HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Classification, Identiication & Delineation-2014 t � � � , • ' � , �
�` • � �
i.
� �
1�
,�,�
;t,
;;
,�;
`�'� ' - � . - � � • � � � . • � • .
.�; � �; -
.`�� � � ' � ' �
�� ��
4 %�i� ' ���♦ � 1 1 ' i 1 1
1
� ��j �,�-
� �'�`�,. ,... �,
; . ,,..��
:, �,
.�}�. ' �,1 , -�.
�. ��� -
:��� . �l-������l
�i• `;:=';� ����I��.i„ •,�e y
� ,,
''�� . 'i�+f�:►,• ; �"
�� i .:/.!.'� �i:''a" :�:
, �'/'�- , .:y�fl tr*r;;L:
' �� �+� ' �l'1�\1�w . -.��: ..��
� � w�,.
' / '� �r i�.1� � ; ..'�.,��F'i.}'�i>r:�►i
t�/ +� .����i�• 'tix��Y��L� �.
`�1 � � r • •r. ,t�. .y,4�F•
��� �.; i 1•�:LjI��.��-''.:���I`�
/ �I.►'�,� ' i � �2'a� H' ��
�11�w��► . w�'. F�j�i,��I
�'
`�� / �R+� � � � i•i�„�1�jIiI
\'.1; 1�� / I ��� � ���� �.�`
.�� �; � re y �� � �w I
�,
�
\���1�� �' '
,� � � � '`� . 1 . . �
r
�\\1' I f .�rl♦f .i� '. 1 ' . � � � / ' ' . •
�� I / i �,. ' �
�
:` � ` � ` I►��, :..
I " ` ;,,:
:
� �- ;,,`- --. � � . � I ' I � I
',n��/�ji
��r ;� --- , • � � - � � �
� ��'�� ' �"� !
�,��, � � , . �
Providing the Sharper Edge in
Natural Resources &Environmental Consulting
ECOLOGICAL RES�URCES
, •�.� , �
. , � •. . � �
1165 Ferndale Road
Orono, MN
Wetland Classification, Identification, and
Delineation Report
Prepared for:
Robert Brook
By:
Svoboda Ecological Resources
Project Number 2014-026
October l, 2014
The contents and format of this report are considered intellectual property and
are subject to copyright restrictions and may not be reproduced without
the express permission of Svoboda Ecological Resources.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT .........................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1
METHODS...........................................................................................................................1
RESULTS.............................................................................................................................2
DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................4
RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................................................................5
CERTIFICATION................................................................................................................6
DATASOURCES................................................................................................................7
LITERATURECITED.........................................................................................................8
FIGURE SET:
Figure 1: Location of Site Overlaid on USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2a: National Wetland Inventory
Figure 2b: Hennepin County Wetland Inventory
Figure 2c: 2014 DNR NWI Update
Figure 3: Web Soil Survey-Hennepin County
Figure 4: DNR- Protected Waters Map
Figure 5: Approximate Wetland Boundaries and Sample Transect Locations
Figure 6: Approximate Wetland Boundary and Soils
THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION:
Field Data Sheets
Plant Indicator Status
Soil Series Data
Wetland Definition
PHOTO LOG
ABSTRACT
Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) visited the above referenced property on November 1,
2011 to examine the site for the presence of areas meeting wetland criteria. The study parcel is
located within the City of Orono, Hennepin Counry Minnesota, (Figure 1). Two wetlands were
delineated at this site. One sample transect was established along each of the two wetland
boundaries in order to characterize the soil, vegetation, and existing hydrology within the
wetland-to-upland transition zones.
INTRODUCTION
The subject parcel is approximately 0.8 acres in size with a single family home located in the
central portion of the property. The site is dominated by manicured lawn, wild grasses, hardwood
trees and some scrub-shrub vegetation throughout. The topography of the site is mostly flat
within the upland areas and has a slight decline in to the wetland area. The surrounding land use
consists mostly of single-family homes. The identified wetlands were classified according to the
Cowardin et al., the Circular 39 and the Eggers and Reed classification systems and marked with
pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. Please find within the Technical Documentation Section;
field data sheets, plant indicator status information, soil survey information, and wetland
definition information.
METHODS
The methods used to delineate the subject parcel are as described in the 1987 US Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Regional Supplement Manual.
In the 1987 Manual, the methods used were described under the "routine" methods for wetland
sites less than 5 acres. This methodology is followed in order to assess whether the three
parameters of a wetland are met for areas on the subject parcel. The three parameters required
under normal circumstances in order to delineate a wetland are described in the Technical
Documentation Section.
The Midwest Regional Supplement Wetland Delineation Manual is also being utilized to
increase the accuracy of our wetland boundaries. This addendum to the original 87 Manual was
created to address the many regional differences that affect wetlands and the delineation methods
used throughout the country. The following explanations are passages from that document.
"This Regional Supplement is part of a nationwide effort to address regional
wetland characteristics and improve the accuracy and efficiency of wetland-
delineation procedures. Regional differences in climate, geology, soils,
hydrology plant and animal communities, and other factors are important to the
identification and functioning of wetlands. These differences cannot be
considered adequately in a single national manual. The development of this
supplement follows National Academy of Sciences recommendations to increase
the regional sensitivity of wetland-delineation methods (National Research
Svoboda F.cological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road
Project No.:2014-026 1 Robert Brook
Council 1995). The intent of this supplement is to bring the Corps Manual up to
date with current knowledge and practice in the region and not to change
wetland boundaries." "...This Regional Supplement is designed for use with the
current version of the Corps Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and all
subsequent versions. Where differences in the two documents occur, this
Regional Supplement takes precedence over the Corps Manual for applications
in the Midwest Region."
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (Figure 2a), Hennepin County Wetland Inventory
(HCWI) maps (Figure 2b), 2014 DNR NWI Update maps (Figure 2c), Web Soil Survey of
Orono and Hennepin County maps (Figure 3), Minnesota Protected Waters maps (Figure 4), and
2010 aerial photographs were reviewed prior to the site visit to identify areas that may be
wetlands. Areas illustrating evidence of wetland conditions were examined in greater detail
during the field survey. Vegetation, soils and hydrology were examined (as outlined in the 1987
Manual) and used to characterize wetland types and determine wetland boundaries. Sample
transects were established in representative wetland-to-upland transition zones in order to
characterize the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the site. Transects consisted of a
representative upland sample point and a representative wetland sample point. Information
obtained from the sample points can be found on the field data sheets located in the Technical
Documentation Section.
Wetland boundaries were marked at the site by pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. The
wetland boundary is considered to be the topographically highest extent of the wetland basin;
areas below the staked boundary met the three required wetland criteria while areas above were
lacking in one or more of these criteria. Wetland classification followed methods described by
Cowardin et aL (1979) and used in the NWI (e.g. PEMB, PSS1C, etc.), completed by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. The Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed classification systems are also
given. The indicator status of plants, as described in The Technical Documentation Section, was
determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands — Region 3 (Sabine
1999).
RESULTS
Background Information- (Office-Based Investigation)
The NWI map (Excelsior Quadrangle) illustrates no National Wetland Inventory wetlands
present within the property boundary (Figure 2a). However, it is evident by aerial photography
that portions of the mapped PUBF and L 1 UBH wetlands do encroach within the boundaries of
the subject parcel. The NWI appears inaccurate within the subject area. The 2014 DNR NWI
Update does show wetlands in those areas on the parcel, PEM1C to the northwest and L2UBH to
eh south. The HCWI indicates no other potential wetlands in the area(Wetland 2c).
The Web Soil Survey of Orono and Hennepin County classifies two soil complexes on the
subject property (Figure 3). Both soil complexes are considered hydric soils. The soil series
descriptions are given in the Technical Documentation Section.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, State Protected Waters Map (Public Water
Inventory), indicates one Public Water wetland present within the property boundary (Figure 4).
Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road
Project No.:2014-026 2 Robert Brook
The public water is identifies as Minnetonka (27-133P).
Site Visit
SER ecologists examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria
during the site visit. Two wetlands met the jurisdictional criteria of a wetland therefore two
wetland boundaries were determined and delineated. The approximate wetland boundaries are
outlined in yellow in Figure 5.
Accumulated precipitation since 4/O1/2011, as recorded at MSP and reported by the USDA
National Agricultural Statistics Service in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of
Agriculture reports that for the week ended November 6, 2011, was 1.76" below normal.
Precipitation for the period 10/31/2011 to 11/06/2011 was reported to be 0.49" below normal and
for the preceding 4 weeks was 1.20" below normal.
The Minnesota Climatology Warking Group Gridded Database for the August 1 through October
31, 2011 period WETS Score for the 1971-2000 normal period was Dry (6). The Score was the
same using the 1981-2010 normal period.
Wetland 1
Wetland 1 is located at the north end of the property and continues off of the subject parcel and
out of the evaluated area to the west. Dominant vegetation within Wetland 1 was narrow-leaf
cattail (Typha angustifolia, OBL), lake sedge (Carex lacustr�is, OBL), lesser duckweed (Lemna
minor, OBL) and hummock sedge (Carex stricta, OBL). Reed canary grass (Phalaris
arundinacea, FACW) was also dominant within Wetland 1 along portions of the fringe area.
Standing water would likely be present during most of the growing season within Wetland 1 but
given that this area was delineated in November, standing water was not present.
Sample Transect 1-1
The vegetation transition zone along Sample Transect 1-1 started with a dominance of
blue-flag iris (Iris versicolor, OBL) at Sample Point (SP) 1-1 WET in the herbaceous
stratum. Common bucktharn (Rhamnus cathartica, FAC) and glossy buckthorn
(Rhamnus frangula, FAC) were dominant within the shrub layer. Cottonwood (Populus
deltoides, FAC) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica, FACW) were dominant within
the tree layer.
The vegetation transition to upland also yielded a dominance of cottonwood and green
ash in the tree layer and common buckthorn in the shrub layer but the herbaceous layer
yielded a dominance of only common buckthorn. The dominance test and the prevalence
index were not met for the upland point.
Soils at SP 1-1 WET were black and hemic down to 4 inches followed by a dark gray
sand with 20 percent brown redox concentrations down to 10 inches. From 10 to 18
inches the soils become a sandy clay loam with a black matrix and 10 percent course
greenish gray gleyed mottles.
Soils at SP 1-1 UP were very dark grayish brown loamy sands down to 9 inches. Soils
Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road
Project No.: 2014-026 3 Robert Brook
became black with sandy loam textures down to 16 inches with 1 percent fine dark brown
redox concentrations starting at 13 inches. From 16 to 21 inches soils were sandy with 20
percent dark yellowish brown redox concentrations within a brown matrix.
Saturation was observed at the surface of the wetland point along with two secondary
hydrology indicators. Only one secondary hydrology indicator was noted at the upland
sample point.
SER delineated Wetland 1 as a Type 3, PEMF, Shallow Marsh.
Wetland 2
Wetland 2 is located at the southern end of the parcel and is fringe wetland of Lake Minnetonka
(L 1 UBH). Dominant vegetation within Wetland 2 was narrow-leaf cattail, lake sedge and reed
canary grass.
Sample Transect 2-1
The vegetation transition zone along Sample Transect 2-1 at the wetland point started
with a dominance of reed canary grass, bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara,
FAC), and narrow-leaf cattail within the herb layer and elderberry (Sambucus
canadensis, FACV� within the shrub layer.
The vegetation transition to upland yielded a dominance of reed canary grass, and Canada
goldenrod (Solidago canadensis, FACU) in the herb layer and elderberry in the shrub
layer. The dominance test was met for the upland sample point.
Soils at SP 2-1 WET were black down to 15 inches and transitioned to a gleyed matrix
down to 20 inches. There were 10 percent dark yellowish brown redox concentrations
from 10 to 15 inches within the profile. Textures were silt loams that transitioned to more
sandy and clayey textures starting at 15 inches.
Soils at SP 2-1 UP were very dark grayish brown with a sandy loam texture down to 14
inches. Soils became black and yellower in hue with 1 percent gleyed mottles and 5
percent brown redox concentrations from 14 to 17 inches. From 17 to 20 inches soils had
a gleyed matrix with no mottles or redox. Textures from 14 inches to 20 inches were
sandy clay loams.
Saturation was present at 10 inches below the surface at the wetland point and 15 inches
at the upland point. Two secondary indicators of hydrology were also noted at the
wetland point. Only one secondary hydrology indicator was noted at the upland sample
point.
SER delineated Wetland 2 as a Type 3, PEMC, Shallow Mars6 wetland that is fringe to
a lacustrine system to the south and west.
DISCUSSION
Svoboda Ecological Resources 1165 Fendale Road
Projcct No.:2014-026 4 Robert Brook
SER completed all on-site delineations based on the three required technical criteria as outlined
by the 1987 Manual: the presence of hydric soils, a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and
indicators of wetland hydrology in each basin. The site visit portion of the wetland delineation
was completed on November 1, 2011.
SER personnel examined the subject property for areas meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria
during the site visit and delineated the edges of two wetland basins within the property boundary
as being jurisdictional wetland (Figure 5). Detailed soils, vegetation and hydrology data for
Wetlands 1 and 2 is provided in the data sheets of The Technical Documentation Section.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Activities which impact or potentially impact wetlands are currently regulated at several levels of
government. In Minnesota, the two primary jurisdictions are covered at the state and federal
levels by the provisions of the following legislative actions.
r State jurisdiction by the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) administered
by the WCA Local Governmental Unit (LGU).
➢ Federal jurisdiction by the Clean Water Act of 1972 and subsequent amendments.
Wetland protection is implemented by the Corps of Engineers (Corps) with permit
certification issued by the Environmental Protection Agency.
While the wetland boundaries that SER has delineated are not official until approved by a WCA
approved local government unit (LGU), SER advises the property owner/developer to refrain
from any filling, draining, or excavating, or any impact to the area SER has delineated as
wetland. No grading or filling in wetland basins should commence until all necessary permits
have been obtained. Violation of wetland regulations has resulted in substantial civil and
criminal penalties. Local ordinances may regulate wetland modifications such as brush and tree
removal and burning in addition to grading and filling. Depending on the location of the
property, buffers around the wetland may also be protected. Any activities in the proximity of
the wetland should be cleared with appropriate WCA regulatory agencies. It is also advisable to
have the wetland boundary surveyed by a licensed land surveyor. Since the pin flags used along
the boundary can be vandalized or inadvertently knocked over, a GPS survey of the flags will
assure the permanence of the boundary. The client should also be aware that approved wetland
boundaries are typically valid for only three years from the date of approval.
To avoid project delays associated with wetland regulations, it is essential that you acquire
necessary permits from all jurisdictional agencies before continuing activities. A WCA
Sequencing form, a WCA and Army Corps of Engineers Replacement Plan Application form,
and a DNR permit application are among the materials that you may be required to submit if
impacts are proposed for the delineated wetlands. By initiating the permit process as soon as
possible, potential costly delays to the project may be avoided.
Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road
Project No.:2014-026 5 Robert Brook
CERTIFICATION
Brian Burgner completed the above-described delineation on November 1, 2011. This
delineation was performed according to the procedures described by the US Army Corps of
Engineers in the 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Region Supplement
Wetland Delineation ManuaL The delineation meets the standards and a criterion described in
these manuals and conforms to the applicable standards and regulations in force at the time the
delineation was completed.
The revised report was prepared by David Remucal and Frank Svoboda on October 1, 2014.
Client: Robert Brook
Project Name: 1165 Ferndale Road
Project No.: 2014-026
Location: Orono, Minnesota
Ecologist II
Wetland Delineator-Certified # 1124
�-a��--- d'
President, Svoboda Ecological Resources
October 1, 2014
Date
Svoboda F,cological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road
Project No.:2014-026 ( Robert Brook
DATA SOURCES
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Public Waters Inventory Basin Delineations,
Published 7/31/2008 and retrieved from http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us
United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map. Retrieved from
http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html on 5/28/12.
2012 Aerial Color Photos. Publicly Distributed by MN Geo WMS Service.
Topographic maps obtained via the National Geographic Society's USA Topo service through
ESRI.
Web Soil Survey for Hennepin County, MN. Retrieved from
http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
Svoboda Ecological Resources 1 165 Fendale Road
Project No.:2014-026 '] Robert Brook
LITERATURE REFERENCED
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31.
103pp.
Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 2011. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of
Minnesota and Wisconsin, Third Edition. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 478pp,
unclassified.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Gleason, H.A. and A.C. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United
States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 910pp.
Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2014.
The National Wetland Plant List: 2014 Update of Wetland Ratings.
Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. http://wetland plants.usace.armv.miU
Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Circular 39. 67pp.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. August 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region(Version 2.0). ERDC/EL TR-10-16. Vicksburg,
MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Svoboda Ecological Resources 1165 Fendale Road
Project No.:2014-026 g Robert Brook
FIGURES
. . � z i. �l, .... -•- � ,! .t„7� , : + •• .� �i
l � ...� _2'- 7 � i — �j��,j l• • � . �, � .��� -..�` .
,,. �• �; � - #/• •A� •
/
, . . /� i. /•
_._..� _ .w... �7iRi.f�w►_� �,,,� �..� _� . �._. � � ,_.... .�...
• r � r, •� • •�`^.'.. �.. ���t . . `\ F..
Y� ���/ [��+ .... �-s�-:, ' i�• _ . �•{ \V\���� �� ,_ '
. . `. .T+ �T� �4 .• �, y •. •9`e � „Mi.�—:'�
t
��~�O`' . �� � �•� . • . � �� �' ' r+ �
. ' � µ ` s • 2• �'��.+�� . r 97�,
'f'P � j , �. • ' ' � �.. .�'+��-•-►.'- - j .' ^ ~ ; .
�. � '1— w • —-r...�''' . ' .�a.
C�r . 95d . • '"' +!_` '� �
1 �, .�. _ .
'� -�' ' � . i� ' .• _ ,• ''
� + }; Z._..',�i f''. ,• . _.,• , a., , -_ _ _ ,..,;_ _-, � ��..; � �,._
E .� �1�, . ��'t � � l Y � � * 4 � ` .J, •
Q \ �y -i---• ��� i+
� , 't � �S � '.,��. �ya` » y 'I ' 4 - -—
� � � � � � - ' .,
- � � � �;=: =���a' � . _ �� �.. :.w ,
� � • • a+ _ . 4-+* _� Q •
5 .�� �
� '��-w /1 �� �r . ��':O ��'`� �� — ..--• — � "' � .r.fl
� ,.,_ / ` \ w�,� � •� e ,.t .�.
���^\�`�
�- ` ..�. , V'��►'ai+a � -'� - � _ - �� �:c� ` -�--_, � : `'� �-�
, . . .
."r ,�,--.--.�-- ' '"Ca��F3c-Csicl� - _..•_ .,.,,_.:� �_,_y..�.__ _ . •
_-� -' ! • . ' , � ' � ° — -- \
.. �j
�� � � ... � �� 1 ' '�. ..-�+� ,4 .J
.
_•. , ��
.'� - �/ � . -- •�� • t� ��- � - 1`
- � '� � _ '�� �� - -'�� �� �
,�� �_ :r � { .
c }� � .��''•, ;r� � . �
, , .
� «,,: �. �. ' . • _ ..• � ; . � ..� a - �iE
.� ' •;��.'�,`� .:� � � � ►f}4a ',� .� ,' _9� � � � -
` _� /'` *_� �. �,
, :i� . i / � `�%~ - 3 � ;.,, ..
�..� �. • �`, � � /:� / � _. �l` f � ' ...,??5 r' 'y .
� � ti . �� 1 �.`�{'i.� ... ,r• �,s„ • i
' t . �/� � _ �..` •Q �. � ' O -.r.
��, t�, � V •� ��
t J • • �
. [�..• �'' �• . � Y .:.._:- • � —. �,�r'",��".�. ��, _. �� ?,_ � �
a �'`--�
� s •� , •t � ` ��:�•i• ��,,•*��~ -�_` ` � . � ,�, r Q �/k�:
, S . � � ' . ` ` .�� . � " ��
. _ , 'j • .,
. �. � O '� ,f �✓� \
�- - . •e.. - �f�� • t ... -. '7i'�"�4�e..«
� ���
_ _ .� ._ -�r, . .�. .. �
_ , -.- . _ ,z�. -+.-
.
,
.. � � _ . , , . . ` -� ,�., _..., .,��• f- - ,,'
.
i' „` ,Y' �� �/� � � �` _ ` .
.. - 7 .,. . _. , - - ..
, .- �
! �
. �., 'n' �� .... - � , • ' ,��• .� � � . +
�-
.b �� , . ,
..., 1
,. __ . �v , � .. , �
..r • o . �. �,. �.• ,r�"l� '�•. - • � t __ .•
- ! - � ' _. � .�• 1' • � • -�f _ "' 1'� Y ��• t,:T
. _
•� ��� . +� . . . .
_a. . .•� � .. � ,,,��„-.r`".".--."v'.�, !. � -
_ _ .�.a .-�. _ � �
. � -- --_- - - :-��.��_._ _�� _
. . ,
. , ...
.,. . r`''� �-��.s . . . '- - x.
..�,._ :a -r= • .
.� ..._._. •�._.1 ' ,+-_'�—=_t
.
-"_"'-�' � � � ; _„�_..._. •
_ % �r '�._�-- �_ �
� j '� ` o��$ _yy �� � � `
. Tan ag►er = .� . i . �, �
;_ L a ke � � : ,�,, �� ,�; j �'Q _ �' � �
, - f � � ti �,
,
, o. ~�_ � `�, � _ � �°�
. , �`, �o � w o ...-.— �� �
_ � , _ '�. -- ;j �,`"".� --..._. � t
_95,� , ,��• ' •, ."�'
�
Y ' •� 1�``. �"►
f • �
_ ��� t � 'r• '" Q ` t
.... �� ` �i - '.�,r �` �i , � .
- �� •, r' ��� /� '�n,� _�_,,,� "L�`��r' i �
� a
� ` '"� �.r• " k
� ; _-° _ , . �. �
- ---__. _,�. » ,..� _ _._..r.,- --_ _
..
. � J, �ti,. � �
/ � tio.
.� �'� `� 27-133-02 � �'� � ���
.� � ,�.-� �-
_ � r ..
� r: -�"�-.,� _
�"' �� ,-, �.�-'�'} ( - i
B a� ,� ; , �,.. � ,� , �
. �,�_^ -'� i �, '' ",� �. , 1 `�•.,�,,,��..,,,.i
. ,, ..,� �,.�'"� �;, ,� -
��.� 1 'L �� ��., ,��� � �
i� ��n�.. 5. . � ... ' • .
1 '. ' ' � Q Approximate Parcel Boundary
,� � Hrn�k�ts,
PorhC
r
T1i�N R23w so2 Overview Figure i
� Overlaid on Topographic Map 2014-026
i t, ��''"6 � �'`" � M�..�.�`''a:��� ..�� ��. '4�,� u��.. �
(." �,. �'3T.f '� ��"�`� ��, �, .�, � .
W' �.� 0.x -�� . � i � n"i � - " "Y �
�,.� �r �;.�' r� �`Y �, �� � 4���F �1� �� ��^�A � { ��'�`����,�� �y�.
� � ` 'A. .}e ..: � �' C .T k0
`8 • } i. �
� Ai�
p'�� � �. „ ' � �.'�N°`�w'�y� y* 7 .�'�1tdr ..
.'�'"� y�• y� e , � . ; ,
'� ��:� ".w , � �+. . ''2'� _amp"".�qiA�� •,� �� �v.�!�`. x� t����
v fi
P " ,
:. , �o, I�III'�i�It�i .,. x i°,y a s �:`�F.ic _ 7
�
� t4�' �' I -y - _ t" �. "� �"{` . 'r� a'���+r.-ti �a5�`-aR�:�,,,����� ni ' .��,��a M"
x .
�
�- a
� __� � �' r��,.�a.
,. � _ * .. ^ ... ,� . . .. �:..
'�'�� :.:., ., ��si ,� '� . .
^`.. . ' a � � .
� . , .. 5 .. «� .,+ ; , . s .
.•. r
s: .. ���` ' " �
�. . : ` " � a �t" -
� �"r_ FEP,iF �"� ; � -
, 8•
_
�- ,� � � ,�, .��y �,�
, �� � _�* ,��
F � � � Ik � ��'� �,� � ��` *� .�� tr M'
k �
... ,�:°�,�, _: t .� �� � ��
y� _� �r.• y
`.yl�� 4�- � � � *" _ t_Irk.. ew ���r
�, ���� �,� �, .� ,. �� t i� �,>
� \ � ��� „:
s � � Y ,�� "� �" "�s �
,, . ,„ � �
;f e"�_M . ,
`b �,,.. .�. .f � � `,�a
-,�. ".x.y��.t p :�`e
�,.� '� i �Q �+� � 1F ..fi`�r
. W� �� �"�� �� #� � .iar �
,u ,�`� ' �
z '�� . �
,�'� � ��i� F'Eh.9F
FUBF � �. R''� :,:� ��
''�� � �+ -�
;;.� �`� ��t �
� � �
�� � ; x �.�'A.
.�... �„ ^ 4�
,�r �
,►" �
� ,+���. .:
_.��b '� � K, �`� �"
,
, . . .. c
� � �1 -�'� -
, -'` r , . ,;. � c ,.. � -
`. ' � „�; `.
�f , , ��� '�5 . � :��r� ..� . .� �N"�I...
�' �
� � � a ,� � .'ai ������,.�{ ��
�"�kt '� .9A Y ..w- 'Z .. . y��'fi�pq�,_ � � � �\.\ �
i � .�'� '�^�.. I
'�°�� � " ^- °�� � r ,�;�
'�S� -. '� � � � 'k �€ ; �pa. �,�'� .
�, y �� R~ � '� � ��� ���fi -� * � ��
a a
.����:. •� �j�� �� ' # ,d *� „�� J�.. 'R;
� .
,
4 . � ! -
+' rz
j �
� �_ .. '� ;� .� . i �a$'_.�: r .._ .�?F� �L .
. . , - _ 4^u u� .,._ �!� : '
w...' ' � :r' � J ��' �
_ iY � _ �...Y .� �'
�,
��y ^ _ �ff �.��4,y ��
"� :A1 � ,� `'�:��� . "�
`� " '-,.: .e ;z
. #�
�` y�u�i�,[ '��r
� .. 'I. � - � ,,. ,,� ,F.; , .� v �
4��.. � _ t...
��`M`�
, �t �:: :� ,� „ � �� � � �� ��
;
��, * '�`� �s.
vY Z �'c ��' �\� ,�'' - �'.
# � �;'. � � '° �
�. ,� c
�'�
�,, �
- ,..`:�,:`..
� Approximate Parcel Boundary
Tl l�N R23w so2 National Wetland Inventory Figure 2a
Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo
, 2014-026
Fi�3 , -� r �k.,r. . . .
�� 4 �x���$%�� �M1�+,� a,w,. ` .
.
� �;. 5 �ul .� .
a
� G' � ;�µ
. � � µ ; r t ".i, � a
�ii ��..*�� �� . f�M I � .l�, �F T �pSR 1Fl� fi..y�:6Y S«� �iF� fL s .
�.., .� ,.4* 1� "'�}i.• .m g. ���}��.�,�WYq��+F� �.dlrt{
+�:d Y .,w � . �.M'�'W a� #
.: � � .i
f � � � �� w., � . � .a' ��'� �"# �+���` °w"alr��
>
; , u s
� �,* " .
�� � � # g�i��. '. ,�� � ., �.' s. # �.s�
i� �. ` :.,a.w . a� - . d�"s�.�; .�,- ` .�
� ; ` ,
�,, 'e ,� .�Mr> .�`s�', '"Y
, , � � _
ay, �; q w . ,� '�.,_ ! �g � .
�...
�.� � � �,��, �' ,�h ,�t � � ... I
,
_ .
,. � .
,�'' . # � � 4y . Fu 4 .,�i „ � . (
� �� .�t - yrt :Y +�$t'. s
., .. t • . # . • . �..��YP.�� e.. ,f .
' �� •, . � � •. ;,: yf� � u � � . -.
°'Ai� !Ye •Y.} _ � . "_tl# xr ,
�.:.. C � � �"�, .. Y ro .' ��:, . � . � � . R -� , .
y& .� ,_ A . . �t +� � q. �' =� a � ' �� #�_.� . . .
;�1.y � � .,k. ,. ,3�. F::�,,'M� . y ��t v. . "
�. �
�r y� 'g
� "� �� � �L � �,�, �� �� �, ��� �� �, '
��Q`& �. ��' ��,, �"�i� �� � � ,
.
,p + +R� � � . "" . .,s «r.
1�, y ' '��, f ' 'df�c.i t �j,�, 7d.6 3 � � µ . _ �,q. � +�Yk"
M� F �� �; ��4 :,.,,,"$'" * ��#pt._� k� y.�
# $ �[
., �� � � r i��.• � d� �.._ ... £��^��.
�.'�� 4.� y�.�� �� �.. �, ' � '� ��t a�,�.,,� ��,
.,,. � ,.„g ���;+�' - !. � ;��ri �
+�ev� �. ����,, � +��4��"�;�.� "� ,r`B,EI��e '� � � „�,� s
F•S 3UF , �. `_' x� 3 �� '7�k,�, if . . . . ��,' � ..
, �.. � ' � ,�r'' ... .-p . . '}'" r
:\� .. , x �.;,. ` �_�� � � ��
. .
..-
.
, S ,,.-,� `� -�
: , 4�� M 5 a'� \�I�I� -. � M , .�" _X , . �y 1p`, � 'F} .
��'4 . . 11� f0 �"i*9, v 11"�tuf y��' . . .. S:�:.
- : .n -��* t rc
t�
. � �.:. • � T '.4� /�Y ��dy,_• � ._� ,�. ^ � �'�..
{
* € �= D K u � t, �t
f
-M�. .,i�y �.. ..
��.,F . ��\ �F '�i ��'`�� m# n N_.��` _€a
. =9:�K- , 6,�, , +�'� iR^"
�k eiR .�_ , » � . � .r-.�.
��. .�' � ��� __9F.. � , � � � .,�N Ir
- + � '+� ,��.
.. i„��„,� ,� � � � �� o
°'�r � i
..t �"`��� t' � t u,� t� ��` �����p.°���y"".�� �Yf��w�h � ��'
.�
s ' +�'Ml.��. �� '° � �t' " �" � i
; � . .
- ,,
,, � � �
,.�
'�
v . , +�
� �,;� ,. ,.. .� . x,�
� � s� Z� �. .rx .Y� e�. '"".. ris� � �
1 �� ... � # �t.�, ,��; ., �:� '�•� ,i � .
Y... k �. ° � � � ,..4 ..
.. �` ,�q� ' ��._' uF. -� �9 1 .��'�r , ����
� d�ir^�� �'` � � � ".�� �'�, � � ti r:� t�sr r. � k
e ' w 'Ir ,�' �
. � �$�, * "".''F �. °'.j�, - V' � 1���. � ���
r
. �. d, .- . ��
� . •�� .� . �, �•. � C'
_� ,
' : � '':-r � ��:'r'' �.�;.. ,...�, „ , . . ,� wi
� H� �.� � ��.�� �� pp ' , r
�'� � �. �`� � # ,�,.
, �r ��� .�
, x�� � ,� .�:� _
�� {.: � �
. �
� �- C
. .. '.�'_ .. �_.�,� � � ` I f�:.�.i^.
� � � �� �
�� ,
`�" 1MA '� ����' ,�
` � s'�� �:
�� ' .;'��
•�*.
, ,:`A� —
�. ,
''��,�" ,\ 1
_ �
,� '�
,
!:� '��
�; . � s.t�
y � �+iF
��'� n`; ,�.�'
��x;a ` � :
�. �',o.h .�i, ',��� �� � � f.
�j A'�..' �....
�f k'.
''�� Potential Wetland
�;� r
� Approximate Parcel Boundary
' " ' '�--� " �tennepin County V�V�etland Inventory Figure 2b
Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo
i 2014-026
PF01A
,�
y ';
�: �
�
�� � �� � PEM1C
�;
` � —��
� ` �
� �v � , " * .`
PENI�1 C �' �
�_
��:. �
� �� . �
� �� - �.��
P , � ���
� ���.
, ' � �, �,i ��� ���
� ,.
i' ��,, ,� �,
4„
� �- �� � �,'
, „..
��„ .� � � ,
. „�, � �, �
�, . .
,. �,� � t ���.„ ` ;
� � � V. — '�
;� . �� ���r� ��h �I''
� �..� i,,... tb�y..�.. �
c
ri� �i I •
�� .. ' , .` ' 3
ro� � .� �- �`�
j � $ ;�,, � g�; . � � , PEM 1 F
.��: . . �E � � �?� .,�p �,.♦ r'4, .� � q �
� . * � �t♦ _ ,�y , � . �'q _ —, ir�;
� . � '�. t ` ..
}-.. � '�.�xa . a��� �. ,.
I � '�� ���. �ae x�'�4 ���� =3 <k t.�
- �� � �� � �' . � �'�' *� ������
� � _ "� , Ai� � ,� � ���4 s,
� �
�� ';1;-K `.�'c'�f"'��' '� F bi���`�7 ;�{` '�k- r'b`� ��.s��
� ��y�a' . ��,.;n W 'S5� �� .���._` TF `i � i f � �
. �b� . � � � �S�
. _ �� � ���*� ��
. . _ .� ��1'...
�#� � ��,�.s �.
�
�,��, � ' ��
,,�
<�
♦
L2UBH
� ;
' ` �= e
° ;� � Approximate Parcel Boundary
,� 2014 DNR NWI Update
-rll�N RZ�w so2 2014 DNR NWI Update Figure 2c
Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo
, 2014-026
1 ��� �":� � � � �- *� �'.;� �� '�%�,�,(i�j6"�"�if'*�} '� ��.:�����'`'�����'�a`F� '�-.- `f ^� „'
�
�' � � � /ers +�•c
�5 ; � � a�� ,� �` � �..�. '°�� � 41s�.r� � �" � � *i
�; �
�� ,� � �' ��s�t ��� � � ��.�
>xL ''�° � � �`� �,�'is��'-'� %`�;h, ,� ",� .'� � ,�^. ,1' f,,'9�i ��4/�' i �a"���s i,s,T
� �� ^�R ��. ��, �• %� �� �����. � �,;�� �' ����� �
�+,.. �c,.,- . � � ,� F yp� � �,��'��.�;
a. � �f-, /. . . /� ..�`,` / / .� a;l,� ,.�� ��`"�;� ''�'f`�'7 .�'��,�i'wk�,+. �b: .l ,�
'� •`_. ' /�,/����"'.:;' ' � ,�. . �� �..�, � �d/f. ,,o-ti"°��+`,�"t`r�
l; .: �i m � � �
� , ,: i ,i,' � "( � ��v ,F"../&��� �/ ,�/�
�����-,, *�.�'"s� / ,Y�i />�� r/��� ���^��` ���;� �''�/./`��� "� �}'�
;�°' . �.�/��� � ' fi �$`.,A���i�� '�'�s� � �
, , ,�.�' ,�€� / �� , `�� .:��-•,�,��, �'��� � �' ��
�.. � � �� ^�/ �, rg � �, � � ' ,
, ,
� f � /r.�v. . + '� � F/ ,.`�n� � �f
� ��i ���' /. �.�
�� ��� r�< ,/i� ,��, i ��+ ,� � � �< , f �� �� �`,
.."s� � � ��r'r r � .�.�,�Aq�^ ;�..'.q�'��� `,��". � /% � .{/,.i� `. ,,�, / /// . '�s
�-_ ���� � �� �.� � �� '` .� s «.k /�� h'� �>��, �f /,
Y y �; u ' �I, �,t �4��> �'Y'�`r a.� s' `� � � Y� � �� �' ��� /�/�_
� � . . 3 "aw ��, �y e /� r
.
,�C�\3 ;� � "�� ..;�;� '�,g��� ��/y;�� r;.�,q'+�� -,� � �" �I�,,,�`/E� y'.
e��•��`;�F �� �' � � ,, . s �'�.,� /F�.* 'sb � � e'�✓,r�"�"�J��'� 7ria`
�'��"�'��` '�, '�� � �F��,°�` ,' , �, ''�"�`"/'',,���" �, �'�i` ` ���`�'���,'� y �;
� �,, M
r�i/�.���,'��'° ,�'� �„ .� /� �. . i' � �%� � ` � �1�4�,� %�,�`..
.
� ��`+"���� � ^�"�L< < . �����,t;"��b' ;,¢�� �=,� � yr��bT� ���:F���. / � �Y"/� � � ����:.
j � :> i� � 'i � ,�� �,;i';,�." � 3 � ;��` :t��
'� ;�;% 't,�"`��� .���,�� �i : �%,�,y���* • .� ���' .,�`°'��' ���
.� EF:�
, ,� � � �,s� � : „,
� �r � � �` ,
�,�'�,������ ����'��� j��,����„����,! '�.vy��i'/�/�� � '� ���+�,��� ',
� �R�� �� 7 /
,F �,� .../•i � �i;i,. y�- �,fr�,,,,��`�:. / .,p�'.'if; �� .��.�?� �, �/��.'<"��/iY
'.A�'. � ��`� 'I��'` - ^'-� �l�r', i�� i ` , i �`ti. ��,� �al�+,�x;
'-� � , � . �ti���''�
"';�..- '�a� � `� ���� �'�"���� ' � '�',� �''�s ,� � ���" ,'°�'����
� ° f � �� <r�'�•� ,,� '�r ;��r�' ; � ��.� ?'�, ���
,� �. � ,�J � , , � .
� .,
;
� '�.'�... ' ;. ' � � ,Ap. �F/ ;
%� �'�i�" � � � � i� 1 1 ' @..t •. ' 1 � 1 � � ' � � �e e f ��(�b' i �
� / � �.
'� f1t � _ ___. I �'� ,��� � ����� �f��: /�� �' ' � ' - ✓��o�,� ��`I+M�r �'�•��Y4. ✓ ��
,�,/� ".� �"���� �i' Y/ �-^A'��%''�r�p .F���� ���/ h �,w �, �4�� "y't�� 'r;f�'^�►���.��"",i
(/� �i',� :r��� � ._r�� �,��'�� '� ...� M, �*+�.�'"y -�,���� I
���a��'"�` r�' ,�`eE`�.A►.����'.r�.nsi�.iif• �'� � �u��{ e�'s*� 'h� r.��r''� �� -��
,� � ,(� r,�.� � s.�„ . � �
,
, , , , ��
��( � m.�?� �,��i �i ,r :E`',� ,.n ,�f� �M Mi
�'' li���� ��/� ;fi'� �'�"'!P`��� �<iy � . y„�vg�."..�� ;.�,ys' " ���",fr'"- .,� �
!�
�.,�i � ��/'4' ��v�'� ,f ���,�y,g,��p��� 1s�'j .�S,- �`
.� '�������� .� .,f�i f�k.�`F ,.� ���,.�.��� f.�.� F /''+Y.�ffa'�� ,�4�, 3 �� 4,��".
. ��.+ ,�"<. � �,�' � .�i�' ,� ��;��� @ : � � , /�y� �,� �.. �'��
e Q � / �{� �i'•(;�:Av � a � �� e �� � � 1 ��K" �� � F 4�7'��� f
� ��,� 9 ` �`5,,� �., � l` �, � ��,�����.� <��� � y� �`����' ���',��
,�����`�`��`�� �° �� F�, ' �, �� ��'�.��,� ����g� ��`� � .��.
��� ��14' <;�, f(�,.�` ��: �' �� ��,�� ,. .�,�,��, `� 't� �%�,��, ,� � ��:. .�'`. ,R.�-
.'i�- `,,�„�►,.f€'� ',;' '�' , - �"" '� � � 'yyy�,� �, -� f' `'� ,�, ,,�'�` �
� ,;_ b,; ;
`��' :a�� ,^�" - � `� .,�# �'� � �a,��^`� �,'�`� "',����v
"� ,g ��°
'�,� ��. '--'"° �,�"� j" ��,/,,R;/ ��`� ✓
.b.�
t� � �� .�
"`��''�` ,, � ,�..�'`/`�'''�'�',��' �, ,�� E� , :,
,�` p,�`�: /+► _ i�,�.� �� ��; <�`�,��,�. ,,,�
�`�`• a •`'r �.;��•�1'�s �� , �. �� �� �a �� �,�'
' ��� � � .���� � � ���F . ��� ��.��� �
f'i
��,��. �y� � ,�cr�',�. � � d �`� 4 ��
� f���`�,,�. � � ���� � � �� ��rj , '��
� .�4A7" '�...;�' �r�:l � ;G" .� '� �� , .�.
��� �3�. � Y�� pi ���. w�.tk ��.��°. � .�
r � ,;.�� �
. b�,��: , , � � �'������"��, ' -��
� �
�`�.�.��� � -�
� � -�:�
.�-.�� .
.� � �
� � .�� ����
;� �
�
L� Approximate Parcel Boundary
�"6� �" �;' 4 '� �^`���,�,�y �. t �zY� �.,e � � S O I I S
�,� �� - �� ..� S� �����'6��������� tii�� �A16�' � ` f F _
� �. �a� �;��'�'d��`�^�����"�'��;����` �'� ,��,��� � Hydric
Y ^ ` �� `�` .�� °"';,��e� ���'�'� +�� '��m�. +u��';? ��� i ' '�`
`: �k ��.�.�„ ���;�.
�� Not rated or not available
� /�`�- ��
� , , � , ' � � Predominantly hydric
� ��/� „�,,
'�'��, .a: . . .�l�.:A �`'`�,'°�
� � � ��- �� ` - l�ennepin �;ounty �oil Survey Figure 3
Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo
, 2014-026
I ��$��1,• �;�R �"-�� ,�'��` t o-e'��� �w z�M''���,A�.�� _..e 4� �.� � .
. � ��E �' � ,`T. � .�+�
y . w� ���r„`'+ � a .� y
�' ��� :� 4r x � ��� k °� ' a�� w ^ +r^ a
� � �p �;;: �� � �, �, � -,� �,�,�'*,� � �.
�_�' � ''�N' ";�U e� +�(� ,�. '�"�x "`�����'° ,.
� %g� s� v ��` � a �. �s a� "' �r� .w'^�� �*'�+���FM� �.
,
�G "� "�"'� 'g '!n .� �k ,K ^�•. ��q` r+'R.� .K ,��� .:������,..��l4t
, ' -
.
.� � e ,,�` '� '. . ,�
; .� , ,, F_
���K. '�'�+u. "»"�^" ' . " �s ` y y ,.�+Ify.�, , ;y�,�.�,�a,.�� x���.�,
� �(4 �
= •
�,�f;� � . < . e{ . r "�g " r;�„;�•` . . � �, �� .
e
� �jy� � a x
� y�� "� ' �` fi�. � .� � '#jl �' ' ..�� ,� .
,. }�.il�x�� '�.. �. �. r - .. .
tl�+ •. ' �' �'�� .��� o . .
'F��;.. ,., . . .. h . .. ...b ¢` � _ .
x " . ,
� *�* ' T�. ,� .* .: . .h• � ��.�,.. r� . , .;
�� ,� „ �. 'f ,
� '�� � -� . ';�,h4. +„�� '+ry `at ..u� ��� p, ..
.� � #
.<� �� 4��_� ; ��� .:� .:�� Z
, � , >.,� ,� , x
�' �'� _ '^ �n . J
M h. I�
���. '�Et. r�a�� r� � � ��� �� ���V� ���I r�����,.
�+� �. i� I
i ��� -� . � � �,'� �-� ���
. �; � �� � '��
7^'.' :
,�.�. �i • w
��a� � ��� y� ��#�;�,`�a,`�+
h �- �.1 ��-p ,� +T 5�..
. _ p � y�Y �� � � �"� � .
!Pt p "�
���,�s \ _R'��`,�i-_.�, aR ' X
k R • . s ;
#. �i \ . �.l, � r ... ..
�\'", r �\�� � �*' � .,,+ .
,� � � � ���� "'�
� , s
' ' " '' ��' � *'�G Femdale Marsh
;.,..
M ,�•x� ��. � �` �� ��r.
, . ,
}���` . � ��. � � #�k�.
r
. / . �.:�..; .
y
�
+ :.,. r1:._. a-.� i t�!,'� - �..y�� t� d •yr`
� . '�� � e s . =.�. ,ry
� � '
. \5 pr
:"� , �a,M, �4 . � '�
' ' � ,
t
Y :., . , F v,� � y �
��" 1�'.y�1, ke '+� . �� `�r ��F
�ua�
'-. +� � `�F '� ' � �'~`
j . �.. � ' ,; �y;.�,.' ..� . - .x ....... E_
. 9 2 � .F, . �� �J ��
.R.. 1 �� � •�{� r ��" �+" � � �¢ rt� �*Fr
i '�k. ' �� f� .,y��d� �� d \ A
'�'�" ��' , � � � �� �� ����g.. ., .. ,�
� � �
r , ,�:" g ''�. 9t� a.� -R�� �`+�(: ,4� .
� i ,�� .� � ,�syg - �' °u',� `i,;�`
� ��� '4;�� ��;;,,�„ '� r�' " �a
� ir
�� �_� � �
'� " ��; � _{
, '�� s ----_.—� $
�p. � � ��' , � \�,. � , �
�� _.—' �` � ..��"�a>�� �
"�,> F
' ; x- y � �� ���i�, �r,s� ��.�. s� �'',�'.;� �
F
�o, ,f�} � . � „?� + a;�.-�+."`tn�u��h'i"�����" ..n ���,��^�`-.`.�:�..� :,�:: ` .�� ��
.,. s ;
, . ,. , ... . ,
P ,� ' . . . r� - . � '.
�,.
# ' `
,
„ � �,����,
. m .
�� �� ����* $...k�,��..µr"t -' > , . a ,- � �, �
_, �
�.�-
i
Minnetonka-Lower Lake
i
27-133-02
A,�
�
�
'�� ��'��. �..��«� ,��r�a✓��.��,� � �
� � ��� "����' ��
,�. �' r� ��
r �s
r ,� Approximate Parcel Boundary
3�,;� s,,,�r m
-��11�N RZ,w so2 public Waters Inventory Figure 4
� Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo 2014-026
� - ++��._ M� •, . ,� � .� �. . .,;J � ^�, .
j � �M ��* °� ��� °�� „� '� � �;P��.{ , � _'��;
>
n, �y,'�^ ,�� �,. � °�g M � *� . � r` "�
� r ,�p - .ff ,� k, � .ra��,."- �;'+� "°°�t� �' .�^ �«
��,, �'n� ���, �,$ €� �x� � qpr �`'"� �.:;. ,. � +��:� �`,� . �,3�"�-��„
� ' � , .. .- ,... . - :.�
$.�. . .� �,. '� . ,.
�- , ,�, ��a ' � a�'�� -. ., `� , a �y,�'d � ��, , � ..�Y�g,� � .�a�"�qe:�a�ut,.
.
�� ' f �•� i � . t �,� "�. . $�,�:•�� . t.� tl��, ��� ��k�k�'.
�.J��� � �
�}n _ �' .. .. , � � . �4 � � ��j � . :��4�
rYP - y .:` +�V wM�a ��'+y� l�.m�,�, *. �` �'�'�. .
`��4� . �wt � �1 N"�'�r m;s€ d �'.�`V� �..,rw. �.
"^. "� '�'^.+'�t, �` ,,' � �14'�'. ab�R.,�w
�r , # �` � Y � � ��`9� �� � �. �� �'"
. � � ;' ��w } � �� �u �A' 'g'YNJ�, x �> � '��y ��� u�^
�
• r J
�
r �4 _
r
' r „ ;
! y� �. . / . !7n� � _,my r
iy a, � ' tA. � . . f p, 4 . c.. . iR �
�'.�4. �: : . � {16" � ..` �'e �.�'�R �i�� ..Y r�, �.T .�..�' � �.._-
,y >. ... . . ♦ f. ..df ; �, - a . � , . 4. �.
. Fx y i. ' .� : ,
�. � a ..; ' . �� . ,� W � "�
� � �� _ � ..,.�� �.��'7
�'.. �_ xa% � . �'a *;;` � � �
� . � ..
��,i�. � 'ti �t V S a� ., ����� µ+' a� y � . .. � ..
. —yk . "� , �tj� " * .� •, �.
� "R
. t � � «�
. �s n°�l� � '�.
� ,. Y .: �- � �11�
\ _ � y
�
� �w. �t� _ ... k � � �,�
� u` � ` .. }F �`. � F, - r; ' � � .
�
�. � � ,� ,y t � �, " �,�,,'w
; � �m
I • 'LL� ,�,. .�aP� �„���t'..�
{� a a
� � et, � �'
: '�"�s� ;AI1�r"o � 'i°�` �, ��,��'�t
,
� ,� 7t; ;s
, •.
� � � � , ti � �
� -.
+�� � �' ` " .F, �
` . - . �-.`a' ..;t C'* �� k j . _. * F��,� .
r , h
�� ' r 'n .� ,�,
,:,.. � _. � .�=' 3 . . � , �' y
.
"� +�y � t'7r� � -4''
. ��. +�jf,s � a . ,m .
. � r
. ,. a �7F � s � „ � � < . �
., � _
�a , ,
�.� , �'� ' : .., �.. �� �w v►...
'*� r
.��'�: . . y� #„� ' �:��,�, � � �� � * � i��
�
yy .. . R�'. . a .� 4 $...
.
�• a s
��
i., � . `. .' " a . i ". �
� __��l � ae� � f,* - n.M � '� yy
M-�, .y4 �� £'`�� k 4 R � '{ #� s� � •F
- �%°`�e`� �� 9 _ � , . ., .
*.�* �
�4:.c . ��� � *� ,� � �,� . �� y4'
` .
yt n � �
���� �¢ !` ,�y� { # '3 ,.# «8�� ����� �
j �N" X .��s,_ {�.; _ ����
I 'f�6�� ��+j� fif� �"� :\�. - � •A��� ,�"�P` ry! � I
� ��:�� � � �. � ��'��.� ' � �'� ,�� . .�
.
; , -i .
�' ` '8 � � �'ffi�,. �,�
. . .yK F, 'i t �A � ;_
�I �"I�.. � `�! �r����+ ryl •. � `�� l�� A �'�
�
. ^ �`.�� g�
� y
�. '�.. a �.. 4' ' - �� , a �} �"'Ir .�#
9
#t u 'a w` '�
' :> . > � � " . ,.
� � 4�'� �> ��� ,�4 : �3
�.�. • �, � � . ... .�
. : , �, w
_�� �E� � ,:�� - � � �
� p f _ �� g�,�s �%
'_ { �.z� � tiY�'A f'>'° ��„� x� ���•6{„ Yl �, �sp. ��,4€'� :3�-.
T .
.. � :�+. .� t�'.. s_ `M � Y }J' � ��. '� � rt �:
:; . �M , dlr'� 5c .,� fi
�:
�.� � ..;�.:, ^� � ,F �,;, �',•�.�+k" �" . �� .
. k,- ... ,wy, $�*r ,�x`� � .. � -. .,� �' _��� .
. �._ ' , ,Y �� .
. ����',yI'I1� -�"� �'.� � . �� ,r� �'
i .. T�. " . �.' A ¢ ,�&�, �
,
� �'�, .1��' ��,k\� �
i � . � �7 }� :�?�i � �y.'�� _
�. ��. \
�4k*'i �,�.;Z �'br
j.` qy F�'�. �v". ,�f;�'�„( � ,.� _'.. �. . k
� . ". .���,... , � � '� .. '
�.�.
� � $�t.. - 'A�
,���`;j�N 4�
.Vl
¢ �
*
�
t
.� � `���� � �� } },
_ ,w_:.
�
�.� � Approximate Wetland Boundary
_ Y,�„ .
� � Approximate Parcel Boundary
„,:,� � `
i ,:;
� � ��-� ' � - Approximate �Vetiand Boundary Figure 5
Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo
, 2014-026
' � '�e � �''"� � ,��``' �/y �i� , �''`"�.�° � ' �,, ,� ,� j
� � �. �'�+ h� ���� . `q. �. �F ����/t�� �� •,'�'����' � ,�"'��/ � ,r ,i . �
�'' �` �" ;'�r � ,�`3�'�� /i ��^�` +'�` �', , �`
{ . . �``. �'� ;S � . .. . .:� �����5, f_�5'�;� ' .�.��✓ i r.. , �` �� . .
�` �4. ,.�, .,w�M , .. '/,f ,"fy` ./��� �����, -��Yr.�, i %�:`",i:. �// ��� ���f� /r
�', �� � W f
'� � �d�'"/c''k �Y'�r . fi � - i . ��,�����
�` i 4- .6r� � x,� ��:�R"�� �� � �dn� � � E'4 ,Aey ��^���` � J
� � �
l' �
� 'y�� .^f�' / .r, / �j /� / ' / �" 4�,A ,� . �✓.�,w.� ��FY ��:��� y�.
�14 �.�/
Y" fyL�'��, /�' £j y� e ,P�ro�/ � � �g,,�y /
,�°�^������� ; ;�%`/.,' �' ��/ � �� e�v�:� r�i'��,��� . / ,.�+i'+��/� �/�`��,.�.,,.,�Y'�+� 'y/���jry,':
�f f �iFfD�6� ��,,,/ r/J" rr/��y 9 . '�F � .
�""..�g�� � '''i'iL�'f . ,�.A ,�1/ _ /�r � s �" �- ��� f � f �'� � .F "�/.�
.
���` � '�'�� ^{� 1, ,� / �. .,, �� / '",� {,�%f�-, '�it��,�u9,� � d �;�� ,p-r '✓��'
.. Q'f / '4 ,�:� �/n�� �'� /' �,�►�� �/ �/Y/��1'��"�����,�Y��i`�rj �/ �✓/�.
i�
6
� i ,; � / � � , F � . / '� /.
�,�j� �f,, %��� ... �� z f�� %a��,� i�� i`4U�'�°% . .� �/r/ �' � ; , / / ,
„� /r ' �
" � � �T �i .�� � �;,;u= '�,' ;',� � � x �� � �'>,, � ,; , �
� . ' � /�
/�'"'�! "� { �.� -.� � ' ��y,f �� 'rti,/�� .s� w.�'" y..i�i f� �! � � /.�` �.
� ��� �,�, � �� � "r,�`��'� ,�� ,�' ,, ��,�,�a`,�, � '� � �� ,,1� .�%��,..,
� '���'.�"i ��`"����;/ i°.':r"t"'�,. �' � . F ��� .'%,,,�~" ''��'��1 ^�w,Jt..�'/ �'"r'} ';€�i�`�j`''�r'%" "'� f,.,
���� > ��` i, .,�,�� /.�i .� %� � �^�+.��(iR,�,�"4� �� �� I f � �e �� �'y� r,��
^ ' �fi�"
i4 ` , ./'if ry�� .,�' " E . .�' %
�"� /�,����s�� y��� .,✓ / �if�/' . '�f �^� � �� p/�� � �.� �/j � ����� �..
�� ��� � ) � ..+�'" �'9� � /'% 'A'_�.� Ji,� 3,#,��i.�%N/ _Yy:���,''S,A
� '9'. ��{/�:�"',".`� � ���'$' �i '�� ��w,/�¢'�� � � '.F��,� f� ,4/�t�!Y� ;! �,.
'����,�����"' �"� �"/ '�i "fr ,� ��/�� ��'�` �/.y""�� �; ` ' Y� i���/�.r�w//'//If �,
���� .���,�,L"� . i ��/�P. '�{.�// � // �. / ��Y i�':. T/•/''..�q . .
�, i /
� r��-.f�'� ,�/� . .�,,;(�� /�5. �'�/, :�... . � M�►,! �✓..�j'e '��1/ ,
' F�;« �. �� �T .� � ,. ���`"� / . , �/� �'i'',����� � W:%i�;
��,� ...1 , �,�'� ',�,.'g .�j�' �.\9������ , i-� � � f, � ..;,�� ..� ,�
� �
����, � Y'� ."E L i �,8 �,+ .r
i �.. . ��` v+ . �f;. r�"�4 . j� . �"�- �� �r�nr
,�`� _/e � � � e • � �, R " �0� ' Q� :.:� � � ��►.�{T� .� /��. �%' yi ��
' � � � �
. � � f yY� � . V/ W ry /_ #t ai�.��! � �A: *5�!Ly ���y I
'��� '�,� '_. E s,�,� �� "�� ��F . ; y-�'. ✓/� ��r,�`y.,�✓'�� -�.�����B.s '� �;
��r"tY'rf' i� �� ��fs+��°F� ��� � ��,'� f , ��!r, -��� 4��c� �` �,r t1�v`4, �',,
� •�� :� �►�✓ :;� a �� y ,� ��� , , ., , 7" .y„ .:,�.,,�,,,� ,.p'';/
� . .
�%'�`� ' F�' �� �/����� � '�� ' .���� i
� .. ���j .� „��i'��"�� � � �� ��,�. r �^yv �� ���� S
C'� �
^�� Q F'`�' �� '#,�.,,`^��"�°t »�i �,F � � '
� y �
� � ��e,�.,�i ,�'�9 ✓,�r�� ,�'�` ..�„� � / ,�`f+�` ..,� ^' , r:„,y � �
� � ��'.�`�,w,p�.:a . ..:��f �'� //�c���������i . � ��� �"�„�" � - �. !�' .�
, ;.M'' . �� ,.�^.
,��y� M' �`, rt���s� � � .,J� ,�1�,�3 A, :f ,r�,����� �•'�f�.r� �i* i I
�. �
. '��'W„i� ��.o . �.�, s /�i sry, �; ,'q����. .��a ��;,�„'� � �'
9 �4�` E , �� � s 5 9 " �� �:� rx �y, � � �� �.M,�;`� ��
�� „���.' M �� w��� f�sy A ,�� �'�,f '� ��Y���} ` /% ���•�,�
1 D��y 4 � � � � �1� ti/.r��. ,y., ,.� �� ��� 3i .� h���7
�,/ .� �,( �!W ,C / ¢1
�� y �✓r%iv3 '�����'� 4 •te `f.k°' r `i� , � *,�`y' '�����Q � 'i�"� ��f5`�` � f�.,
.,�����i � �� ,�w�4,�i _:,d:�����6��`Is.�'�'��"�, ✓ t ���`'"� �."�+" �d y �'Fr°���; � «,�!`',�-�
, , „���,��� Y�'.,��'�.,�'� �', ,�,'� :�� .�� +�,!���;�.f �, �..�'�,. ;. �
t�`" ��,°,. ��'��E"" �'�� � ,,,1, �.r+�J,�, `�I ,�� �!� +$�'� ti;�,� �
,- �
; `�c:���.:�� '°'��=.; - �,�.�'/I�"/i.�`�._'��s.`'�"��;�.�`���''I '�� '�����,g(+;�
�� r� �"`��� �'`� ��`�;�� " � ���
�� ~+�% �� � � F.
fi,���►, � ` �+� � a;�F�',�r�, �" �
r �
. , ,�
� � , ��. �,. ;%a��., '� ,,
i. � � ➢������� �
��'w ''�'�'� `'�A
�+�� `�- ��.� - ��,�.,!��, .�1
� ��� ��
������� �
� �� �
� �
-��� ��t �����,
,.�i
Approximate Wetland Boundary
QApproximate Parcel Boundary
� � `� $OI�S
Y < - � ,��i ��,p� ,,�
� � � S' t � 1'a� ��4 W�'�py&3 y�� r�$�' t�,�[+^+'�Y�,���r� e.
'' . �` a,-�� '�� �y�'�t�'�S�5 "�'p�` r�4"�` �4`�"4�" .,,t'A'✓ �' �e.
>'t } � � � '�,����������, '��`�� � Hydric
a, r� t;� F , a�;�'s��Fa � ��`�§M r;U�� ;;�v�-�3'� � � i , ,� a� '
;��� �' ��'� � f f '� ��� Not rated or not available
��� �`/ �
;�,, � , j; ; � Predominantly hydnc
��, f �
FY�� . �'/`��' "-�
� � � '�- ' - i�etlanci liounc�ary and Soils Figure 6
Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo
i 2014-026
THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION
Field Data Sheets
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-1-11
ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 UP
Investigator(s): BKB 5ection,Township, Range: SEC 2, T117N R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): hilltop Local relief(concave, convex, none): none
Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit NameMuskego, Blue Earth and Houghton, soils ponded VWI Classification: PUBF
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no, explain in remarks)
Are vegetation ,soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlarn N
Wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details.
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2 Populus deltoides 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species
5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B)
40 =Total Cover
Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 Rhamnus cathartica 35 Y FAC Total %Cover of:
2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50
4 FAC species 85 x 3= 255
5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
35 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 110 (A) 305 (B)
1 Rhamnus cathartica 35 Y FAC Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.77
2
3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance test is>50%
6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0'
� Morphogical adaptations`(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
g separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
35 =Total Cover (explain)
WOOdY ville StfatUm (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
� present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc*' Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 3/2 Loamy Sand
9-13 10YR 2/1 Sandy Loam
13-16 10YR 2/1 99 10YR 3/3 1 C M Sandy Loam
16-21 10YR 5/3 80 10YR 3/4 20 C M Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L)
Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? N
Depth(inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Surtace Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surtace Soil Cracks(B6)
High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland
Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology
Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampiing Date: 11-1-11
ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 WET
Investigator(s): BKB 3ection, Township, Range: SEC 2,T117N R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): concave
Siope(%): 1 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit NameMuskego, Blue Earth and Houghton, soils ponded VWI Classification: PUBF
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlarn Y
Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details.
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 25 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2 Populus deltoides 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 5 (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species
5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00°/o (A/B)
40 =Total Cover
Saplin4/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total %Cover of:
2 Rhamnus frangula 10 Y FAC OBL species 15 x 1 = 15
3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50
4 FAC species 35 x 3= 105
5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
20 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 75 (A) 170 (B)
1 Iris versicolor 15 Y OBL Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.27
2
3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance test is>50%
6 X Prevalence index is_<3.0'
� Morphogicai adaptations'(provide
$ supporting data in Remarks or on a
9 separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation"
15 =Total Cover (explain)
WoodV vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
1 present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) °/o Color(moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 2/1 Oe/Hemic
4-10 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 5/3 20 C M Sand
10-18 N 2.5/0 90 10GY 5/1 10 C M Sandy Clay Loam
*Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. "'Location: PL= Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histisol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L)
Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L,R)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
X 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? Y
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required check all that applvl Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610)
X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland
Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology
Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): surface present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-1-11
ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 2-1 UP
Investigator(s): BKB 3ection, Township, Range: SEC 2, T117N R23W
Landform (hillslope,terrace, etc.): hilltop Local relief(concave, convex, none): none
Slope(%): 1 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit NameTadkee depressional complex VWI Classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlan� N
Wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details.
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species
� that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species
5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.67% (A/B)
0 =Total Cover
Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 Sambucus canadensis 5 Y FACW Total%Cover of:
2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
3 FACW species 20 x 2= 40
4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30
5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80
5 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 50 (A) 150 (B)
1 Phalaris arundinacea 15 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.00
2 Solidago canadensis 15 Y FACU
3 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 Rhamnus cathartica 5 N FAC Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 Solanum dulcamara 5 N FAC X Dominance test is>50%
6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0*
� Morphogical adaptations*(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
g separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
45 =Total Cover (explain)
Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
� present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
SOIL Sampling Point: 2-1 UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc"' Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 3/2 Sandy Loam
14-17 5Y 2/1 99 5 GY 5/1 1 C M Sandy Clay Loam
17-20 5 GY 5/1 95 10YR 3/3 5 C M Sandy Clay Loam
*Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histisol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L)
Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Stratifled Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? N
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that applv) Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland
Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology
Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 15 present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
ProjecUSite 1165 Ferndale Road City/County: Wayzata/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11-1-11
ApplicanUOwner: Robert Brook State: MN Sampling Point: 2-1 WET
Investigator(s): BKB 3ection,Township, Range: SEC 2, T117N R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): toeslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): concave
Slope(%): 2 Lat: 44.9674 Long: 93.5522 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit NameTadkee depressional complex VWI Classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlarn Y
Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
Preceding 3-month period was very dry. See text for details.
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species
� that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species
5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B)
0 =Total Cover
Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft radius ) Prevalence index Worksheet
1 Sambucus canadensis 10 Y FACW Total %Cover of:
2 OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
3 FACW species 25 x 2= 50
4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30
5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 1 m radius ) Column totals 40 (A) 85 (B)
1 Phalaris arundinacea 15 Y FACW Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.13
2 Solanum dulcamara 10 Y FAC
3 Typha angustifolia 5 N OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance test is>50%
g X Prevalence index is<_3.0*
� Morphogical adaptations*(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
g separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
30 =Total Cover (explain)
WoodY vine Stfatum (PIOt Siz2: 30 ft fadiUs ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
� present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
SOIL Sampling Point: 2-1 WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc** Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 2/1 Silty Loam High organic matter
10-15 N 2/0 90 10YR 3/4 10 C M Silty Loam
15-20 5GY 5/1 Sandy Clay Loam
`Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L, R)
X Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L)
Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K, L,R)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Redox Dark Surface(F6)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? Y
Depth(inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that applv) Secondar Indicators minimum of two re uired
Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610)
X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland
Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology
Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10 present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION
Plant Indicator Status
INDICATOR CATEGORIES*
Obligate Wetland (OBL)—Occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural
conditions in wetlands.
Facultative Wetland (FACW)—Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67% - 99%),
but occasionally found in non-wetlands.
Facultative (FAC)—Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability
34% - 66%).
Facultative Upland (FACU)—Usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probabiliry 67% -
99%), but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1% -33%).
Obligate Upland (UPL)—Occur in wetlands in another region, but occur almost always
(estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands in the region specified. If
a species does not occur in wetlands in any region, it is not on the National List.
*Reed, P.B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Minnesota. National
Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, Florida.
THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SECTION
Soil Series Descriptions
Acquired from Natural Resource Conservation Service Website, Official Soil Series Descriptions
See Figure 5 for an illustration of each Photo Point (PP) location.
i�m;�;� , �°, ..� �.
� w . � � '� � t
t� :.;
�'
,4*r;
����� Ii� �,
�� �'�;� , '�r �F��
��,.
�' '� � g '��
y� > ���� ,� �t� � 1�- .1
r��4�l+ �w '°`4 N'�.�..�x;A!�}�'+T
. � : py��� �'� . �',�1 4'�t_'��.�� :
, . ,. .. '� � �Y,T A �. .�
' ' . � .. �. �� � z.
.. , � � . f=,y
,
� _. . , .-i �. '- '_ �.
. . � .....^'� . . .
..� . - .,. ,. ., . �., � ...._.: ,�
,...�' :,. . ��:� �,x-�� .,.
9�^"
�t'!�.r,��.=
x.. '�.�. � T '
�:
:
PHOTO 1: Wetland 1 facing north at PP1.
�� � ���� �}. ry ��,
,a �� ;� �: �,� � i;��
� .�.
�:��; `a � ,,,j�.M �,,.,. �
w. .Jt�
l -
� i� «�,.: � H� d� �- �'..� �
„i�. �gq��. �;; xz . . . . r Y tl e��.
��N' e6 4� j:_ep�:y. � .R e�,.
5 d w� �
�,%
n;! �t:
. ��� �
.. �i .� . �..Y x ... , � F .
�+� � ���; ,. �,.,i~� ��� _ ~ ��
e .
�'w4u. ' - „ `�'. .T^r_ '� �
�t y � [
y �� : � �^ " —'�.'�„'. �.._.'m
-�.. ' � ,i��, r�` ti� . .; �x��
, t n I . _ ,: �� • 4 xs . • _ . '�, ' .�
��',ml�„Y'i� . ..._ . �'' f AJ. .i �'.ti' `. 4 R EI..I�iw� _�
p . �,,� � � •
. � � � . � '�ef
� ":�y°.w . ,1g +�7.,�` .. n `;� a,.� "t�.*,,��,.,"�""xt+'�����Y�N �,.. � . .. � ;�
,��•,�K t" . � �- � ��'�'��1� '�''� � ,r��S4�T �'r� . _..,ati°y!''�
,?s►.�'%sc.. " � ,:^ _-'-`a /��'■Y �� � ,�. ' i�; a `s�.,,.�
�.:^ - � " 1`��¢ � -.;-i' '4�'a' . ,� ..�k, ..�.�.'j`.�,��. , °\x` 1i►r,���,"r
�!°'''r � t ' <`�� ." �,��k"' � .-� � !1,l�1, �,��y� `�F �f � i�a. ;l'I�
y► �. , , �,•�, t• �k } `#g�s �
�� ...�>�'� �,-�" -� r,.�"�� .� �,� ���,�,�,��,�.�►1�,;1! Y , l y� �{)���:«�
�;iC' T * M '� ,� t� '!��� t''
�Y•.� ,.� `A �... ��``'" . . ^L� `As. ,�I� ������'": _ ���i 'i°�a.
�^i►I• 'Y�i! � K9" . �',, . C ,k.� - A:a�� !t '4. � ��1.� �'.�
��,.�R��.�� � � �* � �� ``�" �t� � �f`�t� ���.. µ"�
� .�� �',rY� � _ w '� � "R \� �Q ■
�• �"'�� r�y�• ,� .�� ��� �t�f ��'\���+��� � � ��t,s������ .
� .Yl•'•{ � ��„+��„�7',^J� 1��5.�� , ������� x�I �
J �l
�,��;,� � •p-� ��'+�`� yF ,;�, . �'�,�`,,� � ;�� ,�`� m f
,�!,�,��,�-•.^��,«� � ���`�'`�. a�"� �� ��� �.�` j�
i�=t�•'��+�w ... ,.�wrii�'� �� ': � �' �.�
PHOTO 2: Wetland 1 facing southwest at PP2.
2011-028-03
�!��SVOBODA PHOTO LOG OF SITE 1165 Ferdale Rd.
i, `�> Ecological Resources Orono MN
See Figure 5 for an illustration of each Photo Point (PP) location.
�� ! � Y. 'Y.'S�. �s- . � . ��
. .. �� ,*�{f� z �'��
-i /i � � + }e �� �..
3 : . �'slx. .
st . .
rt Tk ' �y, �a o �g.� x ,�s' R,�t � „ ;1��
�y . � .
� $ .�'�T�l. �1 a`�� �'`�q° y '!t.� � 11�C
4£J� l J". :�t . . •5 i, t� r,.q �� �' �1� � ` �
.�3w'}r,t,�'�a.i. x�,� � ' .-. �� a..
,':.
r�
�,«� .�;. ,,, � �,
� . ,�
,.� ;�
�
�
,�. , , . � �h
. �n� . ,
� ' N � �'•' �vs , .� r • • `�'�- , y '�� � "
R�'�*,r'� f .:�W,0 �g�����q, � �. { , ' ��, �. � e�' '8. �.. � �
.���t" �E�ny„y "4.V� � �8�����1� 4 �.pa,f �' R ��1,a�Y '}`�1V`� v .
�, , �,�� ,�� ��a � �w�E+' . .. P�t, . �} � �
�`y, � e • � �'. �'.! . ,+s, �+@, �r
�� a' ' �,� }1� �, t� �r r�a ����'" � �r9e,y t *al
� �� ' i
� �... �",.. � .`��` �� ' �'�, �`���"�'�i ���y� �.. ' �I��, ' t�l �kr.
"`���5 ��...- �r ,r. ."'A"' `. � °�rrsa«,=•.� H .� " ^i [{� �9 ..+�ljtk� �t• ,��r jab 1� ��y�i
,�, ,]� ", � "` �
q��,��l.�,- q �°�k}��� .�, . �!1' x � �"'TM
� �.p . � h o���� 'a� �+,,"'r'rt AR,Y �r �� Y
�4�' * �rt ys�y�. '��°�i�n $ . .y �. �"�a'w "i A', �y�i.�"�p�w�- �.'.'
t"� .�� �r „�, i '""` � i.;1�Aj._� ����� Y'i�Y, d+� �
� . 'y�♦ • � � ['� ""yf J �`�.- `�'-• '� w� ��,�;•i�
k_ ��'�� • .��"��1�.�� t��;,,,,,. ���p- �lr,�C'a!� �,,- 1G-1`e'.
�R �i�?'�y,'�s '���, �� .. o-� '"�A• ", � �; '.•� � i,� +`,l�I
� '�; •� - .. '. NI�i�, �� � � ,+�,� - �.i4. � +' �.. '�ri/'y��,�', !.�..1�','�"
ly `'�;� � ��M ... ��.yj`� :�" �", � �4 d ' ! "��� , ��.
� � •.y_ �e �/ �Y ?�, +�.l�<�'�'°�..,��i' '� fr j� �M.�tr a` ••,�� '.�l� '��
.,� �D � ,+� i �1 R �. . , .. _ ,rF�
�r 4�. .� •.r. ��f ��"• .* _.[.�i�l �,a. ` «� � ` ��lii�, t l.�,.�r�„�`+wl.�
r��li �i�•f ���,r*s (�w �` � �.' "���g►:_.��,,jw �'
* . ,; . ��..sikvt''��i �y'�IY�:r�
,r ��.il:�. _ .'�L � ..11.i�:4
PHOTO 3: Wetland 3 facing south-southeast at PP3.
`�+r� y � Y�„ � �� '�� �p � °'T
!t� .} �'� � � � 1"/i. ,.3,1
, . � f.i �`� . .�.#��1�'� �� ��/� .
, � • `i� .x!Y �.
y�'� . ,�� r .�..
�. i._
�
�.4 � ".. ,.. . , '.l . � �l .. + it - a
F � s
F * �� � . . � .-�
.�. � � � w � �� �°
. .
. � �S . , ..� r y�:� � �, =F.'r i
. � .�»,�-�°4p ^ ro��.� .` * .
e
� tl�.e , .a�"�1'� ,y�R'' A �,.>!6 ���?.y�' n�'.$
�"'�' ' �' ��x. .'t."��/� . �� s ♦ �
�
-.� , - � . .
.�
�,
, •
#� � r� -. w;'
"� ��'L �. : . _-._��'�,.yt+� �'�. . ..r .. �,.N`^�,� `� p`...
:� t ., � . � � �����'��'g.�. �� ,�l ��' +�i"i
'n� �:. ��9 . . . � _ ';�A•.F 4 ��?�`9��
�� A t���� �; . . � ' .` .. �• �.
# r i�
p {{� `�g.�'i �.�.,t
�� N
, ��. u p+� !7#i .x.��a ., t�$:`t.� T-'� .,�kf " �
�Y. .l 4.k� �b ��.14e .,, . � 1��,r,�/e'�.�_.aa! .a
� x� �,l' J• �t x �'� " � 1r� ' '�; {�
r�..: . �+,` , .,�� �,�� ,a .,�,� . �' -r�r��'
�F jY�' ... .P.�.y1 4 .• •'� �1p��.�.v ,p� � q) . ..
•
c yj �i�.� iA�r M$. 1 9 � d � � ,.>����itlt$ ��.` Y '����a�� , .� "�.:�. a w. �� �n.
�-I' �,�`Ar S�� r_`_ $ � ��..
e ' � �. R C �63 �y .e. ��
1 •� � �� � ^�W �y4•:'..
I � 4'�i �,�T`�a'�� �� � ...�3a #-_J' ,gt: "H .. . � 1 •� TA�'��'Y � �.����
$
,I �.,a, y ,�J�` �`� . �rt�'�'x�.� .aM � �„gc . 'q'y ., _�p, �' =;► � •w
£�'� -im y� y# 0� � � ..aa�1 .�� � ; •+�� y'i��. qe �'" ' p� , �'v ""�
'�'e ^7Y. .�� ' i�'' �f+w�.�*�a r �. , Y^«. O't�e�'.�R t . y � �y gy � � �� ,
� , �:P�� '�, : � a tkr.n..�-�'p�i�': � �
� ` ��r �'�'� ��i�A��.. ►�,Myqv '� ' fAe.. �F�a�'�,,, '��,i.��i�e*�^ `7�.�.�
�' �t „7�� �� a \�f.a�' `'~ � . .3 ..y a . �'�r � � iM����
�Ji a � l-�y� ��� �P� � .
, d�... r+r''"'� ��� �w,'"tiY � . .�'�.. �ii�' '�"��� . � j 'k�o-�',c�: ..�
PHOTO 4: Wetland 4 facing north at PP4.
2011-028-03
����.SVOBODA PHOTO LOG OF SITE 1165 Ferdale Rd.
��;x Ecological Resources Orono MN
� � � 1
Project Name and/or Number: SER#2014-026-03—1165 Ferndale Road N,Orono
PART ONE: Applicant Information
If applicant is an entity(company,government entity, partnership, etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the
applicant is using an agent(consultant, lawyer, or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's
contact information must also be provided.
Applicant/Landowner Name: Robert Brook
MailingAddress: 1165 Ferndale Road, Orono, MN 55391
Phone: 612.328.2562
E-mail Address: rbrook@emsinet.com
Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above): Frank Svoboda—Svoboda Ecological Resources
Mailing Address: 22752 Co Rd 7, Hutchinson, MN 55350
Phone: 612-384-7770
E-mail Address: franks@gpsinnovatitons.com
PART TWO: Site Location Information
County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono
Parcel ID and/or Address: 1165 Ferndale Road N (PID#02-1 17-23-43-0026)
Legal Description(Section,Township, Range): Lots 2 and 8, of North Shore Cottage Acres Lake Minnetonka
Addition, a portion Section 2, Tl 17N, R23W, City of Orono,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Lat/Long(decimal degrees): Lat.44.968684(44°58'7.2624"N)/Long.-93.550656(93°33'2.3616"W)
Attach a map show�ng the location�f thP�irP in relation to local streets, roads, highways.
_�����. �� (� ,x � � �.� F�� .,,. � �
� �p f s . i �4,; r y��.xw
.,,k� _ `j �'•�'�` A�"«�.`�q � '
,'' ��'.�°� ': ` '�:' � w?� :�.
�' ,� _ _� ; . ,�'
-`� ,�;, ��ry,� ��� �,� ��' �
� t.� � R 'p`� '.�� .� .�..
�:•��3FJ�,Ei� �`�� ��w.��. '�1 4 � -, . .
n�._ ��i!` �+n,� � �
��, .,,y� . Ay� • .�
_'�a ��..e.+..� � " �' -i�
�,+� � �.�� R� , r��
�' ,T.�.� ���,» �
�� �2�� .
� l
..• (..���• . � 1 .
Y
% 1 � y
�M�.�"��r�*`,r ��' ����a
'bt�J �p � � i
�� �a
� � i
� '�`�� _.�?'4� �'` � � �.:F. T II
`y����±��Y�•���1F����';�#('��' Y� �I
,��`. 1 __ _ �• � .'�
Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project, length (feet): .8 Acres
If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the
names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to
your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at:
http•//www mvp usace armv mil/Portals/57/docs/resulatory/RegulatorvDocs/ensform 4345 2012oct.pdf
Project Name and/or Number: SER#2014-026-03—1165 Ferndale Road N,Orono
PART THREE: General Project/Site Information
If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other
correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number.
Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The
project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements
that effect aquatic resources(wetland, lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings
showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts.
The owner wants to know where the approved edge is located before starting the planning process.As soon as approval is
received they will move forward with their project.
PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact15ummary
If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each
impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view
map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed
impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table.
Aquatic Type of Impact Duration of Existing Plant County,Major
Aquatic Resource Overall Size of Watershed#,
Resource Type (fill,excavate, Impad z Community
ID(as noted on Size of Impact Aquatic and Bank Service
(wetland,lake, drain,or remove Permanent(P)or 3 Type�s)in Impact
overhead view) 1 Resource , Area#of Impact
tributary etc.) vegetation) Temporary(T) Area
Areas
llf impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the"T". For example,a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed
after 220 days would be entered"T(220)".
Zlmpacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre.
Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream
followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 sq/ft).
'This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A".
°Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesoto ond Wisconsin 3rd Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2.
SRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7.
If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated
with each:
PART FIVE: Applicant Signature
❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have
provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked.
By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the
authority to undertake the work described herein.
Signature: �� d Date: October 10, 2014
I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this application.
1 The term"impact"as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify
activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to
indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement.
Project Name and/or Number: SER#2014-026-03—1165 Ferndale Road N,Orono
Attachment A
Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or
Jurisdictional Determination
By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District
(Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU) provide me with the following(check all that apply):
�Wetland Type Confirmation
�Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU
concurring, not concurring,or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation
concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address
the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area
(including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.).
QPreliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication
from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of
computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all
waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be
appealed.
❑Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictiona) determination (AJD)is an official Corps determination that
jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the
affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process.
In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for
Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota(2013).
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx