Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-14-1988 Council Minutesa•'' �' y J • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 14, 1988 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M. The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Acting Mayor Peterson, Councilmembers Nettles and Goetten; Councilmember Callahan and Mayor Grabek were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Public Works Director Gerhardson, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, City Attorney Barrett and City Recorder Schef f ler . CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. APPPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the October 10, 1988 Regular Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* • It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the October 24, 1988 Regular Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes= 3,-Nays =0, Motion passed. PARR COMMISSION COMMENTS PARR SURVEY Public Works Director Gerhardson reported that a more economical method of performing the Park Survey had been found. By revising the method of mailing, the cost would decrease from $2,000.00 to $2,500.00, to an amount between $1,500.00 and $1,800.00. The one page survey would be printed with a return address and bulk mail stamp so it would be mailed out in a first class envelope, but returned as bulk mail. The survey would ask a variety of questions, many of which would pertain to the bike /hike trail. Councilmember Goetten inquired as to whether the Park Commission would tabulate the results themselves and whether they would be funding the survey? Gerhardson replied that the Park Commission would tabulate the surveys. The survey.is not an allowable expenditure for the use of the park dedication fees; the project would be funded by the City's General Fund. Councilmember Goetten expressed -' -her wish to see the survey • and Acting Mayor Peterson and Councilmember Nettles concurred. City Administrator Bernhardson commented that the LMCD's brochure on Eurasian Milfoil would be mailed along with the Park 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 • PARK SURVEY CONTINUED Commission survey and would not add to the mailing cost. It was moved by Counci lmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to table this item until the Council had the opportunity to review the Park Commission survey. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission Representative, Edward Cohen, was not present and there were no Planning Commission comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the Public. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1218 ESTATE OF RUTH SMITH 387 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2536* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2536, approving the Final Subdivision for Ruth Smith. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion • passed. #1323 JON W. PAPAS 3369 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE DENIAL RESOLUTION #2537* It was moved by Counci lmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2537, denying the variance requested by Jon W. Papas. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1329 THOMAS MCNELLIS 355 WOODHILL ROAD VARIANCE Mr. McNellis and Mr. Arthur Dickey, Mr. McNellis's Architect, were present for this meeting. A brief review of Mr. McNellis's application was provided by City Administrator Bernhardson. In order for Mr. McNellis to construct his proposed new residence, he would need approval for a front setback variance and wetland setback variance. The proposed. residence would encroach 4' into the 26' wetland setback. The easement line was determined by using the 964 contour line. The actual edge of the wetlands is actually 36' from the building envelope. Mr. McNellis's deck would be 32' from the edge of the wetlands, but only 22' from the edge of the • easement. Bernhardson further reported that he had met with Mr. Dickey and Mr. McNellis and the possibility of a lot line rearrangement was discussed. If Mr. McNellis could obtain a 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 ZONING FILE #1329- MCNELLIS CONTINUED small portion of land from the neighboring property, he would not require the front setback variance. Acting Mayor Peterson asked Mr. McNellis how he felt about the lot line rearrangement. Mr. McNellis stated that if it was the only solution to the problem, he would not object. He went on to say that placing the house in any other way within the building envelope would greatly affect the drainage and consequently the wetlands. He said that only 9% of the lot was buildable. The proposed location for the house would have the least impact on the mature stand of sugar maples on the property. Mr. McNellis explained how the house would "notch into" the hill on the property. By turning the house, he would not be able to take advantage of a flat location that would aid in moving drainage water into the wetlands. The, present proposal would allow for maximum preservation of the natural resources on the lot. Acting Mayor Peterson inquired as to Mr. McNellis's knowledge of the buildability of the lot at the time it was purchased. Mr. McNellis stated that the covenants and restrictions were quite lengthy. 'He added that Orono was one of • the few cities that required 26' from the easement line of the wetland. He was not aware of that requirement at the time he purchased the lot. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that, in his opinion, the easement line was determined arbitrarily. He added that no two topographical maps are identical and it was possible that the map used to determine the wetland easement had varying alignments from other maps on file for this subdivision. Acting Mayor Peterson asked Mr. McNellis to define his hardship for the variances. Mr. McNellis explained that they included topography, the drainage easement and the particular location of a culvert on the property. When the building envelope was determined, the culvert had not been discovered. Peterson felt that it was difficult to approve a variance for a piece of property that was recently platted. She added that it was the front' yard setback variance that was the problem, not the encroachment into the wetlands. Peterson asked if there was anything that could be done with the design of the house to alleviate the need for the front yard setback variance. Mr. Dickey explained that the house would fit within the building envelope if it were turned. However, turning it would create a negative impact upon the wetlands. Councilmember Goetten expressed her priority to be preservation of the wetlands, as opposed to concern for the front setback. • Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron showed the various surveys and where the wetland easement was on each. Gaffron added that when a wetland boundary line was determined with an easement line, that line would be used for measuring to + r F MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 • ZONING FILE #1329- MCNELLIS CONTINUED avoid discrepancies. Councilmember Nettles asked whether there would technically be any impact.to the wetlands due to the height of the cantilevered deck? Gaffron answered that in his opinion, Mr. McNellis's proposal would have little, if any, impact on the wetlands. Councilmember Nettles brought forth the issue of the lot line rearrangement. Mr.. McNellis explained the ramifications of proceeding in that manner, and added it would cause enough of a delay that he would be unable to build until Spring. City Administrator Bernhardson suggested that the Council grant the variance for the wetland encroachment and indicate whether a lot line rearrangement would be an acceptable remedy. Gaffron suggested that approval be given for the application and the issuance of the building permit be contingent upon the filing of the subdivision application for the lot line rearrangement. This would allow Mr. McNellis to begin work immediately. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the wetland variance and require the applicant to file and follow through with a lot line rearrangement application in lieu of the front setback variance. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1339 DAVID LEE • 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2538 Mr. Lee and Mr. James Robin, Mr. Lee's Landscape Architect, were present for this meeting. City Administrator Bernhardson gave a brief synopsis of the history of this application. It was determined at the last Council Meeting that Mr. Lee be required to remove certain timbers and fill so there will be some natural slope returned to the bank. Mr. Robin believed that it would be best to keep all of the timbers and plant vegetation that would eventually screen the wall from view. He said that he could not guarantee the same kind of stability and screening by following the City staff's recommendations. He asked that the Council reconsider their decision to follow the City Engineer's recommendations and try to reach another compromise. Acting Mayor Peterson stated that she would be inclined to stay with the City Engineer's recommendations. Councilmember Nettles concurred, and added that he actually was leaning more toward total restoration of the bank. However, since the project was already completed, he felt that the City Engineer's • recommendations were a compromise. He said that any deviation from that recommendation would be an even greater straying from 4 `i • MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 ZONING FILE 11339 -DAVID LEE CONTINUED the City's ordinances pertaining to the lakeshore. He did not want to send the wrong message to the citizens of Orono. Councilmember Goetten reiterated her concerns of informing the Public of those ordinances. She added that she had to rely on the information provided from the City Engineer in trying to make the best of a bad situation. Mr. Lee explained that he had received numerous phone calls following an article that appeared in the Wayzata paper. He went on to say that his neighbors were most supportive of him improving his property. Mr. Lee also reiterated Mr. Robin's arguments for keeping the timbers in place. Acting Mayor Peterson asked whether the completion date of April 30, 1989 was realistic? Mr. Robin and Mr. Lee felt it was not, due to the frost. Peterson suggested June 30, 1989. Mr. Lee agreed. Mr. Robin advised Mr. Lee to remove the timbers and do the grading and fill work and immediately establish some kind of ground cover for the bank. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #1339, approving the conditional use permit, and amending the completion date to June • 30, 1989. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. #1347 MICHAEL HALLEY HOMES, INC. 2.715 PENCE LANE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2539 Mr. Bob Martinson, a representative for Michael Halley Homes, and Mr. and Mrs. Dean Terry were present. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the original proposal had been revised to address the concerns of Mr. Dailey and Mr. Skifter. The gateway would now be located approximately 14' from the west lot line and 20' from the north lot line. The 10' setback variance to the north lot line would still be required. A 12' by 12' backup apron has been included to alleviate traffic turning around in neighboring driveways. If the gate were moved back another 10' to 12' there would be no need for a variance. Mr. Martinson reiterated Bernhardson's explanation of the revised proposal. He said that in response to the emergency vehicle access issue, there are three ways to access the electronically controlled gates: (1) Activation from within the houses on the property; (2) Activation from the front by entering in a code, which will be given to both the Police. and Fire • Departments; and (3) a large mechanical pin could be pulled to manually open the gates should there be a power failure. These methods of access have been discussed and approved with the Police and Fire Departments. 5 MINUTES OF'THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 ZONING FILE #1347- MICHAEL HALT Y HOMES CONTINUED • Councilmember Goetten asked for the hardship in this case. Mrs. Terry and Mr. Martinson explained why they felt there was a need to keep trespassers out. The main issue was the loss of privacy. Goetten stated that there has been a lot of difficulty establishing appropriate guidelines for fences. She felt this was mainly due to the fact that citizens of Orono did not want the fenced -in, confined atmosphere. She questioned whether the City staff needed to take a comprehensive look at the issue of fencing. City Administrator Bernhardson acknowledged Goetten's concerns and said that he would be happy to proceed accordingly. Acting Mayor Peterson asked Mr. Martinson if the gate could be moved back so that a variance would not be required? Mr. Martinson replied that he preferred to crowd the front property line as much as possible. There would be a possibility of trespassers going around the gate should it be moved back. Further, the Terry's property line is very defined and it would be better, from a security standpoint, to place the gateway where the property begins. Councilmember Nettles expressed his opinion to be that the gateway was a convenience for the applicant, but not much else. He did not believe that there would be enough trespassing traffic to warrant the need for such security measures. He did not feel • there was an adequate hardship for the variance for the gate. Acting Mayor Peterson reiterated Councilmember Goetten's suggestion of looking at the fencing issue as a whole. She said that she would be inclined to approve this application, especially in light of the fact that she had approved similar applications in the past. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to adopt *Resolution #2539, approving the 10' setback variance and height variance for Michael Halley Homes. Motion, Ayes =2, Nettles, Nay, Motion passed. MAYOR'S REPORT: There was no Mayor's report for this meeting. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the liquor licenses for Jimmies Lounge and Navarre Liquor were coming up for renewal January 1, 1989. There have been concerns with the on- sale operation. However, there have not been any charged violations. Staff is recommending that the license holder be put on more stringent notice and if there were direct violations for which charges were issued, the matter would be brought before the • Council. A s I MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 • LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL- CONTINUED Councilmember Goetten asked for clarification as to whether the Council could review any violations at the time of license renewal or if it had to be reviewed immediately. Bernhardson stated that there was no time limit established. City Attorney Barrett confirmed Bernhardson's statement. Councilmember Nettles inquired as to the costs involved for any additional monitoring that was necessary by the Police Department? Bernhardson replied that in actual patrol time, there were no additional costs. The Officers had been advised to be especially attentive to potential violations. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this was an information item and that it would be brought back to either the Council meeting on the 28th of November or the 12th of December. COUNTY ROAD 51 City Administrator Bernhardson explained that he had expected to receive additional information, but it had not arrived. This item was basically for the purpose of updating the Council as to the current standing with the County. Councilmember Goetten asked why this issue of safety was • dropped several years ago? Bernhardson responded that the DNR and County were looking at parking in those areas and because of the possibility of the additional land being condemned, the City dropped it. When this issue was raised in 1985, it was the trespassing issue that was the major concern, not pedestrian safety, on which the City continued to work. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION City Administrator Bernhardson stated that he was bringing this matter before the Council with the recommendation that a two -day suspension be given to Officer Larry Tomcheck. In addition, another day of 'suspension would be held in abeyance, pending no further violations before April 1, 1989. This recommendation resulted from two separate incidents wherein Officer Tomcheck exhibited behavior that was unprofessional and potentially hazardous. Bernhardson stated that in a case where an employee union did not exist, the next step, should the Council recommend suspension, would be to appeal to the Council for a hearing if the employee chose such an appeal. However, Mr. Tomcheck is a member of the Police Union so the appeal would go through the grievance process and an arbitrator. Acting Mayor Peterson stated that in her opinion, Mr. Tomcheck is now performing his work properly. She mentioned the fact that Mr. Tomcheck was asked to take two days off for an evaluation. Bernhardson explained that Tomcheck did receive sick • pay for those two days. She felt that holding the day of suspension in abeyance for the past 10 months was more severe than two days of suspension with no pay. In her opinion, it 7 .a :r MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION - CONTINUED caused Mr. Tomcheck to question every move he made, everyday. Peterson observed that Mr. Tomcheck paid for the evaluation himself and asked if there were any problems discovered with the evaluation. Bernhardson said that in light of the two incidences occurring back -to -back, the purpose of the observation period was to assure them that there would not be a continuing pattern. Peterson then asked whether Mr. Tomcheck had received any oral or written reprimands. Bernhardson replied that to the best of his knowledge there had not been any written reprimand, and could not recall any oral reprimands being given. It was moved by Acting Mayor Peterson, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to take no further action on this matter at this time. Peterson felt that the 10 month waiting period was a sufficient penalty. Bernhardson explained that the 1 day suspension held in abeyance pending any further violations was the only factor. That would have been the same whether the two - day suspension was assesed now or back in March. Bernhardson stated that the violations were very serious and felt that the recommended discipline was appropriate. He did not feel that the time delay in assessing the discipline had a significant negative effect upon Officer Tomcheck. Councilmember Goetten stated that there was no question that Mr. Tomcheck's violations were serious. She reiterated • Peterson's concerns about the time delay in determining the disciplinary actions to be taken. She felt that praise and discipline should be given immediately following the action. She observed that all of the information she had heard or read concerning Officer Tomcheck had been exemplary. Bernhardson agreed with Goetten that discipline should be assessed quickly and felt that under the circumstances and the need to evaluate all of the factors involved, this matter had proceeded in a timely manner. He added that he would be flexible in dealing with the deadline for the extra one day of suspension. He suggested that February 1, 1989, may be more appropriate than April 1, 1989. Councilmember Nettles made reference to the actual written City and Police Department Policies pertaining to employee behavior. He said that he was not clear on what the policy was for off -duty display of fire arms for police officers. Bernhardson replied that Officer Tomcheck was mainly in violation of the City's rules. Bernhardson stated that Tomcheck exhibited negligence in the performance of duty, as well as offensive conduct toward the public and took actions that were detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. Bernhardson further explained that Officer Tomcheck was involved in a situation that could have been explosive, and had been asked not to participate, but continued to do so. His actions consequently required • additional police response, and because of the nature of the situation, those officers were also endangered. Nettles observed D F Y' MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION CONTINUED " that the off -duty possession of fire arms is not prohibited. There was also no cross - reference made as to the use of intoxicants. Bernhardson explained that he was not solely using one or the other of those particular rules. He was relating the entire incident to various rules concerning misconduct. He further explained that Officer Tomcheck acted in an "on- duty" capacity even though he was off -duty. He caused such a problem by doing so, that had he not been carrying his service revolver, discipline would still have been forthcoming. Councilmember Goetten concurred with Nettles in that she could not ascertain exactly what rules Officer Tomcheck had violated. Bernhardson reiterated the potential danger Officer Tomcheck placed not only himself, but the Officers called to assist him. His conduct was very inappropriate. If each of the violations occurred separately, they would not have been as much of a concern, however, put together, they constituted a very serious situation. The question on Acting Mayor Peterson's Motion was called. Motion, Ayes =1, Goetten, Nettles, Nay. Councilmember Nettles interpreted the situation as he understood it to be. He concluded that what actually needed to be done was to provide a written reprimand for Officer Tomcheck's • file so that the City would be on record as not condoning his actions. Councilmember Goetten concurred with Nettles. She felt that the City should perform some kind of reprimand, but the two - day suspension seemed too severe. Acting Mayor Peterson asked about the length of time the written reprimand would remain in Officer Tomcheck's file. City Administrator Bernhardson responded that the Council could determine a time limit. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to issue a written reprimand to be placed in Officer Tomcheck's file, outlining the violations of the Police Department regulations, as well as the City Rules, and explain why Officer's Tomcheck's activities were undesireable to the City. In addition, the written reprimand would remain in his file permanently. Motion, Ayes =2, Peterson, Nay, Motion passed. APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR FOR 1988 It was recommended by City Administrator Bernhardson to appoint the audit firm of Pannell Kerr Forster, to perform the required audits of the 1988 fiscal year records. Councilmember Goetten inquired about receipt of the Certificate of Achievement. Bernhardson said he had not heard anything, but it takes 4 to 6 months to receive it. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by • Councilmember Nettles, to appoint the audit firm of Pannell Kerr Forster to perform the required audits for the 1988 fiscal year at an estimated cost of $14,000, plus direct expenses. Motion, 0 t, MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 , APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR CONTINUED Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS 4545 WATERTOWN ROAD RESOLUTION #2540 Mr. Jim Miller, the manager of the subject property, was present on Mr. Earl Freeman's behalf. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the list of items set forth in the Resolution would need to be addressed before occupancy could resume. The City Attorney would file this matter with the court. The Court would set a schedule as to when the building must be repaired. If the owner fails to meet that schedule the building would be torn down. Mr. Miller asked whether he would need to have all of the items listed repaired? He cited, as an example, that the rooms are too small. He asked how he could remedy that item. Bernhardson recommended that Mr. Miller meet with Building Inspector Jacobs. He said that Mr. Jacobs could identify.those items, if any that would not require repair prior to the Court Order being, rescinded. Councilmember Nettles inquired as to whether the building • would need to be enlarged before it would meet Orono's standards, or whether it could be "grandfathered "? Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that would need further review. Councilmember Goetten asked what time frame the owner would be given before the matter was filed with the court? Bernhardson replied that Mr. Miller would have approximately 10 days to. determine which items needed to be addressed. However, if it appears as though the building cannot be repaired, the City would proceed with the court after that time period. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, that they adopt Resolution #2540, initiating Hazardous Building Proceedings at 4545 Watertown Road. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT DOG LICENSE ORDINANCE #60, 2ND SERIES City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the- City was proposing to modify the language pertaining to rabies certificates_. The modification would specify that rabies certificates must be valid for the period oft the dog license. Acting Mayor Peterson asked why the hours pertaining to • barking dog,s were 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. She observed that there were citizens in the community that worked various shifts and may be sleeping during those hours. Bernhardson replied that 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 DOG LICENSE ORDINANCE - CONTINUED he would look into that issue further. It was moved by Acting Mayor Peterson, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Ordinance #58, Second Series, amending Section 9.12 Subdivision 4 of the municipal code. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. DRIVEWAY PERMIT -490 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD It was recommended by City Administrator Bernhardson that this item be tabled. The City has had difficulty in getting the owner to respond. It was moved by Acting Mayor Peterson, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to table this item. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZEN'S FOUNDATION RESOLUTION #2541* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2541, declaring November 25, 1988, as Senior Citizen's Day and encourage Westonka Senior Citizens to establish the Foundation for the financial security • of the organization. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. DANGEROUS WEAPONS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE #61, 2ND SERIES* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to adopt Ordinance #59, Second Series, as an amendment to Ordinance Number 9.16 together with adopting Attachment B as a summary of that ordinance for publication. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. RESIGNATION OFFICER MICHAEL KIRNYCZUK RESOLUTION #2543* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to accept Officer Kirnyczuk's resignation effective October 3, 1988, and to adopt Resolution #2543, Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. SALARY ADJUSTMENT OFFICER CHARLES SCHAUSS* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to approve a step raise for Officer Charles Schauss, to $12.554, effective 10/26/88. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. ` FLASHING WARNING LIGHTS WILLOW & HIGHWAY 12 RESOLUTION #2542* It was moved by Councilmember Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution agreement for the f lashing warning 11 Goetten, seconded by.Acting #2542, for the maintenance lights at Willow Drive and MINUTES OF THE ORONO COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1988 FLASHING LIGHTS CONTINUED Highway 12. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to accept the City Administrator's Information regarding: Crystal Bay Road; Woodhill Road; County Road 15; Orono /Minnetonka Beach Interceptor Progress; 1950 Shoreline- - Drive; Big Island Vets Camp; Cross Walk Petition /Cty -MTC Response; Sculpture Unveiling - Livingston Tower Park; and Goal Setting'Status. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: There was _no report from the City Attorney, however, City Attorney Barrett requested an Executive Session. LICENSES* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to approve the following license: Septic System Installer: Machtemes Construction P. O. Box 275 Waconia, MN 55387 Residential Kennel: Josh and Pam Uran 2705 Watertown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 i Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. BILLS* It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Acting Mayor Peterson, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. EXECUTIVE SESSION - 9:00 P.M. City Attorney Barrett requested that the Council go into an executive session at 9:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT 9:14 P.M. It was moved by Acting Mayor Peterson, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting at 9:14 p.m. Motion, Ayes =3, Nays =O, Motion passed. 12 Jame R. Grabek, Mayor 1 0 • •