The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutseptic info f • SEPmIC SYST�M INFORMATION STREET ADDRESS �� (�,f?)C �✓I'Y\ �C�(J{ LOT c.� BLCCK SUBDIVISION ��p,c,C�� MONTH AND YEAR TLSTING DONE �., � ITEMS ALREADY CONIPLETED '� �i7^,�� • , ..� fi �� .: .�jr t� �r� NEED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT : OBORINGS OPERC TESTS r L SYSTEM DESIGN �,��f�� ii �� I�l'l � S I T E P LAN �(��c�1 I) � O OTHER OCOMMENTS DATE THIS SHEET FILED�Z�� BY S�t'i�C ��/i�� SUBDIVISION FILE NO. `�� To: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: March 30 , 1990 Subject: #1519 Fullerton Properties - Willow Drive/County Rd 6 Sketch Plan - Septic Concerns I have transferred the soil survey information to a copy of the proposed plat, and would make the following preliminary comments for sketch plan review: 1. Soils on the west half of the site are mainly LeSueur loam, slopes generally 6$ or less and water table generally no higher than 3' below the surface. The lots designated as Lots 1, 2 and 3 , B1ock ,Y�and Lots 1 and 2 of Block�',� have substantial areas of LeSueur loam and probably will find suitable sites for mound systems. r 2. Lots 3 and 4 , Block ,2� contain areas of Kilkenny and Lester clay loam soils which generally are a little heavier clay soils. Again, these lots would probably require mound systems and both appear to have some area of acceptable slopes. 1 3. The existing farmstead in Lot 5 , Block�2' ( 2225 Sixth Avenue North) has one 1,000 gallon pre-cast concrete tank west of the farm house, and drainiield that is unknown. Notwithstanding concerns about drainage through the west end of this lot, there may be suitable expansion sites west of the house. The higher ground on which most of the bui ldings are located is a Hayden clay loam, often requiring mound � systems due to s low perc rate, with the areas west of the house appearing to be a Glencoe silty clay loam which often prec ludes the use of an� system. I 4. Lots 6 , 7, 8 and 9 of B1ockJ� contain substantial areas of Glencoe soil which often has water table at the surface during the wet season. Lots 6 and 7 would appear to have a - drainageway from the north bisecting these lots into a front and rear portion. Lot 6 may have some mound sites on the fringes of the Glencoe at the front or rear of the lot. Lot 7 will have an extremely difficult time trying to find drainfield sites that are more than 75' from the designated wetland area. Lots 8 and 9 are also quite low, containing mostly wet soils. These two lots might find suitable mound sites near the road, probably ending up in front .yard areas. Both Lots 8 and 9 have a number of drainage concerns, as they are the receiving area for overland flows from the west. I , , Zoning File #1519 - Septic Concerns March 30 , 1990 _ .__._ _ .. .__.__ ..__....____ _ _._ _ . _ ...._._._..._� __ �. Page 2 0�._-2-- .. o,�� 15. Lot l0�has a little bit of everything, including f lat, `°; ,� wet soils, steep slope soils, and high ground to the west. ; �It may be possible to find sites either just above or just ,�` below the steep sloped Lester clay loam area. �,.� .� _ _.__.__._ .,.:...� _. _ __. �. _ ._ ...__ ._... . . __.��_�..�__�....._. Summary - The proposed lots in the west half and northern tier of this proposal probably will have suitable drainfield sites. Lots 6 through 9 are very questionable due to mostly wet soils and drainageways. I have compiled the available soils information, topography, and wetlands map into an overlay drawing for your review. In proposed Lot 7, the designated wetlands appear to be more extensive than shown by the surveyor. The same holds true for Lot 10. On paper Lots 7, 8 and 9 look pretty questionable. Perhaps a site inspection will he lp to confirm whether these concerns are valid. � � _� ' / 1 \ o _�-- �� ' 1 � ,. ' O � / '� \� ► --�-�.` � , .� --- , . ,hd� � — - o�= ' � _ _ __.:..�'."--�' Ut / / �S �" _ ll�_ . .�" 0 � ` °� o �,� �K ' _ ' / °'�_W� �o� � � � _ — — f9A� — ...... �--__.._._..�--- -----'' _ � � ' � � � , _ � — — -- — — — �s�y -- -- _ — �t � \ �� — — � -b — — _ _ � � , � , � "`�,-,. �,. � . , ��.�,,,,�-�`...,.,, � — 7�; �. . — --/ t . � _ -_ r � 4 ` �� . � ! t ' _ ` _ �p� ,��-�..�— � � i . 1 _ — � � � .` _� p� ..- ' �— — � —+�+�. � ��_� ' ,y '� �`� �� — t -� .rI V �-� � "�� ` � `� � / x ` � � ' � Q\ _� '_� x"'.�.+��.. . � tV ,` � ` ,.� . �_..r... �I -�� 1� . � � � \ / � 30 � w ;� � � � � _ JV '° �- • -• _ 1 — � � '� �� • w�� --� � � b m- �,►. �X � ""'�' `' � � _ �� `eOA ` / •� x` � v � xt "n� � � ` � \ �Q � � l _ W W � � \ > >O j0 `' �1 � _ �1J I � �1`C ;e �� \ ''{, I � � ` � i � � ___�_ � � _ �� \ \ � � - 1�� i .�o � �,� � �� t ` � � , �-f_ � \``` � � � •- \_ '�, � �__ � � � \ \ t `� t ♦ � �\ � � � � � r � � � � � ° . — „ ., — �� 1 � \ �� ; �--- `�, � / � - * �� ' ' . -- • 8-27� ,Locat>on or Project / U LG �,�'t /'d/�'.,� ` J•� --' �'C/< � Borings made by ,�/,/1� (J'�D/!/,(��x'tr Date -- n Classification SysCem: AASHO ; USDA-SCS x ; Unified ; other Auger used (check two) : Hand �, or Power ; Flight , or I3ucket �; other Depth, Borin� number _� Depth, Borin� number feet Surface elevation feet Surface elevation 0 0 �Ln� )< C. o �r� 1�� K �S�� 1� 1 �L�cJC �Ar.�'� 1��1�? 1 � � GR�y y .. ��y _��.,�y � � �.� , ► /'1Fo �odr�y sA�D � • 2 — �� QLHCk .SdNd Lv� 2 - � �� TR�y �-ONILI`,:% SJ9!'::/. � �'`t c G�. L,v�r M'r S It r..� .- / MvT]`'LGD OL�.v�iC�R cL�'�/ /'1o�TLt/� oL� vy .L�'� 3 — �.��h� 3 — c L��y �.oQai �� c c�t�;,�: Sdw,U 4 — 4 — - 5 — �,, . ' 5 — � 6 _ . 6 _ . 7 — 7 — g — 8 — ii �l End of boring aC ^� �fer�. End of borin� at 32 'fzt*�. Standing water table: . S�andin� water table: � /J F�esent at feet of depth, Present at . �� aat of depCh, hours after borin�. hours after horin�. rot present in boring hole �_. � Not present in boring hole 2-fottled soil: �/ MotCled soil: � '�� Observed at � €�t of depth. Observed at ,�_ �eet of depth. • Not preseat in boring hole NoC present in borinr hole . ObsurvaCions and co�nenCs: Observations and comm�nts: . � � . • ' • l B-27 ;Locat�-on or Pro�ect �/l � L /�� f p�J --LL� / — � U �3 �� Borings made by �/J /V />"/(' Q/1/!j�'/,r 1.,., Date ,�'=f— CJ (� � f Classification SysCem: AASHO ; USDA-SCS �; Unified ; other Auger used (check two) : Hand �, or Power ; FlighE , or I3ucket �; other Depth, Borin� number Depth, Boring numher feet Surface elevation feet Surface elevation 0 � p . ( �L��r'�; L. ��+�� . 1 — �-��yaL��,� ��.�� 1 — � 2 — J=irt.r GR�� Loa��y.��w 2 _ � �'1J�L�D pLi`4 ��'�R�Y 3 _ c L��r . � 3 _ � 4 — • 4 — 5 — � 5 — _- 6 — 6 — �. 7 — 7 — 8 — 8 — �/ . • End of boring at � � feet. End of boring at feeC. Standing water table: . Standin� water table: � i! R�esent at �,�,-�e�t of depth, Present at feet of depth, hours after boring. hours after borin�. rot presenC in boring hole ' Not present in borin,v, hole *tottled soil: �� Mottled soil: � ' � � Observed aC � �� of depth. Observed at feet of depth. . Not present in boring hole NoC present in borinr hole . Obs�:rvations and comments: Observations and comm.nCs: � • � • ' ' Lo�s or Soi1 norin�;s • ' ' 13-27' Location or Project _ �G1LCFil7'�n/ �iraPE�riF� /' � � , ( f//�D��.Ci✓GG> !.fit iri ) Borings r,.ade by _ �IA�(,�, ll�n� G�i�'<i,v�p��?� ' Date _ �'-/�-90 Classi:ication SysCer�: AASIiO ; USD��-SCS � ; UniF�e� r ; otile_ :.uger used (cnecl: two) ; i;and �, or Po�.�er . ; i'li�;ht , or IIuckec: x"; othc; ��T /O, /J'�r<<E' / . Denth, Borin�; nur�;oer � DepL1i, Borin� numher r' feet Suriace elevation � in � � feet Sur'-`�ce elevation 0 . ' 0 OL��K C 9d M lJL.��X �G.fM � 1 — ' 1 =-- $LACK CC.I Y CD.�!+� . .D,(�; �'�i�"a� Ct�!Y C e,�;r, 2 — Q/1G:.�N CC!Y �� G�.�r �/l�il✓r✓ �'LAY Ca��%t . 2 — r.��:•� 3 — ' • . • 3 — * . . 4 — �� _ S — . � 5 _ `- 6 — . � • u .._. . � i 7 — , 8 — II _ End ot borin� aC ,� O feet. rnd of borin�; aC .� � feet. Stand�ng water table: , Standin� water table: � •P-:esent at feet of deptt�, Present aC feet of deptl�, hours afCer borin�;. hours afCer I�orin�;. 2�ot present in borin� hole ' No� present in borin� .hole "fottled soil: ?•fo�tled soi1: • � . Observed at � .S fcet of depCh. Obscrved a� 2. O -Fcec of dePet,. T:oC present in boring hole . roC presenC in borinC holc Obsarvations and cor.unents: DUservations and comment�: � • . PERCOLA'IIO?( 'I'I:S'i DA'i'A Sll�i:7: I '']+ B�k � Test hole location �irG1�n7'O/►✓— G. d 1 "'�� Ilole number �- �— - Datc test hole was prepared ,�=��,/ �_, DepLh of hole bottom,_� �.. ..,. Diameter of tiole, _� inclies. Soi1 data froa test liolc: � Depth, inches Soil texture o --� y � =,,�1.�c � r� ��y — ,�/ —�.s" ��v , L��,� ��11�� L a�� `fet!:od of scratcllitt� sidc�.aa11 ,�l � C' �j� ` . DepCll oi pea-sized �ravel in boLCocn o1 liole� �__ lIlCI1C:;. `^ 3-� ' Date and hour oE initial �aatcr fillitig �� — �(� �` �� -�--_. . Depth of initial water fillin�, � �j inches above hole bOL"L'oul. �fetnod used to maintain at leasC 12 inches of iaatcr depCh in hole Lor at lc::sc 4 hours_ ��/ �L L . � Y �D �V (,�"��/�j,�/T l� o n Percolation test readings made b ��" 2—�f'D starcin� at T2 .�•itl , t•fa:cir.�u�l water deptll aL•ove iiu�� i.��>cc (date) ,?�°1• �3 �, during test, inches. , Tine I'ercolation Time Interval, tteasurement, Urop in water ratc, I:ci:�arlcs rtinutes inches level, inches � minutes per inch � 3 S � D ' _— 3 � � , ,— =� � jy ---- - `z --- � � � , � 3 s� � Z7 -- - � � , � � 2 d S� _._ S -.-__. � ' � ' ' $ Si 3 i b _ �.S"— --_ , Percolation ratc a �. Q uiinuCes per inch. , � i'.-3�) PERCOLtiTI0i1 T�ST DA'1'A SII�I:T �GK / Test hole location � U E� D/� '-� �J —�0 ltole nu�nber 2 �- — Date test hole was pr�pared S'�/—nj � , DepCii of hole boCtom,�_ :;;c`:c� , Diac�eter of Ilole, _� inclles. Soil data froa test l�ole: � Depth, inches , Soil texture o �� S � _ ,�L,��,� � o��y - �fethod of scratchin� .sidewall �G. F� _� _ _ Depth of pea-sized gravel in bo�tom of liole, �•, 2 ii,clic.� � Date and hour oE initial �aatcr filling s'—/ ' q0 __y 3�.�,,' � Depttl of initial water filling, � Z iiicties above t�ole bo�Lo:�i. �fethod used to maintain at least 12 inches oL- water depttl in tiolc ior ac: lc::_;� 4 hours ��j �L L, � ----. .- Percolation test readings made by /�/�J >-- /J s �/�r,� "•• �/O • ,t �•. � � "�� starcing at . i•fa:tir.iur� ��atcr depth aL•ovc '.:,_. ,, �c. (date) '��''. �. during test , '3 inches. � � TiQe Percolation Ti^_:e Interval, rteasure�nent, Urop in water ratc, Remari:s rfinutes inches level, inclies minutes per inch p > _ , LC � z _� � �1 b �,ci{ f Z. I I �S, I J l . � , 7g � i � 1 � � � � / �8 �� 3'/ O � i � ► � � � � b .S" � . ��, � � _ � + � '� D ' .S"3/6 .�'. 7c� • Percolation rate = ''� � � minuCe� per inch. _ - . 3 ' :i- ��J PERCOL:ITIOPi TrST DA'i'A S1i�I:T ��k � Test holc location��/ �4�;,"�(�d/�-�- � ��1d �` t?o1c nuu:ber�____ �- Dace test hole was prepared -- /�'�� , DepCh of llole bottom,� i,.;:l;u� , Dia^_�e�er of ho1e, �_ inches. Soi1 data froa test hole: Deptti, inciles Soil te�cture � 0 -1 � L o � 2 —� �/ G��v ,f'��r c� b � /�J _ �fethod oP scratchin� .sidewall _�G �"�— --- ---__—__ . -.•. _ . Dept1: o� pea-sized �ravel in boLtom oC liole , _�_ inclies. ,- �- Date and hour or initial �aater fillin� �'—��'�j� L �, � , �---..._... Depttl of initial watcr L-illin�, � Z iiiclies a�ovc liole Uoc�o:�i. 'teti:od used to m�intaiii ae lc��s� 12 111CL1C;; oL water dep�li in tiole Lar a� 1�:...�. 4 tlours �L��1 L L _____ r Perco�latio:l test readin,n,s msde bY �f.,II�J��O/��.�.: -�-. -- , .. �' „ (/ i.i:i. s—�" � j� stareins; at �� /`� ` � . 1'Ia::1C1L'I'1 �a��L'er c!epth abovi: ..�_ .. __ T' �).1:1. (dace) 3 �. ciuri.^.g tes t , ii:c!Zes. � , Tine I'ercolation T�^.e Interval, rfeasure��ent,. Urop in watcr raCe, I:ee�arlcs rfinutes inches level, inches minutes per inch • . S— � � � � — O i/ OS� � � I I -- � I� t . �3/L --- I 3/ �e--- � � 1 � d �I �� S �6 � � � . ► , ? � �� 5, 7� S' ^ ° ' -- � � � ► � -i y � ?J � Percolation ratc � �' �/ uiinutes per inch. �� ' � i;-., . PERCOLATIOti T�ST DA'i'A S1IEI:T BCK � Test hole location ��LE/t��j1 --- ,�.tl��,� (� ltole nuu:bcr �- �-- Date test hole was pr�pared_,�^ J — ef � , Dep�h of liole botto��i, _ �-- Diae:ete: of Ilo1e, �_ inclies. Soil data fron test liole: • Depth, inches ' Soil texture D —�2 � L�,�� Lo,�� ----- 12 —i�� o �fethod oE scratchin� .sidewall _S�/�1j �C �j�� _ ___ _ __ Deoth o� pea-sized �ravel in boe:tom oi l�o1c , 2- 1RC}1C5 . Date and hour oL initial water fillin� ��'_l_ f� __L� ��f� � -- -+----- �- Deotfi o� initial water f-illing, 1 � i:1Ct1CS above hole botto:��. �fethoc used to naintain at 1cas� 12 inclzes o[ water denCti in hole ior at lu;:_;c 4 tiours �L L, �` -------- Percolation test read�ngs made by /� �,1 �y , �a.m ,�� Z— / Q star�ing at /f -�G �� m , i•Isxir.:urs water depth above ilo�e i.�:�tC: (date) � �. during test, inches. ' ) ; Time Percolatioii Time Interval, rteasurement, Urop in water raCc, I:emarlcs Tfinutes inches level, inches minutes per incil D L _ ' � �r _,�� 2 o D i � �' _ 2 � I � / � ` ' � 3 � .S" �� ?� � � � ► y 7 � l /� — --_ � 3 s� � r ---- , S� ' ' � / ' �� ' / � � � .� --- Sy �--; , ' '_ � ' ' � � =� - � ;,� ��--�-- , �___. Percolation rate � �* (� l� �ninuCe� per inch. � �, . S � � , .� L'-39 PERCOLATIOPt 'rrST DATA SEi��T 8c,� I Test hole location ��E,�„ �� Q/�,� -- L, C��-'� ��. llole nuiaber ^ �'- � �---- Da�e test hole was prepared4�'"L�� — , DepC(1 of liole bottoe�, �u ._,.,.::,�; , --�7--- � Diaa:eter of liole, �_ iiiclies, Soi1 data fron test tiole: . Depth, inches � Soil te:cture - � "� �� l� L o�M /� �� /� � / _'�._... - � C L. 0/�'�A _ �fc�'r.od oP scratchin� .sidu�.aal� �_��,:: ;` � �� :�',� --- -- -- --'r'— — _.--- Deo�h o� pea-sized �r;ve1 in boc�oc:i oi� l�o1e , 2 inciles. 5�'_�—.�.o � � D�Ce ar.d hour oL ini�ial �::a�er ::i11inL i � !� r -_'�'l---. _ �' . Depth or initial water fillin�;, f � inches abovc holc tio�tow. ��eCi:od used to �sintain at 1easC 12 inches oi cazter depth in hole for at lc:sc 4 ilours ��'/�LL -- Perco��tion test readines m�de by p0�jj �y. Q� �= /� �:1 �'— a.in. "' �� starei;�� at � �.` . Pfaxir.�u�� t;arer deptll above l:u1e bu�c� �date) / ,�.;n. �. during tes t , �� inclzes. ; Tine I'ercolatior. T�^e Interval, r(easure�.ent, Uro in waccr ra�c P , R�i^�rt,;s i•finutes inches 1eve1, ir.clies r.iinutes per inch L �L_�,. Z /D"� — 1 � 3 � � ! � — . J / � l .� 0 �/ J `/� � �l,�T— ------- 7 � / �os� �, 31 � � c �� 2a // ' � � � -- . � . I Percolation rate = � 1 _ uiinu�e� ��er i��ch. � _ . 6 r+v � j 1;-�_ PERCOL�'IIO:( 'I'��S'L D:'1'i':l SI!rF.T ____ ___'_-___-___"�~!` / :est '�:o'e location � l �? t �, . �-_ � i'7_. �-;!o'_� nu;.:Lc_ \�, — F _� __—.—___._. . -. Date test nolc was prapared �,�''- l - '� (; D�p�ii oi kiolc i�ottc::: :��:. _. '-�--= - �{2�:eCeY OL" 110�C� � �I1CI1C:>. ---i�— Soi1 data rro� test hole: Depth, inciles - Soil teYture O - � 2 � ' ' � � ;:w J � —� l� ' Y � .» ��,/ � � � .hF� ___. __._ . _ t ' � --'_'___- ' ` __'_—.__"_" ..._... . _ �ret.:od a� scracc';1,�i1n s�d��.�ai1 .� " :' ,%'� /'? ,��4' _ �--=-r-- -- ------... ___ DepC'ti o� pe�-sized �rnvel i�l lioCLo:;i o� iiolc , �_ i;�:�:h�:. . ,,. . Date and 'nour oi initial �.�atcr r ill�ns� �� - ?'Q �'f =---- ,�: ' ��/ �-----�--�.-�� Depth o� i.^.itial water iillin�;, f 7 i:iches avovc tiolc bo�Co:�!. L`ec!:od used to c:aizltaii: at. 1easL 12 inclles ot �aaCer de�th in tiole ior at le;.. � i 4 l:ours_�� 1y � ?erco�;.tCio:: CesC re�ci:l^S ;nclde l;y �J� •t"F /'^"�� otw ---- ' +�'-- --=----,��- --'=---{—=----- ' ------ - �� r/ � SL"��'L"1.P.�� .. �'_..:+� . i :i ., ` , �, � � �t _ ��'�" ' !a:� r.��:�� c�Lcr �?e:>cli .i,o�, (dace) ? ' �;>.�:�. �. eu�--r.g test , � �� ;:c!:es. Ti�e 1'e rcola cioii Ti^e Interval, rtcasure::�ent,`; Drop ii: w,itcr r��te, ::c:m;�:-i:. ,� t•(�nutes inche� � level, inci�es r.iiuute� per �� incii � �--� � �f ,�-,� -(�� -- � S i�� I __ � � � �� :� ,� ( � ;__ � ; � i 9 - .� I ,�_�,_ : .__ ,... 12 3 x _, � �i �,�jv 1 �� = 1 � � �- -! !�-�:__:' -�- f�=: �' � / 1M'1 �+. � 3 �! � � � i � __ — � , ,— --- -- ----- 12 S� I I 7 ��---------------- .r , -- —�G'b t /D l`t i I Z 3/•� -�1 � 4 I � %/y J'_.�_1 � .. -----� --`� �.---�-r _ 1 r - -_---T-------� ----- --------------I v � � n � � '`f S'��, �.. � J 1 � / , -I—�---� a-f�- ---_— --�--��-----'---------- - � , 7 v � �-� ��-=�''�--" ��--- � r �------- � `�' l _�---�- � ----- i �- ,, -----_ � .3 � 1 � �1 �.... , ;i<r��_i S. __ I-- "' ------_ 1 1 � 7 �- � =,- ,iy I �' � -----__ . i - � �------ - 1---------- Percolatlon rate = / / (/ minu�e� per inch. � �-— "�O \� �' 11r�`, � O O� � - _ CITY of ORONU � r <, ,,,; ,, ;, >„ ' �� ti, , � �,, �� Municipal Oftices � ti.-,�� ,� ��'� � � �'° �,,`�`��;!� Street Address: q5a.-a�q-y6� � Mailing Address: 9kE3H�g 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 . �130 ��;X �,�� I�J To Current Owner: Address. � City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): � l 1 1"CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets all the location,design and conswction standards ofthe current Orono Municipal Code. �J 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or rivo foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-yeaz flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction stan�rds of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is faIling for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(5-7): � Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. �Septic tanl:s must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped �1- ��—n� )� Make sure septic tanks are pumped throu2h manhole and not through white inspection pipes. This allows for the proper cleanin� Keep water softner and iron filter dischar�e out of septic svstem to prolon�life of drainfield. Ask pumper to test alarm float to verify alarm is still working in your house The alarm warns owner that septa�e is about to backup into basement. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed m each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION(8-10): � Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharginj untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. COMMENTS: 1�-�c v�� 1 c�1LS 6�— Q ��P S c� }-;L �---�.�1(._S S c�c Z�o� (�:�v �a� � r� ,�— Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman - Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guazantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. .�, o,�,. o. �. o �� ,, CITY of �RONO L, r� , .. � �' ��• �}� � �il1IIIC1 ��1CQS '�' ��i��t��`� G~ - � � '�'+ s;i,` �4�i Street Address: Mailing Address: �_E$�I� 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 q5a-�49-y5oo To Current Owner: Address: �3� C oX Fa rr. R� City Ordinance 199 requires that each existin�on-site sewa�e treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewa�e treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. YSTEM CONFORMITY 1-3 : � "CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Qrono bfunicipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono hiunicipal Code but does meet the dvee foot separation requircment or two fooc requirement for systems installed 1996 or eulier,and which is not failinD or an imminent threat to public health or safery. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYS'TEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not mcet all the location,design,or consvuction standards of t�e current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any[STS with lcss than thrce feet of unsaNrated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limitina soil characteristiu. TANK CO�tDITION(�-.7�: � Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. � Septic tanks must be pumped out this ear (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped l 1-��-�� ). Niake sure septic tanks are pumped throuah manhole and not through white insaection pipes. This allorvs for the proper cleaninQ. 7 Inspection risers missin�tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. DRAINFIELD CONDITION!S-�Q): � 8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. �Some evidence of surfacin„not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly dischar�in�un�eated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. CO��ii�NTS: �"`o�^� �`�,5 `".e�- SRd-'s- o� fioe . �u�-(� SeP �-;� �c.�� c�e—�� S �r— r�-�2(' _ � -i� -0 21 �a;�c �-. Date of Inspection l�iatt Bolterman— Septic System Inspector Noce: In the event that this inspection rcporc is used to satisfy the requircmcncs for a mortga;e or other transfer of property,be advised that this rcport does not guarsntee or certify that an eristina systcm will continue ta function properly,but is merely an opinion ofthe adequacy of the system under currentconditiorts based on the availabie information. �� \_ �. �� , �O O`�, �� ,.��,� ,��' CITY of ORONO r� i , �_ v�',, � ;�. lS� j Municipal Offices �� '� G��'�� Street Address: Mailing Addross: ��CEggO�'j� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 ��=--=% Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 July 24, Z000 James & Leslie Hanson 930 Cox Farm Road Long Lake, Mn 55356 Dear Mr. & NLrs. Hanson: An inspection of your septic system was conducted on July19, 2000. A summary of the inspection is below. Septic Tank Condition 1. Pumpout not needed at this time. The septic system is a compliant system, meaning it meets all or most current City and State Standards. Enclosed is a list of licensed contractors who work in Orono on a regular basis. This list is enclosed simply for your reference in case your septic system needs maintenance in the future. r11so enclosed is a fact sheet explaining your septic system and how it functions. Finally, an as-built dra�ving is enclosed showing the approximate location of the septic system. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at the City Offices at 249-4600. Res ectfu . -fiw�'.� Chris Pence On-Site Systems Manager Enclosures In the e��ent this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortga;e or other transfer of propert�, be ad��sed that this report does no guarantee or certify the esisting system will condnue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequac��of the sy stem under current conditions based on the a��ailable information. This report must be kept on the premises with the s�stem location and pumping records. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 . www.ci.orono.mn.us ^� �� \ �\ /� ��. � ��.� �: - ''''� TY of UK011�U► , ,, CI `, r3 �� r ,, - ��% Municipal Offices � y r< '� �� `�, 'C� "'� ' � `.�:� � G:� Street Address: Mailing Address: ', ,� ' ` � , ' .�,;' P.O. Box 66 •� �9 '¢:; 2750 Kelley Parkway ` ,,kESK� %% Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 �:�,/ Orono, MN 55356 To: The Cunent Owner of Address �`�30 �G� r� �� City Ordinance requires that onsite sewa�e treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and the following is known about the system. A sketch of the known components of the system is available for most properties at the Orono City Hall. Imminent Public Health Threat Yes No � If yes,please contact the Onsite Systems ManaSer at 952-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of this notice. The septic system must be brou�ht into compliance within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attomey for legal action. System Identified as Non-Compliant Yes � No If yes, system must be brought into compliance by: December 31, 2007 December 31, 2010 Other Septic Tank(s ump out Needed Yes No � The City recommends the septic tank(s) and/or lift tank be serviced and pumped out every three years. City records indicate the tank(s) were last pumped out on � l - i t- �t�j . The tanl:(s) should be cleaned through the manhole and not throu�h tne inspection pipes, tlLs a::o��rs fo:proper cleanina. Comments: .W. �� ,a : ,. Inspeet��'�� -�.� Date of Inspection � - � � Telephone (9�2) 249-4600 • Fati (9�21 249-4616 . � � Compliance Inspection Form for Existing Individual Sewage Treatment Systems � This form reflects the requirements of the 1996 version of MN Rules Chapter 7080 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Note:Local inspection standards may be more or less restrictive than the state requirements. These differences must be made available by the Local Unit of Government. Date of Inspection: �'�' Property Owner(s) Telephone( )� Person requesting inspection(if different than owner) Telephone ( ) Reason for inspection: , , .-� Site Address City , Zip Code Unit of Government Regulating this property Fire No. Parcel No. Township Name Township Rangc Section Quarter (Check appropriate sewer system component and indicate location on site sketch). Tank s : Soii Treatment System: Other(briefly describe�: Flow Meter �-Septic tank Rock trench _Alternative system _Aerobic tank _Gravelless pipe trench _�xperimental system Yes No ,�Pump tank _Chamber trench _Warrantied system If yes, Holding tank Seepage bed Exp. Date: Other �`,�. Mound Other _At-grade Svstem Classification System Built Prior to April 1, 1996 and not Located in Any System located in Shoreland or Wellhead Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or Serving a Protection Area or Serving a Food, Beverage or Food, Beverage or Lodging Establishment Lodging Establishment, plus all systems Built after April l, 1996 Is the sxstem an imminent Qublic health threat(IPHT,L Up_grade Is the system an IPHT? Upgrade 1.Discharge of sewage to the ground surface? YES NO 10 mo 1.Discharge of sewage to the ground surface? YES NO 10 mo 2.Dischazge of sewage to draintile 2.Discharge of sewage to draintile or or surface waters? YES NO 10 mo surface waters? YES; ,I�IO.,10 mo 3.Sewage backup into dwelling? YES NO 10 mo 3.Sewage backup into dwelling? YES�TrO:'10 mo 4.Situation with the potential to immediately and 4.Situation with the potential immediately and ^`� adversely impact or threaten public health or adversely impact or threaten public health or s--�� safety? YES NO ]0 mo safety? YES(`NO ?0 mo Is the svstem failing? Is the system failing? `" 5.Less than TWO feet of vertical separation between 5.Less than THREE feet of vertical separation between , system bottom and saturated soil or bedrock? YES NO LGU** system bottom and saturated soil or bedrock? YES� NQ,,LGU** 6.A seepage pit,cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit? YES NO LGU** 6.A seepage pit, cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit?YES; NO LGU** ** LGU=Local Unit of Government ordinance must specify the time period within which the system must be upgraded. STATUS OF THE SYSTEM Based on the compliance criteria above the system status is (check one)�'in compliance(functioning)�failing�an imminent threat therefore,this document is a(check one)�3"Certificate of Compliance ❑No[ice of Noncompliance. Page 1 of 2 Wh�t methods were used to make the determinations for the compliance inspection��;'� �, c/� fr ._ ,, . �* � f' Please attach the followina: 1) Site sketch. Suggested items for drawing include:Well,wefl setback to system,dwelling or other establishment,tank(s),soil treatment system, reserved soil treatment area,curtain drain,property lines,waterways,and buried lines(those NOT installed by the utility). Include sizes and length and approximate distances from fixed reference points such as streets and buildings. 2) Soil boring logs,showing each horizon. Indicate the texture,structure,color,depth of each different soil type,evidence of mottling,bedrock and standing water and whether the material is fill. Locate each boring on attached site sketch. 3) A list of any and all requirements of the local ordinance that are different than the sate requirements referred to on this form. CERTIFICATION A. I hereby certify that all the information I have provided regarding the individual sewage treatment system is true,accurate,and complete. Property Owner Date B. I hereby certify as a state of Minnesota licensed Inspector and/or Designer I or Qualified Employee Inspector and/or Qualified Employee Designer I that I conducted an investigation in accordance with applicable requirements that accurately determined the compliance status of this system and that my observations recorded are accurate as of this date. No determination of future hydraulic performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction,abuse of the system,inadequate maintenance,or future water usage. Inspector'sname(print)_,.'��< �� '.�c� �.r�:-1`,-��,�,�� Phone License and/or Registration Number ��'y� Address ��';,.��,".�� .►'�-�:.�e, ., � c��'G'=-�, Employed by,, !.'� . ; ' _ ��..'-EF . Address � �' �s�_X Valid until ,unless the system becomes an imminent threat to public health or safety as defined at Minn.R. 7080.0020,subp. 19a,before that time. —��-�, r` �f Signature l/� ,r.r-d t'�'�'``:�'�,�„�/�.�-.c. .- «�� Date � ,,�''�` �' �.�'' ,: Upqrade Criteria Minnesota Statutes § 115.55 ("law") Upgrade Requirements Any situation witt�the potential to i,-nmediately ard adverse/y affect or threaten public health or safety, must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period of fime if required by local ordinance. If the local unif of govemment with jurisdiction over the system has adopfed an ordinance containing altemative local standards, the existing system must comply with the ordinance. If the system does not comp/y with the ordinance, it must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued according to the ordinance. If a seepage pit, drywell, cesspool, or leaching pit exists and fhe local unit of govemment with jurisdiction over the sysfem has not adopted local standards to the contrary, the system is failing and must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If the system fails to provide su�cient groundwater protection, then the local unit of govemment or its agent shall order that the system be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within fhe fime required by►ule or the local ordinance. If an existing system is nof failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more sfrict. This does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, wellhead protection areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging esfablishmenfs as defined in Iaw. p:\ists\prog_dev\exinp9.doc-6/99 Page 2 Of 2 . � e �C �A�\�� ._..�.._._..�--- � r � � `4 r � _ ��' _...,, t-- 1v_--�1� � A � ' � I � 1 � -- ��.�e'►$:q�_ /0�/�. `r'�{�+'�i "e� i � �_ {� /— � , y� i �%�� ' , !L � 9'� { � . --------------- , � /� I ��, ' S-i�� r �1� l /f �! /'��.'�'-- ,� r► f �. � �'T` E.al �, ; � ; ; �/� s . � . �d ___�___ �.�___ � , � � ` I , �f�t�� d �' i . - -- ��-o i� � � ,; o o , �;, , ;�t�. .. �!I CITY of ORONO �, .,� �►% M�;�,� otr�� .t �1 �r�'.�`�'�G~/ Street Address: MailinQ Address: ��'`�$,F,+gHO�' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 � __ ' =— Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 -�_ Owner: �/ �� Address: 930 Cox Farm Rd. Permit #'s: 4708 Dates: 10/19/92 Contractors: Clover Hill Co. (This is [� an existing system [ ] new construction) . STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (Tha saturated soil lavel is [�] or is not [ ] idantified under this septic system. If the saturatad soil level is not id ntified, this classification is subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 9 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, t�.�y �fi�„�� h„p,Tm_�ed out now 10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant. (The tanks ara [�] or are not [ ] water tiffht or tha condition is [ ] unknown. If the tanks are not confirmad to be watertiQht, this classification is subject to revision.) DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 12 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. � Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc. ) : hiqh COMMENTS: The drainfield is slightly surfacing and may be caused by poor drainage around mound. Call Steve at City offices to discuss repair options before the problem gets worse. ��9-- � � ,---J Date of Insp ction e t'c System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O � O Post Off�ce Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON–SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT r�,� � INSPECTION REPORT ti ��9kESHo�'�G Owner: �/L,�� 7'TZ�r;�O}'� Address: _[,�� ( �X T�7I'/Y`r � Permit #'s: Dates:_[��l-7� Contractors: ( Jll;/�� : �l � City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is [ ] an existing system �.. new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1 "CODE SYS7EM'�-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input uithout discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORM[NG SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface uaters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located uithin a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic � has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identi ied, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): � T�rSy inspection indicates: ��.� Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe> must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been p�xnped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffte (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Dr field inspection indicates: 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector irtmediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): �� COMMENTS: �1 � _� Date of Inspection ptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available informatton. This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system locatien and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner