Laserfiche WebLink
._. , <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March Zl,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> ROLL CALL <br /> The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: <br /> Acting Chair Denise Leskinen, Commissioners Linda Feuss,John Thiesse,and Hue Alexander. <br /> Representing Staff were Assistant City Administrator for Long-Term Strategic Planning Mike Gaffron, <br /> and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Tod McMillan was present. Commissioner Jon Schwingler amved <br /> at 6:33 p.m. <br /> Acting Chair Leskinen called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. <br /> CONSENT AGENDA <br /> Thiesse moved,Feuss seconded,to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, <br /> Nays 0. <br /> *1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF <br /> FEBRUARY 22,2011 <br /> Thiesse moved,Feuss seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting <br /> of February 22,2011,as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> *2. APPROVAL OF JOINT COUNCIL &PC WORK SESSION MINUTES OF <br /> MARCH 2,2011 � <br /> Thiesse moved,Feuss seconded,to approve the minutes of the Joint City Council and Planning <br /> Commission Work Session minutes of March 2,2011, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0: <br /> Feuss recommended that Item No.4 be heard before Item No. 3. <br /> Thiesse asked how they would be able to issue a conditional use permit for Item No. 4 if it is approved <br /> when they have not heard Item No. 3. <br /> Feuss stated based on the fact that the parking is already over the limit under the conditional use permit, <br /> that should not be a problem. <br /> Gaffron stated the existing conditional use permit code language allows tlie Planning Commission to <br /> establish whatever conditions are appropriate, so whether Item No. 3 is heard first or later,the conditions <br /> would still apply to Item No. 4. During both Items 3 and 4, the Planning Commission will have a <br /> discussion about what are appropriate conditions. <br /> Feuss indicated she does not want the Planning Commission to be influenced on Item No. 3 by the fact <br /> that there is an outstanding application. <br /> Gaffron stated he does not have a preference either way. <br /> . <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to hear Item No. 4 before Item No. 3. <br /> � Page 1 <br />