Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2761 . <"� , . `: ° 1�� 1 +' Y ���v o� ORONO . ' t � ,i• - !/ � L��� ' y.���� . .�.w..�• "� Y ^'�a'� t'l�. . ''� �'` ; RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ;� ' �y���' y��>� � NO. 2761 a.�..�. .�.. �� � • ���' --�-:,:Yi:�. A RESOLDTION GRANTING . AN AFTER-TAE-FACT VARIANCE TO MIINICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SOBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SIIBDIVISION 8, � AND AN AFTER-TAE-FACT CONDITIONAL DSE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1481 WHEREAS , Gerald T. McCourtney (hereinafter "the applicant" ) zs the owner of the property located at 1055 West Ferndale Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract B, Registered Land Surv ey �1372, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property") ; and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for an after-the-fact variance and conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 � for approval of grading work in 0-75' lakeshore yard where no such grading work is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council oP Orono, riinnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1481 . 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 20 , 1989 , and recommended after-the-fact approval for the proposed variance and conditional use permit for excavation and grading in the 0-75' lakeshore yard based upon the following findings: A) Z�s a result of rip-rapping the shoreline of the property, trucks transporting boulders to the site damaged the lakeshore yard by creating ruts and disturbing the existing soil and vegetation. As a result of this damage, the applicant was required by the City staff to restore and regrade the damaged area to its original condition. The applicant did this upon �'� completion of the rip-rapping work . Page 1 of 6 ' . � . , r� � sS� J- � `�� � Cit o� ORONO �,,�.� ��. �' ��,• `� t "� fi,�� . r j � ��' RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � � �. '( '��r��- �.��, NO. 2761 � �;i•.�-.<Slr'..n,�. ....---,.•- . .... �;-°�� `�' As part of the rip-rapping project, the applicant - was required to maintain drainage through the rip-rap via a draintile, which was a necessary part of a swale system required in the 1975 subdivision approval that created this lot. The conditions of that subdivision approval required that a swale be maintained generally along the west end of the property to continue drainage towards the lake from the neighboring property from � which the lot was split off. Such a swale has always been in place, and was required to be maintained in a functional manner. Grading within 20' of the shoreline was necessary to maintain proper elevations for the discharge tile line through the rip-rap. This grading work was not brought to the attention of City staff until after the rip-rapping project was underway. C) In conjunction with remodeling of the pre-existing residence on the property, applicants constructed a basement access door at the west end of the house. While a review of the plans later indicated that this door had been proposed, no grading plan accompanied • that plan to inc3icate that outside graae changes would be proposed or necessary. In order to accommodate gravity drainage away �from that basement level doorway to the adjacent swale area, the swale was lowered at the west end of the house approximately 3' , in the 75-250' zone. At the 75' setback line, the swale was lowered approximately 1' from its pre-existing condition to accommodate drainage from this doorway. As the swale headed nearer the shoreline, the extent of grade elevation changes in the 0-75' zone decreased to a few inches. D) The Planning Commission found that the impact of the deepening of the swale in the 0-75 ' zone as described above is minor. The grading does not redirect arainage on the property, but maintains the pre-existing drainage pattern which was required to be maintained when this lot was subdivided. Furthermore, lowering the pre-existing swale by one foot or less in the 0-75' zone to accommodate gravity drainage away from the basement access door would be preferable to requiring the applicant to crib an area near the doorway leaving a stairwell that could cause potential basement water problems. Page 2 of 6 ' •. 1 - � . I h� - � � `y3� �� Clt o� ORONO : . ;. _ . :�.- 3' . �..• ��j `r 4,~ . ,� �:�;� �`°Y=�':,Q�;��` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �-. � .�,. 4" NO. 2761 * i-'� M1 F�,..:.Vs {y,,, • : . • . - `' `f"�' E) The grade changes proposed for after-the-fact approval do not increase the rate, volume or quantities of run-off to the lake from this property. � F) The proposed after-the-fact grade changes have no significant visual impact as viewed from the lake, and do not change the pre-existing character of the shoreline. , 4. The City Council finds that the conc7itions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light , air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties ; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. • 5. The City Council finds that granting an after-the-fact conditional use permit to allow the grading work in the 0- 75' lakeshore yard will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the � property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoninq Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 , and a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for after-the-fact approval of grading in the lakeshore yard where no grading, filling or excavating in normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall sod the 0-75' lakeshore yard and the area of the swale in the 75-250' zone as soon as weather permits in the spring of 1990. 2. During the spring run-off, applicant shall maintain • proper erosion methods to eliminate erosion and sedimentation prior to resodding of the yard. Page 3 of 6 . � � ��,: ;4��t • ;r:`. � \Jit� o� ORONO . �� ;�t,�'�� y �aT;.a ,5..�'�ir.RUF'...�y.� � . -�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL '.�� �. NO. 2761 � � � �:* ,..' - '•", . �`�"3�'" ""Prior to this resolution taking effect, the applicant �f , shall provide an executed drainage easement 10' in width centered on the swale in the 0-75' and 75-250' zones, such drainage easement reducing to a 5' width along the westerly property boundary north to the road right-of-way. Applicant's surveyor shall provide a legal description for such easement. 4. Applicant or his contractor shall obtain a land alteration permit prior to sodding of the yard. Such permit must be obtained before a Certificate of Occupancy for the house is issued. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval , or this resolution will expire on that date (February 26, 1991). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and • conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. � 5. The undersiqned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of February, 1990. ATT T: � t M allin, City Clerk Edward Cal han, r., ctin ayor � � � Prop rty Owner (s) • Page 4 of 6 �. , � . - , , �. ; ���. ��µ� c�t o� oR,oNO . ��� _ �� -r. � � t ( •. 4 ,�"��;. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL '� NO. :��z`�`'��:��. 2 7 61 ,� . � �. .,`. �'F:-.`���.` STA - ��' f' INNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) � The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of February, 1990, by Edward Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Acting Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. �l.Q�c-Q/.�o�- •/�/c�-(�`� Tf1ERESA 1.. NAAB Nota y Pu ic �NENNEPIN COUNTYTA �nmisalon expirQa 9-B-s2 c����� / My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. • COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this �b � day of � , 1� � before me a Notary Public within and oi said county, personally appeared . �u✓� .b known to me to be the person(s) escribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. /'��:cee�c- `���� NOTARY PUBLIC THERESA L. NAAB ���,��� NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA �� r�Y COMMISSION EXPIRES "� My cEommEssioo exP�o 9-S 92 �: Page 5 of 6 • r ♦J • � ,� V � '�i'...5.... .�N. � . �L '�`" T k � . Cit� o� ORONO , , K} . • ,�� �`a���•{ . �r'�� T �; � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � k����� NO. 2 7 61 '.,,.,�-�.�c.,, °`� - • �" . STA � �'~-����Y�'' INNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) . ��. On this ��o � day of n �� � , 199 �, before me a Notar Public wi hin and for said County, personally appeared aY }�}�C r known to me to be the person ( s ) es ibed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. � Q NOTARY PUBLIC " THERESA L. NAAB 1 NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA �' �� HENNEPIN COUNTY W►y commission exptrea 8-e-92 �'�-9� . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES � ' r ' Page 6 of 6 �