The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2015-01445 - add/remodel/repair y � CITY OF ORONO * z 0 1 5 - a 1 4 4 5 * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUEU: 12/02/2015 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 4355 BAYSIDE RD PIN : 06-117-23-13-0005 LEGAL DESC : UNPLATTED 06 117 23 : LOT MB BLOCK MB PERMIT TYPE : ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPA[R ACTIV[TY : 434-RESIDENT[AL VALUAT[ON : $ 5,000.00 NOTE: REPAIR AND FOOTING ONLY APPLICANT PERM[T FEE SCHEDULE 123.87 PLAN REVIEW 80.52 MITTELSTAEDT INC STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 2.50 11730 BRADDOCK AVE SE P O BOX 454 TOTAL 206.89 WATERTOWN,MN 55388- Payment(s) (612)716-9595 CHECK 12509 206.89 Minnesota State License#: BUIL-20012394 ' OWNER WHITE,GREG& LYNN 4355 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. AII provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become nu►l and void if construc[ion authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance!or if construction is suspended for a period of s at any time after work has commenced. The applicant i� nsible f�r assuri g all required inspections are requeste onformance�th th te ilding Code.T 's permit may be /��"� re ed at any time for due c se�/ c � o `\ �' i'i�� / i/ \� \ � `I `J l�� (/` 1� .. �. �j � ' �` � �- � / / � Applicant Per�itee Signatu�'e Date Issued By Signatu Date / � � City of Orono � Building Permit Application for Maintenance / Replacement / Remodel (i.e. windows, doors, siding, re-roof, etc. — NO STRUCTURAL EXPANSION) �O� MailingAddress: Permit number: O�C,�,j b � O PO Box 66 n � Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: / —�� "�� Street Address: Received by: /�� ` y � I�, "I ' 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: F L` Y I t �, Orono, MN 55356 �'�ESH�� Total Fee: �b�p. �� Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: SS ; � �o c�� Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodel rs Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑Yes o If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approva/60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus s ice will be required unless applicant demonstrates su�cient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: /ti�,' c �� .�h c . State License# q Expiration Date: Lead Certification Number: Expiration Date: (for work on homes that were constructed prior to 1978 Phone: (cell) �/,�- ( (�- �S� -- (office) MailingAddress: �/� �D ��..� o� �/�j S City ��cr�-p�r� ZIP:M �� Contact Person: T0. Applicant is: Contractor / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: �� ` � ,f.r-.� �t-Q ��Q-f.. l�- i'� PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: � r �� v G� , .-f- � Phone (day): _ �G _ �s-- Address: r� SS- ,�,�y�s, C ,LO City,�ro k a ZIP: Email and/or Fax: ' PROJECT INFORMATION: Overall pro�ect description: Type of Project: Any earth movement may also require ❑ Door(s) ❑ Remodel ❑ Fire Damage MCWD review&permits: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑ Re-roof,asphalt �Repair ❑ Storm Damage 15320 Minnetonka Blvd ❑ Re-roof,cedar ❑ Restoration ❑Water Damage Minnetonka, MN 55345 ❑ Re-roof,other(specify) ❑ Siding ❑ Other: (specify) Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 ❑Window(s) www.minnehahacreek.orq Estimated Construction Valuation of Project(excluding land) $ i'- APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this informatio ' nually up at our r co and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If ou refuse to su I th ' rmati ,t ed. ApplicanYs Signature: Date: �� 5 �— Owner's Signature: Date: Last Updated:January 2015 , ,,.t . . . �� t'�{;��(;}y� Bassect Creek Business Center Macdonaic� 901 North 3rd Street, #100 Y�� Minneapolis, MN 55401 structural 6I2-827-7825 voice engineers 6I2-827-0805 fax R�vi��+��c� fQ� �c�de � October 13, zois CompEiance Cify ofi�rono ' Greg White Dat� �l l7 l,� - 4355 Bayside Rd Maple Plain, MN 55359 Reviewer ' RE: Fireplace and Deck Structure Assessment-4355 Bayside Rd Dear Greg: Per your request, I have visited your home at the above referenced address in order to review the structural condition of your exterior deck and adjoined fireplace. It is my understanding that this area's condition was identified by a potential buyer,who retained an engineer for a limited structural inspection of your property. Documentation and Background I have received a copy of the report prepared by Paul Schimnowski, a professional engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota,who was hired by a prospective buyer. No other drawings of the existing construction were provided. Visit to the Site On October 1, 2015, at 7:OOAM, I met on site with you, your wife Lynn, your Real Estate agent Catherine Wersal, and Jay Mittlestaedt, the general contractor for the addition in 2007 that included building the fireplace of interest. I observed the fireplace and deck framing,took photos,and measured portions of the structure for further analysis. Description of Property and Basic Structure The house is a two story with a walk-out basement to the southwest. Per public tax records (Hennepin County), the main house was built in 1988. Several Alterations an additions have since been performed, including the fireplace, reportedly in 2007. Also, according to the reaitor's records disclosed on the MLS listing, some alterations included stripping the structure to its foundation and rebuiiding. According to the remodel contractor, the house is a conventionally-framed wood structure on typical foundation walls and spread footings. Area Reviewed The general area of inquiry was the exterior deck and fireplace at the southwest elevation of the house, as indicated in Photos 1 and 2. The fireplace and chimney are wood-framed and sheathed, with adhered cultured stone veneer. The chimney is intersected by a small, low, overhanging roof.The framing and sheathing is covered with finishes, but is reported to be built integrally with the wall framing, providing support for the weight of the upper portion of chimney. The lower portion of the chimney bears the majority of its weight on the exterior wood-framed deck, incl�ding a precast concrete hearth. The deck joists are doubled 2x12 @ 16" OC at the area supporting the fireplace and hearth. The deck framing is connected to the house with a treated 2x12 ledger lag-bolted into the floor structure. The exterior edge of the deck is supported with a 3-ply 2x12 rim beam, one ply of which is interrupted for the attachment of deck posts, leaving an effective 2-ply beam intact.The rim beam is supported on nominal 6x6 treated posts, which bear on poured concrete piers, tapered outward toward their bottom. 4355 Bayside Rd-Report � °f� , , . %V�lill?S:iluvi�i��,1�ii��n:;1;: , � StfUf[Ufa�CflginEEfS ,`s�Y.,r, y.�j7 ��!. ��i,� � ,i ' � � � j�`1 I �t.. '•.�� .rr'. r � �� ! �� .. � � . . �a � ��t�K. � �l '� � e ,a.,r � '�.�� . ��`"`.s. � K� , � .� � ,� . '"�.��. ,� �� i�� *�,� ��. • I�+ v. ,�,,�:' ..` .. w. s;,. Photo 1:Aerial View(google.com) ..� � � � �-� �� ,. a: - . „. _ �` ,- _.___.. u ,x, . > -�' '�=_ .��i ��t�. . _ _., ._._,�.. _ � � _ . , _ � �� , � � � " - � _ � � _._..�___: _ � � _ � :::. -�> r- � �.� _ t; I ?.,....� � � z �� !- ;y ''' r'��'�� f ��7 i�'��'. � � � ;✓" ��r �s :-L ''-. ", ...... '� ,. ..�... .�-,..._a,.-.�:,:��.. � �.'�"+�''` �� ,� �� : Photo 2:Rear of House(Southwest elevation�with Chimney& Deck -S.iJ�J�584'�iii.tC tiu �:c�,:..�I"'. - i=% 1�tU i�Svt�liAtll.ClUf YU�Rl�i!�lJl�it; ' struaurel engineerz ' Observations and Comments In general,the deck structure was observed to be in good condition,with a few minor items we recommend to be addressed, as well as the support of the chimney, which we review in more detail below. No failed members were observed, and while deflection was visible in a couple areas(discussed later), the deflections do not appear to exceed code-suggested limits, and are not judge to be excessive in our opinion. A few minor items of note were observed that are not directly related to the chimney: 1. There are a few joist hangers without proper nailing to the ledger board. 2. There are no visible connections from the top of each post to the deck framing. 3. The post spacing at the southwest edge of the deck appears irregular,and is reported to be a result of underground tanks in the vicinity. Chimney and supporting deck framing: 4. The masonry veneer on the fireplacQ and chimney is an adhered, cultured stone that is supported by its back-up structure rather than at its bottom edge.Some comments regarding this construction: a. While it is not typical to support full-thickness veneer or structural masonry on wood framing, and there are code provisions against such configurations, the support of an adhered veneer is somewhat different. An adhered veneer,which by definition has its weight supported by adhesion to a back-up structure, often relies on wood framing for support. b. Where wood framing serves as a backup wall to support an adhered veneer,the veneer is more sensitive to minor deflections than a more flexible cladding such as siding. As such, it is most typical, and preferred to bear directly on a concrete or masonry foundation wall. However, where wood framing members are adequately sized both to provide sufficient strength and limit deflection, adhered masonry veneer can perform appropriately. 5. There is a minor separation between the adhered masonry veneer and the house wal�, indicative of very slight deflection of the deck joists bearing the weight of the fireplace and veneer. This separation is less than 1/8", and is not considered excessive. 6. Existing installed joist hangers supporting the doubled 2x12 joists are "Simpson LUS210-2Z" attached to the treated 2x12 ledger attached to the house. 7. There are existing windows framed into the house wall below the deck and chimney.There appears to be slight, but visible deflection of the headers, with no other signs of distress. The windows are reportedly operational, and the deflection is not considered excessive(Given that the framing is covered,no further evaluation was sought). Analysis Based on field observation and measurements, I reviewed the deck structure and analyzed the existing members based on code-prescribed loading. Per the Minnesota State Building Code 2015, I considered live and snow loads of 40 and 35 pounds per square foot (psf), respectively. I used the thickness of the adhered veneer and its typical weight, and estimated the weight of framing and fireplace insert.We assumed the that weight of the veneered fireplace surround as well as a portion of the chimney above is bearing on the deck framing, based on description from the contractor as well as industry-standard building techniques.The following summarizes our findings: • The existing (2) 2x12 @ 16" OC are adequate to support the loads imposed, and under the design loads would be expected to perform without exceeding deflections as suggested by code. • The existing Simpson LUS210-2Z hangers are an appropriate selection for the imposed load, based on the manufacturer's product documentation. • The treated 2x12 ledger against the house is adequately sized. • The connection of the 2x12 ledger to the house appears to be undersized for the estimated dead loads in combination with code-prescribed live loads. Since the exact framing configuration cannot be discovered without removing finishes, and the weight of the chimney cannot be assumed to be completely supported by the house wall, we recommend supplementing or relieving this connection. • The rim beam at the outer edge of the deck is undersized for the estimated dead loads in combination with code- prescribed live loads. We recommend reinforcing this beam or installing additional posts to shorten the effective span of the existing beam. d355 Baysfue F�d-Reixni :3 of 5 h'1i]I't5ufu'J1Ul.Clutit)i�i Y�+.iui��t„ ' structural engineers Recommendations Based on our on-site review and subsequent analysis,we recommend the following(corresponding with observations 1-7): 1. All joist hangers should be reviewed for proper nailing, and appropriate nails or manufacturer-approved screws should be installed in place of any missing, loose, or damaged nails. Connectors should be hot-dipped galvanized or otherwise approved for contact with the treated lumber and exterior exposure. 2. The top of each post should be closely assessed for any existing connection (something more substantial than a few toe-nails). Where only toenails are present, add either a pre-manufactured post cap (Simpson ACE6 or similar) or four 6"long SDWS screws(fully threaded)from post to beam,embedded at least 2" into each member. 3. Add new posts and footings as indicated on the attached diagram,which will shorten the rim beam spans. 4. Add a supporting beam and three posts as indicated on the attached diagram.This will serve to provide more direct support of the chimney framing, including the adhered veneer, and relieve adjoining framing from bearing this additional load. 5. The minor gap should be re-sealed to re-weatherproof the joint. 6. See recommendation 1. 7. The window headers will be relieved by added beam and posts(recommendation 4). If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1 hcrcby ccrtify that this plan, spccification or rcport was MATTSON MACDONALD YOUNG, INC. prcparcd by mc or undcr my dircct supervision and that I am a duly liccnscd Profcssional Enginccr undcr thc laws of thc Statc � '�---... 4 of M inncsota. � �` �d.. „_.... V .+ "` .._...- � � w� --�'.�`� G�.=--�_,==-�--,�� Kirk T DaV15, PE Kirk T.Davis MN Reg.No.50909 10/13/2015 4355 Bayside Rd-Report a°t 5 � iV1C71i5UliNlo�Uun�]IU�Y�t��.��tu ' structural engineers j eXiStlCl�' WIfIC�OWS Diagram of Recommended Reinforcement: ✓' in wail below � , , _ ,. . � r�� , . . � s � __.,__.__ ___.__ ____ .___.._— � �_ 4 � �.r� Add beaiY� w/ �� :. , �,ost5 & t�oti��,., , _ �,�"��.�� r- -- - - ��•�,-�_.�� Arrange to avoid uiu�kii�g window, at ' ,.� �� approximate dimensions shown. � � ' " v �,��x��,��,��; �r��x��r� (see note 1 for more info) New dropped treated glulam beam rerr�cive tftil �:�ost aft_er (see note 4 for more info) , others are install��l � �— ---- ___..._.___.._._. �__._. 11'-0"—► �,,.,x�.��„ �_. ._� ___, __._ ��i�l iv�� tre�aLcU E�x:��, ��>>;_; .✓iti, - ' post caps and footings. Align with railing posts above Coordinate new ftg (see note 1 for more info) locations with existing underground tank l Structural Notes: 1) New 6x6 posts shall be treated No. 2 Southern Pine or better. Maximum span of existing 2-ply 2x12 rim beam should be 11'-0" or less 2) Extend treated post down to footing level, rated for permanent ground exposure (0.60 minimum retentions in Ibs per cubic foot). 3) Provide pre-manufactured post caps and bases. (4) Simpson SDWS wood screws (6" long, fully threaded) may be subsituted for post cap hardware. Base is for initial set and is not required for final, compacted condition. Connect to footing with "tapcon" type screws. 4) New preservative-treated glulam beam: S-1/2" x 9-1/2" Western Species (24F-1.7E or better). Install in one continuous length. 5) All fasteners in contact with treated lumber shall be hot-dipped galvanized or similariy coated for corrosion protection. 6) Footings shall be constructed with S,OOOpsi concrete (28-day strength) with 3/4"-minus aggregate, with sizes and reinforcing as follows (set rebar 3" clear of bottom): where marked "F1" : 8" thick x 18" x 18" w/ (2)#4 rebar each way in "#" arrangement where marked "F2" : 12" thick x 30" x 30" w/(3) #4 rebar each way in "#" arrangement. 7) Backfill with granular soils and compact in lifts. 4355 Bayside Rd-Report 5 of 5 • �'`a► � M � � Jay Mittelstaedt<j@mittelstaedt.biz> , .. . .�..� add two posts? 1 message Kirk Davis <kirk@mattsonmacdonald.com> Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:39 PM To: Jay Mittelstaedt<j�mittelstaedt.biz> ��n -„.;.�.-�_.___ � .�.,r e�, ,�„��,��_ _ ::� . :� �� , a��,�> - i�ir:,� �•f -tu�-:. L • �'--'+,w.p,,.,�.,�. �{v4.y.r_� ' S . �,µ NY�i il . Ml�w��l:•kl iq fi/'':. � . ... � e- v. . �r,+.ra � � . `'1$�� t^'in,t.^^"- t 9c ; ' ' . ' - ' ..... .. <3'�f"+ ' .�.. . ... : . . : - � ; �: - , \I. �;. ' w.,,.� "'"�w""�... . - - .s+atr �.` �� ; �_...... ,.__ . . . ______. .�. - — - - - - - - �� > KIPk DaVIS, PE � Associate Ma[tson Macaonald Young inc Structural Engineers 612827 782�voice 6�2 827 0805 fax , DATE TIME \ � CITY OF ORONO CAL�ED IN � INSPECTION NOTIC scHE�u�Eo � PERMIT NO. � �� `�r`�'�� co LEfED -� . /u ADDRESS � OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR , �; D RIPTION ly FOOTING ❑ DEMO- IN ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING y ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP W ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL _ J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO v�i COMMENTS: � W � � � O >. � O � W � Q � 2 W � W � J d W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. p pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call tor the next inspection 24 hours in dvan 5 249-46�0 OwnerlContractor on site: Inspector. White Copyllnspector's Flle Canary CopyfSite Notiee � �,�� % , �- DAT E TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � �`�s � INSPECTION NO CHEDULED /G�� /D� PERMIT NO. � � ��OMPLETED ,, ADDRESS OWNER LEPHONE NO �d 7l ' CONTRACTOR �; DESCRIPTION W ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT � �fMdf,L ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP 4J ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL _ v ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � n r , � a , .Q )Gc,lL yr�n� re,�►��C,.ac — �e✓ r►S � ne�rrru � � O / _✓ p� ^ ��C w�r l�- �i D r+�l./��'P�� — O � W � Q 2 ��WI�� i �! /�LCt�� W � W � J W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED /�'AOJECT COMPLETE W ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED �O ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REtNSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. p pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WIIL REfURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-46�� OwnerlContractor n site: Inspector. l�- White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notke