HomeMy WebLinkAbout#6475 - setback variances - 2015 � alP/� G�-� �� /2�
Doc No T05232533
Certified, filed and/or recorded on
Feb 5, 2015 10:00 AM
Office of the Registrar of Titles
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles
Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer
Deputy 13 Pkg ID 1203446M
Doc Name: Resolution
Document Recording Fee $46.00
Document Total $46.00
Existing Certs
1385507
This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document.
p �!'�� /
�o1Vo I '� 0
��T�' OF �RONO
RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY COUNCIL
� �
� ~ �' � � �.
�' G N O.
r'�kF s H o��'
A RESOLUTION
GRANTING SETBACK VARIANCES
FROM ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTIONS 78-350
AND DENYING VARIANCES FROM
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 78-1403 and 78-1700
FILE NO. 14-3697
WHEREAS, Gary Marquardt and Joan Marquardt, a married couple,
(hereinafter "Applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2617 Casco Point Road
within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: That part of Block1,
and that part of Lot 16 Block 2 and that part of Orono Avenue, vacated by
abandonment, all in "Winship's Subdivision of Lot 1, Spring Park 2"d Division",
� described as commencing at the northeasterly corner of Lot 141, Spring Park; thence
�,� northeasterly along the extension of the easterly line of said Lot 141, a distance of 94.5
� feet to the point of beginning; thence northwesterly deflecting to the left 101 degrees
13 minutes, to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, said line hereafter referred to as Line
"A"; thence southerly along said shore, 52 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of
said Lot 141; thence southeasterly along said northerly line to the northeasterly corner
of said Lot 141; thence northeasterly to a point on the extension of said Line "A",
distant 12.8 feet southeasterly from the point of beginning; thence northeasterly along
the last described extension to the point of beginning. Hennepin County, Minnesota,
(hereinafter "the Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City for a variance
from Orono City Code Section 78-350 which requires a 30-foot rear street setback to permit
construction of second story addition 29.9 feet from the rear street property line; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City for a variance
from Orono City Code Section 78-350 which requires a 10-foot side setback to permit
construction of second story addition over the garage as close as 6 feet from the side
property line and over the lake side of the home as close as 8 feet from the side property
where a 10 foot setback is required; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City for a variance
from Orono City Code Section 78-1403 to permit 3,321 square feet (19.5%) structure on the
property where 2,549 square feet or 15% structural coverage is permitted and 3,033 square
feet (17.8%) currently exists in conjunction with construction of a new lakeside deck; and
WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City for a variance
from Orono City Code Section 78-1700 to allow 4,898 square feet or 28.8% hardcover on the
property where 4,248 square feet or 25% is permitted in conjunction with construction of a
new lakeside deck; and
Page 1 of 7
�Q��
���� C�F �RQN�
RESOLUTION OF "I'HE CITY COUNCIL
��1,, �,G~ N o. 6 4 7 5
kFSHO�
WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the Orono, Minnesota, City Code, the Orono Planning Commission
held a public hearing on November 17, 2014, at which times all persons desiring to be heard
concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission reviewed this application on
November 17, 2014, the Planning Commission voted on two separate motions. The first
motion was to recommend approval of the side and rear setback variances allowing the
second story additions as proposed. This motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. A second motion
regarding approval of the requested hardcover and structural coverage variances to permit
construction of a lakeside deck passed with a 4 to 1 vote and was conditioned upon the
following:
a. Removal of the deck/landing and stair on the south side of the home; the door
should be converted to a window.
b. The deck must be constructed as "pervious" and the patio below removed.
c. No expansion, enclosures or changes to the footprint or the nature of the deck
would be permitted in the future without further Planning Commission and city
Council approvals.
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2014, the Planning Commission's
recommendations were based on the following findings.
PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS
1) Resolution No. 4640, adopted in 2001, granted variances to the property regarding the 6
foot side setback for the garage, the side setback variance allowing the second story and
permitted 2,961 square feet (17.4% as adjusted based on current lot area calculations) of
structural coverage.
2) The second story additions to the home are proposed to be constructed over the existing
footprint of the home.
3) The variance to allow construction over the existing home within the 10 foot side setback
will alleviate a practical difficulty inherent to the Property's width and not created by the
Applicants.
4) The Applicants' initial proposal when revised per the Planning Commission's
recommendation results in 3,261 square feet of structure or 19.2% where 15% is the
maximum permitted and 4,738 square feet or 27.8% of total hardcover where 25% is
permitted by code.
5) The Applicants have agreed to removal of the existing 60 square foot deck and stair on
the south side of the home in order to offset the structural coverage and hardcover levels
on the Property.
Page 2 of 7
� �a�o
��T� �� �RC�I�C�
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� �
� G� 6475
NO.
l"�kF S H O��
6) The proposed lakeside deck is not out of character with the neighborhood and will meet
the side, lake, and average lakeshore setbacks.
7) The Applicant has requested approvals in order to construct an open, upper level deck on
the lake side of the home. The Applicant understands and is hereby put on notice that the
deck:
a) May not be enclosed above or below,
b) May not be expanded in any way without further structural reductions on the Property.
8) The Applicants' request to increase the structural coverage, hardcover and second story
additions within the side setback will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood
and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent properties.
9) The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance.
10)The Applicants' proposal is consistentwith the comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered this application at two meetings on
November 24 and December 8, 2014 including the findings and recommendations of the
Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and
the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community as
well as the impact on properties in the vicinity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on December 8, 2014 made the following
findings with regard to the application:
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS
1) This application was reviewed as Zoning File#14-3697.
2) The Property is located in the LR-1C zoning district, where 0.5 acres is the minimum lot
area and 100 feet is the minimum lot width. The Property has approximately 16,994
square feet (0.39 acre) acre in area and has 47 feet in width at the OHWL and 64 feet at
the 75-foot setback.
3) The Property is located in Tier 1 of Orono's Stormwater Quality Overlay District and is
limited to 25% hardcover based on gross lot area.
4) The second story additions to the home are proposed to be constructed over the existing
footprint of the home. The variance to allow construction above the existing footprint of
the home within the 10 foot side setback will alleviate a practical difficulty inherent to the
Property's width and not created by the Applicants.
Page 3 of 7
. �o��
���� a� �R�N�
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��'l,� ti�'~ N O. � � T 5
kFSHo�
5) Regarding the side and rear setback variances, the Applicants' request is in harmony
with the purpose and intent of the ordinance.
6) Regarding the side and rear setback variances, the Applicants' proposal is consistent
with the comprehensive plan.
7) The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to it and
do not apply gene.rally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the setback
variances for the 2"d story addition over the garage would not adversely affect traffic
conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
practical difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
8) With regards to the proposed deck, Resolution No. 4640, adopted in 2001, granted
variances to the Property regarding the 6 foot side setback for the garage, the side
setback variance allowing the second story and permitted 2,961 square feet (17.4% as
adjusted based on current lot area calculations) of structural coverage. The approval
allowed for the Property to continue to exceed the 15% structural limitation; however an
increase in structural coverage was not approved at that time.
9) As part of the approval granted via Resolution No. 4640 a 750 square foot lakeside deck
was removed and a 196 square foot screen porch was constructed in its place.
10)Granting of a variance for the proposed deck to permit additional structural coverage or
massing on this Property above the allowed 15% and approved level of 17.4% is
inconsistent with the goals and policies contained within the 2000-2030 Orono
Community Management Plan.
11)The additional massing resulting from the proposed structural lakeside deck may alter the
essential character of the neighborhood and would be inconsistent with the intent of the
zoning code.
12)With regards to the proposed deck, the City Council finds that granting the structural
coverage and hardcover variances for proposed deck would merely serve as a
convenience to the Applicants, and that no practical difficulty exists to support these
variances; approval of these variances is not necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the Applicants; and approval of these variances would not be in keeping
with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Cornprehensive Plan of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota
hereby grants a variance from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to permit
construction of second story addition 29.9 feet from the rear street property line; and a
variance from Orono City Code Section 78-350 to permit construction of second story
Page 4 of 7
�o�� ��'� Q� Q�����
�
RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'Y COUNCIL
��l �,G� No. 6475
�kESH�R
addition over the garage as close as 6 feet from the side property line and over the lake side
of the home as ctose as 8 feet from the side property line where a 10 foot setback is
required; and
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby denies a variance from
Orono City Code Section 78-1403 to permit 3,164.4 square feet (18.6%) structure on the
property where 2,549 square feet or 15% structural coverage is permitted; and denies a
variance from Orono City Code Section 78-1700 to allow 4,898 square feet or 28.8%
hardcover on the Property in conjunction with construction of a new lakeside deck.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
The second story addition variance approval stated above are subject to the following
conditions:
a) Council approval is based on the survey and building plans submitted by the
Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A
8� B. Any amendments to these plans may require further Planning Commission
and City Council review.
b) Hardcover shall not increase above the existing level of 4,840 square feet or
28.4% and structural coverage may not increase above the existing level of 3,100
square feet or 18.2%. Any changes to the plans or the Property which result in an
increase in hardcover or structure above the existing or allowed levels are not
approved as part of this variance request.
c) The second story additions will be reviewed at the time of the building permit
application and shall comply with the City's height and number o� stories
calculations.
d) Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for
the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing
inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or
the variances will expire on that date (December 8, 2015).
e) Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
� The undersigned Applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the
terms of this resolution and on behalf of their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property.
Page 5 of 7
. ���vo
���� �� ��c���
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� �
� ~ � 475
�' G N o.
1'9kESH p��'
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 2014.
ATTEST:
� �
r� �'t-�.- I �C./�tJ�
e Tiegs, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor
Page 6 of 7
���� ��� �l' ' � 1�'�
� � �
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� �` 6475
�' G~ N O.
l�kF S H 0��
�
roperty n rs
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowiedged before me this 1�day of A ��
r,1D� by Gary Marquardt, husband of Joan Marquardt.
iE�;N�;`O�,. /I✓`� l.�-� - `
�a�"`�., MONICAA.FADNESS
����.
NOTARYPUBIIC-MINNESOTA Nota PUbIIC
;j A,1�,Commission Expires Jan.31,2017
,�,' n}�
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPPIN
This instrument was acknowiedged before me this /`-��day of �C.��'ti� ,
�D� by Joan Marquardt, wife of Gary Marquardt.
�5` Notary Public
�" `��'`� MONICAA.FADNESS �
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
�,`r
'�;•MY Commission Expires Jan.31,2017
Page 7 of 7
' � Resoiution
: �i' s ' o W � �'���( ��S��° ' Exhibit A
t�5Q I Et�i 3R f I I V� �� 2�q�97 �d�j�� In •� _O�
¢���� i�z� �� , ��f �' oi �� �� ������ ����4� �i� tl� �
.�
NOLLV�IIddtl 3�NVRltl�03SVd2i
� � V s���� � e ; � 0�$ U � e
L� � ��:. E� e �` 2 � o �
r t- G }3i a: " � a S
�f 1 6�E �C' � o c�s`�� y Ef ��3 N� Q � � � .
� ��H�6 a a � °g€i3 :�I � �` __ .'-: � L7 y},� d � ;
,'�I � c O .m * I ,� �k ` �u
} O' 0 oZ �� 3a � m Nm� � Zp � z z
�z � v � ;,O i:rs 1-b �: E�� " 00 � � e`—� u
d a o �� r :as r• >; o+ w
�_�. a � a V �O r u`:il �3:�i� v�i€:€ o01t: vLi CL F- vf vLi o
II � � �� � q W �_ � ` �
a �x." a. =�=;5� e. �'"; �3`s � W �
F y �A :7 :�XS_�: ..: i<i �yi E � ' � x
? � :�= .�E „ 7C� mm� ., 5 � � > _ -
a � g::: �Y €gSaF.� 5? I � I .��.I ;��� I \� \\ \ � e �
W i i . \ �
7 Y o 2 W�� �
p E p � N j N p ?�a� W g W �\ `�_— _ _ �
Q x E - �o� WSzoF 4t��o� � ���bOb `
x � o � �'ni3 II ots`���`e�.� __\_\-2 - ____ `\O�OJ \ �
• o �ttpl�ano �-` �• Sb'J
{ `._u -' 3wi iau
ro/ �� �� _' \-�o�eus,au
`b ?� � '�';`� _� `'—-
E _Q €� � os` F // �p : - � ,"�,\T� � `\ ,
� g E$ `9 = � - €asa . ��X'%A �� a
; �f -���o � i . � .,�.>.\��_ _-_ �c��C�
e
` s"
� �'��� ��E�' Y /' .. /�../1 "'__S j. � —y'�• �\
" E �E =g" � � :�c� � / //� � \ �
� E�y� E�o�; a ' .,; p � Y ��
� '[{EEy 5 E tl�.. _ .�8' �� '+ / � /
�; .7£Y� fi���� Y %,� � 'f �� I
ar �yo£� B�K�? � '�� . / .� l�� \�j/
`S gEo� •��rY : ' � ,-� ,� � .._- . I
g� ���� €F ;;o a o � k�. i ��ua -� � � \
F€Y`F,� a � �-'� \
�E g6P5 �.. E. ��K � �.-^'�,__ ,=`,
W��S 4:yb €£�^�' � 9 '; , �:I. �,� � l , et�.
i ? Es ��r� . 4���x5 € �a �i ����
� yi ��E� oKiiK$ T e- }` .Y �� ay �
¢ sa �g Y ; ,_ }�. \���:
� �{ E��2fr >_���n i �E tr� ��p � �. -,_ ^
II « ^ "_- �b _ I� � � ��h.. �
" b
I _ � �ip
�� �gR ��M\ �_
�d i �r
` o�u l.J�
� ".�.pF P I'�, - __ ='o
Cs"�:=`sc= '
ao�:y�e�� � -----�=. ..�' -- - --- _ ^ a�
pcz1�=:�% x ---- < • - - �m�oiu--� !.
L�'�@€ga�= E I'e � __ - �,�� - 'a'eiass� _-.7- y�
E e a ��C' _ I
3���a_r�t a ?- _ ,.i -- i
5��zy���� o �- y" ' ._._ _ ' �� Qr � �l --
aF�ai , sE F � �- �. . .-
SeFb�„'� < = f�.YJ'� g —� � I K I p� � ��.
sF���:��� ` 3� - � ..-r I .��k�a .. .___ o'� �' ; '. �� , �
��=e=4��`". o � �E ` �.8�}y'S �. � �'`� .
�b_PL`s4� Y : F � ... I-. "' C^ ..�'_ •& _. � ^4�y � I� j
y��vs �"� Q x F k �- _ o '�' .�°4' 'i.�� i� d9 �, i� r
� .
%F=iec��: � J ' `V �� ' _ -- � ��m
;�sgr3Ke� g � __ ,
z ;P5--8 N aE € .� - _�
2 ^ c � f� I
_��
- . 5� ati
F 'S�6 y��y E E � �� £ F � � w2//o✓� -Miiw�o L¢i,� � ....�_�-._� . _ .
yy � Zus-nm �y � ql S I
V �'{egYS�C€ p � ^ N F- � �
e : z 2 �I
� o�E`°o � � s 'a - V}N013NNIW 3MY� � �
_�� L�
o gs���;��c �a aE � ? � �'m � �
II ~asSa;?�8 II - .. � II I �� � _
� - - ijg , � �, o w � �a��=, Z= �g � Resolution
. � �'� .� ��z ��,€�� ic#��;� �� Exhibit B �
ii�� ' I ! �''� � W ��i xE�4�i P���..
`��-' � a't. i� •:, 8 Q p � . E ,F E�
�#:.-= t Y{ g {i e g �•
���,�: iteJ :a . ��I s �I $. �� �� d�€��3 ����d� al� a�
� - NO�1N�I�dd'd3�NM2ftlA
� 3I i� II
"I °I �I �I 'I $' y) �
-�,
y; ;
�i Vj il
ml yP
n
D' 'c A
� - -
=7y�_ _ _ __ _ $f' .
�l� � � i2:., ��
���
I z ` �
Y � ng
_ �$= � �
,� , , �,';I
�_ �
��
I R"� I
M'.� Q I
I Q��
� � �� �'� - ` - a� �, � - -� �G
r; � �.a �\ �' ,/
i �
� , �\
0
��j o
�i� ¢''
lJ� ae - wi•�
�
� ❑ o _a �.� � �
� ; � ..�.— ----
�=
i o, ,I .,�.-------- ��
� o �
�
\ ,
; ��
, � �
, � � � ,
, i, �� � �, �I
; $e Eb �I
'� ;
', �� j�� '
� ,i I�� �
� , :�
i ! �i'y i }g �
� �_` sa � 'a
� iia -
t
� � ;`s"
� -' i
�4 � - _ -t--'---- —
� � —7
; - �
I Y I �
I I
I e �
' C� ' �
�I r�
I �
� g9 I
I �
I _� I
I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
.� ` 2
� OI
„ C �
� -- w
. w
_
' � � o�o
� ' "-
� � _ .,
` Q; �I I &;
�
a� ;'� sl f��� �-� .
��
� �- I
s' e�
J �' -'°
� !� '
�
�
'Vlr e �{tyY 4 �• ^ -
e; i�� � I I � cu'.� � ������ �Y4p� � {'l �_v
• s`' ir�j 4� � I a w �� :j��4- ��t ,1 -�N
���Lr ��:• � S� $ �� �� ������ �'€�i� �¢ �'' Q
��� �t }il � i �i[ `s�. � �e 2, 3 3 t��� � a�
NOI1tl�IlddV 3�NtlIatlA
4 �
p I c �I
" I a �Q:�7
s s� ��� � �— — ----
�� �� ' .e.. ,.,-- _ — —
�� ±isi
'� =� ! �
�
I i'. •�
� F -
i i � �
i I �� -_ _-_ -_- ---j
�,�
i .
F x- I
i �i �� �;_ � y�z
k.:.� �a , �
i ii i \y'
i 1 .. \..x I
�I i ii
i ��i � �� 1
i � i \ Y :
I ' i I '° tl
i i �� �� b�
R '�I I t 1 i V ��'�I .
i I I I � - ��. �3.
i i i i i ^ec
� i i i �s.
i Y. � i i i ` :>..
i i ii i
.3 i i i
� ii
� I 4, i � �I �
� I li
� � � s I
i
� , �y I - I � , I) �
j � ' �id I � I I i 4e � 'i
i d+ � `�
in � ��t
� II � I I I I ���„ O�!i
� I I 1 �'
i
e I I I >�.
I F � � I I I I WI i
I Q�� � i � � W,'
�f: �
I � I Wi�
11
I � � ��.:\
� � I II �
1 �':l
i
i � � ' I �
i � ii
� I ii
i i ii
i'I I� i ii ii
� � i �
� �i � ii
I � I il
I I
I � II
� �I I I I
� II
i I
� II I
I I ' I
I
i
/v I I I II
�i I I
e:' i i i i
� _ ii i
� �i i� i
� ii i
Y§ 1
� p'4 1
II I
y II I
II 1
II
I � I
tl
II I
I
I
II I
II I
II
II I
II
II I
II j
Y Z
0
gna : ¢
4. � c �u
!y 'L o
&-
Ei �
I i� 2=
�� �" ��J
I �
�I
`s.
z
� . ��� � �y€r�_ i; g '� I ��
. �e �?� ;i � � �� � ��;�#� '����3 '�� ��j I
Q��v_ � ;;c� ; F �w �� i,=,�d 1:==a �� '�
�a - o �� ����� f��' �
,��>;� {�Y� �� a � � si �� �� ������ !����� �I� €�: Q I
NOI1VJIlddb'3�M/Rltl�
�'I "' EI° '- �x
dI n�_ �!� ;� ` YE
� �€e;_ �'-��_-.. _.��-. gr �
�I 'E`� ��v_3��.' '
A'•;%�' � �ga-,§ e
€I��6-'�y �_Py_ay:`Ec pi ��. *�I �
:�5i ��i :i
� J' zi ;
r-
i
i
�__�_ _—_ _—_— �
li �
�, �� � '
�
�
�
=� � �,
i.4
I
I,
�
�p{„.
S
�.
\ �
I
��
� �I
Y
�
� F I r.l I I
I � -
' d � e� �� j� s�
��
I
� , ��.-- ,.,�,�- -—- - -
" i
i' ' `� „— - - -
,� � �
�
�; -
�� I o
� �
-�S �,I�� — -—- - - - - o r-1 0
� � a
I � -— -—- - -
� i! _� w
8 ¢, i c�
� f � � � ��
. f i N� � ��. i o�
� � � i 6
= 2 � i �
�/ Ag P a ~I . � ¢
/ G r�, � �� g� i �
I - - 3 � �
� ;e z �
E 64A'Y i .I v� o gl' o
I � �
@��s' S � � �
a I
�`se'214E I I o 0
��',�.�. .. �
w � w
h
. �� '. �� �t.,
. � �_
/l i
� � m� % m'
.s I, �L' k e; ��
` � EI : f� �
�
��' � '' / ��see as
. d, _x
e� �',, ��ras �a
i i �I �5�55Y�G
� 1� € .
� c ' 'Ic
_ �nzui ��4 - 1 —U .
\
�
i
A201 .
I
�
I �
�
,i
' � � _. \ TO PIATE
— I .i—� _--.. --
j I
TYPIGALNEWROOFCONSTRUC710Nu.no. � ,.I '
. ASPHALT SHINGLES. � � i
NEWSiORAGER00M11AD01710N I �i
. 5/8"PLN7f00D OR OSB �i I
� R44 BLOWN INSULATI0IJ. � ' —
PRE�1ANl1FAGNRED ROOF TRUSSES W/12°ENERGY �
HEA�
. VAPOR BARPoER TAPED AND SEALED � � �
� . �"GWB OM CEILING.SEE FINISN NOTES. �Z ., � I TO SUBFLOOR
8�/ l^ —
/� . � � ... . .I �! --TO PLATE _—
� j��� � . . _ . � .. � I I
.� � EXISiING GARAGE (
� A�AM IEVEL
� ---------- ---- -- ----- ---- —�------- ---�I�— --- — —
�
i
I
I
n+w
�� BUILDING SECTION THROUGH GARAGE AND STORAGE ADDITION_____
l)
�
, ,
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The undersigned, being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of
Orono, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing Resolution No. 6475 adopted
at the meeting of the Orono City Council on December 8, 2014 with the original thereof
on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the
City this 18th day of December, 2014.
_,,. �,:��.,.:. ' �
- ,�;�� -
����.� .. ���_�'i ' � �
� g i y Clerk
. . ^;,�,',�, ,,d , ':,
- t% ' � ,� �;_ • .
, ���@'d�.�`,���i:�c�°.� ''�,
:� , ,�`�'`y�f.� n. - e`� ;{
J � . � .._,.!r � ��+ f
'�� ��� ;(i '�-� !:� •:-0
' , '• �� . ,. ��
f1;1 �.. ""';.. •�`�
'`9 ` �'�fPv'f:�' _
��,��., .,.t:...--_