Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLA19-000048 (2967 Casco Pt Rd) VAR PCSRDate Application Received: June 19, 2019 Date Application Considered as Complete: July 1, 2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: August 30, 2019 To: Jon Ressler and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: July 15, 2019 Subject: LA19-000048, Premium Construction LLC, 2967 Casco Point Road, Variance, Public Hearing Background The applicant is proposing to remove the existing home and detached garage and build a new home with an attached garage. The average lakeshore setback is unique for this property due to the neighboring lot to the north. This lot is flag shaped, with a long naoorwe finger providing the lake frontage, and the buildable portion set much further back. Due to this configuration, the subject lot is not buildable without an ALS variance. The current home is nonconforming due to this extreme setback and hardcover. The new home will be located closer to the lake that the existing home and within the average lakeshore setback. The applicant are proposing to build the new home with more massing forward of the average lakeshore setback compared to what is there today. The proposal also requires lot area, lot width and hardcover variances. The hardcover will decrease from the current level with the proposed plan but still over the 25% maximum. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350- Setbacks: Street 30’ Roughly 70’ Roughly 45’ Side (north) 7.8’ 30’ 12.5’ Side (south) 7.8’ 10’ 8’ Lakeshore 75’ Roughly 170’ 141 Average Lakeshore Section 78- 350 - Lot Area/Width: Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback, hardcover, lot area and lot width variances to construct a new home Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. LA19-000048 July 15, 2018 Page 2 of 5 Actual 20,943 s.f. (0.48 acre) 78’ @ 75’ / 80’@ OHWL Section 78-1403- Structural Building Coverage: 20,943 s.f. (0.48 acre) Allowed: 4,188.6 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 3,926 s.f. (18.7%) Section 78-1700 - Hardcover Calculations: Overlay District Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 20,943 s.f. Applicable Regulations: Variance (78-350) Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific standards are met; such as: 1. All setback requirements can be met; 2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant’s request for average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances results in the property’s inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and width variances are required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are not granted. Variance (78-1279) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. The applicant is proposing a new home forward of this setback line. The current home encroaches into this setback due to the significant setback established by the neighbor to the north, that home is 258 feet from the lakeshore. The new proposed home on the property is set at 141 feet from the lakeshore. The home to the north is set so far behind the property, the ALS greatly limits a reasonable building envelope. The applicant is proposing the new home will be closer to the northern neighbor and closer to the lake that the current home. The neighbor to the north has submitted a signed acknowledgement form and had multiple discussions with staff regarding the project. LA19-000048 July 15, 2018 Page 3 of 5 Variance (78-1700) Tier 1 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross lot area. The applicant is still proposing the hardcover to exceed the allowed 25%, though hardcover is proposed to decrease from 30.5% to 29.1% (roughly 300 sq.ft. less). Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The lot includes difficulties in its substandard size and width, and location of adjacent homes. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, exceeding 25% and average lakeshore setbacks, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property’s nonconforming size, the neighboring homes’ orientation with respect to the lakeshore, and adjacent properties creates difficulties. The hardcover level decreases overall from existing levels and the home is set to meet all other setbacks. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The nonconforming lot size and the neighboring home locations prevent a residential footprint consistent with the neighborhood. The proposed overall hardcover level will decrease with the new proposed plan. The circumstances are unique to the property; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: LA19-000048 July 15, 2018 Page 4 of 5 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property’s substandard size and orientation and the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties for the Owners in redeveloping the property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property’s nonconforming size and the relationship between the existing home and the setback of the adjacent properties create difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting lot area, lot width, and average lakeshore variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested hardcover, lot area, lot width and average lakeshore setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variances for lot width, lot area, and average lakeshore set setback are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds due to the nature of the lot and the applied setbacks there are practical difficulties supporting granting the lot area, lot width, hardcover and average lakeshore setback variances for construction of a new home. Engineer Comments The Engineer has reviewed the proposal and recommends the home have gutters and to develop a drainage plan to ensure no runoff is directed to the neighboring properties or roadway. LA19-000048 July 15, 2018 Page 5 of 5 Public Comments Neighbors has submitted signatures of support. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? Specifically pertaining to the average lakeshore setback. 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval with engineer’s comments for the lot area, lot width and hardcover variances. The Planning Commission should discuss the applicants desire to utilize the property for a larger home footprint. If the commission finds the proposed home meets the practical difficulties, staff recommends a motion to approve the average lakeshore setback variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. Staff Annotated Survey Exhibit G. Neighbor Property Signatures Exhibit H. Plat Map and Addresses