HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-010300 (building) PERMIT
CITY OF ORONO PERMIT TYPE: {
2�50 Kelley Parkway- P.O. Box 66 ���_`—' L—L.f�(�?;�
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Permit Number: ;.;�i_;:-;;;:_�
(612) 473-7357 Date issued: ;_}�;,;;_ti:^;;:,�;_;
SITE ADDRESS: �8�
� =i��`v ��i��� i;1�
_ �:�
r� ' � '!`� ' ' t�!' � �. j!z`� ��i�S����i.'���e
DESCRIPTION:
�;s�7. 1��i;"?_=? �`F'�'fit 7. t. �; �: °=;i�;! F r',T:i E y�_. .�s �
_ �__ _ I_ . tv--�:
��{�{1 i}i 1 i'1'� �,i F�t i'�.;: ���'r.' ?=�`�'������4��:�.
�l���,: I„[:_i l.���;;,i:i�t .—_
(:��511:�T.}`5..�C�•1.+�311 i ��'� �'��l. ,
_�_�:4�y"'fy`; i_�`_1 €,,
�_�t��i�� �.I,ii..�� �'.'A .�. �CZ��f . �� #��_!�
REMARKS:
FEE SUMMARY:
�?,;f.�t.�t-�TI:_i�� �:_;i_;::;,iit:t:;
��*'�'�' �w'�' �t 1 � _ _ . _ � �='.� `' � }_i����'_ ��i�tY � . (_i;_i
�-' i �ti� I-:s�y i ww ��. , ��_'i�� . %i :���i,iF�ti ::i�I�'`.i;',j i;F;t-;h:; ___ ?�. . �_���' ibt.�:
��..���r�ict 1'W�_` �•i=._� , t il_' (t�E'�.;�i i=+�' ��1;=�:�1�e :;�fY.
'.jii:. �•�, : (1:.1:_D , t_}S!
`=,;-3t. .. !t)t_i
=:j—�it_ �11"}J, �.•= ....�_._ �
�.S i�l I.I_i i.Ct i �''�,•�:.; ... �i �:t
CONTRACTOR: OWNER: — ►������� ic��-�T. —
?�Et-}[.l`W�f_�f� �����_yE_
�'_:°:7 I'��f �� l I'-� t�;
�°iIs�t��r�i=`+t�i:= i•i�a �=.dt;#,
3-�i°.:-,—•t'�� (t
I
°'L' f- �s •'-�•S •;_C:�,,� CCs'�° '=,• i:_ —�� {T F�; v�i:_;; . ��ri •4:_ .�� _,t.
� F�L, l.ItiE:'1_F?.==�t7l�E�`. P��#z._-_� i t�..__a,�_�__ . _ i__�'`.�`:1�������_�.+; I �_E i :. .�'�•.s.`_ i � ��_ �.`i-iL_ .s.: t�-'i,S t'+/Li`�._i� l '-
,' L . ._ : , aL _ ,_ ''3 [: '� {.—iL� � F _— — dFi�,�( —,c,oi. i. — —}.
`_�i—`�t'_:_� �,�_,; �- (`„_; r-.;��''•.�.,�.`"� i I_,f L%i_i �-i�__� ,4 t_=,•',t�•. �E'Y ,,, ;'`�`�:�� :_.:#_i 1.. �.�.t..t 4:i�.L ,,,� i s #-; _-�4-� — — � 4` i�I P-
� i,i;�s�l�•�' .��s�i�'�;s `i,•'-{!'';i��`•�� ;�ky'; =�l'r�i i i�. �_;I� �'f L��i�`��'�:"sl�i-1 t;i 1 i��'s;�:.� ��:i_li,';� `;`i;�i 1 i��`_`(`:.s�i!�-� • J
�j/l r
�6�L��i//�:�id��°i�.�� -- Y� ��'/.�`.�
APPUCANT%PERMITEE SIGNATURE , ISSUED BY:SIGNATUR
�' �y�� �,�,�
/ ,
Total Fee: $ � Date Received:
� Entered By: Permit#: �jU �e�'
! �
CITY OF ORONO - BUILDING PERNIIT APPLICATION
All information must be submitted in full before plan review will be started.
(please print all information)
-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------
THE APPLICANT IS: (circle one) OWNE R CONTRACTOR
.
JOB SITE ADDRESS: ��/� '���� � ZIP: �J"/���
NAME OF OWNER: ��� n`�'�7�' PHONE: (home)��2.��,�'�0
(work) �P�i���y'�'L. OZL/
MAILING ADDRESS: IJ� '�fi CITY: ZIP:
� �
CONTRACTOR: , PHONE: �2. �L�
CONTACT PERSON: 1dIOBILE/PAGER: ,
MAILING ADDRESS: '�",► . CITY: _Z�:
STATE LICENSE: # ����i _
�K �'�Z'��'�eo�'
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: L� NI��'a��HONE�Z• C�L�
MAILING ADDRESS: O, . CITY: , • ZIP: �
NAME; , REGISTRATION# . �
TYPE OF WORK: New x Addition Accessory Structure
Move Remodel/Alteration Land Alteration
PROPQS D ORK(desc 'be i detai�: � . T`�/� � �/
. '�,i� .
STORIES: � SQ.FEET OF EACH FLOOR: 2`J'0 �� �'C�
NO. OF BEDROOMS: GARAGE STALLS: A
TT. DET �
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land): $ �'��`�
I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and
accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City and with
the State Building Code; that I und and this is not a pernut and work is not to start without a
pernut; and that the work will b n ccordance with the approved plan.
PPLICANT'S SIGNAT ��/�+� DATE: 7.2'�:�
A -
NOTE! Parade o H me events require separate permit approval by Police Department and
City Council 60 days prio o the event. Non pernzitted events will not be allowed.
9
�
Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF S[JBJECTS OF DATA
Subd. 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or to be stored shall be as set forth in this section.
Subd.2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply private or confidendal data conceming himself shall
be informed of: (a)the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting'state agency,political subdivision,or statewide system;
(b)whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data;(c)any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply
private or confidenrial data;and(d)the idenbty of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. This requirement shall
not apply when an individual is asked to supply invescigative data,pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5,to a law enforcement officer.
The commissioner of revenue mav place the notice required under this subdivision in the individual income tax or propertv taz refund
instructions instead of on those forms.
Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authoriry,an individual shall be informed whether he is the subject
of stored data on individuals,and whether it is classified as public,private or confidential. Upon his further request,an individual who is the subject
of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content
and meaning of that data. After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning,the data need not be disclosed to him for
six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or addidonal data on the individual has been collected or created.
The responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority
may require the requesting person to pay the actual cosu of making,certifying,and compiling the copies.
The responsible authoriry shall comply immediately,if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision,or within five days of
the date of the request,excluding Saturdays,Sundays and legal holidays,if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request
within that time,he shall so inform the individual,and may have an additional five days within which to comply with the request,excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays.
Subd.4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private
data conceming himself. To exercise this right,an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement.
The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a)correct the data found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of
inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipienu named by the individual; or(b)notify the individual that he believes the data to be correct. Data
in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data.
The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of the administradve procedure act relating to
contested cases.
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd.2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request
for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or
confidential information.
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested.
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the pernut or license.
3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process
the pemut or license.
4. If your requested pernut or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become
public.
5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (available upon request) to review private data on yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or pernut.
%�� �, t
Firs� �. �_ Middle _ ,� � as �
�i��.. ��jy`
Ad re s�y" ��"�✓K7 �� ���'�� �i 1��9�����'T
Ciry State Zip Phone
I un d my ri ts as stated above.
i
Signature
CHECK O�'F' LIST FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS
' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
� ADDRESS OR LEGAL: �} [�5p�y�i��, ��;��,� �
PID: 38�
DESCRIPTION OF`VORK: �`,i.� ;�S
ZOivING REVIEW BY: „ DATE APPROVED: l� � -`r�
BUII�DING REVIEW BY: , . DATE APPROVED: (� � -4�
�EES TO BE CHARGED: Misc. Fees Calculated By:
PERMIT Yes ✓1 No
PLAN REV�W Yes r/' No SEWER CONNECITON
STATE SITR`�IARGE Yes �/' No WATERCONNECTION
INVESTIGATION FEE Yes No :/ PARK FEE
SAC Y;,s =f No SITEINSPECTION
Number of SAC Units �, OTHER (specify)
s�:w�� c�-+-v��-s�� :�.ti:� .,
ZO1�tING CHECK LIST Zoning District: ZIZ- I A
Fire Depar[ment: �f�C;,lAlc.-l. Post Office: l,cZrv� C1�I�C: School District: ��zvn:,[�
Lot Area: Sq.ft. Acres Width �217x;�U�i2 Depch
Survey Submitted: Yes� No Date of Survey: ��� -�j�
Proposed Setbacks:
Front (�ce}: _ (,,5. !'� Right Side: �i�j�
Rear (St�eet): b� •y. Left Side: ��(7` #�-
Adjacent Structures: ti`'r!� Wetland: �'
Building Height: Def. Hgt. � � � Peak Hgt. '3+
I.ot Coverage: N��
Grading: Staff Approval Date: (�'-�`�j �C'' By: �"�' Council Approval Date: —'
Septic: Staff Approval Date: P'ts ( il� By: �
Zoning File; # �- Resolution: # — Resolution Date: —
Shoreland Dis�ict: ���_
Avg. Setback: >ti (� Bluff Setback: /'�!(✓� I.o[Covera�e: —
• Eziscing Proposed
Hardcover: 0-75'
75-250' i� ` L 7� �.l�
250-500'
500-1000'
Hardcover Variance Required: Yes No_ �� Date of Council Approval:
REI�ZARI�S (in house):
• 26
BUII..DING REVIEW CHECK LIST '
�C� 1� ' -3 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: 'V �
' Sq Footage $ Per Sq Ftg
Basement R =
Ist Floor R _
2nd Floor z =
Garage z _
R =
TOTAL
Estimated Construction Value: $ ;(�c,1, �;Uv
��_
Inspections Required: � Work Requiring Separate Permits:
Site .�_ Plumbing Fire
Hardcover Removal � Mechanical Water Connection
� Footin� Septic �_Sewer Connection
_� Framing ,� Fireplace �X Lawn Irrigation
_� Insulation (Masonry) Other
t�Wall Board _� (Mfg.) �Well (State Permit)
� F�� Grading/Filling _�Electrical (State Permit)
Other
------------------------------------------------------------ --
RE1�Z4RKS (Pli HOUSE):
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVIEW BY OTHERS: DATE:
Access: Existing New
Access Approval: Date By; •
----------------------------------____—_____
REMARKS(TO BE NOTED ON PERMI�: '
27
�
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
� SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' S00-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House x = � S.F.
Length Width
x = S.F.
x = S.F.
x = S.F.
B. Gara�e x = � S.F.
C. Driveway _ x = � S.F.
x = S.F.
D. Sidewalk x = O S.F.
x = S.F.
E. Patio/Deck x = � S.F.
x = S.F.
F. Landscape x = 0 S.F.
Underlain x = S.F.
By Plastic __ x _ = S.F.
G. Other x = � S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - � S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZO E - S.F. B
A � — B ��� ��� x 100 = __ %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House ��b1'1�" x = ��_ S.F.
Length W idth
x = S.F.
x = S.F.
x = S.F.
B. Gara�e Z� x � _ �_I/Y S.F.
C. Driveway � x � = S.F.
(Z x = � S.F.
D. Sidewalk �y x � _ � S.F.
-� x �j = � S.F.
1�/ �
E. Patio/Deck x �t)'r/ _ � � S.F.
x � S.F.
F. Landscape x = � S.F.
Underlain x = S.F.
By Plastic x = S.F.
G. Other x = O S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE - D� S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZO E - S.F. B
A I — B � 100 = %
11
�
O� .
�
O O
;,�j ,� ,.r�,,_�` � CITY of ORONU
, .� f, { , � �
v�,� � ��. �� .-�:' G�E� Municipal Offices
� .::.
� ��,�� � Street Address: Mailing Address:
�`�k'�ggOg'� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
HARDCOVER ORDINANCE - In 1975, the Orono City Council adopted an ordinance
limiting the percentage of lot area that can be covered with impervious surface ("hardcover")
such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake.
Studies have shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized
areas have a detriiiiental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's
ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or
vegetated yard areas before entering the lake.
Hardcover Zones - Allowed Percentages:
0-75 0%
75-250' 25%
250-500' 30%
500-1000' 35%
Hardcover includes:
- Roofs
- Sidewalks
- Paved or gravel driveways
- Patios & decks (includes slatted decks)
- Tops of retaining walls & rock walls
- Decorative landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting or fabric
- Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall
into the ground
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING HARDCOVER CALCULATION
WORKSHEET �
l. Circle which setback zone (0-75', 75-250', etc.) the calculation is for.
2. For each item of hardcover within that zone, enter the length and width, and multiply
to get square footage (s.f.).
3. Add up all the square footages to get total square footage of hardcover.
4. Divide by the total area of property within the zone and multiply by 100 to get
percentage of hardcover in the zone.
5. If changes in hardcover are proposed, you should do a "before" worksheet and "after"
worksheet. If either results in percentages greater than those allowed, contact City staff
before proceeding with your project planning!
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
10
ENERGY CODE DESIGN BY ACCEPTABLE PRACTICE
To Detemune Compliance with the Minnesota Energy Code
(Section 602 of the State Amended 1983 Model Energy Code)
This form is only applicable to detached one-and two-family dwellings. The requirements herein are based on Table
No. 6-11 in lieu of the criteria specified in Sections 602.2.1, .2 and .3.
Building Address �yy��"�/V �71�
Contractor or Owner ,
Building Element "R" Values Area (sq ft) % of Ext. Walls
Ceilings Design�.�'"TReq'd 38 �'1� � �
Walls (exterior) Design� .n Req'd 20 ���� .
w/o f )
Floors (over unheated spaces) Design�Req'd 20 �� ✓ �
*Windows (in bldgs w/o �`' ! Design Req'd 12
sliding glass door) (glass)
*Windows (in bldgs with a Design Req'd 10
sliding glass door) (glass)
Foundation Walls Design Req'd 5 (when insulating full depth of foundation wall)
Ct'���>�KI/M�1� Design�Req'd 10 (when insulating only to frost depth and
� footings extend below)
Slab-on-grade floors Design Req'd _ (See Figure No. 3)
**Doors (1-3/4" metal faced) Design Req'd 3 � �����, W/
(
* All windows shall be double glazed or have storm windows
** Conventional doors other than metal require a storm door
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I have completed the above information and that it complies with the Minnesota State Energy
Code.
Signature � Date �� ���`'�
BCSD 3 9 !�� ���� �� ��2�3
CC/SM/6593
19
GUIDELINE TO (R) FACTORS FROM ASHRAE MANUAL
OF TYPICALLY USED PRODUCTS
AIR FILMS � SHEATHING �
Interior Air Film (Walls) 0.68 3/4" Wood Subfloor or Sheathing 0.94
Exterior Air Film (Walls 0.17 1/2" Plywood Sheathing 0.62
Interior Air Film (Vented Ceiling) 0.61 1/2" Particle Board 0.66
Exterior Air Film(Vented Ceiling) 0.61 Gypsum or Plaster Board 3/8" 0.32
Interior Air Film (Non Vented) 0.61 Gypsum or Plaster Board 1/2" 0.45
Exterior Air Film (Non Vented) 0.17 Gypsum or Plaster Board 5/8" 0.56
Plywood 3/8° 0.47
BLOWING WOOLS Plywood 1/2" 0.62 '
Approx. 3" 9.00 Plywood 3/4" 0.93
Approx. 4 1/2" 13.00 Sheathing, Reg. Density 1/2" 1.32
Approx. 6 1/4" 19.00 Sheathing, Reg. Density 25/�2" 2.06
Approx. 7 1/4" 24.00 Nail-Base Sheathing 1/2" 1.14
Approx. 14" 30.00 .
Approx. 18" 40.00 ROOFS
All other insulation materials Built-up Roofs 0.33
must be verified (R Factor) Asbestos-Cement Shingles 0.21
Asphalt Roll Roofing 0.13
INSULATION Asphalt Shingles 0.44
Insulation: 2-2 3/4" Fiberglass 7.00
Insulation: 3 1/2" Fiberglass 11.00 SIDING
Insulation" 6" Fiberglass 19.00 Aluminum Siding 0.61
Insulation: 3 5/8: Fiberglass 13.00 Aluminum with Backer 1.82
Insulation: 9" Fiberglass 30.00 Aluminum with Backer & Foiled 2.96
Insulation: 12" Fiberglass 38.00 1/2 x 8 Lap Siding (Wood) 0.81
Insulation: 8" Cellulose 29.00 7/16 x 12 Hardboard Siding 0.67
Insulation: 10" Cellulose 37.00 Asbestos Sidings 1/4 Lapped 0.21
Insulation: 12" Cellulose 44.00 Stucco (Brown and Finish Coat) ----
Insulation: 1 1/2" Therma� 12.00
Insulation: 2" Thermax 16.00 DOORS �
1 3/4" Solid Core Door .46
WOODS w/Storm, Wood .31
Fir, Pine & Similar Soft Woods w/Storm, Metal .26
1 1/2" 1.89 Pease Steel Door Insl/N/GL 7.45R .13
2 1/2" 3.12 Sliding Glass Door, Wood .65
3 1/2" 4.35 Metal .72
5 1/2" 6.87
WINDOWS
CONCRETE BLOCK All Windows
8" Concrete Block (S & G Reg.) 1.11 (w/Storms 1" to 4" Space) .56
(Filled with Vermiculite) 1.93 Removal Double Glazing (RDG) .55
12" Concrete Block (S & G Reg.) 1.28 Thermo or Welded 3/16"Air Space .69
(Filled with Vernuculite) 3.15 1/4" Air Space .65
8" Light Weight 2.18 1/2" Air Space .58
(Filled with Vernuculite�' S.03 (Other windows specifically tested
12" Light Weight 2.48 can use better ratings)
(Filled with Vernuculite) 5.82
20
Paul and Karen Madson Residence
3850 Bayside Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
ENERGY CODE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
EXTERIOR WALL
exterior air film .17
brick —
6" fiberglass insulation 19.00
particle board sheathing .66
5/8" gypsum board .56
interior air film .68
Total Wall R Value: 21.07
ROOF/CEILING
exterior air film(vented ceiling) .61
asphalt shingles .44
1/2" plywood sheathing .62
12" blown cellulose 44.00
5/8" gypsum board .56
interior air film (vented ceiling) .61
Total Roof Ceiling R Value: 46.84
FLOORS OVER UNHEATED SPACE
interior air film(non-vented) .61
3/4" plywood .93
12" fiberglass 38.00
5/8" gypsum board .56
exterior air film (non-vented) .17
Total Floor Over Unheated Space R Value 40.27
FOUNDATION WALL
exterior air film .17
12" S & G block 1.28
2" ri�id insulation (�oly-sioscianurale) 11.00
Total Foundation Wall Exposed(slab on grade const.) 12.40
. � ��� �5A1 ���`�'��� ����� Braun Interfec Engineering, Inc.
E.3 g u��❑ �,.: r,,,, ,,,:;:� Y' 6801 Washington Avenue South
' ' P.O.Box 39108
. • I N T E RT E C Minneapolis,Minnesota 55439-0108
612-941-5600 Fax: 941-4151
'—' Engineers ond Scienfists Serving
fhe Builf and Natural Environments
January 6, 1993 Project BABX-92-813
Mr. Paul Madson
Paul Madson and Associates, Ltd.
420 North Sth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55401
� Dear Mr. Madson:
Re: Geotechnical Evaluation for the Proposed House at 38XX Bayside Road in Orono,
Minnesota
As you authorized on December 8, 1992, we have completerl the geotechnical evaluation for
the proposed house at 38XX Bayside Road in Orono, Minnesota. The purpose of the evaluation
was to assist you in designing foundations and preparation of plans and specifications for
construction of a new house. The evaluation was completed in general accordance with our
Letter of Confirmation to you dated December 14, 1992.
Summary of Results
Two soil borings were completed in the proposed house area. The general soil profile at the
boring locations consisted of 1 foot of topsoil overlying silty clayey sand, clayey sand, silty
sand, clayey gravel and sandy lean clay to the termination depth of the borings. Groundwater
was not observed in either boring.
Summary of Recommendations
Based on the soil borings and our evaluation, it is our opinion the proposed house can be
supported on conventional spread footings designed to exert a maximum net allowable bearing
pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot on the soil. �
Although groundwater was not observed in either of the borings, a wetlands area adjacent to
this site has water levels that approach an elevation of 930, or approximately 5 feet below the
existing ground surface at the house location. We recommend the lowest floor grade be set at
an elevation that would allow a minimum of 4 feet of clearance between the floor grade and the
high water level.
- . Paul Madson and
Associates, Ltd.
� • Project BABX-92-813
� . January 6, 1993
Page 2
r—
;�_.
�--
, General
` " Please refer to the attached report for a more detailed summary of our analysis and
-- recommendations. If we can provide additional assistance or observation and testing services
during construction, please call Henry Vloo (612) 942-1779 or Ray Huber at (612) 942-4831.
Sincerely,
��v �
Henry Vloo, P.E.
Project Engineer
,
ay . Huber, P.E.
Vice President
Attachment:
Geotechnical Evaluation Report
hv\rah:mjs\babx\92813\rpt
r—
.4
�...
: A Geotechnical Evaluation Report for
r._ Mr. Paul Madson
�
��_
Proposed House at 38XX Bayside Road in Orono, Minnesota
;�
�
� �
Project BABX-92-813
January 6, 1993
Braun Intertec Engineering, Inc.
F...
I�.
r-
� Table of Contents
� .
r- Description Page
� A. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
�._ A.1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
iA.2 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
' A.3 Available Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
,-
-- A.4 Locations and Elevations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
;
' B. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
B.1 Logs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
B.2 Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
B.3 Groundwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
C. Analysis and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
C.l Proposed Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
C.2 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
C.3 Foundations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
C.4 Floor Slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
C.5 Site Grading and Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
D. Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
D.1 Excavation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
D.2 Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
D.3 Cold Weather . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
E. Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
E.1 Drilling and Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
E.2 Soil Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
E.3 Groundwater Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
F. General Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
F.1 Basis of Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
F.2 Review of Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
F.3 Groundwater Fluctuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
F.4 Use of Report . . . . { . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
F.5 Level of Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Professional Certification
Appendix
Boring Location Sketch
Log of Boring Sheets
Descriptive Terminology
� B R A U N SM Braun Intertec Engi�eering, Inc.
6801 Washington Avenue$outh
P.O. Box 39108
� I N T E RT E C Minneapolis,Minnesota 55439-0108
612-941-5600 Fax:941-4151
Engineers antl Scientists Serving
the Buill and Nafural Environmenfs
A. Introduction
A.1 Purpose
- The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation was to assist you in the design of foundations and
preparation of plans and specifications for the proposed house at 38XX Bayside Road in Orono,
Minnesota.
A.2 Scope
The geotechnical evaluation was performerl in general accordance with our Confirmation of
, Authorization letter to you dated December 14, 1992.
Two standard penetration test borings were performed to depths of 20 feet in the proposed
house area. With the results of these borings, this engineering report was prepared addressing
our analysis and recommendations. It was not in our scope of work to explore for
environmental contamination or pollution at this site.
A.3 Available Information
A topographic site plan showing the proposerl house location was provided to us. The plan was
not titled or dated.
A.4 Locations and Elevations
The boring locations were selected by Mr. Paul Madson and were approximately shown on the
� provided site plan. The boring locations in the field were also staked by Mr. Paul Madson.
. Surface elevations at the borings were approximated by using the contours of the site plan
provided. 'I'herefore, the ground surface elevations at the boring locafions should be considered
approximate.
Paul Madson and
Associates, Ltd.
. Project BABX-92-813
January 6, 1993
Page 2
B. Results
B.1 Logs
Log of Boring sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata,
penetration resistances and groundwater observations are attached. The strata changes were
inferred from the changes in the penetration test samples and auger cuttings. It should be noted
that the depths shown as changes between the strata are only approximate. The changes are
likely transitions and the depths of the changes vary between the borings. �
Geologic origins presented for each stratum on the Log of Boring sheets are based on the soil
types, blows per foot, and available common knowledge of the depositional history of the site.
Because of the complex glacial and post-glacial depositional environments, geologic origins are
frequently difficult to ascertain. A detailed investigation of the geologic history of the site was
not performed.
B.2 Soils
The soils encountered in the borings generally consisted of a thin layer of clayey topsoil
overlying glacially deposited sands, gravel and clay to the termination depth of the borings. 'The
soil types encountered consisted of silty sand, silty clayey sand, clayey gravel and sandy lean
clay.
The recorded penetration resistances in the sands ranged from 12 to 24 blows per foot (BPF),
indicating these soils to be in a medium dense condition. The recorded penetration resistance in
the clayey gravel layer in Boring ST-2 was 100 blows for 2 inches. This high blow count is
likely due to the presence of cobbles within this layer. The recorded penetration resistances in
the sandy lean clay ranged from 14 to 15 BPF, indicating these soils to be stiff in consistency.
B.3 Groundwater
Groundwater was not observed by our crew in any of the borings during the drilling operation
or after the hollow-stem auger had reached the termination depth of the borings. After the
auger had been withdrawn from the bore holes, groundwater again was not observeci in any or
the borings to cave-in depths ranging from 16 1/2 to 18 feet.
. Paul Madson and
Associates, Ltd.
• Project BABX-92-813
January 6, 1993
Page 3
Although groundwater was not observed in either of the borings, insufficient time was available
to allow groundwater to seep into the holes. In clayey type soils, it may take several days for
groundwater in a bore hole to rise to its hydrostatic level. We anticipate groundwater levels will
probably conespond to water level elevations in the wetland area adjacent to this lot.
C. Analysis and Recommendations
C.1 Proposed Construction
It is our understanding that a single-family home will be constructed on this lot. Structures of
this type generally have shallow to deep basements, masonry or concrete bearing walls to first
floor level or adjacent outside grade, with wood-frame construction above. At this time the
proposed grades have not been set.
C.2 Discussion
Basetl on the soils encountered in the borings, it is our opinion the site is general(y suitable for
support of the proposed house. However, some limited subcutting of organic topsoil will be
required.
Because of the high groundwater in the wetlands surrounding the lot, it is our opinion that a
basement should not be built below existing grades unless grades are raised. For the purpose of
this report, we have assumed the house will be constructed without a basement and we have
further assumed that the first-floor elevation will be approximately the same as the current site
grade, or at an elevation of 935.
C.3 Foundations
Based on our assumptions, the soils encountered at the proposed footing grade are suitable for
support of the proposed house. The footings may be designed for a net allowable bearing
pressure up to 3,000 pounds per square foot (ps fl. Depending on the actual building loads, this
bearing pressure may result in relatively narrow strip footings or small column footings.
Therefore, we recommend the strip footings be at least 18 inches wide and the column footings
_ Paul Madson and
Associates, Ltd.
• Project BABX-92-813
� January 6, 1993
Page 4
be at least 2 1/2 feet square. We estimate total and differential settlement of the foundations
will be less than 1!2 inch under this loading.
We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 3 1/2 feet below exterior grade for
frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately beneath the floor slab, unless
construction is to take place during the winter. During winter construction, we recommend all
footings be placed a minimum of 3 1/2 feet below grade for frost protection.
C.4 Floor Slabs
Prior to placement of the floor slab, we recommend the removal of all topsoil from within the
building footprint. To provide a capillary moisture break and reduce the floor slab dampness,
we recommend the upper 6 inches of fill below the floor slab consist of a clean sand with less
than 10 percent of the soil by weight passing the number 200 sieve. If an impermeable floor
covering, a hardened concrete finish or sealer will be used, we also recommend a moisture
vapor barrier be installed under the sand cushion.
C.5 Site Grading and Drainage
We recommend landscaped areas around the house be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within
10 feet of the house and slabs be sloped to permit drainage away from the house. If site grades
are raised and a basement is constructed, we recommend the basement walls be dampproofed
and an exterior drain tile system be installed. Collected seepage should be routed to a sump to
be drained.
D. Construction
D.1 Excavation
It is our opinion the majority of the soils encountererl in the borings can be excavated with a
backhoe. However, because footing grade will be fairly close to the water levels in the
wetlands, areas of water may be encountered during excavation. This water will likely be
controllable with sump pumps. If the bottom of the footing excavation becomes soft prior to
placing concrete, we recommend the footing trenches be subcut an additional 1 foot and
. Paul M adson and
Associates, Ltd.
• Project BABX-92-813
January 6, 1993
Page 5
replaced with a crushed rock. This will provide a more stable working platform for
construction of footings, if needed.
D.2 Observations
We recommend that all excavation, footing and slabs be observed by a geotechnical engineer to
evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered by the borings, adequate to
support the proposed construction and adequately oversized. These observations should be
conducted prior to placing backfills, fills or forms for footings.
After excavating for footings, we recommend that tests be conducted on the subgrades to
evaluate if the bearing capacity is at least 3,000 psf. Typical instruments used for these tests
include hand augers, penetrometers and sample tubes.
D.3 Cold Weather
If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, we recommend that good
winter construction practices be observed. All snow and ice should be removed from cut and
fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on soils which have frozen or
contain frozen material. No frozen soils should be used as fill.
Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM C 94.
Concrete should not be placed upon frozen soils or soils which contain frozen material.
Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. Frost
should not be permitted to penetrate below footings bearing on frost-susceptible soil since such
freezing could heave and crack the footings and/or foundation walls.
E. Procedures
E.1 Drilling and Sampling
The penetration test borings were performed on December 15, 1992, with an off-road mounted
core and auger drill equipped with 3 1/4-inch inside diameter hollow-stem auger. Sampling for
the borings was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, "Penetration Test and
. Paul Madson and
Associates, Ltd.
• Project BABX-92-813
January 6, 1993
Page 6
Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils." Using this method, we advanced the bore hole with the hollow-
stem auger to the desired test depth. A 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches was then used to
drive the standard 2-inch split-barrel sampler a total penetration of 1 1/2 feet below the tip of
the hollow-stem auger. The blows for the last foot of penetration were recorded and are an
index of soil strength characteristics. Samples were taken at 2 1/2-foot vertical intervals to the
15-foot depth and then at 5-foot intervals to the termination depths of the borings. A
representative portion of each sample was then sealed in a glass jar.
E.2 Soil Classification
Soils encountered in the borings were visually and manually classified in the field by the crew
chief in general accordance with ASTM D 2487, "Classification of Soils for Engineering
Purposes," and ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual
Procedures)." A summary of ASTM D 2487 is attached. All samples were then returned to our
laboratory for review of the field classifications by a soils engineer. Representative samples will
remain in our Minneapolis office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination.
E.3 Groundwater Observations
Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottoms of the borings, the holes were probed
through the hollow-stem auger to check for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after
withdrawal of the auger, the holes were again probed and the depths to water or cave-ins were
noted. The water levels were rechecked and the bore holes backfilled by our crew just prior to
leaving the site.
F. General Recommendations +
F.1 Basis of Recommendations
The analyses and recommendations submitted in this repoR are based upon the data obtained
from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Variations
occur between these borin�s, the nature and extent of which will not become evident until
additional exploration or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations of
this repoR should be made after performing on-site observations during construction and noting
. Paul Madson and
Associates, Ltd.
• Project BABX-92-813
January 6, 1993
Page 7
the characteristics of the variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs,
and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose.
To permit correlation of the soil data obtained to date with the actual soil conditions
encountered during construction and to provide continuing professional responsibility for the
conformance of the construction to the concepts originally contemplated in this report and to the
plans and specifications, it is recommended that we be retained to develop and perform the
recommended observation and testing program for the excavation and foundation phases of the
project.
If others perform the recommended observations and/or testing of construction, professional
responsibility becomes dividetl since, in doing so, they assume responsibility for evaluating that
the soil conditions throughout the construction areas are similar to those encountered in the
borings or recognizing variations which require a change in recommendations.
F.2 Review of Design
This report is based on the preliminary design of the proposed structure as submitted to us for
the preparation of this report. Because of the limited amount of information available, a number
of assumptions were necessary to permit us to make recommendations. It is recommended that
we be retained to review the final design and specifications to determine whether those
assumptions were correct and whether any change in concept may have had an effect on the
validity of our recommendations, and whether our recommendations have been implemented in
the design and specifications. If we are not permitted an opportunity to make this recommended
review, we will not be liable for losses arising out of incorrect assumptions, design changes, or ,
misinterpretation or misapplication of our recommendations.
F.3 Groundwater Fluctuations
Water level readings have been made in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated
on the boring logs. These data have been reviewed and interpretations made in the text of this
report. However, it must be noted that the period of observation was relatively short and that
fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring
thaw, drainage, seasonal and annual variations and other factors not evident at the time
Paul Madson and
Associates, Ltd.
• Project BABX-92-813
January 6, 1993
. Page 8
measurements were made and reported herein. Design drawings and specifications and
construction planning should recognize the possibilities of variations.
F.4 Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the addressee and their representatives to use to design
the proposed structure described herein and prepare construction documents. The data, analyses
and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend
that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. In the absence of our written
approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding
this report.
F.5 Level of Care
Services performed by the geotechnical engineers for this project have been conducted with that
level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in
this area under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
Professionai Certifcation:
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
�
A. Huber, P.E.
Vice President
Registration Number: 15329
Date: January 6, 1993
Appendix
BUILDING SET BACK LINE
� WETLAND
i
� � ♦
i � �r—�—_� ♦
� � / � �
� /
� '��p� /// \\ ` //.
� �i
I �� � � � ♦ ��
I � � \ i
I � � � \\ / /
I � �
\ ST-2 �
�
\ ♦` ST-1 � \� /
DRAINAGE EASEMENT \`\ � ' / \� /
� /
_ � / /
I �/ � i
I i �
J
r_ _ �oP
�� ���o�
� �
� � �
�/ �/ /
' / /
�
� � �
i � � i
' / /
� �
/ �
� f � /
� _ _ � �
� I
� �
� — DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF�•STANDARD PENETRAl10N TEST BORING
N
40' 0 80'
SCALE 1'= 80'
� INT REVISION SHEET
BRAV N� GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION DRawr� BY: KMR �2-�s-s2 1
PROPOSED HOUSE APP'D BY: HV �F
INTERTEC 38XX BAYSIDE ROAD ,loe No. BABX-92-813 1
ORONO, MINNESOTA pwc. No. AB2813 FIGURE �
scAtF 1"=80' 1
LOG OF BORING
� PROJECT: BABX92-813 BORING: ST-1
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Proposed House LOCATION:
38XX Bayside Road See attached sketch.
Orono, Minnesota
DATE: 12/15/92 SCALE: 1" = 4'
Elev. Depth ASTM Descripdon of Materials
935.0 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488) BPF Tests or Notes
CL LEAN CLAY with SAND, with fibers, black, Benchmark: Boring
934.0 1.0 wet. elevations estimated from
CL (TopSoll) topographic site plan.
933.0 2.0
C� LEAN CLAY with SAND, with a trace of fibers, 12
brown, wet.
931.0 4.0 SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine- to
SC ��. , medium-grained, with a trace of fine to coarse ,
��. �Gravel, with pieces of shale, light gray, moist to ' 14
�:, swet, medium dense. ,
� �� , (Glacial Till)
= CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with
: a trace of fine to coarse Gravel and Cobbles, with 1S
�. layers of Silty Clay, grayish brown, moist to wet,
medium dense.
(Glacial Till)
22
15
20
916.0 19.0 ��:�
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - -
CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of fine to
coarse Gravel, gray, moist to wet, stiff. 15
4.5 20.5 (Glacial Till)
END OF BORING.
Water not observed with 19' of hollow stem
auger in the ground.
Water not observed to cave-in depth of 16 1/2'
immediately after withdrawal of auger.
Water not observed to cave-in depth of 16 1/2' 1
1/2 hours after withdrawal of auger.
Boring then bacl�illed.
BAIIY92-813 Braun Intertec-12l18/92 ST-1 page 1 of 1
LOG OF BORING
, PROJECT: BABX92-813 BORING: $T-2
GEOTECI-INICAL EVALUATION
Proposed House LOCATION:
38XX Bayside Road See attached sketc6.
Orono, Minnesota
DATE: 12/15/92 SCALE: 1" = 4'
Elev. Depth ASTM Descriprion of Materials
935.0 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488) BPF Tests or Notes
934.3 0.7 CL LEAN CLAY with SAND, with fibers, black,
933.5 1.5 �L moist to wet.
�� (Topsoil)
LEAN CLAY with SAND, dark brown, moist to 12
wet.
SILTY CLAYEY SAND, fine-to
medium-grained, with a trace of fine Gravel, with
30.0 5.0 a trace of fibers, light gray, moist to wet. 15
SC : �: : � (Glacial Till) �
�� CLAYEY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with
� a trace of fine to coarse Gravel, with lenses of "
� Silty Sand and layers of Lean Clay, grayish 16
brown, moist to wet.
926.0 9.0 : `� (Glacial Till)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - -
SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with a
trace of fine Gravel, brown, moist, medium 19
dense.
(Glacial Till)
24
921.0 14.0
GC .� CLAYEY GRAVEL, fine- to coarse-grained, �
„� with cobbles, brown, moist, very dense. * * l00 blows for 2
,@ (Glacial Outwash)
918.0 17.0 �
CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of fine to
coarse Gravel, gcay, moist to wet, stiff.
(Glacial Till)
14
4.5 20.5
END OF BORING.
� Water not observed with 19' of hollow stem
auger in the ground.
Water not observed to cave-in depth of 18'
immediately after withdrawal of auger.
Water not observed to cave-in depth of 18' 1/2
hour after withdrawal of auger.
� Boring then bacldlled.
BABX92-813 Braun Intectec-1/6/93 SI'-2 page 1 of 1
� Descriptive Terminology
j q�I I f Designation O 2487—83
Standard Test Method for
CLASSIFICATION OF SOtLS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
soi�anss�ricnnox PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION
� CaITENIR fOR ASSIGNING GaOUP 51MBOL5 nND fAOUP
GROUP NAMES USING UBORAiORY iE5T5 a SYMBOL GROUP NAME � Boulders over 12
...........................
f Cobbles ............................ 3"to 12„
GIIAYELS CIEAN GRFVEIS C� >1 ana 1 <C� < 3 e GM Mel I-graded gravel Gravel
More than SOS of Less t�an 5X/Ines< - ---
�� coarse (rac[ion C� <C and/or 1 >C� >3 e GP Paorly graded qravel + Coarse ........................... '/a"—3��
retainea on — --- - .
_ ra, o:�e�e raaveis uirn vinez v��e��i,,,,r ::iu o�nn en s�ier s�a�ei �•9•n Fine.............................. No.4—'/,"
_ More than 12S fines� p��es clasz�(y as Cl or CM GC Clayey qrovel f�9.h
Sand
- � SANDS CIENN S�NDS C� :6 ana 1 c C� < 3 e SM Veil-graAed sanA �
so:o or �e:: �na�zz r��e�a --- - Coarse ........................... No.4—No. 10
coarse�iraction C�<6 and/or 1 >C� >3 e SP Poorly graded sand �
w�z
a' Medium .......................... No. 10—No.40
a Dasies Nu. A
. � ` sieve SANOS MITM fINES Flnes classi( as Ml or MH SM Silty Sand 9•h•� Fine.............................. No.40—No.200
� F Mre tnan 12i fines a -- - � —
v;�es c�as:iry as a o�cn sc ctayeY sa�a e.h.� Silt................................. NO.200—.005 mm
� PI q 7'ane pioc:o�o� ,�o�e n ie� <iay k.�.m Clay ............................... IeSS than.005 mm
� SILiS AND CLAYS ', inorganic �_"'_____ ___ '_"_'
Llpuid 11mi[ , PI <0 or plo[s�elo."N" line J ML S�It k,l,m
'ess `"'"5°: RELATIVE DENSITY OF
t�+ �a�;m��-o�e�ariea — - Organic <,,,k. �.m COHESIONLESS SOILS
o�ganic ,�,— <0.75 OL
� L�Qu�d l�m�[- not dried Organic silt k, 1,m,o
�
�'
w a
� `` __'_—___1___'—_—'
- � � __'_.'—_'--__'_--
a �a vi pio�s o�o� an��e•�n� i��e cn Fac[lay k.�•m v2f IOOS2 0— 4 BPF
� "a $ILTS FNU L10.Y5 � Y ....................................
� -- -- —---------- ---- toose................................:........ 5—10 BPF
=E inarganic medium dense ............................... 11 —30 BPF
� liQuld 7imil PI plo[5 Uelow"A" line MM EIaS[ft Sill k,l,m
4 � so:o,���.e dense .........
,. ..............................31 —50 8 PF
�, u a rm;c -o�r�a��ea ----- -- orya��� clay k. I.m. D very dense ....................................... 50+BPF
��yaocc ���T�m�C-=oi e ee�o.�s on rn- a � sui k. �.m�a
v�� ariiy o�ga�����a<<e�, a,�k �� �oio�, a�a ar vea��
Highly organlc so��s o�9a��� �o� ' CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS
a. BaseC on tne material passing t�e 3-in (75-nm) ��e�e. very soft ...................................... 0— 1 BPF
0. If lield sample containea cob�les an�/or Wulders, a�a "wit�coGCles anG/or Loulae�s" to grouP��e. SOfI . 2— 3 B PF
c. G r av e I s�i t n 5 t o 12%�i n e s r e q u i r e a u a t s rno a I s '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
o+-cn ,.en q�aaee qravel �;�n :nc rather soft .................................... 4— 5 BPF
Gu-GC well 9raded grauel with clay
er-cn poorly graded gravel w�en snc medium ...................................... 6— 8 BPF
GP-G[ poorly raaee grafel wi[n<lay
o. sa�a:�;cn s co�izx r;�e, eq�;�e a�ai s�oois rdther Stiff..................................... 9—12 BPF
su-sn we n 9�aaea sa�a.icn s�ic Stiff 1 3— 1 6 B PF
su-5[ .enqraaeasanaw��n�iay """""""""""""""'••••••••••
sv-sn Doorly qraaed:soa.;cn sn� very stiff ..................................... 17—30 BPF
sP-sc poorly graded sau ji�n��dr ............... 30 BPF
30 hard ............................. +
e. Cu ��60��10 �c ��
l0 60
(. I( soil contains > 15Y sana, adA '�ith sana" to group name.
9. �f f��e,��a�s�fy as«-��, �se a�a, s„�o� �-�,, s�-�„. DRILLING NOTES
�. 1( (ines are organic, aGd'with organic (ines" to group n
i. If soil contains > 15i gravel, aGa "witn gravel" lo groupdn
;. i, AtterEerg ��m;rs o�oc ;� na«nea a�ea, �o�i �s a a-n�, s;i�y��ay. Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3'/,"or 6'/,"
k. u so n �o�caco: ts io z9s pt�s no. zoo, ,ae ^.�en sa�a•o�^.;cn gravel" wTicnever �: v�ea�+�a�c.
�. ir s�n �o�ca��: > 3os o����. zoo, p��a���,�uY s,�a, aaa sa�aY co 9�o�P��e I.D.hollow-stem augers unless noted otherwise.Jetting water was
. If soll contains> 30f plus No. ''00, predaninantly grevel,a04 "gravelly" to group name.
o� >a ,�e o,���a�o� �,o.e•n� ���e. used to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on
v°: vi z a o�o,ocs oe,o.•n• r�r. lo s. Standard enetration test borin s are desi nated b the
. o� P�a�:o�o. aoo�e •a" �ine. J P 9 9 Y
a. vi p�„i:or�o.•p�• �,�e. prefix"ST"(Split Tube).
B� , Power auger borings were advanced by 4" or 6" diameter,
For ciozs�f�cor�o� of f�oe-q�a��ea so��s continuous-flite,solid stem augers.Soil classification and strain
and fine-qrained fractionof coarse-gromed �� depihsareinferredfromdisturbedsamplesaugeredtothesurface
soils
H so and are therefore somewhat approximate. Power auger borings
a taual�onof�A-i�ne `��
y� Honzontal ot PI=a *o��=25 5. .�,�� � N� are designated by the prefix"B".
o � rnen PI=O�3;�� 2oi `�i �`� Hand probings were advanced manualiy with a 1'%a" diameter
z Ea�ar�o� Of�U�-iinC ,P probe and are limited to the depth from which the probe can be
— verr�coi ar ��=i6 roPI=� �� G�J manually withdrawn. Hand probings are indicated by the prefix
> thenPI=09lL� 81 , „H„
~ 30
`—' i� SAMPLING — All samples are taken with the standard 2" O.D.
N i� �� split tube sampler, except where noted. TW indicates thin-wall
a zo � � MH ��w �H (undisturbed)sample.
a �
i C�� BPF — Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard
io penetration test,also known as"N"value.The sampler is set 6"
' C ,M ML �L into undisturbed soil below ihe hollow-stem auger. Driving
° - resistances are then counted for second and third 6"incremenis
� and added to et BPF. Where the differ si niiicantl the are
� �0 10 i6 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 i00 I10 g Y g Y� Y
L IQUID L I M I T (LL) reported in the following form—2/12 for the second and third 6"
increments respectivety.
WH—WH indicates that sampler penetrated soil under weight of
hammer and rods alone,driving not required.
LABORATORY TESTS NOTE — All tests run in accordance with applicable ASTM
standards.
DD Dry Densiry, pci OC Organic Content,% B R A!! N sM
WD Wet Density, pcf S Percent oi Sat�nation,%
MC Natural Moisture Contenl,% SG Specific Gravity
LL Liquid Limit,% C Cohesion
PL Plastic Limit,% � Angle of Internal Friction I N T E RT E C
PI Plasticity Index,% qu Unconfined Compressive Slrength
ATE TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN <-� �/%' �'
INSPECTION NOTICE I O�)� SCHEDULED ��' 1 -� '�C�
PERMIT NO. cOMPLETED
�,t' \ r
ADDRESS � �� � --���'-
OWNER `� CONTR. ��"%� �-�
TELEPHONE NO. _ 3�..� - �C� wZ �v
� DESCRIPTION
� 01 FOOTING 11 MECHANICAL RI 18 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
Q 02 FRAMING 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
� 03 iNSULATION 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 34 TREE REMOVAL
� 04 LL BD. 12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE INSPECTION
Z
OS FINAL ' 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 06 PROGRESS
� EMO-SITE 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 21 COMPLAINT
J 07 DEMO-FINAL 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 22 FOLLOW-UP
= 09 PLUMBING RI 23 SEPTIC FINAL 35 HARD COVER REMOVAL
J 10 PLUMBING FINAL 36 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
� COMMENTS:
�
a — \ � �(l, l
J .- �
O
�
�
� � �� �
W
�
Q
� (� ►Mo J�i i v�
z
W
�
W
�
�
d
W ORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED �OJECTCOMPLETE
� ,p CORRECT WORK&PROCEED C ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
W
O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
V BEFORE COVERING _�pERMANENT
❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. �, pHOTOTAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL RETURN
Cl CITATION ISSUED
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance.473-73�J7
OwnedContractor s'
Inspector.
White Copylinspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice
AT TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN y�
INSPECTION NOTI�E SCHEDULED � ��' _`�� .
PERMIT NO. �G4�!'c� COMPLETED �
ADDRESS ��-�� '.��1 �� ,�o�
OWNER___`1��-�-�-�� • CONTR.
TELEPHONE NO. �'-'3 %Z - 7G "ZC�
� DESCRIPTION /�.r2��<.� .�l��f v�7, �Z�
�
lL 01 FOOTING 11 ME ANICAL RI 18 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
� 02 FRAMING 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANOS
�
Q 03 INSULATION 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 34 TREE REMOVAL
Z 04 WA . 12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE INSPECTION
Q FINAL 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 06 PROGRESS
� 0 MO-SITE 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 21 COMPLAINT
� 07 DEMO-FINAL 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 22 FOLLOW-UP
= 09 PLUMBING RI 23 SEPTIC FINAL 35 HARD COVER REMOVAL
J 10 PLUMBING FINAL 36 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
� COMMENTS:
�
ao �c�� � --C°
�
J
0
� ����, ` v1 S �
0
�
W
�
Q
�
Z
W
�
W
�
�
d
W� WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C PROJECT COMPLETE
W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED � ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
� ❑ CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
� BEFORECOVERING
PERMANENT
❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. r; pHOTO TAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL RETURN �
C CITATION ISSUED
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Cail for the next inspection 24 hours in advance.473-73rJ7
OwnerlContract 't :
Inspector. �
White Copyllnspector's Fi Canary CopylSite Notice
DATE TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN 9��. ��...i.�
INSPECTION NOTICE ,�L�� SCHEDULED �5�� •�:� ' �; C
PERMIT NO. � COMPLETED
ADDRESS �
OWNER CONTR.
TELEPHONE NO. �`7�� �` /� ��� �
� DESCRIPTION
� 01 FOOTING 11 MECHANICAL RI 18 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
Q 02 FRAMING 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
y �3�?�n 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 34 TREE REMOVAL
Z04 WALL BD. 12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE INSPECTION
Q 05 FINAL 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 06 PROGRESS
� 07 DEMO-SITE 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 21 COMPLAINT
� 07 DEMO-FINAL 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 22 FOLLOW-UP
? 09 PLUMBING RI 23 SEPTIC FINAL 35 HARD COVER REMOVAL
J 10 PLUMBING FINAL 36 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
D COMMENTS:
�
W
�
�
J
O
�.
�
O
�
W
�
Q
�
Z
W
�
W
�
j
d �ORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED C, PROJECTCOMPLETE
W
� C CORRECT WORK&PROCEED C ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
W
O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
� BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT
❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS.
INSPECTOR WILL REfURN �i PHOTO TAKEN
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR C CITATION ISSUED
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance.473-73�J7
Owner/Contract n�te:
Inspector. �
White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice
DATE TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN l 1 '%� /' �_T I
INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED ' � - �J 1� �`� �ir�
PERMIT NO. ���� � �-'• ` COMPLETED D�I N �
.��'C) � _ %
ADDRESS _ ��_' ,� �l'< < ,-' � �.� � �_c: �
OWNER �'i`i , ,( ,,_�-.s CONTR.
TELEPHONE NO. �-� � � / �- �
� DE��PTION
�01 FOOTING 11 MECHANICAL RI 18 EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING
02 FRAMING 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
�
O 03 INSULATION 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 34 TREE REMOVAL
Z 04 WALL BD. 12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE INSPECTION
Q O5 FINAL 14 SEWER HOOK-UP O6 PROGRESS
� 07 DEMO-SITE 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 21 COMPLAINT
� 07 DEMO-FINAL 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 22 FOLLOW-UP
= 09 PLUMBING RI 23 SEPTIC FINAL 35 HARD COVER REMOVAL
J 10 PLUMBING FINAL 36 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNER/CONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
� COMMENTS:
�
W
�
j � _ C�� � � �
O
�
�
O
�
W
�
Q
�
Z
W
�
W
�
�
d
W� WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED i=; PROJECT COMPLETE
W ❑CORRECT WORK R PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
� ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
� BEFORE COVERING
PERMANENT
❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. �� pHOTO TAKEN
INSPECTOR WILL RETURN
" CITATION ISSUED
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR
❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance.473-7357
OwnerlContract si :
Inspector. -� �
White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice