The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject Packet//��:eipt- CII-Y OF ORONO - A I Y AP ICA'fl!ON E ) i( Initial Application 510 ($50.00 per each additional variance) 2� Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) ----------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 37S5 (As(b A::,p)T U� _ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) o1Cl��a3 i-3 DEC; Please check one - Property _ abstract or X torrent: Attach legal description to application if not included required survey. ___________________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT Plione (home) 1471-7712E Name !/Av-D S BREirNER Phone (work) 931-)it- I - Address: F$D1. 33 Cty: �AyAflPG Zip: 5Sz91 ____________________________________________ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address: City: Zip: Date Property Acquired 01199 (month/year) I (do) (do ot) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------- 4 ___________________________________________________________ PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District _ Present Use of Property DR, ' e d ntial other (specify) ____________________________________________ __-____--___ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost S Describe request in detail: W11>7^'VAJZLA NC • �:AQi (�A VFR VARiArICE ________ ____-______-______ �ARLYCIB RNQOINND Lot Area X Lot Width X nar,'Cove- Setback Variances (_ front Side R,.r Other _ HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict, M enforcement of zoning regulations: I•PACYI( AL TD PT QF RSONA/SGE ------------------------------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: TAKING IMfO Fire u7 All stj _K CPf9UIQM[NTS THE __________________ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ✓ 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (110) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address (use address labels obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. 6. Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. B. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. ___________________________________________________________________________ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. -- _______________________________ Certification by Zoning Department that variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature uate APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant h reby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature lid • 1 LiAutw4A Date $1?_!;I f ONENNS SIGNATURE 7hc owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verificatio of this �rr(1eq�u�e�sstt.. �, Owner's Signature � �.IJ ""�" Date S'Z 549 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held nn the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commissior and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorised agent attend in your place and to advise the Building c Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. #1 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 15.165, ":tights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may to shared with otter local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license regires council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have tertian rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. Ap 0 Sio'Ih I� F 7NE1� F irs� Mi a Last A ress AVAPRf<,•- 55327- I -Y -S Dat— e ? birth We —snot apply to building/general permits) 471-1702 e one I understand my rights as stated above. x A,04 S _ Signature #1 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 15.165, ":tights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may to shared with otter local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license regires council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have tertian rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. Ap 0 Sio'Ih I� F 7NE1� F irs� Mi a Last A ress AVAPRf<,•- 55327- I -Y -S Dat— e ? birth We —snot apply to building/general permits) 471-1702 e one I understand my rights as stated above. x A,04 S _ Signature 'H c" �'KASTER � COVES ; �. • . �' t� taco Ae s "" rolxr No Z O '•/I7 lj o .fIS A w - _ •I 'JF WTI, SPRING YYY I � •_O /� (,A� •�;r o,o Io 3 f • //s' � Poi i_ �. 'ror l 'Ar'✓. 31OU I 3200 I,l4 1 • u CASCO ''''` �l.e - »�',\-,,� r/a�; ,/��I., ate; �••;, I '�«'\ /• ,' is `A, im cj �,�. 76 1e, 2y l,ta, i, a , Y 4P� A N 1 ..• ` 3J / � w` / . 24 RAI DATE 05/25/81 • BATCH 009 38 20-III-23 23 oaos • PROP AOOR 02715 CASXI POINT RD WAR NAME T A 0 E"IN TA..PAYER TERRY A A DOROTHY L ERNIN NAME/AODP 2215 CASCO POINT NO • MAYZATA IRE 55311 • 38 20-11V-23 23 0012 PROP ADOR 027 7 6 CASCO POINT RD OMICA NAME NOLEN A PRICE ETAL TARPAYER NOLEN A PRICE • NAME/AODN 2226 EASED POINT RO HAYZATE IRN 55391 • S8 20-117-23 23 OD19 PROP ADOR 02F55 CASCO POINT RD WIER NAME R A J PIIIT/AM . TARPAYER RICHARD A MVTNAM NAME/AOOP 2I65 CASCO POINT no NAYZATA MN 55391 • • • • • • • • HEMIEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY DRIERS LIST in 20-11I-23 23 0006 02745 CASCO POINT RD S A PETERSON A K A PETEASON STEVEN R PETERSON 2745 CASCO POINT 40 NAYZATA IN SS391 REPORT MO. P141M01 PAGE so 38 20-217-23 23 0002 02;55 CASCO POINT RD CLAREHCE N PETERSON ET AL CLARENCE N PETERSON 29SO JOPPA AVE HPI S IN S%26 38 20-112-23 25 OD17 38 20-112-ZS 23 cola 02795 CASCO POINT RD 02723 CASCO POINT RD J M PALMER A L J PALMER ELAINE E OLSON JACK M A LUAMNE N PALMER EUINE ELLEN ERICKSOi 2295 CASCO POINT RD 2223 CASCO PT RD IAYZATA MN 55391 NAYZATA ON SS391 TOLL BATCH 009 OD002 Y 22 I CERTIFY THAT THE fAC'S REPRESENTED ARE " ACCLARATE AIR) I" REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT 4PPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS ON THE MEMNEPIN COUIIT', DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. to THE REST Of MY RNONLTOOE ANO RELIEF. / ��yy DATE - . / I' I RLY __ �7�Pwneq aaeT.Xbn r.0 naa wb•.. W n IM tourr.l Cn<Wrt al IL' Sure &own ROyI a.. Jam J,.ne tB t4+ 10 rtrltr IM Ipppwyq yrN.y1 Wq,[al.Cr. I lJp I.t.'iBTar lYYl ll MS imnBws ROX tnwe a <agnwnel un Itemmr •O. r. aOCMN [On uClmn O hnwaae..mrv.rq y ronlY�rce �'uen: oo-nt ra aamnwr>en 10 nrv1 rn....... M fweoux W MMlrAlnn, w,xumyr� Kp M tM compyw rlpyUOmrnt O' et 4OIYgarC11 yq Ina ntlYNlbrr Ot t pWl MU a—rbnh se1.n B yEe N Oiacll ...Y... la rnpony ypnbn to IM .n.l.rq .es. 4COrM1 wY M I<dIN I) INl lryn IM Nx IOI lOt xMwtl OI mN4ry IM IpveO yl'NI • NO f.11r Nnllrm Srx.. On.... r. �-. PYKI Xo<rm of sit Xmwq rq e la iila � e.Iw.Mrsl oltlezpas fiteo X lbtleeeFeeW WOCe Y9 N4rn.. IrrCX Ip a aOpyX Mw Xcn tryln IM qll IIOX t11n bl Yn bl wgtn n IrrO COXr rrlrrcn for IM cwnO4la r<cyry,.. y IfinIYR T nr� X 1 <roNir IMI :1 a No luj EOw�.rO ym arm �1101 ias sluppB e.r nen no-m n.u. me<t rw<e w a aalotla al<MI srtpe m na ,auwn n+l o-aYe.ly N O<XM wMq l0 W 11rO mw applr r Inr� wNIX caRrwlt n <1ppnMnttlll rea.cnN Rlrlt Mnttle I t nrrX M Gh OMSn. py ah OI Or. M <rxey eteeYttbn w.wa ralerk. s,uq a zarq Aa*.. IAWItY n Pw LYur yb gryr Jun,, IMI i dM 1 2 IL � — Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin Bill Holm, being duly sworn, an oath says that he Is an authorized agent and employee of Iho publisher of the newspaper known as THE TAKER, Mound. Min. newts. and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below. A I The newspaper has compiled with all the require' merits constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A 02 331A 07 aid other applicable laws. as amended 81 The printed Pig 11, which Is ;,ached was cut from the columns of UP newspaper, aid wall printed and published once each week for successwe weeks: It was first published Monday. the S day of 141 and was mereafter Printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday. the _ pay of 19_; ..�-.Ml,RIETTA A. T.'.lUC Authmued Agent R7::ouar ru r]rA d CAnv Z.1 ". .:.TY `.+aaMXaarNMwnwwMS ..wv......... Subscribed and sworn to aria on thla Qp E2 day of ALA, 1� re•J_. By 'I I Alt Lf / /L / c� Notary Public Rate Informallon I lOwnl Crtlrnla 1a1 pYU br :"nmX1:�1. OXrw'a iO.nperl d1 tOaC1 rY ap Cr rKn :. -.1. I rN1 Wirt./ N .p Iw +OJr1 Tlllw to W Or •w'n ]I IIw11 E." I dir" tlO.w +... t1 M ON .n_n I:Kn eG.)nMr au[c1l x.e xM. {J i1 pN mCn CITY OF ORONO - NOTICE The Planning Commissior will hold putlic hearings in the CounLil Chambers at 1275 South Brown load on Monday, June 19, 1989 to review the following land use applications: 1. 01414 Temple Israel at 645 Tonkawa Road seeks a conditional use permit for the proposed construction of a multi -use facility/structure consisting of conference/meeting rooms and dormitory areas to serve the existing camp use. 2. 41415 Robert and Cheryl Humphrey of 669 Minnetonka Highland Lane seek hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances for the complete replacement of an existing deck and the irstallation of a pool and patio area in their lakeshore yard. 3. 41416 Jeffrey Eccles of 3025 Sixth Avenue North seeks a side setback variance for a proposed addition to the existing residence that will be located 11 feet from the east lot line instead of meeting the required 30 feet. 4. i1417 Northern States Power Company seeks a conditional use permit to install an electric sub -station at the property located at 3960 Sixth Avenue North. 5. 11418 Orono School District 4278 seeks a conditional use permit for a proposed addition that would connect the Orono Middle School and the Elementary School in addition to a proposed expansion of the parking and driveway areas serving the facility. S. 41419 J.R. Bowers of 2905 Casco Point Road seeks a side setback and hardcover variances for a proposed new desk within the lakeshore yard of his property. 7. 41422 David Dreitner of 2755 Caac� Point Pled seeks lot area, lot width and hardcover variances for the complete reconstruction of a new residence on a property that contains an existing residence. 8. 41423 Edward Brown of 355 Stubbs Bay Road North seeks a setback variance for a proposed detached garage on his residential property. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission D" Joanna A. Me us uiialnq i Zoning Administra or To be published the week of June 5, 1909. CERTIPICATB OP MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 1 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO ) I Teri Naab of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of 01422 David Breitner's application was mailed to the certified list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 31st day of May, 1989. Tar Naab, Secretary 27 ASS' CAscD t77r CerLiI iCa Le of Survey for Oav ILI S. BreI User � .I lot. 7. Audl"r—or"—sTOMM"Mron No. 765- Itennepin County. MI noe sofa 1 oeosm oz HIGNI fGHT�'D ;^ ^ 4' y 1p4t. V ^ ' #�4522 i all e /rP jrylr + / I}AT k'nlpr 1 w 1'tt 1 a 1.1..' . :• �.a .Y. 4+. r PRoPOs4D HARDCoVM VAP,I/1NcF 2 HARDCOVER CALCULATION NORKSH i. 1 SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 _ 00 O;r,; O�>�� ExIE.ING HARDCOVER IN ZONE -------------------------- A. HOUSE S.F. LENGTH WIDTH /0.0 x 16.3 / 63 s.F. 7. % x / 9. 4 a / Sz S.F. x _ S.F. x S.F. V11 Z 9 S. GARAGE 3 X /0, 6 T J< ytl 9 S.F. C. DRIVEWAY X S.F. X _ S F. 7� s Z 3 y D. SIDEWALK C/ _ X 7 00 S.F. X/S .Z. Z c� Li S.F. S2S If x / —/' S.F. E. PATIO/ ' 7! ECx x s.F. P.LANDSCAPE x _ S.P. AREAS UNDERLAIN X S.F. EY _ PLASTIC SHEETING x _ S.P. S.F. G. OTHER _—_ < S.F. ---`_� TOTAL 4AADCOVER I'I ZONE - `" "- 3.F. A 1 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - S.F. A I Z d'; .i B /A y! % X 100 - 2 �/. dp i o r HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEcT� SETBACK ZGNE: (CIRCLE ONE) -7 i:-_ U` 21042 2 EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ________________._ Bt. A. HOUSE 2 J. Y x /2.- S.F. LENGTH WIDTH x S.F. x = S.F. - x - S.F. x S.F. 6. GARAGE x = S.F. C. DRIVEWAY x S.F. x S.F. D. SIDEWA' : 6Q_ x S.F. x _ S.F. E. PATIO/ DDECK x S.F. - x ___ S.F. F.I-ANOSCAPE % 9.F. AREAS UNDERLAIN BY x S.F. PLASTIC SHEETING x x S.F. G. OTHER x S.F. ------------- TOTAL HARDCC/ER IN ZONE - VJ V 8.0, ED TOTAL PROPERLY AREA IN ZONE .5'73"O S.F. A J T 8 53 3x 100 - 7. 7S c City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2254 e-a o A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SOBDIVISInN 6(B) AMD SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 JEXJ Z1176 WHEREAS, Richard Putnam (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2765 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 132, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, that part of Lake Shore Avenue dedicated on the the recorded plat of Spring Park and now vacated and that part of a tract of land on the opposite side of said avenue all lying between the westerly extension of the north and south lines of Lot 132 in said plat (hereinafter "the property); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of room and garage additions to attach the existing residence to the existing detached garage which is only 2 feet from the side lot line where a 10' side setback is normally required for an attached garage; and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit construction of a deck and enclosed porch (gazebo) structure that will encroach 25' past the e:.asting average lakeshore setback line and 9' past the potential future average lakeshore setback line, where no encroavhment is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow an .ncrear,e in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 3...4a existing to 40.2% where only 250 hardcover is normally allowed, and to allow 48.5% hardcover in the 250-500' lakeshore setback zone where 85.7t hardcover exists but only 30% is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a street setback of 20' where 30' street setback is normally required. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 01176. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 City of ORONO . y, '` HESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL a ° V 3. The Orono Planning Commissic:i reviewed this application on September 1", 1987 and recommended denial of the proposed variances based upor. the following findings: a) Four of five Planning Commissioners present indicated approval of the hardcover variances, finding that the proposal results in a .,et overall decrease of hardcover square footage on the property and in the dedicated right- of-way of 224 square feet. b) Four of Five Planning Commissioners present indicated disapproval of the side setback variance for the garage, based on the knowledge that the garage will likely require a new foundation and the opportunity to move it to a conforming location would then exist. c) The Planning Commission generally felt that the average lakeshore setback should be reviewed under the assumption that the seasonal residence immediately to the north will eventually be removed and replaced with a house closer to the lake, thus revising applicants average setback line. 4. The City Council finds that the increase in hardcover in the 75-250' zone is adequately counterbalan-ed by the proposed decreases in the 250-500' setback, zone. 5. The City Council finds that the magnitude of actual reduction of potential or existing lakeshore views from neighboring properties will be such that it does not create a significant view encroachment. 6. The Council finds that the location of an existing mature tree is a hardship to moving the proposed garage to the south, and the locations of garages in the immediate neighborhood generally located nearer the northerly lot line then the required 10' setback, will not create a safety hazard nor a visual crowding effect if the proposed 2' side setback for the garage is retained. 7. The Council finds that as a result of the attachment of the house and existing garage, the house setback will technically be 20' from the dedicated right-of-way where a 30' street setback is normally required, but will still maintain a 40' separation from t*,e edge of the actual paved and traveled roadway. 0. On August 10, 1987 the City Council voted 4-1 to conceptually approve the requested variance and directed staff to draft a formal resolution for approval. Page 2 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. --'234 s-s • 9. The City Council has ccnsidersd this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, crmments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 10. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to presetve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan cf the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the constructior of room and garage additions to attach the existing residence to the existing detached garage which is only 2 feet from the side lot line where a 10' side setback is normally required for an attached garage; and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit construciton of a deck and enclosed porch (gazebo) structure that wi11 encroach 25' past the existing average lakeshore setback line and 9' past the potential future average lakeshore setback line, where no encroachment is normally allowed; and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow an increase in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 36.41 existing to 40.2% where only 25% hardcover i:, n: Tatlly allowed, and to allow 48.5% hardcover in the 250-500, tai'u— .•t, setback zone where 85.7% hardcover exists but only 30% is nor::: ,; a.ilowed; and grants a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6,:.; to allow a 20' street yard setback where a 30' street yard setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: Page 3 of 6 City of ORON O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. Hardcover on the property in the 75-250' setback zone shall be limited to the following items: (Area of 75-250' zone = 10,937 s.f.) Existing Home 1432 s.f Garage 6 Home Additior 1100 s.f. Existing Garage 400 s.f. Driveway 238 s.f. Deck not over patio 85 s.f. Patio 576 s.f. Rock walls 194 s.f. Sidewalk 260 s.f. Added Deck N. of patio 120 s.f. 405 s.f. or 40.2% (Refer to Exhibits A s B Attached) Hardcover in the 250-500' zone shall be as follows: (Area within 250-500' zone is 1950 s.:. total, of which 1200 s.f. :s in the right-of-way for Casco Point Road as dedicated on the Plat of "Spring Park", and 750 s.f. is within the property boundaries westerly of the dedicated right-of-way' Driveway (west of right-cf-way) 27u s.f. Driveway (within right-of-way) 580 s.f. Sidewalk (included in 75-250' --- zone calculations) TOTAL 850 s.f. or 48.5% Note: For percentage calculation purposes, because applicant is removing unnecessary hardcover within the dedicated right-of-way, the 250-500' hardcover percentages allowed are based on using the "combined area of property and right-of-way less the paved roadway", or 1750 s.f., as the denominator. 2. Applicant is advised that future proposals that result in additional hardcover on the property will not be approved, but might be approved only if concurrent hardcover removals result in no net increase in hardcover. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 24, 1986). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terr...nate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 4 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL '. NO. 2254 •�• is � S. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this kith day of September, 1997. ATTEST: of y mn'Ballirf, City Clerk zojisrty Owner l s Jam a R. `T, Mayor ?aq 5 of 6 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN City of ORONO ss. ) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. --5" on this 20th day of 0rtnh�r 1 1967 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared Richard A 6 Janet L Putnam known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC 9 !M�a NAA !b. WMMMTA COUNT 9/8/91 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of , 196 , h,fore me a Notary Puolic within and for said County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 6 of 6 • . c G Xl Wn '90. As 75a � • A / ff Ob o °Ove4i 248a�5 ��,^ po0 00 W m T40e BQSeni�nlr�cflC✓ M43A � Cf IL 2 +5+� �� far / EXHIBIT A �RESoL.No+ 225" IC)vsr#u(. OARPCoveR 11 u .AM ) 5 Box 33 Navarre, MN 55392 June 13, 1989 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ATTENTION: Mr. Mike Gaffron SUBJECT: Variance Application for Property located at 2755 Casco Point Road Dear Mike: It was a pleasure meeting with you in your office the other day regarding the above property and variance application. As you are aware, my wife and I are contemplating the purchase of the lot mentioned at the above property site; however, we are incurring some problems with respect to the hardcover variance situation on Casco Point. we would like very much to live on Casco Point; however, due to some of the regulations in the area, it is making it difficult for us to plan our future home on this lot. Enclosed you will find a summary of our thoughts, along with our objective outline for the Planning Commission and Orono City Council. Please review this letter closely and forward to your associates for their review as well. As indicated above, my wife and I are very excited about the thought of living on Casco Point in Orono, Minnesota. It is our objective to build an average -size house of approximately 2,800 square feet on this location with an attached garage. The size of this house will be average: however, the quality of the contruction will be above average, as we are/,ware of the exclusivity of Casco Point. We are aware of the setback requirements and variances needed for our house, and we would like very much to comply one hundred percent with the City of Orono requirements. However, I believe that ill of the setbacks and requirements have been adhered to, except for the hardcover variance which we are applying for. There are several problems that arise when coutew,plating new conscructi,M on the above mentioned lot. As you are aware, the lot is only 60 :eet wide at the building site, and the square footage of the lot in which to wild on contains approximately 10,450 square feet of buildable area. (This excludes the 0-75 foot setback.) Page Two City of Orono Mr. Mike 0affron .Lune 13, 1989 In contemplating the kc-ition of the home on our lot, we have come to the conclusion that we must move the dwelling forward to align even with the neighbors' homes on either side. Evidence indicates that the residence on the south side of our property was given a variance to build - gazebo protruding off the lakeside of the property. This has greatly diminished our views, therefore necessitating the forward movement of our contemplated dwelling. The forward movement mentioned in the above paragraph greatly increases our hardcover surface due primarily to the hardcover generateJ by the driveway. We have attempted to propose a dwelling of similar size to the house and garage that now sit on the property. We have looked at alternatives with regards to detaching the garage at this location. Due to the narrowness of the lot, we would not be able to turn our garage sideways and facilitate a driveway. If we were to detach the garage and face Casco Point Road, we would need to adhere to the 35-foot setback requirement, incurring practically the same hardcover as originally proposed. In addition, if the garage were to became detached from the house by means of new construction, we would incur loss of additional large adult trees on this lot. We would like to save all of the trees surrounding the home to preserve its natural beauty. The advantages to approving our hardcover variance are several. We are proposing a new house in an exclusive area which contains custom quality building. We are not trying to oversize the house on this lot, and we are conforming to all other setbacks with regards to side setbacks, lake setback, and street setback. The driveway, which is creating concern for the hardcover variance, slopes away from the lake, therefore not creating a water quality problem. In addition, we are proposing to clean up the area considerably based on the eyesore that it has been in recent years. We are trying to propose a home that will fit in the area, add to the value of the homes surrounding our property, ani conform to all requirements for the City of Orono. In summary, we are willing to conform to all the ordinances. we are willing to work with the City of Orono within reason to build a reasonable size house on this property with an attached garage. 1 believe that our proposal and application has been made in a fair and reasonable manner, and we are doing everything possible to conform to all ordinances. We would like to build our house as soon as possible; therefore, we are requesting a variance for hardcover per our application. In addition, we are removing hardcover in the 0-75 setback from the lake in the amount of 180 square feet to help reduce runoff into the I-ke. I am looking forward to your favorable response. YWCa Very truly, Davi.f S. Breitner To: Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Pros: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Admi:istrator Date: June 14, 1989 Subject: 41422 David S. Breitner, 2755 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-IC, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover variance to construct a new residence. Also requires lot width and lot area variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey with Staff Notes Exhibit E - Highlighted Site Plan Exhibit P - Hardcover Calculationsi,, Exhibit G - Proposed Building Plans Exhibit H - Applicant's Letter of Request Dated 6/13/89 Pertinent Facts - 1. There is an existing residence structure on this property in poor condition, which is intended to be totally re.noved. The existing detached garage will also be removed. The existing boat house is not intended for removal. 2. When the existing house is removed, this lot reverts to a vacant lot status, therefore lot area and lot width variances are required as follows: Exis�tin Ra�ulr�ed Va. ante Lot Area 0 37 ac 0.50 ac 0.13 Ac (268) Lot Width '0' 100' 40' (40%) 3. The app'.lcant proposes to construct a new house, nearer the lake but still meeting the average setback requirement. The street setback, lakeshore setback, and aide setback requirements will all be met with the proposed residence. Applicant proposes to construct an attached 3-stall garsye, which requires additional driveway. Applicant is requesting a hardcover variance, as follows: Existing Allowed Pro oaed variance 0-75' 430 s.f. (7.75%) 0% 250 s.f. 4.5t 4. a 75-250' 2,600 s.f. (24.881) 25% 3,580 s.f. (34.26%) 9.261 Zoning File $1422 June 15, 1989 Page 2 of 3 This lot is relatively high compared to the Peterson property to the immediate north. There is a 3-4' high concrete retaining wall which from the survey and staff's site inspection appears to be mostly on the Peterson property. The new residence will be approximately 4' further back from the lot line than the existing reside---, hence there should be adequate room for applicant to do necessary grading work to protect the Peterson property f...�. run-off. A detailed grading plan should be required to be submitted and reviewed by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. However, staff would note that the house elevations (Exhibit G) indicate only minor overall grade changes are anticipated. The proposed house generally is designed to fit the existing contours of the lot. Discussion Please review the applicant's letter of request attached as Exhibit H. This lot is somewhat smaller than lots in the immediate vacinity, but it is typical of many similar lakeshore lots on Casco Point. Applicant correctly notes that the Putnam gazebo to the immediate south was recently granted an average lakeshore setback variance anticipating that when Breltner's was redeveloped, any new house would be moved forward to conform with lakeshore setbacks in the neighborhood. As a consequence, any attached garage proposed by the applicant will require additional hard- cover. Note that the Putnam property was ultimately granted variances to allow 40.2% hardcover in the 75-250' zone. In exchange for additional hardcover in the 75-250' zone, applicant is proposing to remove approximately 180 s.f, of sidewalk in the 0-75' zone. However applicant feels that the existing boat house is in such good condition that he would prefer to not remove it. He notes that one of the reasons that he was attracted to the property was because of the boat house. Finally, note that although applicant has not proposed a back-up apron with the driveway, there is a fairly extensive gravel area in front of the existing garage, between the garage and paved portion of Casco Point Road. Applicant could use this area as a back-up apron if necessary. The Public Works Director notes he would probably approve development of a back-up apron in the right-of-way, but also would certainly approve the gravel area being reverted to lawn by the homeowner. Zoning File #1422 rune 15, 1989 Page 3 of 3 Rta::f Recommendation - If Planning Commission feels that the proposed site plan is appropriate, a recommendation for variance approval could make the following findings: 1. Hardcover will decrease in the 0-75' zone. 2. The existing non -conforming detached garage will he removed. 3. The house location is appropriate given the location of neighboring residences in relation to the lakeshore, hence the excess hardcover associated with the longer driveway is also appropriate. 4. The proposed new residence will remove a neighborhood eyesore, i.e. an old summer cabin which has not been used as a full-time residence for at least 10 years. 5. Additional hardships include the fact that no additional land is available, and that construction of a residence nearer the road in order to meet hardcover standards would not allow for lake views afforded to adjacent properties. Appropriate conditions of eoproval would include: 1. Removal of existing garage and residence including all existing sidewalks. 2. Applicant to provide a grading plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Optionally, Planning Commission should address whether a back-up apron must be provided. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 19, 1989 ZONING PILE 11419-BOWERS CONTINUED the Planning Commission that the applicant was requesting variances for hardcover, side setback and average lakeshore setback in order to construct an addition and decks. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area would increase to 34.2% from the existing 32..l. Mr. Bowers noted that an existing patio and step had been removed and were not included in tue hardcover calculations. Gaffron advised that the applicant had several alternatives for reducing hardcover. There is a stone patio near the garbage rack beside the garage and a stone walkway along the west side of the house. Planning Commissioner Brown indicated that he would prefer to see hardcover percentages remain the same. Mr. Bowers explained that the walkway served as a drainage path that allows runoff to occur to the north rather than toward the neighboring property. If a major portion of the driveway were removed, it would make accessing the garage difficult. Planning Commissioner Hanson said that he was satisfied with Mr. Bowers' proposal as is. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson to recommend approval of the hardcover, average lakeshore setback and side se -.back variances subject to removal of the front fireplace. The hardship being that the house is located in such a way that placing the addition in any other location is precluded. There was no second to this motion. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Brown, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of application 01419 provided that hardcover does not exceed 32.4%. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays=O, Motion passed. 4102 2&VID MEITNER "" CUM POUR ROAD VARIABCB PUBLIC BEARING 11:10 P.M. - 11:40 Mr. and Mrs. Breitner were n, for this public hearing. The Affidavit of Publication ai-ertificate of Mailing were duly noted. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that there is an existing house on this property that was abandoned 15 years ago. The applicant is proposing to build the house closer to the lake, however there will be no need for an average lakeshore setback variance. This is due to the adjacent property owner,Mr. Putnam being granted an average lakeshore setback variance for a gazebo. The applicant :s not proposing to have a back up apron. Gaffron had spoken to the Public Works Director who indicated that there is quite a bit of gravel area in front of the existing garage on the right-of-way which could serve as a back up apron if necessary. There is a retaining wall that is shown to extend 2' into the Peterson's 15 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 19, 1989 ZONING PILE #1422-BEEITNEE CONTINUED property and drainage onto that property is a concern due to its lower elevation. The City wants to make sure that drainage continues along and does not have any negative 'impact on this property. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron asked the applicant what he intended to do with the higher portion of the lot? Mr. Breitner replied that they intended to take the knoll off of the top of the hill which is approximately 1-1/2'. Gaffron asked about tree preservation. Mr. Breitner said that they were going to try and preserve the trees which was one of the reasons the attached garage was more preferable. Gaffron provided hardcover information for the existing house. In the 0-75' zone there is a boathouse and concrete sidewalk. The applicant_ wishes to save the boathouse and remove the concrete sidewalk. In the 75-250' zone, the existing is 25A. The applicant's proposal for the house, deck, and driveway would increase hardcover to 34.3%. Planning Commissioner Johnson asked whether the existing garage would be removed: The applicant responded that it would be removed. Planning Commissioner Johnson questioned whether the applicant had tried to keep hardcover within 25s? The applicant replied that they had looked at other alternatives, but felt that the present proposal was best. In order to maximize the views of the lake, the house had to be brought forward to the average lakeshore setback line. Due to the fact that a detached garage would have to meet a 30' setback from the road and the location of Putnam's garage, an attached garage would better fit the scheme of the property. Mr. Breitner further noted that hardcover would be approximately the same for a detached garage as they are proposing for an attached garage. Mr. Breitner said that the hardcover proposed is very close to what currently exists. Brown observed that the new driveway is proposed to be 1,000 s.f. The Planning Commission requested information pertaining to the hardcover percentages of the driveway, house and deck individually. Gaffron calculated that the deck was 350 s.f., the house was 2150 s.f. and the driveway would be 1080 s.f. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to recommend approval of the hardcover, lot area and lot width variances under the following conditions: 1) The proposed hardcover envelope shall not exceed 34.26A. 2) Approval is contingent upon removal of the non- conforming, detached garage and sidewalk. !Si MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 19, 1989 ZONING PILE 41422-HRRITHER CONTINUED 3) A grading plan must be submittec. The hardship in this application is this is an existing developed lot with no additional available land to increase the lot size. Planning Commissioner Brown asked what the total lot coverage was? Gaffron replied that it was 15.625%. Bellows said that she usually had difficulty approving these substandard conditions, but she felt that the applicant had tried his best to keep everything to a minimum. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays=O, Motion passed. 11423 EDWARD BROWN 355 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:15 P.M. - 9:17 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicant was present for this matter. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of this application, subject to a survey showing the location of the barn being submitted. After discussion, it was further recommended that no after -the -fact permit be required, hence no survey would be required. Motion, Ayes=4, Nays=O, Brown Abstained, Motion passed. MISCELLANEOUS (ZONING PILE 11423) Acting Chairperson Bellows stated that the Planning Commission had been asked by Mr. Norwood to reopen and reconsider application 01420. Mr. Norwood discovered after the Planning Commission's vote to table this item that he would be out of town at the time he would be scheduled to reappear. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to reconsider this matter. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-O, Motion passed. It was moved by Planning Commisisoner Johnson, seconded by Planning Commissioner Brown, to deny this application. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. 17 ZONING FILE NO. 1422 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6/22/89 ----------------..-----_---_--_--------------------------------------------- TO: David S. Breitner COPIES TO: Box 33 Navarre, MN 55392 ----------------------------------------..--_-----------------____---------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance -----_----..-------------------------------------------------------.-------- DATE OF MEETING: 6/19/89 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommmends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Maximum 75-250' hardcover: 34.26% as proposed. 2. v(, additional 0-75' hardcover; remove 0-75' sidewalk; boathouse may remain, subject to non -conforming structure regulations. 3. Approval of lot width, lot area variances. 4. Remove existing detached garage. 5. :Applicant to provide a grading plan to be reviewed and approved by Ci•:y Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council Monday, July 10, 1989; meeting starts at 7:OOp.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. TO: Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael 1. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Date: June 28, 1989 Subject: 41422 David S. Breitner, 2755 Casco Point Road - Variance - Resolution Zoning District - LR-1 C, Single family lakeshore residential, 1/2 acre, sewered Application - Request for hardcover variance to construct a new residence. Also requires lot width and lot area variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Notice of Planning Commission Action of 6/22/89 Exhibit s - Proposed Resolution Exhibit C - Memo 6 Exhibits of 6/14/89 Discussion - Please review the memo and exhibits of .:une 14, 1989. This is a request for hardcover, lot width, and lot area variances to demolish the existing structure, which is in poor condition, and replace it with a new home. The hardcover va�iance is due to the applicant's wish to have an attached garage, while locating the house in line with the residences on either side. No average setback variance is necessary. Lot area is 0.37 acre in the half acre zone. Lot width is 60' where 100' in width is normally required. The hardcover request is for 34.26% in the 75-250' zone where only 25% is normally allowed. Planning Commission reviewed this application at their June 19th meeting and recommended 4-0 to approve, finding that: 1. Hardcover will decrease in the 0-75' zone (applicant is removing a sidewalk). 2. The existing non -conforming detached garage will be removed. Note that the applicant proposes to retain the existing boat house near the shoreline. 3. The house location is appropriate given the location of neighboring residences in relation to the lakeshore, hence the excess hardcover associated with the longer driveway is also appropriate. Zoning Pile #1422 June 28, 1989 Page 2 of 2 4. The proposed new residence will remove a neighborhood eyesore, i.e. an old summer cabin which has not been used as a full-time residence for at least 10 years. 5. Additional hardships include the fact that no additional land is available, and that construction of a residence nearer the road in order to meet hardcover standards would not allow for lake views afforded to adjacent properties. Planning Commission recommended that approval be conditioned on the applicant providing a grading plan, with review and approval by the City Engineer before a building permit will be issued. Staff ROOw ndation - Staff reco. mends approval per the Planning Commission recommendation, per the attached resolution. 5580998 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _-'-''___. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) PILE 41422 TRdI.+!il iN �.:D WHEREAS, David S. Breitner (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2755 ras::o Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 265, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has appliei to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (S) to permit the construction of a single family residence on a lot of 0.37 acre where 0.50 acre in area ,s normally required, and of lot width 60' where 100' in width is normally required, and comprising 34.26% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: � &E1I6 CLf1.*y 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File $1422. 2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 19, 1989, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) Applicant will be removing an existing sidewalk in the 0-75' zone, resulting in a decrease in hardcover in that zone. B) The existing non -conforming detached garage will be removed, benefitting the neighborhood. Page 1 of 5 .0 City of ORONO CITY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NO •. • C) The house location is appropriate given the location of neighboring residences in relation to the lakeshore, hence the excess hardcover associated with the longer driveway is also appropriate. D) The proposed new residence will remove a neighborhood eyesore, i.e. an old summer cabin which has not been used as a ful 1-time re9i'1ence for at least 10 years. E) Additional hardships include the fact that no additional land is available, and that construction of a residence nearer the road in order to meet hardcover standards would not allow applicant to enjoy lake views afforded to adjacent properties. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendatioT,s of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire harard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. con =sIONs, ORDxR AMD conDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a residence on a lot of 0.37 acres in area where 0.50 acres is normally required, and of lot width 60' where 100' in lot width is normally required, and comprising 34.26% hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 5 A.. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL s NO. 1. The existing garage and residence, including all existing sidewalks, shall be removed prior to commencement of construction of the new residence. 2. The applicant shall provide a grading plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. ?. The existing boat house, which comprises 250 square feet or 4.5% hardcover in the 0-75' zone, is allowed to remain subject to the pertinent zoning code requirements governing such non -conforming structures near the Jakeshore. 4. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not exceed 250 square feet or 4.5%. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall not exceed 3,580 square feet or 34.26%, as follows: House 2,150 s.f. Deck 350 s.f. Driveway a Entry Sidewalk 1,080 s.f. ------------- TOTAL 3,580 s.f. (34.26%) 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 26, 1990). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of :he terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording_ of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 cf 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting 'Ietd on the loth day of July, l .Go STATE OF MINNESOTA I as. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this loth day of July, 1989, by James R. Grabek i Dorothy M. Rallin, Mayor 6 City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Publ c,. �q;;^'c-K StHENFFLER My Commission Expires Page 4 of 5 Cite of ORO:` ( ) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ^) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) as. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of —c�.t a 1 198 before me a Notary Publiq withiq and for tdid county, personally appeared )„J iS 4$`- V4 Ad 6, .�t) i r . 141) / known to me to be the person s) ed scrived in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (thy) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF M.. -SOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNE) "N ) On this day of , 198 before me a Notary Pv laic within and for saia County, personally appeared known to me to be the person(s) described in an 'oho executed the foregoinginstrument, aaud acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 5 of 5 & qll- fnej% L c JJ 98 5OCT89 a 52 C5580M DOC 010.00 LC - AM 'r• 50 1 SO)( y9/ APPLICATION MO. 1422 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION ^rystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 7/11/89 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: David S. Breitner COPIES: Box 33 Navarre, Mr 55392 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF .FETING: 7/10/09 VOTES 5 For 0 Against ----------------------------------------------------------------..-_-_-_---- COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution .:opies at the City Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property mot sign the resolutions. Variance Approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application mus•_ he submitted no later than July 10, 1989. Building and demolition permits are required - contact Building Inspector regarding statue of application. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. POPHAM, HAIR, SCHNOBRICH 6 KAUFMAN. LTD. 3300 .� Pt R .+cfCN• -O W e e w+.N<q ro xo . �ooaI [ c• o _ u[t+ +O<[wl<.. iry xrrtn .. q+ry •....... D..... r ..... nr.�.<.a.v ..<.. .a. ,. uva o I. C1s..o wN<.. Nu �L DC— P wuu+N n N+ry DOx+ID u n P/x r+ui.i e snu rt< uPOry .a[.+.+.rvc uY•. e[•c.egn MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.02 • sys.Pxc[ aJ e1.Caa.'Y/la ee. Nlau N-.c.[ry ar mc. v..nal p[N V L11. COLOI[AOp LOLOi u[•Nox[ [msa-uoe •n[cewaw eon uan.. .Oe use wN.r. wASNl."0.. p. C. 20 ie •6V-Q.......... OIR[CT OIAL NUMBER 334-2549 iHtx . t[ or[ r wOlu+N .ONr.ON .OVq w <NOu .+... a +w �.oxu com[w s ..war N•O. <.00•<N o.�ao.+oa ¢o.• Cr.twO[...ry L mewolNn *NL rowM[a LAw n.M oa xwL.e.N A D.ecN December 18, 1989 Me. Jeanne Mahusth CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 +fov • wo painnr[ Cn<w [u[<+x • ...nuu0 ,w. .Los•. w•[ey.[x O.P.eN ,vo,.x +evxou I: 1 RE: Land Use Filing information (Resolutions) Dear Dle. Mabusth: Enclosed with this correspondence please find a schedule depicting the filing information relative to numerous Resolutions which have been submitted by your office for filing with the Hennepin County Recorder's Orfice or the Resgistrar of Titles. If you have any questions or :omments relative to this d,. vment, please feel free to call Nancy Husnik or myself at 334-2107. Thank you. Very truly yours, (Ms.)�Vi rginia tk. Melvie Secretary to Nancy E. Husnik Legal Assistant ZNEH 1100(34) Enclosures