HomeMy WebLinkAboutseptic info .SEPTIC ,SY.STEM INVENTORY
. Address: 865 Ferndale Rd. N. PID: 25-118-23 44 0002
Building Type: residence #BRs/GPD: #Systems 1 Units Billed 1
Permit#: 1232 Date of Permit: 8/9/66 Installer: Horowitz Co.
System Type standard trench Experimental: no Appliances
SYSTEM CONDITION
Conformity: 3 Tank Condition: 6 DF condition: 12 Failure Pot: high
SEPTIC TANKS
Material: concrete Capacity: 1000, unknown
Setback to Bldg: 20 Cesspool: unknown
DRAINFIELD
Length of Lines 200 #Lines: 3 Trench Width: 2
Treatment Area: 400 Type of Filter rock Soil Boring: yes
Tile Size: 5 Under Tile 12 Perc Rate:
Setback DF-Bldg: 40 DF Ht above Wt: 0
Soil Type: loam,clay loam Limitations: water table
WELL DATA
Setbacks - Well-Tanks: 100 Well-DF: 75 Report in File: yes
Pump Type: subm. Depth: 300 Diameter: 6 Method: drilled
INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD
DATE DESCRIPTION COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS
7/8/81 no sur�acing 2 9/1/79
10/3/84 no surfacing; noted floor drain problem-w 2 9/28/95 2000
7/20/87 no surfacing 2
7/2/9C1 no surfacing 2
9/3/92 see letter dated 10/12/92 *
5/22/95 ditch over DF surfacing 3
11/1/95 ditch filled by tanks-wetland flowing thru 3
6/16/98 non-compliant-slight surfacing,repair 200 3
10-I-9`i tc,,r,� C{-e c) �-�-, ��';.v�:�
� �� � n�a � I��. �
�� �
� ��
Q,-��a�
,
,�
�
��0(l�►�1��- ��T�'� �
.___
�_.__ ':
__ �-, r�--��I,� ,
_
�t` ,_.. _ -- --- ' ---- '
--- --- _.__ _ �
I�` '���
� �
C�`� '
N
� �
T� a�`� �� 'a
�
! � �1�( `� �I�
�� �Q�' L-r�,' � O
- o.�,:��
�
0 0
CITY of ORONO
.a �.,
l4 Municipal Offices
'�'� _ G'�'
,t9 g.� ; Street Address: Mailin� Address:
� �C�,+gKO �;' 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
-_� � Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Owner: � �� � E C�..� � ��'� � Address: 665 Ferndale Rd. N.
Permit #'s: 1232 Dates: 8/9/66 Contractors: Horowitz Co.
(This is �] an existing system [ � new construction) .
SYSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 3
1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes and is functioning properly.
� Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom
of the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
(The saturated soil lavel is [�] or is not [ ] identifiad undar this septic system. If tha
saturatad soil leval is not identified, this classification is subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 6
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
� Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant.
(Tha tanks are [ ] or are not [ ] water tiQht or the condition is [x unknown. If the tanks
ara not confirmad to be watertiQht, this classification is subjact to revision.)
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 12
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical�et,: Repair is not required at this time.
3 Drainfield is saturated an� visi— bly discharging untreated effluent to the surface.
Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc. ) : hiQh
COMMENTS: In order to confirm that your septic system meets Minnesota standards, soil borings
were performed to verify a 3 foot separation between the drainfield and the seasonal water
table. The separation is 0 feet and the system is non-compliant. Repair or replacement of the
septic system is required by 12/31/2008.
���g � ��
Date of Inspection Sep ic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to
function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipal Offices O � O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 a � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
„� � INSPECTION REPORT
ti
��9kESH04'�G
� l� > )
owner• �/ ��.�►'�f� C 1/I��dress• I c� �� C /
ti
Permit #'s: ���� Dates: �!"��Contractors: �
City ordinance nurnber 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site seuage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(This is � an existing system [ ] new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): ?
�
1 "CODE SYSTEM�'-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface uaters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards ot the
current City Codes, but uas installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and uhich
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input uithout discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYS7EM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristic [ 7 has or �has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identified, this classi#ication may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10): �
Tank inspe ion indicates:
5 not needed at this time.
� ccumulation in tanks indicates they should be pu�nped out this year to help prevent future problems.
ccumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be piunped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be insPected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each
tank at next p�xnpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped
out now.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accunulation>.
If tanks have not been pumped out uithin the last three years, they should be purtiped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
Drainfield inspection indicates:
11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
irtmediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 d�._
14 Drainfield extent and zoR'di�3rt'URKR'own:
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,Water table,etc.):
/ � �
COMMEN S: "' ^ �
� � �� � �� � +1�., -�'I� '� � /
, - �-
Date of Inspection ep ic System nspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function
properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
This report must be kept on the pre�nises With the system loc�tien and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipal Offices O O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 a � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
� �, INSPECTION REPORT
ti
��9kESH��'�G
Owner• �1 1 ��"'��1�C.� � [--/���ddress• �
Permit #'s: � Dates: �5��� Contractors: �
City ordi.nance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(This is �an existing system [ ] new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3):
1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system uhich meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but uas installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input uithout discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface Waters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the locatton, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
betueen the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristic [ ] has or �has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10):
Tank inspect' n indicates:
5 P not needed at this time.
�6,� accurtiulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
�1J accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as os ible.
8 System is discharging to t ou wi ' na e sur ace discharge.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe> must be installed in each
tank at next purnpout. If tanks have not been purnped out Within the last three years, they shoutd be pumped
out now.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of sotids accumulation).
If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINfIELD CONDITION (11-14):
Drainfield inspection indicates:
11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
(�3- Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City [nspector
immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.):
, /
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.):
COMMENTS: -
Date of Inspection Sept c System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function
properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
7his report must be kept on the prE�nises with the system loc�tien and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
�� o _��
� ���,
;�� o�`,
� -�=�� . Y f ORONO
,;.a�,��; . � CIT o
� �����` ���,������ �, Municipai Offices
� � �� ' ti
�,� �'�,;-��������',�G�/ Street Address: Mailing Address:
�:,, � i ,a� i g, ;
��_, �Ff'E�,KQ / 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
-------= Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 0066
Junc 2�, 1995
St. Ldw�trd's Cliurcli
C/O I'hillip Bradlcy
865 I�ernclale Rd. N.
Wayzata, MN 55391
llcar Mc. I3racllcy:
In Scptembcr of� 1992, the septic system inspection revealed tliat the drainfield was satura�ed
a�ul the tanks wcre overfull. A treilch located over tlie draiiifield was saturated also �lllC� lll�l}'
l�avc l�een clischarging untreated effluent ro the surface. Based on this inspection, you were
askecl to have a licensecl septic contractor verify that the system was fiinetioning adequately. I
was never contactcd for tlle requirecl insPection and ttie problem is still appareiit.
I��I�� recent inspection of the septic system at the St. �dward's Church has revealed again that
tiic seE��ic syste�il is not i�unctioning properly. The drainfield area is saturated acid tlie seplic
��rnl:s arc ovcrfull just as in 1992. 'I'his indicates that waste is entering thc scptic syslcm m�rc
ra��iclly tl���n il c�n be I�enetratc into the soil. Also, since tf�ere is a clraina�e trench direclly
c>vcr tl�c clrainiicicl arca, s�inc cf(lucnt could be clischarging to thc surfacc. I3ilSC(� 0[l l�iC
ce�ncli�iunti viewecl o�i the site, the syste�n is consiclered failing a�id niust be repaired willii��
►�incty (90) �fays.
It ii��iy be ��ossible t� cxteiid the life of the exiscing septic systeui, but tlic systetli tllust be
insl�ectecl by a sc��tic contractor and iuyself to verify what action nlust lie taken. Please contact
n�c as soon as possible to set up an inspection or if you have any queslions.
Sinccrciy,
�
��i�� ..L, /,.��%�'.�i��---_
�
Slcpltcn Weckman
Oii-Si[e Systeu�s Manager
Lnc. Septic System Reports (1992 and 1995)
October 1992 Leller
List of Scptic Contractors aud Site Evaluators
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
. . _ ,
.. , ��
//�' o` V'\ �
�� ����,
=;:�=;����� '� CITY of OR4N0
1 r� ^1��4��`,£- - � Ntunic9pal otfices
\ � 4� �i'�,��r�,,``~ C stal Ba�MinnesotaXS 323-0066
'� �r,`;.�Wi-',1��- �� ti'
.L ��1,;,�)s�`it.� G �' x
�
�kESH�4
October 12 , 1992
St. Edward' s Church
c/o Phillip Bradley
865 Ferndale Road North
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
Dear Mr. Bradley:
During a recent septic inspection, a potential problem was noted
regarding your septic system. The septic inspection performed on
September 3, 1992 revealed that the liquid level in the septic tanks
was abnormally high and the drainfield appears to be located below a
ditch which drains the small wetland to the north and east of the
church. The ditch above the drainfield trenches had, standing water in
it which appeared to be at approximately the same level as the liquid
level within the septic tanks . The system was reinspected
approximately four days later at which time the liquid level in the
tanks had gone down to its normal level and the standing water was no
longer present in the ditch area.
The septic system must be inspected by a licensed septic contractor
and myself to assume that the system is functioning properly by
treating the effluent without polluting surface or ground waters.
This can be accomplished by identifying the drop boxes and drainfield
lines to determine whether the ditch is allowing surface waters to
enter the system. If the ditch allows surface water into the system,
effluent could exit the system as well which poses a health hazard.
Please contact a septic contractor and then call to set up an
inspection time so that we may determine what repairs or alterations
may be made to alleviate this problem. A list of licensed septic
. . /'/'
TELEPHONE-473-7357• FAX-473-0510
. , _ ,
-.
St. Edward' s Church
October 12 , 1992
Page 2
contractors is included within this packet and I can be reached at the
City of Orono offices between 8 : 00 a.m. and 4 : 30 p.m. to answer any
questions you may have or to set up an inspection time.
Sincerely,
/ i`7. /
��/Z
Steve Weckman
On-Site Systems Manager
SW/ch
Enc. Septic System Report
List of Septic Contractors
Septic Information Sheet
;
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipal Offices O � O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
�,, �C�. INSPECTION REPORT
ti
��9kESHo��G
�� , (�' , �
Owner: J� /.�i��I'Y�� ����'� Address: 1� �C�'�: I«�� vt
Permit #'s: ��� � Dates: ��'�� Contractors: �;�'��t/I (��
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site seWage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(This is [ ] an existing system [ ] new construction)
SYSTEM CONfORMITY (1-3):
1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
� 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface uaters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system uith less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristic [ ] has or ,[,L�1 has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identified, this L`lassification may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10):
Tank inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
7 5olids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out uithin 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge.
9 lnspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspectad. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each
tank at next purtipout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped
out now.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accurtnalation).
If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONOITION (11-14):
Drainfield inspection indicates:
` / ' 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
�!/ 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
/\ 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
irtmediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.):
COMMENTS:l S�� 1T�77�/-T�.L� l� //�V�
J./" �—''
Date of Inspection eptic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function
properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
informatton.
This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system loc�tion and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner