012 Aerial Color Photos. Publicly Distributed by MN Geo WMS Service. Topographic maps obtained via the National Geographic Society's USA Topo service through ESRI. Web Soil Survey for Hennepin County, MN. Retrieved from http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road Project No.:2014-026 '] Robert Brook LITERATURE REFERENCED Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31. 103pp. Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 2011. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin, Third Edition. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 478pp, unclassified. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Gleason, H.A. and A.C. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 910pp. Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2014. The National Wetland Plant List: 2014 Update of Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. http://wetland plants.usace.armv.miU Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. August 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region(Version 2.0). ERDC/EL TR-10-16. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Svoboda Ecological Resources 1165 Fendale Road Project No.:2014-026 g Robert Brook FIGURES . . � z i. �l, .... -•- � ,! .t„7� , : + •• .� �i l � ...� _2'- 7 � i — �j��,j l• • � . �, � .��� -..�` . ,,. �• �; � - #/• •A� • / , . . /� i. /• _._..� _ .w... �7iRi.f�w►_� �,,,� �..� _� . �._. � � ,_.... .�... • r � r, •� • •�`^.'.. �.. ���t . . `\ F.. Y� ���/ [��+ .... �-s�-:, ' i�• _ . �•{ \V\���� �� ,_ ' . . `. .T+ �T� �4 .• �, y •. •9`e � „Mi.�—:'� t ��~�O`' . �� � �•� . • . � �� �' ' r+ � . ' � µ ` s • 2• �'��.+�� . r 97�, 'f'P � j , �. • ' ' � �.. .�'+��-•-►.'- - j .' ^ ~ ; . �. � '1— w • —-r...�''' . ' .�a. C�r . 95d . • '"' +!_` '� � 1 �, .�. _ . '� -�' ' � . i� ' .• _ ,• '' � + }; Z._..',�i f''. ,• . _.,• , a., , -_ _ _ ,..,;_ _-, � ��..; � �,._ E .� �1�, . ��'t � � l Y � � * 4 � ` .J, • Q \ �y -i---• ��� i+ � , 't � �S � '.,��. �ya` » y 'I ' 4 - -— � � � � � � - ' ., - � � � �;=: =���a' � . _ �� �.. :.w , � � • • a+ _ . 4-+* _� Q • 5 .�� � � '��-w /1 �� �r . ��':O ��'`� �� — ..--• — � "' � .r.fl � ,.,_ / ` \ w�,� � •� e ,.t .�. ���^\�`� �- ` ..�. , V'��►'ai+a � -'� - � _ - �� �:c� ` -�--_, � : `'� �-� , . . . ."r ,�,--.--.�-- ' '"Ca��F3c-Csicl� - _..•_ .,.,,_.:� �_,_y..�.__ _ . • _-� -' ! • . ' , � ' � ° — -- \ .. �j �� � � ... � �� 1 ' '�. ..-�+� ,4 .J . _•. , �� .'� - �/ � . -- •�� • t� ��- � - 1` - � '� � _ '�� �� - -'�� �� � ,�� �_ :r � { . c }� � .��''•, ;r� � . � , , . � «,,: �. �. ' . • _ ..• � ; . � ..� a - �iE .� ' •;��.'�,`� .:� � � � ►f}4a ',� .� ,' _9� � � � - ` _� /'` *_� �. �, , :i� . i / � `�%~ - 3 � ;.,, .. �..� �. • �`, � � /:� / � _. �l` f � ' ...,??5 r' 'y . � � ti . �� 1 �.`�{'i.� ... ,r• �,s„ • i ' t . �/� � _ �..` •Q �. � ' O -.r. ��, t�, � V •� �� t J • • � . [�..• �'' �• . � Y .:.._:- • � —. �,�r'",��".�. ��, _. �� ?,_ � � a �'`--� � s •� , •t � ` ��:�•i• ��,,•*��~ -�_` ` � . � ,�, r Q �/k�: , S . � � ' . ` ` .�� . � " �� . _ , 'j • ., . �. � O '� ,f �✓� \ �- - . •e.. - �f�� • t ... -. '7i'�"�4�e..« � ��� _ _ .� ._ -�r, . .�. .. � _ , -.- . _ ,z�. -+.- . , .. � � _ . , , . . ` -� ,�., _..., .,��• f- - ,,' . i' „` ,Y' �� �/� � � �` _ ` . .. - 7 .,. . _. , - - .. , .- � ! � . �., 'n' �� .... - � , • ' ,��• .� � � . + �- .b �� , . , ..., 1 ,. __ . �v , � .. , � ..r • o . �. �,. �.• ,r�"l� '�•. - • � t __ .• - ! - � ' _. � .�• 1' • � • -�f _ "' 1'� Y ��• t,:T . _ •� ��� . +� . . . . _a. . .•� � .. � ,,,��„-.r`".".--."v'.�, !. � - _ _ .�.a .-�. _ � � . � -- --_- - - :-��.��_._ _�� _ . . , . , ... .,. . r`''� �-��.s . . . '- - x. ..�,._ :a -r= • . .� ..._._. •�._.1 ' ,+-_'�—=_t . -"_"'-�' � � � ; _„�_..._. • _ % �r '�._�-- �_ � � j '� ` o��$ _yy �� � � ` . Tan ag►er = .� . i . �, � ;_ L a ke � � : ,�,, �� ,�; j �'Q _ �' � � , - f � � ti �, , , o. ~�_ � `�, � _ � �°� . , �`, �o � w o ...-.— �� � _ � , _ '�. -- ;j �,`"".� --..._. � t _95,� , ,��• ' •, ."�' � Y ' •� 1�``. �"► f • � _ ��� t � 'r• '" Q ` t .... �� ` �i - '.�,r �` �i , � . - �� •, r' ��� /� '�n,� _�_,,,� "L�`��r' i � � a � ` '"� �.r• " k � ; _-° _ , . �. � - ---__. _,�. » ,..� _ _._..r.,- --_ _ .. . � J, �ti,. � � / � tio. .� �'� `� 27-133-02 � �'� � ��� .� � ,�.-� �- _ � r .. � r: -�"�-.,� _ �"' �� ,-, �.�-'�'} ( - i B a� ,� ; , �,.. � ,� , � . �,�_^ -'� i �, '' ",� �. , 1 `�•.,�,,,��..,,,.i . ,, ..,� �,.�'"� �;, ,� - ��.� 1 'L �� ��., ,��� � � i� ��n�.. 5. . � ... ' • . 1 '. ' ' � Q Approximate Parcel Boundary ,� � Hrn�k�ts, PorhC r T1i�N R23w so2 Overview Figure i � Overlaid on Topographic Map 2014-026 i t, ��''"6 � �'`" � M�..�.�`''a:��� ..�� ��. '4�,� u��.. � (." �,. �'3T.f '� ��"�`� ��, �, .�, � . W' �.� 0.x -�� . � i � n"i � - " "Y � �,.� �r �;.�' r� �`Y �, �� � 4���F �1� �� ��^�A � { ��'�`����,�� �y�. � � ` 'A. .}e ..: � �' C .T k0 `8 • } i. � � Ai� p'�� � �. „ ' � �.'�N°`�w'�y� y* 7 .�'�1tdr .. .'�'"� y�• y� e , � . ; , '� ��:� ".w , � �+. . ''2'� _amp"".�qiA�� •,� �� �v.�!�`. x� t���� v fi P " , :. , �o, I�III'�i�It�i .,. x i°,y a s �:`�F.ic _ 7 � � t4�' �' I -y - _ t" �. "� �"{` . 'r� a'���+r.-ti �a5�`-aR�:�,,,����� ni ' .��,��a M" x . � �- a � __� � �' r��,.�a. ,. � _ * .. ^ ... ,� . . .. �:.. '�'�� :.:., ., ��si ,� '� . . ^`.. . ' a � � . � . , .. 5 .. «� .,+ ; , . s . .•. r s: .. ���` ' " � �. . : ` " � a �t" - � �"r_ FEP,iF �"� ; � - , 8• _ �- ,� � � ,�, .��y �,� , �� � _�* ,�� F � � � Ik � ��'� �,� � ��` *� .�� tr M' k � ... ,�:°�,�, _: t .� �� � �� y� _� �r.• y `.yl�� 4�- � � � *" _ t_Irk.. ew ���r �, ���� �,� �, .� ,. �� t i� �,> � \ � ��� „: s � � Y ,�� "� �" "�s � ,, . ,„ � � ;f e"�_M . , `b �,,.. .�. .f � � `,�a -,�. ".x.y��.t p :�`e �,.� '� i �Q �+� � 1F ..fi`�r . W� �� �"�� �� #� � .iar � ,u ,�`� ' � z '�� . � ,�'� � ��i� F'Eh.9F FUBF � �. R''� :,:� �� ''�� � �+ -� ;;.� �`� ��t � � � � �� � ; x �.�'A. .�... �„ ^ 4� ,�r � ,►" � � ,+���. .: _.��b '� � K, �`� �" , , . . .. c � � �1 -�'� - , -'` r , . ,;. � c ,.. � - `. ' � „�; `. �f , , ��� '�5 . � :��r� ..� . .� �N"�I... �' � � � � a ,� � .'ai ������,.�{ �� �"�kt '� .9A Y ..w- 'Z .. . y��'fi�pq�,_ � � � �\.\ � i � .�'� '�^�.. I '�°�� � " ^- °�� � r ,�;� '�S� -. '� � � � 'k �€ ; �pa. �,�'� . �, y �� R~ � '� � ��� ���fi -� * � �� a a .����:. •� �j�� �� ' # ,d *� „�� J�.. 'R; � . , 4 . � ! - +' rz j � � �_ .. '� ;� .� . i �a$'_.�: r .._ .�?F� �L . . . , - _ 4^u u� .,._ �!� : ' w...' ' � :r' � J ��' � _ iY � _ �...Y .� �' �, ��y ^ _ �ff �.��4,y �� "� :A1 � ,� `'�:��� . "� `� " '-,.: .e ;z . #� �` y�u�i�,[ '��r � .. 'I. � - � ,,. ,,� ,F.; , .� v � 4��.. � _ t... ��`M`� , �t �:: :� ,� „ � �� � � �� �� ; ��, * '�`� �s. vY Z �'c ��' �\� ,�'' - �'. # � �;'. � � '° � �. ,� c �'� �,, � - ,..`:�,:`.. � Approximate Parcel Boundary Tl l�N R23w so2 National Wetland Inventory Figure 2a Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo , 2014-026 Fi�3 , -� r �k.,r. . . . �� 4 �x���$%�� �M1�+,� a,w,. ` . . � �;. 5 �ul .� . a � G' � ;�µ . � � µ ; r t ".i, � a �ii ��..*�� �� . f�M I � .l�, �F T �pSR 1Fl� fi..y�:6Y S«� �iF� fL s . �.., .� ,.4* 1� "'�}i.• .m g. ���}��.�,�WYq��+F� �.dlrt{ +�:d Y .,w � . �.M'�'W a� # .: � � .i f � � � �� w., � . � .a' ��'� �"# �+���` °w"alr�� > ; , u s � �,* " . �� � � # g�i��. '. ,�� � ., �.' s. # �.s� i� �. ` :.,a.w . a� - . d�"s�.�; .�,- ` .� � ; ` , �,, 'e ,� .�Mr> .�`s�', '"Y , , � � _ ay, �; q w . ,� '�.,_ ! �g � . �... �.� � � �,��, �' ,�h ,�t � � ... I , _ . ,. � . ,�'' . # � � 4y . Fu 4 .,�i „ � . ( � �� .�t - yrt :Y +�$t'. s ., .. t • . # . • . �..��YP.�� e.. ,f . ' �� •, . � � •. ;,: yf� � u � � . -. °'Ai� !Ye •Y.} _ � . "_tl# xr , �.:.. C � � �"�, .. Y ro .' ��:, . � . � � . R -� , . y& .� ,_ A . . �t +� � q. �' =� a � ' �� #�_.� . . . ;�1.y � � .,k. ,. ,3�. F::�,,'M� . y ��t v. . " �. � �r y� 'g � "� �� � �L � �,�, �� �� �, ��� �� �, ' ��Q`& �. ��' ��,, �"�i� �� � � , . ,p + +R� � � . "" . .,s «r. 1�, y ' '��, f ' 'df�c.i t �j,�, 7d.6 3 � � µ . _ �,q. � +�Yk" M� F �� �; ��4 :,.,,,"$'" * ��#pt._� k� y.� # $ �[ ., �� � � r i��.• � d� �.._ ... £��^��. �.'�� 4.� y�.�� �� �.. �, ' � '� ��t a�,�.,,� ��, .,,. � ,.„g ���;+�' - !. � ;��ri � +�ev� �. ����,, � +��4��"�;�.� "� ,r`B,EI��e '� � � „�,� s F•S 3UF , �. `_' x� 3 �� '7�k,�, if . . . . ��,' � .. , �.. � ' � ,�r'' ... .-p . . '}'" r :\� .. , x �.;,. ` �_�� � � �� . . ..- . , S ,,.-,� `� -� : , 4�� M 5 a'� \�I�I� -. � M , .�" _X , . �y 1p`, � 'F} . ��'4 . . 11� f0 �"i*9, v 11"�tuf y��' . . .. S:�:. - : .n -��* t rc t� . � �.:. • � T '.4� /�Y ��dy,_• � ._� ,�. ^ � �'�.. { * € �= D K u � t, �t f -M�. .,i�y �.. .. ��.,F . ��\ �F '�i ��'`�� m# n N_.��` _€a . =9:�K- , 6,�, , +�'� iR^" �k eiR .�_ , » � . � .r-.�. ��. .�' � ��� __9F.. � , � � � .,�N Ir - + � '+� ,��. .. i„��„,� ,� � � � �� o °'�r � i ..t �"`��� t' � t u,� t� ��` �����p.°���y"".�� �Yf��w�h � ��' .� s ' +�'Ml.��. �� '° � �t' " �" � i ; � . . - ,, ,, � � � ,.� '� v . , +� � �,;� ,. ,.. .� . x,� � � s� Z� �. .rx .Y� e�. '"".. ris� � � 1 �� ... � # �t.�, ,��; ., �:� '�•� ,i � . Y... k �. ° � � � ,..4 .. .. �` ,�q� ' ��._' uF. -� �9 1 .��'�r , ���� � d�ir^�� �'` � � � ".�� �'�, � � ti r:� t�sr r. � k e ' w 'Ir ,�' � . � �$�, * "".''F �. °'.j�, - V' � 1���. � ��� r . �. d, .- . �� � . •�� .� . �, �•. � C' _� , ' : � '':-r � ��:'r'' �.�;.. ,...�, „ , . . ,� wi � H� �.� � ��.�� �� pp ' , r �'� � �. �`� � # ,�,. , �r ��� .� , x�� � ,� .�:� _ �� {.: � � . � � �- C . .. '.�'_ .. �_.�,� � � ` I f�:.�.i^. � � � �� � �� , `�" 1MA '� ����' ,� ` � s'�� �: �� ' .;'�� •�*. , ,:`A� — �. , ''��,�" ,\ 1 _ � ,� '� , !:� '�� �; . � s.t� y � �+iF ��'� n`; ,�.�' ��x;a ` � : �. �',o.h .�i, ',��� �� � � f. �j A'�..' �.... �f k'. ''�� Potential Wetland �;� r � Approximate Parcel Boundary ' " ' '�--� " �tennepin County V�V�etland Inventory Figure 2b Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo i 2014-026 PF01A ,� y '; �: � � �� � �� � PEM1C �; ` � —�� � ` � � �v � , " * .` PENI�1 C �' � �_ ��:. � � �� . � � �� - �.�� P , � ��� � ���. , ' � �, �,i ��� ��� � ,. i' ��,, ,� �, 4„ � �- �� � �,' , „.. ��„ .� � � , . „�, � �, � �, . . ,. �,� � t ���.„ ` ; � � � V. — '� ;� . �� ���r� ��h �I'' � �..� i,,... tb�y..�.. � c ri� �i I • �� .. ' , .` ' 3 ro� � .� �- �`� j � $ ;�,, � g�; . � � , PEM 1 F .��: . . �E � � �?� .,�p �,.♦ r'4, .� � q � � . * � �t♦ _ ,�y , � . �'q _ —, ir�; � . � '�. t ` .. }-.. � '�.�xa . a��� �. ,. I � '�� ���. �ae x�'�4 ���� =3 <k t.� - �� � �� � �' . � �'�' *� ������ � � _ "� , Ai� � ,� � ���4 s, � � �� ';1;-K `.�'c'�f"'��' '� F bi���`�7 ;�{` '�k- r'b`� ��.s�� � ��y�a' . ��,.;n W 'S5� �� .���._` TF `i � i f � � . �b� . � � � �S� . _ �� � ���*� �� . . _ .� ��1'... �#� � ��,�.s �. � �,��, � ' �� ,,� <� ♦ L2UBH � ; ' ` �= e ° ;� � Approximate Parcel Boundary ,� 2014 DNR NWI Update -rll�N RZ�w so2 2014 DNR NWI Update Figure 2c Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo , 2014-026 1 ��� �":� � � � �- *� �'.;� �� '�%�,�,(i�j6"�"�if'*�} '� ��.:�����'`'�����'�a`F� '�-.- `f ^� „' � �' � � � /ers +�•c �5 ; � � a�� ,� �` � �..�. '°�� � 41s�.r� � �" � � *i �; � �� ,� � �' ��s�t ��� � � ��.� >xL ''�° � � �`� �,�'is��'-'� %`�;h, ,� ",� .'� � ,�^. ,1' f,,'9�i ��4/�' i �a"���s i,s,T � �� ^�R ��. ��, �• %� �� �����. � �,;�� �' ����� � �+,.. �c,.,- . � � ,� F yp� � �,��'��.�; a. � �f-, /. . . /� ..�`,` / / .� a;l,� ,.�� ��`"�;� ''�'f`�'7 .�'��,�i'wk�,+. �b: .l ,� '� •`_. ' /�,/����"'.:;' ' � ,�. . �� �..�, � �d/f. ,,o-ti"°��+`,�"t`r� l; .: �i m � � � � , ,: i ,i,' � "( � ��v ,F"../&��� �/ ,�/� �����-,, *�.�'"s� / ,Y�i />�� r/��� ���^��` ���;� �''�/./`��� "� �}'� ;�°' . �.�/��� � ' fi �$`.,A���i�� '�'�s� � � , , ,�.�' ,�€� / �� , `�� .:��-•,�,��, �'��� � �' �� �.. � � �� ^�/ �, rg � �, � � ' , , , � f � /r.�v. . + '� � F/ ,.`�n� � �f � ��i ���' /. �.� �� ��� r�< ,/i� ,��, i ��+ ,� � � �< , f �� �� �`, .."s� � � ��r'r r � .�.�,�Aq�^ ;�..'.q�'��� `,��". � /% � .{/,.i� `. ,,�, / /// . '�s �-_ ���� � �� �.� � �� '` .� s «.k /�� h'� �>��, �f /, Y y �; u ' �I, �,t �4��> �'Y'�`r a.� s' `� � � Y� � �� �' ��� /�/�_ � � . . 3 "aw ��, �y e /� r . ,�C�\3 ;� � "�� ..;�;� '�,g��� ��/y;�� r;.�,q'+�� -,� � �" �I�,,,�`/E� y'. e��•��`;�F �� �' � � ,, . s �'�.,� /F�.* 'sb � � e'�✓,r�"�"�J��'� 7ria` �'��"�'��` '�, '�� � �F��,°�` ,' , �, ''�"�`"/'',,���" �, �'�i` ` ���`�'���,'� y �; � �,, M r�i/�.���,'��'° ,�'� �„ .� /� �. . i' � �%� � ` � �1�4�,� %�,�`.. . � ��`+"���� � ^�"�L< < . �����,t;"��b' ;,¢�� �=,� � yr��bT� ���:F���. / � �Y"/� � � ����:. j � :> i� � 'i � ,�� �,;i';,�." � 3 � ;��` :t�� '� ;�;% 't,�"`��� .���,�� �i : �%,�,y���* • .� ���' .,�`°'��' ��� .� EF:� , ,� � � �,s� � : „, � �r � � �` , �,�'�,������ ����'��� j��,����„����,! '�.vy��i'/�/�� � '� ���+�,��� ', � �R�� �� 7 / ,F �,� .../•i � �i;i,. y�- �,fr�,,,,��`�:. / .,p�'.'if; �� .��.�?� �, �/��.'<"��/iY '.A�'. � ��`� 'I��'` - ^'-� �l�r', i�� i ` , i �`ti. ��,� �al�+,�x; '-� � , � . �ti���''� "';�..- '�a� � `� ���� �'�"���� ' � '�',� �''�s ,� � ���" ,'°�'���� � ° f � �� <r�'�•� ,,� '�r ;��r�' ; � ��.� ?'�, ��� ,� �. � ,�J � , , � . � ., ; � '�.'�... ' ;. ' � � ,Ap. �F/ ; %� �'�i�" � � � � i� 1 1 ' @..t •. ' 1 � 1 � � ' � � �e e f ��(�b' i � � / � �. '� f1t � _ ___. I �'� ,��� � ����� �f��: /�� �' ' � ' - ✓��o�,� ��`I+M�r �'�•��Y4. ✓ �� ,�,/� ".� �"���� �i' Y/ �-^A'��%''�r�p .F���� ���/ h �,w �, �4�� "y't�� 'r;f�'^�►���.��"",i (/� �i',� :r��� � ._r�� �,��'�� '� ...� M, �*+�.�'"y -�,���� I ���a��'"�` r�' ,�`eE`�.A►.����'.r�.nsi�.iif• �'� � �u��{ e�'s*� 'h� r.��r''� �� -�� ,� � ,(� r,�.� � s.�„ . � � , , , , , �� ��( � m.�?� �,��i �i ,r :E`',� ,.n ,�f� �M Mi �'' li���� ��/� ;fi'� �'�"'!P`��� �<iy � . y„�vg�."..�� ;.�,ys' " ���",fr'"- .,� � !� �.,�i � ��/'4' ��v�'� ,f ���,�y,g,��p��� 1s�'j .�S,- �` .� '�������� .� .,f�i f�k.�`F ,.� ���,.�.��� f.�.� F /''+Y.�ffa'�� ,�4�, 3 �� 4,��". . ��.+ ,�"<. � �,�' � .�i�' ,� ��;��� @ : � � , /�y� �,� �.. �'�� e Q � / �{� �i'•(;�:Av � a � �� e �� � � 1 ��K" �� � F 4�7'��� f � ��,� 9 ` �`5,,� �., � l` �, � ��,�����.� <��� � y� �`����' ���',�� ,�����`�`��`�� �° �� F�, ' �, �� ��'�.��,� ����g� ��`� � .��. ��� ��14' <;�, f(�,.�` ��: �' �� ��,�� ,. .�,�,��, `� 't� �%�,��, ,� � ��:. .�'`. ,R.�- .'i�- `,,�„�►,.f€'� ',;' '�' , - �"" '� � � 'yyy�,� �, -� f' `'� ,�, ,,�'�` � � ,;_ b,; ; `��' :a�� ,^�" - � `� .,�# �'� � �a,��^`� �,'�`� "',����v "� ,g ��° '�,� ��. '--'"° �,�"� j" ��,/,,R;/ ��`� ✓ .b.� t� � �� .� "`��''�` ,, � ,�..�'`/`�'''�'�',��' �, ,�� E� , :, ,�` p,�`�: /+► _ i�,�.� �� ��; <�`�,��,�. ,,,� �`�`• a •`'r �.;��•�1'�s �� , �. �� �� �a �� �,�' ' ��� � � .���� � � ���F . ��� ��.��� � f'i ��,��. �y� � ,�cr�',�. � � d �`� 4 �� � f���`�,,�. � � ���� � � �� ��rj , '�� � .�4A7" '�...;�' �r�:l � ;G" .� '� �� , .�. ��� �3�. � Y�� pi ���. w�.tk ��.��°. � .� r � ,;.�� � . b�,��: , , � � �'������"��, ' -�� � � �`�.�.��� � -� � � -�:� .�-.�� . .� � � � � .�� ���� ;� � � L� Approximate Parcel Boundary �"6� �" �;' 4 '� �^`���,�,�y �. t �zY� �.,e � � S O I I S �,� �� - �� ..� S� �����'6��������� tii�� �A16�' � ` f F _ � �. �a� �;��'�'d��`�^�����"�'��;����` �'� ,��,��� � Hydric Y ^ ` �� `�` .�� °"';,��e� ���'�'� +�� '��m�. +u��';? ��� i ' '�` `: �k ��.�.�„ ���;�. �� Not rated or not available � /�`�- �� � , , � , ' � � Predominantly hydric � ��/� „�,, '�'��, .a: . . .�l�.:A �`'`�,'°� � � � ��- �� ` - l�ennepin �;ounty �oil Survey Figure 3 Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo , 2014-026 I ��$��1,• �;�R �"-�� ,�'��` t o-e'��� �w z�M''���,A�.�� _..e 4� �.� � . . � ��E �' � ,`T. � .�+� y . w� ���r„`'+ � a .� y �' ��� :� 4r x � ��� k °� ' a�� w ^ +r^ a � � �p �;;: �� � �, �, � -,� �,�,�'*,� � �. �_�' � ''�N' ";�U e� +�(� ,�. '�"�x "`�����'° ,. � %g� s� v ��` � a �. �s a� "' �r� .w'^�� �*'�+���FM� �. , �G "� "�"'� 'g '!n .� �k ,K ^�•. ��q` r+'R.� .K ,��� .:������,..��l4t , ' - . .� � e ,,�` '� '. . ,� ; .� , ,, F_ ���K. '�'�+u. "»"�^" ' . " �s ` y y ,.�+Ify.�, , ;y�,�.�,�a,.�� x���.�, � �(4 � = • �,�f;� � . < . e{ . r "�g " r;�„;�•` . . � �, �� . e � �jy� � a x � y�� "� ' �` fi�. � .� � '#jl �' ' ..�� ,� . ,. }�.il�x�� '�.. �. �. r - .. . tl�+ •. ' �' �'�� .��� o . . 'F��;.. ,., . . .. h . .. ...b ¢` � _ . x " . , � *�* ' T�. ,� .* .: . .h• � ��.�,.. r� . , .; �� ,� „ �. 'f , � '�� � -� . ';�,h4. +„�� '+ry `at ..u� ��� p, .. .� � # .<� �� 4��_� ; ��� .:� .:�� Z , � , >.,� ,� , x �' �'� _ '^ �n . J M h. I� ���. '�Et. r�a�� r� � � ��� �� ���V� ���I r�����,. �+� �. i� I i ��� -� . � � �,'� �-� ��� . �; � �� � '�� 7^'.' : ,�.�. �i • w ��a� � ��� y� ��#�;�,`�a,`�+ h �- �.1 ��-p ,� +T 5�.. . _ p � y�Y �� � � �"� � . !Pt p "� ���,�s \ _R'��`,�i-_.�, aR ' X k R • . s ; #. �i \ . �.l, � r ... .. �\'", r �\�� � �*' � .,,+ . ,� � � � ���� "'� � , s ' ' " '' ��' � *'�G Femdale Marsh ;.,.. M ,�•x� ��. � �` �� ��r. , . , }���` . � ��. � � #�k�. r . / . �.:�..; . y � + :.,. r1:._. a-.� i t�!,'� - �..y�� t� d •yr` � . '�� � e s . =.�. ,ry � � ' . \5 pr :"� , �a,M, �4 . � '� ' ' � , t Y :., . , F v,� � y � ��" 1�'.y�1, ke '+� . �� `�r ��F �ua� '-. +� � `�F '� ' � �'~` j . �.. � ' ,; �y;.�,.' ..� . - .x ....... E_ . 9 2 � .F, . �� �J �� .R.. 1 �� � •�{� r ��" �+" � � �¢ rt� �*Fr i '�k. ' �� f� .,y��d� �� d \ A '�'�" ��' , � � � �� �� ����g.. ., .. ,� � � � r , ,�:" g ''�. 9t� a.� -R�� �`+�(: ,4� . � i ,�� .� � ,�syg - �' °u',� `i,;�` � ��� '4;�� ��;;,,�„ '� r�' " �a � ir �� �_� � � '� " ��; � _{ , '�� s ----_.—� $ �p. � � ��' , � \�,. � , � �� _.—' �` � ..��"�a>�� � "�,> F ' ; x- y � �� ���i�, �r,s� ��.�. s� �'',�'.;� � F �o, ,f�} � . � „?� + a;�.-�+."`tn�u��h'i"�����" ..n ���,��^�`-.`.�:�..� :,�:: ` .�� �� .,. s ; , . ,. , ... . , P ,� ' . . . r� - . � '. �,. # ' ` , „ � �,����, . m . �� �� ����* $...k�,��..µr"t -' > , . a ,- � �, � _, � �.�- i Minnetonka-Lower Lake i 27-133-02 A,� � � '�� ��'��. �..��«� ,��r�a✓��.��,� � � � � ��� "����' �� ,�. �' r� �� r �s r ,� Approximate Parcel Boundary 3�,;� s,,,�r m -��11�N RZ,w so2 public Waters Inventory Figure 4 � Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo 2014-026 � - ++��._ M� •, . ,� � .� �. . .,;J � ^�, . j � �M ��* °� ��� °�� „� '� � �;P��.{ , � _'��; > n, �y,'�^ ,�� �,. � °�g M � *� . � r` "� � r ,�p - .ff ,� k, � .ra��,."- �;'+� "°°�t� �' .�^ �« ��,, �'n� ���, �,$ €� �x� � qpr �`'"� �.:;. ,. � +��:� �`,� . �,3�"�-��„ � ' � , .. .- ,... . - :.� $.�. . .� �,. '� . ,. �- , ,�, ��a ' � a�'�� -. ., `� , a �y,�'d � ��, , � ..�Y�g,� � .�a�"�qe:�a�ut,. . �� ' f �•� i � . t �,� "�. . $�,�:•�� . t.� tl��, ��� ��k�k�'. �.J��� � � �}n _ �' .. .. , � � . �4 � � ��j � . :��4� rYP - y .:` +�V wM�a ��'+y� l�.m�,�, *. �` �'�'�. . `��4� . �wt � �1 N"�'�r m;s€ d �'.�`V� �..,rw. �. "^. "� '�'^.+'�t, �` ,,' � �14'�'. ab�R.,�w �r , # �` � Y � � ��`9� �� � �. �� �'" . � � ;' ��w } � �� �u �A' 'g'YNJ�, x �> � '��y ��� u�^ � • r J � r �4 _ r ' r „ ; ! y� �. . / . !7n� � _,my r iy a, � ' tA. � . . f p, 4 . c.. . iR � �'.�4. �: : . � {16" � ..` �'e �.�'�R �i�� ..Y r�, �.T .�..�' � �.._- ,y >. ... . . ♦ f. ..df ; �, - a . � , . 4. �. . Fx y i. ' .� : , �. � a ..; ' . �� . ,� W � "� � � �� _ � ..,.�� �.��'7 �'.. �_ xa% � . �'a *;;` � � � � . � .. ��,i�. � 'ti �t V S a� ., ����� µ+' a� y � . .. � .. . —yk . "� , �tj� " * .� •, �. � "R . t � � «� . �s n°�l� � '�. � ,. Y .: �- � �11� \ _ � y � � �w. �t� _ ... k � � �,� � u` � ` .. }F �`. � F, - r; ' � � . � �. � � ,� ,y t � �, " �,�,,'w ; � �m I • 'LL� ,�,. .�aP� �„���t'..� {� a a � � et, � �' : '�"�s� ;AI1�r"o � 'i°�` �, ��,��'�t , � ,� 7t; ;s , •. � � � � , ti � � � -. +�� � �' ` " .F, � ` . - . �-.`a' ..;t C'* �� k j . _. * F��,� . r , h �� ' r 'n .� ,�, ,:,.. � _. � .�=' 3 . . � , �' y . "� +�y � t'7r� � -4'' . ��. +�jf,s � a . ,m . . � r . ,. a �7F � s � „ � � < . � ., � _ �a , , �.� , �'� ' : .., �.. �� �w v►... '*� r .��'�: . . y� #„� ' �:��,�, � � �� � * � i�� � yy .. . R�'. . a .� 4 $... . �• a s �� i., � . `. .' " a . i ". � � __��l � ae� � f,* - n.M � '� yy M-�, .y4 �� £'`�� k 4 R � '{ #� s� � •F - �%°`�e`� �� 9 _ � , . ., . *.�* � �4:.c . ��� � *� ,� � �,� . �� y4' ` . yt n � � ���� �¢ !` ,�y� { # '3 ,.# «8�� ����� � j �N" X .��s,_ {�.; _ ���� I 'f�6�� ��+j� fif� �"� :\�. - � •A��� ,�"�P` ry! � I � ��:�� � � �. � ��'��.� ' � �'� ,�� . .� . ; , -i . �' ` '8 � � �'ffi�,. �,� . . .yK F, 'i t �A � ;_ �I �"I�.. � `�! �r����+ ryl •. � `�� l�� A �'� � . ^ �`.�� g� � y �. '�.. a �.. 4' ' - �� , a �} �"'Ir .�# 9 #t u 'a w` '� ' :> . > � � " . ,. � � 4�'� �> ��� ,�4 : �3 �.�. • �, � � . ... .� . : , �, w _�� �E� � ,:�� - � � � � p f _ �� g�,�s �% '_ { �.z� � tiY�'A f'>'° ��„� x� ���•6{„ Yl �, �sp. ��,4€'� :3�-. T . .. � :�+. .� t�'.. s_ `M � Y }J' � ��. '� � rt �: :; . �M , dlr'� 5c .,� fi �: �.� � ..;�.:, ^� � ,F �,;, �',•�.�+k" �" . �� . . k,- ... ,wy, $�*r ,�x`� � .. � -. .,� �' _��� . . �._ ' , ,Y �� . . ����',yI'I1� -�"� �'.� � . �� ,r� �' i .. T�. " . �.' A ¢ ,�&�, � , � �'�, .1��' ��,k\� � i � . � �7 }� :�?�i � �y.'�� _ �. ��. \ �4k*'i �,�.;Z �'br j.` qy F�'�. �v". ,�f;�'�„( � ,.� _'.. �. . k � . ". .���,... , � � '� .. ' �.�. � � $�t.. - 'A� ,���`;j�N 4� .Vl ¢ � * � t .� � `���� � �� } }, _ ,w_:. � �.� � Approximate Wetland Boundary _ Y,�„ . � � Approximate Parcel Boundary „,:,� � ` i ,:; � � ��-� ' � - Approximate �Vetiand Boundary Figure 5 Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo , 2014-026 ' � '�e � �''"� � ,��``' �/y �i� , �''`"�.�° � ' �,, ,� ,� j � � �. �'�+ h� ���� . `q. �. �F ����/t�� �� •,'�'����' � ,�"'��/ � ,r ,i . � �'' �` �" ;'�r � ,�`3�'�� /i ��^�` +'�` �', , �` { . . �``. �'� ;S � . .. . .:� �����5, f_�5'�;� ' .�.��✓ i r.. , �` �� . . �` �4. ,.�, .,w�M , .. '/,f ,"fy` ./��� �����, -��Yr.�, i %�:`",i:. �// ��� ���f� /r �', �� � W f '� � �d�'"/c''k �Y'�r . fi � - i . ��,����� �` i 4- .6r� � x,� ��:�R"�� �� � �dn� � � E'4 ,Aey ��^���` � J � � � l' � � 'y�� .^f�' / .r, / �j /� / ' / �" 4�,A ,� . �✓.�,w.� ��FY ��:��� y�. �14 �.�/ Y" fyL�'��, /�' £j y� e ,P�ro�/ � � �g,,�y / ,�°�^������� ; ;�%`/.,' �' ��/ � �� e�v�:� r�i'��,��� . / ,.�+i'+��/� �/�`��,.�.,,.,�Y'�+� 'y/���jry,': �f f �iFfD�6� ��,,,/ r/J" rr/��y 9 . '�F � . �""..�g�� � '''i'iL�'f . ,�.A ,�1/ _ /�r � s �" �- ��� f � f �'� � .F "�/.� . ���` � '�'�� ^{� 1, ,� / �. .,, �� / '",� {,�%f�-, '�it��,�u9,� � d �;�� ,p-r '✓��' .. Q'f / '4 ,�:� �/n�� �'� /' �,�►�� �/ �/Y/��1'��"�����,�Y��i`�rj �/ �✓/�. i� 6 � i ,; � / � � , F � . / '� /. �,�j� �f,, %��� ... �� z f�� %a��,� i�� i`4U�'�°% . .� �/r/ �' � ; , / / , „� /r ' � " � � �T �i .�� � �;,;u= '�,' ;',� � � x �� � �'>,, � ,; , � � . ' � /� /�'"'�! "� { �.� -.� � ' ��y,f �� 'rti,/�� .s� w.�'" y..i�i f� �! � � /.�` �. � ��� �,�, � �� � "r,�`��'� ,�� ,�' ,, ��,�,�a`,�, � '� � �� ,,1� .�%��,.., � '���'.�"i ��`"����;/ i°.':r"t"'�,. �' � . F ��� .'%,,,�~" ''��'��1 ^�w,Jt..�'/ �'"r'} ';€�i�`�j`''�r'%" "'� f,., ���� > ��` i, .,�,�� /.�i .� %� � �^�+.��(iR,�,�"4� �� �� I f � �e �� �'y� r,�� ^ ' �fi�" i4 ` , ./'if ry�� .,�' " E . .�' % �"� /�,����s�� y��� .,✓ / �if�/' . '�f �^� � �� p/�� � �.� �/j � ����� �.. �� ��� � ) � ..+�'" �'9� � /'% 'A'_�.� Ji,� 3,#,��i.�%N/ _Yy:���,''S,A � '9'. ��{/�:�"',".`� � ���'$' �i '�� ��w,/�¢'�� � � '.F��,� f� ,4/�t�!Y� ;! �,. '����,�����"' �"� �"/ '�i "fr ,� ��/�� ��'�` �/.y""�� �; ` ' Y� i���/�.r�w//'//If �, ���� .���,�,L"� . i ��/�P. '�{.�// � // �. / ��Y i�':. T/•/''..�q . . �, i / � r��-.f�'� ,�/� . .�,,;(�� /�5. �'�/, :�... . � M�►,! �✓..�j'e '��1/ , ' F�;« �. �� �T .� � ,. ���`"� / . , �/� �'i'',����� � W:%i�; ��,� ...1 , �,�'� ',�,.'g .�j�' �.\9������ , i-� � � f, � ..;,�� ..� ,� � � ����, � Y'� ."E L i �,8 �,+ .r i �.. . ��` v+ . �f;. r�"�4 . j� . �"�- �� �r�nr ,�`� _/e � � � e • � �, R " �0� ' Q� :.:� � � ��►.�{T� .� /��. �%' yi �� ' � � � � . � � f yY� � . V/ W ry /_ #t ai�.��! � �A: *5�!Ly ���y I '��� '�,� '_. E s,�,� �� "�� ��F . ; y-�'. ✓/� ��r,�`y.,�✓'�� -�.�����B.s '� �; ��r"tY'rf' i� �� ��fs+��°F� ��� � ��,'� f , ��!r, -��� 4��c� �` �,r t1�v`4, �',, � •�� :� �►�✓ :;� a �� y ,� ��� , , ., , 7" .y„ .:,�.,,�,,,� ,.p'';/ � . . �%'�`� ' F�' �� �/����� � '�� ' .���� i � .. ���j .� „��i'��"�� � � �� ��,�. r �^yv �� ���� S C'� � ^�� Q F'`�' �� '#,�.,,`^��"�°t »�i �,F � � ' � y � � � ��e,�.,�i ,�'�9 ✓,�r�� ,�'�` ..�„� � / ,�`f+�` ..,� ^' , r:„,y � � � � ��'.�`�,w,p�.:a . ..:��f �'� //�c���������i . � ��� �"�„�" � - �. !�' .� , ;.M'' . �� ,.�^. ,��y� M' �`, rt���s� � � .,J� ,�1�,�3 A, :f ,r�,����� �•'�f�.r� �i* i I �. � . '��'W„i� ��.o . �.�, s /�i sry, �; ,'q����. .��a ��;,�„'� � �' 9 �4�` E , �� � s 5 9 " �� �:� rx �y, � � �� �.M,�;`� �� �� „���.' M �� w��� f�sy A ,�� �'�,f '� ��Y���} ` /% ���•�,� 1 D��y 4 � � � � �1� ti/.r��. ,y., ,.� �� ��� 3i .� h���7 �,/ .� �,( �!W ,C / ¢1 �� y �✓r%iv3 '�����'� 4 •te `f.k°' r `i� , � *,�`y' '�����Q � 'i�"� ��f5`�` � f�., .,�����i � �� ,�w�4,�i _:,d:�����6��`Is.�'�'��"�, ✓ t ���`'"� �."�+" �d y �'Fr°���; � «,�!`',�-� , , „���,��� Y�'.,��'�.,�'� �', ,�,'� :�� .�� +�,!���;�.f �, �..�'�,. ;. � t�`" ��,°,. ��'��E"" �'�� � ,,,1, �.r+�J,�, `�I ,�� �!� +$�'� ti;�,� � ,- � ; `�c:���.:�� '°'��=.; - �,�.�'/I�"/i.�`�._'��s.`'�"��;�.�`���''I '�� '�����,g(+;� �� r� �"`��� �'`� ��`�;�� " � ��� �� ~+�% �� � � F. fi,���►, � ` �+� � a;�F�',�r�, �" � r � . , ,� � � , ��. �,. ;%a��., '� ,, i. � � ➢������� � ��'w ''�'�'� `'�A �+�� `�- ��.� - ��,�.,!��, .�1 � ��� �� ������� � � �� � � � -��� ��t �����, ,.�i Approximate Wetland Boundary QApproximate Parcel Boundary � � `� $OI�S Y < - � ,��i ��,p� ,,� � � � S' t � 1'a� ��4 W�'�py&3 y�� r�$�' t�,�[+^+'�Y�,���r� e. '' . �` a,-�� '�� �y�'�t�'�S�5 "�'p�` r�4"�` �4`�"4�" .,,t'A'✓ �' �e. >'t } � � � '�,����������, '��`�� � Hydric a, r� t;� F , a�;�'s��Fa � ��`�§M r;U�� ;;�v�-�3'� � � i , ,� a� ' ;��� �' ��'� � f f '� ��� Not rated or not available ��� �`/ � ;�,, � , j; ; � Predominantly hydnc ��, f � FY�� . �'/`��' "-� � � � '�- ' - i�etlanci liounc�ary and Soils Figure 6 Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo i 2014-026 THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION Field Data Sheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-1-11 ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 UP Investigator(s): BKB 5ection,Township, Range: SEC 2, T117N R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): hilltop Local relief(concave, convex, none): none Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit NameMuskego, Blue Earth and Houghton, soils ponded VWI Classification: PUBF Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlarn N Wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Populus deltoides 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 40 =Total Cover Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 35 Y FAC Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50 4 FAC species 85 x 3= 255 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 35 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 110 (A) 305 (B) 1 Rhamnus cathartica 35 Y FAC Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.77 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0' � Morphogical adaptations`(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a g separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 35 =Total Cover (explain) WOOdY ville StfatUm (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-9 10YR 3/2 Loamy Sand 9-13 10YR 2/1 Sandy Loam 13-16 10YR 2/1 99 10YR 3/3 1 C M Sandy Loam 16-21 10YR 5/3 80 10YR 3/4 20 C M Sand 'Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired Surtace Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surtace Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampiing Date: 11-1-11 ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 WET Investigator(s): BKB 3ection, Township, Range: SEC 2,T117N R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): concave Siope(%): 1 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit NameMuskego, Blue Earth and Houghton, soils ponded VWI Classification: PUBF Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlarn Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) 2 Populus deltoides 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00°/o (A/B) 40 =Total Cover Saplin4/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total %Cover of: 2 Rhamnus frangula 10 Y FAC OBL species 15 x 1 = 15 3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50 4 FAC species 35 x 3= 105 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 20 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 75 (A) 170 (B) 1 Iris versicolor 15 Y OBL Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.27 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is_<3.0' � Morphogicai adaptations'(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation" 15 =Total Cover (explain) WoodV vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) °/o Color(moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 Oe/Hemic 4-10 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 5/3 20 C M Sand 10-18 N 2.5/0 90 10GY 5/1 10 C M Sandy Clay Loam *Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. "'Location: PL= Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or X 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required check all that applvl Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): surface present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-1-11 ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 2-1 UP Investigator(s): BKB 3ection, Township, Range: SEC 2, T117N R23W Landform (hillslope,terrace, etc.): hilltop Local relief(concave, convex, none): none Slope(%): 1 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit NameTadkee depressional complex VWI Classification: none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlan� N Wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.67% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Sambucus canadensis 5 Y FACW Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 20 x 2= 40 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 5 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 50 (A) 150 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 15 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.00 2 Solidago canadensis 15 Y FACU 3 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rhamnus cathartica 5 N FAC Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Solanum dulcamara 5 N FAC X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0* � Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a g separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 45 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-1 UP Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc"' Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 3/2 Sandy Loam 14-17 5Y 2/1 99 5 GY 5/1 1 C M Sandy Clay Loam 17-20 5 GY 5/1 95 10YR 3/3 5 C M Sandy Clay Loam *Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratifled Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that applv) Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 15 present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-1-11 ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 2-1 WET Investigator(s): BKB 3ection,Township, Range: SEC 2, T117N R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): concave Slope(%): 2 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit NameTadkee depressional complex VWI Classification: none Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlarn Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence index Worksheet 1 Sambucus canadensis 10 Y FACW Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 5 x 1 = 5 3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 40 (A) 85 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 15 Y FACW Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.13 2 Solanum dulcamara 10 Y FAC 3 Typha angustifolia 5 N OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% g X Prevalence index is<_3.0* � Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a g separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 30 =Total Cover (explain) WoodY vine Stfatum (PIOt Siz2: 30 ft fadiUs ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 2-1 WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc** Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/1 Silty Loam High organic matter 10-15 N 2/0 90 10YR 3/4 10 C M Silty Loam 15-20 5GY 5/1 Sandy Clay Loam `Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L, R) X Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that applv) Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10 present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION Plant Indicator Status INDICATOR CATEGORIES* Obligate Wetland (OBL)—Occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. Facultative Wetland (FACW)—Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67% - 99%), but occasionally found in non-wetlands. Facultative (FAC)—Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability 34% - 66%). Facultative Upland (FACU)—Usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probabiliry 67% - 99%), but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1% -33%). Obligate Upland (UPL)—Occur in wetlands in another region, but occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands in the region specified. If a species does not occur in wetlands in any region, it is not on the National List. *Reed, P.B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Minnesota. National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, Florida. THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION Soil Series Descriptions Acquired from Natural Resource Conservation Service Website, Official Soil Series Descriptions See Figure 5 for an illustration of each Photo Point (PP) location. i�m;�;� , �°, ..� �. � w . � � '� � t t� :.; �' ,4*r; ����� Ii� �, �� �'�;� , '�r �F�� ��,. �' '� � g '�� y� > ���� ,� �t� � 1�- .1 r��4�l+ �w '°`4 N'�.�..�x;A!�}�'+T . � : py��� �'� . �',�1 4'�t_'��.�� : , . ,. .. '� � �Y,T A �. .� ' ' . � .. �. �� � z. .. , � � . f=,y , � _. . , .-i �. '- '_ �. . . � .....^'� . . . ..� . - .,. ,. ., . �., � ...._.: ,� ,...�' :,. . ��:� �,x-�� .,. 9�^" �t'!�.r,��.= x.. '�.�. � T ' �: : PHOTO 1: Wetland 1 facing north at PP1. �� � ���� �}. ry ��, ,a �� ;� �: �,� � i;�� � .�. �:��; `a � ,,,j�.M �,,.,. � w. .Jt� l - � i� «�,.: � H� d� �- �'..� � „i�. �gq��. �;; xz . . . . r Y tl e��. ��N' e6 4� j:_ep�:y. � .R e�,. 5 d w� � �,% n;! �t: . ��� � .. �i .� . �..Y x ... , � F . �+� � ���; ,. �,.,i~� ��� _ ~ �� e . �'w4u. ' - „ `�'. .T^r_ '� � �t y � [ y �� : � �^ " —'�.'�„'. �.._.'m -�.. ' � ,i��, r�` ti� . .; �x�� , t n I . _ ,: �� • 4 xs . • _ . '�, ' .� ��',ml�„Y'i� . ..._ . �'' f AJ. .i �'.ti' `. 4 R EI..I�iw� _� p . �,,� � � • . � � � . � '�ef � ":�y°.w . ,1g +�7.,�` .. n `;� a,.� "t�.*,,��,.,"�""xt+'�����Y�N �,.. � . .. � ;� ,��•,�K t" . � �- � ��'�'��1� '�''� � ,r��S4�T �'r� . _..,ati°y!''� ,?s►.�'%sc.. " � ,:^ _-'-`a /��'■Y �� � ,�. ' i�; a `s�.,,.� �.:^ - � " 1`��¢ � -.;-i' '4�'a' . ,� ..�k, ..�.�.'j`.�,��. , °\x` 1i►r,���,"r �!°'''r � t ' <`�� ." �,��k"' � .-� � !1,l�1, �,��y� `�F �f � i�a. ;l'I� y► �. , , �,•�, t• �k } `#g�s � �� ...�>�'� �,-�" -� r,.�"�� .� �,� ���,�,�,��,�.�►1�,;1! Y , l y� �{)���:«� �;iC' T * M '� ,� t� '!��� t'' �Y•.� ,.� `A �... ��``'" . . ^L� `As. ,�I� ������'": _ ���i 'i°�a. �^i►I• 'Y�i! � K9" . �',, . C ,k.� - A:a�� !t '4. � ��1.� �'.� ��,.�R��.�� � � �* � �� ``�" �t� � �f`�t� ���.. µ"� � .�� �',rY� � _ w '� � "R \� �Q ■ �• �"'�� r�y�• ,� .�� ��� �t�f ��'\���+��� � � ��t,s������ . � .Yl•'•{ � ��„+��„�7',^J� 1��5.�� , ������� x�I � J �l �,��;,� � •p-� ��'+�`� yF ,;�, . �'�,�`,,� � ;�� ,�`� m f ,�!,�,��,�-•.^��,«� � ���`�'`�. a�"� �� ��� �.�` j� i�=t�•'��+�w ... ,.�wrii�'� �� ': � �' �.� PHOTO 2: Wetland 1 facing southwest at PP2. 2011-028-03 �!��SVOBODA PHOTO LOG OF SITE 1165 Ferdale Rd. i, `�> Ecological Resources Orono MN See Figure 5 for an illustration of each Photo Point (PP) location. �� ! � Y. 'Y.'S�. �s- . � . �� . .. �� ,*�{f� z �'�� -i /i � � + }e �� �.. 3 : . �'slx. . st . . rt Tk ' �y, �a o �g.� x ,�s' R,�t � „ ;1�� �y . � . � $ .�'�T�l. �1 a`�� �'`�q° y '!t.� � 11�C 4£J� l J". :�t . . •5 i, t� r,.q �� �' �1� � ` � .�3w'}r,t,�'�a.i. x�,� � ' .-. �� a.. ,':. r� �,«� .�;. ,,, � �, � . ,� ,.� ;� � � ,�. , , . � �h . �n� . , � ' N � �'•' �vs , .� r • • `�'�- , y '�� � " R�'�*,r'� f .:�W,0 �g�����q, � �. { , ' ��, �. � e�' '8. �.. � � .���t" �E�ny„y "4.V� � �8�����1� 4 �.pa,f �' R ��1,a�Y '}`�1V`� v . �, , �,�� ,�� ��a � �w�E+' . .. P�t, . �} � � �`y, � e • � �'. �'.! . ,+s, �+@, �r �� a' ' �,� }1� �, t� �r r�a ����'" � �r9e,y t *al � �� ' i � �... �",.. � .`��` �� ' �'�, �`���"�'�i ���y� �.. ' �I��, ' t�l �kr. "`���5 ��...- �r ,r. ."'A"' `. � °�rrsa«,=•.� H .� " ^i [{� �9 ..+�ljtk� �t• ,��r jab 1� ��y�i ,�, ,]� ", � "` � q��,��l.�,- q �°�k}��� .�, . �!1' x � �"'TM � �.p . � h o���� 'a� �+,,"'r'rt AR,Y �r �� Y �4�' * �rt ys�y�. '��°�i�n $ . .y �. �"�a'w "i A', �y�i.�"�p�w�- �.'.' t"� .�� �r „�, i '""` � i.;1�Aj._� ����� Y'i�Y, d+� � � . 'y�♦ • � � ['� ""yf J �`�.- `�'-• '� w� ��,�;•i� k_ ��'�� • .��"��1�.�� t��;,,,,,. ���p- �lr,�C'a!� �,,- 1G-1`e'. �R �i�?'�y,'�s '���, �� .. o-� '"�A• ", � �; '.•� � i,� +`,l�I � '�; •� - .. '. NI�i�, �� � � ,+�,� - �.i4. � +' �.. '�ri/'y��,�', !.�..1�','�" ly `'�;� � ��M ... ��.yj`� :�" �", � �4 d ' ! "��� , ��. � � •.y_ �e �/ �Y ?�, +�.l�<�'�'°�..,��i' '� fr j� �M.�tr a` ••,�� '.�l� '�� .,� �D � ,+� i �1 R �. . , .. _ ,rF� �r 4�. .� •.r. ��f ��"• .* _.[.�i�l �,a. ` «� � ` ��lii�, t l.�,.�r�„�`+wl.� r��li �i�•f ���,r*s (�w �` � �.' "���g►:_.��,,jw �' * . ,; . ��..sikvt''��i �y'�IY�:r� ,r ��.il:�. _ .'�L � ..11.i�:4 PHOTO 3: Wetland 3 facing south-southeast at PP3. `�+r� y � Y�„ � �� '�� �p � °'T !t� .} �'� � � � 1"/i. ,.3,1 , . � f.i �`� . .�.#��1�'� �� ��/� . , � • `i� .x!Y �. y�'� . ,�� r .�.. �. i._ � �.4 � ".. ,.. . , '.l . � �l .. + it - a F � s F * �� � . . � .-� .�. � � � w � �� �° . . . � �S . , ..� r y�:� � �, =F.'r i . � .�»,�-�°4p ^ ro��.� .` * . e � tl�.e , .a�"�1'� ,y�R'' A �,.>!6 ���?.y�' n�'.$ �"'�' ' �' ��x. .'t."��/� . �� s ♦ � � -.� , - � . . .� �, , • #� � r� -. w;' "� ��'L �. : . _-._��'�,.yt+� �'�. . ..r .. �,.N`^�,� `� p`... :� t ., � . � � �����'��'g.�. �� ,�l ��' +�i"i 'n� �:. ��9 . . . � _ ';�A•.F 4 ��?�`9�� �� A t���� �; . . � ' .` .. �• �. # r i� p {{� `�g.�'i �.�.,t �� N , ��. u p+� !7#i .x.��a ., t�$:`t.� T-'� .,�kf " � �Y. .l 4.k� �b ��.14e .,, . � 1��,r,�/e'�.�_.aa! .a � x� �,l' J• �t x �'� " � 1r� ' '�; {� r�..: . �+,` , .,�� �,�� ,a .,�,� . �' -r�r��' �F jY�' ... .P.�.y1 4 .• •'� �1p��.�.v ,p� � q) . .. • c yj �i�.� iA�r M$. 1 9 � d � � ,.>����itlt$ ��.` Y '����a�� , .� "�.:�. a w. �� �n. �-I' �,�`Ar S�� r_`_ $ � ��.. e ' � �. R C �63 �y .e. �� 1 •� � �� � ^�W �y4•:'.. I � 4'�i �,�T`�a'�� �� � ...�3a #-_J' ,gt: "H .. . � 1 •� TA�'��'Y � �.���� $ ,I �.,a, y ,�J�` �`� . �rt�'�'x�.� .aM � �„gc . 'q'y ., _�p, �' =;► � •w £�'� -im y� y# 0� � � ..aa�1 .�� � ; •+�� y'i��. qe �'" ' p� , �'v ""� '�'e ^7Y. .�� ' i�'' �f+w�.�*�a r �. , Y^«. O't�e�'.�R t . y � �y gy � � �� , � , �:P�� '�, : � a tkr.n..�-�'p�i�': � � � ` ��r �'�'� ��i�A��.. ►�,Myqv '� ' fAe.. �F�a�'�,,, '��,i.��i�e*�^ `7�.�.� �' �t „7�� �� a \�f.a�' `'~ � . .3 ..y a . �'�r � � iM���� �Ji a � l-�y� ��� �P� � . , d�... r+r''"'� ��� �w,'"tiY � . .�'�.. �ii�' '�"��� . � j 'k�o-�',c�: ..� PHOTO 4: Wetland 4 facing north at PP4. 2011-028-03 ����.SVOBODA PHOTO LOG OF SITE 1165 Ferdale Rd. ��;x Ecological Resources Orono MN � � � 1 Project Name and/or Number: SER#2014-026-03—1165 Ferndale Road N,Orono PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity(company,government entity, partnership, etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant, lawyer, or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Robert Brook MailingAddress: 1165 Ferndale Road, Orono, MN 55391 Phone: 612.328.2562 E-mail Address: rbrook@emsinet.com Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above): Frank Svoboda—Svoboda Ecological Resources Mailing Address: 22752 Co Rd 7, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Phone: 612-384-7770 E-mail Address: franks@gpsinnovatitons.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 1165 Ferndale Road N (PID#02-1 17-23-43-0026) Legal Description(Section,Township, Range): Lots 2 and 8, of North Shore Cottage Acres Lake Minnetonka Addition, a portion Section 2, Tl 17N, R23W, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Lat/Long(decimal degrees): Lat.44.968684(44°58'7.2624"N)/Long.-93.550656(93°33'2.3616"W) Attach a map show�ng the location�f thP�irP in relation to local streets, roads, highways. _�����. �� (� ,x � � �.� F�� .,,. � � � �p f s . i �4,; r y��.xw .,,k� _ `j �'•�'�` A�"«�.`�q � ' ,'' ��'.�°� ': ` '�:' � w?� :�. �' ,� _ _� ; . ,�' -`� ,�;, ��ry,� ��� �,� ��' � � t.� � R 'p`� '.�� .� .�.. �:•��3FJ�,Ei� �`�� ��w.��. '�1 4 � -, . . n�._ ��i!` �+n,� � � ��, .,,y� . Ay� • .� _'�a ��..e.+..� � " �' -i� �,+� � �.�� R� , r�� �' ,T.�.� ���,» � �� �2�� . � l ..• (..���• . � 1 . Y % 1 � y �M�.�"��r�*`,r ��' ����a 'bt�J �p � � i �� �a � � i � '�`�� _.�?'4� �'` � � �.:F. T II `y����±��Y�•���1F����';�#('��' Y� �I ,��`. 1 __ _ �• � .'� Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project, length (feet): .8 Acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http•//www mvp usace armv mil/Portals/57/docs/resulatory/RegulatorvDocs/ensform 4345 2012oct.pdf Project Name and/or Number: SER#2014-026-03—1165 Ferndale Road N,Orono PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources(wetland, lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. The owner wants to know where the approved edge is located before starting the planning process.As soon as approval is received they will move forward with their project. PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact15ummary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Type of Impact Duration of Existing Plant County,Major Aquatic Resource Overall Size of Watershed#, Resource Type (fill,excavate, Impad z Community ID(as noted on Size of Impact Aquatic and Bank Service (wetland,lake, drain,or remove Permanent(P)or 3 Type�s)in Impact overhead view) 1 Resource , Area#of Impact tributary etc.) vegetation) Temporary(T) Area Areas llf impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the"T". For example,a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered"T(220)". Zlmpacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 sq/ft). 'This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A". °Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesoto ond Wisconsin 3rd Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. SRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: �� d Date: October 10, 2014 I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term"impact"as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Project Name and/or Number: SER#2014-026-03—1165 Ferndale Road N,Orono Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU) provide me with the following(check all that apply): �Wetland Type Confirmation �Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring,or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). QPreliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictiona) determination (AJD)is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota(2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx