Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2830 u ' '� � . C�t o� ORONO _ �' • (�? RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � NO. 2830 � - • • A RESOLIITION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MDNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1541 � WHEREAS, Dr. Roby & Jane .Thompson (hereinafter "the applicants" ) are owners of the property located at 1520 Tanglewood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot l, Block 1, Tanglewood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the app licant has app lied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of room additions located less than 50' from the rear lot line where a 50' rear yard is norm�lly required. � � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1 . This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1541. � 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Family Rura1 Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 18, 1990, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) Variance application #470 was approved in 1979'; allowing the house to be constructed 20' from the north lot line. The house was actually constructed 26' from the north lot line. The currently proposed additions will at their closest point be 21.9' from the narth lot 1ine, meeting the intent of tYie original variance ` approval. B) The original variance was granted because of extremely limited drainfield sites, topogrpahy, and wetland on the site. Neither of the currently proposed additions encroach into existing or potential � drainfield sites or wetland areas. Page 1 of 4 � �. � � �t;''r�a�. ����� �it� o� ORONO �.: ':sMC� r. .- . . . :��,� +, ��.. • �Yl h.k J��j.a � • . ,� �, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL : ,,_ � ,. � �'' NO. 2830 • - • •� - ,,, . C) The property adjacent to the north 1ot line is owned by the Department of Natural Resources as a � preserved wood land, and it is not anticipated that any new construction will occur in that area, hence the visual density of the neighborhood is not an issue. None of the neighboring residences will be able to see the proposed additions. 4 . The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff , comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light , air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a • convenience to the applicants , but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive P1an of the City. � CONCLIISIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of additions to the existing residence as proposed, such additions being located as near as 21.9' from the north lot line � where a 50' rear setback is normally required,- subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be �xercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this . variance wi11 expire on that date (July 9, 1991). 2. Violation. of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions� of this variance sha11 constitute a violation of the zoning code, shal 1 automatically terminate any authority • granted herein, and shal 1 be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of 4 �, - . � ' _-:.r. Cit� o� ORONO • & RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • 3: p� , 4,.2. :.t::� • ,.: NO. 2 8 3 0 ..• - � � • ; �?", ,-;r. :i: 3. The undersigned app licants have read, understood and ., hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby '� agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of tit le of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Min sota at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of July, 1990. ATT T: Dorothy allin, City C1er Jame R. GrabekZ�Ma�or �..� �1�-Y� - Propert Owner(s • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of July, 1990, by James R. Grabek & Dorothy M. � Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. � � . Notary Public THERE3A L NAAB � � NOTARY PUBUC�MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY IMy Commisslan expires 8-8-92 Page 3 of 4 � . � • ;a':.:�,;. �.��a c�t� o� oR,oNo � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3�,�'�..• NO. 2 8 3 0 • - • • ,; STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUIJTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this �� day of �w��_ _ , 199 � before me a Notary Public within and foi� said county, personally appeared /Q�b�� (��� �'r. �I-� S. �iovn��'1,,� l�inf ��Q�r� known to me t be the person(s) descri ed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. THERESA L. NAAB Q� •: NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My cEommEssioNexpi�ras s-TeY-s2 NOTA Y PUBLIC • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 199_, before me a . Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person ( s ) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. � NOTARY PUBLIC , � � Page 4 of 4 �