The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 TO: Jennifer Simon 3925 Cherry Avenue Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION: ZONING FILE: #04-3044 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 14, 2004 COPIES: Rear Yard Setback Variance DATE OF MEETING: September 13, 2004 VOTE: 4 FOR O AGAINST Motion: To deny per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, September 13, 2004 7:00 o'clock p.m. (James Render, Appeal of Administrative Decision, Continued) Render stated he would like to have approval of the 940'. White moved, Sansevere seconded, to deny the appeal of administrative decision by James Render, 1335 Tonkawa Road, relating to measurement of building height. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Sansevere moved, Peterson seconded, that the sense of the council was that the grade elevation could be set at 940' for the lot located at 1335 Tonkawa Road. White pointed out the Council is accepting the 940' elevation for this proposed residence only. Barrett suggested staff draft a resolution of denial. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 5. #04-3010 THEODORE CAPRA, 3534 IVY PLACE -VARIANCES White moved, Sansevere seconded, to table Application #04-3010, Theodore Capra, 3534 Ivy Place, at the request of the AP,plicant. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (Recess taken from 9:00 -9:07 p.m.) *6. #04-3044 JENNIFER SIMON, 3925 CHERRY A VENUE -VARIANCES -DENIAL RESOLUTION NO. 5224 Sansevere moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5224, a Resolution Denying a Variance to allow a rear yard setback of 20 feet when 30 feet is normally required for the property located at 3925 Cherry Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. *7. #04-3046 ROBERT AND BRENDA MACDONALD, 2480 Old Beach Road - CUP/VARIAN CE -RESOLUTION NO. 5225 and RESOLUTION NO. 5226 Sansevere moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5225 and RESOLUTION NO. 5226, Resolutions granting an after-the-fact side yard setback variance to permit the detached garage to remain 8.4 feet from the side lot line when 10 feet is normally required for the property located at 2480 Old Beach Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Sansevere stated he would like to discuss at a work session the decision made last year by the Council concerning the half-a-day time off that Staff gets if they need to attend three evening meetings in a month. Sansevere stated he would like the time off to be based on the need to attend evening meetings period. Sansevere suggested rather than requiring attendance at three meetings in PAGE 14 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JENNIFER A. SIMON OF LOTS 1 & 2, & IN LOT 21, HICKORY HILL HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ~;1r~ . <1~~;. 5f 0 MH CHERRY A VENUE o'} P.f>. I ;1 n( Vo' 1"-')C' •. ,O· t .• i"g" f \ ~ N 87°58' 19" E 143.45 MEASURED 153.47 144.65 HICKORY HILi,. "PK" NAIL ,,-SET IN t~·· BLACKTOP ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ 0 c.o ; >-FLAGSTONE i• -~ remain : o I l5 W/L S (to . ) :~ ~ ·100/! \ ·························································· .. ········J·· w c.o 24.0 ----61.6 • ,-"1 I . 1 1 --------R ~-I I~ EXISTING 1 . :z ·~ ~1:> ~ j s::t-o PROPOSED q ~ I~ HOUSE~ AODiTION ~ N I #3925 ~ I o I ~ z I PROPOSED l'l WOOD' ADDITION ~. F'ENCE / "l "l 0 . -- ~ PROPOSED BLACKTOP DRIVEWAY J ( €XlfTIJU{; (l~IIV~t.) OC) 0) 65-• ,' C'I N ' ' . .. . _, --------------------------------~ ........ ,/ '•... 143 .63MEASURED 144.33HICKORY HILL ··;;,' . ······· ' \ / 19.8 1M 10.0 i t ······················· ;:o 0 w -ci .. o-i-o<D ~'Ir) q 7 : LC)"-·'-0 ~ !~ I"') l{) N i..,. O O : CX) -i-l CO O i.soo• SETBACK . LINE 2 0 0 0 LO ~ <G -i- I :~ ri-,;..i :z ~e ... l{) l{) ... N 0 0 -i- 0 (f) I "\ z ... ...-[ FROM HALF-SECTION MAP , ~ z \ ... •· : \ ' ~ ' -. ----l \. % I N 88°36' 25" w 143.95""'"'" pp -1 "" I 144.33 HICKORY HILL I~) I ECO I I I EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION -" ...J Lots 1 and 2, and the East 10 .00 feet of ~ot 21 , HICKORY HILL o : denotes iron · marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, and the proposed location of two proposed additions thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments . GRONBERG ANO ASSOCIATES, INC. !=ONSULTINC3 ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, AND SITE PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN . 5535 952-4 73-4141 I hereby certify that this surVey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that i am a duly registered Civil l::ngineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Number 12755 04-101 A MH 40 04101PROPOED.scj . SCALE 1 "=20' DATE 8-9-04 JOB NO. 04-101 A oi ol I _)3/ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JENNIFER A. SIMON OF LOTS 1 & 2, HENNEPIN & IN LOT COUNTY, 21 , HICKORY MINNESOTA 0 '<I" 0 MH CHERRY A VENUE . ,p,'r P.P. ,.-·: .,., f?J : o .... .c• N 87°58' 19" E . ,• •-.......!. I-~_. .... 143.45 MEASURED ""'" c.o . ,j ,r I >-FLAG.STONE 0 c.o I ~ WALI..S 16 ·10.0·~~ WOOD & STONE WALLS/BORDERS w ,- -I -, -o;:t"- ~ .. ~ N 0 r- WOOD 1.--'. .QEQIB. I (0 ..., \: (/) ! I j 1::e ~1-s1"' ~, ;J IC'\) ~ It 10.5 Q ,..-~ I <.O o:: I ~ I :c I u 38.0 EXISTING HOUSE #3925 ,, j 5 / 8: / < r; w " I- N 5 z 0 u Q I ~ 1"4 "! I a.. L, ~ .,......~"-r'f~.....,.,-m~-..C..,,..,.::....f.-.O:....,..lt....,~...J Z I ~ I ~======~=:==d!:!!~L ~ "l WOOD,J CONCRETE > ~ FENC"l : PATIO t::::,r---t----~.,..k,..;,,.,.,-l....,.,,..U-_, if_ ··· : ··.PAV 1 153.47 144.65 HICKORY HILL GRAVEL DRIVEWAY HILL ~;~.p ~~1>;, _, I! >-- 0:: 0 :x:: ,,? :r: l{) (0 ci f'--. ui < w ::::; 0 OJ CJ) "PK" NAIL ,..-SET IN BLACKTOP 0 MH 0 CX) 0) -r- -r-~ ~ z 3: ~ .6~-!; •.:= --------~--:;:~-:. --------------· .. PLANTED AREAS 143 63 -14_4_3_3_______________________ ·· .. NOT HARDCOVER ' MEASURED • HICKORY HILL ---:.~_._;. ~> ~~ >o :;;;>-0 .. :: 0 Or stj--1, ,,..., ,; \ I io.c--- 1'0 0 CX) CX) z -b CD 0...-:jo .. -~ ON L() 0 \ \ r- 0 z .~······ 500' SETBACK LINE ... ...-°FROM HALF -SECTION MAP 2 0 0 0 l{) ------\ I I \ I I I N 88°36' 25" W I -'I ,-,. I -1 I I 143, 95 MEASURED 144,33 HICKORY Hill .... I I I I -· ~, I .... ., I I EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 and 2, and the East 10.00 feet of Lot 21, HICKORY HILL o : denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, and the location of all visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. 0 0 0~ (./) 1---f z z [25 P.P. SCALE 1 "=20' 1--1 ~ 0 MH 40 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC.I vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under ro&llflG E}QflRS, I.AN) SLRw:YffiS, STE PWffRS the laws of the State of Minnesota. ,.., ___ D_A_T_E __ ....,.., I I llllil 3-25-04 445 N. WllOW mvE L~ LAKE, lfi 55356 ECD 952-473-4141 ~_//~~ Mark S. Gronberq Minnesota License Number i:u::i::i JOB NO. 04-101 04-101 ~~ CITY of ORONO August 26, 2004 Jennifer Simon 3925 Cherry Avenue Mound, MN 55364 Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Variance Application #04-3044 Dear Ms. Simon: Municipal Offices Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 The Plam1ing Cormnission reviewed your request for a rear yard setback variance on August 16, 2004. You were notified of the denial recommendation in a letter dated August 17, 2004. During the Planning Commission meeting and during a telephone conversation you indicated that you did not wish to appear before the City Council for a final decision regarding your variance. The City requested a withdrawal letter from you at that time. As of today's date the City has not received a formal withdrawal letter. If your intention is to withdraw your request please sign this letter below and return it to City Hall in the enclosed postage paid envelope. Otherwise, your request will be heard at the September 13, 2004 City Council meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, City of Orono ~ jpuu-~~ Janice Gundlach City Planner I wish to withdraw my request for a rear yard setback variance at 3925 Cherry Avenue. Jennifer Simon, Property Owner Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 TO: Jennifer A. Simon 3925 Cherry Avenue Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION: ZONING FILE: 04-3044 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: August 17, 2004 COPIES: Rear Yard Setback Variance DATE OF MEETING: August 16, 2004 Planning Commission recommended as follows: Denial of the request to allow an addition to be setback 20' from the rear property line when 30' is normally required and a re-design could achieve the required 30' setback. VOTE: 5 FOR 1 AGAINST (Commissioner Kempf dissenting) Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council-Monday, August 23, 2004; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach at 952-249-4623. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 16, 2004 6:00 o'clock p.m. #8 . #04-3044 JENNIFER SIMON, 3925 CHERRY A VENUE -VARIANCE (7:05-7:27 p.m.) Jennifer Simon, Applicant, was present. Gundlach stated the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance to permit an addition to the principal residence where the proposed setback is 20 feet from the rear property boundary when 30 feet is normally required and the existing house encroaches approximately 15 feet into the setback. The property is located in the LR-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District, and consists of .39 acres or 17,195 square feet. The addition would be approximately 21.5' by 16'with a deck adjacent to it. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing screened porch and porch overhang located in the rear yard. Staff finds that there are hardships inherent to the land , specifically the jogged rear property lot and the sloping topography, that somewhat restrict the applicant from meeting the required 30 foot rear yard setback. Gundlach stated the hardship analysis also references "reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls." Gundlach explained the official controls would be the 30 foot required rear yard setback and the City 's Zoning Code. Staff feels the applicant can shift the addition 10 feet to the east in order to meet that 30 foot setback and therefore does not meet the hardship criteria. Staff recommends denial of the requested variance. Gundlach stated if the Planning Commission finds that the sloping topography alone constitutes a hardship and would not allow the applicant to relocate the addition to meet the setback, then approval should be granted based upon a: hardship. Gundlach noted the adjacent neighbor did call this afternoon and stated she has no objections to the addition. Simon requested an explanation be given regarding the sloping. Gundlach stated she took a city topography map and examined the slope of the land. Gundlach explained if the Planning Commission does find the property slopes down enough to prevent the addition from being relocated , then that would constitute a hardship. Simon i,tated she has attempted to redesign the addition but was unable to do so because the addition would then be located in front of a window and the upstairs would not flow properly . Simon explained they were far into the process before the architect became aware that they would have to comply with the side yard setback. Simon noted this is a corner lot and a wider setback is required. Simon stated they did attempt to slide the addition over but in her opinion it does not look very well . There were no public comments regarding this application. Kempf stated he did notice that the adjoining neighbor would not have any problems with the house being located closer to the lot line given the distance, dense undergrowth and mature trees. Kempf commented he did also try to visualize the addition in another location but saw the problem with a design that would locate the addition in front of a rear bathroom. PAGE 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 16, 2004 6:00 o'clock p.m. (#04-3044 Jennifer Simon, Continued) Kempf stated in his opinion the biggest issue is that Cherry is not the front of the lot, and that if Cherry were the front of the lot, then the side yard setback would be 10 feet. Kempf stated in his view the backyard is functionally a back yard and what the applicant is calling the side of the house is functionally a side yard. Kempf stated he cannot see imposing the City's definition for front yard/side yard on this application. Fritzler inquired whether the applicant was unable to locate the addition because of conditions due to the land. Fritzler stated the location of an existing window does not constitute a hardship and is a design issue. Simon concurred that it is a design issue, but reiterated they were unaware of the side yard setback until they were well into this project. Simon stated the entire project would have to be redesigned if the variances are not granted and that she has considerable expense already into the project. Simon commented she may have to forego the project if the variances are not approved. Fritzler indicated he tends to agree with Staffs recommendation. Rahn stated he also is in agreement with Staffs recommendation, and explained that there is some rationale for detern1ining a corner lot. Rahn stated the longer setbacks are on the front and rear of the property and narrower on the sides, so it would make sense to have your larger setbacks go with the length of the lot. Simon stated she is limited in what she can do with the house given the location of it on the lot. Rahn noted the lot is somewhat rectangular. Simon noted she is also reducing the amount of hardcover by removing the patio and porch, which makes the lot well over its hardcover limit. Simon stated this addition would actually bring the lot more into compliance with the hardcover requirements. Rahn commented in his view the addition could be relocated 10 feet over, but that it would be up to the applicant to decide whether she wants to move the addition. Gundlach stated even if Cherry were considered the front, a variance would still be required to do the covered entryway and the tuck-under garage addition. Gundlach stated the existing house does not meet the 30 foot required setback if Cherry is considered the front. Simon commented in her view the side of the house with the covered entryway is the front of the house. Gundlach explained the City's code considers Minnie A venue the front because it is the shortest length. Simon stated in her opinion a variance would be required no matter where she builds onto the house given the fact that the house was originally constructed in the comer of the lot. PAGE 14 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,August16,2004 6:00 o'clock p.m. (#04-3044 Jennifer Simon, continued) Leslie inquired how the topography of this lot could be used as a hardship. Gundlach stated when she reviewed the application, it appeared possible to relocate the addition 10 feet to the east. Gundlach stated a hardship inherent to the land that would prevent the addition from being relocated could be the topography of the lot, but that in her opinion the lot slopes very gradually and would allow for relocation of the addition. Gundlach noted she is unaware of the amount of grading that would be necessary if the addition were relocated and whether that would constitute a hardship. Leslie commented the fact that it might cost more to relocate the addition or is not architecturally pleasing does not constitute a hardship. Kempf inquired whether the ordinance that defines what the front and back yard of a lot is wiitten in stone and if it is reviewed in every situation. Rahn stated since it is a city ordinance, it would require a variance to deviate from it. Gaffron stated it is in the definition section of the ordinance where it defines on a comer lot what the front yard is and what the side yard is. Gaffron stated the short side of a comer lot is the front according to the definition. Kempf inquired whether a variance could be applied for to make Cherry the front of the lot. Gaffron stated he is unaware of any application during his tenure that specifically requested a redefinition of the ordinance. Gaffron stated the opportunity to define a front yard and a side yard exists when someone requests a new subdivision, but to his recollection he is not aware of any variances to the ordinance in a situation similar to this. Leslie concurred that functionally the front of the house is located on Cherry. Gaffron inquired whether the Planning Commission would grant the variances if the front of the lot were considered Cherry. Leslie stated in his view the proposed addition could then be shifted back but does not really solve anything. Gundlach stated if the Planning Commission is interested in looking at making Cherry the front, the code may need to be amended rather than a variance granted. Bremer inquired whether the applicant is even interested in looking at redesigning her plans if Cherry would be considered the front of the property. Bremer stated the addition would merely be on a different side of the house. Simon stated her goals in this project are to add onto the house in a way that the house does not appear to be piece-mealed and to increase the amount ofliving space. Simon stated her in view redesigning PAGE 15 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 16, 2004 6:00 o'clock p.m. (#04-3044 Jennifer Simon, continued) the addition would not be as aesthetically pleasing, and noted that the amount of hardcover on this lot would be reduced with this project. Simon stated in her opinion the slope is more than just gradual, noting that they do sled down it in the wintertime. Simon stated given the location of the house on the lot, her options are very limited. Rahn stated it appears to him that the architect designed the addition not lmowing the parameters of the design and the problem is an architectural thing. Rahn stated if the applicant determines that the addition cannot be relocated in a conforming location, he would not be able to understand that. Rahn commented in his opinion the architect designed the addition for a nonconforming portion of the lot and that there are other locations where the addition could be constructed. Simon stated they also considered turning the existing porch into a kitchen and inquired whether she would be allowed to remodel that and keep the same existing hardcover. Rahn stated if it is an existing closed-in space, she probably could, but that he would have to defer to the building inspector. Gaffron stated one of the things the City would need to do would be to look at the permit history of the property to determine whether that porch was actually permitted at some time in the past, but that he would also defer to the building inspector. Rahn suggested it might be a viable option to have the building inspector look at the porch to determine whether it could be converted into a kitchen. Gaffron inquired whether there is a foundation and basement under the porch. Simon stated it does not have a basement under it. Jurgens commented it appears to be a slab on grade. Simon stated that porch is actually located closer to the neighbor's house. Jurgens commented in his opinion it would be a design issue to relocate the addition. Jurgens inquired whether the addition could be located on the front and the deck on the back and clear the setback. Gundlach stated the deck is a second story deck and would have the same setbacks as the house. Gaffron stated if the deck is high enough to require a railing, it would be considered structural and would need to meet the setback. Jurgens stated at this time he is unable to support approving this addition since it appears to be more of a design issue than a hardship. Simon reiterated that given the current location of the house, it is difficult to design something that is aesthetically pleasing. PAGE 16 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 16, 2004 6:00 o'clock p.m. (#04-3044 Jennifer Simon, continued) Rahn inquired whether the applicant would like her application tabled. Simon stated she would prefer not to table the application. Simon commented if the addition is constructed on the front of the yard, the front yard is basically ruined. Kempf noted the southwest corner of the lot is the nicest part of the lot, and that if the addition is moved forward and the deck is away from the street, the view from the house is turned towards the more private part of the lot. Rahn stated the Planning Commission is an advisory board to the City Council and that she could plead her case before them. Leslie moved, Jurgens seconded, to recommend denial of Application #04-3044, denial of a rear yard setback variance to permit an addition to the principal residence located at 3925 Cherry Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 1, Kempf opposed. 9. #04-3046 ROBERT W. AND BRENDA ZOE MACDONALD, 2480 OLD BEACH ROAD-AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE (7:28-8:12 p.m.) Robert MacDonald, Applicant, and Tim Kelley, Attorney-at-Law, appeared on behalf of the Applicants. Gundlach noted a letter from Mr. Kelley has been distributed to the Planning Commission concerning this application. Gundlach indicated the applicants are requesting an after-the-fact side yard setback variance to permit the detached garage to remain 8.4 feet from the side lot line when 10 feet is normally required. The new garage originated by pouring a new slab over the old slab, reusing the mechanical systems, and constructing new walls and a new roof. The new garage is located in the same location as the old garage. Gundlach explained the changes from the old garage to the new garage consist of a steeper pitched roof, a turning of the roofline, and two dormers added to the conforming side of the garage. Gundlach indicated the City has consistently granted variances to property owners in order to maintain their nonconforming structures to match exactly the old structure and also in some cases to make slight modifications. Gundlach recommended the Planning Commission review this application in one of the two following ways: One, if the Planning Commission determines the improvements to the garage consist of improvements to the nonconforming structure, the after-the-fact variance should be approved; or two, if the Planning Commission determines the structure has been completely rebuilt, the after-the-fact variance should be denied since the structure could have been relocated to meet the 10-foot setback. PAGE17 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 16, 2004 6:00 o'clock p.m. (#04-3046 Robert and Brenda Zoe MacDonald, continued) Gundlach noted there are photographs depicting the old garage and the new garage in the packets before the Planning Commission tonight. Kelley distributed some newer pictures of the existing structure to the Planning Commission. Kelley stated it is his understanding that Commissioners Jurgens and Leslie have viewed the structure. Kelley pointed out that only one comer of the structure is encroaching and the adjacent property located behind the garage is heavily wooded and cannot view this structure. There were no public comments regarding this application. Rahn noted he also has viewed the property. Rahn inquired whether the roof has also been made taller. MacDonald stated he believes the height of the roof is exactly the same but that the pitch has been changed to a steeper pitch. Gundlach commented the steeper pitch could have increased the height of the roof but that City Staff does not have any building plans to confinn that. Rahn stated in his view the roof does appear to be a little bit taller. Rahn inquired whether the new garage is wider than it is deep. Gundlach stated the dimensions have remained the same. Gundlach stated in her opinion when the roof was turned, the pitch was made steeper in order to allow the dom1ers on the front of the structure. Jurgens stated there is some attic space in the garage but the only access to it is a small trapdoor. Rahn inquired whether new studs, sheathing and stucco were utilized to construct the new walls. Kelley stated the old garage was damaged from water so the walls were replaced as well as the slab. Kelley indicated all the mechanical features of the old garage were incorporated into the new garage, such as the sprinkler system, electrical panel, and heating system. Rahn inquired whether the applicant replaced the slab, the walls, and the roof. Kelley stated they poured over the existing slab. MacDonald stated the existing slab was raised because of flooding in the garage. MacDonald indicated every spring they would experience two to three inches of water in the garage. Rahn inquired why the applicant's contractor did not apply for a permit given the amount of construction being done. PAGE18 Date Application Received: 7-21-04 Date Application Considered as Complete: 7-21-04 60-Day Review Period Expires: 9-19-04 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Janice Gundlach, City Planner~ August 11, 2004 #04-3044, Jennifer A. Simon, 3925 Cherry Avenue -Rear Yard Setback Variance -Public Hearing #04-3044 August 16, 2004 Page 1 of4 Zoning District: Lot Area: LR -1 C, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (½ acre min.) 0.39 acres (17,195 s.f.) Lot Width: 119.80 feet Application Summary: Applicant requests a rear yard setback variance to permit an addition to the principal residence where the proposed setback is 20 feet from the rear property boundary when 30 feet is normally required and the existing house encroaches approximately 15 feet into the setback. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the application as the addition can be shifted 10 feet east in order to meet the 30 foot required setback. Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Area (acre) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard (feet) Side Yard (feet) Rear Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent to 0.5 100 30 10 30 List of Exhibits Exhibit A -Applications Exhibit B -Hardship Documentation Form Exhibit C-Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form Exhibit D -Survey of Existing Conditions Exhibit E -Proposed Survey Exhibit F-Proposed Survey w/Topography Exhibit G -Hardcover Calculation Worksheets Exhibit H -Existing and Proposed Elevations Exhibit I -Existing and Proposed Floor Plans Exhibit J -Existing and Proposed Cross-Sections Exhibit K -Existing and Proposed Roof Lines Street ( feet) 15 Exhibit L -Photographs Exhibit M -Aerial Photograph Exhibit N -Property Owner's List Exhibit O -Plat Map Background #04-3044 August 16, 2004 Page 2 of 4 The applicant's representative met with staff to discuss the proposed improvements to the property. It was determined at that time that the applicant would require a rear yard setback variance in order to construct an addition to the existing house. This was a direct result of misinterpretation of what frontage was considered the front. By Code definition, on a corner lot the lot boundary with the shortest street frontage is designated as the front line for zoning purposes. Although a substantial amount of improvements are proposed, staff has determined that because much of what is existing will remain, the project would not be considered a rebuild. LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET Lot Area/Width LR-lC Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (½ acre) 100' Actual 17,195 s.f. (0.39 acres) 119.80' Setbacks LR-lC Required Existing Proposed Front (Minnie Ave) 30' 84' 62' Rear (west) 30' 15' 20' Left Side (south) 10' 62' 43' Right Side (Cherry 15' 21' 16.5' Ave) St t IC rue ura overage Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 17,195 s.f. (0.39 acres) Allowed: 2,579.25 s.f. (15%) Proposed: 2,262 s.f. (13.2%) Hardcover Calculations Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover 75-250 17,135 s.f. 4,284 s.f. 3,362 s.f. (25%) (20%) 250-500 60 s.f. 18 s.f. 0 s.f. * (30%) (0%) * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds Rear Yard Setback Variance #04-3044 August 16, 2004 Page 3 of 4 Proposed Hardcover 3,622 s.f. (21%) 0 s.f. (0%) The applicant has proposed to remove the existing screened porch and porch overhang located in the rear yard. Included for removal are the rock on plastic in the rear yard, some wood rail-road tie retaining walls, pavers, planter areas and some concrete patio areas on the north and south side of the home. The existing 1.7' x 5.7' encroachment is a chimney shaft that will remain and is an allowed encroachment. The applicant is proposing to add a garage and master suite addition to the east side of the home and a covered entry on the north side, all meeting the required setbacks. The applicant is also proposing to construct a kitchen addition to the south side of the home in line with the current house. This requires a rear yard setback variance because the lot line jogs to the east 1 O'. The applicant is also proposing a deck to the east of the kitchen addition, which will meet all setback requirements. Hardship Statement Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Hardship Analvsis /11 considering applications for variance, the Pla1111i11g Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety a11d welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, am/ the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Plan11i11g Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under co11sideratio11, a11d shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keepi11Jt with the spirit and i11te11t of the Orono Zo11i11Jt Code. Staff finds that there are hardships inherent to the land. For example, the jogged rear property line and the sloping topography, all somewhat restricting the applicant from meeting the required 30' rear yard setback. Further, the Zoning Ordinance defines the front on comer lots as the shortest :frontage. In this case that being Minnie A venue even through the applicant's front door faces Cherry A venue and the property has a Cherry Avenue address. If Cherry Avenue were considered the front only a 10' setback to the west would be required, allowing the applicant to proceed without variances. Adding to all mentioned above is the layout of the existing home and what best fits within that envelope. #04-3044 August 16, 2004 Page4 of4 However, hardship also references "reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls"; this being the 30' required rear yard setback. It is staffs opinion that the property owner has reasonable use, especially since the addition can be achieved within the 30' rear yard setback, recognizing the layout of the existing and proposed improvements will not fit together as well or grading may be required. The hardships mentioned above may hold more validity if the applicant had no other options for placement of the proposed addition, bearing in mind that the layout of the existing house is not considered a valid hardship as it isn't something inherent to the land. Issues for Consideration 1. Are the hardships mentioned valid enough to grant variance approval, even though the applicant could meet the 30' required setback if grading were done and the interior spaces were re-designed? 2. Does the sloping topography, by itself, offer a valid hardship? Or, could the grading necessary to meet the 30' setback be minor enough to require it? 3. Should it be relevant that the jogged rear property line was caused by separate acquisition of the east 10 feet of the neighboring lot (the most western 10' in the rear yard was not a part of the original platted lots)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Denial of the requested variance as the addition could be moved 10' to the east in order to meet the 30' rear yard setback. Approval of the requested variance only if you find that the sloping topography alone constitutes a hardship restricting the applicant from moving the addition 10' to the east in order to meet the required rear yard setback. EXHIBIT A City of Orono Variance Application Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: . P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55322-'J066 Application# CL/-30L/ \./ Date Received: 7 ~ 2.-1 -o {/ Amount Paid: f oO 0-<.71> Staff : .::Ja.O i. Le ,1 Fee: S600 Renewal-: --,-$-:-30_0 _____ _ After-the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee This application form must be completed in full. Ap~·:cant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFOzRIVlf }lON: /7 ll:._,, it:_ y !1v/'L . Site Address: z IC--;? <..--ff nr · ~ '-- Property Identification Number (PIN): _..t).,_li;:c....'--:.....:.I I-L)_-_Z_.J"-. _· .,L..~.,,,,.:s_·-....::&:......;o-=-J~f?------------ (Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey.) Date Property Acquired (month/year): //' 02 □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels. Present use of property: i& Residential □ Other Zoning District: APPLICANljlNFORMA .PN: (C?mplete legal na:-:-:es and marital status required for each interested party) Name: vi'#N -fM.tJ Phone (horn~): 9~ · 7}~-. O o ~ Phone (work): Z-·. '-f",. ·-o?c8 Address: !>'i"ZF C::,' _:_4' e,Zy __ L_L Email: ___________________ Fax: OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names a:-,d marital status required for each interested party) Name: F-nn ~ 6/a:=)r t7 r Phone (home):'1'5a,. 41 /. 007/ Phone (work): {p/d-.. ]Lfl c'Jld:ff Address: ,31'.J5 Cl1errcl IJyc Email: ___________________ Fax: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ /?<. .:>VO Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary): £!::Z~df!,/7;;~~ ~ ¼~ ~,;m * &1];J:U I # 1 1 'l i ' REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be processed. □ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner. Completed Application Form Completed Hardship Documentation Form Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map. List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County De ment of Finance, Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephon 612-348-59 Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting uirements listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" for reproduction. Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet). Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17"). Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. * APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its RQtential merit. Applicant's Signature: ,=('Cl ~:-., Applicant's Signature: _ Date: Date: I OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. _a_-'--u--'-/(_'. --~-l~/l=..[__.e,.'1-_.----........,(""---,{::::::\ ______ Date: r Date: Owner's Signature: Owner's Signature: I Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. City of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.*) Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 For Office Use Only: J Ml'/ .,,,.. City Planner: · 111v lt . Meeting Date/Time: 1! tJ IO l/ Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 PC Date: ,AJ/@i)S".,,.-f.,...-'--/'~W=+--lf~-fl-+i'l_'!J ____ _ What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: ,,1 Site Address: ~~ L ~ Ot(i. 12t-y'. /f✓£ Property Identification Number (PIN): ;j/,?--//) ·-ZJ -3} , oofft;, Zoning District: LP--IG Size of Property: ----------- DESCRIPTION OF REQlJl;ST: □ Average Setback ~~de Yard Setback _@'Rear Yard Setback □ Hardcover . □ Lot Covera~.e . □ Lot Area, . □ Other: · l/1 /Yl1'-I 711/CWY-t V IJ1 ~ Jn □ Front Yard Setback □ Lot Width 7. ) I J/ tJ /y .u/!._ Applica~t's ·'.' HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form, Initials: understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance I application. OTHER INFORMATION: *Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will~ted by City staff. Applicant Signature: .f t1 ~(Jr) Date: 74s: /44- EXHIBIT B Page 1 of 3 HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate t.o the request (some may not apply): 1. "The property in· question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed b the · · 11 r-L=.e..:.u,,.._-==.~:..u.=~-L.c..L.lCJ.o..~cL..:=::L.L...:..=~-'-'~--'=-=~c.=..::::..:....:.,___L..f?:~==-~y~~ 2. 3. 4. ~-r, "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not d by the la down 11 ,/I 1-f,~:_~~=~=~!!!-J=~~LL~~L..w~.L..~:_~=--.E-~OO~~C-~~~4~)/ " · · · otalter tMe essential chara e locality." L .L),t!_,Srd-d ..LJ,~"J_~~~_L.~~~~~~-=£...£...e_,~~~-bLa~~~!::J...,~::e::..~~.,,.A,~e:. 7'"f-,I!. -"Economic considerations alone shall· not constitute · an undue · hardship if reasonable use for the pro~rty exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. 11 7A'~ /),,u ,w.s ~j) o~s,,~N ,4 tJ,,v,£ 7#~r <./,?s ,)"-/47 d,9-S4b ti ?tJ,n1 is" Dt:JC.f. ~.,. /., s 7-t~b '?M-~r .z,,,_,, r-t/,.,,e,.,,:?J-.,t.. .s (.J IZ-/1. ,,(,,..,, -r ;t...,lk',,,.,.,,., A,,-.1 -r t:J ,,,..;' /#-'L-_;)~ ?-t .,L-rY. /7 {7 ,1':_ ~ ,._..,r , , ..t.t.l'",,,,.\.\ ,'."·_·1, ~-._: ,.~~/ 5. 6. Page 2 of 3 "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affect erson's land is lo~at~d." / /} ·-_--:, ✓-,,e...zM1·rrv,,l U~,·t. I',,-' rf ,r-:55,,~'?,--;-'-?'t:: 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." 8. 9. · 10. 11. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar t such property or immediately adjoining_property." . ';i c V l-14 t11-i "i> ,1 'T" /o r-/ ~ fl <::J..14,z (,.,.,J H,4-,'$ ; ,ol. ~..u -~ "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said la~s located."- SA~A-# '2 '.'The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a su · I property right o plicant." , . ~,0/2.Jl"-1. --'--l~~__;_u.fl...,____J_·~o~...-4.~C::...:" tll~k.!M.::...:.!:::.()!:::.2:,:.!::l,4':..t.r◄.....:.11:~--J'...L:L.=---L.2..:..=._;~~.J...£.::.___L_...!...L_...!,~J.o::!..!. /t,,):. ~-',,-/ • u..,//r/.1 No ~'7'1-Nr$ ,1~ I~,.,.....;::., ;9-r'~ . V 7"'.,J -'2.4.. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning C de." J;,,... 6,..;J:,,:::::,-1,-;-;-fa.lh-7;;,,, /4;>-,s.,_;> /4..P,..,,..,.,,,,.,,. W1,~ 'E1:: /R../2-4. I,.., 4, Y&Z ft d..,,1 /'/4/6'-#~0A.,#,IJO.t> ~ Page 3 of 3 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is nee · e demonstrab · ifficulty." ~~ ~ ~ -;r')/ ,?-'(.t,7")/ /~ c)N-'t "'7'ff~'T' 4/.,f,.1 0.H-H/Z. ':: -,1 4 ,,..,1, Hardship Statement Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): r"'; -: i ,<:,:-,.-+}"TT di.,,, EXHIBIT C ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) 12t{( D ),,</1-4,f.r,.., 01 /52 c; e±.1' /,"-11(//t.. print name(s)] [print address] have ~eviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at fY°2'!5 e:z_~y also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ . , .. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. C) Q C:Z 7-/:?-o/ properl,i Owner V -D~te Property Owner Date ************************************************************************************************************* I (we) _______________ of ____________ _ [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3? 2-S-(}1.-,/l--t' f also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. (~~~ . . ::·; /'. _·, ~ 4i oS. --tj- CD ci CD w 0 '<!- 0 MH • J:;;'), P.P. ;.-·: 1".:> ¢ iO:::·.O· -Cl!"" I ~:···· l d ,x I ~ FLAG0 STONE Io WAU.S I x: 10.Q-;,,.l ~ 1 s;f-.~ 1(0 -'1 -'I I ~~ I \'vi • I<( 1 ''-::; z_,O CHERRY A VENUE N 87°58' 19" E 38.0 143.45 MEASURED WOOO & STONE WALLS/BORDERS 0:: / a. 1 153.47 144.65 HICKORY HILL --tj--I ~ /;; I ,;f- -~ N c.,f"" i' --tj--if:' I . ZI 10 5, r ,..-<( • 0J ~ 1<.D ~ 0 O I ~yq EXISTING HOUSE #3925 ~ 5 • <( / "-: w ,.._ f- N, 5 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY ,I z ..,--I O a:> f? I :r Q \ I ~1, z : a. 8 I / _J i ) a: 0 :,c CJ :i: l{) (0 ci I'- ui <( w :i; 0 OJ CJ) ~~wooo' ~ ,.. FE,~ ' I CONCRETE _ 6 :,f \ I / PA TIO -._f!AV,_ .. ___ :_ PLAN~-~/~;·::·S 143.63MEASURED 144.33HiCKORY Hill ... > ;:o q :: 0 o.- --tj-r ""j ,,... ' _, \ I --'--I.() t0 0 CX) CX) z J, \ - b o~ o-• --tj- 0 (\J L{) 0 ...-- 0 NOT HARDCOVER \. Z 500' SETBACK LINE \. _ .... ----·rnoM HALF -SECTION MAP .. •· 2 N 88°36' 25" W 143.95 MEASURED 1 A A -Z-Z .......... · · · 0 0 0 l{) v Rf PP. '( "PK"' NAIL .-·SET IN . BLACKTOP 0 MH 0 <X) 0) .-.-µ:i ~ z 3: ~ ~> ~~ 0 0 o~- (/) 1--1 z z 1---i ~ 0 MH c~ ~ g c:, -~ ~ -tj (0 ! U::,O· N 87°58' 19" E 153.47 143.45 MEASURED 1"g"· ~ \ I>-.\ : If) 144.65 HICKORY HILL 0 (0 I a:: FLAGSTONE :co t0 .1 0.0·~ ! remain) (' I . ,---~~=~----------j ~W,L S (to :d -~ " 1 I~ r"-r-7'"7"77-¼c~~~7T,:,----24-.0---------------------------------! w --tj- C\I 0 ,:- I~ EXISTING ~ 1 ··s ······························~··· /,..; , o ~--LI ..=..co -2,.• __ ;J/lf HO l JS E ~ PROPOSED o " I '7,/ . -" ADDITION ~ PROPOSED BLAC ui < OP DRIVEWAY J #3925 ( t;x,fr,A.Jc; AAr/c<..) C(! 0 z l'1 ~ .6:rP I CJ) 24.0 IJ ~ ,-__:~v• "!I g~ ;;j q_Q:q} Q . 'Z ?.-f.: \,..-··· ·-.... 19.B f ~o 0 .................................... : -143. 63MEASURED 144.33HJCKORY HILL 10.0 -------------~1· . ::: 0 Q,:- -tj-? r) LC?'\.. r-r) 0 co co z --- .,, C I -. J l I I I I I I I ,W 1 --oill 0 -tj-o -l[) -tj- C\I 0 :0 :t') r ,:- O i SHADED AA.EA 2 RE&V\R.\N {::f VAR\A-Nl€ APP/Z.ovAL ' j.500' ~ ~t)~ Lll'lC. z .... / 1 FROM ~c 1161& MA, 11 '-· ' ,• ' L:.-i N 88°36' 25" W 5oD' SE,~ fril)M 91-9. lf ...... "' _,/ 143,95 MEASURED 144.33 HICKORY HILL 111::: io I EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 0 ci 11) "PK" NAIL •• -SET IN ~·· BLACKTOP JZf P.P. f£ ·~ ·~ z r::c:i ~1:>-~ <C ,:- R r::c:i 1--f ,z ~ 18 l[) 1.1; -N 0 0 ,:- 0 (/) MH 40 ~ ~ = i,,,,,i ~ i,,,,,i ~ ~ ;l "'-~ ~~ I ::l· 1'J ,e,\ j \ ....._____ N 87~8' 19" E'\ 10..)."t I l'O .• ,O . I 144i5 HICKORY HILL ' ·• >.,.. ~ i \ 143.45 !EASURED . \ -st-I g 1 i \ i~ I / ::1 c.o l , >-FLAGSTONE :«! t'1/ :-Jr t\J, / 1 :I: . I !s Wi/AS (to , ) ;~ o._'O ; ~ (\Y)J t\\)d) .\. fi: • O G ! remain : v, : / v'(J ,I)\ o c.o . -10.0->-1,! 1 \ 1 · / ;~w 7 ............. ~ ... ~"~····························••f w c.o f 24,0 ------61,6 /ci -? -1 I vif I 1. ______ --"-1\Q~L I' ~- 1 I ; 1 EXISTING / . --. -.;J-I~ q PROPOS~ ~ --~ :.i. 1,....: HOUSE ~ ADDITIOM N PROPOSED i:3LACKTOP DRIVEWAY 6 ~ ~ c.o / / (Fx,.;r,.uc; (;,<At/€<.) ro r \0 I #3925 I m 0 / / / I .. , z I p/oposED "! woo~ / ADDITION ~ FENa , • : "l "l~-o 0 . ,... ,... ~ .65-:. •' •: _, -~-N __ _: ~~. \ ., ...... -................. .. I I I Off\. I '\ / -✓,9.8 16.0 10.0 /3: 6 ... /.'...~··········: / . _./ 0 . l --143.6~~~44.33H~7~--------~~.; / / I : .,/ / ./ . . ' /' b~ oZo 1 · / ~rr q~ /j Lt'IL "-} o ~ 1~ i1i'5 Lf) N :-i- o / 0 /: 'CO -i-j / /co O : 500' SETBACK . LINE --./ .,,,,..- z _.,.,,-- .,.,,-------2 ----- / .,,,,,,,. / I/ / 0 0 ci l[) .. -se:r 1t.rn•~ -.~·· BLACKTOP ) ~ ~ :::> z ~ &s\~ 0) ~ ~ -i- R ~ 1-1 z /f z 3: 1-1 --Lf) Lf) -N 0 0 I -i- 0 (J) " z '········-r Ff OM HALF-SECTION MAP I \ ~ ' ---f ~ i I · " ( l N 88°36' 25" W' \ -1 C' I ,. J J \ EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION --. "' -.,/ \•'-;::;Z,O, 143.95 MEASURED 144.33 HICKORY HILL P.P, MH 40 I ~ ~ = .... = .... --3 I "!l!.i I! _J c-NNlrl:~ S'1MOH EXHIBIT G H1c1<012i" Hl'-l J e-r-o'i 9.q-04- HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' ~ 500-1000' / EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X S.F. Lenglh Width X = S.F. X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. ·x S.F.· F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. Or Fabric G. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F. B· A B x l00 = % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE. E,,(IStlllG A. House 38 X Z7 = \O"l.(.i S.F.-HOVSf Length Width . - Pi<DP051:'C '2.A-, 0 X 1...7, D = 648_ S.F. -&1.,U0.ir X = S.F. A0011"10I'{ '2..1, S-· -X \ b,Q = 34-4 S.F. f\opvse,t, h,7Jstc tJAJ1-htiY\ B. Garage X = S.F. Driveway 1172 REC0H~·1G,v1<£O C. X = S.F.-GRMEI.. O~Ne. -X = S.P-: - D. Sidewalk 5. ;;-X S'.~3 Pf<OP05£1\ zq_ S.F. -5,ooP X = \] 0 S.F. -S10fWALJ< E. Patio/Deck '2J.,;-X 10 = "2..IS--S.F. x· = S.F. F. Landscape X S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. Or Fabric 11 f;<1:;r1N6 G. Other X = S.F. -W,41..l>. -T 0 [<. f:A-';1. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE J 62. 2.. S.F. -A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 17,, 13;· S.F. B A + B X 100 = 2.1 . I 4--% [! 3-2 ,:--0'1 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET ~ SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. -x = s.F:· F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. Or Fabric G. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE D S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 6.0 S.F. s- A B X 100 = 0 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE. A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. -. ·-X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. • X = .. S.F-:··· D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. Or Fabric G. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. ··A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F. B A -'-B X 100 = % I I ' 2 1. '° '5 l.l) I I \j) I , '£ ! '2 @: ___ J I ~ I ~ UJ ~ I I ~ \,l.l I ..,.,. I ,!( (5 ~ I \ I i ~-;~ §} i I: I ~ t 'I i !~ i: ! ' :1 !~ ! I: :1 I: :1 d j \)I ~' ..,. == I ~0:1 NOlllOOV I I I I I I I I I 1 , . • I i ~ I I \.U i -z l:::> cJ.. \.L 'i:i' £ v'i .____, :x:. 'r· ·.:::, C, -./). ' • ,~j ~ ~ ~,, i~ ~! l!til,i l;ig ifllil i illliil i11i!llii11 r Na'~ [ EXHIBIT I ·a,,v ,,,.,.."" <is< NOWl9~NGr '>lOol NO!llOOV 1 ■111 ''' '' ''' :{~] L . 1i1 N .. ,... ---------- ., =o [ ·3A~ -'>l>,att:> .... NOWJ9 ~t-te(' :~od NO!l!OOV r lll I G] l' , !h .......... IC: i N if\r-4) J33HS II h / ; ' ! ~ I I i I ~ cl) ~ ..J I i_ I, 111 / i ~ I ~ i I ~ ~'ll a.o. -1"1 ~'IIONl'IOOl1 ONl!-c.,lllt~ 0EXISTING I-IOUSE SECTIQ-l ecAU!-~~ Ne,,1,-e_ RC0'"°"9M~src::coa MPMilll..r ..... 10""1'CN IDCIM9D ll:04Dl.1M~IP.,flllll::tf ........ """'~ Wl't.TD:1:11~~ ~ ~~,,._•Woe. rnu»cmttH&rrffllMf'UMN .-x-.--~™~ OJ .......... ~ PQIQIID c:ac.ffCKIMU. PDII ACM.PUN at~AO~ 'TC fflO~PlCOl..~'Cl~M SG:1P. -E3=~==-IOI _ - 0 ADPITIGN 1-10USE eECTlq,i ecA!.E,- No,..,e.. ~..i M'1LL. ~ " ~TICM"""'1 l"I-AY"""'1 G)J=XISTJNG f:!9:l8E 8ECTIGN ec.AU!,- ,V,AJ.. .... ~ ..=.-:::a.~~ tc:114Mrllll ............. "'°"' ..... .. ......wLTPII.J' lll"Pl."NCIICIC)~-c:uro.....-:t,-:ai,,......,,..oc:,. ffl1191caaflSl'i.-.,....., . ~==~ !Wl¥D2f Mlec wx .. ~~• n.i ....... COffNICIII ~COC.l'tCIC.-..&J. .... l'ICM.JIIUM W~M---, 'ICIDCn::ilDGIIIINl1'CIN.MLW,..,.. ... ....a. 0 AOC>ITIGN I-IOUSE eec:tlc::N ec.AU!,- Nd~ ~ l'<£l"IOP!:!. CIF SIHCIN l'<ESIPENCE -..NC>Tee. Tl-I! l"L.GN&PIJIINlel-E) ._INlll!llll!! l"'IIIEl"Al'IED I.PO{ l'l!!Q.l!&T l!lY A 1"1!&1e>emAL ~ NOi' AIOEGl&'IE'll50 AIOCMITl!CT""'--. &AID ~ -.r-E& NO -llY"""' &TJlll,IC:IUO!AL ""' C>t-l!N&IClHAI. ~ ""' 011~ IQOlTlBI D~ tllWJ. MA\'!! 1"1'11:CEC>ENC -= C)ll"l!N&le:HI, Tl-I!! ~°"'NC>'°"'-tfJ&T __,-NC> c::H5CX AU. NOTS. DIITAIIA !!U!VATICN&, ~ NC> Pl..00l't l"LRlll - ~NC)= ca-&"'LIANCI!! NC) l1NQ! .oM'l",ea_,-CQIOllll!Cr1QN& -TO &T~ Cl' c::ol&n,IJCTIQI. NO -AIOI!! El<l"IIIEeeED Ollt l"PUl!D, HC:UC>ING COMl"I.IANCI! Cl' -l'l..oN5111TH CODI! --Tl-I!! eeJ..ECT1a{ NC> .arPI.ICATICN Cl'~ &TJlll,IC:IUO!AL l!L!l"'ENTII I& Tl-I!: ~ OI' Tl-I!! l!IUILC>l!llt NC)""" Tl-I! -OI' -- H01el, DMJ.~axo...-.fl.DCII~ ,.~•-...,,..10-CICUIL.Mflll MQ.ICIIINW.CM..,_ V AU.ai. ...... O..-.Qll9MIIIII ....... M.Llt to.,..... ........ ~MOftD. s> AU.~ .......... ~ a,WJ.--~ <I) ft.OCll~-..U.-caae,l'CIII ~~•NAX..:.r~aWL ......... ~~ cDt 1-~ !Oz d) () N (i ~ () /,: i? tt'.1 ~ = -~ -~ '-I ri 0UU!eTDAlE "6-2e-"" !IIEVIOIQISEC<ll<D I . 2 . 3 . .. . ~ . . 1 . . ~ . . Ii ~=i EXHIBITK I II 11 11 11 11 11 11 Ii Ii II 11 11 II 11 11 II 11 II 11 Ii 11 11 -/' ,r 1' 1' EXHIBITL . U) 8- :z w -> 968.2 X 964.6 X RUN DATE: 7/'ll/2004 38 0811723330018 PROP ADDR 3928 CHERRY A VE JWNER NAME DONALD R O'REILLY & WIFE TAXPAYER DONALD R O'REILLY NAME/ADDR 3928 CHERRY AV MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330026 PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME JAMES A PURVEY ET AL TAXPAYER JAMES A PURVEY NAME/ADDR 4409 SOUTHMORE DR BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 38 0811723330063 PROP ADDR 1525 MINNIE A VE OWNER NAME DA YID S INGRAM TAXPAYER DA YID S INGRAM NAME/ADDR 1525 MINNIE AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 08 l l 723330075 PROP ADDR 1540 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME EDDIE A LINDGREN TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR EDDIE A LINDGREN 1540 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330078 PROP ADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME PETER S DUNLAVY TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PETERS DUNLAVY 1510 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 !7 P. ~ j cr:H-z~ ~~._,,;,b. ;r, ~· f~· }j !./ LI HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: I PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 0811723330019 38 0811723330020 PROP ADDR 3926 CHERRY AVE OWNER NAME AC PURVEY & DJ MARKUS TAXPAYER ANTHONY PURVEY NAME/ADDR DENISE MARKUS 3926 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330027 PROP ADDR 3907 CHERRY A VE OWNER NAME GERALD M CLARK III TAXPAYER GERALD M CLARK III NAME/ADDR 3907 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330064 PROP ADDR 1535 MINNIE A VE OWNER NAME TL & L H MANWARREN TAXPAYER TONY L & LISA H MANWARREN NAME/ADDR 1535 MINNIE AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330076 PROPADDR 1530 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME ROBERT W VEITCH TAXPAYER ROBERT W VEITCH NAME/ADDR 1530 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330079 PROPADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME PETERS DUNLAVY TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR ~ ~-13/ ~~~=~ (f~~ 't/ ;? \..;.h,:... ,/~,.- ~:~"" PETERS DUNLAVY 1510 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 .f~ s· ~-~ ,,1P~ 7 ;·~·_;-· ~~..!' .r.}i:.~~ ~ t~.J~~'e ,,~"l"J PROP ADDR 3908 CHERRY AVE OWNER NAME RJCHARD H NELSON TAXPAYER RICHARD H NELSON NAME/ADDR 3908CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330028 PROP ADDR 1520 MINNIE AVE OWNER NAME MARK WM JENSEN ETAL TAXPAYER MARK W JENSEN NAME/ADDR 1520 MINNIE AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330065 PROP ADDR 1535 MINNIE AVE OWNER NAME TL & L H MANWARREN TAXPAYER TONYL&LISAHMANWARREN NAME/ADDR 1535 MINNIE AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330077 PROP ADDR 1520 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME DORITH COGEN TAXPAYER DORJTH COGEN NAME/ADDR 1409 7TH ST SE MPLS MN 55414 38 0811723330086 PROP ADDR 3925 CHERRY AVE OWNER NAME JENNIFER A SIMON TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR JENNIFER A SIMON 3925 CHERRY A VE MOUND MN 55364 t_!l!j ~ ~ o:; ~ ~ RUN DATE: 7/'l1/2004 /l r .,1 ' , f( HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATEONTHE RECORDS OFTHE HENNEPINCOUNTYTAXPAYERSERVICES DEPARTM~.~T~, TO lEBEfI }-. OF MY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. -J /2 '7 /Oi L / -. ..1 ~· / '2)7 _,_. •J ,.n . -~ DATE/_L u..-,/( T BY -. · 1., '//1C·/ ,i:/r?/.:Y / ~ r/y, -: _ _'; ...:.. ' ~~::-,,.::;;_..·i~;,-· ._:;,..-=:;t, -~/ -~;_:_ (_: :: ~. , .. :..:::. .. ::.lr;,· 1-~:.J ;_,. :Ji:'. /.;7 /"· '' ····d ~ I // ·-I / (_..· PAGE: 2 0 lO ' ' , , __ .... 79 0 lO EXHIBITO Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department 154. 77 / ' , ,, 7 ,, ,, ,--157.08 9 172.71 10 12 0 '' ,, 242.3 ( CHERRY AVE 168.65 (79) 21 165.2 20 162.21 (78) 19 159.23 (77) 144.65 """ , -1 ~ ',,, (86) ',, 144.33 ' . __ , 0 2 lO 144.33 3 0 ... (t~13 I() ... .....J 4 ~ ...._ (64) 144.33 5 (65) 144.33 6 144.33 144.33 " ,, I ' ' 180 : -Parcel Information .· •. ·•· a:~ef 10·0~11.723330086 ·• /····•ttc,o~~N11rrib~; 392s · .. ··.•,;, v,•·•·••·· ... •.. St~eet':Narttt!'°CHERRYAVE 9 This in;t a lega/lyrecordecl map.It represent~ a co,npi/ationofinrormation .and data from City, County, and State road authoritierand other sources. ·• 60 August 4, 2004 Jennifer Simon 3925 Cherry Avenue Mound, MN 55364 REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION SUBJECT: Zoning Application #04-3044 The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your application for a variance for property located at 3925 Cherry Avenue. Below is a list of items the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review: • An updated survey showing all proposed footprint changes and their respective setbacks to all surrounding property boundaries. Application #04-3044 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the items requested above by August 10, 2004 by 12:00 Noon to remain on the August 16, 2004 Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at (952) 249-4623 should you have any questions. Sincerely, City of Orono Janice Gundlach City Planner HARDCOVER ORDINANC In 1975, the Orono City Council c. Jpted an ordinance limiting the percentage of lot area that can be covered with impervious surface ("hardcover") such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. Studies have shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized areas have a detrimental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. Hardcover Zones -Hardcover includes: Allowed Percentages: 0-75 0% ✓ Roofs, 75-250' 25% ✓ Sidewalks, 250-500' 30% ✓ Paved or gravel driveways, 500-1000' 35% ✓ Patios & decks (includes slatted decks), ✓ Tops of retaining walls & rock walls, ✓ Decorative landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting or fabric, or ✓ Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 1. Circle which setback zone (0-75', 75-250', etc.) the calculation is for. 2. For each item of hardcover within that zone, enter the length and width, and multiply to get square footage (s.f.). 3. Add up all the square footages to get total square footage of hardcover. 4. Divide by the total area of property within the zone and multiply by 100 to get percentage of hardcover in the zone. 5. If changes in hardcover are proposed, you should do a "before" worksheet and "after worksheet. If either results in percentages greater than those allowed, contact City staff before proceeding with your project planning! HAR ;OVER CALCULATION WORKS' -:ET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Ji X i<J = L06 c/ S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway 35 X ,L'I = /~30 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk ,~ X 'i = 31t./ S.F. 32. X 3 = 'J_(p S.F. E. Patio/Deck 2"' X ~ = 'j'(p S.F. /{., X ; 7. = I 'i Z S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ~} t:. -z. S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE {2 'i_lJO S.F. B A 3,·3 (. '2 B !7'1C0 I X 100 = 20 % PROPOSED HARDCOVF=R IN ZONE A House ~2 X 21 = / ]!,{o S.F. Length Width zo X /G = 3_ZD S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway (,o X li = [090 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk 2 c.{ X 3 = zz S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck Zo X [O = 2.00 S.F. X s:: = 30 S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE '1,i._3't S.F. A --TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F. B A .i(i~8 + B X 100 = 20 % ~ ~,~r1 Ffi tI,_-,_•-.:••j~~-. :~. t ,.. - _ CJ-1~ ,~~ ~ _ illZh - · p.Vt2po~ WAf1m: -3YY_ ~YlLpDscJ ~v : CG/ 5 ~ ~dh ~ ~ Lf6 ~ ·. /r,..1R.Y"et-'A1-rrn ~ 2/3 -(JJl ___ _j,L\\,l_ ~r ~----------· .... . 1__,, ?_ VJ l,; - --~---:... . . ,• -----:-------------------- ---~----.. +-- ------- -. --------+ ---. ----------- ------ -. --f------------------... ----.... ---------------~ ----+-----. -. ------•.• -----+ ------. ---- --· ------.,___ --. ------;---· --- t;ity of Orono Variance Application Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55322-'.)066 Application# Qt/-3041 '--J Date Received: 7-2..-i -o i./ Amount Paid: (oO 0· <-71> Staff: :Ja/1 i'U 4 Fee: S600 -'---------Renewal: $300 _;_::...::-=. _____ _ After-the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee This application form must be completed in full. Ap~·:cant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION: C L?rL;"} 4 vA:L , Site Address: <:; I lt;;' tr rz,,e,,f<-7 tt!.__7-- Property ldentifi....,ca~t....::.io_n_N.::..u_m_b_e_r-(P_I_N_) :..;..___()_8 ____ -/;_'/_)_-_Z_)_ 4 _~.._J ___ 6_0_F_~-------------- (Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey.) Date Property Acquired (month/year): //-02. □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels. Present use of property: ~ Residential □ 01her _________________ _ Zoning District: Phone (work): OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names c'.'.d marital status required for each interested party) N3:me: ft.l,n LL 6Ja--)( Y) Phone (home): TCf5;:;.. 47 /. 007/ Phone (work): ft;(;:J. ]LQ, ()12:? Address: 39d5 Cbcu:y fta:e Email: ___________________ Fax: ____________ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ /?~ oVO Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary): ~clv,~ ~~ ~; ; ~ ~ . ~ C, ~l{ tJn ~=i= 1 cl vr =Zz~~ S;;= if~ 'C &= REQUIRED SUBMITTAL . All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be processed. □ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner. Completed Application Form Completed Hardship Documentation Form Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map. List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County De ent of Finance, Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephon 612-348-59 Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting uirements listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" for reproduction. Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet). Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17"). Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. * APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. Applicant's Signature: t'7 ~ Applicant's Signature: _ Date: Date: OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's Signature: ?l ~<Y:\ Date: Owner's Signature: __________________ Date: Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. City of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.*) Street Address: Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 For Office Use Only:JM'/ ., City Planner: ' 111v U:;, Meeting Date/Time: ~_,_1+-IU"""""-1"/'-0-,-L+-/ _____ _ PC Date: /tl/()1/)-/ 'IYliLfl'n:J Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INF Site Address: Property ldentific . J -oo 9- Zoning District: LJL-IL, Size of Property: ----------- DESCRIPTION OF REQl,ll;ST: □ Average Setback ~de Yard Setback p{Rear Yard Setback □ Hardcover . □ Lo~ i;overa~_e , □ Lot Area/ . □ Other: . JJ!r1f/J1 /Yl1'-I ffl1J drJ Yf IN l/1 if~ SUfJ I □ Front Yard Setback □ Lot Width. /J ?121 Y4/f//f'-?-tL_ Applica~t's. HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form, Initials: understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must be completed and submittE:rd in conjunction with their formal variance application. OTHER INFORMATION: *Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will :e~mpleted by City staff. Applicant Signature: f {1 ~(jr) Date: '745 /44-- HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE T SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) \ ;· 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Ji X l'l = 10,r./ S .F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S .F. B. Garage X = S .F. C . Driveway ,~ X LI = /~3o S.F. . X = S.F. D. Sidewalk ,~ X ~ = ';'14 S.F. 1z. X 3 = ~<, S.F. E. Patio/Deck 24 X "' = 'i'l::> S.F. ,, X ,, = I 'I Z S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S .F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S .F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3}(. "2. S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE /_]_ '1.. () 0 S .F. B 3,3 (. '2 B /7..,'V ' A X 100 = 20 % PROPOSED HARDCOV l=R IN ZONE A. House ,2 X Zf = 17!,~ S.F. Length Width zo X I Co = :szo S .F. X = S .F. B. Garage X = S.F. C . Driveway ,o X li = Lo9o S.F. X = S .F. D . Sidewalk 2'1 X 3 = 22. S.F . X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck lo X lO = zoo S.F. ta X s: = 30 S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F . G . Retaining X = S .F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE "1. ':/._ 3 .-; S .F. A &- TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F. B A iq_~g B /7"/00 X 100 = 20 % # tl J;. II---~ ,-~l LJL i . r\ ~ ~~j~~\ /~ ~'ii! Jj ~""' '\\t,a:; '\. ~ ~ ,:rP ~:~ .JtC i -=' .... ,__ HARDCOVER ORDINANCE -In 1975, the Orono City Counci 1 adopted an ordinance limiting the percentage of lot area tt. can be covered with impervious s ace ("hardcover") such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. Studies have shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized areas have a detrimental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. Hardcover Zones -Hardcover includes: Allowed Percentages: 0-75 0% ✓ Roofs, 75-250' 25% ✓ Sidewalks, 250-500' 30% ✓ Paved or gravel driveways, 500-1000' 35% ✓ Patios & decks (includes slatted decks), ✓ Tops of retaining walls & rock walls, ✓ Decorative landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting or fabric, or ✓ Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 1. Circle which setback zone (0-75', 75-250', etc.) the calculation is for. 2. For each item of hardcover within that zone, enter the length and width, and multiply to get square footage (s.f.). 3. Add up all the square footages to get total square footage of hardcover. 4. Divide by the total area of property within the zone and multiply by 100 to get percentage of hardcover in the zone. 5. If changes in hardcover are proposed, you should do a "before" worksheet and "after worksheet. If either results in percentages greater than those allowed, contact City staff before proceeding with your project planning! Page 1 of 3 HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meet ing agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted . The hardship must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid hardships . In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship , address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered . Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate ~o the request (some may not apply): 1. "The property in · question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed b th · i " --,,-L-'-'--L-.....:.....!.~'-A--------"~=-"':::::.._,,,,.;p~~~=Cll!!.=~~:,_,L_-=-;,,..!:...,_ _ __:_~:...:....;_==-:.........:,,;_.; ~ F-L.!!!:.L~-=c...LLL.lioe:=,----L.~~~~=:LL=~~-L---===--===~:.....____.L~~~2:L ._,,~ ,r, 2 . ·3. 4. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not landown " ,/1 ~~-~--:..!.!~~~~~~~--~~;-:L~-_L_!~~:_.:__:~-./,Eµ~~C-==-~#-,,f,~~y "The · · · · otalter tr-ie essential chara f the locality." ~ · "Economic considerations alone shall · not constitute · an undue · hardship if reasonable use for the pro erty exists under the .terms of the Zoning Chapter ." '7#-f-k?A?.l) 5~ · V~s ,;✓,,, d4-&4D z~,, r t/,,,~,~ .. s ,k,•,,~r (J,,-,,, 5. 6. Page 2 of 3 "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter ." "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affect erson's land is located." / ,4 -,:, ~,,,,_rrn-r<,l t.lS,c. ~,-1 rf rr;S,~"5,,.-7"',?--? 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling ." 8. 9. · 10 . 11. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar t such property or immediately adjoinin g_,p roperty ." . ".f e v '-A -11 ,,-1 1> ,1 r ,,o -.,...; ,IC L ~ ,4;z. l-J HA-7'$ "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said la :,%!s located." - S AMA-# "2 '.'The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a sub · I property right o licant." . ----i-ir=---L-'-:=--'--y-=---'--'-----L~=--:::::::::-"--'--.--=--.c..:..._--=-=---'-----=-'---'c.___..;..: _ ,sJ;>,e.,,..,. _,_,=..:.....,,,....._~/l..,.__----LcO:==----L~::...:C:....::-....:.=..:..~..=-:2)=.f=-<-r,-'-'~,._,_---L.LL.C-=----<-.:~F-,=---'....e....:-=--...L._.!....C.___,,,,e__=-r.c...::. ~t;~ Jl-1,../ • lJ IT# No ~rlf.N'r.$ ,1~ / ,.,.,,.,.~ul'/·'r4' · v 'rv A!-4. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning C de." I~ 6;..;,J:,,,,"'::::, .. ,-,. -z;;.~ ~ /4;:-,s -v /4v ... r_.,,...,,. w,,1- 18"-/n.;2-~ ,_ 4-vbz 7i M'-'L M4 ,.,tF-H4o.c.Hbo<t>, Page 3 of 3 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant , but is nee · e demonstrab · ifficulty." #,,,g,y .S ,,;,-y ,;,-c .... ~y /~ c}N"f. '7#-Jl"T tV' ;..5 t,/ M F.,;z. S ,_,.,.,/ • Hardship Statement Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria , describe the unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): plrl /' I ( t!'s:.,~,1·?·~·,; r· ~ ' ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM 1 (we) btt;4;Lii,.,</41d-,fo<-, [prini°:l!.f 5"" ,,,W /,<,',<//L have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ~Y?5 e:!,/;1V1 .. 4'-/ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ . Ji ~ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement , I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 0 QG 2-/;>-o/ Properly o\vner I/ ---oMe Property Owner Date ************************************************************************************************************* I (we) ______________ of ___________ _ [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3 ,-Z ~ &~µ. f also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date . ~ "''-'-)) f:-J .:.~ .• ~~ .;;:121 ,_....~· ·-' .... .., DAT A PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. ~ ,C ./ A 0 -.l'"!nV\1.:e,.v ft u\ (°y\c_y-') Fir~q· ~ C::. ~ Middle ~ Last _id_ a::. _) c_ f.v-~ ct:\& AddrC) re Y::O JvltJ City State QS3llf:j Zip Cl:Q. 47 I· (lYJ I Phone I understand my rights as s ated above. -. Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or to be stored shall be as set forth in this section. · Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data; (c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and (d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer. The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in the individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms. Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning of that data. After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies. The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data. The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases. ....._. 0 I.() ct a 0 I.() , , 0 ~ , , I.() ,, 0 I.() ct 0 I.() 0 <( I.() 0 ~ I.() 0 I.() ct 0 2: (0 r--.: C") .... ' , ' ....... , q:, /\...' °' 9 N 6) ..... 90 --...J ~I ·1 g, I ~ ,g --................. ------·-. --, I ~ i 12 i i i i Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department 154. 77 / ,, 7 " 0 ,, .--157.08 , , -------8 ~ 0 (25) ---I.() --161 ---- 9 172. 71 7,55 ,, 10 ,, , ' , ' , ', " 12 ,· 242.3 CHERRY AVE 168.65 144.65 I.() -.;r-' -1 co (79) 21 .... ' ' , (86) l:2 co ' 165.2 ',, 144.33 20 . -_..., 162.21 (78) 0 2 0 lO lO 144.33 19 3 0 ~ .. ,t~J3 lO lO 159.23 (77) .. M ~ lO .... 4 ~ C\j 0 (64) ~ 3 2 I'--,. lO (28) .... 144.33 5 -~----- (65) 60 144.33 180 7 16 ,, 6 " g ~ g '' '' ' ' (29) 150.29 ' 144.33 ' ' ' 15 ' ' 180 8 ' g 0 (74) '' 0 ,, lO lO ......... (30) 144.33 180 9 a:± ,4· Parcel Information arcel ID 0811723330086 House Number 3925 Street Name CHERRY AVE 1 ~ (27) 8 ------;, 70 ~ 0 lO This is not a legally recorded map . It represents a compilation of information and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources . ~ 'v 15 t-..": ~ ~( ~ n.; _,_ 6'o 6'< LU ~ I'--,. 0) , ~ ----.;r- C\j 14 (87) RUN DATE: 7/'ll/2004 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 1 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 0811723330018 38 0811723330019 38 0811723330020 PROPADDR 3928 CHERRY A VE PROPADDR 3926 CHERRY A VE PROPADDR 3908 CHERRY AVE OWNER NAME DONALD R O'REILLY & WIFE OWNER NAME AC PURVEY & DJ MARKUS OWNER NAME RICHARD H NELSON TAXPAYER DONALD R O'REILLY TAXPAYER ANTHONY PURVEY TAXPAYER RICHARD H NELSON NAME/ADDR 3928 CHERRY AV NAME/ADDR DENISE MARKUS NAME/ADDR 3908 CHERRY A VE MOUND MN 55364 3926 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330026 38 0811723330027 38 0811723330028 PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PROPADDR 3907 CHERRY A VE PROPADDR 1520 MINNIE A VE OWNER NAME JAMES A PURVEY ET AL OWNER NAME GERALD M CLARK III OWNER NAME MARK WM JENSEN ETAL TAXPAYER JAMES A PURVEY TAXPAYER GERALD M CLARK III TAXPAYER MARK W JENSEN NAME/ADDR 4409 SOUTHMORE DR NAME/ADDR 3907 CHERRY AVE NAME/ADDR 1520 MINNIE A VE BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330063 38 0811723330064 38 0811723330065 PROPADDR 1525 MINNIE A VE PROPADDR 1535 MINNIE AVE PROPADDR 1535 MINNIE A VE OWNER NAME DA YID S INGRAM OWNER NAME TL & L H MANWARREN OWNER NAME TL & L H MANWARREN TAXPAYER DA YID S INGRAM TAXPAYER TONY L & LISA H MANWARREN TAXPAYER TONY L & LISA H MANWARREN NAME/ADDR 1525 MINNIE AVE NAME/ADDR 1535 MINNIE A VE NAME/ADDR 1535 MINNIE A VE MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330075 38 0811723330076 38 0811723330077 PROPADDR 1540 NORTH ARM DR PROPADDR 1530 NORTH ARM DR PROPADDR 1520 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME EDDIE A LINDGREN OWNER NAME ROBERT W VEITCH OWNER NAME DORITH COGEN TAXPAYER EDDIE A LINDGREN TAXPAYER ROBERT W VEITCH TAXPAYER DORITH COGEN NAME/ADDR 1540 NORTH ARM DR NAME/ADDR 1530 NORTH ARM DR NAME/ADDR 1409 7TH ST SE MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MPLS MN 55414 38 0811723330078 38 0811723330079 38 0811723330086 PROPADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR PROPADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR PROPADDR 3925 CHERRY AVE OWNER NAME PETERS DUNLAVY OWNER NAME PETERS DUNLAVY OWNER NAME JENNIFER A SIMON TAXPAYER PETERS DUNLAVY TAXPAYER PETERS DUNLAVY TAXPAYER JENNIFER A SIMON NAME/ADDR 1510NORTHARMDR NAME/ADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR NAME/ADDR 3925 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 RUN DATE: 7/'11/2004 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATEONTHE RECORDS OFTHEHENNEPINCOUNTYTAXPAYERSERVICESDEPARTMEN~T., T.O mE·~. •. .· ··/······ . OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ~/2'1 / oy / . . -,1 / / ;f7 ,..-7'\ ,,,,,.,/-~ DATE/_L 1:A..,,/l BY , . , /1/?-'" · , :,P:/ /""' / ~ PAGE: 2 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER A 600 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 -0060 Name David Ingram Firm Address: Serviced issued by: David Yurich Fund 10 Account 44130 Center 671500 Invoice Number 2004 -7 No. of Units ~10 Rate $1 .25/Unit Total $ 25.00 Detail of service performed 1. 0811723330086 2. 3925 cherry ave RECEIVED ~JUL 2 9 2004 CITY Of ORONO FEE TRANSACTION INVOICE Date: 7/22/2004 Make checks payable to Hennepin County Treasurer and mail or deliver to Fee Cashier, A 600 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 -0060 FEE AUTHORITY The charges made hereon have been levied pursuant to Chapter 692, Laws of Minnesota,1969, which gave authority to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to set fees for certain services provided by departments of the county. Copy 1 -Customer # ~.'(;>. -.. ~- -; ... ,• -. . . ' ,•., /:\ 4h ., . :. , -' ·, -~ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of#04-3044, as mailed to the attached list of property owners. ln Witness Whereof, I have hereunto 'LE[ August, 2004. Denise M. Leskinen CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, August 16, 2004, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. 2. ,, .) . 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. #04-3010 #04-3022 #04-3034 #04-3037 #04-3040 #04-3041 #04-3042 #04-3043 Theodore Capra, 3534 Ivy Place, LR -1 C zoning district, requests a hardcover variance in order to permit 31 % hardcover within the 75'-250' zone when 25% is normally allowed and a hardcover variance and lake setback variance to permit an existing 60 s. f. shed to remain within the 0-7 5' zone all in conjunction with the construction of a new residence. Philip and Karen Skoog, 280 Tonka Avenue, LR -lA zoning district, request a rear yard setback variance to allow a rear yard setback of 43 feet when 50 feet is normally required in order to construct an addition to the existing home. A Perfect Construction, LLC. on behalf of Robert P. Mack, 1580 Sixth Avenue N, RR -lB zoning district, requests a conditional use permit in order to construct a berm consisting of greater than 5 00 cu. yd of fill adjacent to Co. Rd. 6. Wayzata Country Club, 430 Old Long Lake Road, RR-lB zoning district, requests a variance in order to construct an addition to an existing maintenance building which will be setback 41 feet from the edge of the Luce Line Trail when 50 feet is normally required and 45 feet currently exists. Dean and Sherry Lundblad, 1290 Arbor Street, RR -1 B zoning district, request a side street setback variance to allow a side street setback of 23 feet where a 50 foot setback is normally required in order to construct a detached garage. Rebecca Holzem, 3407 East Lake Street, LR-lA zoning district, requests a 75' -250' zone hardcover variance, side, rear and lake setback variances and lot area and lot width variances in conjunction with construction of a new residence on a lot that has 44 feet in width and 4,488 square feet in area where 200' in width and 87,120 square feet is normally required. Pillar Homes on behalf of Roger & Carol Rovick, 1625 Bohns Point Rd, LR-lB zoning district, requests an after-the-fact conditional use permit for grading and fill in excess of 500 cubic yards in conjunction with the construction of a new residence. John C. Holm and Susan M. Kerber, 1485 Bay Ridge Road, LR-lA zoning district, request a side yard setback variance and hardcover variance in order to construct a garage addition and replace an existing deck. 9. #04-3044 10. #04-3045 11. #04-3046 Jennifer Simon, 3925 Cherry Avenue, LR -1 C zoning district, requests a rear yard setback variance to allow a home addition to be located within 30 feet of the rear property line. Robert and Mary Jo Enfield, 3165 North Shore Drive, LR -lB zoning district, request a conditional use permit for fill in excess of 500 cubic yards and an average lakeshore setback variance to allow the proposed pool to encroach approximately 30' into the required setback, all in conjunction with construction of a new residence. Robert W. and Brenda Zoe MacDonald, 2480 Old Beach Road, LR-lB zoning district, requests an after-the-fact side yard setback variance in order to alter the existing roofline of the detached garage set back 8.4' from the property line where 10' is normally required and 8.4' cunently exists. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by August 9, 2004. Plans are available for review in the City Offices. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4600. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Janice Gundlach, City Planner To be published the week of August 1st, 2004 Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office 2 RUN DATE: 7/Tl/2004 38 0811723330018 PROPADDR 3928 CHERRY A VE JWNER NAME DONALD R O'REILLY & WIFE TAXPAYER DONALD R O'REILLY NAME/ADDR 3928 CHERRY AV MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330026 PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME JAMES A PURVEY ET AL TAXPAYER JAMES A PURVEY NAME/ADDR 4409 SOUTHMORE DR BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 38 0811723330063 PROPADDR 1525 MINNIE A VE OWNER NAME DAVIDS INGRAM TAXPAYER DA YID S INGRAM NAME/ADDR 1525 MINN IE A VE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330075 PROPADDR 1540 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME EDDIE A LINDGREN TAXPAYER EDDrE A LINDGREN NAME/ADDR 1540 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330078 PROPADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME PETER S DUNLAVY TAXPAYER PETER S DUNLAVY NAME/ADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 [/fl =kt.,," :""lli~, HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 0811723330019 PROPADDR 3926 CHERRY AVE OWNER NAME AC PURVEY & DJ MARKUS TAXPAYER ANTHONY PURVEY NAME/ADDR DENISE MARKUS 3926 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330027 PROPADDR 3907 CHERRY A VE OWNER NAME GERALD M CLARK III TAXPAYER GERALD M CLARK lII NAME/ADDR 3907 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330064 PROPADDR 1535 MINNIEAVE OWN ER NAME T L & L H MANWARREN TAXPAYER TONY L & LISA H MANWARREN NAME/ADDR 1535 MINNIE A VE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330076 PROPADDR 1530 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME ROBERT W VEITCH TAXPAYER ROBERT W VEITCH NAME/ADDR 1530 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330079 PROPADDR 1510 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME PETERS DUNLAVY TAXPAYER NAME/AD DR "'~ Ii," -~.,,. ,J;· o:.,,,;.z; ,_:-,._ rr~ \tb~:.i!Jf; PETER S DUNLAVY 1510 NORTH ARM DR MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330020 PROPADDR 3908 CHERRY AVE OWNER NAME RJCHARD H NELSON TAXPAYER RJCHARD H NELSON NAME/ADDR 3908 CHERRY A VE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330028 PROPADDR 1520 MINNIE AVE OWNER NAME MARK WM JENSEN ETAL TAXPAYER MARK W JENSEN NAME/ADDR 1520 MINNIE AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330065 PROPADDR 1535 MINNIE AVE OWNER NAME TL & L H MANWARREN TAXPAYER TONY L & LISA H MANWARREN NAME/ADDR 1535 MINNIE A VE MOUND MN 55364 38 0811723330077 PROPADDR 1520 NORTH ARM DR OWNER NAME DORJTH COGEN TAXPAYER DORJTH COGEN NAME/AD DR 1409 7TH ST SE MPLS MN 55414 38 0811723330086 PROPADDR 3925 CHERRY A VE OWNER NAME JENNIFER A SIMON TAXPAYER JENNIFER A SIMON NAME/ADDR 3925 CHERRY AVE MOUND MN 55364 PAGE: I RUN DATE: 7/11/2004 n r .,, J HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I CERTIFYTHATTHE FACTS REPRESENfED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OFTHE HENNEPINCOUNTYTAXPAYERSERVICES DEPARTM~.t,:!T.' TOlE7:. E ~ . )_.. __ . OFMY KNOWLEOOEANDBELIEF. --;/2 1 //"·iL /. }-_) /I.A · )j7 /'L/)!•-~ DATE/J_ u_,.,/Ur BY •. ff ·t·<L .?r/jF ~_) r / / , /1/'':::'-.. 11, '\;> / r1 ,If' i /.-. ·····if ~ -./ I / f <.,, ~-· PAGE: 2 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF ORONO . 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 _Fax (952)249-4616 NOTICE . . . The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 · Kelley Parkway on Monday, August 1Ei, 2004, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing ·the following land use applications: 1. #04-301 O Theodore Capra, 3534 Ivy Place, LR -1C zoning district, . requests a hardcover variance In order to permit 31"/4 hardcoveqvlthin the 75'·250' zone when 25% is normally allowed and a hardcover variance and lake setback vari ance to permit an existing 60 s.f. shed to remain within the 0-75' zone all in con junction with the construction of a new residence . 2. #04-3022 Philip and Karen Skoog, 280 Tonka Avenue, LR -1 A zon ing district, request a rear yard setback variance to allow a rear yard setback of 43 · feet when 50 feet is normally required In order to construct an addition to the exist ing home. 3. #04-3034 A Perfect Construction, LLC. on behalf of Robert P. Mack, 1580 Sixth Avenue N, RR -1 B zon ing district, requests a conditional use ,permit in order to construct a berm con sisting of greater than 500 cu . yd of fill _adjacent to Co. Rd . 6. 4. #04-3037 Wayzata Country Club, 430 Old Long Lake Road, RR-.1B zoning district , requests a variance In order to construct an addition to an exist- Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.· . . Eric Serrano, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employ~e of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE PIONEER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full ing maintenance building which will be . . , nowledge of the facts which are stated below: setback 41 feet from the edge of the Luce , RoI1d Mary Line Trail . when 50 feet Is norrnally"lh Shve, LR - required and 45 feet currently exists. equerditional exce>o cubic q The newspaper has complied with all the 5. #04-3040 Dean and Sherry Ie laisetback · t • Lundblad, 1290 Arbor Street, RR -1B 1e pIPooI to ·equiremen S COnStltUting qualifications as a zoning district, request 8 side street set-1ate1pto the ~ualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota ~=~~;f~;~~=t~h:;~:;os::.!!~:!iti~ ~~~/°" wi th Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable normally required in order to construct a i laws, as amended. detached· garage. l F,V-a_nd .·. ._,-,~ . .-,,. :· 1alcP Beach 6. · #04-3041 Rebecca Holzem, ,g di ests an 3407 East Lake Street, LR -1 A zoning ar~ariance district, requests a · . 1xli9 of the 75'-250' zone hardcover variance, side, 11 r0 m the ·rear and lake setback variances and lot ,reprmally · area .and lot width variances In conjunc-rre lion with construction of a new residence I on a lot that has 44 feet in width and 4,488 _1gt)rd . are square feet in area where 200' In width ·.11 eetIng . and 87, 120 square feet is normally , , d and required. . .. · j f Orono · , _... -R<ible for 7. #04-3042 Pillar Hornes on -~PPOint-I behalf of Roger & . Carol Rovick, 1625 ~ rp I Bohns Point Rd, LR -1 B zoning district, requests an after-· ~sc: the-fact conditional use permit for grading 1 and fill In excess of . 500 cubic yards in conjunction with the construction of a new .residence. . iu 8. #04-3043 John C. Holm and . ~1~ Susan M . Kerber, 1485 Bay Ridge Road,. LR -1 A zoning district, request a side yard setback variance and hardcover vari~ : ll ance in order to construct a garage addl-I' lion and replace an existing deck . NE 9. · #04-3044 Je nnifer .Slnion ,dition of ~ 3925 Cherry Avenue, LR -1 C zoning dis• ~ trlct, requests . a rear yard setback vari• ance to allow a home addition to be local ed within 30 feet of the rear property line . --~( ES '" ,_ :.-! -,u,-Sel i8) The pri~:e~ . ~ ,& . . (pt,L,0t.t,c_ which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for I successive weeks . lt was first published Saturday the ·3 / day of ~ v--C_,a 2004, and was thereafter printed and published every Saturday, to and including Saturday, a the -~ I drf __ -~_,_-v_02__:__,) c,,+, _ 2004 ·, <;/ -----A-uthorized Agent Suscribed and sworn to me _on this 6 D day of -:::5-L-~6=--, 2004. Notary Public •'i' .... J,J•,;;.rf ":__.t-.P-J'-1>.,..,..,.~.:,, .• •.,...,.·~~-_,. ,..._,;,,., ~ ~ ! .. -~,f"J.. MJ\.RIE TTA A. STR .t\U~ : l (~~~,·-+J~ NOTA C-·:' .. /''J~~t !C -r-.11r--Jr-.J f:.~\-'T:.._ f l \,;'•J-,'. ./ C"n'l .::R COUN1 1' : , ~~X!:;~ MY COM~;l. EXPI RE S 1-3 1-20\:S l ~ ....... ,:/'-~-~..,~~~,., . ..,.,,~ Rate Information (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space : $15.50 per inch . (2) Maximum rate allowed by la w for above matter: $15 .50 . (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.96 per inch . Each additiona l successive week: $5 .79. LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 · NOTICE The Planning' Commission will hold public hearings in t~e Orono Council Chambers at .2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, August 16, 2004, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter":of ,reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #04-3010 Theodore Capra , 3534 ivy Place , LR -1C zoning district, requests a hardcover variance in order to permit 31 % hardcover within the 75 '-250' zone when 25% is normally allowed and a hardcover variance and lake setback vari ance to permit an existing 60 s.f. shed to remain within the 0-75' zone all In con junction with the construction of a new residence. •. . . 2. #04-3022 Philip and Karen Skoog ,. 280 Tonka ·Avenue, LR -1 A zon ing district ; retjue&r a rear yard setback variance to allow a ·rear yard setback of 43 feet when 50 feet is normally required in order to construct an addition to the exist ing home_. 3. #04-3034 · A Perfect Construction, LLC . on behalf of Robert P. Mack, 1580 Sixth Avenue N, RR -1 B zon ing district , requests a conditional use permit in order to construct a berm con sisting of greater than 500 cu. yd. of fill adjacent to Co. Rd . 6. "( 4. #04-3037 Wayzata Country . Club, 430 Old long lake Road , RR -1 B zoning district, re.quests a variance in order to construct an additio n to an exist ing maintenance building which will be setback 41 feet from the edge of the Luce line Trail when 50 feet is normally·• required and 45 feet cu rrently exists : 5. #04-~040 Dean and Sherry Lundblad, 1290 Arbor Street, RR -1 B zoning district, request a side street set back variance to allow a side street set back of 23 feet where a 50 foot setback is normally required in order to construct a . detached garage. 6. #04-3041 Rebecca Holzem, 3407 East Lake Street, LR -1 A zoning district , requests a 75'-250' zone hardcover variance , side, rear and lake setback variances and lot area and lot width variances in conjunc tion with construction of a new residence on a lot that has 44 feet in width and 4,488 square feet in area where 200'.in width and 87 ,120 square feet is no rma lly required. · 7. #04-3042 Pillar Homes on behalf of Roger & Ca~o\ Rovick, 1625 Sohns Point Rd , LR -1 B zoning district, requests an after the-fact conditional use permit for grading and fill in excess of 500 cubic yards in conjunction with the construction of a new reside rice. ·a. #04-3043 John C. Holm and Susan M. Kerber, 1485 Bay Ridge Road , LR -1 A zoning district, request a side yard setback variance and har.pcover vari ance in ord,er to construct a garage addi tion and replace an exisiing deck. 9. #04-3044 Jennifer ·Simon, 3925 Cherry Ave nue , LR -1C zoning dis trict, requests a rear yard setback vari- Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Eri~ Serrano, being duly sworn on oath, says that he 1s an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newsoaper known as T HE 1 Al<'c::'"' • • 3Sota, and has full ance to allow a home addition to be locat- ed within 30 feet of the rear property line. ch are stated below: 10. #04-3045 Robert and Mary Jo Enfi eld, 3165 North Shore Drive, LR - 1 B zoning district, request a conditional use permit for fill in excess of 500 cubic yards and an average lakeshore setback variance to allow the proposed pool to encroach approxi maiely 30' into the required . setback, all in conjunction with construction of a -new residence. complied with all the g qualifications as a rnvided by Minnesota , and other applicable 11. #04-3046 Robert W. and Brenda Zoe MacDonald, 2480 Old Beach LY Y"'--Q +--l-c_ _,:;;,, Road, LR-1 B zoning district, requests an =..::...--'---'""""c.....:.....:..-=:c...~~ after-the-fact side yard setback variance in order to alter the existing roofline of the detached garage set back 8.4' from the property line where 1 O' is normally required and 8.4' currently"exists : All persons wishing to be heard are · encouraged ro · attend · this meeting. Written comments are accepted and should be ,submitted to the City of Orono by August 9, 2004. Plans are available for review In the City Offices. For an appoint ment, please call (952) 249-4600 . City of Orono By: Planning Commission Jan ice Gundlach, City Planner Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office (Published in the July 31 , 2004 edition of The Laker) : from the columns of printed and published .. successive weeks. 1rday ~_-. (_'-f-' --2004, j and published ~luding Saturday, Authorized Agent Suscribed and sworn to me on this Notary Public {1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for compara ble space: $15.50 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter : $15.50. (3) Rate actua ll y cha rged for above matter : $7.96 per inch. Each additional successive week: $5 .79 . LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Ph.one (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 Dean Lotter, Administrator/Clerk (Published in the July 24, 2004 edition of The Laket') · · NOTICE · . The Planning' d,mniission will hold public shall supply a sufficient quantity of the hearings in the Orono Council Chambers amended Sect io n 508 (H) of the at 2780 Keiley Parkway on Monday, Mi~netonka Beach ·_ City _Code entitled August 16, 2004,_ begin ning at 6:00 P:m. Nuisances and publish said amendment on the matter · of review ing the following 1n off1c1al newspaper. land use applicaiions: -Section 4. Prime Fa cie P 2 1. #04-301 o The odore Capra , l:vi_de~ce . . Amend_ed Se ction 508 (H) 1 3534 Ivy Place, LR -1 C zon ing district , which 1s entitled N_u1sances , as ~n adopt-s requ ests a hardcover varian ce in order to ed amended section of the Minnetonka 1 permit 31 % hardcover within the 75 '-250' Be~ch City Code shall therefore be pn ma . F zo ne wheri 25% is normally allowed and a fac1e evidence of the law of_ the city. hardcover variance and lake setback vari -. ance to permit an existing 60 s.f. shed to Sectio n ~: Effective . Date. remain within the · o-75' zone all in con-This ordman~e t~kes effect upon its ad op junction with -the construction of a new t1on and pubhcat1on · residence . ,:--Adopted by the City Council on the 12th 2 · . #04-3022 Philip and Karen day of July 2004 . Published in the Laker s ·koog, 280.Tonka fvenue , LR-1A zon-Pioneer on ~u ly 31 ,'2004 and August 7, ing district,. request -a rear yard settiac~2004. Effecllve August 8, 2004 variance to allow a rear yard setback of 43 feet when 50 feet is normally required ln,!oann Anderson'. order to construct an additio n to the exist-Recorder ing home_. (P blished in the July 31, 2004 edition of 3 . #04-3034 A Perfect The Laket') Construction, LLC. on behalf of Robert P. Mack, 1580 Sixth Avenue N, RR -1 B zon ing district, requests a conditional use permit in order to construct a berm con sisting of greater than 500 cu. yd. of fill adjacent to Co. Rd. ,6. 4 . #04-3037 Wayzata Country Club 430 Old Long Lake Road , RR -1 B zoni~g district , requests a variance in pr m pr bi WI ec pl ; ac m a Be Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Eric Serrano, being duly sworn on oath , says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as HE LAKER , Mound, Minnesota , and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07 , and other applicable laws, as amended . which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for I successive weeks. It was first published Saturday the 0 ! day of -~-=j =--u_\_'=fi---' __ 2004, and was thereafter printed and published every Saturday, to and including Saturday, the~ day of --=s L~.-':-:, 0 = 2004; Authorized Agent Suscribed and sworn to me on this ··3 U day of --~~----~1~/~" =O_. .. _____ , 2004. Cl By: l\f\c,.\_&'.__ (\. ,J,t;:;_A-,c.-J-J Notary Public ....... ,,._ •••• ,-.,,_.,..:...,,.,, .. ~-~·~-,..;..j>.; .• ·~ .... ~'-; ,! .· -"-~ ·•· l'v·l f.F ~1E TT.A . .t: .. 3f i •;\: ·'._ . t:: :~·. :::_-, !•JU!Af · "':JBLt 1.~ -r.111.;:~1 '.~.-~-~-_:_•_/~_,.-.= __ ~_::_f~' Ct-,r.·Jcr:·i ·:O(JN ·~ :· .\ / (' :I 11•.' .: · '-0 \:::)• • Rate lri.fQrinati~ri .. , ~-.······,••J--i~ ··•~·-· (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercia l users for comparabl e space: $15 .50 per inch. (2) Max im um rate a llo wed by law for above matter: $1 5 .50 . (3) Rate actual ly charged for above matter : $7.96 per in ch. Each additiona l successive week : $5.79. TRACKING SHEET FILE N~. 04-3044 Staff: LP<N \{£ SITE ADDRESS: 3925 Cherry Ave. Applicant: Jenny Simon Address: 3925 Cherry Ave . Owner: Jennifer Simon Address: 3925 Cherry Ave. □ Mound, MN 55364 Meeting with Staff Application Completed Mound, MN 55364 Date:_]-<--+-'-\];~\\ 0_1 _ Date:---'-'/4---'-I v --'--,1 }l--=-o~Y _60 Day:_v\'-+---'l l___,_4 f-=I O___,_Y _ □ Incomplete Notice Sent Date: ______ _ d ef Copy of Application Sent to: __ Engineer _ County DNR MCWD Property Owners Notified: Date: __ {-+\_lP-'-1 _011 __ _ Legal Notice Published Date: 7-31-0'{ LMCD PC Meeting(s): Vote: ------------------- Vote: ------------------- d Notice of PC Action: __ i~\t-, 1_1 _j o_Y ____________ _ City Council Meeting(s): __ q--+j_l 0----+-/ 0_2-i~ _____ Vote : L{----0 Dln::.:9 Vote: ------------------ Vote: ------------------ □ Resolution: D(JJ/~ qtj"l--mo- 01-12 ,//J.er CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JENNIFER A. SIMON OF LOTS 1 & 2, & IN LOT 21, HICKORY HILL HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA /2:~1;p ~~1);. -tjc.o . 0 c.o ~ 0 MH CHERRY A VENUE 0 '), P.P. • •• n< v;.. .,~/CJ v .. ,O· N 87°58' 19" E 153.47 . t ; : I ·:··· : : ..J • • !I! l 1~ I . •<D ~ FLAGSTONE :«i :.- 143.45 MEASURED 144.65 HICKORY HILL ~ remoin) : : ·1 O.O·i, j I i---, PROPOSED I w -:.? ~· -tj- 1 o W/L S (to l~ l I 1....: U) -1 I . 1 24.0 ... ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .... ••51r-••••••••• .. •• ............... ~ ••I I I~ ,~ ~ l ,....: N IU) ~ I o I Z '1 WOOD' ~. FENC~ : 0 : .65-:, :' \ •' . \\ .. ····· .. ~ ............ . :: 19.B ( ······················ 3:0 W 0 :: 0 o~ v? r, LC)''- t"') 0 CX) CX) .. .. 0 :2 . 0" i . ... : 0 -tj-:q l[) N i~ 0 : ~ : EXISTING #3925 & 85 ,----. N <i_~t} PROPOSED o ADDITION !:i 24.0 d r--... ~ PROPOSED BLACKIOP DRIVEWAY ~ ( ex1fr1Nt;. ·1A.AV'R) cq 0) ~~~~ -<:) ------· ------------ 143.63MEASURED 144.33HJCKORY HILL -------- 10.0 .S tt AOE.D AA..EA 2 REG.Vlt<.\/J~ VAR\ A-N C-E APP (<.ov AL ·r 0 0 d I[) ' 0 1 soo· !, ~ Q Lll'IL ... z ... •··•i FROM il:.lf ~QC I ibl4 :O:Ai 11 z "PK" NAIL •• -SET IN 'f! •• BLACKTOP ffi ·~ ~ z ~ &l\:> ~ ~ ~ I ·~ H 'Z ~e .. l[) L() .. N 0 0 ~ 0 (/) ' .•. •• I J ' ~--' J ---, So( ! \, f6 P.P. I -1 C I I ... J I N 88°36' 25" W 1 43 • 9 5 MEASURED 144.33 HICKORY HILL ECO I I I 5o0' SE,~ fri.DM '1'L4. Lf EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION ...... "' - Lots 1 and 2, and the East 10.00 feet of Lot 21, HICKORY HILL o : denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house. and the proposed location of two proposed additions thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. GRONBERG AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, AND SITE PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN. 5535 952-473-4141 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. , Number 12755 04-101 A MH 40 04101PROPOED.scj . SCALE 1"=20' DATE 8-9-04 JOB NO. 04-101 A oS. Q/ 0 "<I- 0 MH 71 -· CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JENNIFER A. SIMON OF LOTS 1 & 2, & IN LOT 21 , HICKORY HILL HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 0 ~<~ '10 ;_;p.,p 1> ~. CHERRY A VENUE 153 A-, "PK" NAIL 1 LL / -------------.•·SET IN I\J O / vu 1 ..,, ._ • • _--=::::::::-., r····· BLACKTOP I n P.P. ~ --·~• 0 c;v 91 .... MH {b .. ·, . .o:i? 144 65 HICKORY HILL .... / _ r ·· %.... -143.45 MEASURED • -.;;1- <.0 . 0 <.O w , -I 1::l 1:i: I >-FLAG'STONE I ~ WALI..S 113 ··10.Q•;x.11 '"· WOOD I.- ORDER 1(0 ,{v &-"" r , j , ,, • , -~'r----., > ; ; ; ; ) I c.,v 1.7,st= , ) , ·1 _J i >(l'.'. 0 ::,c ~ l{) (0 0 OJ . -., ~ -.;;I-.. -.;;f N 1 i \:~ J·-;._ / § . t;!4 ". , " EXISTING _; t ~ "' ,N z I 10.5 SE ,..: ~ l.,J ii! ,~ i HOU "'1 I.;! GRAVEL DRIVEWAY 0 ci I'- ~µ:i I c.~ t 1t0 ~ q ·' ~ OJ 0 r-u I :r: / ~ I O ~ #3925 1 8 CJ) & I O 1L~_J_---------------------------ir---, 0 F \ I ~ 12.4 ;:! I n. ' CONC. [/) ~ z I ''r==~=~~::J...,WALK ffi Z I -. > "! WOOD,-1 CONCRETE PAVER SIDEWALK\ 'cf_ G: FENC7 , PATIO ·._p··· .65,•:?·, I/ \ ... / ./ \. . '!s-l-::d~==~2 PLANTEC(~REAS 143.63MEASURED 144.33HICKORY HILL ···/' ~~ ~> NOT HARDCOVER j 3:0 ~ -0 . 6 <.D :: 0 osc;;:t- 0 Or- 2 0 "tj-,-,.., o- 0 I I ."tj- LO -., \ I ON LO'--LO o l"1 r-0 CX) '\ 0 CX) z '\ Z 500' SETBACK LINE \ .... •·······tROM HALF -SECTION MAP ------' I • .. I I I N 88°36' 25" W -'I ,-) I -1 I I I I 143. 95 MEASURED 144.33 HICKORY HILL ·- I I I I I I EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION -· ., '-., Lots 1 and 2, and the East 10.00 feet of Lot 21, HICKORY HILL o : denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of an existing house, and the location of all visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. ~~ 0 0 0 ~ 2 (./) 1--1 z z 1---i ~ 91 0 P.P. MH 40 SCALE 1"=20' I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC.I vision, and that I am a duly registered Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor under ro&lfflG E}Q{ER.), LOO SffiVEY(ffi, STE PWffRS the laws of the State of Minnesota. r----D-A ... TE __ .....,., ~----~11--1-.-3-25-04 «s N. mow OOVE Lett LAKE, Ii!{ 55356 ECD 952-473-4141 04-101 ~_/ ,/ /'~ Mark S. Gronberq Minnesota License Number 12755 JOB NO. 04-101 ~:nj ~··rri~ '~• fir~ C «'-,,. \tJ•\f\ : ~. J