HomeMy WebLinkAboutdriveway permit process t . �Z� ��r� � P � � ,. e
�
Melanie Curtis
From: Melanie Curtis
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 9:56 AM
To: 'STANDADPM@AOL.COM'
Cc: Christine Mattson
Subject: RE: Driveway permit process
Attachments: Zoning PermitApplication 2012.pdf
Scott
City Code section 86-68 specifically requires survey submittal for building and other permits. Here is a link to this code.
You have asked if you can widen your existing driveway (within the boundaries of the easement) as Hulbert intends to
remove your encroaching driveway hardcover from his property. Because your driveway exists within an easement on
the Seidels'propertv the Seidels would have to participate in, or make the grading/driveway application. You will not be
issued a permit to conduct work on property you do not own without the owner's participation/permission. A survey,
grading plan and hardcover calculations are required for this permit to assure the Seidels' home or the adjacent property
are not adversely affected. The plan your wife brought in was an existing survey with the proposed changes hand drawn
on it; this is not acceptable for permit issuance.
I have attached the permit application form. A $2000 erosion control escrow will be required in addition to the permit
fee. If you have questions please call or email.
Thanks, Melanie
Melanie Curtis
Planning &Zoning Coordinator
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Direct Dial: 952.249.4627
Fax: 952.249.4616
Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620
Email: mcurtisCa�ci.orono.mn.us
Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us
City of Orono Office Hours
Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 4:30 pm
-------------------------------------------
From: Scott Standa[SMTP:STANDADPM@AOL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:11:49 AM
To: Planning
Subject: Driveway permit process
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Christine,
My wife told me we need a survey for proposed forced relocation of are driveway. The permit applications for driveways
and minor land alteration does not specify that requirement. My application provided a survey from the Siedel's with my
Torranced and registered driveway easement clearly marked and plotted. My wife also related that the Siedel's must
agree to my reclaiming of our Torrance and registered easement property whereas Mr Hurlbert per his attorney has no
such requirement. Could you be so kind to explain on how I/We would have or should have known of the survey
requirement?Also why the apparent different interpretations of Torrance law by your department?As an aside consider
1
. '
what will transpire when Mr. Hurlbert exercises his right to block my access to my home from Casco Point Road as a
result of Orono not allowing me to comply with his patient and reasoned requests.
Respectfully,
S Scott Standa
Sent from my iPhone
z