The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-00442 - pool � CITY OF ORONO * 2 0 1 3 - 0 0 4 4 Z * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 06/27/2013 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 420 DEBORAH DR PIN : 3]-]18-23-23-0009 LEGAL DESC : MCCULLEY FARM : LOT 006 BLOCK 002 PERMIT TYPE : ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : POOL- IN GROUND ACTIVITY : 329-STRUCTURES OTHER THAN BUILDINGS VALUATION : $ 30,000.00 NO"1'E: SF,PARA7�E PI?RMI'I'S REQUIRED: MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL(STA"I�E) POOL NOTL: SEPTIC TANKS S�G INSTf1LLFD AND SYSTI?M FULI.Y FLJNC"I'IONAL BEFORE ESCROW FUNDS ARF, RF,TURNGD. INITIAL: � / APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 466.75 BRADY, ROBERT& RACHAELLE STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 15.00 420 DEBORAH DR MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359- TOTAL 481.75 OWNER BRADY, ROBERT& RACHAELLE 420 DEBORAH DR MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performcd according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Codc. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission tbr additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances goveming this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specit�ed herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after wark has commenced. 'I he applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are reque onformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be re ed at a y time for due cause. I � ��.� : � �� lP� a 7� / Ap lican Permitee Signat e Date Issu By Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. ,A � l L N� -----_ , � � l ��w , / � !i �� lp C�ty of Orono � �� Building Permit Application for a Swimming Pool O Mailing Address: Permit number: O�/.�"� � �O PO Box 66 � / �2 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: �0—`7'—/� Street Address: Received by: y� G� 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: Orono, MN 55356 t�'�ESHO�� Total Fee: Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: �� , � �Q � 2� �P CONTRACTOR/APP�,.1�J ANT INFORMATtQN: Name: �r� il a�/(F ��./��/ State License# Expiration Date: Phone: [ ' � f Fax: Address: � /� Cit : � � l � ; ZIP: ,� Contact Person: ' � � 1 � �(l ContacYs phone number Email: App�icant is: Contractor Homeowner (Circle One) PROPERTY OWNER INFO TION: Name: ,�t�G�.,�Fl��' L��G�L� Phone (day): Mailing Address: L/�-C.� �L 6' l� ZIP: �� 3�j Email and/or Fax: ENGINEER INFORMATION: n C�)� � V�U - ��V 7 ,� Name: � �• /v G Phone: �r`�- ' C Address: � �i f Cit : � � ZIP: _.�'J'��/ EmaiL ��- _ ,i� n C�ri � �1 S N :E-t..S'`^�- Fax: �= PROJECT INFORMATION: 1. Pool Dimensions: 4.Accessory to: 5. Pool Type: 7. Retaining Walls? �_X�feet �Single Family ❑Above ground ❑ yes '�no Height " 2. Heated? ❑ Multiple Family/Condo �In-ground "A building permit is required '�j yes ❑ no � Public for any wall over 4 feet in ❑ Other(specify) height measured from the 3. Excavated materials will be: ❑ Commercial bottom of the footing to the top ❑ Industrial of the wall, even if it replaces ❑ removed from site 6.Sewage Disposal & an existing wall. � used on site ❑ Other: (specify) Water Supply Tiered walls are considered ❑ Other: (specify) ❑ Public Sewer one wall unless they are separated by twice the height [�Private Sewer of the higher wall. Total Cubic Yards ❑ Public Water � Priv We Estimated Construction Value $ �� Packet Last Updated: 03/29/13 Page 19 of 21 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed A licable H ❑ Permit A lication ❑ Plan Review Fee p ❑ Pool Plans p ❑ Surve includes radin lan ❑ ❑ Hardcover Calculation Worksheets ❑ ❑ Erosion Control Plan or co of MCWD Permit ❑ ❑ Se tic S stem Certification ❑ ❑ Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan ❑ ❑ Escrow & Escrow A reement ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning & Building Departments; • Understands, if applicable, an as-built survey and as-built hardcover cover calculations, are required to be submitted after the project is complete(including final grading and landscaping) prior to refunding the escrow; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Some or ail of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the permit may not be issued. ApplicanYs Signature: �/'�'l"-� (� Date: �~F � � �� ` . � d;�I�-�'" � �" ��'�� Owner's Signature � Date: Packet Last Updated: 03/04/13 Page 20 of 21 ��►►� ��v��vv ��cL�s�' Fo� ��vv STRuc�'uR�s I i4D�o�'�o�s Address/Permit Number: � � ;,� �� '� �''� ��s �`� Description of work: � �� Septic review by: ., y� �"� Date Approvec�: ��- •�- � �.=� �� Zoning review by: 1b,Lfh�v�"�� Date Approved: � '�� " � , Building rediew by: �,_ _ �� Date Approvecl: �� ' � � `�� ,� Grading review by: �� 6., Date Approved: �l2 � Zonir�g Districf: Zoning File#: Reso#: Reso �ate: Zoning: Lot Area: SF/AC Wic�th: Lot Caverage: SF _% Survey Submitted: �es � No Date of Survey: �'�.�` r �— Revised date(?): q•�'�� Pro osed Setbacks: Front(Lake) Rear(Street) � � � � � Z f � S E W ) Other Buildings 1�11etlanc! Side Side Defined He�gE�t: �eak Height: FFE: FFE minus 6 feet= (Ex6sting Contour� �erimeter(linear feet) = 50% _ #of Stories Ok? � YES FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR GRAVIIL SPACE: The distance between the lowest FOR A�UILDING ON A SLAB FOCINDATION: START WITH proposed floor(of the basement or crawl space)and the highest point of the roof. START WITH The distance between the top of slab and If you have a... the highest point of the roof. If you have a... • GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no windows): Subtract half the windows): Subtract half the distance distance between the highest point between the highest point of the roof of the roof to the low point of the to the low point of the corcesponding SUBTRACTION corresponding gable or hipped roof SUBTRACTION gable or hipped roof (BASED ON ROOF � GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with (BASED ON . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with TYPE� windows): Subtract half the ROOF TYPE) windows): Subtract half the distance distance between the top of the between the top of the highest highest window and the highest window and the highest point of the point of the roof roof ALL OTHER ROOF 7'YPES(flat, • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, e mansard,etc:No subtraction. mansard,etc):No subtraction. ADDITION Add the distance between the top of slab �"' SUBTRACTION Subtract the dislance between the (BASED ON and the highest existing grade adjacent to (BASED ON EXISTING basemenUcrawl space floor and the EXISTING the foundation. GRADES) highest existing grade adjacent to the GRADES foundation OR 10 feet(whichever is Iess). EQUALS Defined building height EQUALS Defined 6uilding height ShQretand District 11�GW� l�errnit Recei�+ed �.vera e Lakeshore Setback Il�et� �lu�f � Yes � No N/A � Yes o 0 Yes No � Yes � No 0 A Permit Number: d g,�f e Setback: Storrr�wat�r Quality Exi�ting Prapasee� �aeiance Required CUP Requirec� Q�eela District Ti�r Fiardcover F��rdcover Q Yes o 0 Yes o Type(s): Type(s): Updated: Jsnuary 2Q13 v:\forms�plan review checklist 2U i 3.docx �` REAAARKS (in-house): � � F�es ta be Char ec! YES h!0 �; Permit Plan Reviev�r State Surcharge :-a�� in�,�estigatior� Fe� � SAC-Riumtaer Qf S/�C Units a� - � Other(specify) � � S uare Foota e $ er S uare Foota e Basement X - $ 1 St Floor X = $ � 2"d FloOr X - $ � Garage X = $ ; Estimateci Construction �lalue: � `�� :��-`�� " Orono Inspections Required Work Reguieing Separate Permits Required State Permits � Site 0 Plumbing � Grading/ Filling D�Well ; 0 rdcover Removal Mechanical 0 Fire ,,d Electrical � Footin � Septic � Water Connection � 9 � � Poured Wall 0 Fireplace Q Sewer Connection t: � Faundati�n Survey � Masonry � Lawn Irrigation � 0 Radon Rock Bed ❑ Mfg. � � Framing 0 Other(specify) �, � � Insulation � Built Survey Final ` 0 Wetland Buffer � 0 Other(specify) � 4 = REMARKS (in-house): i � P pi F �t E �° Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: � � Access: Existing: � YES Q NO New: � YES 0 NO ; OFFICIAL REM�iRKS -TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INiYlALLED � L � �-+'� ��-��/G� �� `� ��.C� �� `��1�� e�� `-�� ;'� i [ ``'� I'Z�6`t. � '�c��3��r-f �� -� �� -e...,i�..�� -� ' t��-'�-.��..�"�'�� Updated: January 2013 v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx s - -- ----- "�r 1 � Bu -- � � ` � _ *b ; �If ' , � 3F =a�.. �� J �T ,�,�� a� � f� � � � � �.rr f,��` � .. �k.' �Y� . . �„'�t � . � r . .:� � ¢ .. � ' `� � 7;" µ .; . ,�,Ya e � - '`� .. 4 � �� ky �a . �'rxg:� ,c ��f•, � - � � � � � '�.. ...# 4 ^ �� . � � � �"'„ ud � �' 3 . � � 'ilg g. . �-+fiS,s ..p� ,. „..:.. �A � � T $• .v_�. � � '3' .. . ��`.. »�. �`J • . v } f ' � 'n � � , �'1 �� 3t� '�'O .+ � �. ��= r�" _ � '��`eb�r�h�rrve � � � '� �� +I�b;� .� ,� �� .f �<: . � : ` . i � � -�20 l)ehtir.�� [)rive I _ �� I � � � �=,��s `± � 5 4,. � � . , � .r� , �i ', � y � Wetland Buffer Sign �. � �'°�� .�� ,�% �"�' p � y�� ++t '� ,d t. x .� t 'S e d'r+. . � � � �t �^��, � '�': i r ,�R. � x � � � � � � � _ �r�� g � � � „�r � t' ��:"� � , � � ._ ��'"� � s.. :r� .�,r��,,,.* �, ;�„ ;� ,: :� � ':. � , _ - . , , �. . > � _ , � . t .�. : , , , �. �. , � ` ,_ '�,, ��.� • - � .. d � W � ,- Q' l�;�. �" �,,jj' E :,�� t �G�J��e� � Wetland Buffer S�gn �`� �`�� '� ,� _< �.< � � . , .. � � � . � - - �, <. , � . . , � . .. � �, � w . ,. ,. _.. � _ ; � �� , ' � . � � % � � ��`,�, ` f �f� �;� �,;,, � ,� �''� '� � � �. .,�- , � �.; �� . � ,w �� +� a �'��.� r�` :.,� �� _ �� ,�` < � �.�;� � �- � ��a��` � + � � .�-� � � '�, � � � . �� . � , w . �y p � �'�� ` � vx � .�. Y .,_ 4,.F . . � � , p: � �' 3L,�� u +�y ' .. ,.. . .. '� � ' �'i i a ..�.^` ,r . ' . f• r �� . x< .. .. .. .._ _ _ __ . __ . � � .�� e J 150 Feet CITY OF ORONO • ��e�� 420 DEBORAH DRIVE � I Preserve Wetland „ I� �Wetland BufEeE � 50 Feet � •� oF �bolton-ms��G Figure 1 Source- SEPTEMBER,2012 � � 1 pOxvmwn 1 .erv _v n f� 9 i1�-: 4 Mike Gaffron From: Jessica Loftus Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:20 PM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: RE: 420 Deborah Dr. -wetland buffer OK,thanks. From: Mike Gaffron Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:17 PM To: Jessica Loftus Subject: FW: 420 Deborah Dr. - wetland buffer Jessica — Below(Scroll down past Rachaelle Brady's response) is the email I sent Brady last fall with her options. Nothing has changed. Mike Michael P.Gaffron Assistant City Administrator/Long Term Strategy City of Orono (Street Address)2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66,Crystal Bay,MN 55323 Phone: (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952)249-4616 From: Rachaelle [mailto:rachaelle48@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:58 PM To: Mike Gaffron Subject: 420 Deborah Dr. - wetland buffer Thank you Mike for all the work you put into my project. After reading and re- reading your information, I've decided that I whole-heartedly can't consider any of the options. I've spoken with many council members and Lili, and they agree, that revisions need to be considered with the wetland buffer code. Guidelines are just that. We as humans still have the power to make judgement calls when there are circumstances that require it. Triggers are just triggers. To dispute: 1. drainage to the wetland, it's hard pressed for any of the runoff getting that far without seeping into the ground before it gets there. 2. We will be regrading the area so the runoff will be toward the tennis court and a berm to the right of the pool. 3. The added hardcover is still way under the allowed percentage, so that should not even be considered. Is this pool project really going to harm the wetland area? Pve lived on this piece of property for almost 26 years and I've loved taking care of it. I only want to make it more enjoyable for my extended family and generations to come. My hope is that the code will be changed to allow the distance to the wetland be a factor. I would like to finish the septic system next spring along with the pool. If my 51/2 acres were divided into 5 lots, 4 of them could have pools. In conclusion, I am a victim of a vague code, new obstacles thrown in in the l lth hour, and poor information about whether or not I even have a wetland on my property. It was questioned by surveyors, wetland specialists, a delineator, excavators, elevation guy for the pool, and my septic installer. I am asking you to please revise this code in my favor. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Respectively, Rachaelle Brady Sent from my iPhone i � On Oct 10, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Mike Gaffron <MGaffron(c�ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: Rachaelle— I sent this to you last Friday—don't know why you didn't get it. Here it is again. Mike Michael P. Gaffron Assistant City Administrator/Long Term Strategy City of Orono (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crvstal Bay , MN 55323 Phone: (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 From: Mike Gaffron Sent: Friday, October O5, 2012 10:18 AM To: 'rachaelle48(a�hotmail.com' Cc: Melanie Curtis; Jessica Loftus Subject: Re: Buffer - 420 Deborah Drive /Pool Permit Rachaelle - Mark Perry has discussed the issue of wetland classification with Catherine Bach at the Watershed District (MCWD). Here is my analysis of the situation: Your wetland is currently classified as a Preserve management category, which requires a 50- foot buffer. Because your proposed construction activity meets all the Code criteria that triggers establishment of a buffer, the 50-foot buffer is required to be established. Those criteria are: 1) the area of the pool construction drains toward the wetland; 2)the amount of grading activity associated with the pool exceeds 50 cubic yards (it's actually more than 100 cubic yards); and 3) the pool results in a net increase in the square footage of impervious surface that drains toward the wetland. Unfortunately there is no provision in the Code that would negate any of these factors just because the pool is 350 feet from the wetland. Your wetland delineator, Wayne Jacobsen, staked out the edge of the wetland approximately 16 feet south of the rock wall. The City's consultant wetland expert, Mark Perry of Bolton & Menk, was on the site and he agrees with Wayne's staked location of the wetland boundary. We discussed the possibility that the current classification of the wetland as a Preserve category might be incorrect. The only way to get it changed to some lower category would be to perform a"MnRAM Assessment" which must be performed by a wetland expert. Catherine Bach indicated MCWD will not perform the MnRAM assessment, but would review an assessment performed by someone else. You would have to have your wetland delineator do the MnRAM assessment. Your goal in having that MnRAM assessment completed would be to have the wetland reclassified to a lesser management category than Preserve, such as Manage 1, Manage 2, or 2 , Manage 3. Manage 3 would be your best result, because it only requires a 16.5-foot buffer, and you already have that in place behind the rock walL If it turned out to be Manage 1 or Manage 2, the buffer required would be 35' or 25' respectively from the edge of wetland. Mark tells me he is fairly confident it would be reclassified to a lower category than Preserve, but until the assessment was done we would not know exactly which category. I understand that Melanie has offered to assist you in choosing the right plantings to establish a buffer if you decide to go ahead with the buffer establishment based on the current Preserve classification. However, if you want to spend the money to have a MnRAM assessment done in the hopes that a lesser or no additional buffer will be required, that is up to you. As I see it, your options for dealing with the buffer issue are as follows: Option l. Have your wetland person do a MNRAM Assessment. If the MNRAM Assessment indicates that the classification should be Manage 1, 2 or 3 instead of"Preserve", then have him submit it to the MCWD for approval. Once they approve it, you would then proceed with submitting to us a buffer plan to have the appropriate buffer established in the case of Manage 1 or Manage 2; or if it's a Manage 3 no added buffer is necessary and we could issue the pool permit once you re-apply. If the MnRAM Assessment concludes that it's still a Preserve category, in order to move forward you would have to do the required 50-foot buffer as noted previously. Option 2. If you choose to skip the MnRAM and just go ahead with the Preserve buffer of 50', you should proceed with the steps outlined previously by Melanie and Chris. Option 3. You could apply for a variancefrom the buffer requirements, which has a $700 application fee and would take about two months to process. You would have to convince the Council that you have a practical difficulty that prevents you from establishing the buffer. From staff's perspective, we don't see that you have a practical difficulty, and staff would not support the variance. But, that is an option if you wish to pursue it, with no guarantee it would be approved. I did research your question about why the septic system had to be replaced. The City inspector did a soil boring on the property on October 8, 1999 and his boring logs (attached) indicate the seasonal water table of the existing system was only 14 inches below the trenches, not meeting the 30" minimum separation requirement. It had a deadline of December 31, 2009 to be replaced, but replacement is also triggered by new construction on the site or by a sale of the home. It is important that you complete the installation of the septic system regardless whether you proceed with the pool. Please call me if you have additional questions. Mike Michael P. Gaffron Assistant City Administrator/Long Term Strategy City of Orono (Street Address) 2750 Kelley Parkway (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bav , MN 55323 Phone: (952) 249-4600 3 . Fax: (952) 249-4616 <Soil Boring Log - 420 Deborah Drive.pdfl 4 Christine Mattson From: Jessica Loftus Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:51 AM To: Christine Mattson; Melanie Curtis; Mike Gaffron Subject: FW: Pool season -----Original Message----- From: Lili McMillan [mailto:lilim(a�mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:50 AM To: Jessica Loftus Subject: Re: Pool season Have staff outline her options. On Apr 24, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Jessica Loftus wrote: Do you think she would want to appeal (or apply for a variance) similar to Jay Kanive? -----Original Message----- From: Jessica Loftus Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:19 AM To: Lili McMillan Subject: RE: Pool season Unfortunately, we have not yet amended our code in a manner that would allow us to issue her permit but the code amendment process is underway. The amendment would in effect exempt her type of project from being subject to buffer requirements. It may be a couple months before the code revisions are adopted. -----Original Message----- From: Lili McMillan Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 4:00 PM To: Jessica Loftus Subject: FW: Pool season Jessica, Can you give me the official city response for this? Lili Lili McMillan Mayor, City of Orono Orono, Minnesota 612-840-8484 From: Rachaelle Brady [rachaelle48@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 3:48 PM To: Lili McMillan Subject: Pool season Hi Lili, Is it possible for me to get the permit for the pool now? I have all the requirements done from last year. My pool guy keeps asking when he can get me scheduled and order the equipment. i Thank you, Rachaelle Brady Sent from my iPhone z Christine Mattson From: Jessica Loftus Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 9:13 AM To: Jessica Loftus; Christine Mattson Cc: Melanie Curtis; Mike Gaffron Subject: RE: Pool season The minutes from her September appearance: MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, September 24, 2012 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS Rachelle Brady, 420 Deborah Drive, stated after complying with the regulations to upgrade her septic system in order to build a swimming pool, her application was denied due to a wetland issue. The wetland is very small in comparison to the overall property. Brady indicated she was originally told that the wetland was not an issue and then it became an issue approximately two weeks prior to construction of the swimming pool. Brady stated she is requesting the City Council waive the requirements for the wetland buffer. The property consists of 5 acres and the wetland buffer is located 400 feet from the pool. The pool would have no impact on the wetland area. The wetland area has been mowed for the past 20 years and has been consistently dry. Brady indicated she would be willing to leave the native grass in that area grow if that is what the City Council determines is appropriate. Brady stated her issue was that she was required to draft a new plan once the wetland became an issue and then needed to appear before the City Council and the Watershed District. Brady indicated approval of her swimming pool has now been pushed back almost a year. Two wetland specialists have looked at the property and initially determined that a wetland buffer is not necessary. Brady indicated her surveyor then received an e-mail from Chris Mattson with the City of Orono stating that their wetland specialist, Mark Perry, has met with Wayne Jacobson, the delineator, and they have agreed there is no wetland on the property and to please update the survey. That has been overturned after Chris spoke again with Mark Perry and others. Chris then indicated she was mistaken and that a delineation and other things will be required. In addition, Jesse Struve is requesting a wetland delineation even though he has not visited the property. Brady stated if the City Engineer would visit her property, he would find that the wetland is not an issue. Brady stated she would like this to become a win/win situation for both her and the City. A new mound system is being installed on the property in light of the pool but that if she is going to be denied a pool due to the wetland issue, she will not be completing the mound system. Brady requested the City Council waive the wetland requirements and allow her to construct a pool. Mayor McMillan asked if the City Council has the authority to waive the wetland requirements. Mattick indicated he is not familiar with the application but that the City Council does have the authority to waive the requirements following a review of her application. Brady asked what documentation the City requires. Mattick stated there is an application form that she would need to fill out requesting the City Council waive the wetland requirements. Mayor McMillan encouraged Ms. Brady to work with Staff on this issue. McMillan noted that Ms. Brady was not aware of the wetland buffer issue until approximately two weeks ago. Bremer asked whether the wetland buffer signs are located on her property. Brady indicated they are not and that the wetland delineator placed those on the plan. Curtis noted the plan is an exhibit that was prepared by the City's wetland specialist to illustrate to the property owner the location of a possible wetland buffer. The reason for the visit by the City's wetland specialist was in an attempt to agree on an area of wetland buffer and that a wetland delineation is not needed. Mayor McMillan stated it was her understanding that a wetland delineation would be required. 1 Curtis indicated the pool is far enough away from the wetland that Staff has made a determination that a wetland delineation would not be needed as long as a wetland buffer area can be determined and agreed upon mutually. Curtis stated she did leave a message for Mr. Perry earlier today but that she has not heard back from him at this point. Mr. Perry has indicated previously that some buffer vegetation improvements would need to be made to the area and that the existing grass is not sufficient. Brady stated she was informed by Ms. Curtis that the existing vegetation was turf grass. Curtis indicated she mistakenly typed the words turf grass in an e-mail to Ms. Brady but that she has explained to Ms. Brady on a couple of occasions that it is not turf grass but not acceptable for a buffer. Brady stated in her opinion the existing native grass should be fine. Mayor McMillan asked if Ms. Brady is willing to work with Staff on this issue. Brady indicated she would like to see if she can put the pool in without a buffer. Bremer stated it sounds like a wetland delineation will not be required but that there needs to be an area designated as a wetland buffer and some restoration. Brady indicated if she has to incur significant expense to restore the buffer area, she does not want to go ahead with the pool. Mayor McMillan asked what the fee is to file an appeal. Curtis indicated it would be $100. Brady noted there is still an escrow for the plan and vegetation required. Mayor McMillan encouraged Ms. Brady to work with Staff on this issue. Loftus indicated she or Mike Gaffron can work with Ms. Brady on this issue. -----Original Message----- From: Jessica Loftus Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 9:07 AM To: Christine Mattson Cc: Melanie Curtis; Mike Gaffron Subject: FW: Pool season Hi Chris, Do you have the latest request or requirements needed for Rachaelle Brady? Thank you, Jessica -----Original Message----- From: Lili McMillan Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 4:00 PM To: Jessica Loftus Subject: FW: Pool season Jessica, Can you give me the official city response for this? Lili Lili McMillan Mayor, City of Orono Orono, Minnesota 612-840-8484 From: Rachaelle Brady [rachaelle48@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 3:48 PM To: Lili McMillan Subject: Pool season Hi Lili, Is it possible for me to get the permit for the pool now? I have all the requirements done from last year. My pool guy keeps asking when he can get me scheduled and order the equipment. 2 Christine Mattson From: Christine Mattson Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 3:11 PM To: 'Rachaelle' Cc: Mike Gaffron Subject: 420 Deborah Drive/#2013-00442 Attachments: Escrow Agreement- Building Permit w Erosion Control 2013-00442.pdf Hi Rachaelle, We are reviewing the building permit application submitted for a swimming pool. While the review process is happening, I thought I would email you a copy of the building permit escrow agreement. When you are notified the permit is ready for pickup you will also need to sign the attached agreement and deposit a check with the City for $2,500. Once the project is complete, all inspections have been finalized, the septic tanks are installed &the system fully functional and an as-built survey has been submitted and approved,the escrow funds can be refunded. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono 2750 Kelly Parkway Orono MN 55356 (physical addressJ PO Box 66 Crystal Bay MN 55323-0066 (mailing addressJ `1? 952.249.4620 � 952.249.4616 � cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us �' www.ci.orono.mn.us Summer Office Hours: (Monday, May 20 through Friday,August 30,2013) Monday-Thursday: 7:30 am to 5 pm Friday: 7:30 am to 11:30 am OUR OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED: Thursday,July 4, 2013 1 ' ' i��''�!`�� -��"��:��'�'i�l��,�� rIN ACCORDANCE WITf�t1N$IJAPSP/ICGS 2011,TNE PLAN C�-lECI<ED F�Y _L��DATE (o - l '1 - Zo ( � INSTALLER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING ONE SKIMMER G� FOR EVERY 800 SQUARE FEET OF SURFACE AREA AND ONE � - ' '" � � RETURN FOR EVERY 300 SQUARE FEET OF SURFACE AREA. �� s' a' �' s' s' � � ._-- � � -. _- ; 4' ; �'�., : --�'' � � 6, � ., ____�-� " ; � 8' ' i r------------r` i i � i � � i i � i � i � i � i � � 1'MIN. � � 18� �O 1 � 2� --I SAFETY ROPE � i I i i AND FLOAT i � � i i ' i � i � � i i j o i 8� ,�------------1_ ' �o i � i ; �'�-�, , �! o Z y�1 I % �� ` i n p `f i i� _ i a m � �: �'�-, i �� 8' 7' 7' 8' ------------------------- --------- ------------------------- � 3� �n 6"WATERI.INE7------------ 3� 4u � � ------------------------------------------- —�- � �}�-8n i 1�� -I �' �— 6' �- 14' 12' -�"�'� , 36' �� CERT#ESR-2782 ��"{j,J�� f�E GTAN G L E � S'�O X ��—O . '- . DNING/SLIDING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CUSTOMER:SPP MN I��ru `' ; j DESIGNED FOR SIMMMING POOLS AND P SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE - WITH THE DIVING/SLIDING EQUIPMENT �pg NAME:18X36 TYPE II �I�� ST EE L P A N E L S PERIMETER: 108'0" VOLUME(US G81): 24235 - �� MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. UWG#: SURFACE(ftZ): 648 VOLUME(Liters): 91716 "�' "0�° PLEASE CONiACT THE DIVING/SLIDING �- * � � EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER FOR �012-�PL-07416 LINER(ftz): 648 DATE: 8/28/2012 DSR: 127 ��+' , '`; '" wa �� `'° TF+EiR sPEciFicnTioNs TIFF#: EMAIL I(IT#: CUSTOMKIT COVER ft' : 760 SCALE: 1/8��_��-O�� MEETS DEP7H AND SHAPE MINIMUM � � STANDARD ANSI/APSP/ICGS 2011 �� '�"��N�� SHEET: 1 OF 2 . � Dia on:.;s �0� � 1 To 2 36'0" O 1 To 3 40'-3" U' 1 To 4 18'0" Part number Descri tion QTY 2 To 3 18'0" ST0960002X 8' 8 2 To 4 40'-3" 3 To 4 36'0" ST0840002X 7' 2 ST0720001X 6' 2 ST0480001X 4' 1 ST0240000X 2' 1 Brace" Brace 12 IPC-AB90 CONNECTOR CNR ANGLE 90D 42" 3 IPC-STKPK25 REBAR STAKE 18"25PC 2 40, IPC-HDWSTRT150 BOLT STR 3/8-16X1"C/W NUT 150PC 2 STP90CSCDP ACRYLIC STEP CORNER 90D 8'-6" 1 "RECOMMENDED BRACE: Generic(XXX-XXX) A B r---------------2,��---------------------------F 4,-0„--------------------------------? � � � � i rI, - -' i 2 i i . -' i � , �� ,_ i i i .\ ,,-� i � i , � � i `, - � i :-, i . , -' i i \ ,,� � '-' i r----------- � i � � � i i � � � � i i � � i i i i i i - � i i � � i �i � � � I M I � N I --j----- ------h-------- I N � �---- � I I I I I j � � 1 I I I 10 � � I �i �.-� I 1 � O I j � � I ��I j j------------ ,� j �OI ~ I � / �� I �ZI i %i ��` � I ��I i n t i ```�� I �°�I I '� �� 3 �� ; 2�� 2�� ; p�------------------------------------------------------------------------------------�C A B C D 1 2'-10" 38'-314" 42'-11 1/4" 20'-1 1/4" 2 38'-314" 2'-10" 20'-1 1l4" 42'-11 1/4" 3 42'-11 114" 20'-1 1/4" 2'-10" 38'-3/4" 4 20'-1 1/4" 42'-11 1/4" 38'-3/4" 2'-10" SZ 32'-9 314" 24'-5" 14'-1 314" 26'-1" S1 26'-1" 14'-1 3l4" 24'-5" 32'-9 314" HZ 23'-4" 34'-5" 28'-314" 12'-2" H 1 12'-2" 28'-314" 34'-5" 23'-4" A 40'0" 45'-7 3/4" 22'0" RECTANGLE 18-0 X 36-0 DWG#: 2012-SPL-07416 DATE: 8/28/2012 SHEET: 2 OF 2 � �� DATE TIME �/ CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN -�I- 3 INSPECTION NOTICE ' /� SCHEDULED — '"I 3 �v:3C� PERMIT NO. -C��`�" COMPLETED ADDRE � OWNER TELEPHONE NOIP�a -��-� �� 7 CONTRACTOR I(t�i � DESCRIPTION � D��'�-- � � ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EX AV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LA ESHORFJWETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL EE REMOVAL Z � INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPT FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEEf YOU• YES_NO � COMMENTS: o� W a � J O �. � O � W � Q � 2 W � W � J d �' RKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECTCOMPLETE W �CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REtNSPECTiON TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. O PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALLINSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cail for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952� 249-46�� OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. ��_�,� � White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopyfSite Notice �'�� `�� DATE TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN _ S/� INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED / � �`'� PERMIT NO. — �OMP ETED ADDRESS Q-�- OWNER LEPHONE NO��i -��--377� CONTRAC OR � DESCRIPTION ��I� �� ❑ FOOTiNG ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING O MECHANICAL FINAL Q ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP � ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL � HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � W a � � O �. � O � W � Q � Z W � W � J O W� ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED �T COMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REtNSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALLINSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cail for the next inspection 2a hours in advance. (952� 249-460� OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. _� White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice �20 ��11J�Y`� �v-' Topographic Surve �pYRF� Pre o�ed for: Rachaelle Brad ��o � Ej P y �FD e end , � , SFP Q • Found l�on Monument \ o ��,2 ;_ ;� ; ' I C,� �2��, � � ,64 730¢,' o . � OF h� �Jril��'i / � rb'S62 ��`o �� !r �'7 �� O�V� ' '32 o so ,o0 200 •Op os. \ - . t}2 J �,- , 4 �,a/�tJ ` lj�� c R� �o t)� - 1 inch = 100 feet a�' \ �P � - .- - � ` a�-- -'/��a 5�'�3„ . P�• 31-J18-23-23-0009 �l r''A ^ ~ � lf��S5�'�� o . `: � '.: `Q� � '°jDS�,°�ed�te ^ � � �d � . � ; � � �P t Address•• 420 Deboroh Orive �D� ` e� �\ Cocotion ,�, Maple Plain, MN �• � �� f- \ 55359 6Q '` .� L ' � � � �� :�., oundory Description (aer clienf,� 1 `-'� �, Lot 6, Block 2, MCCUCLEY FARM, 0� House ,`_ - according to fhe recorded plat ,�(��' _ i Approx. ��,� � � - Driveway 6' �. -`�� thereof, Hennepin County, � h� Location b,��,� Mrnnesoto. Subject to any and 1 a!l easem en ts o f record ��'�• __ 94 `` ��; �� , , n � : o �� Note: APprox.-- �.:�,� �-� .� .: J \ Not oN measured distances a� rennis �""� ' Pro osed--� t - 'r� - � between exrsting � Cou�t p ' O '� 18x36 � ~� � monuments motch plat p� Locotion . i measu�ements. OD P o o l i Approx.---- � Furfher survey work p� / Se fic moy be needed � L O f 6 � Mound fo ve�rfy boundory i�� Location j line locations. (95ffx41 ft) � i ,� `_ � .�� eo5� ``\ ; / i ��9 O� ��\o \ ,. � N89 52'21"E 710.30 (meas.) 713.5� (p/at) �' �6�6�� Note•• Ihere are no obvious/y vrsi6le wet/low /ands on subject porcel. Therefore, wet/onds have not been verified by a certified wetlond delineotor. ��a I I ; �� Existing youse � I � /, LFE�4�A -, / �, I ,. . �, ., , , - _� � \ � �� s�72.�x `---Approx. � �� Wel! � �`� Propose�--' -- I � 4x8;Pool�� `.:;�\ Deck `-`,�,�,_- Locafron "\ Equipmenf \ \ •,_.�,;�I�r� j � _ ,�x;sse.s � � Areo� ��;%�._._�� ' �7,- v ---� �•� '� � � � ", S �� "'�� `,�� .",.�i x g69 4 �� v� � � `� /� i � Brick � � �, � ,� �•.\ _L._patio , � ,�/��, <� � •J� iy`Sc ,�.._--^-� J -v- �� `` �_ � � � �\�� Pro .osed --- ' a' - �.� �, � ��' �P�o�Dec �� l �'``�-j-��_ � �� .o ,. •_._-- o `�"F' pr p ed-�,\ � `• ti! 1 Prop. �� j� ��S � y`',r� Dec ;Edge � �� Bx36 �% -'---:?roposed � � EIev=96�8.5) `� r �+ poo/ � 1 ;� Pool Deck Le•pend � \ � � 1 E/ev�- � � � r (Proposed � X 000.o Existing E/evotion o '� \ �'�, � � 1 '� 968.7 I � '� ' Outer Edge �4�� (000.0) Proposed E/evotion � V � '\ � w „'74'--- '--Ia�' ��v, Elev=968.5) 1 � ``" ,`94 __ `�� t � (-+-_ '� � - - �_� _ � � ��%� �--Gas (Ifility Flag Orainage � - ��" � � j� Approx.;--r�, 2�;, -.._..,J/� %� O Exis tin q Wei! '� i Pro osed �� ` � � (9�8.4�- � % . o i'� Septrc Tank ��\\; 1 ; � y�968.4 P \ - _ � � � Tree (deciduous) � Locafians .:� � ;� ,� � � ; Q '� � \ � � � i �� Arbor �foe �� 1-' � i C �Y OF �� , � !' �RON �'�-;;r_ --� Existing Contour o�Oronb� ',, , - . P1 n�� &,�pning Plan qeV��N� �`�, �`�7 � .'` SIT PLAN f/�( GRqDIN�.P� P!AN _ _�967�_ _ proposed Contour e�Plan Reviei�v Date:�=' '�� \� �O AP VED WITH VISIQ(VS � `� �� ' � DISAp Ep `, APPROVED \ �i � � � "� '• � SCALE �� not�S) w `$Y rs�ii [j 7��P�iOVED WI��F�FVI�IGNS(sss , � , "� 0 15 30 60 `' `� � � �TE `'� �'i []DEN��D �,!'� a Staff: �1 �� ` �`� �, � 1 inch = 3a feet � �- �`� , Beorrngs & elevations bosed on ossumed dofum. Job Number. 7469 S�f 1OLJol 1� ! hereby certrfy thot this certrficate of survey wos prepared by me o� under my dr�ecf supervision ond Book/Page: 75/67 that l om o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the . LAD SERV/CES �aws of the e of Minne ta. Survey Dote: 8-28-12 — Drawing Name: brody.dwg ,N�j. �_ _ D�own by. KLB B. Scfroborg Re visions: 763-972-3221 8997 Co. Rd. 13 SE zol2 www.SchoborgLand.com DeJano, MN 55328 Date: ��Z1�__ __ Regist�ation No. 14700 ��2D ��o✓�a�_ �r�v� To o ra nic Surve ��PY RF P 9 p Y � CFj��D Prepared for.� PCrChC7elle BrC7dy ,�- Le.vend - t. °� � �-.� � , � ��r,�� ' �� \ _ � C • Found lron Monument ��" � � �� "' ��}' �� ,��2,�0 �� I � °�o��,,y� �� .� �� . � � st 4 �Y �,� SCALE g""�`� �� _ �6, .6? �� ;<�. ,�,��` _� o so ioo zoo �' Spp � s �'` t}2'3 �� ,o/at� � lj�- �' RZ ��5.00 . ,� � � �P��t) 1 inch = 100 feet a�c�\ 3•77 " j � � ��,5,�'q�3 �.1 :� ----;' ,1�� ,0� PID: 31-118-23-23-0009 \� r 'APproxirnate �� / � �5 �Q � �� Shed � � � � �p+d{� Address: 420 Deboroh Drive �� ' �� \ Location t �, . \ Mople Ploin, MN O�• , � � .r 55359 � �� Boundary Description (per client) 1 h, �` Lot 6, Block 2, MCCULLEY FARM, �0� �U�e � ��'�.-Approx: ��\ accordin to the recorded lat �'�� •' � � �� 9 P (� --�� , � �°.�Dri ve woy �' �• � thereof, Hennepin County, � 0 4 � � Locotion � � Minnesota. Subject to any and '1� � � ��;� , >; ��p all easements of record. �'�' �� _ "'�� — 94 —� � �. j %\ F ��. � � � � � '� � �. No te: `\ APprox.-_ � � `� �'--�- e'! „� ;• � � Not all measured distances rV` rennis ��, � 4 �"'�` �73 \ Pro osed-- i � ;` between existinq � Cou�t P -- �O / monuments match plat p�� Locotion � �8x36 °�� measurements. •0 P�� Approx.---- ; Further survey work �� / i Septic �• may be needed � L�f 6 ' Mound ,� °�,��' � to verify boundary � Locotion �:� % line locations. , (95ftx41 ft) ` ,�,�e.� . � �� _ . �e°o�.l �.� � � � n � � ti, � � .�� Q � �� °� � � � . ,�6 � _ —4 ,_., •� N89 52'21"E 710.30 (meas.) 713.50 (p/at) �' '�6 � ,.� Note: There are no obviously visible wet/low lands on subject parceL Therefore, wetlana� have not been verified by a certified wetland delrneato�. Deta i I �� m, � � � � � � i�__ , � �.�, �g . . , .,, ° - '� ' �� ,+ ;��a � Exlsting yo� �� u�� ,�� //LFE�968.7Se� � j j � . ,///j� `�--Approx. s�2.�x WeN � Proposed-----_ �w� Locafion 4x8 Pool \`�� 4�"� 'peck X 968.6 �� Equipmen f ` . - �� ,., � � Area � '�- � ��,�k�..� � i �`3� �i �a �e '. .: �"-�" " fja� �� ,, � ��i �� . " � � ; . .. L�"'-.. ^��i x .. � ��.�m�„nxc� e ��``��`s `�. . . . � . B/7C{C :. �So - � I Poti � �,�z o � �� ,� o � � �� _ , � ��_. � T � � "�" � \ z3 t M " � � Proposed --, �f �h '7� � s�� u�� ,<:t�� .�, .o Pool Deck �`. �1 �-'�`��- , � Deck Ed e \ 1 \\ y t p�Op� 'I Pro osed � � 18x36 t�------- p g � � Pool Deck �e-qend � E/ev=968.5) 1 � � � POp� x 000.o Existin Elevation � ` I I � Elev= � � (Proposed g n 1 968. � � -� Oute� Edge (000.0) Proposed Elevation c° _-____ o ,°'ro --'14�--_ -�-�4� `�� EIev=968.5) f— Draina e .y --- 94 —_ �'' ( � � i �— � g � ------_�_� � �� _J I —Gas Utilify F/og O Existing Well =��`-- � Approx. -��_ 20 � I P�oposed ��`�� 1 (968.4�"-'--� .a; Septic Tank. A ��`� �.-/ I � � � �9684) � � � Tree (deciduous) � Locations �� „ �� o .M� � \\ � � Arbor �itae � �� . . Q , • Ex�sting Contour - ' �rv�' Pro osed Con tour — —(967)— — p -----� � `i-_'� ��,�, x . �. SCALE �" ; �� 0 15 30 60 � � � ��,�fi�'�&.� � o ,. .��. � � � � � � 1 inch = 30 feet Beorings & elevations based on assumed datum. i Job Number. 7469 SCHOBORG Book/Page: 75/67 L/`i D SERVICES Survey Date: 8-28-12 Drawing Name: brody.dwg 'NC. D�awn by. KLB Re visions: 763-972-3221 8997 Co. Rd. 13 SE www.SchoborgLand.com De/ano, MN 55328