The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2014-00858 - new structure CITY OF ORONO * z 0 1 4 - 0 0 8 5 8 * � 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 09/16/2014 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD PIN : 17-117-23-41-0016 LEGAL DESC : WALLACES ADDN TO VIL OF MTKA B : LOT 001 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE : NEW STRUCTURE PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : SINGLE FAMILY ACTIVITY : 101-SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES, DETACHED VALUATION : $ 380,000.00 NO"TE: SENARA�CE PERMI"I�S REQUIRI�.D: PLUMI3ING. MECIIAN[CAL, I�IR]?PLACF., Wn�CF.R CONM?CTION, SI:WER CONNI_,CTION, LAWN IRRIGA�I�ION, I?LEC"I'RICAL(S'I�ATF,) NO"I�E: PRIOR'1'O THE S"I�AR"I�01�'FRAMING AN AS-BUIL'T POUNDA" N SURVI,Y MUST BE SUI3MITTGD AND APPROVGD BY TEtI? CI'IY OR A STOP WORK ORDER WII.I.BE ISSUED: INI"I�IAL: NOTE: PI210R'r0 ISSUANCE OI'A CER"rIF[CA"CE OF OCCUPAN A AS-BUILT SURVEY IS RGQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVLD BY STAPF. [NITIAL: NOTE: [N THE EVENT OF WIN"I�ER CON I � S OR OTHER UNFAVORABLE WEATHER CONDI"T'IONS(WHICH PREVGNT THE COMPLF.TION OF TE�3E EXTERIOR [MPROVEMENTS AND/OR AN AS-BUIL'I'SURVEY EMPORARY CL;RTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO)MAY E3E NECESSARY. A"CCO REQUIRES A$10,000 ESCROW. INIT[AL: __��_ NOTE: ACKNOWLEDGE ENG[NEER COMM[��NTS DATEU AliGUST 19,2014. INITIAL: • NOTE: PR10R TO RGLEASE OF F.SCROW MONEY,AN AS-E3UILT SURVEY AND HARD V �.R CALCULATINS MUS"1'I3�;SUBMI"CTED AND APPROVED. INITIAL: APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 2,736.75 STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 190.00 BETZ BUILDERS INC. 300 CRESTVIEW AVE. TOTAL 2,926.75 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Payment(s) (612)221-2963 CHECK 19334 2,926.75 Minnesota State License#: BUIL-BC3515 OWNER SCHMID, DAVID 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA, MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issucd shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and Uie State Building Code. I his permit is for only the worh described and does not grant permission fbr additional or related work which requires separa[e permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this typc of work shall be eompied with whether or not specified herein.'ihis permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within I 80 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time atter work has commenced. 'l he applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections arc requested in confonnance with the State Buildine Code.This pcnnit may be revoked at y time for due cause. � � . ��"� L/ // �/ Applicant Permitee Signature Datc Issue E3y Signature Date � / , � � � CITY OF ORONO � ��P ' BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION � � FOR NEW STRUCTURES OR ADDITIONS ��0�\\ Mai1�P0 Bo�r66. / Permit number. �� i/ � �� Crystal Bay, MN 55323-006 1�� Date received: ��02l�� Street Address:� G�� Received by: � � ; �F �/ 2750 Kelley Parkwa �.�� Plan review fee: � � 7�, g� l�kf� `-'i Orono, MN 55356 O�� _��5-7 �� L— Total Fee: Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www ci orono mn us This application form must be completed in full and all required informati n must be sub � ed. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: (� ' �Q, � ' �� /�' � d Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes No If yes,a specia/event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approva/60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates su�cient on-site parking is availab/e. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLI ANT INFORMATION: Name: State License# � Expiration Date: ` d ' Phone: cell — — office — � � � Mailing Address: po ��,1,, v Cit � ZIP: Contact Person: y Applicant is: Contrac r / Homeowner �c��ie one� Email and/or Fax: Z ;� PROPERTY OWNER INFORM ION: _ Name: V �/ � ' Phone (day): /a— �a —/ SIS� Address: �v� G� rp.� � Cit : �/'lPJ�1p ZIP: Email and/or Fax (�aU i ll�f'{�IeIQ @ Qfll•CeWI ARCHITECT/ENGINEER INFORMATION: Name: /�� Phone (day): Address: City: ZI P: Email and/or Fax: r� PROJECT INFORMATION: Description of ro�ect: �2.�v � �,�'�/�d�% A�'�� hQ,w 1.Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3.Structure Type 4.Sewage Disposal 8� Water Supply �New Construction �Single Family with �Residence ❑Addition attached garage Garage/Accessory Bldg. Public Sewer ❑Accessory Building ❑ Single Family with ❑ Deck ❑ Relocation detached garage ❑Office/Commercial ❑Other: (specify) ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse ❑ Private Sewer ❑ Public ❑ Storage �Public Water ""Any earth movement may also require ❑Commercial ❑ Other(specify) MCWD review&permits. ❑ �ndustrial Minnehaha Creek Watershed District MCWD ❑ PfivBte Well ( ) ❑Other. (specify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven,MN 55391 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.or Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ 3!✓�j �`> STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1.Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) 2.Type of Construction a. Length(ft.)= Number of bedrooms= � �Wood/Frame b.Width (ft.)= Number of garage stalls: ❑ Masonry Areas in sQuare feet Attached= � ❑ Metal ❑ Pole Bldg. c. Basement= Detached= ❑ ICF d. 15`Story = ❑On-site Prefab e. 2"d Story= ❑Off-site Prefab f. '/2 Story = ❑Other(please specify): g. Total Area= REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed A licable � ❑ Permit A lication ❑ Pro osed Buitdin Plans ❑ MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form ❑ Surve meetin all re uirements ❑ ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ❑ Hardcover Calculation s ❑ ❑ Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort ❑ ❑ Access Permit ❑ ❑ Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan ❑ ❑ En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above ❑ ❑ Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit s ❑ ❑ Plan Review Fee ❑ ❑ Application Escrow&Agreement ❑ ❑ Other: APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information, the application may not be issued. • Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. ApplicanYs Sign re: / Date: � �.�� Owner's Sign ure: Date: �c�_T,� 2� I �( , ' • = B O t-TON 8�. M �N K , 1 N C� . Consulting Engineers & Surveyors �� 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200• Chaska, MN 55318-117 ' Phone(952)448-8838• Fax (952)448-8805 � www.bolton-men k.com August l9, 2014 City of Orono Attn: Christine Mattson 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Building Permit Application 2014-00858 3309 Crystal Bay Road Engineering Review#1 Dear Christine: As requested, I have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Following are my comments and recommendations for your consideration: 1. Due to the narrow widths of Crystal Bay Road and the shared driveway,the applicant and his contractors must be vigilant in ensuring demolition and construction activities do not impair others in accessing adjacent properties. 2. Since the applicant will be required to export demolition materials and import fill to achieve proposed grades,the City should consider the following: a. The Applicant should confirm with the City Engineer acceptable hours of truck hauling and provide documentation on the haul route to be used. Acceptable hours and haul route should be approved prior to the removal of demolition materials or importing of any fill. b. The City Engineer should inspect roadways on haul route and the shared driveway prior to and following completion of work to determine whether adverse impacts have occurred. The applicant should be responsible for the repair to roadways for any adverse impacts. 3. The siltfence should be installed and inspected by the City prior to any land disturbing activities. The contractor must provide 24 hour notice prior to inspection. 4. If the mature oak tree on the east side of the property is damaged during demolition or construction, planting of a replacement tree should be coordinated with the City. 5. A financial security of$3,000 from the Applicant is recommended for erosion control and engineering oversight. The financial security is intended to provide protection in the event that it becomes necessary for the City to install or maintain erosion and sediment control within the project area and covers the cost of vegetation re-establishment if the applicant is unable to follow through with the conditions of approval. 6. The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) approval and permitting for their Erosion Control Rule. A copy of any approved permits should be submitted prior to any land altering activities. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. �.Q-�� 6�� Robert E. Bean,Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR NE1N STRUCTIJRES / /4D�ITIONS Address/Permit Number: "1 � � Description of work: Septic review by: � _ Date Approved: --�`` Zoning review by: �_ Date Approved: �•� 2- � ��"' Building review by: �w— Date Approved: �-- i� ^ '�1�/ Grading review by: � Date Approved: ��q ' �.�`� Zoning District: Zoning File#: ( ' Reso#: Reso Date:�� Zoning: Lot Area: SF/AC Width: Lot Coverage: � SF _% Survey Submitted: �'es 0 No Date of Survey: �� 'f Qr" Revised date(?): Pro osed Setbacks: F�cont(Lake) Rear(Street) � �� S E 1N ) ( N �"'J E W 1 Other Buildin�s Wetland Side `°�ide /�..-`y t � l� r � �, c36 „;_a,�- Defined Height: �--�� - Peak Height: FFE R� �°E� FFE minus 6 feet= � r ' �� (Existing Contour) k Perimeter(finear feet) = 50% _ #of�tories �Ok?�YES FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: The distance between the lowest FOR A BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION: �? START WITH proposed floor(of the basement or crawl �__, space)and the highest point of the roof. START WITH The distance between the top of slab and the highest point of the roof. If you have a... If you have a... • GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no windows): Subtract half the windows): Subtract half the distance � distance between the highest point between the highest point of the roof of the roof to the low point of the to the low point of the corresponding SUBTRACTION corresponding gable or hipped roof SUBTRACTION gable or hipped roof � (BASED ON ROOF . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with (BASED ON . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with ' �" � TYPE) windows): Subtract half the ROOF TYPE) windows): Subtract half the distance � distance between the top of the between the top of the highest highest window and the highest window and the highest point of the point of the roof roof • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, mansard,etc):No subtraction. mansard,etc:No subtraction. ADDITION Add the distance between the top of slab SUBTRACTION Subtract the distance between the (BASED ON and the highest existing grade adjacent to +, : � (BASED ON EXISTING basemenUcrawl space floor and the EXISTING the foundation. ' GRADES) highest existing grade adjacent to the GRADES �;,�.:'.,) `- foundation OR 10 feet(whichever is less). EQUALS Defined building height EQUALS Defined building height Shoreland District MCWD Permit Received Avera e Lakeshore Setback Met? Bluff � Yes � No 0 N/A � Yes No �es � No �es � No 0 N/A Permit Number:�, Setback: Stormwater Quality Existing Propasec� Variance Required CUP Requireci Overla District Tier Hardcovee Hardcover - �.�� (�,5'��]p Yes � No Q Yes No � � ��,�� I �{� � T�e�s��,�,t��d TYPe(�)� � Updated: January 2013 v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx ... .. '.-��...,,;��y<,� ,w„}�..,�s.�^+su��... ,, _ �:.�, ;' REMARKS (in-house): Fees to be Char ec! YES NO Permit Plan Review � �� State Surcharge � Investigation Fee SAC-hlumber of SAC Units �,�ac fi�o�s �-t°�-�ofB� g Other(specify) Square Foota e $ er S uare Foota e Basement X ' � 1S�Floor X = $ 2"d Floor X = $ Garage X - � Estimated Construction Value: $ ��A � �� Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits 0 Site lumbing 0 Grading/ Filling � Well � Hardcover Removal ,�Mechanical O Fire Etectrical i.; �'Footing � Septic �Water Connection �Poured Wall �Fireplace �0'Sewer Connection Foundation Survey ��,,asonry �awn Irrigation Radon Rock Bed J�a Mf9. J2�Framing � Other(specify) �nsulation �As-Built Survey �Final 0 Wetland Buffer 0 Other(specify) REMARKS (in-house): , �` Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: Access: Existing: � YES 0 NO New: � YES � NO OF ICIAL REMARKS -TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED � � . [0� � - � e � ' �°�` � l� �� C� � �E� � � ��°S�- ��` �� -�� u . ��n�a � r� �°�i�i ry . v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx � . _ _ _, � �. ; - .. �: ,.. .. :�� ` �.'�� `:'�4"�'�`+�� ."��t-0��"��`;�""�� ' , '`�"'��-�."�- , �' . ,._. . . . _ . �� New Construction Energy Code Compliance Certificate Per NI 101.8 Building Certifica[e.A building certficate shall be pos�ed i�a permanently visible bcation inside the building. The Date Certifitate Posted certificace shall be completed by the bwlder and shall list informabon and values of wmponents lisred in Table N 1 101.8. Mailing Address of the Dwelling or Dwelling Unit City �� U C F'.. S tl�L /3 t� �C� C,�'�G'�'L�r Name of ResidenNal Contractor 0 MN License Number -�.��Z � /3C-c��S'�.� THERMAL ENVELOPE RADON SYSTEM Type:Check All That Apply passive(No Fan) o „ c � � � Active(With fan and monometer or � ;,, other system monitoring devrce) `° "d o m u 0. «, w � a� �a � o n. � v — o � v a o � � � � � � Q CO W � U a> �v c ; O vi vi O N w b 0 Insulation Location � ° z � � c� p � �i _ `° `o o° �o�n � � � v zs ro a C � p O O C �bD OA f� ° Z u, u. u, w � cG r� Other Please Describe Here Below Entire Slab Foundation Wall "/(�' Type in locatiorc ntenor xtenor or integral Perimeter of Slab on Grade Rim Joist(Foundation) � t Type in location� ntenor xtenor or integral Rim Joist(ls�Floor+) ^J(�f' 7ype in location tenor xtenor or integral VVall -1{ Ceiling,flat � �/ Ceiling,vaulted Bay Windows or cantilevered areas Bonus room over garage -?j� Describe other insulated areas Windows&Doors Heating or Cooling Ducts Outside Conditioned Spaces Average U-Factor(excludes skylighu and one door)U:'L�'� x Not applicable,all ducts located in conditioned space Solar Heat Gain Ccefficient(SHGC): R-value MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Make-up Air' Select a Type ApplianCes Heating System Domestic Water Heater Cooling System � Not required per mech.code F uel Type /�A'� 6�}s �/j"t �q'S ��I��C.� X Passive Manufacturer Powered Interlocked with exhaust device. Model Describe: Input in Capacity in Output in 1 Other,describe: Rating Or Siz¢ BTUS: �� Gallons: �� I'ons: pZ Z Heac Loss: Heae Gain: Location of duct or system: Structure's Calculated AFUE or SEF.R: /� HSPF% q� Calculated Efficienc /� cooling load: Cfm's "round duct OR Mechanical Ventilation System "metal duct Describe any additional or combined heating or cooling systems if installed:(e.g.two fumaces or air Combustion Air Select a Type source heat pump with gas back-up fumace): Not required per mech.code Select Type Passive Heat Recover Ventilator(HRV) Capacity in cfms: Low: . High: ��j� Other,describe: Energy Recover Ventilator(GRV)Capacity in cfrns: Low: High: Location of duct or system: Continuous exhausting fan(s)rated capacity in cfins: Location of fan(s),describe: Cfin's Capacity continuous ventilation rate in cfms: "round duct OR Total ventilation(intermittent+continuous)rate in ct�ms: "metal duct Created by BAM version 052009 , City of Orono R�C��V�d' ORO Hardcover Calculation Worksheet�UN 04 2014 Pro rt Address: , ' : I, , � :, y 3.�o � cR�r r,r� BA� R�,�� d,,��o r��'a4��bRpN� ' '-, t� : '^��° \' Prepared by: Date: - G�2 a�i��,� � st�'�'a�r.��.�-. i.�...�r 6-,� _/a� Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER� ----..-____ .____�.-- In the following table, identify ali items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as weil as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and caiculate hardcover square footage separatel for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Surve (S uare Feet) � Exam le) Gara e 24'x 30' 720 S.F. A or= / u _/�oZ S.F. B ,��c � O E c!e -- — S.F. C P.t� — �e"�" _ ,S S.F. D TT P 72 S.F. E o,eit'_ / ,� -- L// S.F. F �i �� ,�� ---y�- S.F. G � oJ'EO /�'.e k'1�,��✓ � . �? S.F. H �'x i.l9''s.ti� ✓c .�" /` S.F. I c � E.�.�1'!1`1 Z p S.F. J -2` � � 3� S.F. K S.F. � S.F. M S.F. N S.F. � S.F. P � S.F. Q --�-- -- �.F. R S.F. �; - s — .r. -r . , -- �.r-. u - `— s.F. V S.F. W r >.F. I X - --- _.--�-- _�� Y j S F. Z S.F. 1 Total Pro osed Hardcover Z GCO / S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Cit Code Sec 78-1684 : E co S.F. F �� i• ., of t��'__ S.F. S.F. — ------ ---� S F. � --1------� �----------- -----� (2) Total Excludable Hardcover � �.F�� --- ,�,..�.�'-�__-_-.._ - I 3 Net Pro osed Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line 1 —L��j ��.�I��-� �� -�LLyl ) ( )] II .�.�,�,�.�,� __�I 4 Total Lot Area 6.�85 - i/y � x,� T 6' ,P° ' ry `� `'v � Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)=(4)) I�I ��'% � ---�1:�.:�._«-�_.-- -._._—....,_° January 6, Z013 � • = BO LTON 8�. M �N K , I N C� . � Consulting Engineers & Surveyors �� 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200•Chaska, MN 55318-117�RON0 COPY Phone(952)448-8838• Fax(952)448-8805 www.bolton-menk.com August 19, 2014 City of Orono Attn: Christine Mattson 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Building Permit Application 2014-00858 3309 Crystal Bay Road Engineering Review#1 Dear Christine: As requested, I have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Following are my comments and recommendations for your consideration: 1. Due to the narrow widths of Crystal Bay Road and the shared driveway, the applicant and his contractors must be vigilant in ensuring demolition and construction activities do not impair others in accessing adjacent properties. 2. Since the applicant will be required to export demolition materials and import fill to achieve proposed grades, the City should consider the following: a. The Applicant should confirm with the City Engineer acceptable hours of truck hauling and provide documentation on the haul route to be used. Acceptable hours and haul route should be approved prior to the removal of demolition materials or importing of any fill. b. The City Engineer should inspect roadways on haul route and the shared driveway prior to and following completion of work to determine whether adverse impacts have occurred. The applicant should be responsible for the repair to roadways for any adverse impacts. 3. The siltfence should be installed and inspected by the City prior to any land disturbing activities. The contractor must provide 24 hour notice prior to inspection. 4. If the mature oak tree on the east side of the property is damaged during demolition or construction, planting of a replacement tree should be coordinated with the City. 5. A financial security of$3,000 from the Applicant is recommended for erosion control and engineering oversight. The financial security is intended to provide protection in the event that it becomes necessary for the City to install or maintain erosion and sediment control within the project area and covers the cost of vegetation re-establishment if the applicant is unable to follow through with the conditions o�f approval. 6. The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)approval and permitting for their Erosion Control Rule. A copy of any approved permits should be submitted prior to any land alte►•ing activities. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. �8C 0�G �e�� Robert E. Bean,Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer MEMORANDUM Date: August 12, 2014 To: Bob Bean, City Engineer From: Christine Mattson, Planning Assistant c Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator Dave Martini, City Engineer RE: Building Permit Number 2014-00858 3309 Crystal Bay Road Attached are building plans and survey for a new single family home at 3309 Crystal Bay Road. Please review the attached information and provide comments by Tuesday, August 19, 2014. Please contact me at cmattson@ci.orono.mn.us or at 952-249-4620 or Melanie Curtis at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us or at 952-249-4627 if you need additional information or if you have any questions. Thank you . , �� i � � C ITY OF ORONO RESOLU�['ION OF THE CI"I'Y COUNCIL �� No. b407 � "�KesHo��` A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-350, 78-1279(1), 78-1286, 78-1680 AND 78-1700(1); AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-966 - FILE NO. 14-3664 WHEREAS, David Schmid, a single person, and Angela Ciliberto, a single person (hereinafter "the Applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3309 Crystal Bay Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Wallace' s Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, together with a portion of vacated street lying northeasterly of and adjacent to said lot described as follows: That part of said vacated street lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southeasterly line of said vacated street distant 10 feet northeasterly from the most southerly corner of said vacated street, to a point on the Southwesterly line of said vacated street distant 113.91 feet northwesterly from said most southerly corner, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new residence on a lot of 5,237 s.f. in area where a lot area of 21,780 s.f. is normally required, and of width 52' at the shoreline and 59' at the 75' setback line where a lot width of 100' is normally required, and with a setbacic of 1.7' from the rear lot line where a 30' setback is normally required; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279(1) and 78-1279(2) to allow construction of a new residence 57' from the OHW of Lal<e Minnetonka where a 75' setback is normally required, and 24' from the traveled portion of Crystal Bay Road where a 30' setback is normally required; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1680 and 78-1700(1) to allow construction of a new residence and associated hardcover in the amount of 36.57% within Hardcover Tier 1 where only ?5% hardcover is nornlally allowed; and Page 1 of 8 , �o�o � C ITY OF ORONO ftESOLUT[ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL � '� b407 � `� �' N o. I�KESH�� WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied for a variance and conditional use permit pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-966 and 78-1286 to allow grading and the construction of retaining walls as well as excavation and grading to accommodate construction of a new home, all within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the Orono, Minnesota, City Code, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 19, 2014 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File number 14-3664. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1 C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District which requires a minimum lot area of 0.5 acre and a minimum lot width of 100'. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on May 19, 2014 and voted 7 for and 0 against on a motion to approve the requested variances and conditional use permit subject to certain conditions and based on the following findings: a. The Property contains 5,237 square feet in area outside of the traveled right- of-way of Crystal Bay Road and has a defined width of 52 feet at the lake and 59 feet at the 75-foot setback. b. The existing residence and attached garage e�chibit a number of nonconformities including excess hardcover, substandard side and lake setbacks and attached garage encroachment of nearly 8 feet into the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRIZA) right-of-way. The proposed residence will be similar in footprint and shape to the existing but is being reoriented to meet the required 10' side setbacks and to be located entirely within the property boundaries. c. In order to accomplish e(iminate the HCRRA encroachment while retaining a viable footprint, the house is proposed be placed �T from the OHWL, resulting in a rear lot line setback of 1.7 feet. The HCRR11 has indicated in an Page 2 of 8 . �� ,; CITY OF ORONO � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC[L ��,� _ �,�' N o. b 4 0 7 _ � h � FSH� email dated 4/9/2014 that they view the elimination of the encroachment as an improvement and do not object to the resulting substandard rear setback. d. The applicants' property and the homes to its east gain vehicular access via a shared driveway that exists within the HCRRA right-of-way under a 2007 easement agreement between HCR_RA and the City. Applicants' property is at the end of that shared driveway, and neighboring property owners have indicated that construction traffic is a two-fold concern in that the Applicants and their contractors must maintain access for the other users of the driveway, and atry ilama�e lo lhe driveway caused by the construction process should be rectified by the Applicants. Planning Commission recommends that the City inspect the driveway prior to commencement of home demolition/construction and establish a baseline condition for comparison after construction is complete. e. Crystal Bay Road is unique in that the street was never platted but exists by prescription between the homes and the lake. The rear of the lots abut the HCRRA railroad right-of-way. In many cases along the road, lots are not very deep and therefore a number of properties have been granted variances to the lalce setback over the years. The proposed lalce setback of 57 feet is not inconsistent with past variances granted for other homes on Crystal Bay Road. The proposed home location will not encroach on the established average lakeshore setback. f. In addition to the house replacement, Applicants propose to remove an existing underground garage that opens to Crystal Bay Road approximately 10 feet back from the traveled road. Applicants propose to 1<eep the driveway and a portion of the garage floor to create an open parking stall approximately 20' deep, which requires the construction of a new back retaining wall approximately 8 feet in height. This parking area constitutes 0-7�' hardcover; however, a significant amount of fill would be needed to eliminate this parking area, as the grade on either side is quite steep and additional retaining walls would likely be needed to stabilize the 80% slope that would result. A guard rail or fence above this parking area is likely to be required for safety. �. Without variances the majority of the subject property is unbuildable as all but � the rear 26'-40' is located within 75' of the OHWL. This creates a practical difticulty for redevelopment of the property. Ho��,�ever, the applicants do have the right to replace the existing residence in-kind if they choose to do so. From a footprint perspective, the existing house and proposed house are nearly identical at approximately 1450 s.f. The proposed house will be 2 full Page 3 of 8 , �o�o CITY OF C.�R(�NO I�ESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNC[L y � 6407 �� ' N o. �9KESH��ti stories rather than the existing 1-1/2 story structure. While the applicants' proposal will not increase hardcover, it will increase the visual bulk and massing as compared to the existing home. The propose low-pitch roof will help to keep the new home from visually towering over the neighbor to the west. h. Due to the very small size of the lot, proposed hardcover of 36.67% is necessary to accommodate the house, driveway retaining walls, sidewalks and parking area, and this level of hardcover is a slight decrease from the existing hardcover level of 37.7%. There is not sufficient room on the property to provide mitigation measures for the excess hardcover. i. City Code Section 78-966(a)(2) indicates that landowners must obtain a CUP from the City prior to engaging in activities that include fill to elevate or alter the existing natural grade. In this project the Applicants propose grading that will direct runoff from the HCRR11 right-of-way around the house and to the front, with the intent to not direct drainage to neighboring properties. The CUP is required because a portion of the grading work and the new retaining wall at the lower parking area are within 75' of the lake. In relation to the findings necessary for issuance of the CUP for grading and retaining walls, Planning Commission finds that: 1) The proposed retaining walls and grading improvements are residential in nature and are compliant with the zoning code. 2) The proposed improvements are appropriate and in character with the surrounding land and neighborhood, and the proposed new residence partially within the 75-foot setback zone will have little impact on surrounding lands. Drainage patterns for runoff leaving the site will be altered with the intent to significantly improve them. 3) The grading activity will not impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have an adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The proposed use of the property for a residence, coupled with the chances in use of the lower garage area, will result in minimal impacts to the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. 4) As long as the Applicants and their contractors are vigilant in ensuring c�nstruction activity does not impair other driveway and Crystal Bay Road users, and that any darnage is repaired, the grading activity and its results will not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets or the Page4of8 . / �°�o CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL y�� ` No. 64 07 �KFSH�� shared driveway, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, nor unsafe access. �) The proposed grading is designed to take into account the natural and scenic features of the area. The proposed grading on this lot is minimal and as a result will have minimal if any environmental impacts but will alleviate an existing drainage issue for the Applicants' property. j. Applicants' initial plan to relocate onto the property the small 5'x9' shed that is partially in the HCRRA right-of-wa_y may be difficult to accomplish in a conforming manner. Therefore Planning Commission recommends that based on the small size of the proposed attached garage, it would be reasonable to provide the Applicants the option of eliminating the shed entirely and increasing the width of the garage by the square footage of the shed, as long as the required side setbacks can be maintained. k. Planning Commission finds that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, i.e. for residential purposes, in a manner similar to other homes on the block, on a parcel similar in size to a nurnber of others in the immediate neighborhood. The small lot was created and developed for residential use long ago, a circumstance not created by the owner. The proposed new residence will result in a home that is similar in scope to other homes in the immediate neighborhood on small lots with substandard setbacks and will not alter the character of the locality l. The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. m. The Applicants have demonstrated that enforcing the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprives the Applicants of the reasonable use of their Property. 4. The Applicants have submitted a revised proposal that eliminates the shed and adds approximately 49 square feet to the garage area by widening it by 2 feet while maintaining the required side setbacks. �. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variances and CUP on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance wou]d not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire Page 5 of 8 ��o� C ITY OF ORONO EZESOLUT(ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL ti � �� b� 4 07 `� N O. t�KFsxo�� hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Citv. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new residence on a lot of 5,237 s.f. in area where a lot area of 21,780 s.f. is normally required, and of width 52' at the shoreline and 59' at the 75' setback line where a lot width of 100' is normally required; and grants a variance to Section 78-350 to allow a setback of 1.7' from the rear lot line where a 30' setback is normally required; and grants variances to Sections 78-1279(1) and 78- 1279(2) to allow construction of a new residence 57' from the OHW of Lake Minnetonka where a 75' setback is normally required, and 24' from the traveled portion of Crystal Bay Road where a 30' setback is normally required; and variances to Sections 78-1680 and 78-1700(1) to allow construction of a new residence and associated hardcover in the amount of 36.57% within Hardcover Tier 1 where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed; and grants a variance and conditional use permit pursuant to Section 78-966 and 78-1286 to allow grading and the construction of retaining walls as well as excavation and grading to accommodate construction of a new home, all within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no grading is normally allowed; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the survey submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and the conceptual building plans and elevations submitted by the Applicants and attached as Exhibit B. Any amendments to the site plan or building plans which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicants shall submit a final grading and drainage plan that addresses any City Engineer concerns regarding slope stability and retaining wall design; subject to adherence to the City's erosion control regulations as well as the permitting requirements of the MCWD. Timely re-vegetation and stabilization of the site will be a requirement of the permitting process. 3. Applicants shall take all necessary precautions to ensure that the mature oak ash tree within the 0-75' setbacic zone is not affected by construction. The mature oal< tree next to the underground garage area is anticipated to be disturbed by the proposed construction, Page6of8 �o�o. C ITY OF ORONO RESOLU-['ION OF THE C[TY COUNC[L � � � � � 7 yF : � NO. ��KFsxo�� and if damaged or removed a replacement tree of a size and species approved by City staff shall be planted. 4. Fencing or other positive safety barriers shall be permanently placed above the retaining walls that surround the lower parking area. �. Applicants and their contractors shall be vigilant in ensuring construction activity does not impair other shared driveway and Crystal Bay Road users. Applicants and their contractors must maintain access for the other users of the shared driveway. 6. The City shall inspect the shared driveway prior to commencement of home demolition/construction to establish a baseline condition for comparison after construction is complete. Any damage to the shared driveway caused by the construction process shall be rectified by the Applicants. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new home. A framing inspection must be completed for the home within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances and CUP granted herein wi11 eYpire on that date (June 9, 2015). 8. Violation of or non-coinpliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The undersigned Applicants have read, understand and hereby a�ree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the Applicants and the Applicants' heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 9`" day of June, 2014. ATTEST: A ;'�C� � pL�,� ��Q C� ,,� , �, - r - �/!'��,� Rachel Dodge, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, M r Page7of8 �0�� C ITY OF ORONO EZESOLUTION OF THE CIT'Y COUNCIL y � 6 � 07 � � G` N o. ��kfSHv�� .----------�.... �� Prope y Owner s) STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this 9 day of J u- , 2014, by David Schmid, a single person. BARBARA G. SILUS �c�� n.- . �t��. ti�;TARY PUBLIC•FAINNESOTA �� 2�l',Gl/1 ��''� M, cmm�ss�on Expires•Jan.31,2018 - �� _ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acicnowledged before me this � day of J u- , 2014, by An�ela Ciliberto, a sinale person. BARBARA G.SILUS �� +: NOTARY PUBLIC-FAINNESOTA NOtaPV PUbI1C :,„..� My Commission ExpiresJan.31,2018 Page 8 of 8 � . � MINNETONKA ExhibitA CRYSTAL BAY � 4 O 7 �� 929.4 �, �/' I CONTOUR,. � O)�� LINE R\P RPP �� (932.4) I �� I �� i� � �i � � . � L NRVE%�� 5268......��' i 20 � � �� / .i ��i _—�—�� ,�� i 9326 CJ�}j1 � I � � i i � 1 `. — __-c�3z.<� �� I _-- ....._..N 35�1 p,�D i ' �g� .: ...._.-'--"" MH R�O _—' �� 1" � r �' �� . � �� 9 SEWER �'( I I S� 1J (933.3) � �� /�i , ,�: ,�. ,, ,,, � g� - �, ,- � 3P � ��/�' •:,.�/. � � CONCRETE � /� �:' I �� 3 q� DRIVEWAY � / �. �� 93 � 2�� G�P�� I ��/ y � � o � �V'�y�`� ...PROPOSED I ~J �93 � g3�9 �a'' Qy�X� AREANG•. �G�..I �E � � 34� 6�� <�——1336� '^ � (940 �yr `� .(942.4) � / � l9} • CONC. WALLS r"'- � . � � �E� Z °� ` ,. `�.� � I� / � __�� 26" OAK\ i �� 941.4) \ �3 0�� .... I �'�RE i PROPOSEO 942��_ '�___ / ' � WALL /` EXISTINGO /�. � � �g40 B� UNDERGROUND I �� f, � I � 94 � � GARAGE—TO . ,.�'�� //(941.1) � ��. BE REMOVED I '' / �—_� _—'� �� 1 � sa2 _�_°'� ��4-- � I __ -�: .. _ � '�/ � � AVERAGE BUILDING SETBACK LINE� _,• /� I "` 'i � --=� � _�--_ �4� 940.3 �D�CKRED �8�� ...33... .. -32" OAK .:..// � / __�--- � �_�� i� 34.0 I LOOKOUT� / • / I . • � / ::... i I I ��70"�10" ASH —— 942 _ _ / o I � __--' _ �, � 12"�ASnH. _ .... . ..'/ �I w � ��/�-t � � PR0P0SED i .�--.. � �944.4, i � \ � 9y �-•--' � 4 d' � � �s � zs ._.-- SETBAC � �� H 0 U S E � I LINE � � � o � I ;_-•••• I �ENTnr I ..„' O o ° #3309 �T)� � I ��..: zo � I...,o.,:�:,... � I _ ,o.o ,3.s s.o � : •. � --•--�•-�----�---•-� ' ` I � R /^` COVER[D . I �.. � ____��_ SILTP�ENC� � I)r \„/ . I � i �// � `��` � .. I : Z � � � � o o � _ ' � < I� ', 944 '.ExiST'N�E OVED � N � '�. To e[ . ... ... .._.. �`v� � � w I !/ �� . ... -� . �vWiw � _� . �. I o'� ' � : i(94a.8j 14" WALNUT_ o� '� I � � a v� 24.0 ; I �SW'LY I ��'•, g�fiQ .^ VACATEI � (945.2)/ ( - �• � `H�m EXiSTING SHED PROPOSED '� 1 O �• � TO BE REMOVED DRIVEWAY � ,��j J.8) I i 54 � ---��10.00�'"'��26" LINDEN_ � (945.1) � � �� '�•.MOST S'LY CORNER '' �OF VACATED STREET � . � -- --....----S 54°45' 00" W � � � � 60.00�-.......: � (945.8� 0 � 24" ELM / I � BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY / 34'-0" _ --------- — 14'-6" 14'-U" 5�-6�� - �� --------- COV RED DECK ABOVE o � � � -- DINING PANTR I I GREAi ROOM �--r- 36'H ��__J 36�R I I KITCHEN � o L I cil cJ REF - � �---- UP COVERED ENTRY OI ENTRY ON i POWDER � I 9'-0" _ `n I — 1 � `� WALL LIPJE ABOVE STAIRWAY WINDO S � T D �5�-O� GARAGE COVERED EPJTRY 13'-6"' — 24'-0" -- � � �� SCHMID `�' 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD, RONO FIRST FLOOR P N m � 1 3-24-14, REV 5-29-14 1�8�� = 1�-0�� x N I � o � o 14b3 SOR. FEET HWSE�GARAGE � Zf' h + 53 SOR. FEET C04ERE�DECK/PORCH AREAS �y = 1516 SQR. FEET iOTAL FOOT PRMT _ ._ --- -- � � —-- � � � �! 34'-0° _--. ' -- 14'-6` 14�-0" 5�-b-- - COVERED DECK I c • O LEDGE M BATH 0 f I M BEUROOM 54"H LINEN -�' i i i � i i i sH � � � BENCH i � � i ii i ii I I I �{ElVES I I CLOSET PLATE LW E BELOW DN STAIRWAY WINDOWS � � TBD — �- � 3/�BAT \ � LAUN�RY � I PLATE LINE BELOW � "'�D ------- INEN ------- 13'-6" 0 I N SCHMID � 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD, OR NO OFFICElBR 3 BR z 1 SECOND FLOOR P N ^\ 3-24-14, REV 5-29-14 1�8�� = 1�-�� 'v .� � -- ------ 24'-0" - ._� � -'C L------- - -- - � . � � � � e� �-I 6407 �J . �� - K �I��g ��'G' � ��;,��..�t f�7 - �-��5� �`� `�-' � 5.��, �� M �,:��_ � �° ��b�:_�`�-`.. . _____�� `7'-_r�`'�°� = (�d¢`_—'`�'ft . I. �/1 J� . r i � P'�G " 1 � � � 7 ; � , � ; _ � � � �1��`= I-c��' _�.. � !� � � � . �GI-��-�L 1p `�� =-��,1�" � ' ��-�. 3 -r�� - ��!- --------- 5- �- �`� !�``� t`�� MEMO ��o� � �s-tai �� -i � � __ - _ _____� . �Q� ��l 6�,� 20 l U -- 6C� $S� --� �'�o�'`da.--��o,-� ��+er- -� ►�q Yl�`m�'�-� J ��o 02 U!4' ' D o�� i ✓�a � 11� vc r 'cl o� �� L�� V�� V�� / � . `� � � �� Y - CITY OF ORONO �ERMiT rro.: 2oia-oosss , 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY � ORONO, MN 55356- DATE ISSUED: 09/16/2014 � (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 � ADDRESS : 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD PERMIT APPLICANT: �� -f� � �' PIN : 17-117-23-41-0016 BETZ BUILDERS INC. ;-;,,,,.f,�1 �� e LEGAL DESC : WALLACES ADDN TO VIL OF MTKA 300 CRESTVIEW AVE. B � : LOT 001 BLOGK 000 LONG LAKE, MN 55356 � � PERMIT TYPE : NFW STRUCTURE � = PROPERTY TYPE : RGS[DENTIAL (612)221-2963 � ;� ' CONSTRUCTION TYPE : SWGLE FAMILY � ACTIVITY : t01-SINGLE FAMLLY HOUSES, DETAC VAI�UATION : $ 380,000.00 SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED:PWMBlNG, MECHANICAL,FIREPLACE,WATER CONNECTION,SEWER CONNECTION,LAWN IRRIGATION, ELECTRICAL(STATE} ��:,, NOTE: PRIOR TO THE START OF FRAMWG AN AS-BUILT FOUNDATION SURVEY MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE '� ' CITY OR A STOP WORK ORDER WILL BE ISSUED: INITIAL , �,,�7 NOTE: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AN AS-BUILT SURVEY IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND ,"3x-' . APPROVED BY STAFF. INITIAL ``�✓ � NOTE IN THE EVENT OF WiNTER CONDITIONS OR OTHER UNFAVORABLE WEATHER CONDITIONS(WHICH PREVENT THE '� COMPLETION OF THE EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS AND/0R AN AS-BUILT SURVEY)A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO)MAY BE NECESSARY. A TCO REQUIRES A$10,000 ESCROW. INITIAL: NOTE: ACKNOWLEDGE ENGINEER COMMENTS DATED AUGUST 19,2014. INITIAL: NOTE PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ESCROW MONEY,AN ASBUILT SURVEY AND HARDCOVER CALCULATINS MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. INITIAL' BUILDING INSPECTION RECORD 48 HOUR NOTICE REQUTRED FOR ALL INSPEC"TIONS. � CALL FOR INSPECTIONS WEEKUAYS: � � CONSTRUCTION HOURS: 7am-8pm Weekdays & 8am-8pm Weekends& Holidays � [NSPECTION TYPE DATF INSPECTOR DATE [NSPECTOR , POOTING � �/y ESCROW REFUND REQUESTED � (, RADON PREVENTION INSPECTIO _ � �.� ESCROW REFUNDED POURED WALL � v L -I FOUNDA'CION WAT�R PROOFING FOUNDATION SURVEY B/4 FRAM . r�e rv� — FRAMING �� ,�� / _� f INSULATION ,'.,�, . : oa �� FINAL ' ,� ��- � AS-BUILT SURVEY •'INSPECT[ON COMMENTS: �N ACCORDANC�: Wf['H CI�CI�'ORDINANCE.NFW OR SUI3S�T'AN7�IALLY REMOD1=,LED BUILD[NGS SI IALL N01�BE OGCUPIED UNTI�L AL{, � WOKK IiAS BGGN�PYROVED.AI�iD A CERTII�ICATE Ol'OCCUPANCY HAS BEF,N ISSUED BY THI�.[3UILDING DEPARTMENT. � THIS CARD MUST BE POSTED AND VISIBLE AT ALL T'1MES UNTTL WORK 1S COMPLETE. �� • : � . 1 • emo To: Finance Department From: Christine Mattson, Planning Assistant CC: Street File Date: August 4, 2015 G/L: 101-22205 Re: Escrow Refund Building Permit#2014-00858 pertaining to 3309 Crystal Bay Road is complete. Please refund $10,000 to the property owner, David Schmid. The following is attached: • Original signed escrow agreement � Copy of cash register receipt showing escrow amount received Mail to: David Schmid 3309 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 w:�street files\crystal bay rd�3309\escrow refund 2014-00858docx.docx ` TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY . ESCROW AGREEMENT Orono Building Permit#2014-00858 AGREEMENT made this 3�d day of ✓��r �% , 20�S, by and between the CITY OF ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Cit�')and i,-/�j rv,i� ("Owners"). Recitals 1. Construction of the new residence located at 3309 Crystal Bay Road the ("Subject Propelty°), legally desCribed as Lot 1, Wa!lace's Addition to the Vi!lage of Minnetonka Beach, together with a portion of vacated sheet/ying northeasterly of and adjacent to said lot described as follows: That part of said vacated street/ying southweste►1y of a line drawn from a pant on the Southeastedy line of said vacated streef disfant 10 feet northeaste�fy from the most southerfy comer of said vacated sheet, to a point on fhe Southwesterly line of said vacated st�eet distant 113.91 feet northwester/y from said most southerfy comer, Hennepin County, Minnesota, is the subject of building permit applica6on number 201400858 has been completed. 2. Winter conditions currently prohibit completion of exterior improvements, final grading, and vegetation establishment. An as-built survey cannot be accurately conducted at this time. 3. Owners request the City issue a temporary certificate of occupancy ("TCO") to the Owners so that the Owners may occupy the new residence. ...;�-y .�.x 4. The City will issue a TCO only if the Owners establish an escrow to ensure completion of exterior improvements, continuation of erosion control and submittal of an as-built survey to the City. NOW THEREFORE,THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DEPOSIT OF ESCROW FUNDS. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow Agreement, the Owners shall deposit ;10,Op0 with the City. All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account. 2. PURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose of the escrow is to assure com{�letion of any exterior improvements, flnal grading, establishment of vegetation as well as guarantee reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred (including planning, engineering, in excess of $500, or legal consultant review) or will incur in reviewing the plan. Eligible expenses shall be consistent with expenses the Owners would be responsible for under a building permit application. The escrow will also guarantee reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred to assure that the work is completed in accordance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and the provisions of Orono City Code Chapter 79. The financial security may also be used by the City to eliminate any hazardous conditions associated with the work and to repair any damage to public property or infrastructure that is caused by the work (including planning, engineering, or legal consultant review) associated with building permit #20140085$ if compliance with the approved building permit is not accomplished. 3. MONTHLY BILLING. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs, the City will in tum send a bill to the Owners. Owners shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the Owners' receipt of bill. 4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. In the event that the Owners do not make payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in#3 above, shall issue a Stop Work Order until the Owners pay all expenses invoiced pursuant to#3. The City may draw from the escrow account without further approval of the Owners to reimburse the City for eligible expenses the City has incurred. 155441 � 5. CLOSING ESCROW. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be retumed to the Owners when all requirements related to the project are complete. City Staff shall review the terms of this escrow agreement two times per year to determine whether the requirements of the project have been successfully completed and whether it is appropriate to return the funds. Owner may also request the release of the funds, and such funds shall be released upon City Staff receiving the appropriate verification that all requirements of the project have been successfuliy completed. 6. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARGES. If the project is abandoned by Owners, or if the eligible expenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid balance to the subject property pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§415.01 and 366.012. 7. ACCESS TO SUBJECT PROPERTY. The Owners hereby grant to the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors, the right to enter upon the subject property for the specific purpose of inspecting and completing any exterior improvements, final grading, establishment of vegetation and the restoration of the subject property should the Owners not complete the work by the specified dates. J�.__-- CITY: CITY OF ORONO OWidERS: J�:- � �� By: its: � — __.. _ .. tntemal Use Onty: Original to P 8 Z Department O Copy to 3treef Fi1e 155441 DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN �a'�� INSPECTION�I SCHEDULED � '�� PERMIT NO. vv� ' � COMPLETED ADDRESS � OWNER ELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR /a �a'��ag� �; DESCRIPTION � � � � l� ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING � ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS ti Q �FRAMING ❑ MECHANICALFINAL p TREEREMOVAL Z�❑ NSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB 0 WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. � FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PIUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTFiACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: [�!�• �r " � '� /5 � cW. �i"6�1K< ` � � �/Ye _ 1`�GI o (� ��Ovrae ,�,�� /6c�� o� L .L . ��r-�� '' .�� !l - � 0 � W � Q � � 6K — d " � W �j� 6K (j2.�Z Ucc� ��l� G�✓�� -��L� —�,�' � j W �WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECTCOMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REtNSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. p PHOTO TAKEN �NSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (J52) 249-4600 OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector.��j G�^- � � White Copyltnspector's File Cenary CopylSite Notice i ty�'��DATE ',.� TIME �ITY OF ORONO CALLED IN �.�- � INSPECTION NOTIC� � SCHEDULED / % � � --,�'= "d, r�� i' PERMIT NO. -�1'L� � �'� �� COMPLEfED ADDRESS „> �:C`�` ��; _ i „�, �Cr °�� ;C OWNER TELE HONE NO. �� I�� CONTRACTOR �� ; DESCRIPTION °��-�l�� F'` '��jf, � k ly ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING � ❑ POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS � Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z 1�1�1SULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPT INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SE IC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Q OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES_NO � COMMENTS: Frt�..�.res ce��'�� '�..��J' � 4S9LaY�t-��i'„�� a �/1�r�/ � ��s 4✓Q S,P�t�y a,.�eD - !�r!/S� j I� `/�T k�l va.00r b.,..�e. � � F�i�� l �?-fo a �',/J. clrse - �'t'-L . O ►�lt t tECJ��r -lb �O � ►'O(J ('JG� � r t.S � r rc � / ' l� �' , P� - ��` � ' � r e - I/�n.�r rt - �— � rl�G IO G � O �'� Gfj 45 L' � � � -d/ 7 ✓ r �5- �dlJ2r/ J� 4�.- ssi W� ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE��a��,a W//�QE8E6T WORK 8 PROCEED G ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF O'CCCIPANCY ��' ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY �� BEFORE COVERING 2 � PERMANENT �.L ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. � pH0T0 TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. C xt inspection 2a hours in advance. (952� 249-4600 O erlCont it � J- Inspector_ White Copyflnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice \ )� ATE TIM� d� CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION CE ��1�.� SCHEDULED � PERMIT NO. "� "" COMPL ADDRESS � -�"� �� OWNER TELEPHONE NO. �� ZZG Z- CONTRACTOR ��l��Z � DESCRIPTION � ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING ❑ POURED W ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORFJWETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Z Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � a �� — �� ^ _ 0 ��74'� ' ,dE✓ �54JC�.l� �H�..teG/�hc �. � ° l�'� 7� ,�r- W � Q k' /'j1�E�.ti �4s,. �/�,S�o n, �S�'i'c� � 2 wc.� r�¢t - � j ,�/ � /�NfARK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE (� w �CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE CWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WIIL REfURN ❑STOP ORDEH POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cal1 for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952� 249-46�0 OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. C�� White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopyfSite Notice v � `�� DATE ` �TIME ,� V CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN / INSPECTION IC CHEDULED �!!�� _/�.� PERMIT NO � �� MPLETED ADDRESS � � �/. / OWNER TELEPHONE CONT ACTOR >; D CRIPTION — � FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL � MECHANICAL RI ❑ IAKESHORFJWETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNERIFIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � � DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTFiACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO �/Q J/� � COMMENTS: � W a � � 0 � � 0 � W � Q � 2 W � W � j GW WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � ❑ ORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED O ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE CWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pH0T0 TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 2a hours in advance. (95 249-46�� OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. White Copyflnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice DATE TIME % CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � INSPECTION y,OTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. o��y�� COMPLEfED ��CS ADDRESS 3 3�� rys�L ,(�y ,e�. OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR ��'''" � DESCRIPTION �d��K ��'��"'� � ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING y�UNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � W � , /� �^ � p CD�I''�O r �tri' N-O� G4 LI fo � ��t SyOBC�t�� . " OC , O r — �,/� �LL/G C O"T �ole•s s�EL��O�'L /t>�i��✓�►�Oo�I•e� d` W � .�ra..�t,7e o6g�rv� 0.2 l�d�[1��4GE0�'�_ Q K' -,�-p/�'o.�l e - 1�ib�l�� .��,/��s Ol� Z W � W � j GW `�10108KSATiSFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE � ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call forthe next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-46�� OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. r� White Copy/Inspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice DATE TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN �'v `�y�'� =3 � � INSPECTION NOTICE _�� SCHEDULED �- ��- �� \ ��C C` PERMIT NO. ��--� �'� -�' �� COMPLETED ADDRESS =� 3 u `t C�c < ��:� " � . �� OWNER ��'"`� � TELEPHON NO. CONTRACTOR �t�� j DESCRIPTION � c�'`�ti ` J��z— �%�� `�� \ ��\tC.�.� ly ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING y ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ INSULAT ON ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT ��FINAL \e-m ��« ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY � ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEEf YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: a ��.;�.-�.��-�=,�: —�..,-,e� � - ��. �,,,�� - 3 - y - ,�_ 0 � —5lytU.(�e cv c{��. — a,� 0 rov!�pe n¢r�r C G� Co _ •.�.c r . �F,.i�.F(�41rf!<<.� - c�.iil.a� e s�n,.:� + io�� s•��e� sc�'� Q � O�r.� b�a�� iio.,, ,��p� �'•iK��S s Q q�y H+�'�,. , �" /�,.•5�o�' or k �'a►�/ e� Q�. t. a e - 2 i�t.�... -< o � F', . � �� - �o�y�-ot3 7g - wo�r/�cb,�/a� � �'i�L F�� .,.�:c � � d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED G PROJECT COMPLEfE w� ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W o -�CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � �EFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. � pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑�INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call forthe next inspection 24 hours in�dvance. (952� 249-46�� OwnerlContractor on site:�� L � _ ___ _ _ Inspector. � �r-.►� White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice �-� � `� r� ATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN -� � � INSPECTION NOTICE� ��.f�+EDULED � PERMIT NO. / c7�k LEfED ADDRESS -33D ��"'� � OWNER T LEPHONE NO. �Z"�� Z'�J'� CONTRACTOR �� _ � � � � ,� � DESCRIPTION l� ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL v Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FOUNDA N WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADO SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL R� ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FR ING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS _ ❑ I ULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT � INAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP = AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTFiACTOR TO MEEf YOU�YES_NO � COMMENTS: � W � � J O � � O � � W � Q � 2 W � W � - j W� ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ROJECT COMPLETE � ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ I E CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WIIL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Cail for the next inspection 2 hours in an . (952� 249-4600 OwnedContractor on site: Inspector. White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION'NOTIC9 SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. OMPLET�D -7 ADDRESS 5O OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION W ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL SEPTIC FINAL Q [I POURED WALL El RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING QElFOUNDATION WATERPROOF [IPLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO u) COMMENTS: W a reg , , amt-cvtj. O W W Q 2 W Z W j W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE QC ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. El PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 owneriContra or on site: �/ Inspector. Ed v1 a j�i j White Copy/Inspector's File Canary Copy/Site Notice City of Orono JUL 13 2015 Hardcover Calculation Worksl�e OF ORONO Property Address: 3?C' 2 CA YV 7',1Z BAY 80.40 /j9 Prepared by: GR�tii9FRG�`sf I�UCIATFI", /NC. Date:- 7-9-1,$ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Ter 5 Step 1: E�xIST1NG HARDCOVE In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey(survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Serve (Square Feet (Example) Gara,e (24'x 30' 720''?S.F. A �r�TF / S.F. B /Z 5 0 2- S.F. C R 1,V 6 tt,1A X 2 ,9 S.F. D -r - LrE.OX 62 S.F. E E GC. 7 ZS.F. F A4 A ck 7zv,,o oUA A%eAlG AA 6.4 G _ S.F. H S.F. I S.F. K S.F. L S.F. fvl S.F. N - S.F. 0 S.F. P 8.F, Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. ('ILTotal Existing Hardcover /, >� S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Cit Code Se;c 78 1:G84J' _� _ i S.F. S.F. ._-__...__....__ __�-_-__-- ___ _ .__._-_._..._.S.F S.F.- -S.F. 2) Total Excludable Hardcover T � � �Y __. _ S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line 2 from line(1)] _ _ - ! %y S.F. �4Z Total Lot Area 6385-!/Y8 SF ei+!L&,d,yeGCEA C.PYfT ,� /y'AY Ac�.ts 2 _ _ . ---'_-_`Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3)T (4) 55' (Proposed Hardcover next page) Ja,waiy S,2013