Laserfiche WebLink
� • . . � � <br /> ���, <br /> .� r�. �,.�s <br /> � �� �., �� �,: c�t� o� oR,oNo <br /> � Rs <br /> � i . <br /> � r�,.,°;�,3�,� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � r NO. 2007 <br /> E: ` �y�" `�x�'' <br /> �; . . <br /> ` � .��,�' "�(�n° i / <br /> ,.:r�.,,:�: _ U �' t' L Y <br /> C c�,��- (D-2 S -Q Z <br /> � i rt,��-f d"l'1 ��� _ , <br /> � <br /> e � F, ., ,._;, � <br /> A RESOLOTION GRANTING ,� r,,r �� <br /> A VARIANCE TO _. `�'� � . �" i� , <br /> _ MIINICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.22, SIIBDIVISION 2 <br /> AND SECTION 10.25, SIIBDIVISION 6 (B) <br /> FILE #1028 <br /> WHEREAS, Len Bachkes (hereinafter "the applicant" ) is the <br /> owner of the property located at 2813 Casco Point Road within the City <br /> of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 121, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all the <br /> unplatted land and that part of Lake Shore Avenue vacated lying . <br /> between the side lines of said lot projected to Lake Minnetonka <br /> according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office <br /> of the Registrar of Deeds in and for said County, (hereinafter <br /> "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br /> variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to <br /> permit the construction of an addition which will increase hardcover <br /> from 26.0� to 29.7$ in the 75-250' setback zone where only 25$ hard- <br /> cover is normally allowed-; and a variance to Section 10.25 , <br /> Subdivision 6 (B) in order to construct the additions within 9.5 feet <br /> of the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1028 . <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> May 19, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance <br /> based upon the following findings: <br /> A) The side setback variance of 0.5' is necessary only for <br /> a small portion of the addition because the house side line <br /> of the existing house is not parallel with the lot line. <br /> B) No items of existing hardcover are readily feasible for <br /> removal as a hardcover tradeoff. <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />