Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Project Packet
MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,July 8,2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. ~~- no City Coun~iL met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: May @) cMillan , C q,uncil Members Cynthia Bremer , Aaron Printup , Lizz Levang, and Kristi An rson . Representi Staff weri City Administrator Jessica Loftus , Assistant City Administrator for Lo -Term Strategic Plan ·ng Michael Gaffron, Planning Coordinator Melanie Curtis , Finance Director n Olson , Public Works D1 ctor/City Engineer Jesse Struve , City Attorney Soren Mattick, and Rec er Jackie Young. e meeting to order at 7:00 o'clock p.m . Item Nos . 4 , 7 and 8 were added to Levang moved, Anderson seconded, t Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES *2. Levang moved, Anderson seconded, to a ove the m utes of the Orono City Council work session of June 24, 2013, as submitted. VOTE· J\.yes 5, Nays 0. *3. Levang moved, Anderson s onded, to approve the minutes of th June 24, 2013, as submi VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ISSI ON COMMENTS -DENISE LESKINEN, REP Leskinen sta a she had nothing to report but would be available for questions . PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT *4. #13-3603 CHERYL CORYEA & RICHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO7>OINT ROAD, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 6300 Levang moved, Anderson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6300, a Resolution Granting Variances to Orono Municipal Code Section 78-350(B), for the property located at 3085 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Page 1 of 13 ----------------- Date Application Received: 04/16/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/10/13 120-Day Review Period Expires: 09/07 /13 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: rl A(/ Administrator Approval: Name: Melanie Curtis VV ~ Title: Planning & Zoning Coordinator Item Description: Date : 2 July 2013 Item No . '-/- Agenda Section: #13-3603 -Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin -3085 Casco Point Road -Variances -Resolution Zoning District: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100' Lot Area: 19,330 square feet (0.44 acre) Lot Width: 120 feet List of Exhibits: Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Survey Exhibit C. Planning Commission Staff Report & Exhibits 05/15/13 Exhibit D. PC Minutes 05/20/13 Exhibit E. Proposed Landscape Plan Exhibit F. Proposed Garage Elevation Detail Exhibit G. 60-Day extension Exhibit H. Council Minutes 06/10/13 Application Summary: The applicants were before the Council at the June 10th meeting requesting setback variances to allow a connection between the existing detached garage and the home via a one-story addition. They also requested setback variances in order to raise and reorient the garage roof. The Council reviewed the plan, the staff recommendation and the minutes from the May 20th Planning Commission meeting. Council discussed the Planning Commission's recommendation for vegetative screening, a revised grading plan and architectural details on the north side of the garage. The application was tabled to allow the applicants an opportunity to prepare the requested plans. After re-consideration the applicants have decided to forgo any re-grading or filling around the garage as it proved to be problematic from a stormwater drainage perspective. They have submitted a landscape plan proposing screening on the north side of the garage and addition; and the requested architectural detail for the garage. Planning Commission Recommendation On May 20, 2013 the Planning Commission voted 6 to Oto recommend approval of the variances as requested. The Planning Commission further recommended that vegetative screening and architectural features be incorporated on the north side of the garage to break up the massing effects. Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested variances incorporating the landscape and architectural plans. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The Council should consider adopting or amending the attached draft approval Resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 78-350(8) FILE NO. 13-3603 Council Exhibit A WHEREAS, Richard G. Devlin and Cheryl' J. Coryea, a married couple, (hereinafter "Applicants") are the owners of the propertflocated at 3085 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Park, Rlennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and · · WHEREAS, the Applicants h°ave .made application to the City for variances from Orono Code Section 78-350 in order to construct a <:>l'le-story addition connecting the home to the detached garage; and · · WHEREAS, the detachecl.garage on the Property received front and side yard setback variances in 1978 and the current survey indicates. it is located 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the north,. side property line; and WHEREAS, ··the Applicants have· also Frlade ipplication to the City for variances from Orono City Code Section 78,;350 in order to raise and reorient the roof of the existing detached garage 6.8 feef from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the north, side property line; and · . . . WHJ:R~AS, the existing home on the Property is located in a conforming location; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the .Orono, Minnesota, City Code, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on Maf 20, 2013, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were .given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THERE!=ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #13-3603. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1C zoning district, where 0.5 acres is the Page 1 of 5 minimum lot area and 100 feet is the minimum defined lot width. The Property has approximately 19,330 square feet (0.44 acre) acre in area and has 120 feet in width. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 2013 and on a vote of 6 -0 recommended approval of. the variances, based on the following findings: a. The Property is located in Tier'.2 ,of Orono's Stormwater Quality Overlay District and is limited to 30%"J'lardcover based on gross lot area. The proposed hardcover level will beiconforming at 23.9%. . .. ' b. The proposed level of<~~ructural coverage 'on the Property will be conforming at 10%. . . c. The Applicants have propose~ to iri~iall vegetative'\scr~ening along their north property line to screen the addition and additional garage massing fromtbe aojacent propertyi . d. The Applicants h~ve agreed to incor;~rat~ architectural interest to the north side of the g'ar;age to break.up the~massing as viewed from the adjacenfproperty and Casc&Poirif Ro.ad. e. · 'The Appli]~hts' reque;t:~iU alleviat:\ practical difficulty inherent to the existing location of tliedetached garage and its proximity to Casco Poiht'Road and>notpreated by the Applicants. f. Th~ ApPliG'ants' re~u~ifis> reasonable as there is a 34 foot distance betw@en the garage and the paved, travelled roadway of Casco Point Roacf~ffering theJeel of a greater setback. g. The Applicants' request will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent propertie$. h. ThiA~plicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. i. The Applicants' proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and Page 2 of 5 recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community as well as the impact on properties in the vicinity. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existi9g on this Property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other propertyin this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely .aff~ct traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neig~qoring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicant$, but'1~ necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants; and would be in ke~ping with the spirit anq.intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Pla~fof the City. ·· CONCLUSIONS, ORDEB.AND CONQITIONS Based upon the above findings, the".:~r:cmo City CouncHhereby grants varianc~s from Orono Code Section 78-350 in order to cbri~trUct a one-story ~(;lciition connecting the home to the detached garage; and to raise and r~brient thereof of the\existing detached garage 6.8 feet from the front property line where 30 feet is \f~guired ano 9..5 feet from the north, side property line where a 10Joot setback i$~required .f~r.~ princfpal structure; subject to the conditions listed below: · · · ··· · · z,. 1. Council appr'oval .is basett.on the suNey, building and landscape plans submitted by the Applicants and,annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A, B & q. Any amenqment$ to\tl1ese plans may require further Planning Commission .~119 City Council revieW, 2. · Hardcover shall nqt. increasE:l above 30% as permitted within Tier 2 of the Stormwater Quality Overlay Distrfct. 3. The Applicants shall 'install vegetative screening along the north property line to screen the addition and.additional garage massing from the adjacent property at a minimum acCQrding tojl;\e landscape plan attached as Exhibit C. 4. The Applicant: ~haUin~orporate architectural interest to the north side of the garage to break up the massing as viewed from the adjacent property and Casco Point Road according to the plans attached as Exhibit B. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining building permits for the new Page 3 of 5 construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (July 8, 2014). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, sh~II automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a<f01sdemeanor. 7. The undersigned Applicants have read, understopd ~nd hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of their heirs, sqc¢ess0fs and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chaii:r.'of title of the ~~perty. Adopted by the Orono City Co1..1ri~il.~n this 8th day ~/~ul&:,.2013. ATTEST: Rachel Dodge, City Clerk Page 4 of 5 Richard G. Devlin STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Cheryl J. Coryea This instrument was acknowledged befor~ me this __ J~~pf ______ _ 2013 by Richard G. Devlin, husband of CherylJ.'1Coryea. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPPIN < Notary Publi:¢,' This instrument was ackn0tvledged befq~; ~e this __ day of ______ _ 2013 by Cheryl J. Corye~jwife <;>fRicnard G. De~lin. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 : ii DAAWH E<P C) !..1..l !-- <( I I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CHERYL CORYEA OF LOT 55, SPRING PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 56 ( ' \ ,._.,, \ 193.93 <( \ .?>--··· I N 84°42' 00" E / I 7 I ,...,-✓-:,,,- I .. ··· '""Ji.:.·---I I / \ I 1 I Z / I I I /I I o i o!J.J 1 I / .i,.. ;; ) I j I /. I I I I I I I I ~~ ,~'i? fl? Id ~U1 1 ...... J? 'I' 11' l's)-!>-0 t / ,, I i (Jl .. , t "\ I II ~ \ I I II \. I I I '•. {M7. ! ,-.,, -.:::..\ // / // ··--;✓-:... .. / // I I I I I I N I I I I I I I I I I I ~I l I I I I / / /I I ( I ~1/ ff I n I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ' /5 TRACT /~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Pork. o : denotes iron marker @ : denotes Judicial Landmark (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum ---917---! dentoes existing contour line. mean sea level datum Bearings shown ore ·based upon an assumed datum. Note: The entire property falls within the 250-500 setback zone. y 'i",,,,,..,,.._i I I I I 2J2, 14 This survey intends to show the boundaries of the 'Clbove describe-cl property, the locqtion of three existing buildings, the location of all visible "hardcover". and the proposed location of a proposed addition thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachmelf1ts. DA!E CESCRPT<JH ,.o ---;JI' .... ?.,~ :( -----I .,..,. ~--........ p/\ ~\ RECEIVED APR 16 20' J CITY OF ORONO ', .. \"!;~~. -· -\ ? ', 0 ~',,~ Go <£, G~S G\>~ (;'\~ ('171.1} --:!-.. (112.1} ···-..... -· : .... / ·····-····· .,i.o' ~06~ . ':,6 E,0 -20 0 20 40 60 SC AL E IN F E, E T · · · J • :J fuoi'f1m i :J:i• Uc:;'od L/nd0;~o~8 ~~!~n. $"-'lE 1•-20· J r, ·" >< en ::r 0 c= i: -· ---· l>g $GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES INC I h.,.eby ce,Uf[ that this sucvey, plan, or report ~ I I I CONSULTING ENGINEER. LAND SURVEYOR. & SITE PLANNERS ~ -• ~ ~/, .•f Minnesota. JOO ,.,_ t::::j:::jt:========================================::: 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 ~/ / ~<>!., DAl( 10-4-12 12-3081---1--II----------------------952-473-4141 . ,4-~ A Mark S. Gronber~---ffta ~N1Jmbj2·,..i';! s "" .. ' ""t.\•.litt-\,o 1,,10 ·r'3""1~·-.,.Jr,~-;ad I ...-0 ;.,a ,.,..._...,_.........,., .. ·I ~: .~ • .. 1 iii 0 -r-- <i ) uJ _J U.l ~ () ~ I.L \iJ G 7 \() \ I s t-z.1· k,1·"2.1 \...JO ·r,~:;> -~-::, "i, l~:;~_:;;\.),,o v-tO v-1n3dda;;i':-u··•~ 7. IL\·l'Z.:LO\r-1,::j ~-\.-,11~~ \ Resolution Hy--,1 'Qria,10 -c--=-:a ..>.N lad ' a. Exhibit 8 2,, Nl7/'\3:J ''tJ / "13~~0?'? I :3.-l,..-,,o J..9 ~"'l ro-.J 1' ,__ ___________________ ··...:c--,,o-d __ ""_,-._r-1_-,,._c_o'-'_"'--;i-=-l .._--------1+1-l .._~~"""--l -~ ) ,,, =; ul~ -b 1-JJ .-!l lll<lo 1i,I!.-11l . .l tJ§ /,r) i ,,_J ~1zyi; ~r 1 ,ul ,! ~\IJ~ q~ Jlt H~ ) ~_../ ~ I ti -1 ~J "'ll \;j r{i " i~ ' og ao J 1. { '.l t3. r.o (-'> ~ -~ !;; ~ 0 fi :!F- "'n Hf 1<Ji J 1 ~ ) uJ .J U-1 .s ,,. .. .,_ ""2.l·.._.l·bO l'-"l .........,.,,..,., .. ~j I a.,...,o )4 """"'1U.":1........-id .. \ \ \ _,.) \_,. ------ \lo-,;/Z,i © 1 11.l -r ~ ::1 1 ... <[ ·~ .J •. -:;i-lL ij "i:, "" I ~ -:., _j lL .J uJ ) L.LJ _J 2 -<t L r I f---- l-i..1•q, . .oz1 "-"' H~-.L~ I == ),.<;;) '....-l-..U..--:tr-+v'"\d s ,, "- '2. I .. 1---- 1--- 1---- 1---[ __ _ 1 4 .J Q_ J uJ ) l.\J, ..Ji '11 I uJ' :J D _) s -----·----c--... -~·--- 'i ····-~- '7..l·b\·-Z\ \.,p ~ -..1.";,T'107 ' =~o )-9 \.-1"3-1.'1. l""l'"l'-,d :i:!- ~i i !) 0~ ~ ! ~ "J ~ 5 ;,~ 11; \. ; jt ~Ji it 11 1,4 !r. dii ) ,Jl 1 •\ {u; ,L 6 ~-• § ~ l , ' \l, -' ' -a :! -~w 'or-io~o -0""9t:T:!1 ...l.rl!Od 07-SV, 5i;;a,ac;,_ Nl1/\3Cl 'LI I 'V~f. )OJ ., ·.-:;,o,; =>,-.i•-.-;;aov-1~ ul :l ~ r~ -i _q t • ··p l ,! J. a j'.j !ii-~D,.i &H JIil O i ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ , IL~ 3 1~ f ~u ~:1 ~ Ja J -~ ~~ j~; ~ g~ i ·10 -~ ~~ ~u ,, ~ii i:J !l :'!ld2 \](l; 't • <::-• \- Resolution Exhibit s..5 ~~ILJ 0 w ~ w (.) w 0.'! 0:: o,_ <( 0 z ~ 0 u. 0 ~ 0 l'<'i .. ~' ~ -0 t-'\,--rL-~ Of-\ OD iZ. r--'\.e.~ e,E.,,-(Of.,.10 L NE:..l....l $\4.~i-lGL.f:. ':::>\011...tG,,. TO ~' c.,\,-li e ><' s. ,' b -- D C . .. - I 1z...~. l'-«I\ o: n c 1 ~c;;:;,!".;'~•~,F;, r r ~ •~• ~ • •H • ?:'~• l--•• \,,.,,.,• \, ~, .t_.,,. .... _, )""'""''~ ....__ __ \ _____ _;__ ____________ , __ ~o-&5 CASCJ:> FT, ~.:o, -oce:.o~o,Mt>J CX..s:,.'Z...<.c .. ~.\::,, \(...ff)<"":,~ [I 'f-,t:,..C,.p.,~ e sT-(u::. L-01.)~ \"" 'e> f-t,..,;:,C.-\ A W/ { ')-CS. Tl1!--ir-"\ \ y Z, ~e. e,~C? -~~~---•-, --~ : TJ J.::---NE:.-\...\ WOW. - z_d',,. 4el >t' ~~ 'Of' c,p-C,ONC... <::) C:,Ai-Y!.. ~L..i:::.-' _____ ....._ ________ __,__,...,.__ ___ _,__ _ _,, ..... _. __ ..,__, ---~~ --...,,,..~ ... ---'--_.._,. __ .......,.._ \ Richard Devlin & Cheryl Coryea ~ ~o Pont Rood -11,,byzoto, MN S'S3Ct -,,.,, 1-..lrie:30~206 1-_., 1--.... 1-blly_ Kell Otten 6r<l$. /' __ ... -·-/ _/ ~,.. __ ,,._.,,, ,.--------;/,/ ~----··· ..... /~::::::~-- ····// .~~·.., N • -Deu t sc hl and As t ilbe Ivory ~alo Dogwood Pagoda Dogwood or Royal S tar Mag nolia m ::a >< (1) ';j' (/j -·O C' - -· C: ........ no· ::I A nnabe ll e ~ydra nge o -- • ! CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CHERYL CORYEA f=J !_Li OF LOT 55, SPRING PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA !--I ,-I <.. \ (.) \ < \ _/?:-----· \ N 84°42' 00" E J I I I / I ~I I z i I I I I I I. I I I o, ,/,UJ I .i,... ;;;r.., 1 j I I I O(Jl -, I ~N I~ f81R! ~Ul I ....J 'f' I l" N-1>-QI I It I (Jl • 1 t -;:_ \ I I II «-\ I II ""' ·-.. I I I ·,., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 56 ~I I I I I i I I I I I I I I / I I / 193.93 I I ~ I I .... .,....1 I I ~---., I I ~ I f I I ;g I I 'f' I I ? -----,- ;f I I~ /'5 I I I I I I I .,o RECEIVED APR 16 20' J CITY OF ORONO ("47~ '· .. I I I I I □1 1ki.J~ i ,f r I I I : I \ ~-~A= / ' ,\.. " "\_1 A ,,,,.._,!-.. Go <f, G~S (;\>~ (;\.~ \-l... ····:;Y.-.. __ _ "..\ // N I I / / // / / TRACT /:,, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Park. o : denotes iron marker @ ; denotes Judicial Landmark (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum ---917---: dentoes existing contour line. mean sea level datum Bearings shown ore based upon on assumed datum. Note: The entire property falls within the 250-500 setback zone. I I I 232, /4 This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above describe-cl property, the locqtion of three existing buildings, the location of all visible "hardcover'\ and the proposed location of a proposed ar;idition thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachme1nts. (972.1) _____ -;::;"' 3'd~ :10?~ b,. s? .,o -20 0 20 40 60 S C A L E IN F ~ E T m o ~o -· C: O' ::, ~(") DAAWH DATE DESCRPTION G BER I hereby certif that this survey, pion. or report ·~ f"l"I =: E<P R Q N · G & ASS QC I ATES INC ""' prepared 6y me, or ...tee my direct supervislon. 1•-20• \N , • and that I om o du! Licensed Land Surveyor under __. "''"'<Ell $CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS the lows of the Sto(e or Mlnne,oto. . o,rr MS6, 10-4-1: JOe ..,_ 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 ~/ / ~ 12-308 952-473-4141 A -~ • -"' tt-'!'t'-l'"~ "'3 . . . . ... • .. ! .. l ____ .... ----- OF L T 55, SPRING PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Park. o : denotes iron marker @ : denotes Judicial Landmark (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum ----917------: dentoes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed cinti 1m I I I 232. 14 ...... _ .................................................. II 2/)I I ~ B2- (5 Date Application Received : 04/16/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/10/13 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07 /09/13 To: From: Date: Chair Leskinen and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator Mw 15 May 2013 Subject: #13-3603, Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin, 3085 Casco Point Road, Variances Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100' Lot Area: 19,330 square feet (0.44 acre) Lot Width: 120 feet Application Summary: The applicant is requesting setback variances in order to connect the existing detached garage to the existing principal structure; and to reorient and raise the roof of the garage. Staff Recommendation: If the Planning Commission concludes the applicants' request is reasonable and meets the practical difficulty criteria for granting a variance, a recommendation for approval should be considered. Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-lC district shall exceed 2 1/2 stories and shall not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366 . (b) Lots . The following minimum requirements shall be observed : Lot Area (acre) 0.5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Exhibit 8. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Exhibit F. Exhibit G. Exhibit H. Exhibit I. Exhibit J. Exhibit K. Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard (feet) (feet) (feet) 100 30 10 Application Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Proposed Survey Setback Exhibit -by Staff Proposed Plans and Elevations Site Photos Garage Roof Illustration Submitted Hardcover Calculations Aerial Photo Property Owners List Plat Map Rear Yard (feet) 30 Side Yard Adjacent to Street (feet) 15 Council Exhibit C Background FILE #13-3603 15 May 2013 Page 2 of 4 In 1978 the City approved variances allowing the detached garage in its current location, as approved it was to be 10 feet from the front and 10 feet from the side lot lines. It was constructed slightly closer to both lot lines and exists today 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side. The applicants would like to connect the detached garage to the home with an addition; and raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the nature of the garage as it (combined with the home) would be considered to be the principal structure. Principal structure setbacks for the district are 10-foot side yard and 30-foot front yard. The property is not a lakeshore lot, so the provision allowing a side loading detached garage 10 feet from the street is not an option. LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET Lot Area/Width: LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre) 100' Actual 19,330 s.f. (0.44 acre) 120' Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Front 30' 44' house (principal structure) 6.8' house 6.8' garage Rear 30' 135' No change North Side 10' 38.2' house(principal structure) 9.5' house 9.5' garage South Side 10' 21.3' No change Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 19,330 s.f. (0.44 acre) Allowed: 2,899 s.f. (15%) Proposed: 1,993 s.f. (10%) Hardcover Calculations· Storm water Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Total Area Tier Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 2 19,330 s.f. 5,799 s.f. 4,436 s.f. 4,638 s.f. (30 %) (22.9%) (23.9%) Front Yard & Side Yard Setback Variances The detached garage location was approved by variance in 1978. It appears that while the approvals allowed the garage to be located 10 feet from both the front and side lot lines it was FILE #13-3603 15 May 2013 Page 3 of 4 not constructed as such and is 6.8 feet from the front and 9.5 feet from the side making it non conforming. Approval of the requested variance to connect the detached garage to the house would make the (now conforming) principal structure non-conforming with respect to the front and side yard setbacks. The garage roof changes will result in a further encroachment into the required 10-foot side yard setback for the½ foot at the north corner of the garage and a slight change in the encroachment on the front. The garage is situated at an angle so that only a small portion, a corner, encroaches into the side setback. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Staff visited the site and took a number of photos to document how the garage was located with respect to the road, the vegetation and the topography of the site. While the garage is only set back 6.8' from the front property line, Casco Point Road is not centered within the ROW which results in a 34 foot setback from the paved roadway. The applicants are proposing to rotate the orientation of the roof and to raise the peak of the roof 10 feet higher than existing. As proposed, the neighboring property owner will see a garage wall and gable end of the garage roof as opposed to the garage wall and portions of roof as they do today (see attached photos). It is unclear from the plans if the applicants are planning windows or other architectural features in the north-facing gable. There does not appear to be adequate space to install trees or other screening, at least at the northern corner, to minimize the views of the garage. The south-facing gable has a vent at the peak. Inclusion of architectural features or windows along the north wall may break up a monotonous view from the adjacent property. There is space available to screen the proposed addition connecting the home and detached garage from the neighboring property. If this were a lakeshore lot a detached garage would be permitted generally in the location of the existing garage. Variances were granted in 1978 to allow the current location of the detached garage between the house and the street. The existing home on the property currently conforms to the required setbacks set forth in the LR-lC district; approving the requested variances will make the home's location non-conforming. If, in the future, the property owner wishes to replace the existing home in-kind the location of the existing home would be considered a legal in-kind rebuild. The proposed connection addition will be most visible from the driveway of the adjacent property to the north; it will be only minimally visible from the road. Issues for Consideration FILE #13-3603 15 May 2013 Page 4 of 4 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? If so, what are those conditions? a. Should vegetation, trees or other screening opportunities be considered? b. Are there architectural options which will mitigate the impacts of the requested variances? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation If the Planning Commission concludes the applicants' request is reasonable and meets the practical difficulty criteria for granting a variance a recommendation for approval should be considered. PC Exhibit A City of Orono Variance Application Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Application# / 3 -3 (p ~ Date Received: Lf-l lo-/3 Staff: /Vl(7 Fee: $70O~p! OL# 7 341 Renewal: $350 -'--------After-the-fact: $1,400 Double Fee Escrow Fee: $7~ ij 73tf/p This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION: f\ ~ . ~ t Site Address: :3o~S-~1...,'JW~"-\-~ Property Identification Number (PIN): 2..f? -1 \ 7 -7-~ -·~ t-DD\0 Date Property Acquired (month/year): 4)U::07 □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels. Zoning District: . OWNER~.F FOR ON: Co e le a es and t us re94ired f Name: LJ,,h-e,., -'-,---'--t---'---=-----,,.;-;1-~.;::___,__.l...-";,;---'----';__;_----.9.--'----=,-----=-__::__~'-'-:----n------,-\--::,~,i=.--"'"'---"----"' Phone (home): Complete Addre City, St Email: , ~ v.,,,._,__ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Describe the request in d · (attach additional sheets if necessary): ,..,2-2-:::rr . , ~. ~ RECEIVED CITY OF ORONO Packet Last Updated: 03/29113 Page 12 of 31 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be processed. APPLICANT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Owner's Signature: Owner's Signature: Packet Last Updated: 03129/13 Date: Page 13 of 31 RECEIVED A.PR 162013 CITY OF ORONO PC Exhibit 8 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of these difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write NIA in the space provided: 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter." t)v,r-c::,,,-t:_ - 2. 'The J by the landowner." e-- Ii() VJ{,C~ 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under jtle terms of the Zoning Chapter." /,),c ('t'-'e.-, 5. "Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Sectio~116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." f.!:jree- 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allow_ d under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." Packet Last Updated: 03/29113 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2013 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwellin.9." ~ re. c:,,. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immed}):~l~?ining property." 9. "The cAditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." ~1cr-e; 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the ~licant." J , . fy; c. -CJe,, 'C,~:Ji e+; ~ 1 r ✓/4-fl r a-e. ti v -e-f r-ot==rl 7 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other.Aspect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." 7t:e-e- 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleAte demonstrable difficulty." · c1rc-e- Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): RECEIVED 1 6 2013 Packet Last Updated: 03129/13 Page 18 of i DRAWH E<P :l t~J !-- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CHERYL CORYEA OF LOT 55, SPRING PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA <.( \ U I ~ \ __ :-:.>---·1 1 N 84°42' 00" E •c-,) .- /f··1-1, ..... t-r-7-77:is~'?'""'l"""'_,'7'-✓-~:~~-;~:::;: /i I I I I I I , z ! I \ , I I I I ,/#11' I // / ✓------------\ j o, , I /1 I I I I ' , ,. -i,. ' .,,.1.1 t I J I / ; r ; : --~,,. .. J a (J1 -:,;r ·, I j I I I I I I I , / ~ N I:::,· I / / / / / ,,.,.,.-( ~, I ~ g I I I / I I I I ,,. ' ' ~56 193.93 -~ -...i '1' I /If I I I I I I I I ~ _ o.. 1 1 ,r , 11 1 1 J. ~ • \ I t / ., / I ,- \ I I II I I ( I 15 ::.;; \ / /I / / , I I I \~ ""' /// // ... Ill I 8 I I . z -88 L I / I D I I / I·-._, I I I ~• I I I i! '""' j I / I'-' I / ,r I I ··--;✓--~- / // N ~ I I 78•1 8' 5o•• TRJ\CT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES A Lot 55, including odjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Pork. 0: denotes iron marker @: denotes Judicial Landmark (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, meon sea level datum ---917---: dentoes existing contour line. mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. Note: The entire property falls within the 250-500 setback zone. I I I 2J2. /4 This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the loccrtion of three existing buildings, the location of all visible "hardcover", and the proposed location of a proposed addition thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachme1nts. DATI ~_mt-I <co ---...._../ ~ o~0 i ------~' ·····--····"!> d' s . ,k -~~ ~1 $GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ Cl<ED ~=:::1~=::'1:================================~, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, & SITE PLANNERS "' 5 " :~::j:~=t=: ================t: 4-45 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE, LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 1~~:s l==::Jl===l=================================t 952-473-4141 RECEIVED APR 16 20 J CITY OF ORONO \ (r ~s G. l) "c, ·c\>~ (;\.~ -&;,.;;...__ (1172.f) <co -20 0 20 40 60 S C A L E IN F ~ E T I hereby certify that this survey, pion, or report was ftr1ored by me, or under my direct supervision, ::: io':s ~t°'Ulea s~~re ~ctW~e~t~~ Surveyor under $CAI.£ 1"•20' '"C (') m >< =CT ;:;: (') -__________ .., .... ...L,;..;,I "--' '-' .J.. \, .1. .L.J .C"l. OF L _; T 55, SPRING PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA . . ... • ... : .... , ......... \ \ \ \ \ 84°42' 00" \ N \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : :··· ···•. ~--.. ;-··~ • ........... . E Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Park. o : denotes iron marker @ : denotes Judicial Landmark {908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum ----917------: dentoes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. 193.93 I I I 232. 74 n ,, n 1 I ,:::'-V (9 c:::; t.tJ !······ .. ~.:c ( ·-. ·-.... •· I I I -__.. ..... .,. J.. ....__,.L.~ OF LOT 55, SPRING PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ~~~~: ;-~~~ 193.93 <( \ __ ?:~:~---\ N 84°42' 00" E '(9#,7),/ I. 4 I I I / Z ! \ I I I /A / I O .,., : i I I / / / c,1-P" I / --: : i I I I I I I .,~I / I -,-' , .. o ; , , . I I / ,- 6 '-~' ~ •• -':; . It~ I I I I I I I I I I ::\. ,..,~--~ ~ u, ,., I I I I I I I ,-' _,. \" I <[',i, / 1 / I I I / I I I ,/' ~· \: .(Jl l _____ jf IJll/1{ I / I I I I I I N-i,.. n I ~ I~ ,!' -~ J ~ I ill ; ,.-, ~ , ···•··; / Ii r II /~-ill ,E 1 · ,_ ; I r I I/ I r I .c:::: \ / /I / I I I 55 < \. / /I / / I I I I -.. _ -· .... I I / / Jf:3 I I (947.~ <. 2 -88 .!._ I / j ; ED I j / ·•.. ··• .. I I ., I I ·-••• __ (953.7 __ 1 I V,., 959.oJ ] I I ·, / '·.. "' I / ·-.✓.. . ( ( I I ... .;_ .. / ....... I I I / N I I I / 78°/ I I I // 8' 50" I ~->·-:\ · .. / . ... ··:·· ·r F?/\\.._.: i /\._ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Park. 0 : denotes iron marker @: denotes Judicial Landmark (908.3) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum --· -·917----·: dentoes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. T I I I ,STEPl'l<G I STOt£S / - I I I I I I / I C<JNCNETE I I 232.14 BLACKTO~ ROADWAY (96-4.6) ~ \0 ,..---9' •(967.S)_._ r¥ < .... 8) -\~ --"''\O /96 '-. ------------~ ~("89-5) ,-------" ~ :A . o ~\ \ ,r ":>.. ,,-9-1 ~ POLE \\ ~.> " \d)o \ ,,,._ "" ~ . Ch ""-"-:0 (911.a> o" " -0 ... ,\ / ~ rt' .... -----~()?. ~ .... I ~() ~o~'o s~ ,, C) m >< ::r cf ;::.: c::, (9 • 1 t 0 --I- <1. ) uJ _J lU ~ CJ_ () ~ \L \l.l 0 \{\ \ r-2>· bl·L..I \...JCl ·;-,.~";) -~7 <;. h,;~;,--kO+-~::ia .;;-;;~.J a;i510?1 -z !"1..1·L2.·L0\.40 ~-\.--lr-.""3':Zd l I ¾"'V'a )...9 -., .. t·a.l.'"l. t-t......-:..:J -:b 1------------------------·"""°"'=-c-'°'_'"'_""'_"' ___ c ___ o_::_'--'.:.c"':...:,!~ t-----------,H-f-' ~_.,,,,~~-+ (1 I ~ .9_J j _,ry ;it !;; jP 1 ~ :r ~ il ~~t '',q LL 3 { Bi Jll ":i: e :l'1', 1<---) ) i (11 I ~-/ I r T H ':/ r u. D~ 3.o J 1. ;'.:I t3. ! to -----~ f .s ., ,;. .. h..1--'tH • .o "'° ~'Wl"l,12/,I I ;u..,,o ).,;I . \.J9..L'1 ~ .. \ \ \ ____ .) \__.-_,, ---- \\a-,;l(i.l ~ 1 ILi -r ~ 1 1 t .... <[ ) _J l:i -,/-Q_ =~ 8 -:., _j lL _J uJ ) uJ _J 2 -<t r: ..1.~r-\S, 0 C") 2 ·-0 w c:::> a::: > C'-J -c.o 0 w .--lL 0 a::: 0 w a_ 0! <( ~ 1 ~------loi j~";,1 r / \1J -i-VJ( . ~ ,\\ 1~1 ;Iii, ,., 1>1 )~ g~ .\\ .. '\ 'o-\~, i~k, \\ ~ :,: '"'" \ t v "' \ (\, e > ~l. ~~ 1-v, ~~--!·· ,, '-,9 ll. if;;! J J1 6v 2 0 f-"i __ \ HD~ ~ '/ o J "rJ u. r r ~ J a r } i 7; ,'\ 1 .3;;: ~ \ 0 i, J . !\LI tu] ~~t© l,or \ Q -,,.......,\ rJ - r,1,.....J 'or-10~0 -·--·---~ -o= .....l.r-11od 0?"""'7 ~ - --. ------------------ .., I ~-g,~ )OJ '? -----c; N\11'3C1 'j -------"l. ---Z,l·b1·--Z\ """ r-'-v',.,J ·...1.'$1"107 \ c;uvo )..9 \.-'"3 ... Cl. t°"'""\"'id :;I-'-"210:::l ~1-.-;:;.cov-l~ 0 i ~ ~~ ul g ! :l i r~ 1t ~i ~ I ;;;h fi1 :l,n \ t J. ,, tr tj 'lr, o.;ni 1 &H ~ 0: ~ Jill CJ ~ ;h 1 ~Ill ~~ i ~· p ~~~~aBJ E~ u4J -) "c t11. ,1fq ) ·10 :;§ ~ih .It i~{~9ii ~~ ~~t -~ ~hi ~1 -, ,_,,> \jll; -" -~ =c:.>J.1 t-l 1 0 0 (..., z w s-~ c::, > (---.! .... (0 0 w ..--I.L 0 0:::: 0 w a_ ct: <C PC Exhibit FI I .. . ·/ I {)~ { . _.,.(, I- i~--.:•; •• , ' , .. ' ., ' ' \ PC Exhibit F 7 .. \ I ... --' 'I l- PE'-'L-,. J l c.oe.'( EA \Z.eMDD~L __ Prz..Q0EcT" N=\,;.l ... Fll:i~C;,.t.;. tr.;551 <SH l~~&....e:. --~\µ(.:, '"TI:'.:!. MA"'t"c:g··_: ~'i(:<;,Tl<=- -- PC Exhibit G . . I PC Exhibit H Prepared by: __ G_A_O_V._8_.;-_1<._C~f_A_F_f'_O_<_~_l'_A-1 _T_if'_r_·~_I M __ c_. ________ _ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ·zoNE: (CIRCLE ONE) --9-+5' l'5•25ft'c~~ .,.. r EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House 30.¥ X Ji(),. "f = Length Width X = 511 ('t) 1..2. a. X 9g = B. Garage 28.3 X 26', '7 = C. Driveway X = X = D. Sidewalk ,!-J7Cl!?P X = J'T((fl1P11VC:: ,'!t'r'.,;((J X j 'J ,t.-5:_ = Ct>,v(', J' i 116' E. Patio/Deck Ct?,vl('. ?Ail' 10 X = il6'1/C r TT(: f J" x 2S'1/ -/00 ('/!. r;~•,rr = 0:?,v('_ /J A .£i F. Landscape Cc;,,1,,,,. AJt?lf.t:/'v X = Underlain JTt:P.P,,,;•,'F' Cf-I'-<: 8 X = By Plastic X = G. Retaining Walls X = H. Other A/r:: PAo X = TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A + B X 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE (including existing hardcover to be retained) A. House ______ x ______ = B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic G. Retaining Walls H. Other Length ,A ¥Iv Irr c,hJ TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A o/C,t8 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + B -21 Width = = = = = = = = = = = = = = (' -1-2 02. ::: /"} 330 X 100 = - ri fj 1 17 ?~r 9 Z tJ S.F. S.F. 9 '7 S.F. 71/Z S.F. 178:? S.F. S.F. /S2 S.F. 22 S.F. 3o l.f:i.S S.F. IS'-f' S.F. /0/ 2.R S.F. s S.F. S.F. S.F. e;; S.F. '1/ 7',] 6' S.F. 1:r. J,10. S.F. 22.. 2.2 % S.F. + 223 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. -S5 S.F. S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ___ ,.. __ S.F. ______ S.F. A B RECEIVED PC Exhibit I H Hennepin County Mailing Label Map Provided By: Taxpayer Services Department 2 0-11 7-23-3 4 For more information contact : Hennepin County GIS Division 300 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@co .hennepin.mn .us Map Comments: 3085 CASCO POINT RD ORONO, MN 55391 PID# 20-117-23-34-0010 ------~ .... ~ ~-../' _.,..-- Print Date: 4/15/2013 Map Scale: 1" = 154' Buffer Size: 150 feet (7 Map Legend : Wate. Parl< Parc el c=J Buffe.-Retion Sele cted Pa.-cels PC Exhibit J 20-117-23-43 1) Major Roads Mino.-Roads fl "➔~-- RECEIVED APR 1 6 201 3 CITY OF ORON O 4/15 /2013 RUN DATE: 4/15/2013 HENNEPIN er-''TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) 38 20-117-23 34 0001 JAYS HULBERT TRUSTEE 3035 CASCO POINT RD JAY S HULBERT 3035 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0010 CHERYL CORYEA 3085 CASCO POINT RD CHERYL CORYEA 3085 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23340017 DORIS MOLITOR-WATERS 3061 CASCO POINT RD TODD WATERS 3061 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0022 FREDERICK C PETERS 3127 CASCO CIR FREDERICK C PETERS 3127 CASCO CIR WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0049 L&JBRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIR LAWRENCE L BRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0005 PHILLIP S WHIPPLE 3095 CASCO POINT RD PHILLIP S WHIPPLE 3095 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 00 II E NEVERMANN & T OSULLIVAN 3065 CASCO POINT RD ERIC NEVERMANN THEA OSULLIVAN 3065 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0018 JOHN P & EVY C DENNIS TRUST 3055 CASCO POINT RD JOHN & EVY DENNIS 3055 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0031 THE CASCO CO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO PARKS POBOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REP ENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RE ORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNT DATE Ot..\ } v::; } \ '::? BY: ---l.~~--1.A~~~=~--- 38 20-117-23 34 0006 KE RICHEY & S J RICHEY 3 105 CASCO POINT RD KENT E & SUSAN J RICHEY 3105 CASCO PT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0012 RA KASTENS & BC KASTENS 3045 CASCO POINT RD RICHARD A/BARBARA C KASTENS 3045 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0021 R G & PA DUDLEY 3125 CASCO CIR RONALD G & PATRICIA A DUDLEY 3125 CASCO CIRCLE SO WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0035 TA SWANSON & DR SWANSON 3040 CASCO POINT RD TROY A & DEBORA R SWANSON 3040 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 PC Exhibit K RECEIVED APR 1 6 2013 ORONO MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 20, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair Dern Leskinen, Commissioners John Thiesse, Bruce Lemke, Kevin Landgraver, Loren Schoenzeit, an aye Ann Bennett. Representing Staff were Assistant City Administrator o ng-Term Strategic Plannin ichael Gaffron, Planning Coordinator Melanie Curtis, and Record ackie Young. eeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pied CONSENT AGENDA Item No. 5 was added to the Consent~ There were no public comments reg Chair Leskinen closed the pu c hearing at 6:31 p.m. *1. AL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MIN Landg er moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono ission meeting of April 15, 2013, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 2. #13-3603 CHERYL CORYEA AND RICHARD DEVLIN, 385 CASCO POINT ROAD, V ARIANES, 6:33 P.M. -6:47 P.M. Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, Applicants, were present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting setback variances in order to connect the existing detached garage to the existing principal structure and to reorient and raise the roof of the garage. In 1978, the City approved variances allowing the detached garage in its current location. As approved, it was to be ten feet from the front and ten feet from the side lot lines. It was constructed slightly closer to both lot lines and exists today 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side. The applicants would like to connect the detached garage to the home with an addition and raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the nature of the garage as it would be considered to be the principal structure. Principal structure setbacks for the district are I 0- foot side yard and 30-foot front yard. The property is not a lakeshore lot, so the provision allowing a side loading detached garage ten feet from the street is not an option. Page 1 of 25 Council Exhibit D MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 20, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Approval of the requested variance to connect the detached garage to the house would make the now conforming principal structure non-conforming with respect to the front and side yard setbacks. The garage roof changes will result in a further encroachment into the required 10-foot side yard setback for the one-half foot at the north corner of the garage and a slight change in the encroachment on the front. The garage is situated at an angle so that only a small portion, a corner, encroaches into the side setback. Staff has visited the site and took a number of photos to document how the garage was located with respect to the road, the vegetation, and the topography of the site. While the garage is only set back 6.8 feet from the front property line, Casco Point road is not centered within the right-of-way, which results in a 34-foot setback from the paved roadway. The applicants are proposing to rotate the orientation of the roof and to raise the peak of the roof ten feet higher than existing. As proposed, the neighboring property owner will see a garage wall and gable end of the garage roof as opposed to the garage wall and portions of roof as they do today. It is unclear from the plans if the applicants are planning windows or other architectural features in the north-facing gable. There does not appear to be adequate space to install trees or other screening, at least at the northern corner, to minimize the views of the garage. The south-facing gable has a vent at the peak. Inclusion of architectural features or windows along the north wall may break up the view from the adjacent property. there is space available to screen the proposed addition connecting the home and detached garage from the neighboring property. If this were a lakeshore lot, a detached garage would be permitted generally in the location of the existing garage. The existing home on the property currently conforms to the required setbacks set forth in the LR-IC district. Approving the requested variances will make the home's location non-conforming. If, in the future, the property owner wishes to replace the existing home in kind, the location of the existing home would be considered a legal in-kind rebuild. If the Planning Commission concludes the applicants' request is reasonable and meets the practical difficulty criteria for granting a variance, a recommendation for approval should be considered. Bennett asked if this is the same applicant that requested the original variance. Curtis asked if the applicants were the owners of the property in 1978. Coryea indicated they were not. Devlin stated they would like to improve the appearance of the house as well as make the roof of the garage match the house. Landscaping will also be done around the garage to help improve the appearance. Devlin stated they would also like to construct an addition between the house and the garage to allow for a mud room and bathroom to help accommodate them as they grow older. The master bedroom will also be relocated downstairs. Leskinen asked if the applicants are proposing to re-side the garage as well. Devlin indicated they are. Schoenzeit asked if the garage has frost footings or if it is slab on grade. Page 2 of 25 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 20, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Devlin stated to his knowledge it has a foundation underneath the garage. Thiesse stated there are masonry walls on the back and along one side, so it is his assumption it goes down into the ground. Landgraver asked if the applicants are intending to incorporate any type of architectural features on the structure that faces the neighbor to the north. Devlin indicated they would like to make the structure architecturally please and so they would likely incorporate a window on the first floor of the garage or some kind of architectural feature near the peak of the roof. Devlin pointed out they will be raising the ground level of the dirt two or three feet up on the garage to help hide some of the massing and then have landscaping around the garage. Landgraver asked if the City has heard from the neighbor. Curtis indicated they have not and that the neighbor has been given notice of the application. Landgraver stated his concern was whether the neighbors to the north were opposed to the project since that is the most impactful view. Devlin stated they would like to make the structure look attractive from the road. Lemke asked whether any trees would be damaged as a result of the construction. Devlin stated to his knowledge there is one tree and the tree is located slightly higher than the garage so the construction should not impact it. Leskinen asked where the landscaping will be located. Devlin indicated it will be on the front of the garage as well as the backside which faces the neighbor's property. Leskinen asked if that will include some taller vegetation. Devlin indicated they probably will have to have some taller shrubs in that area. Thiesse asked if they plan on re-grading the area between the house and the garage. Devlin stated they have been observing the drainage for the past week and that they will be addressing that. Leskinen asked whether the City Engineer has reviewed the plans in terms of the drainage. Curtis stated the survey does not include the drainage and will need to be added prior to the building permit being issued. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has not made any recommendations at this point. Once the survey has been updated, the City Engineer will review it for any possible changes that may need to be made to the drainage. Page 3 of 25 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 20, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. Thiesse stated his main concern was also whether the neighbor objected to the plan and that the proposal appears to be a nice use of the property. Thiesse commented drainage may be difficult but that the City Engineer will be reviewing the proposals regarding the grading. Schoenzeit commented re-siding the garage would also be a benefit to the neighborhood. Landgraver recommended something be incorporated to help break up the massing affect. Leskinen stated in her view the Planning Commission could require some vegetative screening. Schoenzeit stated the applicant could work with Staff on incorporating some type of architectural feature. Landgraver asked if they are agreeable to landscaping and an architectural feature. Devlin indicated they are planning on doing it anyway so it will not be a problem. Bennett asked if this would set a precedent and that any structure could be rebuilt within these guidelines Curtis indicated that is correct. Bennett asked if any restrictions could be placed on that. Curtis indicated approval would result in a legal conforming structure and that it could be rebuilt in kind. Schoenzeit stated it is important to note that the right-of-way is large and the view from the street gives the appearance that the house is more than 30 feet away from the pavement and that this type of lot allows that type of variance. Schoenzeit moved, Theisse seconded, to recommend approval of Application #13.3603, Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, 3085 Casco Point Road, granting of setback variances, subject to the addition of vegetative screening and the incorporation of architectural features on the north side. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. currently exi ts. Page 4 of25 \ - - Richard Devlin & Cheryl Coryea ~ e«.co Pont Roc:i:I Wgyrolo, MN S53Ct 1-h4' -,_ ~ 30!206 _., , __ ..... 1-1,,llr_Kell Olten l3r0$. /2 ~/::::>-- _ .. /1/ ~/····· __ , .. -/ ~-,···: ... -··/ ····/ .------- N Deu t schlond As t ilb e Ivory ~olo Dogwood Pagoda Dogwood or Royal Star Magnolia mo ~0 -· C: C" ::I ;:;: !:?. m- Annabe lle 1-iydrangea ----- M,.-rL~~ Of-! OD i:?. t-"\.e.it.. e>E>(O!--tO L NE:...\...l $~~,-i~ "::>\011,JG:,. \"O t-'V'-T' c.,\-\ e,>.c$T' b Council Exhibit F nr-:: , .. 1·· :i ·· 11.,,. ,. /' 1'17 •,,✓-c: A-i'-" 14'~~--· -: ', l .,s,; I "-._-;_) \{._, \ ;__ ,, tZ ... e)<•I\ Q [,; E \..,.. f>~~:o TE .. c.::r ~o"&S' CA.SU:> f"T, ~o. -D(<:.C>~o, M~ cx..s:, • -Z...tc '.". .\ ~ i c)' )" "=' <. .. Y p~c::, e ST'{U:::. L-01.,)~ ~..,., 'e> P/4-1::>C.-\A W/ l ~S. T~r-'\ 1 ~ z:._ ~e. e:,~O.S --~N-•-•-, '•::v ,c>f' oF-~c... ~ C::,,~ •• :e., . ~L..~ . June 18, 2013 Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin 3085 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Council Exhibit G CITY OF ORONO Street Address: I Mailing Address: I Telephone (952) 249-4600 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952) 249-4616 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.rnn.us On April 16, 2013, the City of Orono received your application for a variance for property at 3085 Casco Point Road; based on this date the current deadline for City action on your application would be July 9, 2013. Due to the timing of submittal of landscape and architectural plans may not receive final City Council approval prior to the expiration date. Therefore this letter is your notification that the City is extending the time period for City action on application #13-3603 under Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. 3(f) has been extended an additional 60 days. The time period for action on this application is hereby extended until September 7, 2013. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Melanie Curtis Planning and Zoning Coordinator MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, June 10, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. Council Exhibit H (6. #13-3596 CITY OF ORONO, ZONING STUDY, ACCESSORY USES & STRUCTURES - ORDINANCE & SUMMARY ORDINANCE, Continued) illan noted flagpoles are allowed as an accessory use. Bremer s d she is in agreement with combing the two recreational term a that you typically see fire rings within t mdful that this could have an impact on people o ed on the lake. Bremer indicated they cou ways have a temporary structure that is removed out of that zo when not in use and that she is fi with the proposed language. Bremer e ground and the list includes some items nent. Gaffron stated the other language e caveat at the end of each listing that says it must be something that must be c e use of the property. Bremer stated the language wou Gaffron noted swing sets for a swing set but th ill now have to meet a 10-foot setback. Levang move rintup seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 106, Third ies, an Ordinance Adding an mending Sections of Orono City Code Chapter 78, the Orono Zo · g Code, Regardi Accessory Uses and Structures, and Repealing the Moratorium Enacte · Ordinance No. 9 bird Series, and to adopt SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 107, Third Series. TE: Ayes ys 0. 7. #13-3606 CHERYL CORYEA & RICHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 6300 Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, Applicants, were present. Curtis stated the applicants had requested setback variances from the front and side yard in order to connect their detached garage to the home with a one-story addition as well as raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the status of the garage as once connected to the home it would be considered to be the principal structure. Principal structure setbacks for the LR-1 C district are 10-foot side yard and 30-foot front yard. In 1978, the City approved variances allowing the detached garage in its current location. As approved, it was to be 10 feet from the front and 10 feet from the side lot lines. It was constructed slightly closer to both lot lines and exists today 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side. At the May 28th Planning Commission voted 6 to O to recommend approval of the variances as requested. The Planning Commission further recommended that vegetative screening and architectural features be incorporated on the north side of the garage to break up the massing effects. Curtis noted that staff recommends approval of the requested variances and the incorporation of the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding vegetative screening and architectural features on the north side of the garage. The Council should consider adopting or amending the attached draft resolution. Page 7 of 32 ----------------- MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, June 10, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (7. #13-3606 CHERYL CORYEA & RJCHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 6300, Continued) McMillan asked if the City has received a landscaping plan or drawings of the architectural features. Curtis indicated Staff has not received those. McMillan asked at what point in the process the recommendations of the Planning Commission would be approved. McMillan stated in the past the City has typically required applicants to provide plans in that regard prior to Council approval. Bremer stated the applicant may have been waiting to see whether that would be required. Richard Devlin stated by the garage they are planning on raising the earth upon the concrete wall to reduce some of the mass and that there will be some planting of trees at the earth level along with some other bushes or plants. Devlin indicated the Planning Commission asked if they would be agreeable to that and it was stated they would do so. Levang asked whether there would be a berm in that area. Curtis illustrated the concrete portion of the wall. Curtis noted Staff has not received a grading plan at this time. Printup asked whether the drainage has been reviewed by the City Engineer. Curtis stated the City Engineer would need to review the proposed grading plan. Levang asked if the City Engineer has any concerns about the runoff. Struve indicated he would not be able to comment on that at this time without a plan. Levang stated she would like that review to be done by the City Engineer prior to approving the application as well as the landscaping and architectural features that the applicants are proposing. McMillan asked if the Council is okay with the resolution subject to those items being provided. Levang indicated she is okay with the resolution but that she would like to see the plans prior to adopting it as well as a review by the City Engineer. McMillan stated the recommendations of the Planning Commission were good and that she would also like to see how the applicant intends to implement them. Devlin stated the recommendation was to raise the level of the earth, which was not their original plan, but that he is agreeable with that. Page 8 of 32 ----------------- MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, June 10, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (7. #13-3606 CHERYL CORYEA & RICHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 6300, Continued) McMillan asked if the applicant would be okay with coming back in two weeks with a more detailed plan. Devlin indicated he is not opposed to that. Printup moved, Levang seconded, to table Application #13-3603, Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, 3085 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. #13-3605 BRIAN AND REBECCA HENNING, 245 TONKA A VENUE, VARIAN CE LICHEARING Rebecca Henning, Applicants, were present. Curtis stated e home on the property was allowed to be constructed 30 feet from t with a variance nted in 1994. Currently the applicants, who are the new prope owners, are requesting a setbac variance in order to construct a 14' x 14' deck, plus stair, om an upper level doorway on the south "de of the home 30 feet from the rear lot line where 0-foot setback is required. A 30-foot setback curren exists for the home. A minimal landing and air were approved in 2012 in this location for egress by t building official. During Staffs review for the setb k variance for the deck, Sta oted an 83 square foot shed located between the home and the street, 19. feet from the front lot r e. This shed was constructed by a previous property owner and not the a licants. No permi exist for this shed and it exists in an illegal location. The applicants are requesting a r-the-fact ar. oval to allow the shed to remain in its current location. As this after-the-fact review was t initial part of the applicants' request, the City Council will need to hold a public hearing regarding th The Planning Commission at its May meetin to 0 to recommend approval of the setback variances to allow the deck. The Plannin lso discussed the shed in question and how to address the illegal location. After disc ion, the Plannin Commission recommended that Staff should publish for a public hearing for the J e 10 Council meetin o the Council could review and either approve the shed as an after-the-£ variance or deny the she . Staff recommends approval o he setback variance to allow a 14' x 4' deck to be constructed with stairs 30 feet from the rear prope line. Further, Staff recommends the Co cil open the public hearing for the after-the-fact variance fi the shed location and receive any additional p lie testimony regarding the variance. Staff finds at the location of the shed does not appear to alter t character of the neighborhood or a ersely impact adjacent properties. It may be reasonable consider approving the location as it exi s today. The Council should consider requiring the applicant o apply for an after-the fact permit fo alizing the shed location. Staff would recommend waiving the a r-the-fact fee for the permit sine 1t was constructed prior to the applicants purchasing the property. McM· an asked if anyone on the City Council has any issue with the deck. ang indicated she visited the property today and that she does not have a problem with th Page 9 of 32 ------------------ #13-3603 -Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin -3085 Casco Point Road -Variances -Resolution Application Summary: This application was discussed at the Council's June 10th meeting. The applicants are requesting setback variances to allow the existing detached garage and the home to be connected via a one-story addition. They also requested setback variances in order to raise and reorient the garage roof. The application was tabled to allow the applicants an opportunity to prepare plans for vegetative screening, grading and architectural details for the north side of the garage as recommended by the Planning Commission. As it proved to be problematic from a stormwater drainage perspective the applicants re considered re-grading or filling around the garage to cover the concrete foundation . They have submitted a landscape plan proposing screening on the north side of the garage and addition as well as the requested architectural detail for the garage. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances incorporating the landscape and architectural plans . The Council should consider adopting or amending the attached draft approval Resolution. Melanie Curtis From: Melanie Curtis Sent: To: Cc: Tuesday , June 18, 20 13 7:34 AM 'Cheryl Coryea'; 'D evlin Richard' Christine Mattson Subject: RE: City Council Meeting #1 3-3603 Cheryl -I received your voicemail yesterday. I understand that it may take a little time to put a thoughtful plan together. We can tentatively plan to put your application on the City Council's July 8th agenda . If this meeting date works for you both please submit the requested plans by or before June 28th at 10 AM (we close at 11:30 on Summer Fridays). Please don't hesitate to call me if you have questions, etc. Melanie Melanie Curtis if 952.249.4627 ~ mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us From: Melanie Curt is Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 9:11 AM To: 'Cheryl Coryea'; 'Devlin Richard' Cc: Christine Mattson Subject: City Council Meeting #13-3603 Good morning, Cheryl and Richard In light of the direction given by th e City Cou ncil at last night's meeting I will need you to provide a revised survey: showing how you intend t o grade or re-grade the area around the addition and garage. Also, I need you to provide a landscape plan -at least for the north property line and a revised plan for the north elevation of the garage and addition showing how you intend to break up the massing of th e structure architecturally. I think you would like t o have th e Council give this a final approval at th e June 24th meeting (their next meeting). If so , please provide the plans requ ested above by or before June 18th so we can review them and incorporate them into the approval. If you have questions, please call me. Melanie Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Direct Dial: 952 .249.4627 Fax: 952.249.4616 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 Email: mcurtis@c i.orono .mn .us Website: www .ci.orono .mn .us City of Orono Office Hours -SUMMER HOURS Monday -Thursday 7 :30 am -5 pm Friday 7:30 am -11:30 pm 1 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, June 10, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. #13-3596 CITY OF ORONO, ZONING STUDY, ACCESSORY USES & STRUCTU CE & SUMMARY ORDINANCE, Continued) poles are allowed as an accessory use. · Bremer stated she is in a ment with combing the two recreational terms a at you typically see fire rings within the 0-75 foot zon Bremer stated the Council needs to be mi I that this could have an impact on people located on the 1 Bremer indicated they could al shave a temporary structure that is removed out of that zone when not 1 se and that she is fine wit e proposed language . Bremer noted there are a number of items that are d and the list includes some items that are more temporary and some that are mo Gaffron stated the other language that prot at at the end of each listing that says it must be something that must be customaril Bremer stated the language would limit t Gaffron noted swing sets now ha o be 10 feet from the side lot line. for a swing set but they will have to meet a 10-foot setback . Levang moved, Pri seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 106, Third Series, Adding and A ing Sections of Orono City Code Chapter 78, the Orono Zoning de, Regarding essory Uses and Structures, and Repealing the Moratorium Enacted in inance No. 96, rd Series, and to adopt SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 107, Third Series. VO 4,Na #13-3606 CHERYL CORYEA & RICHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 6300 Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, Applicants , were present. Curtis stated the applicants had requested setback variances from the front and side yard in order to connect their detached garage to the home with a one-story addition as well as raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the status of the garage as once connected to the home it would be considered to be the principal structure. Principal structure setbacks for the LR-1 C district are 10-foot side yard and 30-foot front yard. In 1978 , the City approved variances allowing the detached garage in its current location. As approved , it was to be 10 feet from the front and 10 feet from the side lot lines. It was constructed slightly closer to both lot lines and exists today 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side . At the May 28 th Planning Commission voted 6 to O to recommend approval of the variances as requested. The Planning Commission further recommended that vegetative screening and architectural features be incorporated on the north side of the garage to break up the massing effects . Curtis noted that staff recommends approval of the requested variances and the incorporation of the Planning Commission 's recommendations regarding vegetative screening and architectural features on the north side of the garage. The Council should consider adopting or amending the attached draft resolution. Page 7 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, June 10, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (7. #13-3606 CHERYL CORYEA & RICHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 6300, Continued) McMillan asked if the City has received a landscaping plan or drawings of the architectural features. Curtis indicated Staff has not received those . McMillan asked at what point in the process the recommendations of the Planning Commission would be approved . McMillan stated in the past the City has typically required applicants to provide plans in that regard prior to Council approval. Bremer stated the applicant may have been waiting to see whether that would be required. Richard Devlin stated by the garage they are planning on raising the earth upon the concrete wall to reduce some of the mass and that there will be some planting of trees at the earth level along with some other bushes or plants. Devlin indicated the Planning Commission asked if they would be agreeable to that and it was stated they would do so . Levang asked whether there would be a berm in that area . Curtis illustrated the concrete portion of the wall. Curtis noted Staff has not received a grading plan at this time. Printup asked whether the drainage has been reviewed by the City Engineer. Curtis stated the City Engineer would need to review the proposed grading plan . Levang asked if the City Engineer has any concerns about the runoff. Struve indicated he would not be able to comment on that at this time without a plan . Levang stated she would like that review to be done by the City Engineer prior to approving the application as well as the landscaping and architectural features that the applicants are proposing. McMillan asked if the Council is okay with the resolution subject to those items being provided . Levang indicated she is okay with the resolution but that she would like to see the plans prior to adopting it as well as a review by the City Engineer. McMillan stated the recommendations of the Planning Commission were good and that she would also like to see how the applicant intends to implement them. Devlin stated the recommendation was to raise the level of the earth, which was not their original plan, but that he is agreeable with that. Page 8 of 32 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, June 10, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. (7. #13-3606 CHERYL CORYEA & RICHARD DEVLIN, 3085 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 6300, Continued) McMillan asked if the applicant would be okay with coming back in two weeks with a more detailed plan. Devlin indicated he is not opposed to that. Printup moved, Levang seconded, to table Application #13-3603, Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, 3085 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. #13-3605 BRIAN AND REBECCA HENNING, 245 TONKA A VENUE, VARIANCE LICHEARING d Rebecca Henning, Applicants, were present. e home on the property was allowed to be constructed 30 feet from th with a variance anted in 1994. Currently the applicants, who are the new prope owners, are requesting a setba variance in order to construct a 14' x 14' deck, plus stair, fi man upper level doorway on the sout ide of the home 30 feet from the rear lot line where a -foot setback is required. A 30-foot setback curr ly exists for the home. A minimal landing ands r were approved in 2012 in this location for egress by e building official. During Staff's review for the s ack variance for the deck, Staff ted an 83 square foot shed located between the home and the street, .6 feet from the front lot Ii . This shed was constructed by a previous property owner and not the plicants. No permits ist for this shed and it exists in an illegal location . The applicants are requestin er-the-fact appr al to allow the shed to remain in its current location. As this after-the-fact review wa ot initially of the applicants' request, the City Council will need to hold a public hearing regarding The Planning Commission at its May meeting v 6 to Oto recommend approval of the setback variances to allow the deck. The Planning Co miss also discussed the shed in question and how to address the illegal location. After discussio , the Plann g Commission recommended that Staff should publish for a public hearing for the June Council meet1 so the Council could review and either approve the shed as an after-the-fact v ance or deny the sn . Staff recommends approval of the etback variance to allow a 14 14' deck to be constructed with stairs 30 feet from the rear property r . Further, Staff recommends the uncil open the public hearing for the after-the-fact variance for the ed location and receive any additiona ublic testimony regarding the location of the shed does not appear to alte e character of the neighborhood or advers impact adjacent properties. It may be reasonao to consider approving the location as it exists to y. The Council should consider requiring the applica s to apply for an after-the fact permit formali · g the shed location. Staff would recommend waiving the er-the-fact fee for the constructed prior to th~ applicants purchasing the property. McMillan a ed if anyone on the City Council has any issue with the deck. dicated she visited the property today and that she does not have a problem with Page 9 of 32 Date Application Received: 04/16/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/10/13 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07 /09/13 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Administrator Appro Name: Melanie Curtis Title: Planning & Zoning Coordinator Item Description: Date : 5 June 2013 Item No. Agenda Section: #13-3603 -Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin -3085 Casco Point Road -Variances-Resolution Zoning District: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100' Lot Area: 19,330 square feet {0.44 acre) Lot Width: 120 feet List of Exhibits: Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Draft Resolution Survey Planning Commission Staff Report & Exhibits 05/15/13 Draft PC Minutes 05/20/13 Application Summary: ~lMe'MV· ~([Rt{ ayM1- tn ~ k,lL- ~t( u\N'41b The applicants would like to connect their detached garage to the home with a one-story addition; as well as raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the status of the garage as once connected to the home it would be considered to be the principal structure. Principal structure setbacks for the LR-lC district are 10-foot side yard and 30-foot front yard. In 1978 the City approved variances allowing the detached garage in its current location; as approved it was to be 10 feet from the front and 10 feet from the side lot lines. It was constructed slightly closer to both lot lines and exists today 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side. Planning Commission Recommendation On May 20, 2013 the Planning Commission voted 6 to Oto recommend approval of the variances as requested. The Planning Commission further recommended that vegetative screening and architectural features be incorporated on the north side of the garage to break up the massing effects. Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested variances and the incorporation of the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding vegetative screening and architectural features on the north side of the garage. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The Council should consider adopting or amending the attached draft approval Resolution . A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 78-350(8) FILE NO. 13-3603 Council Exhibit A WHEREAS, Richard G. Devlin and Cheryl J. Coryea, a married couple, (hereinafter "Applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3085 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City for variances from Orono Code Section 78-350 in order to construct a one-story addition connecting the home to the detached garage; and WHEREAS, the detached garage on the Property received front and side yard setback variances in 1978 and the current surv~y indicates. it is located 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the north, side property line; and; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have also made application to the City for variances from Orono·City Code Section 78-350 in order to·raise and reorient the roof of the existing detached garage 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the north, side property line; and WHEREAS, the existing home on the Property is located in a conforming location; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the Orono, Minnesota, City Code, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 20, 2013, at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #13-3603. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1 C zoning district, where 0.5 acres is the Page 1 of 5 minimum lot area and 100 feet is the minimum defined lot width. The Property has approximately 19,330 square feet (0.44 acre) acre in area and has 120 feet in width. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 2013 and on a vote of 6 -0 recommended approval of the variances, based on the following findings: a. The Property is located in Tier. 2 .of Orono's Stormwater Quality Overlay District and is limited fo 0 30% hardcover based on gross lot area. The proposed hardcover level will be conforming at 23.9% . .. . b. The proposed level .of structural coverage oh the Property will be conforming at 10%. c. The Applicants have proposed to install vegetative screening along their north property line to scre'en. the addition and additional garage massing from the adjacent property. d. The Applicants have agreed to incorporate architectural interest to the north side of the garage to break. up the massing as viewed from the adjacent property and Casco Point Road. · e. The Applicants' request will alleviate a practical difficulty inherent to the existing location of the detached garage and its proximity to Casco Point Road and not created by the Applicants. f. The Applicants' request is reasonable as there is a 34 foot distance between the garage and the paved, travelled roadway of Casco Point Road offering the feel of a greater setback. g. The Applicants' request will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent properties. h. The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. i. The Applicants' proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and Page 2 of 5 recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community as well as the impact on properties in the vicinity. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to n~ighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan ofthe City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances from Orono Code Section 78-350 in order to construct a one-story addition connecting the home to the detached garage; and to raise and reorient the roof of the existing detached garage 6.8 feet from the front property I.ine where 30 feet is required and 9.5 feet from the north, side property line where a 10 foot setback is required for a principal structure; subject to the conditions listed below: 1. Council approval is based on the survey and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A & B. Any amendments to these plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover shall not increase above 30% as permitted within Tier 2 of the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 3. The Applicants shall install vegetative screening along the north property line to screen the addition and additional garage massing from the adjacent property. 4. The Applicants shall incorporate architectural interest to the north side of the garage to break up the massing as viewed from the adjacent property and Casco Point Road. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining building permits for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must Page 3 of 5 be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (June 10, 2014). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned Applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th dayofJune, 2013. ATTEST: Rachel Dodge, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor Page 4 of 5 Richard G. Devlin STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Cheryl J. Coryea This instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ______ _ 2013 by Richard G. Devlin, husband of Cheryl J: Coryea. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPPIN Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ______ _ 2013 by Cheryl J. Coryea,wife of Richard G. Devlin. Notary Public Page 5 of s Date #13-3603 -Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin -3085 Casco Point Road -Variances -Resolution Application Summary: The applicants have requested setback variances in order to connect their detached garage to the home with a one-story addition; as well as raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the status of the garage as once connected to the home it would be considered to be the principal structure. Principal structure setbacks for the LR-lC district are 10-foot side yard and 30-foot front yard. In 1978 the City approved variances allowing the detached garage in its current location; as approved it was to be 10 feet from the front and 10 feet from the side lot lines. It was constructed slightly closer to both lot lines and exists today 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side. At their May 20 meeting the Planning Commission voted 6 to Oto recommend approval of the variances as requested. The Planning Commission further recommended that vegetative screening and architectural features be incorporated on the north side of the garage to break up the massing of the structure. Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested variances and the incorporation of the Planning Commission's recommendations regarding vegetative screening and architectural features on the north side of the garage. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The Council should consider adopting or amending the attached draft approval Resolution. wtta~ ~ ---f1l'f ~IJJ-f-~ f,uJ-z "1f ~~~fh-~'a" l,-v1 i buk--fD J' <M'-f c}Jf-11-- lit~ LJ --b M(f- Pfl~ / lu ~ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______ _ A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 78-350(8) FILE NO. 13-3603 WHEREAS, Richard G. Devlin and Cheryl J. ryea , a married couple , (hereinafter "Applicants ") are the owners of the property locate at 3085 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally d cribed as : Lot 55, including adjacent one-half of Ivy Place Vacated, Spring Par: , Hennepin County , Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicants have m e application to the City for variances from Orono Code Section 78-350 in order to co struct a one-story addition connecting the home to the detached garage ; and WHEREAS, the detached rage on the Property received front and side yard setback variances in 1978 and the curr t survey indicates it is located 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9 .5 feet from the n h, side property line ; and ; and WHEREAS, th Applicants have also made application to the City for variances from Orono City C ae Section 78-350 in order to raise and reorient the roof of the existing detached garage .8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the north , side property line ; and home on the Property is located in a conforming location ; and .-· WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota ,.· tatutes and the Orono , Minnesota , City Code , the Orono Planning Commission held a blic hearing on May 20 , 2013 , at which times all persons desiring to be heard ing this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono , Minnesota : FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #13-3603 . 2 . The Property is located in the LR-1 C zoning district , where 0.5 acres is the Pag e 1 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______ _ minimum lot area and 100 feet is the minimum defined lot width. The Property has approximately 19,330 square feet (0.44 acre) acre in area and has 120 feet in width. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 20, 2013 and on a vote of 6 -0 recommended approval of the variances, based on the following findings: a. The Property is located in Tier 2 of Orono's Stormwater Quality Overlay District and is limited to 30% hardcover based on gross lot area. The proposed hardcover level will be conforming at 23.9%. b. The proposed level of structural coverage on the Property will be conforming at 10%. c. The Applicants have proposed to install vegetative screening along their north property line to screen the addition and additional garage massing from the adjacent property. d. The Applicants have agreed to incorporate architectural interest to the north side of the garage to break up the massing as viewed from the adjacent property and Casco Point Road. e. The Applicants' request will alleviate a practical difficulty inherent to the existing location of the detached garage and its proximity to Casco Point Road and not created by the Applicants. f. The Applicants' request is reasonable as there is a 34 foot distance between the garage and the paved, travelled roadway of Casco Point Road offering the feel of a greater setback. g. The Applicants' request will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and will result in minimal negative impact on adjacent properties. h. The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. i. The Applicants' proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and Page 2 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -------- recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community as well as the impact on properties in the vicinity. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances from Orono Code Section 78-350 in order to construct a one-story addition connecting the home to the detached garage; and to raise and reorient the roof of the existing detached garage 6.8 feet from the front property line where 30 feet is required and 9.5 feet from the north, side property line where a 10 foot setback is required for a principal structure; subject to the conditions listed below: 1. Council approval is based on the survey and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A & B. Any amendments to these plans may requke further Planning· Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover shall not increase above 30% as permitted within Tier 2 of the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. " · 3. The Applicants shall install vegetative screening along the north property line to screen the addition and additional garage massing from the adjacent property. 4. The Applicants shall incorporate architectural interest to the north side of the garage to break up the massing as viewed from the adjacent property and Casco Point Road. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining building permits for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must Page 3 of 5 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -------- be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (June 10, 2014). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned Applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of June, 2013. ATTEST: Rachel Dodge, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor Page 4 of 5 Richard G. Devlin STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -------- Cheryl J. Coryea This instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ______ _ 2013 by Richard G. Devlin, husband of Cheryl J. Coryea. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPPIN Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ______ _ 2013 by Cheryl J. Coryea, wife of Richard G. Devlin. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MondaY., ay 20,2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Janning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the followin embers present: Chair Denise eskinen, Commissioners John Thiesse, Bruce Lemke, Kevin Land ver, Loren Schoenzeit, and e Ann Bennett. Representing Staff were Assistant City Ad · istrator of Long-Term Strategic Planning ichael Gaffron, Planning Coordinator Melanie Curtis, a Recorder Jackie Young. eeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by e Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Item No. 5 was added to the Consen Landgraver moved, Schoenzeit seconde to a ove the Consent Agenda as amended. Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing£ Ite No. 5 at 6 :31 p.m. There were no public comments reg ing this item. Chair Leskinen closed the pub ·c hearing at 6:31 p.m. VOTE ON THE ABO MOTION: Ayes 6, Nays 0. *1. APPRO L OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING M Landgrav moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to approve the minutes of the Oro Planning Comm· ion meeting of April 15, 2013, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS . 2. #13-3603 CHERYL CORYEA AND RICHARD DEVLIN, 385 CASCO POINT ROAD, V ARIANES, 6:33 P.M. -6:47 P.M. Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, Applicants, were present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting setback variances in order to connect the existing detached garage to the existing principal structure and to reorient and raise the roof of the garage. In 1978 , the City approved variances allowing the detached garage in its current location. As approved, it was to be ten feet from the front and ten feet from the side lot lines. It was constructed slightly closer to both lot lines and exists today 6 .8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side. The applicants would like to connect the detached garage to the home with an addition and raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the nature of the garage as it would be considered to be the principal structure. Principal structure setbacks for the district are 10- foot side yard and 30-foot front yard. The property is not a lakeshore lot, so the provision allowing a side loading detached garage ten feet from the street is not an option. Page 1 of 25 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING M onday, May 20, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Approval of the requested variance to connect the detached garage to the house would make the now conforming principal structure non-conforming with respect to the front and side yard setbacks . The garage roof changes will result in a further encroachment into the required 10-foot side yard setback for the one-half foot at the north comer of the garage and a slight change in the encroachment on the front. The garage is situated at an angle so that only a small portion , a comer, encroaches into the side setback . Staff has visited the site and took a number of photos to document how the garage was located with respect to the road, the vegetation , and the topography of the site. While the garage is only set back 6.8 feet from the front property line, Casco Point road is not centered within the right-of-way , which results in a 34-foot setback from the paved roadway. The applicants are proposing to rotate the orientation of the roof and to raise the peak of the roof ten feet higher than existing. As proposed , the neighboring property owner will see a garage wall and gable end of the garage roof as opposed to the garage wall and portions ofroof as they do today. It is unclear from the plans if the applicants are planning windows or other architectural features in the north-facing gable. There does not appear to be adequate space to install trees or other screening, at least at the northern comer, to minimize the views of the garage. The south-facing gable has a vent at the peak. Inclusion of architectural features or windows along the north wall may break up the view from the adjacent property . there is space available to screen the proposed addition connecting the home and detached garage from the neighboring property. If this were a lakeshore lot, a detached garage would be permitted generally in the location of the existing garage. The existing home on the property currently conforms to the required setbacks set forth in the LR-IC district. Approving the requested v ariances will make the home 's location non -conforming. If, in the future , the property owner wishes to replace the existing home in kind , the location of the existing home would be considered a legal in-kind rebuild. If the Planning Commission concludes the applicants ' request is reasonable and meets the practical difficulty criteria for granting a variance , a recommendation for approval should be considered. Bennett asked if this is the same applicant that requested the original variance. Curtis asked if the applicants were the owners of the property in 1978. Coryea indicated they were not. Devlin stated they would like to improve the appearance of the house as well as make the roof of the garage match the house. Landscaping will also be done around the garage to help improve the appearance. Devlin stated they would also like to construct an addition between the house and the garage to allow for a mud room and bathroom to help accommodate them as they grow older. The master bedroom will also be relocated downstairs . Leskinen asked if the applicants are proposing to re-side the garage as well. Devlin indicated they are. Schoenzeit asked if the garage has frost footings or if it is slab o n grade. Page 2 of 25 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 20, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Devlin stated to his knowledge it has a foundation underneath the garage. Thiesse stated there are masonry walls on the back and along one side, so it is his assumption it goes down into the ground . Landgraver asked if the applicants are intending to incorporate any type of architectural features on the structure that faces the neighbor to the north. Devlin indicated they would like to make the structure architecturally please and so they would likely incorporate a window on the first floor of the garage or some kind of architectural feature near the peak of the roof. Devlin pointed out they will be raising the ground level of the dirt two or three feet up on the garage to help hide some of the massing and then have landscaping around the garage. Landgraver asked if the City has heard from the neighbor. Curtis indicated they have not and that the neighbor has been given notice of the application. Landgraver stated his concern was whether the neighbors to the north were opposed to the project since that is the most impactful view . Devlin stated they would like to make the structure look attractive from the road. Lemke asked whether any trees would be damaged as a result of the construction. Devlin stated to his knowledge there is one tree and the tree is located slightly higher than the garage so the construction should not impact it. Leskinen asked where the landscaping will be located. Devlin indicated it will be on the front of the garage as well as the backside which faces the neighbor's property. Leskinen asked if that will include some taller vegetation. Devlin indicated they probably will have to have some taller shrubs in that area. Thiesse asked if they plan on re-grading the area between the house and the garage. Devlin stated they have been observing the drainage for the past week and that they will be addressing that. Leskinen asked whether the City Engineer has reviewed the plans in terms of the drainage. Curtis stated the survey does not include the drainage and will need to be added prior to the building permit being issued. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and has not made any recommendations at this point. Once the survey has been updated, the City Engineer will review it for any possible changes that may need to be made to the drainage . Page 3 of 25 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 20, 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 6:42 p .m. Thiesse stated his main concern was also whether the neighbor objected to the plan and that the proposal appears to be a nice use of the property. Thiesse commented drainage may be difficult but that the City Engineer will be reviewing the proposals regarding the grading. Schoenzeit commented re-siding the garage would also be a benefit to the neighborhood. Landgraver recommended something be incorporated to help break up the massing affect. Leskinen stated in her view the Planning Commission could require some vegetative screening. Schoenzeit stated the applicant could work with Staff on incorporating some type of architectural feature. Landgraver asked if they are agreeable to landscaping and an architectural feature. Devlin indicated they are planning on doing it anyway so it will not be a problem . Bennett asked if this would set a precedent and that any structure could be rebuilt within these guidelines Curtis indicated that is correct. Bennett asked if any restrictions could be placed on that. Curtis indicated approval would result in a legal conforming structure and that it could be rebuilt in kind. Schoenzeit stated it is important to note that the right-of-way is large and the view from the street gives the appearance that the house is more than 30 feet away from the pavement and that this type oflot allows that type of variance. Schoenzeit moved, Theisse seconded, to recommend approval of Application #13.3603, Cheryl Coryea and Richard Devlin, 3085 Casco Point Road, granting of setback variances, subject to the addition of vegetative screening and the incorporation of architectural features on the north side. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. #13-3605 BRIAN , 6:47 P. enning, Applicants, ere esent. Curtis stated t a licants are requestin a re ard setback varianc feet from t rear wR re a SO-foot set ck is requir and a 30 -fo Page 4 of 25 f D Issues for Consideration FILE #13-3603 15 May 2013 Page 2 of 2 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? If so, what are those conditions? a. Should vegetation, trees or other screening opportunities be considered? b. Are there architectural options which will mitigate the impacts of the requested variances? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation If the Planning Commission determines that the applicants' request is reasonable and meets the practical difficulty criteria for granting a variance a recommendation for approval may be appropriate. vvi1t ~ 1,x, (IP<1Jd, '? v2f-. FnM--~Nf jfrJvrt~I)', -~- VV\ n,kr)M 0 VI f)J u VJ1,l ~ &£ 1 fed 1. -~ ( LMLA~~ -~f}(-0 tltf?? "10~ Subject: #13-3603, Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin, 3085 Casco Point Road, Background In 1978, the City approved variances allowing the detached garage to be 10 feet from the front and 10 feet from the side lot lines. As constructed it is slightly closer to both lot lines and is 6.8 feet from the front property line and 9.5 feet from the side. The applicants would like to connect the detached garage to the home with an addition; and raise and reorient the garage roof. Connecting the garage to the home results in a change in the nature of the garage as it would be considered to be the principal structure once combined with the home. Principal structure setbacks for the district are 10-foot side yard and 30-foot from the front yard. The proposal results in conforming structural coverage and hardcover levels with 10% structural coverage and 23.9% hardcover where 30% is allowed. Front Yard & Side Yard Setback Variances The detached garage location was approved by variance in 1978. It appears that while the approvals allowed the garage to be located 10 feet from both the front and side lot lines it was not constructed as such and is 6.8 feet from the front and 9.5 feet from the side making it non conforming. Approval of the requested variance to connect the detached garage to the house would make the (now conforming) principal structure non-conforming with respect to the front and side yard setbacks. The garage roof changes will result in a further encroachment into the required 10-foot side yard setback for the½ foot at the north corner of the garage and a slight change in the encroachment on the front. The garage is situated at an angle so that only a small portion, a corner, encroaches into the side setback. Staff visited the site and observed that while the garage is only set back 6.8' from the front property line, Casco Point Road is not centered within the ROW which results in a 34 foot setback from the paved roadway. It appears to be a greater setback. The applicants are proposing to rotate the orientation of the roof and to raise the peak of the roof 10 feet higher than existing. There does not appear to be adequate space to install trees or other screening, at least at the northern corner, to minimize the views of the garage from the neighboring property. Inclusion of architectural features or windows along the north wall may break up a monotonous view from the adjacent property. The proposed connection addition will be most visible from the driveway of the adjacent property to the north; it will be only minimally visible from the road. However, there is some space available to, screen, the proposed addition connecting the home and detached garage from the neighboring property. The existing home on the property currently conforms to the required setbacks set forth in the LR-lC district; approving the requested variances will make the home's location non conforming. If, in the future, the property owner wishes to replace the, existing home in-kind the location of the existing home would be considered a legal in-kind rebuild. · Christine Mattson From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Hi Chris, Cheryl Coryea [cheryl.coryea@gmail.com] Friday, May 10, 2013 2:47 PM Christine Mattson; Devlin Richard Requested Casco Drawing Exstg. Gar. Roof Ht. vs Proposed.pdf I just got this moment ago! (I pushed as hard as I could with the architect). Can our application still proceed as scheduled with the initial hearing on May 20? Thanks for your patience. Best, Cheryl Cheryl J. Coryea 612.965.6690 -cell 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Monica Fadness, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #13-3603 was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 10th day of May, 2013. Vhnu£~✓ ~ Monica A. Fadness CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, May 20, 2013, beginning at 6:30 p.m . on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 13-3601 City of Orono proposes amendments to Orono Zoning Code Chapter 78, Article XI. - Wetlands Protection, to potentially include revisions to Sections 78-1601 through 78- 1614 regarding regulation of wetlands. 13-3602 City of Orono proposes a housekeeping amendment to City Code Section 78-571 regarding hardcover in the Seasonal Recreation -RS District to maintain consistency with City Code Section 78-1700. 13-3603 Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin, 3085 Casco Point Road, LR-1 C zoning district, request front yard and side yard setback variances in order to attach the existing detached garage to the home making it part of the principal structure within 6.8 feet of the front property line where a 30 foot setback is required and a 6.8 foot setback for the garage currently exists; and a 9.5 foot setback from the side lot line where a 1 O foot side yard setback is required and a 9.5 foot setback currently exists. They also propose to reconstruct the garage roof resulting in an increase in height in the substandard side setback. 13-3604 Eskuche Associates on behalf of Neil &·Barbara Goodwin, 2975 Casco Point Road, LR-1 C zoning district, request an average lakeshore setback variance and a Tier 1 hardcover variance in order to construct a new residence partially ahead of the average lakeshore setback and resulting in 25.78% hardcover where 25% is allowed and 25.15% currently exists. A conditional use permit for grading and filling activities in excess of 500 cubic yards is also requested. 13-3605 Brian & Rebecca Henning, 245 Tonka Avenue, LR-1A zoning district, request a rear setback variance to allow construction of an attached deck 30 feet from the rear lot line where a 50-foot setback is required and a 30 foot setback exists for the home. 13-3606 Luke Kujawa of Your Boat Club on behalf of M.G. Kaminski, 1444 Shoreline Drive, 8-2 zoning district, requests an amendment to the conditional use permit for the boat club operation to permit 1 O additional boat slips for a total of 30 boat club slips. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend these meetings. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearings. Written · comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by May 14, 2013 if possible. Interested persons may review the applications at City offices. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620. City of Orono By: Planning Commission . Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator To be published in The Laker & The Pioneer Newspapers on May 4, 2013. Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office 2 RUN DATE: 4il5/:Z013 HENNEPIN C01 'J\/TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 38 20-117-23 340001 JAY S HULBERT TRUSTEE 3035 CASCO POINT RD JAYS HULBERT 3035 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0010 CHERYL CORYEA 3085 CASCO POINT RD CHERYL CORYEA 3085 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0017 DORIS MOLITOR-WATERS 3061 CASCO POINT RD TODD WATERS 3061 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0022 FREDERICK C PETERS 3127 CASCO CIR FREDERICK C PETERS 3127 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0049 L&JBRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIR LAWRENCE L BRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0005 PHILLIP S WHIPPLE 3095 CASCO POINT RD PHILLIP S WHIPPLE 3095 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 340011 E NEVERMANN & T OSULLIVAN 3065 CASCO POINT RD ERIC NEVERMANN THEA OSULLIVAN 3065 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-ll7-23 34 0018 JOHN P & EVY C DENNIS TRUST 3055 CASCO POINT RD JOHN & EVY DENNIS 3055 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0031 THE CASCO CO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED CITY OF ORONO PARKS POBOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REP ENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RE OROS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNT DATE: 01-\ / \ c; } \;:> BY:--"---=-=---"""----'-"=~.:::=..,,,,,.._ __ 38 20-ll 7-23 34 0006 K E RICHEY & S J RICHEY 3105 CASCO POINT RD KENT E & SUSAN J RICHEY 3105 CASCO PT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0012 RA KASTENS & B C KASTENS 3045 CASCO POINT RD RICHARD A/BARBARA C KASTENS 3045 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0021 RG &PA DUDLEY 3125 CASCO CIR RONALD G & PATRICIA A DUDLEY 3125 CASCO CIRCLE SO WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0035 TA SWANSON & DR SWANSON 3040 CASCO POINT RD TROY A & DEBORA R SWANSON 3040 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 3 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2013 CffVOFORONO ~~-c~ t,,) I\) Q) -"" 'ii al-;:: *~-~~ &\1~3{):X g.2"3~; °'~m~~ c.'< -,(flt/) ~ 0 CD-""~ =: ::J" a:i CJ1 m· g~5'c.no.:,J ~<g:E~;~ ~~[~;-CD no c--·-c -n -. '< ~ Cl ::J m~c,;:rc:a- ~-~ ~ ~ 3-, (1) (1) o n :E3;;; 0 a (1) Cl C" 3 -• i::::o 3 O .. (1) < CD ::J -En:: ct) 0 ~~~ [ oo,:::: C: ' 0 CD rn "C :: ~ :. ~ ~ ::, 0, 0 0 0, -i ?" ~ n 0 =:i ~ ~l)f ., Ill • It OJ '< (/) C ~f 0. 5' (l) <D '< 0. 0 (l) -:J 0. CJ) :E 0 s: <D ~ 0. Sll ' '< 8. (/) Sll -Sll :J ::,-~ ~~CD o. Sll ~~ -:::,-0 CD 0. ;:;: :E Sll CJ) -ia. "O C CD :J :E ~ ~ ~ ::,-CJ) ::,- :E "O -· CD Sll CJ) CD 16 a ;,, -, - --Sll 0. [D -; ::, <D SllW:J3)> 3WCDCD-:....., CD _._)> :E :J ::;j ::, en ...... ~ 0.o<JCJ)CD <D I\) Sll O :J 0.. "OoCD . W CD :J :'E w _-.cnrn ► Sll ~-g • CJ) C "O 0 ::!: CD --.J "O :J .... --. co ::r ~~\ ' '. i ~ i ~ IE o 4 =='0 ►<1 '-•:Di 3 0 3 (I) \~· ~ Sll -, Sll :J CD '< 0. ~ 0 -· ID ........ :J .... Q.-o C-, o. s· s· CD (0 0a (/) Sll Sll :J c o. Q: cii ' ::, CD 0. (/) Sll c a_ N~~ ~ :E Sll CJ) .... :J -ro o 0. 3 Sll ~ ..C ~ :J -· o.o.c () (I) Sll O S.o.~3 0 :J ::,--·-o (1)0"0:: -, '< Sll (I) ::,~ ~ID~ C. """'l ~i'fi~ N en en o~m ·~ ► z s: cii' )> C s: ~~\ II/;, o_l Sll '< Q: Sll ':,< CJ) C () () (I) Sll -:J :::,- 0. (I) CJ) "O () CJ) C 0 c::·o-c (I)~ 3 :E ::,-:J (I) CD CJ) CD o. 0 ;,, - CJ) 0 CJ) Sll S:: §'· o. "O -· :J :E "0:JCJ);::;: =-:J ::, () (I) Sll Sll @}. CJ) en = ., __ ,. 0 . 6i '< '"(J C Q: o· LEGAL NOTICE i 0 .... isi' (I) 0. )> en <D ;::?. CITY OF ORONO ... : ;, 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 . Phone (9$2) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ~ \ The Orono Planning Commission will hold a p,ublic hearing in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Mon~ay, May 20, 2013 ,'begin ning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 13-3601 City of Orono proposes amendments to Orqno Zon ing Code Chapter 78, Article XL '-Wetlands Pro tection , to potentially include revisions to Sections 78-1601 through 78-1614 regarding regulation of wetlands. · 13-3602' City of Orono proposes a housekeeping amend ment tci City Code Section 78-571 regardi ng -hard cover in the Seasonal Recreation -RS Dlstricl to maintain consistency With City Code S~ctiori 78- 1700. cii' I\) ~ ::,-. (I) I\) ~ 1:: < <,) CD '< . :J Sll () -· CD 0. coS.ws: _Sll.QCD Sll (/) C -, :E -Sll Jg CJ) Sll :: C ----+, -· C -·-. Sll -CD <D CJ) CD 0. ' ,,13-3603 .-: L --~ .• ,) •. :, ·: i' lA zoning district, ieq_uest a rear setback variance ,Cheryl Coryea & Richard Devlin , 3085 Casco Point to'.allow cons!(u¢tion of an attached detR 30 feet ,, Road , LR-1 C zoning district, requ est front yard and , , from,,the rear lot l_ine where a 50-foot setback is side yard setback variances in order to attach the -required and a 30 foot setback exists for the home . existing detached 'garage to the home making'it · · part of the principal structure within 6.8 feet of 13-3606 . , '· the front property line where a 3Q foot set6ack ' 'Luke Kujawa of Your Boat ciutl on behalf cif·'M.G. is required and a 6.8 foot setback for the garage ' Kaminski, i 444 Shoreline· Drive,. B:2 zoring dis-· currently exists; and a 9.5 foot setback from the . trict, requests an amendment to the conditional . side lot line where a 1 O, ioot side yard .setback is use permit for the .boat club operation \o permit 1 o required and a 9.5' fooi seiback currently, exists. additional boat slips for a total of 30 boat club slips. They also propose to reconstruct .t~e garage rooi · · . · , 1 • resulting in an inc(ease. in height, in the substan-: .. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to dard side setback. . . attend these meeiings. This is not a final agenda and is subject'to change ·psior to the tteari!lgS. Written comments ' are accepted. anil sHould be 13-3604 Esl<uche Associates on behalf of Neil & Barbara Goodwin , 2975 Casco Point Road , LR-1 C zoning district, request · an average 'lakeshore · setback variance and a Tier 1 hardcover variance in or der to construct a new re si dence partially ahead qt the average lakeshore setback and resulting in 25. 78% Hardcover where 25% is allowed and ?5,15% currently exists. ~ ~o nditional u~e permit for grading and fillin,g activities in ewess qf 500 ·cubic yards is also requestel:l. . · submitted to the City of Orono by May .14, 2013 if possible: Interested persons may review the appli caiions at Ciiy offices: ,For an appointment; please · call (9!'!2) 249-4620. City of Orono By:~ Planniri~ Commission Meianie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator . ,I .. , . ' , .. · . 13-3605 . , . . , , (Published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspa- , Brian & Rebecca Henning, 245 Topka A~enue, LR-_pers May 4, 2013) · · • · ' ·. · . ~s::-g s:~ OOcrE?.;::;: U) § 1n' ::,-::, :E o. ::r CD -a ::,-• CD -· , o· s:: .... en ► ::,--· 0 Sll:::, :::J -::J a.. ~:::,S:wCD CD ~ CD C en 5a.o::,g.o aorcoQ .. ::J CD • ;:E -· O" 0. Sll {5 ~ ~- 0" 6_ Sll O.::, ~ "OSllCO O::rCDcoo. :Ew .... CDc "C/)7"::,- :J -'< cOSlJCJ) ==E:J:E ;,,:J o.o :JwCD3 0 CJ) 3. ~-i"OO (!)Io:J o.m'<o CO (I) Sll CDrCD- )> :::,- 8.;:,:::; S. CJ) ...... m ...... Ill ffi ;o ffi u1 (/) pj' CD 8. ~ :::J :::J CD CJ) 0 _pi 0 0 C :::J '< 0 -I CD :J :J CD :J "Q, :J )> --a. ~ ;:.: 0 --0 C: C'" (') Ill ..+ 0 ::::, --"'Ow I\J D) ...... iisi;~ ~ ;_ ~ ~ mo, 3 en l)l ~ 0 C: "'O - ::r C: 3 ~ !?. W~"'"'COD> a. -D) •• (/) 9:~ i?J~ ~-':1' Q) 01 a;· g!:!5'U1c.JJ ~~:E~ol~ ~==~~(D(l) O O o--·"O -o~<~D> ::J ll:g..r,,.a:o ~-~ ~ ~ -,3 (!) (!) 0 0 :E3; 03 ~ (!) I» CT -• i:::: o 3 0 ~~~ ~::J '.::~~ ~ co,;::: c: . 0 (1) (/) 'O :-'! ~ ~ ~ (J) 5· (.11 o' 0 in .., ::r O 0 . . 0 ~ (f) C O' ~§. Cl. O' ll) <D '< Cl. 0 SlJ -::::, Cl. en ~ 0 3 \ g. <D ··, ~ Cl. SlJ ' '< S, (/) ll) ...... ll) ::::, :::r ;:;: ~~~<D ~ i SlJ en '<en . ~ -...... .... ...... :::r en 0 CD Cl. ...... SlJ .... ll) ::::, IB -< 0.;::::::, 0 <D - "'O C !:2: 1n· :::r CD Cl. CJ) ~ C ~t t~ -~ ", (\ \ ::::, co CJ) ~ a. ~ g. 1n· )> C g. ~ ~:; CD Cl. \-._~~. \'-~ ,.~~ 't;\ C a. "'O ll) C ~!:2: cii' :::r. LEGAL NOTICE . CITY OF. ORONO )> co CD 3. 2750 Kelley Parkw_ay, P.O. liox 66 · Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ' Phone (9521249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ~ -, The Orono Planning Commission wi ll hold a pub li c hearing in the Orono Council Cham bers at 2780 Keiley Parkway on 1 Monday,· May 20, 2013, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matier of reviewing the following land use applications: 13-360 1 City of Orono proposes amendments to Orono Zoning Code Chapter 78 , Article 'XI. -Wetlands Protection , to potentially include revi sions· to Sections 78-1601 through iil- 1614 regard ing regulation df wetlands. 13-360 2 City of Orono proposes a housekeeping ame ndment to City Code Section 78-571 regarding hardcover in the Seasonal Recre ation -RS District to maintain consistency wit~ City Code Section 78-1700 . 13-3603 Chery l. Coryea & Richard Devlin, 3085 I\) f CD I\) ~Is < w <D '< Casco Point Road , LR-1 C zoning district, requ est front yard and side yard setback variances in order to attach the existing de-. tached garage to thli home making it part of the principal structure within 6.8 feet of the front property line where .a 30 foot setback is required and a 6.8 foot setback ior th e · garage currently exists; and a 9.5 foot set back from the side lot line .where a 1 o. foot side yard setback is required and a 9.5 foot setback currently exists. They aiso propose . to reconstruct the garage roof resulting in an increase in height in the substandard side setback. 13-3604 . . Eskuche Associates on behalf of Neil & Barbara Goodwin , 2975 Casco Point Road , LR-1 C zohing distri ct, request an average lakeshore setback variance and a Tier 1 hardcover variance in order tp co,Astruct a new reside nce partially ahead of the av erage lakeshore setback and resulting in 25. 78% hardcover where 25% is allowed and 25.15% currently exists. A conditional use permit for grading ' and filling activi-· ties in excess of 500 cubic yards is also requested. · 13-3605 Brian & Rebecca Henning, 245 Tonka Av enue, LR-1 A zoning district, reque st a rear ·~. CD ::J ~ SlJ <D :::r 0 ~ ff ::::,-en ::::,- ~ "'O CD SlJ <D "'O ;,;-~ --~ ll) h! ::::, -ro o Cl. 3 en C 0 0 <D SlJ ...... ::J :::r Cl. <D en -o o en C 0 <. cr c CD ~ 3 ~ :::r::::, CD CD en <D Cl. 0 ;,;--~ g en 0 e?. CD Cl. CD -I :::r CD SlJ w::::, 3 )> 3wCDCD'--" CD .....,)> ~ ::::, ::j ::::, en ..... ~ a. o -o en <D CDNSlJo::::, o..--ooCD . W CD ::::, ~ w-'"'enen ► ll) ~~ . en C "'D 0 ::::!: CD --.J-o ::J .... ... -. (0 :J"" SlJ ~ .0 ~ ::::, -· o..o.co CD SlJ 0 S.o..:':;;3 :::r -· "'O CDO'O= -.-<SlJCD SlJ s §"· Cl. "'O -· ::::, ~ -O::::,en;::;: =::::, :::r OCDSlJSlJ g}-cnen= ro9.SlJg. _SlJ.o<D SlJ (/) C -. ~ ...... SlJJg cnSlJ=:c • ,-+ -+, -· C -·-. ll) ...... CD CD en<00..• setback variance to allow construction of an attached deck 30 feet -from the rear lot line where a 50-foot settiack is required and a 30 !bot setback exists for the home. 13-3606 , .. Luke Kujawa of Your Boat Club on behalf .of M.G. Kaminski, 1444 Shoreline Drive , B-2 zoning d_istrict, requests _an ame_ndment to the conditional use permit for the boat club operation to permit i o additional boat ·slips for a total of 30 boat club slips. All persons wishing to be heard are encour aged to attend these meetings .. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the h~arings. Written comments are ac cepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by May 14, 2013 if possible . Inter ested persons may review the applications at City offices. For. an appointment, please · call (952) 249-4620. · City of Orono By: Planning Commission Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator (Published in The laker and The Pioneer newspapers May 4, 2013) ~z-g g.~ CO~O'~;::;: CD = ::::,-::::,- 0 _;:o ~ <D "'Cl :: r co en· · :::r O .... )> <D ::J O SlJ ::::, -+,(O -+o=1 0. ~rS:SlJ~ UlmcoS.(/) ;,;-:::r 0 ~<D::::,o_::::, :::r -<D ::!. O' o· S ~ N CD :::r -· en <D -· ::J-oCl.::J ~ ::::, SlJ ll) co mg;-ocoo. ~g_~~~ ll) SlJ ...... '< cii-;,;-Sllcn Cl.SlJ6::::J~ cr::::,~o.o ~Cl.::::,CD3 0 :::r 3 -~ SlJen SlJen "2.. 0 •. 0::::, --1'<0 §:ICDSlJ m <D ...... ;,;-0 :::r ::::, "'Cl -en 0 -,_ Ill ~ 0 ::Y-< I I CD (/) (f) iii (D S, s ::J ::::, <D en 0 _iii 0 0 C ::::, '< S, 0 SlJ < ~ ~ -C. Sl) < ;:;: 0 -""C C O"' 0 Sl) -0 ::J Christine Mattson From: Sent: To: Subject: Cheryl Coryea [cheryl.coryea@gmail.com] Monday, April 29, 2013 12:27 PM Christine Mattson Fwd: lli~, ! Could this picture of the house & current garage slope be sufficient for the l pplication? If so, it would save us the cost of the architect for something we are replacing. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to hearing from you. Cheryl ----------Forwarded message ---------- From: Devlin Richard <devlin.richard@co .olmsted.mn.us> Date: Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11 :58 AM Subject: To: Cheryl Coryea <cheryl.coryea@gmail.com> Fl :.._____---,- 1 26 April 2013 Cheryl Cornyea & Richard Devlin 3085 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION SUBJECT: Zoning Application # 13-3603 CITY OF ORONO Street Address: I Mailing Address: I Telephone (952) 249-4600 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952) 249-4616 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your application for variances for property located at 3085 Casco Point Road. Below is a list of items the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review: ✓ Scaled elevation drawings and floor plans of the existing garage which illustrates the garage roof as it currently exists for comparison with the proposed (as it relates specifically to the roof). A reduced copy is also required. ✓ All proposed hardcover shall be calculated for the appropriate Tier (Tier 3) on the revised hardcover worksheets that are enclosed. The hardcover calculations must be completed by your surveyor. ✓ $2,500 escrow -This project requires submittal of an application escrow in the amount of $2,500. ~ ~ Please complete the enclosed escrow agreement and submit along with a check for the escrow. Apph ation #13-3603 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the items requested above by Monday, May 6 at noon in order to remain on the May 20th Planning Commission agenda. Please contact me at 952.249.4627 or email at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us should you have any questions. Sincerely, :;;;;;acg Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator c: Cheryl Cornyea via email City of Orono Variance Application Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono , MN 55356 Main : 952-249-4600 fax : 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O . Box66 Crystal Bay , MN 55323 -0066 Application # / 3 -3 (p ~ Date Received : 't-llo-/.3 Staff : JV1_(l Fee : $70O_.fl: ct..-# 7 3c+l Renewal : $350 -------- A ft er -the-fact: $1,400 Double Fee Escrow Fee : $7~ # 73't1p This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application . Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION: SiteAddress: :3-o~-s;-· 7u:;, Property Identification Number (PIN): -00,C;; Date Property Acquired (month/year): Zoning District: Name : lt~ APPLICANT INFORM · ~ Phone(ho_m_e_)_: __:_...:........:.,------:+--'----7...---:---'--:;,r--l-"-:.-"..:--=,---------'-~'\-'------"'-----"-----,-->i.----""-----1--'---'"---'-~~r----=---=;;;;--::=-:,it--,-(d)D. Complete Address : City , Stat Email: OWNER,lt{JFOR ON: Co Name : U ,,h-e,, Phone (home): Complete Addr City , St Email : DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Describe the request in · attach addit ional sheets if necessa : "'2-L :;,-r ' , ' Packet Last Updated: 03129/13 #360 3 Page 12 of 3 1 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2013 CITY OF ORONO REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be processed . Not ·. " Enclosed Appl'icable_ .. ' □ □ Escrow Agreement (signed) □ □ Escrow (received) ·' □ □ Pre-Application Form □ □ Aoolication Form □ □ Practical Difficulties Documentation □ □ Certified Property Owners List □ □ Survey (meeting ALL requirements) □ □ . Proposed Plans "" - □ □ Hardcover Calculation(s) □ □ Seotic S,vstem Site Evaluation Report □ □ Wetland Delineation □ □ Wetland Buffer Evaluation □ □ Buffer Improvement Plan □ . □ T · .. APPLICANT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to prov ide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application , and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge . The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a. complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed . • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants , agents , Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/o r owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting , please make arrangements to have an authorized representat ive attend in place of the app licanUowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Owner's Signature : Owner 's Signature: Packet Last Updated: 03129/13 3 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2013 CITY OF ORON O ,' DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd . 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information . You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license . 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve , some information may become public . 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. First Middle Last ?=, "'s ~ "-0 ?o,-, rt-/2:_ ~ Address 0('01'\-c, City Packet Last Updated: 03/29/13 Page 14 of 31 Ip 0-·j h 5 · (Pb7";) Phone 3603 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2013 CI TY OF ORONO DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. First Middle .:?x> ~ S:-'~7 ~ ?o, '-r? 'f- Address ) /~1 IV s;;-:31 / State Zip I under, tand m ri stated abov . . . . . / . - ~..c--~ Packet Last Updated: 03129/13 Page 14 of 31 RECEIVED APR 1 6 2013 CITY OF ORONO j ►- PE'-'L,, J l c.oe.:'(E..~ __ - \'4::MDO~L P~::[E:cT -- -------~fo-c;· -~'SCQ ·porN-r t?:.-o • .:__ -c~, M~ PC Exhibit G Ne:~ ._FJ~~G!-.t,;..·~.s~ SHl~~f...~ .. -~1µ<..o "TI:;!_ .: :t-1~CB.~:~::E.1i'-$Tib ME~~::: .. ~_A,~ I --=-; iz:coF ~~ -~ , --~-.:,_. --'} c.. ri11-c.;.t,-..l<:c. s-n::-eer 1 -!I,! ✓-'.'....., _,.,. ' ~~_-......::. _..l---1,..-I ~~ _,,,... i ' r-...._ --. ----' t---,,1..-,tJ! --II ...._ '-....__ / ..-I ----__.. -----f I -~ • ..__ .._ '-.._ --- lj. -±- -~ .. -·· . -······ ... -· ...... . -- s ----·· ~ .. ,_l.-,.\"'bQ ""'0 vtn~d~5Jrgj ., '1..\•L1,.·Lo '"'° ~'\,,,,11""'1:r::ll,d I iUvo >-'ii ~"1 r----'\J ... -o-,o-a ..I.NlCld O?-;, -~.,,,11 ,__ _______________ .. _.;..._.,._..,_,...,...,_,.._.,o_~ __ ,.__ ------- ' r-------------~-------~--------------------------·-·-------\---~-------=----- iJI 0 w > ..... CD 0 w .--u. u 0::: 0 ~ a_ ~ < 0 ) ·~ ( =; uii -h !B lt ~'l ~j "'~ i_-J 1 0 -t ) uJ J uJ I-ti 1; . ..1 rtl) (), ~ !id! t',}_y -.. 1 . PE'-'L..,\~ _, l c.oe.'-(EA tz:e.MDO~L __ Pt2'-C):fEc-Y- Ne\..J .F 1:i=,~G;;.t;. .6o.5S <:,H t~t,,,..e. ... ~\tJ(.o -n::>. HA=t:""c:a-··. "E'i'$Ti'=- t"'\e"t"~----~-A~ • . .j , _. ~ . . -:=::: .... ..........: ,...-. r ' -~ .. _.... ,--I-" ! . r-..__ ---. --.,.-i--li--tl l--+---111 ..._ '-...__ / -----. -_,..,. .-_I,.... ' ---. . ..._ '-..._ -- City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: :?=r05 ~1'bP~~rT ~~ Prepared by: Date: I .>... ,f-1/b· /.;,; Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Exampl (Garage) (24' X 30') (720 S.F.) e) ----, " l I'; A r a::i~t' --ro f-Jtr~« S.F. B ' I' ·-... S.F. C ~1.,o, r1/le-'-t' -1-b e.il!. rl) r:.,...rrr" S.F. D I S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. s S.F. T S.F. u S.F. V S.F. w S.F. X S.F. y S.F. z S.F. (1) Total Existinq Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover I S.F. I (3) Net Existina Hardcover rsubtract line (2) from line (1)1 S.F. ( 4) Total Lot Area S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4)] % (Proposed Hardco'IMIC'.""...,:Vc& Packet Last Updated: 03129/13 Page 25 APR 1 e 2013 CITY OF ORONO City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24' X 30') (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. s S.F. T S.F. u S.F. V S.F. w S.F. X S.F. y S.F. z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover rsubtract line (2) from line (1 )] S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4)] % Packet Last Updated: 03/29/13 Page 26 of 31 11a~ -0699·g96·z19 oa,(Jo:, · £ l,(Ja4:, City of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.) For Office Use Only: M ,I 11 ,A ., City Planner: _ f>A[.,{lf\, It Meeting Date/Time : PC Date : ____________ _ What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: //,.../'\ /\,. .J),L II) j Site Address: ~r N&5 L,,(l £co [T ,-..u'- Property Identification Number (PIN): Zoning District: l,41)--l v Size of Property: DESCRIPTION OF RE~5,ST: □ Average Setback 9l:,Side Yard Setback □ Rear Yard Setback □ Hardcover (Tier :?:) □ Lot Coverage □ Lot Area □ Other: VL'ake/~ Yard Setback □ Lot Width Applicant's PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES: Owner and/or Applicant has received the Practic~I f--ln_it_ia_ls_: __ +-.\"C----V -ifficulties Documentation Form, understands it as it has been explained to them, Owner's and is aware that it must be comple ted and submitted in conjunction with their Initials: formal variance application . / Applicant 's BILLS AND ESCROW: Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses Initials : i curred in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in 1------f---+--~ Owner's ~tion fee, as well as provide an escrow in the amount of Initials : to guarantee payment of the above . OTHER INFOR. *Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will be completed by City staff. f., ~-1 ~ v-- Applicant Signatu r .&di\ 0...c(7 ~J.. "t •/p ·l':J z/--. 1/•l-3 .r +-lit;:;,-l!J RECEIVED APR 1 B 2Dl-3 Pa cke t Last Upda ted: 03/29/13 Page 9 of3 # 3 6 0 3 crrv Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® 38 20-117-23 340001 JAYS HULBERT 3035 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 340010 CHERYL CORYEA 3085 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0017 TODD WATERS 3061 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23340022 FREDERICK C PETERS 3127 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0049 LAWRENCE L BRUSTAD 3309 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160® i I J .. -l'eedPaper - 38 20-117-23 34 0005 PHILLIPS WHIPPLE 3095 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 340011 ERIC NEVERMANN THEA OSULLIVAN 3065 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 340018 JOHN & EVY DENNIS 3055 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0031 Bend along line to i expose Pop-up Edge™ J CITY OF ORONO PARKS PO BOX 66 CRYSTALBAYMN 55323 ~ Sens de chargement Repliez a la hachure afin de I reveler le rebord Pop-up™ j AVERY® 5960™ : ! 38 20-117-23340006 KENT E & SUSAN J RICHEY 3 105 CASCO PT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 340012 RICHARD A/BARBARA C KASTENS 3045 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 340021 RONALD G & PATRJCIA A DUDLEY 3 125 CASCO CIRCLE SO WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0035 TROY A & DEBORA R SWANSON 3040 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 RECEIVED APR 16 2013 CITY OF ORONO www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY I I I 1 Hennepin County GIS -Printable Map Parcel 20-117-23-34-0010 A-T-8: ID: Owner Market Name: Cheryl Coryea Total: Parcel 3085 Casco Point Rd Tax Address: Orono, MN 55391 Total: Property Residential Sale Type: Price: Home-Non-Homestead Sale stead: Date: Parcel 0.44 acres Sale Area: 19,228 sq ft Code: Abstract $246 ,000 $2 ,758 .86 (Payable: 2013) $390,000 04/2007 Warranty Deed Page 1 of 1 Property Map Map Scale: 1" == 50 ft . N * Print Date : 5/1/2013 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied , including fitness of any particular purpose , merchantability , or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown . COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 ~ hink Green! http://g is.co.hennepin.mn.us/Property/print/default.aspx?C=4 51482 .71409452724 ,4 9745l2.... 5/1/2013