HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 Annual Monitoring Report '
' .
'
1
� Cullum site
1435� ���2N ��a�,�: N�
' Orono, Minnesota
� 2007 Annual Monitoring Report
�
Prepared for
' Tom Cullum
t
t
'
'
by
' Kjolhaug Environmental Services Compaoy, Inc.
(KES Project No. 2007-106)
'
'
August 27, 2007
1
t
'
��c�iv�r�
`� � �U G 2 8 2007
� -��: � CITY OF Qp��r;
K�OL11t1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY
�...�r
Providiny so��d,ea�anoed,c,omp,ei,e.►srv+e nratura�r2esource sautionS
Letter of Transmittal
TO: NAME COMPANY prpject
Chariie Wojtysiak Minnehaha Creek Watershed Cullum Site
District
lyle Oman Orono,MN
City of Orono
CC: Tom Cullum Landowner
FROM: NAME DATE Copies Description
Kelly Kunst 8/27/07 2(1)(2) 2007 Annual Monitoring Report
RE:
0 FYI 0 For Your Review �Please Reply �As We Discussed
• Comments:
Enclosed is the 2007 Annual Monitoring Report for the Cullum Site in Orono, MN.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information to
evaluate the site.
26105 Wild Rose Lane,Shorewood,Minnesota 55331,Phone:952-4U1-8757,Fax:952�401-8798
1
, •
Cullum Site
, Orono, Minnesota
� 2007 Annual Mooitoring Report
'
I. INTRODUCTION
' Wetland Replacement monitoring is re uired for u to five 5 ears followin the com letion
q P � �Y g P
of a wetland replacement project to determine if the replacement wetland achieves the goal of
' mitigating functions and values lost due to project impacts. The replacement wetland should
meet both the general and specific requirements as outlined in Section 8420.0550 Subpart l.
of the 2002 Wetland Conservation Act Rules(Appendig A). This report presents observation
, for the 2007-monitoring year for the Cullum site in Orono,Minnesota.
' The Cullum Property was in the N 1/2 of the NE %4 of Section 36, Township 118 North,
Range 23 West, City of Orono,Hennepin County Minnesota. The site address is 785
Ferndale Road(Figure 1). The Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distnct(Wetland Conservation
' Act administrator)granted appmval for a Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)
Rule D: Wetland Protection permit on December 18,2003 and construction of the
replacement wetlands was completed the following year.
� The 2007 monitoring site visit took place on August 14,2007 and at that time vegetation was
actively growing,temperatures were in the 80's,and hydrology was assumed to be dryer than
' normal due to below average precipitation in the manths prior to the site visit(Appendiz B),
however a large precipitation event occurred the day before the site visit.
I II. PROJECT SUMMARY
' A total of 2,135 square feet(s�of created wetland and the establishment of a 20-foot wide
native buffer was created on site to replace impacts associated with the placement of fill to
' create a low berm within existing wetland along the west side of the property(Figure 2).
At the time a WCA No Loss application was submitted because the project partially
restored the excavated wetland. Even though the proposed work was considered a no loss
' situation, the placement of 2,135 sf of fill material for the construction of the berm was
mitigated through the creation of 2,153 sf of new wetland adjacent to the existing wetland.
Buffer areas and the constructed berm were to be seeded with a native upland and wetland
' seed mix, respectively. The annual wetland monitoring report is to satisfy the MCWD
monitoring requirement since the created/restored wetland was not replacement to satisfy
the Wetland Conservation Act(WCA).
�
'
1
1
III. PROJECT BACKGROUND
' At the time of the 2006 site visit the wetland ed e was lo
g cated usmg a Le�ka GPS urut and
, was 29,104 sf in size. By subtracting the original wetland size from that number the wetland
was determined to be 8,279 sf larger after the expansion. Originally the wetland and buffer
areas were seeded by L&K Contractors usmg a native seed mix provided by Specialty Seed.
' The seed mix was consistent with the mix specified in the original plan.At the time of the
2006 site visit it did not appear that the new wetland and buffer vegetation had been
mauitauled after seeding. Recommendanons in the 2006 report were to hire an experienced
' restoration company to manage invasive and weedy species in the buffer and establish the
native plant community.
' Since 2006,the applicant hired Prairie Restorations,Inc. (PRn to manage the vegetation of
the replacement wetland and buffer. PRI completed the following treatments since 2006.
' Oct 2046: sprayed for cool season grasses
Apri12007: performed controlled burn.
May 2007: spot sprayed for black nightshade, Canada goldenrod, Canada thistle
, June 2007: spot sprayed for Canada goldenrod, Canada thistle, creeping Chazlie
June 2007: spot mowed cool season grasses, reed canary
Ju1y 2007: continued monitoring for future work, integrated plant maintenance
' In September 2006 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District asked that an as-built survey be
completed on the wetland to verify the berm was constructed as proposed. According to
� the applicant an as-built survey was completed and submitted to MCWD as requested.
� IV. METHODS
' Vegetation and hydrology were documented at fixed photo reference points as shown on
Figure 3. Plant species dominance was estimated based on a meander survey throughout
the new wetland area. The location, composition, and extent of plant communities were
, described for the replacement area.. Hydrology characterizations consisted of aerial
coverage estimates during the site visit. Photographs were taken at one to three fixed photo
pomts at each replacement wetland and were referenced to fixed points identified on the
, wetland replacement plan and labeled accordingly. All field observations took place during
the growing season.
I V. RESULTS
' Replacement Area 1 (Figures 3 and 4) was to consist of three sma11 areas excavated
adjacent to the existing wetland on the north and south sides. A low wetland berm was to
be constructed within the existing wetland to create an azea that would support woody
'
�
'
' vegetation where the wetland was otherwise too deep to establish the desired plantings.
The berm was not to exceed 1 foot above the normal water level of the existing wetland.
, The center of the berm was left open to allow for hydrology to be shared with existing
wetland on the adjacent property to the west. Hydrology was to be supplied from surface
runoff and from shared hydrology from the existing wetland.
' Based on the as-built survey(Append�B)the new wetland was excavated as proposed
and the wetland berm constructed as planned. The berm was approximately 1 foot above
� the standing water in the rest of the basin and had an understory dominated by a
hydrophytic plant community. The trees planted on the berm included tamarack, silver
maple,river birch and white pine. Overall the wetland consisted of a Type 5 open water
' basin with a narrow saturated and emergent fiinge.New wetland areas were contiguous
with the original wetland and consisted of pa open water area with the narrow emergent
fringe. At the time of the site visit open water made up approximately 85 percent of the
' total wetland.
The original wetland on the adjacent property to the west consisted of a shallow basin
' domina.ted by giant manna grass and sedge and had less than six inches of standing water
at the time of the site visit.
, Buffer Description
A total of 11,787 square feet of buffer established adjacent to the wetland was to be seeded
' with a native mix.
At the time of the site vlsit rt appeazed that areas of reed canary grass,Canada tlustle and
' common mullein had been sprayed. Reed canary grass still made up part of the plant
community but cover levels were reduced from the previous year.
T'he observed plant community is as follows:
■
Elymus canadensis 15 Polygonum sp. 5
' Verbena hastata 15 Aster sp. 5
Phalaris arundinacea 10 Corryza canadensis 2
Andropogon gerardii 10 Sorgastrum nutans 2
, Poa sp. 5 Solidago sp. 2
Echinacea sp. 5 Mentha arvensis 2
Rudbeckia hirta 5 Eupatorium perfoliatum 2
' Glyceria grandis 5 Lythrum salicaria trace
Agropyron repens 5
, V. MANA E
G MENT ISSUES/RECOMMENDATIONS
' PRI should continue management into 2008 to eliminate more reed canary grass and
remove a11 purple loosestrife. There are no other management recommenda.tions.
'
�
,
'
' Cullum Property
� Orono, Minnesota
Figures:
� • Figure 1: Site Location Map
• Figure 2: Mitigation Plan
' • Figure 3: Replacement Area 1 Data Sheet
• Figure 4: Replacement Area 1 Photographs
'
,
'
'
�
D
1
1
1
i
1
1
�
,
'
' Note: Site and wetland boundaries on
this figure are approximate and do not
' constitute an official survey product.
�
�������`R ��� �
���1� o
1 � � �
Hollander �
' � _
, Lydiard Rd Phlmouth
Orono rrth 9ve N
' Bror,�f
v,�
Site Location ��.�
� 1�
9tt� �
' � z
� �
� �
� �
� � $th Ave,L
� �
�
'
'
'
'
' Figure 1— Site Location Map
� ,� � Cullum Property (KES Project No. 2006-172)
T Orono,Minnesota
s ,�
� 1 l�OL11tiUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY
� TN No Scale
'
�
' . .
. ' �
� � J . �
I�;�V \D P ��
l� . .
� .
� .
� � . . N
� . ��- . _.. .�, . � . .
; �'`Lath on Ilne �.�j"' Mtnimt�m Buffe�
� ��CWD AND PUBLIC VALUE CREDIT
' ���—",Prope�ty Une V ` . AREA = 3.39 AC
, :�:_:�_^^"~"��f��;"::�:::=.:=.�• •���� J�{gf .
� ;�;�Irrr y�'`•: - ';:i�?�'k=::��:: _ ��� �� m �
, .�r.-=,,;:�:�:�'r::::::':-�::=::__::___:�:::•- _ :��r �,n1��
� . . �:: � :::�: 5
� �, .��6 .
sa:. _ �,� � ��: ,�'\ �
1 ���:- �5' �� � _ _ �:�:_-- \
�� o�d � � }
_ ---Loth on /Ine�6t� ` :.......::-::�::-�� .
' _ �'• � ::�;:..:....._.
\ � s u�N. �cni PosT
ALLOW FOR ~'� � '""�" REFER TO KJOLHAUG WErLAND BUFtER
/ A7 4'. A�A�C. SP.1dNG
� ....
...
... ..... ...
..... .... _..
DRAINAGE THRU �� Qe�1� � _ � � a PLAN FOR BUFFER TREA7MENT �
' BERM. - �� / GE07DCT1LE FABRfC
� � FABRIC ANCHORACE T�vG
• � _ = - . / OtRECT10t1 OF �' BACKFILl. NRTH TAAtPID
�o�. \ .�-v WE'TLAND y� .
RUNOFf �10W NA?t1RAL SOiI
' CONSfRUCT BER,t! 15'.f W/DE, \ _ � IMPACT �Q � J�� B b � ,
�' AREA �r..::. �� ��
TOP ELEVATION = 99.0 (APPROXIMATELY -- =' i �?�� �"�'�" / � �N Z . .
0.5' ABOYE' K'FTL4N0 EI.EVATION.) _ - -�'� � � :;:1='�:�'. . � �
I ' PROPOSED _ �! ��:� . ��� / - — ` —�
WETLAND lMPACT — 2,135 SF ~- _ t r� �� �'
" � ==:I:::='. ��� � SfLT FENCE DETAIL
�TOTAL Ml71GA710N '`- ::.::::: �
_:.
AREA=�135 SF '� /1 Q o --�--SF--DE7�totEs sa.T Ef?1cE
' 25 BUfFER AREA=5,157 SF �'-:::.' .��-:::• / � �
DE t
16.5 BUFF�74 ,qREq=6 630 SF � �
. TOTAL BUFFER ,4REA�1 i 787 SF �"~:�. ....... / � +
.. ' :�`'�.� - ':�-: � � 0 .
• . -�. ��f't�tIl C / � � , . ( j � t � .
1 / � �'� :�, . . r ;
� � � f } -�: �
. � � j � / a�� r. J�V ��� �_:
\ l � r �� ;
' 1 P�operfy Llne�--�-
Property Descrlp f1on: ! � � �� `• , .` .
T�act B, Registered Land Survey ^ r �
t No. 103f, Ne�nepin County, Minnesofo, J � � Note: .
according to fhe files of fhe Reglsfra� of Trt/es. 1. Wetlands Dellneofed by.
. — • KJolh vug En Nronrnen ta/ services.
2. The buildings, If any, were
' nof located as port of thls survey
� � � FIGURE �
' • denotes iron monument fo�rnd Requested By: l HEREBY CERi1FY THAT THiS PLAN, Revisec
SPECIFlCAl10N, OR REPORT 11/01/02
m f ►r � lm WAS PREPARED BY MF OR UNDER �� . Web Sife:
Q denotes !I"OCl pipe SGt p�aT� ��, ` I Cu`�u� ! j �pD��T ISAMDU'Y 1JCENSED � �K'�oEfoaSSOCiafeS,COm
' C7!'ld rnar.ked Cl5� S�IOWtl: • � PROFESSIONAL ENGiNEER UHDER TNE 9 Wesf Dl�+ls(an St. .
o denotes • wood loth O1T°�°�2 Date: � Drawn By: Scale: ' :hecked By: �WS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA �uffa��
�Aart,n P. Campion �� , MN55373 Job Nc
6� denotes soil boring _ �� � „ , � SSOC►ATES ph�(763)682-4T27
' 08/14/�2 KDK 1 =5d � uc�sE # 1 sso� � Fa� (7s3)ssz-�522 163�
Q denotes ercolat�on test hole , . . En,n, neersandLandSurveyors, inc.
' _ _
� _-- �
' KJO[ .��.t1UG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY
' M/NNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
WETLAND REPLACEMENT MONITORING FIELD FORM
' Project: Cullum Site Photo Reference Point
Area ID: Re lacement Area 1 PRP#1: Lookin SW from NE ed e
Investi ator s : K Kunst PRP#2: Lookin NW from SE ed e
' Date: 8/14/07 Mon.Year 2
A e of Miti ation: 4 ears
' H drolo
Reference Point ID Water Level Readin elevation or aeriai cover
SE ed e 85% aerial cover
' Plant Communities
Communi 1 Communi 2 Communi 3
S cies %Cover %Cover %Cover
' GI ceria randis 20 Lemna minor 100
L co us americanus 20
Phalaris arundinacea 15
' Sa iftaria latifolia 10
!ris s . 10
Verbena hastata 5
Pi/ea umila 5
' T ha latifolia 5
Ascle ias incamata 2
Ascle ias incamata 2
' %Wetland Area %Wetland Area 85 %Wetland Area
Hydrologic Indicators Observed: Hydrologic Indicators Observed: Hydrologic Indicators Observed:
' Saturated to�1' inundation n 0 to 4(?)dee
Restored Wetland `c� Replacement Wetland i
a.� MPIAIIui��t+vi�v
/ , A-�a-^ e � Community 2 �;�wo nxv Pvs�ic�
r� _ — �—, �� ,�,,
� -- -�4�^'�-`'� � t � — — 1{ 41'�� — ..sr' �A�p5—
� s� ef. �FPv"rv- r.l pRP#� �. aa .-� r�tk�-,}w 1. .�!�r � ���`3�'
f . _..:� -
_ �- :: ` . ��'�
- -,;�, ,
. � ��
r. I _ � PRP#2 " �`'�
� � ` � �
. , � �� ;
� �
: �s ���� :��, �.i,
--t {f �'a �i '
f –�a.'h or li�e�bl� � :.� —F
� �' � `� � � -,� o� ' -'�`__�~
ti� 5 e�� i �� `. ' � . ._
� �� � � ' � � ��� �/ /�
? /� \ f���� .:�i
ti; � �,
\ � IS'E77AN0 O _ �� /.' �� ��B /
ti• �IMPACT C \ � �AC`� B
� AREA ,," . _ �
\
ti f � � ,l�,� .�� J� \ l�_:. / /.
� � �
tir :jl 4 ,,� l '?6' . .�-:': � �,?�a�
� �_,� �. ��y Buffer ��:'� °��-� �
��,�.� / /� � "�`�, ;� =�r ��,
' ` �
1 �; / /�03' � N ,� E , , �
��.: _: � �� � �_� ,. �;_� � Community 1
Pre-existing wetland � ; �
/ � _ �� a i / �
'
26105 Wild Rose Lane,Shorewood,Minnesota 55331,Phone:612-401-8757,Fax:612-401-8798 Figure 3
1
'
' Re lacement Area 1
�`� F� � �F . 4�� �c yJ..�r.
��; � 5\.� � � '�f�'eT€`�y
' � v�„ � � � r �.
y �� r ' { ^� i� �V _ �1� � A � __
'k'���'�, ����� �-�.. .. d� �S� �, � 'F ..i
� � � �� N��
S.. " "�kf�� � u t
� �, �., � r
k � �,� � ��` . �,j �� �•�r t.
t - .. �` �;' . 4 5. Y���, t s�j.
����.�t�� ��-.M:&�'nY,����,�.����. .. �.�....,. a.. '�: R99+'b/�.'.:i1�3Xe,' a�b'. ,� �i =
�
, . ... .. . . ..� 5.
4i .
S- a6t1�`���+,� ")� � .
' • � . x:3��t.° �� `, �. � :5�.\
�� R b �
t , {� •
` t},i� � � i�.� `ki��'��
r
5� t�� r� } �
fi � ' -t t
i Y� �4� 3f t'�� � �� � ���
.� Y` � �� i' . I �"�t.��, �
� ��_. � :S�a� 1 y T-� � .f. '�.d���.����ti. k 'r ',
� . �� ¢.,Yy`��« ��j`�''�4� 1 'j, i;��� ,r� E �' ��i�fs�Y ;�..��., r��� � � �. - �� s_�� •, � ��,"�� � .
��:� i $�'�, �i 4�°:*'��. . ..�� �.,���� � ��..'}F�. - � ' �'�'� � .
� i �r'�'je+. dh� �.: Y. , ��.f ''4 y: €
� �� '.F� ...a .. ` � �, - � e #t` _ i . � . r�"';
d�� ��, c� �r. t��-~�" � - 4 � ��4d .
�x � x � � �� � g�.
�4 � + "9n ���.��'$w,''z � .�� � � ,-F,�E_ "� �s,,v
..e� e r.F�yfa s�? s. . x9�T�,,�1� . �ei
b� �'� � � '���' � � PRP#I:NEtoSW
.�,�: ,�, �„ � � �.
y � , _ t . , � �"�* � .� � .� e r
' 1v f`° .... � 1 �...
-'�'E��'� ��s�,,w+ � +:�, 4� �`� "� �' s,� . Date: 8/14/07
,� -�, � .� .`���=v� '�� •�s�n..�..�� . .�. �.��� �
� .,<. ;S ' ����
' .'�'�'� } 4 P�!, �§� �' . . . . , . .�I..
} '
�� ;' ,`s, -r !� i
��',�t � ;� y� » � �
� �'��' � � ����` ���`���� x�"' . �,
� !r �f t �s ;�` ' �`` ,:
�i � +� �. ��'ra,s� �"'�,o-
� � y i,� tl �`` y��:c �.`F �
' k .; Y�:�x ��� � . '
,
. l� x .;
,yt '-� Kfy���,.� a fiu�, y .-.d._.; .�,�;�`�} . S �.,�, z" .'ny ` +C'
,�t Y+i �:T �
� . , .. w" z'fl! �
st . •� 7,: K �-!
S,'. � . � � ' w. - '
_ �'u. _y.
.- ,
_ . „ .
' 'r., `,� '; . � �� p` . :3„ � .:-r,
'� '
� �,. _ 3 � g. �� -. �:
i: � � �''w o,
' %�� " `
�*" 'a ' � S
�1� ' .y,;�, i.i
�.� r , p�M _ � •
� 4=' , :�� , � ,,
"ELL ° ��M - h3� �•' ' � .. �"''�,:�`�"-,:..
' � x I� • � , ,Y • `\ �' ...
. '.�.F `-{ �` y�� �, �*�"
' z£ ' I -� I� .�' •,� •� � r � K .
�°n �' ,�jy�� J� �' ��� ,��
�. f'Sr . ��` t v ��1� �' � � � . • rb t - �w�'' �
� /�J
,�e � � �� �}���� `LL�. �'.� �,Aa J, ♦�,�;�.t � �,; 4; ��;'� � �
, � �a1»' � �N � ��`��'A� -,�,� �i;4P ' .; _. y.`� � v �,�r:y a � '€
�r,i�f;y �+�= '��;������ �h'f'�t^,���s y� �,,�'4 '�j'g a -.�fw'�S.�t�.� � y > �
�.� - � r��'k s� ��3'r. ��� � e �,�`� �t :+^� � ��� L,� 5� ,,. �' �'�z �'j' � �w'$
..�1 � �'' r 4 r ,y�t�,i2. 4�� :, ...,.z a
n\ � �, A i a . rs'n. � a 4.. £ {�..
��/� \ 1'. ! �,�'x -.�� A4 `L'� ��R��� 1 � '�� .nl�vl�` e 3:1�� ,�:�n;,,, '� .� � 1 c� ti ,
, dc+ �i '�! = ,� ���`'�. �� , �.TY:f ). e�?. ` � ��5�.� x,,,�,F�.!"1 l:c� �_�.;�� Y �
1 � r
� M�. <;a ^ �, sE�u , � e `� 'yz t �r �i�m. ,,ya ;,=a s c �H' .
�,.
�� ,-�, � � �� n�+Ah> �'� � � �� ��1 v � r F e, r �,+ �„t 4 ��ii� ��� �
w �° �.
.-y�.' , . �:- 'r y„�d! ;J �� , � .-; }'� �p' � '� �'., �,t�,� `
,._ t �a�d � � � , '� '3 �
��a� yI�� �'4' ~f���� 4 �- r��`1 r d�` 6r�����x, ��, �. .;�'." . j j " �.kyl-,.
� ��11 � '�i'.� �, ,� � . 1 .� � � .,,�M', �� : �` ��Gb { f� ,�'�. . i:j
t� a�+'�'�W`r?� �..�'+ � A-:' �1 -My/ ,>4'`'; 4e`` y et � t��r" °� `�;�.��b�`� � � ., � - ,
�E�`��.. �� �i �}� 4 , , _ � � , i` a� k,�,,�� �,��:.� �r`; �';. PRP#2: SE to NW
���,�: ' �`�'�` '� ���,'� `�-* F• „r.�r� i t� ; � r � ����ti +�'<��.��. Date: 8/14/07
x�+ � � ��� �� �+
�.� �a�. � ��C a�•+q� ��.C,�r '�.e'P^� �� �. t y�+�'' ;i i E��p�r- ,¢�a*.'' .
: /�,�ra �° t i '�,�� x ?:,!5-r � a�ix .J - .� �oa t
, "+y'c.��t �g' "�,' i�t"�.�,a a - .�.'���i r'' ..e,� �y�e_��..h�i_.s.4�";�.�c'�.. � �f.;-'
' Fi ure 4
�
1
1
,
' Cullum Property
Orono, Minnesota
�
Appendiz A: Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Standards
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
1
1
,
t
'
'
1
'
, 8420.0550 WE�I.I�ND REPT,AC�T �p,�.
Subpart 1. Geueral =equireme.nts. The standards and
guidelines in this part shall be used in wetland oreation and
; restoration efforts to ensure adequate replacement of Wetland
functions and values.
, In evaluatir�g a Wetland replacement plan, the local . '
, � �`government unit must determine �rhether the ketland type statecl '
' as the replacement plan g.onl �rill result from the replaceme'nt
glan specifica�ions. If a Ketland type other than the
repl�cement plan goal is ],ikely to zesult, the local government
� unit taust evaltaate the plan based on this determination, The
' ' local goveXnment unit raust also determine thnt the proposed
replacem�nt p].an will adequately replace functions and publie
values lost. If adequate rep.lacement of function anc7 public
value is i�at likely to result, the local governm�nt must
' d'etermine �rhat further measures �re necessa,ry to obtain ad�quate�
repince�aent or deny the replacement plan.
Subp. Q, SpeciEia requiremente. The stAndarda in itews A -
� to H. shnll be follosaed in all wet�and replacements uniess the
technical evaluation panel deteriaines that a standard is clearlp
not ap,�ropriate.
' A. i�'ater cont=ol structures muet be conetructed ueing
specificatione providec3 in the Minnesota Wetland Restordtion
Guide or their equivalent. Con�rol st=uctures map be subjec� to
the Dep�rtment of Nntur�►1 Resouxaes dan safety regulntiot�s.
' S. Best a�nagement p�actices must be established and .
maintained adjAeent to the entire periueter a� all xeplacecaent
wetlanda.
C. F'or replacement �re�lnnds Ktie.re native, noninvasive
' vegetation thnt is ahar�cteristic of �he wetland type identified
as the replacement goal �n part 8420.0530, item D, is not likelp
to become dominant na�urally in a five-year period, th�
, replace�nent w.etland shall be seeded or planted with appropriate
native, noni�vaeive species�, as determined by the technicnl
. evaluation panel. If the replacemen� Wetland is seeded or
pianted, the se�d or pinntfng etock r,tionld be frrnn native.
' i�oninvasive species of regional wetland origin. During the -
monitoring pe,riod, the applican�t must take re�sonable steps to
cqntrol fnva,sfon by any nonnative ar invasfve species, for
' exaraple, ree.d canary yrass, Canada thistle, coaanon buckthorn,
spotted knap4reed, leafy spurge, p�rpTe loosestrif�, and Sttrn_sian
xaker ailfoil, that would defea,t the reveqetdtion goal.of the "
' � replaoement plan.
D. Erosivn cont=ol weasures as deternined by ttie sail
�nd wateX conseraation district iaust be e�ployed durinq
.constructi:on aud ut�til permdnent ground cover ia esteblished to
' prevent siltAtion of the replace�uent Wetl�nd or nearby Water
bodiee.
E. For all restored wetlands Where the otigiaal �
, orgnnic substrate t�s'been_ etripped away and for n11 cre��ted -
Wetlands, provieiona must be m�ade for providinq an orgabic
substrnte unless. tke technical evalua�tion panel recommends '
: otherwiBe. When feasible, the or.qanic soil used fn= backfill
' . should be taken ftom the drained or filled wetltind domivated by E
� nntive, noninvaeive species. Organic soil for backfill from
�.wetlan�c]s drnainated by nonnntive, �nvasive species should be
' ;avoided.
F. Thp bottoa contours of created �ppes� 3, 4, nnd 5
`Wetlainds should be undulatittg, rdther than fl�t, to p�ovid� a
• va►riety of water depths, compnrable to natural wetlsu►ds in the
� ;vicinitp of the repiace�neAt, and be coasis�eat wfth pnrt
"8120.0517, sub�art 2. _
G. Sideslopes of created portions af Ketlands anc� '
' . . ' 1
134
, ' _ �
, -_.
' � 9raded t�uf£er strips must not be stee�ier tha� 5:1, five f�e,et
, . ' _ 8orizaritally for e�9erg► one foot verticallp as averd. e� aro
• the Wetlanti; SS.desl:opQ.s of 7�0:1 fo 15s1, are pre�er�e�3. More
'_ than ta�lf af ttre slpQes•.a� y�ad�ea area,s iAside th� e�cterior �
bourida,riee pf Xeato�Q$, creater�, or en'hA�ced� �retYar�d� �aus� be x�o-
s�eeper thau 10:1 u;rrles� -t�� �e.�}�ical evaluatioa pA�el con�urs :
that stee�er slopes ar��,a�ep.tablQ..
$. Created W�tlands should hnve an irreguinr .�dge to
, create pair�ts �znd bays, cv�siste�t xith part 842.O.U5�9, subpart
2.
Subp. �. (Repealed, 27 Sit 13•�j
' &A: NS s 14.065 1035.101= 1(�3�.3'355s 103G.2242
ffi�= 18 SA Z�X: 22 SR 1877;: 37 SR= 135
� ' � .
, , .
1 _
�
' -
.
, ~
, '
' , -
;
' '
, ;
i
, ` " ;
1 � +
- i
• (
. . �
' • � '.
' •
'
'
, Cullum Property
Orono, Minnesota
'
Append�B: As-bwilt Survey
'
,
�
'
,
'
'
,
,
r
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
b
, � � o
z
o �
z �� � �
��� �^�
� fi �i��
, �
eco �
��g� �q ����
��_� � �
� ���� �� �
� �� �
� � g
�
�o $
� a��e �
����� �
� ��. _
������
� �sv«�
€o�c o�
E E`� ��
� ° o �\
� _S���� a°�
� � �i �m
o S g Q
�. $
U �' � � � � ~
< d s � e,g.�
a � � ) g g �
■•� •��s/ �,,—�--�-�=` '�
� � � , e
�� �������\ � � �
� �/� � ��� `l � n �� t�
� �1 0 �� b
I / /� I 1 N
e �J�l Ig `.� ^ � �
' � a ' .
� � g e � � V
D � I � ,^ �
L � �(/ � \ p �\t �`� �i� '° Q
! $ . a \
� �,\ � �' � $� s� � []
.
;\._ �
, 1��.� � � �!,� q\\� � � �\. '� o ���� L �
O � � /p p \ �� ` r /�
/ ' � ^ \n�\\ �0 `� h� W
� O h \_ �\ 8 Q
� ��ry /a "��\\�� �� � r�
, O � � � � � � � �\ \ �, ���\ ^ g � � O
c I �� I h �'ry\� � �.}. \ e S � xO �-'
,� q �^, $ �� e � I ' . n rc 6
� 3 s 1� • ` l • ��� �.\ g g��-.�— � os o
� � � � �� o s� s�� q�.,\�q w • �e �,
� o
� p l �\ h � y� q �I � �\\ $ `�`_�_ �'IYN � ^ �
� a a Q1 G
� � c
� �I � $� ' ��` � �&'e $°q' � o O �
� F g �-�ec�� � 1� wi
� � � _ o � 'o � �j�a's o V `�- O C
��` $ � a"�`�.'� � �S n� a �� `'j � p O � U
a
�� $ � °° � 4 u L L V1
a� � � �n;,►� qL;�' a � /�Y--� � > �'/ o °a ,i .c
, — — — � -_� l m �. � '/ . �`A'� ° o � c
� v � �'�'a�te• w`2/ y X'� w 4 M / � � QCi
, `�� �,�� ��a-,� q y� $ i z i =
�� � s'�a5 = m _! i � 6$ygap �
�w \�`_ 4/ Q ' � ' O O.O L
� . �A4� q" � I � p
I J I E mo �o
I i Z I c �q
0
' � c n� $ u
I I lWL I � Q� °m n
o $° � o°
v �� v v°
, • O 00
_ _
'
�
' Cullum Property
Orono, Minnesota
'
Appendiz C: Precipitation Summary
�
�
,
,
,
'
'
'
'
,
r
r
�
�
�
'
' Precipitation Summa
rY
Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group
'
' Monthly Totals : 2007
Target: T118 R23 536
, mon year cc tttN rrw ss nnnn o000000o pre
Jan 2007 27 117N 23W 34 BYRG .40
' Feb 2007 27 117N 23w 34 BYRG 1.13
Mar 2007 27 117N 23W 34 BYRG 2.18
apr 2007 27 118N 22w 31 SwC� 1.49
May 2007 27 118N 22w 31 SwCo 3.81
�un 2007 27 118N 22w 31 SwC� .66
, Jul 2007 27 118N 22W 18 SWCD 2.23
7uly/August-Daily Records
� Date Preci .
P
� �ui i, zoo� o �ui 2s, zoo� o
��i z, zoo� �Ui z6, zoo� o
7u1 3, 2007 7u1 27, 2007 .06
)ul 4, 2007 - 7u1 28, 2007 -
, 7u1 5, 2007 = 7u1 29, 2007 -
7u1 6, 2007 �ul 30, 2007 0
7u1 7, 2007 7u1 31, 2007 0
7u1 8, 2007 .36 Aug 1, 2007 0
7u1 9, 2007 1.62 Aug 2, 2007 0
' 7u1 10, 2007 0 Aug 3, 2007 0
�ul 11, 2007 0 Aug 4, Z007 0
�ul 13, 2007 0 Aug 6, 2007 40
� lul 14, 2007 .08 Aug 7, 2007 0
7u1 15, 2007 0 Aug 8, 2007 0
7u1 16, 2007 ,4ug 9, 2007 0
7u1 17, 2007 .11 Aug 10, 2007 0
7u1 18, 2007 0 Aug 11, 2007 1.68
� ]ul 19, 2007 0 Aug 12, 2007 0
�ul 20, 2007 0 Aug 13, 2007 0
7u1 21, 2007 Aug 14, 2007 1.61
�ul 22, 2007 -
� ��i za; zooi - Total : 7/1 to 8/14: 6"
1971-2000 Summary Statistics
, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju/ Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT
30% 0.56 0.35 1.17 1.23 2.85 3.27 3.01 3.51 2.03 1.04 1.22 0.53 16.63 27.61 25.99
� 70% 1.06 0.91 1.92 3.09 4.14 5.01 4.89 4.92 3.27 3.40 2.04 1.21 21.69 33.39 34.56
mean 0.93 0.71 1.74 2.38 3.44 4.30 4.44 4.22 3.06 2.30 1.87 0.94 19.47 30.35 30.50
i
1
1