HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject Packet1 udw ncc u_
--.fpTL.if.TL', Receipt
Initials --
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION Q ,(
Site Address o2y��++?� i�//��IISLO X41 eow/ ) �Rxlt /y 3-Till
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.),Oi-!/7-13 -71 Qo53
Please check one - Is the property _ abstract or L�'torrens7
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT .� Phone ( home ) V71- 95✓ z 6
Name iC l�ft//pMp ��nn�/p�///+Ulm ��/P"""ho��,���ne (work)f2"�-5156
_____Ad,4� Cr5ec, f'f)i�F/ ,ea Cityt� -_ Zip:Ss
---------------------------------------- �-------------------
OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)
Name Phone (work)
Address: City r Zips rTTY If MM
� E OFFICE
Date Property Acquired (stunt r
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of lend. 01 GEN 150.00
------------------------------------------------------------ rhaT" --A---MOO
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY RECEIPT-TPM YOU
#vmro Cooi Roi Iwo
Present Zoning District 0&1"6117
Present Use of Property �tfLt��O rf-sivf✓ Residential
�T l
Other (specify)
---------------------------------------------- -------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost 8
in _Oet ail
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Setback variances (_ Front Side Rear)
Other OROtw &. C-f X/d. 02Y S&,Ci-d 5pirau 1 4I
-----5, 4 d vf%� -- - --- ---8-------------------------------
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty
S*j e
IPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions prevent
Code Requirements: 04 elz
ltina from
;__7001AZ---
compliance with Zoning
___________________________________________________________________________
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Plat Map.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
___________________________________________________________________________
Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete.
Zoning Official's Signature Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge. /� 1
Applicant's Signature -( 8 � Date 612YZR2
OWERS SIGNATURE �7
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of t(hhissrreeq�u/esst q-- '
Owner's Signature ---w4 w`/LJ[.�-.tee i�iY7J�s Date90,L,4�92
____ems_______________________ -__ =r______
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an
applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange-
ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the
Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting.
OS
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data",
we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or
license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may
require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform-
ation.
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine
your qualification for the permit or license requested.
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require
that the City deny the permit or license.
3. The information may be shared with other local, state
or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process
the permit or license.
4. If your requested permit or license regires council
action to approve, some information may become public.
5. You have tertian rights under M.S. 15.165 to review
private data on yourself.
6. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process
this application or permit.
(Pee kd0, G' C�x O46�4
First Middle t ems[
�ress
�
J .�..
Date of birth oes not apply to building/general permits)
e
7/- fy.26
I understand my rights as stated above. /
3` g n tft�ele
�t
Adjacent
/ I (wel W2GJG6 PrK1operty Owners' Acknowled em nt Form
L.Sof
pr t names pr nt address
have reviewed the plans for the proposed
proposseeCi
d improvement or proposed use of the
property located at o289� ( A=P.,I:also referred to as Land Use
Application No.
we) nderstand that in executing this acknowledgement, I we am
are not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use
but merely to confirm for the City Council that I we am (are aware of
the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use
requires Council approval.
Date
82 Date a
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of
this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 6
Zoning office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date.
E/SP.rs �vr�lcase o f '7 .� / 1perfy
Cl dPu ex odl a.,�2ovf
A�d(j`afc�e roperty Owners' Acknowledgement Form
fjill��i
I ' J AI.191 w M of
[print names print address
have reviewed the plans for the proposeY
d ,iimprovement or proposed use of the
property located at gR5 CWc E. Lr4- also referred to as Land Use
Application No.
,I it*) understand that in executing this acknowledgen.ent, I (4W am
(, not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use
but merely to confirm for the City Council that I 10VI am kfl(e) aware of
the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use
requires Council approval.
Pro a ty owner
Property Owner
Date
Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of
this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building a
Zoning office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date.
w.
RIN DATE 0012L0T HENEPIM
CHARY PPOPFPTY THYMM-TlY SA91EM
w
MOPLRTY COERS LIST
BATCH 004
m 20-112-23 31 Ooze
SIT 20-112-21 31 0023
A
MOP ADOR
02020 CASCO MINT RD
UCER MANE
N C GONTEA ETAL
N C COMYEA ETAL
TA%PATER
WILLIA.M C CORNEA
M C VON'EA
NANVIODR
2529 CASCO MINT RD
2079 CASCO MINT M
A
WAYZATA TN 55191
WAYZATA MI 55591
A
35 20-117-13 31 002E
" 20-111-23 31 0029
MOP ADM
02910 CASCO MINT PO
0291z CASCO MOM RD
MIEN MAHE
MILLIP A BETTY III[CNI
M 0 BARRETT A D M BARRETT
TAXPAVER
MILLIP J NICELN
MICTOLL D PARREIT
NAHE/ADOR
2910 CASCO PT RD
2912 CASCO MINT RD
WAYZATA MY 55391
WAYZATA IN 55391
n
N 20-1CA" 31 0051
EO-u1-O II DOSS
PROP YOUR
02915 CASCO MINT RD
o
0AMES CASCO Po11N PO
RAN
INNER IR
R C RM ! C L AA
JAIES A[NIESN DO'Jf R9
/1
tMPAYER
A
C NAIL A CAROL RAIL
JAMES X
TLVIE/A11DR
UPON U9C0 MINT ROAD
2915 CA
COIMI
2905 MINT RO
OPQO 1N 55591
TASCO
WAYZATA MI 55391
n
30 20-117-25 31 0094
M 20-117-23 31 OoSs
MOP AMR
02679 CA-0 routs FU
0-917 CASCO MINT M
MOP TIAOE
'J—I!lPOT!
N H MAXNELL JB ETAL
TAXPAYER
_c
MIRNI�N ,eAgey �iX�
WAYNE "MILL JR
HAN[/AMR
2029 CASCO POIN
291E CASCO P011lt M
WAYZATA MT 55391
WAYZATA iN 55191
n
A
MOP ARDR
MIER 11'.IIE
TAXPAYER
TOTAL PATCH 006 00012
NAME/ADO"
to
REMRT MY. PI915901
PAGE 10
SO 20-112-23 31 OV6
02900 CASCO MINT PO
0 SIrAR003 ETAL
DON3Lo SIGAI003
2900 CASCO PT RD
WAYZATA TN S5391
IB 20-112-23 31 OOMI
02925 CASCO MINT M
B P 813401, E M S BI^MIP
Bt RePPO P ! MARLENE 5 BISHOP
Y
2929 CASCO PT RD
y �.
WAYZATA MI 55391
1 1
I0 20-112-23 31 0051
r
(IM" CASCO POINT M
RICHARD C MELSTPdI ETAL
RTCHMO 6 HELSTRM
Z695 CASCO MINT RD
- 5
BRUCE 101 55391
30 20-119-23 IN 005A
02021 CA^CO MINT M
J P OR WIFE
J PATRICK ODLFE
PI .
Mil CASCO MINT M
WAYZATA IN 55591
r .Carry ..wd �',Ef�r 64Srw q.-e O V V.O 6o flier
02 a 4r f 6l?o1B7.
NEHMI-IN CORITY NOPTRfY II If PODAIIOI SISTEM
140PtR1Y CQITPS USE
PEISIPT No. P1015901
PAGE 11
I CERTIFY MAT MC FACTS PEFPFSEMED APE AN ACCOPATE AM TRUE
REPRLSf4TATION OF Ilff"UTIC4 AS 11 APPEAPS THIS DATE CM ME RECORDS
OF THE HFAIMPIN CIMITY DEPAPfMENT OF "ROFERTY TAXATION. TO ME BEST
OF MY FNpNLEDGE AIU BELIEF.
DATES
i
/i
T« a ,u,,
M.qr w IN CYIt. CMOM.n IIllsW
berm IbNTMpN./.lulyide Bar aa en11y
rrV11Y W IM lebwrq IIM uM .p[1f..1!Tf
I Iles 9NrniM ]IMS CeKOVml eeea
....prom rra rror..rra.wco-am,.I Affidavit of Publication
. a1L1aG er.e. yla.r •mm� lIy ONvwe
r•w rra r«
t ttM rarinim Oaeu• VMM Ie.O Stele OI Mlnne.sO1J. County OI Hennepin
Wu.0 2.
Nrt4r..r
° 11°T r'O1•e '"4 ''"" °sn"" Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is
`aI]orc vo-m e«. wraNe
aorr re.ar.�Ie.c..rr<r le cerlKl an authorized a0en1 and employee of the publisher
/Ns of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound Mm
ee IL[NC G WYI•an La[a
'°sRfifwT .w. NOce•.r ra ...rO • nasoi and has lull knowledge of the lads which are
IrNV. MOC. wW1[« le WMrNCI a Y
�me eron ara re.a.r m `i slated below
° Ilrx (llrMn. ail YlOOw'..
wu Naro..•.r wrv. rlx. air.
rar I. ceNNuaea wino rr o re ro A I The newspaper has compiled with all the require
ments constituting qualifications as a qualified
e In owa re T,.«crar. ItJowe
.a nn•. d+. Y.Y.•�Mi .re...s.c..rnewspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute
o cramcl. a.l.cn.a yr.p a.Nm« 331A02, 331A.07. and other applicable laws. as
1)ew
a.ue,b w rre w.
r .I1M IE ILCr F.a'.s0n 3011YI amended.
IFJr' n...M-
p•u['.r.MMc.annvMe•.WLlbl 710 f�p
s e wl.e mnN,. tree c.r..ae B.1 The pnntetl //�� ✓�//�t�t ,Utz
enr rw.Nae.r.ii wrw.rwv.. l•
ervu+•..m ra o..r..aae. aIU M.Pa+ia•aq 10«MO.a.Ge.rM V'�/K° �•ra
rm.Irr Tr mrwp u.nr � °o.m w•.. which is attached wanas cut ffoffi the columns of said
re warnrw r...tra nrar..r.rw. l
• m. t.r oni.« .r sor+.•.. arnlwav printed and published once each
weekl
W@@k 0r / n1.CC@sely@ Weeks
e1 M�.y L.iellarT
4n ..r..rp ra z.w ., .,�•��- It was first published Monday.
IIUYYrY w Tr lliw rN r vyw yry e p
14h the C day of 19 p 7
and was Iherealter tad published every
Monday, to and including Monday.
the ely of .IB
�Ir-honzed Agent
Subscribed and ,worn to me on this p
L' day of tY0
JUL
8
ICI if yLi(iL✓�1
Lam.. BY
Notary Public
dale lieft w efien
l r ri..0 r4WryO�nre p.iE or nr^^vrw u.[v. ro- <umy.r.
er .«ce f l N wzn
Ill iJl !WRia.mx•�.�. rlOr.a er l.a ra .reor11 ry.r a. M r4• zn
e r.vrh arwa.°'u !n•. rrlir S. sa pn rt
!in pOrrvW wcc.Wve +rM 93 O]Y.r uMe
CITY OF ORONO
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers
at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, July 20th, 1987, on the matter of the
following land use applications:
1. 41165 Steven Fay, 3045 Casco Point Road - seeks front yard
setback variance to construct a detached garage partially within the
defined front yard area.
2. 41166 Hartmut Ginnow-Merkert, 1840 Lakeview Terrace - seeks front
yard setback variance to construct a 2nd story deck.
3. 41167 Leonard and Mary Ann Bachkes, 2813 Casco Point Road - seek
renewal of hardcover and side setback variances to construct addition
to existing home.
4. _1.l.1.b8... Richard G. Helstrom, 2995 Casco Point Road - seeks
hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances to construct a
'second story deck and screen porch.
5. 01172 Christine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue - seeks hardcover and
lakeshore setback variances to construct a deck within the 0-75'
protected lakeshore area.
6. 41173 David and Tres& Gardella, 1230 Orono Oaks Drive - seek a
front yard setback variance to construct n detached garage within
their defined front yard area.
7. 11175 Walter and Nancy Erickson, 335 Hollander Road - seek a lot
area variance to construct a residence on an undeveloped lot.
8. #1176 Richard Putnam, 2765 Casco Point Road - seeks hardcover,
side setback variances to construct room and garage additions to
existing residence.
All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. The meeting
starts at 7:00 P.M. Written co®ents arr solicited. Plans are available
for review in the City offices, by appointment.
By: Planning Commission
v
/_
MXchael P. Ga ron
Aset Planning c Zoning Administrator
To be published the week of July 6th, 1987.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) as.
CITY OF ORONO )
I, Jamie BeRma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of i1168, was mailed to the attached list
of property owners .
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 2nd day of July, 1987.
Jame Bosma
t�' i c..w ✓'s i�91t _te
i y;1! L'4l t+✓,•yIyKL'y1M :: RSL 91Ltf. ,i t _A
-�--.-�.+E .�SC,fy.l.. _il4�f.rli�•�it�-.:.3�� :.�..! i
a f� -���.-,��.•�
t.-
.n
,.1C
•� 9
(, --_. .•�-..-.. Nit W1 ,t1f If1 �1y.,�Yf,
�p fYY tl �i ii1 160
44
t
I}.
!%•QY�1 � u. S. &Y3. ,.-..�t�.e'�$wY .id�.t`'t. ��f�""1 JdtiM' �'1i
Cl
1
G
zo
2�
Y5,3
' PPP - NE-r,4�n2 = �gx2s yX�� = zz5 i� � 2ql
7624 -2,r1
12 X / i/ s r /GS'l-'
yS.7
1
`"mowC,4vK
hbi7p., ��.6Pc"� Dcm,+N — No FEmusN/�
h hGffBl+2 o!*'orinoN ' �
2� %'I'ELS7'Q01M
in..ey70N i 2-�nD 7C:> ,LI�F'!..4V�
/Annie, -S'uGG-es7- �Cewmoue- iPfc-eZS FC, zr
rpr►o - Hsu4-rs 281 s�. Lam,
1VOC-L, -M 4�t—p - r ti -r?%cc4iF
r<-.&' L-,V-4e-rOF 57 d
,f PeC4
3� r VA-) FW CD
y, tz�es Dou7
Wfx ves C/-
f%2JC SM6*k.
ITV/S&' lCrSOLtt770fN
/ Qeyv-o/g 2 )p7 sr oNrs Dc� N� Dew
3 J I �'�7 S?wt QWtI tAN ST')N7 G-' NCKC = /T
pov S�,-
crie�v.ra Tia aT M1nna LLV Gam.
1
—occur aoea. �n iv fi
1a4 R•v Mo. R4R
• ... snrcao ye '
1
4.4 FLO '/O G4r L iMR6�
UnTEs:
R« cn.tiacrnRs L MSr�rCRi rG es
!. K, Carnfao we" To
11a�.Y Rao wood.
4.fnorwaa+o as ie'A o•�«an nan
. S� o(. co.+c• iva ap.Farwraa-Y
5 Awpr�Ori coy♦ 4j�t D� ��a 2'd�•. Gp
/. ralJa/M♦ <LT TO coraG nL�
RNrv► �1-I4I; 'i0a7G �GaL.
DECK PLAN (�
t•wr�_Mu�sa ti Naw q�,
. / a4 Gs+c
I
NORTH ELEVATION
- iRIf�IM6 N�Vf�
■rrr■santnaarraw■Is■n■.■ rm ■ara■aaa ■ ■a ow an r■■"
- 1.0
WEST ELEVATION
r
a
u
s
V
i
��s¢N
20''I
P
aIK iI
^vw, I
i
Y,
�� TTME.Y
L NRGN OP
�iDUTHEASTERLY
9O FCCT OF LOT
Ito
I
s
'
I 2i.2
u
�
o
itdi
I
r e
a
k
.*
XcLtg!P.1 0"vA
P
CVACA p) m`
0
O l00
PtCJL
I.
•
(` ,�,.♦
T .% 0
I`w (�
49,)W •,ff.
f kloposED
I
AN4 beck
®R�v�=
cl
Decv.ONAY
Qlvw-�
d=�
00
I
�qps
no
' 4
1 J��
P -- qO.
os
LY
. F C
, Z .THC 4S� •,L
per' C,; _O 110
• SAll—
� � ,STR gt1N RE
0 A#40
Y
IIN N��eocovNc
26
1
lu
dt � p •
l �` � � E L.STROAt�
•
RAROCWEII CALCULATI011 WORKSlUM
Co" & I S �A f G (I-' 'F Sn . ->"isfl
g y qvP: r C.oNr'
Mat••rk i{{•I (circle {A{I 0.73' TS••GTp• 710-500• 500-1000• Existing hNew•r t . DU trt•ttr ■{umm • top
Ewetr wa.�. V ea j
Lea Area ■•this hA•
•. E•.r ■ 1+123
..c, , 1pp
�z 1 ..r.
clock
157SOG"
2j1. S ■ 20. S . 1.0s E.g.
J�SL�
Awftt•Ml hrAtet•r to beAA •=A to Mae,9
^
It., ■ �� . S "Ln •.t.
Itop Iop0Ae
rtl : 1h
I JAI
a. Driveway L
-. .� . C� a. I.
TOOL A.F. TO SE AOAtO L 5' (tl
A. St•oML /- a ■, f,
Galati" "I Arowr to M b.otN, It ■y,
■ 2 r . �Yo_ {.f.
stop fop{th ■ NlAa TOTAL S.E.
0. kale �� _ '`n
+!fir . 3 I l7 30
Q
,\` ..•{•
r l oprtt•t■ ■ e ■.r.
TOTAL S.F. TO is AOlprtp 171
,�'r
by pattc
••••tty _� ■ ...�� - (: n G.C.
nMl Mr•tewr ho•e••1+
'x
�� t.t.
iLtM ill . LIM tal •LIM Itll
' r. Oise ■ •.f.
7.In • (.S
.w
3 O
Yy m
l•tlbo AdW T• M A•A■vN Final
r' ^ • e ••t•
Z ■ � •.f.
h•pe•M Nor•■•wr I .
- Maccereaer
TOTAL EXISTING MEEaorom IN am . �7-7 {.f. (I)
•� •� jJ
Lim (4) a too . I��f� •-f' . 100
��YY T
LIM (1) �; 'LSD■•f•
�V
ExISTG .I_ New Ay?ipz7 J
I:M"o IT C6Cwft
RDOr TO MMTc 04 4(I ST'4
2,25 Fir WOOD r^%CA^
Er,�GTG L.IOY>« lzjC1wG TO MATcw EXISTG—�
-_ FI-A rle LiNe
-- Cam■ 12' wooO
rG wv C el's
rlm fta. LINE.
I
ID"cp LL.6P rlaR¢•Go"c rluzo 4
NC. GL ,-% QDOiL
Taro WAIL c�F
nrq srl¢T -7
*ooII L
�i>
2wC FGG
r..w, &
op Is
ffF
im
Gx�2 fawc
E.XlGT G CIE%
i x 4 6i°4f`T
MATGM
�x�sT'd Wow
�w -
R+oc�s
r `
u a 7 t rlw ovc wv%
a I tiN1S14 I4TEW09— or WALK
1� WIT" 1a4 Rv -4o+ON ,W Cw+W V
REv WOOG•,+na��jogTq(. -: •'� x
r
S�IoqHt Gut% paMi
a.c cols,.
2-4t4 REvwool
*xb Rev ICAT
117.np. SuhA_ 1. Varimnrpae TaanAnCea. EXIT e J
A, in considering applications for variance, the
Council shall consider the advice and recommendation of the Board
and the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and
welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding
area. Before granting a variance, the Council shall hear requests
for variances from the literal provisions of this Chapter in
instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship
because of circumstances unique to the individual property under
consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is
demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit
and intent cf this Chapter. "Undue hardship' as used in connection
with the granting of a variance means:
1. The property in question cannot be put to a
reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official
controls. _
2. The plight of the landowner is due to
circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner.
3. The variance, if granted, will not alter
the essential character of the locality.
1. Economic considerations alone shall not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property
exists under the terms of this Chapter.
5. Undue hardship also includes, but is not
limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy
systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06,
Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter.
6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the
Council :.ay not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted
under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected
person's land is located.
7. The Board or Council may permit as a
variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family
dwelling.
section 6. Ordinance Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) is hereby
amended by adding the following:
(81 The special conditions applying to the structure or
land in question are peculiar to such property or
i news diately adjoining property.
(9) The conditions do not apply generally to other land or
structures in the distict in which said land is located.
(10) The granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
of the applicant.
(11) The granting of the proposed variance will not in any
way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other
respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.
(12) The granting of such variance will not merely serve as
a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to
alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
' - F
-� -rd P � �•�
i
V•
o�o
NORTNwHsTGRIY �
�� rt a or TN!
V qO FeeT CW LOT
1 . 90 fGGT OF LOT
�' Z u I
S� I
B �' 21 T
z �
Via. �� `
o
(VACATeP)
f
�M�WN;ON op
P /
ao.o ----
I
o�
�
�y
r
--NORTNWp+sTERL'T
j
..D LINC OP TNC
qo T— pp LOT 110
-
1-
5°
I
r
I
N
�
Q.
Q
2c.2
t4
is
N
Apt
--T
� �e
� F
4 JV�
�y
4 •TNE mo 6.�.
�aa. as � KI �• a Il0
' 1 � STRNMNRE
i
0 IL'NO
M.K
4 0 fy 1
' 2.. Sw.vO 5I -
0
----I— of 1 " �i1 A0.5E18
It
pitl4 w4zlWd AP e;1
oz ic�w.lb Si ii ;R.i 1
-rpm w. M� D
__ COdtA� S 1 Q f
fQV 1 8
I i I • s�yt
ti
a� s
July 7, 1987
Mr. Gaffron,
I reside at 2915 Casco Point Road. This is the second lot
from Richard G. Helstrom, 2695 Cass Point Road. #1168 on the
July 20th hearings.
It states he is seeking hard cover for the addition. I do
not understand this because there already is hard cover there
in the form of a patio.
I have seen the plans for the addition, and I feel this is very
good for the improvement of the neighborhood.
Mr. Helstrom is a structural engineer and everything that he
does is first class.
have no complaints to the addition of his home.
Richard C. Kai)
.-_ M -OW I�InnII��'III
Ulm
Juty 9, 1987
City O6 Oeano
1335 South Bnavn: Road
Otono, MN 55331
Attn: MA. Michaet P. Gab64on
A66"tant Ptann.ing 6 Zoning Admina tnaton
RE: Land Ube Apptica.tion 01168
Dean M. Ga661on:
We have necentty puncha6ed the pnopetty imnediatety adjacent to 7895 Calico
Point Road on the w"t and notth (e.g. 2979 Calico Point Road).
We have reviewed Dick and Vicki Hetbttom'a plans bon a three aeaaon porch
and deck addition and have no objection6 to the ptopoaed con6tnaction.
Sincetety,
Lattyand Kathy Men
710 King aview Lane
Plymouth, MN 55441
Home: 473-0064
Woah: 522-6683
New House Phone: 471-0684
rj1L__U
n°July 14, 1987 L20W
Michael P. Gaffron
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
Box 66
Chrystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Sir:
I am writing this letter about the planning commission meeting on
Monday, July 20, 1987, and the Item M1168, Richard G. Helstrom,
2895 Casco Point Road.
I am concerned about the variance for the Helstrom item because
my property is set back from both my neighbors on the east and the
west. If the current set -back ordinance is not strictly held to
I am going to find my home even more set back than it is now.
It is my understanding that the set -back requirements are in place
SO that houses like mine are not cut-off from their views of the
lake and lake breeze:;. I'm sure that all lake shore owners would
like to improve their homes with better views of the lake, but if
the zoning requirements are not held to, therproperty owners that
do put on additions will continue to expand their homes towards the
lake. I would appreciate it if the Zoning Commission would consider
my property placement in view of the other neighboring properties and
would hold to a strict inforcement of the current zoning requirements
so that I am not deprived of my relative position to the lake shore.
I hope to be at the July 20th meeting, however, if I am not, I would
appreciate this letter being put into the record at that time.
l necroly,
e�
Jl K. Bowers
2905 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
WS:RT1
Tot Mayor Grabsk /
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
Front Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning c Zoning Administrator
Dates July 16, 1987
B@bjects t1168 Richard G. Helstrom, 2895 Casco Point Road -
- Variance - Public Hearing
Eoninq District - LR-lC
Application - Variance for hardcover and average lakeshore setback to
construct a 2nd-story three -season porch and deck.
List of Exhibit@
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plot Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Neighbor Acknowledgement and/or Non -objections
Exhibit E - Survey
Exhibit P - Staff Sketch On Survey, Showing Hardcover and Average
Setback
Exhibit G - Hardcover Calculation By Staff
Exhibit H - Elevations - Side, Lake(Front)
Exhibit I - Plan View
Exhibit J - Section 10.08 Subdivision 3
I( -((cc v l) -7 2c,-Oct) Lc'r T-v-,— ivevwa.� l�x�•-..r+rf
Pertinent Mantes
Existing Allowed Proposed Variance
- Hardcover
0'-75' 9.61 0% (No Change)
75'-250' 45.3% 25% 45.71 20.5%
250'-500' 26.7% 30% (No Change)
- Average Lakeshore 0' 0' 25' 25'
Setback Encroachment
- Lake Setback 135' 75' 110, None
Diecassiont
This is a request to construct a second story three -season porch and
deck where only a ground -level loose concrete block patio now exists. The
three -season porch is approximatly 16' x 20' surrounded on two sides by a
9' deck.
This addition covers about 820 s.f. in area, of which about 775 s.f.
is currently considered non-structural hardcover.
The City Council in recent years has made it clear that when allowed
hardcover percentages are already exceeded, replacing non-structural
hardcover with new structural hardcover requires a variance approval. Note
that a 26' x 20' garage addition entirely over existing driveway was
permitted in 1984 before that policy was in effect.
Zoning Pile i1168
July 16, 1987
Page 2 of 2
There is currently no average lakeshore setback encroachment. The
proposed porch and deck will comprise a 25' average setback encroachment.
This has a potential view encroachment effect from both neighboring
properties. The Risen's at 2879 have stated no objections, and staff notes
their lake views across applicant's lot are already limited by the hill
along applicants southeast lot line. Bowers' views from 2905 might be
slightly encroached by the three -season enclosure (about 9' lost) but not
by the deck since Bowers' lot is much higher.
A significant portion of the existing 0-75' and 75-250' hardcover is
taken up by plastic -lined rock beds and the extensive driveway. the
plastic under rock beds along the southeast slope may be helping to control
erosion - applicant should address this. Although there is only a small
net increase in hardcover, Planning Commission may wish to explore ways to
decrease overall hardcover on this property.
sardshIps
Staff notes that City files indicate there was originally an 8' x 22'
deck along the lake side of this house. That deck was removed at some time
prior to this review, leaving a 2nd-story glass door with no place to walk
out to. This might be considered a hardship and a safety concern as well.
Does Planning Commission find a hardship or justification to grant a
variance to allow the proposed 820 s.f. of additional structure hardcover
on the property? What hardship or justification exists to grant the
variance to average lakeshore setback?
staff MoommsadatSoa
Staff would recommend approval of hardcover and average setback
variances for construction of the proposed additions only if the applicant
can demonstrate to the Planning Commission adequate hardship and
justification for the proposal in accordance with the provisions of Section
10.08 Subdivision VA) attached.
FSMINUTES
ACERES
OF TER PLANNING COMMISSION MRRTING RELD JULY 20, 1987
CONTINUED L V, D
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
11188 RICKARD G.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to
recommend renewal of the variances per staff
recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, N•ys 0. (Taylor not
present to vote.)
2895 CASCO POINT RORD
VARIANCUS
PUBLIC REARING 801-8t51
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Chairman Kelley read into the record a letter received
this day from J.R. Bowers, 2905 Casco Point Road, asking
the Planning Commission to consider his property
in relation to the average lakeshore setback proposed by
applicant, so that he is not deprived of lake views and
lake breeze.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request for hardcover and average lakeshore setback
variances to construct a 2nd story three -season porch
and deck as followst
-Hardcover 75-250' - Existing - 45.30
- Proposed - 45.7%
-Average Lakeshore Setback Encroachment
- Existing - 0'
- Proposed - 25'
Applicant proposes to construct a 2nd story three -season
porch and deck where only a ground -level loose concrete
block patio now exists. The three -season porch is
approximately 16'x 20' surrounded on two sides by a 9'
deck.
Bellows felt that, based on the drawings submitted, it
should be considered an 'addition' to the house, not an
average opaque porch structure.
Richard Helstrom was present for this matter and stated
he did not feel the addition would obstruct Mr. Bowers'
view, and there would be a minimal view obstruction, if
any, from Elson's (2679 Casco Point Rd.) yard. He noted
that the addition world be 110' from the lakeshore.
Dick Kail, 2915 Casco)POint Rd., stated applicant's
house is downhill from his, therefore, the addition
would not obstruct his view.
NINOTRS OF TEE PLIMIIINO COMMISSION MMBTING NNW JOLT 20, 1907
s 007.B171O11 C0flINI7®
There were no other comments from the public and the
public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission unanimously felt the addition was
too much of an intrusion into the average lakeshore.
They felt the addition should extend no further than the
existing patio. Planning Commission did not find
Hardcover an issue.
Planning Commission member Hanson's written comments as
follows:
'I see no hardship, and am concerned with the view
encroachment on neighboring properties. No; do a
redesign.'
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
table this application pending a revised reduced plan.
Notion, Ayes 5, Nay■ 0.
91172 CERISTINE SOCK
2020 CRERMT AVENGE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC SNARING
This matter was held over until the end of the meeting
(10:06) for applicant to be present.
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Cohen, to table this
application until applicant can be present. Notion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
'7I DAVID AND TRRSA GANDELI
1210 OOM OARB DRIVR
VARIANCE
PUBLIC SEAMING 900-9112
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Naillnq
was noted.
Zoning Aide Knott explained the request for a front yard
setback variance to construct a detached garage 00 fast
in front of the front line of the principal structure.
Staff noted the following hardships - steep topography
to north and east, location of well on east, and
inadequate area to place garage on west. No major
grading would be required in proposed location, and the
garage will be naturally screened from neighboring
properties by existing heavy vegetation.
Planning Commission member Hanson's written comment
concurs with staff recommendation.
9
(0 fO 4 D�b
�• PC
,Ape s
s..y P4- w41/ / 675- Casco
Lt,rof C1v+/BITS
/
/S /N
d6 ptq
17
omA
P°`° eeLa a
�a[�A wl�v /N'NO /ham /.55c e-,Ate— ��/F�-"Jcavat,
WN /LP ?TFC �JWPOfF'P � r�'tt� DS C_LGf� TD
i1►Y G.1R� rua,-i rNE flXzz' l�e�K�/4�/ti,auY wsi o.�
TW/S 5/sE� ECIr/tiM70�1 OF TME* SClLtry fbrt•.E wot[ tj
Ems• $
CITY CITY of ORONO
Pop Mfio Boa af•C".W B.'. Min 6aLJ• WniripJ Omer.
OF
• • • • On the North Shoe of Lase Minnetonka
September 21, 1987
Richard G. Helstrom
2895 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MR 55391
Ret Proposed Deck Construction
Dear Mr. Helstrom:
we are in receipt, as of September 17, 1987, of a revised deck
proposal submitted by your contractor, Mike Schmieg. This proposed deck
extends past the average lakeshore setback line by a distance of
approximately 12 feet and therefore requires a variance.
In addition, portions of this deck adjacent to the house will be over
areas not currently hardcovered, hence a variance would be needed for
increases in hardcover over the existing percentage. I would also note
that, although you might propose to remove items of existing hardcover so
there is no net increase, staff has not bee- granted the authority to
approve such trsdeoffs; this requires City Counc�i approval.
I would further note that the Planning Commission may have given you
the impression that you could replace your previously existing 8'x22' deck
without a variance. In fact, replacement of any portion of that deck that
encroaches past the average setback line would also require a variance.
i will be pleased to present your current plan to the Planning
Commission at their October 19, 1987 meeting if you wish. Any addition
information you way wish to submit in support of your request must be in
this office by October 5, 1987.
Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have further questions.
Hln�a�mre�lJy� ///%L
is<iY.�j/ /
Michael P. Gaffron,
Asat Planning a Zoning Administrator
MPG/tln
cc: Mike schmieg
et9lD1Y6 A ZONING -eINMI a AOYatwtaA7WN a PeIANQ_ e71-7169 a PORn'nelaS -473136g
a ESMN4
Ilvl (47
2�os Ce9eo P{ . �1
wMe37L r�u. sSsq 1
3 .
sj -. .�(s-
WA'/
K
1010087
i
�G
.,* ,ed
Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
Front Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s Zoning Administrator
Date: October 14, 1987
Subjects #1168 Richard G. Helstrom, 2895 Casco Point Road -
Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing
Application - Revised deck proposal.
List of Rathibits
Exhibit A - Revised Plan
Exhibit B - Staff Letter to Applicant Dated 9/21/87
Exhibit C - Letter From Neighbor Bowers Dated 9/29/87
Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/20/87
Exhibit E - Staff Sketch
Exhibit F - Memo i Exhibits of 7/1�/87
Pertinent Facts -
The applicant has reduced the extent of his proposal to exclude the 3
season porch and to lessen the encroachment of the proposed deck into the
average lakeshore setback area. Please review the staff sketch (Exhibit E)
which shown the applicant's original proposal and shows the current
proposal. Encroachment past the average lakeshore setback line for the
revised proposal is 12 feet, or 13 feet less than previously proposed.
Note also that the proposed deck, while it is at second story level at the
walkout side of the house, is at generally a ground level in relation to
the Bowers' residence, whose views would have been most affected by a
structure extending above that level. Note also that neighbor Bowers has
written a letter of non -objection to the revised deck proposal.
Hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone under the original proposal was
7,192 s.f. or 45.7% with the revised proposal 75-250' hardcover will be
7.368 s.f. or 46.81. This oresumes that the patios originally on the lake
side of the house will not be removed. Hardcover in the 250-500' zone does
not exceed the 30% limitation. Note that applicant was advised to relocate
a play structure located on the lake side of the house into the street yard
in order that that structure not contribute to an excess of hardcover i:.
the 75-250' zone. Staff notes that the 14'xl2' block patio could be
removed to decrease hardcover by 168 s.f and get back to the 45.7% of the
original proposal (see Exhibit F of 7/16/87 memo).
Planning Commission is asked to refer to their minutes of July 20th,
1987 meeting. Planning Commission felt that hardcover was not an issue but
that the intrusion into the average setback was.
Staff Recommendation -
The revised proposal provides a deck space more in keeping with the
Planning Commission's desire to minimize encroachment into the average
lakeshore setback zone and minimize view encroachment, yet allow applicant
to replace his originally existing deck with a similar non -obtrusive deck.
Staff would recommend approval of an average lakeshore setback variance and
hardcover variance to allow the revised deck as proposed subject to removal
of 168 s.f. of extraneous patio hardcover In order to meet the 45.71
hardcover originally proposed.
�4PR s.'ctist iv �..//ri of (45 3� f'P."u
perre , �, - C-J
MINUTES OF TUN PLANNING CONMISSIOR MEETING HELD OCTOBER 19, 1987
P964 SANCKUR CONTINUED
proposed barn location and if 75' setback is required,
the barn would also have to placed more south and
further from the house.
Mr. i Mrs. Mike Plank, 4145 Watertown Road, adjacent
property owners were present for this matter. Mrs.
Plank felt that applicant had plenty of property to
maintain the required 75' setback. Mike Plank noted
concern with drainage from the barn and corral run-off
onto his property.
It was noted that an existing drainage problem currently
exists from Watertown Road that the City is aware of.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron suggested a
vegetation barrrier to protect the Plank property,
however could not make an actual recommendation on the
drainage at this time.
Joe Sawchuk stated that he is working on re-routing the
drainage.
There were no other comments and the public hearing was
closed.
Planning Commission felt the 75' side setback should be
maintained and that existing drainageways be defined and
kept open to accommodate drainage. In addition, if was
recommended that Sawchuk and Plank talk to th City
Council regarding the Watertown Road drainage pro..iem.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to
recommend denial of the request for a side setback
variance. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
01168 RICKARD G.
2995 CASCO POINT ROAD
VARIANCES
CONTINUATION OF POBLIC NEARING 8:03-8:05
Mrs. Nelstrom was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
revised proposal which provides a deck space more in
keeping with the Planning Commission's desire to
minimize encroachment into the average lakeshore setback
and minimize view encroachment, yet allow applicant to
replace the originally existing deck with a similar non -
Obtrusive deck. The revised deck plan will encoroach
the average lakeshore setback by 12' as opposed to the
original plan fcr a 25' encroachment. Staff recommends
approval of the revised plan subject to remov:' of 168
s.f. of patio hardcover in order to meet the 4i.7% 75-
250' hardcover originally ,iroposed.
5
MINUTES OF TRs PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING eaLD OCTOBER 19, 1987
11168 REuSTRON CONTINUED
There were no comments from the public regarPing this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
Brown felt that approval of the application would not be
consistent with average setback standards.
Mrs. Helrtrom noted that an B' wide rotted deck
previously existed and was removed last year. The
proposal consists of an additional 6' encroachment in
average lakeshore setback than what previously existed.
Johnson felt that the revised plan was an improvement
from the the original plan and recommended approval.
Cohen agreed with Johnson.
It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend
approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays
0.
81169 MEAN PARTNERSHIP ENTWRISES
OLD CRTSTAL BAT RD" AND WATERT'OMN FORD
CLASS III SUBDIVISION
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
82CIM REVIEW
Bill wear was present for this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the revised 6 lot
subdivision.
It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Brown, to recommend
approval of the preliminary subdivision per staff
recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Hays 0.
Bellows voiced concern with a subdivision requiring all
mound systems.
#1199 RICEARD 6 GAT R85,LY
625 OXFORD ROAD
VARIANCE
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC REARING 8:19-8:25
Richard c Gay Kelly were present for this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the request for a
setback variance to construct a new residence 65' in
front of the average lakeshore setback line. Letters
from the two adjacent affected property owners have
been recieved: Arthur Burton, 405 Oxford Road request
that the proposed residence be placed 15 feet closer to
Oxford Road to eliminate encroachment of privacy and
view; Melvin a 011ie Peterson, 475 Oxford Road are
opposed to the proposal.
6
7bt Mayor Grabek i Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
Prop; Michael P. Gaffron, A98t Planning i Zoning Administrator
Date: October 21, 1987
Subjects 11168 Richard G. Helstrom, 2895 Casco Point Road -
Variance - Resolution
Application - Variances to hardcover and average lakeehore setback to
construct a 2nd story deck onto lake side of residence.
Pertinent facts -
1) Increase 75-250' hardcover from 45.31 to 45.71;
2) Increase average setback encroachment from 4' pre-existing to 12'
proposed.
List of RRhibits
Exhibit A - Planning Commission Action Notice of 10/21/87 1 Ak'r"F nF
Exhibit B - Proposed Resolution C6�1�IL T•A-"'L'
Exhibit C - Memo and Exhibits of 10/14/87 /e
Discussion -
The applicant removed his originally existing 81x22' (176 s.f.) deck
about a year ago because it was decaying. He proposed to replace it with a
screen porch and deck of about 820 s.f., both extending from the upper
floor of the residence.
At the Planning Commission meeting of 7/20/87, the Planning Commission
generally felt that the increase in hardcover from 45.31 up to 45.71 in the
75-250' zone was not a concern, but Planning Commission did table the
application pending a redesign to decrease what Planning Commission felt
was an excessive average setback encroachment of 25'.
Applicant returned to Planning Commission with a revised plan on
October 19. The revised proposal omits the screen porch and reshapes the
deck to place it closer to the house, with an average lakeehore setback
encroachment of only 12'.
Neighbor Jim Bowers, who had opposed the original plan based on it
reducing his lake views and creating a "tunnel" effect for his property,
has submitted a letter of non -objection to the revised plan. Bowers'
residence site higher than the Heletrom house, and Bowers notes, as your
site inspection will confirm, that his view will not be obstructed by the
deck as revised. The neighbor to the west, Elsen, has submitted a letter
of support for the original proposal and would not object to the revisions.
At their October 19th meeting, Planning Commission recommended 6-0 to
approve the proposed deck as revised, subject to removal of a 141x12' (168
s.f.) block patio in the lakeshore yard, resulting in a net increase of
0.4% hardcover in the 75-250' zone, or a net increase from 45.3% to 45.7%.
Staff Recommendation -
A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is
attached for Council review.
ZONING FILE NO. 1160
CITT Or OFAM NOTICE Of PLANNING CONNISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notices 10/21/87
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Richard G. Relstrom COPIES To:
2895 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
Or APPLICATIONz XX Variance
___________________________________________________________
DATN Or NEXTINOz 10/19/87 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against
Planning Commission recos•ands the followingz
XX Approval as revised, subject to removal of 168 s.f. (12'xl4') patio
area.
I-_Jai--:item=ilff:1i-4fY -�.— -IiiT:7:f'.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council October 26, 1987; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission
minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and
approval by the Planning Commission.
I
MINUTES OF TEE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MRETING EELD OCTOBER 26, 1907
116E RICBAAD G. BILSTROM
ANCE
POUR ROAD
V
RESOLUTION
Richard Helstrom was not present for this matter.
Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained the
request for hardcover and average lakeshore setback
variances to construct a 2nd story deck and screen porch
onto the lake side of the residence. The proposed deck
i porch replaces a smaller dilapidated deck that was
removed last year. He noted that the proposal was
revised per Planning Commission direction to minimize
the average lakeshore encroachment. Planning Commission
recommended approval of the revised proposal subject to
removal of a 14'x 12' block patio in the lakeshore yard.
Councilmember Sime are ed he was in attendance at the
Planning Commission review and noted that the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended approval and the
affected neighbor, Jim Bowers of 2905 Casco Point Road,
rescinded his objection to the original proposal and is
in favor of the revised prolisal. Therefore, made r
motion to approve the revised proposal per Planning
Commission recommendation.
Motion seconded by Councilmember Peterson.
Councilmember Goetten requested clarification regarding
the specific patio area proposed to be removed.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that
patio proposed to be removed is a 12'x 14' area, and the
a wooden structure play area recently added by the
applicant in that area was to have been moved to the
250-500' zone near the road. He noted that the patio
under the proposed deck porch addition is not planned to
be removed.
Councilmember Goetten felt that the patio area under the
deck/porch that extends beyond the deck/porch could
also be removed to decrease the hardcover from 45.7%.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that if the
additional patio area was removed as Councilmember
Goetten suggests, it would decrease the hardcover by
approximately 2%, to around 43-44%.
Councilmember Callahan did not feel that removal of the
patio area without the wooden play area structure
constituted an entire removal of hardcover.
.O MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBEIR 26, 1907
01168 NELSTROM CONTINUED
Because Council voiced concerns with the proposal,
Councilmembers Sime and Peterson withdrew their previous
motion.
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to postpone this matter until the
end of the meeting for applicant or representative to be
present.
Deferring this matter until the end of the meeting
(9:34) and no presence of the applicant or
representative, it was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded
by Councilmember Goetten, to table this matter until
applicant/representative can be present and direct staff
to review the play yard area. Motion, Ayes 5, Rays 0.
91177 TODD WATERS
3061 CAECO POINT ROAD
APTER-TEE-PACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AND VARIANCE
Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained the
request for an after -the -fact conditional use permit and
variance for unapproved land alteration within the 0-75'
setback area involving the excavations for a partial
lakeside walkout, major alteration of lakeshore yard up
to within 5-10' of lakeshore and major alteration of
both the 0-75' lakeshore protected area and 75-250'
setback area in excess of 100 cubic yards involving
changes in drainage for a 5+ acre watershed that would
not be covered under customary/usual grading allowed
under building oermit. Planning Commission recommended
denial and complete restoration to the original
elevations, with the drainage being treated as before
with an underground tile.
Todd waters and Dori Molitor -waters were present for
this matter. Todd waters introduced their Attorney,
David Davenport, and Engineer Consultant, Greg
Kopischke. Todd waters reviewed the background of the
project, their plans and intention noting that it was
never their intention to do something not allowed and
they tried to follow the City codes and procedures,
while trying to solve a drainage problem.
Attorney David Davenport explained at great length the
following three alternatives including the advantages
and disadvantages of each:
I - Deny CUP and require total restoration of
original site grade with elimination of walkout
noting that this could cost the applicant
approximately $63,000 for restoration and decrease
in home value because of loss of walkout.
APPLICATION 80. 1168
CITr or OROND NOTICN OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 10/27/67
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Richard G. Helstrom COPING:
2895 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
TTPN OF APPLICATION: XX Variance
------------------------------------------------------------
DATN OF MENTING: 10/26/87 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against
COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION:
Council voted to table application since applicant was not present to
answer questions related to the following concerns:
1. Existing (new) play structure constructed in location of 12'xl4'
block patio. Planning Commission recommended that this patio be
removed. Per our discussion in mid -August, you had intended to move
that play structure to the area near the street in the 250-500'
setback zone. The structure contains decking and is considered
hardcover.
2. One Councilmember felt that additional existing patio hardcover
(outside the proposed deck area) should be removed.
This item will be rescheduled for the Council meeting o ovember 9,
1987. You or your representative should attend this meeting order to
address Council-s concerns.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council mi tea, they
are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after feview and
approval by the City Council. /
LAO,
�-U
4� S lsjf[t5S pA+70 NoT
y NDfIC a)e+ 0*t-K
If eewoueo ( NC.
je~CA- ,a y3.9 '/
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
INO. 2290
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 i 2
PILE 11168
WHEREAS, Richard G. Helstrom (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 2895 Casco Point Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
The Southeasterly 90.0 feet of Lot 110, SPRING PARK, except the
Southeasterly 20.0 feet thereof.
Also the Southeast 20.0 feet of Lot 110, and Lot 99 and the
Southeasterly half of Lot 100, including all land lying between the
Northeast line of Lake Shore Avenue and Lake Minnetonka and bounded on
the Southeast by the Southeast line of said Lot 99, extended to Lake
Minnetonka and bounded on the Northwest by the Northwesterly line of
said Southeasterly half of Lot 100 extended to Lake Minnetonka and
including the vacated portion of Lake Shore Avenue lying adjacent to
said premises, all in SPRING PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter *the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision. 1 6 2 to permit the
construction of a second story deck which encroaches 12' into the average
lakeshore setback zone where no encroachment is normally allowed, and which
results in an increase in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone
from 45.3% existing to 45.7% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by t:ic City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 51168.
2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July
20 and October 19, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed
variance based upon the following findings:
A) The proposed deck encroachment of 12' into the average
lakeshore setback will have no significant impact on neighbors'
views of the lake due to the topography of the site in relation
to the elevations c: those neighboring properties.
Page 1 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2290
B) The increase in 75-250' hardcover on the property can be
minimized to an increase of 4/10 of 1 percent (0.4i) by removal
of a 168 s.f. block patio on the lake side of the house.
4. The hardcover can be further reduced by removal of 277 s.f. of
patio blocks adjacent to the proposed deck.
5. The wood play structure located near the 168 s.f. patio will not
encroach on any lake views enjoyed by neighbors.
6. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono
City Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.22, Subdivision 1 6 2 to permit the construction of a second story deck
which encroaches 12' into the average iakeshore setback zone where no
encroachment is normally allowed, and which results in a net decrease in
hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 45.3% existing to
44.6% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Applicant shall remove 168 s.f. of hardcover contained within the
block patio located at the southerly corner of the house (see Exhibit
A attached). Applicant shall also remove 277 s.fi of patio blocks
adjacent to and not under the proposed deck. The 110 s.f. play
structure is allowed to remain. Final hardcover on the property is
allowed as follows and per the hardcover worksheet attached as Exhibit
B:
0-75' Zone = 91
75-250' Zone = 44.6%
250-500' Zone = 30%
Paqe 2 of 4
1987
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2290
2. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not
with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exe_cised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (October
26, 1988).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicant have read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of November,
Jame`s R. /GrSbeW-, Mayor
�-
Page 3 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2290
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) as.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I
On this 94 day cf ♦'hL -*— , 19e/
before me s ,j�lota—,�l, ry Public within an r said county, personally
appeared %<,'. OJ Y.r_, �i '�- c_k 144'
known to me to be the person(s) clescribed in and who executed the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed
the same as his (their) free act and deed.
0 �rwrota
M �ry�
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
NOTA Y PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
Cn this day of , 198 before me
a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared
known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION FXPIRE;
Page 4 of 4
p
/
O b
�'n -
Ex#. A
a
2290
,
5 �
100
qo.
I
r' CF
� I
� �`����
•TNE ASI
FEET C� _
IIO
r
I
I
Q
p ccow.O
Ild �
I
b
N
M••!
i� ` i
u rT
,�. �
s I
` Out ♦�z
oslws'su'Y,�
�-
���•��
�.�Cd1Ita�DS �
�•�..� it
°O
e°
EXHIBIT B
RESOLUTION NO. 2290
HARDCOVER REVIEM
41168 Richard Helatron, 2895 Casco Point Road
0-75': 600 s.f. landscape bed w/plastic (pre-existing)
48 s.f. wood platform (pre-existing)
648 s.f.
Area of 0-75' zone = 6750 s.f. 648/6750 = 9.6% Allowed
75-250': 2548 s.f. house and attached garage
2520 s.f. driveway
160 s.f. concrete entry sidewalk
75 s.f. rock wall
876 s.f. landscape beds w/plastic
30 s.f. rock steps
706 s.f. deck (new)
110 s.f. play structure
7025 s.f.
Area of 75-250' zone - 15,750 s f. 7025/15,750 = 44.6f.Allowed
250-500': Area = 9450 s.f.
Existing Driveway - 2525 s.f. = 26.7%
Allowed Hardcover = 2835 s.f. = 30%
Net Available - 310 s.f.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF OEONO
I Dorothy M. Wallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the
foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono
with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the
proceedings of said -City Council at a meeting of said City Council held
on November 9 , 19 87 , and that the same is a true
and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City
Council at said meeting.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
30th day of December , 19 87
Do othy W. •llin, 'City Clerk
(SEAL)
MINUTES OP THE REGU7AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVBMBER 9, 1987
1984 JOB SAMCHOR•
4105 WATERTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE
DENIAL RESOLUTION 02289
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution 42289
denying Joe Sawchuk'r application for side setback
variances for construction of a horse barn at 4105
1 Watertown Road. Motion, Ayes 5, Rays 0.
r6116I RICBARD G. NXLSTROM
1695 CASCO POINT ROAD
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION #2290
Richard Helstrom was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the revised
proposal per Planning Commission direction to construct
a deck encroaching 12' into the average lakeshore
setback and increasing 75-250' hardcover from 45.3% to
45.7%. The proposed deck replaces a smaller dilapidated
deck that was removed last year. Council tabled this
application at their last meeting since the applicant
was not present to answer questions relating to the play
structure constructed and the possible removal of
additional patio hardcover extending outside the
proposed deck area.
Mr. Helstrom stated he would rather not move the play
structure to the rear yard area for childrens safety
reasons. He stated he is willing to remove the patio
block area under the play structure and some patio area
adjacent to the proposed deck extending outside the
deck.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Sime, to adopt Resolution 02290 approving the variances
amending it allow the play structure to remain and
subject to removal of the 12'x 14' block patio area and
removal of patio area adjacent to the deck extending
outside of deck. Motion, Ayes 5, Rays 0.
11169 NEAR PARTNERSHIP EIT23"ISRS
WATEtTOWN ROAD
PRRLIMINART SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION 12291
William Wear was not present for this matter.
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Counci lmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution 02291
granting preliminary approval of a subdivision of Lots 2
and 3, Peterman Addition of Wear Enterprises
Partnership. Motion, Ayes 5, Rays 0.
ZONING FILE NO. 1168
CITY or ORONU NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/16/87
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Richard G. Helstrom COPIES TO:
2895 Casco kolnt Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance
-----------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETINGS 11/9/87 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against
COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION:
To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution
previously mailed to you, with the following revisions:
1. Play structure may remain in its existing location.
2. Must remove 168 s.f. patio blocks under and adjacent to play
structure.
3. Must remove 277 s.f. patio blocks which will not be under new
deck.
The resolution attached has been revised to reflect these conditions.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City
offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an
interest in the property must sign the resolutions.
Variance Approval is limited to the extent shcxn on approved pan and
as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject
to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after
date of aprrcval. Permit application must be submitted no later than
November 9, 1988.
You must apply for and obtain a building permit prior to commencement
of construction. (The building permit application is a separate
application from the zoning variance or conditional use application.)
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they
are avail%,ble from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and
approval t,y the City Council.
POPHAM, HAIK,SCHNOmRICH 6 KAUPM ..LTD
]]00 RIVER Lrr AT TOWER
MINN[MOLIS. MINNESOTA 6610E
ww•NL..AR....
+... .. I.......+r
.uo.ox[
i[.... c.. copiu[p
TNo«p w. Nu.
woo
III... .. ...
.�.-aa wwe
ANOAII:o.a.
�.,AN
vim..
�a .. « oYN
Lw w..c«xotw¢«
ewv e A. .on..
N .Nsa.
�ONv{w w.urNwN
L..�. w...N.
ru[c O.rt.
.MO... W
.rLv[N • uuN�.
Q IA. N�Np«
[-saw Vl]
...N.w En
e.1.0 A,6 ac0++
wort • w{N
wen[NL.o
L`
pis �r'o n[
un u. a>w-ou
" c� • use.
Draw
AR... e..........
..c
.aL
Lrt •
wO.[wT c CASTLE
�1,VC{ a us
uI u[. aaw-a.oa
MI[L L.N•u[.N
.......
i.RIC.SN•wp[
1O
ILL.. .o-w.Lr[
J[c.[+.
...0...I
O..o.m J
MOIL-[
eo�Lnr c,Y •.Ln
.o.�xw
•. p•.ox
.. ..A
N....:C*
OY][
.Wr[ ewo
E SLx N. wra
N
OON IL.V..
1wON•. JJ•DIO
1, A.S.
�tOO.LvOLOP
[ x Oa.O.x
..'L.
N..
V NN
.w[ot1 c:uc
L
^onx
430 00
OCNv[R. OOLONILDO
Y
oNL::
"[-
NOW.
N
NOW.
NLc[N Y ,N
.1— .......
w.0.. aoa.ouoo
'.OR
un.
c
on•
MAR ..L[ra
I..o
acx,.e.•r
N
w. vu L[N
r[••c pn[x ioa-w: u.w
nu.L ^�1`T
L
I.....sn A....
Lux w...Noc...Lw
wm N•wo •..•n.N
... A.
.•M. L. O
n -
.WL
.:OT+[.wiC
WYNIN OtD..D. C. t00]•
M+.[w [i. NO
/f
Nw[L O~T[[N.N
. VL J L111.1.01.
ip[.«ON{ tOl-O.-000
ELL. w
«OwMD A. [.L.eI
O. O.[L
LW r+.'. �I..
M • Y.LON
r[L [[O.......-.....
x W M
A
...0.• O Y
4
J1Nr .. Y.r[wOM
A9= I
.Prx J..wu[Yxp
DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
Nrtu•Y Y.OJrt[.^
Iw[p&.w
334-2549
March 23, 198A
Ms. Joanne Mabusth
city of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay. MN 55323
Dear Jeanne[
Enclosed and listed below are resolutions granting
variances which cannot be filed in torrens property.
Name Resolution No.
Holatrom, Richard A. Res. 2290
Bruce and Camille Curtiss Res. 2342
If you have any questions please, call either so or my
secretary, Joyce Pedersen at :,34-2736.
Ver truly yours,
Nancy R. Husnik
Legal Assistant
NRH/jlp/3228