HomeMy WebLinkAboutserptic info and design 11/05/,2015 12 :22PM FAX f�0001/0004
i , Z � i
y' '�
� , �'�
; i . -,
�;,-. • �
4� � Minnesota Pollution • '
� � � �ontrolAgency ��mpl�anc�e Inspect�on Form ` ;
520 Lafayette Road North ���ting Subsurtace Sewage Treatment Syste�ms,($STS);'; ."`
�I t.Paul,MIV 55155-4194 Doc Type;Compliance and Enfolae'ment
ti:: i
Ins ect[on� results based on M[n Fpr IoC�I tr�r
p nesota Pollut�on COntrol A enc MPCA �L� : �
s v( > fiE�� , ,,,, ,
requirements and attached forms—additiona!local requirements may alsp apply. �+y� , i, (
Submlt completed form to Local Unit of Gavernment(L U G)a n d s y s t e m o w n e r N�� �5 20�5� ' I
within 15 days
S stem S :� �,��
y ,tatU5 ; a�f
. _ �;
Syste�m st�tus on date(mm/dd/yyyy): 11/�/2014 . ;
. ,
� Corripliant— Certificate of Compliance ❑ Noncompliant— Notice of Noncomplian'ce ' ' ' I
(V a l l d f o r 3 y e a r s f r o m r e p o r t d&t e, u n l e s s s h o r t e f t i m e �: y ' � >. '� � `
(See Upgra de Requirementa on p�ge 3.) ,,,_ �
frame ouflined in Local Ordlnance.) �
. :,,. �
'� Reason(s)for noncompltance(check al!applicable) _: ;
❑Impact on Publfc Heafth(Compliance Cpmponent#i)—Imminent threat to puhliC health and safe(y �'
❑�Other CompElance Conditions(Complisnce Component#3 —Imminent thr� ° `-: �
) st to ublic health and
p saf� _.
tY ,
❑!Tank Integrity(CompGance Component#2)—Fai/ing to pro(ect grounrlwater '�
_ ❑�Other Campliance Conditions(Compliance Componerlt�13)—�a�ling to protect groundwater
❑'ISofl Sep2r'ation(Compllence Component#4)—Fgiling to protect groundevater
'� �
{]IOperating permiUmonitoring plan requirements(Compliance Component#5}—Noncompl;ant
i ,
' ;� �_i f'
' ,r;: j,
"` Pro ert Information j �
f �' .' � yl Parcel!D#or SeclTwp/Range: ,.. :
Property address: 425 Ferndale Roed North Qrono Reason for in8pection: Sale
Property ow�er. Le0 Hause�Estafe OwnerB phone: 612-309-6332 �
or < , ;. ,
Owne�s rep�l-esentatiV�: Represent�tive phone: � :
Local regulai ory authority: City of Qrono Regulatoty authority phone: '
Brief system description: 2',1Q00 &I se tic tanks, 10fl0 allOrl um tank&4 bedr0om mound s stem ' �
Cornments br recommendations: � { '"
iI . . . . . r.�x��-
i . .: .. . . .. ,
.. � i . �. .�� .
��� Certification ���, �� :���� ���,� � �����
, . . .!i... ..��.
� .�:�i��.�.
I hereby cerfify that a!1 th�necessary information has been gathered to determine the campliance status of fhis system:No
determination of futur'e system�Iperformance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditinns during system construCtion,
" possible ab�se of the system, inadequate maintenance, or futu�water usage. ,
Inspector name: Josh Swedlund Certification number: C1659 � � "> '��
Buslness na�ne: Swedlund �e �c S License number: 2502' ' '" `7 , '
; -�
Inspector signature: Phone number: 852-873-3292
;;;
Necessary or Loca Iy Requfred Attachmen s
0 Soil bo�ing Ipgs �! �System/As-built drawing � Farms per local prdinance ;,
[] Other information(Ilst)' � ' • t ; �
= j I
- - �I
www.pca.state.mn.us • 651�,'246-6300 • 500-657-3864 • TTY b51-282•5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in altemativ�focTriats::i::_::i
wq-wwists4-3! . 3/i6/12 " .
; p�8 1 o f;3,,;;, ;
i
11/05/2015 12:23PM FAX �0002/0004
I I
.. 3 ,i
- � �t i '�
��
Proparty address: 425 Ferndale Road North Orono Inspector initials7Date: JS 1:1/4/2015' 'I , ��i �
j�: ' (mm/dci/yyjry): ; . � �
1. lmp�tt on Public Health-�Compliance component#1 of 5 �
I
f � I
COmpliance criteria: Verification method(s): - � '�' '`��'�� �
: . , .' �. .
�;;; ,. System discharges s�wage to the ❑Yes � No �Searched for surFace outlet ' �,
groun�tl surfaca. � S82rched for seeping Icl yardlbackup in hame I
� System discharges sewage to drain ❑Yes 0 No ❑ Excessive ponding in spil system/D-boxes::
i
tile or�surface waters. _ Homeowne ,' � ��'
❑ r testimon (Sea Cor�ments/Ex Ia aLon :�- � :I,.,..
Y P I
J.
� . P .
; System caus6s sewage backup into [�Yes � No ❑°Black soil"above soil dispersai system � �� '�� E�.;�;,
dwelfingorestablishment. ' ; �,
• � ❑System requires"emergency"pumping
� Any"yes"answer above indicates the ' �
sys#em !s an imminent threat to public ❑PerFormed dye test
healfh and safe#y. ❑ Unabl�to verify(See comments/Explanetion). _ , .
, ..; �
_ � Other methods not listed(See Comments/F�cplanefion)'•�.-' :'.'_ , ' i
CommentS/Explanation: ., I
A: � ;
�' ,-� I
, . � � . {� -f.:,D yqj !�'�i.
��;
` I
?`- � 2. T�11k (ntegrity— Compliance component#2 of 5 ` '
. ,� �
Complianee criteria: _ Verification method(s): ' � �,�
1 �ri`. y�Y�,� � ,q�e�t
Systerrt consists of a seepage pit, ❑Yes �(Vo � Probed tank(s)bottom , �b�+.,� rs�; I'
cesspoo l, drywe l 1,p�162c hi�g pi t. ❑ Examined CpnstCuction records �i k�,} �i
s :
�.��� . Seepage pits me�fing 7080.2550 mey 6e ❑ E x a m i n e d T a n k I n t e g r i t y F o r m(A t t a a h) � ��
compllanf if el/owed in local orqinance, ;
• Sewa e tank s leak below their ❑ Observed liquid level belaw operating depth ,; �, ��: �
g ( ) ❑Yes � No _ � �,.
desigrled operating depth. �Examined empty(pumped)tanks(s) '`: � �,� �';�3r
If yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks: ❑ Probgd outside tank(s)for"black soil' ��
� '' - ❑ Unable to venfy(se�Comments✓Exp/enetion)
' � ` Any ,"yes"answer above indica#es the '
system !s failing to proi�ect groundwater_ ❑Other methods not listed(See Comments�Explanetron) �` � '
CommentslExplanation: ,;- �`� `
, ...
, - --- .._..._.._..�,--..
f; i �
� - ��
� i ;; � ' ;
-':;z u f r� '; � i :�'
�.. .
3. Othe��ComplianC� COndltlOns—Compliance component#3 of 5
a. Mainfenance hole covers are damaged,crecked,unsecured,or appear to be structurally unsound. ❑Yes` �No ❑�Unknown � ' i
b. Other issues(e�ec�icalhazanfs,etc.)to immedistely and adversely impact public heaRh o�safety. ❑Yes* �No �UnknoWn'�_;'�; ;
"Sysdem is an imminent threat to public health and safety. y ,€a� (� i, '
�4;� � ; E�Plaln: : �
;, ,� !
,.,
�.. �
_ _ , i i
;,
� �
c. System is non-protective of ground weter fpr pthef oonditions as deferrnfned by inspector. ❑Yes� �No. . ; ;.
� , . ��
=System is failing fo protectgrou»dwater. ' ' ` ::'' I
, H�plain: ��
� s� _ �
; _ ;
th
� �� 1
'
'. _ �.. .� .. > . .
j : www.pca.state.mn.us . 651-296-63U0 • B00-657-3864 . TfY 651•282-5332 or 8Uo-657-3864 . Available irr altemative formats
� ^ ' ' wg�wWfsL54-3 • 3l l6/1T -pqge.2 af 3 . , ��
� _ __ _... . I�
11/05/2015 12:23PM FA;t 1�0003/0004
_ ; 'n i�
� J Prope a�dr6ss; 425 Ferndale Road NorEh 01'Ono ' � �i,
�' � _ _ Inspectorinitials/Date: JS 11/4/201� _', '.
� � �(mm/dcuyyvyl:�' '-',�r»;;''�,�i�'�
� ����:';�',
, �:i I I
„ 4. S�il 5eparat�on—Compliance component#4 of 5 � . .: ��
''; ' Date of I�stallation: 5/31/9s90 ❑ Unknown Verification method(s): �
I (mm/dcl/YYYY)
Shorelan�ellh�ad protectioNFood beverage Soll phserva�on does not exprie.PrevioUs SOrI ,; 6���.;,�;��
�odg��ap L�Yes � No observations by twp independent p�rtigs a�e:��cre�� :�
y. I unle8s site conditions have bean aitered or/oca/
13 �
, Compliance crlteri�: roquir�ments diifer. �
Forsysferr�s built p»orto Apnl i, 1996, and �Yes ❑ Na �ConduCted soil observatfon(s)(Attech boringlogsJ.1 i�
notlocated in Shoreland or Wellhe&d � �. '
Protecfion IArea or not seiving a food, ❑Two prevfous verifications(Attach bonng logs) � ; -�i
' � ,.,°" �
beverage orlodging est�b!lshment: ❑ Not applicable(Hold�ng tank(s),no dreinfield) ;' � t, ; �
,,::: ;
' ' � , Drainfield itas at least a fwo-foot vertical ❑ Unable to�erify(See CommentsiE,rplanaflon) � � i
� separation distance from perlodiC&Ily ❑Other(See Comments/Fxp/anatia») �
saturafed�oil or bedrack.
Non- erformance S Stems builf A ril 7, ` ' `'��'' �
A y p ❑Yes ❑ No CommentslExplanation, `'", �r, ;
1996, ar l8ter or ior non-perfOrmance . • ? , �
systems/ocated rn Shpr�land or Wellhead Boring: I �
��i Protection Areas or serving a food, 1-14"10YR 2I2 Loam � �
beverage, 'orlodgJng establishment: '. i
15-24" 10YR 4/4 Clay Loam .".;� '
Drainfield IiaS a three-foot vertical " ,
separefionidistance from periddiC�lly No Redox � ��y �'%'�
saturated spil vr badrock." ,';;: � 3�1' ;
-- ,
'i
��"i �'' "�xpenmer�ta!'; "Other'; or "Perfarmance" ❑Yes �No Indicate depths or elevationg
` � syste�s bu,lt under p�-2008 Rul�s,-(ype!V — ::� ��
or V s ster�is built under 2008 Rules 7080. A. Bottom of distribution media lus 12" 'r °
2350 or 7080.2400 (AdvanCed Inspector �
-. LiCense required) � B. Periodically saturated soiUbedrock Over 24`.'. " �•
Drainfield meets the design�d�ertical � ` �
;` ,� separation�distance from periodlcall y ��tem se aration 36" lus , i
saturated SOiI or bedrock. ;.', :: `;c,'.:' 1 '
D. Re ufred com liance se arat(an' 24" �}:� 1I
Any"nvy'answer above indlcates the s,y�tem is *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by,�ocal ' �' i'��fi� {;' ,!
failing td protect groundwater, ord�nance. ;j
�i
�. � � i _ - ���,
5. Operating Permit and Ni�rog�n BMP"—Com liance com onent#5 � ' ' �
p p o f 5 � N o t a p p l i c a b l�e,�,:,�.,,::,�,,�Y�,i,,
!s the system operated under an Operafing PermiY? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes',',A below is requlred ' ' F '� �",:�
�,; ,
Is the system requfred to employ a Nltrogen BMP? ❑Yes 0 No lf , �
�a'' _ '"yes",B below is rec{uired '
�
BMP�Best Management Pracfice(s)speclfied in the system deSign �
If the a�svver tn bolh uesfions/s"no" t 's �
q , hi sectlon daes not need tn be comp/eted. c a;,,;
::� , �I
Compliance criterla
; ; a. ORerating Permlt number: .— � ' ,
H�Ive the Operaling Perrnit requirements baen met7 O Yes ❑ No , �
, - � < <a
b. Is�he reguired nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑Yes L]NO ' !�
� ' Any "rio"answer indicates Noncomp/iance. � ' �'' ` � '
.; .
-�_� '
Upgradel Requirements(Minn.Stat.§115,55)An imminent threat to public haalth and selery(lTPHS)mustba upgrsded,r�place�l,qrlts use y T �
diseorttln�ed within ten months of rt�ceipt af this noflee ar within a shorter period if required by/oeal atYmence.If ths system!s falGng to Qra�e"r�f,� � �
qround wat�r,ths system must be upgreded,replaced,or its use dlscontinued within the tfine r�quired by laca!onilnence.If an�acistjng�ysEe�n� s i �
is not f�ili�tg es deBned in law,and hdS�t least hao feet of design soi!separdf/pn,thBn the system need not be upgreded,repalr�d.:r9�laced;;;or �' � �
its use dlacontinued,notwifhstandfng eny loc�l ordlnance that is more strlct. This provision does noi spply m systerns!n shoreland.'are�s .- '
Fi ;': Wellhead�Protectlon AreBs,ar those usep fn Connection with Pood,beversge,andlodging estedllshments as defJned/n lew. � � E
j ,. � �
www.pca.staCe.mn.us • 651-296-8300 • 800•657-3864 • TTY 651-282-533z vr 800-657-3864 . Availabie in altematrve foiirial�,w,, �j �
woq�wwists4-3�I . 3/!6/12 ' Page 3'bf�3� � �E i
f '
11/05/201� 12:23P�1 FAX f�0004/0004
� ' ' c , � � . . ���,� "�� r 5 �- �
• x ti.::r;�- Sir � i��,r�i'�`.� ���ta�'�4+�'1���sk*���Y ,�� �ir r� i��`� �#y�f'�' � vy^� �"r �
��,.,a�+�c i ��:.1, i�pC C ��' �x� �r� � � ��: � 1 >� �y� z ���� f
Fx �57 �-� � yoF.iY ,fh �
i� . �i. r. Z�1 �;S � ''�*���/�� ,, !L�,� � y'�.rs, � ��s i � . .
?;' _ �ln. I S:.f ���-k �j�"�"�,' 4� ��ty�` _ L t i � � ��� �y ti
�.: . . . '. . 'K I [ MKf � � � �.�✓ S � � �.�'r�� + .�.J
� , . .ia.�' a e,�-�a ^.1' ��/z - ) .�' �� �'`N,y ..��i 1?'�i' .+.ti, . .
. . . . . <_ . � . .
.. . . .� . !��- W -�.�5«:.J _ '
�
. ;k -..��- � . - ...
���,� . . . :v�/. _ �.1:i . . . . .
. � . . . . .. W�.� � .
4 _ ���' � �,r-f , � ��,�.� .l � . .
. C�J ��,-"/f ` ._��, ���f�. �ry` t . 4'1 '1+r1 . .y flt'�1YW c.L ti.S.A.,�. [
,,�. �� �' r '��S A�� , .. nn-� ....� �. . . . . �'■ .
, , w;�� rr +k � �/ � �bF'� ?�i ,�c 7 tt.�1 >�� �,n � ���i���c
�,5 �^ ��� � �<y l."' .,, � ��S�. �..� t � C � �g � ,
. . .. �� S '.• ' . .� � '�� t �y � ti � ..� 1 '_�✓1_ f�5 ' ��'■ . .
S !3 . �'�.sir ���
�1 �:RWY- . ' .�"r ."•n �T.f .��t�.�i� .'.L-'� '�:F ���ts, � .
�t . '� �l� '�!: t i
.���.. . .r � t��, � _ � .`:�� ,
/.�. �..'.. = ' � �
�y_., . . � . �,.� �,�� _r" .' �.:� a < .y_
. ..��, .' ., . . � . .,�, .�, �-.
. . , .. ..,.^ .r a 'q,�, � . �+ ' ':. �
. . _ .. • . ' . i�,. f ..;;r,'�` � � .` '�� ..
. . � , . . :� . . . �� �i�r 4��.-� ; ��1 �t A��'�{rr �j��5k ' .
l . , r".,,� L
.. y t
. . . ��lif'� . s' ,�'�Th <.rtir.es, .,,'�� F�n� �u��.�. ���r 1`�.'�'� ���y �. .. � .
f 4 �
'��LJ� 7l `\'f �k,
. �IF�.�1 ��~ ._. Y1=-� �` ���p �!y 1. /���� r�. ���r�"bC .! � .r �i,y����"�rw. ;Sii~y��_ �
�
7 <
_ � � ��� �. � n `7 l Y r' � �,/ ,
� r Fr ��� � ���.�. 1 . .
' .f .� � � � _' .
�� , r r �. .�,
� q
I .a � ' ��r�f ���^�'~ 4ib r �• !y"��'�'"� ,C"f 1' . � .
it'
-� L' � t�'� n`fr.i � .n���� ��,.�t�cr�;:� i �. �� �: �'
i� l Y� �J�� ���7 b���• �r i �y ���t - `�� iY,�� r.. { L � � ' .�
, �D , � r- . �:, ;�� .�.
' OV� �'�� y ,?`l.a „ ', s� ��x�.�..� a,� fti�,�:;����� ,�� ` /
�� r � �Yr� ' ti � n� l-
,; > - f.�
�� � . .T �� �r` � 'ab S� ::t' .
,�I ! i I ..ti yl'r f. �
� � .�C � ' �r � .µ i ��"k��r�+'.'. � �' ' .
�3 /�1�1 �1 O � f�� , _ .�.�� �
,
-. , _ J ° �..��.� � �
; ,; ,:_ .
,' � ` " �
, M
� . ., .. '•,r � � �r � � . . . '
.� , i. , .. . . '.�r -. � .,
� - �. � �'.f [�:.- .
��` . . . .. � � ^�mT
� ��a t
. _ ('Y lat t" '., .}� �, ' )3'V%r '✓..
� / Fc
. . . �}4�Mt'�+� 1 ,
... ..�',. 4
�
S
� � . ����. ' ,���, .2 f�:..� ,
I ���V'� ��� �a �6 i �I +� Yf ' � , ,
� � ... ' . . �{: .
I . . � �7� . . . . ' ' .,
� . � � � ' . - , .. . .
� .. ' ,. . ' ' . . ' ' ..� � � '
. , . . . -'� , �,y�.A _
� - ' ' I'� .. � t �% .�}..-. . .
, :i(�! 4 �1�4� ;. '�(� ���_ . ,x' �F...', � .. ..
• i .P�+ �.�'�• . ,
` T<<d
r' ( d `
. ., , ht �7 �R 1 h+,. ��, .
� , i�. .L' [ JA�'T!�,:�S�l�'�_ � ' r�y1/ �'I. 1:"� . . ,
- ' . ',� ..�R��i �Ff.� i ��' } . ' � i
. . . . � '� � l . . S- ��(i. . . ,�;. .
. . . ' . .. � :;41YT S ��::} V . . . ..
. . �. . ����.Tt r, } 4 C ! �
, � . , :h ' �.. . IN."' �' '..1. . 1
. . . .. � � � . � r 't'�����y . . {
" ' ' ,'
��� I
� . .`' .. . '_ � fl ' � �
. , , .. - . V 2., . ,
6�✓� l
' (��` i:b•,�� 9�,.'. . . . ,Y,� ti.� . .
,;.�, , , -3' E
� ;�: �
.. , ,
t - i
r r. _ . 'R �, i
. . �.s . 1
'��`'sds9`ti
, .';:,� h�.1 4' ' ..
. . , ,. . . . ... , �
'.!. r N�ry T�, ..
. �9,�y�� J ., ._ ' � .
• � . .-� . ' � , .��. �
� ,� .._, i : ...
. . ,__ il_'. . ...„, �
^ . . �, ` �r�.,� ' . . . r�," . . . _ i
� �. � .. � \ y. ..,� yr,,kl..: r �,f�' � , .
,r �p 4 '
� '�.d Y�u «_} i: . . . . . , ,
. . , .�t.. . 4,. .'A. . � ' ' � . . '
� o� �
o,�:,a o
�,,��:1���,;-: � CITY of ORONO
� � ` .
',.y�`� ,1��`,: L �4 Municipal Offices
'� ��C��u��,'��'r��Y�� G'ti
,� ��,; t 4;, � Street Address; Mailing Address;
'9$'EgKO¢ 2150 Keiley Parkway P.O. Boz 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
To Current Owner: Address: r��1� ������� �r� I'.� �
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage h�eatment system in Orono be inspected every two years.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
SYSTEM CONFORMITY 1-3 : `
1 "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standazds of the current Orono Municipal
Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or nvo foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or
an imminent threatto public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-yeaz flood plain,any ISTS which may
or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standazds of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason; and
any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand beriveen the distribution device and the limiting soil chazacteristics.
TANK CONDITION(5-7): 5
Tank inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped �'1-1�1��� ).
Make sure seatic tanks are numped through manhole and not throu�h white inspection pipes. This allows for the
proper cleaning. Keep water softner and iron filter discharQe out of septic system.
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If
tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
D� CONDITION(8-10): �
8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
COMMENTS: r�c..,�c� �00`�5 OK. � Qu,-.� SQ�i �:� }-t,�-5 U hce
�V`c -,� `3 y e��r� � -�
� -�� -� c�� `�'�`� ���
Date of Inspection Matt Boltertnan - Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other Vansfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee
or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system undercurrent conditions based on the available
information.
Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616
. �°� � � �
o�� o � .
� ±=��:���-�? CITYof O�tONO
� �}�' .v! r' �.� /�Y
� ��`y������ �,� � MilIIiCt� O�iCCS
�' � �' ���I�G
l "'%'��t�i�� Street Address: Mailing Address: •
.�EB�IOg 2150 Keiley ParkwaY P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Owner: Ne��� �a�5er � Address: 4as Fer��41� Rd �v. .
Ciry Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage�eatment system in Orono be ins�ected every two years.
The on-site sesvage�reatment rystem at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked beloN.
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): ( � '
� "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets all the locaiion,daign and construction��� +��ofthe curreat Oroao bfuaicipal Code.
2 °CO�LIANT SYST'EM" Aa ISTS which does aot meet all the location,daiga and coastruction standards of the curreat proao Municipal
Code but doa meet the three foot separation requiremeat,and which u IIa failing ar aa imn,;ne�threat to public hcaIth or saf t�,
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" AproFu'bited ISTS;aa ISTS locafed withia a desigaated 100-yeaz flood plain,aay ISTS which may
or may not mad all the locatioq drsigr�or coasC�uctien siandards oFthe current Orono I�tuniapal Code aad which is faling for any reason;aad
any ISTS with less than three feet of uruahuated soil or sand betweea the distn'bution device and the limiting$oil characteristics_
TANK CONDITION(5-10): �O. ' ••-
Tank inspection indicates: .. •
� Pumpout not naaded at tius tima
� Tank must ba pumped out this yaat (city code requira tanks to be pumped out every 3 years. Tank w�s last pumped V�k^0 w r� �,
7 Solids ac�vmutation in tanks is at a aicical a criti�llaveL Tanks should be pumpad aut bs soon as possibte.
8 Systtm is dis�harging W the surface. Tankt must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface d'ucharge.
9 Inspe�tion risers missing-tanks could not be inspecced. Irupeetion risers(4"d'�pipe)must be instal(td in each tank at next pumpout If tanks
have nut betn pumped out within the last three years,they should ba pumped out now.
1� Inspectiun pipa is locatad d'unUy ova tank ba.�l�(dou not give accucate measuremeni of solids accumulsdon)_ If tanks hava not bern pumped
out�vithin the list three years,they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION(11-I4): 11
I 1 Drsinfirld'u dry,no surfacing evidant �
12 Some e�ldence of surfacing,not critica(yet . ' ' . '
13 Drsinfield is saturatad and visibIy discharginq nntrea2rd e&lueat to the rurfaca Contace the City Inspector unmediately.Repairs musi be
compietedµ�ithia 90 days. .
1� Drainfield tstrnt and condition unknown.
Co1�NTs: S y s���. \o nk5 o k- p��,p fiG�kS �� ��
�/ ��vC �o-r �ec�
n�r.�2 w,�h.�. \0.5� � �jcA�S
�'�.7 -'�\ ��
Dace ofInspecaoa � rt' .
Sepfic System Inspector .f
No�: In tf�e event that tfsis iaspedioa npoR u uscd to satisfy the reqairemeatt for a moctgage or other�acufa of propecty,be advised that this repod doa not gvaraatee
or certify that an esisting systtm will coatiaue to functioa properlY.but is maely aa opiaioa of the adequacy of the sysiem yIIder Naeat wa�itioas based oa the availsble
informatioa
/ �-O`\\\\
%/ 7 � ���
i O O ,\
� - " CITY of ORONU
' ,� j�: . ,, �
.;. �E �.� �!4 Municipal Offices
�� ; ; s ;� G �
Street Address: Mailin� Address:
�`��9$EgHOg'� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
\ --- Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Owner: [./ (�(/ Address: 425 Ferndale Rd. N.
Permit #'s: 2939 Dates: 5/29/90 Contractors: Don's Backhoe
(This is [� an existing system [ ] new construction) .
STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1
1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes and is functioning properly.
3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom
of the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
(The saturated soil level is �� or is not [ ] identified under this saptic system. If tha
saturated soil lavel is not i en ified, this classification is subjact to ravision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 9
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
� Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be um ed o now.
10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means e sep ic system is non-compliant.
(The tanks are �[ ] or ara not [ ] water tiQht or the condition is [ ] unknown. If the tanks
ara not confirmed�to be watertiQht, this classification is subject to revision.)
D INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface.
Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc. ) : low
COMMENTS: In order to confirm that your septic system meets Minnesota standards, soil borings
were performed to verify a 3 foot separation between the drainfield and the seasonal water
table. The separation is 3 feet and the system is compliant.
�(,—�L�
Date of Inspection Sep c System Inspecto
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to
function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipal Offices O � O
Post Office eox 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
r�,, �C�, INSPECTION REPORT
'C�� G~
9kESH�4'�
Owner: �i3.Ct�L'�' f�U✓SP� Address: L1�o�� �YYY'�/,rlP /Cd. .!(/,r
i r� //
Permit #'s: vZ���� Dates: �����J Contractors: -1"1S �f[K1"K"K�P.
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked belou.
(This is � an existing system [ l new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY 1-3 :
1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but uas installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current seuage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristic � has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. [f the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identi ied, this classification may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10):
Tank inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
b Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems.
7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be insPected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each
tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped
out now.
� Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation).
!f tanks have not been purtiped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
Dr,a��field insPection indicates:
(11% Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
�� Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately. Repairs must be completed uithin 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils.water table,etc.): �y�,_/
COMMENTS:
,"" � ;sI_�
Date of Inspection ptic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certtfy that an existing system will continue to function
properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system loc�ti�n and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipal Offices O � O
Post Offtce Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 a � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
v� �C�. INSPECTION REPORT
'�t �jti
�
9kESH04'
Owner: �� �l Address: /o�'�.� �1��+�-�T/�l� Ic�D(, 1V�
Permit #'s: `' Dates: .s���� !(� Contractors: �� I�CKf`/�?_
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(This is � an existing system [ ] new construction)
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3):
1 "CODE SYS7EM"-A system which meets atl the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and uhich
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current seuage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface uaters.
3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any
system uhich may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes and which is failing tor any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
betueen the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
(The limiting soil characteristic Yy�has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. [f the limiting soil
characteristic has not been identified this classification may be subject to revision.>
TANK CONDITION (5-10):
Tank inspection indicates:
5 Purnpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be p�xnped out this year to help prevent future problems.
7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out uithin 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each
� tank at next pumpout. [f tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be purt�ed
out now.
Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation).
If tanks have not been purtiped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14):
D�nfield inspection indicates:
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
imnediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING S1TE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.): �-
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): �L�
COMMENTS: �— � n v c�v�� ��r, � � ati�.J.
Date of Inspection ept c System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function
properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
information.
This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system loc�tion and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
On the North Shore of
Lake A�linnetonka
ON-S17E SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66
1335 S. Brown Rd.
� � � Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
OWNER `-�G:L�IC�[ '�L���::;�°� ADDRESS `t�� J�f'r'1';�`r,'Ir �, 1V'
�a <.�_ :,> �
PERMIT NO.'S. ��39 DATES �� � �� CONTRACTORS �5 ��'�����
City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The onsite sewage
treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below.
(This is ❑ an existing system � new construction)
I'� � Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating
�� properly,
� 2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed,
located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes. System appears to be functioning properly; no major
upgrading of the system is required at this time.
� 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, construction,or location.Appears to be operating
adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at
this time.
� 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and
dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply,or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is
creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.P�ease contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/
replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan
must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started.
SYSTEM CONDITION ( m Checked items may require your action)
Tank inspection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not
�Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulatio�.) If tanks
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years, they
ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now.
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates:
should be pumped out as soon as possible. �•Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated
❑ Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected, effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace-
Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector
at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
the last three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for
❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion
❑ Soil table,and system condition) �-Adequate
❑ High water table � Low ❑ Fair
❑ Lot size ❑ Medium ❑ Poor
❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High ❑ Inadequate
❑ Drainage ❑ System is causing visible
surface discharge.
COMMENTS:
�.�1—`�c� �' �---
Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that
this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy
of the system under current conditions based on the available information.
This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner
c
� � �� S � :
.
� CITY OF ORONO Per�ait # ;
:.
SS.PTIC SYSTEi�i APPROVAL Fee $ �
r
Sntered By
. r
p of this re ort and is
�,,
The Genera 1 Contractor �i 11 be given a co y P _-
responsible for its distas 8IItr oed°unlessnthis sheett�s attar_hedc system :
design is not considered pp , �;�
�� >,;,����,-G,t' �,�.,
I,pC'�TION: �-=: O�"G- ,
R: � �,�� ` �� ���� .,��� :A ._ 2I�3 / '
G1�RAT: cox�c� .
PHONE:
SEPTIC COIdfiRAC'1'�R= ,
�, .� � ,
y,_�,1 �} , ',. j �„���� � � � ,� ; ."� ' ' -
OWNER: L.J `'--k �
❑ APPROVED `
�CO2�TDITIONAI�LY APPROVED: Note Changes Below :
/U a� � � � �� � �-� � ��-...�. , �.,�-a�-�.. a� ,��� ���r-����`", .,;
�o�s: � � —
. .
_ �/ � ,, ,,�' -`"�- = } y�t . "r�':' " f`P'�C �%f�'S f�,/',i ��r��' � �_.F � � ?
.�(� �T�- �T7'!� ..> ...�" -.F.. �
� '� � S i` ,�+ ! � r��"O r "�`~��� �� '^� '� �.+�-k!��1�� � I`�� K A .
� r ��.3� �j _;/'-t.r_) �.�:
--� , �,� ��. _ �V�Sg z� SP � �
�.4_...�.�
�, _,�.._...�.. . .
,f i
i'C� .�" � . . , .
.� �,� �::
_..: �`_
�. , .
..t�"" � �
a
�� � . ,,,� �.--�-- ���„ � �-���
_.,, � '!"$*�.-'
�___.�..r R . ,�:.;t �f t�� E�, ��..� s:� • �� :
�, �
C '�I �L L- J l�t'i► �-,�.� �ra�f �' - � '���.,c, , r �.
�` r�.,., .; . . ^, r � " �-�� O 1 `�—' .
,�`"' �,f•,�� � ��(; �,,f. ;'f j -� ...� �
. _ _ , ._„
..-� _ � ;..
" ", ^,�, , ,f, :r- �'`�.� �
�a«- � ��
".,�� ��' - " .�� �`;' � ! � � �-�-` �``'`�.
� ��. r
�;C' ('�:°� �� � �� �
� ,
— � � .
chan es to the approved plan and specs must have
NOTICE TO INSTALLERS: �y 9
prior approval of the Inspector (473-73�7). Call for inspections 24 hours
in advance. �
NpTICg Tp GENERAL CON�RACTORS: Drainfield sites must be protected prior to
after s stem installation to avoid compaction of th c o�errthem.oil. _
�and Y .
Drainf ie ld areas must be fenced of f to e liminate a 11 traf f i
�, / '
�� t��� .. � `�� a°�.-,� .�� .
�� � � � .
Date Approven By
,,,� ..
, � •
• SYSTEM DESIGN FOR LEO HAUSER
OF LOT 3 , BLOCK l , HAUSER LAUER WCC ADDITION
ORONO, MINNESOTA
11 -30-89
Information follows for the installation of a pressure mound
system for the proposed house on the above property . Also,
two septic tanks of at least 1000 gallons will be needed
along with a pumping tank of at least 750 gallons .
All construction and materials must adhere to the provisions
of the City of Orono . All construction and grading must be
kept off both the primary and the alternate septic site
areas . Runoff water should be diverted from the mound area .
If any other information is needed, please contact me .
Sincerely,
PERCOR, INC .
�'L,n����
i M�ark S . Gronberg ,
PCA certified
/
, - , C E'd ,�'`,�,�',1.l����
. � r4"F.�%'e<'�;::��' S` �-19
MOUI�,'D DESIGN PROCEDURE
(For Flows up to 1200 gpd)
A. Sewage Flow Rate I'. Pressure Distribution System
See D-7 or I-3, 4, or 5, or tise
metered alue; Flow a = 1• Select number of perforated �
D gpo �7 laterals {�
l � 2. Select perforation spacing /
B. Septic Tank Liquid Volume / _ .3 ft ✓
(see C-3 or C-5) �oo a gallons ✓
3. Select perforated lateral
C. Soi1 Characteristics length; Note if manifold is
at end of rocic layer, lateral
1. Depth to restricting layer length is rock layer length
such as seasonally saturated less half a perforation
soil, bedrock, coarse soil, / spacing. If manifold is in
etc. ; i,�6 inches `� center of rock layer, lateral
2. Depth of percolation tests; length is one-half rock l�er
�S inches � length less half a perforati�i
spacing. Perforat d' latera� �
3. Number of percolation test / length = ��, ,�_ f� � �p ,,�
holes; _� holes
�/ � 2
4. Divide lateral lengt��y perf�or-
4. Ave. p�rcolation rate; / ation spacing to get number of
-_32 mPl `� perforations per lateral (�
5. Landslope = �_% ✓ ,� � � :J feet : ,3 feet = perfs
� Note: last perforation must be
`_ D. Rock Layer Dimensions in end cap, (see page E-14)
l. Tlultiply gpd by 0.83 to 5. Multiply perforations per
obtain required area,d� ��``� lateral by number of laterals
rock layer; to get total number of
� �23 -;
` ��'(� c�O�� gpd x 0.83 =,>��c�-ft perforations; n./ �
� ' � �perfs/lat x � lats = � �D
' 2. Select width of rock layer /''' 6. Determine required flow rate
(10 feet or less) _ /O feet "
by multiplyin� number of
3. Lengt�2q�f rock layer = Area perforations by flo:a per � f'�;�- -.;�,
- t,Tid f D s9 f.t -:�..1/n f t � erfor�tion : �,) y �'�
p (see page E-17)
-. �,
- c� f t/ � �, � � �perfs x .7Y�PmIPerf =.��Pn����
� �OZ• .� ! — �__
E. Rock Volume �` --•'" � � 7. Select minimurn required lateral
,"""y�P diameter from table on Pa�;e E-17;
1. Multiply rock area by rock deptl enter table witli �erforation
to get cubic feet of rock; (of1r3 spacing, perforation diameter,
�22� � sq ft x / ft =„s�y�cu ft '� and number of perforations per
j� lateral. Select min '
2. Divide cu ft by 27 cu ft/cu,.� diameter for per � ated lat al
to get cubic yards; /� �� _ /�� " inctles UIf / �/� '�
3. Multiply cubic yards by 1:4_�
get weight of rock in tons; G. Basal Width
��;�cu yds x l.4 = Z , 9 t�,As��~ ' /
,,L 1. Percolation rate in top 12 �
32 � inches of soil is �.3,� mpi
2. Select allowable soil loading
'- rate from table on pa�e E-16; /
C.�J'� �. �� �P d/f t� ✓
• , .��r:7 O,%�l,J�'�',(%
� U''Fl.I�'.��.�c 1 E-20
MOUND DESIGN PROCEDURE (Continued)
(For Flows up to 1200 gpd)
G.3. Calculate basal width ratio H.2.f, riultiply dike multiplier by
by dividing rock layer downslope mound height to get
loading rate of 1.20 gpd/ft2 downslope dike width; /
by allowable soil loading ,3. �p x.�? 6 = /� 2 f t `�
rate; 2 / g. Compare the values of step H.l
1. 20 gpdi f t� -0, ,Sgpui i t = 2. �OJ and step H.2,f. Select the
Check this value on page E-16, greater of the two values as
4. Multiply b�sal width ratio by the downslope dike width; /
rock layer width to get /� � feet `�
Y
req�iired basal width; h. Calculate upslope dike width
.�. �d0 x /O f t =Zi/•D f t � using upslope mound height
and upslope dike multiplier
H. Downslope Dike Width fro,�-n��pa�e E-18;
1. If landslo e is 3% or more, �. -�r x .-�•U = �f t
P i. Total mound widtti is the sum
subtract rock layer width of upslope dike width plus rock
from basal width to obtain layer width plus downslope dike
minimum downslope dike toe wid,th width• / I' ,-�Q
�.�j f t - �_f t =/5! Of t ✓ ;�7`. 6f t�+ /O f t +� .�f t =.3'/,4'f t J � S,��r
2. Calculate mound hei ht at ed e � `
g � 3. If landslope is 2.9 percent or �1�
of rock layer on downslope side; less, basal width includes both
a. Determine depth of clean sand the upslope and downslope dike
fi11 at upslope edge of rock / widths.
layer: /, O feet `�
b. rfultiply rock layer width by a. Calculate downslope dike width
landslope to determine drop using steps H.2.a. throup,h
in elevation; ` H.2.f; feet -
� x �% : 100 = Q, t�f t � b. Calculate upslope dike width
c. Add drop in elevation to depth using upslope mound height and
of clean sand at upslope ed�e dike multiplier from Pa�e E-18;
of rock layer to get depth of a ft = ft
clean sand at downslope edge � c. Add downslope dike width to
of rock layer. � upslope dike width to rock
Q� �ft + /. lJft = /r, �� ft layer width to get total P,101111C�
d. Add depth of clean sand at down- width;
slope edge to deptti of rock _f t + _ _f t + _f t = f t
layer to depth of soil backfill
to get mound height at downslope d. Compare total mound width to
ed�e of rock layer; / required basal width from step
� �ft +,7Sft +/.ZSft =�. li ft � G.4 . If total mound widtli is
greater than required basal
e. Enter table on page E-18 with width, use calculated dike
landslope and downslope dike `! widths. If required basal
ratio. Select dike multiplier J width is p,reater than total
of -3. 66 3;/ S"ea/>�' mound width, increase downslope
dike width.
� � � L e�'� .t,/it'4u J cG'�
�i' /�r�%��-�o�,,.;
' F-15
PUI�iP SELECTION PROCEDUR�
A. Determine pump capacity:
1 . Minimum sug�ested is 600 gallons ner hour (l0 �;p1») -
to stay ahead of water use rate
2• Ma}:imum suggested for delivery to a drop box of a home
system is 2700 gallons per hour (45 Qpm) to prevent �
buildup of pressure :in droP box �
3. Use value from design of pressure distribution system � f
/�I �
SELECTEn PLT�1P CAPACITY . . . . . �t
. . . . . . . . . . . --- __ � _ �P
i3. Determine head requirements:
1 . Elevation difference between pump and poitlt of disctlarfie �� � feet
2• If pumping to a pressure disLribution system, add 5 feet
for pressure required at manifold . . . . . . .�i feet
3. Friction loss � � ` ' ---------
a. Enter friction loss table with gpm and pipe diameter.
Read friction loss in feet per 1(10 feet froni pa�e I'-18.
r. L. _ % /�/ ft/100 ft
b. Determine total pipe length from pumP to discharge
point. Acld 25 percent to pipe length for Littin�
loss, or use a fi.ttinF; loss chart . Equivalent pipe
l�ngth = l . 25 t imi�s ��ipe len�th = ].. 25 ;c `� (� _ ,t`�t� Q
c. Calcul.ate total Eriction loss by multipl.yin�; � --- r�,��
(ricCion l�ss in ft/10O ft hy equival.ent pine
lenpth .
'I'otal friction loss = �" ��
7 !Y it::,;x /�� 3� = f. / f e e t
4 . Total head required is the sum of elevation d9.ffererce,
special head reyuirements, and total fr.i.ction loss.
L� + -S + �. �
TOTAL HF.AD . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �C�. !d f e e t
C. Pump selection ��
1 • A pump must be selected fo deliver at least � . S gpm
with at least ��$`, ,� feet of total head.
D. To maximize pump life select sump size for 4 to 5 pump
operations per day.
1;. Ca1cu.Latc cirainbacl.
1 . Determitle total ��i_Pc: ].en�;L11, �� teet .
2. Determine liquid volume of pipe, ,��, S;�' gallons per
100 feet. (See page �-18)
3. T1ultiPly lengtll by volume: Draiilback quantity =
�Q _ feet x ��, ��' g;�.11ons/1_00 ft = u�i . �'�' �allons
4 . Suggested drainbacic quatitity is 10 percent of pumped quantity.
A larger drainback percentage will decrease pump station
efficiency slightly but pumping energy costs are usually a
relatively small part of tlie total household energy costs.
I
I G Fo �/.�k.r�- � .
\ , � � _
\ ��,,- ---�
N � -rt � �- -� �
,� � - � �- � --� �-
� � � � ---�-.�- !�..-� - � � �
N 53�3 ` ,n _-Tz.o-. _ ;\a� �" EAST t00.00 � � � ��_ �
� �o°p �' `1 iS.�Ti-'_ /�a' °/ ` �p 9� in
_ = ;` �—�, wEST I4t.47 '�. o �� f���`h / �` `Sov � ,li 50.00 " �
O -�--a • � W E S T'�
5 5 � ��� �', , ---"� 9. '�', / � �' ""' �
I � `�,__
�• _ �_ ' � / � ,
-r �_-. 9 9 a o � ! � ,
�_ �` ', � . o� f � /, � �
� ��; � �
/ ��\ .�` ,\ � P�aFo1'�o tDi � ��, �
�
� �� � tiy 9 92 o,c�v E � ' � � P�(E �, � �.. _
�n �- / e� �� �
�
� C' �-'`-�-----. �.� � �� ,. � �` ��� ; , ��'
� � � ,, ,�E ,
�v \ � �o`' '`� 9 P���o1fo, , 34.6„�. i
�, , '° `�E"��� � -- _ � Y � F '�� �� ,�E =,'�` � �` �
-� � S � � �
~� ��`� �' 15.16 N N 4 { i P�� I � ' �
• 1 � J M 4 � f' ;' � _
/ -'`' 10.0 � � � ` , I �- �
\ ' �� � M' tD 4.83 W :M . i �i ��.� P_� J �,.r/ \ N
\ Do� _ N _�� � � .rn i 't S K� � -'r , __,.-.��
O�o`c � `�' 9$8 -- I 14.0�' _ .� � ` .. � '1 _ '`.._' '-.- �.
' � �� �\ � � `��' �. -
`� . 6A � I .✓ ..'',f �
�_ , � h Q
. `''-- . � p; �W f� i � _ � ' ',r•��
-`� � �(n l0 � f �...-� .�/ � .
-o � � r
^� 9p n, o'`-- v, i � � ✓� �
�-�' 6 � � ^� � � � 'z-�:, , ...� -.
3 � ., — �. ` � \` � n' 3.33 i P'3 SQ_1� �� ,, � ,,, � �--
- 98q., . � 2.83 r � -�'
\ .r." �
o ^`� �� � Z33 � `: r i � o
, ,� ���i<<-
° � �, � �° �t�C"�' -� � ;� - "
� P �
� � - 40.67 N '' dy , �
Z ., �� ,
--- 9B2 1 �.:_ .o -� _ - �
' , � � - �� �
' � °`y' �
� 6 • ��Y / �P s~'- iZ � \ e�`
1 IRo�Pa1F0 � �• � o ��H� �os �
� ��'Af'/1�!'--"� �„�,����'� .._... ___._._ ._.
� \ ` ,� Ta-3 -�✓Qr .__ ---- `— �
� ! i-� / B,, n
� l 11 f � '�! . o°'e [�
5 5 ! � o`� ,
P-6 � -` `:/ �
\ G ..�� .c �-�w� ��, /_ I 0' �'
^ D/KF � ' _ C/Q �
�� � ��� ��� ;,
� � ` ��' ii-.�° -�9
( � '
, ,
. -o --�— ,-, � .-
SITE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR LEOPOLD HAUSER III
475 N. FERNDALE ROAD
ORONO, MINNESOTA
5-5-89
On May 2-3 , 1989 the existing house was tested for an alter-
nate drainfield site and very good. sandy soils were encountered
with an average percolation rate of 4 . 33 minutes per inch. This ,
along with the lack of a high water table would enable a standard
system to be constructed.
The new lot 2 was tested for both a primary and an alternate
site with both areas meeting the criteria for pressure mound sys-
tems . The primary site had an average percolation rate of 22 . 4
minutes per inch, and the alternate site had an average rate of
32 . 0 minutes per inch . Both showed evidence of a high seasonal
water table .
Individual system designs will be needed when a new house
is constructed. If any other information is needed, please con-
tact me .
Sincerely ,
PERCOR, INC .
.��-4''�..���
Mark S . Gronberg,
PCA certified
8- 15
PERCOLATION T°BST DA2A SHE'LT' ,
Te�t hol� loc:tion_ �T/� (J .S �/� -- �� Hole n�ber �
Date test hole vaa prepared �--„� --� � , Depth of hole bottom� / ,� inches.
Dianecer of hole, � inchea.
Soil data .from test bole:
Depth, inches Soil tezture
(� — �� �� �li.,�. ,T�r- .�� � .�J�l�'1
.
Method oi scratc}:ins� s�dewall _ ,�C. ��� �l_ {�1 �%�
�e�:h o* ;,ea-si�ed gravel in botto�� of hole, � inches.
ilcie c.^,G1 rtCL'r Gf �?':1:1�1 ;:�ter T�i�l:i� �� �^�'� , � .�.r ����
De�.h c` �ai�iai •�ater filling, f rf inches above hole botto�. -
':ctho� used :o �aint�{n at le2st 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
4 h au:s /1�/='f-/ � L.
' rercei�Lior� test read;.ngs �.ade by ,���►� (�y-,!'��>ji! ,�j ,���`�;,�,,,� on
,
,�-',3^ �� starting at �, � II: . Maximi:m water depth above hole bottom
(d��e)
cur_ng ;est , �_ inches.
�
j =�me ; � Percolation
T�me I inte:-�al, ; Measurement, � Drop in water zate, Rem.arks
i u�nutes j iaches level, inches minutes per
;
' I inch
�,� i v L.L r— F� l. =
�-t> t� L- � � � � '
!�+ ,�--r 1 � � �i.� L'� � '
.3h � �J.i ► '
/l r�-f) '� , i /n���.-= 7 � �l� .. � l 1
l ,� ,� ri r � � � � — 7 �l♦ �i I/
/_� r�y� � ' � ' /�.��. -- 'T s`�a � � ? � S�� � ,'
1:1 , 3 D r r � ' �l ��1 -- � ��''Ca �' 7 �'
rercolation Tate � //� t�.inutst par inch.
s— 1S
PERCOLATION T�ST AA2A SHBET �
Te�t hole location_ � ,� 1� ,c E,,�(' — Lp� � Hale nti�ber �
Date tert hole vao prepared � � -- �Gs , Depth of hole bottom� I� inches.
Diameter of hole� �n inchee.
Soil data .from test bole:
Depth, _ inches , Soil tezture
�!
� _" � ��/�! �� � 011/'�I
� �� -�- � � �� ,y� � ',�f.t�/ �� �!'� ,
�/7/��?.-��i'' r 4 J �
1
Method of scratchins� sidewall SL��,/ C h �`'/�
De�th of ,;ea-=_i�ed gravel in bottoW of hole, ,,'�,,�.., inches.
t1cCe c::C riCUT Gf :?':1�12� rcie2' I�i�l:i€ �'�',..� ^���j� .� �'�� � ��
De��h c` i^itiai �ater filling, f �, inches above hole bottom.
Mctho� used to �.aiatain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at leasL
4 r�c u:s d t r /'"/ �- �
rercolaLlOI'i test res�ings aade by ,���� �,1,� �j jt� �j i:^��P,,,, on
.�--...�' �� �t storting at � '3� 8 m�' . Maxim�n water depth above hole bottom
(da�e) �
cur::�g test , inches.
j ==-�e ; � Percolation
7��e I ir,te�al i I Drop in water rate, Reff,a_ks
, Measurement , T
i uinuLes j iaches level, inches minute6 per
�
'• I inch
�, C) i /L �-
D-'' I -�, L L. � ./� _r- �� L- �, '
/ t'�,. Gr'U � �'1 I�. L.. t 1
/�, �� f �,� ..
/l c7 / �e:� R'�i .� 3 r� `— ��s� .-,� I /
t � . ,3 ! � � � � /f ' -- '`7 �'/� /-�,� /�', �l� � �
/ n I + ' 1 ' 9 � , �_�s��. i�� �
r�n S � r 1 � � G •r!�� .°S�. `Y /
i
�
Percolation rate � � ,�r y �� ainutot par inch.
�
B-39 '
PERCOLATION TEST DATA S�IEET
� Test hole location �,��f`S �-� ._ � �
_—�-� v� f�ole number
Date test hole was prepared_ 5'-- ? — �9 , Depth of hole bottom,�� inches.
Diameter of hole, �_ inches.
Soil data from test hoie: .
Depth, inches
Soil texture
.i .
� — �� �� �, % .�7��� � G ��/^'1
� ✓�"S , �str'.'d r,;'.�� '� ..� \/ '
tfethod of scratchin� .sidewall ���- � �-�
Depth of pea-sized �ravel in bottom of hole, inches.
Date and hour of initial water filling ��"�» ? � ,(" �'' •
, � l,� �,
Depth of initial water filling, � � inches above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hoie for at least
4 hours_. �� f-�� � � �
Perc.olation test readings made by ��j�}�/ r,...,�p f� � F�r
,� � on
�_t��_ starting at � '�-� �'�' , Tfa:cimum water depth above hole bottom
) �� _
�- during test, inches.
Time Percolation
Time Interval, rfeasurement, Drop in water rate,
rfinutes Femarks
inches� level, inches minutes per
inch
U v/-L
D, 3 3 t
/ 1��� �D l�/l7 7 �cl ��:�!
9l 33 r � , � � 1 1 �
7 D�' ' ' ' � h� ;rc� ;. 1 1 �°1
+ _ �.J 1 � � � � rLi s �7 !J�
Percolation rate = yf}� tainutes per inch.
B-39
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SRE�T '
� Test hole lo.cation �/� (,� s �� --� �� � Fiole number
Date test hole was prepared ,�- �? -�
�'� , Deptli of hole bottom, /� inches.
Diameter of hole, _ � inches. �
Soil data from test hole: .
Depth, inches Soil texture
� � � � ��
_ ' �'L� - �' G, n� �r
� _ � a� -- i � '' �
. ����,�►� � � v � � .
tfethod of scratchin� .sidewall _ �'('/'/..a-�� �f't�
Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, �,,,,,_ inches.
Date and hour of initial water filling _ �"-� --. �� - `�"' ����
Depth of initial water filling, _ �� inches above hole bo'ttom.
Method used to maintain at• least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
4 hours . %��- f=��� �, �
Percolation test readings made by �n�� ��,p���� �r��! on
�'"(a�e��/ � starting at �� � •a:m: , rfaximum water depth above hole bottom
�- during test, _ /��l�_ inches.
Time Percolation
Time Interval, rleasurement, Drop in water rate,
Minutes Femarks
inches• ' level, �inches minutes per '
inch
S�' �C> ��
9 B—t� �.!_ /�r-' �i L /
li�� / l
� � �
�� d 3 � 1 � �� "".`�' �{, ? / /
/�' 3N �� �, ' � r�, /tl I
. C�U � � i, �.� ;� �/ . >�1
� 3c� � � i � ��U , ,
� �.
Percolation rate = /?, �,�j minutes per inch.
B-39
PERCOLATION T�ST DATA SfIE�T �
� Te s t h o 1 e 10.c a t i o n ��U'�s�,.�� .... L�7' S�,,.
- � Hole number
Date test hole was prapared ..� —� ^ ,�r�_� Depth of hole bottom,� inches.
Diameter of hole, �, inches.
Soil data from test hole: .
Depth, inches Soil texture
�, •
r� �- /,� ' � �,�7� � ;� n�i �M
,
�-� -- / k ' . - �
. or.�>.•r� ,_... ��>./ .
tfethod of scratchin� .sidewall .��� ,p,� / r '� F.��
Depth of pea-sized �ravel in bottom of hole, ,� inches. �
Date and hour of initial water filling ,�''= .2 �i� �^' t1�,3„�,_ ��
Depth of initial water fillin �
. �� _ � r�, inches above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of w a t e r d e p t t i i n h o l e f o r a t least
4 hours ��_'��� Z, l •
Percolation test readings made by ���) �..��� �J ����
r on
-���� "' %� �? starting at ,� ,�O ' a't"' Maximum water depth above hole bottom
(date) , :m. ' .
�- during test, � inches.
' Time Percolation
Time Interval, rfeasurement, Drop in water rate,
rfinutes Remarks
inches• � level, �inches minutes per
inch
S�, 3v fvL
9. �t� > >
�D �`,t)
�f'� �iL �
/D, ,?( /
� � -�� / 7 y�l , ��
/� .� f � r � r ,� � �-i/
�C�,
� � � ' ' ' ' ��
_ }
/.' �' � � � � �
`� f�
,
�
Percolation rate = � (� minutes per inch.
B-39
PERCOLATION TEST DATA SHE�T -
� Test hole lo.cation �/� rJ ��,� — L v��, Hole nunber �
Date test hole was prepared_ ,.�'- � -- ,¢�� , Depth of hole bottom �,
, ��' inche�
Diameter of hole, �_ inches.
Soil data fron test hole: •
Depth, inches Soil texture
�'i
. � r �� _ •. ���,�c1<'' � ��M
_ !� -- /�' �� ,����.l�.,� ��>�a�'S': � �i.�Itt �/�,�1T,�
�
t�fethod of scratchin� sidewall ..�[/�� y.�� ��'�
Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, __ � inclles.
Date and hour of initial �aater filling ,�'"- � - ��� „�" � �I�,�
Depth of initial water filling, � j„ inches above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches oF water depth in hole for at least
4 hours . �' �� ��.. L '
Perc.olation test readings made by _ ��/U �r�ON ��-�r� . .
on
_L�r�(aa�' CI starting at �.�-� -a'-�'� , r�;�imum water depth above hole bottom
�- during test, _ f f inches.
Time Percolation
Time Interval, rfeasurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks •
Minutes inches• � level, �inches minutes per
inch
� � � ,�vLL
9 � �
a �' �
�� .
/�' D 1�r� 3`� �
� � � �'i . t
�. o � ;� `l � �� -':� 9
' � �� � j `% �t' �"— F', G L
9 , J o 1 ��it/ t"�) ' -� ;��, � („
'3 ' �'��� � C.
�.1 3 /a i i l� 9 � 2 '? � � h
9 � � � ��iL L.
t7 �'! � / � �!
Percolation rate = � minutes per inch.
, � . - , -- 8-27. .
Location or Pro�ect �� /I,C ��C� �/y / ?
. � /
Borings made by d�.', -,� �� 1->• ;�� ��/� , fi �'' �'/._. Date ,<"'- � .., r�T� _
Classification Sys�em: A.ASHO ; USDA-SCS � ; Unified ; other
Auger used (check two) : Hand X , or Power ; Flight , or Lucket �( ; othcr
- . --�-
Depth, Borin� number Depth, Borin� numher � '
in Surface elevation .�c�'c�' in Surface elevation 9��6�
feet feet •
a 0
. �
,,�jLRC,< CO�;M tS'Li►CK ���fM
1 — . 1 = .
2 — 2 —
b'�t'OGv,v ��,t�' �4.{M C'�°�G✓•� CG.(Y G D�%z'�
3 — • 3 � .
� 4 — � 4 —
S — � � 5 —
_ 6 -- . 6 -- . :
� .—. 7 ._.
8 — 8 —
End of boring at ��• � feet. End of boring at y .j feet.
Standing water table: . Standin� water table: �
P�-esent at feet of depth, Present at feeC of depth,
hours after borin�. hours after horin�. �
i�ot present in borin� hole X ' Not present in borin? hole �
*iottled soil: riottled soil: • ' � •
Observed at � �� feeC of depth. Observed at � feet of depth.
rot present in boring hole NoC present in borin�: hole '
Obs�.:rvations and commenCs: Observations and commrnts:
� •
: .- � 8-27 .
' Location or Pro�ect ��(,'�S 1=%� � ��:j� �
M . /� �
Borings made by J /el���� C5",��'�/!��'� �.���'�•� Date ��-• '� ^ �'<r
Classification SysCem: AASHO ; USDA-SCS �_; Unified ` ; other
Auger used (check two) : Hand �, or Power ; Flight , or Lucket �; other
Depth, Boring number � Depth, Borin� numher
in Surface elevation ��''� � in
feet . , feet Surface elevation
0 � '
. •
b'G.S Ck L Orf/►�� �
1 — , 1 = .
2 — 2 _
��'�G✓.✓ C`�.�r G�.f��r •
3 — • 3 — • .
4 — ' . � _
5 — . � 5 -_
� �, — . 6 ` . �, �
, �
7 — 7 —
8 — 8 —
End of boring at �. � feet. �nd of borinfi at � feet.
Standing water table: . Standin� water table: �
�esent at feet of depth, Present at feet of depth,
hours after boring. hours after horin�. �
i�ot present in borinfi hole ��, ' No� present in borinQ hole
?•Sottled soil: Tiottled soil: • • � •
Observed at � feet of depth. Observed at feet of depth.
Hot present in boring hole 23oC presenC in borinr hole
Obsurvations and comznents: Observations and commrnCs:
� .