HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-13-2006 Council Minutes•
•
4
r'
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
ROLL
The Council met on the above - mentioned date with
Jim White; Council Members Bob Sansevere, Jim T
Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron M
Kellogg, and Recorder Jackie Young.
Mayor Barbara Peterson was absent.
Acting Mayor White called the meeting to order at
CONSENT AGENDA
1. APPROVE /AMEND
Items 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
*2. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF J
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve
meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS — MIKE
Huddy stated the Park Commission is enthusiastic a
its work sessions. Huddy reported the Park Commi
ordinance and the creation of a soccer practice field
Huddy requested that someone from the Public W
Commission on park- related issues.
following members present: Acting Mayor
)hy, and Lili McMillan; City Attorney Matt Brokl;
e, Planning Director Mike Gaffron, Engineer Tom
00 P.M., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
added to the Consent Agenda.
Consent Agenda as amended.
Y 23, 2006
minutes of the January 23, 2006 City Council
Y, REPRESENTATIVE
at working more closely with the City Council in
)n would be further discussing the tree preservation
one of the local parks at its next meeting.
Department be appointed to work with the Park
PAGE 1 of 25
161
t
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006 .
7:00 o'clock p.m.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS — RALPH KEMPF, REPRESENTATIVE
Kempf stated he had the opportunity to sit in on Spring Park's Planning Commission work session last
week and reported that they discussed the conversion of 154 apartments into 147 condominiums. Kempf
commented on the amount of change that is happening along the County Road 15 corridor and this area in
general.
Kempf stated the Planning Commission appreciated the new City Attorney attending their last work
session.
Kempf stated he would be available for questions.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT •
3. #05 -3131 STEVE BOHL OF BORLAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., 190 WILLOW DRIVE
NORTH AND 177 GLENDALE DRIVE — PRELIMINARY PLAT & RPUD CONCEPT PLAN
APPROVAL AND REZONING — RESOLUTION NO. 5420
Steve Bohl, Applicant, was present.
Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting general RPUD Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval
review. Gaffron noted this application was tabled at the January 23rd City Council meeting to allow a site
visit by the City Council and to allow further additional discussions with Staff regarding methods to limit
the bulk and massing of structures on the site. Since the last meeting, the applicant has submitted a
number of documents and has worked with Staff to define the limitations that would be imposed by a 0.4
FAR versus a 0.5 FAR. Gaffron noted the applicant has submitted a letter documenting the history of the
application and the process undertaken to date by the applicant seeking approval of his plans.
Gaffron stated the Watershed District has confirmed that the wetland along Willow Drive will be
considered an incidental wetland. Gaffron noted the fill for Lot 8 has been reduced from 2000 square feet
to 1700 square feet and that the proposed homes on Lots 7 and 8 will still meet the 25 -foot buffer plus
20 -foot buffer setback requirement.
The applicant has requested that the 20 -foot buffer setback be reduced to 10 feet for Lot 10. Staff
recommends approval of the 10 -foot setback. •
PAGE 2 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
• Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #05 -3131 Steve Bohl of Bohland Development, Continued)
Gaffron discussed the floor area ratio for this development, noting that the applicant has indicated that the
0.4 FAR should be acceptable. The applicant has expressed a concern with the definition of whether front
open porches, decks and 3- season or screen porches are included in FAR. Gaffron stated in his opinion
an open deck does not count, but that a space enclosed by permanent walls and roof should count
regardless of whether it is heated, and whether screen porches should be included are open to discussion.
Gaffron noted the reduction of the FAR to 0.4 would Ihelp to limit the size of the structures on the lots.
The applicant has submitted a conceptual landscaping plan that was created with the assistance of AES.
Staff is generally in agreement with the design covenants provided by the applicant and feels that only
some minor tweaking is necessary.
Gaffron stated some minor issues that remain to be addressed include whether the church parcel, Lot 3,
should be exempt from the SW &DT fee. Staff would note that the church property is being reduced in
size, with the change being the addition of a trail along its southern border. In addition, some setbacks
shown on the preliminary plat need to be corrected. Gaffron indicated the homeowners association would
have responsibility for the stormwater pond and the outlot, with the question of who assumes
• responsibility for trail maintenance from the new road to Glendale Drive still remaining unresolved.
I
Sansevere inquired whether the City has a comparable trail elsewhere.
Gaffron indicated he is aware of a number of trails that are located on private property on easements that
the City or county currently maintains.
Sansevere inquired whether there are any developers;that currently maintain any trails.
Gaffron stated typically the homeowners associatioh'will maintain the trail if it is considered a private
trail. Gaffron noted this trail would be a public trail and probably should be maintained by the City.
I
Murphy inquired what maintenance of the trail would entail.
Gaffron stated if the City currently removes snow from other trails located within the City, they would
also remove the snow from this trail. Gaffron stated the City would also be responsible for replacing the
trail once it reaches that point.
Gaffron stated another issue with the trail was whether the crosswalk to Hackberry Park should be striped
and whether the City or the developer would assume that cost.
Sansevere inquired whether this would be a
0 Kellogg stated he is not aware of another situation.
PAGE 3 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006_
7:00 o'clock p.m. •
( #05 -3131 Steve Bohl of Bohland Development, Continued)
White commented the school pays for the striping on the trail between the middle school and the high
school.
White recommended the City Council discuss the six items raised by Planner Gaffron.
The consensus of the City Council was that the revised setback for Lot 10 is acceptable.
White inquired how the City Council feels about the floor area ratio and the points raised by Staff.
Murphy stated he does not think the City Council should spend a lot of time discussing whether three -
season porches should be included in the FAR calculation. Murphy stated that the open decks and three -
season porches should probably be included in the calculation. Murphy stated there is some leeway to
decide whether those types of structures should be included in the calculation.
Bohl stated he did look at a few different options to reduce the amount of massing. Bohl stated he would
like to exclude a screen porch from the floor area ratio if the FAR is reduced to 0.4. Bohl stated the size
of the screen porch could be regulated with covenants to a 12' by 14'. Bohl stated a four - season or three -
season porch would be included within the floor area ratio. •
The City Council indicated they are in agreement with the comments made by the applicant.
White inquired if the Council feels the church parcel should be exempt from the SW &DT fee. White
stated in his view since the size of the church property is being reduced, that he would not be opposed to
waiving the fee.
Kellogg stated there is a drainage boundary depicted on the overhead and that currently the drainage in
that portion of the property is not treated but would be treated in the future under the proposal and would
be an improvement over what currently exists.
White inquired whether the City or the developer should be responsible for maintaining the trail.
Murphy inquired who would maintain the trail along the road.
Gaffron stated the road itself would act as a trail and the City would be maintaining the road.
White inquired who would be responsible for striping the street.
Murphy inquired whether the City is equipped to stripe the roads at the present time.
Moorse stated the City currently hires someone to do the striping.
•
PAGE 4 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
• Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
•
•
( #05 -3131 Steve Bohl of Bohland Development, Continued)
Murphy stated in his view the City should stripe that'portion of the road since it is a public road and it
would also eliminate any administrative issues that i ay occur if the homeowners association was
responsible for the striping.
White inquired whether there were any public
There were no public comments.
Murphy stated he suggested to the applicant that the
which did occur on Friday.
Bohl noted the Mayor of Long Lake did attend the
regarding this application.
of Long Lake be invited along on the site visit,
visit and that it was a productive meeting.
Sansevere moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5420, a Resolution Approving
the General Concept Plan and Granting Preliminary Plat Approval for Property Located at 190
Willow Drive North and 177 Glendale Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
4. #05 -3139 HILL SCHOOL, 2180 NORTH
TO PLANNING COMMISSION .
Merry Beth Hovey, 2180 North Shore Drive, was
DRIVE — CUP REVISIONS — REFER
Gaffron stated the applicants were granted variances to side setbacks last fall in order to construct an
addition. The applicants have recently been informed that an internal stairway system must be provided,
which will require that the proposed first -story addition be extended an additional ten feet northward, for
a total of 40 feet. The applicants are also contemplating an option to add a second story above the
addition, extending the roofline and walls of the existing building.
Gaffron stated because these are potentially significa� t visual changes to the building, Staff has advised
the applicant that this would be considered an amendment of their current approval and should be
reviewed by the Planning Commission and Council, including reopening the public hearing process.
Hovey stated the parents are very supportive of the project and that they would like to pursue their
options. I
Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to refer Application #05 -3139, Hill School, 2180 North Shore
Drive, back to the Planning Commission. VOTE:, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PAGE 1,5 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006 •
7:00 o'clock p.m.
5. #05 -3146 MARK AND PAMELA PALM, 1447 PARK DRIVE — VARIANCE
Mark Palm, Applicant, was present.
Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting a number of variances to replace an existing detached garage.
The applicant had originally received approval for variances on a slightly different proposal and as part of
this application they are now requesting the following variances:
Hardcover variance to permit 34.51 percent hardcover within the 75' -250' zone where 25 percent
is nonnally allowed and 38 percent currently exists.
2. Hardcover variance to peinlit 57 percent hardcover within the 250 -500' zone where 30 percent is
normally allowed and 49.5 percent currently exists.
The Planning Commission recommended denial of the variances as requested but recommended approval
of the variances only to the extent of the prior approval of July 2002. The prior approval included
limiting the size of the garage to 22' by 34', a 5 -foot setback, and hardcover not to exceed 34.1 percent in
the 75 -250' zone, not to exceed 45.86 percent in the 250 -500' zone.
Staff recommends approval of the application per the Planning Commission's recommendation. Gaffron
noted the final building plans and drainage and grading plans have to be submitted. is
White inquired how long it would be before the applicant would be able to submit the required
documents.
Palm stated the water issues from the adjoining property have delayed his project and that he has not had
formal plans drawn up. Palm indicated he should be able to submit the plans in the near future.
Gaffron noted the City Engineer would also need to review the grading and drainage plans.
White stated as soon as the formal plans are submitted and reviewed by Staff and the City Engineer, this
item would be placed on the City Council agenda.
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to table Application #05 -3146, Mark and Pamela Palm,
1447 Park Drive, to allow the applicant time to submit the required documentation.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
•
PAGE 6 of 25
•
•
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
6. #05 -3147 STEVE AND JANNA SUND
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Steve Sundby, Applicant, was present.
Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting a number c
the existing residence. A portion of the entry will be
requesting a lake setback variance to permit a lake si
feet is normally required and 21 feet currently exists
percent hardcover within the 0 -75' zone where 0 per
exists. In addition, the applicant is also requesting a
where 1500 square feet is normally allowed and 271
On January 17`x', the Planning Commission, on a vc
hardcover and lot coverage variances as proposed.
problem was gutters, not an overhang; and that the
granting variances to allow them after a house is bi
Sansevere indicated he is in favor of the variances,
there are safety issues that should be considered.
Murphy inquired whether the City should consider
3587 NORTH SHORE DRIVE — VARIANCE
F variances to construct a 5' by 8' covered entry to
under an existing overhang. The applicant is
tback of 49 feet from the 929.4' OHWL when 75
A hardcover variance is also required to permit 65
znt is normally allowed and 65 percent currently
,tructural coverage variance to permit 28 percent
scent currently exists.
of 3 -2, recommended approval of setback,
ie minority opinion was that the solution to the
ty needs to either allow entryway overhangs or quit
without them.
that some of these houses are older and that
their code to allow for covered entryways.
Gaffron recommended the City Council consider amending their code to allow for a certain sized covered
entryway. Gaffron stated this issue tends to relate to the older homes.
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution for Application
#05 -3147, Steve and Janna Sundby, 3587 North Shore Drive, granting of variances to allow
construction of a 5' by 8' covered entry. VOTE: I Ayes 4, Nays 0.
7. #05 -3152 BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT ON BEHALF OF JAMES D. MACKINNON, ET
AL, "3500" WATERTOWN ROAD — PRELIMINARY PRD PLAT APPROVAL — RESOLUTION
NO. 5421 _ 1
Steve Bohl, Applicant, was present.
Gaffron noted a revised draft resolution has been di
made to the resolution since Friday. Gaffron indica
three language has been added regarding declaratioi
roadway easement. The intent of the added langua�
the property to the north access to Watertown Road
road at no cost except for sharing of the maintenanc
ributed tonight, with a few minor revisions being
:d the revisions are shown in bolded print. On page
of covenants, conditions, restrictions and private
is to make it clear that the future property owners of
vill have access to Watertown Road via the private
costs of the same private road.
PAGE 7 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #05 -3152 Bohland Development on behalf of James MacKinnon, Continued)
White inquired what size property is being referred to and how many homes will likely be affected.
Gaffron stated the property is approximately 700 feet north/south and 1300 feet east/west and that
approximately eight lots could be created from the site. Gaffron stated it is their anticipation that the road
would continue to the north and perhaps out to Stubbs Bay. Gaffron indicated it is the general feeling of
the City that they would prefer to maintain through roads rather than cul -de -sacs.
McMillan inquired what would happen if the road starts out private and then the property to the north gets
developed and the City then feels it should become a public road.
Gaffron stated the developer would grant the City an underlying road and utility easement, which
essentially gives the City the right to use the road as a public road but that it becomes the responsibility of
the homeowners association to maintain that road or be assessed for the improvements.
Gaffron stated there is one case he is aware of where the developer refused to grant one :property to the
north the right to use the road and that the City had to assume responsibility of that private road and allow
that property owner to utilize the road.
Murphy inquired whether the homeowners could petition the City to take over responsibility of the road.
Gaffron stated the homeowners could petition the City to assume responsibility of the road, but that that
situation is rare.
Gaffron noted the City Engineer has reviewed the drainage and ponding plan, with the applicant
submitting a revised plan that addresses the City Engineer's concerns and reduces the impact on a number
of items.
Gaffron stated Staff has met with the neighbors and that in Staff's opinions their concerns have been
addressed by the revised plan.
McMillan inquired whether a wetland buffer is necessary for the adjoining property.
Gaffron stated creation of a stormwater pond in an upland would not require a buffer.
Gaffron stated there is an issue with the steep grade and the amount of grading and tree removal that may
be necessary and that some limits have been placed on those items.
Murphy noted the City Council has discussed that item in the past and that the Council is in general
agreement that this type of issue would be best handled by covenants.
•
Bohl stated he would propose prior to final plat to go out and delineate significant trees on a particular lot •
to establish a scenic easement area. Bohl stated the resolution does contain language regarding the scenic
easement areas.
PAGE 8 of 25
ORONO CITY CO'
• Monday, Feb%
7:00 o'cl
I
( #05 -3152 Bohland Development on behalf of J
Gaffron stated that would be Condition 1 -C in the
Murphy inquired whether Bohland Development woi
Bohl stated they would be constructing the house on
roadway is required.
Gaffron stated Item 6 in the resolution addresses that
shown that existing trees that enhance the wooded bE
Bohl pointed out that Item 7 on page eight has a 28 -1
It was the consensus of the City Council to require a
Kellogg reconunended the 24 -foot width be face to f
. Kellogg pointed out with a 24 -foot width, there
OF THE
NCIL MEETING
iary 13, 2006
ck p.m.
MacKinnon, Continued)
be constructing that residence on Lot 3, Block 2.
lot. Bohl inquired whether a 24 or 28 -foot
and that a 24 -foot might be appropriate if it can be
:kdrop can be preserved.
)ot paved width.
paved width.
noting that there is curb and gutter in this area.
be no parking available on the street.
McMillan inquired whether the entire roadway would be curb and gutter.
Gaffron stated final plans have not been submitted depicting curb and gutter for the entire length but that
it is likely, in order to control the water runoff, that there would be curb and gutter for the majority of the
roadway.
McMillan inquired what type of material the retaining walls would be constructed of.
Bohl stated he is proposing to utilize limestone bl
McMillan inquired whether the three western lots
Bohl stated most likely they would not be walkouts.
McMillan inquired how the water runoff from the wi
Bohl stated the majority of the water would drain
McMillan recommended some swales be
diverted down driveways.
Kellogg stated the latest revision has addressed so
and that there are just a few minor details that still
be walkouts.
lots would be managed.
the road from that area.
to avoid a significant amount of water being
of the issues regarding the stormwater and ponding
:d to be worked out.
PAGES 9 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #05 -3152 Bohland Development on behalf of James MacKinnon, Continued)
Sansevere moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5421, a Resolution Approving
the Preliminary Plat for property located at 3500 Watertown Road.
Sansevere thanked the applicant for his efforts in working with Staff on this application.
White thanked the property owner for being willing to work with the City on this new type of
development.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*8. #05 -3159 TODD KNUTSON FOR FRED JOHNSON, 4017 NORTH SHORE DRIVE —
VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5422
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5422, a Resolution granting
variances for lot area and lot width in order to construct a new residence on the property located at
4017 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. •
*9. #06 -3165 DENNIS BACKES, 2940 FOX STREET — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT —
RESOLUTION NO. 5423
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5423, a Resolution granting a
conditional use permit for plumbing in an accessory building at 2940 Fox Street.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*10. #06 -3166 STEVEN R. JACOBSON, 4185 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH— VARIANCES -
RESOLUTION NO. 5424
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5424, a Resolution granting
front and rear setback variances for 4185 Sixth Avenue North. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
,7
PAGE 10 of 25
•
•
•
ORONO CITY C
Monday, Fe'
7:00 of
11. #06 -3171 JOHN AND JOAN BROOKS, 9
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
John Brooks, Applicant, and Christine Albertsson,
Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting variance
order to relocate and reconstruct an existing deck an(
requesting a conditional use permit to allow for insta
and sink into the existing nonconfonning lakeshore
to the existing accessory building have been determi:
noted the request for replacement of an existing fenc
Ferndale Road is beyond the scope of the variance pi
Code Section 18 -2 regarding obstructions within the
Statutes regarding reconstruction of nonconformities
The Planning Commission recommended denial of 1
accessory structure on the basis that both replaceme:
the accessory building would constitute expansion c
of the stairway down the steep slope to the lower lei
The Planning Commission relied more on the basis
to a location that is still within 75' of the lakeshore 1
would rather eventually have removed. In addition,
accessory building to a more habitable space by the
nonconforming building from its original storage in
expansion of a nonconformity.
OF THE
fNCIL MEETING
iary 13, 2006
ck p.m.
FERNDALE ROAD WEST — VARIANCE
were present.
for lakeshore setback and hardcover in the 0 -75' in
access stairway. In addition, the applicants are also
ation of plumbing consisting of a toilet, lavatory
cessory building. The proposed cosmetic changes
-d not to require special zoning approvals. Gaffron
completely within the right -of -way of West
icess and is subject to the provisions of Municipal
ight -of -way, and to the provisions of Minnesota
e hardcover variance and CUP for plumbing in an
/relocation of the deck and installation of a toilet in
a nonconforming use. It was noted that replacement
I could be accomplished without variance approval.
at relocation and reconstruction of the existing deck
prolonging an existing nonconformity that the City
ae Planning Commission felt that conversion of the
3dition of plumbing would change the use of that
nt to a more recreational use and that this is an
Staff had initially recommended approval subject to the Planning Commission concluding that there
would be no visual impacts to the neighborhood. The conclusion that the addition of plumbing and the
reconstruction of the deck next to the building would convert this to a higher - intensity use is a compelling
argument in favor of denial. Staff would caution that the owner may have the right to reconstruct the
deck "in kind" in its current location based on State Statutes. However, relocating it clearly requires a
variance, and if Council concludes that such a variance would result in expansion of a nonconforming
use, then denial may be appropriate. 1
Albertsson stated their application for the plumbing was based on 78 -303 Item 17 of the zoning code
which states that a toilet is a permitted use in an accessory building on a lot greater than two acres in size
as long as the residential character of the neighborhood is not altered. Albertsson noted this lot consists
of 4.5 acres and that in their opinion it would not alter the residential character of the neighborhood.
Albertsson stated the difficulty with the lot is the f
the buildable area to a small triangle that would all
Albertsson stated given the fact that this structure 1
reasonable request for a variance.
Albertsson distributed a three- dimensional view of
deck currently sits on a small knoll 11 feet from the
that the lot is located on a peninsula, which limits
for a recreational structure to be constructed.
existed for a long time, the applicant feels it is a
deck to the Council. Albertsson pointed out the
)reline and that they are proposing to relocate the
PAGEi 11 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
deck behind the knoll, which would help to conceal it and lessen its impact on the lake. In addition, the
size of the deck would be reduced and there would be additional screening of the deck provided, which
would also reduce the impact of the deck and building on the lakeshore.
Brooks indicated the existing house is located on a hill and that there is a dramatic drop -off down to the
lake. Relocating the deck would allow easier access to the deck and lakeshore. Brooks stated the
addition of the plumbing in the boathouse would make it a more enjoyable and would accommodate the
needs of the people in the lower yard rather than forcing them to climb a number of stairs to access the
residence at the top.
White requested Staff address the issue of nonconformity.
Gaffron noted state statutes have changed in the last couple of years and that property owners are allowed
to reconstruct but not expand an existing nonconformity. Gaffron stated the issue is whether the structure
would be better if reconstructed in its present location or if it is relocated.
•
City Attorney Brokl stated he has met with Staff over this issue and that Orono's city codes contain
specific language that goes further than what state statutes currently allow. Brokl indicated the City •
would be drafting an ordinance that would parallel the state statutes, but that at the current time he is
relying on the state statutes.
Brokl stated there are basically two issues to consider with this application. One, the changes to the
storage shed to a more livable structure would be classified as an intensification or expansion of a use.
Brokl stated this application would not fall under the section of the ordinance referenced by the
applicant's architect since it is a nonconforming structure and that the City Council does not have to
approve the application. Brokl stated on the other hand, the Council does have the right to find that it is a
reasonable use, and if there is a finding of reasonable use, which would constitute a hardship, the Council
could approve the application.
Brokl indicated the same situation exists with the deck and that if the Council finds relocation of the deck
to be a more reasonable use of the property, they would have the right to approve the variance. Brokl
stated the proposed changes do clearly expand the use of the structure and would fall under the
nonconformity section of the City Code, which would give the City Council the right to deny the variance
if it so chooses.
Sansevere stated he is not convinced that the request for a toilet is not unreasonable. Sansevere
commented the installation of a toilet would increase the use of the structure.
Murphy noted this structure has been called a number of different things, and inquired exactly what the
structure is.
Brooks stated the structure is basically a storage area where they store life jackets and other items related •
to their boat.
PAGE 12 of 25
•
CI
I�
U
ORONO CITY C
Monday, Fe
7:00 of
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
Murphy commented he personally would prefer to
Murphy inquired what the anticipated use of the cc
Brooks stated they envision using the deck to grill c
located in the refrigerator. Brooks commented this
improvements would help make it more useable.
Murphy inquired whether the drawing depicting the
Albertsson indicated that is the plan they intend to
located in the structure but merely a sink and a refs
classified as a boathouse. Albertsson stated they v
make it a structure that adds to the character of the
Albertsson noted that the majority of the improi
the toilet would make the structure more viable.
White stated the Council does not want to see the
in light of the amount of taxes that are probably b
make the property more useable. White noted he
application was discussed and that he is leaning b
OF THE
INCIL MEETING
Lary 13, 2006
ek p.m.
i some of the older boathouses around the lake.
deck and structure would be.
on and that there would probably be some food
:a would be a nice place to gather and that the
is what would actually be constructed.
Albertsson noted there would not be a stove
for and that in her view this structure should be
like to make the structure more attractive and
hore more than it currently does.
are currently permitted and that the installation of
cture turn into living space over time. White stated
; paid for this lot, that the structure would help to
attend the Planning Commission meeting where this
..ds supporting the request.
Sansevere stated in his experience visitors on the lake are impressed with the boathouses, which do add to
the character of the lakeshore.
Murphy stated he has a different opinion regarding;
parts of the city. Murphy indicated he is inclined to
character of the lakeshore and are an improvement c
Murphy stated he is unclear on what the neighbor's
Brokl stated the applicant is requesting a conditional
refrigerator and that the City is entitled to put reason
would help to limit the use of the structure. Brokl re
used as a supplemental residence and/or living quart,
ssory structures along the lakeshore than in other
rove the requests since they would add to the
what currently exists.
has to do with this application.
permit for the installation of the toilet, sink and
e conditions on a conditional use permit which
amended one condition be that the structure not be
on a seasonable basis.
White stated there is no question that this should not be considered as an additional residence or living
space. White recommended that another condition also be that a furnace not be installed.
White inquired what the appropriateness of the
Brokl stated the letter outlines the neighbor's con
City is working with the neighbor on some of the
letter is as it relates to this application.
relating to a number of issues. Brokl stated the
including the fence and access on the extra
PAGE 0 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
driveway. Brokl stated the materials submitted by the neighbor do not directly relate to the
nonconformities and/or the conditional use permit that is being requested and are general objections to the
changes that are occurring on this property.
Murphy stated he would like to be sensitive to the neighbor's concerns, but that he fails to see the impact
to the neighbor if this application were approved. Murphy pointed out the structure and deck would not
be visible from the adjoining property and that the letter appears to reflect other issues that have gone on
between the two neighbors.
Sansevere stated in his opinion the Council needs to address, perhaps in a work session, the allegations
made by Mr. Floyd concerning City Staff. Sansevere commented he hopes those comments have not
been made frivolously by Mr. Floyd.
Mr. Floyd stated those comments are not frivolous.
Sansevere stated he would take exception to the allegations made by Mr. Floyd, but that tonight's meeting
is not the place to discuss them.
Murphy stated he is happy to know that the City Attorney and City Staff are dealing with some of the •
issues raised by Mr. Floyd but that he does not want this application to get caught up in the other
unrelated items.
Sansevere stated in his view the neighbor's letter goes beyond the application by the Brooks.
Brokl concurred that the letter does contain a number of items that are not related to the application by the
Brooks and that tonight's meeting is not the means by which those items will be resolved. Brokl stated
the City would be looking at those items in the future.
Brooks pointed out the improvements are not visible to the Floyds.
McMillan stated she does see a hardship given the fact that the property is on a peninsula and that there is
very little buildable area. McMillan concurred that there should be restrictions placed on the conditional
use permit, but that she feels an attractive structure along the lakeshore would be an asset to the property.
Robert Floyd, 960 West Ferndale Road, requested he be allowed to speak on this application.
White requested Mr. Floyd limit his comments to the issues relating to tonight's application.
Mr. Brooks excused himself from the meeting.
Floyd stated as far as the relevancy of what is contained in his letter, he feels that the items raised in the
letter do relate directly to tonight's application. Floyd stated in order for the proposed work to be
accomplished, access would need to be obtained.
PAGE 14 of 25
ORONO CITY C
• Monday, Fe
7:00 0'
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
OF THE
INCIL MEETING
iary 13, 2006
ek p.m.
Murphy requested Mr. Floyd confine his remarks specifically to the application. Murphy stated the
Council tried to establish that Mr. Floyd has a working path with the City Attorney and the City
Administrator to address those other issues and that lie does not want to take the time to discuss those
other issues tonight.
Floyd stated in his view those issues could be resolved as a part of this process.
White inquired whether workers could access this
neighbor.
Brokl stated it is possible.
White stated access is not an issue tonight.
Floyd stated the comments of the applicant show th,
the existing structure was grandfathered in in 1983
boathouse. Floyd stated the structure was strictly ut
White inquired whether Mr. Floyd is opposed to the
through an access that does not belong to the
the use of this structure will intensify. Floyd stated
a single, low ceiling garage, and was not a
.zed for storage.
using this structure as a recreational space.
Floyd stated the use and the intent of the structure is (being changed.
White inquired whether Mr. Floyd is opposed to the application because of that change.
Floyd stated he is opposed to the expansion of the
White stated he understands Mr. Floyd's position
requested that Mr. Floyd go on to the next issue.
Floyd stated there currently are two dwellings on the
Floyd inquired who would be verifying that the struc
he is opposed to the expansion of the use and
>erty and that this would be a third dwelling.
is not used as living space.
Sansevere commented that it sounds like Mr. Floyd would be monitoring the situation. Sansevere stated
the City has to trust that the citizens will comply with the City's rules and regulations and that the City is
not capable of policing every property. Sansevere stated the City routinely becomes aware of violations
through notification by neighbors. {
Brokl stated the City does have the right to give notice and put the matter on for public review whenever
there are concerns raised regarding condition violations of conditional use permits. Brokl stated the
building could be red tagged if the building does not meet the conditions of the city.
• Murphy inquired what Mr. Floyd is worried about regarding the structure.
PAGE i5 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006 •
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
Floyd indicated he is worried that the City is taking a structure that has been grandfathered in as a garage
and is now expanding the use.
Murphy inquired what Mr. Floyd's concern is with the expanded use.
Floyd stated regardless of the acreage of the lot, there is only supposed to be one dwelling on the lot and
that this would now increase the dwellings to three.
Sansevere stated it is not the intent of the City that this structure would become a dwelling.
Floyd stated the City had no intention in 1983 that this structure would become a recreational facility.
White stated he does not want to discuss what happened in 1983. White noted he did attend the Planning
Commission meeting and has read through all the materials relating to this application. White stated he
understands Mr. Floyd is opposed to the expanded use and that there also is a concern that the structure
will turn into living space. White stated the City has already determined that the applicant does have
access to this structure. White requested Mr. Floyd limit his comments to tonight's application and not
what happened in 1983.
Floyd stated his comments in his letter relating to hardship directly relate to the application and that there
are deficiencies and omissions in the applicant's application.
Gaffron stated the survey submitted by the applicant is relatively detailed and that the only item with the
survey is that it does not clearly show the driveway access. Gaffron stated Staff accepted the survey in
good faith and that in his opinion the survey is not deficient as it relates to this application.
Murphy inquired whether a local surveyor completed the survey.
Gaffron indicated it was.
Albertsson stated she directly spoke with the surveyor and requested that the survey depict the pertinent
issues relating to their application tonight. Albertsson stated it is her understanding there are a number of
surveys that depict the property.
Murphy noted the City Attorney is willing to work with Mr. Floyd on the driveway access and the other
issues raised by him in his letter. Murphy inquired whether there is another access to this property.
Brokl stated there is an alternate access that could be provided.
Floyd noted that it was his understanding the City requires a variance for any fence located within 75' feet
of the lake but that he has been informed of a new process whereby a property owner is allowed to sit .
down with Mr. Gappa and he determines whether something should be allowed.
PAGE 16 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
• Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
Floyd stated in his opinion his letter does deal with the Brooks' application. Floyd indicated he has not
had an opportunity to work with the new City Attorney but that he has had countless meetings with City
Staff in the past in an attempt to address some of these issues.
White requested Mr. Floyd direct his comments to tonight's application. White stated a lot of the City's
decisions are based on common sense and experience and that if Mr. Floyd has an objection to the
process, he can discuss that further with Staff. White commented that those types of issues would not be
discussed at tonight's meeting.
Floyd stated in his opinion those issues are related to tonight's application.
Murphy noted Mr. Floyd was in attendance at the time the City hired Mr. Brokl. ' Murphy stated he is not
aware of any concerns raised by Mr. Floyd that Mr. Brokl is not a person he could work with.
Floyd stated he is quite pleased with the City's
•Murphy stated then he would like Mr. Floyd to deal with Mr. Brokl and staff on the other issues relating
to access, trespassing and the fence. Murphy inquired whether Mr. Floyd has any further comments
relating to tonight's application.
Floyd stated as it relates to hardship, the applicant
in of a garage does not later make it a boathouse.
used for storage and that he is now expanding the
facility and that it is likely it will become living sr
White stated in his view the proposed use of the
taxes on the property.
Floyd stated he has heard the City Council deny
White stated the Council is only discussing the Br(
1983. White stated the Council is dealing with the
w what he was buying and that the grandfathering
(d stated the applicant admitted the structure was
of the structure by making it into a recreational
in the future.
is appropriate and that the applicant does pay
applicants the same type of use in the past.
' application tonight and not any issues relating to
ation as it exists currently.
McMillan noted the applicant currently is allowed to'grill out in that area and that he does currently have
a deck. McMillan stated the applicant is basically improving the structure.
Floyd commented the building was grandfathered in as a storage facility and that the use should relate to
the structure that was grandfathered. Floyd stated this is clearly an expansion of the use of what was
grandfathered in. I
• Brokl stated this is an existing nonconforming structure and that the deck does require a variance to be
relocated. Brokl stated the issue is with use and nonconformity, and noted state statutes regarding
PAGE i7 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006 .
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
nonconforming structures have been changed and that the Council can find that the use is reasonable and
approve that.
Brokl stated with regards to the structure, the applicant is applying for a conditional use permit and that
the Council can place reasonable restrictions on the use of the building.
Sansevere noted that future councils cannot be bound or held to decisions by past councils.
Sansevere stated the City Council today could decide that what happened in 1983 does not have merit.
Sansevere commented it is unfortunate that the two neighbors do not get along better.
Brokl noted technically the public hearing was held at the Planning Commission and that a complete
record of that public hearing is included in the application materials before the Council tonight.
Floyd stated as it relates to his allegation regarding City Staff, he was being truthful.
Sansevere stated he feels it is a very serious allegation and that he would like the matter to be handled by
the City Administrator.
Floyd indicated he has discussed that issue with Ron Moorse. - •
Sansevere stated that issue is not germane to tonight's application and that he would like to discuss it
further in a work session. Sansevere stated in his opinion Staff has conducted itself with integrity.
White suggested Mr. Floyd speak with Mr. Brokl on the other issues and that the Council has enough
information regarding this application to make a decision. White stated he does understand Mr. Floyd's
concerns but that the dispute between the two neighbors is not an issue for the City Council.
Floyd stated he understands the Council's time is limited and that is why he submitted his letter.
White stated access to this site would not be gained through Mr. Floyd's property.
Mr. Brooks re- enters the meeting.
Murphy moved to approve Application #06 -3171, John and Joan Brooks, 905 Ferndale Road West,
granting of a hardcover variance to relocate an existing deck and the granting of a conditional use
permit to allow plumbing in an accessory structure, and to direct staff to draft an approval
resolution with conditions prohibiting use of the structure as a secondary residence and /or living
space.
Gaffron pointed out Staff does have standard language restricting the use of the structure that could be
inserted in the resolution. 0
Murphy inquired whether Mr. Brooks understands that the structure is not to be used as living space.
PAGE 18 of 25
ORONO CITY C
• Monday, Fe
7:00 o'
( #06 -3171 John and Joan Brooks, Continued)
Mr. Brooks indicated he understands the conditions.
OF THE
fNCIL MEETING
Lary 13, 2006
ck p.m.
McMillan seconded the motion. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
12. #06 -3174 KEVIN AND SUELLYN
RESOLUTION NO. 5425
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt R
variances for the property located at 1056 Loma
13. BRIAN FULMER, THE DOG HOUSE
BOULEVARD WEST — RELOCATION OPTI
• Brian Fulmer, the Dog House, was present.
1056 LOMA LINDA AVENUE — VARIANCE —
UTION NO. 5425, a Resolution granting
i Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
KENNEL, 3505 WAYZATA
Gaffron stated Mr. Fulmer would like to discuss with the Council his options to relocate to other
properties within Orono. Gaffron stated his existing location is zoned single family rural residential,
which does not allow for a commercial kennel operation. Gaffron stated the business operates as a legal
nonconfonning use.
Gaffron stated this matter has been discussed with the City Attorney, noting that this use is prohibited
under home use occupations. Gaffron stated the City is considering a business license process to allow
this use elsewhere in the City rather than adding this;use to one of the City's other zoning districts.
Gaffron stated Mr. Fulmer has been working with the Eisingers in the past to purchase some land directly
east of where he is currently located but that to date no agreement has been reached.
Sansevere inquired why Mr. Fulmer has not dealt
whether Mr. Fulmer is currently operating his WE
Fulmer indicated his business will be closed on the
relocating in the past. Fulmer stated originally the p
option but is now a possibility. Fulmer indicated he
that they have had environmental testing performed
undisturbed soil they would like to build on if an age
• Sansevere inquired whether the 875 Wayzata Boulei
Fulmer stated it could become a permanent facility.
this issue a long time ago. Sansevere inquired
'►' and that he has looked at other options for
►perty located at 875 Wayzata Boulevard was not an
as had ongoing discussions with the Eisingers and
i that site. Fulmer stated there is an area of
ement is reached with the Eisingers.
property would be a temporary facility.
PAGE;19 of 25
1
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(Brian Fulmer, the Dog House, Continued)
Gaffron stated Mr. Fulmer would like to know whether the Council is agreeable to allowing his dog
kenneling operation at either property.
Murphy stated he would like to discuss the property located at 875 Wayzata Boulevard. Murphy
indicated he has concerns with locating a dog kennel in close proximity to the Luce Line and that he
needs to be ensured that the dogs will not get loose. Murphy noted a large number of adults and children
utilize the Luce Line. Murphy stated he also has a concern with noise as it relates to the outside portion
of the business.
Fulmer stated they would use the current facility and that they would increase the height of the fenced in
areas. Fulmer stated at either site they would have perimeter fencing to prevent dogs from getting out and
that they would be willing to plant trees and other screening to mitigate the sight of the dog kennel from
the Luce Line.
White inquired how many dogs Mr. Fulmer currently has.
Fulmer indicated he has space for 65 dogs.
McMillan commented that there must be an issue with noise at times due to the large number of dogs
Fulmer stated they have not had any complaints regarding noise in the past and that they attempt to keep
the noise at a minimum.
Murphy noted Mr. Fulmer's current location is fairly isolated.
Murphy indicated he is not opposed to the Eisinger property being used for this purpose but that he does
have a number of concerns with the property near the Luce Line. Murphy stated he has a concern that the
noise from the dogs will scare the horses, especially given the large number of dogs that would be housed
on the property.
Fulmer stated the trail would not be visible from the play areas and that they would not allow the dogs to
be close to the Luce Line. Fulmer noted the dogs would not be outside the entire time and would only be
allowed outside during certain daytime hours. Fulmer also pointed out that not all the dogs would be
allowed outside at the same time.
Murphy inquired how many dogs would be allowed outside at one time.
Fulmer stated approximately one -fourth or one -third of the dogs would be allowed outside each time.
•
Brokl stated he has discussed this matter with Mr. Fulmer and that the City is looking at implementing a
business license arrangement allowing this use at a particular location rather than changing the City's •
code to allow that type of use within any particular zone or district.
PAGE 20 of 25
i
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
• Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(Brian Fulmer, The Dog House, Continued)
McMillan noted that the City of Long Lake is loca
taken into consideration.
Sansevere inquired how close the nearest neighbor
adjacent to the Luce Line, which also needs to be
be.
Fulmer noted the 875 Wayzata Boulevard property i i almost 11 acres.
Gaffron displayed an aerial photo of the Wayzata
Sansevere inquired whether there could be a pro
located to the Wayzata property.
Brokl noted that a public hearing would need to be
White stated in his view it would be appropriate to
provided.
and surrounding area.
period placed on this use if the operation is
for whichever location is decided upon.
this discussion until further information is
Murphy stated he is reluctant to say he would be in favor of relocating the operation to 875 Wayzata
• Boulevard without formal plans being submitted. Murphy indicated he has grave concerns with locating
s op
this near the Luce Line and the Long Lakeneighborhood.
Sansevere commented he would have preferred that
ago rather than waiting until the last minute.
White stated he would like to see a plan showing
Sansevere suggested the dog runs be located as far
McMillan concurred that this matter needs to go
made.
Fulmer would have approached the City months
the property would be utilized.
from the Luce Line as possible.
the proper process before a decision can be
Gaffron stated the City currently does not have an established business licensing process. Gaffron stated
the City currently licenses garbage haulers and liquor establishments but that the City would need to
develop appropriate language to deal with this type of operation.
Sansevere encouraged Mr. Fulmer to decide which property would work best for him and then proceed
forward. i
Gaffron stated a public hearing would need to be held on each different property and that that would not
be ideal. Gaffron concurred that Mr. Fulmer should decide on which property would work best.
McMillan stated from a public perception the Eisinger property might be more workable.
0 It was the consensus of the City Council that Mr. Fulmer work with Staff further on this matter.
PAGk21 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
Murphy stated he has noticed on his street that the recycling is not being picked up until the evening.
Murphy inquired whether other parts of the city are experiencing the same type of problem.
Moorse stated to his knowledge the City has not received any complaints on the recycling pickup.
McMillan commented that perhaps the hauler changed its routes.
Dick Kroeger noted that the manpower on the trucks has been decreased to one person rather than three.
Sansevere inquired whether the City should be doing more to address the coyote problem. Sansevere
stated in his opinion the coyotes are a problem and are becoming a bigger issue.
Murphy suggested this matter be discussed in a work session and that someone more knowledgeable on
coyotes be brought in to address the City Council.
White concurred that the City should get some expertise on this subject.
White stated he attended a Metropolitan Council meeting on February 6u' and that the Council approved a
new infiltration surcharge program starting in 2007, which states that cities that are leaking freshwater
into the sewage system will be assessed a charge. White stated the City of Orono would have a 29
percent increase in their sewage costs due to the surcharge if some adjustments are not made.
PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
*14. SUPPORT FUNDING TO ORONO DISCOVERY CENTER —RESOLUTION NO. 5426
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5426, a Resolution of Support of
Funding for Infrastructure Updates to the Orono Discovery Center. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*15. AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT A TRANSIT - ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT GRANT
APPLICATION — RESOLUTION NO. 5427
•
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5427, a Resolution authorizing •
the submittal of a grant application under the Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development
grant program. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PAGE 22 of 25
ORONO CITY C
• Monday, Fe
7:00 o'
•
•
16. RESOLUTION AMENDING SUPER
RESOLUTION NO. 5428
Sansevere inquired whether the police chief is
OF THE
fNCIL MEETING
Lary 13, 2006
ck p.m.
ADMINISTRATIVE PAY SCHEDULE —
under contract.
Moorse stated the police chief receives pay increases according to the supervisory administrative
schedule. Moorse indicated the amendments to the supervisory/administrative salary schedule allow the
police chief to move to the top of Level 9 salary range. Moorse stated the City originally had a three -year
agreement with the police chief, which has since expired and needs to be renewed.
Sansevere stated in his view the police chief is a valuable asset to the city and that the employment
agreement should be renewed.
Murphy recommended this matter be discussed further at a work session, with the salary schedule and the
different levels being explained to the Council. Murphy noted the City Council has not had a
performance review for the city administrator and ha not set any goals for 2006.
Sansevere moved, White seconded, to approve amending the Supervisory /Administrative Salary
Schedule to eliminate the public services director position from the salary schedule to reflect the
ISTSBuilding Inspector position at Level 2, and to reflect the police chief position at Level 9.
*17. PERSONNEL MATTER
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to authorize'the Mayor and City Administrator to sign the
severance agreement related to the elimination of the Public Services Director position.
VOTE: Ayes 4,, Nays 0.
*18. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE 2001 SQUAD CARS
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve the purchase of three (3) 2006 Ford Crown
Victoria squad cars from Elk River Ford for $21,376 each plus $17.50 registration each for a total
cost of $64,180.50. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1
*19. SETUP OF NEW SQUAD CARS
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve EVS to set up the new police squad cars for a price
not to exceed $6,101.90 each for a total not to exceed $18,305.70. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PAGE 13 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'clock p.m.
*20. SUPPORT CDBG FUNDING TO WESTERN COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve sending a letter of support for the CDBG grant
application being submitted by the Western Communities Action Network.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
Brokl indicated he has been working with City Staff on matters relating to nonconformities, personnel
issues, building permits, the police policy manual, and updating the City's personnel handbook. Brokl
stated he has also been working on some developer - related issues, noting he has sat in on some developer
meetings in an attempt to address some of the issues upfront rather than waiting until they are before the
City Council.
Brokl stated he has enjoyed working with Staff and that he will continue to work on these issues.
*21. LICENSES
ANNUAL LIQUOR LICENSES
Club on Sale and Sunday Liquor
Spring Hill Golf Club
Tom Dalum
725 Sixth Avenue North
SPECIAL EVENT
2. Applicant:
Hickory Fine Homes, Jim Mohs and Steve Bohl
Event:
2006 Midwest Home Luxury Tour
Location:
3240 Watertown Road
Date:
June 9 -11, 16 -18, and 23 -25, 2006
Time:
Noon — 6:00 p.m., Fridays — Sundays
3. Applicant:
Minnesota Distance Running Association, Peter Erpenbach
Event:
Fred Kurz Memorial 10 Mile Run
Location:
Luce Line trail starting at the Wayzata Middle School — approximately 4.5 miles
out and back.
Date:
Saturday, April 8, 2006
Time:
8:30 a.m. —11:00 a.m.
•
•
4. Applicant: Wells Fargo Bank— Wayzata, Loretta Docken
Event: Wells Fargo Half Marathon •
Location: Begin: Wells Fargo Bank Wayzata. Lake Street to Ferndale Road to County
Road 15 to Orono Orchard Road to Fox Street to Old Crystal Bay Road to
County Road 51 to County Road 19 to Crystal Bay Road to Northview Road
PAGE 24 of 25
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
• Monday, February 13, 2006
7:00 o'c l ock p.m.
is
•
(Licenses, Continued)
to Lake Road to County Rod
Beehrle Avenue to the South
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve
*22. BILLS
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
Sansevere moved, McMillan seconded, to adjour
9:58 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ATT ST: /'/- &
'Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
15 to Old Beach Road to County Road 19 to
est LRT Trail to Water Street. Finish: Wells
above licenses. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
of the All Funds account.
he City Council meeting at
/A Grin ��
&�-Ihite, Acting Mayor
PAGE 25 of 25
Fargo Bank Excelsior
Date: Sunday, May 7, 2006
Time: 8:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
TOBACCO
LICENSES
5.
Lakeview Golf of Orono, Inc.
Grant Wenkstern
405 North Arm Drive
6.
Narrows Saloon
James Anderst
3380 Shoreline Drive
7.
Rick's Market
Von Martin
3333 Shoreline Drive
8.
Spring Hill Golf Club
Tom Dalum
725 Sixth Avenue North
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve
*22. BILLS
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to approve
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
Sansevere moved, McMillan seconded, to adjour
9:58 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ATT ST: /'/- &
'Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
15 to Old Beach Road to County Road 19 to
est LRT Trail to Water Street. Finish: Wells
above licenses. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
of the All Funds account.
he City Council meeting at
/A Grin ��
&�-Ihite, Acting Mayor
PAGE 25 of 25