The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSeptic info � �� O :� O �~ CITY of ORONO .�>::�_� � 'b�� ,,� (�,, �� ,� �lCr Municipal Offices ,t � `�.'�"�0� G Street Address: Mailing Address: `q�tEg'g0g'� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 April 18, 1997 George Johnson 879 Brown Road North Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Dear Mr. Johnson: In response to your request that your property be included in the proposed North Long Lake/Long Lake Country Club sewer project,the City Council has indicated that your property may be conditionally included. The conditions of your inclusion are as follows: 1. You must legally combine your homestead lot with your secondary lot. It has been the city's policy that providing sewer to an area will not increase the allowed density. The combined acreage of your two parcels is 3.66 acres, which does not meet the 2 acre density guidelines for this area of the city. Also, without sewer it would be necessary to combine your two parcels to provide a site for replacement of your current septic system. Based on these factors,the City Council has determined sewer service will be provided only if your homestead lot is combined with your secondary adjacent lot. 2. Your property will be assessed at the reduced assessment amount of$13,950 which is the level established for the majority of properties within the sewer project area. If you have questions regarding the conditions of your inclusion in the sewer project, please call me. Sincerely, Ronald J. Moorse City Administrator Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 � O � � �' . O O � . t=�,, ,� CITY of ORONO � Fr, Municipal Offices "�,'� �� , �,� ,. j Street Address: Mailing Address: l,q � ��`g,�i ; �C'EgKO �=% 2750 Kelley Parkway �P.O. Box 66 ----- Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Owner: � � J Address: 879 Brown Rd. N. Permit #'s: 7233, 2866 Dates: 11/7/83, 9/24/71 Contractors: Jerry Johnson, Norman & Smith (This is �) an existing system [ ] new construction) . SYSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 3 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 03 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level is [�] or is not [ ] identified under this septic system. If the saturated soil level is not identified, this classification is subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 6 � Pumpout not needed at this time. (6j Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. �� System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant. (The tanks are [ ] or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [� unknown. If the tanks are not confirmed to be watertight, this classification is subject to revision.) INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc. ) : medium COMMENTS: The septic system is non-compliant and must be connected to municipal sewer by 12/31/1998. � ��_ ( � � n�� Date of Inspection epti ystem Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not auarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telep6one (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O � O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT � �, INSPECTION REPORT ti ��9kESH��'�G Owner: �� Addre s s•_s�� f�/�"'��i�1�� Permit #'s: ` �� Dates: �7;��{�%�}—�� Contractors: lY4a�,4-Y��IF'� �/'�� UY`� City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site seuage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is L�9.an existing system [ ] neu construction) ✓ SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface Waters. "NON-CONFORMING SYS7EM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and uhich is failing for any reason; and an s stem with less than 3 feet o unsaturated soil or sand betueen the distribution device and the limiting soi c ar s ics. -� (The limiting soil characteristic has or [ ] has not been identified a��iis rme It-the im ing soil characteristic has not been identifie�, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): 7ank inspection indicates: 5 Purtipout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical tevel. Tanks should be pumped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pimped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. lnspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next purtipout. !f tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be purnped out now. � Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tanks have not been p�xnped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): D field inspection indicates: 11 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector imnediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks.etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE Cdepends on soils,water table,etc.): �a,�l�,G�,y-.� rl�� f �OMMENTS ^ '"�c' ' ,�� i ,� ��S Q� - ` r Date of Inspection Sep c System s ector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certtfy that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system toc>tion and pumping records. WHITE COPYllnspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O � O Post Office eox 66 Crystal eay, MN 55323-0066 a � ON—SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT „� � INSPECTION REPORT ti ��kESH��'�G Owner: C�� 1'Z�{'� Addres s: �,��L�l✓y� JCU. 1�/e Permit #'s: n Dates: 7".� — is� Contractors: /,��'Itb3nr.:n,, TP�'t�:��'� City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site seuage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site seuage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is�l an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): � 1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input 7 without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. "CONFORMING SYSTEM'�-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but uas installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants �nto ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which ts failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic [ 7 has or � has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): � T inspection indicates: Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent tuture problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. 7anks should be purtiped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out uithin 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. 9 lnspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. ]nspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). !f tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): �Dr field inspection indicates: Orainfie[d is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector irmiediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slope,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL fOR SYSTEM FAILURE (depends on soils,water table,etc.): ��„� COMMENTS: ,P Date of Inspection eptic ystem Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the pre�nises with the system toc�tien and pumping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner On the North Shore of Lakc Nlinnetonka ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT INSPECTION REPORT i POST OFFICE BOX 66 1335 S. Brown Rd. � � � Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 OWNER ��`�� 7', T�1�1JCjl�. ADDRESS �/�,�, �+��t�/r'� �� PERMIT NO.'S. � �a� DATES ��/ ��1 ��7 g� CONTRACTORS��"y� � �'r�� / /, �j�jn�,� City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fail into the category checked below. (This is � an existing system ❑ new construction) � � Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating properly. (� 2 Does not meet atl current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed, �� located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioning properly; no major upgrading of the system is required at this time. D3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, construction, or location.Appears to be operating adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at this time. � 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public�uisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/ replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary, soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started. SYSTEM CONDITION ( m Checked items may require your action) Tank inspection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle. (Does not ❑ Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks � Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the last three years, they ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now. ❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drai field inspection indicates: should be pumped out as soon as possible. � Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. ❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drai�field is saturated and visibly discharging untreated ❑ Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected, effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace- I�spection risers (4" dia. pipe)must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. the last three years,they should be pumped out now. ❑ Drainfield extent and condition unknown. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for ❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion ❑ Soil table,and system co�ditionl �Adequate ❑ High water table � Low ❑ Fair � Lot size ❑ Medium ❑ Poor ❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High ❑ Inadequate ❑ Drainage ❑ System is causing visible surface discharge. COMMENTS: �t'7-5=/l� �. Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records. WHITE COPY/ Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY Addr: 879 Brown Rd. N. PID: 27-118-23 34 0004 Building Type : residence # BRs/GPD: 3 # Systems/units : 1/1 Permit No : 7233 , Date of Permit : 11/7/83 , Installer: Jerry Johnson, System Type : standard trench Appliances : lndry SYSTEM CONDITION Confc�=mity: 3 Tank Condition: 10 DF condition: 11 Failurz Pot : medium SEPTIC TANKS Material : concrete block Capacity: 600 , 600 Setback to Bldg : 15 DRAINFIELD Length of Lines : 270 No. Lines : 3 Trench Width: 3 Treatment Area : 810 Type of Filter: rock Tile Size : 4 Under Tile : 12 Perc Rate mn/in: Setback DF-Bldg: 40 DF Ht above WT: 3 Soil Type : loam Limitations : water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks : 60 Well-DF: 75 Report in File? : Pump Type : subm. Depth: 193 Diameter : 4 Method: drilled INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD Date ComPliance Date Gallons 7/14/81 no surfacing, but Df is nearly saturated 2 8/13/81 1500 11/8/83 added 800 SF of DF 2 10/1/90 1000 8/5/86 no surfacing 2 5/25/93 1000 6/29/88 no surfacing 2 8/23/94 1000 10/5/90 no surfacing-pump tanks 2 5/27/92 no surfacing 2 9/8/95 non-conforming-repair by 12/31/97 3 i I � N — �;��;e�d � � � � � , � `� ; � � � b � . � ` � � � � � � , �; � �' �J�jll `�` � � �i �r�_ � � _ - - _ _f - ., _ i -- - , � � � � T C�c.�}— �g�� /�O � Ta�- �� o ' �g, �� a'� , � ��a � d � ('� � SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTOR Y Address: 879 Brown Rd. N. PID: 27-118-23 34 0004 Building Type residence #BRs/GPD: 3 #Systems 1 Units Billed 1 . Permit#: 7233, 2866 Date of Permit: 11/7/83, 9/24/ Installer: Jerry Johnson,Norman& yll System Type standard trench Experimental: no Appliances lndry SYSTEM CONDITION Conformity: 3 Tank Condition: 6 DF condition: 11 Failure Pot: medium SEPTIC TANKS ` Material: concrete block Capacity: 600, 600 Setback to Bldg: 15 Cesspool: unknown DRAINFIELD Length of Lines 270 #Lines: 3 Trench Width: 3 Treatment Area: 810 Type of Filter rock Soil Boring: yes Tile Size: 4 Under Tile 12 Perc Rate: Setback DF-Bldg: 40 DF Ht above Wt: 0 Soil Type: loam Limitations: water table WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks: 60 Well-DF: 75 Report in File Pump Type: subm. Depth: 193 Diameter: 4 Method: drilled � INSPECTION RECORD PUMPO UT RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS 7/14/81 no surfacing, but Df is nearly saturated 2 8/13/81 1500 11/8/83 added 800 SF of DF 2 10/1/90 1000 8/5/86 no surfacing 2 5/25/93 1000 6/29/88 no surfacing 2 8/23/94 1000 10/5/90 no surfacing-pump tanks 2 5/27/92 no surfacing � 2 9/8/95 non-conforming-repair by 12/31/97 3 8/20/98 non-compliant-connect sewer by 12/31/9 3 �� . �. � � I N — _�,��d _ � � � �as Q— -- - 1 , I � � b � � � � . i � I � �� `� J� �_ � � _ _ - - - _ _� fi�-- --� _ ` - -� - � I � � � Qc�- Ig'� 31� I T o�- �� , �� 4a�� a �'� � ("� �