HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-11-24 Lot Evaluation ReportJ
ti
K
r
St,
■i
:4
tl"’-.
#
mm'# 4:
"■^:' -v S' - '
.:■ ■■: ," 'T—i,:|^-'w.
••■ V,
;\DDITIO^^.\L TN^’O^M..TICN
LOT t-, BLOCK 1
.ICimLTON'L PHE'JCH LAKE
SECOND addition
HC8EHT &: JOAN D.iVTO'J
Iv
i-L
f
A:4:^;;yr 11-24-83
■.tv.r-
m
.i
Because the drlvow.iy might encroe»ch on the drainfield
area and the alternate site vould he pushed dov/n the hill
where no previous soil borln»;s were taken, two utkliticnal
borings were taken with results shown belrw.
Soil Borings
S.B. ¥ k
Depth(ft.)
O.C-0.8
1..8-2.5
2.5-4.0
4.0-5.0
5.C-6.8
6.8-7.5
Mfi tori •.!
Black Loiim
Red Brn. S^^ndy Cl^y
Red Brn. oa.ndy Loam
Red Brn. loamy 3^nci
Red Brn. Co.arsc 3‘-<nd
Moist Pine I,o any S-nd
No mottled soil or water table ^fber cl4 iiours.
S.B. B
Dei)th(f t. >
0.0-1.0
1.0-..0
2.0-5.0
5.0-7.5
M'l terlnl
Black loam
Dk. Brn. S“ndy I.oa.m
Dk. Brn. Medium Sand
Brov.’n Medium Cand
No mot*'led soil or wat*^r table ..fter 2U. heirs.
' ;'i A fi- '
a:-
«s
Thus, the soils encountered were very good cjid similar to
those up the hill. Hov;ever, this area is or. a r. teejer slope
and thus it would be rrucii bottf If the urivew.TV w.iS shifted
to the east as itmcdi .s po.'uilV.l* to s ive tne bett-i* di’clnrield
are i.
h iU i •; I. i'v 1 ,
x*-c.
.rK o. dr u.Lt rg, IH,.
«
]i
' A
f'p'i-A:'
€: -%
.-I
*
•V
4
V
■i
. A ;
■ ' ■■ - , , M
•A
;.Wm; : ■
II:yyy'<l
: ■■
. ' -y:'
♦
. /; \/\•I
\«.• V • •
\\
V
\V
\V Cl \"J
f-1
■j
XI,'f:v
r:
\\
<§N <1^\
Jr \HDVX
1 j< i,' \i•s • ^
///fi:;
Vl!k
^ 2f>vi4^K\
\
>\Vi
fs\?»\w
U\
I V
« X
c
?
■i
•v#:'
<r:
/u>-sX.vK
/\P
\J?'
t&'■
I,\2y
k- •
b-
•i- ■ ■ I
if