HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2064 \
Y S
// •
/ � � • ��-
k
Cit� o� ORONO
• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �
.
� NO. 2064
• - • •
L.AU� IS
A RSSOLUTION GRANTING
�0� �,� A VARIAPICE TO
� MONICIPAL ZONING CODE .
� ��,� �€ �E SECTION 10.22, SIIBDIVISION 2 AND
10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND
�Q�?-y L'J9.&� A CONDITIONAL DSE PERMIT PER
, SECTION 10.03, SOBDIVISION 19, AND
s GRANTING A VARIANCE TO
SECTION 10.03, SOBDIVISION 9 (D) �
FILE #1073
WHER$AS, James Deanovic (hereinafter "the applicant") has an
interest in the property located at 2050 Shoreline Drive .within the
City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and Iegal ly described as follows:
� Lot l, Block 1 and Out�ot B, Hartwood, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of
Orono to permit grading and filling in excess of • 100 cubic yards,
requiring a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.03, Subdivision 19; grading. and fil ling within the 0-75' lakeshore
setback zone, requiring variances to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and
10.55, Subdivision 8.
NOW, THER$FOR$, B$ IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1073.
2. The property is Yocated in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District. •
3. The Orono PYanning Commission reviewed this application on
September 15, 1986, and recommended approval of the variances for
grading and filling based on the proposed site plan, and
recommended approval of ths conditional use permit for grading
and filling within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area, based on the
following findings:
• A) The proposed grading w�11 not create additional run-off
to the 1ake.
B) The proposed grading w� ii have no effect on the
neighborhood drainage pattern. �
Paqe 1 of 4
�.�� �d� Clt� o� ORONO
,;�
• �,�,����:`: � .
� � �' � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
;<:;,..`;,_
�, - .�.,. .
"°` NO. 2064
,��� .,.
�
,� _ � �
�;:
C) Portions of the grading, near County Road 15, are
necessary to alleviate existing drainage problems.
D) Based on the grading plans submitted, the proposed fill
does not constitute a berm as such, except for the portion
of elevation 944'-946' located 50' back from the right-of-
way line, and that berm is of a height and location that
W�ii not cause view problems for the adjacent properties.
4. This lot has unique concerns because the lakeshore parcel is
taxed separately from the residence parcel. A special 1ot
combination was not filed when the plat was approved, hence a
dock would be allowed on OutYot B only if Outlot B is combined
with Lot 1 through a special lot combination.
5. . This 1ot is considered as a lakeshore lot: under current
code all accessory structures on the property must meet the
average lakeshore setback. This 1ot is considered to have a
�akeshore yard, 2 side yards (adjacent to the north and south lot
� lines) , and a rear yard (along the west lot line abutting the
railroad right-of-way). The south side yard setback ( 30 '
required) shaY1 be measured from the actual south lot line rather
than from the private road easement.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generaYly to other
property in this zoning �district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties;
would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli-
� cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
7. The City Council fincls that granting a conditional use permit
to a 1 low the proposed grading and f i 11 ing wi i i not be detrimenta 1
to the health, safety or general we�fare of the pubYic, wou�ld not
adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other
danger to neighboring properties, nor wilY it depreciate
surrounding property values and that the proposed Ievel of use of
the property wiY1 be in keeping with the intent and objectives of
the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. ,
CONCLQSIONS, ORD�;R AND CONDITIONS
� Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning
Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for grading and filling in the
amount of 5,000-10,000 cubic yards; and grants a variance to Sections
10.22, Subdivision 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 for grading and filling
within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area, subject to the following
conditions:
Page 2 of 4
. , ♦. . •
� `�
. . . �•,�M.. .
� �t ��� ��' � City o� ORONO � �
.:;.�� . .
i.. s :
• ' �� ' •
.,F r J�!�.'���}.,
j�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
" NO. 2064
,,
� �Y 4 q .
•. - ..n. . ,
l. Applicant shall maintain suitable erosion control measures
� during the grading and filling, as required by the City
Inspector, until vegetation cover is established.
2. Al1 grading shall conform to the proposed grading plan which
shall become Exhibit A of this Resolution, except that the ditch
along County Road 15 shall be regraded to provide positive
drainage and a slightly larger ponding area near the culvert
inlet. �
3. The applicant must execute a special lot combination for
Outlot B and Lot 1 prior to issuance of a permit for construci:ion
of a dock to serve the residence on Lot l.
4. Applicant is advised that �the 934'-936' elevation will be
• considered as original grade if a .fence is constructed along the
County Road; any such fence may be not exceed the 6' maximum
height above the crown of the road.
5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property
not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised
by application for a building permit within one year of the date
of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution
will expire on that date (October 13, 1987).
6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution sha�1 constitute a violation of the
. zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shal 1 be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. '
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of
October, 1986.
ATT T:
�' v
• D rot Hallin City Clerk Mary C. y � �
ler, Ma or
� .
roperty r- (s)
Page 3 of 4
. - . .
C�t � � of ORONO .
� �
• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� / NO. 2064
�
' • � • • .
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss. �
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this 19th day of Jurie . 198� .
before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
appeared Rona l c� r a„e,- known to me to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
' C���� �L:Gu-�
�
• NOTARY PUBLIC
THERESA L. NAAB
� µOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA 9�8�9 2
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My commission expiros 9-8-92
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 198 , before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
• MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
j . . paqe 4 of 4 . . .'
'� � . � ' ' '�, . �
� . ,
.2: . . , . .. ,, s t M1 . a:l .,a�-.
��' .• ` . . . .�. . . " . . • . ._' f.. ... I —. ... ' . . � . �._.. .. .. ... 1. �.. ' 'y, . . .
� • , � � � 1 'i �� ('t �R�\ • �
, � . p,.�c�,q � �'.�,.'��t� � � , ;
� s ` ::! ',::���
" � •• � . '• Certificate of Survey �"� � F? ��� � �e�'e+ .
for the Acorn Group ��•.
of Lot l, Block 1, Hartwood
Hennepin County, Minnesota •
• � � EXHIBIT A
� ' � : . � RESOLUTION # 2064
. � ' . Esitri.vG
. . . • . NoUJf .
31A 53' .
• . : /� ��'7 i ,�i .�� �� �� ./'/`/ '�.�.. ��� �. �� f V:,Y�. , .
. . / . /� �o�`� � � '/ . . �' � , ..n%';'y+/ .
��. i t��) � / ��/ '"�'I�
' 10% � /� ' � qtor-• • / �'�.%••,
. .� � ;i��� .;:ri.
� � '�iY'rr���
�i / %;.:•.t.'qf��,
. . l • � ./ -.�� . �� /�A�j i:?}.�.��:j.;fl;i
. . • / �J , �./ /':.,Jr,i:��?4�:yb�i;
�Y t�¢.
� e e. .� � �J18-' p1 /•'. � i i ,�"
. . � � , • . �� ���j� �.l,;..2�.t:
/ . 'J , � q'�' .
= a ,.;,`�o:':�:��,. � ��
�o� � , , j �.�' J �:... rq.;:.,;,:
, eP . � • '6� . .� l K ` drkc,�J y�.� �0�
. .. . . � Qt �.�\ � , / � ��'/�. ',,{F / !�yt��;t,t� j'• `� .
,� � � � O�'� � V�i . , / • � � � ,�l y ,;,�=�Ya.,•i' .,- , �`
/,/ 1 t,, � �� ` . /� . . ` / ;1/ k�q��./AYf I �
: S 1 g �� . _..�f � ta`.�`�.•;.+
't • � �`�/I � I I ^ �,:,r:,i�3;�i. ! .
/ � Q r5+%{S;j�dti��.
� /� � ,' f , � � I��? • ' � I ;_,::•�.�•��;- � �, ' �v
. � `.�� '� ;` ° 1 r `�'` ��°�I( � % / � �/ ;iu''•% `h`�' • � _.
� � '� —J �� � �:'' '-� i Q I
� � � 1 L � �� :,�'I�..i� �
,� ` ' � �I � l/// � /•,A�,� '�,�... .
•,pO.:n t'
/ o ' / �//�jm � '�.^�,:iV.:y,�`<� �
� l ��`�'r. '•�.--•L./�'�'� I q2 r'" i� !� y ' :i1'7'L.'':;�:�,� e
• / . •.t,: r `�.x''.' " — , 3 / I I '.;�,r;y;:.•;
. i � ��s e ��a3��tiy� . z ,-•
` =:3 .� � �''r' � *. / ./ �� •�_2� eH.� �
� , .`!, �:;,; �� •� `— .— �' 1 ' � �., , . '
� _ . . '��� ��,:T '` ---� i` _ � ��l , z . _
-�,r_�:,,.,,,�,,. � �� Ta ,
""..r.�'q��T...:,o�c::-�-..,A..r�..,.�1 " . . 1 J H ���. �� � . . -
. , . � :. . . 2 . . . .�ji'r} ,�.e ��'��"S' "7r -. " ,..�-•-T.-�:....-�.+..y^�:,--^_.,....-....-�
��, � _ � �. I` i.� . � �
. .. . i, . 6a,�.rj .l . , � � . , � �`!�1 � . ';�.�i'::�,3'�i . . ,
' • . �S•yr�� � , . � '���i ::. , .
� � � � � _ . � � . � . . � � �. � � � � 1 ����F�:5����� � � � .
. � . �. �.. , . . . . :. . ; .
' � I hereby certify that this' is a tr.ue and 'correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of e
Lot 1, Block•1, Hartwood, the:location .of'all existing�bufldings, if any, thereon, and the prop- �
• osed location of a proposed building, It does not purport to show any other improvements,or en- �
` croachments. . • � � � .
' . -• . • ' . ; • COFFIN & GRONBERG� INC.' '
. . Date . 8-18-86 � . , � � : � � � ' � . � ��� ��,��—� ,
Scale: 1" = 50' � � . . . ' • •„' a�b�ron erg •ic.�o�"f1755 :
Gordon R. Coffin Lic. No. 6064 �
� o : Iron marker • . ' • Engineers & Land Surveyors � ,
--►�a--: Existing elev. Long Lake, �Minnesota
--+�—: Proposed elev. •
' Datum: Mean Sea Level� • • �. • ' � � • •�• . . .: . � � �
i � � • � �