HomeMy WebLinkAboutre shed on wrong property Kare� Fuller-Feyo
1677 Long Lake Road
New Brighton, Minnesota
7 November 1994
City of Orono
Attn: Jean Mabusth
2780 Kelley Parkway
Orono, Minnesota 55356
Dear Jeanne Mabusth,
Enclosed are copies of our letters to Mr. and Mrs. Herman
Laue dated September 16, 1994, as requested.
We have attempted to resolve this matter to no avail. We are
requesting the City of Orono to uphold and enforce all city
ordinances that apply to this situation.
Please contact us or call our Realtor, Mark Fuller, at 786-
9660, as soon as possible.
Warm Regards
� ,
��r I /��
/ � G 2i� , ���
��� � � -��
,
Karen � uller-Fey�o a�c� Timothy Feyo
633-2�47
i
�_
1677 Long Lake Road
New Brighton, Minnesota
16 September 1994
Mr. & .Mrs. Herman Laue
594 Park Lane
Long Lake, Minnesota 55356
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Laue,
I am sure that you already luiow, the variance request presented to
the City of Orono Planning Commission and the City Counsel has been
approved for the Lots East of your property. What you may not be
aware of is that all requiremeots requested by the Planning Commission
of the applicants have been fulfilled, including a resolution of the dispute
concerning the survey discrepancies. As per our conversation after the
planning commission's meeting in August, we contacted our surveyors
and pointed out your concerns about the property line between your east
lot and our west lat. At our request, our surveyors, Demars-Gabriel
Land Surveyors Inc. contacted Schoe❑ & Madson Inc., and a
representative of each business met at the lots site to review the
discrepancy. According to Demars-Gabriel representative Mr. David
E. Crook met with Schoell & Madson representative Mr. Ted Kemna.
Both Mr. Crook and Mr. Kemna reviewed their data and discovered
that the Scholl & Madson survey was in error. Both individuals double
cbecked their data and discovered an error of three (3) inches by the
Demars-Gabriel survey (prorated equals one (1) inch for each of our
three (3) lots.) What this all comes out to, is that the survey that
Demars-Gabriel Inc. conducted, and the one presented to the Planning
Commission and City Counsel, is the latest and correct survey to date.
We understand that Mr. Kemna went and spoke to Mrs. Laue to
report on the finding and errors of the original Schoell & Madson
survey. They even went out and reviewed where the property line is
located. With the correct property line now firmly established, it is
evident that your utility shed is clearly on our property. ( To your East.)
We request that you remove this structure off our property
immediately, now that the survey reviews are concluded. We request
that this structure be removed no later than 23 September 1994. Failure
to remove this structure by this date will only result in forcing us to take
one of several actions. One option is to take legal action which would be
expensive to both of us . I'm sure that neither of us wants this matter to
get that far. As we have stated, the survey review is over, your
structure is clearly on our property, we request you remove your
structure .
We thank you for all consideration regarding this matter and we hope
that this letter will resolve all differences.
Respectfully, �-�
%� � .�� - �
� `� ��, �,`�/�G��
- ��
; Karen Fuller-Feyo and Timothy Feyo
j� � _. ✓