HomeMy WebLinkAbout#6500 - variances - 2015 � � , / ��v /��-u
. �
:
Doc No A10204588
Certified, filed and/or recorded on
Jun 17, 2015 10:00 AM
Office of the County Recorder
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Martin McCormick, County Recorder
Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer
Deputy 87 Pkg ID 1256426M
Document Recording Fee $46.00
Document Tota/ $46.00
This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document.
. r „
�
�Of V 0
C ITY OF ORONO
� ,,
RESOLUTION OF "I'HE CITY COUNCIL
�� G� � � � ��
t�KFS H o�ti N O.
A RESOLUTION
GRANTING VARIANCES FROM
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 78-1279 & 78-1680
FILE NO. 15-3728
WHEREAS, Kevin B. Torgerson and Teresa A.Torgerson, a married couple
(hereinafter "the Owners") are the owners of the property located at 1410 Cherry Place within
the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as: Lot 2 and 3, Block 4, Crystal
Bay View, Hennepin County, Minnesota (PIN 08-117-23-33-0081) (hereinafter the
"Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City of Orono for
variances from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 and Section 78-1680 to allow
construction of a new, reconfigured retaining wall within the 75-foot setback on the Property
where retaining walls and their associated hardcover are normally not permitted; and
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the Orono, Minnesota, City Code, a public hearing was held by the
Orono Planning Commission on April 20, 2015 at which times all persons desiring to be heard
concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #15-3728.
2. The Property is located in the LR-1 B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning
District which requires a minimum lot area of 1.0 acre and a minimum lot width of
140'.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on
April 20, 2015 and voted 5 to 0 in favor of a motion to approve the setback and
hardcover variances for the walls. The Planning Commission finds that the
following factors support the granting of the requested variances:
a. The Property contains 23,038 square feet (0.52 acres) in area and has a
defined width of 99 feet at the lake and 99 feet at the 75-foot setback.
Page 1 of 5
, � �o�o ,
C ITY QF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'Y COUNCIL
�`�1.� ti�`� N o. 6 J 0 0
'�FS H O�
b. A new residence on the Property is currently under construction.
c. With a total of 25% overall hardcover, the Property will conform to the
hardcover limitations of a Tier 1 lot.
d. The proposed retaining wall within the 75-foot setback area will have no
impact on surrounding lands. Drainage patterns for runoff leaving the site are
not proposed to be significantly altered.
e. The proposed retaining wall will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood and because of the proposed location will result in minimal or
no negative impact on adjacent properties.
f. The project will not adversely impact views of the lake currently enjoyed by
the adjacent properties; because of the topography, existing boathouse
elevation and proposed location of the wall, the proposed retaining wall plar�
will not be apparently visible when viewed from the lake.
g. The Owner proposes to use the Property in a reasonable manner, however,
the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. - The walls are
necessary in order to retain the slope.
h. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the Property
not created by the Owner. The Owner is replacing previously existing walls
with new, reconfigured walls which will have less visual impact than the
previously existing walls.
i. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
j. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
k. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are
peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.
I. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district
in which the land is located.
m. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the Owners.
Page 2 of 5
� �Oh�� ,
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF "I'HE CITY COUNCIL
�� G� 6500
j"�kFsxo�� NO.
n. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,
safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of
this chapter.
o. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
Owners, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.
p. The Owners' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the
ordinance.
q. The Owners have demonstrated that enforcing the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance deprives the Applicant of the reasonable use of their Property.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
the Owners and the public, and the effect of the proposed variances on the
health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting
the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a
fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the Owners, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants; and would
be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants
variances from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 and Section 78-1680 to allow
construction of a new, reconfigured retaining wall within the 75-foot setback on the Property
where retaining walls and their associated hardcover are normally not permitted; subject to the
following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the survey submitted by the Owners and annotated by City
staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the approved survey
which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and
City Council review. f
2. Proposed hardcover levels shall be conforming to the Tier 1 standards; no hardcover
variances are granted to exceed the 25% limitation for the Property. Structural coverage
Page 3 of 5
, �o�o ,
CITY OF ORONO
� �
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
y� 1 6500
�' N O.
�AkFS H�R�
limitations shall also be met. An as-built survey reflecting conformance to the approved
plan and hardcover limitation shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the new home.
3. Owners shall comply with the City engineer's requirements for the project.
4. Owners shall comply with the permitting requirements of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District.
5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owners, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a zoning perrnit for land alteration
for the project and commencing construction of said project within one year of the date
of Council approval, or the CUP will expire on that date (May 11, 2016).
6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority
granted herein, and shafl be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned Owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of the Owners and the Owners' heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 11th day of May, 2015.
ATTEST:
; � �. ..����:
iegs, City Cle� Lili Tod McMiilan, Mayor
Page 4 of 5
. , , .
. �0��
C ITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
y`�1.� �.`'~� N o. 6 5 0 0
kESH�R
�
Pro rty Owner(s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this `7" day of , 2015, by
Kevin B.Torgerson, husband of Teresa A. Torgerson.
.
�° `� N t Public
��}' � MONICAA.FADNESS
��- NOTARYPUBLIC-MINNESOTA
� �,m,Commission 6c ir
�i�:a:y� P es Jan.31,2017
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this��day of , 2015, by
Teresa A. Torgerson, wife of Kevin B.Torgerson.
DIANE L.TIEGS
— � NOTARYPUBLIC-MINNESOTA N ry Public
��;:�� My Commission Expires Jan.31,2016
Page 5 of 5
. . ,
• � ' �'Sr'wN 1 �� ��� �
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
KEVIN B. TORGERSON
OF LOTS 2 & 3, BLOCK 4, CRYSTAL BAY VIE�F
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MIN�TESOTA
,,,� ,�.,°
, pW � , � 1 i � ��
, 11 � , ►
���� ��h pos wsi ��` l��\\\�11`� � j �
St \ ��
�� \�� a„i OOSTNG 1 �� �\\���� ,�,1 � ;
� HOUSE ��� ������`�ly t
�sr�"s /�+oo �� 1� �
o,� , _ �
�� � N a�°z�l 28., �. � ;�----�.-��\�"�{���'1+ � ' LAKE
��''� � � ., � a.#9 n - -�
s., �� t , : :
�' �"`° "'3 � . �wa> � _' �=� a, ' ..� °'� +3,', �; MINNETONKA
I {�F' � y i ��ra€.w�'oi � � �.l 1 i i
)
� ' a 1 1
w � \� \ � 3 1 `` �' : 14:;�
� �_ �` '�• � �B _ �d � � �+r�;°"� �41 a �' NOR1'H ARM
�, '" ' ` i, _ �� � �
�
a �,�� �� �� ``s PROPOSED! ' - � % � r
. ,: i
� i"'� � PB��WOSAml'^ \�'� � _`�HOUSE__ -�? ""�c� � - - -+� �� -�-4T��n
1 �-: --- �• �
3 .-�-___ - ,._......_.... �...., � � a
_ ; -� - -
t�, ° � ... ...� 1410 ! �- � 1
�
��' o �\I �; �i �. (A)R �:q v(a� ib ..1""r-�� � �' 'L°zlE°�IoHM)
.
��
�t � .-�_..su�,-- � n�� ( i °l �`� ` }
m �
� � r� i �
WN . � \ _...., _..� � � a � 1 1
FTi r°+) � � � ��f : • 0') �� (
fy-1 p rN � �� \ l i , ; y�'d wry� �""/'��s � � � �\ 1 I
U � � . ...,.m�o. rr��+r3.• I I �r�1ti
r ♦ :........... ..._ro.R.oay:: � � � �, f . -�� �
\ti � 215 .OB� I-�'� j• � � � -
W \ :� � �
�il � �6Y I \ 1 ��_I-th��`...•�� }
'�� _._.-s 8�°'1�5\ 35�� w ��.-,�=°"`-_ ; ,' ; �\\ , �23. �� i � ` ; ; ;
,r+p'�'"Y � � ., M"'+ , i � ' ,1 / ' � � ; � , } ! ;
4 �
(� •-�____1-- � � �� ; � � � ; i ,
ao EXISTING `� 1 1 ' ,� 1 ! t \
I a.n HOLISE ,1 �� �1 1 ! I i � i 1� �, u�
` �,.�o � r r � � °",� � \�� � � !
� r,,,i a ? 1 � \
oECK � � '
PROF'OSFD ELEVATpNS:(yer achi:scia y:ona)
LEGAL DESCRPTION OF PREA9SES : ���°9°� •D�
Z) rap of rov�datlon-� �
Lot 2 md 3, Blodc 4, CRYSTAL BAY V!EW
J)Boser:xnt =9 A
o : denotea iron marker found 4)N'=t�°°r'�
{008.3): denntea existing apct ekvction, mean seo kvel datum
910.8 : denotea proposed epot ebvailon, meon sea level datum
--9?�--: deneles exieting contour I'ne, mecn meo levei dotim
—u--: denptes propoeed coMour line, mem eeo level datum
BeQinga shown ae based upon on assurned dotlim.
This survey intends to ehow the bounderiea of the abovs deecrbed property,
the !ocation o! on ezisting houu, to be ranoved, trees, spot elevatiam,
topogophy, the bcotion pf dl v7ai61a "Fqrdsover^, and �hB propoaed location
of a propoeed house, porch, pctio, wdK, drlvewoy, ond grodee tAereon. It does
rwt purport to ehow ony otha irnprovvnmta or mcroochments.
`w" '�°�„�,�",,m'�' GRONBERG AND „���kr���-��.w�,�4.���d� �
.as-�� nio�aqu�e� Y me�or�rdr my drKt wprvifon 1'�7D'
'°'¢_ � ASSOCIATES, INC. "°&'�'°'"°"�`""���SW��
nvva wcm�a tlu 1»�n1 tM S4 of 1im.�otn o�a
CONSUL7ING SNGIl10Egy,yAND �-Yt-74
�� - SURVgYO$S k SI pL NNER9
/S-1Je +u woArH v�.��b� ����1�y ,oe�n
LONG LAI�,MN.SSD�e
852�73-47�1 Yo#S�mbr i4maeola lioen NirtMr/2766 15-738
. . . �
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The undersigned, being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at the meeting of the
Orono City Council on May 11, 2015 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same
is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS rriy hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate a of the City this
9�' day of June, 2015. ,!
. �
,�,�`�' `� �' i_�, iane Tiegs, City Cl
� ,
: � , . -.;
,- _ � �, ,
. �:J �. . ... •v
- �
� . _. . �!_���� .