HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketI
I
I
I
I
I
HAV S DONE
EK AGO T.HUBSDAY:
(!ftJt'/5trS lU'W /\l
~µ MP c.4r7 ON
1f f //t/3
1~ '<;371
___ \____:_
4824\384
CityofOR NO
RESO LUTION OF T HE CITY COUNC I L
NO. 1487
GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL
ZONING CODE SECTION 31.700 AND A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 31.983 FILE 741
/~l:;,O Ci+eetl-1/ p~
WHEREAS, William C. Sinclair is the owner (hereafter "owner")
of property legally described as Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Saga Hill
Revised (hereafter "the property"), located within the City of Orono
(hereafter "City"); and
WHEREAS, the owner has applied to the City for a Conditional
Use Permit for land alteration as required by Municipal Zoning Code
Section 31.700 and a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 31 .983
to permit the alteration of his lakeshore bank located within 75' of
the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka; Sect i on 31.983 does not permit
ix ca v ation of the area within O' to 75' of the lakeshore.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED b y the City Council of
Orono , Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1 . The application was re v iewed as Zoning File No. 741.
2. The property is .located in .the LR-lB Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District.
3 . The owner must replace an unstable section of foundation
loc a ted in his lakeshore yard.
4 . The o wner requires additional living area and at the time
the f o undation is replaced, he proposes to construct a
walkout b a sement area providing below grade li v ing area.
5. The construction of a wa lkout at the l a keshore side of
the house will require the removal of appro x imately 600
cubic y a rds of fill and major alter a tion of the lakeshore
b a nks located within 75' of the lakeshore .
6. The land alteration will be done in t wo stages o v er a
24-4 8 hour period of time.
7. The first phase will deal with the e xc avation around
the house and the second ,ph a s e will i n vol v e the removal
of a ppro x imately 6' of the lakeshor e bank .
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 1487
8. The walkout will provide additional living area and the
owner will not have to construct an extensive addition
on the north side of the house creating additional .
hardcover.
9. When completed the lakeshore bank will be at a grade that
will allow easier maintenance and decreases the potential
for erosion of lakeshore bank.
10. The City engineer in his report, dated 4-18-83, finds no
significant impact on quality and quantity of runoff as
a result of the proposed construction .and land alteration.
11. In that same report, the City engineer finds the proposed
land alteration does not affect the neighboring properties.
D -2-
12 . The City has received no negative comments from the surrounding
property owners notified during the review of application No. 741.
13. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, _ reports ··
by staff and comments_ of the applicant and the ef feet of the
proposed land alteration on the health, safety and welfare of
the community.
14. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit
to alter the lakeshore bank as proposed will not be detrimental
to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would
not adversely affect light, air .nor pose a fire hazard or other
danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surround
ing property values and that the land alteration and the manner
in which the excavation is to be carried out to be in keeping
with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
15 . The City Council finds that granting a variance for the land
alteration as proposed as necessary to alleviate a demonstrable
hardship, is necessary to preserve a substantive property right
of the owner and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
TR ANSFER ENTERED
OEPMHMf'.NT OF PROPERTY TAXATION
.:;),\:;~ 6 J.983
H~ IN COUNTY MINN.
avA'"'-ic-_ ~EPUTY
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF TH E CITY COUNCIL
NO. 1487
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants
a variance to Zoning Ordinance 31.983 and grants a Conditional Use
Permit as required per ·zoning Ordinance 31.700 to permit the excava
tion of thelakeshore bank, portions of which are located within 75
feet of the lakeshore subject to the following conditions:
1. Stak ed hay bales and a fabric silt fence must be used for
erosion control .during construction and until vegetation
is established .
2. Staff must be nbtified prior to second phase of land alteration
(lakeshore bank e x cavation) in order to assur e proper erosion
control devices have been installed.
3. The boat house located on the lakeshore of the property has
been inspected by staff on May 10 ~ 1983 and f o und to be in
excellent condition. The structure is a non conforming
structure and subject to all pertinent municipal ordinance.
4. No other vari~nces are granted or permitted for this
application.
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of .this resolution shall constitute a violation
of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any
authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
6 . The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his
heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property .
. \·. ~·: C.-( '-.: •.
A:2r.dpt :~'d •,by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of May, 1983 .
:,·A.~<f:~ft~:t,· : .
. A ., ·_-J ".~_,~~ i'."' , TTEST :· . :/,.S/ .. ~··.;•,· -/< ... _· .-,,..l· :1 ,· . -~~\·//::----¥ ~/ ~~ ._·,~~·1:~~~.1 //1 ~ A~
~~,.c:,·,,ij:~?~r\'ea M. Strom, Cit y Clerk '{"t\ ~~ -. , ·:·--~ UA½ G~
.~ , _M_a_r_y_C...,._, .~B-u~t--1~-e-r-,--""'-M-a~y~o-r~-,~-------
, Wi~air
•••--Cl..,.sb ___ J
)
I
I
\
+-
TO: William Sinclair
1360 Cherry Place
Mound, Mn. 55364
Control i-.Jo.
Meeting Date
Notice Date
Variance
741
May 9, 1983
May 11, 1983
....xx..
xx Conditional use Permit
Subdivision, Preliminary
Subdivision, Final
Copies to:
**********************************~************************************************
COUNCIL ACTION Vote: _5_ For Against Abstention
MOTION to conceptually approve your variance and conditional use permit
application and directed staff to draft a resolution affirming that action
for presentation at their meeting of May 23, 1983. The Building Inspector
will inspect the boathouse for structural stability. I will advise you of
his findings.
***********************************************************************************
DEADLINE DATE
for submittal of new information (application may be considered
formally withdrawn if in::orination or explanation is not provided).
for Work Perr.1i t
application
for work to begin for Hork to be
completed
WORK PEID1ITS ARE REQUIRED -cont3ct Building Inspector before beginning
work.
VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans.
Do not change plans. Variance authority expires one year after approval.
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ovmership or use,
or on deadline date specified above.
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL -Applicant must
and/or improvements required for final approval.
Administrator.
provide all information
Contact Zoning
FIN:AL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL -Applicant must have drawings, resolution
and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such
recording returned to the City by deadline date.
Cert i fie d cop i es o f o ff i c i a l Ci t y Co u n c i. 1 Minutes may be ob ta {n e d b Y
contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from ,neeting date.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, MAY 9, 1983 PAGE -4-
r
!738 -KIP NELSON
4580 WATERTOWN ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
~41
1360
-WILLIAM SINCLAIR
CHERRY PLACE
5. Applicant to resolve drainage prohlems and
encroachment of driveway with owner of Lot 1,
Liberty Acres -resolution of problem prior to
final plat approval.
Motion, Ayes (5) -Nays (0).
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmcmber Adams seconded
to table this application due to the applicant not
being present. Motion, Ayes (S) -Nays (0).
Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed this
application with the Council.
Mr. and Mrs. Sincl21ir were present regarding their
application.
Councilmernber Frahm asked the Sinclairs about
their boat house. What condition was it in? Mr.
Sinclair stated that it was in good condition, he
does not keep a boat in the boat house but he does
use it for storing all his life jackets, etc.
Frahm directed staff to inspect the boat house for
structural stability. Frahm advised the appli
cants that if the structure is found in serious
disrepair, staff must bring the ·report to council
for action on the boat house.
Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Grabek
seconded to approve the Variance and Conditional
Use Permit of William Sinclair for 1360 Cherry
Place per the findings and conditions set by the
Planning Commission and Staff as follows:
1. No increase in hardcover.
7.. Lakeshore banks will now be at a grade for
easier maintenance and decreases potential of
erosion of lakeshore banks.
3. No significant impact on quality and quantity
of runoff as a result of the proposed
construction.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, MAY 9, '1983 PAGE -5-
✓ 4 . The proposed a 1 t e r a t i on does no t
·u
affect the
it742 CRAIG OLSON
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION il483.
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
MAYOR'S REPORT
CABLE TV REPORT
TRANSPORTATION REPORT
RESOLUTION ½1484
ORONO GOLF COURSE
neighboring properties.
S. The proposed plan will alleviate need to
expand to the north and increase hardcover.
CONDITIONS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Staked hay bales with a fabric silt fence be
used for erosion control during construction and
until vegetation is established.
2. Staff to be notified prior to second phase
land alteration (lakeshore banks excavation) to
assure proper erosion control devices have been
installed.
3. Staff to inspect boat house and if structure
is in serious disrepair, the question of removal
of said $tructure must be addressed by Council.
Motion, Ayes (5) -Nays (0).
Councilrnember Grabek moved, Councilmember Adams
seconded to adopt Resolution #1483, A Resolution
Establishing A Conditional Use Permit For
Operation Of A Lawful-Nonconforming Use of Land,
for Craig Olson, 19G0 Shoreline Drive. Motion,
Ayes (5) -Nays (vl).
No report from the City Engineer
Mayor Butler stated she had nothing to report at
this time.
None
None
City Administrator Benson reviewed Resolution
#1'184 with the Council and answered any questions
they had regarding the transfer.
'rO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Walter R. Benson, City Administrator
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
May 5, 1983
#741 -William Sinclair -1360 Cherry Place -Variance &
Conditional Use Permit
Zoning District -LR-lB
Area -0.53 acre or 23,940 sq. ft.
Allowed Hardcover -4,110 sq. ft.
Existing Hardcover -2,798 sq. ft. 75'-250'
Existing Hardcover 414 sq. ft. -0-75'
Application:
a) Variance -31.983 -Excavation within the 75 1 setback protected area
is prohibited
b) Conditional Use Permit 31.700 -Major land alteration anywhere in the
City requires a conditional use permit
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Application
Exhibit B -Property Owners List
Exhibit C -Plat Map
Exhibit D Survey
Exhibit E -Floor Plan
Exhibit F -Site Plan
Exhibit G -Engineer's letter -April 18, 1983
The Sinclairs must replace the existing, unstable section of foundation
under the livingroom area of their house in order to stabilize the
now shifting foundation. Their home is of modest siz~ and they require
additional living area. Their choices are either to add an extensive
addition on the north side of the house or at the time the lakeside section
of foundation is replaced to dig out around the foundation and create a
walkout basement. Review the contour map -slashed lines designate the
area to be excavated (960 contour through 954 contour) -a drop or removal
of six feet of earth -total 600 cubic yards of fill -60 tandem-sized
dump truck loads. In creating the walkout, the steep lakeshore bank will
be cut back and allow for a more graduated access to the lake and the
removal of upper section of the existing access stairs, approximately
100 sq. ft. of hardcover.
I have reviewed the application with Mike Panzer of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District and he advised that the proposal does not require
permitting or review of the District as it involves a single property
and the location of the property is not in a "strategic" area.
#741 -William Sinclair
May 5, 1983
Page 2
C.
(
In consideration of similar applications reviewed last year, as the
Zoning Administrator, I have appreciated the fact that the Sinclairs have
consulted with staff and sought advice rather than staff having to stop
construction when the simple foundation replacement turns into a major
land alteration and we are once again reviewing an "after-the fact"
application.
Staff forewarned the applicant of the restrictive ordinances dealing
with alteration of areas within the lakeshore protected area. (0-75').
The applicant has been made aware of Council's conservative position
on such applications and still he persisted convinced of the many positive
benefits of the proposed application. He contends replacement of the
foundation will necessitate alteration of his lakeshore yard (10' into
the lakeshore yard) and if below grade living area is not possible, they
will be forced to add a major addition on the north side of the house.
Please review the City Engineer's review of the proposal. The land
alteration will be done in two phases over a 24-48 hour period.
The first phase will deal with the excavation around the house and the
second phase, the excavation of the lakeshore bank -review Exhibit F -
the 954 elevation marks the limit of the lakeshore excavation.
Cook has recommended specific erosion control devices for this type of
land alteration involving steep lakeshore banks and the closeness to
the lake.
Planning Commission approved the conditional use permit and variance
application of William Sinclair to permit major alteration of the lakeshore
bank of his property based on the following findings and hardships:
a) hardships are as follows:
1. location of the house in relation to 75' setback area
2. steep lakeshore bank
b) findings are as follows:
1. no increase in hardcover -removal of approximately 100 sq. ft. of
hardcover within 0-75' setback area
2. lakeshore banks will now be at grade for easier maintenance and
decreases potential of erosion of lakeshore banks.
3. no significant impact on quality and quantity of runoff as a
result of the proposed construction
4. the proposed alteration does not affect the neighboring properties
5. the proposed plan will alleviate need to expand to the north and
increase hardcover.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. staked hay bales with a fabric silt fence be used for erosion
control during construction and until vegetation is established . •
#741 -William Sinclair
May 5, 1983
Page 3
2. staff to be notified prior to second phase land alteration
(lakeshore banks excavation) to assure proper erosion control
devices have been installed.
Please review the minority opinion of one in the Planning Commission
minutes of April 18, 1983.
Council action -give conceptual direction to staff to draft approving
or denial resolution for presentation at next Council meeting.
11740 -EDWARD T. LEHi"fAN
2450 Carman Street
Variance
v;;:;_ -wILLIAM SINCLAIR
1360 Cherry Place
Variance+ Conditional Use
11742 -CRAIG OLSON
1960 Shoreline Drive
Conditional Use Permit
PACE-4-
2. Rental of second unit ceased in 1978. The rental
of the second unit cannot be permitted per Ord. 31.105.
3. Guest house use cannot be approved because lot
standards of the RR-lA Zoning District cannot be met.
/ I
4. State Statute prohibits the City from approving a
second residence on the property -municipalities cannot
issue use variances. Staff must determine the necessary
structural modifications in the subject structure to remove
classification of residence.
Motion, Ayes (7) -Nays (0).
Member Goetten moved, Member McDonald seconded, to table
the application for a Variance for Mr. Edward Lehman at
3525 Shoreline Drive regarding 2440, 2450, 2470 Carman
Street. Motion, Ayes (5) -Nays (O).
Mr. Sinclair and Mr. Ted Rozenboom were present regarding
this application.
Member Goetten moved, Member Adams seconded, to approve
the Variance and Conditional Use Permit subject to the
following conditions:
1. Applicant must follow temporary erosion control method
setforth in City Engineer's letter dated 4-18-83.
2. Alteration of lakeshore yard shall be done in 2 stages.
(First Stage -foundation work) Second Stage -Alteration
of lakeshore bank) the work to be completed within 24-48
hour period.
Motion, Ayes (6) -Nays (1) McDonald Voting Nay
McDonald stated her reasons for voting nay are as follows:
1. A negative pr~cedence setting for a 75' setback standard.
2. The foundation could be repaired without causing major
land alterations.
3. The 60 dump truck loads of earth to be removed are excessive.
4. No erosion problems of the bank, no obvious erosion problems
of the existing lakeshore bank.
5. You would nullify the intent of the existing ordinance.
6. No visible hardships.
Member Adams moved, Member Callahan seconded, to approve the
Conditional Use Permit for Craig Olson at 1960 Shoreline Drive
subject to the following conditions:
.t-"os.i {Jfi.l/(,1:l Box Gti•CrysUll U-ay, M1nne&0t.a ~.:.J'"'inuruc,~nu v~.iH .. ,__
· · -· --· Telephone 473-7357
Mr. & Mrs. William Sinclair
1360 Cherry Place
Variance '}:)--1
Conditional Use Permit
Subdivision, Preliminary
Mound, Mn. 55364
4-19-83 Date of Notice .;;;__ ________ _
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Copy: Mr. Ted Rozebloom
Date of Meeting __ 4_-_1_8_-_8_3 _______ _
Votes: 6 For 1 Against
Plan:ciing Commission recommends the following:
Approval: As submitted
Approval: Subject to conditions noted
Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting
Denial: For reasons noted
Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicant
Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission
study
No action required
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS (1) Applicant must follow ternporarv erosion control
method setforth in City Engineer's letter dated 4-18-83. (2) alteration of lakeshore yard
shall be done in 2 stages (first stage -foundation work -second stage -alteration of lake
shore bank) the work to be completed within 24-48 hour period.
Review enclosed letter from Glenn Cook.
D Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
□
Planning Commission
Counci 1 May 9, 1983
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent,upon receipt of
additional information. Deadline for the
meeting is
for the
____________ ; or
meetingo
all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of
requested information within
or the City will consider the application as formally withdrawn.
If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please
contact the Zoning Administrator.
,,.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission Minutes
they. are available from the Building and zoning Secretary upon review
and approval by the Planning Commission.
2335 1W. "'J,,_j, di~ 36
St. P,u.J, lrf.,.,~ 55ff3
Ptw-, 61.2-636-4600
April 18, 1983
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323
Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth
Re: File No. 139
Sinclair Residence
Dear Jeanne,
qt 111
Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E.
Rohert W. Rosene, P. E.
Joseph C Anderlik, P.E.
Bradford A. Lem berg, P. E.
Richard E. Turner, P.E.
James C. Olson, P. E.
Glenn R. Cook, l'.E
Keith A. Gordon. /'.L
Thomas E. Noye.\, 11.1:.
Rich(Jrd W. Fosta, P. L
Robert G. SchunH'hr, P.L
Man·in L. Sorvula, P.l:'
Donald C. Burgordt. I'. F.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P. t:.
Mark A. Hanson, P.I::.
Ted K. field, P. E.
Mh·hae/ T. Rautmann, P.E
Roher! I<. P./c'J/crlc, /'./.".
( '/wries A. l:'!k!..,<m
l.eo M. /'uwd,J.._1·
I larlari M. ( )Ison
This letter is relative to our inspection of the Sinclair residence on April
15, 1983. The grading plan proposed would not significantly alter the volume
of storm water runoff from the site. There would be a slight increase in the
concentration of storm water in the center of the excavated area but not sig
nificant enough to cause any additional problems on the slope down to the lake.
We would recommend that staked hay bales with a fabric silt fence be used for
erosion control during construction and until the vegetation is established.
We do not foresee any significant impact on the quality or quantity of runoff
as a result of the proposed construction.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
'11·l .J ,) /Ji:~.,~"'--JC
Glenn R. Cook
GRC:li
4491b
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission Members
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
April 15, 1983
#741 -Willi.am Sinclair, 1360 Cherry Place -Variance &
Conditional Use Permit
Zoning District -LR-lB
Area -0.53 acre or 23,940 sq. ft.
Application:
a) Variance -31.983 -Excavation within the 75' setback protected area
is prohibited
b) Conditional Use Permit 31.700 -Major land alteration anywhere in the
City requires a conditional use permit
The Sinclairs must replace the existing, unstable section of foundation
under the livingroom area of their house in order to stabilize the
now shifting foundation. Their home is of modest size and they require
additional living area. Their choices are either to add an extensive
addition on the north side of the house or at the time the lakeside section
of foundation is replaced to dig out around the foundation and create a
walkout basement. Review the contour map -slashed lines designate the
area to be excavated (960 contour through 954 contour) -a drop or removal
of six feet of earth -a total 600 cubic yards of fill -60 tandem-sized
dump truck loads. In creating the walkout, the steep lakeshore bank will
be cut back and allow for a more graduated access to the lake and the
removal of upper sections of the existing access stairs.
After Planning Commission action, the applicants must file for a Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District premit.
In consideration of similar applications reviewed last year, as the
Zoning Administrator, I have appreciated the fact that the Sinclairs have
consulted with staff and sought advice rather than staff having to stop
construction when the simple foundation replacement turns into a major
land alteration and we are once again reviewing an ''after-the-fact"
application.
Unfortunately, I have had to postpone several scheduled site inspections
of the property because of rather unusual spring-time weather. We will be
trudging throught the snow drifts on Friday and at least his oral comments
and answers to my questions will be presented at the meeting.
In consideration of the plan presented for this review, my questions are
as follows:
1. There is no information on temporary erosion control devices -how do
they plan to protect the lakeshore during construction?
#741 -William Sinclair
April 15, 1983
Page 2
2. Is Cook satisfied that the abutting neighbor's properties are not
affected by land alteration -is drainage kept away from side property
lines?
3. What kind of ground cover, terracing, etc. will be used to stabilize
the disturbed lakeshore bank?
4. Does the proposal alleviate the erosion problems of the steep lakeshore
banks?
If Planning Commission feels they can act on the application after the
engineer's comments are reviewed, the following findings can be used,
if the conditional use permit is to be recommended for approval:
1. No increase in hardcover
2. Control of the erosion on steep lakeshore bank
3. Proposed plan will provide more grassed areas for surface drainage
draining direct to the lake
4. Provide more graduated access to lakeshore and the removal of the
upper section of access stairs.
)
CITY of ORO ()
Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 5532:3 • Municipal Offices
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
April 6, 1983
Mr. Glenn Cook
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates
2335 West Trunk Highway #36
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
Re: #741 -William Sinclair
1360 Cherry Place
Conditional Use Permit & Variance
Dear Glenn:
The above referenced application will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission at their April 18, 1983 meeting. The application
involves extensive land alteration within the 0-75' setback area.
The engineer/architect, Ted Rozeboom (332-3944) will send plans
under separate cover for your review. Call me when they arrive
as they are incomplete and I am sure you will need additional
information. I have already called with several questions of
my own.
Please call at your earliest convenience and we will arrange a
site inspection of the property.
Sincerely,
Je~abusth
Zoning Administrator
BUl!_'DlNG & ZONING -473-7357
ASSESSING
ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE -473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS 473-7359
,,.
•.: ,.:
'!
.. ··: ,.··~ :· <·· .'
~ ...
y 2.
...,l
\
\
I ,
11 \,
/ I I i,~~~~:i] r' /I ~
G--i &t
----~_L__j,
I ,
,J
---------
. i
J::, .~
'_;:, ·~
--... -~------_________ ____. a
N -.--------
-~=--
-~~ ?C ; __ .,-----------
/ -----------✓ --✓ ~~-
\
;W'
~
\.
i " " Q
ci:.
' ,-, .
' '
G)
"' ."' ....
~
"' 'st 'f I,;,'
'I
Certificate of Survey
for William C. Sinclair
of Lots 3 and 4, Block 11, Saga Hill Revised
Hennepin County, Minnesota
221.10'
~ £..,,.f;r,~ .. 1-...,p
., hov.,,.._ ,;,. __ %5
44.2' .
35.ID' -· \1''.t
I
I
\
\~ t £~; .. +;.,'!
l:,oo~house·
. l'I.,;• ...
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a
survey of the boundaries of Lots 3 and J.., Block 11, Saga Hlll Revised,
and 'the location of all existing buildings thereor.. It does not pur
port to show otter irrcp,ove~ents or encro8chments •
Scale:
l)3. te
0
1 11 ::: 40 1 :
3-1-83
Jron marker
. GOPJX)N R. COFFIN CC • , INC •
.,,
~6fi~ 6064
·Yiark S. Gronberg Reg. No.12755
Land Surveyors and Planners
Long Lake, Minnesota
o [§@l§□w@ n
APR -8 1983 u
CITY OF ORONQ_
CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
Land Use Application
J...DCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property)
Mailing
Address
I
,> , ,, / -/ , ,/// I "'./J/:,,1,:/
OWN ER Name ./._ / {;_ 7 ( l 1) ;c /""-: /·•I •Te 1 # c/7 '-r.~1 ' I
;..._..;...· ------------· _ ••• _,.<--'( -/ /' /' / ~✓-~' )
/
1),--t°I
USE APPLI0ATION
.00 a) Res. Acc. Use
$100.00 b) Institutional
(Church, Sch.
etc.)
0100.00 c) Duplex Cr/Blg
d) Land Alteration
(grading, fil
ling)
$150.00 e) Com/Ind. Use
__ PRD/PID -See fee schedule
vvariance $100.00
Mailing
Address /;/;/ --:'1/[:~
#/s~a/ ?¥ ani,..
Present Zoning
/2oning Ordinance Section Relating to Request
,,/ Specify Ordinance Requirements
IJ E 1,,J ~ ✓ O✓h. CJ' /J ~
Explain your request and reasons for same /-jar d s:: /2 ,' v? bf r C¼d c:: e
f o i,< ,.._ clc~ l-i 0----i S c-r c,. c k f d rif 5' /" ; f -1,·,,... 1 ~ ?\ d l,vf, n e i;cl a cl c/,r f; 00---C,_,..(_
~: ~~ i-cc 'iv v~~ a-/,~
1
c~ lv~ l /I:: h T
14 b ?ls;;:; ;n f-e. x-r; 1 ~~:J1-/ ✓ ~d j s
Specify
CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER -explain proposed use of property
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION
(Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting)
f l l