HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 1614 �
� ,
;.� �
� �
Cit� of ORONO
• '
� � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� � NO. 1614
� • � • •
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL
� ZONING CODE SECTIONS 34. 201 AND 34.2H2 - FILE 815
Whereas , Ralph C. Bagley is the owner (hereafter "owner" ) of
a �property legally described as follows:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No . 441 , Files of Registrar
of Titles, County of Hennepin, except that part embraced in
Registered Land Survey No . 902, -Files of Registrar of
Titles. '
� ^.
- � Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No . 902, Files of
., Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin•, (hereafter "the
property") , . located within thP City of Orono (hereafter .
, . "Ci ty��� � a.nd '
Whereas , the owner has applied to the City for a variance to
• Municipal Zoning Code Section 34. 201 to permit the construction of a
screened porch (28. 7 ' x 13 . 4 ' ) 12 feet from the lakeshore instead of the
required 75 feet and the construction of a bay window (4' x 8 ' ) 55 feet
from ,the lakeshore instead of the required 75 feet and a variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 34. 202 approving the addition of 424 sf
or 1 .6� of hardcover created by the improvements requested above
within the lakeshore protected area where none is allowed .
� Now; Therefore Be It Resolved by the City Council of Orono ,
Minnesota : . '
Findings
_ � 1 . The application was reviewed as Zoning� File No. 815. :
� _ " 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Lakeshore Residential
. Zoning District.
� 3 . On February 21 , 1984. , the Orono Planning Commission �
reviewedthisafterthefactvarianceapplication involving
� improvements made to the property without the required
permits and approval• by the� City, Planning Commission
recommended approval of the variances as requested based on
the following findings: �
• . � a) the property is surrounded� by water on three sides.
b) any improvement made to this property would require
setback and hardcover ,var-iances to the Municipal Zoning
Code. , �
. L.� _ �
clt� o� oR,oNo
• . �
Q� RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� NO. 1614
• � • •
c) a house has existed on property for over 30 years.
d) the m�jority of the hardcover credited against this
property at� 4 , 40a sf consists of a shared gravel �rive that
also serves adjacent house on property to east .
el the owner plans to redirect roof drainage from screened
porch located I2' from Lake Minnetonka to retention area
that wiil provide ground absorption rather than permit
drai.nage to run directly into lake .
f) the propose� and existinq improvements on the property
� � are consistent with the existing imp,rovements on the
' surrounding neighborhood properties. �
g) the owner occupies the residence on the property and no
longer rents the subject structure . -
• h) the City has received written comments from the neighbors
all confirming approval of the proposed improvement of the
property.
4 . The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission,
reports by staff , the written comments of the surrounding
propertyowners, thewritten commentsof theowner ' sattorney and
the effect of the improvements on the health , safety and welfare
of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district: that granting the variance
would not adversely effect ,traffic cbnditions, light, air nor
pos� a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the owner , but is necessary to
alleviate ademonstrable hardshipor difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the owner ; and would be
in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning code and
comprehensive plan of the City. �
•
. L.� _ �
Clt� o� ORONO
• '
a� � RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� NO. 1614 ,
• � • •
CONCLIJSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants
variances to Zoning OrdinanceSections34. 201and34. 202approving the
construction of a screened porch I2 feet from the lakeshore instead of
the required 75 feet and a bay window 55 feet from the lakeshore instead
of the required 75 feet and a hardcover increase of 424 sf or 1 . 6�
suUject to the f_ollowing conditions: •
1 . Owner will redirect roof drainage from screened porch away
from lake into a retention area to be approved by the City.
• 2.� Owner must obtain a building permit for all new construction
� � . based on after the fact fee schedule and all work on improvements
covered by that permit must satisfy alI standards of the Uniform �
Building Code.
• 3. No other variances are granted or permitted with this
application except the ones specified above.
4. All improvements on this property are limitec� to 7 , 6101 sf of
hardcover (3, 21f3 sf for the house and 4,40.01 sf for the shared �
driveway) , owner is hereby placed on notice that the City will not
approve future improvements to the property that encroach
further into the protected lakeshore setback area .
5. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property '
not with the owner , but are permissive only and must be exercised
by application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval , . or this variance will, expire on that date
(March 26, 1985) . - . -
5. Violation of or noncompliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the
Zoning Code, shallautomaticallyterminateanyauthoritygranted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemea.nor .
7 . The undersigned owner has read ; understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his
heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of
this resolution in the chair� of title of �the property.
•
� � i�
♦
� �
• . 1
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of March, 1984 .
ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO
City Cler�� Mayor �� � -
(I)
Pro e ty Owner . " —
�2�=���`�o __ __.--_ _.__ .
Property Owner (s)
• �3� -- — — — _.^.�
Property'Owner (s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss . . �
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
��.
On this ,�� day of , 1984,�before me a Notary
Public within and for said County, personally appeared
� known to me to
be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
� instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed . �
.. . G�
���w� ROBERTG. MITCHELL. JR. NOTARY PUBLIC ,�,., �
;.ti':�•!! ' NOTAfiY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
�e� HENNEPIN COUNTY ,
_ "���• My Commiseion Expires Fsb 8.19II� •
, MY' COMMISSION EXPIRES �
• .
,� - °
. ' �,
• � �
Clt� o� ORONO
• '
a� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� NO. 1614
A • � • • �
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ,
) ss .
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this _ day of , 1984 , before me a Notary
Public w.ithin and, for said County, personally appeared
known to me to
be the person�(s) described�in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
� - NOTARY PIJBLIC � f� ~
� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES �~ ���� �
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss .
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this ° day of , 1984 , before me a Notary
Public wi�thin and for s ia d County, personally appeared
. � known to me to
be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and ackriowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed .
NOTARY PUBLIC ,
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES �' �
• .