HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2284 . �, .
�- �
,'-:�
Cit� o� ORONO
� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� NO. 2284
�
' • - • •
A RESOLIITION GRAIdTING
A VARIANCE TO • . .
� I+�iJNICIPAI, ZONING COD}3
SECTION 10.24, SDBDIVISION 5 (B)
FIL$ #1206 �
WH$REAS, Katherine C. Perry (hereinafter "the applicant") is the ,
owner of the property located at 2693 Kel ly Avenue within the City of Orono
(hereinafter "City") and Iegally described as follows:
Block 2, Carman Cove, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the
property"); and
Tnl�$REAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the
construction of a deck and screen porch Iocated 32 feet from the side
street Iot line where a 35 foot side street setback is normally required.
NOW, THEREFOR$, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
• Minnesota: ,
FINUINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1206.
2. The property is Iocated in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October
19, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon
the following findings:
A) Moving the wall of the porch to meet the 35' required setback
would place the wall in conflict with existing door and window
Iocations.
B) The porch and deck as proposed W�ii have no significant
visual effect on the character of the neighborhood. •
4. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
�
Page 1 of 3
� `..
s;
.
C�t� o� ORONO �
• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� NO. 2284
�
' • • • •
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generaYly to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, Iight, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial •
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
Citye
COYJCL�SIONS, O12DER AIdD CONDITIONS �
Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono
City Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a deck and screen
porch located 32 feet from the side street lot Iine where a 35 foot side
street setback is normal ly required, subject to the following conditions:
• l. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not
with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a bui].ding permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or this variance wi1 1 expire on that date (October
26, 1988).
2. Violation of or nori-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shal I be punishable as a misdemeanor.
3. The undersigned applicant have read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of October,
1987.
ATT T:
,
. '
orothy allin, City Clerk Jam s R. Gra , yor
• �
P operty Owner(s)
Page 2 of 3
.- �
''�!': _
• •
Clt� of ORONO
• RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� NO. 2284
�
' • - • •
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) , •
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this �(o '�'h day of �C��,(�Qr , 198 rJ
before me a Nota y Public within and for said county, personally .
aPPeared ,c 2�'irl� � � 2l'/y ,.�i/la /�i
known to me to be the person(s) desc ibed i and who executed the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed
the same as his (their) free act and deed.
. � . ��..� -�?�1/�G--
Patricia L. Petersun NO ARY PUBLIC
' � NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
• My commissfon expires 7-15-93 _ —
� /5 9.3
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
. )ss. -
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 198 , before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
�
Page 3 of 3