HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-00635 - addn/remode/repair . �
CITY OF ORONO PERMIT NO.: 2009-00635
2750 KELLEY PARKWAY
ORONO, MN 55356- �ATE IssuEn: 10/OS/2009
952 249-4600 FAX: 952 249-4616
ADDRESS : 965 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
PIN : 02-117-23-14-0001
LEGAL DESC : REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 1098
: LOT 000 BLOCK 000
PERMIT TYPE : ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR
PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL
CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPA[R
ACTIVITY : 434-RESIDENTIAL
VALUATION : $ 263,000.00
NOTE: SEPERATE PERMITS REQUIRED: PLUMBING,MECHANICAL,ELECTRICAL(STATE)
PERM[T#2009-00634 -ADVANCED PLAN REVIEW -PD$1332.59
PERM[T#2009-00636 - ESCROW- PD$2500.00
OTHER INSPECTION NOTED IS FOR A POURED WALL INSPECTION
APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 2,034.75
JAMES PATSCH CONST INC. STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 131.50
3427 HUMBOLT AVENUE S
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408 MISC FEE 0.00
(612)527-01 ll TOTAL 2,166.25
Minnesota State License#: 4290
OWNER
CUSICK, MR. & MRS. THOMAS
965 EDGEWOOD HILLS RD
WAYZATA, MN 55391
AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT
The work for which this permit is issued shall bc performed according to
the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the
State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does
not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate
permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work
shall be compied with whe[her or not specified herein."Chis permit will
expire and become null and void if construction au[horized is not
commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is
suspended for a period of 180 days at any time aRer work has commenced.
The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are
requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be
revoked at any time for du ause.
`� �O�.s � � y?�t'.GG� � cr s � v y
Applicant Per tee Signature Date I � d By Signature Date
SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE.
�
�
�
�Cv p � `� City of Orono ,�
�
� � a ���. �
Building Permit Application �
for New Structures or Additions
Mailing Address: Permit number: ��Q
g,�,�. PO Box 66
� � 0 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received:
�� �_
a ,
�; � , �, Street Address' Received by:
�'�,c, ���~ Gti 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: 3 .J`f
r9kESH�4'� Orono, MN 55356 ���� _���� .
- " Total Fee:
Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 ��:.�w cl orcno i��n us
This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted.
Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print)
GENERAL INFORMATION: ' ` `
Job Site Address: � � � G' �wC�''C1 i l S �
Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodele Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes o
/f yes, a specia/event permit is required with Po/ice Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shutt/e bus service i//be
required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed.
CONTRACTOR/APP�LI ANT INFORMATI N•
Name: J(XWIf'S t--- � �0 �S ✓,i,i� � � .
State License# 2. � Expiration Date: �, � Z��
Phone: L � � office � �- �i �S 3 cell
Mailing Address: Ci : \ ' ZIP: .S
�ontact Person: •` ,� Applicant is: ontractor Homeowner (Circle One)
mail and/or Fax: �� ,/' �� � �.�y►1
PROPERTY OWNER I ORMATION:
Name: S�L�
Phone(day): � � - 2 �� P,�
Address: y '� � � ' � `1 Ci : �� 4'� ZIP: s�(�
Email and/or Fax yv, U. n d
,._----.-�,
ARCHI EC GINEE F RMATI N•
� 'V\ �. - i G
Phone(day): ��.- �1- Z
Address: r Ci : � Z P: �
Email and/or Fax: •i2- � V 1C i (.Q�
PROJECT INFORMATION:
1.Type of Project 2.Pro osed Use 3.Stru ure Type 4.Sewage Disposal 8�
Water Supply
❑ New Construction Single Family with Residence
�ddition attached garage ❑Garage/Accessory Bldg. �ublic Sewer
❑Accessory Building ❑ Single Family with ❑ Deck
❑ Relocation detached garage ❑ Office/Commercial ❑ Private Sewer
❑ Other: (specify) ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse
❑ Public ❑ Storage ❑ Public Water
""Any earth movement may require ❑Commercial ❑Other(specify)
MCWD review 8�permits. ❑ Industrial �rivate Well
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑Other: (SpeCify)
18202 Minnetonka Blvd
Deephaven,MN 55391
Phone: 952�71-0590
Fax: 952-471-0682
www.minnehah acreek.or
Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ , �,�j
Last Updated: 6/22/2009
- 19 -
�
�
,
STRUCTURE INFORMATION:
1.Structure Dimension� 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) 2.Ty e of Construction
:
a. Length (ft.)= ��_ Number of bedrooms=� Wood/Frame
2 ❑ Masonry
b.Width(ft.)= �/� Number of garage stalls: ❑ Metal
Attached= ❑ Pole Bldg.
Areas in square feet Detached= ❑ ICF
❑ On-site Prefab
c. Basement= �� ❑ Off-site Prefab
_�7f_c ❑ Other(please specify):
d. 1 s`Story = '[�i�
e. 2"d StOry=
f. '/z Story =
g.Total Area=
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed:
Not
Enclosed A licable
❑ ❑ Permit A lication
❑ ❑ Pro osed Buildin Plans
❑ ❑ MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form
❑ ❑ Surve meetin all re uirements
❑ ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
❑ ❑ Hardcover Calculation s
❑ ❑ Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort
❑ ❑ Access Permit
❑ ❑ Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan
❑ ❑ En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above
❑ ❑ Plan Review Fee
❑ ❑ Other
APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
• Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department;
• Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500;
• Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they
are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative
but to reject it until it is complete;
• Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed;
• Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or
confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data.
Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and
intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law.
If you refuse to supply the information,the appJieation may n be issued.
ApplicanYs Signature: Date:
Last Updated: 6/22/2009
-20-
Plan Review Checklist for New Structures / Additions
Address/ PID/ LegaL � f � � 1_ �5'�C{,JU �,
Description of work: i�i l/� �{ � � � G s �
Septic review by: ���' Date Approved: � '�� '��
Zoning review by: �/�L,�"� �-'L� Date Approved:
Building review by: Date Approved: �-r'3 � -0`7
Grading review by: � Date Approved: �� �— ��j��
Zoning File#: Resolution#: Resolution Date:
Zonin District Fire Department Post Office School District
Zoning: Lot Ar a: � SF�AC Width: ��3��� Depth:
Survey Submitted: es 0 No Date of Survey: Z3 (J�
Pro osed Setbacks: ��`—v�
ront ake) Rear reet) N S E W ) ( N S E W ) Other Buildings Wetland
Side Side
�� �. �_ .
Building Defined Height: Building Peak Height: #of Stories Ok?: YES
FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: FOR A BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION:
START WITH the distance between the basement floor/crawl START the distance between the slab and the highest
space floor and the highest roof peak, the top of WITH roof peak,the top of the cornice of a flat roof,
the cornice of a flat roof, the deck line of a the deck line of a mansard roof, or the
mansard roof, or the uppermost point on a round uppermost point on a round or other arch-type
or other arch-t e roof roof
SUBTRACT half the distance between the highest window and SUBTRACT half the distance between the highest window
hi hest roof eak of a itched roof and hi hest roof eak of a itched roof
SUBTRACT the distance between the basement floor/crawl ADD the distance between the slab and the highest
space floor and the highest existing grade within existin rade within the foundation
the foundation or 10 feet,whichever is less. EQUALS Defined buildin hei ht
EQUALS Defined buildin hei ht
Lot Coverage: ��G� gF CP� �%�� o�o
�
Shoreland District MCWD Permit Received Avera e Lakeshore Setback Bluff
0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A ❑ Yes o
0 Yes �] No � Yes ❑ No /A
Permit Number: Setback:
Hardcover Zones Existin Proposed Variance uir d CUP Re 're
0-75' ❑ Yes o ❑ Yes No
75-250' Type(s): Type(s):
250-500'
500-1000' , � ���
REMARKS (in-house):
Updated: 09/11/2009
z:\forms\ptan review checklist.docx
Fees to be Char ed YES NO
Permit �
Plan Review �/
State Surcharge
Investigation Fee
SAC— Number of SAC Units
Sewer Connection �
Water Connection
Park Fee
Site Inspection
Other(specify) ,
Miscellaneous Fees
Calculated By:
Square Foota e $ per Square Foota e
Basement X = $
1 St Floor X = $
2nd FlOor X = $
Garage X = $
Estimated Construction Value: $
Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits
� Site �Plumbing 0 Grading / Filling 0 Well
0 Hardcover Removal �' Mechanical ❑ Fire �Electrical
�Footing 0 Septic 0 Water Connection
Ja' oured Wall � Fireplace � Sewer Connection
oundation SurvEy 0 Masonry � Lawn Irrigation
0 Radon Rock Bed � Mfg.
�Framing � Other(specify)
�nsulation
As-Built Survey
JZf Final
0 Other(specify)
REMARKS (in-house):
Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved:
Access:Existing: ❑ YES R NO New: � YES � NO
REMARKS (TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED BY PERSON PULLING PERMIT)
Updated: 09/11/2009
z:\forms\plan review checklist.docx
����� � 1� r�k y,,,7u��
�
'T''�e��r.� c�v,���.,� �/l.�4c..7'� ,�, �"�, �. .�, /��r� ��
�-I:�:C�COVER CALCULATION WOI2KSH�ET �' 9-Z3-ag
SET'13:�CTti !Ori'1;: (CIRC;L#: �.iNE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 00-1000'
E�.I>'TING I3�ItDCQY"I;R IN ZONF,
A. I-iouse --- x = Z68� S.F.
Length Width
X = S.F.
Y = S.F.
-- - x — S.F.
I3. Gara�c ----- x = S.F.
C. Dri�•eway --- x — ��'�' S.F.
--- X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk �O�t� i'�pp�t} x =
ZS� S.F.
--_---- -- X — S.F.
E. P�t'io��k x = �� S.F:
t�+ _ -- X = Z� S.F.
F. Laudscape __ x = /� 7 S.F.
Underiain __ x = S.F.
13y Plastic , x = S.r.
Or I'�bi-ic
G. Other � _
� _�.—— S.F.
"I'UTAL HAItDCOVER IN ZONE - 7�,7� S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - ,69Z.Q$—S.F. B
� _ 72�9 = B 6 9Z9 S X ioo = . io,50 �ro
PROPOST!;I) }IART)COVL'R IN ZONE
A. I-Ioiise x =
— _ S.F.
I.ength Width --- —
a9-oo.TronL_, x = f/'0'2 6 s.�'.
--^— x — S.F.
--- — x = S.F.
B. Garage x =
s.r.
C. Driveway _ x = S.P.
X — S.F.
ll. Sid�walk _`_ x = S.P.
-- X = S.F.
E. Patio/D�ck __�_ x = S.F.
— — x = S.F.
F. Landscape -- ---- -- x- = S.F.
UIIC�ZI'�81I1 x _
---- S.F.
By 1'lastic x = S.F.
Or Fabric
G. Otlier __ x = S.F.
"t'U1'AL HARIaCOVER IN ZONE 7��9,,,:: /o Z 6 � �j3 p S S.F. A
'1'OTAL PIZOPLRTY ARP,A IN ZONE - �
t� �3 4 S _ B ,-� _��' Z 9,S� S.r. B
— _ � S x loo = //, 9$ %
2335 Highway 36 W
St.Paui,MN 55113
Te1651-636-4600
Fax 651-636-1311
www.bonestroo.com
October 1, 2009 � Bonestroo
Ms. Melanie Curtis
Planning and Zoning Coordinator
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Re: 965 Edgewood Hills Road
File No. 000139-09000-2
File No. 2009-0635
Dear Melanie:
We have reviewed the plans for a proposed addition to the existing home at 965 Edgewood Hilis
Road. The plans are dated 9-23-09. We have the following comments with regards to
engineering matters:
• This project will disturb more than 25, but less than 100 cubic yard of material.
Sediment and erosion control information meeting the requirements of Orono's City Code
79-7(c)(1) must be submitted. The minimum $2000 sediment and erosion control
financial security should be required of the applicant for this permit.
• The plans are generally acceptable from an engineering standpoint. However, with less
information than rypically required, we recommend a foundation and as-built surveys be
provided to the city for review.
If you have any questions, please call me at (651) 604-4894.
Yours very truly,
�,�------�i -��—l�_
Darren Amundsen
Cc: Tom Kellogg
BUILDING PERMIT ESCROW AGREEMENT
Orono Building Permit#2009-00635
AGREEMENT made this �>E� day of f/JT�«,gr.Q, , 20�, by and between the CITY OF ORONO,
a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Thomas Cusick ("Owner").
Recitals
1. Building permit applications have been filed for a an addition to the existing home located at
965 Edgewood Hiils Rd the ("Subject Property"), legally described as Tract B Registered Land Survey No. 1098
files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County Minnesota.
2. Owner requests the City to review this application.
3. The City will commence its review of the application and incur costs associated with said review
only if the Owner establishes an escrow to ensure reimbursement to the City of its costs.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. DEPOSIT OF ESCROW FUNDS. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow
Agreement, the Owner sha►I deposit $2,500 with the City. Ail accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to
reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account.
2. PURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City
for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred (including planning, engineering, in excess of $500, or legal
consultant review) or will incur in reviewing the plan. Eligible expenses shall be consistent with expenses the
Owner would be responsible for under a building permit application. The escrow will also guarantee
reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred to assure that the work is completed in
accordance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and the provisions of Orono City Code Chapter 79.
The financial security may also be used by the City to eliminate any hazardous conditions associated with the
work and to repair any damage to public property or infrastructure that is caused by the work (including planning,
engineering, or legal consultant review) associated with building permit #2009-00635 if compliance with the
approved building permit is not accomplished.
3. MONTHLY BILLING. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs, the City will in turn
send a bill to the Owner. Owner shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the Owner's receipt
of bifl.
4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. In the event that the Owner does not make
payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in #3 above, the City may draw from the escrow account without
further approval of the Owner to reimburse the City for Eligible expenses the City has incurred. The City shall
notify the Owner the Owner of such draw and the nature of the expense for which the reimbursement is being
made. If the Escrow amount falls below 75% of the original escrow amount the Owner shall deposit additional
sums as directed by the City, or the City shall discontinue review and post a Stop Work Order.
4. CLOSING ESCROW. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the
Owner when the review has been completed and written notification is received from the Owner requesting the
funds.
5. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARGES. If the project is abandoned by Owner, or if the eligible expenses
incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid balance to the
subjecrpro�erty pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§415.01 and 366.012.
CITY: CITY F O NOl OWNER:
r. ' ��� �f ���
�
By: � ----.__----�-�. By,r�
, �
Its: C' ��,��+- gy. `a�.�\.C:4�c.�,� C�--c�c���.
Intemal Use Only: G Original to Finance Department �Copy to Street File
MEMORANDUM
Date: 28 September 2009
To: Tom Kellogg, City Engineer
From: Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator
RE: Building Permit # 2009-00635 for 965 Edgewood Hills Road
Please review the enclosed information for a building permit for an addition to the
home and provide comments on or before October 6tn
Please call me at 952.249.4627 if you need additional information or if you have
any questions on the attached information.
Thank you,
��
��
� _ D��
C✓ „ �n,0 -
f�" I
�����
�
�����y �1 r,a,��� ����' ���"f;:
� ��Sch���°�� ����.��fi���,� ��ers�.�� ��._„�, � . , � �'
� Com liance Certificate
z�
p
Project Title: Cusick residence
Energy Code: 20061ECC
�ocation: Orono, Minnesota
Construction Type: Single Family
Conditioned Floor Area: 1992 ft2
Glazing Area Percentage: 13%
Heating Degree Days: 8037
Climate Zone: s
Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor:
965 Edgewood Hills Road Cusick James L Patsch Construction,Inc.
Orono,MN 3427 Humbolt Ave.S
Minneapolis,MN 55408
- �
�_:�.�:�^
Compliance:0.0%Better Than Code Maximum UA:208 Your UA:208
}.� �: :;:�
.� ya<, .
�y o a a i e
�.
��,. - - m
Basement Wall(garage):Masonry Block with Empty Cells 255 0.0 10A 14��
Wall height:9.0'
Depth below grade:8.5'
Insulation depth:9.0'
Basement Wall 2:Solid Concrete or Masonry 90 13.0 0.0 6
Wall height:9.0'
Depth below grade:7.0'
Insulation depth:9.0'
Wall 1:Wood Frame,16"o.c. 162 13.0 0.0 13
Wall 2:Wood Frame, 16"o.c. 468 19.0 0.0 25
Window 1:Metal Frame with Thertnal Break:Double Pane with 14 0.340 5
Low-E
SHGC:0.31
Window 2 Fixed Unit:Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double 35 0.290 10
Pane with Low-E
SHGC:0.35
RIM:Wood Frame,16"o.c. 98 14.0 0.0 8
Wall 4:Wood Frame,16"o.c. 882 19.0 0.0 43
Window 3:Metal Frame:Double Pane with Low-E 143 0.340 49
SHGC:0.31
Window 4:Metal Frame with Thermal Break:Double Pane with 20 0.310 6
Low-E
SHGC:0.32
Floor 1:All-Wood Joist/Truss:Over Outside Air 50 60.0 0.0 1
Ceiling 1:Raised or Energy Truss 1026 44.0 0.0 28
Compliance Statement. The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans,specifications,and other
calculations submitted with the permit application.The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2006 IECC requirements in
REScheck Version 4.2.0 and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist.
—_ . _ __
Name-Title Signature Date
Project Notes:
Master Bedroom Addition
Project Title: Cusick residence Report date: 09/24/09
Data filename:C:1Users\KenlDocuments\Ken's1PlanWames L PatschlCusick\Cusick Res Check.rck Page 1 of 1
�
. ' �
���� ���� ,- ����"�,�
€�i���n�� ��r�ifi�at�
��� .
� .� j
��� -�`� r� ._��� 3 , �� . .��', �.
Ceiling!Roof 44.00
Wall 19.00
Floor/Foundation 10.00
Ductwork(unconditioned spaces):
_ � ���
_ � ;� �r��
�
Window 0.34 0.31
Door
, - �
Water Heater:
. . . ..... ..':'i:����.-�...�'�... ':: ?t'�' ,.
Name: Date:
Comments:
.,,��A � ,��
� ' � � ° Stork Twin Cit Testin Cor '��ti��
STO I�I� Y 9 p
Materials Technology
�U� 2�, 2009 Material Testing •Non-Destructive Testing
Y Product Evaluation •Construction Materials
Mr. Jim Patsch 662 Cromwell Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55114
James L. Patsch Construction, Inc. usA
3427 Humboldt Avenue South Telephone : (651)645-3601
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55408 Telefax : (651)659-7348
Website : www.storktct.com
RE: Geotechnical Exploration — Soil Borings
Residence at 965 Edgewood Hills Road
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report concerns our recent geotechnical exploration program at the site of the
existing residence located at 965 Edgewood Hills Road in Orono, Minnesota. We
understand a geotechnical exploration program was required to depict the subsurface
conditions for the proposed addition to the existing residence and provide a discussion
as to the suitability of the soils encountered by our borings to support the proposed
addition.
1.1 Scope of Work
We recently performed a geotechnical exploration program in general accordance with
our proposal dated July 6, 2009 and your subsequent authorization to proceed. The
scope of our work for the project was as follows:
1 . Arrange to have buried public utilities marked through the Gopher-State
One-Call system.
2. Explore the subsurface conditions by performance of four (4) standard
penetration test borings to unit depths of 15' to 20'.
3. Visually classify the extracted soil samples.
4. Prepare a geotechnical report which includes the following information:
a. Logs of the soil test borings showing the soil and groundwater data.
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions ot sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT')dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation is an operating unit of Stork Materials Technology B.V.,Amsterdam,The Netherlands,which is a member of the Stork group
' ST0 f�I-� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hills Road Page 2 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
b. A site plan showing the approximate boring locations.
c. Written description of encountered soil and groundwater conditions.
d. A discussion as to the suitability of the soils encountered by our borings to
support the proposed addition.
The scope of our work is intended for geotechnical purposes only. This scope is not
intended to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination at the
site.
2.0 FIELD TESTING PROGRAM
2.1 Soil Borings
A total of four (4) soil test borings were drilled on the site on July 8, 2009. The
approximate boring locations are shown on the attached site plan. The planned
locations and number of test borings was determined through discussions between
James L. Patsch Construction and Stork Twin City Testing. Our drill crew elevated the
borings using elevations shown on the lot survey.
The standard penetration borings were performed with an all terrain mounted rotary drill
rig using split-barrel sampling procedures. Water level observations were made in the
boreholes during and upon completion of the drilling and sampling operations. During
the field operations, the drill crew maintained logs of the subsurface conditions including
changes in stratigraphy and the observed groundwater levels. The boring logs are
attached.
After completion of the drilling operations, the boreholes were backfilled with auger
cuttings and bentonite chips to the existing surface.
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
' ' �TO t�I� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hills Road Page 3 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
Sampling and classification of soils were perFormed in general accordance with
American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedures, and are described
on an attached sheet.
2.2 Surface Conditions
The existing walk out home sits on a lot that is heavily wooded to the south of the home.
The home site slopes from the front portion of the lot to the exterior where there is a
considerable grade change. A limited amount of landscaping surrounded the home. A
deck is attached to the rear of the home.
2.3 Subsurface Conditions
The subsurface conditions encountered at the test boring locations are shown on the
test boring logs. The boring logs also indicate the possible geologic origin of the
materials encountered. We wish to point out that the subsurface conditions at other
times and locations on the site may differ from those found at our test locations. If
different conditions are encountered during construction, it is necessary that you contact
us so that our recommendations can be reviewed.
The borings indicated a generalized soil profile consisting of fill at the surface underlain
by glacial till.
The fill included a thin topsoil layer at the surface underlain by clayey sand or lean clay
with a little gravel. Pieces of wood and bituminous were encountered within the fill of
borings B3 and B4. Minor organic inclusions were encountered within portions of the
fill. The fill extended to depths ranging from 6' to 10'/2' below the surFace of the borings.
The fill soil was very soft to soft based on the penetration values (N-value) obtained
during drilling.
Topsoil comprised mainly of organic lean clay was encountered beneath the fill of
borings B1 and B2.
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
� ' STOI�I� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hilis Road Page 4 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
The borings terminated in lean clay glacial till that was firm based on the penetration
values (N-value) obtained during drilling.
2.4 Water Level Conditions
Water level observations were made during and after completion of the drilling
operations. Groundwater was not encountered at the time of drilling in the borings.
Since the clay soils encountered in the test borings are relatively impervious or slow
draining, it may take several days for groundwater in a borehole to rise to its hydrostatic
level. If more accurate water level determinations are required, piezometers should be
installed and the water level monitored over a period of time.
In general, water levels may fluctuate throughout the year depending on variations in
the amount of precipitation, degree of evaporation, surface run-off characteristics and
other related hydrogeological factors.
3.0 LABORATORY REVIEW
The soil samples obtained during the drilling operations were logged, labeled, sealed
and delivered to our laboratory for further review. The soil samples were classified in
general conformance with ASTM Standards by a Twin City Testing geotechnical
engineer.
4.0 ENGINEERING REVIEW
Based on the information obtained from our geotechnical work and our understanding or
assumptions of the project data, we made our engineering review and
recommendations which are presented in the following sections. If any of our
understanding or assumptions are not correct, or if conditions observed during
construction are significantly different than those encountered in our geotechnical work,
we should be contacted immediately so we may review our recommendations.
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
S�O I�I� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hills Road Page 5 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
4.1 Project Data
We understand that an addition on the west side of the existing house is proposed. The
addition will be approximately 32' by 56' and have either a poured concrete or masonry
foundation with a wood frame structure. The floor slab of the addition will match the
slab elevation of the lower level of the existing house.
4.2 Discussion/Site Preparation
The soils encountered by the soil borings showed very soft fill underlain by topsoil
(borings B1 and B2) then terminating in tean clay glacial till. The existing fill and buried
topsoil is not suitable to support the foundation for the proposed addition. Either a soil
correction would need to be performed or the foundation would need to be lowered
beneath the fill/topsoil layers and be supported by the suitable natural soil encountered
at the site. Minimal soil correction would be needed for floor slab support.
Site preparation should consist of removing the surface vegetation/topsoil and fill from
the proposed bui�ding addition area. The subcut should continue to remove very soft
clays encountered beneath the topsoil. Engineered fill may then be placed to attain
footing elevation and site grades. The alternative would be to lower the foundation
through the fill and topsoil layers and support the addition on the firm natural soil.
The following tabulation shows the minimum recommended depth to competent soils for
building support at the respective boring locations:
Boring Ground Surface Minimum Approximate Elevation
Number Elevation Excavation of Competent Soil
(Ft) Depth (Ft) (Nearest '/2 Ft)
B1 987.5 11 976'/2
B2 986.1 8 978
B3 987.1 10'/2 976'/z
B4 992.8 10'/2 982'/2
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
� �TO(�I�; Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hills Road Page 6 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
The recommended depth of suitable soil is approximate and may vary between borings.
Contingency should be put in the project budget for excavations that extend below
anticipated subcut depths. The actual excavation depth should be determined in the
field at the time of construction. Test pitting should be performed by the contractor in
the presence of a geotechnical engineer or their representative in order to help verify
depths of subcuts. The excavation bottoms should be observed by the geotechnical
engineer to document the exposed soil conditions.
Where the excavation extends below bottom footing elevation if applicable, we
recommend providing lateral oversize equal to the depth of fill required to attain bottom
of footing elevation (i.e. 1 V:1 H lateral oversize). This oversizing is necessary to support
the lateral loads exerted by the footings through the fill system. An illustration of this
oversizing is provided in the Appendix.
After the recommended excavation, engineered fill should be placed to attain final
grades. Below foundations and floor slabs, the engineered fill should be compacted to
at least 95% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). The
moisture content of the engineered fill should be maintained within 3% below and the
optimum as determined by the Standard Proctor test.
Fill compacted with heavy, self-propelled compaction equipment should be placed in
lifts not exceeding 12 inches in loose thickness. Fill compacted with hand-operated
compaction equipment should be placed in lifts not exceeding 6 inches in loose
thickness.
We recommend positive surface drainage should be maintained so water is not allowed
to pond on site and promote soil disturbance. If soil becomes disturbed, additional
excavation may be required.
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
�� STO I�I� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hills Road Page 7 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
4.3 Foundations
It appears feasible to support the proposed residential home addition on conventional
spread footings, after completion of the earthwork procedures as outlined in section 4.2.
The building footings should bear on the native competent soils or on the engineered fill.
We recommend that the home addition footings be designed for a maximum net
allowable soil bearing pressure of up to 1500 pounds per square foot (psf). A factor of
safety of at least 3.0 against foundation shear failure was considered in this
recommended design bearing pressure.
All perimeter foundations in heated building space should be placed at a minimum
depth of 42 inches below exterior grades for frost protection. Interior footings may be
placed at any convenient depth below the floor slab. In unheated areas where deeper
frost penetration may occur, we recommend that the foundations have a minimum soil
cover of 60 inches for frost protection.
Based on the above recommendations, we estimate total settlements of the building
foundations of less than 1 inch, and the differential settlements of 1/2 inch or less.
4.4 Floor Slabs
Site preparation should include removing surface vegetation and subcutting existing fill
as needed to allow for placement of a 1' sand section beneath the floor slab. The
existing fill should be surface compacted prior to placement of the sand section.
Particular attention should be paid to properly compacting the fill against the
foundations and within the utility trench backfill beneath the floor slab. Inadequate
compaction at these locations may cause cracking of the slab from subsidence of the
fill. The floor slabs may be designed to be structurally independent of the building
foundations or walls.
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
� � 5T0 I�I�; Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hills Road Page 8 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
We recommend that a vapor barrier be placed beneath the floor slab along with an
interior and exterior drain-tile system to pick up groundwater moisture from beneath the
slab and divert it away from the building.
4.5 Underground Utilities
The soils encountered beneath the surficial topsoil layer in the borings appear to be
suitable for the support of typical buried utilities. We anticipate the buried utilities will
bear on either fill or glacial till, based on the subsurface data. Fill placed as utility
bedding should be either crushed rock or a clean, well-graded granular soil.
The utility contractor should provide the proper shoring equipment during utility
construction due to the non-cohesive nature of the soils encountered by the boring logs.
All backfill in underground utility trenches in building areas should be placed and
compacted as recommended in Section 4.2 of this report.
5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
5.1 Excavation Safety
All excavations should comply with applicable O.S.H.A. standards. Excavation safety is
the responsibility of the contractor.
5.2 Cold Weather Construction
Construction during cold weather should be exercised with care. We have included a
sheet entitled "Precautions for Excavating and Refilling During Cold Weather".
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
' � STO I�l� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
Proposed Addition at Residence 965 Edgewood Hills Road Page 9 of 9
Orono, Minnesota
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation Project #3106831
5.3 Field Observations and Testing
As variations in soil conditions may exist at locations and elevations other than those of
our borings, we recommend the geotechnical engineer be retained to observe the soil
conditions during site preparation.
6.0 REMARKS
The soil testing and geotechnical engineering services performed by Stork Twin City
Testing for this project have been conducted in a manner with the level of skill and care
ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing in this area
under similar budgetary and time constraints. No warranty, express or implied, is made.
This report was:
Prepared by: �-' '�ti� 4L� ��
Kevin Zalec, EIT
St�f� gi�ne r
1` �i �
Reviewed by:
Mark trai ht, P.E.��-
Senio Pr ject Engineer
MN Reg. o. 41658
Attachments:-Soil Boring Location Plan (1 page)
-Soil Boring Logs #B1 to #B4 (4 pages)
-Symbols and Terminology on Test Boring Logs (1 page)
-Field Exploration Procedures (1 page)
-Construction Observations and Testing (1 page)
-Cold Weather Precautions (1 page)
-Prerequisites for Sound Engineering Practice (1 page)
-Excavation Oversizing (1 page)
This agreement shall be governed exclusively by the general terms and conditions of sale and performance of testing services by Stork Twin City
Testing,Inc.a North Carolina business corporation("TCT")dd.02/04/2001. In no event shall Stork Twin City Testing,Inc.be liable for any
consequential,special or indirect loss or any damages above the cost of the work. Payment is due within 30 days of invoice.
Soil Boring Location Plan STOt�I�'�'TCT No. 3106831 -
;-
,�
�� / niCv: i �tt�......
j�2 � _..._....... .__
/ % � I
i 2��� 8 i -
Z4
/3 � � N.�
/ / i
� / 8 ��` � �
�� ,,�/ �
�� � 'C " � �
/ 5'K
2 � W
� 3 � � �� i �� � I
V ;' orc�
� 64� , � � ' I /
� A, j ,
r' �: 0
— ,. . �\., aaNsreF aeoixco�a \ , � ��/
� -----*�'
�'�B2 � �_�, ���- I I
, � . ,
� � � �
�- �� -
.,(\� � ; � ,
�\�\ K:IiG\ \��,\ � ._. :I..II 1J'G I
\\ \ \�� N \� I� \\\� �I II �
� L
U` \ � \?� \ O�
"
� y�
� �l � � � / � / �.
� �..
��. � \i � �sz's \ -�c: I ,
� �, �
�� r �
k _ �.,-_
w �
� �
� � �� ,. �, �.-
� "
\ � � - --\ ,
5� � _- , ,�_. ��
�� � �� �
� F�.� �� �� ���
\� FtiwF � , �.� G.�
w �
�
\ \ 'JALK N �j �
� (.L .1ET �� �141 7�,\' I
/
�`�� ��s�'� ��� -� �,, �'�``v�0 -- - --
� " �i ���,s�- �
i
. �,\ \ �'�g� �
�, . �,,, � .` �62
�� �� �4' ��� y. �
� ' .. `,.6..
� �� /
n� �. � .-�%�
. �� �\�!''.
�
���� ��3z,
m 21
�
', ;�.�a�r: CUSICK RESIDENCE
� 965 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD
ORONO, MN
Plan provided by James L. Patsch Construction. Borings located in the field by Stork Twin City Testing.
twin utti+testinq
��•..._ CWPOleG017
�..
Project No. 3106831 LOG OF BOREHOLE NO. B� Sheet 1 of 1
CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
James L. Patsch Construction, Inc.
SITE 965 Edgewood Hills Road PROJECT
Orono, Minnesota Proposed Addition
SAMPLES TESTS
0
� o � a
� � N w j Z w � � ADDITIONAL
U LL- �� � O j � W w DATA/
a = �¢ m w� � o � REMARKS
Q d O�� � a Q.'� � �L.L O_J
Surface Elev.: 987.5 ft. Datum: Basement Slab � o m z� z � ?? � o� c��
FILL, 2"of organic lean clay topsoil at the AS 1 UGE 24
surface underlain by clayey sand with a little
gravel, brown, moist, a slight odor of product
detected at 5'
3 2 SS 18
(Fill)
5 7 3 SS 18
7.0 980.5
ORGANIC LEAN CLAY with pieces of wood �'—° �` 4 4 SS 18
and metal, black, moist(CL) '; >'T',
;��i. ,�
(Topsoil)
9.5 978.0 ';. ,�''
LEAN CLAY with a trace of gravel, brown � �� 5 5 SS 18
and gray mottled to greenish gray, moist,
very soft to soft(CL)
(Glacial Till)
6 6 SS 18
14.5 __ 973.0
LEAN CLAY with SAND and a trace of 15 13 7 SS 18
gravel, brown mottled with iron oxide
staining, moist,firm(CL)
(Glacial Till)
20 14 8 SS 18
0 21.0 966.5
� End of Boring
0
c�
0
z
z
�
a
c�
0
�
a
c�
� WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS StOrk TWlll Clt�/ TeStlllg COrp. STARTED 7/8/09 FINISHED 7/8/O9
0
o None 662 CI"OIl1W@II AV@. DRILL CO. StOfk TCT DRILL RIG ATV
Z St. Paul, MN 55114
� Telephone: 651-645-3601 DRILLER T. Aldrich ASS'T DRILLER JR
Q
o Fax: 651-659-7348 LOGGED BY KSZ APPROVED MAS
J
Project No. 3106831 LOG OF BOREHOLE NO. BZ Sheet 1 of 1
CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
James L. Patsch Construction, Inc.
SITE 965 Edgewood Hills Road PROJECT
Orono, Minnesota Proposed Addition
SAMPLES TESTS
0
� � o } d
� � - w z w � � ADDITIONAL
U �w �
� � � O� � z w DATA/
� _ �Q m w� � a � REMARKS
Q d Q�� � a �� � �L.L QJ
Surface Elev.: 986.1 ft. Datum: Basement Slab � o m z� z � ?? � o a�. c��
FILL, 2"of organic lean clay topsoil at the AS 1 UGE 24
surface underlain by clayey sand with a little
gravel, brown, moist, an odor of product
detected at 5'
8 2 SS 18
(Fill)
5 4 3 SS 18
6.0 980.1
ORGANIC LEAN CLAY, black, moist �{� ��
(CL-OL) ;; ,;_,;.
7.5 978.6 6 4 SS 18
To soil
LEAN CLAY with a little gravel, greenish
gray, moist, soft(CL)
(Glacial Till) �0 8 5 SS 18
12.0 974.1
LEAN CLAY with a trace of gravel, brown 12 6 SS 18
mottled with iron oxide staining, moist,firm
(CL)
(Glacial Till)
15 14 7 SS 18
16.0 970.1
End of Boring
0
m
�
0
�
0
Z
�
Q
c�
0
J
a
�
� WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS StOfI( TWlll Clt)/ TeStlllg COrp. STARTED 7/8/09 FINISHED 7/8/09
0
o None 662 Cromwell Ave. oRi��co. Stork TCT DRILL RIG ATV
Z St. Paul, MN 55114
� Telephone: 651-645-3601 DRILLER T. Aldrich ASS'TDRILLER JR
Q
o Fax: 651-659-7348 LOGGED BY KSZ APPROVED MAS
,
Project No. 3106831 LOG OF BOREHOLE NO. B3 Sheet 1 of 1
CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
James L. Patsch Construction, Inc.
SITE 965 Edgewood Hills Road PROJECT
Orono, Minnesota Proposed Addition
SAMPLES TESTS
0
� o } a
� � N j Z w � � ADDITIONAL
U � �� � O W � z w DATA(
a � �Q m w� � p � REMARKS
Q d Q�� � a �� � J-L.L QJ
Surface Elev.: 987.1 ft. Datum: Basement Slab � o m z� z � ?? � o� c��
FILL, 2"of organic lean clay topsoil at the AS 1 UGE 24
surface underlain by clayey sand with a little
gravel and pieces of bituminous, brown,
moist
9 2 SS 18
(Fill)
5 5 3 SS 18
5.5----------------------- 981_6
FILL, lean clay with sand and a little gravel,
gray to brown, moist, with minor organic
inclusions
5 4 SS 18
(Fill)
10.5 976.6
10 12 5 SS 18
SAND with SILT,fine grained, light brown,
moist, medium dense(SP-SM)
12.0 975.1
Coarse Alluvium 12 6 SS 18
LEAN CLAY with SAND and a trace of
gravel, brown, moist, firm(CL)
(Glacial Till)
15 14 7 SS 18
20 15 8 SS 18
0 21.0 966.1
� End of Boring
0
c�
0
Z
z
c�
¢
�
0
J
a
c�
� WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS StOC'I( TWICI Clt�/ T2StIClg COfp. STARTED 7/8/09 FINISHED 7/$/O9
0
o None 662 CCOIIIW@II AV@. DRILL CO. S10fk TCT DRILL RIG /-�TV
Z St. Paul, MN 55114
� Telephone: 651-645-3601 DRILLER T. Aldrich ASS'TDRILLER JR
Q
o Fax: 651-659-7348 LOGGED BY I�SZ APPROVED MAS
�
Project No. 3106831 LOG OF BOREHOLE NO. B4 Sheet 1 of 1
CLIENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
James L. Patsch Construction, Inc.
SITE 965 Edgewood Hills Road PROJECT
Orono, Minnesota Proposed Addition
SAMPLES TESTS
0
� � o } d
� � - W Z w � � ADDITIONAL
U �W �
� � � O� � w W DATA/
a = �Q m w� � o � REMARKS
Q d p>� � a �� � r� a�
Surface Elev.: 992.8 ft. Datum: Basement Slab � o m z� z � z z � o a ��
FILL, 2 1/2"of topsoil at the surface AS 1 UGE 24
underlain by clayey sand with a little gravel,
brown to dark brown, moist
(Fill) 3 2 SS 18
4-5 ---------------------- 988.3
FILL, lean clay with a trace of gravel and 5 4 3 SS 18
pieces of wood, dark brown, moist
(Fill)
�—�----------------------- 985_8
FILL, clayey sand with a little gravel, brown, 6 4 SS 18
moist
(Fill)
10.5 982.3
10 8 5 SS 18
SAND with SILT,fine grained, brown, moist,
loose to medium dense(SP-SM)
(Coarse Alluvium) 15 6 SS 18
14.5 978.3 :
LEAN CLAY with a trace of gravel, brown, �5 11 7 SS 18
moist, firm (CL)
(Glacial Till)
20 13 8 SS 18
0 21.0 971.8
rn End of Boring
0
�
0
Z
�
Q
c�
0
J
a
�
� WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS StOCI( TWlll Clt�/ T@Stlllg COI'p. STARTED 7/8/�9 FINISHED 7/8/�9
0
o None 662 Cromwell Ave. pRi��co. Stork TCT DRILL RIG ATV
Z St. Paul, MN 55114
� Telephone: 651-645-3601 DRILLER T. Aldrich ASS'T DRILLER JR
Q
o Fax: 651-659-7348 LOGGED BY KSZ APPROVED MAS
J
° �� � Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
SYMBOLS AND TERMINOLOGY ON TEST BORING LOGS
SYMBOLS
Drilling and Sampling Laboratory Testing
Symbol Description Svmbol Description
HSA 3-1/4"I.D.hollow stem auger W Water content,%(ASTM:D2216)'*
FA 4",6°or 10"diameter flight auger D Dry density,pcf
HA 2",4"or 6"hand auger LL Liquid limit(ASTM:D4318)
DC 2-1/2",4",5"or 6"steel drive casing PL Plastic limit(ASTM:D4318)
RC Size A, B or N rotary casing
PD Pipe drill or cleanout tube ---Inserts in Last Column(Qu or RQD)---
CS Continuous split barrel sampling
DM Drilling mud Qu Unconfined compressive strength,psf(ASTM:D2166)
JW Jetting water Pq Penetrometer reading,tsf(ASTM:D1558)
SB 2"O.D.split barrel sampling Ts Torvane reading,tsf
L 2-1/2"or 3-1/2"O.D.SB liner sample G Specific gravity(ASTM:D854)
T 2°or 3"thin walled tube sample SL Shrinkage limits(ASTM:D427)
3TP 3"thin walled tube using pitcher sampler OC Organic content—Combustion method(ASTM:D2974)
TO 2"or 3"thin walled tube suing Osterberg sampler SP Swell pressure,tsf(ASTM:D4546)
W Wash sample PS Percent swell under pressure(ASTM:D4546)
B Bag sample FS Free swell,%(ASTM:D4546)
P Test pit sample SS Shrink swell,%(ASTM:D4546)
Q BQ,NQ,or PQ wireline system pH Hydrogen ion content—Meter Method(ASTM:D4972)
X AX, BX,or NX double tube barrel SC Sulfate content,parts/million or mg/I
N Standard penetration test,blows per foot CC Chloride content,parts/million,or mg/I
CR Core recovery,percent C* One dimensional consolidation(ASTM:D2435)
WL Water level Qc* Triaxial compression(ASTM:D2850 and D4767)
� Water level D.S.' Direct shear(ASTM:D3080)
NMR No measurement recorded,primarily due to the K* Coefficient of permeability,cm/sec(ASTM:D2434)
presence of drilling or coring fluid P* Pinhole test(ASTM:D4647)
DH' Double hydrometer(ASTM:D4221)
MA' Particle size analysis(ASTM:D422)
R Laboratory electrical resistivity,ohm-cm(ASTM:G57)
E* Pressuremeter deformation modulus,tsf(ASTM:D4719)
PM* Pressuremeter test(ASTM:D4719)
VS* Field vane shear(ASTM:D2573)
IR' Infiltrometer test(ASTM:D3385)
RQD Rock quality designation,percent
* Results shown on attached data sheet or graph
" ASTM designates American Society for Testing and Materials
TERMINOLOGY
Particle Sizes Soil Layering and Moisture
Tvpe Size Ranqe Term Visual Observation
Boulders > 12" Lamination Up to 1/4"thick stratum
Cobbles 3"—12" Varved Alternating laminations of any combination of
Coarse gravel 3/4"—3" clay,silt,fine sand,or colors
Fine gravel #4 sieve—3/4" Lenses Small pockets of different soils in a soil mass
Coarse sand #4-#10 sieve Stratified Alternating layers of varying materials or colors
Medium sand #10-#40 sieve Layer 1/4"to 12"thick stratum
Fine sand #40-#200 sieve Dry Powdery,no noticeable water
Silt 100%passing#200 sieve and>0.005 mm Moist Damp,below saturation
Clay 100%passing#200 sieve and<0.005 mm Waterbearing Pervious soil below water
Wet Saturated,above liquid limit
Gravel Content Standard Penetration Resistance
Coarse-Grained Soils
Fine-Grained Soils Cohesionless Soils Cohesive Soils
%Gravel Description %Gravel Description N-Value Relative Density N-Value Consistencv
2—15 A little gravel <5 Trace of gravel 0—4 Very loose 0—4 Very soft
16—49 With gravel 5—15 A little gravel 5—10 Loose 5—8 Soft
16—30 With gravel 11—30 Medium dense 9—15 Firm
31—49 Gravelly 31—50 Dense 16—30 Hard
>50 Ve dense >30 Ve hard
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation is an operating united of Stork Materials Technology B.V.,
tw�n c�tv test�nq
�ao„M,o„ Amsterdam,The Netherlands,which is a member of the Stork group
°�� � � -�� �� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES •
Soil Sampling
Soil sampling was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586-08. Using this
procedure, a 2" O.D. split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 pound weight
falling 30". After an initial set of 6", the number of blows required to drive the sampler
an additional 12" is known as the penetration resistance, or N value. The N value is an
index of the relative density of cohesionless soils and the consistency of cohesive soils.
Thin wall tube samples were obtained according to ASTM D 1587-00 where indicated
by the appropriate symbol on the boring logs. Rock core samples, if taken, were
obtained by rotary drilling in accordance with ASTM D 2113-06. Power auger borings, if
performed, were done in general accordance with ASTM D 1452-00.
Soil Classification
As the samples were obtained in the field, they were visually and manually classified by
the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D 2488-06. Representative portions of the
samples were then returned to the laboratory for further examination and for verification
of the field classification. Logs of the borings indicating the depth and identification of
the various strata, the N value, the laboratory test data, water level information and
pertinent information regarding the method of maintaining and advancing the drill holes
are attached. The descriptive terminology and symbols used on the boring logs are
also attached.
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation is an operating united of Stork Materials Technology B.V.,
tw�n citti+test�nq Amsterdam,The Netherlands,which is a member of the Stork group
��«�e„
��;���...::a,.�:....
���°�� � �°-��°� ������ � Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING
The recommendations made in this report have been made based on the subsurface
conditions found in the borings. It is possible that there are soil and water conditions on
site that were not represented by the borings. Consequently, on-site observation during
construction is considered integral to the successful implementation of the
recommendations. We believe that qualified field personnel need to be on site at the
times outlined below to observe the site conditions and effectiveness of the
construction.
We recommend that the completed excavation and prepared subgrade be observed
and tested by a soils engineer/technician prior to fill placement or construction of any
foundation elements. These observations would be necessary to judge if all unsuitable
materials have been removed from within the planned construction area and that an
appropriate degree of lateral oversize has been provided for in those areas where fill will
be placed below the bottom of foundation grade.
We recommend a representative number of field density tests be taken in all engineered
fill placed to aid in judging its suitability. We suggest that at least one density test be
performed for at least every 2500 square feet of engineered fill placed for every 2' of fill
depth. Additional tests should be taken where confined areas are compacted. Any
proposed fill material should be submitted to the laboratory for tests to check
compliance with our recommendations and project specifications.
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation is an operating united of Stork Materials Technology B.V.,
twin citv testinq Amsterdam,The Netherlands,which is a member of the Stork group
��«�,�,
� �
�° � � �� �� � �� Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
PRECAUTIONS FOR EXCAVATING AND REFILLING DURING COLD WEATHER
The winter season in this area presents specific problems for foundation construction.
Soils that are allowed to freeze undergo a moisture volume expansion, resulting in loss of
density. These frost-expanded soils will consolidate upon thawing, causing settlement of
any structure supported on them. To prevent this settlement, frost should not be allowed
to penetrate into the soils below any proposed structure.
Ideally, winter excavation should be limited to areas small enough to be refilled to grade
higher than footing grade on the same day. Typicaliy, these areas should be filled to floor
grade. Trenching back down to unfrozen soils for foundation construction can then be
performed just prior to footing placement. The excavated trenches should be protected
from freezing by means of insulating or heating during foundation construction. Backfilling
of the foundation trenches should be performed immediately after the below-grade
foundation construction is finished. In addition, any interior footings or footings designed
without frost protection should be extended below frost depth, unless adequate
precautions are taken to prevent frost intrusion until the building can be enclosed and
heated.
In many cases, final grade cannot be attained in one day's time, even though small areas
are worked. In the event final grade cannot be attained in one day's time, frost can be
expected to develop overnight. Leaving a layer of loose soil on top of the compacted
material overnight can minimize the depth of frost penetration. However, any frost that
forms in this loose layer, or snow that accumulates, should be completely removed from
the fill area prior to compaction and additional soil placement. Frozen soils or soils
containing frozen material or snow should never be used as fill material.
After the structure has been enclosed, all floor slab areas should be subjected to ample
periods of heating to allow thawing of the soil system. Alternatively, the frozen soil can be
completely removed and be replaced with an engineered fill. The floor slab areas should
be checked at random and representative locations for remnant areas of frost and density
tests should be performed to document fill compaction to slab placement.
Due to the potential problems associated with fill placement during cold weather, a full-
time, on-site soils technician should monitor any filling operations. Full-time monitoring
aids in detecting areas of frozen material, or potential problems with frozen material within
the fill, so the appropriate measures can be taken. The choice of fill material is particularly
important during cold weather, since clean granular fill material can be placed and
compacted more efficiently than silty and clayey soils. In addition, greater magnitudes of
heaving can be expected with freezing of the more frost susceptible silts and clays.
If more specific frost information or cold weather data concerning other construction
materials is required, please contact us.
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation is an operating united of Stork Materials Technology B.V.,
ewu,c�ev eest�nq Amsterdam,The Netherlands,which is a member of the Stork group
����b�
.
._........._..............._.. .......... . .
nF � y�� ���...
Materials Technology Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
PREREQUISITES FOR SOUND ENGINEERING PRACTICE
In order to properly evaluate the foundation soils at a building site, it is imperative for
our firm to know exactly where the building will be placed, its size, and the efevation of
the foundation elements. Without this information, a judgment regarding the adequacy
of the preparatory foundation earthwork is not possible.
This project data is especially critical in situations when the excavation extends below
the footing grade and compacted fill is required to attain building elevations. In these
situations, the excavation would require lateral oversizing to provide suitable lateral
distribution of the footing loads.
Offset batter boards of the building lines stakes provide the best on-site verification of
the building location and size. It must be recognized that Twin City Testing does not
practice in the field of surveying. Therefore, we must rely on staking by others. If Twin
City Testing is required to perform the survey, we will retain a licensed surveyor and
invoice our client for the amount per our current fee schedule. Provision of the building
foundation plans is also important so that we may properly perform our engineering
judgments.
If the construction is redesigned or otherwise moved subsequent to our work, we should
be informed so our firm can assess if additional engineering observation is required or
suggest sound engineering alternatives. We cannot be responsible for any soil
foundation system if the structure has been relocated with respect to the excavation
subsequent to our observations.
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation is an operating united of Stork Materials Technology B.V.,
twin atti+test�nq Amsterdam,The Netherlands,which is a member of the Stork group
��«�e.,
� i
�r_� & :_ . .., ..
°� � �� � Stork Twin City Testing Corporation
Materials Technology
EXCAVATION OVERSIZING
NORMAL EXCAVATION
�,�,����
� E7CCAVA71C�9
` ��MffS
�
C` ._.. .. •;-. .�,,.
_ _ _ r�:
t ���Jr�����
L � Z �
� l /
FOC�l�:G ' '• �, SLCSPE SaTt�FY1NG /
.::.�� ' •, �"''�`:�'-'�'�' D---=------r- QSYfIi �EOUIR.�.ISEI47S
���r'�,". �.. _
.�, �
� �. . .. � . //
e� •. , ..t(s
`,.. . .. } . � /
.. ,cNGiN�RE3.l,FTLt, ; ,i ItN4UtTA6'„z SOIIS
.. .. : a . . . ,� .K.• � ... ,`�•� " /r
�- /
x i -�' �
�"�—�---Fj�----""—""'
ccsM�;";F�,r soi� �
SWAMP OR EXTREMELY SOFT SOIL EXCAVATION
� ti,��,���
EXf�1VAT10�1
U11fiS
' - � ..�.—c.,�-...�.
, �_ "..' '�. .,, .. ''_' :'
.- ""`_
...t' .. . ,. .. . „ . �
�:. .-^-^-^-
S _ ^-�--�
/ /
FOOTING �.., � .. ,-�.- ..�;. � ' � , - ,.*, . ,' SLOPE SnriSF'YlNG
/
. �� �. • . , 5 l+ 2A�.__ OSHP. RE64:REMEN75
�..'������y . ., �.
� '� ` / �
�� ENGInEE�'ED FI�L ..� �.� S+vA�P OEPOSITS 1}R �
EXTREME;.'! Si;FT SOlLS
_ :.i:, _ - _
4y
. � r"----20 �`�}
C4NrFT�:'.JT SU'i..9 f
!
!
NOT TO SCALE
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation is an operating united of Stork Materials Technology B.V.,
tw�n atv teseinq Amsterdam,The Netherlands,which is a member of the Stork group
��.xn„
• ,.
F'•
�i;t'
��/ ��t_'��I��' � �fr'�,����,:
���,� �
Basset Creek Business Center
901 North 3rd Street,#100
Minneapolis, MN 55401
structural 6I2-827-7825 voice
engineers 612-827-0805 fax
Date: September 22,2009
To: James L. Patsch Construction, Inc.
3427 Humboldt Ave. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55408
Attn: Jim Patsch
From: Eric Bunkers
Project: Cusick Residence
965 Edgewood Hills Rd.
Orono, MN
Proj. No: 09268
Subject: Proposed Addition
Dear Jim:
As requested,we designed new foundations and a main floor beam for the above referenced project. We
have designed the new members using a roof and floor dead load of 15 psf,a roof snow load 35 psf, and a
40 psf floor live load in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code. Our work only includes
designing the new foundation and beam as shown at the above reference project and is based on drawings
provided by you.
Attached are 2 framing sheets with annotated framing notes and 2 detail sheets showing the new members
and connections. All framing shall be shored and temporarily braced as required by the contractor and all
minimum nailing shall be in accordance with IRC Table R602.3(1). Lumber shall be minimum#2 SPF with
treated lumber to be#2 S. Pine and engineered lumber to have Fb=2600 psi with E= 1.9. Our calculations
assume all lumber is of good quality and does not have large splits and checks and shall be visually
inspected by the contractor at the time of construction. All fasteners in contact with treated lumber shall be
G185 hot dipped galvanized or equal. Steel wide flanges shall meet ASTM A992 and miscellaneous steel
shall meet ASTM A36.
Concrete used for footings (4"slump) and masonry core grout(8"slump}shall have a 28 day compressive
strength of 3000 psi. The new foundations have been designed as directed by you as a result of your
conversations with Stork Twin City Testing Corp. based on their preliminary soil boring findings. The existing
footings have been assumed to be typical spread footings on good soils that are assumed to be performing
adequately. The contractor shall also verify the condition of structural members and foundations affected by
the remodeling with the engineer as indicated on the attached plans.
When installed as indicated above,the new foundation members and main floor beam shown on the
attached sheets shall support the loads as required in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code.
The risks have been allocated so that Mattson Macdonald Young Inc.'s total liability to the Client shall not
exceed the total amount of twenty five times Mattson Macdonald Young's received payment or one million
dollars whichever is less. If you have any questions or concerns,please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Mattson Macdonald Young, Inc.
�
Eric M. Bunkers, P.E.
MN Reg.Num.26490 I hereby cerdfy that this plan,specification,or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the state of Minnesota.
G—�—
Eric M.Bunkers
Date:September 22,2009 Reg.No.26490
u;,-:- ,
_ --- _ __ _ _. _ _.. �__.._. .,---- - - ... _... . �- -- . � . ___ __ _ _. _
�.
.�,/
MattsonMacdonpldYoung project � (� r�, E: F{��-�.�a- �{���`�� r _�
structural engineers /
Bassett Creek Business Center Description � lJ � ��-'�-_ ,���� � �_
901 North 3rd Street,Suite 100
Minneapolis,MN 55401 �Ofie �—'Z.� "�� Project No. (�� Z(,��
612-827-7825 voice
612-827-0805 fax 8y � ` '�`` , Sheet �
( C� � `� Grnv
�l2 7c, (Z�� r� � Q o�'t:S
�� � _ , hj.�v�/
` � Z � �-'--o Q � Cz ',�� i' ; ` � , . st_._f�E�
�
,
1nlPcS�c�IZs r It� �1�= �' So(!— GoR-RFG1'lol�
t i i �`j i �'
t � ' 2 C � p C V�'�`7
; W� -��
��: ��C, c�Yr�p.
;;� � � �}—�-.-�` e� C � P��J�.C�
�
�-- ,� , � l�
��-���
�-
� 2 -�3 �T� �-�-� Ps
, �m , ° a L. ��, P ���—
�
c ��� ��2 -�-�"
�
� , ,� ' - 1��tz-�� �
� �z CL(Z �� � � l( �.��/`�F�.
fkT S 1D�5 ,
� ToP 3 -�� �
.�-- N���.GR L �'t�t�. �"��� G o r�'T I r� Q
� �- ��� ��-�lN�.� .� �1� l �
I
, �s
, ` `„F C`, �, �
� , D k ,
o� ' 'R�,�' o >` �' G� a i
�, �� �a�,��'e�� �� T� 0 �`�-n, - I
�,� � � , � �� � ,:� o � ' , , , �
J
�,Q �y `��'�C Z O � C, O 0 E' � n !�r ` �. . . ` T � � '��' 7
�- (�' •�, Z' 3 `�4- Q T �
R D Z- pCG A Q � G �� C��' � -��t� " , _, �� � ,.
' � • 'P O �t`"" F- �, _ ,,� Q -
`" ; � c �--- ,,et — �
� p C:�. 4 J �u���5' // �R' � / �� \�\
,� , . / �� � s"R \ \\ ���\ � i
_�1 `�� � N T� ��
£Z �., J ' �� � � � K x �
. �
�
-.' . 'J ,��\t. \ `'. , . \ �' � � �
� ! • �,�>.� ,- - - \ � \ q� _ �
`g_,�v ��� , �._{ & ��: � .��� �, q ''-L X
' - a "' �' �b`- � a- N � -
- �ti � - �_' r � ` �' y�� � �� ��� ;p �� N
�— h y"���� ,�,.,,�" i � �9, �'`� - f ,
cn ,— —' �' � ' �v ,i ����� �� v�j n� _
� r � � ��� ' �� -. r�`� � � �'�^3 � " \ � � o
�r '(��? ` Z
'n � '/��/// . �\\•-;�a,l �i- , � -+��:� -" \ `' Ip ^ .
a,o �, '� ; \;. ,. � �� � avG -+ �
�I �'p��� " '= � � g fi V.i� �ay� � � � / �, �= ' �
_� \R.\ � �n �� \��'\ %`�� � Eg � b
� � �V1�' '- 3 . % 1' � /
� _i �� \ �� - - i , i�i -
�3 � ���� �� � � -T, - g°� ��t ��� � ,F,, : _ , _-
� .� =r. ���:, �y..'• ,, , r
� � � . _ -; � � � ��, ,�- ,-
R , � - �.
�\ �_—_T—�' ��i__ _���_�-� ,
\ �.\ � . I'�`I . � i� .I�yc-��12'3 Y ..��`
� . . ..��„'____'_.viJuu_ L�_ �
�bC��� � �..��: .-� '— ' — —,�.1_� �gv} .
�<{� � �,. iv 1
��j'� � � � s
�k
m
I��i I ( �, ,vi II
�,rl, � � ,, � �
i�� � ; � ,.' , `_ ;
i'�i ? ^i_ �� ' ° =r � � �� �
i i � � 1�. g �T' i i
ti i "i �. � f �' i �" i i �'''`� 1
�
� i i R �" � �s-� � � ~ i i �
i i �' x � � _:,; �� i i ���
ii
i, i � -(� � �. i i i , �
i'� i --�i A - i i "
i� i �, ��,� i � i � � � `� ' � N
iKi i: i � �
if�i i 'i ,;;t. ` ` _ "
, �.
, � . -
i i �� i��i C� ,� � i �
i �---,-------------..�i •�� ' :: i i ` ;
- v� :�_ i i
•--------- � I,�
i_ i i � , i -� o
i i i -� �--, i !
- �(� i i a � i� i x �
i�i i �, i i
i i i -� i--_J
i -- ----- -s- i �
---"- �� i i
,ra—� � I I �
� - - � � I
i -- � , ,
i � '
o i ,� ,'
, i i �
" , i i �
, i i i �->
i i i
. � I I I � �
� j I I I
' I I I
I I I �
» ' I I I
�
� ' ��,�v—[i,"w4___�i,C�_�-M7S.cty�:X��z"2�-. — I
- ��'�.. 789 �-15'8 —123 4'
678 '_'._.'—_ .
tl _ I
� I
� J. I
!
° �5,: O #
— � 3 W ^ _ � '
� a € �#' _ j A� �, .
= kS G n j0 m -�(� '
_ _ :<_ = a ��� �£- ..
Sc�s= _- �� � N = o I
e�{g=,-' � 6^'r .
s:_ �n _
D "_'">; "' �O O � �...a _.
O I 'aFjes. �n �n lip�
— R�� ��� � �
�:AR'n'.b=,G �� �` .
.
_� ,____�-.v -- - _:.-__- - - � -
- --_ ___ _,,_� _ _�-- �
; C�,-�- ����G�LS onl PoS� '
�\ �� r� . �2�
j � �� Xltv x1.Z GoN�. PIE(�
�y P��f��.- C A�P �� Z -*�4 fz�-e>� � � , ,
, ,
G�.t� �� �a . wr�y �'flP � � ..�
� g � � � ; y' . -
��P�Nn.S� 6Et_ow s�.�B. 6 i�
s�� 5 ; ,� 24 � �p�� �
32 20 �- �
�i s�G't-!O� "-a!w,�,° ' ' � Z- #� 4 (�f
,
M °`� '�t�r �\ � � 5 otL4 w�r4
,
6 ' ��� / ' , N FTG. ELE
5 w ,, �.n. Cd�;,. .� \ a �
9 - , C �
�i" Fielca�Fkn � �
� si�qc �� /Y � ' p
owe�FNo
\ �-3 �. \�� r�ns. ,,,,
�� '�' — -----
� � ,,, rn d�s �
\ � �- ------
� ��/ �,-'�' /t�. 1a:. \\ — I ,,
� I '
- �- �v�-t�y �x
��/ /'s� � '�_, �` i �TG� zq." �
s
� ��'� � � i 8" o�-P.
, � ,
" � � o�-- ' • �' �, I I s:�.:���
,, � � � ,,-2� , , � _I ^ ��
, ,. , ��
�� s+�°` ,- �
� � � ����5� ,- Z 6 T�.roow�w�, \ �1
� `� � �' � �` 'J �
.a s�
� \\ `K ` ' 61n �nuMeRoor v� / — �` ' 9 �I� �
t N �� �,
.. /��,v �' `, / �w� , � ��E'` ��--S ' `° �, i �', — '
(� �� ..� ,� - \ � (�. � Q�,- � �v � I I��
� ��i�'' `L, � � �\ .. �o� �,,, p S ���t�� i
.
. � , � � a �l � � , BATH
,
C�°` �� � s� `� ,� ���-� � �S __ i
. I
. �'���`'��o,�• �,- G �,� ✓� :;: . . . .
, �. �,
0"3 'C` , \ Q �/ � � _�__
Q � , � -- ��"�- Y�-=�•,n�=-a'� - �':
S� - ` �� � :=Mb��;,�°�,� �,f pd+�P
-� \ � �
` -, -� � �\ � ,����'- ���D�-c�� �S'�• �" p2��t �
� ,
"� ���.�o � � ,��_-, :<ct� �- �P`� PowE.L
v� �%`�`:�1, Cm.FY a[3a:n,Locafbn
�d\
.. G,�J �o�- - "�*'�` � N�3T�;
� ��' �� �, . ._-=..�- $
� �QQ"' �!A.�..O �`�Sa�� \\\ \�` ��'C,S T� FT J� GARAGE W�l_L wI
K
i �'�-�S �v3�p. �� \ V�'fZ�F� t
� V�t,�p o�.t�✓ � `� �,C„`� � 1 ro v.l x, 8
YL�� � � � �_ �'� �� �
., G v
� � �,� �� P���� _� � \�� \��
� � a �
�
2K ,� � �Ci' �' �'�� w ��Jp�J� \� \��j-�• oiJ ' ��-----------
� ��� s�i+\�r Q,7 -�j• O c7'• '(�
dr �� .� o o�S �� � � J P ,- , -----------
�S Gi .,rG� �� � ,-' ,-� z3��—
���(/�'/ o o-g'' ,�y� �� , � .� ��
IQ� �L�Q. � ��� ��
i� �o� Zo
,
I
I O� ;`f i :_ �, �o� ,
� n'1 l�1 r�1 �'L (Z-
',; A�1.0 EZ(�SM�i�CT �' �Np , Scale:1/8"=1'-D" _ . .
:� �Lp��
;i l i=,: ��
� CUSICK RESIDENCE
, �� �� wl 3 _ `�4"X�'� �� e��c.
� L,c,4c...S C�+. ItA��o..c. �ro �A�� S'N.t�
GARAGE
���`'( � EXTG 2"x 4" WALL � � ' � ���''
' I ut� �.-,1 W��1N��-R.
, I
j h � Ml
," —_.��� _ _ _. . . � � ,. .�-'; T j r-,1`.�. d,t__' t..— —. i'1 �. ��. .
._.—. .._ _ '• L _ � . .
��� � 2 C. 6" CONC BLK CONC FLR
/ ; ,
,
;
NEW FLR
3/4" PLY
12" !-JSTS
LVL RIM � EXTG B�ND BM
' ; _.-r � , .t ,, �== �;�`
}.` : `:�L.�,f/� L Q 4�Ft- 1 N S 7t1 LL�
_� _,: , - , : : : '�^s 5 T�t�L Z — �-4 iZ-�t��.
� Nv�" .F'T �, :> :. .:_ �}c�WVLS t�S+oTI-! W P�� 5 �
-� � aY AT�- �, . - - - -
��
U N EXCAVATE D
GRADE � , � �'!�
'��._ .
- � `='� ',`�� :
' �� {�+ �-.
i =;<� �:. �--=�; y_.�+\ ` �__, � 11 C. 12" CONC BLK
r�E_�;� ��. �.. �. `�.
� � 1/ ^-`�-
� � ; , :, � :.
� ' /
t� (..�r-.��- - 51�E=, --• ,-
T � G' '`C"O '�,., . l�C���`�
-- � -,.,��L,�.- .µ,��� c.� �
- ,�--: ��- ��s-r���
� ` _ ,.� �Y L f1- S �T 1 L�- "' B AcGk.
20"x 8" t,�/ /a, °o o (�
�..E-��1��� L.of�-�
r�-.,,1 � i o�,1 p
SECTI�N : EXTC GARAGE FDN
SGALE: 1 /2"=1 '-0"
--_-- _ .�.
- --__ _-
___ --
� .
�... =_---
�-"- --- — POS� 56'S 4�
��L 1.G1�C l,S o n1 .� 2a� �
�r
.lZ'� Go,��, P�F-!�
� -�4 r��e�A� �
► ��� � � �
. �
.FrB. 3 l� DECK `��t.w-' �.
24��x I o F-r�• �I ,-,
66 _
� p Z- �$ q.- (2.�A�E� 01�1 C7'�°�--
�-��,e , _ , \ ��, � 5 0�L4. rh pr�rc�4 �x�s�r. i _ i
�'" � " FTG. E�-EVATion15--- i� � - �
_�
�;
,��.� �� ��� - ----� �
'' � G � � , i �-- -
FkMeal Pkrs ' / / \ \
\ �
� SLC�20K � ��\� O RID � / � —_—___
'j, \ 1 �T�stIKK rw —_----- � \ .__`_—
� � � —__`._—_. � _—
� �i \
, � \ �.
fj/ \
�` �L- \ - C-' v+�-t'�"� �x cs�-
' � C
� - � c � FTG. �" `^�`� 1 _ _ FAMILY
� , � �'� i � $�� ��• L�pG�Cz `�
I
-r��nv
n o�'.'" �` `, � � �`\�� — �� L�X tSY. S7""ps ;
�� -'"Z,.C� , ���'-�_� y � �,R �o�s-r
� , ' � � w�+ea w� � �� � v P P o P-'�� V„y��. . _ .._ I
° " � t� ` ',� `�� 3 _ `/q,n s�" yF-pG��R.
,c�„F„o o , �� � ,
� , N i�
� , ����, s,\�5� � �`` i l;� ��" ' ` ���lk S,r-�, ,�,
�G �� o, S ���t I�
� �,I sn�rf+
=����'��S � 1� � �1 �, - ------
�� � � �".--�y- ��r�'�.�'��s.�s,�°�'�;,-��?�'�'�'s.�i�����'
,,. ��
��'' �=�'��_ =`��-�t��=-=�'��-�_�`- ;�� `. k _- `.. ,--
� �
� p
�� � , ��,,�,�a:. Pc�' � ,,� �.b{<.:- .s, �,f:L-�-'c�, �-'t'F�-p�'�.
� i " a 3��, '� '+ E � _
�Y� G � /� ..,.�.
� i� � .<`�, F�.n ��t_`• D(Z\LL �'( E�aXY , �1 ' C � - �-
' S � " ..�I - t� � >
� � •�, ��` pow�i- �-4 7.214
�� R �-� ' �.D �-,''`�_ _I I - -- - -� 4'�
�-'i��'J�t ��`_ �-CoroFl�dBumi.acdfon� ��g►�{� Lr Z�N�`L�!" � �
�iE1i����'?,�
�,�',�"` � 1 N T-c E K.�S'r, F nti D.� �' '� ' �s�h��'�'--
\ \ , `' �/ �.(� J 4'�� �" ' { �li I I `------ -
\ \ ,�!'��S T. �� �� GARAGE L�L W� 11 ,
�� ; I I
� �\ \ \�\ v��\��� �� ��I� I I
�O \ � 6 7c. a ��.� �< � �
� �� � � ���y i � I
'�' � \ � 't=�=�y<, ir '._ - , a ��i I ,I
�, � � '. ' �,,.,_ i '�. . 1� I I �
' �-• \ \ � I h�
�/�DeJp \ - ., ------� - - —, — _ __ -- -- - --
\ _ '� -� � `- �`� � ,�I
� � �L! � � 4� ' � uc�`�__.iB��Y'�'J�''z'���kc��.����"�'=�=-—� r
\�5• � � � P��� � �'�"==------------- �____$,6 �.I 2r—
' ``'` �' 23'7 —'
S ..<G�` �� ����-�-:�� � ss�
� � �
�
� / 1 - - -
. �� / ./ :., � o"� � �. _ _.'� . .. ..-_. � _.
Zo `` ���s �.� �,.x, f ST� ��'�3p, W A-L� _
� �,r (�,, -��-r�P , � � �"t�-�'`I�'t'`t�-rJ`t' 5 v �-' t' ;';��_.k
�T , _; .,'., , ,�, . : :L_
� _-.. �' �G� �V�-N L�( _ . • . �_
� �. X 1 ST , E'l 1...h'S"T�°:..
1�-��� v�L� L`-�r ' - a z �• 6,
Jp 5cale:1/S"- �,pOOfa`b5, s�-� - .
,
_- �:� t��'�LL_ - ---_____�,
� __ .... .��.__� ___-._ -T„_ ..�__�__.__�. __?__ _._ _.�T.�..____..._..___----�_____�;
�
JOISTS JOISTS
FULL HT. ff WIDTH
BLOGKS BOLTED
HAN6ER5 TD WEB W/3/S" � HAN6ER5
FLUSH LVL THRU BOLTS FLUSH STEEL
BEAM � 32" O.G. BEAM.
JOISTS, LAP, J015T5, LAP,
6LUEINAI L. GLUE/NA I L.
,, •,
� �
� �
� �
., �,
TOE-NA1 L
BEAM TO
JOISTS. ��8 x 2
SGREWS 8 DROPPED STEEL
DROPPED GWE. BEAM.
BEf�M
STEEL BEAM, 3/16" WEB
SEE PLAN. STIFFENERS
.
2 - I/2" x4"
LA65 I NTO
POST.
POST, SEE I HEREBY GERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS
PLAN. PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIREGT
SUPER�lISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
LIGENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNE50TA.
�
Eric M. Bunkers
DATE: 03I20/09 REG. NO: 26490
Mattson Macdonald Young ���. "�.
structurai engineers Date o3i2o�oq
Drawn By DLH
Basset Creek Busfness CeMer ��
901North3rdStreet,Sufte100 Framing Se�tions and Detaiis
Minneapotis,MN 55401
612$27-7825 votce
612.827-0805 fax
� , ,
. ; • .
1 .
emo
To: Finance Department ��
From: Christine Mattson, Planning Assistan���'� ��
�
CC: Zoning Application File
Date: 10/21/2010
Re: Building Permit Escrow Refund
Building Permit application 2009-00635 pertaining to 965 Edgewood Hills Road is complete.
I verified there are no open inspections on this application. The applicant, Tom Cusick, has
requested a refund of the application escrow.
The following is attached:
• Escrow Refund Request
• Email from Bonestroo indicating no unbilled WIP on this project
• Email from Campbell Knutson indicating no unbilled WIP on this project
• Original signed escrow agreements
• Copy of cash register receipt showing escrow amounts received
w:�street files\edgewood hills road\965\escrow refund memo.doc
Christine Mattson
From: Sherry Charboneau [SCharboneau@ck-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 9:56 AM
To: Christine Mattson
Subject: RE: Unbilled WIP
Chris:
We have no unbilled WIP for any of the files listed below.
Sherry
From: Christine Mattson �mailto:CMattsonCa�ci.orono.mn.us]
Sent: Wednesday, October Z0, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Sherry Charboneau; 'Amundsen, Darren T
Subject: Unbilled WIP
Hello,
Can you tell me if you have any unbilled WIP for any of the following:
965 Edgwood Hill Road Building Permit#2008-00635
200 Bederwood Building Permit#2009-00513
1985 Fagerness Pt Rd Zoning Application 10-3482
2933 Casco Point Road Building Permit#2009-00223
Building Permit#2009-00381
4725 North Shore Drive Zoning Application 10-3477
Thanks!
Christine Mattson
Planning Assistant
City of Orono
2750 Kelly Parkway ; Orono MN :; 55356(physica/addressJ
PO Box 66 ; Crystal Bay ; MN '. 55323-0066 (moiling addressJ
� 952.249.4620 6 952.249.4616
� cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us ; ; www.ci.orono.mn.us
Office Hours: Monday- Friday 8:00 am to 4:30 pm
OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED:
Thursday, November 11,2010 (Veterans Day)
1
Christine Mattson
From: Amundsen, Darren T[Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 7:56 AM
To: Christine Mattson
Subject: RE: Unbilled WIP
Darren Amundsen, PE
Associate
Direct651-604-4894
Cell 651-775-5623
darren.amundsenC�bonestroo.com
�°Sa�estruo
__
Visit the new Bonestroo.corn to sign-up for SourceONE,
our upcoming newsleiter.
From: Christine Mattson [mailto:CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us]
Sent: Wednesday, October Z0, 2010 8:04 AM
To: 'Sherry Charboneau'; Amundsen, Darren T
Subject: Unbilled WIP
Hello,
Can you tell me if you have any unbilled WIP for any of the following:
965 Edgwood Hill Road Buitding Permit#2008-00635 none
200 Bederwood Building Permit#2009-00513 none, but record plan review?
1985 Fagerness Pt Rd Zoning Application 10-3482 yes, the review letter just went out last week.
2933 Casco Point Road Building Permit#2009-00223 none
Building Permit#2009-00381 none
4725 North Shore Drive Zoning Application 10-3477 none
Thanks!
G.�.a-f bi.e, M.a.F f�aan,
Planning Assistant
City of Orono
2750 Kelly Parkway ; Orono MN ' S5356 (physica/addressJ
PO Box 66 ; Crystal Bay : MN 55323-0066 (mailing addressJ
`�' 952.249.4620 � 952.249.4616
� cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us ; � www.ci.orono.mn.us
Office Hours: Monday - Friday 8:00 am to 4:30 pm
i
Christine Mattson
From: tom cusick (thomascusick@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:22 AM
To: Christine Mattson
Subject: building permit escrow agreement
Dear Ms Mattson,
I am requesting the return of my $2,500.0o escrow deposit. Orono building permit32008-00635 dated September 30,
2009 was for construction activities at my home, address being 965 Edgewoodhill Road, Orono Mn. 55391. All
construction has now been completed.
Thank you for your assisstance in this matter.
Thomas A. Cusick
612-868-0999
1
BUILDING PERMIT ESCROW AGREEMENT
Orono Buiiding Permit#2009-00635
AGREEMENT made this�(jE� day of f/�lF.«r9i�2 , 200�, by and between the CITY OF ORONO,
a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Thomas Cusick ("Owner").
Recitals
1. Building permit applications have been filed for a an addition to the existing home located at
965 Edqewood Hills Rd the ("Subject Property"), legally described as Tract B Registered Land Survey No. 1098
files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County Minnesota.
2. Owner requests the City to review this application.
3. The City will commence its review of the application and incur costs associated with said review
only if the Owner establishes an escrow to ensure reimbursement to the City of its costs.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. DEPOSIT OF ESCROW FUNDS. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow
Agreement, the Owner shall deposit $2,500 with the City. All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to
reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account.
2. PURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City
for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred (including planning, engineering, in excess of $500, or legal
consultant review) or will incur in reviewing the plan. Eligible expenses shall be consistent with expenses the
Owner would be responsible for under a building permit application. The escrow will also guarantee
reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred to assure that the work is completed in
accordance with the Stormwater Poflution Prevention Plan and the provisions of Orono City Code Chapter 79.
The financiaf security may also be used by the City to eliminate any hazardous conditions associated with the
work and to repair any damage to public property or infrastructure that is caused by the work (including planning,
engineering, or legal consultant review) associated with building permit #2009-00635 if compliance with the
approved building permit is not accomplished.
3. MONTHLY BILLING. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs, the City will in turn
send a bitl to the Owner. Owner shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the Owner's receipt
of bill.
4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. In the event that the Owner does not make
payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in #3 above, the City may draw from the escrow account without
further approval of the Owner to reimburse the City for Eligible expenses the City has incurred. The City shall
notify the Owner the Owner of such draw and the nature of the expense for which the reimbursement is being
made. If the Escrow amount falls below 75% of the original escrow amount the Owner shall deposit additional
sums as directed by the City, or the City shall discontinue review and post a Stop Work Order.
4. CL.OSING ESCROW. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the
Owner when the review has been completed and written notification is received from the Owner requesting the
funds.
5. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARGES. If the project is abandoned by Owner, or if the eligible expenses
incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid balance to the
supject-pro�erty pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§415.01 and 366.012.
CITY: CI'('Y F O OWNER:
' �/ � �
BY: ___.�-�_�___----� By. /
C �- f��,
Its: ^C � "-�-"" gy: ����C-'t.c..e� �J�.-���c
Internal Use Only: G Original to Finance Department �Copy to Street Fite
C:ii.f ;_l'i lil''r:,��:
. �'M�' ';:�' �sd7'1t�i�t�! ��.
i,.st� i%�n� i- �
Uf,-,u,;1 !'!'h� �i4:t.��• '�{}r..�l.;��_l;,v,1" �
, ���.�#fi.j.�t, �4fai .:ln�•.c ;��' ;N71 ^ ' n �
., ."` r �.F� i.'�J�j? .
�, �i7�:3i3>74 i;:t3C`:; �
I
�
�;F:.•�1 i't t�
, �� !^ir. i.�t_:'',L� �:��l.�; 4sj ^`t(;,��1 �;�
', . 4i.!�..,.:_C.`-:�;,� ' .
jfc+<f.;r...k� , ::._;:t'vF i�u�,` lic,;�?::,.
, T+���s?:. �_..___.-`",'; i,'';
� .y.,,,., �--�--�--____c. ��:,I
?iz .:�;
�
�. l�ii���_'h t�'F.)� 3:j�1.� •..J�'r��4Ji3
r
'�Y?;JF�"� ..
�r+.FHid� y"1�^.1� I
..:r?? P�f1�F�•'rnii.. - 'r�� ii('; �.
� ._,.`t�. ....
t .(l.ni�ii7?S fE`yjl�ai:�Lio .. ....______."r,�J
< .
:;�:.r�:_3=,;i;`-,' ;f';m;�;;}�.1�;
�
u
i
�./ � `'- � ' D TE �,/� TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN 'U ���C/y
INSPECTION NQ,� � = U/,'��CHEDULED G� ��• ��
PERMIT NO.������� D �'��COMPLETED
ADDRESS �' S �� �-�d� L
OWNER CONTR. �e-vv
TELEPHONE N0. — l— I D �J��J oZ�
/
� DESCRIPTION ��7�
��OOTING � MECHANICAL RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
Q �❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
y ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE
Q ❑ TREE REMOVAL
Z ❑ WALL BD. ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ SITE INSPECTION
Q ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS
� ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ COMPIAINT
Q ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ FOLLOW-UP
_ ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL
v ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
� COMMENTS:
�
W
a
�
�
O
�
�
� � � �� f .� ��J
�
W
� �; -� . 5G�� �
Q
�
z
� �it �', �� � Q � .�.�S� �'/�J S-F�lrl ts-f-- �, t E�
�
j
d
W��VORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C! PROJECT COMPLETE
W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED = ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
� ❑CORRECT WORK,CALI FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT
❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. � pHOTOTAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑ CITATION ISSUED
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call forthe next inspection 24 ours in advance. (952� 249-4600
OwnerlContractor on site:
Inspector.
White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice
� TE TIME
V
CITY OF ORONO � CALLED IN !�
INSPECTION NOTI E 3� SCHEDULED �Zo���� /O:O O
PERMIT NO. �d COMPLETED
ADDRESS �G��S 4�L 1��� ��
OWNER CONTR.��4 �S� C�'�'
TELEPHONE N0. �P�z 3�� `7��Z-'
r
� DESCRIPTION � GZ���Pi'
� ❑ FOOTING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FIL�ING
Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
y ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ TREE REMOVAL
� WALL BD. ❑ WATER HOOK-UP
Z ❑ ❑ SITE INSPECTION
Q ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS
� ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ COMPLAINT
J ❑ DEMO-FINA� ❑ SEPTIC INSTAI.L. ❑ FOLLOW-UP
Q
� ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL
J ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
Z OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
� COMMENTS:
�
W
C
� ' /� ��"1 I� ► � � � /-�� �
0
o I�la .� Q! �; 11 - r/U
� S �," S < � s S�al
W
�
Q
�
Z
W
�
W
�
�
d
W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED [� PROJECTCOMPLETE
W �CP�,ORRECT WORK&PROCEED '� ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
� CJ C�RRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT
❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITNIN HOURS. �, pH0T0 TAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL RETURN
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR � CITATION ISSUED
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. �952� 2Q9-46��
OwnerlContractor on site: '
Inspector. � �
White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice
�,- `"""�� �� /� /9T�j/� TIME �
J �
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN
INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED � D�` I�� � �7-�
PERMIT NO. :�<(���I�" � �'� � COMPLETED
ADDRESS t � ' � � ��' c -�' y�`-'�.-.� ' ,�
OWNER CONTR����'�PS ���`'C�
TELEPHONE NO. r'' �� �� �' `— � � I� �Sf-
� DESCRIPTION �l Ya--u--�� �� ��tC1d f
� ❑ FOOTING � MECHANICAL RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
y ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FiREPLACE
❑ TREE REMOVAL
Z ❑ WALL BD. ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ SITE INSPECTION
Q ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS
� ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ COMPLAINT
Q ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ FOLLOW-UP
_ ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL
J ❑ PIUMBING FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNER/CONTRACTOH TO MEET YOU:�YES_NO
� COMMENTS:
�
W
C
�
�
O
a
�
O
�
W
�
Q
�
Z
W
�
W
�
j
O
W��NORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED C i PROJECTCOMPLETE
W��O CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
O ❑ CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT
❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. C PHOTOTAKEN
�NSPECTOR WILL RETURN
�f7 CITATION ISSUED
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR
C; INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. �95Z� Z49-460�
OwnerlContractor on sit
Inspector. � ��� �
White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice
�, f � �/
�.�� ATE TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN `� ���
INSPECTION NOTICE scHEou�Eo �� � __, /�
PERMIT NC�� �, ��i'�;� COMPLETED
�
ADDRESS ao� � � `� �� c , � �i .S
OWNER TELEPHONE NO. �� ��d .����
CONTRACTOR ('����� ` �n 6�
�: DESCRIPTION ��j J�-/� F/YYY��
�
� ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORFJWETLANDS
y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL
Q ❑ TREE REMOVAL
Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION
Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS
� ❑ FINAL O SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT
� ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP
_ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL
v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ S � IC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YO�1� YES_NO
� COMMENTS:
�
W
a
o � i�c�K.�_ � r� -�-e � �� �'�t`�...����C�
� :�n_ �v IU L-f Q �� rOv�
0
�
W
�
Q
� � �"/�- ( - � � .
Z
w
�
W
�
�
d
� ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ROJECT COMPLETE
W '' CORRECT WORK&PROCEED r IS E CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
Q ❑CARRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
� BEFORECOVERING
PERMANENT
❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. � pHOTOTAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL RETURN
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALLTO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. �952� 249-46QQ
OwnerlContractor on si :
Inspector. i
White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice