The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-00308 - new structure � CITY OF ORONO * Z 0 1 3 — PJ 0 3 PJ 8 * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 07/16/2013 � ' ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 1 105 FERNDALE RD W PIN : 02-117-23-43-0033 LEGAL DESC : REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 0441 : LOT MB BLOCK MB PERMIT TYPE : NEW STRUCTURE PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : SINGLE FAMILY ACTIVITY : ]Ol-SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES, DETACHED VALUATION : $ 757,000.00 NO"CF,: SEPARATE YERM["TS REQUIR.F,D: PI_UME3ING, MECHA'vICAL,FIREPLACE, SGWER CONNEC"[�ION, LAWN IRRIGATION. WELL(STATE),ELEC1'R1CAL(S"I'A'I'E) NOTG: A FOLTNDATION SURVEY REQUIRFD PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION. INITIAL: � � „ ) NO"1'E: CI'I'Y APPROVAL OF AN AS BU[L'C SURVEY REQUIRI:D PRIOR TO CERT[FICATF,OF OCCUPANCY ISSUANCE. INI"I�IAL.-�� NOTE: BE AWARE, IN"I'HE EVENT WGATHER OR OTHER C;ONDITIONS PREVF,N"f T�IiE COMPLETION OF AN AS-BUIL"I SURVEY AT CHE TIME THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS R�QUES'I'ED,A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY [3};ISSUED UPON RECEIP OF A$10,000 ESCROW"1'O ENSURE COMPLETION OF THE AS-BUILT SURVEY AND ALL SITE IMPROVI:MEN"CS. INITIAL:.—� NOTE: ALL CONCRETE WASHING[S TO BE DONE OFFSI'I'L,. INITIAL:-�� APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 4,741.75 LIND NELSON CONST INC. STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 3794 299TH AVE NW 378.50 ISANTI, MN 55040 TOTAL 5,120.25 (612)282-3006 PA1D WITH CC# 1955 Minnesota State License#: BC384640 OWNER TRUWIT, CHIP 1 105 FERNDALE RD W WAYZATA, MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This pemiit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within l80 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with thc State Building Code.��his permit may be rev �� at a y � or due cause. / / � 7� / � c rmitee Signature Date Iss 3y Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. c� �,��' _ ' �-iz"'3 �� . P¢'d . . ' � � , City of Orono � �J� Building Permit Application / for New Structures or Additions ,.._— Mailing Address: � ' g,�,j�.�� PO Box 66 Permit number: a0�3 ' � i �%0 Q\� Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: ��.- � �k ' � �a ''"jl� ,, ,� Street Address:� Received by: �`f ��'_.� �; � �� ti 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: � / \\�t9kE9H�4�'� Orono, MN 55356 �v _�� --_- ` Total Fee: � Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono-mn_us r� This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: c! :" F r , r;:.-� }:,.ti' ' IJ �i ��`�� j� , �'�//�/ �S�`" Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Horrie or other Display Home? ❑ Yes No If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and Ciry Council approva160 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrafes sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLICANT INFORMATION: l'� !111ti� Name: r;�:-,, c" ��G�Ir•' State License# (3C', ,7�y�= 42�� Expiration Date: � � s Phone: office ' �Z 2�3� 3' cell Mailing Address: �"(� 2�l t�1 lIVL% N�-V City: � ZIP: �'�SC�`�1.b Contact Person: ,C �4- 5�� Applicant is ��Contract / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: ,j (�lCL��'� L IN�1J�= �N -: �.p�*-� PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: (' ` ;. Phone (day): /, � �r�_ �"� :. �.—,, --, Address: �..q v XAN-TNO� L�.�<�;' ✓�i City:PL`�n�/D,;/T=+'�� ZIP: _, ::: ~�==� � Email and/or Fax —�'�:.,�t._'r'i'-; �!ryfLJ/;� . (��:' ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORMATION: Name: .«.; Phone(day): Address: /" �;, ;: , � : . City: , ZIP: � -/ Email and/or Fax: _ ' ;f�- ; PROJECT INFORMATION: 1.Type of Project 2.Proposed Use 3.Structure Type 4.Sewage Disposal 8� Water Supply �New Construction �Single Family with �Residence ❑Addition attached garage ❑ Garage/Accessory Bldg. �Public Sewer ❑Accessory Building ❑ Single Family with ❑ Deck ❑ Relocation detached garage ❑ Office/Commercial ❑ Private Sewer ❑Other: (specify) ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse ❑ Public ❑ Storage ❑ Public Water **Any earth movement may require ❑ Commercial ❑Other(specify) MCWD review&permits. ❑ Industrial �Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑Other: (speCify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven,MN 55391 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.min nehahacreek.orq Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ �� / , <�(7U • STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1.Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) 2.Type of Construction ,-� a. Length(ft.)= �/ Number of bedrooms= -' � �Wood/Frame b.Width(ft.)= �� Number of garage stalls: ❑ Masonry Areas in square feet Attached = � ❑Metal ❑ Pole Bldg. c. Basement= � Detached=� ❑ ICF d. 15l Story = 3 �d /�6 ❑On-site Prefab @. 2"d StOry= 2iLa� ❑Off-site Prefab f. '/z Story = � ❑Other(please specify): g.Total Area= 5� REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed A licable ❑ Permit A lication ❑ Pro osed Buildin Plans ❑ MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form ❑ Surve meetin all re uirements ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ❑ Hardcover Calculation s ❑ �' Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort �� j' �£ ,* �'_-- ❑ �( Access Permit O Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan � En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above ❑ Plan Review Fee ��,J `,� A� �2y oo ��C�CI,�,, i ❑ Other: APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or atl of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the apptication may not be issued. • Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested,a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. � ApplicanYs Signature. T � �7� Date: � � f Owner's Signature: Date: PLAtV REVIEW CHEC�C�,IS�' FOR NEW STRUCTURES / ADDITIONS ,k f � �� •�� bA� �� , � ��,; Adc!ressiPermit Number: E� V ` Description of work: ;'� � �� ._�� _ ;� Septic review by: ~ -'� Date Approved: 6-� --- �•� — p � Zoning review by: Date Approved: �� t Building review by: _ `� � Date Approved: � -�� Grading review by: Date Approved: � Zoning District: � Zoning File#: �' Reso#: Reso Date: �'�7�j Z» E�• 12.-7•(2. ' Zoning: Lot Area: Z �,G S /AC Width: Lot Coverage: SF �% ` Suroey Submitted: �es � No Date of Survey: �'�-� •�� Revised date(?): Pro osed Setbacks: Front(Lake) Rear(Street) ( N S E W ) ( N S E W ) Other Buildings Wetland S6de Side , Defined Height: Peak Height: ° ` F FF�: FFE minus 6 feet= (Existing Contour) Perimeter(linear feet) = 50%_ #of Stories Ok? � YES FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: The distance between the lowest FOR A BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION: ' START WITH proposed floor(of the basement or crawl ' space)and the highest point of the roof. START WITH The distance between the top of slab and If you have a... the highest point of the roof. If you have a... • GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no windows): Subtract half the windows): Subtract half the distance distance between the highest point between the highest point of the roof of the roof to the low point of the to the low point of the corresponding SUBTRACTION �orresponding gable or hipped roof -� �� SUBTRACTION gable or hipped roof (BASED ON ROOF . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with � (BASED ON • GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with TYPE) windows): Subtract half the ROOF TYPE) windows); Subtract half the distance . • distance between the top of the betwee�the top of the highest highest window and the highest window and the highest point of the point of the roof roof • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, mansard,etc:No subtraction. mansard,etc):No subtraction. ADDITION Add the distance between the top of slab Subtract the distance between the ,P BASED ON and the hi hest existin rade ad acent to SUBTRACTION I. � 9 9 9 1 (BASED ON EXISTING basemenUcrawl space floor and the � EXISTING the foundation. GRADES) highest existing grade adjacent to the GRADES foundation OR 10 feet(whichever is less). �-. . EQUALS Defined building height EQUALS De£ned building height �� Shoreland District D Permit Received Avera e Lakeshore Setback Met? Bluff Yes 0 No 0 N/A 0 Yes �- No �Yes 0 No � Yes Q No 0 N/A Permit Number: Z Setback: Stormwater Quality Existing Proposed Variance Required CUP Required Overla District Tier Hardcover Hardcover ; �ZD/� Yes � No Yes 0 No � � � �� T pe(S>� ��'`�I!�'"� TYPe(S)� t�(P�� fi Updated: January 2013 . v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx , , �;_„ _ _ . _ . i REMARKS (in-house): Fees to be Char ed 1fES NO Permit � Plan Review � State Surcharge �'" Investigation Fee �'� 5AC i I�umlaer�f�AC Units �'��;�_� �.�. �� :g'` ,..�, °� ,�,`'r� a Other(specity) "'�� S uare Foota e $ er S uare Foota e Basement X - $ 1 St Floor X - � 2"d F100� X - $ Garage X - $ Estimated Construction Value: $ � � �, �°�' ``" Oeono Inspections Reguired Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits � Site Plumbing O Grading / Filling �Well 0 Hardcover Removal Mechanical 0 Fire �lectrical Footing � � Septic 0 Water Connection Poured Wall Fireplace �ewer Connection FFoundation Survey 0 Masonry �Lawn Irrigation � Radon Rock Bed �Mfg. � �"Framing � Other(specify) Insulation As-Built Survey inal 0 � etland Buffer Other(specify) �c�, � REMARKS (in-house): Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: Access: Existing: � YES 0 NO New: 0 YES 0 NO OFFICIAL REMARKS -TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED � � ��'� � � �,� �� Updated: January 2013 v:\formslplan review checklist 2013.docx , � ity of ono �Y — � �� . � �o� � �� I I ion Wor� ; . �� ,vo Hardcover Ca cu at '� �� Property Address: �Q� �� S �— "�'�^�~ Prepared by: Date: ,,,,�,�., �i�i�� /��y�� s- �z 3 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)�Ti' er 1 ier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 _.� Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separatel for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet Exam Ie Gara e 24'x 30' 720 S.F. q � ;'sr� �-� � S.F. B /� � '�%� S.F. � C lZt�t� , -��J.r- �::�%c:��:,�% S.F. D S GL, . � S.F. E S.F. F , (/�7 ,','� � � S.F. G ;? ;/�` �„x%' S.F. N , c 7`� ,�j!'��.�ce° � / S.F. I O S.F. J Ky�' ,�`Y` , ,�`,�; O S.F. K l,�f S.F. L -G�' O S�= SD S.F. M f .C.-�- lr�,�c:r��%''a4�` � S.F. N ` S.F. p S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. g S.F. T S.F. � S.F. V S.F. �/ S.F. X S.F. y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover � ,� �S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Cit Code Sec 78-1684 : S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Pro osed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area � �`� 1 !"'-`: �' ,�'t�"" S.F. Proposed Hardcover f�►��:(4)] �>�,��; % MAY 2 2 2013 January 8,2013 �JTY OF ORONO \ • = BO LTON 8� M �N , � . Consuiting Engineers & Surveyors " 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200•Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone(952)448-8838• Fax(952)448-8805 www.bolton-menk.com May 22, 2013 �� City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis PO Box 66 Orono,Mn 55323 RE: Building Permit Application 2013-00308 House Construction 1105 Ferndale Road West Dear Melanie: As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Our current review is based on the documents listed below, and we offer the following observations,comments, and recommendations for your consideration. Submittal Documents • Resolutions granting variances to sections 78-305, 78-1279, and 78-1288 and a CUP pursuant to sections 78-966, 78-967, and 78-1286; dated February 27, 2012 • Certificate of Survey prepared by Egan, Field, and Nowak; dated April 29, 2013 • Certificate of Survey prepared by Egan,Field, and Nowak with additional proposed hardcover • Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan prepared by Anderson Engineering; dated December 14, 2011 • Landscape Plan prepared by Anderson Engineering; dated December 14, 2011 • Architectural Plans and Elevations prepared by YA Architecture; dated May 1, 2013 • Foundation and Framing Plans prepared by YA Architecture; dated May 1, 2013 Review Comments 1. Per City Council resolution 6118, the following items should be conditional to the approval of the building permit: a. Council approval is based on the survey, site grading, landscape and house plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A, B, C, &D. Any amendments to these plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. b. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall be limited to 8,581 sf or 32.2%per the proposed survey/site plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted in Exhibit A. The Applicants are advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing/proposed hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. The current hardcover depicted on the Certificate of Survey is 8,871sf or 33.29%. The plans must be revised to be in conformance with the approved resolution or request the City to increase the allowable hardcover. c. A lakeshore buffer shall be established and maintained in the areas shown on Exhibit C; all landscaping shall be planted and maintained per the planting plan attached to this � 1105 Ferndale Road West,Orono, MN ; - . May 22, 2013 � � Page 2 Resolution as Exhibit C as annotated by Staff. The submitted Landscape Plan was used as Exhibit C and has not been revised since approval of Resolution 6118. d. Applicants shall not place any plastic or fabric liner material under any landscaping on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces. The Landscape Plan should be revised to add notes accordingly. e. Council approval is based on the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan submitted by the Applicants and annotated by Ci�y staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B. Any amendments to these plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. The submitted Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan was used as Exhibit B and has not been revised since approval of Resolution 6118. f. Submittal of MCWD permit for floodplain alteration/mitigation shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Applicants will also rzeed a MCWD permit for erosion corztrol,and a copy of all required permits should be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. g. The home plans submitted are for the parpose of hardcover review. The construction plans and survey submitted for building permit will be reviewed for conformance with Orono's building height and number of stories calculation. Review of home plans for conformarcce with height and number of stories calculation will be performed by the Building Department. h. Authorities granted by this resolution run wilh the Property not with the Applicants,but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances and conditional use permit will expire on that date (February 27, 2013). The Applicartts have requested and been granted an extension by the City. i. Violation of or non-conformance with any of the terms and conditions of this Resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. j. The undersigned Owner and Applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this Resolution and on behalf of their heirs, successars and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this Resolution in the chain of title of the property. 2. Since this project will disturb the majority of the lot and is located directly adjacent to Lake Minnetonka, it is recommended that a financial security of$5,000 for erosion control and engineering oversight be required of the Applicants. The financial security is intended to provide protection in the event that it becomes necessary far the City to install or maintain erosion and sediment control within the project area and covers the cost of turf re-establishment if the applicant is unable to follow through with the conditions of approval. 3. Perimeter erosion control devices (siltfence, rock construction entrance, and inlet protection) should be inspected by the City prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with the erosion control depicted on the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan. 4. Tree protection fencing should be installed at the outside edge of the drip zone for trees to be saved, and the fencing should be inspected by the City prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with the locations depicted on the Landscape Plan. The areas requiring tree protection depicted on the Landscape Plan do not correspond with the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan. The Landscape Plan should be revised to add fence installation notes accordingly, and the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan should be revised to correspond with protection areas depicted on the Landscape Plan. 5. Inlet protection should be placed on the proposed yard drain after installation and removed only after permanent site stabilization. The Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan should be revised accordingly. I � • • 1105 Ferndale Road West, Orono, MN : . . � May 22, 2013 Page 3 6. If a concrete washout is to be used on-site,the plans should be revised to provide a detail of the washout and show where it is to be located. 7. A record drawing of final grading elevations should be submitted after grading is complete to ensure compliance with floodplain mitigation depicted on the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON&MENK, INC. �d'�Ci'IJ�SJ"� �'<�-�� / . Robert E. Bean,Jr.,P.E. Water Resources Engineer . , • = BO L._TON 8� M �N K , I N C� . Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200•Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone(952)448-8838•Fax(952)448-8805 www.bolton-menk.com May 22, 2013 �G�,�Z��( ��/'17t.��S .-_.. City of Orono ..— Attn: Melanie Curtis PO Box 66 Orono,Mn 55323 RE: Building Permit Application 2013-00308 House Construction 1105 Ferndale Road West Dear Melanie: As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted far the above referenced project. Our current review is based on the documents listed below, and we offer the following observations,comments, and recommendations for your consideration. Submittal Documents • Resolutions granting variances to sections 78-305, 78-1279, and 78-1288 and a CUP pursuant to sections�8-966, 78-967, and 78-1286; dated February 27, 2012 • Certificate of Survey prepared by Egan,Field, and Nowak; dated April 29, 2013 • Certificate of Survey prepared by Egan,Field, and Nowak with additional proposed hardcover • Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan prepared by Anderson Engineering; dated December 14, 2011 • Landscape Plan prepared by Anderson Engineering; dated December 14, 2011 • Architectural Plans and Elevations prepared by YA Architecture; dated May 1, 2013 '� • Foundation and Framing Plans prepared by YA Architecture; dated May l, 2013 Review Comments 1. Per City Council resolution 6118, the following items should be conditional to the approval of the building permit: a. Council approval is based on the survey, site grading, landscape and house plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A, B, C, &D. Any amendments to these plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. b. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall be limited to 8,581sf or 32.2%per the proposed �� survey/site plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted in Exhibit A. The t '�� Applicants are advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature �Q�� of existing/proposed hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover _ �p� will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. The Y��G yw�� current hardcover depicted on the Certificate of Survey is 8,871 sf or 33.29%. The � �p.�,,,,,�p� plans must be revised to be in conformance with the approved resolution or request the ��' � ,"` City to increase the allowable hardcover. a c. A lakeshore buffer shall be established and maintained in the areas shown on Exhibit C; '� �� all landscaping shall be planted and maintained per the planting plan attached to this �� ' 1105 Ferndale Road West,Orono, MN ; � . May 22, 2013 � • Page 2 �2esolution as Exhibit C as annotated by Staff. The submitted Landscape Plan was used V � as Exhibit C and has not been revised since approval of Resolution 6118. d. Applicants shall not place any plastic or fabric liner material under any landscaping on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces. The Landscape "� Plan should be revised to add notes accordingly.--• ��(,q�r1�' � �,}� e. Council approval is based on the Grading and Floodplain itigation Plan submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B. Any endments to these plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. The submitted Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan was used as Exhibit B and has not been revised since approval of Resolution 6118. f. Submittal of MCWD permit for floodplain alteration/mitigation shall be submi City prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Applicants will also nee a MCWD ,(f��1V p permit for erosion control,and a copy of all required permits should be s br�zitted prior � to issuance of the building perinit. g. The home plans submitted are for the purpose of hardcover review. The construction � plans and survey submitted for building permit will be reviewed for conformance with Orono's building height and number of stories calculation. Review of home plarzs for h� � conformance with height and nunzber of stories calculation will be perforined by the V Building Department. h. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants,but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be ompleted within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances and condilional use permit will expire on that date(February 27, 2013). The Applicants have requested and been granted an extension by the City. i. Violation of or non-conformance with any of the terms and conditions of this Resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. � j. The undersigned Owner and Applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the � terms of this Resolution and on behalf of their heirs, successors and assigns,hereby agree �� 1N � to the recording of this Resolution in the chain of title of the property. � ,�5� 2. Since this project will disturb the majority of the lot and is cate irectly adjacent to Lake �j� � Minnetonka,it is recommended that a financial security $5,000 f r erosion control and engineering oversight be required of the Applicants. The ' � security is intended to provide protection in the event that it becomes necessary for the City to install or maintain erosion and sediment control within the project area and covers the cost of turf re-establishment if the applicant is unable to follow through with the conditions of approval. 3. Perimeter erosion control devices (siltfence, rock construction entrance, and inlet protection) should be inspected by the City prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with the erosion control depicted on the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan. �� 4�. Tree protection fencing should be installed at the outside edge of the drip zone for trees to be �� saved, and the fencing should be inspected by the City prior to any land disturbing activities to rS ensure compliance with the locations depicted on the Landscape Plan. The areas requiring tree ,�y�� protection depicted on the Landscape Plan do not correspond with the Grading and Floodplain r �� Mitigation Plan. The Landscape Plan should be revised to add fence installation notes �� accordingly, and the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan should be revised to correspond with protection areas depicted on the Landscape Plan. 5. Inlet protection should be placed on the proposed yard drain after installation and removed only � � after permanent site stabilization. The Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan should be revised � accordingly. � �,r��ro a,�►.�c�l- �u U�„�,u� a�c.� n. 1105 Ferndale Road West, Orono, MN : . May 22, 2013 + • Page 3 6. If a concrete washout is to be used on-site,the plans should be revised to provide a detail of the washout and show where it is to be located. 7. A record drawing of final grading elevations should be submitted after grading is complete to ensure compliance with floodplain mitigation depicted on the Grading and Floodplain Mitigation Plan. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, � BOLTON &MENK, INC. � a1 ' � ��( �� Robert E. Bean,Jr.,P.E. Water Resources Engineer � MINUTES OF THE � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING " � Monday,February 13,2012 7:00 dclock p.m. 9. #12-3540 CHARLES TRUWIT AND PAULA PICARD, 1105 FERNDALE ROAD WEST— VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Charles Truwit, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated in 2009,the property owners applied for and received approval to redevelop the subject property in order to make it more saleable. The property owners have received annual renewals of those applications. The applicants have an interest in purchasing the property. With the exception of a few cosmetic changes to the property,they wish to construct what was initially approved. The applicants are proposing to slightly increase the size of the proposed footprint by 19 square feet over the previous approval. The proposed home consists of 3,409 square feet of structural coverage. A second floor continues to be proposed over a portion of the house, although the applicants are proposing to move it further west for a more central location. The change results in less massing for the adjacent lot. Also being requested is an increase in hardcover from 30.1 percent approved hardcover to 36 percent within the 0-75 foot zone. The hardcover numbers were recently adjusted by the applicant. The increase in hardcover being requested is primarily to allow a tear drop configuration of the driveway. The Planning Commission voted in January to recommend approval of a CUP and to recommend denial of the increase in hardcover. The Planning Commission had recommended approval of the hardcover variances with the removal of the proposed tear drop driveway. Curtis stated the colored overhead view reflects the Planning Commission's recommendation relating to the driveway. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the existing hardcover for the driveway with the exception of the green and red areas as well as the addition of hardcover to provide access to the front door. In addition, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot area and lot width variances, approval of the requested side yard setback variance, approval of the requested 75- foot lake setback variances, and approval of the CUP for grading within 75 feet of OHWL. � �. �Ca�1 @ Staff recommends appr �l of hardcover totali 8,0281square feet total.`The Planning Commission's recommendation add�56 ��are feet of additionaa-hardcover for a total of 32.2 percent. The applicants have agreed to plant addifiional shrubs or trees to screen the proposed lakes�'�3e�deck. Staff continues to recommend approval of the inclusion of a vegetative, shoreline buffer to infiltrate stormwater runoff along the southwest lakeshore area in the place of the proposed sod as illustrated on the landscape plan. The Council should discuss the various elements of the application and determine an appropriate level of hardcover for the property. In addition,the applicant should be required to provide a revised plan and revised survey prior to final Council approval. Rahn asked when Staff recommends approval of the 32.2 percent hardcover,whether that is more or less than what was approved in 2009 plus the 19 square feet. Rahn noted Staffs report states that 8,899 square feet was approved by Resolution 5841, but noted there was some swapping with the driveway. Curtis stated the front page of Staff's report shows the levels approved originally. Those hardcover numbers have since been adjusted to account for the removal of a piece of property belonging to the adjacent lot. Curtis noted the revised hardcover numbers have been adjusted on the second page of Staffs report, t�['Ch i he 8,028 square feet. The Planning Commission is recommending approval of an additio al 553 s�c uare feet. = --�---�� Page 9 of 22 ' MINUTES OF THE � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING � : • Monday,February 13,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (9. #12-3540 CHARLES TRUWIT AND PAULA PICARD, I105 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, Continued) Curtis noted Staff did receive an e-mail today that has been distributed to the Council from an adjacent property owner. McMillan asked where that property owner is located. Curtis illustrated on the overhead the location of that property. Bremer noted the concern relates to headlights and privacy. Rahn asked as it relates to the 5-foot setback, what the next level of distance is. Rahn asked if the 5-foot conflict is only for the last 10 feet. Curtis indicated it is and that it is closer to l2 feet. The lot line was adjusted in the past to reflect a chimney on the adjacent home. Today there is a carport that goes to the property line on the subject property. Rahn asked whether 10 feet is required there or 30 feet. Curtis indicated it is a 30-foot setback since it is a two acre zoning district. The proposed home is consistent with the home's current footprint. Tom Owens, Attorney-at-Law, stated he would like to supplement Staf�s review with five additional points. Before the Council tonight is an application seeking these variances because the plans in 2009 had one key oversight; namely,the driveway near the house lacks two features to make the driveway safer and more practically useable. The plans were drawn up in 2008 and modified several times in 2009. Those plans were drawn up for a hypothetical buyer. Owens stated his second point is that the findings made by the City Council in June 2009 all apply to this application with one exception, which is that instead of a slight decrease in hardcover, there is a slight increase from 31.5 percent to 36 percent. The third point is that the only genuine issue before the City Council is whether the hardcover change is reasonable and whether it will alter the essential character of the locality. The applicant urges the City Council to find that the request is reasonable. The subject property is surrounded on three sides by water. The property located at l 101 West Ferndale was granted hardcover of 52.6 percent in 1995 for a replacement residence. In addition,the dwelling and lot nonconformities and parcel configuration are truly unique to this lot, which means that whatever the Council does tonight will not set a harmful legal precedent. It is extremely unlikely that another homeowner will come before the Council and make a similar request. Owens noted the legal landscape has changed recently and the bar for variance approval has been considerably lowered by the MN Legislature. The practical difficulty standard allows the property owner greater latitude. - Page 10 of 22 1 MINUTES OF THE � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING � • � Monday,February 13,2012 7:00 o'dock p.m. (9. #12-3540 CHARLES TRUWITAND PAULA PICARD, 1105 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, Continued) Dr. Truwit stated what he is attempting to do is live within the spirit of what was already approved but that there were a couple of items that were either deficiencies or oversights with the original approval. Truwit noted the previously approved house has no door on the lake side of the house, which is inconceivable that someone would construct a house on the lakeshore without a door to access that area. Dr. Truwit noted the original proposed house and driveway were to be elevated as well as the garage floor per the previous variances. Truwit stated the thing that caught his attention the most was the elevated driveway. Due to the issues associated with the elevated driveway as previously approved, Truwit indicated he is proposing the area in green. Given the current configuration of the driveway without the extension, if someone is backing out in the winter and the driveway is icy, a vehicle could slide over the retaining wall. The Planning Commission agreed with that premise since it is a safety issue. The second issue before the City Council is one of practical difficulty. Currently you have to back out into the neighbor's driveway or back all the way out to the road. That situation is going to raise the risk that someone is going to back up and go off the driveway. Truwit indicated he would like to have a turnaround so that people can drive out facing forward. Truwit stated he has only recently learned ofthe neighbor's concern. With the current configuration of the driveway, the headlights will hit the neighboring home when someone enters the driveway and when someone leaves. With the tear drop,the neighbor would experience only one set of headlights. Truwit displayed a picture of the lot showing the trees on the property. Given the substantial number of trees, Truwit stated he is not sure what the neighbor will see. Truwit indicated they are not proposing to remove the trees and are, in fact, proposing to plant more trees, which will increase the privacy. This issue was not raised at the Planning Commission meeting. Truwit stated they will be taking out the patio that was requested be removed, removing the carport, and freeing up the space between the two properties the best they can, but that that they would like to use the existing foundation. Truwit stated he has talked to the neighbors about the project and they have indicated they would like to see the carport removed, which is being done. Truwit stated he is asking for a slight increase in hardcover, but that in his view it is a reasonable request. Truwit stated he initially attempted to point out to Staff that the neighbor has over 50 percent hardcover. They are requesting 31.6 percent. Staff pointed out it is not an apples to apples comparison, which he understands, but that he would request the City Council consider what the hardcover numbers would be if that portion of the driveway is added to their property. Truwit stated according to his calculations, it would be between 39.5 and 42.5 percent hardcover. Truwit pointed out their request is still well below what the most immediate neighbor has for hardcover and that he is asking for something very reasonable in order to address some safety concerns. Franchot asked about the conservatory on the second floor. Truwit indicated it is more of a four-season room. Concerns with the conservatory were also included in the comments from the neighbor. Truwit stated there is no conceivable way the neighbors can see the conservatory from their property. Page 11 of 22 ' MINUTES OF THE � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING � � • Monday,February 13,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (9. #12-3540 CHARLES TRUWITAND PAULA PICARD, 1105 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, Continued) Franchot commented his concern with the conservatory in general is that if it is used at night, it will be quite brightly lit. Truwit indicated if they do use it at night, it would be with the lights off and that it is not going to be a center of activity during the nighttime. Truwit illustrated the line of view from the neighbor's house to the conservatory. Franchot asked whether there would be lights in the conservatory. Truwit indicated there will be. Franchot commented the residence is larger appearing with the second floor and high peak and that he has a concern the glass structure will be lit and bright for the whole lake. Franchot stated the concern also relates to future property owners. Truwit stated the shades would be down at night and not lit up so people can see what they are doing. The principal concern raised at the original City Council meeting was the proximity to the adjoining property and the proximity to the lake, which is why their plans do not put the second story right up to the corner and instead step it back. Rahn asked if the existing home is a single story. Truwit indicated it is. McMillan asked if the driveway needs to be elevated due to the floodplain. Curtis indicated it does. McMillan commented the elevated driveway may be more as a result of the MCWD than the Orono City Council. Truwit indicated there was no MWCD approval applied for with the last application, which has been taken care of with this application. The MWCD has reviewed this application and Staff has been provided with their findings. McMillan commented the Council would love to have a driveway without a retaining wall but that it may not be possible in this case. McMillan asked if the driveway would be raised all the way out to Ferndale. Truwit indicated the straight part is elevated approximately six or seven inches and that the portion near the house has to be raised a foot and a half. McMillan stated whenever there is a shared driveway arrangement, the City gives some credit for the hardcover, and asked whether that has been done in this case. Page 12 of 22 � MINUTES OF THE � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING � • • Monday,February 13,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (9. #12-3540 CHARLES TRUWITAND PAULA PICARD, 1105 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, Continued) Curtis indicated that is what the revised hardcover calculations show on the second page of Staff's report. Staff removed the portion of the driveway that only benefits the neighbor and everything that the subject property needs to access the property is included in the hardcover numbers. McMillan asked whether anyone has any issues with the patio being converted into a deck. Bremer and Printup indicated they do not. Rahn stated as it relates to the driveway, in his view the circular driveway is excessive and that he is not in support of the turnaround. Rahn commented there might be more headlight issues with the tear drop. Rahn stated he is not sure why the City Council would allow the blue driveway area since it appears the applicants have a plenty wide turnaround without the blue area. Truwit indicated the blue currently exists and that it would be removed with the addition of the turnaround. Rahn stated he would go with Staff's recommendation and pointed out that it is a lot more house than what was there before and that in his opinion it would have an impact on the character of the neighborhood. Rahn commented that he has received complaints from other citizens about ramblers being changed to two-story residences. Rahn stated as it relates to driveways in general,the City Council gets very detailed on how wide driveways can be, along with turnarounds. Rahn stated it appears that there would be plenty of room to turn a car around and asked whether the engineer agrees with that assessment. Curtis indicated he does. Rahn stated if the applicant would like to rearrange the driveway and perhaps remove a third garage stall, the application can be tabled for redesign. Truwit indicated he did remove some of the existing hardcover and that he is not interested in redesigning his plans. Truwit noted this is the last one-story house in the neighborhood and that the other homes have already been converted or have been approved for redesign. Truwit stated the character of the neighborhood has already changed and that the current house is not livable the way it is. McMillan commented the applicant has a right to construct a second story but that it will have some impact to the neighboring property. As it relates to the driveway, in an ideal world without the need to limit hardcover, it would be elegant. McMillan stated in her view the applicant does have enough room to back cars in and out of the driveway. McMillan stated she understands why the applicant would like that amenity but that in her opinion there are already concessions being made with the location of the house. Truwit stated the current house is an eyesore and that they are proposing a solution. Truwit stated he has given the City Council his rationale for the turnaround and that he would like to proceed forward with the rest of the house. Franchot asked which corner the conservatory would be located on. Page 13 of 22 r. . ` MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ' Monday,February 13,2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. (9. #12-3540 CHARLES TR UWIT AND PA ULA PICARD, 1105 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, Continued) Truwit pointed out the location of the conservatory on the overheard. Franchot indicated he is in agreement with Council Member Rahn and Mayor McMillan as it relates to the driveway and that he can live with the conservatory. Rahna moved,Franchot seconded,Application#12-3540,Charles Truwit and Paula Picard, 1105 Ferndale Road West,to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving the lot width and area variances,a 5-foot side yard setback variance, lake setback variances,a hardcover variance not to exceed 32Z percent,and a conditional use permit,subject to the City Engineer's recommendations. McMillan asked whether it would be the green, blue and yellow. Curtis indicated that is correct. Truwit stated it would be everything but the red. Bremer noted a revised plan and certificate of survey must be provided prior to the resolution being approved by the Council. Truwit stated he has discussed that with Staff and that he was waiting until the driveway issue was resolved. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 10. #12-3541 KC CHERMAK ON BEHALF OF ROBB AND TINA RICHTER—3508 IVY PLACE—VARIANCES—RESOLUTION NO. 6112 KC Chermak, applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to redevelop the subject property and construct a new residence. They are requesting a lot width variance, a lot area variance, hardcover variances, as well as a side street setback variance. Due to the topography and shape of the lot,the majority of the driveway for the existing home is located in the right-of-way along with some other encroachments. The applicants' proposal includes a setback variance from the right-of-way to allow a 10-foot setback where a 15-foot setback is required; an average lakeshore setback variance to allow a small portion of the covered porch to partially encroach two to three feet; and a hardcover variance to allow 46 percent hardcover. All of the encroaching improvements within the right-of-way are proposed to be removed and the right-of-way will be restored with vegetation. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the request. Staff also recommends approval of the variances. ' Curtis noted this application has received supporting comments from the neighbor to the north,who would be affected by the average lakeshore setback variance. Public Works has also commented today on the applicant's right-of-way vegetation plan and they are satisfied with the proposed improvements. The Page 14 of 22 -_ - � - -- _. __ _ _ __ _--- __— `- \I IIII �i ('rrtilirale . it��u�i��. `:�m��c ��»i,a�� Date• _ OS-O/- /.� Site Address• �/Or I��ID�L� � (�t �A�`1�l,� ��/ ��" ;? l Contractor Name: License Number: � ' _ _ ____ _ _ _ __ __ , _ Cooalloh l Sire ', � -- _ ---- loc�tron Type of � Instd/led -- )ype , , ?hs4�alloh _ R�-�--- - - r--- ------- - Makeu�Air � 1��,. L�- '� __.- - - Roof Ceilin �. ;�-� ; � SE c,C, _ _ _----�--- _---- -- �� ---- -- _--- -_- - _--- �- ---_ _ Combustion Air_ ____ ,�,.� Walls s (�►' E ;� -yo � Water Heating I ,• .,., _ , _______ _�.oly--- ' Slab-on-Grade I�. '� -iS ___ _ ��1-�•�-. l _ __._ ____.�n � G.►� ____ _.__-.- ---tiLd�?4�C_'t4�'_ __.�?_o�C'� Floor /�,/ , --_----. -- -- ---- Ducts Outside of Conditioned Spaces . Rim]oist �ri, �: �- - � ------ ..--- -- - _---------------------____._ ____._ CC nterior Exterior or Integral tj �.� Foundation Wall p �(��t,. - lO - i � � Interior Exterior or Integral ' _--- ------- - -__—�--- _� , _ _ _ ---_ _ __ _ - ____ � e�ll��actor � skGC l�/ar_he�t.�'n coe�r'e2t1_ --- �s'�.e qcti�e --- Fenestration a� _ __�� Radon Control ❑ _ _ _ _ __--.__._---- _. __ __. _____ __.__ _____ _.___ __.__._.. __ - --- --- I _ t gati F(JF �1a24�aC re�' _ a/c4�at�eb t Coss � --- Heatin� S�stem . ,�1�,,� �v , � � ___�/�/�._ ��.. � � �_�1-�.-�s, �3CG, /��' 3, �o C� � -_ �� -�...�.-��.-�- �TC'3Cn __ /c�n� �_� - __ ' �s - ___. ._._ .�.;�.��_:r�� .t 1�r,�� Q��- � .�------ i _c��". �'C._��'. __ .. __�U1�_ __ �._.,� �-- _ __. - _Q4rp�t_� _.__s_�. _ � �c.�� _ _..�bo�%9'4od�Lhreat�in Cool ing System , 1,.� �.,. - ' "7,�1 C�!�'__._ _. _ _ ��._.._._ � � _S.l n.�-Z ��,��'�� '.� _., _.__. , ��.... �4�.� i -a _ __ _ _ __ _. __�.._. ___�_,. _ , _.__..._.M._.._.__._._�.._ ______._.�_. � _.._ __ __ __�. ______ ._ .___. ..--____ _— _ _ �__.. �..— — -- -- —_____._ �._.._ _---- - _ _ ______. �yp�__ 4oc�t�o --- ---Cbnhnvovs� Nlation , �vra� �enr;iat�o� __ , Mechanical Ventilation _,_,�� ►t' __j�il� L� ��-*s-� � z.�-t �l� �. . _ ___ .��' �� l�� _ , _ _--. ______�_.___,____ _ , , , DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. �.J C��L � ��STi"t� First Middle Last =7`�`� 2��i�-f� ��L' �'r.v Address �� `�� p�� 2.Z��r City State Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. �'� ; e Packet Last Updated: 03-06-2012 - 19- 'Melanie Curtis , From: Steve Christopher[SChristopher@minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 11:24 AM To: Melanie Curtis Cc: Catherine Bach Subject: RE: 1105 Ferndale Rd W/ Permit#2013-00308 Attachments: 12-004 Permit.pdf Melanie, We issued the permit last October(see attached). Our financial assurance requirements are extremely low and in cases below 5 acres would only cover the mobilization cost.They are approved by our Board annually, but I generally don't get the heads up prior to the meeting. < 1ac. = None 1ac.—5ac. _$1,500 >5ac.—10ac. _ $2,500 >10ac. _$3,500+$200/ac over 10ac. I would support your recommendation. Steve Christopher Regulatory Program Manager 18202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 Direct: 952-641-4506 Office: 952-471-0590 Fax:952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.or� .� MI�lNEHAHA CREEK WATER$HE� DI$TRICt From: Melanie Curtis [mailto:MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:08 AM To: Steve Christopher Cc: Catherine Bach Subject: 1105 Ferndale Rd W/ Permit #2013-00308 Steve Have you received and/or approved a floodplain mitigation permit and erosion control permit applications for the project to construct a new home at 1105 Ferndale Rd W? (Chip Truwit) They recently submitted a building permit application; we will require copies of MCWD permits. Also, I'd like to discuss coordination of escrow securities with you. Our engineer is recommending that we collect $5000 escrow for erosion control purposes (instead of our $2500 minimum). I don't want to be overly heavy handed with our escrow requirement if you will also a significant amount. What are your thoughts? i Tha n ks 'Melanie �, Melanie Curtis Planning &Zoning Coordinator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Direct Dial: 952.249.4627 Fax: 952.249.4616 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 Email: mcurtis(a�ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us City of Orono Office Hours Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 4:30 pm 2 , MEMORANDUM Date: May 9, 2013 To: Dave Martini, City Engineer From: Christine Mattson, Planning Assistant c: Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator RE: Building Permit Number 2013-00308 1105 Ferndale Road West Attached are the survey, building plans and resolution for 1105 Ferndale Road West. Please review the attached information and provide comments by Thursday, May 16, 2013. Please return the survey and plans after your review is complete. Please call Melanie Curtis at 952.249.4627 if you need additional information or if you have any questions on the attached information. Thank you, . . ' City of Orono � � . ,.,,_o;�:J� Hardcover Calculation W e . , �_\I , � ' Property Address: �;:, �� vLr�l j�i�r� �L-' �✓�� ; , ; �� Prepared by: �,-;� Date: � /�'r�.��- l�v�'GD y�� S— �z 3 - , , Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 %�ier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Surve Square Feet) Exam le) ! Gara e 24'x 30' 720 S.F. A ,�1-,��; ?;r s.F. B �l ,<_'�� S.F. C �' -'t' '!,� ' -;y'':.,�.�.��..- ,,-.,�:,�._,y :�� t �'' S.F. � ` S✓''�L�1-� I��-C�i�; S.F. E S.F. F ri'j, ;��;�, : ��.,,�:, S.F. G ,;�; ',��:_ ,9, °' S.F. H � �;;-;-:'� ��.,,:�9��,,�° /;'�;:=? S.F. I �1�,Q-��'a; f� S.F. J ' � �'='� r :', / O S.F. K (� ,Gt1 � ' S.F. L '"1�=c�'' U/l�' ' S� S.F. M l�r`��.-{�-j��,;t;:r,�'�f�� S.F. N � S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Pro osed Hardcover �`�: '�� ;':�S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Cit Code Sec 78-1684 : S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Pro osed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area �'�;:`;,'�' � ` � � �� ,�:��.�� S.F. Proposed Hardcover F�r��q/�{�:(4)] %��:? �; % � v �. �;.- , � MAY 2 � �013 January B,2013 CITY OF ORONO � , � City of Orono �0�� o ,� H r v r alculation Workshe�� 0 . .,�. n� a dco e C �,�� PropertyAddress: ��j'S— h�D� W�S T- ','yT'\'. ^„�,�.F '� Prepared by: Date: - �i�� v►�a y.�� s- �-z 3 ��__ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)i Tier 1�J'ier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 � Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separatel for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet Exam le Gara e 24'x 30' 720 S.F. q ;� �, y � � S.F. B '�A s.F. c � r� �.�, A�;.�,:x.:��° o s.F. p s GL G S S.F. E S.F. F r'y �; S.F. G ..,,. ;;� ,;N''� S.F. H �?i �' �� I "��:�t�� / S.F. I S.F. � �r., �:� � ,�-�t�'_ O S.F. K G S.F. L '"?�"Ck:- O/ .�,t ' S� S.F. M � � ' ,,�`;:.. ` ", S.F. N S.F. p S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Pro osed Hardcover �� :=-S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Cit Code Sec 78-1684 : S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. 3 Net Pro osed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover F�r 1't�q/��:(4)] �-� �i % �erLV / v MAY 2 2 2013 January B,2013 CITY OF ORONO DATE C ME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN i� INSPECTIO TI S HEDULED ,� � PERMIT NO. �� '0O3��PLEfED , ADDRESS �, LC�S '��r�o�°�'L'`" �aR- C��' OWNEF�I'�d.� �Y�--'� TELEPHONE NO.��`'��'`�� CONTRACTOR � ,�tZ�S�QQ�'SF�a ��— � DESCRIPTION� � � � � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORFJWEfLANDS � ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z 'Crt ATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FtNAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL � � PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: F_ lcol . Q-� � DK G�.L, /3/V/� a f. N'6!/!/9� %/'G 5S , i.f�� 7 s -�b ►� 7`�4s��g j — o d -,� !,J � � � o�� (�ro� � ` a r' // / 0 � W °C Q e 5�� -F�-�c� ►K� �� la. L . o� Q � CG r r evf � �,L' � Cau�o L0. L . �n�s. z W � W � J d W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE ��Q,�$ECT WORK 8 PROCEED O ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. � pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WFLL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for ext inspection 2a hours in advance. (g52) 249-4600 Owner ontractoronsite• L.�c� R1,�alsa.r Ci�`�. Inspec , White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice J � ATE TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � INSPECTION OTICE SCHEDULED r PERMIT NO. � COMPLETED ADDRESS OWNER TELEPHON NO. �'�c�P;-��I'Y/� CONTRACT �� l �; DESCRIPTIO �� `�'�� ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORENVETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPT FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES_NO � COMMENTS: �� W � � 6 - �' - 0 �. � 0 � W � Q � 2 W � W � J d W WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPL E W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � BEFORE CWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. � pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REOUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in dvance. �9 9-46�� OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector_ White Copyllnspector's File Cenary CopylSite Notice � �Lw/ DATE TIME V CITY OF ORONO A� INSPECTION TI SCHEDULED � — �� PERMIT NO. �� -d �COMPLETED ADDRESS OWNER TE EPH NE O. 10�� 'at$��QOL� CONTRACTOR � DESCRIPTION ` —� � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FI L Q EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y O FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL Q ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL � SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTFiACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � — W C J y . O ` , ^ �. � �� i O � -� � W � Q � 2 W � W � J . d �. W WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE � ❑ RRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. � pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WFLL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. � Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. z49-46�0 OwnerlContractor on site: ' '� 1 , Inspector. /`?'✓ �-� '� � , � White Copyllnspector's File �' Canary CopylSfte Notice v r� � DATE TIME v CITY OF ORONO aD(3-Od3b CALLED IN �� INSPECTION NOTI E��r� CHEDULED '��TS-�5� �1.' 3d PERMIT NO. OMPLEfED ADDRESS �/�� L� l��,P . � l�{/ � OWNER T EPHONE NO.��a-o�Sa a7 CONTRACTOR � � DESCRIPTION � � ❑ FOOTtNG ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WEfLANDS y � FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES NO v�, COMMENTS: � W C j � ♦ O � � � � �L W � Q � 2 W � W � J d W RKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � ❑ ORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. � pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOfi �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REOUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. 9 ) 249-4600 OwnerfContractor on site: Inspector. White Copyllnspecto�'s File Cenary CopylSite Notice S� DATE TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED �� PERMIT NO.oZ�I�—OC�3��' COMPLETED ADDRESS�� I �1� � OWNER TELEPHONE NO. �Z Zg�,�1 Z7L CONTRACTOR 1-�nc� /U�� '�- C�1-� � DESCRIPTION L �`�'�"v � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHOREJWETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP � COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � � � �+ 4'��► �� 5{�� I/e,cee r � bo�o a�. d�' ,h!�. - w < <� SC�ee� 0 � ,(�r� v�de�? — O � W n � � s•�t'� d�4 d itSC� �, �,id�E f /� 5 a�t G� Q 2 LL O 11$� r Q� -!6 G`U!i C/' "" W � � � � � �Q �l �O/ f ••LSe�G'T•e�. (�l��^ rCiY►rt��1�� /"�'.rD d r W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE � ORRECT WORK&PROCEED �ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WIIL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call forthe next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952� 249-46�� OwnerfContractor on site: Inspecto . ite Copyltnspector's File Cenary CopylSlte Notice -- � l / DATE TIME �/ CITY OF ORONO � CALLED IN S C.� / INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED �_;�� .3•'<�Z PERMIT NO..��%/� (,�'Z� COMPLETED :f�Q2 iiP�-�� ADDRESS � � �� .E%:1{%?�rz (i' � �(J. �C�SSi/��% OWNER TELEPHONE NO. ��'��" CONTRACTOR � � , � DESCRIPTION ' � L - ' " � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAI ❑ EXCAV/GR DING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL O MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORENVETLANDS Q �FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLA�NT "i ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ? ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPri�FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:�.YES_NO c�.� COMMENTS: l� � a � YJ c�s - 3� '�i .� �� '�o '` — ol�r�r+�.ic - �e r d/� � b�K �CG�e 1� �. � W ��C—y '6 x ��i' •��o�� t��..�c � � �S ,� � ��.�� Q Z /,�.f�c r -- W � W � � d W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECTCOMPLETE � �ORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � �RRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � " BEFORECdVERiNG PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pH0T0 TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CAIL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARFANGE ACCESS. Cail forthe next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-4600 OwnerlConVactor on site: � Inspector. ` . - White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice �� t/� DATE TIME ✓ CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED — PERMITNO.aOi3'DD3� � COMPLETED /-/7-!� �� • ADDRESS � 105 1—P�h�C�O� � � OWNER TELEPHONE NO. ��a ��U� ��'� CONTRACTOR �'1 n� �� t t� �; DESCRIPTION I n S��—� � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILIING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS � ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL p TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_N � COMMENTS: � W a j �_ O a � O � � � � Q � � Z W � W � j d W WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED f,, PROJECT COMPLETE � ❑ RRECT WORK&PROCEED �:, ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑ CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. �, pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED �STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR O INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hour 'n advanc . 49-46QQ OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice �� DATE TIME ✓ CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED -ZL-/ / :D D PERMIT NO.ao�3-D�3�� COMPLETED ADDRESS ��5 �"�� 1 � OWNER TELEPHONE NO.��Z Z�Z .3�� CONTRACTOR L.!/liL� fV e�� DESCRIPTION � -' `S7�� ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING INAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL O MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORENVETLANDS y �FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL O ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION � WOOD BURNERIFIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ? ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL O HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNbATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � � y �i61ff/CQ �S�%'t'v �t»1.rrcr — O � J o ..� " , � �/rlT.�•n� G°�� C_°orn,iJ��.v f�c•e� �P,Q7�i�5 o � W �� Q � 2 W � W � J � �.Ip(QRK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE W ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. p pH0T0 TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspect^24�t�rs in advance. (g52) 249-46�� OwnerlContractor on site: �� Inspector. White C yllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice ��«�1 � � DATE TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � —I —� INSPECTION N TIC CHEDULED /— l .�L� D.' � PERMIT NO. � COMPLETED ADDRESS �S � OWNER TE PHONE NO. � � � CONTRACTOR � DESCRIPTION �� ❑ FOOTtNG ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORENVETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL O p TREE REMOVAL Z �INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP � ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: (�T�r C've�I OrL �(.,. '� W a 0 �'1�4��5 - .S�! �2�f TOO vrl�d/ � � � �; � //7 .7 e4� 4!� e�rl�`7�Y��-".—�g0-f- W � � Q _" � h � W � W � � J a � ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE W CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REtNSPECTION TEMPORARY � BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. p pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDEH POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cal1 ion 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-4600 Ownerl nVactor on site: �'� — Inspector. White Copyllnspector's Ffle Canary CopylSite Notice �� c/-°�T�-13 Tc.� CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN �• INSPECTIO�Ti�^�� SCHEDULED _�� PERMIT NO COMPLEfED ADDRESS I �OS '�-�r�a--�C 1�.� OWNER � TELEPHONE NO. ��Z- Z�'2--�� CONTRACTOR �� `� �-�`,'1 �� DESCRIPTION ��-2� C5�1 � � ❑ FOOTtNG ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORFJWETLANDS � O FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL Q ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BUFiNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � � DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ? ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � W a � J O �. � O � W � Q � 2 W � W � J O W KSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE CWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CAIL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cail for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-46�� OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. White Copyllnspector's Ffle Canary CopylSite Notice � D TIME �/ CITY OF ORONO s�CALCED IN �� INSPECTION OTI E ,�CHEDULED — � PERMIT NO " ��v cOMPLETED ADDRESS ��OS ��"�1�� F d �/ OWNER TELEPH NE NO.6/Z 3� Q CONTRACTOR L�� L�� DESCRIPTION ��iL�� GC/Q� � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHOREIWETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL � ❑ TREE REMOVA j� Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNbATION/REMOVAL Z OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO c�., COMMENTS: � W � j � � � r � ° � -�✓ �� -�c � 0 � Q —� �A-�� .r�� e e � W /� -� �.r W � � a W �K SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W � ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � BEFORECWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-46�0 OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. _ ��t �rI�.1T�� White Copyllnspector's Ffle Canary CopyfSite Notice �� T TIME V CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED - - •� PERMIT NO.�OI�'�Q✓?�� COMPLE/TED " '� ADDRESS ��De�S f—�/"/Z�` � F-C�' [�J OWNER TELEPHONE NO.��Z 3� �.6 CONTRACTOR L�1/f/1��- l�7tGt..� �; DESCRIPTION �v'��1 � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHOREMIETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP i ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J � PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO y COMMENTS: � W a � J O �. � O k W � Q � 2 W � W � J d W��WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECTCOMPLEfE � ❑COHRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CAIL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE CWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cail forthe next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-46�� OwnerlContra o sit - Inspecto White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice �`� `�'�" DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN /�� INSPECTION NOTI �J/� �CHEDULED �' - � �� `� PERMIT NO.�� `�`�—�Dv COMPLETED ' ADDRESS ��AS �P��-� � • OWNER TELEPHON NO.lO��c��a�GY.6 CONTRACTOR ��n� N��h C��--7L > DESCRIPTION T � � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y �RAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Z Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL � FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO �/�. R� �6�. 1 � COMMENTS:��• �/Ovi�. �r4Sf b �4c�hc �6✓6-/ ' a 6-�3 -�6-y�� S -- , � o `� l��o«,.�t, �.�c�o� do/ts �rf.y,K: �� '` a�'�r-y � � � _�f� o.rd� " � — ,L.�{�� , �c%j -�- �`i��o�.s�r5-�4a� ,.... w °� 5 a�,C,"f Q � ` ,('� . Z Y/'lrC�`"' `�� i��,o�Pl !►- �.r/e�.� - ��t7�, . �C � � � . C'c�C'�� r rc as �� W � � � � l�1 S/_/, - r� L��. Na,.?�" /%� � W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED � �� PR�COMPLETE � CO ECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W � ❑ CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. � pH0T0 TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR '-'•CITATION ISSUED � r P/'Uv7�JC �c�►�tt'� � ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS�O S �••�r��l�!� r� Ca11 f t inspection 24 hours in advance. (952� 249-4600 Ownerl ntractor on site: " e�� - w-� -'�File Canary CopylSite Notice DATE TIME � CITY O�ORONO CALLED IN INSPEC�ION NO�ICE �n SCHEDULED .� PERMIT NO. �O �✓'�" J�J COMPLETED ADDRESS ` O� � OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR �; DESCRIPTION � t� ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING � ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORENVETLANDS � Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ? ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � W C � � O ry�^ ^ � V/�1.� . � O � W � Q � Z W � W � � d W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECTCOMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALI FOR REINSPECT�ON TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITNIN HOURS. O PHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALI{NSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALITOARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952� 249-4600 OwnerlContrac or on site• Inspector. White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice �C-� �,QTE TIME ✓ a� CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN h �� ` u INSPECTION � m�y�� SCHEDULED 1 1 • PERMIT NO. �(.JiJi`_o COMPLETED ADDRESS � �-d� �r�� `'� OWNER TELEPHONE NO.��2-Z��•��O CONTRACTOR � �-�`�'` � DESCRIPTION I ,n� �C"" ��'� �� ly ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING � 0 POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORFJWETLANDS h Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ,,❑��//RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � U!,FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT Q �bbEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP i ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � � / . � � � o \ � 0 � W � i Q � W '` � W � � � W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALLTO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (9 6�� OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector_ White Copyllnspector's File anary CopylSite Not e . • • . • . � • emo To: Finance Department From: Christine Mattson, Planning Assistant CC: Street File Date: February 9, 2015 G/L: 101-22205 Re: Escrow Refund Demolition permit #2012-00986 and Building Permit #2013-00308 pertaining to 1105 Ferndale Road W are complete. Please refund $5,000 to the applicant, Chip Truwit & Paula Picard. The following is attached: • Original signed escrow agreement • Copy of cash register receipt showing escrow amount received Mail to: Chip Truwit& Paula Pichard 1105 Ferndale Road W Wayzata, MN 55391 w:\street files\femdale road w�1105\escrow refund request 2012-00986&2013-00308.docx Jui-16-2013 08:14 AM HCMC 612-904-4567 1/1 �ui�.dtNG p��ir 2oya-ooao8 , �SCRdW AGR�EM�NY � c r AGREEM�N7 mede thle�day of `�� ,2013, by and beiween the CI'i'Y OF ORONO, a Minnesota municlpal corporatlon("Clty")and Charles Truw and Pau1a Picard("Owners"). Rectta�s 1. � An applicatfon for a Building Permft has bsen flled for the property located at 1105 Ferndale Road Weat and legally described as:7ract A, HLS No.44i, �iles of the Aeglatrar of Title�, County of H4nnopin, excapt that part embraced In Rt,S No. 902, Flles o} the Reglstrar of Titloa, Tract� A snd C, Regfstered �and Surv�y No. 902, Flles of the Reglatrar of 7ltles, County of Hennepin (hereinafter the "SubJact Praperty"). 2. In conJunction wlth the constructlon of the new resldence and associated grading and floodplain alteratfan9, eroslon control measur�g are requlred as ahawn on the approved Grading and euilding Plans relating to Buflding Permit 2093^Q0308. NQW,THEREOFRE,TH�PARTl�3 AG�i�E AS FOLLOWS: 1. DEPOSI'f OF ESGROW FUNDS. Gontemporaneously wlth the eXecUtlon of this Escrow Agreement, the Owners shall deposit$5,000.00 with the Clty. All accrued lnterest, if any,shall be paid tv the City to reimburse the Clry for Its cost In adminlsiering the escrow accaunt. 2. PURPOS�OF�SCFiOW. The purpose of the escrow Is to guarantee relmbursement to the Clry far all out-of-pocket costs(fncluding planning, englneering, or legal conaultsnt revlew)the City has lncurred to assure that the erosion control measur�s are installed and malntalned so the Sub�ect Properry complles wlth the provlslons of Orono Clty Code Chapter 79. The flnancial security may also be used by the City to elfminate any hazardous conditions asaocfated wlth the work attd to �epair any damaga to public property or Infraetructure that le caused by the work. !f compliance with the approved 6ullding Permlt is not accompllshed wtthin the allowable tlme perlod,the City may bring the proJect Into compllance by use of fhe securlq+. 3. RlGWT OF ENTRY. The Owners h�reby grant the City,its agents,employe�s,o�cers and contractors the rlght to enter the SubJect Prope�ty to perform all work and lnapectione deemed approprfete by the Clty In conf unctlon wfth the required erosian control measures, lncluding but not Ilmited to constructing or completing any and all of ths agreed upon lmprovements shoufd the Owners' contractor not compl�te those improvements by th� date specified herein. 3. MONTHLY BlLLING. Ae the Glty rece(ves consultant bilis for inourred oosta,the CiEy will in turn s�nd a blll to tha Owners. Owners shall be r�sponslble for paymeni to the Clty wfthln�0 days of the Owners'recelpt of blll. 4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. fn the event that the Owners do not make payment to the City within the timafram�vutllned !n#3 above, shall lssue a Siop Work Order until the Owners pay ail expenses Invoiced pursuant to #3. The City mey drew from the eacrow accaunt wfthout further approval of the Owners to refmburse the City for ellglble expenses the City has incurred, S. Cl,OS1NG ESCROW. Any remalninq amount of the flnanciel securiry deposfted with the Clty for falthiul perfarmance af#he plans and speclflcatlons and any related remedial work will be released after the completion end fnsp�atlon of ell such measures and the establlshment of flnal 6tebfffzatlon for the 9ubJect Property. 6. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARG�S. lf the proJect Is abandoned by Owners, or if the eligible expenses Incurred by the City exceed the emount fn eacrow, the Clty shall have the right to certify the unpeid halance to the SubJect Property pursuank to Minn.Stat.§§415,01 and 38B.012. CITY: GITY OF�QNO OWN�F�bc} / sy: 0 1� its. lnternal Usa On1y: 0 Orlginat to Finance Departmant p Copy to&treet File �. _ d r ,� 3 Pi .:; �� .�� t, ��ti 4' � O'Y '''� C� v:t] /^� { � 1 i � i1� .Sl� �c.� � T', ji .� :... � � 4l.' , . i _ �� •.f`t ;:''^, . `;i r4 a:.J� � •..�i� f . ..� j! �. . �� e i� � ji . �. � � �i � li ;�� i ., Y� '-� . C; °L . :p P•. . � �� ^` r,! �: •*' � C �'a t..' "° �� .X�� . +71 :j'J FA +�`-9 . �G��J.� " C ..� �� r1 �.s7 . , . tl:�Y;J_7"'1 4:ti ip ...., '�' � _ : �` �. ... � r^ry�,'97 � ..Y 4 .��.:. � r:.;; • +F,,,.,,-�' `'.,�, �!� u7 [I J •-• ' . �.. i'v r.. a. 11!�Lb �J.' . ' �..}'.i 6T. •�`�-. .�T.�:C: zj �_ .- � .� 1 � � � � � � �? �'� . .°'^�7 1 -r:4 � ,:J ..J jd t'y� '? L�. ,. .i-. .. -Y, eI� ' �r ..1 a' s i 1 ( .�:•s..,:_S � �e r f .°�"3 ry_ `Y ��. � .. 1:?4 w.:� . � J:. ,. P..3 7.� f`1 � CITY OF ORONO * 2 0 1 3 - PJ 0 6 5 1 * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 07/16/2013 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 1105 FERNDALE RD W PIN : 02-117-23-43-0033 LEGAL DESC : REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 0441 : LOT MB BLOCK MB PERMIT TYPE : ESCROW FEE-TIED TO BUILDING PERMIT PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRiJCTION TYPE : ESCROW FEE -TIED TO BUILDING PERMIT NOTE: THIS$2500 F,SCROW IS TIED TO BUILDING PERMIT#2013-00308-PAID CHECK#7416 PD BY BUILDER JEFF NELSON APPLICANT ESCROW FEE-BUILDING 2,500.00 TRUWIT, CHIP 1105 FERNDALE RD W ESCROW FEE-EROSION CONTROL 0.00 WAYZATA,MN 55391- ESCROW FEE-GRADING 0.00 TOTAL 2,500.00 OWNER TRUWIT, CHIP 1105 FERNDALE RD W WAYZATA,MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time afrer work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. / / / / Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issued By Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. �b'-?ermit � '� o � � �3 ` � I {E i � � 11 � � � ► � /1 � � _..J _� P� � _.___—� � o'N _.! � � i . � ; ., .. �_ ... . Permit#: }2013-00308 I �, �__. � Permit Address: ;1105 Femdale Rd W � i ' " Permit issue F Parcel Issue � ; -. 3 Generol� Fees Inspections(143�N�es�Applicant Detnil 1 C�Detail� � Seq Inspection Type fnspedor Date 5[attts H Fee Rec i i �1 Radon Rock Bed WGfB 912 512 0 1 8 P ; 0 � 2 FooUng LOMA 8l1912D�3 P 0 ; ��3 PouredWafi WGIB 9/11/2013 iP iY 0 i � :;4 Foundat�onSurvey8/4Frammg MCUR 1124120�4 P !Y 0 ' ; I :5 Framing METJ 5/7/20�4 F iY fl � �6 Framing REINSPECTIO�J PAETD 5/23/2014 P Y;0 �7 Insuiation AAETJ 111412014 P Y t0 � 8 EscrovJ Refund Requested � � T?9 Escrow Refunded ! i i �10 Final METD 8/27f201d IP lY 0 � � � � — ' I � � � ;��.-�-�.. . � �m �► � �� .;�;��.�.�.�.�� `� f�� ^ °..:,�:�° + � i �• 12 Other ' i -113 Erosion Controi _ WGIB 11l1812013 ;Y fl � ; �14 Lath METD 4125/2014 P IY 0 ; ; __. _ ; I i � ,_ r ►� � x � , Add New DeFete i � � � � , ,. , , � k: , ,..,. � �, � r� TUE/1�/OCT/2012 1�� 33 AM VITAL IMAGE5 FAX No. 952-487-9510 P. 001/001 � pEMOL1T10N PERMIT.2012�00986 and LAND USE ApPLICATION 72-3540 ESCROW AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this �� day of VG � , 20 �2' by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City")and C arles Truwit and Paula Picard ('Owne�s"). i1�ls 1. An applicstlon for a demolition permit has been filQd for the pnnapel structure located at 1105 FQrndale Road West (°Subjeat Property") legally descrlbed as TraCt A, RI.S No. 441, Flles Df the ReAlStfaf of Tltles, County of Hennepin, except that part embraced in RLS No. 902, Flles of the Registrar of Titles, 7�acts A and C, F�egistered Land Survey No, 902, Flles of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennapin, .2. In conJunction with the deinvlltlon, erosion control measures are required asshown on attached �Xhlblt . � �q». NOW,TH�REOFRE,THE PART1�9 AGREE AS FOLLOWS: . - - - �1. flEPOS1T OF-ESCRDW FUNDS. Contemporar�eously with the�execution of this �scrow Agreement, - tha Owners shall deposit$2,500 with the City. All accrued lnterest, if any, shall be pafd to'the Clty to reimbursp th? Giiy far it�cvzt In sdminist�ring the escrow account. :2. PURPOSE OF E3CROW. The purpose of the escrvw is to guarantee reimbursement to tha City for all out-of-pocket costs (ncluding planning, engineering, or legal consultant review)the City has lncurred to assure that the erosion control measures are installed and maintained so the property complies with the provisions of Orono City Coda Chapter 79. The financial securlty may also be used by the City to eliminate ariy hazardous condltlons associated with the work and to repair any damage to publlc property or tnf�astructura tnat is caused by the work. If complian�e with the approvetl Land Distu�bance Permit is not accomplished within-the allvwable tlme period,theCity may bring tho proJcet lnto compllance by use of the securlty. a, RfGWT OF ENTRY. The Owners hereby grant the Clty, its egent5, employees,officers 9nd CAnt�eCtofS the rlght to enter the property to pertorm all work and Inspectlons deemed approprlate by the City in conjunction with the required eroslon control measures,I�eluding but not limited to constructing or completing any and all of the agreed upon Improvements should the Owners' contractor not complete those improvement�by the date specified herein. '3. MONTHLY BILLING. As the City receives consultant bllls for incurred costs, the City wi�� in turn sena . a bill to the Owners. Owners shall be responsible for payment to the Clty within 30 days of the Owners' recelpt of bi11. 4, DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. In the ev�nt that the Owners dc �ot make payment to the City within the tlmefreme outlined in#3 above, shall issue a Stop Worlt Order until the Owners pay all expenses invoiced pursuant to#3, The Clty may draw from the escrow account without furthar approval of the Owners to reimburse the Clty for eligible expenses the City has incurred. 6. CLOSING ESCROW. Any remafning amount of the financiaf securlty deposited with the City�for faithful performance of the plans and speclfications and any related remedial work will be released after the completlon and inspection of all such measures and the establlshment oi ilnal stabilP�aUon�for the Subjecl Property. 6, CERTIFY UNPAID CHARC3ES. If the projact is abandoned by OwnerE, or if•th� ellglbfe expenses incurred by the City exceod thc amount in esc�ow, the Clty ahall have the right to cerHfy Ihe unpaid balance to the subject property pursuant to Minn. Stat.§§415.01 and 366.012. CITY• Il'Y�F�RONO OWNER ay: �tS: ti � ',rs,� ,ry� � � , ��i+�r��:a�� 1 �� .. �y� � t�� t v � ,.� ,d�. ..�,. �'i�;,��. a�"' + ,��d�n q��d ��PE�,"��.�e+' „ ,�„� � � �R��1��i �� r�e�r.na�"ilxg�=1n1�Y eriGy � �;(,,�r�ga��pp� a �C '� �' �C�t�'��t8`��I�e��le w� � � � .��4"`'��;'a�'� �',�1a1, r i .�,.'a S.0 G�rA?�y ° a�.�� "ei� � ��,n��qrM� f1 � y+� �� h m � � � �� ..�2±t;A�,..) � rrii�2 y �� '"� � `{{ 1 E �i� i.'116i��.�ei.. �d�" �'_....,w:v.�'�_'..». a`�n�, � Hennepin C;ounty Ci15 - Yrmtable Map rage i ot � �'�r Interactive Property '� Maps , Map ,_.-_ �� —�'c ... . ,. :-. ,. ., ,.. : ., ,. .�. „��,� �. �--., �� (* � �''�� '��` ��`�+f�tr' ��j P.�.` } �L� �*�^�{ ,�1� �/J /I�/'(J � .�b , �.. (�/ •I �// 'G {�✓ � ��`�" , "'�''�`��.�: � - • � � . ,. , '� �� P �'jt } . ( .�r�Y�.3•� ' . + 'Y . � � ' �. � . .. �% n - • ' . ` . t�y �/� \ . AR �,, ' .4 .y \ V" J �. 4 .7�1 � �; �y . �. � ��/ 6. . � t.-� � '' �� y,lt ,� /� �i��.. '��`'.�C N � ' � � �t �� i �) \) �R��.q • y.f• j�;�� 1 � A � �� f �� , .t � 6� ,.. � ��„ � �, � �,....., � -] . � v e �dgy4..Y.:?� , � \'4t-� .��.'� }pq�.�.'�` � � _ /^/�1 M� �i ' � �'- T � YM �"� � //�J.�� ';�.. . ��... . ��y p. � ` � �w�s ; 1 +�'�. + �wl� �� 1 R .,�'.. � �� * ��` �I J � .. � : ( . � � � " w � � ." * �+�+ N �� ` �i [ ` .. . i �J y.1 a►��';"�^�'M6a,�i�� " ' ^--�� , �'w �?� �'t '� a � "�' ;..,� si 'v� �.� ,,. ", � � =:, #. � ��►�'` {�.�►�, .a«*'• ., �^ . t . �1�. 1...y .'��i �� 'F.� �. t � . ! � ,� � �' �','y� J t Y 9�'� � . / � .� . ��` x 4 y / A/ • ��^ �y�': MT Pr �. . •'•�� ... �ti ;'� .. � ..�� Y�ak ��rt� � � �, M �M` ! � �'�� .4� . t '`y�� ' i,`y ' � �� ' ��yr ' �. v �ny e � fi• ,�4 * , �+t�, �•�, �G .J ry°.,Y.AAr . iY' �� y \ �. .y�,j.: � �k �♦ 5r ➢i.�� !'� � �� C . Y` �'� � .. ` -,i ��.1�!'``.. . :'.�, �C� ..tM.y��,• .y�.. 1,.� - � c_ ly �. +� . . +.:�'7 � ��#4 ,. . w�� v�*.d�'#�4 �� C � / d Y.,�M+�yr;.• a�� +4�' � rc � ��r �, x��♦ -� 4 �� '� �, •.�, ��A•4y +y� ..�� S!'n� '� ` � �RM'' `PY1` �"\, i.t'.� ! /^ti /� A { � y�,, (��1 �y.� � . �.,,�s . 'a .S�y �k��;b a;��x1��t ,-�;G$; r� ` �`7�,:�` ,'"�rt' p!-�, _ ' E� '��"Cy� .R 'M,.�„ 4J � ,- � � �" �` ' �"�° �',� `�`' � V�� "� w,�,g s s ';� �° I ) - � � , � ,!' k�k. �a"�'� ��''�� - �`<� � / ls ��'� F w 4 ti �fl C�-�� °�' - �� .;_ . � �^� ;a, . '°e r, .�' 'p� . �� - . : . . 5��2� =p�Aek��r�� T � Y 4��y.' ��1•.. .. � { . � r �r'p ; ��J� �� ..A�t�}, u�� . . 4.�`�k�t." �� .. �#•�t� 'sT4��.�� 4N 4�'. . . .. � '"c':. httn://eis.co.henneoin.mn.us/Propertv/nrintldefault.aspx?C=456539.6403 868301,4979348.45914393&L=9&T=aerial&D=true... 10/1.1/2012 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 2 a 3:- � ; °Y' interactive Property Maps : Ma � �� . p V ��E � �� ° '�"�x�w� >,r `>:-� �`�� N��'.. � ..,; �t � ��y 1��:� /� a �M'4 :: i <Y �. .� � �., C � � `' � % ' � � .� i � . :. � _ �' ., ��"� � � ✓) eti�:- r �t t. %�w �y;"' � '� t' ` �x,� �.��1 � �.,, �{ '��' �> « A�� r ��„,�'�`�: � . �n �, � ^,��'"' �+e` ��' ,M�R R :• �� A S`. k�"" y,� � � �.:� p� '$'!'� �' n. .: � ,�� 4�k. �.,�� `Fr � �" .�' .s � � � � ~ . . '_.> r :.'� � � �� ^"'��► � � j�,�s�'� * �,� �< � � � ;;w y � � `�yA' Y . ��* :�9 ''�y. t . , . ��: �'� p � ��i''�� M1Q` N �.�,�� ! -..� M1 *�k'A y��.y� u, ; Y �� 'p .:. -� "S� :rv� �� +' WY . � . i :�� ,� , , . �, �� ,� 2 , ,r--. � 4 ,v '- _ ,�� a �� ;::� �� --7> k nr '� �(� .' �.A � �� » 4- . � .'�ir � }Y yT.i ', .�. ., . w. �� 1 �`'��,�9N � � ' rr M ' � � . s ��.V ��'''"� '��,� � '� �� d� '�,, �..� �w ,� � � ,�,� p �'" i► �t a �`�.a* . °�t' � li �' . ... . ' '��v�. '�`a /� a a�. r R t �:b i "�,�, 0� ,��r. . ti < � *w: .A /� � � � ^� . 1� '� "•'ti � '"�w x' � .;�"" � '`�'� ,� �, �� L �y � i 4 1 � .�^x �p sl i,� � J �' ��t,.r +� %, t # �. �4 �!g.. 't�,�� .::. K 9:., i t.�� t* .:.. �a'�� +�;_�My _ '4�` "" R� '�5`� �+„�#.� . .�;. ... ,� T`� .�� •_� .i`,��, s ."� �"TM� b1�'',��:;G r;�� `"�� # �"` � f r i(yM""�� ` 'f � . � hi�'y cV �� ..�_ 'M1.yn..ai,� � .� ,.�' � '+� �, ��`, � �� . .� . ��'r��,. �,�k.. , �rl�.f yy�'.,�-�',' � �� 5 4 �� "�.. . . .. ;, �'i.�� ."�yr+��1,. R��' V ''� � +�. � . u- � . . � : � � �,;: � � '"�!� t� .r�:"�j�'� yy�''&z�'`� � � . � �,a J�"i y, a* .�.�.�' � �Is..� h� +'<R t °`��,� � ,. �°"� �4� � ./ � � .��. �r .� � � .� i' t . , . � � �� #�',�, ",` �� y �,-- // �'�}, �� '�`'�",4!a� �c ��.s��'.� F yrP .,"`f\.'# . . . �::��. . .�y- � � . �F�� 'Lt� ~ �' � Y i �;. �f � �y �+�- +; � C' ' �,y^� t'� "� � °�,� ,c . '�''�`a 'ti"�'�,.' , /�l :. y.��' � � Y�v t� � ��+ri� � " � �� ',�' � .r;�:.;' � ``�� + � ,� �.._ � � � ,�. `�" �-�J �� s- � , 1 �f �`'� ., � . .. *�� .� , �` � �.` ". ' dt�. � � ,A4� N W q}�'��` . . �' � � ' ^ t !�1 µ h,��q� . ..- � } - .� . � � ��k ' ;� � W ..I ��l�. ' 1f{. ••�R` w i L 'i' . : v z � , . �. , .,,� , �� . . . u�, .�� . . sw`-...... ,. Y....�. .�. .� _ � - . �r \ ... :..Y�...'�Y � ... ?,�+.,.•//..;� .... l.o.,..o.,.:., ,,,,« ..../D,-,....,...�../,,..:«�/a,.C..l+ ,,,..,_.��—.fc�c�nc�n�oco� nn�n�nnnn-�o�nnnoo_r _no_m—______io_r. ._ _ n ,.,�, + �.,..,r. Dec,271102:42p Truwit-Picard 9524769971 p.2 jo0'd 'I�fWO,:, � ; . LAND UBE APPLIC ATION ESCROIN AGREEMENT I Appilcatlon�12-35�0 AGA�ENI�NT made this `'' Oay of I�f"L-° , 24�, by and betw�en the C17Y OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal oorporacion (�City"}and Charles Truwir and PauEa Picard ("Applicants"�• R.�I�IS �, Applicants have filed Zcning Applicatlon�F12-�540 formaliy requesting the City to review pl�ns for oonstruction of a new residence requirina variances and a conditianal use nermit located at 1105 Ferndale Road West the"Subject Property") as more fui�r showr�and descnbed as 7rart a aL No.441. Files of the ReCistrar af Title_,s.Count}t of Hennepin exceQt t�ai aart ernbraced in RL5 No. 802. Files of the Reaistwar of Titles, Tracts A �nd R qistered and Sun+ey.No. 9D2. �ile5 of the Reqistrar of T�tles, Countv of Henne9�n. 2. Applicanis request the City to rey�eW said plans which requires Ciry approva! including-variances , ��.. __..a:.;�„a: s,;�G.,e..,,.� I.,.,�iyj�e cilv��1a1�@@�Ig�_ IBa81 8fld DI811�I�C I'�VIEW, 3. The City is willing to commence its review af the appllcation anC inc�r costs associaled with said revi�w only if the Applican#.s establish an escrow ta ensure reimbursement to the Cily of its Costs. NOW THEREfOAE,TFiE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: i. DEPOStT 4F ESCROW FUNDS. Contemporanaously with the execution of this Escrow � A�reement, the Applicants shall dep�sit 52500.00 with the City. All aocrued intereu, if any, shall be paid t� the City to reimburse the Gity fer its cost in administering the escrow account _ . 2. PURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose af the escrow i5 to guarantee reimbursement to-the City � �or ail out-of-pocket oosts the City has incurred (intluding �lanning, engineering, or legal cartsultant review)or will � incur in m��ting with the Applicants, reviewing the p�ans, and preparing agenda pack�t material for G�ty Council review of appCication #12-3 a , Eligible expenses shall be consistent with expenses the AppGcants would be responsible for us�der a zoning and svbdivision application. � 3. MDNTHLY BILLING. As the City re�oeives ce�sultant bi11s fnr incurred costs, the City will in turn sand a bilt to the App�icar�ts. App�icants shall be responsib�e for payment to the Giry withtn 30 days of the App�Gants' receipt of bilL 4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCaUNT. In the event thal the Appli�ants do nvt make payment to ihe Gity within the timeframe outlined in#3 above, shall Cease a11 revieuvs until the Appllpnts pay all expenses i��oiced pursuant io#3. Tk�e City may draw from the escrow account withaut further appraval of the AppiiqntS t0�e�mburse the City for eligible expenses the City h�s incarred. 5. CLOStNG ESCROW. The Ba�ance on deposit in the escraw, if any, shatl be returned to the Appiicants when the review has been completed. 8. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARGES. If the project is abandoned by Appllcents, ar ii the e�igible , expenses ir�curred by the City exceed ii�e amount in escrow, the Cityi shall have the right ta certify the unpaid • halanCe to tt�e homestead of Applicants at 378 Ferndale Road West, Or�no, MN 55391 (PID No. '12-117-23-12- • 00�"^'pt�uant tp Minn. 5tat Sections�'E 5.01 and 366.0'1. ( � C�TY: APPUC TS: g gy; � . Y• � _ ,. - �. .. /�� I�: ey: - ` . f � - - � . ItS= ' �� - .,.�, „�:, •„� ••�., ,. - �, , . I , Date Incomplete Notice Sent: Copy of Application Sent to: Engineer on__ County on DNR on MCWD on LMCD on Date Property Owners Notified: Date Legal Notice Published: PC Meeting(s): Vote: � Vote: � Vote: j Notice of PC Action: , City Councii Meeting(s): Vote: � Vote: � Vote: Notice of Council Action: Resolution: � _ � �'i;'>' �` t:iP`lFY�7 --;c<, ..� ��.�?:J i'?'r`'t:ide.'{ �� `'L:i?�.'�♦ ;�:-! .j.`�+FrFj� -. . 'j,-�°i�1'4'�,��;'° ��. �;=r�� :'.'! h�'"+: ,.'it"t�j�F'��C ;�r. :��. :��:! iC 1='tr,P �2r !;4#1b� j ��1 � �li;t� '�C ��tir.i:9Y"t3i'.ii .,�,; - ;fii;EO j+ti�_'�.N_� ,+.'7{.' ..t i�.ix� .. `i�'1r 1'1(1 �'�. 59CJ�Jr"�a?�I`P1.;.4?_ ... . � ' {r si:��i.:t('�� . . � . � vtn—{. ii L �sv. ' �.1.X�.I�3J1J..�"o:'_•�i�l�[SSI+�N_�'.I1�, �l-"i 1try tL ?� �.Ytf .fit{ .F U ��i 7�{� � �`tG .J�1l�' x�:� r...»J%H'� . �:J;S�k_,.';i1�. :S� �-••,.s �C:�—GG:.'r:�y . AA�eY�-t': ��;•_j��ltr.i��cp' a........::1* . Y�_'��, '4_��'ft .�pt� � ut�ir3.:�` - �_....__..__._�,_..__ n(,nT� n�_Y . ..,..y+.,t� . . . � I/��f16'C.°• !�� 1�'��.1 - � J11�.:"✓.�� U'Y).3..',: . . . . . a —.l.i�!v � ��;Y:!", �r'�.t�l '�t�sa i�E#.�;�d¢ i? � , a�•`�, :-�+ 'i_�: : s��;;;te;,i:�. t��ar;�� T r��:5�p, ;;� � . �. �+��.ft r��_1�,:�.. 1`�_�a�...__._._.._._..__. . �, ; t �. . . . - � � . � � CITY OF ORONO PERMIT NO.: 2011-01556 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356- DATE 1SSUED: 12/15/2011 952 249-4600 FAX: 952 249-4616 ADDRESS : 1105 FERNDALE RD W PIN : 02-117-23-43-0033 LEGAL DESC : REG.LAND SURVEY NO. 0441 : LOT MB BLOCK MB PERMIT TYPE : ESCROW FEE-APPLICANT PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ESCROW FEE-APPLICANT NOTE: 7'HIS$2500 ESCROW IS TIED TO ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 12-3540 APPLICANT ESCROW FEE-APPLICANT 2,500.00 BAGLEY, RALPH 602 CARTER ST TOTAL 2,500.00 GO GEORGE BAGLEY NEW CANAAN, CT 06840- OWNER BAGLEY,RALPH 602 CARTER ST C/O GEORGE BAGLEY NEW CANAAN,CT 06840- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances goveming this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced wi[hin 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. / / / / Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issued By Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. s�-Permit i� 0 ¢ « � � i� � � f � ►i � ❑ � � �w. PIW -_� , CI ' °�" � � �1.� 1 � , , , ' 9 ..� � . _ + , ; ; , ' � � _____� � —. --�—a Pertnit#: 12012-00985 , f. ---------___._.`_..�.____�._..,___.�.----..._- . Pertnit Address: �1�q5 Femdale Rd W � 3_.._. ___...�.,_..._.___..-.. _.............. . .._._....._.. ......_..._..__._.. ....___.�_�___..__.._. ' � Parcefissue f-- Permit Issue " � General� Fees Inspeciions(3}��s;ApPlicant[3etail�CQ Detail 1, ___�....-- ------- -------__—.._ _ _ Seq knspedion Type lrtspector Date Status H Fee Rec � �' ��'�,,,.��,��µ��f',��'�,��n��,��,� ' + 2 Final WGIB ''SQ/19i2012 P :� 0 �i3 'Erosian Controi ;�T/GI8 ':1fll17I2012 Y 0 i �--_ _..--._. _ ..._._..- — _.._._ _.._.._ _ _ __ __---� ►• X Add New Delete � O M O � ..�,, � � � o O ��\ � aMaMoU a (14.0 PRO) = DENOTES BUILDING TIES PER PROPOSED LOCATION AS DEPICTED ON PROPOSED �\�� \ N N � M }: o SITE CONDITIONS PLAN DATED APRIL 29, 2013. ��`� I� 41 � .p� � � N � �� ZC � .p4' z 14.0 ASBLT = DENOTES BUILDING TIES PER FOUNDATION AS—BUILT DATED OCTOBER 4, 2013 \ ��\ � �N�N ; W X933.5 = DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION �� i �O N��:.p � m � �� O � . yJ o • = DENOTES RECOVERED MONUMENT I � � I � � �,v0 � o � \ � � � � � � c = c � 0 30 �-929.4 FT. O.H.W. CONTOUR �i � N � - , ��, �. O,9 N � � , %^ - --__ , ,�r � ` O � �i' .-------- , �� ,/,' ti SCALE IN FEET --� \��— \ � �• \ V � ,� 4 ------ _,� � LAGOON i;' �'s s �LF�(� � � l� i \� � LAKE ELEVA770N AS OF N01/EMBER 8, 200? �� +� \ � m � \�� \ 928.60 FEET (N.G.V.D. 1929) �� 66 � � �� I � \ �� O � I� i �� ;� � Z y j� i �� \� /�' � � � � i �� \� j�� 3.00<_ rn� .� � � �I i \� �� BENCHMARK 2 N m � I �� %,' �� R1M:933.14 � I 1 � � � i � � � N l� r� � \� \\ —�� C // � ,P�O�p� \��\ \�._____;_----'� \ . � o � /� �3 �`a•k �------- � � o � � ^ � � I -��' � ` �ry S 6 s ��`��:,�T � n i � `r `r i �6 �E � ti �. r ��56� r_ � � � �. /� � � � �O 33•5 �' _" 5 I \. L.. _\ \ �I I � � A� � � � 23s ,ase�r �S �`� h !n �--�----- k6 F�s � 'L � � W �� (23.6 PRO) �F�y 2�, ti `�� _ � y � ,� � �� 0�2�Gti� 33e 9'f' 3g,5 i\ � � � ��\;\ \\��O O \`�� / \�� r�\�� 3',�.� � � r � �� `�i�F �L �� p��' s oP<s � C) \��\ o '�`P � °° 6P5Q�p� j kh',�6 't�sp ' �'F"9�+90,� _� � � a w lM �� \ �,�o� �.`,�'y5 <r� C�k1 ��9� `� Q1��Dc�/ 0 = Q lA \ � �'� — . �S �t, F `. �' k H � 0 Z y0 0l s o < ��_ � 1 .�y BENCHMARK 1 � U N �� `, �,Pe� , sA'SP<s �r��' ��1 � RIA,':929.64 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: � L z � � � � \� ��\ �i;°`6• � ��F`�so,J ✓ MH Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 441, Files of Registrar of Titles, m � uJ Q � ` 3.00—�__�=>J — � �`9' `y' County of Hennepin, except that part embraced in Registered Land Q � � LL Z � �� N4823�16"W `��`� � '`'r? � J' Survey No. 902, Files of Registrar of Titles. Z Q � � �1 �\� ' ' yTtj�O `'9,p9 / � i.�i � �L \� 1 � . �6,, �F Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 902, Files of Registrar H i � O LAKE ��\� '�`� � � �� of Titles, County of Hennepin. � � r \ r0 'y � �J �F J Z O �� .��,�� J��' . Registered Property, as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 645075 � MINNETONKA ��`�, �°`. ��IJ•`J CVP�� / o a � i �;� (BROWNS BAY) \��`, - �� CERTIFICATION: o m W i� , � „ oLL 3 � 1 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my �W Q W � � direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor LLv o vm� �1 � under the laws of the State of Minnes�ta. m �� 1�� Date of survey: October 4, 2013 Q � i1 � Date of signature January 21, 2014. a � w � � I / M t!') � � �� Y Z M v O � ----------------------- m � ? i p O Brent R Peters Minnesota License No. 44123 � N � Z Z W � m J LL � O LL Christine Mattson From: Christine Mattson Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 11:15 AM To: 'jnelson@lindnelson.com' Cc: Melanie Curtis Subject: 1105 Ferndale Road W/#2013-00308 Attachments: Hardcover Calclulation Worksheet From 2014 Packet.pdf; Hardcover Information Packet -2014.pdf Jeff, Per our telephone conversation,the as-built survey was received with hardcover calculations shown on the survey. Please have the surveyor prepare hardcover calculations using our hardcover calculation form, attached. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Thank you. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono MN 55356 (physical address) PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 (mailing address) 9 952.249.4620 �L, 952.249.4616 M cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us `-" www.ci.orono.mn.us Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 1 Christine Mattson From: Robert Bean [bobbe@bolton-menk.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 2:23 PM To: Christine Mattson Cc: Andrew Mack; Melanie Curtis; David P. Martini Subject: 2013-00308 - 1105 Ferndale Road West Christine, I performed a site inspection regarding the Asbuilt Survey for 1105 Ferndale Road West today. The house was constructed per plans, and the site is permanently stabilized with vegetation. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to discuss. Thanks, Robert E. Bean,Jr, P.E. LEED Green Assoc. Water Resources Engineer Bolton & Menk, Inc. Consulting Engineers&Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318 P:(952)448-8838, ext 2892 F:(952)448-8805 email: bobbe@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 1