HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6659 ' � ' � y � �a yv C'�.�-
� -�
Doc No A10354288
Certified, filed and/or recorded on
Sep 1, 2016 4:30 PM
Office of the County Recorder
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Martin McCormick, County Recorder
Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer
Deputy 47 Pkg I D 1442651 M
Document Recording Fee $46.00
Document Total $46.00
This cover sheet is now a ermanent art of the recorded document. ���
P P rj
� • f � • / `
��� CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
s� �,c� No. ,� 6 5 9�
��s�Q�*�
A RESOLUTION
GI7;ANT�'�1G VARIANCE5 TO
MUNICIPAL ZONIlVG CODE SECTION 78-420
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1240 ARBOR STREET
-FII.E N0.16 3845.
WSEREA3,Timothy P.Dn�k and Julie A.Dnilc,husband an,d wife,(]�'tl�e
"Owners"� are owners of the properiy located at 1244 Arbor Street within the City of Orono
�'�e"CitY'�and leBallY descn�ed as follows:
Lot4 6 and 7,Block 1,MAXWELL'S ADDITION TO CRYSTAL
BAY,He�epin Cou�tY,lVfinnesota{hereinut�er the"ProPeat��,a�
wHEREA.S,the Owners on Ju1y 6,20l 6 made a cflmplete application to the City
for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420�in order to a11ow tLe construction
of a new single family residence on a lot 16,796 s.f. in area where g7,120 s.f. lot area is normally
required;on a lot 100 feet in defined width yvhere a�,yidth of 200 feet is normally required;with$
front street se�tback of 20.4 feet where a 50-foot front setUack is noimaily required; with a north
side setback of 25 feet wheY,e a 30-foot se#back is normaily required; and with a south side street
sctba�ck of 23 feet where a 50-foot setback is normally required;ead
+ � on July 18,2016 after publishod and mailed notice in accordance with
Mi�s°ffi S� and the CitY Code�the Orono planning Commission held a public heaiing, at
which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning t�is applicaUion were givon the opportunitY
to speak thereon; and
WH�REAS, on July 18, 2016, the Planning Commission on a vote of 6-0
recommended approval of the variances ss presented;and
WSEREAS,on Aug�st 8,2016,the Orono City Council reviewed the application
and the recommendations of the Plaaning Commission and City staff
NUW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota
hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following
findings of fact conceming this property;
1
� r .
��c� CrrY oF oRONo
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL,
s� �,�' No. 6 6 5 9
���1�SH��`�
FINDINGS OF FACT:
Al. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exh�ibits attached to the aforesaid
memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all othe�.materials
distributed at these meetings�re hereby incorporated by reference.
A2. The Property is located within the RR 1B Single Family Rura1 Residential District which
requires a minimum lot a�ea of 2.0 acres and a minumum lot width of 200' for construction
of a singte family residence.
A3. The Property is 0.39 acres in area, being 100 fe�t in defined width, Thc pmperty is
considered as legally nonconforniing with regard to lot area and lot width.
A4. The Property is located within Storm Wa�ter Overlay District Tier 3 which allows 35%
hardcover. The ptoposed resideace construc�ion will result in hardcover on the Froperty
of approximately 15.5%,well below the ma�cimum batdcover allowance.
A5. The Owners are pl8aning to cons�uct a n�,hOme o��vacant lot. The lot is just under
4/10 acre in the RR 1 B 2-acre zone, e� is a corner lot with the Arbor Stmet frontage
defined as front. The Property has sewer available and was assessed for sewer in 1985,
��e�PertY was assumed to be buildable as a combinstion of two lots at that tizne,
as evidenced by City Council Resolution No. 1797. The Property vvill be se�tyed by �
private well. The pzoposed 2-story home incl�des an att�hed garage and has an overall
footprint of approximately 1850 s.f.including deck and porches. '1$e house is proposed as
a`lookout'rather than,a walkout due to the relative flatness of the lot,and as proposed will
have e defined heiglYt of just over 26 f�eet,meeting the 30' limit.
A6. The Ovvners are requesting a number of variances,as the buildable envelope under RR_�S
sa'tback s�andards is app�oxi.mately 24 feet in width and 60 feet in lengtl� and would not
allow sufficient footprint area for a reasonably sized home.
A7. The Property at 100'wide and less than 1/2 acre in area is typical of lots in the Crystal Bay
nei8hborhood,the majority of which was platted in 1909 and 1915. Over the past ce�y,
individual lots as well as double lots and a few triple or largen�lots have been built on with
single family homes. 'The RR_1$ zonin�g of the Crystal Bay neighborhood is a reflectian
of the surrounding rural area,and hes nev�been revised to reflect the actual n�ighborhood
lot sizes crea�teed 100 years ago, Rez.oning to more closely match the prevailing lot sizes
has been discussed in the past but not acted upon. It is noted that Qrono°s %2_acre zone
standards would allow for a 0.5 acre lot and 100' width,with setbacks of 30'front and rear,
1 U' sides,and 15' side stree�
2
��� CI� oF ORorro
x�soLVTTrnv oF�crrY covxcn,
�� �•�' No- 6 6 5 9
� sHo�,�
A8. The Qv�mers are praposing to meet the required 50' rear yard setback. The front setback
varixnce is for a setback of 20.4 feet for the porch,with the bulk of the house being 26 feet
from the street lot line. Tvis setback is generally in line with the e�cisting hous� to �he
immediate north, and is typical of many other lots in the neighborhood, which l�eve front
setbacics ranging from 17-18 feet to as much as 40-SQ feet. The n�d for the shortened
setback is in part due to the topography of the lot and its relation to the `lookout'
configuration. With regatd to the side setbacks of 25' snd 23', �ese pla�ce the house
S��y��ed on the lot,which will avoid visual crowding in the neighborhood. It is
noted thgt under%Z-acre standards these would be conforining sctbacks.
A9. In considering this application for variances, the Council h$s considered the advice and
recommendaxion of the Planning Comumission an�d the effect of the proposed variances
upon the healtb, safety a� welfare of the community, existing and a�icipa�ed tra�'ic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire,risk t�the public safety, and the effect on values
of properiy in the surrounding area.
VARIANCE ANALYSIS:
B1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
aad intent of the ordin�snc� . . . ." Smgle famiiy homes and the aseoCistted�uneni�ttes are
permfitted osea in the RR 1B districk T6e reqa�variancea if granted would aaow
construction of a smgle family home on the Property. The proposed reaidence is a Si�e
family honie on a smnR tot in a neighborhood of 'simil:riy sixed lots with�imi�r eetbacks.
B2. "Variances shall only be pernutted... wl�n the variances are consistent with the
comprehensive plan." The praposed new residence $tractare ia consi8tent witb tLe
comprehensive plan guiding of this and sarroanding pruperties for residentisl use.
B3. "Variances may be graated when the applicant f�or the variance establishes tbst there are
practical difficulties in canplying with the zoning ardinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used
in conn�ion with the granting of a vatisnce,means that:
i. The p�operty owner in question pmposes to use the propetty in a n:asonable menner,
howevex,the praposed use is not permitted by the official co�d+ols.,,
u. The plight of the landowner is due to circums�aces unique to his property not er�a�
by the iandowner.,,
iii. The variance,if gtanted,will not alt�er the essential character of the locality."
3
��� CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF TFIE CITY COUNCII,
y'd�� 6G��' No. 6 6 5 9
SN04
The Property owners are proposing to use the property in a reaaonable manner but the
s�efic lot area, lot widt� and setback requirements of the Zoning Code re�ult in the
need for variances m order to bnild vn the lo� T6e ptight of the Owner is dne to the lot
hnving been created prior to establi�Lment of zoning codes,and the application of area,
width and setback standards more suited to 2-acre lots tLau t�e small lota m tlte Cryata!
Bay neighborhood;t6e landawner did not creat�the smaU lot situat�ion Constructing a
aingie family residence as p�raposed is not anticipated to alt�er the chnracter of fhe
neighborhood,since many 6omes in the neighborhood ezLst on similariy eized lots with
similar setbacks.
B4. "Economic cansiderations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic
consideratians have not been a factor in the v�cisnce approval dctermination.
B5. "Pra,ctical difficulties also includ�e but are n�ot limited to inadequate aacess to dit+act sunlight
for solsr energy sysbems. Variaaces s1�all be granted for earth�ltered construction as
definod in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 2,when in l�armony with pl,ono City�C�,
78" This condition is not appl�cable.
B6. "'Ihe board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not penmitted under
Orono City Cod�e Chapter 78 for properiy in th�e zon�e wh+ere the aff� p�n's land is
loca�d." TLis condition is not appticabk,ws the use for s sin�le fimily re�idence is an
allawed use im the RR 1B District.
B7. "The board or council may per�mit as a variance tl�e temporery use of a ono-�amily dwelling
as a two-family dwelling." Thi�conditiwn is not apphcable.
B8. "The special conditions applying to the st�ucture or laud in question are peculiar to auch
Property or immediately adjoin3ng property," The aubstandard lot area and width are
common in the Crystal Bay neighborhood,where many eriatiing homee do not meet the
��.B D�trict e�ctback standards.�is not the case thrroug6out much of the RR iB
D�trict, bnt Crystaj Bay ia a neighborhood created long bet'ore the RR 1B zoning
at�tdards we�re in effect The conditions applicable to tLe Property at�e typfcel of fhe
Cryatal Bny neighboxhood but are not typicnl of the over�lt RR 1B zoning diatrict,
B9. "'The conditions do not apply generally to other land or s�truchu+es in the district in wltich the
�and is located." The conditions apply to many other 100'wide corner lota in t6e Crystal
Bay neighborhood wLich as a reanit of t6e required s�etb�cks woald have onty a 2Q'wide
bn�ldable em�elope under RR-1B standards;but do not:ppiy to a majortty of lots witbin
the RR!B dietrict.
B10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
sub�antial praperty right of the applicant." . The Property is typical of simgle family lob
4
��� CrrY oF oRorto
RESOLL7TION OF TI�CTTY COUNCII,
s�, G� No. 6 6 5 9
`� SHoad
in the Crystal Bay neighborhood. Further,the Property was ns�eased for a sewer unit
aad provided witl► manicipal rewer m 1985, hence the Property wns assumed to be
bnildable aa a cambmation of two lots at that tmie, as evidenc� by City Counc�
Resolation No. 1797.
Bl l. "The granting of the pmposed variance will not in any way unpair health, safetY,caanfort or
morals, or in arry other re.�pect be contraiy to the iutent of this chapter." Gra�ating of the
aren,width,setbsck and lot coverage variancee woald not impnfr health,aafety,comfort
or morALs and woald be in keepmg wifb�c mttnt of the zoning code.
B12. "The g�ra�tin�g of such variance will not merely serve as a conveni�ce to the applicant,but is
necessary to alleviate de�nonsirable difficulty." The lot eize �a aompared to the RR 1B
zoning at�ndard�is a practical difficulty,as adhereace to those at�ndards would re8nit
in a very n.arrow bw7dable enve�ope and a home t�utt would be out of clt�tracter�yith the
snrrounding neighborhood. Granting af the ar en,width nnd�tbnck varianc.e+s rwitl eolve
s Pract�ical difficulty that otheiwise would make the lot virtual�y unnsable�far a�ingle
fami�y home.
CONCLUSIONS,ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council heieby grants
va�i�aces to Orono Municipal Zoning Cvde Sec�ion 78-420 in ord�er to a11ow the conslruction of a
new single family residence on a lot 16,796 s.f. in area where g7,120 s.f. lot area is normally
required;on a lot 100 feet in defined width where a width of 200 feet is normally required;with a
front street setback of 20.4 fee�t wheze a 50-foot front setback is normally xequired; with a north
side setback of 25 feet where a 30-foot setback is normally requirod; and with a south side sire�t
setback of 23 feet where a 50-foot setba,ck is normelly requirod,subject to the gollowing conditions:
l. Council appToval is based on the survey/site plan aed building plans submitt�ed by the
Owners and annotated by City staff,attech�to this R,esolutioa es Eihibits A and B. Any
amendments �to the approved survey/site plan and building plans wlsich are not in
conformity with City codes will require ftirther pianning Commission and City Council
rEview.
2. Owners shall comply with the permitting requirements o�the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District.
5
��O CITY OF ORONO
RE30LUTION OF THE CTTY C'AUNCQ,
��,� �`�' rro. 6 ( .rj �..—_
� sHo��`
3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the Owners,but are
permissive only and must be exercised by ob�taining a building permit for the praject and
commencing construction of said project within one year of the date of Counoil approval,
or the v�ciances will expire on that date(August 8,201'n.
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the tenns aad conditions of tbis resolu�ion s�hall
constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminat� any au#hority
Sranted herein, and shs11 be punishable as a misdemeanor.
S. Tbe und�ersigned Owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of the ovv�rs and the Ovmers' heirs, successors and assi8ns,
hereby ag�ee to the recording of this resolution in the chain of tifle of the Propei�ty,
Adopbed by the Orono City Council on the 8th day of August,2016.
ATTEST:
,
,
- �
- - � � ,�.
' �Tie�s, Cirty Cterk Lili M
Millan,Mayor
- ._,
f .� `
Property Owner(s)
6
���� CITY OF ORUNO
RESOLUTION OF Tf�CTI'Y COUNCIL
�i�� ' G�� NO.__���_�___—
sHo�
STATE OF MIN;�IESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEpIN
The foregoing instrume�was acknowledged before me this�day of 2016
Timothy P. Druk,husband of Julie A.Druk, '�'
� ^
�� MONICAA.FADNESS
� ';' N07ARY PUBLIC-AIINRJESOTA Np Public
'•- '- - A4Y Comm�ssiai Expims Jan.31.2017
�•��y�
STATE OF�IIlVNESpTA
COUNTY OF HENNEpIN
The foregoing inst:vment was aclawvvledged before me this�day of � � 2016 b
Julie A. Dnilc,wife of Timoth y P.Lhvk. ' y
�;��iH����� ..11V�/w�. '1v V C
,g_ � RACHEL DODGE Notary Public
�� �- NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
��„.: �4Y Corrordssion Expires Jan.31,2020
L'%
7
i
�
CERTIFICATE OF SUR�Y : ���,�,������,�P����q,��y��ALUDRIVEWAY�� �s R..«�«�
�for— Tlm Druk �0 IOCAnCN TD BE DETERMINED BY CONIRACTOR. _ � 6 5 9 ��A
• FlNISHEp qtADE ApJ�CENT Tp HpAIE SHpLL BE 0.S FEET BELOW 70P OF BIOqC �d °Urv°Y 1MOB°°mpl�t�d by E.G. Rud and Sone, Ine. on 06/13/18.
"Of" �2�AI'�O�,Orono,�N — ` ��7 AT pFmVEWAY AND PA710. - B�arinya ahown are bated cn the Henneptn County CoordMute Systam NAD 83(96 adJ,),
� �
I'�`-�/s� — � � — — -� — — —�� - V�IwI Datum: NAVDBB
'��. ' - BuI1Mr/contrnetor to�ify Sanitory Sewer Depth pryor to axeawtton.
� ..........�' ..•:;'
I � � ` 7h�s wrrey was preparad w!thout the b�n�flt of tiUe work, Additkrtd eosemsnta,
I ��•. � t1T C �/cw-``90 to roWa�ians W�/raeeipt,otra�current tlUai'commttmant o�an ttorney's tltle opMio y eu Jsct
I .......................%` , .... .. : ,
/ b
•p�,yp ,
e° ��P I§� �� �s.w� �
� ,�, _^ ross.ae 1
nOR'�N �°°°'�` �ya��.—' — — —:— , — _ _ _ — � � • DENOTES IRON MONUME�iT FOUND AS LABELED
I �� � : iD �°�'J8 � � � / x�� OENOTES EXISPNG SPOT ELEVAT!ON
`, •°°°'°° .°s[°° '°�°' �' ,°'°." ` �P�,y ■ DENOTES HUB
•960.J�D6-03 °01Owl��iapa�-�` ���.ese.ez i�aas.se '� � '� DENOTES POWER POLE
u�''�-- oasrMo ': io ,oss.as ' ��/
� ._ j�� � �"""� rosi;4s g'Tn s , T � .+ � / � �' DENOTES TELEPHOWE PEDESTA�
I � � °�°'.o !S89'1��'�►9�d,,,....,.'191.$6��sQ.4J •+�p y � ' /� � :.•'_'"''�':.'-�.'.'".-�� DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS
.9 ,••..y �91i� �Pj�J ' ci � �� � DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS
�� / •�YYY1 DENOTES TREE UNE
i,eea � `'�� 4°'"w� �`'
:` ,.....�� . •, �"�. •960
t ii'M YSi.7S; ��� "�.
f�jry � 9�. i '- Pmir.,�i ....�Q,/.. _�p� T
� ro ,, s ; ; ,,4 ,py_ .............. DENOTES OVERHEAD NARE
� DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE
IXGVAl10N.` .� i' .H � ' �i � / L��._I
�aB8 N� � . R �• •BSS.B3•.�• �0.56.13 r �, r,.,
j' •�.az � T �'•�''`� OENOIES GRAVEL SURFACE
''•:I ' '" .. t_;}, i. E:aa�s:•.�
.�-g .ss..�� aa'r� ~. � %o '� L�.'.:`?7 q ''�' ` •ox.0 S DENOTES SILT FENCE
.�� � .r � �""� '�; � ..��.� ��Q� � DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
` . 0°°'� •1 as : 11 �� ����� osdaP � DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
�+sszos��?L � _ .. — �wrw.u,�sssp.rr� (Y•eea.Fs ` -�
.t '— � 7 �
: Q ;T ., , o i� : v �o�o�s aRoaosEo �rnnar.
" .�� ��'�'1`'"' ` d1�'� •��� � ��T ��� � +': ,. HARDCO�ERAREAS� X 1011.2 DENOTES EXISTING EIfYAT10N.
� .; � . '�:
�t �aeo.y!� � ti �+ad'y �.� •f w7H � DENOTES DIRECTION OF ORNNAGE.
� � i� � �R.� � ` • .� '� �Su Hadoovsr Cdalatbn Woriuheet) � DENOTES W00p HUB/NETA�SPIKE AT 11 FOOT
I•aes.b�•re�.so. C��� ..o�}.d �a�x.D o 4 ;py�.w\ .yas.�4�a�s.�a �; :.:JT •• � OFFSET. (UNLSS OTFIERNASE NOIE�)
�-'30' ---� �1q `'R ...../ � � F: : S3: n.� . :;� �� xna .pFF'�T DISTANCES fROM HUBS SHOMM DO NOT
�y�y�" :'Rr- �� I,.,� �1' . ': o MA.TCIi WHAT IS 1MR1
i p � ��� 'v,•?_• � � o FlELD, T7FN q�l 7?1E STAKES N THE
�98t`�° e` �"L�j a/s w ' g `� "'<.a�r, yye � A R
, .ae�.76 Po;'o ; � r':.�;: •a�6.3e
''••. . � �.�y 9«�, r�,;v.
'; '—; aiw ! `r , . � yB(}��.., {..;,f- p�� e � -------- DIAGONAL: 32.00 X 74.Q0 a 80.62
aro- _ sao
�90 �
4����� 'so�� � o iao� (BASED ON A 12 COURSE BASEMENT)
°so � .' � s �,N . ... ,,,�y;�y 'y '�`�•
`�;. t n ' , '' B
: ; n
; t.,�.�. � �i��`.onka �kav�........ .�..� ---
;a,`' � °�! PROPOSED E FVATIONS•
� i�9�E g
' ........ • ..._.. •ndx .,,s.�o ,9e,.
� i .. T�OF BLOqC � 981.9
' — —� _, .. _ _ _ — .. �0 0.0 _ aao GARACE FLOOR . 981.5
..� — ...—...� _ _ '� — — — - �a.o<'G TO�OF � � 833.5
Lots 6&7, Block 1, MAXWELL'S ADDITION TO CRYSTAL BAY, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
o Deno:es Iron Set Bearings shown are on I hereby certify that this plon, survey or report wos
• Denotes Iron Found an assumed datum, prepored by me or under my
direct supervis�on ond that I am a duly Regiatered Lond Surveyor under the lawa �pA a gAM IYP
' SCale 1��= 3�� Drawn By. $NN of the State of Minnesoto. Dated this 11th day of _ .,. �_�_� 2016. s � ---�
Professional l.and Survsyors
Job No.: 16486HS Project Manager: KDN _ �tcense No. 45356 ""�'p1OedP H�utch���oon^IYINS�n°�
. *ia�o►a�e r�e,�arawe
` .�• � � `�.,�.»� �Im �. � R�6utl5a�9
0 0 o ExF11Wt g
�
�
�`fi
.� ���� s�- t
! �� �
� •� � �r
..� � �
� �a.�v �
� wx�at
urs� �
I 4 �
, � ,.� � O �Q�
�`.one. �
�EFT ELEyAT101� RIGHT ELEVATIDI�
. ac""'"`a'r .wi.ia�ar �
S�AB ELEVATIDN
��...,.�..�.�..�,�.. �
war�w��ew�r��u� �Pa
FQR StD PURPOSES C)NLY M""""""'""""" �
•,�.�...a�......,. .
���a ��
.o...�...,.�.,� ���
��w��
� ���
._..._.sTAff NeT�S ; �w�"ir.."'°�""°ma�+a a 9���
.._......_.._..........-....�_ti.. _ �����
��-+ �s mnR��wesss�uv Y s
...:._'. R'�`t.e�a�M��p�r`=tp�s•_�. ��'.S'���' ���� ,,,4 ` ..�ss.» �
�nMN1r vrs�iWO��
Q ~� ���lA 1q
Pi�t I�voT��`T'Del�te--'�"�on1_.__. -'J��� � ..�,
.:,.- ..s++��:--_._._.._. --- ..___.... a ��.�� �
z.'�•���-;�•�vp�Tr�s�...._..,._. �`��.��., O
.._.�..�„�,�1t� __...._.____.._. �� ! J �� xi �
eaw a
�^bt�-��tf�•tl3�-_- : '""■' � ►-�i
�...:_�a:-�a.�....�.�,:ruv�u��.��._,...:�:. i �'� � �
.. .. .......�_....�_..�__._.__._...____...._ �.__.__-�'� � A
_.._.___._._.._...___.._._r...r__ � �
� � e�r w�r
� �
I n�o.w�oao �
roroR�w�
I
� FRONT ELEVATIDN �K��RM�rM70/CMR1Wmyl�p °�^�
I v���. �,� , m
r nrr ��p�m� ��
la K ���K���wb0�lAIOOOpII{ M�
r...� 124 ORAORBNOR�EET I
..�...
eares•
`�"��"��"'� 6 6 5 9
��r�1/1r�I/Y��
"'�'•��U� � � Raeolullon
�� ; '� FOR B!D PURPO�ES ONLY „�., ' �� � ExhFbitB
......� �
�� � �v�9S ��� s6t�r 2
�Y
��wa�me...�r �G #
eM�r
R
� d�� �
t+�moaa� �
""" c�iQ�
S: i 4�I!f r
d � �
NbNA I �
eann I
�Ifl � 0 � � �
NI� `
� p'� ��r
�; � � i �
� �,,; �; � j �, fi
,,� ,�
�'N �� � ,K,� �� ��� �
„ �, �� � �, � �
�11/PAII/Yllt y�l O• � t� T i a�Y
" _ � � � F
Iq' MLMLL�f��yql � ` � ��2� I
�y� � G1f
Lia iu �.s"�'n` g 4
t�a ,W r� q O _ e p��� i
q €
iu w�wwawu i O g
� i ------ ---��- 1 �
- ------ -------------
iaa�a
� •��� ------------'-' `---
� ----------- � T�
iu � Vl �
` HOLOW pY � W
Z 1� �OTI� p M.�II� ��
�_"_�' �_""`�_ 4 '_�'_' '�'_�_�_""_ �� �
---�-f ------- --------
ie,rwi j , .snr�feo'w----�=__=_=_+��, !
! i��� � tl � � ""' � 0 I
�� �� ��
� �' � � � � i� � x
�a i a �� . ;; �
I � ii y� � � �� IM111l1 J � �i .
~� �
� ""
'__"" M►J � .
t� -------'-- i-�I q./L. �
i. MI��1�! `�____ �M Ol _ � '
n�wa wwrn s.� ' i � N
i�r Y a � A
i I '� �Sfdl ' L�� � �
i �tl^
� �S
__ a a -=�s.-- ��e :- - _r'•� � I an
' - HI•16
AN1�011'
� � I1Y�M � � �
• •���M W 761q1�D0'���� i
�lL/10710TpRVNO ��111�M !
- FIRST FLOOR PLAN Q
�� I
�.�.,. .,_".�� . .
- 1240 AR$OR STREET �
. ORONO MN, 3.Z
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The undersigned, being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at the meeting of the
Orono City Council on August 8, 2016, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof. -;''� '
.,�l::a��
�:��
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the corp0�ate s���;of the City this
12th day of August, 2016. �_, r;''� � ,�,✓ � P►t�;;
1 t'` �^ '� •' £,�':
..,� r.., ' ;, I' Y � {w
J � ./ R•; /I F ,�-
_ �9 � �`) '�'1 ���^7 a'J �f i -i r .�`
7 �� � .__ � �-"+• Y
iane�iegs,��Cle�� �� � ��' ��
�" ,a �� ,,,,�
f -,�Q t1 i, '. �l
pi � �� �� i�' o~.a�{
� ✓R�Q .�//I �' 1 D�/\� fr�:r
�,� �' ,�V"Qir�H ��
'�,� �a�f,!#��`�'�! y.. � �
,:5,��,n ���y S�```�.:.:v�i��._...;���
,Y�..,. `.`.�.��w"�. ,Fr�,
,�� ��. w
� � {
�w�f'