The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotice of Decision - MN wetland conservation act ��` ' Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act � �� ,r�,r,,�; Notice of Decision �� Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka, MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Karen Pugh 701 Dickey Lake Drive Application Number 5/17/2016 V1'16-24 � Attach site locator map Type of Decision: � Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan � Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recomm� ❑ Approve ❑ Approve with ❑ Deny Summary(or attacl�): 2 - � x,, Date of Decision: 6/1 s, � ` � roved \ � App v � ❑ Denied � t� LGU Findings and Conclusions � � Karen Pugh applied for a wetla. ..�ds located at 701 Dickey Lake Drive (PID 34i .apin County, Minnesota. Legal description: Sect. �J. The boundary & type approval was requested May 17t�', 2� � A wetland delineation was conducted by _�nmental on April ]9`�', 2016. A coinplete delineation report and WCA app. cre submitted to MCWD on May 17t�', 2016. Four wetlands were identified and del� ..�ed. Wetland 1 was identified as a Type 2, Fresh Wet Meadow wetland. Wetland 2 was identified as a Type 1, Seasonally Flooded Basin. Wetland 3 was identified as a Type ], Seasonally Flooded Basin. Wetland 4 was identified as a Type 1, Seasonally Flooded Basin. MCWD reviewed tlle boundaries in the field on May 23`d, 2016. Wetland ] was revised to be a Type 6, Shrub Swamp. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as delineated in the field and documented in the delineation report ai�d updated in the Notice of Decision. This decision is valid for five years. A future project located on this property rnay require a pennit from the MCWD. BWSR Fornis 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 r , For Replacement Plans usin�credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved far ��°� �,,.� Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest � .O1 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑ Financial Assurance:For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to tl�e LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" farms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this co�npleted form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon rec�uest. Name Title Rachel Workin Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail ,� � � = 6/13/2016 (952) 641-4518 � rworkin@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities befare commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if wark authorized by this decision is started befare the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible far restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid far three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition far appeal,including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: � Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and $0 fee(if applicable)to: Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Directar 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka, MN 55345 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 BWSR Fonns 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES � SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski—stacey.lijewski@hennepin.us � BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer—ben.me,yer@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): � DNR TEP Becky Horton- becky.horton@state.mn.us � DNR Regional Office(if different than DNR TEP member): Leslie Parris - leslie.parris@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO (if applicable): � Applicant (notice only) and Landowner(if different): Karen Pugh- karenp@nspack.com � Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): Ben Carlson- ben@kjolhaugenv.com; Christine Mattson- cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us; Wes Boll-wboll@wenck.com � Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Melissa Jenny— melissa.m.j enn,y@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: ��.b��sr.state.mii.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: w��w.bwsr.state.nm.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TFP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Re�ion: Southen�Reeion: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Reg. Em�. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E.Iiwy. 2 Div. Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 Soutl� NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm, MN 56073 Bemidji, MN 56601 55744 St. Paul,MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr re<�ions.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/re�ulatorv/default.asp?pa�eid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator�nap, list any other attachments: � Approved wetland boundaries ❑ ❑ BWSR Fornis 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 . - • r �� '�, 1� � � , � ,� � � g„��` F . � � , , a ... j� .. �.. x{ ,� !I r,�..�1�'a'"Y r k.'~ � ;?t+ p � �'"w r^ar � �y,�'�. �T' , �.y` : �'w1�,t�.� -O�� ,� R t �� ' ,! +�� r � 4�' . 4 �i ` y� "" . ,` �,.: +,� 4�"�,,, '.� '*� �- �" ,�' �„ , «� ' " �" J s �i-t *µ .� � I P ,�O/ �t ,A' ' �° � � � '"» . � , ,. � -� .r . . � . . �T � . �, ' r �p ,� - '} `� s. :� �. .� �1p_ ��' �, 1�1,�Rr� '�'� �. ,.. �+�dn r ',d�� h .� ' '� � �,` �~��' ��. , _ .." „ . . � �f'r�� . '� ;*�,�.r�`+� ��"o �, 10 20,`� �� "�,,,,� �i�� ,g.��,. «. .^i «�.�"'�� ,I�r a�• � � '�'�iY-i,,��.'�� .s�, ��,,�y„,' ,y � "� ,1►;y��,;i;:� "-• . .� �j , �•� ^' O �" ��'. _,��..+� r � @«,�,y4t,• ��",�w. �,yi.��, a+ a M�� 4+r' w�„�,kJ �� I�� ,F;'. � N a � ..�1"' + � �� + �� /*�'�� ' , � , ' � 6 ��+�., .M, ��. '� ��.w*T�� 4A�� x� r, a. � � l�c. �. �r1'- � �: � �,. ,�xri . ' • , � } � �" .�� %�'^• �A .... � y..� � �� M'�1.,.�� 'T�O..�� ., ��'�� ...� �31M;•.�..'� � ��' ."�1E�. P �V.�.. '��4 . 1f. � ��♦�. � F � . , � �� *� x:.-0. ��.�+"� . ,; �, � �.1 : '� •�` ,s��. ,Y" "� <,,,• �1 � . , ,, .. ,�! R� � � ,� .. L ' . s. � ' �". . a ,d'�'*�S^'" dM r 4." +�',�'ye �w,. "� ;� �: � r, -;�" .�. < .�. �1µ:.,, .y�i. Yr s.�., . .,-. �'""P`+� ,..n., ,��n�y O •'�,' + � r ,. , , • . k � .� .. " - r t.Y';�;"'�.,'°3t.. i� ,� 7 1,. .,�.,� �- �� .Y` �,''�!�: �,: s,.. 'x� t ,Y, -„r��. .�.. sr�,�s; .�a�,1. a .�, , ,t . ..O . . . . , s y ' . T -0` ' . � !7�'� �y,..:n a ."� �„�g��` , ,+�" r.` 't+� , Ory rs,,r M��;�r � �� Q." . "� ,,y ^..a�� - yr .�*��`+ ,'�.. t �� ti � '� �r^k' ,�a� + �af �� r � j:, �` �ed� " � .� , t' >�� ^WL3 ;: �,�:. �z'F�p .., �` ' ,. ^ �_„ , . . �� ... �v�,,� .« t�:r. '' �� .. S� ..J `�' y ,] � � .�� -h� ��" 3,153 sqft ""� ` .• �"'a � � .; _ �- ., , , • . . , . 'I.. +�a' *�` I` � � l.. �T r �..; 1 ""i� �+r�' . + _�� . - " . �. � � `sw, ,_.,..�. .�„ if'�'y�;s��d��. �� . i� ,"s �, < 3� � ��'�.�. +�,. ��e�� `�a �, r"` � ..��, ' �f� � ` "��Y° �� , .t�"�,> s . ' :� . n q �� F� ti WL 1 ,r � y� . '�r` ,� ��,A � �, ;�,� , ��l�� y�'s�-�� 'a� ` � .-#�r ,� �ia r� � ` � „� .;� ,� t � .�; � � 2 685 sqft ' <tit� 'r,, sz ' � � t,� � �.t� f ��, �� : � _ � , -_� . _ �� , ��. �.1�ly� � ��H 1� � � � k � «£ � ,�� ^}}}��a,,,� �# �� c .-� ! '.� ��y 'P�B��t�l . �' -zJ . � J" . .a' . ,�.- �� 't' [14 � 3 • P t . g 1 �k.#� rvf 3- s �' "p , ja., t + .-.. j F� . ,�4-f' `��' ��r�/�� ,�y �i � ��t � t� � .x` � �� 3, �� •� s� S' .4� � T sk •�.£` c� pW - w� j�*.�*, � � � . d il 3" ��p '.ffi. �' s�: � �� ,�`.. �n � j � � ► ` � � � � ,�.�' � � �. �,�` �" �� -'. � �. �. r �� , � � :�� .}`a � ��¢' '�* `R` � . '�:. ,� , ''"�' sqz Sqn �"�'..'` �.,. �%�.;.�i' ,� �`..��. �.�,_`;' �� ..�a. .a.- g �.�.2 � � Y�' � Je � -+ �. .�' p # ��' .�"�� .`s.l , � [ " � �-� -,,'E.� >r � . ,,,� � � '''.,�,ts�� '°�w ,'4' ��,- �4 �4`a �'PW �y �.� s. � �,��* � ��- r�< . � � t i ��.�� WL4� y�' ,� �_ � � � • � { � c'=�' , �� _'..._ Q `+` ''�,� i n � � � �,.; ��'' .�:�' . 1,220 s ft � . ,��"' � � ' �,,; , r �� '"' r �p�3�! � � r� (� �+ � � �y�� . �� ,�,j. ') . . /�� l.y��.,.!�i J . !,�" '�ly� '. . ..-„-,a. . � +-..w, � . ' ../�. l I i i.. � t •T ' �"��r't� -. '� • ti +�«Ii �a .e� a+' x.r �r. . � � }7; , � .......,,,_.,..„. . . `�r �.. . � em � .e �. � � rtMj� i�� 4 �7'. �M f. ' . S��, r :�"" �. ..�...�-.�„„„� ,., .,_` �`.�N.. ��, �� I�':� + ��_ �. t 1� e' ` ,�¢ �4� I �. . �z � � - . _ . "^�w' .. ��y� / � �: z. /11� �'1 1�1 .p � lT � � Y `�. r✓.. �f�.�'r . �,� ��M r��Y±,. � . ��R'� . ..^�.,q `^'�°" 4. .a "r. R ��r� J r y �- �.� •��°� ». . J ��f i� ,�f. .� � +'J��1� '\P '� *� .,., . ,.., , � '� � " .a�*, � � t�. . � �0 � ,S ��r��. , � i. +�,q _ � ��. {' � . � • �p '�i, . 2 ^y� � #� I � y 2� . s ".'. .. 1 0 g_ . � ��L�i'��,�r �`,�..�� , � �r�ti•.� , _ ' 1' • - .. . O '� .a � . . . � 1p . _ T � ' . , . � � t �*� � �..-,�'-.�....,�, ° > ' ,� -.�E, �� °,,y,� `,..� �,�.. p`� �'; .-,aer_ . .. .. s \ �� .,. 1 r�� *" '�p � "�. � R.rv�_��4� .. . . '� �wl� w.yYk, �/A1.�" � .�rl �k. . � � �'�My � .. .'.e., [ ,t.l � f': �i, � ,�", '1'1� .,+r. . j � � ,� � � ` ,�._..,,,m"�� 1 + "a,�,,. ' �� . � . ' .__.�,..,,�� ,' ' '�� r, �,'P � r' ,,,�, x , . ,� �`. �,�,` i�f t . . — � � " �`� r �'�,' ' a �P �._._ t --- `" �"�.� __ :.• Figure 2 - Existing Conditions N 0 100 a Project Boundary Dickey Lake Drive (KES 2016-074) ' - � � � Feet Wetland Boundary Orono, Minnesota -'- `�' :1. Note: Boundaries indicated �jOr uA 7 TG Transect on this figure are approximate f LLltl(J ENVIRp�A4F.NTA1.SERL•'1(:ES COI�4PAAY and do not constitute an `�''�`� Henne in Coun}�' Lidar �� Sm�rce:�linnesota DNR(2013) p �r OffiCla�SUIVC}'pt'O(]uCl. ' / , � �+a {< " .,��R ��A�'�� f�� .,. rf.`«e..3t,� Dickey Lake Drive Orono, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepa�ed for Karen Pugh by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2016-074) May 17, 2016 �, ' , � �,�� '��,� �,•,� > � `;�.`✓:�, WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY �``" • The Dickey Lake Drive site was inspected on April 19, 2016 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI-map showed no wetlands present within the site boundaries. • The soil survey showed Cordova loain (Predominantly Hydric) as the only soil type present within the site boundar� • The DNR Public Waters map : � and (27-839 W) approximately 300 feet west o 0 • Four(4) wetlands were identif �ite boundaries and are summarized below. r Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the Tartan Golf Course site Wetland Wetland Ty e ID Cir3c�ular Cowardin Eggers and Reed Dominant Vegetation � � 1 2 PEMB Wet Meadow Wetland Reed canary grass,redosier dogwood 2 1 PFO 1 A Seasonally Flooded Basin Green ash trees, sparse understory 3 1 PFOlA Seasonally Flooded Basin Cottonwood,elm, sparse understory Green ash,reed canary grass, 4 I PFOIA Seasonally Flooded Basin redosier do wood 1 Dickey Lake Drive Orofao, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report I. INTRODUCTION The 2.45-acre Dickey Lake Drive site was inspected on April 19, 2016 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section 34, Township 11 SN, Range 23W, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site was located north of Dickey Lake Drive and east of Willow Drive N (Figure 1). The site limits correspond to Hennepin County PID 3411823220005. The site consisted mainly of mixed coniferous deciduous woodland. Surrounding land use to the north, west and east consisted of single-family houses. Commercial land use includin�the Otten Brothers Garden Center was located south of the site, while the Orono High School was located nearby to the west. Four(4) wetlands were identified and delineated within the site boundaries (Figure 2). II. METHODS Wetlands were identified using Routine Detennination methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags and were surveyed by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estiinated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a I S-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius far the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 18-24 inches (unless otherwise noted) utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used in reporting are froin Field Indicatars of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service in cooperation with the National Technical Committee far Hydric Soils, Version 7, 2010). 2 ,� , � � Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonoiny and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2014 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers 2014. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.2, https://wetland�la�lts.usacc.ann. .1�� Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). III. RESULTS Review of NWI, Soils, and DNR Information The National Wetlands Inveiitofy (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014, https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/water-nat-wetlands-inv-2009-2014) showed no wetlands present within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey of Hennepin County, Minnesota (http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geo�raphy/ssur�o/) showed Cordova loam (Predominantly Hydric) as the only soil type present within the site boundaries. A soils map indicating the soil types present within the parcel is included in Figure 4. A table of soil series data and hydric ratings is shown below. Map Map unit name Hydric Rating Acres in Percent of unit AOI AOI s mbol L23A Cordova loam Predominantly Hydric 2.45 100% The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Map, Hennepin County (https://�isdata.mn.gov/dataset/water-mn-public-waters) showed one DNR Public Wetland (27- 839 W) approximately 300 feet west of the site (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset(U.S. Geological Survey, http://nhd.usgs.gov/) showed no water features within 1000 feet of the site boundaries (Figure 6). Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on April 19, 2016. Four wetlands were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included ii� Appendix A. The following description of the wetlands and the adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. The field visit was conducted during the growing season with actively growing vegetation present on the site, as well as identifiable senesced vegetation from the previous growing season. Precipitation conditions were below the nonnal range based on available 30-day rolling precipitation data, and typical based on the gridded database method (3-month antecedent conditions) (Appendix B). Wetlmzd 1 was a Type 2 (PEMB) wet meadow wetland dominated by reed canary grass and redosier dogwood with a trace of cattail and scattered willow sllrubs. At the time of the field visit Wetland 1 was saturated at the surface. 3 �� , � ��'��'.��;, Adjacent upland was dominated by green ash trees, with an understory of common buckthorn, redosier dogwood, and garlic�nustard. The delineated boundary followed a change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant cominunities, as well as a slight change in topography. Wetland 1 was not shown as a wetland on the NWI map, and is located within an area inapped as Cordova Loam (Predominantly Hydric) on the soil survey. No inlets or outlets were observed within Wetland l. Wetland 2 was a Type 1 (PEMA) forested seasonally flooded basin wetland dominated by a canopy of green ash trees, with a sparsely vegetated understary containing reed canary grass. At the time of the field visit Wetland 2 was saturated at the surface. Adjacent upland was dominated by a canopy of green ash trees, with an understory of common buckthorn, garlic inustard, wild geranium, and catnip. The delineated boundary followed a change in vegetation froin wetland to upland plant coinmunities, as well as a distinct change in topography. Wetland 2 was not shown as a wetland on the NWI map, and is located within an area mapped as Cordova Loam (Predo�ninantly Hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 2 extended off-site to the east. Wetland 3 was a Type 1 (PEMA) forested seasonally flooded basin wetland dolninated by a canopy of cottonwood and elm trees, with a sparsely vegetated understary. At the tiine of the field visit Wetland 3 was saturated at the sui•face, witl� pockets of water 3" deep present in the central portion of the wetland. Adjacent upland was dominated by a canopy of cottonwood and green ash trees, with an understory of cominon buckthorn, garlic inustard, wild geranium, and catnip. The delineated boundary followed a change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a slight change in topography. Wetland 3 was not shown as a wetland on the NWI map, and is located within an area mapped as Cordova Loa�n (Predominantly Hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 3 extended off-site to the northeast. Wetland 4 was a Type 1 (PEMA) forested seasonally flooded basin wetland dominated by a canopy of geen ash trees, with an understory of redosier dogood, reed canary grass, Kentucky bluegass, and common buckthorn. At the time of the field visit Wetland 4 was saturated at the surface. Adjacent upland was dominated by a canopy of green ash trees, with an understory of common buckthorn, creeping charlie, and garlic inustard with a lesser amount of woodland strawberry, bedstraw, wintercress, and vetch. The delineated boundary followed a change in vegetation from wetland to upland plant communities, as well as a slight cllange in topography. Wetland 4 was not shown as a wetland on 4 the NWI map, and is located within an area mapped as Cordova Loam (Predominantly Hydric) � on the soil survey. Wetland 4 extended off-site to the south into the road row. Other Areas Cattail was observed mostly off-site in the road ditch just west of the western property boundary, but was only present within the road ditch and was therefore not flagged as a wetland. No other areas exhibiting wetland characteristics were observed within the site boundaries. 5 i� , ' � � `� "�,� *,. �� j�� t� ��`w 4 � ,Y� �-.4� ��w�"qa., ��„'+, IV. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation Completed by: Ben Carlson, Wetland Specialist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1125 Adam Cameron, Project Assistant Report Prepared by: Adam Cameron, Project Assistant Ben Carlson, Wetland Specialist Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1125 � Report reviewed by: Date: Mav 10, 2016 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 6 Dickey Lake Drive Wetland Delineation Report Figures: • Figure 1 — Site Location Map • Figure 2 —Existing Conditions Map • Figure 3 —NWI Map • Figure 4— Soil Survey Map • Figure 5 —DNR Protected Waters Map • Figure 6—National Hydrography Dataset Map rtV_� . i' �`-�'�fh. W��S�t'�U � � �y�p""" W�GCy$ _ •. x SN,4 - � , Utn A�y�ni:a Fi�r?F . fi�.l.�h � �' Sn.a[ia�� i:'h Aven�rt . . � `+�._ a 6�y4� - ��'4:X' � 4f� � f O�xlr'Y!(y� �! � Vg i^� �. �� S `s �5+r. 2� s0, � �i yNSt Is�ry� i a 1 .,�.: . �; .. .. . � ' � -_ Site Location; � �• - - - - � f ` � ' ' "'M,� �o.»�bv�� _ _ a i � cn 71: Wayraca 9aikva�d .. _.. .. ._. ._ . . ---- .... ___. ---_. wanaueoukvam cn�1: �� .� � � �wdndta — � �ukws,d ._ . � � � c . � � j ,. �UT.a�S SI'Ce/ y f � � � � - . � i . �1 . ^ `" U!11 ...—__._......_� _ � � � ,, L5 12 —"' " 135 17;, '_" . ._.. . .. - - _ _ _ _ _ -- _ - - _ _ _ � _ — _ _ _ _ ._ s . . _ , ._ IF-��..�::��.,�.�.� _ .a ' '� ��.�" ° . acniaL.,e _.'-�-•...,�,�'_. ... ^, ., ,.� -;ffi." , ��:1.- wayTw fbi, .••-.., U�$Iz . .. � Cp1J6 �� '� .. ,.. i = r.,,r�r�.� N � �H:�ao,�.�.v �':ti.,�,.. . "� ,._ o." 3 � 5� �" �K i, - • g � ^ a C..sM A.py�! �1 � � � � � � _ . ��!_ _ E�� ` � � � . �,M. �` 4 � q � ra i�v; ��``� 3 4 . ;� � 5 � � � � : � � 1 ° � i � " K � - ` � . , Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1 500 Dickey Lake Drive(KES 2016-074) ' ' _ � I � Orono, Minnesota Feet -- `y �1- Note: Boundaries indicated �TO�uA7T/'� on this tigure are approximate j 11tiVLT ENVIRQ�ATFNTAI.SFRI•'I(.7ES COD4PAIti'Y and do not constitute an �� "�.�"'V Source:ESRI Streets Basemap official survey product. . i e 6 '4 ° • � !k �I4 ��`(''(r� ' . <� 1,�� a..,�. tl� ..�s ♦, �w�4n ♦'�''..a . ��'i�`��, Y� �� 9nK'. �� g�✓ ,'!+ ,.! � � I�. Q�O�,.� °,. �. } ��µ �,A- � '�O Y" " i' ^� .`4�y=, : ;: y + � �' 2'f' y �•�� .: � �IYR. � �`��a,ar ' , ,.•��.a� � �� b > . . . � �I -• �O. ` •�� `� \�� t.,"'� �*�' �i:s� F ;•�jy�.+ � �� '�� r.�+s��rF� �� 4 y'��"� .st..��. � -�r�.. < , . t. a ' a � � � � . �!'� .*� _ . � y � � ' 4��' �o ' • ., , . �OZ ��. � ' � y� � +Vf +� � � J '�I�I J . ... �i m� .� y. � � �� . .�..'n . y�� `. 1�..,. Y � R � *y� +p �;. , \ �F*e t h� 9�� a�' �� d•"N► "'� . �a +In' ��T"'a', ��A'♦ } �'�, �r. ' ]��FF�.. r_�,... � ':V � . ` '� e�P. � . , ��.�, : -��" O ,��. a �i�� .: y ' �w� .- �+a� � � � �, � �, � �� k�k. "1C ia .r t- 4ts.4 . * , �� * ��..M ` �� , '� � , ' pr s . � � � � � � �� e��r � . � � A � �:� " _ .� � . . . � � � �� "". � . ��a:�� 1� �!+e^� �.��,� ,�` ' t : � � �, � v � � � � � � ' ,��. : i '��,,, . �+a i ,�' , .�i �;'j +rr� � . �. �, i'h+a 2 '� �: **�`w�<� � '�' ' �b �y+ r.� � � � '.,�'{� '>,�y .��. ! . + JYy' W � +i.. +M ;M` ;� �r!, �+ia .8�4'"�s,F an � � ' ;'��y, +�� +r."� .r �.',. ^ � � . �/ ��''��,, u ` �i i ��11� �� 4e.�� VF `� r� � .��';. �*�'�''�^."�'�;�'"r�� ^'w�r� � � .�"` ;�� . .. ^ �.. � '� , �r�'r,,,`5,��. �., k, '' 1� .� % . � �. '� ,�,M ..,r,�,•�`A�� ,'�,t. `.."�"^'r.�, ..�. «,+� �*p 4•k 4� f �y��Ot� .�`p « z � �. p�"�/ � � '{: ` [� . �- j ,O'�f "'}� � !S. '� '�r'b`�° � ♦ jk �,. ""1%q�, �,h'R r s .Y ` '��''y r• : 0 . 1� j �; �`�� µ = k r. ""`'f {�''�` y WL 3 r.�' A�� wM ��/� rrs �Iw f ,.� �f s � cr� � ,� ��, � ` � . � � . . { �" 3,153 sqft , �.`�. +� w" rfYt� r ' i �f,'� � �€,¢ . i �` �`" .a' ;vr '.�' �,, � +"� . „y+�� .. *f�fX�xj�t��*t �b� �}`•;�' P ' �� ?� �. WL� �`.e �.e-r. \.. C ' °-,c�-�'fE_ �� .� �-£ -�� i ..\��,�,. . � , � � � � . � � �� . j��};t ,��;t �''�,�' '.�y� e � � � �� 2,685sqft V �� „� . ' Y . l #�J`� .�.� �� !ti (�4'.�.y � a f!'�� ti�� '� a�3y�. �� )� D ?i�i*V�"�.- T ` �'�' 'n!*6 `,'.,;� k . �,� .�` `�. ;� Y.. ��{4 i f� ` �4'� ,4' .�p,� 7 j�. ��' ��5� ..� w i} � d.� �'�� . �� , ��y�+��+�,�� e I R `� � �' �� x .. ,��_._ � .� �., �� f ,a �� '.. «�` rr'r �� ,.,J k�� `� �� . .. +�u �� "�. �.. �* � � � � � � ,�� 'S � . `� � WL 2 :` ..�' �� d�. �-1�,�,�. �'�r � �.,':' ,� �"r�t .�. �' ��.�1`. � 392 sqft � � �r � � °,��. �*j;�� ^ �.y ,�� i � "►s'� _ "' -� ��' ` > � �" r�. j� .• 7`� � r •i�. �`€ q r� � k'�. �� J F g �5� : ��'� x t ��. �� s ,`�j . #. T ��'' �t �� I N✓�_ 4. *�e 5 �� . ` � �♦ i�� .: . �� . . �r��! " -�°� ' '_ � ,' � �� _w�� ! ..720 — _ `r . - .� ` :. ..� . � _ �a y;f�s �"_� v T ,r,, � , ,.' .., .. - �•. �� . ,'°f: .,,,..� q .,,,�. �'d; �''�rfi . � �- � ` ,�. � ��.�'!.S � , Jr ,*': . � � � > . . _ .. a _ ,. � 1• ,� �y�. � ; ...,. ., .. /:�f .:�� e-t..� '� i�`fY ; ' � �.'! � .. '^+e. _ ' ' t 'r� '�� _ ' _._"_ . � , -- «.. jJ a • ^ . . . _ �, v� r�,� /. ,. f:, . . ( ,. . . ...,...�.�.ti... . . ..__.._�� y . s�' " ,,r �yY , 'A"� ��.� l. ��. 1 't � .'�i� �`�. )y�'e �. w� �-�-^-�.�� . ^ "` �",�r. n,, � ww .^��x .�- 3�' ,'s. � � � . � .i ,i� , ' . . _ o .. . �'4�,�'�}'��' '� ��f��` �r � "°"�"' �" � y .� �,{�� ' � �« r "�� , ��.1ti�,.t T'�'i.: aI o�,�E� 1�� . ��. � �� t � �. j .. � � . � � �- .�� . t� �. "-'��,.. ,.�� /� ,~,� y ' 1� a b .f`�'� .. `� � � � � � 1+^� • •� � " N a I 1//�� ^ , �� rl�� ' �w. .. .,y� ��# .,, ��r . 1- ��* • � .. � ' ,Q2 �.f . �1of'� ' • . -" � . � � :• �,��''` ,. ;,.��,t � m,,. 1020 `� �y . � +� J , �. A . . . ... .� . �• � � .c �:�;•. �._ .. .......... ' v � • � L• �t' �.�.....,: , r '__ " _,_, �� . �.. �,. �p, � _, i "f��,-ra+ ' � � �� I `-�V r �i+, � ;� ,�� `r`;.a.e . .� � t` t l� x I� " - . s,,.r�..-�!--��S _'^�"^,�,c� r"� �9`p�� 'Y�c. .qf.-_ T.�rp ,�,�,� .x ��" ,>:�.�... ��,� 'j� > � `� `�"�,,,,�"�!Y 1��D*�. F��-'�' 5 ' ��" _ ma� ' � � ��F�� 4... ,fa�` �W:. ��f . �a ` � . � hr �.. - .,,�. - . � Af w '�. ' � r �1 ` ...� '• ; ,�' 'y '„,.� � h� .+ Of kf w8� � � _, ♦ " J � � , �� , �� F �� M ` ^ � � � < r �- ��,� ��' � � ��; ..� ,. , a�. . � ,�Q . , .: �, `, �'� s � . - .��..a.�A _ � " r " . -. .. � ��- t�.�d � �...: . �, ' : , -� '. � . �' ' w��. �. ,„y� . __� .�s. _..._ r Figure 2 - Existing Conditions N 0 100 � Project Boundary Dickey Lake Drive (KES 2016-074) - � � � Feet Wetland Boundary Orono, Minnesota -'- ��` �i. Note: Boundaries indicated �J/'1TuAT� Transect on this figure are approximate L1L1711(J� F.NVIRQ�44F.NTAI.SFR�'I(..FS COI�4PAI�Y and do not constitutc an `�""� Henne in Coun Lidar �ry Source:111innesota DNR(2013) P ty official survey product. � ,'�ir'� *� ��,� � �'� m .' �r ,. *��N , � � . .. T . .�'�'" P x. ,� �A� �� s � ' #" ,4qp,�", �` �"i`. ' *�` '�� ... � ' -q a . 'R. . r � .. �.. :. . . � . , • � • . +� r�x �K '��+. � �-�:. � ' ! �.�.; "'•�. $�'�•�„� ,�a � .ra�� Q�..t��i � `��,'#� w �gM�`�� . . f �*� J`. � • ,� a„ ,` .� ` te �`e R a�,. � � � �#` �'�.j `-'X• '( y. , . "r} .„ �� '� .... -� f ,� e��q �..'t' I . . .� � . j � ,a,1 `" Y3^ ._'�' � � � �,'� M �...�• z , �t � � � #�,�r� ^�,a� � : � >. 4 .�-� .. .� k� � Ys � �� 4 ��L 1 � �,� �� ..x �l�F ,,�y..F� y.y�Y� ,� `�. ..�� .� '�'�' j�� ''�. � � - t �. � $� ,; ,��e � - �� a�, _ a,.� �' , �, ` .�'�. ,� ,, �, , , . � _ ._ "'�� . '`��#,� �•.r�. �� r .�� *� �..v x � �„ ,� �,' PSS1A �,� "�,�`�"� �,�� „°'� � ".��„'M"� � � "� �, `, ^ < "� `�'""�'°� ' " j i . z��.� . . � '# �,' F� s . '„� r��'"� �a.�:�x�'�"s. �,�.PR, i'"�,� ta{�� . " r j' ,�f11"�- �+c-,s- •.� ' � ,,�R :. � � '� !r,':.. �,�an .�i � �r'e'�y`.,�i.� .��'% �:�,,'� �„�..4+ ��y . �#� . „'�+..�:'!� . {w"' f f ... �' i •'� t�� '�r�'�'�'#, rN��y� yoF .r • "�y�rc�� i � � � o . , �� .� ^E" e ,' . , .F � x . ,. . ., • x � . . . . � � » .«�y = ys '�"" n�W'� �.- °�-°^....:. � `a.: ��x�„ y a . ,a� � ; : � . � . � `# '"` y,M4 `w3 � '+�".�4`r.'�"�i ; � � .*� p rP � � � �`� �'�"�,��, ,�'. � � as.y� �- ,� � : � s � a .,. � ,� " �' � r: ��.i ; �,�� ; � � v� $� �� q�r� � � � �*`�� e 4� * r�p��q�"'»,r r � ��.Y i ��,� �� .;. � y y �.� *� » , , �� "'t �� '� � t , � ' : � �.«.�x� .a �� ,_ � . ": .:, �� t�s s. t..° � . . Y °�'"" �,� .. e � � „ � F ,�M�� s`...# � .! � . ,y ytYa,+�:. a�� - ..��5. *''�' _R .. ' . �„ .,'"4, �.k � ,e`a .w; � .. ! *!F„ '� � � ✓��M � � ` ' -' � � � E. �� .. �, T , Y a p« �,��,��°,�e.#�Yf" �� ' �� .�., , "' v� . �Y ,�M„ - ` - `� �.- yj . + �_/1, ' '" j�R'y�.. t q Y *��,�,�y�j�M^' {.. . x . � �+ . E. � � .�� k � i* 'f�#i A $ y " 4 �y, ��' �{"� � � "`F, � . ' ��r��. s *, j �` � �Y ` '� rt �i,b6 �f,. �.°�. �x 'T r� '� , , ,� � , .�/ �a �+��.`�� ,. �I '`�; ' s .�� 4�;c � .,;� ° i,1�1 �rr r�,t-�`�►w.: '�'�. ��+'�'i+�. :*�„ �.,3�q.. � pi ' '# �p i � d `�t �. �}.> rf .� T.,f � .�� ;__� �� "+i#Ip� # � `�f,'.S e+� �i'' y i�. Y F •�� ;'�' ��. ' i'� �•� ,..! �8f '�� .�,��'l�+ri _ � �{ " '�' ,�# �.'��»_�. A� 3 o r �'��'.s � S � `�X � �� -�. S � + '? ` ,��', ; `� � .' , - 1 ;:�,,� ,.0 a ^ ' � `' ��' °':P E M 1 C ' � ;�p, ` � �r },� ��. , �c,j�'� � �",,y , � ��, . : , . . ,�t . � `. � a� '�� ;a:+ , � • `� rd �: . . , : „ � • � a,. �� ;, s•t. . , �, , �: � � ��w ,�tiry,s k ,�� } ..��.#:�:. .i .. ; - � � . {.R� d � �,,�y .. s� s � �}f, � !. . .� i_'"�"� � .y�l 't'� , - �"' ,�'y�_ �I�,� . . . .. . -�* � �� a�.. x. t t t r`., t �` -0g ��'. � . ,.'.�..�......wsa��—ti �` . � . ` ' ...t [ „ � � � � . � - '_.r`il�� ' .. ��¢�� C � .�'� !5� � � �= ��k - M�J �� -� `" "' x � ' , . "'.�.,_ .. - `-' ., � � �� =��a+��°�! i 1� �� ', - «. � "t . Y� a � � a r �,� . _.- .. �,�,„�� .y,„�!W . ' � , '$r�. i �. . ��zt �� j � ._. . .' .. .Mr.� . '� .� '�Y a. ,. i f r� � �z.j- � ' . . ��I��Fy . � a _ .. S � S�#� ! s. .. .�: � A 4 I�� :' , t 4t� ��{ ',i#��' � JI' 'F'�, µ-8� {{ d` < t � � � ry .a �.. �• - �~� � � � ' r} y' � �'.� }�e' s �.r t .i'`� a � .� ''�.w� � .�' � .', - �TY.�. . ' .� '� r.>:. . . . ..'. �• � ��;• .� . s t� �l "' : . ,��' ;� �� ..�A�.{ .ap` � �^•. E.y� �'� �_ �R., � � � �a 1�� Ps wm i. � �. .- • ,. T ` s '� Y. �d j��+�w� '�. . �1� `�� '{,�`r,+� r I� e 'v � �� , „ 4 .. . � ,� �.� � " PABGx � ' � � . a . �, . . . , �, k , � ,�,� , � .. � j � .` _ ,��, . ,� . R �(. , �� , z-." i��S�G t��4� 9��" � . .- , . . a .�� .w � `tw� �,. . • � . . .. - - �� y�r��,�� . yi'r . .; r, , �+ ' . ..m.�. �: a t» �� , � 4 f . . �, � . � . _.� • � ' . ';=g �'S • .M„ar.; ; ,� � � � �,� ' , _ � ,.. R� ' � ,�.. `��; �*: �' _ , . � � � � , -.r � � r , . .. ' �'�+° . ` .,�a. � ;i '�i- � "�; � � , ` t_�� s w 1�k'�� ` �" �' b�� '- - `+/ ,,`� �v° i�� » ., �� .. . '1�� .._y,� x �c'e� * i��W1�'iq�C�Mb►��i�� y "...� 't. - __. . _ ..c._..�_ �Y,: Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory N 0 100 Dickey Lake Drive (KES 2016-074) _ � � � Feet Orono, Minnesota ' �� - Note: I3oundaries indicated u� /'r on this figure are approximate ��.+1.+ ��13t`1�Lr EN�'IRQ�A4F.N1'AI.SER�'I(.:ES COI�4PAI��Y and do not constitute an �� source:nu��esota�NR�2o�a�,usF��'s official survey product. . _ _ y �"t�. � �. J r �� > �"� � . . } L132A � Y�, ,. ��,� ,"a� � . � ..:£`•� �""�'",: �"�"`/ L26B � � �.� � A# �g�x �'„�� :� . � �� g �� . �� .� *� �y � ��:`-,. •+ i 4":� � .. �� t� � � �� ..':Y �'�� .� z��'.� �'��' �'��'�'��SZ�k.:,�,'� � �'» �. y .� . .� ' � a '^-� t�� " • � � s� M1 F l�` �t, � r, � � .r�sT .� " .. 1 ",�' � .' .3 3 � � :� :!':� � � 't q� 'r � ... �F.,4 , � ��c+ g e� � . y ;i� , �'dWy'S.. i.� p. .�� 'K, y� � . � � ' � ,r� �.i ' m S« y�,. �.`�`� x q��. `�:# �,� °�� , - �� + l �� -� � 'R .�," � °�� '. �� , ._ .:.�� b^ �« .,� �rg� .. � s,f d�` r�� s s�� + �2` � ` -�"`�` ��, �,�,�:�a � ��. �. '�",� � A i�� * `�+ . � �'�� f"�+�'�' �s, �; �"-� � . . �-..- +�� .� aF'�` �'� � �I �'� ��'� � .�._, � _ �. .� � .�� 'SN.:�" �k, �" �',��- � .._ ; "�j� K.,�`�" '��r `s' t � . - �, � a� *,�e'i ,�"" _ d ; ^'�.'.�' � . ��;i '��,j"_ .�n � . �,�.� � �� !ry�� _� ,� � �: , s � d k "� � 't �'. "� � A ��3°` � � �� v�. �'E q"�'� �� y(. , , �� „ �, �,� ,,_ - �. ,. �"� , �� , . , � ,��, ,, -�. � - � �_. � � �� `� �°�`: x�� . °� � P� � �t� � �, e� a ,� �; � "�� ' �� , -� • � � ...� � � �-:. �� '�,�.� � y� � ��_� �� - �.'7�'+� , �' , a� k��` i .� ��,. �` � ��:�9�. � � � ;'�� ,t � �,r L23A=�,<e , aay� .� �_ �;r � �� . �;�.t'��` .�• � � �r� � 4�' + =�� Ad � I , � �' �+�`� (y T'�.��t'' ��i�' ••K�� n F,A��, ��i} �* . � � • � , y�*� III ��.�'0.y �e� � �� ,.��'� +�.. ,4 :��a j.�.� .'t . . ` f. i� � . �� '�- � `e� � � ; � � � � �- '� v' � v ' a � k K '3 k ,++� ^<,I � � �7M��'O�f � �h` � �` �'� y ��' � ` ;� �. -` `� �,` � "^e...,. r � . . � �r.tt � ''�`� F- :� . � � : � ' � . a �r �„ r� �Y�� ,+� � � �p � Q,� 1 a"" y. ,t�*a � .� � � t r"' . a �� R ... ._ . 3" ro �� . � '"� : ,� �� '�`!, " � y ,� � �,1 �° ��. t.: . �".�.. 'S �,{ �� s��t.. r`�'�' � Y "�t1� ��{� � � ',� � � � � "�f ' � x ' ... _ . ., y ',.`�" `i"� ,a,_ ;�� ,�.� a�.�#Y�..� � ;��a"f�`�r,.�;.�, ,, m a •,y. a � �_* ��' � ,�?.0 4 E�.',� � � ��;+ ,�''L132A f��" �� ,� ,A �..: . '�� ;, � `�_� , �� , , �,�� , � � , ,� ,,� �«,� � k,'� �� r x $ � _" r �� . � . � , „ .- �g � � « .;: �. � r4'�m� .. -�,jar .. *1 1 � R ��. . .q ., �� :I.�� ' , " �� TM ' t ,i f , i�� ' �, °i „ a,, . « �� _ �,,. �a. �e. u.�z s�* �� V � �, ; .� �', , � , ., '�'k . '*rrt � ' • � a `"'�..,�„� <. �z�� ' � . . �� . ,:�-�� . " ��,` + � �� h � L37B '� � � � �� s6:� • �,.,,�...� ,;�.� '�,� .s` �-� �,' ""+ A � � .F w. „ ; � . ..., .v� "a.. �� ' X� ^', �-�4,� ;� �;a, �"`�. �a�.� . � ' � � �,� } 11 ..� - ' '� , � - , a. . . - .. 'a �� ,� - �. `� �� ':+`r.+.�+ ' � "` -sM v. . ' '+a;�., �, . �'�' � . �:"'�" � �� L18A �, , „ �� L25A ' ` � ►.KK - _ �` � � �►� . � See narrative for soil series information. �� 3 « e" ' < � � R, "� � - Figure 4 - Soil Survey N 0 100 Dickey Lake Drive (KES 2016-074) � � � � Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Orono, Minnesota Feet ti �'� �. Non-Hydric/Predominantly Non-Hydric lvote: [3oundaries indicared � ' u Tu�7�/'r on this figure are approximate l LJ�L1ItiV17 ENVIRC)�A�F.NTAI.SERVI(.;Fti Cor2PAt.Y Partially Hydric and do not constitute an �� 'V Source:USDA,NeCs official survey product. ... � i}�. 1 � & ia R� �y�. � ..a ' �-�r�" �� w; ,�!", �� 'w' k.�' , _ � IG'�`�� x�;��:�w. � � � i- " q= ,c�++��' �"� '� � ;� ��y • . �t �..+f�' �.0 Y :�� ', .y-y�� .9 L Y . � "�s� % '�'< s+= �,� � t yt «1.' .. �r :-., � ,y f .( '�'.. r_�+. �.X�" "+ _ ,m L �� #' w.* ,^ "1& . L- , : ` ' "l yf ♦ e *: �� • �£" �,�.� �� Y � �aa »� E dt y ��. �*� �� + '�� , •� �� ,�` � � � $ Dick y s ( 7-161 ) . . � _ F y: ��' , ,5r° , �yik • .t fi �u ��' *}`* e�� a @ 2 W �y. � . !I �r � �, "�- .� ��. #. " ' . ,'�� `��r�- �`�,� .'�'�°".—�,,«..�� y: e y' �w , . �-� , � � � ,_ . n- .. ., �. - . „ �. .��1+g ,,�. ,�. � i � � � ; n. *� -. � �:��b" � #�t. �o �+`#' � '��i�. < ,.i �� • . „ , : . . .. M� . .�,- sz;., , � � � »v i ""iif> .": .� �:,�> y ,��.�� -F�'.;"+r ��'-��"• � ♦ 4 v �� J�. �` §t�' d �d�"�"r � ,- r� - �� .�� C �� t ' ��., , ♦ ,� �y.i.`� C'w#, f , i' �" Pn ws�. w „�� :* �"' '� �' � �:�`� � s '� �' �` , . _ � � ; t . � v �, ,. ,�S , ��" � <., , ; : , �, x.� , .-� � �� ,. }b��x= r �a�� `-;, ..��.� �.:,, �k � �� . � .. • � 1� 7 , �, .r '� �' . �' '. � F� r�b+ a � � ; �.� � �"� � �,p� � ,,t.�� `t;. `� � � . . �,,,. �-� �•� .z� �ai �} ,�}; �� x� .� � �� ~ � ��v` P'�' � , �'�� " r J �": Y ��'s� ,.� � � �' �' �"»�� . � . k ,. � ,,�" . . l�e, `y : � 1'" fi � �� •�! `� ` 4�" � ��.g!µ` >`� � ��+�r s��c�'�`3F*`� �� '. �; �Nc�y�� 4-�` , ,�` �, ��:�, r i'" ' . !�p F, �, g .�f m „ ��` . � .� , �. a� � ( k � ° -�!�' �G.� � : WC"' 7t .+J�3 ,"�' * �.'.-� �. �'.-'{5,,'` �� ' '��°�� "�}` �.�� ,.`�'�.� ��. r _ a ' � 'r. .{ ; } �, �� ,�w �� '�� r �,; .,< �. � � �l � � , � ry! � a a� "` ; �.r�� : , �� . . � � � ,�� , �. �� . .� � `� . �; � ,Fi . � d .� ; ,.�� ?^j��_.,< �».., � «: ��k�i`r�, � _ �� A� � ��; � �� w . �* ",� � .� •��`,�Unnamed 27-839 W �� '�.�' � ��w� ,4 � � �'` •� ( ) � � � r , . � . M � . � • � �� ` �, t +T� L� . r F A7 � . . . . , � �,�� '. ��?!+4� � ,�. � �� `� .�� .� �'"# µ ��.➢�� . . .. .� ... * ., , . ,� . . c 4. .n ', . 1 ....� wr` ., +�� A E �,� « P� �W s ' j �r � �v x�a—�.-s�;is� � ��Mw �`` ' . �€4' �!.,,,� •�, _ .. `� �"""� , �;' .� ..,r �'y!. ''�� } * � �'� T . . � ` hl� 4 , '`�� { ''d� '.'�. :y�s "�. � � ... ..... , - I� ..e��....�� , - p�. a, . .�>. � � �`y � a .�:. �� ` Z ' '�.� fa _� .�,^ �. ♦:, r' , � � :� ""�" ,.,, a - ),, o j . . � " '< , �. 4 µ . � • - . _ . I ..... ... . .�. •, ..� ! .'�.'` .� . . . - ' " . . ` :�.;�`x'- ", . . .,' � , � -" �� ... .; ..,_ �� . �� i + .. � • '.'�iF�:.r 1 W� �' .... .. : .�.- � � � ,�� . � � � Y �'�4"�'� _,.. . . � . �r ; r:.< . . , � , . • , ' 'r'� �'"� � �� + • .�Iq��li� r . _ � � � _ � r �' ` . : . ,, _ � ; -. _ � . � w ' ':� ' . - �«, � � �r��.��w. . ' �` �„i�19 � ; . � .�,� _ . ,�, , r _,. .. �� ,-:. •�� ' �ws.. .,,�, j _ , � . : � s----� ,e,,..,.....,,.. � (`� .� !��- � � � <�<... , „ ; . . � � � .�"�- ... �..�,;...- � .I � � . ' , �� '' ,�;;. �. .. __� r" ' , � . � � °� � y '` � ,�. ( ,_ 'r� ' , �� `s .... � ; ,. . �-,, . �,, ' .« � 1 ��`, , ..� T�'I � ,� —; � ;�. �.� '�.Z � � +, ` _ . : � ..a.. , .�� _ �' ��,,. . __ . ;, �g< . . .. • t 4'r Y i� Y - ` �_ �.��.... � .A... .�.. ._ �� 1 . . `' « �� ^� . Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory N 0 600 Dickey Lake Drive(KES 2016-074) _ _ � � � Feet a Project Boundary Orono, Minnesota � �' PUb�IC�/V2t@fCOU�S2 Note: I3oundarics indicated TT�T,1T�/�r on this figurc arc approximate �� L.13LiVLi ENVIaC)n n4F.NrAt.SERV�Ic:ES COI�4PAI��I' Public Waters and do not constitutc an �rV Source:111innesota DNR official survcy product. .� .�� : , � , � �,,� ' , � � ,� ;,� � ..,. : ° � � ' 4��" �§ -�e�:w � ` 4� a P � . . �, ., . � "�' � �,v ��.� ; . .�� . � ,� ��'. . . . s . _ , , , , � � � . n _ ; ` . `�a� e " a Y �� a ' s e'4 � � °- � .., '¢ J� . ; � + � \� . . t ; " q, , . . � . - . . . � � ' � . '. �', w"� .- .. �'s� � ��i' ' ..', ' x• ,�A'-� ' ' � W .( - !s .+s"- :T�'� `�' ��j.� �,' . ".� 's . . ',�$�.�,$ �.�.. +M". <..� � "'�'� / � � � � � � ��!.3��i� n,' . '��a` �^. ar ` ..A- y�� , �• � ,�:� ,�` `�� / . i � 1 � L `g � � . � a �� a �� ,�':'1��'{ k�, �'�� y. ". . " :� �'� r°�.r, � s- �:� _i �;Y r.. �,� , ,_ .� �. , »« , M . •« a �� li ��..��`, �- s �� ,�,� y� ''�i, � �° ` �u� ! It 7,�.,"+� ,� � :� �- � . // � .�` . {., � } +w 'x ��,,y�� s�*� .�'q�a" .�`'; ,.��16"' � � + ,.�=�----��M"��;�"' � •�,£ /,,� -`� e,. � ;a� �= �x �Y .3 w'" '� `s �-a�'' .,� `°��r '°' ,� '`�" �+'* � »-.�.e a-p., �...,� ''�kyil'�;'� � i � . ; �=:�'`yr'� . , � * � *£ � j:� . r kf s 5��i:.eaa �lF.,�� '� ,�,..,,$ . ..r � • ��,�yy.� �o. ; �. �/ � �''!-` �.�j`�� . . J M � '� e . •�,, . ,��,ry;��. �^� � ��. � . �� ,] • .� z� a. � � ��+'�-r3:r� 4��w € �'"",,��.�, � ��, ,� �?'�" . 4 ' �` "�* w �'� �I�. �- �:� �; �.. �.. �F' s f� r .+e q : � tr.r��, , .. �' ig ',y� ..^"'#� � �.k t!+ a a ` ,t�` / M � 9' !� $ xf: � � !'._�xk ,a��'ay{a '�� +��' y� . y�i* � r�$� ��6�'!� �.� ./ '� . ' �r '� �` - '%. :��'f.a1.' °� '� �. `fl :'�. '�,��'�'�`�a�M�r�F � �-s,�6. ..�q,.� �`�_ �`` f1t � ��ny..a �*r�f�5 �4 �� ..��Y � 7 �� j,..e'f ��. . � �!.. � �(�,,�.�,��8�'�' �r;� . ,�'� *�' � �f.� �' � �� ' � �M �. '°'�R. .,z{ '�+' �^afu� � `' +d�_.� r;F� � '�'��`� a�€. �. , % �,_ �� ,., �� '"�,��+iF'.. � Y.�y, " 4� � 'r'.J' �� ,�y y� . ,_� ��► +w � �' �"�,� ; t �,g.s'.!"� -s� b ��,f ��R� a �- r^ �, a `� ' •_�;� ��r�•. i� � .�a�ir"� a� '"� y � " �;, � J .s� �i' �, . _ �' ` !� ♦ ^ �" s� �` �� " �; w � , ,� .. . � � � ,.;,� ; ,� '' �f.� �n � � , , ;� _ '�, � ..'"�� . ,�,,;'�_ �t� . , * 'ff } � �p ;+ . . .. 3 .. , i . �, . '. � �� :J�� p�� <... � +. . ''i , w � W } � „ . � n r � ' . . ' ' �" �w}�"� �� ' _ � r �.� '� ,ti, '..,3`�,� � �'a r. . �J�yv,��, , , �,,�, . � ,p f'' ._{ . q- : r , . _ 1 ¢�]' : k �k• � _T� t.r,., ��3.�+�.. �G��e\ t. �j� �y� � ��'�� "� r • �§�y �� '�► � •� ��R�1 ,� ��„_ y� r. :, . � ... t r Y.. , � 4 a y�� "# &f� �, ��_ ��••�`� C�� k' .Yb��} �.e� ,.�� L� '"�r�` �E .. � �• � . • 'V � {� �_ � � �j } . q . - . �{.�.� ,... . ,� . ,,� p r.*� .-..! � f�'�E .,� ♦. � '7y�_.. t �,�.,.� ��M. �� } R�� i. � ... . �� "+il�u� , '�' . � � T Y�� • , ; �. . _ i� +i � �e , , �;szr �s� ,�, . ,.-�,.�-�. . . � � ~��.� �_� � � . '��' ;,�` s �� , n , .: } ..... ,. , �. , �, . . .. . ��„_>.,..,,.,..� : ..:�, . ,- , ,.$" f. fi ' ��-' �. � � .� � � � ,_.� ._ , _ � �, �.� � � �.. , .._ ��,1'� �� 1� �;s. .., � �,�l. � �' • . � � �! tl � '. ' . >� i ,l r� � i : , 4 � , .. � �{ �` :� � �� r � �e"'! � �, _ » . . � � �' !llM*..,,...,r� . +N�,r . ��.x..�.%�:,w�g,r:�i �9��,.r'.»a, .� _. :..'� , =J" �: . , r , - � _ . �,� '� ;.� . . � _ - �� .,. .,� . . ;� � � r � .:.,...,, ,. - +� �,: ` �� .� .� �� ` � �[ ' � _ _ . •. ' .� � _�{�:� f �� ,, . � � y _��""" . .� � . � _ � , . � �,�- � ' �� ,: ,` �: '�, . �. . ,�' , �� - ` . . � � -+�1N�. ' .4 . � , ... ,.rar�. , .�1 � � � ,,,.,...,; �e 31t�° .�, •.! � �►d" "�. �^� .,r+r � � " �„ �,,"'�►+-�++ � �" ,� �r�r` "; e��; �,,,_� �, � vw � - � �k � _,, �1 ""�� . ��. 1 � .� �� g • . � �. � � � � , �r � . _�:� rr_ . _ � � � t . ,. �w �� w ! � { Y ,y P� , r �}'� r . _�. �� ' ..JI � � A �.. • �. � STr�x r . ' � � �� ....w. V� ` �# 4 �� e� ,: rA 1 �.�.. � � � ...... i., , y�,, `^�� / : `� e . '� _ � i � s. . ` , � �� .... }.... � 'Al+� #nr i�,«. ��y •� � . � �: �, �. � � � �/' ` ..�. w.e„-..... ' .. 7� •,v.., . �r i��6 . ♦ .,��{�n �x .. . ,{ �� . ��. i � �f ..y� � �.. �. '� ' � �L � ♦F. a� Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset N 0 600 � Hydro Junction Dickey Lake Drive (KES 2016-074) ' � I � Orono, Minnesota Feet ArtificialPath - `� ,L Note: Boundaries indicated StreamRiver on this figure are approximate KJoLx��G FNVIRQ�A4F.NTAI SERi•'IGES COA4PAI�`Y and do not constitute an �� v so��e:usr.s � L2keP011d official survey product. � � T H,��kfi � ��a d�� _�� . ��x�°� � �_ . Dickey Lake Drive Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A: Wetland Delineation Data Forms ,� � WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-1U Investigator(s): B.Carlson,A.Cameron 3ection,Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): Linear Slope(%): 2-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus resinosa 40 Y FACU that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 66.67% (A/B) 60 =Total Cover Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet � Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 20 x 2= 40 4 FAC species 75 x 3= 225 5 FACU species 65 x 4= 260 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 160 (A) 525 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 75 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.28 2 Trifolium pratense 15 N FACU 3 Taraxacum officinale 10 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50°/o 6 Prevalence index is<_3.0* � Morphogical adaptations`(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation" 100 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius � 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region � . �SOIL � Sampling Point: SP1-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) °/o Color(moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 3/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Loam 16-24 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam *Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is repuired; check all that aqqlvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two repuired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(66) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) ' Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region • � WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampling Point: SP1-1 W Investigator(s): B.Carlson,A.Cameron 3ection,Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief(concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0- 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) �WI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 1 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) °/o Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Salix nigra 60 Y OBL that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across a�l Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 60 =Total Cover Saplinq/Shrub straturr (Piot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Cornus sericea 20 Y FACW Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 70 x 1 = 70 3 FACW species 40 x 2= 80 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 20 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 110 (A) 150 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 20 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.36 2 Typha angustifolia 10 Y OBL 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0" � Morphogical adaptations"(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 30 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover �egetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL � Sampling Point: SP1-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) °/o Color(moist) % Type' Loc"" Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/1 100 Clay Loam 8-12 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam 12-16 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 4/6 15 C M Sandy Clay Loam `Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is required; check all that applv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region �� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-1U Investigator(s): B.Carlson,A.Cameron 5ection,Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): Linear Slope(%): 2-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 75.00% (A/B) 30 =Total Cover Saplinp/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 30 x 2= 60 4 FAC species 40 x 3= 120 5 FACU species 25 x 4= 100 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 95 (A) 280 (B) 1 Alliaria petiolata 30 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.95 2 Geranium maculatum 15 Y FACU 3 Nepeta cataria 10 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0' � Morphogical adaptations"`(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation"` 55 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region �SOIL � Sampling Point: SP2-1 U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc** Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 8-22 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Clay Loam 22-26 10YR 4/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Clay Loam '`Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL= Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark SurFace(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is repuired� check all that apqlvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region � � WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 Applicant/Owner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampiing Point: SP2-1W Investigator(s): B.Carlson,A.Cameron 3ection,Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief(concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0- 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 2 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 30 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 30 =Total Cover Saplinp/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total% Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 35 x 2= 70 4 FAC species 10 x 3= 30 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 45 (A) 100 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 5 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.22 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50°/a 6 X Prevalence index is<-3.0* � Morphogical adaptations'(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation` 5 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) •Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 501L � Sampling Point: SP2-1 W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type" Loc""` Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 Clay Loam 12-18 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Clay Loam 18-24 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS =Masked Sand Grains. '"Location: PL=Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired; check all that applvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(66) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) X Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 5 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region � � WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampling Point: SP3-1U Investigator(s): B.Carlson,A.Cameron 3ection,Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): Linear Slope(°/o): 2-3 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 15 =Total Cover SaplinQ/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 15 Y FAC Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 17 x 2= 34 4 FAC species 15 x 3= 45 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 15 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 32 (A) 79 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 2 FACW Prevalence Index= B/A= 2.47 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50°/a 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0* � Morphogical adaptations`(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation` 2 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius � 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region �,SOIL , Sampling Point: SP3-1 U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type"` Loc'" Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 6-16 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Clay Loam 16-24 10YR 4/2 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ""Location: PL=Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired� check all that apply) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two repuired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(66) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 20 hydrology present? N (inc�udes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region � � WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampling Point: SP3-1 W Investigator(s): B.Carison,A.Cameron 3ection,Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief(concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0- 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) �WI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Wetland 3 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Populus deltoides 40 Y FAC that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Ulmus americana 10 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 50 =Total Cover Saplinp/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 10 Y FAC Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 80 x 2= 160 4 FAC species 50 x 3= 150 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 10 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 130 (A) 310 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 70 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.38 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is<-3.0' � Morphogical adaptations'(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 70 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region �SOIL � Sampling Point: SP3-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc'`' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 4/6 2 C M Loam 16-20 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam `Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) "`Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is repuired� check all that aqply) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two repuiredl X Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(66) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) X Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Surface Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region � � WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 ApplicanUOwner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampling Point: SP4-1 U Investigator(s): B.Carlson,A.Cameron 5ection, Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief(concave, convex, none): Linear Slope(%): 3-5 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) °/o Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 50 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 50.00% (A/B) 50 =Total Cover Saplinp/Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhamnus cathartica 20 Y FAC Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 50 x 2= 100 4 FAC species 25 x 3= 75 5 FACU species 45 x 4= 180 20 =Total Cover UPL species 10 x 5= 50 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 130 (A) 405 (B) 1 Glechoma hederacea 15 Y FACU Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.12 2 Fragaria virginiana 15 Y FACU 3 Coronilla varia 10 N UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Galium aparine 10 N FACU Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Barbarea vulgaris 5 N FAC Dominance test is>50% 6 Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Prevalence index is 53.0* � Morphogical adaptations'(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 60 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius � 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region S�DIL � Sampling Point: SP4-1 U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) °/o Color(moist) % Type' Loc""` Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 6-24 10YR 2/1 100 Clay Loam 24-28 10YR 4/2 100 Clay Loam `Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. '*Location: PL= Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is repuired; check all that aqqlv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 28 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region •� , WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjecUSite Dickey Lake Drive City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 4/19/2016 Applicant/Owner: Karen Pugh State: MN Sampling Point: SP4-1 W Investigator(s): B.Carlson,A.Cameron 3ection,Township, Range: S:34 T:118N R:23W Landform(hillslope,terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief(concave, convex, none): Concave Slope(%): 0- 1 Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit NameCordova Loam(Predominantly Hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 4 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation from gridded database method typical; 30-day precipitation rolling average drier than normal range VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 60 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 60 =Total Cover SaplinQ/Shrub straturr (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Cornus sericea 30 Y FACW Total %Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 130 x 2= 260 4 FAC species 20 x 3= 60 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 30 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 150 (A) 320 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.13 2 Poa pratensis 20 Y FAC 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is<_3.0'` � Morphogical adaptations'(provide $ supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 60 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region . SOIL , Sampling Point: SP4-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type` Loc" Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 6-12 2.5Y 5/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Clay Loam 12-18 2.5Y 5/2 70 10YR 4/6 30 C M Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D= Depletion, RM =Reduced Matrix, MS =Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired; check all that applvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(66) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Dickey Lake Drive Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B: Precipitation Information � IVli�nnesota Climatolo Workin Grou � gY g p State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota .,�,�,..�� v,,.....��,V.- ;..,*,M.��,�.,� : .. ,��,..:. �.�w.�,..,,., >:r�.�.s,�� ..;.,� ,�,R.�,,,,...,_�� ,.�,�,��:�:.a��.,.�,�.£,..�.,,..,� home � current conditions � journal � past data � summaries � agriculture � other sites � contact us � search � � Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland tocation: county: Hennepin township number: 118N township name: Medina range number: 23W nearest community: Long Lake section number: 34 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Sunday, May 01, 2016 Score using 1981-2010 normal period first prior second prior third prior values are in inches month: month: month: A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived April March February from radar-based estimates. 2016 2016 2016 estimated precipitation total for this location: mlSSlllg rYliSsing 1111SSIng there is a 30°/a chance this location will have less than: 1.96 1.21 0.42 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 2.75 1.94 0.87 type of month: dry normal wet missing missing missing monthly score missing missing missing multi�nonth score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) 1'T1ISSIIIg Other Resources: ■ retrieve daily precipitation data ■ view radar-based precipitation estimates ■ view weekly precipitation maps ■ Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) 5 __,_ _______ _..___.__ _..._. __.__ ..�.__.._._.._.-- _________.__�-.---.__..__._________________._ ___..__________.._.__...---.----.______ ----. ______^ N 3rd Prior 30 Days 2nd Prior 30 Days 1 st Prior 30 Days i W j s v 4 c � Dickey Lake Drive, � Orono MN r ca Q � '� 3 a� � � Site Visit 4/19/2016 � � O � +� ; � g s 2 � c o ; � ; � � c . � � . . . - T � I � T ' T I — I � � _ ; i 1/30/16 2/14/16 2/29/16 3/15/16 3/30/16 4/14/16 4/29/16 o monthly precip — daily precip 30d rolling total Dickey Lake Drive , Orono MN : Precipitation Summary Source : Minnesota Climatology working Group Monthl y Total s : 2015 (latitude: 44.98559 longitude: 93.57367) Target: T118 R23 534 mon year cc tttN rrw ss nnnn o000000o pre (inches) ]an 2016 27 117N 23w 26 w5D . 34 Feb 2016 27 118N 23w 2 ws� . 80 Mar 2016 27 117N 23w 26 wSD 1.09 apr 2016 27 117N 23w 26 w5� 3 .44 Jan/Feb/Mar/Apr Daily Records 7an l, 2016 0 Feb 1, 2016 0 Mar l, 2016 0 Apr l, 2016 .O1 7an 2, 2016 0 Feb 2, 2016 0 Mar 2, 2016 0 Apr 2, 2016 0 7an 3, 2016 0 Feb 3, 2016 .42 Mar 3, 2016 0 Apr 3, 2016 0 7an 4, 2016 0 Feb 4, 2016 .Ol Mar 4, 2016 0 Apr 4, 2016 0 7an 5, 2016 0 Feb 5, 2016 0 Mar 5, 2016 .06 apr 5, 2016 0 7an 6, 2016 0 Feb 6, 2016 0 Mar 6, 2016 0 Apr 6, 2016 .06 7an 7, 2016 .02s Feb 7, 2016 .Ol Mar 7, 2016 0 Apr 7, 2016 .Ol 7an 8, 2016 .11s Feb 8, 2016 0 Mar 8, 2016 0 Apr 8, 2016 .02 7an 9, 2016 .04 Feb 9, 2016 0 Mar 9, 2016 T Apr 9, 2016 .Ol �an 10, 2016 0 Feb 10, 2016 0 Mar 10, 2016 T Apr 10, 2016 0 7an 11, 2016 0 Feb 11, 2016 .02 Mar 11, 2016 0 apr 11, 2016 0 �an 12, 2016 .04s Feb 12, 2016 0 Mar 12, 2016 0 apr 12, 2016 0 7an 13, 2016 0 Feb 13, 2016 0 Mar 13, 2016 .02 apr 13, 2016 0 7an 14, 2016 0 Feb 14, 2016 .06 Mar 14, 2016 .Ol Apr 14, 2016 0 7an 15, 2016 0 Feb 15, 2016 0 Mar 15, 2016 .06 Apr 15, 2016 0 7an 16, 2016 0 Feb 16, 2016 0 Mar 16, 2016 .03 apr 16, 2016 0 7an 17, 2016 0 Feb 17, 2016 0 Mar 17, 2016 T Apr 17, 2016 0 7an 18, 2016 0 Feb 18, 2016 0 Mar 18, 2016 T Apr 18, 2016 0 7an 19, 2016 0 Feb 19, 2016 .25 Mar 19, 2016 0 Apr 19, 2016 .21 7an 20, 2016 .06s Feb 20, 2016 0 Mar 20, 2016 0 Apr 20, 2016 .09 7an 21, 2016 0 Feb 21, 2016 0 Mar 21, 2016 0 apr 21, 2016 .37 )an 22, 2016 .Ols Feb 22, 2016 0 Mar 22, 2016 0 ,4pr 22, 2016 .12 7an 23, 2016 0 Feb 23, 2016 .03 Mar 23, 2016 0 ,4pr 23, 2016 0 7an 24, 2016 0 Feb 24, 2016 0 Mar 24, 2016 0 Apr 24, 2016 .07 7an 25, 2016 .Ols Feb 25, 2016 0 Mar 25, 2016 0 apr 25, 2016 1.13 ]an 26, 2016 .02s Feb 26, 2016 0 Mar 26, 2016 .02 Apr 26, 2016 .17 7an 27, 2016 T Feb 27, 2016 0 Mar 27, 2016 .22 Apr 27, 2016 .O1 ]an 28, 2016 0 Feb 28, 2016 T Mar 28, 2016 .Ol apr 28, 2016 .40 7an 29, 2016 0 Feb 29, 2016 0 Mar 29, 2016 0 ,4pr 29, 2016 .75 ]an 30, 2016 0 Mar 30, 2016 .55 Apr 30, 2016 .Ol 7an 31, 2016 .03 Mar 31, 2016 .11 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.48 0.42 1.21 1.96 2.60 3.27 2.55 2.91 2.35 1.27 1.08 0.62 16.36 26.95 26.29 70% 1.10 0.87 1.94 2.75 4.10 5.28 4.18 4.71 4.01 3.34 1.99 1.42 21.28 33.66 33.48 mean 0.82 0.79 1.73 2.56 3.46 4.38 3.97 4.11 3.41 2.39 1.68 1.15 19.33 30.45 30.28 Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources I in Minnesota This joint application form is the accepted means for initiating review of proposals that may affect a water resource(wetland, tributary, lake, etc.) in the State of Minnesota under state and federal regulatory programs.Applicants for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(DNR) Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. Applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form (see the paragraph on MPARS at the end of the joint application form instructions for additional information).This form is only applicable to the water resource aspects of proposed projects under state and federal regulatory programs;other local applications and approvals may be required. Depending on the nature of the project and the location and type of water resources impacted, multiple authorizations may be required as different regulatory programs have different types of jurisdiction over different types of resources. Regulatory Review Structure Federal The St. Paul District of the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(Corps) is the federal agency that regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States(wetlands,tributaries, lakes, etc.) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)and regulates work in navigable waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Applications are assigned to Corps project managers who are responsible for implementing the Corps regulatory program within a particular geographic area. State There are three state regulatory programs that regulate activities affecting water resources. The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) regulates most activities affecting wetlands. It is administered by local government units(LGUs) which can be counties, townships,cities,watershed districts,watershed management organizations or state agencies(on state-owned land).The Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources issues permits for work in specially-designated public waters via the Public Waters Work Permit Program (DNR Public Waters Permits). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA)under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act certifies that discharges of dredged or fill material authorized by a federal permit or license comply with state water quality standards. One or more of these regulatory programs may be applicable to any one project. Required Information Prior to submitting an application, applicants are stron�lv encoura�ed to seek input from the Corps Project Manager and LGU staff to identify regulatory issues and required application materials for their proposed project. Project proponents can request a pre- application consultation with the Corps and LGU to discuss their proposed project by providing the information required in Sections 1 through 5 of this joint application form to facilitate a meaningful discussion about their project. Many LGUs provide a venue(such as regularly scheduled technical evaluation panel meetings)for potential applicants to discuss their projects with multiple agencies prior to submitting an application. Contact information is provided below. The following bullets outline the information generally required for several common types of determinations/authorizations. • For delineation approvals and/or jurisdictional determinations, submit Parts 1, 2 and 5, and Attachment A. • For activities involving CWA/WCA exemptions,WCA no-loss determinations, and activities not requiring mitigation, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachment B. • For activities requiring compensatory mitigation/replacement plan, submit Parts 1 thru 5, and Attachments C and D. • For local road authority activities that qualify for the state's local road wetland replacement program,submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachments C, D(if applicable),and E to both the Corps and the LGU. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 1 of 11 Submission Instructions Send the completed joint application form and all required attachments to: U.5 Army Corps of Engineers.Applications may be sent directly to the appropriate Corps Office. For a current listing of areas of responsibilities and contact information,visit the St. Paul District's website at: httpl/www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re�ulatory.aspx and select"Minnesota"from the contact Information box. Alternatively,applications may be sent directly to the St. Paul District Headquarters and the Corps will forward them to the appropriate field office. Section 401 Water Quality Certification:Applicants do not need to submit the joint application form to the MPCA unless specifically requested. The MPCA will request a copy of the completed joint application form directly from an applicant when they determine an individual 401 water quality certification is required for a proposed project. Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit. If necessary,contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District(SWCD)office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources(BWSR)web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us)to determine the appropriate LGU. DNR Public Waters Permitting: In 2014 the DNR will begin using the Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System (MPARS)for submission of Public Waters permit applications (https://webappsll.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login). Applicants for Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. To avoid duplication and to streamline the application process among the various resource agencies, applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form. The MPARS print/save function will provide the applicant with a copy of the Public Waters permit application which, at a minimum,will satisfy Parts one and two of thisjoint application. For certain types of activities,the MPARS application may also provide all ofthe necessary information required under Parts three and four of the joint application. However, it is the responsibility of the Applicant to make sure that the joint application contains all of the required information, including identification of all aquatic resources impacted by the project(see Part four of the joint application). After confirming that the MPARS application contains all of the required information in Parts one and two the Applicant may attach a copy to the joint application and fill in any missing information in the remainder of the joint application. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 2 of 11 __ __ � Proj�ct Name andjcr Number ,'0� Jickey Lake �r ve PART �NE: Applicant Information I!applicant s an entity(cnmpany,govPrnm�nt entity, partn�rshlp,etc.), an aulhorized conlacl peison rnu5l be idenlif,ed. I( lhe applican;is using ac �gen: (ccnsultant; lawyer, or other third party} and has authorized them to act en:heir behalf, the a�,ent's .ontact informa-ion must also be provided. ApplicantfLand�wnerName: KarerPuKh Mailing Address: A5?4 f3irr_hmont Drive NE�il"? Bemidji, MN 56601 Phone� r7E-4U7•pZD7 E-mail Address: karenp�:�ns�ack.com Authorized Contact(do not comp{ete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: AgeM Name: Ben Cai i5on Mailing Address: 251�5 Wild Rose LanE Phone: 352-401-8757 E-mail Address: ben��kjvlliaugenv.corT� PART TWO: Site Location lnfarmation County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 3411823220005 Legal Description (Section,Township, Range�: 5:34 T:i18N R:23W lat/Long(decimal degrees): 44.991572, -93.582869 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads, highways. Approximate size of site(acres}or if a linear project, length(feet): 2.45 I�you kno�,v thal yuur �reposal vriU reyuire an indiv+dual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Enginee�s,ycu rnust provide the names and addresses ot all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your applicalion or by usink block 25 ot the Application ior Department of the Army peimil which can be ablained at: httu:/,%www.mvp.usace.a�mv.mii!Portalsi57%doc�'re�ulato�y;�RegulatorvDocs/en�torm 4345 2G12oct.pdt PART THREE: General Project/Site Information I'�lhi� �pplication fs related to a delin:-a,icn auFic.�vd , txernption deterrnination,jurisdic?�cnal de;er--iinalion,or other corresponden�e submitte�prior to this appl'ca:ion tnen describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number Describe the project that is beinE prcpose:�l, the prc�ject purpose 2nd need, and scr�edule f�r implementation and completien The pro;ec:descript�on must fully describe t7e nature and scope of the preposed a�tivity mclud�n�a Jcscription of a�l praject elerlients that e"ect aquatic resou�ces (wetland, lake,tributary, etc j and must alsa include plans and cross sect�on or p-of�le drawin�s �t�ow ng the �oc:ation, characler, and dimen,ions of all propased activitics and aquatic rescu�cc impacU. t�1 nnesota Interagency 1,'v'ater Resource,lpp�icatia�� Form Feb�uary 2014 Pa�e�of 11 � � Project f�a^-e ardlor Numb=r 701 Dick_� Lake Drive PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impactl Summary If your proposecl proiect invclves a direct or indirect ir��p�ct to an aquatic resource Iwetl�nd, lake. tr�butary, etc j identify e�ch impact in the tab;e below. Inc:ude all ar,ticipatec impacts, mcluding those expected to bF temporary Attach an OVPfF1P�C VIPVJ map, a�rial photo, andJor drawir.K showinK al; of the aquol�c re�ources in ;he project area and the location(5) �f the pro(�oscd impacts. Label e�ch aquutic resource on the map with a reterer.ce number or ,etter and identit��the impacts in the followin�tabie I; 4uatic Resource' A uatic � . _ ______i__ _ _ ' Type of Impact� Duration of I County, Major q � Existing Plant A {fill; excavate, j Impact : Qverall Sixe of Watershed k, ' Resource Type ' Community ' ID;as noted nn cirain,or I Perman�nt ;Pj 5ize of Impact'', Aquatic � and Bank i::�etland, lake, 3 ' TYPe(5) in i overhead view) ' remove or TemNotary Resource � 4 Service Area tl' tributa►y etc.) , Impact Hrca �: vegetatian) (T) o+Impact Arca"' . i ._.. . ---�------_----� --_.�--- �I �. ..—_.__—..._... . . ._. ...._. .. . . _ � . . i 'Ir impacts are tc�ii�orary�,ent^r-ne d�.rati�n of,Fe impacts in da+;s next,c th�"T" F^r eKample,a ��ro,ect with a tem�orary a�-cess fill that v.�o.ild be rem�ved�*ter??0 days wr,uld be en?�rPd"T(�20►". llmpacts less than C�.U1 aere shvuW be repvrted�n syuare feet. nnpdct,U.::1 acre _r g•::atcr sho.,ld be rcported as acres a��d •ounded te tho nearest 0.01 acre Tributaiy ir�ip�cts must be reperted in Imea�feet of_impact znd zn area of impa��by r�d�cat�ng f�rst thz I near feet of impa:t along the flotivline ot the stream follov:ed bp•ttiP area i�n:art in parenthesesj. For e�:�mp�e,a p��je�-that impacts 50 feet ct c stream that's E feet tivide would be reporteC as SG ft(3�0 syuare fee;1. '?his is gener�l y only ap�licab:e f ti�o�are app'ying for a d?minimis exemption un�er t�N Ri les 8�2�'�a2�Subo. A,otherwise=_rter"N,�A". 'Use Wetion,d Plontc n�d Plont C.omm;.r�ty Types otiv;�nneso.o ono''.1�isconsirr 3"Ed as modifiec �n MN Rcles 84?O.J405 S;.bp. 2. �� sRefer tu Maj��Vdat.rshe::an� 13ank 5en�ice Area ma;,;s�n M:N Rules L�41U D522 Subp 7 If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify:vhic.h �mpacts tnPy are and thc�circ.umstances associa;ed with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ��, C`IIPCI: F1PfP If ycu ;�r�r�q,�e;ting a p*e-application cans..ltaucn�vith t^�e Co�pti and LC�U 'based on the ir:formation you have provided. Regulatory entitie�will not initiate a for��ral application revie�a�if this box is checked. liy signalure below, I at?est that the in`ormalion in Lhis application iy c�rnplete and accurale 1 furlher dltest that I pos5e55 lhe uuthority tv undertake the work described herein. 1 �� Signature� �_��'`�- ��" Date: � - l� -1 � - ----_—�_ hereby authorize to act on nr;behalf as my agent in thc processing of thu application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in s�ippnrt nf this application. 1 The term "impact" as used in this joint application form is a Reneric term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate�vhether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. ftilinn�sota interagency\ti'ater Resource Applicat�on Farm Fe�ruary 2U1A Pake 4 0(il � � Project Name and/or Number: 701 Dickey Lake Drive Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU) provide me with the following(check all that apply): � Wetland Type Confirmation � Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). � Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminaryjurisdictional determination(PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements,a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. P1Ds are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. �Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re�ulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 � � Project Name and/or Number: 701 Dickey Lake Drive Attachment B Supporting Information for Applications Involving Exemptions, No Loss Determinations, and Activities Not Requiring Mitigation Complete this part if you maintain that the identified aquatic resource impacts in Part Four do not require wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation OR if you are seeking verification that the proposed water resource impacts are either exempt from replacement or are not under CWA/WCA jurisdiction. Identify the specific exemption or no-loss provision for which you believe your project or site qualifies: Provide a detailed explanation of how your project or site qualifies for the above. Be specific and provide and refer to attachments and exhibits that support your contention.Applicants should refer to rules(e.g.WCA rules),guidance documents(e.g. BWSR guidance,Corps guidance letters/public notices), and permit conditions(e.g. Corps General Permit conditions)to determine the necessary information to support the application.Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the WCA LGU and Corps Project Manager prior to submitting an application if they are unsure of what type of information to provide: Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 6 of 11 � � Project Name and/or Number: 701 Dickey Lake Drive Attachment C ; Avoidance and Minimization Project Purpose,Need,and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint,water management, and any other applicable requirements.Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project(buildings, roads,etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted)and construction details(grading plans, storm water management plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary: Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist. Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site.These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or not doing the project.Alternatives should be feasible and prudent(see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C).Applicants are encouraged to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis: Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water resources(see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp.4): Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal will require an individual permit(standard permit or letter of permission)from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you may be required to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must be provided during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final decision. Applicants with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project Manager. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 7 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: 701 Dickey Lake Drive Attachment D Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation Complete this part if your application involves wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation not associated with the local road wetland replacement program.Applicants should consult Corps mitigation guidelines and WCA rules for requirements. Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation via Wetland Banking. Complete this section if you are proposing to use credits from an existing wetland bank(with an account number in the State wetland banking system)for all or part of your replacement/compensatory mitigation requirements. Bank Wetland Bank Major Credit Type County Service Number of Credits Account# Watershed# (if applicable) Area# Applicants should attach documentation indicating that they have contacted the wetland bank account owner and reached at least a tentative agreement to utilize the identified credits for the project.This documentation could be a signed purchase agreement,signed application for withdrawal of credits or some other correspondence indicating an agreement between the applicant and the bank owner. However, applicants are advised not to enter into a binding agreement to purchase credits until the mitigation plan is approved by the Corps and LGU. Project-Specific Replacement/Permittee Responsible Mitigation.Complete this section if you are proposing to pursue actions (restoration,creation, preservation, etc.)to generate wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation credits for this proposed project. Corps Mitigation Bank WCA Action Eligible Credit% Credits Major Compensation Acres 3 County Service for Creditl Requested Anticipated Watershed# Technique2 Area# iRefer to the name and subpart number in MN Rule 8420.0526. ZRefer to the technique listed in St. Paul District Policy for Wetland Compensatory Mitigation in Minnesota. 31f WCA and Corps crediting differs,then enter both numbers and distinguish which is Corps and which is WCA. Explain how each proposed action or technique will be completed(e.g. wetland hydrology will be restored by breaking the tile......) and how the proposal meets the crediting criteria associated with it.Applicants should refer to the Corps mitigation policy language,WCA rule language, and all associated Corps and WCA guidance related to the action or technique: Attach a site location map, soils map, recent aerial photograph, and any other maps to show the location and other relevant features of each wetland replacement/mitigation site. Discuss in detail existing vegetation, existing landscape features, land use (on and surrounding the site), existing soils, drainage systems(if present),and water sources and movement. Include a topographic map showing key features related to hydrology and water flow (inlets, outlets, ditches, pumps,etc.): Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 8 of 11 . � , Project Name and/or Number: 701 Dickey Lake Drive Attach a map of the existing aquatic resources, associated delineation report, and any documentation of regulatory review or approval. Discuss as necessary: For actions involving construction activities,attach construction plans and specifications with all relevant details. Discuss and provide documentation of a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the site to define existing conditions, predict project outcomes, identify specific project performance standards and avoid adverse offsite impacts. Plans and specifications should be prepared by a licensed engineer following standard engineering practices. Discuss anticipated construction sequence and timing: For projects involving vegetation restoration, provide a vegetation establishment plan that includes information on site preparation, seed mixes and plant materials,seeding/planting plan (attach seeding/planting zone map), planting/seeding methods,vegetation maintenance,and an anticipated schedule of activities: For projects involving construction or vegetation restoration, identify and discuss goals and specific outcomes that can be determined for credit allocation. Provide a proposed credit allocation table tied to outcomes: Provide a five-year monitoring plan to address project outcomes and credit allocation: Discuss and provide evidence of ownership or rights to conduct wetland replacement/mitigation on each site: Quantify all proposed wetland credits and compare to wetland impacts to identify a proposed wetland replacement ratio. Discuss how this replacement ratio is consistent with Corps and WCA requirements: By signature below,the applicant attests to the following(only required if application involves project-specific/permittee responsible replacement): • All proposed replacement wetlands were not: • Previously restored or created under a prior approved replacement plan or permit • Drained or filled under an exemption during the previous 10 years • Restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs • Restored using private funds,other than landowner funds, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual or organization that funded the restoration and the individual or organization notifies the local government unit in writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement. • The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland. • An irrevocable bank letter of credit, performance bond, or other acceptable security will be provided to guarantee successful completion ofthe wetland replacement. • Within 30 days of either receiving approval of this application or beginning work on the project, I will record the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants on the deed for the property on which the replacement wetland(s)will be located and submit proof of such recording to the LGU and the Corps. Applicant or Representative: Title: Signature: Date: Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 9 of 11 - • . . � . Project Name and/or Number: 701 Dickey Lake Drive Attachment E Local Road Replacement Program Qualification Complete this part if you are a local road authority(county highway department, city transportation department,etc.)seeking verification that your project(or a portion of your project)qualifies for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program (LGRWRP). If portions of your project are not eligible for the LGRWRP,then Attachment D should be completed and attached to your application. Discuss how your project is a repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction,or replacement of a currently serviceable road to meet state/federal design or safety standards/requirements.Applicants should identify the specific road deficiencies and how the project will rectify them.Attach supporting documents and information as applicable: Provide a map, plan, and/or aerial photograph accurately depicting wetland boundaries within the project area.Attach associated delineation/determination report or otherwise explain the method(s) used to identify and delineate wetlands.Also attach and discuss any type of review or approval of wetland boundaries or other aspects of the project by a member or members of the local Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP)or Corps of Engineers: In the table below, identify only the wetland impacts from Part 4 that the road authority has determined should qualify for the LGRWRP. Wetland Impact ID Type of Impact Size of Impact County,Major Watershed#, Existing Plant Community (as noted on (fill, excavate, (square feet or and Bank Service Area#of Type(s) in Impact Areal overhead view) drain) acres to 0.01) Impact2 lUse Wetland Plants and Plant CommuniTy Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3'd Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. zRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. Discuss the feasibility of providing onsite compensatory mitigation/replacement for important site-specific wetland functions: Please note that under the MN Wetland Conservation Act, projects with less than 10,000 square feet of wetland impact are allowed to commence prior to submission of this notification so long as the notification is submitted within 30 days of the impact. The Clean Water Act has no such provision and requires that permits be obtained prior to any regulated discharges into water of � the United States. To avoid potential unauthorized activities, road authorities must,at a minimum, provide a complete application to the Corps and receive a permit prior to commencing work. By signature below,the road authority attests that they have followed the process in MN Rules 8420.0544 and have determined that the wetland impacts identified in Part 4 are eligible for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program. Road Authority Representative: Title: Signature: Date: Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 10 of 11 v h �Tec�nic�al Evaluation Panel Concurrence: Project Name and/or Number: 701 Dickey Lake Drive TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority's determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? ❑Yes ❑ No Signature: Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority's determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? �Yes ❑ No Signature: Date: TEP member: Representing: Concur with road authority's determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? �Yes ❑ No Signature: Date: TEP member: Representing: I Concur with road authority's determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? � Yes ❑ No Signature: Date: Upon approval and signature by the TEP, application must be sent to: Wetland Bank Administration Minnesota Board of Water&Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul,MN 55155 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 11 of 11 s ' , + . r � �se ,'t4� �F � i�� P a ; Dickey Lake Drive Wetland Delineation Report Appendix D: Survey _,,\ ,as8 � � � / 1_ \�� \�8S9 / � \ 6- m \��,,��&sa i m �,,\ \��g � � � ��ZZ,��ese i � \�g / � \I N \\\\\�'� Sg��es� m \�ese \ ��ase � \ aS \m `\\` \ �j g\�858 � \ \�BSg Z i) \\\`\��\ ��8S8 �m \``\��-\�BSg ra� ------------------- ---- ---��Z-- // — ------ — --------��----�� m N Im � I J m I m I � � m � � m �d� � � �- > /SLL'IZ01 Q � � � � � ZOL �,`c:�� / / � J � � � � I / � ' I � � 1 � °° � / m � � � � � / � � J / / m m / I I / / m / / m � / / / J /m � / m lI / �� J / ` � m � ` m �_� l L—� � m �IZ01 �•3��"��-�� \ � ��7 � _• � 1 'm� � \ C� ��O`�� --yl � \