HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O.Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Andrew & Kristen Ronningen
3030 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
ZONING FILE: #05-3140
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: August 23, 2005
COPIES:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rear Yard Setback Variances, Average Lakeshore
Setback Variance
DATE OF MEETING: August 22, 2005 VOTE: 4 FOR O AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed
to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday
through Thursday, 7:30am to 5:00pm and Friday, 7:30am to 11:30am). All persons
with interest in the property must sign the resolutions.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the
approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City.
Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be
obtained no later than August 22, 2006
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the
City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, August 22, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.m.
*8. #05-3134 RICHARD AND PATRICIA CROSBY, 2705 WALTERS PORT LANE-
VARIANCE -RESOLUTION NO. 5372
White moved, Sansevere seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5372, a Resolution granting
hardcover variances stipulating the removal of 142 s.f. of timber borders within the 0-75'
setback zone for the residence located at 2705 Walters Port Lane. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*9. #05-3140 ANDREW AND KRISTEN RONNINGEN, 3030 CASCO POINT ROAD -
VARIANCE -RESOLUTION NO. 5373
White moved, Sansevere seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5373, a Resolution granting
rear yard setback and average lakeshore setback variances for 3030 Casco Point Road.
VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays O.
*10. #05-3144 BERKSIDRE PROPERTIES, 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY -
POD /COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN RENEW AL -RESOLUTION NO. 5374
White moved, Sansevere seconded, adopting RESOLUTION NO. 5374, a Resolution granting
a one year extension for the Commercial Site Plan approval approved on June 14, 2004, for
Berkshire Properties, 2745 Kelley Parkway. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
11. APPEAL OF ENFORCEMENT ACTION -2990 CASCO POINT ROAD
After receiving a nuisance complaint and perfonning a site inspection in May of 2005, Curtis
explained that the owner was sent a notice of violation including the appropriate City Code
sections. She noted that the property owner has requested an appeal of the violation notice
regarding the expired or inoperable vehicles stored on the property. Curtis indicated that the
property owner has worked with staff to remove most of the existing violations and a few other
items have been negotiated to extended deadlines; however, the vehicles in violation and numerous
vehicle parts remain and the property owner has indicated his intent to sell these items instead of
removing them by the deadline date.
The owner has also requested that he be allowed to tarp the items and has been opposed to
removing them from the property. Curtis pointed out that these items stored outside and covered
with tarps wo uld still be in violation and the next step for staff is to proceed with the enforcement
action to have the vehicles and other items in violation abated, or removed from the property .
Curtis noted that staff would hire a towing service or contractor to remove the violations and the
property owner would receive a bill for the service. Curtis stated that it would be staffs
recommendation that the Council direct staff how the violations should be addressed .
Pekarik explained that he was a mechanically inclined fellow who picked up odd jobs in rebuilding
autos . He ensured the Council that he was not a deadbeat and that it was his intent to remodel
someday. He stated that the vehicles and parts in question hold value to him and his business. He
requested that the Codes be changed or amended so that he would be allowed to retain his items on
his property.
PAGEsof9
Date Application Received: 7-18-05
Date Application Considered as Complete: 7-18-05
60-Day Review Period Expires: 9-16-05
Department Approval:
Name: Janice Gundlach~
Title: City Planner
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Administrator Approval:
Date: August 18, 2005
Item No.:
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #05-3140, Andrew & Kristen Ronningen, 3030 Casco Point Road
Variances -Resolution
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits
LR-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District(½ acre min.)
0.71 acres (30,927 s.f.)
97'@ shoreline; 153'@ 75' setback
A -Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation
B -PC Action Notice of 8-16-05
C -PC Memo and Exhibits of 8-9-05
Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct a 12/12
pitch roof where a 4/10 pitch roof currently exists, which will increase the ceiling height in the
main level kitchen/living area and add a 1/2 story over the existing main level bedrooms:
1. Rear yard setback variance to permit rear yard setback of 20' when 30' is normally
required, 20' currently exists, and 20' was permitted by variance in 1968.
2. Average lakeshore setback variance to permit the new roof structure to encroach into the
required setback (no further lake encroachment is proposed however the increased height
proposed requires approval of this variance).
And, also the following variance to allow a covered entry over the existing stoop:
1. Rear yard setback variance to permit a rear yard setback of 15' where 30' is normally
required and 20' currently exists, and 20' was permitted by variance in 1968.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission on a vote of 6 -1 concurred with the staff recommendation to approve
the variances to allow the increased pitch roof as no additional encroachment to the required rear
yard is proposed and the additional height will not impact adjacent properties views to the lake due
to the curvature of the shoreline in the cove.
Planning Commission discussed whether variances should be granted to permit covered entries,
when the hardship almost always is the location of the existing home on the lot. The majority of the
Planning Commission determined that due to the location of the undeveloped right-of-way, the
configuration of the lot lines, and the front stoop being the location of an old well with storage
underneath, the variance for the unenclosed covered entry would be acceptable in this application.
Staff Recommendation
Approval per the attached Resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached Resolution granting rear yard setback and average lakeshore setback variances
for 3030 Casco Point Road.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-350 (B) AND 78-1279 (6)
FILE NO. 05-3140
WHEREAS, Andrew V. Ronningen and Kristen M. Ronningen, husband
and wife (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3030
Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described
as follows:
Lot 3, Block 1, KELL Y'S 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono
for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-350 (B) and 78-1279 (6) to
allow construction of a 12/12 pitch roof where a 4/10 pitch roof currently exists, which
will increase the ceiling height in the main level kitchen/living area and add a ½ story
over the existing garage and main level bedrooms requiring a rear yard setback variance
to permit a rear yard setback of 20' when 30' is normally required, 20' currently exists,
and 20' was permitted by variances in 1968 and 1999.
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono
for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 (B) to allow construction
of a covered entry over the existing stoop requiring a rear yard setback variance to permit
a rear yard setback of 15' where 30' is normally required, 20' currently exists, and 20'
was permitted by variance in 1968 and 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 05-3140.
Page 1 of 6
2. The property is located in the LR -lC, Zoning District which requires a
minimum lot area of 0.5 acres and a minimum lot width of 100' at the
shoreline and at the 75' setback of Lake Minnetonka.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing
held on August 15, 2005 and recommended approval of the variances
based on the following findings:
a. The proposed roof addition will not encroach further on the existing
rear yard setback to undeveloped Maple A venue.
b. The proposed roof structure and ½ story addition meet the building
height and half story requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
c. The proposed roof structure, while adding height, will not impact lake
views for adjacent lakeshore properties due to the curvature of the
shoreline within Casco Cove of Lake Minnetonka.
d. The additional 5' encroachment on the rear yard of undeveloped
Maple A venue will consists only of an unenclosed covered entry over
the existing stoop.
e. While the 1968 variance approval categorizes the rear lot line as the
line adjacent to undeveloped Maple Avenue, this property boundary
functions more like a side street which would only require a 15'
setback due to the orientation of the adjacent houses.
f. The area existing under the proposed covered entry, in the basement
level, already exists as storage space to the house as it was an old well.
The covered entry proposed will not encroach any further than this
existing storage area in the basement level.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings
and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff,
comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed
variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Page 2 of 6
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are
peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning
district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic
conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-350 (B) and 78-1279 (6)
to allow construction of a 12/12 pitch roof where a 4/10 pitch roof currently exists, which
will increase the ceiling height in the main level kitchen/living area and add a ½ story
over the existing garage and main level bedrooms requiring a rear yard setback variance
to permit a rear yard setback of 20' when 30' is normally required, 20' currently exists,
and 20' was permitted by variances in 1968 and 1999 and to permit a covered entry
setback 15' from the rear lot line where 30' is normally required and 20' currently exists,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants and
annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will
require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. The covered entry shall remain unenclosed. If at any time the applicant submits
for a building permit to enclose the covered entry, a variance to the rear yard
setback requirement would be required.
3. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative
landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover
surfaces.
4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building
permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval,
or the variances will expire on that date (August 22, 2006).
Page 3 of 6
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
6. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the
chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 22 nd day of August, 2005.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Property Owner( s)
Page 4 of 6
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
____ , 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
____ , 2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 6
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2005
by Andrew V. Ronningen, husband of Kristen M. Ronningen, husband and wife.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2005
by Kristen M. Ronningen, wife of Andrew V. Ronningen, husband and wife.
Notary Public
Page 6 of 6
ll,f;':2;",.;;,q
,:,
. '
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, August 15, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3136 Troy Broitzman, Continued)
Broitzman stated he would be residing there with his girlfriend but that he comes from a large family who
would be visiting from time to time.
Leslie stated if the number of garage stalls were reduced, the amount of grading could also possibly be
reduced.
Broitzman indicated he is not willing to eliminate the walkout.
Jurgens stated a po1tion of the walkout could be retained and that it is not necessary to have a walkout the
entire width of the house. Jurgens stated in his opinion the house could be redesigned to reduce some of
the grading.
Jurgens moved to table Application #05-3136, Troy Broitzman, 1860 Shoreline Drive, to allow time
for the City Engineer to comment on the grading plan.
Gaffron stated the length of the house and the garage could possibly be reduced and that it appears that
the narrow width of the lot seems to be driving the design of the house.
Bremer noted the applicant does not need a setback variance.
Kempf seconded the motion. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0.
Jurgens noted Mn/DOT has estimated the amount of traffic on Highway 15 at approximately 20,000 cars
a day.
5 . #05-3140 ANDREW AND KRISTEN RONNINGEN, 3030 CASCO POINT ROAD,
VARIANCE, 7:24 P.M. -7:38 P.M.
Andrew Ronningen, Applicant, was present.
Gundlach stated the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance to permit a rear yard setback of
20 feet when 30 feet is nonnally required, 20 feet currently exists, and 20 feet was pennitted by variance
in 1968. An average lakeshore setback variance to permit the new roof structure to encroach into the
required setback (no further lake encroachment is proposed; however, the increased height proposed
requires approval of this variance). In addition, a rear yard setback variance to permit a rear yard setback
of 15 feet where 30 feet is normally required and 20 feet currently exists. Gundlach noted the 20 feet was
permitted by variance in 1968.
Staff recommends approval of the variances to allow the increased pitch roof as no additional
encroachment to the required rear yard is proposed and the additional height will not impact adjacent
PAGE 11
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, August 15, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3140 Andrew and Kristen Ronningen, Continued)
properties' views to the lake due to the curvature of the shoreline in the cove. Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission discuss whether variances should be granted to permit covered entries. Gundlach
stated in the past hardships have been based on the location of the existing house on the lot and not
always inherent with the land.
Ronningen stated they are attempting to design the addition to fit in with the neighborhood. Ronningen
stated they currently are experiencing an ice buildup on the front steps, which would be improved by the
overhang. Ronningen stated they would also like to add one light to improve the safety of the entryway.
There were no public comments regarding this application.
Rahn inquired if Maple Avenue were considered a side setback, what the encroachment would be.
Gundlach stated a side yard adjacent to a street in the half-acre zone requires a 15-foot setback.
Rahn noted the address is Casco Point and inquired whether this application could be reviewed with a
different rear yard.
Gundlach indicated Staff reviewed this application in this manner because there is an approved variance
from 1968 where it was called the rear yard. Gundlach stated technically a rear yard is the yard opposite
to the front, which in this case would be the lake.
Rahn stated in his view Casco Point would be a side street yard.
Gaffron stated the City needs to be consistent and if the City in 1968 determined that it was a rear yard, it
should probably remain a rear yard.
Jurgens commented some day in the future Maple Avenue might be improved and is technically a
right-of-way. Jurgens inquired whether the 20 feet is measured from where the stoop currently is.
Gundlach stated the existing 20 feet is from the wall of the home.
Rahn stated there would be an additional five feet of encroachment with the stoop.
Jurgens stated in theory there actually is house located under the front stoop given the fact that there is a
well pit in that area. Jurgens stated he does not have an issue with the application.
Leslie stated as long as the City's building code does not mandate a covered walk, he does not see a
hardship for a covered entrance and a further encroachment into the setback. Leslie stated the hardship is
inherent with the building and not the land and that he does not support this portion of the application.
PAGE 12
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday,August15,2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3140 Andrew and Kristen Ronningen, Continued)
Bremer inquired if it is changed to a side yard setback, how that would impact the other two variance
requests.
Gundlach stated the average lakeshore setback variance would still be required and the rear yard setback
variance for the additional story would be eliminated.
Kempf stated he also tends to agree with Chair Rahn. Kempf stated Maple Avenue is a driveway that
accesses one lot and more than likely would never be developed.
Jurgens stated he does not lmow what the future holds for this area. Jurgens stated he does not have a
problem with the encroachn1ent since there is already a well pit located below the stoop.
Kempf stated it does make sense to have a heated structure over that area.
Bremer moved, Fritzler seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3140, Andrew and
Kristen Ronningen, 3030 Casco Point Road, granting of a rear yard setback variance of 20 feet, an
average lakeshore setback variance, and a rear yard setback variance to permit a setback of 15 feet,
with the hardship being the safety concerns and the structure that exists below the stoop, with the
recommendation that the Council consider this a side yard setback, which would make the
structure be in compliance. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1, Leslie Opposed.
6. #05-3141 JEFFREY AND ETHEL GUSTAFSON, 4203 NORTH SHORE DRIVE,
VARIANCE, 7:38 P.M. -7:45 P.M.
Jeffrey Gustafson, Applicant, was present.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a lot width variance in order to construct a single family home on
the property. The property is one acre in area but does not meet the width requirement at the lakeshore.
Additionally, due to the amount of fill and grading proposed, a conditional use pem1it for 770 cubic yards
of fill is required.
Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width variance and the conditional use permit in
conformance with Staff and City Engineer's comments.
Gustafson thanked Staff for their help with his application. Gustafson stated they would like to eliminate
the circular drive\vay and that his neighbor is agreeable to doing some joint landscaping along the
property iine
There were no public comments regarding this application.
PAGE 13
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
ZONING FILE: 05-3140
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: August 16, 2005
TO: Andrew & Kristen Ronningen
3030 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
COPIES:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rear Yard Setback Variances, Average Lakeshore
Setback Variance
DATE OF MEETING: August 15, 2005
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
To approve the following variances to permit construction of a new 12/12 pitch roof
where a 4/10 pitch roof currently exists, including a ½ story over the existing garage and
main level bedrooms and covered entry over the existing front stoop:
1. Rear yard setback variance to permit a rear yard setback of20' where 30' is
normally required, 20' currently exists, and 20' was permitted by variance in
1968.
2. Average lakeshore setback variance to permit the new roof structure to
encroach into the required setback.
3. Rear yard setback variance to permit a rear yard setback of 15' where 30' is
normally required and 20' currently exists, specifically to allow for a covered
entry.
VOTE: 6 FOR 1 AGAINST
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council-Monday, August 22, 2005; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning
Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach
at 952-249-4623.
I
! )
#05-3140
August 15, 2005
Page 1 of5
Date Application Received: 7-18-05
Date Application Considered as Complete: 7-18-05
60-Day Review Period Expires: 9-16-05 ,.
To: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
From: Janice Gundlach, City Planne1~
Date:
Subject:
August 9, 2005
05-3140, Andrew & Kristen Ronningen, 3030 Casco Point Road, Side
Street Setback & Average Lakeshore Setback Variances, Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential District(½ acre min.)
0.71 acres (30,927 s.f.) Lot Area:
Lot Width: 97'@ shoreline; 153'@ 75' setback
Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct a
12/12 pitch roof where a 4/10 pitch roof cunently exists, which will increase the ceiling
height in the main level kitchen/living area and add a 1/2 story over the existing main
level bedrooms:
1. Rear yard setback variance to permit rear yard setback of 20' when 30' is
normally required, 20' cunently exists, and 20' was permitted by variance in
1968.
2. Average lakeshore setback variance to pe1mit the new roof structure to encroach
into the required setback (no further lake encroachment is proposed however the
increased height proposed requires approval of this variance).
And, also the following variance to allow a covered entry over the existing stoop:
1. Rear yard setback variance to permit a rear yard setback of 15' where 30' is
normally required and 20' cmTently exists, and 20' was permitted by variance in
1968.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the variances to allow the
increased pitch roof as no additional encroachment to the required rear yard is proposed
and the additional height will not impact adjacent properties views to the lake due to the
curvature of the shoreline in the cove .
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss whether variances should be
granted to permit covered entries, when the hardship almost always is the location of the
existing home on the lot. If so , the Planning Commission may want to determine under
what set of standards covered entries, requiring variances, should meet (for example,
fully enclosed, unenclosed, size maximums).
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
(b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed:
#05-3140
August 15, 2005
Page 2 of5
Lot Area (acre) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard (feet) Side Yard (feet) Rear Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent to
0.5
Street (feet)
100 30 10 30 15
(Code 1984, § 10.25(6))
Sec. 78-1279. Placement of structures on lots. When more than one setback applies to a
site, structures and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Structures shall be
located as follows:
(6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located
closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of
existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not
apply to stairways, lifts, landings and lockboxes. Further, the average
lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to
tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line
connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the
immediately adjacent lakeshore lots.
(Ord. No. 101 2nd series,§ 1(10.56(16)(C)), 2-24-1992)
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Applications
Exhibit B-Hardship Documentation Form
Exhibit C-Existing & Proposed Survey (from 1999 Variance -No Footprint Changes)
Exhibit D-Hardcover Calculation Worksheets (from 1999 Variance -No Change)
Exhibit E -Proposed Elevations
Exhibit F -Proposed Floor Plans
Exhibit G -Staff Reports & Minutes of 1968 Variance
Exhibit H -Resolution from 1999 Variance
Exhibit I -Photographs
Exhibit J -Aerial Photograph Depicting Average Lakeshore Setback
Exhibit K-Adjacent Property Owner's Acknowledgement Forms
Exhibit K -Property Owners List
Exhibit L -Plat Map
Background
The applicant originally applied for a building permit on June 28, 2005. After review of
the plans submitted for the permit and review of prior zoning applications for this
property, it was determined that variances would be required. The applicant met with
staff for a pre-application meeting and submitted for a variance. Staff accepted the 1999
survey as no footprint expansions are proposed.
LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Lot Area/Width
LR-lC Lot Area Lot Width
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100'
#05-3140
August 15, 2005
Page 3 of5
Actual 30,927 s.f. (0.71 acres) 97' @ shoreline
153' 75' setback
Setbacks
LR-lC Required Existing Proposed
Front NIA NIA NIA
Rear 30' 20' 20' new roof
15' covered entry
Left Side (west) 10' 37' house No Change 20' detached garage
Right Side ( east) 7 5' setback more 7 5' setback more No Change restrictive restrictive
Lakeshore 75' 75' No Change
Average Lakeshore 175' -150' (going ~30' encroachment No Change (except
west-east) additional height)
Structural Coverage
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
30,927 s.f. (0.71 acres) Allowed: 4,639 s.f. (15%)
Proposed: 2,715 s.f. (8.8%)
Hardcover Calculations
Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed
Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 10,757 s.f. 0 s.f 0 s.f.* No Change (0%) (0%)
75-250 20,170 s.f. 5,042.5 s.f. 4,512 s.f.* No Change (25%) (22.4%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
Rear Yard Setback Variance
The applicant is proposing to remove the existing 4/10 pitch roof and construct a new
12112 pitch roof that would provide a vaulted ceiling on the main level kitchen/living area
and also provide additional living space above the existing main level bedrooms, which
will act as a half story. The existing home is setback 20' from Maple Avenue, which is
acting as the rear lot line. In order to add additional height to the existing structure where
a 30' setback cannot be met, a new variance must be approved. The existing home was
permitted to be setback 20' from Maple Avenue under a 1968 variance review
(resolutions were not drafted during that time).
The applicant is also proposing to construct a roof over the existing front stoop. The roof
will extend approximately 5' into the 20' rear yard. This requires approval of a rear yard
setback variance to permit a 15' setback.
Average Lakeshore Setback Variance
#05-3140
August 15, 2005
Page 4 of5
The applicant is proposing to add height to the existing footprint. The property is located
on Casco Cove where the shoreline curves around, rather than extending in a line. The
average lakeshore setback is determined by the closest corners of the neighboring homes
to the lake. Because of the cove situation, which is the reverse of a point situation, the
applicants home lies forward of the average lakeshore setback, requiring a variance ( see
Exhibit J).
Hardship Statement
Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for
additional testimony regarding the application.
Hardship Analysis
/11 co11sideri11g applications for variance, the Pla1111i11g Commission shall co11sider the effect of the
proposed variance upon the health, safety a11d welfare of the community, existing a11d anticipated
traffic co11ditio11s, light a11d air, da11ger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect 011 values of
property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval
for varia11cesfrom the literal provisions of the Zo11i11g Code in instances where their strict
e11forceme11t would cause u11due hardship because of circumsta11ces u11ique to the i11dividual
property u11der consideration, a11d shall recommend approval 011/y when it is de111011strated that such
actions will be i11 keep inf! with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zo11h1f! Code.
Staff finds that a hardship exists to warrant approval of the rear yard setback and average
lakeshore setback variances to permit construction of a new roof adding a half story and
vaulting part of the existing home. The City found in 1968 that the logical placement of
the home would be at a 20' setback from undeveloped Maple Avenue due to the
hardships of topography and configuration of the lot. Staff finds that the 1968 findings
are still valid and the applicants should be able to build above the existing house but
within all other restrictions imposed under the Zoning Ordinance. All building height,
hardcover, structural coverage and other setback requirements will be met under the
proposed plans.
Staff does, however, view the covered entry as a new encroachment warranting additional
hardship findings beyond the 1968 variance. The Planning Commission and City
Council have approved and denied additional encroachments on non-conforming
setbacks for covered entries in the past. Being that these features are becoming more
prominent in renovation projects, the Planning Commission in determining whether this
request should be granted, may want to establish specific findings of when variances will
be allowed for covered entries and when they will not.
Issues for Consideration
1. Does the Planning Commission agree with the 1968 variance approval?
2. Should a covered entry be permitted by variance?
3. Should covered entries meeting a certain set of criteria be permitted?
4. Is a covered entry a reasonable request?
5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Staff Recommendation
#05-3140
August 15, 2005
Page 5 of5
Staff recommends approval of the variances to allow the increased pitched roof as no
additional encroachment to the required rear yard is proposed and the additional height
will not impact adjacent properties views to the lake due to the curvature of the shoreline
in the cove.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss whether variances should be
granted to permit covered entries, when the hardship almost always is the location of the
existing home on the lot. If so, the Planning Commission may want to determine under
what set of standards covered entries, requiring variances, should meet (for example,
fully enclosed, unenclosed, size maximums, etc.).
City of Orono
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Application # 05 -'-$ / t./ D
Date Received: ,,---,'l~/$"'---,,,--=----
Amount Paid: fl tobD. 00
Staff : J.\tv / lE
Main: 952-249-4600
fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
Fee: $600 --'--------
Renew a I: $300 --'-----,-------
After-the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee
P.O. Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Site Address: 30~0 Ca s-c o rfo ,'vtt V'(c)ct d
Property Identification Ntrmber (PIN): 20 ~ I ( 7-2-3 ...-lejg .... c)dS 2.
(Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey.)
Date Property Acquired (month/year): to/1.J □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels.
Present use of property: ~ Residential □ Other -----------------
Zoning District: -~lf!--"'~/(-/ ____ _
APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name: W c)t'\
Phone (home): Phone (work): 9S2 -~s],6080
Address: City: drdb e) Zip: S:S:::3S: (
Email: _ _,Cc~Vl=d=re~¼J""-'-n--"'£)_._Vl-'-'--'1_._.,f=-~'-+'-,o,e-"'-e....,.___,,_e_y;+i&"'-'-"ld:-=..,,edc..c..~-=c-=-d-vi.... __ Fax: ------------
OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name: d., 4-f(r/:r reov, ,
~ Phone (home: :5J.~'f? (-72C> 'f..., Phone wor~): 9S~-;J.SJ ,OQcf'~
Address: ,3D3_6 COLS:co j?t-&,d City: (')(Ql,,u) Zip: ,S":S:35'1
Email: q ndr&,,,J ronn,hJt::h @ '(Cf li&; . Cr/IA. Fax: __________ _
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ JflO, (tRJ .. .
Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
C.,hgf'\De :thJ<,.. Cddt OV\. ff.4 vt,.,a./b see,,,npt..._ cr:f ~e. hd~:€_
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL$:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed.
Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner.
Completed Application Form
Completed Hardship Documentation Form
Certified Property Owners List -owners within (15cr)of the subject property, labels and plat map.
List, labels anc:Lm~J? may be obtained fro~ennepin County Dep__artmenLoL_f inance,
GoverlTrTTenl=center,A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephon(612-348-5910/)
Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meetlngatJ-th-e-.equirements
listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or
11" x 17" for reproduction.
Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet).
Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11"
or 11" x 17" for reproduction.
0 Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17").
□ Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning
Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is
true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely
responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the
staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for
denial of the request regard! ss of its po ntial merit.
Applicant's Signature:
Applicant's Signature:
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for
purposes of investigation an ve 'ficatio f this request.
Owner's Signature:
Owner's Signature:
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and
Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to
have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner
assigned to your project.
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.*)
Mailing Address:
P.O . Box66
For Office Use Only: 1 City Planner: 0/tN l_lG
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Meeting Date/Time: 7 /(p 3 :-3/) lt1Vf
Main: 952-249-4600
Fax : 952 -249-4616
PC Date : Aygu s+ 'Pc,, M an N6
What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting?
Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal , inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code , and identify policies or regulations that create
opportunities or problems for the proposal.
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Site Address: ?;O?i) (/)jJt{) PT /2D
Property Identification Number (Pl N): .... t ,.,____.o;-J-L-71-L---"Z'--3""-4_..,._.~""---"'0'--"'0~S~&-~---------
Zoning District: l/2.-/6 Size of Property: 1 o. 7 Al/!l.S
~SCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
~tverage Setback □ Side Yard Setback
□ Hardcover □ Lot Coverage
□ Other:
)( Rear Yard Setback (MAfl!) □ Front Yard Setback □ Lot Area l>M:,,. □ Lot Width
Applicant'~ HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form,
Initials:-~.,_..,.._ ___ understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must
be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance
application .
OTHER INFORMATION:
*Please note: Your variance a plication will NOT be accepted without a pre-application
meeting during which this form · ill co p ted by City staff.
Date: °J_ [J 2/ Q ( I I
Page 1 of 3
HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application
will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is
complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be
demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the
property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic
situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by
the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be
demonstrated.
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship
exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship,
address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible.
Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the
variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a
denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered.
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may
not apply):
1.
2.
3.
"The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls."
1hst. L½e o:f avevct5e se~±<o<ack .. rvns d,vectf:y
JC~3~tl~~~e-the~~;~da:;:;;e%s~;x;2+
{,d< .. e s ,~h-f/,-,,...,es or vtet...JJ",.
"The plight of The landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not
created by the landowner."
TN a v3,, s:ef:bac k:. o. V\d cet?t.u ya. rd se.c+ loa c. fc:..
Wei'£ tn fl~ce Tu?. hdl"Y'.£ we;is: bv, .... lt-,':, /96~.
1(14'~ loe-f°GJire 1--fi..R d~eJT, Tbe c@v-e cvtves ft>
ere A-e. C/"'1 ,-crue d ,-s ~{lfc.€ ve t~+~,-i,,sC,,~ r,.
"The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
:r:-t-w,'tl only lvvieCd ✓e_ ~ look 6-f ~
"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter."
8.
9.
10.
11.
Page 2 of 3
"Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in
harmony with this Chapter."
"The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone
where the affected person's land is located."
"The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a
one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling."
"The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar
to such property or immediately adjoining property."
""Jht_ "'c1v~ cl:S1?..r1ce_, fr~ ~ sfe#s rho
&ca.~fe ,s 35' -fee±.. -rz._.g_ d,~nthce :r✓c::>0--°'tk:L s;-de,
o:f j1,.--.Q, VJdrY\e. ~ VV\11,pre ,s '-({' /11 • r'v1vl-e i1 °"
+-ivc h oVV\e. clrtvew(J'\y ,n /J,Pic -h-c e,,
"The conditions do not apply genetally to other land or structures in the district in
which said land is located."
~ V\Uv (Do:f [,VL€.. wi-(( r10+ owSD'VcT v;ec.-J£ t>:f
fu. lo..ke a""d tb-< n-ew ove,r ~lllj Ts 6 11 shor'fev;
'The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant."
~ sr,eCltc e. wtlr vi ((dw hcffec use c1-l,v,i--t~
"The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
Code." ~ V0C( Att1 ,.e w: t ( c:d ( ow c:;\. l'½a r c:: vt:=fa fed
lao I<. av1d w/t( grve ~ ha,a~ g wrvch '1 0 fter
eCl\eCj y eft~ctenc y Lever ✓
12.
Page 3 of 3
"The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty."
w(thdv-t-the v~rraVlc:e aVld dv-e T'f::l 1bP... cove
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the
unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance
with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if
necessary):
&kf(,e t4re tf A dr,ve WtA~ ,-n {)rt?tcnce gvte/
do~a°Jr:f56~;J:,!;:'bh Mn; °Jt~0 a,~gcfi.-t::r1:1i1£Jt~Y,Y
--fK"-IA fc.. Y O Vt
Lc&lrlt..
L.or 3 Bioc)( I
kGtLY5 z~ .IJtJC.
11 L:.. {l,u0,1f£J.B,:,•J
U., vTf'H i--'LA.Slt<-
ftffT
tf o
SCHOBORG
ND SURVEYING
IHC.
e.Gl'Oy.R:1.138:: = Doioino,MNIS5:ml
ir~~n~~q ~ ~..J:Mil~.,;;~ \l(!,i c,-'l __
trnof o~ONO
~. SITE PLAN _ GRADJ;<l!G !l'Lt~N i 0 .~p;::RDVED -AIJIJ, n"'
l O i•.1'f·f.10'Jt:D WITH REV!,slONS
-~,1,.,,,1 .. -~ ! L--_, 1·v-:-~-~;:,,,r.1 iv,vizpizp,·:
Erl __ ~ l [~-1\T:: ;··, ,g. 2-f-~ -.. , .,· ._,
.\.·'
t,
;;!.~ j'
:.,.! ::i
(), 71
fl(#)
p7c·t F. o/' t..e , r
-r--------,_ rJ~. L. 4//E . .· : ,:,,, 0 ·:/4hvJ!/'#.!!J· I-.. 6 ; (o,,,, ou,~':::. q~~
75''
~
rLt
(1\0
{/6 ?,1995
fJ/.,
ereby certify that this plan, survey or .report was JOB#
prepll.redbymeoru_p~my ,. __ -• -----·-·
adulyRe·· · ··
of Min
5208
Book• P;i,e
i.-L
S;;ale
, , -,. , -, , , , , Registration No. 14700 /~'%)/
26~0 () 4 7 d 41..d
C<~ l ~, '
'('
/'5v,.
b
'"' • .. '-...
'-,
'•.
---A (!itr: '
(/ ff ~ ·'""~ tt :;~::~ JL.
/~ ,0
··~Ji·: €;J
CITY OF ORONO 'i' 6122494616 08/' '99 10:27 BJ :05/05 N0:011
.:... .-·,, • . hAIU)COVER CALCULA~VORK~.HEET
rrnrt{ ltv ;t. SETBACK ZOl"1tt (C~CLE ONE) 0..1$1 ~ 250-S00· 500-1000'
IDQllffi'G BAIW.COJ!IB W.ZPNE
~,-1~ / }.. Hause~%£~===. x
b~. ~ . · X a:~ _._
1Jo·~./~ .
~, B. ·am.se . 2 z:___.
X
..,/,.. ...
_____ s.F •
_ ____ S.F. ____ s.F. •
jll'.
m
...
Ill
.'
I(; o/0 . c. Driveway .. X 1111 S.F. ............ ,fllllclloca, .... d ...... dd--X ... S.F.
O. Sidewalk Zr;' X 3 1111 . ?'Y. S.F.
. 'F--....... X ? "' ·30 S.F. ? ... ~s"""
E. Patio/Deck I c./ :!t q,7 m I 5 S-. ~ S.F. ,. I "' ... :WLdJ
X ... -S.F.
p. L&ndlclpe I<( :x f u --1..L~S.F.
U11det1aln 5'2. X s:: • '2,0_,Q. S.F. . . , ..
·'·s.F. By Plutlc /0 Jl .L.Q. 11:l /00 ....
Or'Fabdc . LIO c... ~-,o
o.~er S-2-~ 11111 s-2.. S.f.
~ TOTAL HARDCOVER lN ZONJ! '-/ 11 L{_( ,. 9 S,F. A
TOTAL PROPER.TY' AREA lN ZON'E ~-1::?a., S.F. B
A + B ,: 100 = 22 "
tBOl!QD;Q.flAPJlCOmJtl Z~
J L/.?q A. House .. Z.'5 X 51 Im S.F. ...... 1•"" pn'
'Lu,;111 Wldlh
2( .,. ~ L( 11:11 5-2t: S.F. ...,.....,.,..... ..
;t Im S.F.
)t II,:! S.F.
B. Guqo Zc, X 2 .........._ ... (p ... STL S,F.
c. Prlveway ,'I; ear J /p(J (p S.F.
){ !Et S.'f. .. ,. , ... , 1 . -..,"' .....
p, Sidr=w&lk -/{ X ---j'. ill> ~-~/ ~ S.F. ... k. .... --:ro I {) ,:, .,:z, . ~ .. S.'F.
.. '1 ..... 1'" c:-· .. c-?.~--::; _,
'>d
E. P,tlo/Peck Iv/ X Cf, 7 l!li3 I'S$", ~ · S.F. ---.. •-.-1, ...
lt '"" S.F.· ---d ..
f. Ll.ttd!• X lll!l S.f.
Undetllln 2 ;,_ X < ~ '2 4, fJ S.P.
By Pliutle tJ> )t ~r.2... 1l5i'J /0 () S.f.
OrFa'bd<: "-fO 2 ~ {)
o. Othti: 5'Z X S:..2-S.F. ~ 1w.Jl
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE .... lj Cir:-l~ J' s.rr. A
TOTA.t:PROPRRTY i\.REA lN ZONE. ~D 170 ,s.P. B
A + 13 X 100 .. :. z✓.Y.:.. % .... Wlo'R
14
.. ', ., ..
"'
'I• .. , : .
... ... ..... ....,.
··.:·
.··.
,•:.
"'•i' · . . , ..
,!'
··•.·•,
· ....
!• ...
•' ·.:
',
.,·,::.: :'•:: ..... :·•··
,:·
....
• I • • \: •
.: !.•
.·· . ; . · ..
.•·.
""
,·:-': .. (\:~ ·Co·, 'i , .. , ... -~' 9
:_.,:.··.
·•::.:
... ......
. .
. . . . . . . '
..... . . . .
' . . .
· .• 11r;::::. -.. . . . I~ .
·. . . .. . . .
.... ·· I
. ' ,. . . : .
' ' '
. . . .... ·, . ' : .
. .·' :·:, . ,··
~fi====~·-~~rnJJlliifj ' ' ·t,,
.·)• .. :: .
. :>;) .. ;:)/ii.tiid¼.)!:.t,
.·~.·
,:~;
--·· -.
TO:
FROM:.
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Administrator
Inspector
April 16, 1968
Setback Variance -Joel Gainsley
, /"" 2-c.-.
The above has taken out a buil~ing permit and is asking for a ·front
setback variance of 10 feet, moving the house to 20 feet from the
str~et.
. . .
The lot drops off ;1,a.st and economically and structurally, the logical ·· ·
place to put this liouse would be on the higher elevation where proposed,
than back 10 feet on lower ground. ·
There'.are no,houses in immediate vicinity but any homes built on
adjacent lots would b1e faced with the same problem.
Th·~· gati.ge · entrance would be on the side not from the street.
·I'm· encl_o~iAg a hall-section :map and lot survey which shows ·e1eva
at ·the··street of 945~5 .. The elevation where house would be is:94 ·i!l tll.ii{ffbrtt:·~nd 9 34 in the rear. showing the swift drop off in th
area~ · · · ·
,.:
TO: Village Council
PROM: Adaini1trator,
DATB: · . April 19, 1968
SUBJBCT: Setback Variance• Joel Gainsley
Mr. Galnsley is applying for a build:lng penit which will require
a setback -variance of 10 feet on Tract u, R.L.S. 461, located off
of old platted, but undeveloped Maple Annue on Casco Point. The
.variance is required because of the slop of the land and soil
conditions. There being no other deyelopmerit on 'thi~ street.,. ...
it will be establishing building lines .£or future construction ·
in 'the·area.
U· C
· 1!) 0,1/r~ tJ11 1 ·.·. I-// :r -:i--~ ;
"-·------..... ·--
.. --·· --.... ~-~ ---... -
.,,_
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD APRIL 22, 1968 Page 2
Butterfield moved,1 Stubbs seconded, that
the request of James Owens for a Variance
at 3329 Crystal Bay Road, be referred to
the Planning Commission for review and
recommendation. Motion, Ayes (4) -Nays (0).
Stubbs moved, Searles seconded, that the
request of Joel Gainsley for a front-yard
setback at 3030 Casco Point Road, be
approved. Motion, Ayes (4) -Nays (0).
. .
Searles moved, Butterfield seconded, that
the Registered Land Survey of Fredrick
Herfurth at 645 North Ferndale Road,
with his right-of-way easement increased
to 25 feet, with utility easements, with
these standards to apply to all similar.
tracts served remotely by private road
and with the requirement that equal right
of-way will be require on both sides, be
approved. Motion, Ayej (4) -Nays (0).
Butterfield moved, Searles seconded, that
the second Division of Bennie Foss at
565 Old Crystal Bay Road, be approved.
Motion, Ayes (4) -Nays (0).
Searles moved, Butterfield seconded, that
a Public Hearing, May 27, 1968, at 7:30 P.M.,
CDT., for the 11 :. F. W. Building Permit and
Club Liquor License, and any other activity
anticipated and subject to the provision
that such future use may be limited, be
ordered. Motion, Ayes (4) -Nays (0).
Searles moved, Stubbs seconded, that the
Tax Board of Review meet in the Village
Office, July 15, 1968, at 7:30 P.M.,
CDT., be approved. Motinn, Ayes (4) -
Nays (0).
Stubbs moved, Butterfield seconded, that
the Street Maintenance Contract with the
Village of Independence, be _approved.
Motion, Ayes (4) -Nays (0).
VARIANCE
3329 .Crystal Bay Road
VARIANCE
3030 Casco Road
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
645 North Ferndale Roai
DIVISION
565 Old Crystal Bay Ro£
PUBLIC HEARING
3445 Lyric Avenue
BOARD OF REVIEW
STREET MAINTENANCE
CONTRACT
VILLAGE OF INDEPENDENCl
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
4 qQl"1 NO. V g) 1-
A RESOLUTION GRANTING AV ARIAN CE
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION l(B)
FILE NO. 2509
WHEREAS, Andrew Ronningen and Kristen Ronningen, formerly known as Kristen
Forss, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 3030
Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 3, Block 1, Kelly's 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subd. l(B) for an average lakeshore setback variance to allow the
construction of a 22' x 24' two-story addition to the existing home.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2509.
2. This property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District where the minimum lot area
requirement is 1/2 Acre. The property consists of approximately 30,927 square feet
or . 71 acres.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 16, 1999 and
recommended approval by a vote of 5-0 on the proposed variance based upon the
following findings of fact:
A. The neighboring residence to the West was constructed after the applicant's
home.
Page 1 of 4
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 4 3 31 ~
B. Mature trees are located along both the East and West property lines,
extending past the average lak:eshore setback line.
C. The proposed house addition will not block or interfere with the neighbors'
views of the lake.
D. The applicants have agreed to remove all the plastic underlay within the
landscaping areas, a total of approximately 436 square feet.
E. The construction of the house addition will not exceed the allowable
hardcover for the 75' -250' zone once the plastic is removed, and the total
hardcover for this zone after the addition will be 5,221.2 sq. ft. (24.6%).
4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting
the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by
the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants an
average lak:eshore yard variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to
permit the construction of a 22' x 24' two-story addition to the home. Approval was subject to the
following conditions:
Page 2 of 4
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 Q (;;, f")I NO. V ~J' «
1. All plastic underlain landscaping must be removed at the time of construction
and will be inspected as a part of the building inspection.
2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but
are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within
one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date
(August 23, 2000).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any
authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby_agree to the terms of
this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 23rd
day of August, 1999.
I-~, I
:P,Yoperty O~er ( s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 23rd day of August,
1999 by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
Page 3 of 4
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. LJ: 3 3 7
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of tl:e City.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this d-:5f-1i day of A, 1eiu 7 f . 1992., before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally ap/eared /(r,5frti Ponninc;f'.h marr.'e/,
..J __________________ known to me to be the persdn(s) described in and
who executed the foregoing instrume;nt, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this c:f&-l>i day of . 199 9. before me a Notar.-Public
within and for said County, personally appeared -. 11 r · d
__________________ known to me to be the person(s) described in and
who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 4
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT F~~M,)
Jw di )la,~ 6\V)~ h of W3X'. CasLO Pf-071 I (we)
[print name(s)] [print address]
have reviewed the p s . or the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
ti..3D CaSCCJ .)so referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
~ --JLCj/65
Pro~ Date
Property Owner Date
*************************************************************************************************************
l(we)~'( \N E:NGG-/<.__ of 3o3 ':{ Cf\SC~ ?ot ~ ~.
[print name(s)] [print address]
have revi wed the . Ian for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
3o3D ~ ~co . . also referred to as Land Use Application No . ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
Date ' {
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 1 O days
prior to the scheduled meeting date .
0 ,
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
I (we) //4b.!;me~ 'cc'•'o~,,,:!P I/Ji a5t?Z> ll Kc!.
have reviewed the plans fo;,!~\'.';,'.'~~~~ ;~r~~:~:~\.~!~~.!;~•.-~,~se of the property located ~ : J
. ,:;, .. t
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
" approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (w,~ -~
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requiret ·'1
Colil approval1.
ll¼1M __ j1f 1)-j~ ~ =· ~ J
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Date
,:,>~
~-
tr'~"
7
RUN DATE : 7/14/2005
38 2011723340001
PROP ADDR 3035 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME DP TRIPP & P A TRIPP
TAXPAYER DOUGLAS &PATRICIA TRIPP
NAME/ADDR 3035 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723340025
PROP ADDR 3020 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME E LINDGREN JR & B LINDGREN
TAXPAYER E LINDGREN JR & B LINDGREN
NAME/ADDR 3020 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
38 2011723420029
PROP ADDR 3525 IVY PL
OWNER NAME D L CUMMINGS & MM CUMMINGS
TAXPAYER DANIELL & MARTHA M CUMMINGS
NAME/ADDR 3525 IVY PL
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20 l l 723430051
PROP ADDR 3034 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME WENDY NOEL WENGER
TAXPAYER WENDY NOEL WENGER
NAME/ADDR 3034 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
"t
!: tt.t
Jl
. .Y r~
~;~c•G~~.;;.;)
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 2011723340003
PROP ADDR 3015 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME D P SEIDEL & H N SEIDEL
TAXPAYER DANIEL & HELENA SEIDEL
NAME/ADDR 3015 CASCO PT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 2011723340026
PROP ADDR 3026 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME JAMES R DAILEY/AMY K DAILEY
TAXPAYER JAMES R DAILEY/ AMY K DAILEY
NAME/ADDR 3026 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723420035
PROP ADDR 3535 IVY PL
OWNER NAME PETER J BAZIL/SUSAN M BAZIL
TAXPAYER PETER J BAZIL/SUSAN M BAZIL
NAME/ADDR 3535 IVY PL
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723430052
PROP ADDR 3030 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME KM FORSS & A V RONNINGEN
TAXPAYER A RONNINGEN & K FORSS
NAME/ADDR 3030 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
38 2011723340012
PROP ADDR 3045 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME RA KASTENS & B C KASTENS
TAXPAYER RICHARD A/BARBARA C KASTENS
NAME/ADDR 3045 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723420006
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
TAXPAYER HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
NAME/ ADDR NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN
LAKEMTKA
38 2011723430035
PROP ADDR 3040 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME TROY A SWANSON
TAXPAYER TROY A SWANSON
NAME/ADDR 3040 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723430055
PROP ADDR 3038 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME DONALD JAMES KAVANAGH
TAXPAYER DONALD JAMES KAVANAGH
NAME/ADDR 3038 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORD
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTM~O THE BJ;ST
OF MY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. 7 --/ u -,,,C--
DATE __ r _o.::J_ 0 B"Y
PAGE: I
(18)
Hennepin County
Taxpayer Services Department
,,,_.~'o L ///
(32) /~~~
/ ✓,'!j
/
' ' ' ' ' '
........ 2!gJJ .. 6__
Vj
"'
.. ,
" '' '' ' ' '
A
(5)
' '"' "'' \!
' ' ' ' ' '
',,~, Q:-:~
~~~~-"-L--..,__---'-""'"!C-L-,
20-117-23-
' B .......... ',~
(6) 4± -,·t:-
;a,
,Ori
'<o
Parcel Information
reel ID 2011723430052
ouse Number 3030
1
(1)
Street Name CASCO POINT RD
This is not a legally re corded map. It represents a compilation of information
and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources.
CITY of ORONO
July 27, 2005
Andrew Ronningen
3030 Casco Point Road
Orono, MN 55391
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #05-3140
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your
application for a variance for property located at 3030 Casco Point Road. Our preliminary review
indicates that your application is complete.
Your application is scheduled to appear before the Plaiming Commission on Monday, August 15,
2005. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. Please make sure that you or your representative is available
to attend the meeting. You will be mailed a staff report regarding your application prior to the
meeting date.
Please call me at (952) 249-4623 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
VtJU,lL . {;ttL!LUlt-UL-
Janice Gundlach
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 ° Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
tJe
Total Fee: $ --------Entered By: ________ _
Date Received: --------"'-/
Permit#: ____ &_/_. _l<3_,/~rn~_
CITY OF ORONO -BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
All information must be submitted in full before plan review will be started.
(please print all information)
THE APPLICANT IS: (circle one)
·wm this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home?
D Yes 171 No If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval r. 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates
sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed.
NAME OF OWNER: lfr& (}T 8ndtPJ.;J ~1Wf1PHONE: (home) f5J--f/-7// 7 3/Jf/·_
rp_ . · r J i / (work)95J.-tf7/-73t Y
MAILINGADDRESS:~23CctSC6 lf lei.. CITY: /MJJ~ ZIP: ~tJ/
I
CONTRACTOR: /41:i9-!e/Y)IYU!f/VJCU/J PHONE: ¾f.J--f ?J-3t>03_
CONTACT PERSON~ fl/1/2 / ¥0BILE/PAGER: '7tf,,,g -~;?~ :731Pa
MAILING ADDRESS: 1W!' flp RI, Ji!/ 5·±:_ CITY: A/a....Mt2 ZIP.: 55~:J-?
STATE LICENSE:# t/f 5._lj:_ EXPIRATIONDATE: , ;/2I /J>{e_
ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Jr;lf /Jr'/1;:-S PHONE: I
MAILING ADDRESS: ___________ CITY: _____ ZIP: __ _
NAME: _______________ REGISTRATION: # _____ _
TYPE OF WORK: New ---
Move Home --
Addition ___ Accessory Structure __ _
Remodel/ Alteration X
-,, -'~.,_,]<,=~,~' '
STORIES:___ SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR: _________ _
NO. OF BEDROOMS: GARAGE STALLS: ATTACHED DETACHED
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land): $_,_,/~=· _4.,,_1 _0_lYJ_"_·, _IJ_o_
I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and accurate;
that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City and with the State Building
Code; that I understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a permit; and that the work will be
in accordance with the approved ~l~~-~
AI'PLICAi'IT'S SIGNATURE~~ DATE: /, /4£,5 )5 / I
31
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you
that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may
require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or
license requested.
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or
license.
3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license.
4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information
may become public.
5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on
yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
First d 303 CasCQ
Address
Or&o
City
Signature
II
(<dnn ,•t13 e 1c
Last
&tJ
State
'-()f, )Jdlf
Phone
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
REGISTERED CIV,c_ C:,-sGINECR
GO, 0AI'\ ·;:.,-...
WIS ..... o. &.:·(•1·/1.;
f'LORIO,_ ,-.o, ..,_;,1
NO, o .... K. c,;..=,
I
(,
!•
: i v ✓,
~ -1 .
I
I"= 50 ✓
' ·HQPL'f \...,........ LJ LJ
00 l'-,:;NT;-; J..VE.'.NUl: SOUTH
kOPK:Ns. MINNESOTA
PHOtsC: 938•761-.
.;68/ / 558,? 7/. 3 5
• CARLISLE: MADSON
R£Gl6TEkC:D LAND :!iUh:'✓li:YOR
~INN. NO. 43'"/4
:JO, O.,i..>{, '7~1
WIO. NO. 6°674
IOWA ~O. 3'10?:'
NO, OAK. 1108
MONT, NO. t7"2-li
.')
7. 3) -DEA/OTE s EXIST/A/(i
'-' -->::N<JTE 5 /R,oN /YloJJV/VIENT
:·o -.JZ,/\1 OTE..S }RON /v10/4/UM£NT
ELE. V.
POONO
SET
(.5EE. NOTE.S QN SHEET 2)
HAl'ICO
.---·-t--+--t---t-t-+---t--+---t---+-t--+---+---+---t---+-t--+---+---+---t---+-t--+---+---+---+--+-----1
)/ 0 '/.I OS_, = I 1~,~-o
t ,,_,.. .... w.i.-.....
110-
I J<. i
y
I
I i .
! i ---~-+-,--+I---!!·-+-, --+I --.
I----!----!---+--+---+-------~---i----~---·· +-·-+·-··i···--~---·+·----i----i--+ ____ J __ . -:-----:--·-\-···-L----~----1---·-·------·-
i I i I i I i i i I i i i : I 1 I
Jeff Danberry " General Contractor
44 t O ShoreUne D:dve, IP O Box 145 • Spring Park, MN 55384
1~11'1\ Ll711-lllB;;~7 a f!:'A.X {611.\ 471-0916
I
F'HDt·•lE t--lD. 61213723221
B, _Ga.rage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
lo
E, Patio/Deck
· • C' rftC'M'·> F. Landscape ;?11f(6. ) fJ
Underlain 5::2::
:Sy Plastic t4
'30
G. Other t,;t. (u iJ ( l. "2 '2
X
X
'X
• I
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOT AL PROPER fY AREA IN ZONE
Z..8
/
A ..--.-.£.L4J ~ + B Z / 2 s-z ..
PROPOSEX.LHARDCQVER W ZONE
A. House -Z 4 x
B. Garage
c. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. LMd-lc ape
Underla.i.o,
By Plastic
G. Other
A
~ngth
X
X
X
X
X
X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
Width
'1'0!,A_l:; P~9PERTY AREA IN ZO~E
1
? -...,
;:;; 4-4'4, ?--~ B ,:.. / ✓ 5 c;..,.,
13
...
=
=
,r. 100 =
=
=
X 100
Ai.t •3. 1 l:1:1 1 '39'3 l"-12 : l"-15F'M F'02
"•~. ': '
sol)..iooo•·
/-<1_79 S.F •
----~--S,F. -------S.F,
----~--S.P . ____ ?___._7_2. ____ S.F.
z3.;-5"' _______ S,F,
-------S,F.
--=/7,,......,.f __ S.F.
-......--.,,<,3?2=-,...,......,_ S.F.
13 /.6 __ .;._ _ _;,_ __ S.F.
~------S.F.
__ __,,IJ~'tJ~::-----S.F.
__ ....,·?-G,,_.,,.c:> __ S.F. __ ..... l'-=-o-'J ___ S.F.
76
___ d...:,1~/...C:C...1,6'--_ S.F.
£/4'?,2.. $,P.
-Z./2. <;-"7.. S.F.
--~;;?.4 .. 22--%
•,·?7 6 SF __ _,_-=:::-;..,V"--~ . •.
S.F.
S.F. _______ S.F.
_______ S;F.
_________ S.F.
-~~~---S.F.
_______ S,F.
S.P. -------
_______ S.F.
_______ S.P.
-----~-S,F, -------s.~. _______ S.F.
_______ S.P.
A
:a
. . .
. i.: ..
z:1t;•Lrif..,:
t::!:.E~+.-~~:J.+-_;.....~+-----~---~~PlN.b
. :.:~~ll~it>-rret~t -· -.-:.-•·· . .
----------.. ,.-·o:
. . . .
b<, .
UVtWP··RM
:·-.!>'.-.· _· c·-----+-
ON. . ·. :"• : . ·!J:
. . .,_ .
. -· . , ·: . ... .. . : : .. ·
_., ·.--,-. · .... -·.·_· . ··s
. -~ . . .. ••, ·.. ,.
. .
. ,·
.IT _,. ..._
~--' ·. : \ .
~ '. _.· .. --··._ -
·-' ...
'1 . . .
lo~xb~_PA1io ~--
-_,
\.
. \.
~· ;_---·-;_ .. )
''9
:' ,
; ·"
3,;:~1{'}~'r-•;i'fx:i,p{--,~:;;•1;~r~~r.~7;.-.;. · ~~<::-\? :rf'.);i t,t:~E ~: ~ i: _ -: ·;.:~:. ,~~;: ~> _:-: :! .:;;:. _.T: ·--r ;'.;: -~-.~; j :. ··J -~:::)~ ·-,-~;'.
,ff~~~ ,J.11.:~ii~''.:-12~:W';;;;>'.*~1 i:, .. ~J,¾t~~~§!.!gf~;1t,\~:~t~f!Jrf ~~~
. \
. ·-· .·
..
l~-~]&>1:\· ------
~th Y4"~J~t
M~) P~l~N .
ftt f.?A~~ ll+c>~ _ ---
.. :ffA)~e,,. .
--_ w) f2~tt I t¥4 1 -
......
. . . . ' . . . . . .. . . . . '
-~Db~ -\f~f
f't4P#hLf *' ~eovt>'J
_l&f ~;r~? _
. }IJ ft)1 lN'D1 a~·rt'&> · .
Affidav it of Pu'b li cat ion
which is attached was cut from the columns of
said newspaper, and was printed and published
orice each week for one successive week(s).
It was first published Saturday
the 30th day of July 2005,
and was thereafter printed and published
every Saturday, to and including Saturday,
Authorized Agent
By:~~~
Notary Public
SUSAN A. FLOHRS
NOTAAY PUBUC 0 MINNESOTA
MY~El!Pffl!S01-G1·2010
Rate Info r mat io n
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space : $15 .50 per inch .
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $15.50 .
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7 .96 per inch.
Each additional successive week: $5 .79.
LEGAL NOTICE
CITY OF .ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600
Fax · (952) 249-4616
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The P1annlng Commission will hold
public hearings In the Orono Council
Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on
Monday, August 15, 2005, beginning at
6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the
following land use applica.tlons:
-#04-3068: Ian Petersen, 2690 Fox
. Street, RR -1 B zoning district, requests a
lot area variance ln order to build a new
res idence on an existing lot 1.255 acres In
· size when 2.0 acres Is normally required,
• #05-3134: David Park ol OurabUt on
behalf of Richard & Patricia Crosby, 2705
Walters Port Lane. LR -1 B zoning dis
trict, . reques ts hardcover variances fo r
14.2% hardcover within the 0 -76' zone
where 0% Is normally allowed and within
the 75' -250' zone for 61.7'% hardcover
where 25% Is normally 'allowed and
61.7% currently exists in order to con•
stiuct an attached 16' x 17' garage. '
• #05-3135: Allen & Deanna Munson,
3165 North Shore Drive, LA -16 zoning
district, request a condlUonal use permit
to allow,flH in excess of 500 cu. yards and
an·average lakeshore Setback variance to ·
construct a new singlEI family residence at
the same setback as the existing home.
,· #05-31-36:Troy R.,Br,oitzrnan, 1860
Shoreline Drive, LR -.1 A ,zonlng district,
reque~ts an average lakeshore Setback
variance Jn-order to construct a new slngle
family reside nce.
ance fo r a lot 79' In width at the shoreline,
and 106' In Width at the 75' setback where
·140' In width Is normally required to allow
construction :of 1a._new ,SltJgle family hoine.
• #05-3142:,'ch'rlstopher { Emily
Chapman: '3775 Bayside ·'Aoacf/LR "-1AJ
zoning distrlct;.)request a, street tyard~set•~
~~!~ :~fr~:· ~~::i~l~~~~st~it~~n~b! 1:) .
story office bulldlng and associated site
Improvements,
-#05-3145: ICO Landscape LLC. on
behalf_ of · Robert & Vicky Nelson, 579
Mlnr,etonka Highlands Lane, LR -1 B
zoning district, requests a conditional use
permit to 'allow rE!placement of retaining
walls existing within 75'of the OHWL of
Lake Minnetonka . . :-·
• All"p8rsons wishing to be heard are ·
encouraged to attend this meeting., This Is
-#05-3139: HIii School of Minnesota,
Inc, 21 BO North Shore Drive, RR -1 B
zoning district, requests side yard and
side street setback variances in order
construct an addition for office space,.and
a cond!llonal. use permit amendment to
expand the school: and allow a·temporary
traller on the property for use during con•
struc_tlon. -~
. normally required and the existing home •
Is setback 21.8' and a hardcover variance
whereby the proposed removals of non-•
,structural.,.,hardcover .... lor , tb~;.addiijon ... o(,
structural hardcover would result In a
"'Slight net decrease ln"hardcover-wlthln·:o,
250' of Lake, M.lnnetonka. ~ ,i.
•• 1,.~:: •• ;: •• ;.,~o;~;,:~!!;F,;: Oa~i~,:~' ~~~·~b~rg • of~
Hi:;iss~urg Qel.(elopment Inc., 774 Tonkawa;.
Road , tR -,1 B· zoning dlstrlct;.requests lot .
area and lot ~idth variances to permit
construction of a. 1new residence-on. an-
· not a· ·flnal . agenda and Is subject to
change prior to the hearing. Written com•
ments are accepted and should be sub•
mltted to the Cily of Orono by August 1 0,
2005 If possible, Plans are available for
review ln the City Offices and au Interest•
ad persons are encouraged to contact the
City for further Information . For an
appol~tment, please call (952) 249-4600,
, • #05-3140: Andrew & Kristen
Rori01Mger\i 3030 CasC:o Polnt1Aoad, LR:-
1C zoning district, request an average
lakeshore setback variance and a. street
yard setback variance to permit a setback
ol 20' from Maple AvElnue when 30' is nor•
ma!ly required and 20' currently exists for
construction of a new. 12/12 pitch roof
where a 4/12,pltch currently exists and to-...
Incorporate Uvlng space above the exist
Ing attached garage artd also a street yard
setback variance lo permit a setback ot
15' from Maple Avenue when 30' Is nor
mally required and 20· currently exists to
allow construction of a covered entrY. over
the existing stoop.
• #05-3141 : Jellrey & Ethel
Gustalson, 4203 North Shore Drive, LR -
1 B zoning district, request a lot width var!-
existing lot 0.36 acres In area when 1,0 City of Orono.
acres Is normallycrequlred and•a width of · .s y: Planf)lng Commission
75' at the shoreline and 6-1,5', at the--75' · · ·
setback when 140' Is ncirm'ally required ·, Michael P. Gaffion,
.~~d .~.haJdcoi.i:e~ variance~ for:,_the •7~'-250\:; -P\!1f1nlng.plrect~r1
zone,,to permit ,29 .8% hardcovet,-whe~e~···-· .. •·~t ............ -· ·--~.•·:~--
25% 'Is normally allowect and to -permlr0: ·Posted at: Orono Clly Offices
39 .4% hardcover ·within the 250'-500/.: , Crystal BaY. Post, Office
zone where 30% Is no[mally allowedh•-:::·.,~1.,! LonQ Lake f:>o~t Offlc8
-~ ·• · · ·-Navarre ·Post Office
• #05-3144: Berkshire Properties~ ' ·
~~~~cte;~:,::.::~~!y~a~:~~n:i~~~l' t~~~::~nJ~•3~'.'~~~~l~ ;~~ Pioneer
f i.n:~~i=1~~1~:~ini~~~;rj:~~~~-;~:;~;;~~-:~~,,,t;Jl}::rrif • ·. -,, ~-
------------~------
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Eric Serrano, being duly sworn on oath, says that
he is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as THE
PIONEER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full
knowledge of the facts which are stated below:
A .) The newspaper has complied with all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable
laws, as amended.
8.) The printed Review Land Use Applications
which is attached was cut from the columns of
said newspaper, and was printed and published
once each week for one successive week(s).
It was first published Saturday
the 30th day of July 2005,
and was thereafter printed and published
every Saturday, to and including Saturday,
\
/
Authorized Agent
Suscribed and sworn to me on this
30th day of July 2005.
~J . By: ~ ~ Notary Public
•
SUSAN A. FLOHRS
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
II( COMMISSION EXPIRES 01-31·2010
Rate Information
(1} Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space : $15 .50 per inch .
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $15.50 .
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7 .96 per inch .
Each additional successive week: $5 . 79,
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota , do hereby certify
that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #05-3140, was mailed to the attached list of
property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 5th day of August, 2005 .
1LU
Denise M. Leskinen
SG-,
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Monday, August 15, 2005, beginnirig at 6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following
land use applications:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
#04-3068
#05-3134
#05-3135
#05-3136
#05-3139
#05-3140
#05-3141
#05-3142
Ian Petersen, 2690 Fox Street, RR -1 B zoning district, requests a lot area
variance in order to build a new residence on an existing lot 1.255 acres in size
when 2.0 acres is normally required.
David Park of Durabilt on behalf of Richard & Patricia Crosby, 2705 Walters
Port Lane, LR -1B zoning district, requests hardcover variances for 14.2%
hardcover within the 0-75' zone where 0% is normally allowed and within the
7 5' -25 0' zone for 61. 7% hardcover where 25 % is normally al lowed and 61. 7%
currently exists in order to construct an attached 16' x 17' garage.
Allen & Deanna Munson, 3165 North Shore Drive, LR-1B zoning district,
request a conditional use permit to allow fill in excess of 500 cu. yards and an
average lakeshore setback variance to construct a new single family residence at
the same setback as the existing home.
Troy R. Broitzman, 1860 Shoreline Drive, LR-IA zoning district, requests an
average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct a new single family
residence.
Hill School of Minnesota, Inc, 2180 North Shore Drive, RR -lB zoning
district, requests side yard and side street setback variances in order construct an
addition for office space, and a conditional use permit amendment to expand the
school, and allow a temporary trailer on the property for use during construction.
Andrew & Kristen Ronn ingen, 3030 Casco Point Road, LR-1 C zoning district,
request an average Iakeshore setback variance and a street yard setback variance
to permit a setback of20' from Maple Avenue when 30' is normally required and
20' currently exists for construction of a new 12/12 pitch roof where a 4/12 pitch
currently exists and to incorporate living space above the existing attached garage
and also a street yard setback variance to permit a setback of 15' from Maple
Avenue when 30' is normally required and 20' currently exists to allow
c01istrnction of a covered entry over the existing stoop.
Jeffrey & Ethel Gustafson, 4203 North Shore Drive , LR-lB zoning district,
request a lot width variance for a lot 79' in width at the shore! ine and l 06' in
width at the 75' setback where 140' in width is normally required to allow
constrnction of a new single family home.
Christopher & Emily Chapman, 3775 Bayside Road, LR-lA zoning district,
request a street yard setback variance to permit constrnction of a shed 28' from
Bayside Road where 50' is normally required and the existing home is setback
21.8' and a hardcover variarice whereby the proposed removals ofnon-structural
hardcover for the addition of structural hardcover would result in a slight net
9. #05-3143
10. #05-3144
11. #05-3145
decrease in hardcover within 0-250' of Lake Minnetonka.
Daniel Hessburg ofHessburg Development Inc., 774 Tonkawa Road, LR-lB
zoning district, requests lot area and lot width variances to permit construction of
a new residence on an existing lot 0.36 acres in area when 1.0 acres is normally
required and a width of 75' at the shoreline and 61.5' at the 75' setback when
140' is normally required and a hardcover variance for the 75'-250' zone to
permit 29.8% hardcover where 25% is normally allowed and to permit 39.4%
hardcover within the 250'-500' zone where 30% is normally allowed.
Berkshire Properties, 2745 Kelley Parkway, B-6 PUD zoning district, requests
a one-year extension of the effective period of commercial site plan approval
originally granted on June 14, 2004 permitting construction of a 2 story office
building and associated site improvements.
ICO Landscape LLC. on behalf of Robert & Vicky Nelson, 679 Minnetonka
Highlands Lane, LR-lB zoning district, requests a conditional use permit to
allow replacement of retaining walls existing within 75'of the OHWL of Lake
Minnetonka.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This is not a final agenda and is
subject to change prior to the hearing. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the
City of Orono by August 10, 2005 if possible. Plans are available for review in the City Offices and all
interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for further information. For an appointment, please
call (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono ~;~2
Michael P. Gaffron, Planning Director
To be published in the Laker and Pioneer on July 30, 2005.
Posted at: Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
2
RUN DATE: 7/14/2005
38 20 I 172334000 I
OP ADDR 3035 CASCO POINT RD
VNER NAME DP TRIPP & PA TRIPP
XP AYER DOUGLAS & PA TRICIA TRIPP
,ME/ADDR 3035 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20 I 1723340025
.OP ADDR 3020 CASCO POINT RD
VNER NAME E LINDGREN JR & B LINDGREN
,XPA YER E LINDGREN JR & B LINDGREN
1.ME/ADDR 3020 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
38 201 I 723420029
'.OP ADDR 3525 IVY PL
NNER NAME D LCUMMINGS & MM CUMMINGS
,XPAYER DANIELL & MARTHA M CUMMINGS
\ME/ADDR 3525 IVY PL
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 201172343005 I
'.OP ADDR 3034 CASCO POINT RD
NNER NAME WENDY NOEL WENGER
1.XPAYER
\ME/ADDR
WENDY NOEL WENGER
3034 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
tf;~j
~~
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 2011723340003 38 2011723340012
PROPADDR 3015 CASCO POINT RD PROPADDR 3045 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME DP SEIDEL & H N SEIDEL OWNER NAME RA KASTENS & B C KASTENS
TAXPAYER DANIEL & HELENA SEIDEL TAXPAYER RICHARD A/BARBARA C KASTENS
NAME/ADDR 3015 CASCO PT RD NAME/ADDR 3045 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391
38 2011723340026 38 2011723420006
PROPADDR 3026 CASCO POINT RD PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME JAM ES R DAILEY/ AMY K DAILEY OWNER NAME HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
TAXPAYER JAl\1ES R DAILEY/AMY K DAILEY TAXPAYER HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND
NAME/ADDR 3026 CASCO POINT RD NAME/ADDR NOT FOR SALE/UNDER WATER IN
WAYZATAMN 55391 LAKEMTKA
38 2011723420035 38 2011723430035
PROPADDR 3535 IVY PL PROPADDR 3040 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME PETER J BAZIUSUSAN M BAZIL OWNER NAME TROY A SWANSON
TAXPAYER PETER J BAZIUSUSAN M BAZIL TAXPAYER TROY A SW ANSON
NAME/ADDR 3535 IVYPL NAME/ADDR 3040 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391 WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723430052 38 20 I 1723430055
PROPADDR 3030 CASCO POINT RD PROPADDR 3038 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME KM FORSS & AV RONNINGEN OWNER NAME DONALD JAMES KAVANAGH
TAXPAYER A RONNINGEN & K FORSS TAXPAYER DONALDJAMESKAVANAGH
NAME/ADDR 3030 CASCO POINT RD NAME/ADDR 3038 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391 WAYZATAMN 55391
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORD
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENA'.f, 0 TH½~. T // ,
OFMY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. _7 _ l ,-✓1 ,--( • // / • }J .
DATE I ;I UJ BY J '(j iLL ,,/ I A/-t
I
PAGE: I
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
l(we) //4ra;::mo~.,-"-·o~ ... l!lfii fi.sm g, KY
have reviewed the plans fo!,!~eJ?:::!';~';~ ~~~:~~;~;~t,o~i,~~•-~,te of the property located~ : )
. :;, .. t
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (w~~, ~J
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requir:r~ ·.-1
Cou~I approval1.
l ~)QM_~ ,JLe 0-1l{-o;( ~ =.
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Date
TRACKING SHEET
FILE NO. 05-3140
Staff: )j)<l\j \ C(
V
SITE ADDRESS: 3030 Casco Point Rd.
Applicant: Andrew Ronningen
Address: 3030 Casco Pt. Rd.
Owner: Andrew & Kristen Ronningen
Address: 3030 Casco Point Rd.
Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391
i Meeting with Staff Date:
□ Application Completed Date:
□ Incomplete Notice Sent Date:
Copy of Application Sent to:
__ Engineer _ County DNR MCWD LMCD
~ Property Owners Notified: Date: ij5/D3
I
1jl Legal Notice Published Date:
PC Meeting(s): i)1s \D5 ________ Vote: f\f P~ b-1
Vote: -------------------
Vote: -------------------
¢ Notice of PC Action: __ 1_)1_io~lo_s ___________ _
City Council Meeting(s): -~i~!,_'Ll_;i/~® ________ Vote: Af f J2-, LI-b
Vote: ------------------
Vote: ------------------
□ Resolution: