HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-13-2005 Council Minutest
s MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
• 7:00 o'clo k p.m.
ROLL
•
The Council met on the above - mentioned date with th
Peterson; Council Members Jim Murphy, Jim White a
Representing Staff were City Administrator Ron Mooi
Melanie Curtis and Janice Gundlach, Engineer Tom K
Recorder Jackie Young.
Council Member Bob Sansevere was absent.
Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:02
CONSENT AGENDA
1. APPROVE /AMEND
Items 4. 6. 11. 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 19 were
Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PRESENTATION
2. NORTH HENNEPIN MEDIATION
This item follows Item No. 10.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
following members present: Mayor Barbara
d Lili McMillan; City Attorney Thomas Barrett;
e, Planning Director Mike Gaffron, Planners
llogg, Public Service Director Greg Gappa, and
followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
to the Consent Agenda.
Agenda as amended.
*3. • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 23, 2005
Murphy moved, Peterson seconded, to approve ti
meeting of May 23, 2005, as submitted. VOTE: E
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS — Charles I
No representative was present.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS —
Winkey stated he had nothing to report but would
minutes of the Regular Orono City Council
,es 4, Nays 0.
Representative
ivis Winkey, Representative
available for questions.
PAGE 1
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING `
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m. •
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
*4. #05 -3102 KATHRYN ALEXANDER ON BEHALF OF J. SVEN GUSTAFSON, 920
BROWN ROAD SOUTH — VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5329
Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5329, a Resolution granting
approval of lot area and lot width variances and approval of side setbacks of 20 feet on each side for
the property located at 920 Brown Road South. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*5. #05 -3108 GARY AND LYNN CHRISTENSEN, 3560 IVY PLACE — VARIANCE —
RESOLUTION NO. 5330
Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5330, a Resolution granting
hardcover, side and lake setback variances for the property located at 3560 Ivy Place. •
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*6. #05 -3109 NAVARRE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, 3655 TOGO
ROAD — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 5331
Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5331, a Resolution granting a
conditional use permit and hardcover and sign variances for the property located at 3655 Togo
Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
7. #05 -3110 THOMAS AND SHEILA BROWNE, 760 BROWN ROAD SOUTH — VARIANCE
Thomas Browne, Applicant, was present.
Curtis stated the applicants' property is located on Tanager Lake, which has been classified by the DNR
as a recreational development lake requiring a 100 -foot structure setback. The applicants would like to
construct a window dormer for added space and safety in an existing second story bathroom. In addition,
the applicants would like to construct a small garage addition to the north of their attached garage. Curtis
noted the entire home is located within the 100 -foot structure setback and any building envelope
expansion would require a lake setback variance.
El
PAGE 2
r 1
LJ
•
•
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #05 -3110 Thomas and Sheila Browne,
The Planning Commission voted 4 -2 to recommend
construct a second story dormer but recommended c
order to construct the garage addition. The dissentii
smaller garage addition with some additional hardcc
Curtis stated the applicant is proposing a smaller
Planning Staff recommends approval of the lake se
dormer not extending outside the existing home f6
of the lake setback and hardcover variances for the
hardship exists with respect to the revised garage a
discussed.
Browne addressed the Council concerning the ration
approved if there are health or safety issues, traffic c
public safety, and the effect on values of property in
for approval where strict enforcement would cause L
the individual property.
Browne indicated his property is unique. At the tin
marshland. Browne stated the house was approxim
made to the house over the years complied with Cit
a multi - million dollar house on this lot. In 1992, th
lake. Browne indicated in his opinion there is no u;
construct a garage addition over existing hardcover
house.
Browne noted the house is fully guttered, with the
the grass area before it enters the marshland. Bro)
granted in the past by the Council, he should be gi
Murphy indicated he did visit this site and inquired
garage addition.
Curtis indicated the garage addition would not incri
with the revised proposal is requesting a 14' by 19'
the applicant is also proposing some additional harc
Murphy inquired what the rationale was for the two
the reduction in the size of the garage addition.
Winkey stated the three primary issues were the pot
close proximity of one corner of the garage to the w
commission members felt that a bigger reduction in
were approved.
P
of the lake setback variance in order to
[ial of the lake setback and hardcover variances in
Commissioners stated they would be in favor of a
;r removals.
garage with some additional hardcover removals.
ick variance in order to construct the second floor
,rint. Planning Staff, however, recommends denial
xage addition. Should the Council find that a
ition, appropriate hardcover removals should be
for requesting variances, noting that they are
.itions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the
area. Browne noted variances are recommended
ie hardship because of circumstances unique to
it was purchased in 1977, it was considered
tely 1000 square feet and that the improvements he
's regulations and that he did not attempt to construct
DNR changed the classification from marshland to a
;able lake area. Browne stated he would like to
nd that he is not requesting a major addition to his
ority of the runoff being diverted to the road and/or
stated in light of the other approvals that have been
the right to add a stall to his garage.
the total square footage would be with the
the hardcover on the lot and that the applicant
ige rather than an 18' by 20' garage. Curtis noted
er removals on the north side.
Commission members for recommending
1 massing, the encroachment on the lake, and the
d. Winkey stated some of the planning
cover would be appropriate if the garage addition
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #05 -3110 Thomas and Sheila Browne, Continued)
McMillan inquired why the garage is angled.
Browne stated it is a design issue and that the lot does drop off down to the wetland.
Gaffron noted the garage addition would add approximately 230 square feet of structure.
McMillan inquired whether there is any issue with structural coverage on this lot.
Gaffron indicated there is not.
White concurred that the site is unique and that the applicant is not proposing a major addition.
McMillan inquired whether there would be sufficient room to back a vehicle out.
Browne stated there would be enough room.
Murphy stated he does not see the need to remove the stones to help mitigate the hardcover.
•
Browne stated the stones help to outline the edge of the dropoff. Browne indicated he does not have a full
basement and that he would like to have the additional garage space for storage and in order to park an •
additional vehicle.
Curtis stated in her opinion if the amount of structure in only the area above the 929.4' elevation is
considered, it could be perceived as massing, but that if the entire lot is taken into consideration, there is
not an issue with massing.
McMillan inquired whether the applicant would like to retain the blacktop to the right of the garage.
Browne stated he is planning to remove that blacktop.
Murphy noted this addition is not visible to the neighbors or the road.
Murphy moved, White seconded, to direct Staff to draft a resolution reflecting approval of the
garage addition and dormer for the property located at 760 Brown Road South, subject to the
additional hardcover removals proposed by the applicant, with the understanding the stones would
be allowed to remain. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
8. #05 -3111 WATER STREET HOMES, LCC ON BEHALF OF RANDALL AND SARA
HOGAN, 2260 FOX STREET — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES
Rick Carlson, Water Street Homes, was present.
PAGE 4
•
•
•
•
ORONO CITY C(
Monday, J
7:00 o'c
( #05 -3111 Water Street Homes, Continued)
OF THE
NCIL MEETING
13, 2005
. p.m.
Gaffron stated the applicants are proposing to construct a detached accessory structure for the storage of
collector vehicles, with a number of variances being requested. The applicants are proposing the
accessory structure be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal residence structure and a
variance to the allowed footprint area for an oversize accessory structure. The property, not including the
separate outlot driveway corridor, is about 2.7 acres, which would allow an accessory structure with a
footprint of 1,200 square feet. If the total area of the lot and outlot, including wetland, is used in the
calculation, the lot at,4.985 acres would allow a 2,000 square foot footprint..The total buried and above
ground footprint of the proposed building as reported by the applicant is 3,310 square feet, with 1,426
square feet being located above ground. Gaffron noted the City's code does not address whether the
outlot should be included. In addition, the applicants are also requesting a conditional use permit for
plumbing in an accessory structure that includes a toilet.
Gaffron stated the site is limited due to the topograp
reason for constructing the structure in the proposed
wetlands located on this property and that the applic
wetland. Gaffron noted Orono's wetland moratorim
feet of the wetland. Gaffron stated one corner of the
wetland. Gaffron stated due to the moratorium, the
affects wetlands.
Gaffron indicated the Planning Commission review
the visual aspect of the building, with the applicant
based on the concerns raised by the Planning Comrr
structure slightly further to the east, which provides
Gaffron noted the Planning Commission also raised
applicant is now proposing some retaining walls an(
Gaffron stated the main issue is the proximity to the
subject to the wetland moratorium. Gaffron indicat(
26 -feet from the wetland, they would not be subject
Gaffron stated the Planning Commission had some
with the applicants indicating they are willing to pl
Council on the property to limit the future use of th
Murphy inquired whether there is a hardship to
Gaffron stated from Staff's perspective there is not
are some mitigating factors that reduce the visual a
building could be built which would comply with t.
Murphy noted the lot is very isolated from the neigl
conditional use permit would be appropriate for the
and the location of a septic site, which is the
)cation. Gaffron pointed out there are some
its are proposing a 16 -foot setback from one
prohibits alteration of wetlands or lands within 26
proposed structure is located within 26 feet of the
)uncil is not able to approve any application that
i this application and spent some time considering
aving submitted some revisions to the original plan
ssion. The applicant is now proposing to locate the
greater separation between the two buildings.
ome concerns regarding the drainage and the
some minor grade changes.
etland and whether,this application would be
if the applicant is able to locate the structure
the moratorium.
mcerns regarding the future use of this structure,
e covenants or other restrictions requested by the
structure.
the variance.
hardship for the size of the structure but that there
I future use concerns. Gaffron stated a smaller
codes.
PAGE 5
properties. Murphy inquired whether a
-d structure.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m. •
(05 -3111 Water Street Homes, Continued)
Gaffron stated there are risks associated with granting a conditional use permit and that conditions can be
placed on the property to address any concerns the Council may have. Gaffron indicated a situation could
arise that the conditions do not address.
McMillan commented the enforcement of the conditional use permit would be another issue.
Murphy stated in his view it is a remarkable use of the property and that the applicants have taken great .
steps to design it to fit the land. Murphy inquired how this structure could be redesigned so it would not
fall under the wetland moratorium.
Gaffron inquired whether the building could be shifted without having other major impacts on the site.
Carlson inquired what setback they would need to meet.
Gaffron stated the moratorium requires a 26 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland. Gaffron indicated
the moratorium covers any wetland that has been identified under the federal wetland delineations and
that any structure that is located within that 26 -foot buffer would be affected by the moratorium.
Carlson stated the building would need to be redesigned if they are required to meet the 26 -foot buffer.
Carlson stated the hardship in this case deals with the intent of the ordinances and why they are drafted ,
and that the ordinances do not address every situation. Carlson pointed out there is an outlot located in
the front and that the entire square footage of the property should be counted. Carlson stated the outlot is
owned by the property owners and there is no shared access over the outlot. Carlson stated if the entire
amount of land owned by the applicants is taken into account, a variance would not be required, and that
the strict interpretation of the ordinance creates a hardship.
Carlson stated they are able to meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance by constructing two separate
structures, each consisting of 1200 square feet, which would not be as aesthetically pleasing as what is
being proposed. Carlson stated they have attempted to create an aesthetically pleasing structure that
would add value to the lot, limit the visual impact to the neighbors and to the property owner, and also
meet the spirit and intent of the code. Carlson agreed they would need to address the issue with the
wetlands.
Barrett stated he is in agreement with staff that the moratorium does apply to this property and that no
portion of the structure can be constructed within that 26 -foot buffer while the moratorium is in effect.
Carlson inquired how long the moratorium is in effect.
Gaffron stated the moratorium expires in October but that the City would likely adopt stricter regulations
concerning wetlands once the moratorium is up.
Carlson stated they would be able to meet the 26 -foot buffer by reducing the amount of square footage of
the structure. Carlson requested that they be allowed to submit a revised drawing that meets the 26 -foot •
PAGE 6
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
• 7:00 o'clock p.m.
•
•
( #05 -3111 Water Street Homes, Continued)
buffer as a condition of approval. Carlson noted the
underground.
Gaffron inquired whether the driveway could be
Carlson stated the property owners would prefer not
of square footage of the lower level................
Murphy inquired whether all variances are
Barrett indicated they are.
that falls within the 26 -foot setback is located
slightly.
relocate the driveway but rather reduce the amount
on a hardship.
Gaffron stated the variance language in part reads as follows: `Before granting a variance, the council
shall hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of this chapter in instances where their strict
enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property
under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter." Gaffron stated a hardship needs to be demonstrated
and a showing that they are keeping with the spirit of the code. Gaffron indicated a number of variances
have been granted throughout the city and that the type and degree of hardship varies from application to
application.
Murphy stated one solution is to construct two structures above ground, which may not be the best
solution.
White commented that the proposed plan looks aesthetically pleasing and makes sense for this lot.
McMillan inquired whether the City has other two -story accessory structures where the below grade level
has different footprints.
Gaffron indicated this type of design is unusual for the City and that Staff has not determined how much
fill depth is necessary for an area not to be determined as hardcover.
White stated he prefers this proposal rather than two
McMillan stated the issue then becomes what the
Carlson stated the configuration of the lot is a
the ordinance.
McMillan noted there is a fair amount of wetlands
buildable land.
Murphy inquired how the current footprint is calcula
buildings.
footage should be of the one structure.
and that the design meets the spirit and intent of
this property that reduces the amount of dry
PAGE 7
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m. •
( #05 -3111 Water Street Homes, Continued)
Gafron stated every portion that has foundation and floor has been included but that the second story is
not counted as additional footprint.
Murphy inquired why the underground garage portion is included in the footprint.
Gaffron stated it is considered structure from a building code perspective. Gaffron stated the two main
_. ...... reasons for the oversize accessory structure ordinance deals with.the appearance of the structure and.the .._.............
future use of the structure.
White stated he is willing to agree to a smaller footprint because a portion of the building is located
underground.
Murphy inquired what the City was attempting to accomplish with the oversized accessory structure
ordinance.
Gaffron stated the ordinance addresses the size of the building and the total number of square feet that
could be constructed on a lot, with the future use of the structure also being a concern.
Murphy inquired whether the lower level could be considered a second building.
McMillan noted they are requesting more than what is allowed for this size lot. •
Carlson stated the variance is necessary if the outlot is not considered in the calculation for land area.
Gaffron stated the ordinance does not address whether an outlot and/or wetlands should be included in the
calculation of land area. Gaffron stated if the Council concludes that the primary reason for the ordinance
is the visual impact and that the wetlands are a mitigating factor, the Council could find justification for
granting a variance.
Carlson inquired whether the outlot could be combined.
Gaffron stated normally the City does not give credit for outlots. Gaffron stated this portion of the
property was platted as an outlot in order to achieve a 200 -foot lot width along Fox Street.
Barrett stated as a condition of the variance, it would be necessary for the property owner to agree that the
two lots would be held in common and exclusive ownership.
Carlson stated that would not be a problem.
Barrett inquired whether another driveway access would be granted onto Fox.
Carlson indicated no, noting that the outlot can only serve this property.
Gaffron concurred that there is no other property that could be served by the outlot. Gaffron stated the •
question then becomes whether wetlands should be included in the calculation for land area.
PAGE 8
•
n
U
•
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #05 -3111 Water Street Homes, Continued)
Carlson stated if the outlot is included, they are
Peterson noted the applicant has indicated they are
the total amount of footprint allowed.
to comply with the 26 -foot buffer as well.
White moved, Peterson seconded, to direct staff to draft a resolution granting a variance for an
accessory structure to be located nearer the front or street lot line than the principal residence
structure, subject to the condition that a revised plan be submitted depicting the reduction in
square footage, and further subject to the condition that a covenant will be placed on the property
restricting the future use of this structure, and granting of a conditional use permit for plumbing in
an accessory structure that includes a toilet for the property located at 2260 Fox Street.
McMillan inquired whether a holding tank would be
Carlson stated they are willing to install a holding
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
9. #05 -3114 PETER J. BOYER ON BEHA
3145 NORTH SHORE DRIVE — VARIANCES
Peter Boyer, Sever and Sharon Peterson, Applicants,
present.
Curtis stated the applicants are requesting variances
28 percent, and average lake setback in order to buil,
from the neighboring property owners for additional
of these letters reference an "ordinance change" rege
accounts for this hardcover. Curtis indicated there h
calculation of this hardcover for shared driveways, b
who is accountable for what portions. Curtis stated 1
driveway the property owner benefits from shall be i
while the remaining hardcover not benefiting that pr
completely removed from the hardcover analysis.
The Planning Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend
variances but recommended denial of the 75' -250' 1
single - family residence.
Staff recommends approval of the lot width and
hardcover variance consistent with the Planning
The Applicants had nothing to add to staff's report.
if Staff so requests.
OF SEVER AND SHARON PETERSON,
Jim McNeil, Formation Architects, were
lot width, hardcover within the 75' -250' zone of
a new single- family residence. Letters of support
5' -250' hardcover are attached as Exhibit B. Both
ling the shared driveway and how the City then
never been a formal ordinance regarding
t rather a policy has been established to determine
e policy states that the portion of the shared
-luded in the property's hardcover calculation,
)erty owner and underlying square footage are both
of the lot width and average lake setback
variance in order to construct a new
lake setback variances and denial of the
;sion recommendation.
PAGE 9
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
( #05 -3114 Sever and Sharon Peterson, Continued)
Murphy inquired what is necessary to reduce the hardcover to 25 percent.
Gaffron illustrated the portion of the driveway that is not necessary to access this property, noting that
that hardcover amount has not been included in the calculation. Gaffron stated one option discussed at
the Planning Commission was turning that section of the property into an outlot. Gaffron stated the
policy could be forcing the property owners into a hardship situation. Gaffron stated if that portion of the
property was considered an outlot, the amount of hardcover with this proposal would be calculated at 21
percent.
McNeil pointed out their proposal reduces the amount of hardcover to 27.4 percent on the property from
32.7 percent hardcover. McNeil noted that a large portion of the driveway does not need to be used by
the Petersons, and that if the driveway were reduced to nine feet wide, they would be below the 25
percent hardcover limit.
McNeil stated they are willing to reduce a portion of the driveway and that they are asking the Council to
review the policy and only count the driveway as being nine feet in width in determining this property
owner's hardcover calculation.
Murphy inquired what the actual hardcover on this lot would be if everything is counted.
•
Gaffron stated it would be 27.4 percent. Gaffron indicated if the shared driveway portion is removed, the •
hardcover would be approximately 21 percent.
Mr. Peterson stated they feel it is an unfair burden to have to include the extra width of the driveway in
their hardcover calculation that is required as part of a shared driveway. Peterson noted the lagoon also
should be considered a hardship in the need for an average lake setback variance.
Gaffron stated the lagoon does impact this property.
Peterson stated the lagoon was artificially created and has caused a hardship.
Murphy inquired whether the house footprint could be reduced another three percent.
O'Neil indicated they have reduced the hardcover on the lot with their proposal and that if they are
required to reduce the footprint by another three percent, they would be left with a house that is smaller
than what currently exists. O'Neil noted they are also improving the sight lines for some of the neighbors
with their proposal. O'Neil stated they could avoid the need for a variance by reducing the driveway by
seven feet but that it might be a policy issue.
Murphy stated in his opinion given the number of homes that utilize this driveway, it should probably be
considered a road. Murphy noted the amount of hardcover on this lot is being reduced with the
applicants' proposal.
•
PAGE 10
n
U
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, J
7:00 o'c
( #05 -3114 Sever and Sharon Peterson, Continued)
McMillan stated in her view some credit should be
being located on their property.
Murphy moved, White seconded, to direct Staff to
05 -3114, Sever and Sharon Peterson, 3145 North S
average lakeshore setback and hardcover at 28 pei
given to the applicants for the shared driveway.
Gaffron stated in his opinion there is justification for
driveway situation.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
10. JACK AND KAKI OLSON, 1966
Jack Olson, 1966 Shadywood Road, was present.
13, 2005
p.m.
to the applicants for a majority of the driveway
a resolution approving Application No.
Drive, granting of variances to lot width,
with the understanding that credit is being
the additional hardcover given the shared
ROAD — INQUIRY
• Curtis noted the Council in May 2005 approved a Resolution granting setback, hardcover, and lot
coverage variances to allow the construction of a 441 square foot detached one -story garage. The
property owners are now asking the council to examine the possibility of constructing an attached garage,
with the same footprint that was approved in May. The applicants are proposing to attach a two -story
20' by 22' garage to the house and eliminate the five - I foot separation between the buildings.
Staff feels the new request will require a new application as the previous application has been closed with
the resolution approval at the last Council meeting. If the Council determines that a two -story attached
garage proposal may have some merit, Staff would direct the applicants to make a new application for
review by the Planning Commission.
Staff further feels that a minimal two -story attached
existing house would make use of the space within t
space, would allow for better on site parking and we
as viewed from the channel. Curtis noted a 230 squ
limit for this property.
White stated in his opinion the two -story attached
Olson concurred, noting he has spoken with several
garage.
Gaffron stated Staff in the past was attempting to li
Gaffron recommended the applicants consider redu
• percent structural coverage and utilizing part of the
rage that adds approximately 230 square feet to the
existing residence, would create additional living
i limit the visual impact of the additional structure
foot addition would be within the lot coverage
makes more sense.
who have recommended the attached
this property to the 15 percent structural coverage.
g the size of the addition to stay within the 15
isting house for garage.
PAGE 11
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m. •
(Jack and Kari Olson, Continued)
Peterson noted the applicant would need to submit a new application if he wishes to proceed forward with
an attached garage.
McMillan pointed out the applicant would probably need to comply with the 15 percent structural
coverage limit if a new application is submitted.
Gaffron noted a portion of the living space on the lower level would need to be converted into garage
space.
Olson stated that portion includes a kitchen and a bathroom and they are not in a financial position to
remodel that at this time.
Murphy stated it was his understanding they had proposed a detached garage because of the costs
associated with attaching the garage.
Olson stated they are simply moving the garage over.
Curtis stated the Council had previously approved the structural coverage at 1711 square feet, with the
structural coverage on this lot currently being approximately 1200 square feet. Curtis stated the detached
garage consists of 441 square feet. •
McMillan pointed out there is more massing on the lot with the attached garage. McMillan noted there
was no restriction put on the approval for adding a second story to the detached garage.
Gaffron stated in his opinion a second story would need to be reviewed since it would be located within
75 feet of the lake. Gaffron displayed the design that was previously approved. Gaffron stated a new
application would need to be submitted if a second story is added to the detached garage.
Curtis noted the approval did not include the dormers that are depicted on the drawing.
Olson indicated his surveyor included the dormers on the garage for aesthetic reasons.
Peterson stated total hardcover on the lot after construction of the garage and some blacktop removals
would be at 43 percent.
Curtis stated the applicant would be constructing the garage over existing hardcover. Curtis inquired how
the hardcover was reduced from 48 to 43 percent as shown on the updated survey.
Olson stated he instructed the surveyor to relocate the detached garage next to the house and that he is
unsure why the hardcover number changed.
Curtis inquired whether the applicant is proposing any further hardcover removals.
Olson stated he is not.
PAGE 12
•
0
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(Jack and Kari Olson, Continued)
Peterson stated the applicant is looking for direction on whether this concept would be approved by the
city. I
White stated they are not able to approve something that the Planning Commission has not reviewed.
g pp g i see whether the Council would be opposed to the
long rather than two buildings.. t were looking t
Moorse stated it appears that the Council is fine with, attaching the garage but that they would prefer to
have some input from the Planning Commission and whether the amount of structural coverage should be
reduced.
Murphy pointed out the applicant's detached garage was approved and that he does have the option of
bringing a new application before the Planning Commission to get their input on the new design. Murphy
indicated he would have trouble supporting the new proposal given the amount of massing on the lot.
Olson stated everyone he has spoken to have indicated that they prefer the garage attached due to
appearance and the fact that there would be water runoff between the two structures. Olson stated he
would like to know whether this proposal is a viable, option.
White stated if the applicants can meet the 15 percent structural coverage, it probably would be approved.
White suggested the applicant speak with Staff and with his builder to see whether some modifications
could be made to the plan in order to comply with tie 15 percent.
Murphy stated if the ten feet difference between the Lo is the kitchen and the bathroom, it might not be
worth it. I
Olson stated it is not an option for him to relocate
Gaffron stated the roofline for the detached garage
Murphy stated the garage could be turned the other
Peterson suggested the applicant speak with Staff
the appearance of massing on the lot if the garage
White indicated he prefers the attached garage
The City Council took no formal action on this
kitchen and bathroom.
match the rooflne for the house.
to achieve the look of two different buildings.
-ther on this proposal, but that she has an issue with
attached.
than two separate structures.
PAGE 13
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
PRESENTATION
2. NORTH HENNEPIN MEDIATION PROGRAM
Murphy moved, Peterson seconded, to approve funding for North Hennepin Mediation, Inc., in the
amount of $3,000. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT
McMillan stated she has reviewed the LMCD budget, noting that a six percent increase is being proposed
for Orono, which amounts to $3,680. McMillan stated the LMCD would approve the budget July I", and
recommended that some guidance be given on the budget.
White indicated he is in favor of the increase.
Moorse stated he has not reviewed the budget in detail but noted that the LMCD is proposing to use fewer
reserves this year.
•
McMillan stated the LMCD could use the Save the Lake money to deal with the zebra mussels. •
Murphy inquired how much is in the Save the Lake fund.
McMillan stated there is approximately $230,000 currently in that fund. McMillan pointed out they are
only able to use the interest and not the principal.
McMillan stated two citizens along County Road 6 have contacted her recently regarding an increase in
the amount of people fishing along the east end of Long Lake Road. The citizens raised concerns
regarding the safety of children and other people in that area given the parking on the side of the road, the
narrow road and the blind curve.
Murphy stated he also has received a call regarding this situation.
Gappa stated he has spoken with the police department regarding the placement of signs in that area
warning drivers of pedestrians ahead.
McMillan suggested that "no parking" signs be placed in this area.
Moorse inquired whether a fishing pier should be installed in that area.
McMillan stated there could be a problem accessing the pier. McMillan suggested the police department
review the situation on a weekend and make some recommendations.
McMillan stated she is in support of researching the Life Line.
PAGE 14
•
•
•
i
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(Mayor /Council Report, Continued)
Murphy indicated he is in support of the new
White inquired whether the park tour was successful
result of the storm that went through Orono recently.
McMillan stated she is happy with the purchase of
improvements to the Navarre Park........ ... .. ..
Murphy stated the tour was productive.
Moorse stated to his understanding Casco Point
Gappa stated the Public Works Department would lik
keep up with the demands placed on sewer lift statior,
of residents now have their own generators and sugge
city newsletter regarding water usage during power o
Peterson inquired about the mowing at Crystal Bay
Gappa stated he did speak with the mowing
rains.
gy
whether the City encountered any problems as a
additional land next to Navarre Park and the
the brunt of the storm.
to purchase some additional generators in order to
during power outages. Gappa stated a fair number
ted that the City include some articles in the next
who indicated he is behind schedule due to the
Peterson stated the park should be mowed more oftenthan every ten days.
Murphy noted May Street is scheduled to be closed Monday. Murphy expressed a concern that a large
number of residents would try to go south on either Brown Road or other streets, and inquired whether the
police chief has been notified of the potential situation.
Moorse stated a letter has been sent to the County.
Murphy stated Long Lake and Orono have agreed to have a shuttle bus available on Monday morning at
St. George's Church that would circle its way around the lower part of Long Lake to pick up pedestrians
from the south side and drive them to the north side. Murphy indicated this information would be
distributed to the residents via cable television and newspapers. Murphy stated they are seeking donations
to help keep the shuttle bus running for the next three months.
Murphy indicated by closing May Street, they are ant.
Road would be opened a year earlier than originally p
Murphy stated a meeting was held between repres(
Three River Parks, and the Hennepin County Rail
process for constructing a trail on Dakota Line. M
would be started in 2006. Murphy noted there has
Line.
that Brown Road and Old Crystal Bay
yes of the cities affected by the Dakota Trail,
irity regarding the planning and decision making
indicated it is expected that the trail, if approved,
some opposition to the trail along the Dakota
PAGE 15
1
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
11. AWARD CONTRACT FOR NAVARRE WATER TOWER REPAINTING
Murphy moved, White seconded, to award a contract for the Navarre Water Rehabilitation Project
to Classic Protective Coatings, Menomonie, Wisconsin; award to include both the Base Bid and
Alternate No. 1, in the amount of $207,231.00, to be funded from the Water Fund 2005 Capital . ,.._ . .
Budget. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*12. AWARD CONTRACT FOR HIGHWAY 12 SANITARY SEWER PIPE BURSTING
Murphy moved, White seconded, to award a contract for the Highway 12 Sanitary Sewer Pipe
Bursting Project to Push Construction, Inc., Rice Lake, Wisconsin, in the amount of $47,740.00 for
the Base Bid and $2,500.00 for Alternate No. 1, to be funded from the Sewer Fund with a budget
adjustment to the 2005 Sewer Fund Capital Budget to reflect this expenditure. VOTE: Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
*13. WAYZATA FIRE SERVICE AGREEMENT
Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve the 2005 Wayzata Fire Service Contract with the City
of Wayzata. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve payment for fire protection services for the first half
of 2005 in the amount of $11,980.00. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*14. LONG LAKE FIRE STATION INVOICE
Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve the payment of $5,000 to Diversified Coating for the
epoxy floor upgrade, to be paid from the Joint Fire Station Construction Fund. VOTE: Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
*15. ACCEPT DONATION FOR POLICE RESERVES
0
r�
U
Murphy moved, White seconded, to accept a $30 donation on behalf of the Orono Police Reserves. •
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PAGE 16
•
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
16. URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (CDBG) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2006 -2008 — RESOLUTION NO. 5332
McMillan inquired whether this is the same joint
Moorse indicated it is a renewal of the prior
McMillan moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt RI
the Execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement 1
for Participation in the Urban Hennepin County I
in Fiscal Year 2006 -2008. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0
*17. NO ASSESSMENTS FOR TOWNLINE
NO. 5333
Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt RESC
No Portion of the Costs of Improvements to Tow
• Area Property Owners. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*18. BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP — STE
Murphy moved, White seconded, to adopt I
City of Orono to Submit Information to the
Development and to Enter into a Grant Agr
of the Big Island Veterans Camp Property.
*19. HIRE FULL -TIME COMMUNITY SER
agreement as what was proposed last year.
ION NO. 5332, a Resolution Authorizing
the City of Orono and Hennepin County
pity Development Block Grant Program
IMPROVEMENTS — RESOLUTION
ION NO. 5333, a Resolution Providing that
Road will be Assessed to the Townline Road
FUNDING — RESOLUTI ON NO. 5334
JTION NO. 5334, a Resolution Authorizing the
nent of Employment and Economic
for Funding to Assist the City in the Purchase
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
OFFICER
Murphy moved, White seconded, to advertise for'and extend offer of hire to full -time CSO
candidate beginning July 11, 2005, at the beginning pay rate of $12.95 per hour. VOTE: Ayes 4,
Nays 0. 1
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
• City Attorney Barrett requested an executive sessio i to discuss pending litigation.
PAGE 17
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 13, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
*20. LICENSES
The following licenses were approved:
RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE
1. Michael and Cynthia LeJeune
480 Old Long Lake Road
ONE DAY GAMBLING — RESOLUTION NO. 5335
1. Sister Kenny Foundation
Minnetonka Center for the Arts, 2240 North Shore Drive
Raffle with Art of Living Gale and Auction
Tuesday, June 14, 2005, 6:30 p.m. —10:00 p.m.
TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
1. Sister Kenny Foundation
Minnetonka Center for the Arts, 2240 North Shore Drive
Art of Living Gala and Auction
Tuesday, June 14, 2005, 6:30 p.m. —10:00 p.m.
SPECIAL EVENT
1. Applicant: Sister Kenny Foundation
Event: Art of Living Gala and Auction
Location: Minnetonka Center for the Arts, 2240 North Shore Drive
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Time: 6:30 p.m. —10:00 p.m.
2. Applicant:
Paul Merlo
Event:
Private Party
Location:
2142 Shadywood Road
Date:
Saturday, June 25, 2005
Time:
5:00 p.m. —10:00 p.m.
Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve the above licenses. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*21. BILLS
Murphy moved, White seconded, to approve payment of the All Funds account.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PAGE 18
•
n
LJ
•
•
ADJOURNMENT
ORONO CITY C
Monday, ,
7:00 of
Murphy moved, Peterson seconded, to adjourn
9:21 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ATTEST: &A-1
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
•
•
i
S OF THE
iUNCIL MEETING
ne 13, 2005
lock p.m.
Orono City Council meeting of June 13, 2005, at
Barbara Peterson, Mayor
PAGE 19